Monthly Archives: October 2023

Less Than Lethal (LTL) Technical Security Systems (TSS)–Acoustic, Radio Frequency–Sought by the Department of State for “Protection” of Diplomatic Mission Compounds

RAE (Report Analysis Op-Ed) | Ramola D | October 29, 2023/Updated November 2, 2023

Compound defense systems aiming to employ “Less than Lethal” technologies to secure the compounds of diplomatic missions worldwide are being sought in a new call for proposals by the US Department of State, citing international threats to diplomats.

“Systems of interest include, but are not limited to acoustic, radio frequency (RF) energy, static energy, chemical, pressurized water, food-grade irritant, laser, fog, foam, and others not identified herein.”

Less Than Lethal (LTL) Technical Security Systems (TSS) – Product and/or Engineering Services/Contract Opportunity/

Less than Lethal technologies inclusive of Acoustic Neurotechnologies, Radio Frequency (RF) Millimeter wave, infra-red, and magnetic surveillance and metal detection systems have been acknowledged by DARPA and the National Institute of Justice to have been developed and tested in the United States of America, overtly or acknowledgedly from 1994, according to declassified document reports released by DARPA in 2018 including this one, covered here earlier:

Documentary Evidence of Covert Electronic-Weapon and Neurotechnology Use By US Government on Americans Series (2) The Limited Effects Technology (LET) Program Report | JPSG, OOTW/LE Programs, 1996

These are counter-personnel technologies, specially aimed at people.

They are also the very kinds of technologies avidly denied by the CIA, mainstream media, and Intelligence agencies worldwide, all rushing to name reporters of such technology-use on them “mentally ill.”

Kept secret for many years, rolled surreptitiously into police arsenals worldwide, tested by NATO and the US Army, Navy, Air Force, Marine Corps, in numerous weapons-testing programs which mainstream media just forgot to cover, and surfaced continuously here, including here and here, “Less than Lethals” are apparently now being nudged as extant into plain view by strategists and arms manufacturers revolved-well-into the US Government via publication of contract opportunities such as this, as if desirable, and necessary. Where is the Human Rights arm of the Department of State or GAO or the Pentagon to keep such contract opportunities in check?

Is the Bureau of Diplomatic Security the Global FBI?

(To Be Further Investigated)

The “Bureau of Diplomatic Security,” a police arm of the Department of State reportedly responsible for the protection of 275 State Department missions, is keen to “detect and mitigate terrorist threats to American lives and facilities” and is now “developing innovations in security training, cyber security, and physical security engineering.”

Checking the Department of State website briefly, one finds the US Govt has become the British Empire by stealth and is sending missions to UN and NATO bodies, all corporations, in regions apparently formed by the Club of Rome and Bilderbergers’ Agenda 21 UN in inexplicably intricate ways involving Mens-Club Diplomatic mayhem:

DOS Facilities and Areas of Jurisdiction

[Screenshotting stopped by obvious Cyberhacking–possibly Data Interception from a British Bureau zooming up and down outside.]

(All emphases below in quotes mine)

“As the law enforcement and security arm of the U.S. Department of State, the Bureau of Diplomatic Security (DS) is responsible for providing a safe and secure environment for the conduct of U.S. foreign policy.  DS is the most widely represented U.S. law enforcement and security organization in the world protecting people, property, and information at 275 DOS missions around the globe.  Every U.S. diplomatic mission operates under a security program designed and maintained by DS.  To achieve its mission, DS is a leader in detecting and mitigating terrorist threats to American lives and facilities, mounting international investigations, and developing innovations in security training, cyber security, and physical security engineering. 

To promote the safe conduct of U.S. diplomacy, the Directorate of Security Technology (DS/ST) deploys agile TSSs to match emerging threats.  ST employs courageous professionals and insightful leadership to accomplish this mission at operating locations worldwide.  The Office of Facility Security Engineering (DS/ST/FSE) develops, supplies, installs, and maintains TSSs to help ensure a safe and secure environment.”

—-Less Than Lethal (LTL) Technical Security Systems (TSS) – Product and/or Engineering Services/Contract Opportunity/

Disappearing Testing Operations While Revealing Them

It appears therefore that the long Cover race to simply roll these electromagnetic, acoustic, and other named-as-less-than-lethal weapons systems into use bypassing the requisite public comment and review process and not quite discussing the pros and cons and in fact inhumane aspects of using Radio Frequency technology on people’s bodies–ignoring the numerous reports of absolute torture, cruelty-in-use, abusive and inhumane effects (masked in Air Force, Navy, Army language neutrally as “bio-effects”) from all scientists, whistleblowers, journalists, authors, physicians, everyday reporters of this weapon-use on their bodies, disappeared as “Targeted Individuals” [a CIA-CFR term for Acceptable Pariahs in Democratic but Secretly Communist-Nazi States probably invented by Machiavellian Psychiatrists-playing-Pharaonic-Prison-Guard (Knighted by the Pope and Venetian Black Nobility both)]–has resumed.

“The current international environment presents significant challenges for the conduct of U.S. diplomacy abroad with terrorist attacks and civil unrest directed at U.S. diplomatic facilities even in friendly countries.  Moreover, DOS increasingly finds itself conducting diplomatic missions not only in combat zones supported by the U.S. military, but also in failed states where terrorism is an ever-present fact of life.   

To defend its compounds against intruders and other unauthorized activities, the DOS employs a tiered system of physical, technical, and personnel security measures.  The tiers start outside the perimeter walls and end within the secured spaces of the compound, with each tier adding to the overall defense.  Some of the security measures are intended to deter, detect, and delay perpetrators of hostile or clandestine acts, and to provide notification and response time for security personnel; others are intended to suppress or disable potential attacks.

Scope of Services: A future potential contract is expected to encompass companies with subject matter expertise in LTL compound defense systems, and in identifying commercially available systems and components; also, emerging technologies that meet crowd control and deterrence requirements

LTL Compound Defense Systems:  DS currently employs several legacy LTL compound defense systems.   TDB requires identification of new and/or emerging LTL technologies that may, or may not, be presently commercially available.  These technologies should offer improved performance and new/enhanced capabilities to meet DS’s LTL requirements. 

Respondents are encouraged to respond to individual system categories.  It is important to note that a respondent does not need to have a solution for every system category mentioned in order to submit a response.

If a requirement cannot be met in full, the respondent shall state as to what extent a particular requirement can be met.

TDB is not interested in fences, walls, barriers, or turnstiles as part of this RFI/SS.

Systems shall not use an explosive charge to deploy irritants.

Systems of interest include, but are not limited to acoustic, radio frequency (RF) energy, static energy, chemical, pressurized water, food-grade irritant, laser, fog, foam, and others not identified herein.”

Less Than Lethal (LTL) Technical Security Systems (TSS) – Product and/or Engineering Services/Contract Opportunity/

“Others not identified herein” as well as the languid construction of this sentence, typical of much militaryspeak, suggests possibly ledgersful of undisclosed patents and systems. Over 5000, by Paul Baird’s estimates from a couple decades ago, as noted in his website, possibly double to triple that now. “Such is the extent of US National Security law that over 5,000 classified devices are currently covered by the US Inventions Secrecy Act.”–Paul Baird/Surveillance Issues: Covert Oppression Using Classified Technologies

[Others have been disclosed, patents for stealth neurotechnologies like methods for altering consciousness exist, corroborating reports from the field of their use, but because what appears still to be called The Press doesn’t cover any of it, they are neither known nor tracked; as a consequence, the industry has expanded.]

Systems of Interest Intending Further Expansion of Dubious Military Tech into Daily Commerce

“Food-grade Irritants”: Does this imply Slight Poisons exist, and are acceptable, as “Diplomat/ic mission defense?”

“Static Energy”: Might this refer to Standing Waves/ELFs necessary for scalar radar transmissions, and acoustic spy technologies such as Synthetic Telepathy using AI neural network mapping?

“Chemical, Laser, Fog”: Possibly aerosol-induced, large scale DE-run?

Clearly, a whole industry exists now, as “commercially available systems” imply, and a whole new generation of continued expansion, development, and further weapons-testing of these so-called Less Than Lethals is being planned here, as also by the intended DETER efforts reported here, all apparently to protect Diplomats–the sons and daughters of fabled bloodline AristoCats steepling fingers as they stumble out of Cobalt 3-2-2 coffins in Yale and Princeton dorms and reach for virgin bloody-marys to return to their Cover lives of covering up Daddy’s daily LTL, NLW, IFC Crime against the citizenry, perhaps?

November 2, 2023/Note: The DOS Less Than Lethal Defensive System Requirements Matrix document provided as an attachment to the published Less than Lethal contract opportunity announcement was repeatedly frozen out as I sought to access and examine it for commentary and possible posting here the day of publishing this article. What this document confirms is that Less than Lethal systems have now reached the level of COTS–Commercial Off the Shelf–systems, they are intended to be electrical and electromagnetic in nature, they have a software component, they are required to be installable outdoors as well as indoors, employ concealment for “low visual impact” and clearly are weapons systems intended to impact the human body.

These are Human Control Weapons Which Need to Be Stopped

“Less than Lethal” weapons as “Non Lethal Weapons” as “Intermediate Force Capabilities” as “Counter Personnel Directed Energy Weapons,” all Cover for Neuroweapons, Nerve Weapons, Microwave Weapons, Acoustic Neuroweapons, Radar Guns, and Conducted Energy Police Weapons–now extending further into Public Safety, Public Health, “First Responder” EMS, Homeland Security, and “Behavioral Health” vibrational and pulse-wave technologies, all for Behavior Modification–have been and continue to be used in acts of terrorism against the citizenry in the name of “counter-terrorism” in “Operations Other Than War” as the famed but unrevealing Reno-Deutch memo from 1994 implicating both the DoD and the DOJ has documentedly permitted.

This essentially means we are being Warred-On, and have been, for a long time. People occupying elitist niches they’ve reserved for themselves alone [“Thinking belongs to Us Alone”] need to start speaking out about this invisible Human Control Electromagnetic Radiation and Sound Weaponry in every arena of their conceptualization, development, manufacture, testing, and operations. [Weaponry I’ve been cautioned against speaking about for a decade (of speaking) now, by those clearly inside this rigged power game–and yes, as an unfortunate First-Line Trench Cowerer here, I’ve been pulse-struck with neuroweapons and energy weapons as I write.]

The full solicitation posted on October 23, 2023 may be found here.


“DETER” on Industry Day: Directed Energy Technology Experimentation Research (DETER) Advanced Research Announced on October 19, 2023: The Techno Arc from Targeting Tech to 5G/Smart City/HAARP Tech in Visions of Large-Scale Human & Earth Control (For Humanity to DETER)

Brief RAE (Report, Analysis, Op-Ed) | Ramola D | October 24, 2023

An ‘Industry Day’ to surface and share information and intention on “Directed Energy Technology Experimentation Research” aimed at both building infrastructure, small and large systems, devices, and extension of industry into a future for “next-generation and innovative technologies” in numerous fields including, it seems, Public Health, Public Safety and “integration of disparate technologies for the fielding of new HPEM systems and weapons” was announced for October 19, 2023, as reported by a Notice posted at here.  


The Techno Arc from Targeting Tech to 5G/Smart City/HAARP Tech

Little known to many, continuing to be exposed at this media site and magazine, the many secretive control technologies used en masse or individually in “targeting” which turn out to be 5G/wifi, aerosols, nanotechnologies, vaccines along with sensors, space telemetry, large-scale weather events as run by HAARP, DEWs, radar, are being streamed it seems through ventures such as this into larger use, particularly through Health and Safety, Behavioral Health, Smart City control-tech.

DETER for Deterrence (Cold War Echoes) Which Suggests Counter-Terrorism and Public Safety–or Possibly Also “Homeland Security” and “Corrections” in Extended Criminal Justice/MK ULTRA Maneuvers to Include all “Communities”

“The Air Force Research Laboratory (AFRL), Directed Energy Directorate (RD), will host a hybrid Industry Day on 19 October 2023. This event will provide an overview of the DETER ARA (FA9451-21-S-0001) and the TACTICAL BAA (FA9451-24-S-0001) which will support AFRL/RD in its mission to equip the warfighter with next-generation technologies, innovative solutions, and advanced research and development concepts for directed energy investments.”

Industry Day: Directed Energy Technology Experimentation Research (DETER) Advanced Research Announcement (ARA) Open Announcement/Sam.Gov/GSA

Further information on this Industry Day on October 19, 2023, not dissimilar to the classified Los Alamos Non Lethal Defense Conference days (16th-17th November) in 1993, preceding the 1994 DOD-DOJ (and probably CIA) MOU covered here earlier and in itself heralding a new era of remote-access human control and secretive city and weather control (all yet to be Deterred by humanity), will no doubt be released by the US Department of Defense (in its charge to Deter One World Offense) shortly, perhaps on this writer’s FOIA request as well.

DETERring Awakenings, Consciousness, Human Potential via Nano-Neuro-Bio-Brain-Weather-Control?

A new 2021 DEW contract by the same acronym DETER, sounding quite a bit like the 2013 DEBR–Directed Energy Bio-Behavioral/Bioeffects Research basic contract covering a lot of bases being examined here–has been recently updated, in April 2023.

Directed Energy Technology Experimentation Research (DETER) Advanced Research Announcement (ARA) Open Announcement

This Directed Energy Technology Experimentation Research contract–with this rather intentionally explicit acronym DETER–appears to wish to herald another new era of extended Directed Energy weapons and systems testing, research, and operations in the realm of “next-generation” and “innovative” technologies on humans, regions, populations, infrastructure.

A Two-Step process, this announcement signals AFRL’s interest in receiving white papers and proposals first. Systems and supplies for laboratory research and field trials are mentioned. Experimental Development, buildouts of machinery and DE (directed energy) “source components” to include rather dubiously phrased “supplies for laboratory research and experimentation and field trials” appear to rather blandly indicate continued and extended use and unacceptable abuse of Directed Energy “technologies”–graduated from Weaponry–on animal and human populations. Seemingly compendious, more detail in description perhaps in an RFP (request for proposal) might be needed to get some deeper insight into precisely what this very large research announcement is really aiming at.

Excerpt, DETER Open Announcement (emphases mine below):

“Program Summary:
This is an Open ARA announcement pursuant to the authority of 10 U.S.C. §2373.  AFRL/RD is interested in receiving white papers and proposals through a Two-Step Process to perform research and development (R&D), modeling and simulation (M&S), design, component/subsystem, prototype risk reduction, fabrication/purchase, assembly, integration, and testing of directed energy source components (to include spares and alternate component technologies), and/or systems and any required accessories, materials, and supplies for laboratory research and experimentation and field trials in a relevant environment to demonstrate system capabilities.  Dialogue between prospective Offerors and Government representatives is strongly encouraged. *Note: AFRL/RD reserves the right to collapse a white paper/Two-Step into a One-Step if the situation warrants the white paper contains sufficient technical detail to do full technical proposal evaluation instead of white paper evaluation.

*Please see the attached DETER Industry User Guide for guidance on definitions, processes, submission requirements and evaluation criteria.*

Background:  AFRL/RD equips the joint warfighter with next-generation technologies, advanced concepts, and weapon system options across all operational domains to become more agile and increase the commercialization potential of directed energy investments to ensure the National defense.  

This solicitation intends to use acquisition authorities provided by 10 U.S.C. §2373. This authority applies to acquisition of items related to “…ordnance, signal, chemical activity, transportation, energy, medical, space-flight, and aeronautical supplies, including parts and accessories, and designs thereof, that are necessary for experimental or test purposes in the development of the best supplies that are needed for the national defense.  Consequently, white papers and proposals should address how the proposed effort provides benefits to the national defense and a strategy for verifying those intended benefits.

The proposed solutions should be innovative and substantially improve national defense capabilities across the domains of directed energy.  While the Government describes discrete topic areas below, it also anticipates that certain comprehensive technology solutions and prototypes may require multidiscipline approaches that address two or more topic areas.  The topic areas are covered under this announcement, which may be used in any combination.  The Government reserves the right to add, delete or modify the topic areas as necessary.”


Experimentation and Field Trials, Wargaming, Simulation, Biosafety and Bioeffects

Looking closer at the language in the announcement of this solicitation, it becomes evident that a next generation of experimental technologies is being solicited with “prototype risk reduction”, redesign and refurbishment of existing systems, as well as new weapon systems of different kinds all intending rather large-scale control, some of human bodies, systems, space objects, platforms.

Topic Areas include Directed Energy Weapon Systems, System Biosafety and Biological Effects, Wargaming, Precision Tracking as in “Acquisition Tracking Pointing”, Beam Control and Atmospheric Compensation systems to “control the propagation of directed energy so as to maximize energy/irradiance on target.”

Excerpt from DETER Open Announcement:

Clearly a solicitation to watch further, and follow, the persistence of Directed Energy Technologies mention of which here includes Bioeffects, Biosafety, Detection, Targeting, and Tracking, Acquisition, Targeting, and Pointing, Beam Control, Atmosphere Compensation systems, sensor integration (optical, radar, passive radiofrequency), satellite signatures, and much else, in itself indicates the continuing need for all to stay very closely focused on what these precision energy technologies are doing, how they are being used on humans, brains, earth and weather, and why it’s vital to hold on to our autonomy, our intelligence, our human rights, and our humanity as we keep moving forward into True Awakenings of consciousness in this, one hopes, (will become) our Truly Human Twenty-First Century.


Declassified US Air Force Directed Energy Bio-Behavioral Research (DEBR) Contracts Reveal Weapons-Testing on Humans Using Counter-Personnel Radio Frequency High Power Microwave (RF HPM) Weapons

Claiming Human Rights Protections on US Air Force Directed Energy Bio-Behavioral Research RF HPM Weapons-Testing Contracts

HIGH POWER MICROWAVE WEAPONS: DISRUPTIVE TECHNOLOGY FOR THE FUTURE, 2020, Major Jack McGonegal, USAF | Re-post & Note | September 28, 2023

Wildfires, Directed Energy Weapons, Smart City Health & Controlling Humans

Directed Energy Futures 2060, US Air Force | Report & Op-Ed, September 1, 2023: Counter-Personnel DEWs Need Halting for Open Full-Spectrum Ethics Review

Narration and Account of Occurrences on October 19, 2023 related to Unlawful Attempts at Legal Guardianship Civil Committal and Forced Medicating of Ramola D, Writer and Journalist | October 20, 2023

Report | Ramola D | October 20, 2023

Posting, for the record:

Narration and Account of Occurrences on October 19, 2023 related to Unlawful Attempts at Legal Guardianship Civil Committal and Forced Medicating of Ramola D, Writer and Journalist | October 20, 2023

Yesterday, Thursday, around midday, when I was upstairs, I heard the doorbell ring and went down to see who it was. I witnessed the backs of two strangers’ heads on the front porch as I looked out through the front dining-room window, which had both curtains pulled aside, the sheer and the brocade. I did not know nor recognize either. Given the unlawful forced-kidnappings I have been subjected to twice over the last year and the subsequent assassination attempts and grave physical abuse with remote-access vibrational electromagnetic technologies as well as abusive forced-drugging I have experienced since that time—that is, since April 19, 2022 on day of “discharge” from the unlawful site of my first captivity, Steward Carney Hospital, and December 29, 2022 on day of “discharge” from the unlawful site of my second captivity, Emerson I, Bournewood Hospital—I wondered if these two strangers, who looked well dressed, the man in a powder-blue suit and the woman in a black blazer, were connected with the Boston and South Shore psychiatric brigade I had met on both forced kidnaps, and decided it would be best to retreat. I therefore retreated to the family den in the back and thence the bathroom in back and sat down to take a breath. Unfortunately (for these strangers), the doorbell-ringing resumed, accompanied by door-banging. I walked out of the bathroom and looked out at the front porch—the woman’s head was in the window. She beckoned me over, and, given that she clearly needed to be asked to leave, and I couldn’t exactly pretend I wasn’t home anymore, I came up to the dining-room and to the window to tell her to go away, or rather, to find out what she wanted to say—just in case she was someone innocuous, like a vendor or marketer.

“Can I speak to you” she said.

“Who are you” I said.

“I’m Virginia” she said, as if I should Know Virginia.

“I don’t know you” I said.

“I’m Virginia Connolly,” she said, “I’m an attorney, I’m here to speak to you about representing you.”

“I don’t need to be represented” I said.

“Can I speak to you” she said, looking to the door as if I should open it. The man was standing in the door or closer to it, He seemed to have opened the glass door (which has a keyhole on the outside) but I cannot be certain about this right now. (I don’t recall, later in the day, when I opened the door, whether that inner door was open or closed—it’s a slide-lock.)

“I’m not speaking to you, you’re a stranger,” I said, and left the window and went back to the den.

There was sound of talking on the porch and then the phone on the TV cabinet rang. I let the rings go to the answering machine. A male voice announced himself as David Aptaker—a name and person I do not know, have never met, have never been introduced to, have never encountered in my broadcasting, writing, and teaching careers but who sent me a threatening email last month, in September (now published)–and said he was standing outside the door and could I come to the door and tell him I did not want to see him, then proceeding to leave an office number. The doorbell-ringing and door-banging resumed. I went up to the window again and knocked on it to get the woman’s attention. She was looking at the door and ignoring my presence at the window so I had to knock on the window to beckon her over this time.

She looked over and said again “Can I speak to you” and I said, “I’m not speaking to you, you’re a stranger.”

I then pulled the sheer across and the brocade across to shut her out of view and retreated upstairs. I went to a front room window diagonal from the porch and looked down to see the man on the step. He was wearing black glasses and looked about sixty-five. (Both were “white” or Anglo Americans. She was wearing blondeish hair and black glasses, a black sweater, a black blazer and lighter pants. He was in a powder blue suit, a lightish shirt and that’s all I saw.) After a few minutes I went down to look out the front window, lifting the curtains a tad. I did not see the man. I saw the woman by a black-grey SUV parked up the hill opposite, obviously speaking to someone across the street. I looked but could not see properly who she might be speaking to—I presumed it might be the next door neighbor, the Le Ming woman who has been making intensive noise-harassment street theatre all summer and became the Duchess of Digging Holes as she dug up the entire side of her house by our driveway apparently looking for hidden water piping, but perhaps it wasn’t her. I don’t know. I saw a slightish looking figure in pants, man or woman I could not tell, with a backpack on his back, walking away, up the street on this side—the side our house is on–as the woman got in her car and drove away. It didn’t strike me that this man or woman was in a suit. Perhaps that was a Third member of the Unlawful Psychiatric Ever-Attempting-Civil-Committal Brigade running impersonating fraud on this family and seeking to unlawfully commit the sane and truthtelling journalist as insane and incompetent. Perhaps that was “Back Up” as occurred last April, when three Quincy Police men got in our front door and later called for Back Up and an ambulance while I was speaking to my husband and asking him to let them out. Perhaps that was the man in the powder-blue suit. Who knows. My day and week had clearly been disrupted. I sought to resume my day but took time out to write and post a Notice online to All Psychiatrists and Lawyers and EMS and LSW folk (in this place they call Massachusetts but which seems to have become Manic Mental-Health-Captivity-Obsessed Hunting Country and Predation Land, sending it to my absent husband at his workspot email address. This Notice was printed and posted this morning on the inside of my front door—a glass door—and the inside of my front dining-room window, as Plain English Notice to all attempting to visit and “speak” to me of the Unlawfulness in seeking to cast a living and working Woman Writer and Journalist as insane, incapacitated, and incompetent.

2:43 pm, October 20, 2023

Finalized 3:11 pm, October 20, 2023

Ramola D, Author, For the Sake of the Boy, Temporary Lives, Invisible Season

Publisher, Editor, Reporter, Broadcaster:

The Everyday Concerned Citizen, Delphi Quarterly, Ramola D Reports

Pine Haven, Quincy, Massachusetts


Notice to All Physicians, Psychiatrists, Psychiatric Nurses, Hospital Staff, EMS Personnel, Ambulance Staff and Owners, Licensed Social Workers, Mental Health Lawyers, Attorneys, Law Enforcement Officers | October 19, 2023

Reporter’s Note 6: Personal Update, October 19, 2023

Directed Energy Bioeffects Research | The BAA-HPW-RHDR-2013-0002 Solicitation, as Archived

Report | Ramola D | October 15, 2023

Posting, as I find it, here, the links to the original Broad Agency Announcement for the Directed Energy Bio-Behavioral Research High Powered Radio Frequency Microwave Weapons testing contract reported here recently. This is a page I came upon a few nights ago as I worked on completing this post on Human Rights Research Protections on the subject of testing weapons on humans: Claiming Human Rights Protections on US Air Force Directed Energy Bio-Behavioral Research RF HPM Weapons-Testing Contracts. I was looking for the original RFP on the contract which I had quoted in one of my letters to the Office of Human Research Protections, which as I recall I came across first on the site in 2014, a site that now can be found on the Wayback Machine’s archive but seems to have been replaced by

Link to Broad Agency announcement with several documents for review:

“Broad Agency Announcements” as described by Federal Acquisition Regulations listed at the US Government website appear to refer to open-ended research and experimentation rather than more finite and bounded research:

“….BAA’s may be used by agencies to fulfill their requirements for scientific study and experimentation directed toward advancing the state-of-the-art or increasing knowledge or understanding rather than focusing on a specific system or hardware solution.”

Documents listed here as under different time and date stamps include the list below and will be further reported on shortly:


Download All Attachments/LinksAttachments

DocumentFile SizeAccessUpdated Date
Model-Contract.pdf (opens in new window)313 KB PublicFeb 22, 2013
DD254.pdf (opens in new window)594 KB PublicFeb 22, 2013
CDRLs.pdf (opens in new window)602 KB PublicFeb 22, 2013
Oral-Presentation-Guidelines.doc (opens in new window)51 KB PublicFeb 22, 2013
TO-0004-SOO.pdf (opens in new window)68 KB PublicFeb 22, 2013
TO-0003-SOO.doc (opens in new window)53 KB PublicFeb 22, 2013
TO-0002-SOO.doc (opens in new window)61 KB PublicFeb 22, 2013
TO-0001-SOO.doc (opens in new window)81 KB PublicFeb 22, 2013
Basic-IDIQ-SOO.doc (opens in new window)69 KB PublicFeb 22, 2013
BAA-HPW-RHDR-2013-0002-02.doc (opens in new window)28 KB PublicMar 19, 2013
BAA-HPW-RHDR-2013-0002-01.doc (opens in new window)53 KB PublicMar 05, 2013
BAA-HPW-RHDR-2013-0002-03.pdf (opens in new window)25 KB PublicMar 20, 2013
BAA-HPW-RHDR-2013-0002.pdf (opens in new window)258 KB PublicFeb 22, 2013
BAA-HPW-RHDR-2013-0002-04.docx (opens in new window)36 KB PublicMar 29, 2013

For reference, my original FOIA request at Muckrock as archived at Wayback in 2014:

Request for Documentation of Informed Consent in USAF DEBR Contract • MuckRock (

As I am still awaiting documents from this past request and new ones, this find online of information related to this solicitation on the US Air Force-General Dynamics contract feels significant. Much is presented in these declassified documents which I imagine may have been posted here only in recent times and after the filling of this FOIA request. These documents are marked “Public” which means they are being held in the public domain and are available for public perusal. Some of these documents have been included in redacted PDFs after US AIr Force FOIA Office release on this FOIA request and posted online at Muckrock, found, accessed, and reposted at my site in 2020 in a few documents including Documents Obtained on FOIA Request/USAF General Dynamics Contract BAA-HPW-RHDR-2013-0002, and 2015: “Targeted Individuals” are Non-Consensual Subjects in Criminal, Clandestine, Classified “Top Secret” MKULTRA-Extended Mind & Behavior Control/Torture Experimentation by Joint Military/Intel/Justice/Academic Institutions, as well as Targets of COINTELPRO and Electronic Warfare.

I am posting this link and information currently here as found, for further reportage shortly.

One aspect of note is the use of the term “Bioeffects Research” as opposed to “Bio-Behavioral Research” which term as I recall I used in my FOIA requests in 2014, as directed, I believe, by text in the extant US Air Force RFP at the time: a mystery yet to be solved. “Bioeffects” is a term used in “radio dosimetry” on several other contracts and declassified documents including the declassified US Army Intelligence and Security Command document released to Mr. Donald Friedman in 2006, Bioeffects of Selected Non-Lethal Weapons.


Declassified US Air Force Directed Energy Bio-Behavioral Research (DEBR) Contracts Reveal Weapons-Testing on Humans Using Counter-Personnel Radio Frequency High Power Microwave (RF HPM) Weapons

Documents Obtained on FOIA Request/USAF General Dynamics Contract BAA-HPW-RHDR-2013-0002

Claiming Human Rights Protections on US Air Force Directed Energy Bio-Behavioral Research RF HPM Weapons-Testing Contracts

Ramola D, Letter to the Ombudsman: Human Rights Violations on US Air Force Contracts, October 2nd, 2023

Claiming Human Rights Protections on US Air Force Directed Energy Bio-Behavioral Research RF HPM Weapons-Testing Contracts

Report & Note | Ramola D | October 11, 2023/Updated October 12, 2023

Human rights protections on the US Air Force Directed Energy Bio-Behavioral Research (Weapons-Testing) Contract in response to the solicitation BAA-HPW-RHDR-2013-0002F, reported here recently as on other military contracts are assured by a Federal Wide Assurance (FWA), a formal certifying HHS “Assurance” document provided by the Defense contractor, in this case General Dynamics Information Technology, and approved by the Department of Health and Human Services’ Office of Human Research Protections, signed by a Human Protections Administrator, in this case a “Principal Subject Matter Expert” from the contractor in question, General Dynamics Information Technology, as well as the company’s President, and indicating existence of a designated Institutional Review Board from the US AIr Force, in this case Chesapeake Review Inc.

The Question of the Federal Wide Assurance, OHRP, and IRBs

Federal Wide Assurances, a mystery in themselves, requiring closer study, as also Institutional Review Boards are referred to by HHS online thus: “Through the FWA and the Terms of the FWA, an institution commits to HHS that it will comply with the requirements in the HHS Protection of Human Subjects regulations at 45 CFR part 46.”

The “Terms of the Federalwide Assurance” can be found here on the OHRP website: Federalwide Assurance for the Protection of Human Subjects.

HHS Protections of Human Subject regulations referenced above, 45 CFR 46 can be found at the Code for Federal Regulations website:

And, as below, at the OHRP, HHS website:

Unfortunately it is not quite clear to what extent any human rights or human subject research protections on such contracts are actually guaranteed, overseen, periodically addressed, or audited by external parties given the formality of such a document and the fact that it is not exactly available for open review.

This subject was earlier examined in a few posts at this site in 2015 when the subject of the Office of Human Research Protections needing to assure Federal Wide Assurance on every experimentation contract involving humans, including military, first came to this writer’s attention:

Clandestine “Classified” Human Subject Experimentation using EMF Radiation/Sonic/Ultrasonic Neuroweaponry

In the Name of National Security? Secret, Classified Human Subject Experimentation and Research in 2015: Where is the Public Outrage?

At the time (October 2014), correspondence with Dr. Jerry Menikoff’s OHRP and subsequent research of Federal regulations by this writer, intended to determine the nature of Informed Consent as understood by the Department of Health and Human Services revealed that while the OHRP’s stance was that it did not guarantee protections for anyone on contracts not funded by Health and Human Services, exemptions to Informed Consent were also provided to all agencies of US Government via written exclusions in the CFR (Code of Federal Regulations), as published here then.

This issue of protections has become a pressing one in recent times as thousands of people have come forward both in the USA as well as in the UK, Europe, Australia, New Zealand, Asia to report being unconsentingly experimented on. Many know that Informed Consent has become a phrase, a label, words in a template not adhered to, contested by lawyers, ignored by unethical researchers from many institutions.

Current text online at HHS presents the principles that Should govern informed consent and ethical treatment of “human test subjects” but there is much else behind this subject which needs continuous public address.

Ramola D: Complaint to OHRP and Response from OHRP Regarding Non-Consensual Human Subject Research/Contract Involving Directed Energy Bio-Behavioral Research/US Air Force, October 18-23, 2014

In October 2014, I wrote in to the Office for Human Research Protections, to the Director of the Office for Human Research Protections, Dr. Jerry Menikoff, and to Ms. Kristina C. Borror, Director for Compliance Oversight, OHRP, seeking information on how to file a formal complaint regarding being used non-consensually as a test subject putatively on an US Air Force contract, possibly the one whose RFP (request for proposal) I had then read and was researching further (the DEBR contract which is now being further reported here), at the same time as I was making Freedom of Information Act requests to the Federal Aviation Authority regarding the frequent flyover of helicopters and small planes over our house and yard. During our interchange of emails (now PDF’d below) I learned that OHRP, tragically, could not investigate allegations related to research funded by Federal Departments and Agencies other than themselves but that they would retain my emails as a formal complaint filed with their office as a matter of public record.

Excerpts and Email Exchange with OHRP, HHS in October 2014, Complaint Regarding Nonconsensual Human Subject Research, Contract Involving DEBR/USAF

Federal Wide Assurance For the Protection of Human Research Subjects from General Dynamics Information Technology in Relation to the US Air Force Contract on Solicitation BAA-HPW-RHDR-2013-0002

In November 2014, I received the FWA for the US Air Force 2013 General Dynamics DEBR contract from the Office of Human Research Protections, HHS via Muckrock, seemingly redacted but with some information on responsible parties in General Dynamics Information Technology, to whom I then wrote in December, 2014, seeking clarification on their Informed Consent practices and enquiring about field research, acquisition of “human subjects”, watchlisting, bio-effects, and related aspects, within the context of non-consensual but deleterious biomedical radiation research as surfaced and discussed by then in lawsuits, investigative journalistic research, whistleblower testimonial and general witness reportage. I did not receive responses to my letter of enquiry, sent by email.

These letters and questions, still relevant–and likely useful for Congressional enquiries and Commissions of Truly Ethical Beings–are posted below.

FOIA Documents returned from the Department of Health and Human Services, November 28, 2014:

Federalwide Assurance (FWA) for the Protection of Human Subjects filed by General Dynamics Information Technology, June 30 2014-6-17-2018/Returned on FOIA Request November 28, 2014 from DHHS

The “Terms of the Federalwide Assurance” referenced in No. 5 of the FWA above can be found here on the OHRP website: Federalwide Assurance for the Protection of Human Subjects.

My letter sent in December 2014 to John Alvarez, the named Human Protections Administrator described as a Principal Subject Matter Expert on this FWA for General Dynamics Information technology filed with HHS was copied to S. Daniel Johnson, the named President of General Dynamics Information Technology, Kristina Borror and Jerry Menikoff of OHRP, HHS, Letitia Aby of the Human DIgnity Council of which I was then a part, and the general information desk at Muckrock. I wrote as a journalist, seeking answers to questions on Informed Consent by the people named “human subjects” affected by the contract.

Ramola D to GDIT: Enquiry Regarding Informed Consent Human Subject Protections on Current USAF Contract Pursuant to FOIA Request to OHRP for GDIT FWA via Muckrock:

Questions raised above: Directed-Energy Weapons (DEWs) Testing or Directed-Energy Bio-Behavioral (DEBR) Research into Human Bio-Effects Using Human Subjects | Created 12-8-2014, Sent to GDIT December 9, 2014

I had also made enquiries on FOIA for Informed Consent documentation to the Department of Defense and to the US Air Force with no responsive documents returned from the Inspector-General, DOD while a redacted, older document was returned by the US Air Force, along with, more recently, from Muckrock, some additional information provided by the Department of the Navy in an addendum naming and listing human rights protections provided by various Department of Defense regulations (see below). This information–the question of what kind of protections exist on military contracts as enshrined in extant regulations and for who–will be further discussed in a separate article soon.

There are many aspects to this subject and I like a few other journalists and scholars who have examined “human subject protections” have sought to send our views to those professing to provide them, to little avail. I will continue to unearth some of this history here and in future journalism.

Revisions to the Common Rule within the Context of Classified Operations and Reporting Victims of Same

The very notion of providing human subject research protections–to whom? (Consenting or completely non-consenting subjects, pulled into classified operations via reckless watchlisting by secret society mavens shaking hands with each other behind closed doors while pulling in kickbacks as FBI “informants” on upstanding school moms and dads?)–was revised in 2018 in the US by a group of agencies and military contractors and divisions, seeking changes to the Common Rule. This was a painful situation to examine and seek to influence at the time, as many tried.

The words of many human rights activists and those experiencing harm from covered operations were lost to all: No Waivers of Informed Consent, PERIOD: The Public Reports Ongoing Non-Consensual Experimentation and Demands the Common Rule Protect Citizens, Not Covert Activities | 2016-7-17

Claiming Human Rights Protections: Writing to the Ombudsman for the US Air Force

The notion of weapons-testing on humans as also on animals is or should be reprehensible to all.

As a matter of fact, people all over the USA speaking out about the unlawful use of directed energy weapons technologies on their physical person have long experienced, spoken out about, and sought redress for the harms they have experienced, physical, psychological, social, emotional and life-related as often covered here.

Those continuing to address and speak out about these human rights violations and life-takedown operations conducted on them or those they know and love may want to write to the named Ombudsman for the US Air Force on this contract, whose name and address can be found on the pages sent onward by the US Air Force and Muckrock and now published both here and at Muckrock.

This writer’s preliminary email last week addressed to the Ombudsman for the US Air Force and calling for a halt to all DEW testing on people is posted here for public review.

Ramola D, Letter to the Ombudsman: Human Rights Violations on US Air Force Contracts, October 2nd, 2023

More actions need to be taken on these documents and this writer continues to work on these matters as she continues to query Muckrock and the US Air Force for a fuller reveal of the documents provided on FOIA request earlier but which seem to be withheld somewhere in transit.

The 2013 USAF DEBR Contract

While this contract, in the form–of scattered sections–in which it has been provided to this writer remains somewhat mysterious, closer inspection reveals it is of profound significance and may in fact be the base contract being provided to a principal contractor for use in design of subcontracts with other Air Force bases, cities, organizations, and subcontractors; further perusal reveals the possibility of several kinds of contracts being folded within this one. Reportage on this subject will continue under separate focus and as further documents are provided to this writer.

Meanwhile, readers may wish to write to the Ombudsman themselves, and include the letter above, also to be posted on a separate page to be linked here. I hope to continue researching who best to write to next and will publish my letters and record of phone calls as I proceed.

Both at the time that these assaults were first directed my way and later, I have made many “complaints”–that is, letters of disclosure, enquiry, questioning–on sites online at the Department of Defense, the Air Force Office of Inspector General as guided by OHRP, and others. This is prior to the letters to many in Government sent by letter-mail and email, which I am striving to collect here, in efforts to provide a chronological history of effort in human rights activism and journalism.

Those who have followed this subject know that absolute tragedy has resulted, nationwide, and worldwide, consequent to the use of electromagnetic weapons — radio frequency high powered microwave weapons among them — and acoustic neuroweapons on people, unconsented-to, undisclosed publicly, and currently being reported as in use in numerous areas, including Law Enforcement, Criminal Justice, Medical Technologies, Neurotechnologies, and tragically, in incredible extension of MK Ultra, in “Behavioral Health.”

Meanwhile, public report of weapons testing on human bodies which has sought recognition in Media has been prohibited by the police-enforced lock of Fraudulent Psychiatry.

These subjects need candid address by all in Medicine and Law Enforcement today as also in the US Air Force, if this and all other nations are to proceed forward in some semblance of civility in safeguarding our children’s futures and all our rights as humans with God-given lives to live, flourish, and prosper, on this our mutual plane/t.


“Exemptions to Informed Consent” in Classified Research and Non-Consensual Covert/Clandestine Human Subject Experimentation in the USA Today Versus “Consent of the Governed” | January 21, 2016

In the Name of National Security? Secret, Classified Human Subject Experimentation and Research in 2015: Where is the Public Outrage? | March 26, 2015

Clandestine “Classified” Human Subject Experimentation using EMF Radiation/Sonic/Ultrasonic Neuroweaponry | March 9, 2015

Domestic War on Americans Hidden by Secrecy in Homeland Security “Counter-terrorism” & Intel agency activities | November 16, 2014