Category Archives: EMF Radiation/Sonic Neuroweapons

TechnoGate for Targets: New Intel Gatekeepers NSA Whistleblowers Bill Binney and Kirk Wiebe?

Ramola D | Op-Ed | May 17, 2020

Image: Screenshots from the Containment Op Video at Stop007

Recently, like many other human rights activists and wrongful targets reporting Crimes Against Humanity from fusion centers, military branches, and Intelligence agencies freely using anti-personnel microwave, milliwave, acoustic neuroweapons on the populace—for the past 20-30 years–as if it were their right to do so—in stealth mode, undisclosed publicly, yet well-documented in many ways, as covered here and here and here by me earlier—I was appalled to learn that NSA whistleblowers Bill Binney and Kirk Wiebe were planning an appearance on Katherine Horton’s channel, and later appalled to witness their gatekeeping performance by her side on her channel.

A few years ago, Bill and Kirk made a big splash on Ella Free’s Talkshoe conference-call, issuing a call for information along with Cait Ryan and Karla Smith, announcing a survey to collect victim experience information on EMF/Neurotech assault. This was covered by me here.

This survey eventually fell into a turbid silence as no news whatsoever was provided and months and years rolled by and nothing was done, reported, or published on the matter by all original named parties above—and no substantive responses offered to queries by many including myself.

Nevertheless, several activists including myself frequently kept Bill and Kirk informed, sending in evidence, visual or recorded, of high-tech assault, sending in accounts of Stasi behavior from neighbors—with few getting any acknowledgment, including myself. The most Bill has written back to me was two words, Thank You, when I offered to send in reports of information as I received them, plus send in declassified and public-domain military and Intelligence documents on the weaponry and bio-effects I knew of and thought would be useful to their investigation. This was at the time of their appearance on Ella’s call, when I too called in to speak with them and did.

Kirk Wiebe is on Twitter and I have frequently tagged him in tweets. My letters to Bill invariably included him in the recipient list.

Over the one and a half years of public witness that I was on Techno Crime Fighters Forum, I continued to write to Bill and Kirk, as a reporting journalist of crimes against humanity being reported by Americans, Europeans, and others worldwide, despite their peculiar refusal to respond to me. I also invited them to interview with me, in print or podcast, several times—all of these invitations were ignored—including very recently, after I heard and saw Bill Binney speak openly for the first time about people in the community reporting microwave weapons assault to Chris Hedges on RT, in April 2020.

Over the past 6 years, since I was first singled out by the corrupt and criminal FBI/DHS/CIA mechanism in Boston for special treatment with EMF weapons, having a little too much integrity to their liking apparently—reported earlier at Washington’s Blog and Dr. Marko’s Pine Cone Utopia—I have researched, investigated, documented, written, podcasted, and published extensively on the subject of targeting, surveillance overreach, FISA abuse, non-consensual experimentation, surveillance technology used by fusion centers, in addition to other, related subjects in science and technology, human rights, and ethics. My articles and interviews have striven to unearth the means by which such perfidy could have been rolled out on the American public, and world public, and have highlighted the testimonial of many including CIA whistleblower Barbara Hartwell, FBI whistleblower Geral Sosbee, NSA whistleblower Karen Melton-Stewart, writer Paul Baird, actor Steve Shellen, many others. Additionally, I have authored, co-authored, and sent off memoranda and letters to various politicians, academics, and Commission heads including President Trump, Senators Ed Markey and Elizabeth Warren, and SACHRP committee chairs and members. I mention this to underline the fact that my writing on these matters—which occurred in a void, when no other journalist was covering these issues—except Barbara Hartwell, whose work I regrettably only discovered later but am indeed most grateful for—was well-known to all engaging in testimonial reportage and activism on these matters, and also to many in alt-media who occasionally republished, or made mention of my work.

During and after the time Karen Stewart, Katherine Horton, Millicent Black, and I worked on Techno Crime Fighters Forum, significantly, it was only Katherine Horton who received responses from Bill Binney and Kirk Wiebe that I know of (perhaps Millicent did, I do not recall this currently); Karen Stewart has reported that she too was long ignored and not recognized, certainly never publicly recognized, by these two stalwarts from the very same NSA she too had been employed in.

After Techno Crime Fighters Forum closed, as everyone following this matter knows, Katherine Horton embarked on a profoundly vicious, malicious, and vindictive smear campaign on me—publishing outright lies and false-allegations, in clear attempt to sully my character and name, which I documented and rebutted in numerous articles, videos, and Twitter threads. Her extensive actions as an infiltrator in the midst of victims and activists, functioning as agent-provocateur, saboteur, NLP controller were covered by me extensively here and here. Katherine Horton was also running smear campaigns at the time on others, including CIA whistleblower Barbara Hartwell, and other human rights advocates Cassandra, Thomas McFarlan, and Melanie Vritschan. Despite several Cease and Desists to her, her malicious slander and libel on all of us continues to be maintained at her website, stop007.org. This is defamation and character assassination, for which she could be and still can be sued. CIA whistleblower Barbara Hartwell has also documented and rebutted Katherine Horton’s smears and false-allegations against her in numerous articles on her site. Writer and activist Thomas McFarlan has documented and published in video the clear evidence of Katherine Horton’s lies and agent-provocateur calls to violence on her own videos which she later denied—but continued, including in her tweets on Twitter. Writer and activist Cassandra has documented and published the facts regarding Katherine Horton’s smear campaigns in threads on Twitter. Founder and President of ICATOR Melanie Vritschan has documented and rebutted in video the numerous lies, smears, and false-allegations directed at her by Katherine Horton, whose hand in the wrongful medical kidnap removal of Ms. Vritschan’s newborn, and refusal to help get her back is well-documented, well-reported (by me) and well-known.

In fairly recent times—November and December 2019—Karen Melton-Stewart, whose case I have consistently covered for years as a journalist, abruptly turned on me after we worked on a Joint Statement to rebut Katherine’s continued smears and tedious lies indicting and scapegoating me as means to deflect attention from her (Katherine’s) own culpability; thereafter Karen Stewart began to publish—exactly like Katherine Horton—outright lies, insults, and false allegations against me, all of which was documented, responded to, and rebutted extensively by me here and here and here.

Karen Stewart’s inexplicable turnaround from decrying Katherine’s behavior to suddenly condoning, “forgiving,” and lauding it while libelously and baselessly calling me names and denigrating me publicly with malicious lies and insults was abrupt, extreme, and publicly noticeable—as Karen splashed her false allegations all over Facebook and Twitter. Karen Stewart also libeled and denigrated CIA whistleblower Barbara Hartwell, which was documented and rebutted by Barbara Hartwell in numerous articles at her site.

Since Karen Stewart’s public and supernasty attacks on me, several other activists came forward publicly and privately to me to report malicious attacks by Karen Stewart on them. Writers and activists who witnessed Karen Stewart’s wrongful attacks on me at Twitter and Facebook published their observations and reminded her of the facts—which she was twisting, distorting, and ignoring—in Twitter threads, linked here, in this Statement I was compelled to make on her extreme-lying and defamation campaign against me. Karen Stewart also can be sued for her malicious defamation and libel against me, which she continues to maintain at her Facebook and Twitter pages and at a page she names “Perps and Nutcases” on Facebook—daring to include me in this group, along with others who are equally outraged at this extreme act of character-assassination and libel against them with this kind of noxious labeling by a now proven liar.

A prime contention (as stated by herself) of Karen Stewart against me – after the Joint Statement was approved by all co-authors and published – centered around a court case Katherine Horton was supposedly then filing, mischaracterized by Karen Stewart as a group or class action for European targets. This case, as I understand was later reported by Katherine Horton, was apparently thrown out of court for lack of paperwork or photocopies.

It is apparently this same court-case that Bill Binney and Kirk Wiebe are now suddenly popping out of the woodwork to say they are supporting publicly.

What exactly is happening here?

Why would Bill and Kirk step forward to shore up the image of someone who has long been operative as an agent-provocateur, saboteur – literally sabotaging and ending various projects prematurely, as covered earlier here and here — and smear-artist – unless they are all part of the same Intelligence network seeking to play the same game of Limited Reveal, acknowledging perhaps the worst, or some of the most extreme Crimes Against Humanity being reported by targets, while protecting a large part of the numerous and immense roster of classified, compartmentalized military-academic neuro experimentation and weapons-testing programs that they are casually experimenting on, exploiting and using hundreds and thousands of targets to nefarious end?

Is it possible that two senior former officers from the National Security Agency (Agency that loves to snoop!) have not, as another activist puts it “analyzed & monitored Katherine Horton’s social profile, videos, websites, case record of sabotaged projects and working relationships, published lies, provocations, insults yet want to align themselves with her as opposed to other targets with evidence/testimony?”

Why did Karen Stewart suddenly turn on me – as if coached to do so, and, peculiarly at the very time that Katherine Horton, by her recent stating on video, was in the United States, seeking out NSA whistleblowers to support her public image and become “experts” in her court case – unless she too is a part of this Intelligence network engaging in Limited Reveal while just co-incidentally, no doubt, working to bury my name, work, and journalistic and scientific disclosure on targeting?

Notably, Katherine Horton, like Ella Free, and like Midge Mathis of the probably-CIA-set-up Targeted Justice, has never mentioned my journalism or technical coverage as significant; she has however, sought openly to act as a technical gatekeeper, with absolutely meaningless blather on the technology herself, often saying she had no clue about it, as she puts out disinformation about the technology and supports others doing the same, such as former NASA “Richard Lighthouse,” and actively gatekeeps to repress reportage and analysis from others including myself of the technologies which apparently the Intelligence agencies and local governments and fusion centers want hidden forever—as I have often covered earlier.

Clearly, Bill Binney and Kirk Wiebe – ex-NSA officials of high stature, who have high-level secret clearances, who signed NDAs, who are privy to classified information, who surely know a lot more of SIGINT – as revealed by John St. Clair Akwei in his lawsuit – than they’ve ever let on in public, although Bill has let slip once that nefarious “classified programs” had been unleashed on the public (Tommy Collins interview), and another time that “ambient signals” were known to be picked up by the NSA (such as brain waves?) (Abby Martin interview) – also have never mentioned my journalism or technical coverage as significant.

My undergraduate degree in Physics and science-based interest in the various covert technologies of political targeting have led to my continued research and reportage on the putative technologies in use, as reported in many articles, and most recently in the listing of extrajudicial targeting technologies here and in the reporting of the 1996 DARPA/NIJ Limited Effects Program Report here.

There are several Facebook groups I am a part of where I regularly witness and read the highly erudite and probing analyses of various science graduates, Ph Ds, scientists, and engineers worldwide on the nature of the neurotechnologies and radiation and sonic technologies being used on targets, and ways to record these.

It is curious therefore, to see Bill Binney, once Technical Director of the NSA, cryptologist par excellence, Math major and codebreaker, and Kirk Wiebe, retired senior intelligence analyst, suddenly line themselves up with supposed high-energy particle physicist Katherine Horton, and all three of them hold forth on the opacity and complexity of the technology that “even they” could not comprehend, and the difficulty of measuring or recording any impact of this technology on human bodies.

(Meanwhile, many engineers, scientists, analysts, accountants, audio technicians, musicians among targets are busy experimenting and recording the high EMF hits, the bio-effects, even the V2K and projected sound attacks.)

It is even more curious to hear Kirk Wiebe – who has never responded to emails (from me and others who have copied me in on emails to him) proffering information on these EMF and Neurotech/Nanotech and covert implantation assaults – say on this video that people should send their questions about the technology to him, a line of action Katherine Horton appears also to be pushing as she refers to Kirk as an expert. Relaying a commonly-known, children’s textbook understanding of audible sound frequencies as between 20 and 20,000 Hz, Kirk Wiebe in fact suggests he has been informed of this as if he had been “read-into” a highly classified matter!

I have seen no evidence – nor communication from Kirk Wiebe – to suggest he has any knowledge whatsoever of the kind of ELFs, EMFs, microwaves, milliwaves, carrier waves, acoustics, or neurotech targets are reporting that he is willing to speak openly about, and therefore no indication that he should be regarded as a technology expert in this matter.

In speaking of the emails sent to him on the TI survey, Bill Binney—who says he is not an expert on these technologies, and, significantly, never reported the results of this survey, dismisses emails from targets as from bots or fraudulent in their reportage—but how would he know to judge?

Katherine Horton, who worked hard on her video to get Bill Binney to say he witnessed her being hit, presents Reflectix/aluminium coated bubble-wrap as a means to record sub-audible pulse shots.

My own shield made of Reflectix over steel-core baking sheet, with a layer of sticky-back foam-craftpaper over the Reflectix more definitively and distinctly records sub-audible microwave pulses and shots (more than Reflectix alone, which I have long experimented with) – something I have spoken and written about for ages; in tandem with an EMF meter, it offers irrefutable proof and directionality of external EMF pulse-shot hits.

I did not hear this mentioned by the new TechnoGate trio, nor did I hear mentioned any of the other means of recording that many targets have spoken of, privately and publicly, in emails and social media, to me and to others.

This is of course only one recording method, and one putative tech being used on targets. There are indeed a whole range of technologies being used against targets today, and huge difficulties in attempting to record and expose many of them; the bio-effects-reports of targets were summarized here in this second memo to President Trump; the many DEW/neuro targeting-tech reports from targets were summarized here in this document. Many of these coincide with bio-effects disclosed in military documents, and weapons disclosed in military documents, and by whistleblowers.

There is no doubt neither Bill, Kirk, nor Katherine are technical experts here, nor should they be considered as such. Yet this is how they are presenting each other and themselves—while also suggesting the impossibility of learning more about these technologies or of recording them. This is fraudulent. It is also a clear push to contain classified projects as classified – which is doing a huge disservice to the victims of these technologies, who deserve every single one of these technologies to be declassified and openly acknowledged as in use against them, while restorative technologies, countermeasures and compensation also need to be openly meted out to them.

The very detailed discussion of the technologies DARPA and the DOJ have confessed to be using, as evidenced in the recently released-on-FOIA-request document, The Limited Effects Program Report, the many surveillance technologies and crowd-control technologies DHS and local law is using, the weaponized and portable millimeter wave and sonic tech the military is using as evident from their weapons manuals, the many radiation, sensor, and radar technologies the AFRL and USAF is testing, the neurotechnolgies which scientists Dr. Robert Duncan and Dr. James Giordiano expose, all of which I have reported on, is completely ignored by this crew which fixates on the difficulty of measuring, does not once mention the many invasive neurotechnologies targets report being hit with, and conveniently buries the reportage and patents that I and other writers online have published on these matters.

It is my opinion therefore that Bill and Kirk are either playing a NSA game or a NSA/CIA game to continue to keep most things opaque and secret and vague, right alongside with Katherine playing a JTRIG/GCHQ/MI5/MI6/Swiss Intel/CIA game to do the same—while it is entirely plausible Karen Stewart, with her touching faith in the “white hats” culled from unreliable and deceiving NSA/FBI/CIA (who have twice distinguished themselves with false Intel on me fed to her, as proved in Twitter threads linked here) has been roped in to participate in these limited-hangout operations—as is evident in the bizarre hatchet job she has wrongfully swung against my character in recent times. In other words, a high-tech military Intel op designed to deceive, placate, control-the-disclosure, keep most of the tech classified, secret, sacrosanct and still-in-use, while palliating and misdirecting the victims—not to mention data-collect in the process, and keep victims subjugated for years with these technologies while data-collecting.

Notably, Bill and Kirk mention a long period of years to collect information and bring cases to court – when they could call up RT or Info Wars or any of the big alt-media channels right now and speak openly—whistleblow!–about what targets are relaying to them!

My being publicly slandered, lied-about, insulted, and defamed by Katherine Horton from July 2018, and publicly slandered, lied-about, insulted, and defamed by Karen Stewart from November 2019 is, it seems to me, very much a part of this scenario: my published sci-tech journalism on targeting and targeting technologies is apparently intended to be buried by their smear ops. Why? Why do I need to be disappeared as a journalist by this crew—and also by the Targeted Justice/other targeted-organization crews, who have all engaged in supernasty smear ops on me online?

Because the singular investigative technology, testimonial, whistleblowing, documentary, and analytical reportage I have published over 6 years as a writer and journalist exposes the Intelligence agencies and military and local/federal governments quite irrefutably—and exposes the actual nature of the sinister and deadly technologies they are using against us.

Which, I should remind all, is also completely in line with the investigative journalism and historic disclosure of investigative journalists, writers, whistleblowers, and scientists Dr. Nick Begich, Mark Rich, Cheryl Welsh, Dr. Rauni Kilde, Renee Pittman Mitchell, Deborah Dupre, Mojimir Babacek, Gloria Naylor, Magnus Olsson, Richard Alan Miller, Mary Gregory, Dr. John Hall, Dave Case, and Dr. Robert Duncan, as well as international human rights organization founders and advocates Galina Kurdina and Melanie Vritschan (and many others with sites online) and many reporting victims whom I have interviewed and written about—all of whose voices and work I frequently refer to and showcase.

Karen Stewart teaming up with Katherine Horton to attack my name and character is most definitely an attempt to disappear my name and silence my work and voice in these matters; Bill Binney and Kirk Wiebe’s propping up Katherine Horton currently both discredits them completely and is a clear attempt to gatekeep (everyone/all reporting victims) on all target-talk, speculation, and reportage of the anti-personnel radiation, sonic, bioweapon, and neural weapons technologies being used. (Don’t look at or refer to anyone’s work such as Ramola’s recent published work—or anyone else’s historic, published work, eg., Welsh, Kilde, Begich, Rich, Duncan etc.–on the actual technology or disclosures from documentation analysis, look here at TechnoGate which tells you “even we” cannot make statements on the tech being used.)

This is especially pernicious in the current atmosphere of media-neglect, as a wrongfully targeted writer-colleague points out:

“Because the targeted community as a whole is ignored by mainstream media/public, there is no widespread public social commentary, critical analysis, checking over facts/details, other experts giving their analysis/expertise–which allows for gatekeepers to use any kind of professional credentials, made-up or otherwise, Whistleblower status, and public profile, to come along and control the narrative, isolate real targets, truth-tellers, and journalists, and make vulnerable targets feel they must follow certain groups/self-proclaimed leaders out of fear of being left behind, isolated, or publicly ignored/denigrated if they dare give a genuine point of view about targeting and the weaponry/technology used for remote access torture.

Public scrutiny is always necessary regardless if it is an authoritative government/independent body, non-profit, charity, or activist group, especially when crimes against humanity and insidious torture are being exposed; it makes those of us targeted vulnerable to set-ups, cover-ups, punitive psychiatry, and counterintelligence operations used to: control the narrative, minimize the full extent and horror of what has happened, limit disclosures, delay or even prevent justice and recompense for the millions of us targeted.”

Pointing up this fact: For the past 30 years, ALL mainstream media – DOD/CIA-run – has, criminally, published lies—open lies—as well as disinformation, mockery, ridicule, downplayings, denigration, deprecation, distortions, skewings of fact, omissions of fact, in their limited and concealing coverage of targeting crimes with high-tech weaponry reported by citizens and supported by whistleblower scientists: The New York Times, The Washington Post, Wired, The Daily Beast, CBS, Chicago Sun-Times currently come to mind. My commentary on a few of these publications—which also point up this media treason is here:

Failure-To-Report-Crime & False-Reality-Construct | #Media POPPCon | 60 Minutes/CBS/Sep 1, 2019: “Targeted Americans: Brain trauma suffered by U.S. diplomats abroad could be work of hostile foreign government”

Failure-To-Report-Crime | The Chicago Sun-Times Debacle: Neil Steinberg, Ella Free, David LaPorte, Ph.D, and the Ruthless Tearing-Down of All Reporting Unethical US Mil/Intel/Medical Experiments and Political Persecution Operations with Neuro/Bio/Energy Weapons as Delusional, Paranoid Schizophrenics Enjoying a “Mass Delusion”

Censorship, Lies, Deception: WIRED Removes Writer’s Comment Exposing DOD/CIA Crimes at Laura Yan’s POPPCon (Psy Op Propaganda Piece) for the Deep State

United States of PsyOps: Call Them Paranoid. Call Them Delusional

So yes, most savvy activists are aware the “TI” community is bristling with infiltrators and gatekeepers— some of whom I have written about and exposed – who lean on email lists, conference calls, newsletters to cuttingly interrogate and censor targets. Infiltrators and gatekeepers also seem to have either Phd credentials or Intelligence Agency history or both, or run media ops to play “Spokesperson”—this is clearly by snaky Intelligence Community design.

It is also my opinion that, given Katherine’s past record with her court cases, given State Secrets and Official Secrets acts—which usually stop such cases in courts very early, given that she has not taken her case to the UK Investigatory Tribunal for classified matters but a regular court in the UK, her court case is a fraudulent artifact, for show, merely for use in the live action role play she appears to be a part of. Others have expressed to me that her court case may be a way to set precedent and prevent others with clear evidence from getting a hearing in court.

I do think everyone who is targeted with stealth technology needs to write a detailed affidavit–and while people are interested in building cases to take the Intelligence agencies to court, and dreaming of class-actions, I myself have been learning about the fraudulence of the judicial system, the recalcitrance of the military and Intelligence agencies (to the point of murder) in maintaining classified covers and extreme deception, and am exploring other definitive ways of exposing and terminating these assaultive crimes against humanity – but I would not advise anyone to hand their affidavits over to a group of Techno Gatekeepers with Intelligence and military roots: whose technical credentials and output regarding targeting technologies is non-existent, who have disdained from communication with and interviewing with a science-and-tech truth-journalist publishing extensively on targeting, who are instead supporting libel-practicing charlatans, poseurs, saboteurs, who have rejected the data from numerous victims on a past survey, and yet who are now clearly engaged again in supporting data collection—for handover to whom in which covert agency, and for what purpose—of further tabulating effects of these deadly, inhumane tech?–one can only speculate on.

All of it bodes ill, and does not offer hope for the saving of lives of present-day targets or future generations (when classified military/Intelligence actions against citizens are kept concealed, the lives and health of those citizens—and everyone else’s by extension—are in grave danger). Currently it seems classified torture or stealth-mode torture – which is what this is, essentially – is being protected, camouflaged, concealed by these elaborate bogus-courtcase-support operations by two NSA whistleblowers whose word—based on their actions and inactions–I can no longer trust.

I also note that Katherine Horton apparently recently disappeared from public view on her channel where she had been running her own show after Techno Crime Fighters Forum closed, without a word to her viewers (causing much anxiety amongst them, to the point of people openly, online, asking me—subject of her attacks—what had happened to her!), yet surfaced in others’ videos recently publishing notice of her having “been declared legally incompetent,” and hiring a public relations firm to clean up and defend her public image – which she herself has successfully sullied. In these videos and documentation by others she has distinguished herself most notably for apparently claiming a peculiar “right to be forgotten,” presumably in an attempt to reframe herself and her public image in a new light succeeding the many ways in which her execrable lies and smear operations in addition to other infiltration actions have recently been exposed, including by the Joint Statement.

There is no clarity, no authenticity, no truth, no integrity, no disclosure—but much obfuscation–in this group; I would not trust them, nor rely on them to fully expose targeting or procure justice.

This is my opinion, I have been made aware others share it. I am publishing it to surface some of the disquietude others have mentioned to me, just as much as to express my thoughts on the matter—and to make this a matter for open public discussion. This seems to be a classic Limited Hangout or Controlled Opposition scenario.

Rely on yourself to fully expose targeting crimes and obtain redress, would be my advice. High-flying NSA whistleblowers who don’t answer emails or complete survey-projects or speak openly of these crimes on all media are not going to do it. Bill Binney and Kirk Wiebe have had ample opportunity to publish the truth about the reportage many who are targeted have meticulously presented to them over the past few years, as they have the stature and credentials as NSA whistleblowers to command mainstream media attention, but they have not done so. Mainstream media and the Intelligence agencies in any case are intimately tied to each other, we know now, through much investigative excavation including by Americans for Innovation and German journalist Udo Ulfkotte’s disclosures in recent times.

The limited reveal Bill Binney offered on the Chris Hedges show this April seems to be in line with that paradigm; if Chris Hedges himself were a real journalist, he would have (much earlier) spoken to and highlighted the testimonial of targets, the whistleblowing of military scientists, and acknowledged the historic work of journalism of Dr. Nick Begich, Mark Rich, Dr. Rauni Kilde, myself, others. In his long silence, he reveals himself to be merely one of a whole train of well-known journalists, including those who purport to cover surveillance matters and technologies, who has been schooled to ignore the real reports of targets and the real work of journalists (such as myself and others wrongfully consigned to the “fringes” and “conspiracy theory” margins such as Miles Johnston, Alfred Webre, Kerry Cassidy) of exposing the true horrors of surveillance targeting with bio weapons, neuro weapons, nano weapons, and Psy Ops weapons being used widely on world populations today by layers of US/Five Eyes/ NATO/UN government, military, and Intelligence barbarism.

If people hadn’t noticed, the noose of totalitarianism is striving currently with the COVID-19 Plandemic Scam to tighten around the necks of every human on the planet, and it is increasingly vital for every human on the planet to know exactly what kind of supremely evil technology is being used against us all, and against some of us in extreme measure—so these actions and technologies can be halted in their tracks.

There is no doubt whole governments, whole Intelligence agencies, whole departments of the military, “healthcare”–read traitorous medical institutions who contract callously with Military/Intelligence to use, abuse, traumatize and persecute targets with the New Technologies of Torture which comprise neuro/DEW targeting—academic, and weapons industries will be intimately exposed as CRIMINALS if the whole truth about these targeting crimes is exposed – and that I think is the reason so many limited-reveal and palliative operations have been set in place around targets, including this one, to which Bill and Kirk are lending their names and credentials, but not, sadly, their credibility, in aligning with proven smear artists and liars such as Katherine Horton and Karen Stewart (not an idle statement, please see all articles posted on these two, with screenshot evidence of their libel and lies against me).

None of the (military/academic/Intelligence/law enforcement/private) groups and individuals involved in these Crimes Against Humanity should be protected, in my view, nor the classified projects, nor the classified weaponry being used on targets. We do not need TechnoGatekeepers but an unstoppable stream of voices and testimonials from all who experience or know of these crimes; the old structures of criminal Intelligence, law enforcement, and military agencies practicing crime in secret with stealth tech need to be torn down.

Humanity needs openness, truth, transparency – not limited-reveals so classified crime can continue and Remote Access Human Weapons and Psy Ops persist. Industries, agencies, governments, and militaries creative of and dependent on the barbarically invasive, intrusive, persecutory remote-access, degradation, and control, today AI-driven, of human bodies and brains need to be torn down.

In the balance lies all human bodily integrity, neuro privacy, cognitive rights, neuro rights, DNA rights, basic human rights to breathe, live, and exist as individual and independent human beings—basic humanity, in other words, which is today being corralled for cyborging destruction and transhumanizing by Satanists in power who are striving to remake man in their own image, as brain-dead slaves and robots.

Limited-hangouts are not going to save humanity, and it is regrettable to see Bill Binney and Kirk Wiebe embody one. (Joining Edward Snowden, in fact, in this continuing saga of Deceiving the People: Put (20-70 years of) Bio-Hacking and Neuro-Hacking on ice, let’s all flail about raving about NSA email and phone intercepts instead until kingdom come.)

To me, the base fact that both these gentlemen blew me off so thoroughly, disdaining to acknowledge the surveillance-tech journalism along with the emails and several requests for interview, while choosing to appear on Katherine Horton’s channel instead to prop up her self-tarnished public image and her more-than-dubious UK court case, speaks volumes about the nervous, high-anxiety state the so-called “Intelligence Community” is clearly in, to be using these well-known NSA whistleblowers—now protecting DOD/NSA/CIA?–to limit the damage from full disclosure of these extreme Techno-Torture Crimes Against Humanity—which cannot be stopped, despite their efforts, is already here, in multiple ways, from a multitude of voices—not least from my own desktop–and will continue to starkly inform the world.

RELATED

Report #182: Galina Kurdina on Neurotargeting Activism; Betrayal, Slander of TI Activists by NSA WBs | Published May 17, 2020

Galina Kurdina: Government agents, provocateurs and slanderers in TI Community. NSA agent Karen Melton Stewart.

RAMOLA D | STATEMENT ON NSA WHISTLEBLOWER KAREN MELTON STEWART

REPORT & JOINT STATEMENT ON HOW TECHNO CRIME FIGHTERS FORUM ENDED | Correction of Dr. Katherine Horton’s False Narrative Changing Facts

The Consequences of Infiltration

Ramola D: Swiss Cheese and Bayonets: Katherine Horton’s Nasty Defamation Campaign Titled “Ramola’s Defamation Campaign”

Dr. Katherine Horton (Stop007.org) Runs Smear Campaigns

Ramola D/The End of Techno Crime Fighters Forum: The Real Backstory

Disclaimer Re. Reportage by Dr. Katherine Horton on Erasme Medical Kidnap as Recorded in JIT Press Releases and Articles at The Everyday Concerned Citizen

Microwave Ranger | 60 GHz (5G) Interaction with Human Body, CoronaVirus Connections, & Why 5G Rollout Isn’t Being Stopped By Technocracy: 6G & BRAIN NET Ahead

Re-Post | Letter To Humanity, Email from Microwave Ranger | April 27, 2020

Image from a paper on “A Vision of 6G Wireless Systems”: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1902.10265.pdf

Dear fellow citizen,

Here is some information about the question of whether five-gee is responsible for the worldwide epidemic of 2020 and whether 60GHz in particular is causing the observed hypoxia (not pneumonia) in Covid-19 patients.

The mega-city of Wuhan, China, has come into focus because:

1) it is the epicenter of the pandemic that started in December 2019

2) it is the first city to turn on five-gee city-wide on October 31, 2019

3) it is the city where the only Chinese biolevel-4 laboratory is located

4) it is the city that hosted the 7th Military World Games in October 2019 where 10,000 military athletes from 100 countries competed.

5) On June 29, 2019 China adopted the Vaccine Law, which provides for the “strictest management system for vaccines … and social co-governance”:

https://www.loc.gov/law/foreign-news/article/china-vaccine-law-passed/

But first, let’s try to understand what non-thermal electromagnetic fields (EMFs) do to us. There was a study done in 2015 that revealed quite a bomb shell. Please take a look at the blood pictures here: https://www.westonaprice.org/health-topics/does-short-term-exposure-to-cell-phone-radiation-affect-the-blood/

The bomb shell is that blood clumps up severely with very little microwave radiation, likely due to a substantial drop in zeta potential of the blood cells. When that happens, and one must assume that most, if not all, people wearing a cell phone that is NOT in airplane mode, exhibit similar blood aggregation. Since blood cells must travel through capillary vessels single-file, this effect alone makes it plausible that capillary blood flow is severely impacted by very low-level microwave radiation. The reason this is so important is that impaired blood flow compromises every tissue that relies on healthy blood flow, which is about 85% of our body’s tissue.

This finally makes it plausible why the Naval Medical Research Institute found some 130 seemingly unrelated disease states exhibited after microwave exposure as early as 1972(!):
https://apps.dtic.mil/docs/citations/AD0750271

(PDF of the Zorach Glaser Report from the Naval Medical Research Institute, 1971, here: BIBLIOGRAPHY OF REPORTED BIOLOGICAL PHENOMENA (‘EFFECTS’) AND CLINICAL MANIFESTATIONS ATTRIBUTED TO MICROWAVE AND RADIO-FREQUENCY RADIATION)

This study alone belies the industry’s mantra that the science is “inconclusive” whether non-thermal EMFs have adverse biological effects. Here is a recent compilation of the vast number of known biological effects:

http://www.5gfrequencyfreefairbanks.org/

The drastic drop in zeta potential after only minutes of EMF exposure may be understood from Martin Pall’s research on voltage-gated calcium channels (VGCC) in cell membranes.

Therefore, we might have a causal chain as follows:
microwaves compromise VGCC in most if not all cells -> the intra-cellular Ca++ ion concentration rises (it is typically 10,000x less than in inter-cellular fluid) and the leaky VGCC essentially create a small electrical short -> the small electrical short partially shorts out the charge separation necessary to maintain a high zeta potential -> the zeta potential drops -> blood cells can no longer repel each other sufficiently -> rouleaux forms resulting in clumped and viscous blood -> capillary blood circulation is compromised -> the tissue is starved for nutrients and oxygen and poisoned by an accumulation of metabolites and toxins -> a disease state develops after chronic exposure.

If the above rational has any merit, then we can expect compromised health merely by carrying cell phones with us.

Image: Chillopedia

Please know that any cell phone that is NOT in airplane mode will periodically communicate with the network to transmit geo-location and other data such that the network knows into which cell to route an incoming call. This “minute” radiation is sufficient to cause blood rouleaux in just a few minutes and it is systemic! If our bodies are already weakened by environmental toxins, glyphosate, GMO foods, inhalation of the fly ash from chemtrails, organic and inorganic toxins from contaminated vaccines, high microwave background, dirty electricity, strong extremely low frequency fields (ELF) from improper or faulty grounding of power lines, lack of natural sun light to name just a few stressors, then our defenses may already be so weakened that any additional stressor has a much stronger impact than it would if our bodies were healthy and strong.

Therefore, any new microbe against which there is no herd immunity will opportunistically spread through a population with weak natural resistance.

Next, the 60GHz oxygen connection is addressed that was said to change the oxygen molecule such that our blood could not uptake the modified molecule and the target person literally suffocates as a result. This argument gained traction when it became known that Covid-19 patients suffered from hypoxia and not pneumonia. Research indicated that 60GHz can indeed be expected to interfere with proper oxygenation of body tissue, just not the way it was described on the internet.

Generally, it was claimed that 60GHz five-gee couples strongly to the oxygen molecule (high absorption), changes its electron structure and as a result it can then no longer being uptaken by the hemoglobin and thus we suffocate, as seen with some Covid-19 cases. While it is true that 60GHz millimeter waves couple strongly to the valence electrons of the O2 molecule, these effects are excited and decay in microseconds because they are molecular processes. Once the O2 molecule is inhaled, it is shielded from 60GHz and by the time it reaches the lung it has reverted back to normal O2. Therefore, this is not the pathway as claimed.

But things are a bit more complicated than the explanation above, and this relates to the potential formation of so-called Brillouin precursors. Please learn about this electromagnetic phenomenon here:
https://microwavenews.com/sites/default/files/sites/default/files/backissues/m-a02issue.pdf

In the article Kurt Oughstun explains: “We have found that pulses that produce Brillouin precursors can deliver a significant fraction of their energy deep into the tissue—much more so than can pulses from a conventional radar.” Note that radar uses part of the millimeter wave spectrum assigned to 5G. Oughstun quotes a threshold of 10Gb/s data rate as sufficient to produce Brillouin precursors when the 5G radiation is absorbed by our skin. Then, contrary to popular belief, the electromagnetic energy can travel deeply into the tissue. If so, then one might expect that the oxygen molecule in the lungs can indeed be excited by 60GHz and might indeed change its electron configuration such that an uptake by the hemoglobin is impaired. However, this is a chain of arguments, each one of which must be scientifically proven before the end conclusion can be accepted as valid.

But the Brillouin precursors can indeed be expected to be produced in our skin as the 5G standard wants to ensure peak data rates of at least 20Gbps. Also, there are now 60GHz wireless point-to-point links being sold to replace expensive HDMI cables to deliver 4k and 8k video signal:


https://www.amazon.com/IOGEAR-Ultra-Fast-Projector-Uncompressed-Streaming/dp/B07NFV2JN1/ref=sr_1_2?dchild=1&keywords=60ghz&qid=1586464337&sr=8-2


This device specifies data rates of 18Gbps, well above the Brillouin precursor threshold. This phenomenon must be investigated scientifically because it might elucidate a new pathway to wireless radiation pathology.

Next, the destruction of hemoglobin must be addressed to understand the Covid-19 pathology. The clinician Dietrich Kliinghardt pointed out that the biomarker ferritin increased upon infection of the more lethal viral strain (he distinguished two strains!). The increase in ferritin was puzzling. But then a publication that appeared quite relevant indicated that Covid-19 attacks the hemoglobin, releasing the iron:

https://chemrxiv.org/articles/COVID-19_Disease_ORF8_and_Surface_Glycoprotein_Inhibit_Heme_Metabolism_by_Binding_to_Porphyrin/11938173/5?fbclid=IwAR1K50u0wRWhOCv0_rxS2_bYk7p3mT-OWX08GXaa0Tm13bzT8Wl8MYfTAI8

The serum ferritin increase is a coping mechanism to bind the free iron which would otherwise be very toxic. With hemoglobin destroyed, the patients are starved for oxygen. Ventilators tend to be ineffective and even damaging as most patients can breath on their own but their hemoglobin is dysfunctional! The paper also explains why the anti-malarial drugs might work, at least in part, to protect hemoglobin in erythrocytes. Dr. Cameron Kyle-Sidell shared his clinical observations here:

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2020/04/08/dr_cameron_kyle-sidell_does_covid-19_really_cause_ards_acute_respiratory_distress_syndrome.html

And lastly, a look at five-gee in general. Given the enormous international resistance to this potentially very harmful technology, the roll out was assured through several egregious laws being passed with no recourse by the affected public. This tactic might be better understood when one realizes that each generation of telecom network takes about 10 years to develop and deploy (incidentally, that is a military term referring to weaponry and troops). In fact, the work on six-gee has already begun two years ago and is slated to be rolled out in 2030. Please take a look at this paper:

https://arxiv.org/pdf/1902.10265.pdfFig. 1 shows that it will rely on five-gee and one of its main drivers is the brain-wireless network interface. And now we can view the fight against five-gee happening within a much broader context and why it MUST be rolled out as planned as it is prerequisite for a much more ambitious control of the world population.

May the world population wake up in time and reject a dystopian future as depicted in many Hollywood end time movies…

This letter was sent on via email to me from a friend of a friend, with Physics, Engineering, Medicine, Neurology, and Microbiology credentials between them. Thanks very much to both for this great information and all links. — Ramola D

Please note, this information from the anonymous Microwave Ranger seeks to be published under a No-Copyright claim–meaning people are free to use this information in any form, share widely, rephrase or paraphrase or condense in order to spread the word. Please share this post widely!

Documentary Evidence of Covert Electronic-Weapon and Neurotechnology Use By US Government on Americans Series (2) The Limited Effects Technology (LET) Program Report | JPSG, OOTW/LE Programs, 1996

RAE (Report, Analysis, Op-Ed) | Ramola D | Posted January 30, 2020

Documentary Evidence since 1994 of Covert High-Tech Electronic-Weapon and Neurotechnology Use in Targeted Surveillance, Experimentation, Operations by US Government on Americans: A Series

(1) The DOD/DOJ Memorandum of Understanding on OOTW/LE, 1994

(2) The Limited Effects Technology (LET) Program Report | JPSG, OOTW/LE Programs, 1996

Unremarked in mainstream media, deliberately hidden from wider readership, there have been a series of declassified document FOIA-releases over the past few years which astonishingly reveal many facets of the now-known covert use of electronic-weapon and neurotechnology surveillance, experimentation, weapons-tests, and operations on the American public by various agencies and departments of the US Government and their contractors.

Similarity with Covert Global High-Tech Policing Operations: Similar operations have been unleashed worldwide, as reported extensively at this site and others online earlier. Some documentation in the public domain testifies to this global program, and will be reported more fully here shortly. For now, please see this Twitter thread, which discloses NATO High-Tech Non Lethal Weapon/Neuro Policing operations in Europe and discusses also how Non-Lethal Weapons Testing & Neuro Surveillance have been unleashed inside the USA:

HTML Page: Thread on Non-Lethal DEW Operations in USA, Europe, world, with references to US, NATO documents, articles 

On Twitter: Thread on Non-Lethal DEW Operations in USA, Europe, world, with references to US, NATO documents, articles

This series aims to address the public disclosures in recent FOIA releases of ongoing US Government use of Electronic Weapons and Neurotechnologies on Americans.

“Electronic Weapon” herein refers to the spectrum weapons used in Electronic Warfare as defined by the Department of Defense (DOD) in documents, particularly relates to anti-personnel weapons, includes all labeled as non-lethal-weapon, less-than-lethal weapon, psychotronic weapon, neuroweapon, next generation and emerging technologies, and includes RFID (Radio Frequency IDentification) and BCI (Brain Computer Interface) tech.


(2) The Limited Effects Technology (LET) Program Report | JPSG, OOTW/LE Programs, 1996

PDF: The Limited Effects Technology (LET) Program Report | JPSG, OOTW/LE Programs, 1996

Recent document releases into the public domain include this Limited Effects Technology Program Report (linked above) released by the US Department of Defense on FOIA request on May 31, 2019 to Harun Krasna via Muckrock News, on a multi-document request made in January 2018, where initial notice of delays from the DOD FOI Office (until September 2018) suggesting high volume of responsive records seems to have petered out by May 2019 into return of a single report from DARPA, as their final response letter shows.

This FOIA request was made in January 2018 and asked DOD for “Copies of all research reports, annual reports, and indices of the Joint Program Steering Group (JPSG) as established by the 1994 MOU between the Department of Justice and Department of Defense, dating from 1994 to the present.”

(NOTE: The same request was sent by Mr. Krasna to the Department of Justice in January 2018 and yielded several documents in February 2018, including the 1994 DOD-DOJ MOU reported here earlier. Of note, this writer had also queried the DOJ for this very same 1994 MOU in 2015, and was at that time denied this document, citing “no responsive records” and several claimed exemptions.)

The purpose of this article is to report on the structure, disclosure, and highlights of this JPSG LET Program Report, and offer insight into its content with an eye to more fully informing the American public what the implications and ramifications are regarding the use of anti-personnel military weaponry by domestic law enforcement and military branches on the American public, which is what this JPSG LET Program Report is premised on.

Notable About This Foia-Request Response

  1. DARPA chose to return one single document, after a 1.5 year delay, on this multi-document request for documents dating back (from 2018, time of request) to 24 years. (This should not be found acceptable to the American public—other reports obviously exist and are being withheld; DARPA should be queried again.)

  2. This document is dated 1996; no recent reports were released by DARPA; no notice of the ending of these JPSG joint DOD-DOJ programs has been given in this May 2019 response.

  3. This document is not redacted and is released in full, which implies that the disclosure of technology and policy in this document is acceptable now to DARPA; this is in line with the slow release of information on Non Lethal Weapons, Electronic Warfare, and Neuroweaponry the DOD has made online and in print—via notice of programs, weapons, conferences, articles, and recorded lectures in public-domain documents and sites online–in recent years. However it also implies the JPSG (a DOD-DOJ entity) chooses currently to reveal what’s in this document as applicable to Law Enforcement—which could be a way of corralling tacit public consent to Law Enforcement use by thus publishing notice of this insidious and pernicious weaponry.

  4. It is essential therefore for Media, human and civil rights groups to take note now of the disclosure here and ask further questions, examine implications for all, and delve deeper into what is really at stake with this “Limited Effects Technology Program.”

Basic Structure of This Limited-Effects Technology Report

This 9-page report with the JPSG Defense-Justice logo on the cover and naming David Fields as the Program Manager is divided into the following sections:

Background

Program Thrusts

The Limited Effects Technology Program

Electric Stun Projectile

Laser Surveillance and Dazzler System

Handheld Laser Dazzler

Pyrotechnic Devices

Acoustic Study

Summary

The Section Titled “Background”

Notable from the information in this section titled “Background” is the following:

  1. This Limited Effects Technology Program is acknowledged to be a JPSG program resulting from the MOU from 1994, reported earlier.

  2. The need for such a joint program merging the efforts of Defense and Justice in developing technology applicable to both is being rationalized and legitimized by recourse to stated historical reference of common “need” as technology requirements for both “converge.” This is assertion which is neither specific, transparent, nor explicatory. It is presumption which seeks to hide the fact that what is being discussed here, as the immediate technological lead-up to the 1994 DOD-DOJ MOU, discussed here, demonstrates, are Remote Human Access-and-Control Neuro/Bio Weapons—Non Lethal Weapons and Neurotechnologies (to some extent revealed in “Program Thrusts”), which are arguably highly invasive of bodily and brain privacy, integrity, health, and safety.

Please see the section Some Context to this MOU in Article 1 of this series for historic Non Lethal/EMF Spectrum & Acoustic/Neuro/Bio Weapons-Development background to the MOU and all technology programs the MOU has given rise to.

  1. Examples given of operations sharing this need are “the (Defense) provision of humanitarian assistance, peacekeeping, countering the flow of drugs into the United States, counterterrorism, etc.–and (Justice) law enforcement forces engaged in LE operations.” We are expected to agree that military operations, even “peacekeeping” (which should not be considered a military activity in the first place: weapons cannot “peacekeep,” they subjugate) share a common need for “limited effects” tech i.e., silent Human Access Weapons—which, it should be noted, are not being named as such here. This notion of “need” is presumption, and emblematic of coercion of consent.

  2. The Need to Limit Force or apply only a “minimum amount of force” as primary principle of action is posited here—again without corroboration from real-life where war casualties and police violence abound—as a severe constraint to military and police ability to function. The solution to this false claim (false because it does not seem to be a real-life principle by which either police or military adheres) then funnels down to Non Lethals or Limited-Effects weapons, which are being characterized as force-limiting weapons within a claimed hierarchy of severity which completely ignores the unethical, human-rights-violating aspects of bio-hacking and neuro-hacking weapons, which is what they are (as will be seen shortly). More accurately, this section should be headed The Need to Be Seen to Limit Force, with Public-Image-Boosting Non-Visible Weapons.

  3. Common Threats posit militarized drug-smugglers and terrorists with access to military and LE Tech, which in real-life is made possible (as we understand now from much investigative and whistleblowing reportage including from journalist Gary Webb, LAPD investigator and government whistleblower Michael Ruppert and others) by gun-running, drug-running, and open arms sales by government, military, CIA, mafia, and private-sector alike, which makes this a circular argument: Military and LE fuel the arms/police weapons industry which creates these weapons, as well as tools such as electro-optic imaging devices to aid night vision goggles and Electronic Weapon countermeasures. This circular view also promises endless escalation via blackmarket sales of new weapons. “The criminals have our guns so we need new guns” could go on forever.

  1. Common Missions which name the War on Drugs and the War on Terrorism imply that these are both military campaigns just as much as law enforcement campaigns, which would explain both the military-style DEA and LE SWAT team “drug” raids on homes, terrorizing children and families, and the non-lethal weapons-operations via DOD/USAF weapons-testing contracts on people wrongfully labeled “terrorists” as ensured by the Omnibus Counterterrorism Act of 1995 after the Oklahoma Bombing (a staged insider event, as per whistleblower evidence), and later the Patriot Act of 2001 post 9/11 (another staged insider event, as per much public analysis and testimonial). Yet, in mainstream media and government press releases, these missions are not disclosed as such—the military aspect kept hidden–with much secrecy especially attending the field testing aspect of otherwise openly-disclosed non-lethal weapons testing contracts inside America.

  2. The most significant disclosure from this section comprises notice of 1) the members of the Joint Program Steering Group, as deriving from DARPA, the National Institute of Justice, the FBI, the Bureau of Prisons, and the US Army; 2) their ability to engage at any point in R&D of the weapons mentioned here; 3) the notion that they could participate in “demonstrations” of this technology just as much as developments. Are demonstrations then, what people are reporting today as 24/7 silent microwave/milliwave/infra-red/neurotech weapons operations in their neighborhoods, with use of drones, small planes, satellites, helicopters, zooming cars, parked vans and cars, antennas, cell towers, smart meters, backpack stalkers? (These also appear to be weapons-testing activities, weapons-training activities, and weapons-operations activities.)

  3. Also significant is the information that the Limited Effects Technology Program is only one part of a multi-technology program established by the JPSG to address joint tech priorities of Defense and Justice in 1995. The other tech programs are described in Program Thrusts.

The Section Titled “Program Thrusts”

This section in the LET report discusses the actual technology programs of the JPSG, names certain technologies being developed, tested, and used in training, reveals that most if not all of these are Remote Human Access spectrum and sonic technologies, yet maintains quite some obscurity in disclosing certain of these technologies, for example using vague terms like “communications security technologies.”

It is interesting indeed that this document titled The Limited Effects Technology Program Report in actuality presents information on all JPSG DOD-DOJ programs (or all deemed safe to record), yet focuses only on some LE tech, and uses the same opening Background section to preface notice of all JPSG programs—which implies commonality of context and nature of weaponry, i.e., Non-Lethal, Remote Human Access/Control (as will be seen below).

Significant, in this section, are the following.

  1. The JPSG Program—the most essential program ensuring DOD-DOJ liaison re. “advanced technology development” as per the 1994 DOD-DOJ MOU—focuses on 7 technology areas, which, on close perusal, cover quite a bit of territory. This program in other words is being used to develop, test, and demonstrate sophisticated and secretive wireless, remote, radiation, EMF spectrum, acoustic, bio-communications detection, monitoring, tracking, and communications technologies with major implications for all individuals and the entire urban environment.

  2. The first six program areas are presented only in summary, with slightly more elaboration of the Limited Effects Technology program which titles the report. Notably, even this seventh section is not comprehensive in its coverage of the LET it purports to cover: the devices highlighted do not comprise the whole of the LET program, only that portion DARPA is willing to put in a document clearly intended for eventual public-release (after 25 years!) into the public-domain, which has happened now. (More on this subject in the LET Program section below.) 

  3. Concealed Weapons Detection:

Concealed- Weapons-Detection technologies the JPSG reports here it seeks to develop are “unobtrusive” —read, concealable in plain sight–systems which can detect weapons of various kinds, including those with little to no metallic content, from over 9 meters—27 feet, width of a couple rooms–away. Initial efforts were to cover stationary devices—but clearly this 1996 wording suggests mobile devices would also be developed.

Actual detection technologies in process then in 1996 included:

3.1 An X-ray sensor: which refers to sensor technology; X-ray sensors are variously used in medical/dental radiography and in scanning systems as in airport scanners for people or baggage.

They are possibly also used in Backscatter X-ray technology as reportedly carried in NYPD vans, about which NYPD, although sued by ACLU, was protected by the NY Appeals Court from divulging much about, while companies contracting with the US Government to produce “Z-Backscatter-Vans” offer more information on the X-ray imaging of vehicles they do;

3.2. Combined passive millimeter wave and infra-red sensors: which are sensors used in scanning systems which can detect objects by their relative millimeter wave glow or infra-red heat signature profile, literally see through clothes better than X-rays and give rise to images highly invasive of personal privacy. Both millimeter wave sensors and infra-red sensors are energy sensors, detecting bio-field energy and thermal signatures; the distance from which such sensors can be used is a matter for further research. Some infra-red sensors are used in cameras mounted on aircraft and satellites.

Interestingly, a document online from the Air Force Research Lab, written by an apparent contractor, Decision-Science Applications Inc., found online after the bulk of this article was written, reports in 1998 on Concealed Weapons Detection programs run on grants from the NIJ and DARPA--which suggests a possible connection to these JPSG programs, while revealing that NIJ and DARPA were funding the Air Force Research Lab, which in turn funded a private contractor, in a chain of inter-agency connections–and points to sensor technologies being intentionally developed to penetrate clothing.

Concealed Weapon Detection Program, AFRL Report/https://apps.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a359699.pdf

https://www.millivision.com/technology.html

Camera with Infra-red sensor showing heat signatures/https://www.wisegeek.com/what-is-infrared-imaging.htm#

3.3 Combined ultrasound and radar sensors: which translates to:

a) Ultrasonic sensors: the use of high-frequency ultrasonic pulsed transmitter/receiver sensors to send and receive waves in echo from materials to determine their composition or proximity (used in a variety of industries including healthcare, agriculture, target-tracking of animals or humans from UAVs or manned aircraft, water-level sensing, car or obstacle detection), used in short-range, up to 10-meters application;

b) Radar sensors used in short and long range (up to 100 meters) object detection, tracking target movement, collision avoidance in cars, and to detect materials with guided wave radar or special antennas which ultrasonics may miss, such as softer, powdery, foamier, dustier materials, using either Doppler pulses or frequency-modulated continuous wave radar.

https://www.maxbotix.com

3.4 Low Frequency Magnetic sensor: Magnetic sensors use a variety of physical effects related to magnetism, such as eddy current sensing, measuring small relative changes in earth’s magnetic field created by variations in magnetic material, to detect flaws in metal, movement of metals (as in weapons) carried on a person’s body, movement of large metallic objects such as cars, etc. Magnetic sensors detect metal carried on persons when radar alone, stopped by metallic-walls or reflective insulation barriers, is not enough.

Low magnetic fields relate to biofields; low frequency magnetic sensors can pick up low frequency (ELF, ULF body resonance frequency below 10 Hz, below 30 KHz) magnetic fields as indicated in rise and fall of chest cavity; this capacity is used in earthquake life-detection and through-wall surveillance in combination with radar sensors.

Then there are super-conducting quantum interference devices (SQUIDs) which also pick up very low emfs, such as brain ELFs.

MEMS and nanosensors using thin film magnetic technology also exist. (On this subject: Radar sensors used in prisons are taking recourse to radar tagging to distinguish inmates from  guards—implying the use of nanosensors in tracking, which appear to be of different kinds.)

Through-the-wall surveillance technologies/https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/07_01.pdf

Squid/Wikipedia

Finally, this section’s disclosure on then-current use notes that the X-Ray sensor was being “demonstrated”–meaning, operated–in a correctional institution in California—a prison or juvenile detention center. The use of sensor and imaging technologies in correctional and detention institutions must be thoroughly investigated, in relation to the bioeffect harms from such technology usage.

What Is Not Being Explicitly Stated But Implied In This Entire Section?

  1. These sensor technologies are being tested on populations as per the 1994 DOD-DOJ MOU in joint military-police programs, which means they are being used silently and experimentally on people.

  1. All sensor technologies, unless passive, require emission as well as reception of signal. This means that people—unwittingly, without being informed—are being subjected to X-rays, ultrasound radiation, millimeter wave technologies, radar technologies, ULFs, ELFS, and magnetic fields, at short-range and long-range, close-in and remote, ostensibly for weapons-detection testing purposes, in any number and type of environments, including but not limited to airports, train stations, public areas, and private homes. These technologies could be directed at people from inside buildings and homes, from inside cars, pickups, trucks, vans, from mountings in public locations, from parked vehicles in parking-lots and from moving vehicles while driving.

  1. Sensor technologies being tested at short and long range include low frequency magnetic sensors which track biofields, breathing activity, body resonance emfs, and low frequency brainwaves, plausibly using superconducting quantum interference and tunneling technologies, and comprising earthquake-life-detection monitoring or through-wall-surveillance as described in various other public documents, and plausibly also Remote Neural Monitoring or neurosurveillance, of the kind spoken about 28 years ago in the ex-NSA employee John St. Clair Akwei lawsuit against the NSA.

  1. As in the found document Silent Weapons for Quiet Wars, which posits the surreptitious use of socio-economic weapons of degradation to disable and disarm entire populations without their conscious awareness, the surreptitious testing of sensor technologies on populations is essentially the leveling of silent military spectrum weapons technologies on the bodies of citizens, without their knowing.

  1. The surreptitious leveling and usage of silent military spectrum weapons of bodily and brain monitoring, assault, and modification is precisely what thousands of reporting victims of EMF/Neuro DEW crimes worldwide—often labeled and dismissed as Targeted Individuals—are currently reporting, both inside the USA and out. Could it be that the testing of sensor technologies in concealed weapons detection constitutes one aspect of this surreptitious assault on citizens?

  1. Factually speaking, the disclosure in this document along with the disclosure in the 1994 DOD-DOJ MOU that these technologies are being tested is, at minimum, evidence that invisible, spectrum technologies are being operated and tested on the bodies of people, from a distance and from close-by, exactly as thousands of highly credentialled and credible people– often labeled as “Targeted Individuals” and falsely characterized for credibility-disappearance as “Mentally Ill” by mainstream Govt-propaganda-pushing media–are reporting.

4.Geolocation/Navigation/Communications:

Three aspects to location, ID, and tracking technology are being covered in these JPSG programs, as delineated in this section on Geo-Location/Navigation/Communications in the LET Program Report:

4.1 Locating or precision-finding, precision-targeting of specific people, objects, or vehicles—this implicates GPS (Global Positioning Satellite) and other satellite technologies, including handheld satellites, for GPS-tracking of RFID human/object tags, cell phones; as well as human/object RFID/other, Nano/Micro tagging technologies to facilitate GPS-tracking, in other words, Surveillance and Tagging-for-Surveillance technologies.

4.2 Identifying or pinpointing identity of individuals & things—this suggests Identifying Biometric Surveillance & Tagging-for-ID- Surveillance: Facial/Gait/Iris/Fingerprint/Body/DNA/Other Recognition Surveillance; Unique RFID Tagging (Nano/micro biosensors & object tags) & WBANS (Wireless Body Area Networks) for Identification. Again, Surveillance and Tagging-for-Surveillance technologies. Involves Biometric Data Collection.(Law Enforcement has long been involved in this.)

4.3 Monitoring or tracking movement of people and things—this suggests Surveillance & Tagging-for-Surveillance: Audio/Visual Surveillance using microphones and cameras; Cyber Surveillance of computers; Through-Wall Surveillance with RF/ULF/Magnetic sensor technologies; Medical/Health monitoring & continuous detection of RF/other Implants & WBANs using Radar, Wifi; ISR (Intelligence, Surveillance, Reconnaissance) surveillance using Radar from drones, spy/commercial planes, satellites, ground vehicles; Tagging-for-Surveillance: Unique RF/Spectrum & Nano/Micro tagging (correctional, medical) technologies, CCTL—Continuous Clandestine Tracking and Locating (military, intelligence) technologies; Sensor technologies (as discussed in the previous Concealed Weapons-Detection section). Again, Surveillance and Tagging-for-Surveillance technologies. (USAF, AFRL, USMC are currently conducting Non Lethal Weapons tests and ISR tests using these.)

Notably, “reduction of power consumption” is mentioned as a DARPA interest in tracking technologies; this might account for the increased development of passive or inert nanosensors which can be activated or energized by energy signals sent to them, rather than relying on inbuilt battery packs.

4.4 The two JPSG efforts mentioned here include Tagging, as discussed above, very slightly referenced with this line about tiny wireless sensors, termed “devices,” notably marked “modular” as in implantable WBANs, which do indeed have modules or nodes in a network. These are not just object-tagging devices, they are human-tagging devices.

Military tracking of objects and humans using sensors

The fully-implanted and centrally-monitored human

Sensors at level of cell, molecule, DNA

And this is not a slight JPSG effort at all: Tagging and sensor technologies constitute multi-billion dollar businesses and are intimately linked to all aspects of Geo-Location, Navigation, and Communications, as discussed above. Again, here too, DARPA should be more definitively and minutely questioned about these tagging technologies and how they are being used inside America, on Americans—especially since thousands of Americans, as also people worldwide, are reporting violative, non-consensual RFID micro and nano implants in their bodies.  

4.5 The first JPSG effort mentioned here, Soldier 911, is mentioned in DARPA literature as an emergency radio to help find soldiers in crisis.

However from the description in the LET report, it also sounds like a handheld satellite linked in to an emergency response network, functioning as a device to locate, identify, and track “the movement of individuals and vehicles,” which, if an additional feature (undisclosed in DARPA literature) on this device, is only possible through the use of pre-tagging of said individuals and vehicles with sensor and tagging technologies–or the use of SIGINT Remote Neural Monitoring, as described in the John St. Clair Akwei lawsuit vs the NSA in 1992, in the case of humans.

5. Sniper DetectionSniper Detection systems as mentioned here were intended to be of various kinds, including manually-portable, bodily-worn, and vehicle-mounted.

These systems, as stated above in the LET Program report–being explored and tested publicly from 1996 on–involve sensors: acoustic sensors, infra-red sensors, and integrated infrared-acoustic and infrared-laser sensors.

Interestingly, this section appears to be discussing technologies for detection of actual gunshot or sniper fire—not non-lethal fire, not spectrum-weapon-related shots. However the detection technologies themselves are spectrum technologies.

Brief research of these detection technology sensors indicates that acoustic, infra-red, and laser technologies are being developed and used by militaries to determine with pin-point precision the direction and location of fire from a weapon after a first shot. Sensors today are becoming highly sophisticated with universities (working on military grants, partnering with private firms) also involved in developing bio-mimetic systems of detection, using neural network learning and studying how bats and dolphins process sound and vibration.

It is notable that this program of Sniper Detection has been included as a JPSG program in this Limited-Effects Technology report as one of the multi-technology program thrusts of the JPSG.

JPSG, we recall, is the Joint Program Steering Group formed by the 1994 DOD-DOJ MOU employing parties from both Defense and Justice in mutually-relevant matters and projects of security and law enforcement, OOTW and LE, intending to jointly develop and test “advanced technologies” of common interest.

Some Undisclosed Conclusions

1. Could it be therefore that Sniper Detection is related to matters of Mass Shooters, the phenomenon of supposedly crazed “lone gunmen”–plausibly mind-control victims of MK ULTRA RHIC-EDOM (radio hypnosis intra-cerebral electronic dissolution of memory) radio-hypnosis—shooting up people in random settings, as well as the Live Action Drills with Active Shooters run by the Department of Homeland Security?

If so, this offers a connection not merely between the DOD and DOJ but also with the DHS; all three departments are in some way involved in these sniper detection programs.

This also offers a connection to War on Terror programs and funding, since mass shooters are characterized internally as Domestic Terrorists—even if their “Manchurian Candidate” creation is by covert agencies in Defense/Justice/DHS/CIA, undercover of Live Action Drills, for purposes of driving Agenda 21/2030 Gun Control agendas, as is often surmised by many analysts.

2. Further, the JPSG efforts noted here to develop sensors, in its inclusion of biomimetic systems and neuroscience research, now used in sniper detection in the field, may well involve the use of neuroprosthetics, as indicated by the acknowledged use of cochlear implants in medical and neuroscience research over several decades by a Defense contractor, Biomimetic Systems, Inc.

3. It is plausible therefore—and a matter for further investigation—that the non-consensual use and implantation of cochlear and other neurological implants—which numerous citizens have come forward to report, over the last three to four decades–for the study of neural networks and auditory processes has accompanied the JPSG efforts in this area of Sniper Detection.

6. Information Technology:While this section is quite opaque, a few conclusions can be drawn:

  1. The JPSG states that it is addressing the needs for instant and secure communications needs in LE and Military by taking advantage of advances in civilian and govt-sponsored IC technologies. This would not however require a separate program to do so, unless undisclosed advances were being acquired.

  1. These advances, hinted at but not specified, could include Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, autonomous systems, cybernetics, cognitive computing, Internet of Things, Internet of Humans, lesser-known Neuro/Bio-communications technologies such as V2K (Voice to Skull) and Synthetic Telepathy, Hive Minds and Brain Nets revealed by whistleblowers like Richard Alan Miller and Robert Duncan (while some brain projects are openly revealed by public-domain DARPA information and known to exist via academic/government focus in US and worldwide), robotics, nanotechnology, the miniaturization of electronics, quantum computing, and other aspects of modern ICT which are left unnamed here. Simulating all 100 billion neural connections of brain on future supercomputers/https://www.kurzweilai.net/new-algorithm-will-allow-for-simulating-neural-connections-of-entire-brain-on-future-exascale-supercomputers

    Brainternet-Connecting a Brain to the Internet as an IOT device/Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LSdN–axYbA

This possibility—of such undisclosed advanced projects being part of the IT program sketchily noted here–is once more underlined by the opaque disclosure of “innovative exploitation” of existing ICT infrastructure intended in the creation of interagency crisis management systems.

  1. Communications security technology” in common parlance includes encryption and authentication technologies which today include biometrics and RFID microchips, but is not further specified in this section.


Considering that the rollout of biometrics (iris, fingerprint, face, voice recognition) at airports and borders is being overseen by TSA, a part of DHS, and that DNA is collected by LE at jails and detention centers, it can be safely concluded that any joint program of Defense and Justice in this area would indeed encompass all of these certainly exploitative technologies.

  1. “Sharing information among agencies” points to shared information from different databases collected by different parties, including DNA collection databases managed by LE, and recently exposed for massive privacy violations. Police databases are apparently highly insecure, and corrupt officers have made it a practice to sell databases to private companies for thousands of dollars, a practice revealed by recent news articles, including by Chief Jones on Ramola D Reports.

Information Sharing across Law Enforcement/RAND report/https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR645.html

Law enforcement investigators seek out private DNA databases/Mashable

Police Are Collecting DNA From People Without Telling Them/Futurism

Police use of surveillance technology raises privacy concerns/MintPressNews

Across US, police officers abuse confidential databases/AP

Agencies Behaving Badly: Government Surveillance and Privacy Act Violations/Jurist

Ramola D Reports| Report # 120: Retired Police Chief Daymond Jones on Policing in America Today

  1. To conclude, the opacity of this section on Information Technology appears to hide much. It is entirely possible that non-consensual, clandestine implantation of RFIDs, as part of developments in Military/LE cybernetics, telemetry, biometrics, neuroinformatics in “innovative exploitation” of communications security technologies, is being executed by this JPSG program—as reported by high numbers of Americans. Again, this presents therefore an issue to be examined further with DARPA and the Justice Department.

7. Personnel Armor:This section, like the Sniper Detection section, seems to pertain explicitly to lethal weapons and not non-lethal or spectrum weapons.

However, it notes that lethal weapons threats—bullets from rifles and handguns—affect OOTW and LE operations both.

Protection from rifle bullets via advanced lightweight body armor in the course of OOTW/LE operations of any kind appears to be the focus here; the implication appears to be that such operations could involve rifle threats; it is possible therefore that this pertains, as also the Sniper Detection section, to mass shooters and the weapons (assault weapons, rifles) some have used, as well as to regular LE activities, which do involve lethal exertion of force, warranted or unwarranted, in situations of gun violence.

It’s interesting that this has been designated an area for Defense-Justice collaboration; plenty of Defense contractors exist who research and develop body armor, as any cursory inquiry into the market shows. LE also has a dedicated market producing police gear. For the JPSG to enter this arena suggests a corralling of new Federal funds perhaps, or some kind of development of new technology – countermeasure shielding for spectrum technology? – that is not being fully disclosed here. Note that what is being stated above as aspects of this program are presented as inclusions (“efforts include”), not all-encompassing and exclusive.

8.Biomedical Technology:

This is also a relatively opaque section suggesting telemedicine application in penitentiaries and OOTW rescue operations, which implies audio-video consultation and data transmission of medical detail perhaps but does not expand on the suggestions implicit in the label of “biomedical technology” which could include medical telemetry, meaning implants, body area networks, biosensors, and implanted biomonitors, at nano- and micro-levels, to aid in remote patient monitoring and other telehealth initiatives.

New Atlas article, 2018/https://newatlas.com/profusa-health-monitoring-biosensors/53870/

To reiterate, the incidence of such biomedical implants found to have been non-consensually implanted in what can only be understood to be undisclosed and covert human experimentation and tracking operation projects involving variably, academic, medical, and military/Intelligence personnel has been reported in large numbers by Americans as also people worldwide. It is possible therefore that the opacity of the language in this section obscures the larger truths of such non-consensual implantation being part and parcel of a plethora of telehealth processes and technologies being tested silently on people.

This latter possibility in fact has increasingly been reported by people experiencing invasive radar activation of non-consensual implants within contexts of seemingly being probed in public by a rotating army of stalkers masquerading as community monitors and healthcare workers.

9. Limited Effects Technologies:


Significant, from this brief introduction (further screenshotted below):

  1. As noted earlier, this section, which titles the report and occupies 5 of the 9 pages of this report yet details only one portion of the multi-technology JPSG program.
  2. Further, its detailing is incomplete, as indicated by the language in the opening section.

  1. Crowd control and deterrence devices being studied and developed under this LET program are presented here as innocuous, benign, and needed—as per a nonspecific claim of need. There is no indication however of actual studies to establish they are such, or actually “eyesafe” or “less lethal” as stated.

A significant fact to note is the language referring to “sponsoring” and “funding” programs and projects to develop these limited-effects technologies, which means JPSG is handing out grants and contracts to Defense/LE contractor companies to develop these weapons. This might well be the protocol by which all JPSG programs work, and could explain the AFRL contract with Decision-Sciences Applications, Inc. on NIJ and DARPA grants, mentioned above in the Concealed Weapons Detection section. 

Electric Stun Projectile

This “effort” relates to a physical projectile using wireless, gas, or “conventionally propelled” means intended to electrically shock and stun a human target, as Tasers also do. Hardly a “Limited Effect” weapon, this is a stun gun intended to be used as a  shock-defence if a soldier or LE officer is attacked. Note that the intent is still incapacitation, blunt trauma, high impact force–but using an electrical charge, not a high-velocity bullet. 

Developed in San Diego, tested on the Marine Corps, probably rolled out and in use now, post 1997. Notice that the photograph is blacked out almost and reveals nothing. DARPA is not going out of its way to provide clear information here.

A look into Jaycor, the company, online, now subsumed into Titan Corporation, a larger Defense contractor engaged in large-scale DEW, satellite, and navigational systems manufacture, reveals their interest in other counter-personnel stun-gun non-lethal weapons and crowd-control devices. Titan Corporation is therefore now manufacturing both large-scale DEWs to take out battleships and smaller-scale non-lethal weapons (being characterized here as “Limited-Effects”) to take out human beings, or fell them for a while–no doubt with damages, as “crowd-control.”

Laser Surveillance and Dazzler System

While blinding lasers were banned by the European Parliament in 1995, the use of lasers to dazzle and disorient human targets did not stop, as BOSS, developed by the US Air Force’s Phillips Lab in Albuquerque, New Mexico demonstrates. It is interesting that this surveillance and dazzler system was developed for and presumably funded by the JPSG at an Air Force laboratory.

From Defense Review, 2005/Laser_Battlefield_Optical_Surveillance_System_BOSS

Notably, this system 1) involves the use of infra-red thermal sensors to find targets plus lasers to dazzle targets, 2) can be applied remotely from a considerable distance, and 3) intends both a psychological effect in alerting targeted individuals to being targeted by way of Show-of-Force bright illumination and the physical effect of deleterious uber-brighting or dazzling of the target’s eyes.

Again, not exactly Limited Effects, but labeled as such.

Finally, it is notable that further integration of this “Limited Effect” optical sensor-and-weapon system with acoustic sniper detection systems already developed under JPSG (as indicated above also by the AFRL/Decision-Sciences Applications 1998 Report) was also being explored in 1996, further evidence that sensor and “non-lethal” spectrum technologies were being developed and tested by the JPSG for multiple uses.

Handheld Laser Dazzler

Also developed by the US Air Force’s Phillips Lab, the handheld laser dazzler—whether portable in a backpack or camouflaged as a flashlight—demonstrates that non-lethal energy weapons, including lasers, promising limited-effects were being made by the JPSG on a smaller scale, at lesser power, for purposes of portability and ease of use.

Portable Handheld Laser Dazzlers/https://www.tech-lasers.com/dazzlers/portable

Again, as per the 1994 DOD-DOJ MOU, the non-lethal Spectrum/Acoustic sensor-and-weapon technologies being developed by the joint Defense-Justice partnership here were being tested—are being tested, have been tested for the past 25 years—and “demonstrated” on real targets.

Pyrotechnic Devices

The publishing of flash-bang devices designed to fast-bloom-smoke, dazzle, whistle, and other such is the one consistent element that disclosure on non-lethal weapons has maintained. Unwilling to speak openly of radar and sonic devices with silent and invisible physical bio-effects on humans, literature from the Joint Non Lethal Weapons Program has not refrained from pointing openly to these dazzle and vibrate devices, in obvious attempts to misdirect focus away from the far deadlier bio-hacking and neuro-hacking devices of non-lethal sensor technologies and neuroweapons.

Acoustic Study

This is evidence that infra-sound (below 20 Hz, the threshold of human hearing) weaponry for crowd-control was being researched in 1996 and tested on people, specifically to determine the biological effects of such transmissions, and explore means of incapacitating individuals for crowd-control purposes with infra-sound.

Prior information, available online, shows that infrasound had long been known to produce bio-effects and brain-effects–nausea, disorientation, brain fog–in humans, since Dr. Gavreau’s discoveries and experiments with infrasound in the 1950s, and efforts had already been made to create devices and systems to use infrasound in a weaponized way against humans, as in the published US Patent 3612211, screenshotted below.  

A salient point to note is that infrasound weapons (like other emerging weapons technologies) had been reviewed in the 1970s by United Nations conferences on disarmament, and efforts had been made, particularly by the Soviet Union, to halt the development of all such new weapons then seen as weapons of mass destruction. The US and UK were prominent naysayers to this plan in 1978 at the Conference of the Committee on Disarmament, where Hungary presented a paper on infrasound weapons and their effects. Now it appears that not only were such weapons not halted in development between 1978 and 1996, DARPA was arranging in 1996 for further development and testing of these dangerous acoustic weapons, long known to harm human bodies and brains.

The Section Titled Summary

While this document has touched on major program areas of the JPSG, its title and detail elaborate the more obvious flash-bang aspects of the “Limited-Effects Technology” program, while the Summary remains opaque. Notable however is the casual mention of “corrections” being aligned with the main parties involved in these joint programs, as in “military, law enforcement, and corrections” as the primary “user communities” being awarded “new, more effective tools,” with little description or specificity on the nature or kind of tools, and no summation of the high points of this document.

However, some definite conclusions can be reached regarding this entire document, in addition to all noted above at end of sections.

CONCLUSIONS

  1. DARPA returned this one 1996 document to a multi-document request on JPSG programs begun 25 years ago, after 25 years.

  2. This is not a fully disclosive document; much is being obscured, summarized, glossed over.

  3. The Limited-Effects Technology program is only one of several JPSG programs mentioned in this document.

  4. All these JPSG programs need to be understood, as stated, as deriving from the 1994 DOD-DOJ MOU which announced the testing and demonstration of “advanced technologies.” That MOU followed on the heels of a classified Non-Lethal Weapons conference in 1993, and several decades of development and study of Non-Lethal technologies and “Psycho-Corrective” Neurotechnologies. (See Background & Context, MOU.)

  5. The need to limit force is reiterated as primary motivator in bringing DOD and DOJ together in a quest to find and use common modalities in wars on drugs and terrorism—a need which points directly to Anti Personnel Non Lethal Weapons—which are EMF Spectrum and Acoustic Weapons.

These JPSG OOTW/LE programs therefore are definitely focused on Non Lethal Weapons, that is, EMF Spectrum and Acoustic Weapons, which, by nature of the physical bio-effects they have on humans’ bodies and brains, are also Bioweapons and Neuroweapons—not mentioned as such in this document, but elsewhere disclosed, as for instance, by Debra Schnelle at the 2019 Blue Ribbon Emerging Biodefense Conference as Neuro Cognitive Weapons, by Dr. James Giordiano as Neuroweapons in numerous lectures, and discussed at length in the declassified US Army document Bio-Effects of Selected Non-Lethal Weapons as Bioweapons and Neuroweapons, with intended damage to the human body and human brain.

  1. The JPSG comprises members from DARPA, US Army, National Institutes of Justice, Bureau of Prisons, and the FBI. Stands to reason that each of these institutions therefore—and their overseers, the Department of Defense and the Justice Department and leaders, the Secretary of Defense Mark Esper and the Attorney-General William Barr–is fully cognizant of the JPSG programs developing and testing sensor-and-weapon technologies on the streets of America described in this report.

  2. Further, each of these institutions is being permitted to participate in all aspects of the RDA (Research, Development, Acquisition) spectrum, meaning it is acknowledged that these non lethal neuro/bio EMF/acoustic technologies can be tested and demonstrated by the Bureau of Prisons (on prisoners), FBI, and NIJ (on watchlisted citizens? on unwitting members of the public at airports, train stations, hospitals, stores, roadways?) just as much as by DARPA and the US Army (on military personnel? On civilians near military bases? on “indefinite detainees”?) and just as much as jointly developed.

  3. Concealed weapons-detection technologies being developed indicate that people—unwittingly, without being informed—are being subjected to X-rays, ultrasound radiation, millimeter wave technologies, radar technologies, ULFs, ELFS, and magnetic fields, at short-range and long-range, close-in and remote, ostensibly for weapons-detection testing purposes, in any number and type of environments, including but not limited to airports, train stations, public areas, and private homes. These technologies could also be directed at people from inside buildings and homes, from cars, pickups, trucks, vans, from mountings in public locations, from parked vehicles in parking-lots and from moving vehicles while driving.

  4. Sensor technologies for weapons-detection being tested at short and long range include low frequency magnetic sensors which plausibly track biofields, breathing activity, body resonance emfs, and low frequency brainwaves, using superconducting quantum interference and tunneling technologies, and comprising through-wall earthquake-life-detection monitoring, remote neural monitoring, and the surveillance and monitoring of brain states and emotion states.

  5. GPS Tracking and identification technologies being tested and developed imply tagging-for-surveillance sensor technologies inclusive of RFID microchips, WBANs, biosensors, and nanosensors, and include monitoring and surveillance technologies such as different kinds of radar being tested and operated under ISR and military/Air Force Non Lethal Weapons Testing programs.

  6. Sensor technologies being developed for sniper detection, based on biomimetic systems, could include the use of cochlear implants and other neuroprosthetics in the study of auditory and neurological processes, as indicated by companies developing such systems.

  7. Innovative exploitation” of IT communications infrastructure & new technology here could include hive-minding AI projects, nanobots, Brain Nets, quantum computing, and synthetic telepathy, among other undisclosed technologies, involving non-consensual, clandestine implantation of RFIDs and BCI Tech, as well as biometrics/DNA data collection and sharing—as part of developments in Military/LE cybernetics and telemetry, and as reported today by high numbers of Americans.

  8. Personnel armor” being developed as a JPSG program could include research and development of countermeasure shielding for spectrum and acoustic non-lethal bio/neuroweapons, although not expressly stated here.

  9. Biomedical technology initiatives involving telemedicine and telehealth could include medical telemetry, meaning implants, body area networks, biosensors, and implanted biomonitors, of nano- and micro-levels, to aid in remote patient monitoring and other telehealth initiatives. Non-consensual implantation may well be part and parcel of a plethora of telehealth processes and technologies being tested silently on people, in prisons, as noted, and elsewhere.

  10. Limited-effects technologies being developed and tested under JPSG include electric stun projectiles, dazzling laser devices of both mountable and portable kinds, and other crowd-control devices.

  11. Acoustic devices using infrasound to produce physical effects for use in crowd-control to “incapacitate” was being studied at an Air Force Laboratory—and possibly being field-tested and “demonstrated” on populations to provide the needed “hard evidence” mentioned here.

  1. Factually speaking, the disclosure in this document along with the disclosure in the 1994 DOD-DOJ MOU that these technologies are being tested is, at minimum, incontrovertible evidence that invisible, spectrum technologies are being operated and tested on the bodies of people, from a distance and from close-by, exactly as thousands of highly credentialled and credible people– often labeled as “Targeted Individuals” and characterized for credibility-disappearance as “mentally ill” by mainstream Govt-propaganda-pushing media –are reporting.

  2. This document’s disclosure therefore—notwithstanding that much of its details have been withheld–is profoundly important in establishing that non-lethal weapons and sensor technologies, specifically EMF Spectrum and Acoustic Bio/Neuro Weapons have been developed, demonstrated and tested on populations under the aegis of joint Defense-Justice JPSG programs, since 1994.

Related

Documentary Evidence since 1994 of Covert High-Tech Electronic-Weapon and Neurotechnology Use in Targeted Surveillance, Experimentation, Operations by US Government on Americans: (1) The DOD/DOJ Memorandum of Understanding on OOTW/LE, 1994

Public Disclosure on Neuro Weapons and Neuro Technologies In Use Today

Extrajudicial Targeting Technologies (Weapons Use/Tests/Abuse); Biometric Surveillance, Non Lethal Weapons, Neuroweapons

False-Claim of Mental Illness in the Microwave, Millimeter Wave, Other “Non Lethal” Weapons Testing on Citizens in USA & Worldwide

Ramola D/No Longer True: The NSA “Isn’t Getting Violent Internally in the US”: Millions Today in US Are Targeted with RF/Scalar/Sonic Weapons, Nano Weapons, Neuro Weapons, Chem/Bio Weapons

Documentary Evidence since 1994 of Covert High-Tech Electronic-Weapon and Neurotechnology Use in Targeted Surveillance, Experimentation, Operations by US Government on Americans: (1) The DOD/DOJ Memorandum of Understanding on OOTW/LE, 1994

RAE (Report, Analysis, Op-Ed) | Ramola D | Posted December 1, 2019

Documentary Evidence since 1994 of Covert High-Tech Electronic-Weapon and Neurotechnology Use in Targeted Surveillance, Experimentation, Operations by US Government on Americans: A Series

(1) The DOD/DOJ Memorandum of Understanding on OOTW/LE, 1994

Unremarked in mainstream media, deliberately hidden from wider readership, there have been a series of declassified document FOIA-releases over the past few years which astonishingly reveal many facets of the now-known covert use of electronic-weapon and neurotechnology surveillance, experimentation, weapons-tests, and operations on the American public by various agencies and departments of the US Government and their contractors.

Similarity with Covert Global High-Tech Policing Operations: Similar operations have been unleashed worldwide, as reported extensively at this site and others online earlier. Some documentation in the public domain testifies to this global program, and will be reported more fully here shortly. For now, please see this Twitter thread, which discloses NATO High-Tech Non Lethal Weapon/Neuro Policing operations in Europe and discusses also how Non-Lethal Weapons Testing & Neuro Surveillance have been unleashed inside the USA:

HTML Page: Thread on Non-Lethal DEW Operations in USA, Europe, world, with references to US, NATO documents, articles 

On Twitter: Thread on Non-Lethal DEW Operations in USA, Europe, world, with references to US, NATO documents, articles

From Riot Control Tear Gas to Pulsed Microwaves and “Acoustic Psycho-Correction”The irritant chemical weapons of riot control of the 1960s and ’70s—the original non-lethal weapons–have steadily given way to a plethora of non-lethal technologies in the range of electromagnetic, acoustic, scalar, and other exotic neuro/bio technologies steadily released by military weapons research into law enforcement, and currently also into futuristic crime-prevention or Pre-Crime use over the ’80s, ’90s, and beyond.

(The Early History of Non-Lethal Weapons, Neil Davison;

Timeline/EM Weapons Interact with the Nervous System, by Judy Hall)

Public Domain Disclosure on Non Lethal Weapons Has Ramped Up Lately

This series aims to address the public disclosures in recent FOIA releases of ongoing US Government use of Electronic Weapons and Neurotechnologies on Americans.

Electronic Weapon” herein refers to the spectrum weapons used in Electronic Warfare as defined by the Department of Defense (DOD) in documents, particularly relates to anti-personnel weapons, includes all labeled as non-lethal-weapon, less-than-lethal weapon, psychotronic weapon, neuroweapon, next generation and emerging technologies, and includes RFID (Radio Frequency IDentification) and BCI (Brain Computer Interface) tech.

The Memorandum of Understanding Between Department of Defense and Department of Justice on Military Operations Other Than War and Law Enforcement, 1994

PDF: The Memorandum of Understanding Between Department of Defense and Department of Justice on Military Operations Other Than War and Law Enforcement, 1994

Recent document releases into the public domain include this MOU (linked above) released by the US Department of Justice on FOIA request in February 2018 to Harun Krasna via Muckrock News, signed by Janet Reno and John Deutch on April 20, 1994, when Reno was Attorney-General of the United States and Deutch was Deputy Secretary of Defense.

Some Context to This MOU

This Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) was preceded by decades of reported development of non-lethal energy weapons and neuroweapons by different departments of the US Government, including Defense, Justice, Energy, US Army, Navy, Air Force, DARPA, NSA, CIA, and NIJ, as indicated by various conferences held through the ’80s and early ’90s, by white papers from military and intelligence personnel, by declassified documents currently in the public domain as released by DOJ, CIA, NSA, and DOD, inclusive of the CIA’s MK Ultra documents and Project Stargate archives, and by information preserved in the Congressional record.

For instance, information on the growing focus by the Justice Department through the ’80s and ’90s on electromagnetic weapons can be gleaned from government reports on NIJ (National Institute of Justice) conferences on electromagnetic weapons.

Numerous military reports in journals detail the military development of infrasonic, radar, microwave weapons from the ’50s onward; their use in US Law Enforcement seems to have occurred particularly from the ’70s and ’80s upward.

Significant, in the ’80s-’90s lead-up to this MOU, are the following sampling of reports, white papers, and articles:

NIJ Reports

Sherri Sweetman’s NIJ Report on the Attorney-General’s (1986) Conference on Non-Lethal Weapons dated March 1987

NIJ 1993 report, NIJ Initiative on Less-Than-Lethal Weapons

Military Reports & Articles

The Electromagnetic Spectrum in Low-Intensity Conflict by US Navy Captain Paul Tyler, an essay included along with other critical essays in the 1986 Low-Intensity Conflict and Modern Technology edited by US Air Force Lt Col David J. Dean (link opens pdf of this essay).

Controlled Offensive Behavior (USSR) – a DIA Report, 1972

Nonlethality: John B. Alexander, The Pentagon’s Penguin, June 1993, Lobster Magazine

The New Mental Battlefield: “Beam me up, Spock” by US Army Lt. Col. John B. Alexander, Dec 1980, Military Review

Books

1969: Physical Control of the Mind: Toward a Psychocivilized Society by Jose Delgado

1970: Between Two Ages: America’s Role in a Technetronic Era by Zbigniew Brezinski

CIA Reports/Congressional Record

1977: Project MK Ultra, the CIA’s Program in Behavior Modification/Joint Hearings

Summations & Compilations of Reports, Patents, Studies from this time-period:

Mind Control, The Ultimate Brave New World by Dr. Nick Begich

Remote Mind Control Technology by Anna Keeler

Mind Controllers by Armen Victorian

One Notable Classified Conference

The 1993 Los Alamos-sponsored Classified DOJ/DOD Conference on Non Lethal Defense

The singular and secretive Los-Alamos-sponsored Justice/Defense classified conference on Non-Lethal Defense in 1993 at Johns Hopkins Applied Physics Laboratory no doubt had a direct connection to this Memorandum of Understanding, signed in 1994. The agenda for that conference is posted here.

Please see my earlier discussion on that deliberately-kept-secret conference and its consequences for Americans in these two critically questioning articles here—which include disclosures from multiple researchers, writers, and investigative journalists including Dr. Nick Begich, Dr. John Hall, Dr. Robert Duncan, and Renee Pittman Mitchell:

How Secret Policing With Deadly “Non-Lethal” EMF/Scalar/Sonic Neuroweaponry Has Been Installed Domestically Inside the US, & Globally

Is the US Department of Justice Secretly Permitting Local Law Enforcement & the Military to Assault American Citizens Using Covert Directed-Energy “Non-Lethal” Weapons?

Lack of Media Coverage, Human Rights Coverage, Public Disclosure & Debate of Non-Lethal & Neurotechnologies Promised by This MOU

Significantly, there have been no public debates, discussions facilitated by Media and human rights or civil liberties groups, disclosure from the Justice Department, nor disclosure from the Defense department on the intended or ongoing use of non-lethal Remote Human Access Weapons and Neurotechnologies on Americans, which this MOU promises.

Instead, there has been an unethical and treasonous official Media and Human Rights cover-up, which has led to the public being misinformed.  (This has been discussed extensively at this site, including in Open Season on Targets: Blacklisted Individuals, Extreme Abuse in Targeting, Secretive Lab-Rat Exploitation, & Massive Establishment Cover-Up.)

Highlights of this Memorandum of Understanding 

The purpose of this article is to report the content of this MOU—which is not fully transparent–highlight its main points, and offer insight into its intent with an eye to more fully informing the American public on what exactly has transpired here, what exactly this MOU has permitted, who is aware, who is involved, and who needs to be held accountable.

Significant, as stated, in this MOU are the following.

From the Section titled General, A and B:

  1. This was an agreement to permit Defense and Justice to jointly share and develop certain kinds of technology and systems for shared purposes, for Military Operations Other Than War (MOOTW), and for Law Enforcement (LE).
  2. This agreement sought to “conduct a program to enhance” both MOOTW and LE operations. (Was this also the kept-quiet political persecution program to target innocent Americans, activists, journalists–falsely labeled as terrorists–extrajudicially under Watchlist Fraud, and covertly use their bodies and brains for target practice in OOTW?)
  3. This agreement came on the heels of DARPA, NIJ, and FBI deciding to gift Law Enforcement with these certain advanced technologies on the basis of findings of “convergence” they made regarding the applicability of these technologies—still not described–to both military and law enforcement operations.
  4. DARPA, NIJ, FBI also felt these advanced technologies would “enhance the effectiveness” of both military and law enforcement missions.

From the Section titled Concept:

  1. The objective of this joint program was to “develop and exploit” this advanced technology for military operations and law enforcement operations both—and does not refer to this technology as weaponry here, although it clearly is, if being applied militarily or forcibly by military or police. This is weaponry.
  2. This joint program intended to open a “development and application program” contract creation industry where competing technologies, components, and systems—presumably from Defense/Security Service companies–could compete; the implication appears to be the promotion of competition in the development and testing of these advanced technologies, which have still not been described, in this Concept section. This Joint Program was unleashing a mercenary competition between rival tech weaponry companies—Defense/Security Service contractors–to develop, test, and fine-tune these sophisticated advanced anti-personnel technologies inside America, on Americans. (The involvement of Law Enforcement implies anti-personnel technology.)
  3. “Testing and objective evaluation” was legitimized as necessary to ensure “quality of the competition.”

From the Section titled Implementation:

  1. This was a 5-year MOU, which presumably has been extended periodically (to be confirmed). 
  2. A Joint Program Steering Group (JPSG) was created, with someone from DARPA chairing it and DOJ appointing a deputy chair, with technical program managers from both Defense and Justice. Significantly, a representative from US Army is designated to be on the JPSG, in addition to reps from DARPA and DOJ. 
  3. This Steering Group, chaired by DARPA, would make decisions on technologies of interest (to jointly share and develop presumably), plan, manage development, test, “conduct technology demonstrations and evaluations” – which suggests that military tech, already developed, would be demonstrated for law enforcement use – and make decisions on “transition strategies.”
  4. “Test bed units” or “user organizations” would test the “transitioning products” (meaning the up-til-then secret or classified tech from DARPA, perhaps) and suggesting:
    * for LE operations: different police/sheriffs’ departments possibly, or corrections departments—prisons and juvenile detention centers;
    * and for MOOTW (which could include information warfare, psychological operations—Psy Ops/MISO, counter-terrorism and counter-drug operations, show-of-force operations et al): military units (such as the Marine Corps, Air Force, Navy, Army) or special operations forces.
    The implication appears to be that those groups intending to use this technology would serve as testers of it. There is a connection here to Non Lethal Weapons Testing contracts announced by US Air Force Secretary Michael Wynne in 2006, when he stated weapons would be tested on Americans, which needs to be further explored; these military weapons-testing-contracts continue, and notice of them can be found in the public domain. 
  5. The JPSG would move physically to DARPA in the first quarter of 1995 to begin “intensive management of the OOTW/LE program” from DARPA. (Then called ARPA; Note that DARPA is a weapons research and development agency for the Department of Defense, and not part of the Department of Justice. This MOU establishes military management of Justice, Law Enforcement, and FBI  programs using these “advanced technologies”.)

  1. Policy guidance would be provided by a Senior Review Group which would include the Deputy Secretary of Defense and the Deputy Attorney-General. This implies that both parties—and it is significant that the DAG is involved, FBI Directors frequently serve first as DAG (witness, Mueller and Comey) —would have full cognizance of these particular advanced technologies to be deployed by Law Enforcement and Military divisions both, and would make decisions to “facilitate technology transition to applications.”
  2. JPSG projects would be of 3 types—transitioning or transferring existing military tech to DOJ (Corrections & Law Enforcement) where DOJ would test these; transitioning ongoing in-development-military-tech in “current programs” to DOJ where DOJ would modify as needed and test these; or jointly developing new tech, where DOD and DOJ would separately modify and apply tech as they needed. From analysis of conference reports from DOJ prior to this MOU as well as materials from DOD, some linked above, it appears that many forms of Biometric Identification, Pre-Crime Monitoring, and Neuro Surveillance technologies might well have fallen within the aegis of these categories. There is a connection here also to C4ISR (C4 (Command, Control, Computers, Communications) Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance) technologies, many being tested now via Non Lethal Weapons Testing contracts, e.g., by the US Air Force Research Laboratory, which needs to be further explored. (Please see my Twitter thread at head of this article, for links.) 

From the Section titled Responsibilities:

  1. Defense would identify tech and systems, existing and in-process, to hand over to Justice for testing, modification, and use as above.
  2. DOJ would identify those requisite military technologies and systems in process at DOD found attractive for use by DOJ; interestingly—perhaps for obvious reasons, since it implies DOD has all the technology already that it could choose from to hand over–it appears that DOD is the primary party responsible to identify and select already-extant technology for DOJ use, but DOJ would be made privy to current military technology programs in process. This probably also implies that a lot of this DARPA tech is classified, and DOD would pick from extant tech to hand over to DOJ, leaving DOJ out of the loop there; with regard to in-process tech, DOJ would be permitted disclosure and be allowed to choose.
  3. Yet both departments are required to identify their own requirements and “candidate technologies,” presumably within the constraints above.
  4. Security classifications would be used as per whichever department was acting as the Executive Agent for specific projects.
  5. Specific projects would be described in Annexes.
  6. Important to note is the fact that the Attorney-General would be fully cognizant of this joint program and its essentially military activities, as reported to him or her by the DAG in charge of the senior review group. This is a program of testing advanced military technology on the streets of America by military units and special operations forces, and in America’s prisons and detention centers by sheriffs and police departments and all contractors interfacing with them, that the AG, DAG, and FBI  would be fully aware of. 

Further Conclusions

Notice of Joe Biden’s Omnibus Counter-Terrorism Act of 1995, which predated the 2001 Patriot Act, and established Military interference in domestic Law Enforcement, created the “Terrorist” label for domestic use, permitted indefinite detention without judicial review, and stripped Due Process from Americans.

This 1994 MOU establishes that the Attorney-General and DOJ and FBI and local Law Enforcement nationally in the USA were fully cognizant and partaking in joint military-justice advanced-tech weapons testing operations on Americans from that time onward and, significantly, during milestone moments in American history, such as the very next year at the time of the Oklahoma Bombing on April 19, 1995 followed by Joe Biden’s Omnibus Counter-Terrorism Act of 1995 (proposed in February 1995, passed in May 1995), then seven years later at the time of the 9/11 event in 2001 and the passing of the Patriot Act in 2001, and one decade later, at the time of the President’s Bioethical Commission hearings in 2011.

Americans testify at the President’s Bioethical Commission, 2011

On that historic occasion, over 300 Americans—out of over 600—registered to give their testimonials of being covertly persecuted with electromagnetic and acoustic neuroweapons “testifying to their ongoing, unwilling enrollment in non-consensual human experimentation with military-grade electromagnetic (EMF) neurotechnology projects in the USA,” with only 40 being allowed to testify, the rest repressively turned away by Amy Gutmann, Chair, and Valerie Bonham, Executive Director, claiming “the Commission was not a “law enforcement, regulatory, or legislative body” (The American Public Informs President Obama’s Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues About Ongoing Non-Consensual Experimentation in the USA Today) PDF of this article here

Advanced Technologies”: Remote Human Access Non-Lethal Weapons and Neurotechnologies

In the entirety of this opaque MOU, nowhere is it mentioned in so many words what exactly these technologies are. However, from the lead-up news reportage prior to this MOU, the many preceding technology conferences, succeeding documents released on FOIA-request, and succeeding execution of Directed Energy Bio Behavioral Research projects using Non Lethal Weapons contracted publicly by DOD, USAF, USMC, others, it becomes evident that these technologies DOJ and DOD jointly sought to deploy—and are currently deploying–are less-than-lethal weapons, non-lethal weapons, through-wall-surveillance weapons, weapons-detection technologies, behavior-modification technologies, medical monitoring technologies, and—secret of secrets–neuroweapons.

Details on some of these technologies now emerging from other FOIA-released documents will be explored in succeeding articles in this series covering these documents.

****

RELATED

Secret Policing Inside the United States of America: “Domestic Adversaries” and Covert Electronic Weapons

Is the US Department of Justice Secretly Permitting Local Law Enforcement & the Military to Assault American Citizens Using Covert Directed-Energy “Non-Lethal” Weapons?

Open Season on Targets: Blacklisted Individuals, Extreme Abuse in Targeting, Secretive Lab-Rat Exploitation, & Massive Establishment Cover-Up

Twitter thread on Non Lethal Weapons Testing in the USA and  in Europe via NATO: https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1114347466667769856.html

Washington’s Blog: The American Public Informs President Obama’s Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues About Ongoing Non-Consensual Human Experimentation in the USA Today PDF of Article

No Waivers of Informed Consent, PERIOD: The Public Reports Ongoing Non-Consensual Experimentation and Demands the Common Rule Protect Citizens, Not Covert Activities

 

Public Notice: The Remote Access of Human Beings is a Crime Against Humanity

Notice | Ramola D | November 5, 2019

While it is clear that Offices of Legal Counsel at organizations such as the US Department of Health and Human Services, which houses the OHRP, Office of Human Research Protections–an office which appears to function in name only since it brazenly ignores public comment sent in to the SACHRP, Secretary’s Advisory Committee on Human Research Protection on the importance of Informed Consent in human experimentation, as reported previously here and as evident in their pushing-through in 2016 of a revised Common Rule rife with exemptions for Informed Consent, handed like candy to Intelligence agencies, the Department of Defense, and the Department of Justice, along with other government departments and Universities–who have essentially been thus (self-)permitted, by Deans of Universities, academics in Medicine, Law, and Bioethics, and government departments to freely prey on American bodies and brains without consent–basic humanity, common sense, and awareness of crimes against humanity from a general human rights point of view dictate the following:

  1. That the Remote-Access Bio-Hacking and Neuro-Hacking of humans without their prior Informed Consent (as in fully-consented-to medical health monitoring) is most definitely a Crime Against Humanity.

  1. That everyone who participates in such remote-access-of-humans with Covert or Stealth bio-hacking and neuro-hacking radio frequency/sonic/scalar/implant/neuro/bio/chemical technologies and equipment, on the instruction of another, whether within the context of a secretive or overt Intelligence/Defense/Justice/Fusion Center contract or academic grant as employee, contractor, student or as a volunteer in Community Policing programs involving Electronic Surveillance, all in the false name of Surveillance, Public Safety, and National Security, Public Health, Mental Health, or Medical Bio/Behavioral Research, is knowingly participating in this Crime Against Humanity being enacted without Informed Consent, as a modality of electronic and remote capture, suppression, and subjugation of another, and thereby engaging in Human Trafficking.

The OHRP is particularly responsible since it requires all agencies of the government engaging in research using human subjects, including military divisions with internal Institutional Review Boards to submit a Federal Wide Assurance indicating adherence to ethical principles embodied by a particular set of guidelines such as the Belmont Report, Helsinki Declaration, or Common Rule.

Human Trafficking is Understood Worldwide to be a Crime

President Trump’s Executive Order 13818 on Human Trafficking

UN’s strictures on Trafficking in Persons

UN OHCHR’s Human Rights and Human Trafficking Fact Sheet No. 36

Electronic Enslavement is Akin to Physical Enslavement Which is Understood Worldwide to be a Crime

World Notice of Crimes Against Humanity Using Energy Neuro/Bio Weapons

Non-Lethal” Weapons Cannot Be Used Indiscriminately & Criminally on Humans

The International Legal Implications of “Non-Lethal” Weapons by David Fidler/Michigan Journal of International Law

Non-Lethal Weapons Police Use to Suppress Protest are Killing People/Huffington Post

Less-Lethal” Weapons can kill and police misuse them for torture/Amnesty International

Today, as graduate students, neighbors, small business owners, private sector and Security service employees are increasingly drawn into chilling programs of Fusion Center community policing and monitoring as well as unethical medical or bio-behavioral research which include GPS tracking and electronic “anti-personnel” monitoring of people with wireless technologies, it is important to remind people of their base sense of morality, humanity, and integrity and ask everyone to think deeply about their own culpability in Torture, Electronic Enslavement, and Human Trafficking when they assent to participating in the remote-access bio-hacking and neuro-hacking of humans, often their next-door neighbors, customers, colleagues, employees, or family.

This notice was written a couple months ago specifically to inform work colleagues of the crime against humanity they were committing on an American woman non-consensually implanted who is still seeking justice, who reported (to this writer) she was being remotely-accessed at her workspot continuously, with intense pulsing pain signals being sent to various organs including private parts. It is this kind of remote access, for torture and sadism, that many people from all walks of life are reporting today, both in the USA and worldwide, and which needs to be fully outlawed, legislated against, and terminated.

This notice is being published in the hope that Human Rights, Common Decency, and Common Sense will prevail over the insanity of compliance to unlawful physical assault and battery on humans, achieved covertly and remotely—for whatever stated reason. The day will come when such crimes will indeed be prosecuted.

Notice of Crime Against Humanity in Remote Access of Human Beings in PDF Format (easier to print and share as a flyer): Notice of Crime Against Humanity: Remote Wireless Manipulation of Human Beings

PLEASE POST WIDELY, IN EVERY NATION OF THE WORLD, FOR THE PROTECTION OF ALL HUMANITY

***

NOTICE OF CRIME AGAINST HUMANITY

DO NOT PARTICIPATE IN REMOTE ACCESS OF HUMAN BEINGS

Remotely Vibrating, Pulsing, Burning, Manipulating Human Bodies

USING WIFI, CELL PHONES, BCIs, WBANs, REMOTE EMF/SONIC DEVICES

Without Full Continuously Verifiable Informed Consent is a Crime Against Humanity

& Criminal, Prosecutable Offense as Torture of a Human Being

By international law, every researcher/agent/student/contractor/employee accessing anyone without their Full Informed Consent is a Human Trafficker.

Notice to One is Notice to All

Please be advised that by International Law, Article 7 of the Rome Statute, the Geneva Conventions, and the Nuremberg Treaty,

  • You are prohibited from remotely manipulating the bodies or brains of any human being without their own vocal, witnessed, verifiable, public, open informed consent in that moment and prior;

  • You are becoming an accomplice to crime if you participate in such manipulation on someone else’s directive, whoever it is, whether identified to you as a researcher, an investigator, an officer or agent for any agency, military, government, hospital, or your own boss, and for whatever reason;

  • You are personally responsible even if you perform such actions of wireless, remote manipulation under presumption, belief, or notification from anyone of your subject having “impaired consent capacity,” or of your subject being a “participant in a research project for her/his own good,” or “needing therapy” which you are falsely told you are providing through such bodily manipulation;

  • You can be publicly named, shamed, and prosecuted by the subject of your manipulations;

  • You can be held publicly accountable by human rights organizations, courts, and councils for your own individual actions of harm to another.

The covert remote access and manipulation of a human being by means of a wireless, spectrum, sonic, neuro device such as a cell phone app, bar code reader, RFID detector, infra-red emitter, microwave emitter, or scalar wave emitter, whether sold to you as Surveillance or Medical Monitoring, used to pulse, vibrate, send electrical vibrations, shocks, spasms, skin-burn, and other human bio-effects, is, quite explicitly, Torture, and a Crime Against Humanity. Please use your common-sense: no-one wants their private parts or any other body parts vibrated, pulsed, or burned by you—whatever misapprehension of “therapy,” “research,” or “benefit” you may be laboring under. These are crimes, and you can indeed be held personally responsible. Therefore, please DO NOT PARTICIPATE IN REMOTE ACCESS OF HUMAN BEINGS. You can and must say No, to unscrupulous traffickers, which may include Universities & agencies. (Note that every researcher/agent/ student/contractor/employee accessing anyone without their Informed Consent is a Human Trafficker.)

Karen Rex, Silicon Valley Security Whistleblower: US Army Base in Florida Threatens National Security

Report | Karen Rex | 9/17/2019

The US Army is known for telling its recruits to be “Army Strong” ironically the Army is strong in violating our National Security. New technologies created by the Pentagon’s Brain, DARPA, have new weapons to use on US citizens on US soil apparently!

Image from https://spectrum.ieee.org/

The Army is currently targeting Americans on the very soil they are ordered to protect.

Karen Rex and Justin Pitts

Former Army Ranger Justin Pitts was attacked by non-lethal weapons by the US Army’s Program Executive Office Simulation, Training, and Instrumentation (PEO STRI). They are located at 12211 Science Drive, Orlando, FL 32826. Justin was a personal friend, we were both what is termed Targeted Individuals. This is a new program run by our government. If you are unlucky enough to be put in this program, your life as you knew it will NEVER be the same.

Electromagnetic Frequency (EMF) and Cyber Operations

The US Army in this case is running what they have labeled Electromagnetic Frequency (EMF) Warfare and Cyber Operations. The Army is using the PEO STRI to run simulations that control a target’s electronics, including his or her actual mind and body. The carrier EMF signals have the ability to send voices to your head that only you hear, termed Microwave Acoustic Hearing. The technology is so advanced that you can have EMF signals sent directly to your brain changing your mood. The technology causes all kinds of life- changing problems for those attacked.

US Army Ranger Justin Pitts

Justin and I met on YouTube. He was a kind, skinny, short southern Army Ranger that was targeted during his last year as a recruiter for the military. While he was still Active-Duty, the Army base in Orlando, FL started targeting him. Justin started hearing voices receiving Synthetic Telepathy. This is not too different to my targeting; however, Justin could not keep weight on his body. He was constantly eating junk food. Justin also had severe EMF attacks where his entire body would shake. His targeting increased when he, through microwave hearing, heard someone blow their nose into a trash can while he was not at work. This gesture is common among military men. He had heard the guys at the recruiting office make that noise before and identified it. This was the first time he realized that someone had tapped into his brain. Justin’s targeting would start to escalate at that time.

We decided to take our information and put it together to figure out a way to help expose the targeting of US citizens. We knew these were crimes against humanity not unlike the Nazi treatment of anyone they deemed unfit. These non-lethal weapons were designed in the last 40 years. Justin and I interviewed on YouTube to get information out about how individuals are targeted.

Cyber Reconnaisance (Karen Rex) and Justin Pitts (Due Hass) Interviewed by Nexx Level

Justin was targeted with gang stalking. He had military helicopters and planes fly over his home in South Carolina. Justin was smart and had the ability to review the Army’s Cyberspace and EMF Operations FM 3-12 Manual that is available online. Justin’s targeting would continue and his hearing one person turned into a classroom of Army soldiers exchanging paperwork and talking. He would be in his home and hear the classroom become animated. He saw cars drive into his neighborhood with Florida license plates at this time. Justin continued to also be targeted throughout his body with electromagnetic-frequency-attacking causing him to shake uncontrollably. No matter how much they attacked Justin, he continued to fight back going up the Army’s chain of command to expose the National Security violations.

Justin Pitts in his own words, September 5, 2018, at his Youtube channel

Targeting Individuals Threatens National Security and Abuses the Security Clearance System

The targeting of the individuals threatens National Security and abuses the security clearance system. The Army is also committing treason, murder, cyber espionage, human trafficking, violating children’s online privacy act (COPPA).

https://fas.org/irp/congress/2015_hr/dod-cyber.pdf

The Congressional hearing dated September 30, 2015 stated that definition of cyber included “emerging technologies, drones, nanotechnology, and a slew of other technologies which the term cyber is inadequate to define.” This is true and is why Targeted Individuals have a hard time trying to explain what is going on with them. Targeted Individuals will be labelled a psychological dysfunction by uneducated citizens. However, these crimes are really happening.

Justin was able to start to file complaints with numerous military and intelligence agencies. He went up the Army’s chain of command and this went nowhere. Then, he was harassed by the military planes in his neighborhood, so Justin filed a report with the Oconee County, South Carolina Sheriff’s Department. This was not enough to stop the program. Justin went to US Army Special Operations and Military Police to file complaints. However, people including military and intelligence agents do not know about technologies torturing US citizens on US soil. This is by the very definition treason, punishable by death.

Justin then was clever enough to start recording phone conversations when he filed complaints. His perpetrators told him where they lived and their names. Justin had one of them come near him. This perpetrator told Justin his name over the Acoustic Microwave Hearing from the base in Florida. The man’s name is Joshua Pierce, Sergeant 1st Class, Non-Commission Officer. This perpetrator had a complaint filed by Justin to the FBI.

Justin contacted the NSA and filed a report with them since the Army was violating National Security with the Cyber and Electromagnetic Warfare tools at their disposal. Next, he contacted an UN journalist and NATO’s biomedical military command.

Justin talked with Presidential correspondents, however, he could never get his computer secure enough to send the information to the White House. Finally, when all these attempts to stop the targeting did not succeed, he went to Washington, DC. Justin tried to have Congress listen as well as the Pentagon. Unfortunately, this technology is so powerful that people at all levels are mind controlled with electromagnetic frequencies. Functional MRIs are also used to read and change people’s thoughts and minds.

Image from https://derinstrateji.wordpress.com/

Our world is no longer a free will society. We can be mind controlled without our knowledge at anytime. That is how truly powerful these weapons are becoming. All of Justin’s complaints fell on deaf ears, and he started to become very depressed. I did not see Justin at that time. If he was feeling that way it was probably an inserted frequency and not actual depression.

In December 2018 around Christmas, Justin supposedly took his own life; I do not believe that to be true. I cannot believe it when the soldiers at the US Army Base in Orlando, FL have the power to insert frequencies to make you feel how they wish. It is extremely unfortunate that I lost my friend, but he has left us the ability to stop the PEO STRI. This base is threatening our National Security by causing a substantial and specific danger to public health and safety. This is one of thousands of crimes they commit hiding behind a security clearance that needs revocation. We can together stop this base from taking all Americans’ free will. The 5G network will only enhance the crimes they are already commit daily. The PEO STRI is abusing their authority, causing gross mismanagement of military assets and wasting taxpayer funds.

Image from FM 3-12 Cyberspace and Electronic Warfare Operations

Mainly, I am bothered by the children that they can essentially mind control to do whatever they wish. This is a sick form of pedophilia, and these soldiers are criminals. The amount of people under the treasonous Cyber and Electromagnetic Warfare will continue to increase. Thus, more citizens will become human experiment test subjects without consent.

Neuroweapons kill US Veterans at a staggering amount daily. These programs are murdering good people as they come back from war. We must join together and support Targeted Individuals notifying Congressional Representatives. We can also fight back by filing FOIA Requests for the US Army’s PEO STRI program, alerting Inspector General offices, and Civil Liberties offices everywhere.

Image from http://paintbottle.com/brave-new-world-movie.html

We must not turn a blind eye to our enslavement. No matter who is in political office or where you are, you will not have free will to go and choose what you want in life. Our children deserve their innocence and freedom. America’s children deserve protection even if you choose to be complacent, what about the children of our nation and the entire world? Please, if you do not understand the technologies, try to, for our nation is at stake in a major way.

We must always remember what Thomas Jefferson stated, “Does the government fear us? Or do we fear the government? When the people fear the government tyranny has found victory. The federal government is our servant and not our master!”

Karen Rex describes herself as a Targeted Individual and former Security Operations Manager and contractor with Lockheed Martin.  An Accountant & Business Information Associate with degrees from De Anza College in Silicon Valley, Karen has 15 years’ experience as Construction Financial Controller and Software Migration Engineer in the Bay Area.  A whistle-blower of Cyber Espionage in 2015, she is currently a Whistle-blower of the Targeted Individual Program being run by the US Army.

RELATED:

New Security Operations Lockheed Whistleblower Reveals National Security Violations, Treason, and Public Safety Endangerment via Electronic Weapons Simulation & Experimentation Programs from Orlando US Army Base

Newsbreak 38: NSA Whistleblower Karen Stewart Recommends Informing Judge Trenga Further on the Unconstitutionality of the Terrorist Watchlist/

Once Again, A Memo to President Trump: Massive Surveillance State Abuses | Treason on the Ground, in the USA: Public-Private Partners in Targeted Killing of Americans

Many thanks to Karen Rex for her article and information on unlawful targeting operations and disclosure as related to Remote Neural Monitoring Terrorism activities from an US Army base, as reported by late US Army Ranger Justin Pitts, and the broad framework of Cyberwarfare and Electronic Warfare operations within which they are putatively conducted. Many thanks also to Justin Pitts for his many commendable efforts to report these crimes to both government agencies and the public–Rest in Power, Justin. Many thanks to Nexx Level for conducting that video interview with Karen and Justin at an important time. This article will be followed up soon with further discussion and analysis, including focus on related targeting technologies reported by those targeted as well as by government and military whistleblowers.

–Ramola D

New Security Operations Lockheed Whistleblower Reveals National Security Violations, Treason, and Public Safety Endangerment via Electronic Weapons Simulation & Experimentation Programs from Orlando US Army Base

Ramola D/Posted 9/16/2019

A former Security Operations manager and Lockheed contractor has stepped forward to whistleblow on national security violations, treason against American citizens, and hazards to public safety engendered by abusive Electronic Warfare weaponry use on targeted Americans by a US Army operation named Program Executive Office Simulation, Training, and Instrumentation (PEO)(STRI) operating out of an Army base in Orlando, Florida.

PROGRAM EXECUTIVE OFFICE SIMULATION, TRAINING AND INSTRUMENTATION | http://www.ndia-cfl.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/NDIA-Briefing-No-Notes_23-May.pdf

Working currently on sending FOIA requests and letters of information to various offices such as the OIG and ODNI as well as civil liberties organizations, Cyber Reconnaisance (Karen) wrote recently to the Pentagon Security Clearance Review team, requesting that the military base be reviewed for violations of security clearance and national security (letter below).

“ They are committing treason, human trafficking, murder, cyber espionage, and violating children’s online privacy act (COPPA).  The other violations are abuse of authority, gross mismanagement, gross waste of funds, and putting national security at risk. 

These soldiers are targeting US citizens including children on US soil.  These crimes use electronic warfare, electronic harassment, EMF non-lethal weapons, and microwave acoustic weapons to target US citizens on US soil.”

The base itself had been identified by late US Army Ranger Justin Pitts, a friend of Karen’s who had reported that he was told as much by soldiers who worked there.

“The soldiers there have been located by violating their security clearance and alerting citizens they are using for experimentation who they are and where they are.”

Justin Pitts had made efforts to report violations of security clearance and abusive experimentation on Americans, going up the chain of command as per his Army training.

“Justin made a complaint to the US Army Special Operations, Military Police, Oconee County South Carolina Sheriffs Department, FBI, Pentagon, NSA, NATO, UN, and presidential correspondence.  He warned all appropriate parties going up the correct chain of command for the US Army and the intelligence agencies.”

His death one month later, in December 2018, was reported as a suicide, but those today being targeted with radio frequency weapons know that neural and emotion manipulation can be achieved with this neuroweaponry and may have been responsible, as Karen surmises. (More needs to be investigated here.)

PROGRAM EXECUTIVE OFFICE SIMULATION, TRAINING AND INSTRUMENTATION | http://www.ndia-cfl.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/NDIA-Briefing-No-Notes_23-May.pdf

Aware that national security is being violated and public safety endangered by the use of these weapons and trafficking operations on citizens and their children, Karen is seeking to expose these crimes, and alerting military and Intelligence authorities of the great harm to Americans.

Illicit Military Experimentation and Weapons-Tests Targets Individuals

One more piece in the puzzle regarding illicit, non-consensual human experimentation and weapons-testing by Military/Intelligence divisions and agencies with the stealth weapons of Electronic Warfare, which was recently highlighted in this second Memorandum to President Trump by this writer, and endorsed by NSA whistleblower Karen Stewart, this story will be further investigated at Ramola D Reports shortly.

US military and federal security clearance reviews were shifted to the Department of Defense last year from the Office of Personnel Management apparently after Edward Snowden and Chelsea/Bradley Manning’s disclosures of classified documents prompted interest in periodic criminal and financial background checks of cleared personnel and backlogs of 700, 000 applications were noticed, according to the Associated Press.

Karen’s letter to the Pentagon is below. Many thanks to Cyber Reconnaisance (Karen) for disclosing this matter and stepping forward to whistleblow on these crimes against humanity and Americans.

***

Dear Security Clearance Review Team,

I am a former Security operations manager that worked with Lockheed Martin in Sunnyvale, CA.  It has come to my attention that the US Army base located at 12211 Science Drive, Orlando, FL 32826 is abusing the security clearance system and violating national security.  My friend and US Army Ranger, Justin Pitts, was murdered in Newry, SC by the soldiers that told them they worked in Orlando, FL in December of 2018.  This base operation named Program Executive Office Simulation, Training, and Instrumentation  (PEO) (STRI) is a substantial and specific danger to public health and safety.  

The soldiers there have been located by violating their security clearance and alerting citizens they are using for experimentation who they are and where they are.  I am requesting that this base have it’s current programs reviewed for security clearance and national security violations.  They are committing treason, human trafficking, murder, cyber espionage, and violating children’s online privacy act (COPPA).  The other violations are abuse of authority, gross mismanagement, gross waste of funds, and putting national security at risk. 

These soldiers are targeting US citizens including children on US soil.  These crimes use electronic warfare, electronic harassment, EMF non-lethal weapons, and microwave acoustic weapons to target US citizens on US soil.  If we do not expose this immediately my fear is that more US citizens will be exposed and possibly used as human experiment test subjects against their will.  Please, investigate these programs and help stop them from committing violations against our National Security and abuse to security clearance system.   

National security is at stake if no one exposes these new cyber, neurological, and microwave acoustic non-lethal weapons that are currently being used on US soil.  Justin made a complaint to the US Army Special Operations, Military Police, Oconee County South Carolina Sheriffs Department, FBI, Pentagon, NSA, NATO, UN, and presidential correspondence.  He warned all appropriate parties going up the correct chain of command for the US Army and the intelligence agencies. Please, review all documentation regarding Justin’s complaints against this base and its soldiers. 

I worked in Silicon Valley and ruined my career trying to expose these crimes.  I would be happy to give you any other additional information you need to help you in your investigation.  I have video, audio, and other documentation.  I have sent a FOIA request on the US Army base and the PEO STRI.  

I fear that the request will not reach the US Army FOIA office in Ft. Belvior, VA due to my computer web security being totally compromised.  

I would like to help in anyway possible due to the fact that Justin is dead.  I am making FOIA requests, and notifying the Inspector Generals and civil liberties offices trying to expose these crimes myself.  

Your time and attention is greatly needed to address the national security violations and abuse to the security clearance system.

Thank you,

Cyber Reconnaissance (Karen)