Inaugurating Newswatch Live, to be livestreamed Friday mornings at Live 528/Ramola D Reports or on Thursday afternoons on occasion (Weekly Schedule will be posted at Livestream/Ramola D Reports, please check in weekly.)
Media Deception is keeping the truth from being shared with millions who unwittingly are helping roll out a future biosurveilling, biodigitizing state.
The vaccines are dangerous for children and should be stopped.
Further: When governments push to “vaccinate everyone,” they are disrespecting individual healthcare choices, ignoring the vast and growing numbers of people choosing, committed to, and investing in natural remedies, naturopathy, and traditional forms of herbal, homeopathic, energy medicine practices which have lasted through the millennia and helped heal millions. Vaccines inject poisons, while healing natural medicine gently supports, sustains, heals, restores the natural immune system, overall health and energy of the human body.
The push to install Vaccines as necessary ingredient of Public Health is a push to standardize healthcare for all, and capture all into a pharma-run drug-and-vaccine-based paradigm with military Standard Operating Procedures: this is absurd, and should be globally resisted. Nobody needs poisonous vaccines and dangerous drugs. Nobody needs their natural healthcare practices ripped from them. Nobody needs the vast deception of “Public Health” to remove true healthcare with true healing from the world.
(2) The Limited Effects Technology (LET) Program Report | JPSG, OOTW/LE Programs, 1996
Unremarked in mainstream media, deliberately hidden from wider readership, there have been a series of declassified document FOIA-releases over the past few years which astonishingly reveal many facets of the now-known covert use of electronic-weapon and neurotechnology surveillance, experimentation, weapons-tests, and operations on the American public by various agencies and departments of the US Government and their contractors.
Similarity with Covert Global High-Tech Policing Operations: Similar operations have been unleashed worldwide, as reported extensively at this site and others online earlier. Some documentation in the public domain testifies to this global program, and will be reported more fully here shortly. For now, please see this Twitter thread, which discloses NATO High-Tech Non Lethal Weapon/Neuro Policing operations in Europe and discusses also how Non-Lethal Weapons Testing & Neuro Surveillance have been unleashed inside the USA:
Thread on Non-Lethal DEW Operations in USA, Europe, world, with references to US, NATO documents, articles
This series aims to address the public disclosures in recent FOIA releases of ongoing US Government use of Electronic Weapons and Neurotechnologies on Americans.
“Electronic Weapon” herein refers to the spectrum weapons used in Electronic Warfare as defined by the Department of Defense (DOD) in documents, particularly relates to anti-personnel weapons, includes all labeled as non-lethal-weapon, less-than-lethal weapon, psychotronic weapon, neuroweapon, next generation and emerging technologies, and includes RFID (Radio Frequency IDentification) and BCI (Brain Computer Interface) tech.
(2) The Limited Effects Technology (LET) Program Report | JPSG, OOTW/LE Programs, 1996
This FOIA request was made in January 2018 and asked DOD for “Copies of all research reports, annual reports, and indices of the Joint Program Steering Group (JPSG) as established by the 1994 MOU between the Department of Justice and Department of Defense, dating from 1994 to the present.”
The purpose of this article is to report on the structure, disclosure, and highlights of this JPSG LET Program Report, and offer insight into its content with an eye to more fully informing the American public what the implications and ramifications are regarding the use ofanti-personnel military weaponry by domestic law enforcement and military branches on the American public, which is what this JPSG LET Program Report is premised on.
Notable About This Foia-Request Response
DARPA chose to return one single document, after a 1.5 year delay, on this multi-document request for documents dating back (from 2018, time of request) to 24 years.(This should not be found acceptable to the American public—other reports obviously exist and are being withheld; DARPA should be queried again.)
This document is dated 1996; no recent reports were released by DARPA; no notice of the ending of these JPSG joint DOD-DOJ programs has been given in this May 2019 response.
This document is not redacted and is released in full, which implies that the disclosure of technology and policy in this document is acceptable now to DARPA; this is in line with the slow release of information on Non Lethal Weapons, Electronic Warfare, and Neuroweaponry the DOD has made online and in print—via notice of programs, weapons, conferences, articles, and recorded lectures in public-domain documents and sites online–in recent years. However it also implies the JPSG (a DOD-DOJ entity) chooses currently to reveal what’s in this document as applicable to Law Enforcement—which could be a way of corralling tacit public consent to Law Enforcement use by thus publishing notice of this insidious and pernicious weaponry.
It is essential therefore for Media, human and civil rights groups to take note now of the disclosure here and ask further questions, examine implications for all, and delve deeper into what is really at stake with this “Limited Effects Technology Program.”
Basic Structure of This Limited-Effects Technology Report
This 9-page report with the JPSG Defense-Justice logo on the cover and naming David Fields as the Program Manager is divided into the following sections:
The Limited Effects Technology Program
Electric Stun Projectile
Laser Surveillance and Dazzler System
Handheld Laser Dazzler
The Section Titled “Background”
Notable from the information in this section titled “Background” is the following:
This Limited Effects Technology Program is acknowledged to be a JPSG program resulting from the MOU from 1994, reported earlier.
The need for such a joint program merging the efforts of Defense and Justice in developing technology applicable to both is being rationalized and legitimized by recourse to stated historical reference of common “need” as technology requirements for both “converge.” This is assertion which is neither specific, transparent, nor explicatory. It is presumption which seeks to hide the fact that what is being discussed here, as the immediate technological lead-up to the 1994 DOD-DOJ MOU, discussed here, demonstrates, are Remote Human Access-and-Control Neuro/Bio Weapons—Non Lethal Weapons and Neurotechnologies (to some extent revealed in “Program Thrusts”), which are arguably highly invasive of bodily and brain privacy, integrity, health, and safety.
Examples given of operations sharing this need are “the (Defense) provision of humanitarian assistance, peacekeeping, countering the flow of drugs into the United States, counterterrorism, etc.–and (Justice) law enforcement forces engaged in LE operations.” We are expected to agree that military operations, even “peacekeeping” (which should not be considered a military activity in the first place: weapons cannot “peacekeep,” they subjugate) share a common need for “limited effects” tech i.e., silent Human Access Weapons—which, it should be noted, are not being named as such here. This notion of “need” is presumption, and emblematic of coercion of consent.
The Need to Limit Force or apply only a “minimum amount of force” as primary principle of action is posited here—again without corroboration from real-life where war casualties and police violence abound—as a severe constraint to military and police ability to function. The solution to this false claim (false because it does not seem to be a real-life principle by which either police or military adheres) then funnels down to Non Lethals or Limited-Effects weapons, which are being characterized as force-limiting weapons within a claimed hierarchy of severity which completely ignores the unethical, human-rights-violating aspects of bio-hacking and neuro-hacking weapons,which is what they are (as will be seen shortly). More accurately, this section should be headed The Need to Be Seen to Limit Force, with Public-Image-Boosting Non-Visible Weapons.
Common Threats posit militarized drug-smugglers and terroristswith access to military and LE Tech, which in real-life is made possible (as we understand now from much investigative and whistleblowing reportage including from journalist Gary Webb, LAPD investigator and government whistleblower Michael Ruppert and others) by gun-running, drug-running, and open arms sales by government, military, CIA, mafia, and private-sector alike, which makes this a circular argument: Military and LE fuel the arms/police weapons industry which creates these weapons, as well as tools such as electro-optic imaging devices to aid night vision goggles and Electronic Weapon countermeasures. This circular view also promises endless escalation via blackmarket sales of new weapons. “The criminals have our guns so we need new guns” could go on forever.
Common Missions which name the War on Drugs and the War on Terrorism imply that these are both military campaigns just as much as law enforcement campaigns, which would explain both the military-style DEA and LE SWAT team “drug” raids on homes, terrorizing children and families, and the non-lethal weapons-operations via DOD/USAF weapons-testing contracts on people wrongfully labeled “terrorists” as ensured by the Omnibus Counterterrorism Act of 1995 after the Oklahoma Bombing (a staged insider event, as per whistleblower evidence), and later the Patriot Act of 2001 post 9/11 (another staged insider event, as per much public analysis and testimonial). Yet, in mainstream media and government press releases, these missions are not disclosed as such—the military aspect kept hidden–with much secrecy especially attending the field testing aspect of otherwise openly-disclosed non-lethal weapons testing contracts inside America.
The most significant disclosure from this section comprises notice of 1) the members of the Joint Program Steering Group, as deriving from DARPA, the National Institute of Justice, the FBI, the Bureau of Prisons, and the US Army; 2) their ability to engage at any point in R&D of the weapons mentioned here; 3) the notion that they could participate in “demonstrations” of this technology just as much as developments. Are demonstrations then, what people are reporting today as 24/7 silent microwave/milliwave/infra-red/neurotech weapons operations in their neighborhoods, with use of drones, small planes, satellites, helicopters, zooming cars, parked vans and cars, antennas, cell towers, smart meters, backpack stalkers? (These also appear to be weapons-testing activities, weapons-training activities, and weapons-operations activities.)
Also significant is the information that the Limited Effects Technology Program is only one part of a multi-technology program established by the JPSG to address joint tech priorities of Defense and Justice in 1995. The other tech programs are described in Program Thrusts.
The Section Titled “Program Thrusts”
This section in the LET report discusses the actual technology programs of the JPSG, names certain technologies being developed, tested, and used in training, reveals that most if not all of these are Remote Human Access spectrum and sonic technologies, yet maintains quite some obscurity in disclosing certain of these technologies, for example using vague terms like “communications security technologies.”
It is interesting indeed that this document titled The Limited Effects Technology Program Report in actuality presents information on all JPSG DOD-DOJ programs (or all deemed safe to record), yet focuses only on some LE tech, and uses the same opening Background section to preface notice of all JPSG programs—which implies commonality of context and nature of weaponry, i.e., Non-Lethal, Remote Human Access/Control(as will be seen below).
Significant, in this section, are the following.
The JPSG Program—the most essential program ensuring DOD-DOJ liaison re. “advanced technology development” as per the 1994 DOD-DOJ MOU—focuses on 7 technology areas, which, on close perusal, cover quite a bit of territory. This program in other words is being used to develop, test, and demonstrate sophisticated and secretive wireless, remote, radiation, EMF spectrum, acoustic, bio-communications detection, monitoring, tracking, and communications technologies with major implications for all individuals and the entire urban environment.
The first six program areas are presented only in summary, with slightly more elaboration of the Limited Effects Technology program which titles the report. Notably, even this seventh section is not comprehensive in its coverage of the LET it purports to cover: the devices highlighted do not comprise the whole of the LET program, only that portion DARPA is willing to put in a document clearly intended for eventual public-release (after 25 years!) into the public-domain, which has happened now. (More on this subject in the LET Program section below.)
Concealed Weapons Detection:
Concealed- Weapons-Detection technologies the JPSG reports here it seeks to develop are “unobtrusive” —read, concealable in plain sight–systems which can detect weapons of various kinds, including those with little to no metallic content, from over 9 meters—27 feet, width of a couple rooms–away. Initial efforts were to cover stationary devices—but clearly this 1996 wording suggests mobile devices would also be developed.
Actual detection technologies in process then in 1996 included:
3.1 An X-ray sensor: which refers to sensor technology; X-ray sensors are variously used in medical/dental radiography and in scanning systems as in airport scanners for people or baggage.
3.2. Combined passive millimeter wave and infra-red sensors: which are sensors used in scanning systems which can detect objects by their relative millimeter wave glow or infra-red heat signature profile, literally see through clothes better than X-rays and give rise to images highly invasive of personal privacy. Both millimeter wave sensors and infra-red sensors are energy sensors, detecting bio-field energy and thermal signatures; the distance from which such sensors can be used is a matter for further research. Some infra-red sensors are used in cameras mounted on aircraft and satellites.
Interestingly, a document online from the Air Force Research Lab, written by an apparent contractor, Decision-Science Applications Inc., found online after the bulk of this article was written, reports in 1998 on Concealed Weapons Detection programsrun on grants from the NIJ and DARPA--which suggests a possible connection to these JPSG programs, while revealing that NIJ and DARPA were funding the Air Force Research Lab, which in turn funded a private contractor, in a chain of inter-agency connections–and points to sensor technologies being intentionally developed to penetrate clothing.
3.3 Combined ultrasound and radar sensors: which translates to:
a) Ultrasonic sensors: the use of high-frequency ultrasonic pulsed transmitter/receiver sensors to send and receive waves in echo from materials to determine their composition or proximity (used in a variety of industries including healthcare, agriculture, target-tracking of animals or humans from UAVs or manned aircraft, water-level sensing, car or obstacle detection), used in short-range, up to 10-meters application;
b) Radar sensors used in short and long range (up to 100 meters) object detection, tracking target movement, collision avoidance in cars, and to detect materials with guided wave radar or special antennas which ultrasonics may miss, such as softer, powdery, foamier, dustier materials, using either Doppler pulses or frequency-modulated continuous wave radar.
3.4 Low Frequency Magnetic sensor: Magnetic sensors use a variety of physical effects related to magnetism, such as eddy current sensing, measuring small relative changes in earth’s magnetic field created by variations in magnetic material, to detect flaws in metal, movement of metals (as in weapons) carried on a person’s body, movement of large metallic objects such as cars, etc. Magnetic sensors detect metal carried on persons when radar alone, stopped by metallic-walls or reflective insulation barriers, is not enough.
Low magnetic fields relate to biofields; low frequency magnetic sensors can pick up low frequency (ELF, ULF body resonance frequency below 10 Hz, below 30 KHz) magnetic fields as indicated in rise and fall of chest cavity; this capacity is used in earthquake life-detection and through-wall surveillance in combination with radar sensors.
Then there are super-conducting quantum interference devices (SQUIDs) which also pick up very low emfs, such as brain ELFs.
MEMS and nanosensors using thin film magnetic technology also exist. (On this subject: Radar sensors used in prisons are taking recourse to radar tagging to distinguish inmates from guards—implying the use of nanosensors in tracking, which appear to be of different kinds.)
Finally, this section’s disclosure on then-current use notes that the X-Ray sensor was being “demonstrated”–meaning, operated–in a correctional institution in California—a prison or juvenile detention center. The use of sensor and imaging technologies in correctional and detention institutions must be thoroughly investigated, in relation to the bioeffect harms from such technology usage.
What Is Not Being Explicitly Stated But Implied In This Entire Section?
All sensor technologies, unless passive, require emission as well as reception of signal. This means that people—unwittingly, without being informed—are being subjected to X-rays, ultrasound radiation, millimeter wave technologies, radar technologies, ULFs, ELFS, and magnetic fields, at short-range and long-range, close-in and remote, ostensibly for weapons-detection testing purposes, in any number and type of environments, including but not limited to airports, train stations, public areas, and private homes. These technologies could be directed at people from inside buildings and homes, from inside cars, pickups, trucks, vans, from mountings in public locations, from parked vehicles in parking-lots and from moving vehicles while driving.
Sensor technologies being tested at short and long range include low frequency magnetic sensors which track biofields, breathing activity, body resonance emfs, and low frequency brainwaves, plausibly using superconducting quantum interference and tunneling technologies, and comprising earthquake-life-detection monitoring or through-wall-surveillance as described in various other public documents, and plausibly also Remote Neural Monitoring or neurosurveillance, of the kind spoken about 28 years ago in the ex-NSA employee John St. Clair Akwei lawsuit against the NSA.
As in the found document Silent Weapons for Quiet Wars, which posits the surreptitious use of socio-economic weapons of degradation to disable and disarm entire populations without their conscious awareness, the surreptitious testing of sensor technologies on populations is essentially the leveling of silent military spectrum weapons technologies on the bodies of citizens, without their knowing.
The surreptitious leveling and usage of silent military spectrum weapons of bodily and brain monitoring, assault, and modification is precisely what thousands of reporting victims of EMF/Neuro DEW crimes worldwide—often labeled and dismissed as Targeted Individuals—are currently reporting, both inside the USA and out. Could it be that the testing of sensor technologies in concealed weapons detection constitutes one aspect of this surreptitious assault on citizens?
Factually speaking, the disclosure in this document along with the disclosure in the 1994 DOD-DOJ MOU that these technologies are being tested is, at minimum, evidence that invisible, spectrum technologies are being operated and tested on the bodies of people, from a distance and from close-by, exactly as thousands of highly credentialled and credible people– often labeled as “Targeted Individuals” and falsely characterized for credibility-disappearance as “Mentally Ill” by mainstream Govt-propaganda-pushing media–are reporting.
Three aspects to location, ID, and tracking technology are being covered in these JPSG programs, as delineated in this section on Geo-Location/Navigation/Communications in the LET Program Report:
4.1 Locating or precision-finding, precision-targeting of specific people, objects, or vehicles—this implicates GPS (Global Positioning Satellite) and other satellite technologies, including handheld satellites, for GPS-tracking of RFID human/object tags, cell phones; as well as human/object RFID/other, Nano/Micro tagging technologies to facilitate GPS-tracking, in other words, Surveillance and Tagging-for-Surveillance technologies.
4.2 Identifying or pinpointing identity of individuals & things—this suggests Identifying Biometric Surveillance & Tagging-for-ID- Surveillance: Facial/Gait/Iris/Fingerprint/Body/DNA/Other Recognition Surveillance; Unique RFID Tagging (Nano/micro biosensors & object tags) & WBANS (Wireless Body Area Networks) for Identification. Again, Surveillance and Tagging-for-Surveillance technologies. Involves Biometric Data Collection.(Law Enforcement has long been involved in this.)
4.3 Monitoring or tracking movement of people and things—this suggests Surveillance & Tagging-for-Surveillance: Audio/Visual Surveillance using microphones and cameras; Cyber Surveillance of computers; Through-Wall Surveillance with RF/ULF/Magnetic sensor technologies; Medical/Health monitoring & continuous detection of RF/other Implants & WBANs using Radar, Wifi; ISR (Intelligence, Surveillance, Reconnaissance) surveillance using Radar from drones, spy/commercial planes, satellites, ground vehicles; Tagging-for-Surveillance: Unique RF/Spectrum & Nano/Micro tagging (correctional, medical) technologies, CCTL—Continuous Clandestine Tracking and Locating (military, intelligence) technologies; Sensor technologies (as discussed in the previous Concealed Weapons-Detection section). Again, Surveillance and Tagging-for-Surveillance technologies. (USAF, AFRL, USMC are currently conducting Non Lethal Weapons tests and ISR tests using these.)
Notably, “reduction of power consumption” is mentioned as a DARPA interest in tracking technologies; this might account for the increased development of passive or inert nanosensors which can be activated or energized by energy signals sent to them, rather than relying on inbuilt battery packs.
4.4 The two JPSG efforts mentioned here include Tagging, as discussed above, very slightly referenced with this line about tiny wireless sensors, termed “devices,” notably marked “modular” as in implantable WBANs, which do indeed have modules or nodes in a network. These are not just object-tagging devices, they are human-tagging devices.
Military tracking of objects and humans using sensors
The fully-implanted and centrally-monitored human
Sensors at level of cell, molecule, DNA
And this is not a slight JPSG effort at all: Tagging and sensor technologies constitute multi-billion dollar businesses and are intimately linked to all aspects of Geo-Location, Navigation, and Communications, as discussed above. Again, here too, DARPA should be more definitively and minutely questioned about these tagging technologies and how they are being used inside America, on Americans—especially since thousands of Americans, as also people worldwide, are reporting violative, non-consensual RFID micro and nano implants in their bodies.
4.5 The first JPSG effort mentioned here, Soldier 911, is mentioned in DARPA literature as an emergency radio to help find soldiers in crisis.
However from the description in the LET report, it also sounds like a handheld satellite linked in to an emergency response network, functioning as a device to locate, identify, and track “the movement of individuals and vehicles,” which, if an additional feature (undisclosed in DARPA literature) on this device, is only possible through the use of pre-tagging of said individuals and vehicles with sensor and tagging technologies–or the use of SIGINT Remote Neural Monitoring, as described in the John St. Clair Akwei lawsuit vs the NSA in 1992, in the case of humans.
5. Sniper DetectionSniper Detection systems as mentioned here were intended to be of various kinds, including manually-portable, bodily-worn, and vehicle-mounted.
These systems, as stated above in the LET Program report–being explored and tested publicly from 1996 on–involve sensors: acoustic sensors, infra-red sensors, and integrated infrared-acoustic and infrared-laser sensors.
Interestingly, this section appears to be discussing technologies for detection of actual gunshot or sniper fire—not non-lethal fire, not spectrum-weapon-related shots. However the detection technologies themselves are spectrum technologies.
Brief research of these detection technology sensors indicates that acoustic, infra-red, and laser technologies are being developed and used by militaries to determine with pin-point precision the direction and location of fire from a weapon after a first shot. Sensors today are becoming highly sophisticated with universities (working on military grants, partnering with private firms) also involved in developing bio-mimetic systems of detection, using neural network learning and studying how bats and dolphins process sound and vibration.
It is notable that this program of Sniper Detection has been included as a JPSG program in this Limited-Effects Technology report as one of the multi-technology program thrusts of the JPSG.
JPSG, we recall, is the Joint Program Steering Group formed by the 1994 DOD-DOJ MOU employing parties from both Defense and Justice in mutually-relevant matters and projects of security and law enforcement, OOTW and LE, intending to jointly develop and test “advanced technologies” of common interest.
Some Undisclosed Conclusions
1. Could it be therefore that Sniper Detection is related to matters of Mass Shooters, the phenomenon of supposedly crazed “lone gunmen”–plausibly mind-control victims of MK ULTRA RHIC-EDOM (radio hypnosis intra-cerebral electronic dissolution of memory) radio-hypnosis—shooting up people in random settings, as well as the Live Action Drills with Active Shooters run by the Department of Homeland Security?
If so, this offers a connection not merely between the DOD and DOJ but also with the DHS; all three departments are in some way involved in these sniper detection programs.
This also offers a connection to War on Terror programs and funding, since mass shooters are characterized internally as Domestic Terrorists—even if their “Manchurian Candidate” creation is by covert agencies in Defense/Justice/DHS/CIA, undercover of Live Action Drills, for purposes of driving Agenda 21/2030 Gun Control agendas, as is often surmised by many analysts.
2. Further, the JPSG efforts noted here to develop sensors, in its inclusion of biomimetic systems and neuroscience research, now used in sniper detection in the field, may well involve the use of neuroprosthetics, as indicated by the acknowledged use of cochlear implants in medical and neuroscience research over several decades by a Defense contractor, Biomimetic Systems, Inc.
3. It is plausible therefore—and a matter for further investigation—that the non-consensual use and implantation of cochlear and other neurological implants—which numerous citizens have come forward to report, over the last three to four decades–for the study of neural networks and auditory processes has accompanied the JPSG efforts in this area of Sniper Detection.
6. Information Technology:While this section is quite opaque, a few conclusions can be drawn:
The JPSG states that it is addressing the needs for instant and secure communications needs in LE and Military by taking advantage of advances in civilian and govt-sponsored IC technologies.This would not however require a separate program to do so, unless undisclosed advances were being acquired.
These advances, hinted at but not specified, could include Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, autonomous systems, cybernetics, cognitive computing, Internet of Things, Internet of Humans, lesser-known Neuro/Bio-communications technologies such as V2K (Voice to Skull) and Synthetic Telepathy, Hive Minds and Brain Nets revealed by whistleblowers like Richard Alan Miller and Robert Duncan (while some brain projects are openly revealed by public-domain DARPA information and known to exist via academic/government focus in US and worldwide), robotics, nanotechnology, the miniaturization of electronics, quantum computing, and other aspects of modern ICT which are left unnamed here.Simulating all 100 billion neural connections of brain on future supercomputers/https://www.kurzweilai.net/new-algorithm-will-allow-for-simulating-neural-connections-of-entire-brain-on-future-exascale-supercomputers
This possibility—of such undisclosed advanced projects being part of the IT program sketchily noted here–is once more underlined by the opaque disclosure of “innovative exploitation” of existing ICT infrastructure intended in the creation of interagency crisis management systems.
“Communications security technology” in common parlance includes encryption and authentication technologies which today include biometrics and RFID microchips, but is not further specified in this section.
Considering that the rollout of biometrics (iris, fingerprint, face, voice recognition) at airports and borders is being overseen by TSA, a part of DHS, and that DNA is collected by LE at jails and detention centers, it can be safely concluded that any joint program of Defense and Justice in this area would indeed encompass all of these certainly exploitative technologies.
“Sharing information among agencies” points to shared information from different databases collected by different parties, including DNA collection databases managed by LE, and recently exposed for massive privacy violations. Police databases are apparently highly insecure, and corrupt officers have made it a practice to sell databases to private companies for thousands of dollars, a practice revealed by recent news articles, including by Chief Jones on Ramola D Reports.
To conclude, the opacity of this section on Information Technology appears to hide much. It is entirely possible that non-consensual, clandestine implantation of RFIDs, as part of developments in Military/LE cybernetics, telemetry, biometrics, neuroinformatics in “innovative exploitation” of communications security technologies, is being executed by this JPSG program—as reported by high numbers of Americans. Again, this presents therefore an issue to be examined further with DARPA and the Justice Department.
7. Personnel Armor:This section, like the Sniper Detection section, seems to pertain explicitly to lethal weapons and not non-lethal or spectrum weapons.
However, it notes that lethal weapons threats—bullets from rifles and handguns—affect OOTW and LE operations both.
Protection from rifle bullets via advanced lightweight body armor in the course of OOTW/LE operations of any kind appears to be the focus here; the implication appears to be that such operations could involve rifle threats; it is possible therefore that this pertains, as also the Sniper Detection section, to mass shooters and the weapons (assault weapons, rifles) some have used, as well as to regular LE activities, which do involve lethal exertion of force, warranted or unwarranted, in situations of gun violence.
It’s interesting that this has been designated an area for Defense-Justice collaboration; plenty of Defense contractors exist who research and develop body armor, as any cursory inquiry into the market shows. LE also has a dedicated market producing police gear. For the JPSG to enter this arena suggests a corralling of new Federal funds perhaps, or some kind of development of new technology – countermeasure shielding for spectrum technology? – that is not being fully disclosed here. Note that what is being stated above as aspects of this program are presented as inclusions (“efforts include”), not all-encompassing and exclusive.
This is also a relatively opaque section suggesting telemedicine application in penitentiaries and OOTW rescue operations, which implies audio-video consultation and data transmission of medical detail perhaps but does not expand on the suggestions implicit in the label of “biomedical technology” which could include medical telemetry, meaning implants, body area networks, biosensors, and implanted biomonitors, at nano- and micro-levels, to aid in remote patient monitoring and other telehealth initiatives.
To reiterate, the incidence of such biomedical implants found to have been non-consensually implanted in what can only be understood to be undisclosed and covert human experimentation and tracking operation projects involving variably, academic, medical, and military/Intelligence personnel has been reported in large numbers by Americans as also people worldwide. It is possible therefore that the opacity of the language in this section obscures the larger truths of such non-consensual implantation being part and parcel of a plethora of telehealth processes and technologies being tested silently on people.
This latter possibility in fact has increasingly been reported by people experiencing invasive radar activation of non-consensual implants within contexts of seemingly being probed in public by a rotating army of stalkers masquerading as community monitors and healthcare workers.
9. Limited Effects Technologies:
Significant, from this brief introduction (further screenshotted below):
As noted earlier, this section, which titles the report and occupies 5 of the 9 pages of this report yet details only one portion of the multi-technology JPSG program.
Further, its detailing is incomplete, as indicated by the language in the opening section.
Crowd control and deterrence devices being studied and developed under this LET program are presented here as innocuous, benign, and needed—as per a nonspecific claim of need. There is no indication however of actual studies to establish they are such, or actually “eyesafe” or “less lethal” as stated.
A significant fact to note is the language referring to “sponsoring” and “funding” programs and projects to develop these limited-effects technologies, which means JPSG is handing out grants and contracts to Defense/LE contractor companies to develop these weapons. This might well be the protocol by which all JPSG programs work, and could explain the AFRL contract with Decision-Sciences Applications, Inc. on NIJ and DARPA grants, mentioned above in the Concealed Weapons Detection section.
Electric Stun Projectile
This “effort” relates to a physical projectile using wireless, gas, or “conventionally propelled” means intended to electrically shock and stun a human target, as Tasers also do.Hardly a “Limited Effect” weapon, this is a stun gun intended to be used as a shock-defence if a soldier or LE officer is attacked. Note that the intent is still incapacitation, blunt trauma, high impact force–but using an electrical charge, not a high-velocity bullet.
Developed in San Diego, tested on the Marine Corps, probably rolled out and in use now, post 1997. Notice that the photograph is blacked out almost and reveals nothing. DARPA is not going out of its way to provide clear information here.
A look into Jaycor, the company, online, now subsumed into Titan Corporation, a larger Defense contractor engaged in large-scale DEW, satellite, and navigational systems manufacture, reveals their interest in other counter-personnel stun-gun non-lethal weapons and crowd-control devices. Titan Corporation is therefore now manufacturing both large-scale DEWs to take out battleships and smaller-scale non-lethal weapons (being characterized here as “Limited-Effects”) to take out human beings, or fell them for a while–no doubt with damages, as “crowd-control.”
Laser Surveillance and Dazzler System
While blinding lasers were banned by the European Parliament in 1995, the use of lasers to dazzle and disorient human targets did not stop, as BOSS, developed by the US Air Force’s Phillips Lab in Albuquerque, New Mexico demonstrates. It is interesting that this surveillance and dazzler system was developed for and presumably funded by the JPSG at an Air Force laboratory.
Notably, this system 1) involves the use of infra-red thermal sensors to find targets plus lasers to dazzle targets, 2) can be applied remotely from a considerable distance, and 3) intends both a psychological effect in alerting targeted individuals to being targeted by way of Show-of-Force bright illumination and the physical effect of deleterious uber-brighting or dazzling of the target’s eyes.
Again, not exactly Limited Effects, but labeled as such.
Finally, it is notable that further integration of this “Limited Effect” optical sensor-and-weapon system with acoustic sniper detection systems already developed under JPSG (as indicated above also by the AFRL/Decision-Sciences Applications 1998 Report) was also being explored in 1996, further evidence that sensor and “non-lethal” spectrum technologies were being developed and tested by the JPSG for multiple uses.
Handheld Laser Dazzler
Also developed by the US Air Force’s Phillips Lab, the handheld laser dazzler—whether portable in a backpack or camouflaged as a flashlight—demonstrates that non-lethal energy weapons, including lasers, promising limited-effects were being made by the JPSG on a smaller scale, at lesser power, for purposes of portability and ease of use.
Again, as per the 1994 DOD-DOJ MOU, the non-lethal Spectrum/Acoustic sensor-and-weapon technologies being developed by the joint Defense-Justice partnership here were being tested—are being tested, have been tested for the past 25 years—and “demonstrated” on real targets.
The publishing of flash-bang devices designed to fast-bloom-smoke, dazzle, whistle, and other such is the one consistent element that disclosure on non-lethal weapons has maintained. Unwilling to speak openly of radar and sonic devices with silent and invisible physical bio-effects on humans, literature from the Joint Non Lethal Weapons Program has not refrained from pointing openly to these dazzle and vibrate devices, in obvious attempts to misdirect focus away from the far deadlier bio-hacking and neuro-hacking devices of non-lethal sensor technologies and neuroweapons.
This is evidence that infra-sound (below 20 Hz, the threshold of human hearing) weaponry for crowd-control was being researched in 1996 and tested on people, specifically to determine the biological effects of such transmissions, and explore means of incapacitating individuals for crowd-control purposes with infra-sound.
Prior information, available online, shows that infrasound had long been known to produce bio-effects and brain-effects–nausea, disorientation, brain fog–in humans, since Dr. Gavreau’s discoveries and experiments with infrasound in the 1950s, and efforts had already been made to create devices and systems to use infrasound in a weaponized way against humans, as in the published US Patent 3612211, screenshotted below.
A salient point to note is that infrasound weapons (like other emerging weapons technologies) had been reviewed in the 1970s by United Nations conferences on disarmament, and efforts had been made, particularly by the Soviet Union, to halt the development of all such new weapons then seen as weapons of mass destruction. The US and UK were prominent naysayers to this plan in 1978 at the Conference of the Committee on Disarmament, where Hungary presented a paper on infrasound weapons and their effects. Now it appears that not only were such weapons not halted in development between 1978 and 1996, DARPA was arranging in 1996 for further development and testing of these dangerous acoustic weapons, long known to harm human bodies and brains.
The Section Titled Summary
While this document has touched on major program areas of the JPSG, its title and detail elaborate the more obvious flash-bang aspects of the “Limited-Effects Technology” program, while the Summary remains opaque. Notable however is the casual mention of “corrections” being aligned with the main parties involved in these joint programs, as in “military, law enforcement, and corrections” as the primary “user communities” being awarded “new, more effective tools,” with little description or specificity on the nature or kind of tools, and no summation of the high points of this document.
However, some definite conclusions can be reached regarding this entire document, in addition to all noted above at end of sections.
DARPA returned this one 1996 document to a multi-document request on JPSG programs begun 25 years ago, after 25 years.
This is not a fully disclosive document; much is being obscured, summarized, glossed over.
The Limited-Effects Technology program is only one of several JPSG programs mentioned in this document.
All these JPSG programs need to be understood, as stated, as deriving from the 1994 DOD-DOJ MOU which announced the testing and demonstration of “advanced technologies.” That MOU followed on the heels of a classified Non-Lethal Weapons conference in 1993, and several decades of development and study of Non-Lethal technologies and “Psycho-Corrective” Neurotechnologies. (See Background & Context, MOU.)
The need to limit force is reiterated as primary motivator in bringing DOD and DOJ together in a quest to find and use common modalities in wars on drugs and terrorism—a need which points directly to Anti Personnel Non Lethal Weapons—which are EMF Spectrum and Acoustic Weapons.
These JPSG OOTW/LE programs therefore are definitely focused on Non Lethal Weapons, that is, EMF Spectrum and Acoustic Weapons, which, by nature of the physical bio-effects they have on humans’ bodies and brains, are also Bioweapons and Neuroweapons—not mentioned as such in this document, but elsewhere disclosed, as for instance, by Debra Schnelle at the 2019 Blue Ribbon Emerging Biodefense Conference as Neuro Cognitive Weapons, by Dr. James Giordiano as Neuroweapons in numerous lectures, and discussed at length in the declassified US Army document Bio-Effects of Selected Non-Lethal Weapons as Bioweapons and Neuroweapons, with intended damage to the human body and human brain.
The JPSG comprises members from DARPA, US Army, National Institutes of Justice, Bureau of Prisons, and the FBI. Stands to reason that each of these institutions therefore—and their overseers, the Department of Defense and the Justice Department and leaders, the Secretary of Defense Mark Esper and the Attorney-General William Barr–is fully cognizant of the JPSG programs developing and testing sensor-and-weapon technologies on the streets of America described in this report.
Further, each of these institutions is being permitted to participate in all aspects of the RDA (Research, Development, Acquisition) spectrum, meaning it is acknowledged that these non lethal neuro/bio EMF/acoustic technologies can be tested and demonstrated by the Bureau of Prisons (on prisoners), FBI, and NIJ (on watchlisted citizens? on unwitting members of the public at airports, train stations, hospitals, stores, roadways?) just as much as by DARPA and the US Army (on military personnel? On civilians near military bases? on “indefinite detainees”?) and just as much as jointly developed.
Concealed weapons-detection technologies being developed indicate that people—unwittingly, without being informed—are being subjected to X-rays, ultrasound radiation, millimeter wave technologies, radar technologies, ULFs, ELFS, and magnetic fields, at short-range and long-range, close-in and remote, ostensibly for weapons-detection testing purposes, in any number and type of environments, including but not limited to airports, train stations, public areas, and private homes. These technologies could also be directed at people from inside buildings and homes, from cars, pickups, trucks, vans, from mountings in public locations, from parked vehicles in parking-lots and from moving vehicles while driving.
Sensor technologies for weapons-detection being tested at short and long range include low frequency magnetic sensors which plausibly track biofields, breathing activity, body resonance emfs, and low frequency brainwaves, using superconducting quantum interference and tunneling technologies, and comprising through-wall earthquake-life-detection monitoring, remote neural monitoring, and the surveillance and monitoring of brain states and emotion states.
GPS Tracking and identification technologies being tested and developed imply tagging-for-surveillance sensor technologies inclusive of RFID microchips, WBANs, biosensors, and nanosensors, and include monitoring and surveillance technologies such as different kinds of radar being tested and operated under ISR and military/Air Force Non Lethal Weapons Testing programs.
Sensor technologies being developed for sniper detection, based on biomimetic systems, could include the use of cochlear implants and other neuroprosthetics in the study of auditory and neurological processes, as indicated by companies developing such systems.
“Innovative exploitation” of IT communications infrastructure & new technology here could include hive-minding AI projects, nanobots, Brain Nets, quantum computing, and synthetic telepathy, among other undisclosed technologies, involving non-consensual, clandestine implantation of RFIDs and BCI Tech, as well as biometrics/DNA data collection and sharing—as part of developments in Military/LE cybernetics and telemetry, and as reported today by high numbers of Americans.
“Personnel armor” being developed as a JPSG program could include research and development of countermeasure shielding for spectrum and acoustic non-lethal bio/neuroweapons, although not expressly stated here.
Biomedical technology initiatives involving telemedicine and telehealth could include medical telemetry, meaning implants, body area networks, biosensors, and implanted biomonitors, of nano- and micro-levels, to aid in remote patient monitoring and other telehealth initiatives. Non-consensual implantation may well be part and parcel of a plethora of telehealth processes and technologies being tested silently on people, in prisons, as noted, and elsewhere.
Limited-effects technologies being developed and tested under JPSG include electric stun projectiles, dazzling laser devices of both mountable and portable kinds, and other crowd-control devices.
Acoustic devices using infrasound to produce physical effects for use in crowd-control to “incapacitate” was being studied at an Air Force Laboratory—and possibly being field-tested and “demonstrated” on populations to provide the needed “hard evidence” mentioned here.
Factually speaking, the disclosure in this document along with the disclosure in the 1994 DOD-DOJ MOU that these technologies are being tested is, at minimum, incontrovertible evidence that invisible, spectrum technologies are being operated and tested on the bodies of people, from a distance and from close-by, exactly as thousands of highly credentialled and credible people– often labeled as “Targeted Individuals” and characterized for credibility-disappearance as “mentally ill” by mainstream Govt-propaganda-pushing media –are reporting.
This document’s disclosure therefore—notwithstanding that much of its details have been withheld–is profoundly important in establishing that non-lethal weapons and sensor technologies, specifically EMF Spectrum and Acoustic Bio/Neuro Weapons have been developed, demonstrated and tested on populations under the aegis of joint Defense-Justice JPSG programs, since 1994.
With thanks to early reviewers especially biomedical scientist Tracy W for review and contributions to this checklist.
In light of the continuing use, worldwide, of Remote Human Access neuro/bio/chemical/RF/sonic/scalar/nano weapons which are causing untold suffering to millions, both physical and psychological, via unconsented-to Bio-Hacking and Neuro-Hacking, and which essentially constitute Torture, prohibited by all nations of the world, healthcare and law enforcement professionals in particular are called on today to wake up, get informed, and take action to protect, care for, and support the reporting victimsof Fusion Center, Intelligence Agency, Military, Security Service, Telecom, Defense contractor, and University/Research Institution crimesof non-consensual human experimentation, harassive Electronic Weaponry persecution, and subjugatory Electronic Surveillance, permitted and being hidden by massive Watchlist Fraud, as described in the Notices, Memos, and articles listed below, as well as disclosed elsewhere widely by other writers in articles, books, and websites online.
This Ten-Step Checklist with preface offers all concerned citizens, human rights advocates and activists, civil rights groups, media, medical professionals and ethical law enforcement officers a document listing the suggested steps hospitals, law enforcement, and doctors should take to honor the reports of genuine victims, to investigate these reports from a human rights and healthcare perspective, and to respond appropriately in the face of Intelligence agency, Fusion Center, Deep State/Military crime and political persecution with high-tech remote human access weapons and life-takedown operations to assist reporting victims and provide basic health care and community care–starting with checking for RFID implants, measuring EMF pulses on their bodies, doing X-rays, MRIs, Scada analyses, and generally honoring their witness and further exploring and assessing it with the help of radiology, medical physics, and other sciences.
High-Tech Remote Access Weapons Being Operated Worldwide Today on Humanity
Note: Psychiatry is being used to disappear these crimes, and is the problem here, not the answer. The profound irony of doctors, psychologists, and psychiatrists daring to suggest that reporting victims are “Mentally Ill” and hustling them into Psychiatry Wards & Mental Institutions, forcing them to take brain-damaging drugs, and refusing basic medical healthcare–based on their ignorance of Mil/Intel High-Tech Crimes today, their blind indoctrination by collusive mainstream media, and their own lacking medical education, or by way of their avarice and avid complicity–in essence, re-victimizing already traumatized and terrorized victims who need caring physical healthcare, not mental–must be addressed.
Law Enforcement — despite being fully aware of ongoing National Institute of Justice advanced-technology testing, US Defense and Air Force and NATO microwave/milliwave/other weapons-testing & Directed Energy Bio Behavioral Research, military-academic social engineering and Psychological Operations–is still trained to run community mental health interventions or 5150/302/Baker Act Mental Health Involuntary Holds on anyone complaining of DEW harassment, Neurotechnology harassment, or other harassment from neighbors or satellites and celltowers: this is entrenched perfidy, enabling the crimes of torture of citizens with Remote Human Access weapons andmust be stopped.
Key Articles on Mass FISA Abuse and State-Run Domestic Terrorism: Fraudulent Targeting, Watchlisting, Subjugating with Electronic Warfare Neuroweaponry, Blacklisting, Community Policing, Human Trafficking into Barbaric Human Experimentation
This checklist should be provided to all doctors, psychologists, psychiatrists, Law Enforcement officers, EMS personnel, nurses, hospital staff, technicians, administrators, all medical staff in Emergency Rooms in hospitals.
In conjunction with this check-list, a badge of Citizens Rescuing Citizens from Surveillance & “National Security” State Abuse should be presented.
This is because Defense, Security, and Intelligence agents flash badges, court-orders, and warnings to doctors and psychiatrists, stating the reporting victim is under a “National Security” protocol and demanding the withholding of all services and help to the reporting victim, also stating that the reporting victim is “mentally unstable” and is under surveillance; all this, while using, abusing, exploiting, and enslaving the reporting victim in terminal, torturous, persecutory and inhumane experimentation involving covert RFID implants, EMF/Neurotech Assault, DEW Testing, DEW Operator Training Psychological Warfare, Blacklisting, Character Assassination, Organized Stalking, Community Persecution and Life and Career Sabotage.
Extreme Human Rights Violations Ongoing Must Be Stopped
Women and men and children are being raped, burned, and mutilated with these EMF/Neuro weapons. Pulsed microwaves are being shot at people’s faces, throats, heads, lungs. Pulsed microwaves are being shot into people’s genitals. Organs are being destroyed, Knees are being destroyed, Heart attacks are being induced. Respiratory infections are being induced. Invasive and degrading sounds, smells, sensations, images, dreams, emotions are being injected into their brains. Additionally, they are being stalked, Psy Opped, and assaulted verbally in public. Then they are named “Mentally Unstable” by Mil/Intel so they can be isolated and guinea-pigged for life.
In Case of EMF/Neurotech Crime Reports by Reporting Victims of Covert Tracking Implants, Microwave/Directed-Energy-Weapons Assault, Invasive Brain Technology Assault, Anti-Personnel Electromagnetic Technology Assault, Organized Stalking & Harassive Community Surveillance
Call on Radiology: Send reporting victim of EMF/Neurotech Crime to Radiology for thorough and complete scanning to detect the presence of RFID chips or other kinds of emitting/receiving micro/nanotech all over body, particularly in upper arm, brain, spine, teeth/jaw, and cochlear implants in ear. Obtain FCC license markers from FCC RF registration tables for all radio frequencies detected.
Record burns and scars: Examine and record all scars, breaks, scabs, burn marks on victim’s body, and record with detail any narrated incident related to each.
Scan with Spectrum Analyzers, Acoustic and EMF Detectors: Isolate and observe if pulsed or other radiation directed on the reporting victim of EMF/Neurotech Crime can be detected in a ward which is kept as secluded from WiFi and EMF radiation as possible, using Spectrum Analyzers, EMF Detectors, Acoustic Detectors, and other means of radiation detection which radiologists and radio/electrical engineers can advise on.
Document the Report of Assault: Record and document in detail the entire narrative of covert-implant assault and radiation-technology assault the reporting victim offers.
Open 24-Hour Radiation Assault Watch: Put thereporting victim of EMF/Neurotech Crime on a 24-Hour Radiation Assault Watch, recording and reporting all Spectrum Assaults and sonic assaults on this person, using meters and detectors as noted above.
Scan Victim’s Home: Send an EMF Detection team to reporting victim’s home, so they can take scientific readings of incoming pulse radiation or sonic attacks at a variety of different times and locations inside the home over a 72-hour period.
Map the Cell-towers, Antennas, Satellites, Drones Near Home: Map the pattern of cell-towers and antennas surrounding the home. Map the satellites recorded over home and neighborhood. Map the presence and frequency of drones over home and neighborhood.
Call for Diagnostic Testing, Toxicology & Forensics: Use DNA damage kits and Live Blood Cell Analysis to detect radiation damage. Add testing for altered sugar metabolism and detection of internal infections like Dysbiosis, Systemic Candida, Scalp Candida, SIBO, SIFO, etc. Send reporting victim to Toxicology for forensic analysis of nanotechnology lodged or self-assembling in body and brain. Research and establish origins of nanotechnology
Call for Surgery: Send reporting victim to Surgery for theremovalof all detected RFID implants, Bio-MEMs and others which can be removed. Retain all removed implants for the record.
Create a Detox & Support Regimen: Start the reporting victim on a Detox and Support Regimen using powerful natural detoxing and cleansing methods, while also providing a supportive atmosphere for the reporting victim to rest, recover, and rejuvenate post this criminal Mil/Intel/Electronic Enslavement ordeal.
While it is clear that Offices of Legal Counsel at organizations such as the US Department of Health and Human Services, which houses the OHRP, Office of Human Research Protections–an office which appears to function in name only since it brazenly ignores public comment sent in to the SACHRP,Secretary’s Advisory Committee on Human Research Protection on the importance of Informed Consent in human experimentation, as reported previously here and as evident in their pushing-through in 2016 of a revised Common Rule rife with exemptions for Informed Consent, handed like candy to Intelligence agencies, the Department of Defense, and the Department of Justice, along with other government departments and Universities–who have essentially been thus (self-)permitted, by Deans of Universities, academics in Medicine, Law, and Bioethics, and government departments to freely prey on American bodies and brains without consent–basic humanity, common sense, and awareness of crimes against humanity from a general human rights point of view dictate the following:
That the Remote-Access Bio-Hacking and Neuro-Hacking of humans without their prior Informed Consent (as in fully-consented-to medical health monitoring) is most definitely a Crime Against Humanity.
That everyone who participates in such remote-access-of-humans with Covert or Stealth bio-hacking and neuro-hacking radio frequency/sonic/scalar/implant/neuro/bio/chemical technologies and equipment, on the instruction of another, whether within the context of a secretive or overt Intelligence/Defense/Justice/Fusion Center contract or academic grant as employee, contractor, student or as a volunteer in Community Policing programs involving Electronic Surveillance, all in the false name of Surveillance, Public Safety, and National Security, Public Health, Mental Health, or Medical Bio/Behavioral Research, is knowingly participating in this Crime Against Humanity being enacted without Informed Consent, as a modality of electronic and remote capture, suppression, and subjugation of another, and thereby engaging inHuman Trafficking.
The OHRP is particularly responsible since it requires all agencies of the government engaging in research using human subjects, including military divisions with internal Institutional Review Boards to submit a Federal Wide Assurance indicating adherence to ethical principles embodied by a particular set of guidelines such as the Belmont Report, Helsinki Declaration, or Common Rule.
Human Trafficking is Understood Worldwide to be a Crime
Today, as graduate students, neighbors, small business owners, private sector and Security service employees are increasingly drawn into chilling programs of Fusion Center community policing and monitoring as well as unethical medical or bio-behavioral research which include GPS tracking and electronic “anti-personnel” monitoring of people with wireless technologies, it is important to remind people of their base sense of morality, humanity, and integrity and ask everyone to think deeply about their own culpability in Torture, Electronic Enslavement, and Human Trafficking when they assent to participating in the remote-access bio-hacking and neuro-hacking of humans, often their next-door neighbors, customers, colleagues, employees, or family.
This notice was written a couple months ago specifically to inform work colleagues of the crime against humanity they were committing on an American woman non-consensually implanted who is still seeking justice, who reported (to this writer) she was being remotely-accessed at her workspot continuously, with intense pulsing pain signals being sent to various organs including private parts. It is this kind of remote access, for torture and sadism, that many people from all walks of life are reporting today, both in the USA and worldwide, and which needs to be fully outlawed, legislated against, and terminated.
This notice is being published in the hope that Human Rights, Common Decency, and Common Sense will prevail over the insanity of compliance to unlawful physical assault and battery on humans, achieved covertly and remotely—for whatever stated reason. The day will come when such crimes will indeed be prosecuted.
PLEASE POST WIDELY, IN EVERY NATION OF THE WORLD, FOR THE PROTECTION OF ALL HUMANITY
NOTICE OF CRIME AGAINST HUMANITY
DO NOT PARTICIPATE IN REMOTE ACCESS OF HUMAN BEINGS
Remotely Vibrating, Pulsing, Burning, Manipulating Human Bodies
USING WIFI, CELL PHONES, BCIs, WBANs, REMOTE EMF/SONIC DEVICES
Without Full Continuously Verifiable Informed Consent is a Crime Against Humanity
& Criminal, Prosecutable Offense as Torture of a Human Being
By international law, every researcher/agent/student/contractor/employee accessing anyone without their Full Informed Consent is a Human Trafficker.
Notice to One is Notice to All
Please be advised that by International Law, Article 7 of the Rome Statute, the Geneva Conventions, and the Nuremberg Treaty,
You are prohibited from remotely manipulating the bodies or brains of any human being without their own vocal, witnessed, verifiable, public, open informed consent in that moment and prior;
You are becoming an accomplice to crime if you participate in such manipulationon someone else’s directive, whoever it is, whether identified to you as a researcher, an investigator, an officer or agent for any agency, military, government, hospital, or your own boss,and for whatever reason;
You are personally responsible even if you perform such actions of wireless, remote manipulation under presumption, belief, or notification from anyone of your subject having “impaired consent capacity,” or of your subject being a “participant in a research project for her/his own good,” or “needing therapy” which you are falsely told you are providing through such bodily manipulation;
You can be publicly named, shamed, and prosecuted by the subject of your manipulations;
You can be held publicly accountable by human rights organizations, courts, and councils for your own individual actions of harm to another.
The covert remote access and manipulation of a human being by means of a wireless, spectrum, sonic, neuro device such as a cell phone app, bar code reader, RFID detector, infra-red emitter, microwave emitter, or scalar wave emitter, whether sold to you as Surveillance or Medical Monitoring, used to pulse, vibrate, send electrical vibrations, shocks, spasms, skin-burn, and other human bio-effects, is, quite explicitly, Torture, and a Crime Against Humanity.Please use your common-sense: no-one wants their private parts or any other body parts vibrated, pulsed, or burned by you—whatever misapprehension of “therapy,” “research,” or “benefit” you may be laboring under. These are crimes, and you can indeed be held personally responsible. Therefore, please DO NOT PARTICIPATE IN REMOTE ACCESS OF HUMAN BEINGS. You can and must say No, to unscrupulous traffickers, which may include Universities & agencies. (Note that every researcher/agent/ student/contractor/employee accessing anyone without their Informed Consent is a Human Trafficker.)
In a conversation with UK journalist Ian Crane today, shortly after his appearance at Southwark Crown Court this morning, David Noakes, CEO, Immuno Biotech, reported that the court had demanded further accounting of his assets with apparent intent to further strip him of all economic latitude.
In fact, says David, “They want to make absolutely certain I have nothing left because of course if I have nothing, I can’t make GcMAF anymore which is the exercise–the entire exercise is aimed at preventing GcMAF from ever hitting the public.”
As many know, David Noakes has been the subject of long-running persecution by the MHRA (Medicines and Health Products Regulatory Agency in UK/equivalent of FDA in US) following their forced and unsubstantiated shutdown of his company which had beensuccessfully treatingcancer patients and autism sufferers with GcMAF, a naturally-occurring bodily human protein intrinsic to the immune system which can be manufactured externally for those with compromised immune systems.
The powerful possibilities for a natural cancer cure inbuilt into the human body’s defense mechanism which GcMAF embodies is what the MHRA and the pharmaceutical industry it protects is frantic to keep hidden from the larger British, European, American and world public, David Noakes has stated earlier, citing the huge profits currently made by the chemotherapy industry, which would conceivably collapse overnight were GcMAF, a low-cost supplement, made available to all chemo patients.
This indeed is what David Noakes recommends, that people petition the NHS to put GcMAF into British hospitals, and similarly ask Congress to put GcMAF into American hospitals, in order to save lives, not just from cancer, but many other diseases and conditions it has shown a positive effect on, such as autism.
Doctor Healing Autism with GcMAF, Dr. Bradstreet, Shot Dead in June 2015
However, in peculiar opposition to the objectives of curing people from chronic and debilitating diseases, the FDA has shut down GcMAF manufacture in the US, and the MHRA has shut down GcMAF manufacture in the UK. Worse, in June 2015, a prominent doctor and researcher who had worked with David Noakes and successfully treated 3000 autistic children (as covered here earlier), Dr. Jeffrey Bradstreet, was shot dead, one day after his office was raided, while on a drive through N. Carolina, his body found face-down in a river, with much frenetic mainstream media coverage professing his death was a suicide.
The phenomenal success in treating autism Dr. Bradstreet had achieved along with Immuno Biotech — David Noakes reports that “60% of non-verbal autistic kids were cured in one week flat with an ultrasound probe held on the brain for 5-10 minutes after the GcMAF was administered” — was built on his keen research and studies of Nagalase levels in autistic children, noted online at many health sites including Age of Autism and AutismWeb (and covered here earlier).
Ian Crane notes that Dr. Bradstreet was one of a hundred and two holistic doctors shot dead in the USA in recent years, all by an assassin with a gun, many of them well-known and highly reputable, who had been having great success in treating patients with naturopathy, homeopathy, and other natural means.
Standing Conflict of Interest in MHRA
Clear evidence of conflict of interest (covered here earlier, and here) can be traced to the overt ties of FDA and MHRA regulators to pharmaceutical industry, where most in top positions have held senior positions in drug companies. Protecting the profits of the drug companies then becomes a key role of the FDA and MHRA regulators. The emphasis has switched from public safety to private profit-protection.
David Noakes points out that while the mandate of the MHRA was to “protect the British people from the 1.8 trillion dollar pharmaceutical companies and their chemical drugs that kill, actually what they do now is they protect the profits of the big pharmaceutical companies and kill 200,000 English people every year when of course this is actually a part of the Codex Alimentarius agenda — for the corporatocracy to completely eradicate all natural healthcare and all natural foods at the same time so condemning people to lives of certainly substandard health.”
Notably, as David Noakes points out, the Codex Alimentarius will dictate and destroy livelihoods and health of all people worldwide in its bulldozing strides to fully take down natural healthcare, which intent can also be seen in the MHRA’s frenzied suppression of GcMAF from the British public,
Grave and Injurious Perjury Committed By MHRA
David Noakes relays how his wife Lorraine Noakes’ bank accounts have been seized and how a wrongful figure of three hundred and fifty thousand has been attributed to her personal balance.
This appears to be part of the overall false-attribution scenario facing David as well, who says the judge was unable to move further against him for a few salient reasons, including the fact that he was representing himself in court, and that he had sent an email earlier this week to the court, denying the judge and court jurisdiction by pointing out the perjuries committed by the MHRA and the French OCLAESP against him and Lynda Thyer.
These perjuries include attributing wrongful balances — in the millions — to his and Lynda Thyer’s bank accounts — 11 million Euros, later corrected, after two years, by English Judge Supperstone to 11 thousand; duplicitously stating no scientific studies, reviews, or trials had been done on GcMAF when 150 papers have been written by 300 scientists, and when 1180 papers can be found on Google Scholar; duplicitously stating GcMAF needed licensing and regulation when it was a naturally-occurring bodily protein; and in duplicitously stating he had paid no taxes at Guernsey where his office had been, when he had indeed overpaid taxes there.
Each of these perjurious statements have been employed to level fabricated UK and French allegations against David Noakes and Lynda Thyer of terrorism, money-laundering, tax-evasion, and unlicensed use or sale of unregulated substances; the “11 million Euro” perjury has procured for Judge Gadaud an European Arrest Warrant on which Lynda Thyer was forcefully extradited and incarcerated in France.
The involvement of the French court and Prosecutor itself being highly suspect, since no GcMAF manufacturing or business had been conducted by them in France, says David, on the occasional holidaying weekends they had spent there at a rented home. Yet the Prosecuteur invented nine false charges against him, and against Lynda Thyer.
Lynda Thyer’s Dire Situation
David Noakes reports that he informed the judge that Lynda Thyer, “an innocent woman who is in a French jail put there by the MHRA is still on hunger strike after two months and has now attempted suicide twice and she almost certainly will not see the new year since the MHRA will almost certainly kill her by Christmas — but that’s no problem for them they kill 200,000 people a year so what does one more matter?”
An emergency appeal podcast and article was published here this week; members of the public are being asked to make a call to the British consulate in France or to local MPs to ask for Lynda Thyer’s immediate release from jail and from this wrongful prosecution and extradition based on perjury by the MHRA, the UK courts, and the French OCLAESP and French courts.
–RAE (Report, Analysis, Op-Ed) | Ramola D | Posted September 10, 2019
On the 21st of April, 2019, the Chicago Sun-Times, owned by a group of neither intellectuals nor literati but businessmen and politicians in Chicago, ran a story by columnist and editorial-team member Neil Steinberg, who was once arrested for getting drunk and beating his wife, and spent a month in an alcohol-rehab facility, as his profile in Wikipedia—in itself a forum famous for its selective truths and rampant propaganda (much like Steinberg’s article here)—so ardently details.
The title of this masterpiece by a little-known journalist now marked in Wikipedia as a drunken wife-beater is “Are you being tracked? Burned by lasers? Maybe you are a ‘Targeted Individual‘
Not solicitous, not concerned, not critically enquiring nor journalistically curious, but skeptical, mocking, stopping just short of sticking a question-mark at the end of that pithy projection of disbelief, and offering a label in quotes, “Targeted Individual,” priming the reader to care just as less as the writer about all of it.
A label, indeed, used as an indictment and straitjacket, a closed door and condemnation, as labels usually are.
And a not-so-subtle invite to the reader to dismiss the entire subject as illusory.
No Longer in Kansas, Neil, Time to Read Orwell
Which is more than confirmed in
Steinberg’s opening as he launches into a cascade of scenarios, all
presented as improbable, unimaginable—a skepticism which might be
convincing if we lived in Dorothy’s Kansas, but reeks of
Fusion-Center-driven propaganda instead since we actually reside in
post 9/11, post-Orwell, All-Horrors-Plausible America:
“Strangers are following you. Teams of them, coordinating their surveillance. Recording you. Attacking you with sonic devices. Maybe burning you with lasers. Maybe implanting grain-sized trackers inside your body. You can feel the hard bumps under your skin.
You are alarmed, naturally, and turn for help to those you trust: your family and friends. Maybe law enforcement. Only they don’t believe you. They might even act like you’re the problem. Like you’re crazy.
Welcome to the world of Targeted Individuals, a loose confederation of those, in their words, subject to the “growing crimes of organized stalking, surveillance, abuse and electronic harassment.””
This last, in tandem with the bland caption below the photo of a group of people with signs noting Covert Experiments, Torture, Microwave Weapons, and Failures of Law Enforcement, now labelled as “People who claim they are being put under organized surveillance and harassed by shady forces” continues the priming: you, the reader, are enjoined to react only with skepticism to the possibility of surveillance crimes, illicit experiments, torture, microwave weapons, and harassment being reported.
Because of course, with the callous promiscuities of the Patriot Act, the excesses of the NDAA’s Indefinite Detentions, the twisted revisions of the Common Rule favoring carte blanche secret experiments for Intelligence agencies & the Justice department in conjunction with Executive Order 12333, the cannibalizing military complacencies of 5241.1R which permit surveillees to be experimented on and character-assassinated, the hundreds of bio-behavioral field-tests with millimeter/microwave weapons currently ongoing, the numerous categories of citizen the FBI has declared it must and will surveil and investigate, the nauseous militarizing of police and hand-over of multiple powers to fusion centers, the sinister 1994 Memorandum of Understanding between the DOD and DOJ permitting the testing of “advanced technologies” on Americans, the many revelations by whistleblowers from the CIA, NSA, FBI, DHS of perfidy in-house inclusive of DEW attacks on whistleblowers, the hundreds of thousands of National Security Letters rubberstamped every year by the corrupt FISA court, the unauthorized spying of innocents up and down the coasts & heartland of the US, including the outright targeting and surveillance of an elected President by men in high office, the Stasi crossover into community policing nationwide, no organized surveillance and harassment by shady forces could possibly be happening, oh no…Neil Steinberg (the rehabilitated alcoholic) says so.
The Mental Illness, Paranoia, and Delusion Fraud: The DOD/CIA Psy Op of Labeling Victims and Equating that Label with Paranoia and Delusion
One part of this troubled scenario—where purported journalists can write hit-pieces on whole groups of people and get away with it, thanks also to precedent set by such stalwarts as The New York Times (“The United States of Paranoia”) and Wired (“Mind Games: The Tortured Lives of “Targeted Individuals””), proving they’re really full-on propagandists, paid to deceive—is the inherent difficulty in the label “Targeted Individual.”
A military term quite factual in its meaning yet offering a pigeonholing label now historically misused and abused by reporters who claim people “self-identify” as TIs (short-form for Targeted Individual) and do nothing to investigate their claims/reports but spend reams of column-inches mocking, ridiculing, and calling them “delusional,” this term now occupies a conflicted signifying space, at once literal and associative, which no doubt has been the intention all along, to tie the term to notions of paranoia and delusion.
Stage set, therefore, for a propaganda artist like Mr. Steinberg to engage in some hard-core Media POPPCon—Psy Op Propaganda Piece Conning—which he does, with aplomb. Reading the rest of his article follows the formula for propaganda success over at POPPConville (a MockOp subdivision of Langley): Cast TIs as delusional, interview someone who helps establish TIs are delusional, cast this someone as delusional, call on a psychologist to state the lot are delusional, bring up “mass delusions” and “Internet” syndromes, close-case on anything TIs claim, now that you’ve worked so hard to damage their credibility by naming them delusional.
What is lost in this merry-go-round of formula madness is that “Targeted Individuals” are reporting victims of extremely grave human rights violations under cover of Fusion Center Surveillance, involving the non-consensual use of silent electromagnetic weapons, sonic weapons, scalar weapons, neuroweapons, bioweapons such as microchip implants—all bio-hacking, neuro-hacking “advanced technologies” and “non-lethal weapons” that both DOD and DOJ have publicly established they are testing—treasonously and unethically—on Americans, in addition to harassive COINTELPRO, extrajudicial surveillance, and worldwide “community policing” Psy Ops also known colloquially as Gang Stalking—as this writer has been reporting for several years now, and as many other writers and whistleblowers, such as Paul Baird, Barbara Hartwell, Karen Melton-Stewart, Dr. Rauni Kilde, Mark Rich, Cheryl Welsh, Soleil Mavis, John Finch, Dr. John Hall, Dr. Eric Karlstrom, Harlan Girard, Dr. Corkin Cherubini, Mary Gregory, Renee Pittman Mitchell, Rosanne Schneider, Mojmir Babacek, and others, have also been reporting for years.
It is no exaggeration to say Targeted Individuals have been extrajudicially targeted for extreme persecution and illicit and unethical Mil/Intel experimentation—by corrupt criminals in power seeking to ruthlessly silence people of integrity, including activists and whistleblowers—and my own numerous interviews over the years, my own 6-year experience of being extrajudicially targeted, and my research and published investigative journalism, in addition to that of others (named above) confirms this.
Free’s Statement to Neil Steinberg Regarding Targeted Individuals
Being Mentally Ill
In this particular case, it has been extraordinarily concerning to myself and other journalists and human rights activists to note that Ella Free who runs talk shows on Talkshoe for TIs and has tried to establish herself as a radio and talk show persona under her banner “Freedom For Targeted Individuals,” purporting to be deeply concerned about TIs and seeking to offer human rights “support” is quoted as herself calling TIs mentally ill.
Calling spokeswoman, “Ella Free,” started with a surprise.
“A good portion of people who claim to be Targeted Individuals are actually mentally ill,” she said. Straight to the elephant in the room. “So many of them, people have the same story: it’s interesting that a person isolated is having a very similar scenario.”
She meant “interesting” as in “persuasive” — these people are describing the same thing, therefore it must have basis in reality. That logic doesn’t hold up.
Giving Ella the benefit of the doubt, despite being incensed—as an investigative science and technology journalist who has been researching and reporting on this subject for 5 years–at this false statement (more on this below) I contacted Ella fairly immediately on Twitter, DM (text on Twitter), and email to find out what she had said to Neil Steinberg and if indeed she had said what he claimed, that many TIs are mentally ill.
Free: “It Was A Strategy Behind It”
In the course of the convoluted text/email conversations that followed, it became clear that Ella Free had 1) indeed said to Steinberg that a “portion” of Tis were mentally ill, and 2) sought to explain to him simultaneously—with her apparently non-existent communications skills—that TIs “came across that way’ because “it’s hard to discern the symptoms”/”the symptoms seem the same.” Her texts sought to explain to me that she’d had a “strategy” behind this statement of hers, a strategy which had apparently backfired.
Does agreeing with a propaganda-publishing misleading reporter working for mainstream media constitute a strategy?
Ella also stated that she did not keep on top of all that has been published in recent times in terms of disclosure or analysis, which means she has missed Dr. James Giordiano’s recent rather stunning disclosures of military neuroexperimentation on “selected targeted individuals” and Debra Schnelle’s astonishing reveal of “neuro cognitive weapons” inducive of high-speed-Alzheimer’s the US Navy was seeking to build countermeasures for, and Dr. Hoffman’s and Dr. Golumb’s and Dr. Giardiano’s affirmations of neuroweaponry and radiation weaponry being used on the diplomats from China and Cuba reported to have been hit with sonic weapons originally–among other interesting revelations.
What DARPA, MIT, and Dr. Giordiano in
particular have been publishing recently is nothing short of
mind-blowing—especially in terms of public acknowledgment of the
kinds of neurotechnologies only Tis had previously been talking
about, even though patents for many of these have been long in the
Stressing how busy she is “supporting”
those who are targeted, she stated she had no time to read.
What then is she doing acting as a spokesperson for those targeted?
Post the publication of Report #144 with CIA whistleblower Barbara Hartwell, Ella Free left a torrent of comments on Twitter, including one disavowing any claim from her of being a journalist, and one suggesting that talking about the technology being used on targets was provenly pointless, in response to a tweet from me pointing out that Targeted Justice Board members Dr. Katherine Horton and Richard Lighthouse were both putting out Disinfo regarding the technology, and that Midge Mathis was blindly supporting them, despite, most especially, Dr. Katherine Horton’s well-reported and widely-known petty, juvenile, but profoundly injurious and sinister smear attacks, sabotage-activities, calls to violence, and echo-stalking/mirroring displays-in-plain-sight of her Intel Neuro-Linguistic-Programming efforts, the latter aimed directly at me, earlier described in The Consequences of Infiltration,Swiss Cheese and Bayonets, and The End of Techno Crime Fighters Forum: The Real Backstory.
Contextualizing Ella Free’s tweet (below) regarding ignoring the technology, are some of my previous tweets regarding Disinfo, clarifying my stance re. what I see as an influx of Disinfo being poured into the TI activism space by highly questionable personalities in Targeted Justice and Freedom for Targeted Individuals and supported and endorsed by others such as Frank Allen of Targeted Massachusetts (@FranktheArcher), and a couple tweets in response to Lulie’s (@B91827364) questioning of that stance. (Lulie apparently has removed her Twitter account, hence the blanks below.) Ella’s tweet, focus of this scrutiny, is in the last tweet pictured below.
Then there’s the assurances from Ella Free, post-article, that she’d had most enriching conversations with #MockOp minion Neil Steinberg and he was going to issue a follow-up article filled with truth and facts (Dream On, really), while stating to her it was not his intention to “sadden” anyone. In contrast, consider the actual pithless remonstrances she apparently made on email, post-article, which her pal Neil brushes off like he might a flea, oh, a mentally-challenged flea at that. Both below.
Media Tactic from Neil Steinberg: Find a Lone “Spokesperson” to
Cast as Delusional
Tellingly, and most intriguingly, Ella
revealed that Neil Steinberg had told her he wanted to talk to her
alone for his article.
Remember the POPPCon formula for
success in Mindwash Media, over yon at POPPConville (wealthy suburb
of Langley)? Cast TIs as delusional, interview someone who helps
establish TIs are delusional, cast this someone as delusional…
I spoke with Free and listened to her interviews on Internet shows, about how a bad online relationship expanded into obsessiveness — whether hers or someone else’s I’ll leave unaddressed. Maybe everyone at the beach was videotaping her.
“I knew right off this guy had hired these people to do this to me,” she said.
Maybe the stabbing pain in her leg was being induced.
I knew it was artificial,” she said. “I thought it was a laser, maybe going off the wi-fi.”
I do not mean to
suggest that I see Ella in the same light as any of the other named
witnesses above, each of whom has a solid history of highly credible
research, testimonial, and reportage behind them.
The difference is, Ella – whose words, as she stated to me, could certainly have been taken out of context in order to cast her as delusional, as evident in the semantic sleight-of-hand above – openly confesses she has no idea about the technologies being used, makes no effort to determine what they might be, discourages others from doing so (as recently on Twitter), and suggests it is schizophrenic to read and learn widely from articles and videos, exercise critical thinking, and get informed!
Insider-Outsider MockOp Media Psy Op: Factors of Note
I will also note here that Ella’s story of being obsessively stalked by a single deranged acquaintance appears to many of us, extrajudicially targeted, who are being multiply-monitored, surveilled, COINTELPRO’d, high-tech-weapon-hit and harassed by whole groups of Fusion Center-run minions (including local police, ambulance, and EMS personnel, often flashing Masonic symbols) in highly organized fashion indicative of Mil/Intel operations, is highly anomalous and in no way typical of the general TI experience. But comes across really as nothing but a fairy-tale, token concoction to gain her entrance into the highly-fragmented and severely-infiltrated, data-collector-strewn, targeted “community.”
In fact, as many readers may know, one important reason I am writing this article is to illustrate why Ella Free is clearly not a trustworthy spokesperson for those targeted and reporting victims of fusion-center trafficking into black ops military/intelligence/academic neuro/behavioral/medical experimentation, who are being disappeared with the label “Targeted Individuals” now freely being synonymized by Mainstream Media, as Steinberg does, with Paranoid and Delusional—as part of the gigantic False-Reality-Construct being run by Operation Mockingbird’s media minions, as noted in this recent expose of CBS 60 Minutes’ Targeted America, a well-scripted-and-played Tell-a-Lie-Vision production playing the Cuba/China Mysterious Weapons Charade.
When she is not informed, not well-read, not aware, what is she doing running an organization termed “Freedom for Targeted Individuals” and handing out flyers which strategized-tunnel-vision reporters like Neil Steinberg can latch on to?
Also of note is the fact that it is the Targeted Justice group here, along with Ella Free and Matthew Aaron’s group, Freedom for Targeted Individuals, offering a public face for mainstream Chicago media to notice while using her flyers: is this their joint intent–through on-street-activism, while also pushing Disinfo and Misdirection in efforts to limit the public disclosure, as covered here earlier?
And why, most of all, did Neil Steinberg interview only Ella for his little froth-piece with a purpose, to denigrate Tis as mentally ill? What does that really signify about his own interests in covering the issues of targeting and being targeted? Not to mention the interests of the Chicago Sun-Times in projecting those reporting the persecutory depredations of Surveillance Abuse and wrongful watchlisting—which has permitted Mil/Intel/Univ exploitation and human trafficking–as mentally ill?
How does this not
establish the Chicago Sun-Times as complicit, in this clear
Also: As Barbara Hartwell asks in her meticulous examination of Ella’s own words and actions here, who is supporting the many billboards she has now placed in many cities and seeks to place in many more? Those who are targeted and being destroyed are generally flat-broke, near-homeless, kept unemployed or low-income-employed by severe blacklisting, wrongfully psych-committed or wrongfully incarcerated; clearly her benefactors are well-monied: what is their purpose? Given especially, the Victim Message of those weeping blue-eyed billboards, which completely bypass the Governmental/Fusion Center/Military/Intelligence/Academic/Medical Research nature of these illicit targeting and persecution programs, and highlight contract-stalking instead, suggesting private stalking, not taxpayer-paid-for, pervasive, government-run, military-funded, Defense-granted programs.
To me, as to many others (who have reported to me the lopsided focus and selective highlighting of witness on the interminably long (3-4 hours) conference calls that she runs), the conclusion that Ella Free is a carefully-strategized, deliberately-planted misdirector “activist” running an insider Psy Op to match the carefully-strategized, deliberately-planted misdirector “journalist” outsider Psy Op, which Steinberg embodies, is inescapable.
And how this might fit into a historic alt-media construct run by CIA fraudsters keen to keep us all swimming in Fake News and False Realities, is well-described by CIA Whistleblower Barbara Hartwell in her observation of long-time alt-media persona Ken Adaichi, who stepped forward in 2017 to squash and obscure the witness of real truth-telling writers and journalists, including myself, by avidly tunnel-vision-spotlighting the Talkshoe antics of Ella Free.
My own previous comments on Ella Free’s Hollywood connections and background-supported ability to persuade the most extraordinary guests onto her calls, including such as former NSA Technical Director Bill Binney–who has to date ignored my several requests and invites to come do an interview on my video channel Ramola D Reports–can be found at The Consequences of Infiltration, and other articles and comments I have posted online.
for Organized Persecution With High-Tech Weapons: Of Course the
Government is Involved
On the subject of who is targeting and assaulting TIs, what also surfaced from my emails with Ella Free was that she had sent Steinberg a list of statements about people targeted which her FFTI partner Dr. Matthew Aaron had compiled. Much of this is highly questionable. Both have made statements that government agencies are not involved, when much evidence to the contrary exists. Pretty much everyone knows that large-scale organized social ostracizing, blacklisting, character-assassination, and harassment which includes ground and aerial stalking (involving small planes, drones, and helicopters), non-stop monitoring, neighborhood hostility, and obvious COINTELPRO on the roadways cannot be accomplished without Fusion Center and local government complicity and oversight.
While private individuals and companies may be involved in targeting and covert persecution of people, their participation is both concealed and made possible by Fusion Center (government agency) contracting. NSA whistleblower Bill Binney has expressly spoken of public-private partnerships in mass surveillance and counterterrorism activities which has ensured that thousands of private contractors are being supported and directed by the government.
Further, in a multiplicity of programs connecting Defense funds to University researchers (DURIP and MURI programs, for instance, as well as the Minerva Research Initiative and new Defense Education Institution and Civilian University Research (DECUR) Partnership) and to research institutions which are increasingly doing away with Informed Consent, citing lies and equivocations like Minimal Risk, Broad Consent, and Benefit to Participant, government monies are being funneled into unethical experimentation involving top Universities, hospitals, research institutions—as Dr. Millicent Black’s experience indicates, and others’ – matters of interest to this writer, to be further investigated and fully reported soon.
So yes—in contradiction to what Ella Free and Dr. Matthew Aaron suggest–these are unethical, inhumane government-run-and-contracted programs. Local governments/police/sheriffs/FBI are clearly fully aware, public and private sector both have been drawn into participating. Please see the plethora of reports at this site and in interviews at Youtube.com/Ramola D Reports that offer much disclosure on this subject.
Danger of Projecting Cover-Stories that Reporting Victims of Serious
Government Crime are Mentally Ill
Suffice to note in this essay that two
extremely grave crimes are committed by those journalists and the
psychologists/psychiatrists/sociologists they quote who engage in
such absolute deception:
The primary Failure-to-Report-Crime of covering up the base Government crime of wrongful Surveillance watchlisting, and from there, wrongful human trafficking into exploitative and persecutory and terminal (profoundly unethical) medical experimentation programs—and thereby misleading the public while protecting Serious Government Crime.
The also primary Abuse-of-Publishing-Powers-Crime of publishing injurious untruths which have extremely deleterious ramifications for reporting #GovtCrime victims within their families, work environments, and communities. Reputations are ruined, characters are smeared, careers are halted. Families and communities believe the published lie, disbelieve and shun the being-abused #GovtCrime victim. Blacklisting, social ostracism, social isolation, and utter ruination of the #GovtCrime victim’s life follow. Families themselves report the #GovtCrime victim as Mentally Ill to Community Services, police, and hospitals, and ruthlessly and cluelessly force their already-persecuted family-member into psychiatric drugging and incarceration—as reported in numerous cases. Medical treatment is compromised; many targets report that doctors IGNORE their actual physical problems and call for psychiatrists. Doctors, in fact, misled by Media Lies, believe the lie and completely dismiss the reports of #GovtCrime victims of radiation assault and implant assault as delusional.
This Question of Targeted
Individuals Suffering Mental Illness
The instant-labeling of Targeted
Individuals as delusional, precisely the intent and enacted intention
of the perpetraitors assaulting and exploiting them, as described
earlier, is nothing to endorse and project by any genuine human
rights activist seeking to represent, support, or protect them.
But regarding the notion that mental illness can exist among any sector or group of the population, including TIs, here is my base understanding: Yes, from what has been reported to me, and what I have learned, there are some who before they were targeted were being treated for milder issues such as anxiety, or stress, or depression, and continue to take pills for these—but not full-blown schizophrenia or paranoia; there are some who have developed PTSD or stress or anxiety after being targeted—for good reason, given the 24/7 COINTELPRO and neuro/DEW trauma they endure, and that is still not schizophrenia or paranoia; and most vitally, there are some, in fact quite a few crisis actors and infiltrators in the such-as-it-is TI community who write and speak disjointedly, leave weird comments on websites and under videos including mine, espouse bizarre theories and report a-credible occurrences: these are not the genuine targets but the genuine Intel plants deliberately playing mentally-ill in order to help outsiders like Steinberg label TIs as mentally-ill–and apparently feed Ella Free’s unsupported and unscientific notions of 5% of TIs being mentally ill as well.
And then, crowning coup for misleading, abusive, authoritarian Psychiatry: there are some, force-drugged, force-committed, force-false-diagnosed as schizoid, delusional, schizophrenic and on Disability—who are fully mentally-sound, sane and well, but victimized, exploited, persecuted, as described earlier.
Additionally, it is entirely possible–going by the historic Government record of rampant experimentation crime–that people locked away in psychiatric institutions or homes with false diagnoses of serious psychoses and schizophrenia are also being non-consensually experimented on by unethical Military/Intel/Academic researchers, just as prisoners in the nation’s numerous private prisons, including Guantanamo–as testified to by many imprisoned there, no doubt also are.
THE MISO/PSY OP CONSTRUCTED PERCEPTION OF MENTAL ILLNESS: Not to be forgotten is the fact that the entire MISO/Psy Op (Military Information Support Operations/Psychological Operations) of the “Gangstalking” COINTELPRO/MK ULTRA Trauma that targets are subjected to 24/7 in homes, neighborhoods, communities seems to be aimed at eliciting the self-incriminating projected symptoms of mental illness–heightened reaction to constant harassment and provocation, while slyly aimed also at provoking reports of stalking and gaslighting to be easily DSM-dismissed by DSM-indoctrinated psychiatrists as “paranoia” thereby creating the bugaboo “diagnosis” to dog and discredit reporting victims as paranoid and delusional.
Given that mental illness is the precise tool of oppression being used against targets and used to conceal these crimes publicly, it is the one most important aspect to be careful about when speaking to MSM reporters—which Ella Free, self-confessed “leader” (a term she has used to describe herself on her podcasts and conference calls) acting like she is to be considered a primary Voice for TIs, flubbed.
Psychology Professor David
La Porte: Paranoid Individuals Enflamed & Organized by the
Internet into “Probably a Delusion”
Then there’s the issue of the Authority Figure. Predictably, as in Mike McPhate’s Psy Op slam-piece in The New York Times, Steinberg cites a psychologist to give credence to this convolution of a “mass delusion” which, the psychologist explains, is fed by the finding-each-other phenomenon the Internet offers:
“People who are paranoid start to latch onto the same kind of delusion,” said David LaPorte, a professor of psychology at Indiana University of Pennsylvania.
“This is not uncommon. When airplanes first started, people started having delusions they were being followed by airplanes. The computer has been a huge issue that leaked into paranoid delusions. Every technological advance becomes fodder for paranoid individuals.”
“They’re well organized because of the Internet,” LaPorte said. “That’s part of the problem. It deepens and entrenches what is probably a delusion.”
Note the “probably” in the previous sentence. Sometimes the improbable does happen. Stalking is real, though usually by individuals, not shady networks.
“No one’s really actually talked to these individuals in a clinical way to establish whether they are nuts,” LaPorte said. “Anybody who has worked in this field for a long period of time, you hear stories of fantastic delusions only to find out it was true. What they’re talking about could be true, but it’s probably not.”
“To establish whether they are nuts,” note. Not, “To find out if what they are saying is true” but to establish whether they are nuts.
I wrote to Professor La Porte, given that his university affiliation was published and email posted online. My intent was to inform and educate him, and assure him he was wrong about his delusion theories in relation to government and military crime victims.
Subject: Re: Your recent comments in Neil Steinberg’s Chicago Sun Times article on “Targeted Individuals” versus the facts
This is the letter, sent to Professor La Porte on April 26, 2019:
From: Ramola D<firstname.lastname@example.org>
Friday, April 26, 2019 1:59 AM
Dear Professor La Porte,
I am an investigative science and technology journalist who has been covering the subjects of current-day science and technology, surveillance, Defense, ethics, and consciousness for the past 5 years, with an educational background in Physics, Business Management, and Writing and a 20-year career in teaching College English, Creative Writing, and Literature, as well as in management consulting and technical communications, and ongoing practice as a fiction-writer, poet, playwright, memoirist, essayist, literary editor, publisher, and journalist, in addition to broadcasts and articles at my media sites and channels, Ramola D Reports and The Everyday Concerned Citizen.
I am writing to you because I have covered the subject of “Targeted Individuals” for five years, and engaged in investigative research with the US military and Intelligence agencies on the subject.
In the course of my investigative reportage, I have studied military and Intelligence documents, spoken with and reported the testimonial of US Government whistleblowers and scientists, including from the NSA, CIA, FBI, Department of Defense, US Air Force, US Navy, NASA, and US Army, as well as former French and Belgian Intelligence; I have researched and reported the work, words, and testimonial of scientists from the CIA, US Navy and UK Navy, as well as widely researched and reported on the work of scientists and militaries worldwide, particularly in the areas of electromagnetic weaponry or DEWs, neurotechnology, EMF/neuroweapons testing, wireless telemetry, and surveillance technology. I have investigated and reported on human subject protections and non-consensual neuro-experimentation among other modern science and technology issues, interviewed a wide variety of professionals including science and technology journalists, authors, academics, neurologists, psychologists, psychiatrists, electronic engineers, scientists, writers, other journalists, and published the testimonials of many people worldwide reporting non-consensual military/Intelligence neuro-experimentation with Radio Frequency and Sonic technologies today. From my perusal of military and Intelligence documents, listening to and reading audio/video/print testimonial of whistleblower scientists and Intelligence analysts, researching the history of weaponized Neuroscience, and speaking personally with whistleblowers, and multiple reporting victims, I can attest to the reality of ongoing Neuro-technology testing and training as well as non-consensual neuro-experimentation with electronic warfare weaponry, Brain Computer Interfaces, and RFID tracking micro/nanotech on civilian populations in the US, Europe, and worldwide.
“Targeted Individuals” are the Crime Victims of the Military Intelligence Industrial Complex. The wrongful watchlisting of innocents and the human trafficking of them into military/USAF/Marine Corps Anti-Personnel Non-Lethal Weapons Tests and Neuro Surveillance Beta Testing by the National Institute of Justice/FBI/CIA as well as military and NIH/NSF medical experiments have together unleashed a new era of horrific violence in our midst with Spectrum (EMF/sonic/scalar) weapons being used on people; these people are literally the targets of new emerging military technologies which use Radar, Scalar, and Sonic tech as well as covert RFID/nanotech implants on their bodies to non-consensually test out a variety of concepts from cybernetics, AI, robotics, neurotechnology, behavioral psychology, criminal justice and other sciences.
Your statement here therefore that “They’re well organized because of the Internet. That’s part of the problem. It deepens and entrenches what is probably a delusion.” is untrue.
“Targeted Individuals” are not delusional, nor does the Internet create their condition, the US Military and the US Department of Justice and the US Department of Homeland Security does. They are also victims of Torture, which is illegal by US and International Law, and those who seek to conceal these War Crimes being investigated and reported today by journalists and whistleblowers may well find themselves called to testify soon at new Nuremberg trials for their crimes: today, reporters like Neil Steinberg and others who work for corporate Propaganda Media as well as psychologists, sociologists, and psychiatrists who confirm their biases and propaganda, wittingly or unwittingly, by calling Mil/Intel Crime Victim targets mentally ill without investigating the matter will be culpable.
(Please note, it is people like Steinberg and psychologists who don’t read, don’t investigate the state of the world today re. Surveillance, except in mainstream media channels/fora which suppress the truth of what the Government is doing and conceal the War Crimes the Government is committing who are displaying Confirmatory Bias.)
These matters are discussed in numerous articles at my website, including this one by Dr. Seth Farber, a psychologist:
In addition, I recommend that you watch the many video podcasts I have posted at my Youtube channel RamolaDReports, which include interviews with many “Targeted Individuals”–in truth, Crime Victims of the MIIC.
Finally, please consult the two Investigative Reporter Statements for Todd Giffen and Frederic Laroche at my site for details of whistleblowing and declassified documents attesting to the reality of these War Crimes.
As a journalist publishing the truth of current-day reality, I will be compelled to address the several false and ignorant statements you have made in this article, in print. However, I urge that you inform yourself with deep exploration of this very vital subject, issue a retraction of your amazingly off-base and false statements, and wisely choose not to make the same mistakes in the future.
I also enclose a Ten Step Checklist for Doctors and Psychologists and Psychiatrists I am developing to help bring much-needed medical services for TIs. A primer on human rights is also being developed and I will be glad to send you a copy soon when it is completed.
Best wishes for your Continued Education, Ramola D
thank you for taking the time to write to me and also thanks for send me the links. As is often the case with interviews only a portion of what I said is ever published. I was quoted correctly when I indicated that I’ve heard wild stories from people in the past that on first blush appear to be delusions only to find out that they are completely true. And there is little doubt that in the past the government has done things to citizens without their permission or knowledge. That said, it is still an open question if paranoia is a possible explanation. I try to keep an open mind about such things and it is my intention to do further research on this by interviewing as many TIs as are willing to talk with me. I need to obtain permission from my university’s Institutional Review Board before I do so and hopefully that will occur this summer. I will definitely be looking at the information you sent me once the semester ends.
David J. LaPorte, Ph.D.
Professor of Psychology
Indiana University of Pennsylvania
1020 Oakland Ave. 220 Uhler Indiana, PA 15705-1068 email@example.com 724-357-4524
I then wrote back to Professor David LaPorte, copying my letter to Dr. Seth Farber, also a psychologist and insightful scholar and author whose well-known article on the subject of the Psychiatric Metanarrative regarding Targeted Individuals, the Deep State, and shoddy New York Times coverage is noted above.
From: Ramola D<firstname.lastname@example.org>
Sunday, April 28, 2019 3:57 PM
Dear Professor La Porte,
Thank you for your note in response and noted, that only a portion of what you said was published, and that you acknowledge previous stories of delusions you have heard turning out to be true.
I am glad to know you will be further investigating this matter.
However, given the subject matter, and given, as you acknowledge, the nature and history of non-consensual military and medical experimentation, it is my informed opinion that investigating the claims of truly “Targeted Individuals” is not the purview of Psychology alone, but also Journalism, Radiology, Toxicology, Forensic Science, Medical Physics, Neuroscience, and Radio Frequency and Electrical Engineering.
In fact, I would suggest that no psychologist is equipped to undertake a study of Reporting Victims of Military Weapon Use on their own. The material evidence provided by physical scanning for RFID implants via MRIs, X-Rays, Faraday RFID Detection, SCADA scanning for nanotechnology wave guides, and bodily and residence scanning for receiving and emitting radio frequencies, in conjunction with documented photographic and/or videographic evidence of high, pulsed EMFs such as is obtainable with an electrosmog detector or EMF detector app, spectrum analyzer, or other detecting and recording equipment; evidence of burns, blisters, lesions, and scars on body; hair, skin, and nail analysis, blood plasma analysis, as well as recorded footage of repeated Community Oriented Policing or Neighborhood Watch cell-phone-pointers/recorders or COINTELPRO swarming, or repeated drone and helicopter stalking will more readily furnish absolute evidence of EMF/Neuro DEW Targeting & Organized Stalking.
I have personally examined and reported on the scientific scanning reports from private investigators and industrial toxicologists attesting to the reception and/or emission of radio frequencies on different parts of the body (indicating presence of RF implants or RFID nano-clusters) as well as examined MRIs and X-rays and read the radiologists’ reports provided for several TIs, and reported in print on some of these cases. These articles will offer further information:
Your statement therefore, here, about paranoia cannot be tested without physical, medical, radiological analysis alongside. Excluding the Surveillance and Military Experimentation/Weapons Test and completely physical Weapon-Use context when examining the claims of TIs can only lead to false, illogical, and incomplete conclusions: “That said, it is still an open question if paranoia is a possible explanation. I try to keep an open mind about such things and it is my intention to do further research on this by interviewing as many TIs as are willing to talk with me.”
Reporters like Neil Steinberg who work for corporate media adhering to CIA Operation Mockingbird principles of Deception and Propaganda in the interests of Psychological Warfare and Information Warfare on the American citizenry are doing Americans a great disservice by starting, framing, and concluding that MIIC Victims are mental patients needing help from psychiatry–when they completely ignore the exacerbated Surveillance and Military Weapons Testing context (both public-domain knowledge) we are all living within, in contemporary America, and in fact, ridicule and mock it, as if it doesn’t exist. In this, they give away their obvious base allegiances to the Surveillance Abuse State — and their lack of intelligence as journalists.
Had Mr. Steinberg wished to really conduct a meaningful investigation, he would have spoken to a group of TIs and especially examined their physical evidence, as I have. He also would not have spoken to just one “spokesperson” for TIs–Ella Free–nor told her he did not wish to speak to anyone else (as she reports).
I would suggest that in your University-supported research project, you especially speak with those TIs who can and have furnished evidence of the physicality of this atrocious anti-personnel weapon targeting and nonstop torture, some of whom I have interviewed.
Dr. Seth Farber, whom I copy here, has suggested that I offer personally to be interviewed by you, since I too am reporting Military Weapon use on my person, and have collected much video/photo evidence of such; however, I am still collecting medical and radiological evidence of non-consensual RFID implants even as I continue to publish my own experience in articles and affidavits, and recommend, if you are interested, research of my story online, as published & broadcast in Washington’s Blog and The World Beyond Belief/Pineconeutopia, for more information. There are many others with solid radiological and toxicological evidence.
Ignoring the extensive information on ongoing military and Intelligence technology tests, experiments, and war crimes I had provided, including my suggestion that Radiologists, among other technology professionals would be needed to test out the claims of Targeted Individuals, and ignoring the insights and information in Dr. Seth Farber’s meticulously thought-out and referenced article, Professor David La Porte wrote back, working desperately to swing the focus back to Mental Illness:
Monday, April 29, 2019 9:24 AM
From: David LaPorte <email@example.com>
To: Ramola D <firstname.lastname@example.org>
As a psychologist I cannot, as you point out, investigate the various science and technology aspects of this issue since I have no training in those areas. I’ll leave that to others. You have to understand that to many people the claims of TIs sound “crazy” and that stain will remain until the issue of mental illness is formally addressed. That is my goal: to address the mental state of TIs, since that has not been done to date. Thanks for your offer of an interview and once I have received IBR permission I will certainly take you up on that offer.
David J. LaPorte, Ph.D.
Professor of Psychology
Indiana University of Pennsylvania
1020 Oakland Ave.
220 Uhler Indiana, PA 15705-1068
Considering that I hadn’t offered and wasn’t offering to interview with a psychologist who could not apparently assimilate the information I was providing, I felt obliged to write back to Professor LaPorte and inform him as much. I also forwarded this correspondence (on which Dr. Seth Farber had been copied) to Dr. Eric Karlstrom, Professer Emeritus of Physical Geography from California State University, and NSA whistleblower Karen Stewart, for their information, and Dr. Seth Farber wrote back a detailed letter analyzing and addressing Professor LaPorte’s stance. This email he addressed to this small group, although his letter itself was addressed to me. In addition I understand he wrote to Professor LaPorte separately. Professor LaPorte also wrote back again to me, informing me he was a trained skeptic and intended to hold his blighted pattern. I responded briefly, skeptical myself. All 3 emails are below, with Dr. Farber’s offering the clarifying final word.
From: Ramola D <email@example.com> Sent: Thursday, May 2, 2019 10:19 PM To: David LaPorte Subject: Re: Your recent comments in Neil Steinberg’s Chicago Sun Times article on “Targeted Individuals” versus the facts Dear Professor La Porte,
Thanks for your note and apologies for my late response. However, I felt I should clarify I wasn’t offering to interview with you, particularly since you fixate on mental illness in the face of the blatant Surveillance/Military Context as well as solid scientific evidence I was striving to call your attention to. Dr. Seth Farber wrote you the most apt response and I will not repeat myself. Suffice to say your efforts to address “the mental state of TIs” are an insult to the earnest efforts of (perfectly sane and mentally well) reporting victims of Military/Intelligence/Industry crime, and your determined ignoring of absolute fact AND evidence regarding the use of Anti-Personnel DEWs in testing and operation by DOD/DOJ suggests nothing less than pre-planned agenda, well in support of Mainstream Media Propaganda. I have published extensively on this subject; the information is out there for all sufficiently intelligent to avail of it.
Dear Ramola,I certainly understand your position and respect your wishes. I take issue with the intimation that I have a pre-planned agenda here. As a scientist I am skeptical by nature and training. So my agenda is to seek answers not to promote one position over another.
David J. LaPorte, Ph.D.
Professor of Psychology
Indiana University of Pennsylvania
I did write back to Professor LaPorte, although by this point I was tired of this being-ignored attempt to educate and inform him.
From: Ramola D <firstname.lastname@example.org> Sent: Friday, May 3, 2019 10:14 AM To: David LaPorte Dear Professor La Porte,
This is hardly an issue of promoting positions but unearthing facts, which I certainly do not believe can be accomplished by a psychologist alone in a void of factual and physical scientific context, and a stated pre-determined focus, which is precisely what invokes the possibility of pre-planned agenda.
I continue to investigate and publish on the subject myself, as noted earlier, as do others, and will look forward to more real scientists, including psychologists capable of assimilating physical evidence stepping forward to support the hard-core physical reality of non-consensual RFID, WBAN, BioMEM, Nanotech & BCI implants, RF transmissions, and acoustic and radiation weapon use on people, which is the reality “Targeted Individuals” AKA Military/Intelligence Weapons-Testing Crime Victims report.
Finally, the brilliant Dr. Seth Farber’s incisive, scholarly, and considered response, referred to in my final emails to Professor LaPorte:
Monday, April 29, 2019 9:08 PM, Dr. Seth Farber wrote:
These conventional psychologists are all the same…He writes, “You have to understand that to many people the claims of TIs sound “crazy” and that stain will remain until the issue of mental illness is formally addressed.”
This is a non-sequitur. It tells me that LaPorte has no intention of removing the stain– a stain reified by mental health professionals.
If a person–say a self-described TI– hears punitive voices that have no referent in the external world then by psychiatric standards and by common sense she is “mentally ill.” (I don’t accept the disease paradigm–so I would use a different formulation to describe her emotional crisis) If she says the CIA creates the voices in her head through advanced cyber technology to harass her, then (by psychiatric standards) she is a “paranoid schizophrenic.”
But if the CIA is in fact using directed energy weapons and experimenting on her brain then obviously her assertions are veridical and she is not paranoid–even by psychiatric standards.
LaPorte’s idea that he can determine whether someone is ‘mentally ill” without determining whether the putative technology –of which they claim to be victims– exists or not makes no sense. He does not need training to determine the latter—he only needs to be willing to look at the evidence.
He did not answer my letter because I pointed out the pseudo-scientific nature of “psychodiagnosis” which bases its finding of “psychosis” not upon scientific knowledge, but upon ‘”common sense” about what is possible. Psychiatry/Psychology substitutes psychiatrists’ consensus about what is delusional for a view of reality that actually corresponds to the “real world” as confirmed by empirical investigation. For example the veracity of TIs’ claims about group stalking could easily be confirmed or vitiated by hiring a private detective to investigate their claims. THat is an easy way to assess whether a TI is delusional.
But as psychologist Bruce Levine says they do not want to know the truth.
The validity of a view of reality is established by the generation of predictions that are subjected to testing and confirmed—not by taking a straw poll among psychiatrists and psychologists! Had scientists taken LaPorte’s approach in 20th century, quantum (physics) never would have been discovered.
I pointed out in my letter to LaPorte that once Hemingway’s friend/biographer read the FBI files on Hemingway 25 years later, he changed his assessment of Ernest. This may be the reason LaPorte wants to address the issue of “mental illness” without even glancing to see if there is an elephant in the room. He’s a phony. If he admitted there was an elephant in the room, how could he declare that people pointing to the elephant were all mentally ill, all delusional??
What if there was a tiger in the room? If a person’s sympathetic nervous system is aroused for no reason, he probably had a panic attack. If in addition he sees things that are not there, he is “psychotic” by psychiatric standards. But if there is a tiger in the room he would be “mentally ill” if his sympathetic nervous system were not aroused! LaPorte intends to look at signs of arousal without examining the environment.
The fact that Dr LaPorte thinks he can assess one’s mental health in abstraction from social context shows that like his cohorts he is involved in stigmatizing persons–any deviation from the status quo is deemed pathological, including any dissident (“extreme”) political views.
Psychiatry is an effort to discredit people by declaring them “psychotic.” In the case of TIs this requires ignoring the elephants and the tigers in the room. Then after the frightened person, the TI, is declared psychotic his claims about the deep state can be dismissed and the mental health profession can continue to serve–wittingly or unwittingly– the social control objectives of the deep state.
Sincerely, Seth Farber, PhD
As Dr. Farber so aptly pointed out, the stance that David LaPorte, Ph.D takes is to ignore the actual physical context and fixate on his primary and unsubstantiated obsession that reporting victims of high-tech Government crime must be mentally ill, that being the premise and lens to regard #TargetedIndividuals through. If that’s not a pre-planned agenda, I’d like to know what is.
Neil Steinberg’s glib recourse to LaPorte’s unexplainable premise advertises itself therefore doubly as government-protecting propaganda, and part of a sustained, determined, Information Warfare and Psychological Warfare operation being conducted against Americans–and by extension and in replication, citizens worldwide–by #MengeleMen in the US Department of Defense and CIA, operating through their larger umbrella of academics, journalists, brain-experimenters, weapons-testers, medical researchers, Intel analysts, insider activists and outsider reporters to conceal their incredibly appalling roster of extremely unethical #WarCrimes and Crimes Against Humanity via illicit targeting, surveillance, and injurious, intrusive, human-rights-violative non-consensual experimentation. Many people are involved in this criminal Psy Op, many agencies, many government, military and Intelligence divisions. Those losing out here are the innocent people of integrity, wrongfully targeted and trafficked.
The only way forward is to continuously expose all of it.
Her fiction, poetry, and writer-interviews have been widely published. Subscribe to her video-channel at Youtube.com/RamolaDReports for ongoing science and tech, investigative, and human rights journalism. Stay tuned for the revival of her literary review Delphi Quarterly and author website ramolad.com, the launching of a literary press, and a new book of short fiction whose publication has been mysteriously delayed. If you are a whistleblower, activist, journalist or other wrongfully targeted who wishes to publicize via podcast interview or have information to share for an article, please write to her with your story at email@example.com.If you appreciate her voice and work, please support her no-holds-barred, truth-seeking, and clear-speaking journalism via Patreon.com/RamolaD or via the Paypal Donate link here.
In a rather brief and opaque statement on June 28, 2019 titled an “Order” Judge Michael McShane of the US District Court of Oregon, demonstrating that Justice is quite visibly dead in Oregon upheld Judge Mustafa Kasubhai’s inexplicable and baseless decision finding Todd Giffen mentally incompetent, and ordered he be “restored to competency.”
Liberty weeps as we know, and Justice too
Stating he found no error, and the Review and Recommendation by Judge Kasubhai is correct, flying therefore in the face of all evidence to the contrary presented by Todd Giffen and his psychologist of many years, Dr. Seth Farber, as presented in Dr. Farber’s recent letter to Judge McShane, as well as investigative reports and declarations by this science-and-technology reporter on the reality of the military neurotechnologies Todd has reported being used on him non-consensually (and thereby establishing, for all educated Americans, including judges and lawyers who are not immune from literacy that mention of such neurotechnology does not constitute mental illness); and, additionally, several Declarations by supporters pointing out Todd is highly versed in legal matters and scarcely schizophrenic as Dr. Cynthia Low the court-appointed psychologist glibly stated after 2 hours with Todd and no evidence, Judge McShane essentially added to the blanket railroading of Todd Giffen’s case by several parties here and established that he too is a compromised judge unable to make an independent review of the actual facts.
In doing so he has also upheld the deliberate, planned Obstruction-of-Justice moves by US Attorneys Billy Williams and Joseph Huynh to persuade Judge Kasubhai to find Todd incompetent despite his being acknowledgedly articulate in court, noted by Todd and reported here earlier:
Despite lengthy objections to Judge Kasubhai’s ruling carefully detailed by Todd Giffen and sent in to Judge McShane, Todd notes that this brief order suggests he has “refused to look at any case laws or material or even ask that any witnesses be called to testify.”
Primary among his objections was the fact that he was not permitted to call psychiatrists and psychologists of his own choosing for the previous hearing, thanks to negligence and stalling by his court-appointed attorney Lisa Ludwig: “Under 18 USC 3006A I was reading the case laws, it states ‘defendant has an absolute right to examination by independent psychiatric experts of his own choosing separate from the courts appointment of any experts..’ Yet no motions were filed on my behalf, nor anyone hired.”
At that May 23 hearing with Judge Kasubhai, the speculation that Lisa Ludwig was in fact working with the judge and US attorneys against Todd Giffen as a “double agent,” does not appear to analysts of this case as an idle one.
“Only one witness was present; the government’s own, this was done to knock out from the record all my witnesses and doctors.
My attorney refused to hire any doctors or my private investigator solely to help the US attorney and judge create the record which would have no details about my abuse in custody, so I could be committed and the judge would not look like he was making any mistakes.
This was all rigged, and a set-up as Seth Farber and all my witnesses wrote letters supporting me. Lisa Ludwig was available in April and May to work on my case, but pretended she had no time.
The reality is she denied me a service on purpose, which is why no private doctors or experts were hired, and at the last minute, she moved to block having to subpoena anyone to make sure nothing contradicting Cynthia Low would be present.”
Further, while the US attorneys submitted a Memo to the judge fixating on Dr. Cynthia Low’s faulty assessment of Todd and seeking to discredit Dr. Seth Farber (as reported earlier), sudden stating of need for a “forensic psychologist” in court and Lisa Ludwig’s failure to support Dr. Farber in court also sought to exclude Dr. Farber.
“My attorney had him present, but excluded his testimony entirely and refused to let him speak, so they could make it look like they allowed him to be called to talk – but in reality, they would not let him talk or have any witnesses there to back him up.”
Dr. Farber also had pointed this out to Lisa Ludwig in his letter to her:
Most egregious about the current ruling by McShane is his blanket dropping of the case and refusal to hold a rehearing, despite grave violations of judicial process and defendant’s rights.
“…I looked up the case laws for 18 USC 3006 and I found out I have a right to hire my own independent psychiatrist regardless of what the court thinks.
United States v Bass (1973, CA9 Cal) 477 F.2d 723
Defendant with history of mental illness whose competency and sanity had already been evaluated by two court appointed psychiatrists, has right to hire his own psychiatrists of choosing under 18 USC 3006A.
United States v Pete (2016, CA9 Ariz) 819 F.3d 1121
District Court abused its discretion in declining to appoint neuropsychological expert to aid defense because (1) reasonably competent attorney would have found services of requested expert necessary to provide adequate representations; and (2) defendant was prejudiced by not having access to expert he requested because defendant requested expert services is furtherance of claim that would have, if meritorious, changed outcome of case.
So essentially McShane was required to heed my requests for additional doctor evaluations in my objections because defendant has an absolute right to be evaluated by his own chosen psychiatrist. The appeals court would deem my objections to the magistrate’s findings as making timely requests to be evaluated by my own doctor, because McShane had not yet adopted or made any decision about my competency yet, but I was allowed under 20 USC 646(b)(1) to submit new evidence and have a rehearing to do so.”
Notice must also be made of Judge Kasubhai’s lengthy and spurious narratives in his Review and Recommendations where he demanded Todd be seen as incompetent by his order and be “restored to competency” by the court’s willing henchmen aka psychiatrists, which Todd spent several pages refuting, and which this writer intends shortly to dissect and address in closer detail.
One aspect of this missive can be commented on here, the intention throughout to shore up this manufactured notion of “incompetency” by projecting Todd as a manic and uncontrollable person given to outbursts, imagining covert government assaults, and therefore clearly delusional and incompetent:
Excerpt/Case No.: 6:18-mj-00236-MK, Document 67, REVIEW AND RECOMMENDATION
Todd’s own recounting of his calling out in court at that Dec 5 hearing when his then-court-appointed attorney was Todd Bofferding, was reported earlier:
By all counts, Todd Giffen has been the victim of intense discrimination in the Oregon District Courts, and appears to be being held unlawfully in prison (for nine months) by way of a collusive mechanism involving corrupt lawyers and judges, US attorneys and court-appointed psychologists all keen to protect non-consensual military and Intelligence neurotechnology experimentation being conducted unlawfully on hundreds of thousands if not millions of people inside USA and also abroad, worldwide—which this reporter once more reported to President Trump this Fourth of July week, as reports of horrific invasion of bodily and brain privacy, absolute torture, and grave human rights violations pour in from Americans all over the US and worldwide. (Please see the many video interviews with reporting survivors at Ramola D Reports on Youtube, and print interviews and articles at The Everyday Concerned Citizen for evidence of such reports, including highly significant interviews with NSA, CIA, and FBI whistleblowers on matters of Surveillance abuses and non-consensual Neurotech/DEW use on Americans.)
Basic investigative journalism establishes without a doubt that the kind of invasive brain assaults Todd Giffen reports are being reported also by thousands of others, testified to as ongoing by military/Intelligence whistleblowers including Dr. James Giordiano and Dr. Robert Duncan, and indicated as plausible by several declassified documents reporting the studied bio-effects of non-lethal weapons which include microwave technologies.
Spectrum weapons-testing contracts running Directed Energy Bio-Behavioral research programs and sensing & tracking air/ground systems communications are currently being run nationwide by the US Airforce, Air Force Research Laboratory, US Marine Corps, and other agencies through Defense contractors like General Dynamics and Lockheed Martin.
Does the Department of Justice, the FBI, and the Attorney-General imagine their current secretive use of these neurotechnologies and anti-personnel “non-lethal-weapons” also putatively hidden in documents as enhanced surveillance, biometric surveillance, surveillance devices, electronic surveillance, crime prevention, and advanced technology on Americans, non-consensually and intrusively and inhumanely, is going to be kept hidden forever?
But perhaps the real truth here is that these agencies, as also the CIA, NSA, and Department of Defense know very well that what is being reported by Americans is true, and fear the avalanche of culpability and retribution headed their way once the extent of their criminality in wreaking absolute torture and bodily/brain invasion on their unconsenting and impotent victims is fully known to the American public, and prompts the full exposure and shut-down of all their Classified-to-Conceal-Crime “brain research” National-Security-lie programs–which appear to have transcended MK ULTRA in criminality currently, or at least, as much as has surfaced of those 1970s Church Committee findings on MK ULTRA.
Hence the shutting-down of any possibility for justice in the judicial system, and hence this absolute control of judges and attorneys, who are willing to sound delirious with stupidity in their pronouncements of orders which fly in the face of all reason, and unashamedly inflict further criminal violations of human rights and outright political persecution hand-in-hand with criminally unethical psychiatry in the attempt to “restore to competency” a quite mentally sound and competent reporter of their crimes.
Matters of collusion, conspiracy, and sabotage have been extensively detailed in this article which includes letters and complaints sent to Lisa Ludwig, Todd Giffen’s attorney and Judge McShane by Dr. Seth Farber and this reporter as well as Todd’s own analyses from his jail cell in Sheridan, Oregon:
Todd Giffen is currently researching options wherein he can appeal this second lax finding by Judge McShane, find a private attorney willing to take on his case, and is intending to sue Lisa Ludwig for essentially operating as a double agent on behalf of the US Government and helping to lose his defense by failure to provide assistance of counsel, interference with his “compulsory process clause rights,” “deliberate indifference/reckless indifference to Due Process,” refusing to call witnesses and private doctors he called for, while also failing to procure him basic medical care and protect him from harm in custody.
Mojmir Babacek, founder of the International Movement for the Ban of the Manipulation of the Human Nervous System by Technical Means, author of numerous articles on the issue of mind manipulation, offers via email on May 24, 2019 this preface to an Open Letter recently published at numerous non-mainstream media outlets, and seeking wider exposure:
“Here in the Czech Republic we have started a campaign for legislation banning attacks by physical fields on human nervous system by an Open Letter to the Czech Government describing possible growth of occurrence of cancer diseases in the Czech republic due to increasing electromagnetic smog (global positioning systems, cell phone systems, Wifi etc. followed by 5G technology in a close future).
Czech statistics show that since 1985, until 2016, the occurrence of cancer tumors in the Czech republic grew by 140% and the growth of cancer disease causes presented by the World Health Organization (obesity, smoking, drinking alcohol, smog, etc.) can account only for a growth of cancer disease occurrence by some 10%. Cancer of the skin grew in the Czech Republic by 400% since 1992, and this is the time when the ozone hole in the atmosphere was disappearing. There should be no hole above the Czech Republic after 2020. So there is a good chance that it was the growing electromagnetic smog which caused the growth of cancer of the skin in the Czech Republic.
This article was not published in the major media, but at least some 35 independent or alternative media sites have published it. After the publication we were invited to the radio broadcasting of an Internet radio station, Infovojna (Infowars), in Slovakia to talk about mind control. Right now, as a next step of the campaign, we are starting publication of the Open Letter to the Czech Government asking it to enact legislation banning attacks by physical fields on the human nervous system. We hope to reach the same amount of publication of the Open Letter as with the previous one. The text of the letter is below.”
Open Letter To The Czech President, Government And Deputies Of The Czech Parliament And Senate
The USA and the European Union have invested since the beginning of the century billions of dollars and euros into brain research. As a result of this research, perfect maps of the brain were developed, including the areas of the brain that control the activity of different body organs or parts where higher brain activities, such as speech and thoughts, are taking place. The brain activities corresponding to different actions in those areas were also deciphered.
Thanks to the knowledge of specific locations of different centers in the brain and frequencies of the neuronal activity in them, teams of physicians are now capable of helping many people who were in the past, for different reasons, unable to participate in a normal life. There exist prostheses, which are controlled directly from the brain centers that normally control the movement of the limbs, https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=8082156, and enable people, who lost them, to use the prosthesis in a way similar to the way normal people use their limbs. Higher brain activities were produced as well. In 2006, scientists placed into the brain of a completely paralyzed man an implant which transferred the activity of his brain into different devices and enabled him to open his e-mail, control his TV set, and control his robotic arm. Other paralyzed people were able to search the Internet, play computer games and drive their electrical wheelchairs: https://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/18/magazine/the-cyborg-in-us-all.html?pagewanted=all .
Thanks to extensive brain research, computers were taught to understand the neuronal activity so much so that they are now capable of using the activity of our brain to reproduce our perceptions. Canadian scientists demonstrated an experiment, where the computer could interpret the electroencephalographical recordings from the brain to produce the painting of a face that the subject of experiment was perceiving: http://www.foxnews.com/tech/2018/02/26/this-literally-reads-your-mind-to-re-create-images-faces-see.html.
In the opposite way the data, processed by the computer in the way that will make them intelligible for the nervous system, can be transmitted into the brain and produce there a new reality. When an implant is placed in the brain and connected to a camera, placed on spectacles, for people whose photoreceptors in their retina stopped working, the sight is at least partially restored. In this case the camera on the spectacles is transmitting into the implant light frequencies and the implant re-transmits them in frequencies which “understand” the neurons processing the visual perceptions: http://www.businessinsider.com/scientists-put-a-bionic-eye-to-the-test-and-it-helped-blind-people-see-again-2015-7.
Just like in the case of visual perception, it is possible, when knowing the algorithms of brain processing of words, to generate algorithms of different words in the computer and transmit them into the brain in ultrasound frequencies and in this way produce in the human brain particular thoughts.
Everybody will easily fall victim to the proposal that, instead of typing or searching with the use of mouse, his computer or cell phone could react directly to his brain’s activity and take down his thoughts directly to the documents or carry out operations that has just occurred to him.
As a matter of fact Apple and Samsung companies have already developed prototypes of necessary electro-encephalographical equipment, which can be placed on top of a head and transmit electromagnetic waves produced by the brain into the prototypes of new smart phones. The smart phones would analyze those waves, find out what the intentions of their owners are, and carry them out. Apple and Samsung companies expect that the direct connection with brains will gradually replace computer keyboards, touch screens, mice and voice orders: https://lsspjournal.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s40504-017-0050-1. When the system is complete, it will be feasible for hackers, government agencies, and foreign government’s agencies to implant thoughts and emotions in people’s minds and “hearts“, when they will be connected to Internet or cell phone systems.
In 2013, scientists in the USA could infer from their brain activity the political views of people and distinguish Democrats from Republicans, and, in 2016, scientists used transcranial magnetic stimulation to make subjects of experiments more positive towards criticism to their country, than the participants whose brains were unaffected https://lsspjournal.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s40504-017-0050-1 .
Last year, the historian Juval Noah Harari was invited to deliver a speech at the World Economic Forum in Davos. The editor of the British Daily Financial Times stressed, when introducing him, that it is not usual to invite a historian to speak to most important world economists and politicians. Juval Noah Harari warned in his speech against the rise of new totality, based on the access to the human brain. He said: “Once we have algorithms that can understand you better than you understand yourself, they could predict my desires, manipulate my feelings and even make decisions on my behalf. And if we are not careful the outcome can be the rise of digital dictatorships. In the 21stcentury we may be enslaved under digital dictatorships”: http://www.ynharari.com/wef2018. In a similar way the Stanford University researcher in Neurology and Dolby Labs’ chief scientist Poppy Crum warned at the conference in Las Vegas: “Your devices will know more about you than you will. I believe we need to think about how [this data] could be used”: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-5611645/Future-devices-let-companies-scan-body-detect-mood-health.html.
In April 2017, the neuroethicist at the University of Basel Marcello Ienca, and Roberto Andorno, a human rights lawyer at the University of Zurich, writing in the journal Life Sciences, Society and Policy, published the article “Toward new human rights in the age of neuroscience and neurotechnology”: https://lsspjournal.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s40504-017-0050-1, where they called for the creation of legislation which would protect the human right to freedom and other human rights from the abuse of technologies opening access to the human brain. In the article, they wrote that “the mind is a kind of last refuge of personal freedom and self-determination” and “at present, no specific legal or technical safeguard protects brain data from being subject to the same data-mining and privacy intruding measures as other types of information.” Among the world media only the British newspaper The Guardian wrote about their proposal: https://www.theguardian.com/science/2017/apr/26/new-human-rights-to-protect-against-mind-hacking-and-brain-data-theft-proposed?CMP=share_btn_fb. This fact suggests that in the actual democratic world, there exists no political will to forbid remote control of human thoughts and feelings, no matter that such perspective breaks elementary principles of democracy.
In 2016 and 2017, 10 European organizations tried to convince the European Parliament and the European Commission to enact the legislation that would ban the remote control of activity of the human nervous system, since pulsed microwaves could be used to manipulate the human nervous system at a distance at present time already: https://www.globalresearch.ca/electronic-weapons-radio-frequency-radiation-remote-manipulation-of-the-human-nervous-system/5584676. The European Commission excused itself finding excuse that according to the principle of subsidiarity this legislation must be created in each of the European Union member states individually.
We ask you therefore to create in the Czech Republic a legislation which would ban, under heavy penalties, interference with the human nervous system and organism by external energies. This legislation should establish as well the teams, with participation of human rights organizations, equipped with technical devices, which would enable them to supervise obedience to this legislation. Otherwise there is a danger that in the Czech republic a political system will evolve, which will simulate for the public, that it is defending human rights, but in reality it will be suppressing them by classified means of remote control of the human nervous system. In the Czech Republic, there live at present time some 30 people who claim that they are subjected to experiments with weapons based on the effects of pulsed microwaves and have no legal means to defend themselves. In the future it could be the whole nation. Current fast advances in scientific research can discover other physical means how to manipulate the human nervous system than are pulsed microwaves or connection of brains to cell phone systems or Internet. It is high time to create legislation which will protect the brain, human nervous systems, and the human organism from harmful electromagnetic waves and attacks on freedom of thought and decision making.
–Citizen’s Association for the Ban of Manipulation of Human Nervous Systems by Radiofrequency Radiation
In a live broadcast yesterday, on the anniversary of her passing on Feb 8, 2015, on Ramola D Reports, initially interrupted by the usual disgruntled Deep State cyberhackers but soon resumed,
Dr. Eric Karlstrom and I honored the immense work and voice for humanity that Dr. Rauni Luukanen-Kilde, former Chief Medical Officer for Finland, long-time author, public speaker, and activist has gifted us, with her numerous books, articles, and video talks and interviews on the diverse subjects of DEWs, mind control weapons, microchip technologies, worldwide EMF control grids, Intelligence agency and secretive military predation on humanity, UFOs and ETs, other dimensional realities, eternity of the soul, parapsychology, and life after death.
Foremost scientific whistleblower on the use of DEWs, mind-control weapons and micro/nanochips on human populations in the US and Europe, Dr. Kilde traveled widely, experienced much, visited numerous military and medical conferences, researched in-depth, and reported to all continuously and candidly on her experiences, analyses, research, interviews and findings.
Taken too soon from us by DEW-inflicted cancer, in her own analysis–as recorded here, at Henning Witte’s White TV site, on Feb 8, 2015, a shining beacon to all who would dare to step forward in these times of abject totalitarianism and speak out to save humanity from ongoing and impending transhumanism, cyborgism, and deletion.
We speak also on the subject of how the attempted global takeover agenda is being rolled out–including on 5G and the Internet of Things, by who, and what targeted whistleblowers can do to help inform all to wake up and stop the totalitarian takeover.
“Targeted Individuals” who bear witness to the deadly electromagnetic and sonic weapons being used on all humanity today, are indeed whistleblowers–and the criminal suppression of their voices by a massive Intelligence cover-up to label them delusional, involving mainstream media and bought-and-sold psychiatrists, psychologists, and physicians must be exposed.
The fact is, the Age of Nuclear Weapons has given way to the Age of Weapons of Human Manipulation, and the military and Intelligence community who seem to believe they can keep using these weapons in secret forever on humans worldwide don’t want you to know they exist and are in wide-scale use on populations.
Note: Global Gestapo is an ongoing series of interviews and discussions with Dr. Eric Karlstrom on a variety of subjects relevant to the understanding of the power structure currently holding humanity captive, the understanding of our own power as individuals in addressing the injustice and technocratic lunacy of our times as we collectively seek to move humanity forward in the direction of freedom for all, justice for all, and evolving creativity, growth, harmony, and consciousness. Livestreams announced a few moments before start at my Twitter site, @EccEveryday; not really planned on a regular basis thanks to cyberhacking but you can subscribe to Ramola D Reports at Youtube, which will notify you when livestreams start.
Polish NTV Commemorates Dr. Rauni Kilde’s Life and Work | IVth International Day Against Mind Control
In a broadcast honoring Dr. Kilde aired on February 8, Dr. Eric Karlstrom was also interviewed on Polish TV station, NTV, by Ewa Pawela and station owner Janusz Zagorskimain with translator Maria Dominguez on various aspects of the current world situation including the intended 5G rollout, HAARP, and Mind Control covered by Dr. Kilde and also many broadcasters and researchers today.
Dr. Karlstrom, an Emeritus Professor of Geography with 30 years of experience teaching Physical and Environmental Geography, who retired from California State University, runs a plethora of True-Media websites with compendiously researched and synthesized information on such pressing matters of note such as the truth behind the massacres effected by the 9/11 destruction of the Twin Towers in 2001, the truth behind the chimera of Global Warming now morphed into the chimera of Climate Change, the truth behind the insidious New Age movement, the truth behind the phenomenon of “Targeted Individuals,” the truth behind the mass assault on humanity with Mind Control weapons, ELFs, neuroweapons, DEWs, and the truth behind the Globalist Agendas 21/2030 and the technocratic takeover of humanity. These websites include 911nwo.org, naturalclimatechange.org, and gangstalkingmindcontrolcults.com.
“ETK (Webmaster) Introduction: Ewa Pawela, the mainstay of “MindControl in Poland,” together with NTV television owner, Janusz Zagórskimain, organize the International Day Against Mind Control on 8 February of every year to commemorate the 4th anniversary of the death/murder of Dr. Rauni Kilde, Finnish medical doctor, author, “Targeted Individual” (TI), and tireless educator and advocate for the rights of Targeted Individuals. This year, Ewa asked me to participate in honoring Dr. Kilde by doing this interview. The topics they wanted to cover were mind control, HAARP, and 5 G.
TJanusz Zagórskimain conducted the interview and it was broadcast in both English and Polish on Feb. 8, 2019, with Maria Dominguez translating.
I very much appreciate the opportunity to make friends with and share perspectives with TIs and other concerned individuals in Poland and to honor the great Dr. Kilde, who in my opinion, has done more to educate others on the topics of mind control and gang stalking than any other single individual, living or dead.”
Outstanding in this interview is the detailed information Dr. Karlstrom shares about the many researchers and scientists and whistleblowers today alerting all about the dangers of 5G, the use of DEWs on all as for instance in the creation of the California fires, the great danger that humanity faces mutually in the continued and secretive roll-out of mind control weapons, and the great need for all waking up to these dangers–leveled against humanity by the corrupt, globalist coterie running shadow governments behind our de facto governments–to start acting together to protect humanity, a theme echoed as well in Global Gestapo 10.