Monthly Archives: November 2020

Ramola D | Report | Nov 4, 2020

In the first of a series of News Panels exposing rampant crime, corruption, and fraud in the UK Family Courts and Bankruptcy Courts, several UK mothers of varying socio-economic strata came together recently to discuss the bankruptcies, destitution, loss of custody, and theft of children they have suffered at the hands of the UK Family Courts and Bankruptcy Courts.

What emerges from this discussion is that the criminal actions of highly-placed barristers, solicitors, judges, accountants and financiers appear to be interlinked (via secret-society handshakes and brownpaper-envelope-bribes) and appear to be maliciously focused on targeting women in a vulnerable life-situation: wives and mothers recently divorced or bereaved, depriving them wholesale of all assets, estates, and hard-earned wealth, while shamelessly running abduction schemes in broad daylight to steal, traumatize, often disappear or dubiously farm-out-to-foster-care, force-adopt, and sex-traffick their children.

This situation points to systemic and entrenched corruption, driven by lucrative rewards for participants—not dissimilar to blatant highway robbery or piracy on the high seas, where each thuggish minion gets a share of the bounty.

The only difference today is these are white-collar professionals with a salary, prestigious title, and deceptive badge of authority. Social workers, law enforcement, and psychologists partake in these management-driven “Child Protective Services” crimes, as many police and social worker whistleblowers have revealed, including Carol Woods, Jon Wedger, Melanie Shaw, and others.

Social Workers, Psychologists, Police Become Accomplices to Crime

The tragedy also is that possibly upright and well-meaning social workers, policemen, psychologists associated with the Family Courts then get caught up in the tide of what can only be called outright crime, and end up as accomplices to crime, assisting this now-derelict and cynical system in removing children from good, caring homes and callously ripping babies from the arms of loving, caring mothers.

British mothers in fact are being targeted on a large scale for victimization, often subjected to extreme trauma in removal of their children, refusal of custody, and worse: actual physical assault at the hands of police, wrongful psychological profiling and misdiagnosing by court psychologists for purposes of criminalizing and stigmatizing good mothers and stealing their children.

Children too, all over the United Kingdom are being traumatized. “It’s absolutely devastating the effect it has on the children,” says Michelle Young, “it’s absolutely the whole court system. The family court system is not fit for purpose. They are ignoring the law and they are ignoring the evidence.”

SECRET FAMILY COURTS AND INSOLVENCY COURTS SO DYSFUNCTIONAL THEY NEED TO BE ABOLISHED

The failures of the court system, in particular the secret family courts and the insolvency courts are so extreme at this point that what really needs to be done is to abolish them completely, suggests Michelle, who reports hers was “the biggest case in British divorce history” and involved the loss of millions of pounds in solicitor fees, being forced into bankruptcy, and the loss of her estates succeeding her divorce from billionaire Scot Young, whose connections with Russian oligarchs who also met tragic ends have been reported following his tragic death in suspicious circumstances. The story was covered in British mainstream media, including in The Tatler: Did Scot Young and his high-rolling friends really die by their own hands?

Intelligence UK News notes that the bankruptcy Michelle was forced into was engineered and the assets disappeared, all by sleight of hand of high-rolling insolvency lawyers. “Ms Young was awarded a mere £26.6 million out of the vast estate, plus half of the value of the assets of Mr Young’s estate recovered by the bankruptcy trustees. The problem is, none of those assets were ever recovered, they appeared to “disappear” without a trace. Ms Young was very soon stripped of her judgment debt, a case of giving with one hand and taking back with another.” Michelle Young / Scot Young grand corruption and insolvency fraud 

Even more terrifying is the systemic stealing of children from mothers and divorced wives.

The either-complicit or indoctrinated social workers who take children from good homes on the flimsy basis of a report from a vengeful ex – and then disappear them, whether into foster homes or sex-trafficking (as many police whistleblowers have alerted lately) – will apparently say anything to stop mothers from being able to get their children back.

Maria, a mother whose 2 year old boy and 10 year old girl were snatched from their beds when in the safe house of their grandmother by police and social workers (videos on Facebook) was told she was never getting her children back because “of the chance of her getting into a new abusive relationship with a man in her future,” a baseless, absurd projection which no social worker or government agency should be permitted to make, given the enormous loss of child and family it then permits.

Worse, this loving mother, whose troubles started after her ex-husband began calling CPS and reporting lies. was glibly characterized by venal social workers as a violent criminal, beaten in jail by police to the extent that her ribs were broken, a new baby removed at birth, and ambushed by a posse of police in 10 squad cars on the occasion her kidnapped daughter ran out of school back to her home and mother close-by.

Flagrant Deception and Clear Subjugation of Women in UK as Beefy Police (Mis)characterize Women as Violent Aggressors in Order to Steal Their Children

In addition to concocting stories and false-allegations, UK police and social workers it seems frequently characterize mothers as violent–Maria’s experience like many others indicates that social workers will lie freely–and engage in serious intimidation which includes violence against them. Maria reports that her ribs were broken by police, that she was beaten by police, that she was accused of aggression and obstruction by police when she simply spoke up and used her voice. How is a petite woman with a voice (whose children are being kidnapped and who must necessarily speak) considered violent and aggressive by a group of brawny policemen and women equipped with tasers, handcuffs, and pistols who engage in brutal acts of violence against women–except as a matter of flagrant deception?

Parental Responsibility and Residency Rights Handed to Abusive Ex-Husbands & Partners

Conversely, many mothers report that their children are handed right back to the abuser in the family. Women often lose custody, losing both residency-rights for their children and “parental responsibility” although they are proven to be good and responsible mothers. Why are children being handed back to abusers? Libby, an academic whose case is particularly shocking reveals that her ex-wife was given full custody and parental responsibility for her three year old (now seven) even though she herself was the breadwinner and biological mother.

Libby reports that she took loans to pay the legal fees for barristers, continually appealed earlier court decisions, yet was compelled to do a psychological evaluation (with a psychologist Hessell Willemson who featured in other ladies’ cases as well on the panel, and who has been reported as not being fit for purpose) which accused her of a “borderline personality disorder” and restricted her visits with her child to two hours every other week, which she is once more appealing–while her ex aggressively “drove her nanny off the road, kidnapped the child” and absconded to Greece, her native country, yet has been permitted to keep the child–who seems to have been the victim here of targeted trauma.

Racketeering in Litigation Loan Funding by Solicitors and Loan Companies

Michelle Young makes the remark that “What will happen is they will run Libby until she’s got no money left,” a prediction agreed to by the other women on the panel. Rosie Heys who said she “ended up with a legal bill of half a million pounds that amounted to over a third of the marital assets” points out that solicitors and loan firms never stop milking their clients for funds.

Rosie Heys

Not merely are women’s savings fully exploited, as Rosie points out, during a time of desperate stress in a woman’s life, the family home is also put at risk by these practices of mortgage fraud which put money directly into solicitors’ pockets. Further, solicitors moonlight as judges in the family courts, as in Rosie’s case where a senior partner at Paine Hicks Beach also sashayed as Judge, a situation of clear judicial fraud which permits exploitative recycling of faulty judgments and fresh funds back to the less-than-adequate solicitors who don’t win cases for their clients. Judges are not regulated independently, notes Michelle, and that’s a big problem. Nor, notes Libby, are social workers and CAFCASS workers–the Law Society, notes Michelle Young, seems to be a Lawless Society and the SRA (Solicitors’ Regulation Authority) does nothing; the whole system is rigged to empower solicitors, judges, social workers, and police to engage in white-collar brigandry at the expense of divorcing wives and traumatized mothers. Not to mention causing infinite trauma for those who suffer most as home, family, and mother are ripped from them: the children.

Reporting a similar case of coerced litigation loan funding (which she reports the family did not need), Shelley also reports being targeted for slander, stalking, and stigmatizing via false labels from the same psychologist Libby has mentioned, Hessel Williamson, while her ex obtained Occupancy of her home (major share of which had actually been awarded by the court to her in equity), and then also obtained Residency rights for her children. Losing custody of her children, she reports not being able to communicate with them and not having seen them for a year.

Shelley

Rosie Heys points out that so much hinged on the fraudulent diagnoses of Dr. Hessel Willemson, who had been foisted on Shelley and the other women as a matter of prescription not choice by the court; in Shelley’s case he appeared to have cut-and-pasted text on a diagnosis used in another patient’s case, one which had the serious repercussions of greatly limiting her time spent with the children, to their own detriment, particularly since they all wanted to live with her.

“The harm to the children as a result is just beyond imagination,” says Rosie Heys.

Audrey’s story of being forced to see a court-appointed psychologist, the same infamous Dutch doctor, Hessel Willemsen, who removed custody for her children from her, handing it over to her ex, a man found provably abusive to the children, has the same overtones of misogynistic denial of the mother’s rights.

Audrey

Systemic Injustice, Old Boys’ Clubs, Social Circles, & Stealing Children: Is There Remedy?

“What we all have in common,” notes Shelley, “is obviously most of us no longer have custody of our children, number two we’ve all been asset stripped, number three is financially abused, and number four we’ve been left desolate and homeless.” All through the process as well, the women have been traumatized and left unsupported.

“That’s the main reason, ” says Michelle, “because it’s not just these ladies I’ve brought on the call today, and believe you me this is systemic, as I said we’re working on the frauds across the country and this is the majority– I’m sorry to say, the majority of the judges are unlawfully practicing in those courts and with everything they are doing, the majority of them need removing. I think we should go back, stop the usury of all these law firms and go back to common law which is not usury, which is the people’s law.”

Problems abound it appears, that are glossed over and entrenched: the psychologists foisted on women through courts and solicitors are not qualified, many of them, and seem to have connections with the solicitors and ex-husbands, always favoring the latter. Solicitors and financiers party together, along with the judges who play solicitor and family court judge both, sometimes, in the same social circles, which cements the racketeering bonds they forge together, it appears.

Fraternities, secret societies, old boys’ clubs, Freemason oaths and networked power syndicates have a lot to do with it, Bibi Bacchus, UCC code expert explains in Report #203, when some of the group reconvened to discuss solutions and remedies, after News Panels 2, 3, and 4 examining networked crime and the parts played by police, bankers, and solicitors were aired. “Women need to organize, to learn the law, to get back the Birth Certificates for their children, and to support other women in court.”

Stealing children for adoptions is big business, apparently. Forced adoptions bring 30,000 pounds for each child to Social Services, which gives them the twisted incentive to steal children from good homes, as Maria’s case demonstrates. The spectre of child trafficking into prostitution, of ritual abuse and gory, murderous use for Satanic practice is today a macabre reality that no-one can deny, given the amount of whistleblowing on this subject and continuous surfacing of information we have seen in recent times. Women need to rise up together to stop these crimes, suggests Bibi. When you know the law in certainty–UCC law or contract law, under Maritime or Admiralty Law–and take action to protect yourself and your family based on it, no-one can touch you.

Is it possible for all these disenfranchised women to retrieve their children, their assets, their homes? Yes, says Bibi Bacchus.

Listen in to Report # 203, News Panel 5 for more:

RELATED

News Panel 2

News Panel 3

News Panel 4