Category Archives: America

Documentary Evidence of Covert Electronic-Weapon and Neurotechnology Use By US Government on Americans Series (2) The Limited Effects Technology (LET) Program Report | JPSG, OOTW/LE Programs, 1996

RAE (Report, Analysis, Op-Ed) | Ramola D | Posted January 30, 2020

Documentary Evidence since 1994 of Covert High-Tech Electronic-Weapon and Neurotechnology Use in Targeted Surveillance, Experimentation, Operations by US Government on Americans: A Series

(1) The DOD/DOJ Memorandum of Understanding on OOTW/LE, 1994

(2) The Limited Effects Technology (LET) Program Report | JPSG, OOTW/LE Programs, 1996

Unremarked in mainstream media, deliberately hidden from wider readership, there have been a series of declassified document FOIA-releases over the past few years which astonishingly reveal many facets of the now-known covert use of electronic-weapon and neurotechnology surveillance, experimentation, weapons-tests, and operations on the American public by various agencies and departments of the US Government and their contractors.

Similarity with Covert Global High-Tech Policing Operations: Similar operations have been unleashed worldwide, as reported extensively at this site and others online earlier. Some documentation in the public domain testifies to this global program, and will be reported more fully here shortly. For now, please see this Twitter thread, which discloses NATO High-Tech Non Lethal Weapon/Neuro Policing operations in Europe and discusses also how Non-Lethal Weapons Testing & Neuro Surveillance have been unleashed inside the USA:

HTML Page: Thread on Non-Lethal DEW Operations in USA, Europe, world, with references to US, NATO documents, articles 

On Twitter: Thread on Non-Lethal DEW Operations in USA, Europe, world, with references to US, NATO documents, articles

This series aims to address the public disclosures in recent FOIA releases of ongoing US Government use of Electronic Weapons and Neurotechnologies on Americans.

“Electronic Weapon” herein refers to the spectrum weapons used in Electronic Warfare as defined by the Department of Defense (DOD) in documents, particularly relates to anti-personnel weapons, includes all labeled as non-lethal-weapon, less-than-lethal weapon, psychotronic weapon, neuroweapon, next generation and emerging technologies, and includes RFID (Radio Frequency IDentification) and BCI (Brain Computer Interface) tech.


(2) The Limited Effects Technology (LET) Program Report | JPSG, OOTW/LE Programs, 1996

PDF: The Limited Effects Technology (LET) Program Report | JPSG, OOTW/LE Programs, 1996

Recent document releases into the public domain include this Limited Effects Technology Program Report (linked above) released by the US Department of Defense on FOIA request on May 31, 2019 to Harun Krasna via Muckrock News, on a multi-document request made in January 2018, where initial notice of delays from the DOD FOI Office (until September 2018) suggesting high volume of responsive records seems to have petered out by May 2019 into return of a single report from DARPA, as their final response letter shows.

This FOIA request was made in January 2018 and asked DOD for “Copies of all research reports, annual reports, and indices of the Joint Program Steering Group (JPSG) as established by the 1994 MOU between the Department of Justice and Department of Defense, dating from 1994 to the present.”

(NOTE: The same request was sent by Mr. Krasna to the Department of Justice in January 2018 and yielded several documents in February 2018, including the 1994 DOD-DOJ MOU reported here earlier. Of note, this writer had also queried the DOJ for this very same 1994 MOU in 2015, and was at that time denied this document, citing “no responsive records” and several claimed exemptions.)

The purpose of this article is to report on the structure, disclosure, and highlights of this JPSG LET Program Report, and offer insight into its content with an eye to more fully informing the American public what the implications and ramifications are regarding the use of anti-personnel military weaponry by domestic law enforcement and military branches on the American public, which is what this JPSG LET Program Report is premised on.

Notable About This Foia-Request Response

  1. DARPA chose to return one single document, after a 1.5 year delay, on this multi-document request for documents dating back (from 2018, time of request) to 24 years. (This should not be found acceptable to the American public—other reports obviously exist and are being withheld; DARPA should be queried again.)

  2. This document is dated 1996; no recent reports were released by DARPA; no notice of the ending of these JPSG joint DOD-DOJ programs has been given in this May 2019 response.

  3. This document is not redacted and is released in full, which implies that the disclosure of technology and policy in this document is acceptable now to DARPA; this is in line with the slow release of information on Non Lethal Weapons, Electronic Warfare, and Neuroweaponry the DOD has made online and in print—via notice of programs, weapons, conferences, articles, and recorded lectures in public-domain documents and sites online–in recent years. However it also implies the JPSG (a DOD-DOJ entity) chooses currently to reveal what’s in this document as applicable to Law Enforcement—which could be a way of corralling tacit public consent to Law Enforcement use by thus publishing notice of this insidious and pernicious weaponry.

  4. It is essential therefore for Media, human and civil rights groups to take note now of the disclosure here and ask further questions, examine implications for all, and delve deeper into what is really at stake with this “Limited Effects Technology Program.”

Basic Structure of This Limited-Effects Technology Report

This 9-page report with the JPSG Defense-Justice logo on the cover and naming David Fields as the Program Manager is divided into the following sections:

Background

Program Thrusts

The Limited Effects Technology Program

Electric Stun Projectile

Laser Surveillance and Dazzler System

Handheld Laser Dazzler

Pyrotechnic Devices

Acoustic Study

Summary

The Section Titled “Background”

Notable from the information in this section titled “Background” is the following:

  1. This Limited Effects Technology Program is acknowledged to be a JPSG program resulting from the MOU from 1994, reported earlier.

  2. The need for such a joint program merging the efforts of Defense and Justice in developing technology applicable to both is being rationalized and legitimized by recourse to stated historical reference of common “need” as technology requirements for both “converge.” This is assertion which is neither specific, transparent, nor explicatory. It is presumption which seeks to hide the fact that what is being discussed here, as the immediate technological lead-up to the 1994 DOD-DOJ MOU, discussed here, demonstrates, are Remote Human Access-and-Control Neuro/Bio Weapons—Non Lethal Weapons and Neurotechnologies (to some extent revealed in “Program Thrusts”), which are arguably highly invasive of bodily and brain privacy, integrity, health, and safety.

Please see the section Some Context to this MOU in Article 1 of this series for historic Non Lethal/EMF Spectrum & Acoustic/Neuro/Bio Weapons-Development background to the MOU and all technology programs the MOU has given rise to.

  1. Examples given of operations sharing this need are “the (Defense) provision of humanitarian assistance, peacekeeping, countering the flow of drugs into the United States, counterterrorism, etc.–and (Justice) law enforcement forces engaged in LE operations.” We are expected to agree that military operations, even “peacekeeping” (which should not be considered a military activity in the first place: weapons cannot “peacekeep,” they subjugate) share a common need for “limited effects” tech i.e., silent Human Access Weapons—which, it should be noted, are not being named as such here. This notion of “need” is presumption, and emblematic of coercion of consent.

  2. The Need to Limit Force or apply only a “minimum amount of force” as primary principle of action is posited here—again without corroboration from real-life where war casualties and police violence abound—as a severe constraint to military and police ability to function. The solution to this false claim (false because it does not seem to be a real-life principle by which either police or military adheres) then funnels down to Non Lethals or Limited-Effects weapons, which are being characterized as force-limiting weapons within a claimed hierarchy of severity which completely ignores the unethical, human-rights-violating aspects of bio-hacking and neuro-hacking weapons, which is what they are (as will be seen shortly). More accurately, this section should be headed The Need to Be Seen to Limit Force, with Public-Image-Boosting Non-Visible Weapons.

  3. Common Threats posit militarized drug-smugglers and terrorists with access to military and LE Tech, which in real-life is made possible (as we understand now from much investigative and whistleblowing reportage including from journalist Gary Webb, LAPD investigator and government whistleblower Michael Ruppert and others) by gun-running, drug-running, and open arms sales by government, military, CIA, mafia, and private-sector alike, which makes this a circular argument: Military and LE fuel the arms/police weapons industry which creates these weapons, as well as tools such as electro-optic imaging devices to aid night vision goggles and Electronic Weapon countermeasures. This circular view also promises endless escalation via blackmarket sales of new weapons. “The criminals have our guns so we need new guns” could go on forever.

  1. Common Missions which name the War on Drugs and the War on Terrorism imply that these are both military campaigns just as much as law enforcement campaigns, which would explain both the military-style DEA and LE SWAT team “drug” raids on homes, terrorizing children and families, and the non-lethal weapons-operations via DOD/USAF weapons-testing contracts on people wrongfully labeled “terrorists” as ensured by the Omnibus Counterterrorism Act of 1995 after the Oklahoma Bombing (a staged insider event, as per whistleblower evidence), and later the Patriot Act of 2001 post 9/11 (another staged insider event, as per much public analysis and testimonial). Yet, in mainstream media and government press releases, these missions are not disclosed as such—the military aspect kept hidden–with much secrecy especially attending the field testing aspect of otherwise openly-disclosed non-lethal weapons testing contracts inside America.

  2. The most significant disclosure from this section comprises notice of 1) the members of the Joint Program Steering Group, as deriving from DARPA, the National Institute of Justice, the FBI, the Bureau of Prisons, and the US Army; 2) their ability to engage at any point in R&D of the weapons mentioned here; 3) the notion that they could participate in “demonstrations” of this technology just as much as developments. Are demonstrations then, what people are reporting today as 24/7 silent microwave/milliwave/infra-red/neurotech weapons operations in their neighborhoods, with use of drones, small planes, satellites, helicopters, zooming cars, parked vans and cars, antennas, cell towers, smart meters, backpack stalkers? (These also appear to be weapons-testing activities, weapons-training activities, and weapons-operations activities.)

  3. Also significant is the information that the Limited Effects Technology Program is only one part of a multi-technology program established by the JPSG to address joint tech priorities of Defense and Justice in 1995. The other tech programs are described in Program Thrusts.

The Section Titled “Program Thrusts”

This section in the LET report discusses the actual technology programs of the JPSG, names certain technologies being developed, tested, and used in training, reveals that most if not all of these are Remote Human Access spectrum and sonic technologies, yet maintains quite some obscurity in disclosing certain of these technologies, for example using vague terms like “communications security technologies.”

It is interesting indeed that this document titled The Limited Effects Technology Program Report in actuality presents information on all JPSG DOD-DOJ programs (or all deemed safe to record), yet focuses only on some LE tech, and uses the same opening Background section to preface notice of all JPSG programs—which implies commonality of context and nature of weaponry, i.e., Non-Lethal, Remote Human Access/Control (as will be seen below).

Significant, in this section, are the following.

  1. The JPSG Program—the most essential program ensuring DOD-DOJ liaison re. “advanced technology development” as per the 1994 DOD-DOJ MOU—focuses on 7 technology areas, which, on close perusal, cover quite a bit of territory. This program in other words is being used to develop, test, and demonstrate sophisticated and secretive wireless, remote, radiation, EMF spectrum, acoustic, bio-communications detection, monitoring, tracking, and communications technologies with major implications for all individuals and the entire urban environment.

  2. The first six program areas are presented only in summary, with slightly more elaboration of the Limited Effects Technology program which titles the report. Notably, even this seventh section is not comprehensive in its coverage of the LET it purports to cover: the devices highlighted do not comprise the whole of the LET program, only that portion DARPA is willing to put in a document clearly intended for eventual public-release (after 25 years!) into the public-domain, which has happened now. (More on this subject in the LET Program section below.) 

  3. Concealed Weapons Detection:

Concealed- Weapons-Detection technologies the JPSG reports here it seeks to develop are “unobtrusive” —read, concealable in plain sight–systems which can detect weapons of various kinds, including those with little to no metallic content, from over 9 meters—27 feet, width of a couple rooms–away. Initial efforts were to cover stationary devices—but clearly this 1996 wording suggests mobile devices would also be developed.

Actual detection technologies in process then in 1996 included:

3.1 An X-ray sensor: which refers to sensor technology; X-ray sensors are variously used in medical/dental radiography and in scanning systems as in airport scanners for people or baggage.

They are possibly also used in Backscatter X-ray technology as reportedly carried in NYPD vans, about which NYPD, although sued by ACLU, was protected by the NY Appeals Court from divulging much about, while companies contracting with the US Government to produce “Z-Backscatter-Vans” offer more information on the X-ray imaging of vehicles they do;

3.2. Combined passive millimeter wave and infra-red sensors: which are sensors used in scanning systems which can detect objects by their relative millimeter wave glow or infra-red heat signature profile, literally see through clothes better than X-rays and give rise to images highly invasive of personal privacy. Both millimeter wave sensors and infra-red sensors are energy sensors, detecting bio-field energy and thermal signatures; the distance from which such sensors can be used is a matter for further research. Some infra-red sensors are used in cameras mounted on aircraft and satellites.

Interestingly, a document online from the Air Force Research Lab, written by an apparent contractor, Decision-Science Applications Inc., found online after the bulk of this article was written, reports in 1998 on Concealed Weapons Detection programs run on grants from the NIJ and DARPA--which suggests a possible connection to these JPSG programs, while revealing that NIJ and DARPA were funding the Air Force Research Lab, which in turn funded a private contractor, in a chain of inter-agency connections–and points to sensor technologies being intentionally developed to penetrate clothing.

Concealed Weapon Detection Program, AFRL Report/https://apps.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a359699.pdf

https://www.millivision.com/technology.html

Camera with Infra-red sensor showing heat signatures/https://www.wisegeek.com/what-is-infrared-imaging.htm#

3.3 Combined ultrasound and radar sensors: which translates to:

a) Ultrasonic sensors: the use of high-frequency ultrasonic pulsed transmitter/receiver sensors to send and receive waves in echo from materials to determine their composition or proximity (used in a variety of industries including healthcare, agriculture, target-tracking of animals or humans from UAVs or manned aircraft, water-level sensing, car or obstacle detection), used in short-range, up to 10-meters application;

b) Radar sensors used in short and long range (up to 100 meters) object detection, tracking target movement, collision avoidance in cars, and to detect materials with guided wave radar or special antennas which ultrasonics may miss, such as softer, powdery, foamier, dustier materials, using either Doppler pulses or frequency-modulated continuous wave radar.

https://www.maxbotix.com

3.4 Low Frequency Magnetic sensor: Magnetic sensors use a variety of physical effects related to magnetism, such as eddy current sensing, measuring small relative changes in earth’s magnetic field created by variations in magnetic material, to detect flaws in metal, movement of metals (as in weapons) carried on a person’s body, movement of large metallic objects such as cars, etc. Magnetic sensors detect metal carried on persons when radar alone, stopped by metallic-walls or reflective insulation barriers, is not enough.

Low magnetic fields relate to biofields; low frequency magnetic sensors can pick up low frequency (ELF, ULF body resonance frequency below 10 Hz, below 30 KHz) magnetic fields as indicated in rise and fall of chest cavity; this capacity is used in earthquake life-detection and through-wall surveillance in combination with radar sensors.

Then there are super-conducting quantum interference devices (SQUIDs) which also pick up very low emfs, such as brain ELFs.

MEMS and nanosensors using thin film magnetic technology also exist. (On this subject: Radar sensors used in prisons are taking recourse to radar tagging to distinguish inmates from  guards—implying the use of nanosensors in tracking, which appear to be of different kinds.)

Through-the-wall surveillance technologies/https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/07_01.pdf

Squid/Wikipedia

Finally, this section’s disclosure on then-current use notes that the X-Ray sensor was being “demonstrated”–meaning, operated–in a correctional institution in California—a prison or juvenile detention center. The use of sensor and imaging technologies in correctional and detention institutions must be thoroughly investigated, in relation to the bioeffect harms from such technology usage.

What Is Not Being Explicitly Stated But Implied In This Entire Section?

  1. These sensor technologies are being tested on populations as per the 1994 DOD-DOJ MOU in joint military-police programs, which means they are being used silently and experimentally on people.

  1. All sensor technologies, unless passive, require emission as well as reception of signal. This means that people—unwittingly, without being informed—are being subjected to X-rays, ultrasound radiation, millimeter wave technologies, radar technologies, ULFs, ELFS, and magnetic fields, at short-range and long-range, close-in and remote, ostensibly for weapons-detection testing purposes, in any number and type of environments, including but not limited to airports, train stations, public areas, and private homes. These technologies could be directed at people from inside buildings and homes, from inside cars, pickups, trucks, vans, from mountings in public locations, from parked vehicles in parking-lots and from moving vehicles while driving.

  1. Sensor technologies being tested at short and long range include low frequency magnetic sensors which track biofields, breathing activity, body resonance emfs, and low frequency brainwaves, plausibly using superconducting quantum interference and tunneling technologies, and comprising earthquake-life-detection monitoring or through-wall-surveillance as described in various other public documents, and plausibly also Remote Neural Monitoring or neurosurveillance, of the kind spoken about 28 years ago in the ex-NSA employee John St. Clair Akwei lawsuit against the NSA.

  1. As in the found document Silent Weapons for Quiet Wars, which posits the surreptitious use of socio-economic weapons of degradation to disable and disarm entire populations without their conscious awareness, the surreptitious testing of sensor technologies on populations is essentially the leveling of silent military spectrum weapons technologies on the bodies of citizens, without their knowing.

  1. The surreptitious leveling and usage of silent military spectrum weapons of bodily and brain monitoring, assault, and modification is precisely what thousands of reporting victims of EMF/Neuro DEW crimes worldwide—often labeled and dismissed as Targeted Individuals—are currently reporting, both inside the USA and out. Could it be that the testing of sensor technologies in concealed weapons detection constitutes one aspect of this surreptitious assault on citizens?

  1. Factually speaking, the disclosure in this document along with the disclosure in the 1994 DOD-DOJ MOU that these technologies are being tested is, at minimum, evidence that invisible, spectrum technologies are being operated and tested on the bodies of people, from a distance and from close-by, exactly as thousands of highly credentialled and credible people– often labeled as “Targeted Individuals” and falsely characterized for credibility-disappearance as “Mentally Ill” by mainstream Govt-propaganda-pushing media–are reporting.

4.Geolocation/Navigation/Communications:

Three aspects to location, ID, and tracking technology are being covered in these JPSG programs, as delineated in this section on Geo-Location/Navigation/Communications in the LET Program Report:

4.1 Locating or precision-finding, precision-targeting of specific people, objects, or vehicles—this implicates GPS (Global Positioning Satellite) and other satellite technologies, including handheld satellites, for GPS-tracking of RFID human/object tags, cell phones; as well as human/object RFID/other, Nano/Micro tagging technologies to facilitate GPS-tracking, in other words, Surveillance and Tagging-for-Surveillance technologies.

4.2 Identifying or pinpointing identity of individuals & things—this suggests Identifying Biometric Surveillance & Tagging-for-ID- Surveillance: Facial/Gait/Iris/Fingerprint/Body/DNA/Other Recognition Surveillance; Unique RFID Tagging (Nano/micro biosensors & object tags) & WBANS (Wireless Body Area Networks) for Identification. Again, Surveillance and Tagging-for-Surveillance technologies. Involves Biometric Data Collection.(Law Enforcement has long been involved in this.)

4.3 Monitoring or tracking movement of people and things—this suggests Surveillance & Tagging-for-Surveillance: Audio/Visual Surveillance using microphones and cameras; Cyber Surveillance of computers; Through-Wall Surveillance with RF/ULF/Magnetic sensor technologies; Medical/Health monitoring & continuous detection of RF/other Implants & WBANs using Radar, Wifi; ISR (Intelligence, Surveillance, Reconnaissance) surveillance using Radar from drones, spy/commercial planes, satellites, ground vehicles; Tagging-for-Surveillance: Unique RF/Spectrum & Nano/Micro tagging (correctional, medical) technologies, CCTL—Continuous Clandestine Tracking and Locating (military, intelligence) technologies; Sensor technologies (as discussed in the previous Concealed Weapons-Detection section). Again, Surveillance and Tagging-for-Surveillance technologies. (USAF, AFRL, USMC are currently conducting Non Lethal Weapons tests and ISR tests using these.)

Notably, “reduction of power consumption” is mentioned as a DARPA interest in tracking technologies; this might account for the increased development of passive or inert nanosensors which can be activated or energized by energy signals sent to them, rather than relying on inbuilt battery packs.

4.4 The two JPSG efforts mentioned here include Tagging, as discussed above, very slightly referenced with this line about tiny wireless sensors, termed “devices,” notably marked “modular” as in implantable WBANs, which do indeed have modules or nodes in a network. These are not just object-tagging devices, they are human-tagging devices.

Military tracking of objects and humans using sensors

The fully-implanted and centrally-monitored human

Sensors at level of cell, molecule, DNA

And this is not a slight JPSG effort at all: Tagging and sensor technologies constitute multi-billion dollar businesses and are intimately linked to all aspects of Geo-Location, Navigation, and Communications, as discussed above. Again, here too, DARPA should be more definitively and minutely questioned about these tagging technologies and how they are being used inside America, on Americans—especially since thousands of Americans, as also people worldwide, are reporting violative, non-consensual RFID micro and nano implants in their bodies.  

4.5 The first JPSG effort mentioned here, Soldier 911, is mentioned in DARPA literature as an emergency radio to help find soldiers in crisis.

However from the description in the LET report, it also sounds like a handheld satellite linked in to an emergency response network, functioning as a device to locate, identify, and track “the movement of individuals and vehicles,” which, if an additional feature (undisclosed in DARPA literature) on this device, is only possible through the use of pre-tagging of said individuals and vehicles with sensor and tagging technologies–or the use of SIGINT Remote Neural Monitoring, as described in the John St. Clair Akwei lawsuit vs the NSA in 1992, in the case of humans.

5. Sniper DetectionSniper Detection systems as mentioned here were intended to be of various kinds, including manually-portable, bodily-worn, and vehicle-mounted.

These systems, as stated above in the LET Program report–being explored and tested publicly from 1996 on–involve sensors: acoustic sensors, infra-red sensors, and integrated infrared-acoustic and infrared-laser sensors.

Interestingly, this section appears to be discussing technologies for detection of actual gunshot or sniper fire—not non-lethal fire, not spectrum-weapon-related shots. However the detection technologies themselves are spectrum technologies.

Brief research of these detection technology sensors indicates that acoustic, infra-red, and laser technologies are being developed and used by militaries to determine with pin-point precision the direction and location of fire from a weapon after a first shot. Sensors today are becoming highly sophisticated with universities (working on military grants, partnering with private firms) also involved in developing bio-mimetic systems of detection, using neural network learning and studying how bats and dolphins process sound and vibration.

It is notable that this program of Sniper Detection has been included as a JPSG program in this Limited-Effects Technology report as one of the multi-technology program thrusts of the JPSG.

JPSG, we recall, is the Joint Program Steering Group formed by the 1994 DOD-DOJ MOU employing parties from both Defense and Justice in mutually-relevant matters and projects of security and law enforcement, OOTW and LE, intending to jointly develop and test “advanced technologies” of common interest.

Some Undisclosed Conclusions

1. Could it be therefore that Sniper Detection is related to matters of Mass Shooters, the phenomenon of supposedly crazed “lone gunmen”–plausibly mind-control victims of MK ULTRA RHIC-EDOM (radio hypnosis intra-cerebral electronic dissolution of memory) radio-hypnosis—shooting up people in random settings, as well as the Live Action Drills with Active Shooters run by the Department of Homeland Security?

If so, this offers a connection not merely between the DOD and DOJ but also with the DHS; all three departments are in some way involved in these sniper detection programs.

This also offers a connection to War on Terror programs and funding, since mass shooters are characterized internally as Domestic Terrorists—even if their “Manchurian Candidate” creation is by covert agencies in Defense/Justice/DHS/CIA, undercover of Live Action Drills, for purposes of driving Agenda 21/2030 Gun Control agendas, as is often surmised by many analysts.

2. Further, the JPSG efforts noted here to develop sensors, in its inclusion of biomimetic systems and neuroscience research, now used in sniper detection in the field, may well involve the use of neuroprosthetics, as indicated by the acknowledged use of cochlear implants in medical and neuroscience research over several decades by a Defense contractor, Biomimetic Systems, Inc.

3. It is plausible therefore—and a matter for further investigation—that the non-consensual use and implantation of cochlear and other neurological implants—which numerous citizens have come forward to report, over the last three to four decades–for the study of neural networks and auditory processes has accompanied the JPSG efforts in this area of Sniper Detection.

6. Information Technology:While this section is quite opaque, a few conclusions can be drawn:

  1. The JPSG states that it is addressing the needs for instant and secure communications needs in LE and Military by taking advantage of advances in civilian and govt-sponsored IC technologies. This would not however require a separate program to do so, unless undisclosed advances were being acquired.

  1. These advances, hinted at but not specified, could include Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, autonomous systems, cybernetics, cognitive computing, Internet of Things, Internet of Humans, lesser-known Neuro/Bio-communications technologies such as V2K (Voice to Skull) and Synthetic Telepathy, Hive Minds and Brain Nets revealed by whistleblowers like Richard Alan Miller and Robert Duncan (while some brain projects are openly revealed by public-domain DARPA information and known to exist via academic/government focus in US and worldwide), robotics, nanotechnology, the miniaturization of electronics, quantum computing, and other aspects of modern ICT which are left unnamed here. Simulating all 100 billion neural connections of brain on future supercomputers/https://www.kurzweilai.net/new-algorithm-will-allow-for-simulating-neural-connections-of-entire-brain-on-future-exascale-supercomputers

    Brainternet-Connecting a Brain to the Internet as an IOT device/Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LSdN–axYbA

This possibility—of such undisclosed advanced projects being part of the IT program sketchily noted here–is once more underlined by the opaque disclosure of “innovative exploitation” of existing ICT infrastructure intended in the creation of interagency crisis management systems.

  1. Communications security technology” in common parlance includes encryption and authentication technologies which today include biometrics and RFID microchips, but is not further specified in this section.


Considering that the rollout of biometrics (iris, fingerprint, face, voice recognition) at airports and borders is being overseen by TSA, a part of DHS, and that DNA is collected by LE at jails and detention centers, it can be safely concluded that any joint program of Defense and Justice in this area would indeed encompass all of these certainly exploitative technologies.

  1. “Sharing information among agencies” points to shared information from different databases collected by different parties, including DNA collection databases managed by LE, and recently exposed for massive privacy violations. Police databases are apparently highly insecure, and corrupt officers have made it a practice to sell databases to private companies for thousands of dollars, a practice revealed by recent news articles, including by Chief Jones on Ramola D Reports.

Information Sharing across Law Enforcement/RAND report/https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR645.html

Law enforcement investigators seek out private DNA databases/Mashable

Police Are Collecting DNA From People Without Telling Them/Futurism

Police use of surveillance technology raises privacy concerns/MintPressNews

Across US, police officers abuse confidential databases/AP

Agencies Behaving Badly: Government Surveillance and Privacy Act Violations/Jurist

Ramola D Reports| Report # 120: Retired Police Chief Daymond Jones on Policing in America Today

  1. To conclude, the opacity of this section on Information Technology appears to hide much. It is entirely possible that non-consensual, clandestine implantation of RFIDs, as part of developments in Military/LE cybernetics, telemetry, biometrics, neuroinformatics in “innovative exploitation” of communications security technologies, is being executed by this JPSG program—as reported by high numbers of Americans. Again, this presents therefore an issue to be examined further with DARPA and the Justice Department.

7. Personnel Armor:This section, like the Sniper Detection section, seems to pertain explicitly to lethal weapons and not non-lethal or spectrum weapons.

However, it notes that lethal weapons threats—bullets from rifles and handguns—affect OOTW and LE operations both.

Protection from rifle bullets via advanced lightweight body armor in the course of OOTW/LE operations of any kind appears to be the focus here; the implication appears to be that such operations could involve rifle threats; it is possible therefore that this pertains, as also the Sniper Detection section, to mass shooters and the weapons (assault weapons, rifles) some have used, as well as to regular LE activities, which do involve lethal exertion of force, warranted or unwarranted, in situations of gun violence.

It’s interesting that this has been designated an area for Defense-Justice collaboration; plenty of Defense contractors exist who research and develop body armor, as any cursory inquiry into the market shows. LE also has a dedicated market producing police gear. For the JPSG to enter this arena suggests a corralling of new Federal funds perhaps, or some kind of development of new technology – countermeasure shielding for spectrum technology? – that is not being fully disclosed here. Note that what is being stated above as aspects of this program are presented as inclusions (“efforts include”), not all-encompassing and exclusive.

8.Biomedical Technology:

This is also a relatively opaque section suggesting telemedicine application in penitentiaries and OOTW rescue operations, which implies audio-video consultation and data transmission of medical detail perhaps but does not expand on the suggestions implicit in the label of “biomedical technology” which could include medical telemetry, meaning implants, body area networks, biosensors, and implanted biomonitors, at nano- and micro-levels, to aid in remote patient monitoring and other telehealth initiatives.

New Atlas article, 2018/https://newatlas.com/profusa-health-monitoring-biosensors/53870/

To reiterate, the incidence of such biomedical implants found to have been non-consensually implanted in what can only be understood to be undisclosed and covert human experimentation and tracking operation projects involving variably, academic, medical, and military/Intelligence personnel has been reported in large numbers by Americans as also people worldwide. It is possible therefore that the opacity of the language in this section obscures the larger truths of such non-consensual implantation being part and parcel of a plethora of telehealth processes and technologies being tested silently on people.

This latter possibility in fact has increasingly been reported by people experiencing invasive radar activation of non-consensual implants within contexts of seemingly being probed in public by a rotating army of stalkers masquerading as community monitors and healthcare workers.

9. Limited Effects Technologies:


Significant, from this brief introduction (further screenshotted below):

  1. As noted earlier, this section, which titles the report and occupies 5 of the 9 pages of this report yet details only one portion of the multi-technology JPSG program.
  2. Further, its detailing is incomplete, as indicated by the language in the opening section.

  1. Crowd control and deterrence devices being studied and developed under this LET program are presented here as innocuous, benign, and needed—as per a nonspecific claim of need. There is no indication however of actual studies to establish they are such, or actually “eyesafe” or “less lethal” as stated.

A significant fact to note is the language referring to “sponsoring” and “funding” programs and projects to develop these limited-effects technologies, which means JPSG is handing out grants and contracts to Defense/LE contractor companies to develop these weapons. This might well be the protocol by which all JPSG programs work, and could explain the AFRL contract with Decision-Sciences Applications, Inc. on NIJ and DARPA grants, mentioned above in the Concealed Weapons Detection section. 

Electric Stun Projectile

This “effort” relates to a physical projectile using wireless, gas, or “conventionally propelled” means intended to electrically shock and stun a human target, as Tasers also do. Hardly a “Limited Effect” weapon, this is a stun gun intended to be used as a  shock-defence if a soldier or LE officer is attacked. Note that the intent is still incapacitation, blunt trauma, high impact force–but using an electrical charge, not a high-velocity bullet. 

Developed in San Diego, tested on the Marine Corps, probably rolled out and in use now, post 1997. Notice that the photograph is blacked out almost and reveals nothing. DARPA is not going out of its way to provide clear information here.

A look into Jaycor, the company, online, now subsumed into Titan Corporation, a larger Defense contractor engaged in large-scale DEW, satellite, and navigational systems manufacture, reveals their interest in other counter-personnel stun-gun non-lethal weapons and crowd-control devices. Titan Corporation is therefore now manufacturing both large-scale DEWs to take out battleships and smaller-scale non-lethal weapons (being characterized here as “Limited-Effects”) to take out human beings, or fell them for a while–no doubt with damages, as “crowd-control.”

Laser Surveillance and Dazzler System

While blinding lasers were banned by the European Parliament in 1995, the use of lasers to dazzle and disorient human targets did not stop, as BOSS, developed by the US Air Force’s Phillips Lab in Albuquerque, New Mexico demonstrates. It is interesting that this surveillance and dazzler system was developed for and presumably funded by the JPSG at an Air Force laboratory.

From Defense Review, 2005/Laser_Battlefield_Optical_Surveillance_System_BOSS

Notably, this system 1) involves the use of infra-red thermal sensors to find targets plus lasers to dazzle targets, 2) can be applied remotely from a considerable distance, and 3) intends both a psychological effect in alerting targeted individuals to being targeted by way of Show-of-Force bright illumination and the physical effect of deleterious uber-brighting or dazzling of the target’s eyes.

Again, not exactly Limited Effects, but labeled as such.

Finally, it is notable that further integration of this “Limited Effect” optical sensor-and-weapon system with acoustic sniper detection systems already developed under JPSG (as indicated above also by the AFRL/Decision-Sciences Applications 1998 Report) was also being explored in 1996, further evidence that sensor and “non-lethal” spectrum technologies were being developed and tested by the JPSG for multiple uses.

Handheld Laser Dazzler

Also developed by the US Air Force’s Phillips Lab, the handheld laser dazzler—whether portable in a backpack or camouflaged as a flashlight—demonstrates that non-lethal energy weapons, including lasers, promising limited-effects were being made by the JPSG on a smaller scale, at lesser power, for purposes of portability and ease of use.

Portable Handheld Laser Dazzlers/https://www.tech-lasers.com/dazzlers/portable

Again, as per the 1994 DOD-DOJ MOU, the non-lethal Spectrum/Acoustic sensor-and-weapon technologies being developed by the joint Defense-Justice partnership here were being tested—are being tested, have been tested for the past 25 years—and “demonstrated” on real targets.

Pyrotechnic Devices

The publishing of flash-bang devices designed to fast-bloom-smoke, dazzle, whistle, and other such is the one consistent element that disclosure on non-lethal weapons has maintained. Unwilling to speak openly of radar and sonic devices with silent and invisible physical bio-effects on humans, literature from the Joint Non Lethal Weapons Program has not refrained from pointing openly to these dazzle and vibrate devices, in obvious attempts to misdirect focus away from the far deadlier bio-hacking and neuro-hacking devices of non-lethal sensor technologies and neuroweapons.

Acoustic Study

This is evidence that infra-sound (below 20 Hz, the threshold of human hearing) weaponry for crowd-control was being researched in 1996 and tested on people, specifically to determine the biological effects of such transmissions, and explore means of incapacitating individuals for crowd-control purposes with infra-sound.

Prior information, available online, shows that infrasound had long been known to produce bio-effects and brain-effects–nausea, disorientation, brain fog–in humans, since Dr. Gavreau’s discoveries and experiments with infrasound in the 1950s, and efforts had already been made to create devices and systems to use infrasound in a weaponized way against humans, as in the published US Patent 3612211, screenshotted below.  

A salient point to note is that infrasound weapons (like other emerging weapons technologies) had been reviewed in the 1970s by United Nations conferences on disarmament, and efforts had been made, particularly by the Soviet Union, to halt the development of all such new weapons then seen as weapons of mass destruction. The US and UK were prominent naysayers to this plan in 1978 at the Conference of the Committee on Disarmament, where Hungary presented a paper on infrasound weapons and their effects. Now it appears that not only were such weapons not halted in development between 1978 and 1996, DARPA was arranging in 1996 for further development and testing of these dangerous acoustic weapons, long known to harm human bodies and brains.

The Section Titled Summary

While this document has touched on major program areas of the JPSG, its title and detail elaborate the more obvious flash-bang aspects of the “Limited-Effects Technology” program, while the Summary remains opaque. Notable however is the casual mention of “corrections” being aligned with the main parties involved in these joint programs, as in “military, law enforcement, and corrections” as the primary “user communities” being awarded “new, more effective tools,” with little description or specificity on the nature or kind of tools, and no summation of the high points of this document.

However, some definite conclusions can be reached regarding this entire document, in addition to all noted above at end of sections.

CONCLUSIONS

  1. DARPA returned this one 1996 document to a multi-document request on JPSG programs begun 25 years ago, after 25 years.

  2. This is not a fully disclosive document; much is being obscured, summarized, glossed over.

  3. The Limited-Effects Technology program is only one of several JPSG programs mentioned in this document.

  4. All these JPSG programs need to be understood, as stated, as deriving from the 1994 DOD-DOJ MOU which announced the testing and demonstration of “advanced technologies.” That MOU followed on the heels of a classified Non-Lethal Weapons conference in 1993, and several decades of development and study of Non-Lethal technologies and “Psycho-Corrective” Neurotechnologies. (See Background & Context, MOU.)

  5. The need to limit force is reiterated as primary motivator in bringing DOD and DOJ together in a quest to find and use common modalities in wars on drugs and terrorism—a need which points directly to Anti Personnel Non Lethal Weapons—which are EMF Spectrum and Acoustic Weapons.

These JPSG OOTW/LE programs therefore are definitely focused on Non Lethal Weapons, that is, EMF Spectrum and Acoustic Weapons, which, by nature of the physical bio-effects they have on humans’ bodies and brains, are also Bioweapons and Neuroweapons—not mentioned as such in this document, but elsewhere disclosed, as for instance, by Debra Schnelle at the 2019 Blue Ribbon Emerging Biodefense Conference as Neuro Cognitive Weapons, by Dr. James Giordiano as Neuroweapons in numerous lectures, and discussed at length in the declassified US Army document Bio-Effects of Selected Non-Lethal Weapons as Bioweapons and Neuroweapons, with intended damage to the human body and human brain.

  1. The JPSG comprises members from DARPA, US Army, National Institutes of Justice, Bureau of Prisons, and the FBI. Stands to reason that each of these institutions therefore—and their overseers, the Department of Defense and the Justice Department and leaders, the Secretary of Defense Mark Esper and the Attorney-General William Barr–is fully cognizant of the JPSG programs developing and testing sensor-and-weapon technologies on the streets of America described in this report.

  2. Further, each of these institutions is being permitted to participate in all aspects of the RDA (Research, Development, Acquisition) spectrum, meaning it is acknowledged that these non lethal neuro/bio EMF/acoustic technologies can be tested and demonstrated by the Bureau of Prisons (on prisoners), FBI, and NIJ (on watchlisted citizens? on unwitting members of the public at airports, train stations, hospitals, stores, roadways?) just as much as by DARPA and the US Army (on military personnel? On civilians near military bases? on “indefinite detainees”?) and just as much as jointly developed.

  3. Concealed weapons-detection technologies being developed indicate that people—unwittingly, without being informed—are being subjected to X-rays, ultrasound radiation, millimeter wave technologies, radar technologies, ULFs, ELFS, and magnetic fields, at short-range and long-range, close-in and remote, ostensibly for weapons-detection testing purposes, in any number and type of environments, including but not limited to airports, train stations, public areas, and private homes. These technologies could also be directed at people from inside buildings and homes, from cars, pickups, trucks, vans, from mountings in public locations, from parked vehicles in parking-lots and from moving vehicles while driving.

  4. Sensor technologies for weapons-detection being tested at short and long range include low frequency magnetic sensors which plausibly track biofields, breathing activity, body resonance emfs, and low frequency brainwaves, using superconducting quantum interference and tunneling technologies, and comprising through-wall earthquake-life-detection monitoring, remote neural monitoring, and the surveillance and monitoring of brain states and emotion states.

  5. GPS Tracking and identification technologies being tested and developed imply tagging-for-surveillance sensor technologies inclusive of RFID microchips, WBANs, biosensors, and nanosensors, and include monitoring and surveillance technologies such as different kinds of radar being tested and operated under ISR and military/Air Force Non Lethal Weapons Testing programs.

  6. Sensor technologies being developed for sniper detection, based on biomimetic systems, could include the use of cochlear implants and other neuroprosthetics in the study of auditory and neurological processes, as indicated by companies developing such systems.

  7. Innovative exploitation” of IT communications infrastructure & new technology here could include hive-minding AI projects, nanobots, Brain Nets, quantum computing, and synthetic telepathy, among other undisclosed technologies, involving non-consensual, clandestine implantation of RFIDs and BCI Tech, as well as biometrics/DNA data collection and sharing—as part of developments in Military/LE cybernetics and telemetry, and as reported today by high numbers of Americans.

  8. Personnel armor” being developed as a JPSG program could include research and development of countermeasure shielding for spectrum and acoustic non-lethal bio/neuroweapons, although not expressly stated here.

  9. Biomedical technology initiatives involving telemedicine and telehealth could include medical telemetry, meaning implants, body area networks, biosensors, and implanted biomonitors, of nano- and micro-levels, to aid in remote patient monitoring and other telehealth initiatives. Non-consensual implantation may well be part and parcel of a plethora of telehealth processes and technologies being tested silently on people, in prisons, as noted, and elsewhere.

  10. Limited-effects technologies being developed and tested under JPSG include electric stun projectiles, dazzling laser devices of both mountable and portable kinds, and other crowd-control devices.

  11. Acoustic devices using infrasound to produce physical effects for use in crowd-control to “incapacitate” was being studied at an Air Force Laboratory—and possibly being field-tested and “demonstrated” on populations to provide the needed “hard evidence” mentioned here.

  1. Factually speaking, the disclosure in this document along with the disclosure in the 1994 DOD-DOJ MOU that these technologies are being tested is, at minimum, incontrovertible evidence that invisible, spectrum technologies are being operated and tested on the bodies of people, from a distance and from close-by, exactly as thousands of highly credentialled and credible people– often labeled as “Targeted Individuals” and characterized for credibility-disappearance as “mentally ill” by mainstream Govt-propaganda-pushing media –are reporting.

  2. This document’s disclosure therefore—notwithstanding that much of its details have been withheld–is profoundly important in establishing that non-lethal weapons and sensor technologies, specifically EMF Spectrum and Acoustic Bio/Neuro Weapons have been developed, demonstrated and tested on populations under the aegis of joint Defense-Justice JPSG programs, since 1994.

Related

Documentary Evidence since 1994 of Covert High-Tech Electronic-Weapon and Neurotechnology Use in Targeted Surveillance, Experimentation, Operations by US Government on Americans: (1) The DOD/DOJ Memorandum of Understanding on OOTW/LE, 1994

Public Disclosure on Neuro Weapons and Neuro Technologies In Use Today

Extrajudicial Targeting Technologies (Weapons Use/Tests/Abuse); Biometric Surveillance, Non Lethal Weapons, Neuroweapons

False-Claim of Mental Illness in the Microwave, Millimeter Wave, Other “Non Lethal” Weapons Testing on Citizens in USA & Worldwide

Ramola D/No Longer True: The NSA “Isn’t Getting Violent Internally in the US”: Millions Today in US Are Targeted with RF/Scalar/Sonic Weapons, Nano Weapons, Neuro Weapons, Chem/Bio Weapons

In Memory of Kim Straub: Whistleblower, Nurse, Advocate for Humanity

Report & Op-Ed | Ramola D | December 23, 2019

Last week I received the news that Kim Straub, mother of two girls, a nurse and human rights advocate who reported being unlawfully targeted, as thousands of Americans today and people worldwide report, had just recently passed away. I could barely believe this startling and tragic news since it seemed really like yesterday that she’d been on a Newsbreak with me at my video channel, reporting the incident of unlawful psychiatric arrest she’d experienced, living in a suburb, Collierville, of Memphis, Tennessee; I had to go back and look at the dates closely to remind myself it wasn’t this past summer but last fall, October 2018 when she’d been on.

I remember it was a very hot day here in the Boston area on the South Shore and we took a few minutes setting up while Kim stepped outside to find sunshine in her lovely rose garden in Tennessee for the interview.

I post the interview here again, in memory and gratitude. Kim was a nurse, with an understanding of how hospitals worked, how nurses and doctors in hospitals worked or were supposed to work, how drugs and Psychiatry wards in hospitals worked. She had gone down to the police station to report a theft in her house, while carrying with her–as she usually did, as a human rights advocate helping to educate Americans–flyers publicizing organized stalking and anti-personnel non-lethal weapons’ torture, crimes of Patriot Act and DOD/DOJ overreach, which she had handed out inside the police station as well.

In the middle of filing her theft report, she reports she was literally “jumped” by a police officer who handcuffed her behind her back, arrested her over her protests, and drove her down to the local Behavioral Health hospital. From there, she was admitted into a ward which she says was termed the “grossly psychotic” ward, the one reserved for people in the throes of extreme psychosis.

At the hospital–to put her in this ward for the seemingly extremely mentally ill and hold her there on Medicare fraud for a week–the police officer lied outright and told the clinical social worker taking down information that Kim had said she was “going to blow up the government” while also reporting proof of means, extrapolating freely from her information that she owned a gun.

Pure fabrication in other words, a lie pulled out of thin air by a deceitful and duplicitous police officer, apparently seeking to fill his quotas and name people “domestic terrorists” and “violent extremists” so that any number of kickbacks could then be extracted: budgeting funds and grants for anti-terrorism initiatives at the police station, insurance funds from Medicare for unneeded “treatment” for a week, the cachet of intimidation of city residents, and so on.

This is no longer an isolated incident; people across the country are reporting identical situations of wrongful psychiatric arrest and diagnosis, wrongful pickup on mental health charges, wrongful “Involuntary Holds” and consignment to psychiatric wards in hospitals, on any number of trumped-up charges of “psychosis” or “violence” following incidents of truth-reportage of anti-personnel DEW assault, or activism of any kind, whistleblowing, questioning, speaking out on anything–all indicative of tremendous abrogation of Constitutional and civil rights. This situation in the USA is mirrored in all Five Eyes countries and NATO countries, possibly all UN countries–it appears to be part of the quiet rollout of the NWO totalitarian agenda, facilitated in the USA by DHS fusion centers, and attempting the establishment of a no-questions-asked police state.

All the more reason therefore that people speak out now, while incidents like these occur and question and challenge their wrongfulness immediately. To this end, Kim Straub’s testimonial has been and continues to be vitally important. Her courage in speaking her mind and her candor in speaking out is exactly what is needed from everyone today if we are collectively to stem the rising tide of this Communist superstate.

Over this past year, Kim has kept in touch, sending on links to interesting articles and also to the DHS Trip Complaint Form for issues with TSA screening people may experience, a small way in which people can report their extrajudicial targeting to the DHS (which unfortunately appears to be involved in these targeting programs as well).

I had hoped always to work further with Kim on round-tables as I’ve sought to return to a focus on psychiatry as tool of the incipient police state, and am regretful now that we did not return soon enough to do a longer interview.

I hope however that her interview, her spirit of courage and conviction, her freely speaking out inspires many, all round the world, to never accept oppression when they encounter it, to always honor their own experience, to always record and report injustice, express indignation, and demand change.

I hope also that those who have experienced the kind of wrongful psychiatric and police oppression Kim reports continue to come forward to report their experiences and tell their stories, recent or not so recent; this is an ongoing subject at my channel and anyone can contact me via email with a brief summary for a video Newsbreak or report.

I thank Kim again for coming forward, for her honesty and openness, and I send love and healing prayers to all who knew her and loved her. We love you and thank you, Kim. Soar ever onward in spirit, may angels be with you and yours always.

Documentary Evidence since 1994 of Covert High-Tech Electronic-Weapon and Neurotechnology Use in Targeted Surveillance, Experimentation, Operations by US Government on Americans: (1) The DOD/DOJ Memorandum of Understanding on OOTW/LE, 1994

RAE (Report, Analysis, Op-Ed) | Ramola D | Posted December 1, 2019

Documentary Evidence since 1994 of Covert High-Tech Electronic-Weapon and Neurotechnology Use in Targeted Surveillance, Experimentation, Operations by US Government on Americans: A Series

(1) The DOD/DOJ Memorandum of Understanding on OOTW/LE, 1994

Unremarked in mainstream media, deliberately hidden from wider readership, there have been a series of declassified document FOIA-releases over the past few years which astonishingly reveal many facets of the now-known covert use of electronic-weapon and neurotechnology surveillance, experimentation, weapons-tests, and operations on the American public by various agencies and departments of the US Government and their contractors.

Similarity with Covert Global High-Tech Policing Operations: Similar operations have been unleashed worldwide, as reported extensively at this site and others online earlier. Some documentation in the public domain testifies to this global program, and will be reported more fully here shortly. For now, please see this Twitter thread, which discloses NATO High-Tech Non Lethal Weapon/Neuro Policing operations in Europe and discusses also how Non-Lethal Weapons Testing & Neuro Surveillance have been unleashed inside the USA:

HTML Page: Thread on Non-Lethal DEW Operations in USA, Europe, world, with references to US, NATO documents, articles 

On Twitter: Thread on Non-Lethal DEW Operations in USA, Europe, world, with references to US, NATO documents, articles

From Riot Control Tear Gas to Pulsed Microwaves and “Acoustic Psycho-Correction”The irritant chemical weapons of riot control of the 1960s and ’70s—the original non-lethal weapons–have steadily given way to a plethora of non-lethal technologies in the range of electromagnetic, acoustic, scalar, and other exotic neuro/bio technologies steadily released by military weapons research into law enforcement, and currently also into futuristic crime-prevention or Pre-Crime use over the ’80s, ’90s, and beyond.

(The Early History of Non-Lethal Weapons, Neil Davison;

Timeline/EM Weapons Interact with the Nervous System, by Judy Hall)

Public Domain Disclosure on Non Lethal Weapons Has Ramped Up Lately

This series aims to address the public disclosures in recent FOIA releases of ongoing US Government use of Electronic Weapons and Neurotechnologies on Americans.

Electronic Weapon” herein refers to the spectrum weapons used in Electronic Warfare as defined by the Department of Defense (DOD) in documents, particularly relates to anti-personnel weapons, includes all labeled as non-lethal-weapon, less-than-lethal weapon, psychotronic weapon, neuroweapon, next generation and emerging technologies, and includes RFID (Radio Frequency IDentification) and BCI (Brain Computer Interface) tech.

The Memorandum of Understanding Between Department of Defense and Department of Justice on Military Operations Other Than War and Law Enforcement, 1994

PDF: The Memorandum of Understanding Between Department of Defense and Department of Justice on Military Operations Other Than War and Law Enforcement, 1994

Recent document releases into the public domain include this MOU (linked above) released by the US Department of Justice on FOIA request in February 2018 to Harun Krasna via Muckrock News, signed by Janet Reno and John Deutch on April 20, 1994, when Reno was Attorney-General of the United States and Deutch was Deputy Secretary of Defense.

Some Context to This MOU

This Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) was preceded by decades of reported development of non-lethal energy weapons and neuroweapons by different departments of the US Government, including Defense, Justice, Energy, US Army, Navy, Air Force, DARPA, NSA, CIA, and NIJ, as indicated by various conferences held through the ’80s and early ’90s, by white papers from military and intelligence personnel, by declassified documents currently in the public domain as released by DOJ, CIA, NSA, and DOD, inclusive of the CIA’s MK Ultra documents and Project Stargate archives, and by information preserved in the Congressional record.

For instance, information on the growing focus by the Justice Department through the ’80s and ’90s on electromagnetic weapons can be gleaned from government reports on NIJ (National Institute of Justice) conferences on electromagnetic weapons.

Numerous military reports in journals detail the military development of infrasonic, radar, microwave weapons from the ’50s onward; their use in US Law Enforcement seems to have occurred particularly from the ’70s and ’80s upward.

Significant, in the ’80s-’90s lead-up to this MOU, are the following sampling of reports, white papers, and articles:

NIJ Reports

Sherri Sweetman’s NIJ Report on the Attorney-General’s (1986) Conference on Non-Lethal Weapons dated March 1987

NIJ 1993 report, NIJ Initiative on Less-Than-Lethal Weapons

Military Reports & Articles

The Electromagnetic Spectrum in Low-Intensity Conflict by US Navy Captain Paul Tyler, an essay included along with other critical essays in the 1986 Low-Intensity Conflict and Modern Technology edited by US Air Force Lt Col David J. Dean (link opens pdf of this essay).

Controlled Offensive Behavior (USSR) – a DIA Report, 1972

Nonlethality: John B. Alexander, The Pentagon’s Penguin, June 1993, Lobster Magazine

The New Mental Battlefield: “Beam me up, Spock” by US Army Lt. Col. John B. Alexander, Dec 1980, Military Review

Books

1969: Physical Control of the Mind: Toward a Psychocivilized Society by Jose Delgado

1970: Between Two Ages: America’s Role in a Technetronic Era by Zbigniew Brezinski

CIA Reports/Congressional Record

1977: Project MK Ultra, the CIA’s Program in Behavior Modification/Joint Hearings

Summations & Compilations of Reports, Patents, Studies from this time-period:

Mind Control, The Ultimate Brave New World by Dr. Nick Begich

Remote Mind Control Technology by Anna Keeler

Mind Controllers by Armen Victorian

One Notable Classified Conference

The 1993 Los Alamos-sponsored Classified DOJ/DOD Conference on Non Lethal Defense

The singular and secretive Los-Alamos-sponsored Justice/Defense classified conference on Non-Lethal Defense in 1993 at Johns Hopkins Applied Physics Laboratory no doubt had a direct connection to this Memorandum of Understanding, signed in 1994. The agenda for that conference is posted here.

Please see my earlier discussion on that deliberately-kept-secret conference and its consequences for Americans in these two critically questioning articles here—which include disclosures from multiple researchers, writers, and investigative journalists including Dr. Nick Begich, Dr. John Hall, Dr. Robert Duncan, and Renee Pittman Mitchell:

How Secret Policing With Deadly “Non-Lethal” EMF/Scalar/Sonic Neuroweaponry Has Been Installed Domestically Inside the US, & Globally

Is the US Department of Justice Secretly Permitting Local Law Enforcement & the Military to Assault American Citizens Using Covert Directed-Energy “Non-Lethal” Weapons?

Lack of Media Coverage, Human Rights Coverage, Public Disclosure & Debate of Non-Lethal & Neurotechnologies Promised by This MOU

Significantly, there have been no public debates, discussions facilitated by Media and human rights or civil liberties groups, disclosure from the Justice Department, nor disclosure from the Defense department on the intended or ongoing use of non-lethal Remote Human Access Weapons and Neurotechnologies on Americans, which this MOU promises.

Instead, there has been an unethical and treasonous official Media and Human Rights cover-up, which has led to the public being misinformed.  (This has been discussed extensively at this site, including in Open Season on Targets: Blacklisted Individuals, Extreme Abuse in Targeting, Secretive Lab-Rat Exploitation, & Massive Establishment Cover-Up.)

Highlights of this Memorandum of Understanding 

The purpose of this article is to report the content of this MOU—which is not fully transparent–highlight its main points, and offer insight into its intent with an eye to more fully informing the American public on what exactly has transpired here, what exactly this MOU has permitted, who is aware, who is involved, and who needs to be held accountable.

Significant, as stated, in this MOU are the following.

From the Section titled General, A and B:

  1. This was an agreement to permit Defense and Justice to jointly share and develop certain kinds of technology and systems for shared purposes, for Military Operations Other Than War (MOOTW), and for Law Enforcement (LE).
  2. This agreement sought to “conduct a program to enhance” both MOOTW and LE operations. (Was this also the kept-quiet political persecution program to target innocent Americans, activists, journalists–falsely labeled as terrorists–extrajudicially under Watchlist Fraud, and covertly use their bodies and brains for target practice in OOTW?)
  3. This agreement came on the heels of DARPA, NIJ, and FBI deciding to gift Law Enforcement with these certain advanced technologies on the basis of findings of “convergence” they made regarding the applicability of these technologies—still not described–to both military and law enforcement operations.
  4. DARPA, NIJ, FBI also felt these advanced technologies would “enhance the effectiveness” of both military and law enforcement missions.

From the Section titled Concept:

  1. The objective of this joint program was to “develop and exploit” this advanced technology for military operations and law enforcement operations both—and does not refer to this technology as weaponry here, although it clearly is, if being applied militarily or forcibly by military or police. This is weaponry.
  2. This joint program intended to open a “development and application program” contract creation industry where competing technologies, components, and systems—presumably from Defense/Security Service companies–could compete; the implication appears to be the promotion of competition in the development and testing of these advanced technologies, which have still not been described, in this Concept section. This Joint Program was unleashing a mercenary competition between rival tech weaponry companies—Defense/Security Service contractors–to develop, test, and fine-tune these sophisticated advanced anti-personnel technologies inside America, on Americans. (The involvement of Law Enforcement implies anti-personnel technology.)
  3. “Testing and objective evaluation” was legitimized as necessary to ensure “quality of the competition.”

From the Section titled Implementation:

  1. This was a 5-year MOU, which presumably has been extended periodically (to be confirmed). 
  2. A Joint Program Steering Group (JPSG) was created, with someone from DARPA chairing it and DOJ appointing a deputy chair, with technical program managers from both Defense and Justice. Significantly, a representative from US Army is designated to be on the JPSG, in addition to reps from DARPA and DOJ. 
  3. This Steering Group, chaired by DARPA, would make decisions on technologies of interest (to jointly share and develop presumably), plan, manage development, test, “conduct technology demonstrations and evaluations” – which suggests that military tech, already developed, would be demonstrated for law enforcement use – and make decisions on “transition strategies.”
  4. “Test bed units” or “user organizations” would test the “transitioning products” (meaning the up-til-then secret or classified tech from DARPA, perhaps) and suggesting:
    * for LE operations: different police/sheriffs’ departments possibly, or corrections departments—prisons and juvenile detention centers;
    * and for MOOTW (which could include information warfare, psychological operations—Psy Ops/MISO, counter-terrorism and counter-drug operations, show-of-force operations et al): military units (such as the Marine Corps, Air Force, Navy, Army) or special operations forces.
    The implication appears to be that those groups intending to use this technology would serve as testers of it. There is a connection here to Non Lethal Weapons Testing contracts announced by US Air Force Secretary Michael Wynne in 2006, when he stated weapons would be tested on Americans, which needs to be further explored; these military weapons-testing-contracts continue, and notice of them can be found in the public domain. 
  5. The JPSG would move physically to DARPA in the first quarter of 1995 to begin “intensive management of the OOTW/LE program” from DARPA. (Then called ARPA; Note that DARPA is a weapons research and development agency for the Department of Defense, and not part of the Department of Justice. This MOU establishes military management of Justice, Law Enforcement, and FBI  programs using these “advanced technologies”.)

  1. Policy guidance would be provided by a Senior Review Group which would include the Deputy Secretary of Defense and the Deputy Attorney-General. This implies that both parties—and it is significant that the DAG is involved, FBI Directors frequently serve first as DAG (witness, Mueller and Comey) —would have full cognizance of these particular advanced technologies to be deployed by Law Enforcement and Military divisions both, and would make decisions to “facilitate technology transition to applications.”
  2. JPSG projects would be of 3 types—transitioning or transferring existing military tech to DOJ (Corrections & Law Enforcement) where DOJ would test these; transitioning ongoing in-development-military-tech in “current programs” to DOJ where DOJ would modify as needed and test these; or jointly developing new tech, where DOD and DOJ would separately modify and apply tech as they needed. From analysis of conference reports from DOJ prior to this MOU as well as materials from DOD, some linked above, it appears that many forms of Biometric Identification, Pre-Crime Monitoring, and Neuro Surveillance technologies might well have fallen within the aegis of these categories. There is a connection here also to C4ISR (C4 (Command, Control, Computers, Communications) Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance) technologies, many being tested now via Non Lethal Weapons Testing contracts, e.g., by the US Air Force Research Laboratory, which needs to be further explored. (Please see my Twitter thread at head of this article, for links.) 

From the Section titled Responsibilities:

  1. Defense would identify tech and systems, existing and in-process, to hand over to Justice for testing, modification, and use as above.
  2. DOJ would identify those requisite military technologies and systems in process at DOD found attractive for use by DOJ; interestingly—perhaps for obvious reasons, since it implies DOD has all the technology already that it could choose from to hand over–it appears that DOD is the primary party responsible to identify and select already-extant technology for DOJ use, but DOJ would be made privy to current military technology programs in process. This probably also implies that a lot of this DARPA tech is classified, and DOD would pick from extant tech to hand over to DOJ, leaving DOJ out of the loop there; with regard to in-process tech, DOJ would be permitted disclosure and be allowed to choose.
  3. Yet both departments are required to identify their own requirements and “candidate technologies,” presumably within the constraints above.
  4. Security classifications would be used as per whichever department was acting as the Executive Agent for specific projects.
  5. Specific projects would be described in Annexes.
  6. Important to note is the fact that the Attorney-General would be fully cognizant of this joint program and its essentially military activities, as reported to him or her by the DAG in charge of the senior review group. This is a program of testing advanced military technology on the streets of America by military units and special operations forces, and in America’s prisons and detention centers by sheriffs and police departments and all contractors interfacing with them, that the AG, DAG, and FBI  would be fully aware of. 

Further Conclusions

Notice of Joe Biden’s Omnibus Counter-Terrorism Act of 1995, which predated the 2001 Patriot Act, and established Military interference in domestic Law Enforcement, created the “Terrorist” label for domestic use, permitted indefinite detention without judicial review, and stripped Due Process from Americans.

This 1994 MOU establishes that the Attorney-General and DOJ and FBI and local Law Enforcement nationally in the USA were fully cognizant and partaking in joint military-justice advanced-tech weapons testing operations on Americans from that time onward and, significantly, during milestone moments in American history, such as the very next year at the time of the Oklahoma Bombing on April 19, 1995 followed by Joe Biden’s Omnibus Counter-Terrorism Act of 1995 (proposed in February 1995, passed in May 1995), then seven years later at the time of the 9/11 event in 2001 and the passing of the Patriot Act in 2001, and one decade later, at the time of the President’s Bioethical Commission hearings in 2011.

Americans testify at the President’s Bioethical Commission, 2011

On that historic occasion, over 300 Americans—out of over 600—registered to give their testimonials of being covertly persecuted with electromagnetic and acoustic neuroweapons “testifying to their ongoing, unwilling enrollment in non-consensual human experimentation with military-grade electromagnetic (EMF) neurotechnology projects in the USA,” with only 40 being allowed to testify, the rest repressively turned away by Amy Gutmann, Chair, and Valerie Bonham, Executive Director, claiming “the Commission was not a “law enforcement, regulatory, or legislative body” (The American Public Informs President Obama’s Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues About Ongoing Non-Consensual Experimentation in the USA Today) PDF of this article here

Advanced Technologies”: Remote Human Access Non-Lethal Weapons and Neurotechnologies

In the entirety of this opaque MOU, nowhere is it mentioned in so many words what exactly these technologies are. However, from the lead-up news reportage prior to this MOU, the many preceding technology conferences, succeeding documents released on FOIA-request, and succeeding execution of Directed Energy Bio Behavioral Research projects using Non Lethal Weapons contracted publicly by DOD, USAF, USMC, others, it becomes evident that these technologies DOJ and DOD jointly sought to deploy—and are currently deploying–are less-than-lethal weapons, non-lethal weapons, through-wall-surveillance weapons, weapons-detection technologies, behavior-modification technologies, medical monitoring technologies, and—secret of secrets–neuroweapons.

Details on some of these technologies now emerging from other FOIA-released documents will be explored in succeeding articles in this series covering these documents.

****

RELATED

Secret Policing Inside the United States of America: “Domestic Adversaries” and Covert Electronic Weapons

Is the US Department of Justice Secretly Permitting Local Law Enforcement & the Military to Assault American Citizens Using Covert Directed-Energy “Non-Lethal” Weapons?

Open Season on Targets: Blacklisted Individuals, Extreme Abuse in Targeting, Secretive Lab-Rat Exploitation, & Massive Establishment Cover-Up

Twitter thread on Non Lethal Weapons Testing in the USA and  in Europe via NATO: https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1114347466667769856.html

Washington’s Blog: The American Public Informs President Obama’s Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues About Ongoing Non-Consensual Human Experimentation in the USA Today PDF of Article

No Waivers of Informed Consent, PERIOD: The Public Reports Ongoing Non-Consensual Experimentation and Demands the Common Rule Protect Citizens, Not Covert Activities

 

Ramola D | Dr. Eric Karlstrom Discredits Himself

Report | Ramola D | 30 November, 2019

Four days ago, on Tuesday Nov 26, 2019, I woke to an extraordinary text on Skype from Dr. Eric Karlstrom, Professor Emeritus with 30 years of teaching experience in his field, Physical Geography and Environmental Geography, who retired from California State University, runs many websites, interviews on alt-media, and has been doing interview and conversation podcasts with me at Ramola D Reports over the past 2 years, including the well-known Global Gestapo live-streamed series probing the truth behind the worldwide oppressors of humanity currently running totalitarian, weaponized operations on one and all:

 OK, that’s that…. you are fucking CBA- citizen based agent. A con-woman. A piece of shit.

Dr. Eric Karlstrom to Ramola D, Nov 26, 2019, Skype

Just prior to that, he had sent me this series of texts, on Saturday, 23 November, 2019:

Global Gestapo 12, as many know, since I have written about it before was pulled twice off Youtube, despite my Video Note and appeal to them, questioning why they would pull a video which did not even meet the bar for their community violation guidelines, & neither espoused violence nor hatred of anyone, even as it probed the historic involvement of Zionist Jews in the persecution of others worldwide, including other Jews.

As I have stated before, I personally think that video was pulled because it was a little too candid and a little too powerful in its statements on the actual reality of Electromagnetic Weapon and Neurotechnology use on targets-being-tortured of the Organized Crime Superstate – which the famed “White Hats” we hear about from Q circles have done nothing to stop yet, and in its candid discussion of infiltration Psy Ops and Containment Ops as evidenced by Disinfo artists and agent provocateurs supporting each other in the TI activist movement– or perhaps we should call it the TI Containment Ops Community fracas.

For my own previously-published thoughts on GG 12 and its subject matter, I suggest reading: Ramola D | Post Youtube Censorship of Global Gestapo 12, Mission Statement Re. My Journalism and Human Rights Advocacy

and watching:

Video Note on GG 12/https://youtu.be/BLl2tyquHD8

However I have a little more to reveal on GG 12 and its aftermath as I experienced them and will do so below.

Dr. Eric Karlstrom did not receive a response from me for those texts he left on Nov 23, because he had already distinguished himself earlier with me with the peculiar and insulting accusation of being an operative acting within a “chain of command” – sounding thereby the death knell to our association.

This occurred directly after an email from me suggesting the closing out of the Global Gestapo series, explaining briefly why I felt GG 12 had been problematic to me, why the series felt like it had run its course, and disclosing that I was working on three other projects, but would do more to promote the GG series and looked forward to his own future podcasts. Nothing in my email – the last email or textual communication I sent him – can possibly be construed as insulting—nor can it be construed in the blatantly false way characterized by Dr. Karlstrom in his Skype texts: I was not closing the GG series because Youtube had pulled GG 12, but for other reasons, explicit and implicit in my email. Nor was I quivering with fear and needing admonitions of courage to go on doing what I am doing already, and have never stopped doing—speaking truth to ill-gotten and abusive power. I relay the entire communication below.

Dr. Eric Karlstrom, Crashing Out of Communication with Ramola D

And now I am going to be candid.

GG 12 had been set up – planned – to be a conversation focusing on writer Gloria Naylor’s groundbreaking fictionalized memoir 1996 early revealing NSA chicanery, FBI COINTELPRO she had been subjected to as a sudden target after run-ins with a neighbor who had high-level NSA connections, and encountering the Zionist Satanist aspects of targeting and harassment, and Stephen O’ Keefe who has written and posted videos online about community ZersetZung essentially being Zionist or Masonic Jewish counterintelligence stalking. The title mentioned the “Counterintelligence Zionist Superstate.”

What occurred in GG 12 however was a deviation into the Protocols of the Elders of Zion and indeed framing quite a bit of the conversation in those terms. Conversations do tend to freefall in podcast so I did not yank it back although I tried a couple times; we also ended up talking about infiltration, psy ops, disinfo, containment operations in TI activism, etc., and I got to speak my mind candidly about these, as always is my intent. I openly discussed Targeted Justice’s, Midge Mathis’s, and Richard Lighthouse’s public rejection of my voice and work while supporting Dr. Katherine Horton—who had long established herself as an agent provocateur and saboteur, as detailed extensively at this site—and about the publication of disinfo and misdirection in a recent Horton-Lighthouse podcast.

This is GG 12, on Vimeo and Bitchute:

https://www.bitchute.com/video/JDuAw4E9GB2g/

However, I was not comfortable with how GG 12 devolved into a focus on those Protocols and in our after-talk, which was a little longer than usual, I let Dr. Karlstrom know my thoughts. During this conversation we detoured to speak about other actions and TI activists in our midst. I had indeed been exchanging notes freely with Dr. Karlstrom for quite some time on this subject, having trusted him enough.

Significantly, twice during this after-talk, Zoom crashed me abruptly out of the video-meeting directly after Dr. Karlstrom leaned forward and stroked his nose suggestively, as if signaling to a watching party on one part of his monitor. I won’t draw any conclusions here yet, I am reporting this fact.

The first time I was crashed out (on my infinitely cyber-hacked laptop–and then returned automatically to the meeting by an apparently-compromised Zoom), I had been talking about FBI lies, about how the FBI goes around to our neighborhoods, fabricating and spreading lies about targets they wish to neutralize while spreading fairy-tales about “investigations” and coercing neighbors’ consent to and participation in the target being harassed in her own home and neighborhood.

The second time I was crashed out–also mysteriously returned to the meeting automatically after a few minutes by Zoom–I had been talking about Dr. Tomo Shibata, who had left her home in California (or so she said) and seemed to be intent on suddenly visiting me in Massachusetts while supposedly heading to Maine without a plan or place to stay, and who had started to make numerous uncalled-for controlling, interfering, and directive statements to me over the phone, while making frequent calls–frantic, urgency-filled–in which she was never able to explain to me exactly what was going on at her end.

Regardless, despite these peculiar and pointed interruptions, I mentioned to Dr. Karlstrom my discomfort with his focus on the Protocols and with his inevitable confusions of Zionism with Judaism – which I always make it a point in podcasts to distinguish between: as far as my own thoughts on these matters go, I have no issues with people practicing their religions, whatever they are, Hinduism or Judaism or Christianity—in fact (despite the failings of organized religion) I think all religions are great in their practice of caring for humanity and conscience–but I do think it is an issue of significance when people impose power and persecution over others, as in Zionism and Satanism, or as in 7th-century-or-earlier interpretations of repressive-to-women-and-children strictures contained in their scriptures (many religions are guilty of this—eg Islam, Judaism, Christianity). I did not however get any sense from Dr. Karlstrom that he wished to make any distinctions between Zionism and Judaism; while we have discussed Babylonian Talmudic Satanism where the Satanists hide as Jews inside Judaism, Dr. Karlstrom often makes statements about Judaism itself being Satanic—which I can hardly accept.

I was left after this after-talk with much feeling of perturbation and discussed this matter with a few trusted confidantes.

Who exactly is Dr. Eric Karlstrom?

Dr. Karlstrom has stated earlier to me, in fact on podcast, that he had very high-up CIA connections, with his uncle being a very high-up-in-CIA persona. I have never looked into his background and in fact would not know where to start. I have taken him as I have found him and have engaged in what I thought was a very cordial relationship with him throughout.

Dr. Karlstrom has stated—on podcast & pre-podcast—that the DOD/CIA is indeed interested in my brain and probably wanted to make a “digital clone” of same, since I have a science background and am a poet. No idea if he said that because he knew, or if he was merely surmising. I have presumed the latter, but I do wonder now.

Dr. Karlstrom has stated to someone else, a sister researcher, that she is on the target list; this person has insisted to me that he made this statement to her as if he knew. In my asking him about this, the subject was brushed off.

Dr. Karlstrom made a comment to me as he entered the last Zoom video-meeting (for GG 12) suggesting he may have been in the meeting much earlier than he let on, silently watching me as I adjusted my camera and hair as I waited for him—only possible if he were working undercover for some Intelligence entity in some capacity.

Dr. Karlstrom has long insisted it is a Jewish Masonic conspiracy behind the targeting scenarios I continue to research and write about. In his recent text, he states: “But the best understanding of the whole “gang stalking” phenomena is to see it as a part of this larger Jewish/Illuminati coup against the civilized world. So in that sense, we finally got the context right for this torture/takedown program.”

In trying to understand—after the conclusion of my conversation post-GG 12 with him–why Dr. Karlstrom would focus so intensively on the Zionist Masonic/Illuminati aspect of the undercover Satanist/Luciferian power structure that seems to rule police departments, intelligence agencies, and governments, I have thought briefly of all those who are thus obscured by such a focus: the Anglo-American secret societies, Yale’s Skull and Bones, the Oxford “Group,” the Jesuits, the Vatican, the Black Venetian Nobility, the Swiss Nazi Templars, the British Crown, the British East India Company which never closed up shop, Tavistock, Thule, Club of Rome, the Trilateral Commission, the CFR, the RIIA, the Committee of 300, all of whom I am still reading about. No doubt there are wealthy, sociopathic Zionists owning media, publishing, intelligence and so on, but they are not the only ones at the top of the pyramid, which seems to be represented differently by different researchers and misdirectors both. (The Pope, the Vatican, the Queen, the Gray Pope, Rothschilds, ETs and so on.)

Is Dr. Karlstrom’s notion of a “Jewish/Illuminati coup against the civilized world” a red herring, a deliberate misdirective trope into which I—by continuing podcasts with him—was also being mis-led?

Is this part of a larger intelligence effort to derail my time, my research, my work, my focus? Is he working for the CIA? Or is he an FBI Confidential Human Source engaging in privileged access to a certain group or individual/s, as their recently-declassified policy manual delineates?

Strikingly, there is a whole group of claimants in alt-media who fixate on wealthy Satanist crypto-Jews as primary and sole oppressors, including it appears Rick Wiles of Tru News, whose broadcasts Dr. Karlstrom has been urging I should watch. Both claim to be Christian (Rick Wiles and Dr. Karlstrom.)

John Coleman, former MI6 agent, offers a clue in his book on the Committee of 300:

“I pursued my investigations, pressing on in the face of severe risks, attacks on myself and my wife, financial losses, continual harassment, threats and calumny, all part of a carefully-crafted and orchestrated program to discredit me, run by government agents and informers, embedded in the so-called Christian rightwing, the “Identity Movement” and rightwing “patriotic” groups. These agents operated, and still operate, under cover of strong and fearless outspoken opposition to Judaism their main enemy, they would have us believe.”

–John Coleman, Foreword, Conspirators’ Hierarchy: The Story of the Committtee of 300, Nov 1991

John Coleman posits the Committee of 300, the Olympians, and the Crown as primary controllers:

There is much in these final texts from Dr. Karlstrom to me—prior to his clincher at head of this report—that makes me uneasy.

To call me (and him) a high-profile target who may suddenly find myself in added danger is absurd. I am fending off heart-hits with radar as I write; drones and helicopters have been flying as usual over the house and street. If that denotes my being a high-profile target, it means this has been the case for a few years now, and picks up in urgency with the publication and posting of certain reports and podcasts.

As I have noted earlier, it is particularly when infiltrators are being exposed at my keyboard that I am hit the most; it is no different currently.

To suggest that I leave the US and go resettle in India or Mexico because a pogrom may start here in the US reads as fear-mongering, of the kind he has previously laughed at Bryan Tew for. I have been hit with pulsed microvaves, ELFs, ultrasonics, nanotech, other exotic close-to-body tech in London, Frankfurt, Dubai, and various cities in India including Bangalore and Chennai just as much as in Boston, Washington DC, Myrtle Beach, Orleans in Cape Cod, Provincetown, Grenwich-Connecticut, Kalamazoo-Michigan, Newport-Rhode Island, Burlington-Vermont, and many other cities in the USA. Others have reported online and to me how they have been hit in pretty much every country in the world.

Especially interesting is the suggestion that my notices, appeals, and memos to Trump and friends might “have the opposite effect”: “BTW, I like your worldwide appeal that Nina shared…. and it’s a good strategy to do that sort of thing…. as it was to write Trump about these horrors. But you (we) have to know that asking Lenin to stop sending state enemies to the gulags of the Soviet Union would not have worked…. likewise these efforts to ask our torturers to please stop will not have the effect and could have the opposite effect.”

Is this an attempt to stop my impassioned writing of letters and memos and putting people to shame, worldwide, who have sanctioned these programs of cruelty with Stealth Assault Neuroweapons—who may actually be exposed and prosecuted for their crimes if enough powerful and persistent writing blankets the Net?

The pogrom is already here. It is worldwide. Populations are being “pacified” with Remote Access Human Control neuroweapons. People are being silently irradiated, burned, and killed in their own homes—by others, persuaded to surrender their humanity to fear by ruthless and corrupt employees/contractors of agencies, governments, and their-controllers.

Writing is powerful–and, with speaking, filming, recording, documenting, art, podcasts, documentaries, books, still the primary means I see to disseminate the truth of these crimes to the world.

It is also interesting to me that in these texts he has sought to backtrack and seek my continued collegiateship and work with him, attempting to suggest that his own knee-jerk insults sent my way could have been prompted by “cyber-warfare” and the “censoring and tampering” of my email (none that I can see). I have worked for a long time with Dr. Karlstrom, both doing interviews on subjects of his expertise and conversations on subjects of mutual interest; these are interesting podcasts—even if incomplete in their disclosure–and will continue to be featured at my website and at my video channels at Youtube, Vimeo, Bitchute, Ramola D Reports. I recommend that all watch them. I am not afraid of history, and I do not remove people’s podcasts and articles from my sites.

But I reject entirely all attempts, surreptitious and overt, sneaky and in-your-face, to exploit, manipulate, and patronize me, to misdirect, trample, smear, and corrupt my own efforts to expose these crimes against humanity. I reject entirely insults made against me as a writer, interviewer, podcaster, journalist. I am seriously disappointed, in fact appalled and taken aback at Dr. Karlstrom’s unprecedented and unwarranted attack on me with his words—remarkably Luciferian, I may add, in their fixation on excreta—and I am herewith dissociating entirely all connection with him. I ask those who communicate with me on email and elsewhere to kindly never include me in email lists with him. I have no idea who he really is, what his real agenda may be, which agency he may be in cahoots with, but at this point, nor do I care!

I will add that he has not been the only one lately to send insults, demands, or frenzied appeals my way, as efforts escalate among the infiltrator-infidels to derail me from my own intended focus as an independent journalist, and my innate calm as a writer. I will publish on this as well shortly. It’s been ridiculous.

This report is being published both to inform all and let Dr. Karlstrom know his abusive, cyber-bullying, unChristian actions and words to me, particularly after our long, cordial association, are repugnant and unacceptable, and call into question the entire body of his work. Any further abusive communication from him will be ignored or/and immediately published.

CIA Whistleblower Barbara Hartwell | SMEAR CAMPAIGNS: The Wicked Tool of Lowlife Losers

Re-Post | Barbara Hartwell | November 26, 2019

Preface | Ramola D | November 26, 2019

PREFACE

Originally posted at Barbara Hartwell’s website and republished here, with permission.

This article, at Barbara Hartwell’s website

I spoke to Barbara last night and wanted to relay one important message she shared with me, about her writing and calling out particular people engaged in such delectable activities as smear campaigns, infiltration of true activist movements, and agent-provocateur and saboteur actions directed against same.

I have to say it is always refreshing to speak with Barbara Hartwell on such matters, since she is well-rooted in her Christian faith, has an unshakeable roster of principles to live by, does not equivocate, does not compromise, is unafraid to clearly speak her mind, analyzes things both with her innate intelligence and training as well as through the filter of her spiritual principles, and inevitably delivers a verdict that goes directly to the heart of the matter and is not a Masonic chess-board-style perspective which pretends it can play both sides, marking itself in the process as unprincipled.

The message she shared was about the intent behind such writing which exposes and names, within the mileiu of a media scene spiked with duplicity and crawling with infiltrators: the purpose is to warn, to inform, to put the information out there so others may be apprised and understand the truth. The information is also posted so others may do their own research, engage in their own thinking about it all, and come to their own conclusions. With smear campaigns too, of course, the intent is to repudiate the smear, to deconstruct and expose the truth which is being attacked and sullied by the smear.

This is precisely the reason behind my own writing to examine and expose those who have recently engaged–and continue to engage–in smear campaigns against my name, and those who have successfully infiltrated, co-opted, run Disinformation campaigns, and appear to commandeer the quite-splintered “TI Community”–which Barbara Hartwell recently described for us, with her Counterintelligence training, as Containment Operations. (TI standing for the term “Targeted Individual,” an unfortunate label emanating from the military and early infiltrators themselves, which no doubt is accurate, yet has become a misused label by way of the long-standing Mental Health Fraud operation executed on it.)

I have written extensively on this myself in The Consequences of Infiltration.

Please read the rest of this discussion at The Consequences of Infiltration

Having endured the multiple advances of a flurry of infiltrators on email lists, now expanded into Twitter and Facebook forums and private email over literally six years since I was first extra-judicially targeted and sought to connect with others to find out more, research, eventually write, and engage in public activism efforts to expose these government and private-sector crimes, my own assessment currently is that there are hundreds of genuine targets/MIIC victims out there, but plenty of fakers, trolls, victim role-players too.

I do not see a “TI Community” anymore but a rather large “TI Containment Ops Community” with several Disinfo-running groups and individuals supporting each other, with pockets of true-TIs connecting in groups on social media.

I do not see myself or posit myself as a leader of any of these communities or groups, but some do (I mean, they posit themselves as such).

I understand that my quite-visible journalism and human-rights advocacy in this space makes my name prominent, and I encourage all to use my work as significant, referrable reportage for their own work of personal letter-writing, activism, and to raise public awareness.

My purpose in this space is to continue my journalism and HR advocacy–which seems to trouble certain parties inordinately, the very same who have currently and recently been engaging in mob attacks against me, and who are apparently bonding with each other over lies and disinformation, as perhaps, is their special charge from Mission Command.

I am sorry for those who believe in these lies, who cling to the liars, and who wait interminably for these mushrooming groups to speak for them, to advocate for them, to run class-action lawsuits which will Not be thrown out by State Secrets Privilege, and to save them. I encourage everyone to speak out themselves, to write letters, blogs, websites, articles, affidavits, accounts, journals, books themselves, to take action to educate others and raise public awareness, to name and shame the offenders publicly, to demand of the offenders an end to these persecution, torture, and experimentation programs. I wrote to Attorney-General Barr last week, feel free to use my letter and send your own.

This is already taking time, and may take more time. These offenders in high places are protecting their lifestyles, their industries, their names and titles and comfy positions of power. Never stop exposing them.

In the process of exposing, I guess I have learned now to expect smear campaigns.

Whole thread here:

Thanks very much to Barbara Hartwell for discussing openly why Smear Campaigns are run, and what they really mean.

–Ramola D

SATURDAY, NOVEMBER 2, 2019

SMEAR CAMPAIGNS: The Wicked Tool of Lowlife Losers

by

Barbara Hartwell

“When the debate is over, slander becomes the tool of the loser.”

Socrates

NOTE: This is a brief report I published (2006) on another site in relation to the defamation campaigns being waged against a number of my friends and colleagues, all Christians and Patriots, Defenders of Liberty.

Since that time, I have observed that the smear campaigns run on the Internet against legitimate persons (journalists, activists, whistleblowers) have tremendously escalated, especially due to the nature of social media. However, the same basic principles apply.

If your good name is being slandered, libeled, smeared, especially by diverse individuals, groups, organizations, and if outright fabrications are the basis of the smears, your adversaries are certain to be LOWLIFE LOSERS who cannot present a logical, reasonable argument, nor any facts, nor evidence to support their position.

As liars and cowards, these unscrupulous reprobates resort to the smear campaign.

MOST LIKELY TO BE TARGETS OF A SMEAR CAMPAIGN

A “high profile” individual, having a name that is usually recognizable.

Uses his/her real name on Internet posts, not attempting to hide behind a screen name or “anonymous”.

Has a “track record” of exposing government corruption, crimes, political chicanery and skulduggery.

Bases his/her reports on facts; names the names of
criminals/perps/provocateurs, etc. Demands evidence from others for corroboration of facts as well as furnishing it.

Is consistent in sticking to solid principles, year in, year out. Believes in moral absolutes. Defends the God-given, Unalienable Rights of the Individual.

Is a defender of the Constitution of the United States of America, against all enemies, foreign and domestic.

Has a “no-nonsense” attitude in standing up against police state tactics, from law enforcement officers right up to the crooks in the White House, and everyone in-between.

Demands accountability from public servants/government officials.

Has bona fides (of one type or another) which establish legitimacy.

Has a previous (often long-standing) record of harassment/ persecution by criminals in government and their hirelings and minions. May have been falsely deemed “enemy of the state”; “terrorist”; “enemy combatant”; “high-profile subversive” and so on….

What type of person are we looking at here? Seems to me we’re looking at a person who may be considered a serious “threat” to the status quo of corrupt government, the New World Order, Communism/ Socialism/ Fascism/global tyranny and totalitarianism.

It also seems to me that anyone who would target such an individual for harassment, stalking, slander/libel/bashing and trashing…in attempts to demonize and DISCREDIT that individual, has an awful lot in common with the corrupt government officials who also are desperate to DISCREDIT/silence/neutralize that individual.

Barbara Hartwell

December 24, 2006

CIA Whistleblower Barbara Hartwell | IN DEFENSE OF RAMOLA D: TARGET OF VILE SMEAR CAMPAIGN

Re-Post | Barbara Hartwell | Nov 25, 2019

Originally posted at http://barbarahartwellvscia.blogspot.com/2019/11/in-defense-of-ramola-d-target-of-vile.html

Re-posted with thanks to CIA Whistleblower Barbara Hartwell for her friendship, support and candor in speaking out. 

I posted her article in a brief thread on Twitter yesterday (link below) with some thoughts & much gratitude. To clarify, as Barbara notes, I was pleasantly surprised and appreciative but did not ask Barbara to write in my support. It is a pure testament to Barbara Hartwell’s integrity and sense of rightmindedness and justice that she would write in support of a friend and sister journalist working for Truth and Justice as she is, and there really is no-one else in the world like her, uncompromising in her integrity and clear-seeing of Dark and Light, rock-solid reliable in her alignment with Light. I am honored therefore and grateful beyond words for her freely-given friendship and her incisive, history-making writing.

–Ramola D/Nov 25, 2019

SUNDAY, NOVEMBER 24, 2019

IN DEFENSE OF RAMOLA D: TARGET OF VILE SMEAR CAMPAIGN

“Good name in man and woman, dear my lord,
Is the immediate jewel of their souls:
Who steals my purse steals trash;
’tis something, nothing;
’twas mine, ’tis his, and has been slave to thousands;
But he that filches from me my good name
Robs me of that which not enriches him,
And makes me poor indeed.”

William Shakespeare, Othello

Katherine Horton has been running a massive smear campaign against a former colleague, Ramola D, for at least the past 18 months. I do not know Katherine Horton, but I have witnessed the damages to Ramola’s reputation, as a journalist, and as a person, as her character has been vilely assassinated and her professional work trashed.

To add insult to injury, Katherine Horton has enlisted many others among her gaggle of sycophants (her followers on social media, supporters of her website and audience of her You Tube channel) to engage in mob tactics against Ramola, to attack her, to defame her good name, to publish outrageous lies against her and her family.

Additionally, Horton has targeted others for her lies and calumny, including Barbara Hartwell.

EXCERPT from previous report:

Horton then began a smear campaign against Barbara Hartwell, promoting outrageous falsehoods for which she had no evidence whatsoever. Horton has claimed from the beginning that I am a CIA agent. Having no facts at her disposal, she simply parroted the mantra of long-running counterintelligence ops against me: Barbara Hartwell is a CIA disinfo agent.

I wrote several reports in which I refuted her false claims, and further exposed her as a malicious liar and promoter of violence and murder, using HER OWN PUBLISHED WORDS as evidence.

*******

In my considered professional opinion, as an intelligence analyst and former profiler for the US government, based on my observations of her words and actions, from March 2018 until the present time, Katherine Horton is a despicable fraud whose prolific criminal conduct makes her a danger to anyone associated with her.

What is of great concern to me is that so few people will stand up and tell the unvarnished truth about Katherine Horton, though the writing is on the wall, clear as crystal for those with eyes to see.

Nor will they stand up publicly in defense of Ramola. What I have witnessed (aside from those rabid Horton supporters openly participating in the witch hunt) are the fence-sitters, the compromisers, who refuse to take a firm stand, to name names of those engaged in unscrupulous actions, some of which are criminal in nature.

No, apparently they would rather sit silently on the sidelines, waiting to see which way the wind blows, rather than stand up and be counted in defense of Ramola against her enemies, those who clearly wish to destroy her.

For the record, I stand with Ramola, not just because she is my friend; not just because she has supported me and my work (for which I know she has taken tremendous heat). I stand with her because I see her value as one of very few people I have known who DOES stand up against evil, against oppression, against tyranny, without compromising her principles, without concern for the approval of others, whatever the consequences to herself.

Ramola did not ask me to write this, though I dare say she may not be surprised that I did. As her friend and colleague, I know the terrible price she has paid for telling the truth and for standing up for what she knows to be right, even if she has to stand alone. That is the stuff of which heroes are made and I cannot be silent in the face of these vile attacks on her name, her character and her work on behalf of those many decent, law-abiding persons, worldwide, being targeted for harassment, torture, terror, wrongful incarceration and life-destroying crimes.

Barbara Hartwell
November 24, 2019

Please see Ramola’s recent report here:

REPORT & JOINT STATEMENT ON HOW TECHNO CRIME FIGHTERS FORUM ENDED | Correction of Dr. Katherine Horton’s False Narrative Changing Facts

Worldwide Appeal to Doctors, Psychologists, Psychiatrists, Law Enforcement: Extreme Human Rights Violations with High-Tech Remote Human Access Weapons Ongoing MUST Be Stopped

Appeal & Checklist | Ramola D | November 22, 2019

With thanks to early reviewers especially biomedical scientist Tracy W for review and contributions to this checklist.

In light of the continuing use, worldwide, of Remote Human Access neuro/bio/chemical/RF/sonic/scalar/nano weapons which are causing untold suffering to millions, both physical and psychological, via unconsented-to Bio-Hacking and Neuro-Hacking, and which essentially constitute Torture, prohibited by all nations of the world, healthcare and law enforcement professionals in particular are called on today to wake up, get informed, and take action to protect, care for, and support the reporting victims of Fusion Center, Intelligence Agency, Military, Security Service, Telecom, Defense contractor, and University/Research Institution crimes of non-consensual human experimentation, harassive Electronic Weaponry persecution, and subjugatory Electronic Surveillance, permitted and being hidden by massive Watchlist Fraud, as described in the Notices, Memos, and articles listed below, as well as disclosed elsewhere widely by other writers in articles, books, and websites online.

This Ten-Step Checklist with preface offers all concerned citizens, human rights advocates and activists, civil rights groups, media, medical professionals and ethical law enforcement officers a document listing the suggested steps hospitals, law enforcement, and doctors should take to honor the reports of genuine victims, to investigate these reports from a human rights and healthcare perspective, and to respond appropriately in the face of Intelligence agency, Fusion Center, Deep State/Military crime and political persecution with high-tech remote human access weapons and life-takedown operations to assist reporting victims and provide basic health care and community care–starting with checking for RFID implants, measuring EMF pulses on their bodies, doing X-rays, MRIs, Scada analyses, and generally honoring their witness and further exploring and assessing it with the help of radiology, medical physics, and other sciences.

High-Tech Remote Access Weapons Being Operated Worldwide Today on Humanity

Extrajudicial Targeting Technologies (Weapons Use/Tests/Abuse) & Biometric Surveillance, Non Lethal Weapons, Neuroweapons

Note: Psychiatry is being used to disappear these crimes, and is the problem here, not the answer. The profound irony of doctors, psychologists, and psychiatrists daring to suggest that reporting victims are “Mentally Ill” and hustling them into Psychiatry Wards & Mental Institutions, forcing them to take brain-damaging drugs, and refusing basic medical healthcare–based on their ignorance of Mil/Intel High-Tech Crimes today, their blind indoctrination by collusive mainstream media, and their own lacking medical education, or by way of their avarice and avid complicity–in essence, re-victimizing already traumatized and terrorized victims who need caring physical healthcare, not mental–must be addressed.

Law Enforcement — despite being fully aware of ongoing National Institute of Justice advanced-technology testing, US Defense and Air Force and NATO microwave/milliwave/other weapons-testing & Directed Energy Bio Behavioral Research, military-academic social engineering and Psychological Operations–is still trained to run community mental health interventions or 5150/302/Baker Act Mental Health Involuntary Holds on anyone complaining of DEW harassment, Neurotechnology harassment, or other harassment from neighbors or satellites and celltowers: this is entrenched perfidy, enabling the crimes of torture of citizens with Remote Human Access weapons and must be stopped.

Ten-Step Checklist for all Doctors, Psychiatrists, Psychologists, Law Enforcement PDF

How to Use This Checklist with Preface to Raise Public Awareness:

  • Print and make copies of the PDF Ten-Step Checklist for handout at your local hospital Emergency Rooms to all ER staff.
  • Send the Ten-Step Checklist PDF by email to hospital doctors and local law enforcement.
  • Post the Ten-Step Checklist PDF online at your websites for easy access.
  • Send your own doctors the Ten-Step Checklist and a link to this Worldwide Appeal.
  • Select a few hospitals and Universities locally and email or letter-mail or fax this Ten-Step Checklist PDF to specific doctors, psychologists, psychiatrists.
  • Select a few Universities locally, identify key Human Rights, Psychology, Bioethics, Neuroethics faculty and send this Ten-Step Checklist PDF by email or letter-mail to them.
  • Send the Ten-Step Checklist PDF to human rights groups, civil liberties groups.

Supporting Notices, Memos, Articles

Public Notices on Patriot Act Crimes and Worldwide Crimes Against Humanity Using Remote Human Access Energy and Neuro/Bio Weapons

Public Notice: The Remote Access of Human Beings is a Crime Against Humanity

World Notice of Crimes Against Humanity Using Energy & Neuro/Bio Weapons

Community Notice: Notice of Crimes Against Humanity/Patriot Act Crimes

Memoranda to President Trump on Patriot Act Crimes–Massive FISA and Surveillance State Abuses–Leading to Crimes Against Humanity with Remote Human Access Weapons

Once Again, A Memo to President Trump: Massive Surveillance State Abuses | Treason on the Ground, in the USA: Public-Private Partners in Targeted Killing of Americans

Memorandum to President Donald J. Trump on Domestic US Torture Programs Running Under Cover of Surveillance

Key Articles on Mass FISA Abuse and State-Run Domestic Terrorism: Fraudulent Targeting, Watchlisting, Subjugating with Electronic Warfare Neuroweaponry, Blacklisting, Community Policing, Human Trafficking into Barbaric Human Experimentation

Ramola D/No Longer True: The NSA “Isn’t Getting Violent Internally in the US”: Millions Today in US Are Targeted with RF/Scalar/Sonic Weapons, Nano Weapons, Neuro Weapons, Chem/Bio Weapons

Open Season on Targets: Blacklisted Individuals, Extreme Abuse in Targeting, Secretive Lab-Rat Exploitation, & Massive Establishment Cover-Up

How Secret Policing With Deadly “Non-Lethal” EMF/Scalar/Sonic Neuroweaponry Has Been Installed Domestically Inside the US, & Globally

Is the US Department of Justice Secretly Permitting Local Law Enforcement & the Military to Assault American Citizens Using Covert Directed-Energy &;Non-Lethal Weapons?

2015: “Targeted Individuals” are Non-Consensual Subjects in Criminal, Clandestine, Classified & “Top Secret” MKULTRA-Extended Mind & Behavior Control/Torture Experimentation by Joint Military/Intel/Justice/Academic Institutions, as well as Targets of COINTELPRO and Electronic Warfare

Key Articles on the Media Cover-Up (Operation Mockingbird/Information Warfare) of Targeting and Neurotech Crimes

Failure-To-Report-Crime | The Chicago Sun-Times Debacle: Neil Steinberg, Ella Free, David LaPorte, Ph.D, and the Ruthless Tearing-Down of All Reporting Unethical US Mil/Intel/Medical Experiments and Political Persecution Operations with Neuro/Bio/Energy Weapons as Delusional, Paranoid Schizophrenics Enjoying a “Mass Delusion”

Failure-To-Report-Crime & False-Reality-Construct | #Media POPPCon | 60 Minutes/CBS/Sep 1, 2019: “Targeted Americans: Brain trauma suffered by U.S. diplomats abroad could be work of hostile foreign government”

Robert Duncan, Regarding 6/10 NYT Article on Gang-Stalking & Targeted Individuals: “When Weapons Are “Field Tested” They Need To Be Very Secretive”

United States of PsyOps: Call Them Paranoid. Call Them Delusional.

Censorship, Lies, Deception: WIRED Removes Writer’s Comment Exposing DOD/CIA Crimes at Laura Yan’s POPPCon (Psy Op Propaganda Piece) for the Deep State

Fourth of July, 2019: Implications of Targeting Individuals in US and World that Mainstream Media and Alt Media Ignore

Key Articles on Use of Psychiatry in Disappearing Reporting Victims of FISA Fraud, State-Run Domestic Terrorism, Military/Intel/Justice Weapons Testing and Neuro Experimentation

Welcome to the Gulag Created by Crooked Intelligence Agencies, Crooked US Military, and Crooked Fusion Centers

NSA Whistleblower Wrongfully “Baker-Acted” by Florida Sheriff’s Department After Providing Hard Evidence of Covert Electronic Harassment

Paranoid Schizophrenia, Tool of the Red Terror, Makes a Comeback in Authoritarian USA & Other Western “Democracies”

Disappearing the Testimonials of Today’s Clandestine Human Subjects: How US & Western Psychiatry Function As Political Tool to Muzzle Witnesses

Seth Farber, Ph.D: The Psychiatric Metanarrative, Targeted Individuals, and the Deep State: A Response to The New York Times

False-Claim of Mental Illness in the Microwave, Millimeter Wave, Other “Non Lethal” Weapons Testing on Citizens in USA & Worldwide

***

Ten-Step Checklist for all Doctors, Psychiatrists, Psychologists, Law Enforcement

This checklist should be provided to all doctors, psychologists, psychiatrists, Law Enforcement officers, EMS personnel, nurses, hospital staff, technicians, administrators, all medical staff in Emergency Rooms in hospitals.

In conjunction with this check-list, a badge of Citizens Rescuing Citizens from Surveillance & “National Security” State Abuse should be presented.

This is because Defense, Security, and Intelligence agents flash badges, court-orders, and warnings to doctors and psychiatrists, stating the reporting victim is under a “National Security” protocol and demanding the withholding of all services and help to the reporting victim, also stating that the reporting victim is “mentally unstable” and is under surveillance; all this, while using, abusing, exploiting, and enslaving the reporting victim in terminal, torturous, persecutory and inhumane experimentation involving covert RFID implants, EMF/Neurotech Assault, DEW Testing, DEW Operator Training Psychological Warfare, Blacklisting, Character Assassination, Organized Stalking, Community Persecution and Life and Career Sabotage.

Extreme Human Rights Violations Ongoing Must Be Stopped

Women and men and children are being raped, burned, and mutilated with these EMF/Neuro weapons. Pulsed microwaves are being shot at people’s faces, throats, heads, lungs. Pulsed microwaves are being shot into people’s genitals. Organs are being destroyed, Knees are being destroyed, Heart attacks are being induced. Respiratory infections are being induced. Invasive and degrading sounds, smells, sensations, images, dreams, emotions are being injected into their brains. Additionally, they are being stalked, Psy Opped, and assaulted verbally in public. Then they are named “Mentally Unstable” by Mil/Intel so they can be isolated and guinea-pigged for life.

***

21st-Century Citizens’ Clean-up of Non-Consensual Weapons Testing/MK Experimentation & Military/Intelligence/Contractor Crime:

Ten-Step Checklist for all Doctors, Psychiatrists, Psychologists, Law Enforcement

In Case of EMF/Neurotech Crime Reports by Reporting Victims of Covert Tracking Implants, Microwave/Directed-Energy-Weapons Assault, Invasive Brain Technology Assault, Anti-Personnel Electromagnetic Technology Assault, Organized Stalking & Harassive Community Surveillance

  1. Call on Radiology: Send reporting victim of EMF/Neurotech Crime to Radiology for thorough and complete scanning to detect the presence of RFID chips or other kinds of emitting/receiving micro/nanotech all over body, particularly in upper arm, brain, spine, teeth/jaw, and cochlear implants in ear. Obtain FCC license markers from FCC RF registration tables for all radio frequencies detected.

  1. Record burns and scars: Examine and record all scars, breaks, scabs, burn marks on victim’s body, and record with detail any narrated incident related to each.

  1. Scan with Spectrum Analyzers, Acoustic and EMF Detectors: Isolate and observe if pulsed or other radiation directed on the reporting victim of EMF/Neurotech Crime can be detected in a ward which is kept as secluded from WiFi and EMF radiation as possible, using Spectrum Analyzers, EMF Detectors, Acoustic Detectors, and other means of radiation detection which radiologists and radio/electrical engineers can advise on.

  1. Document the Report of Assault: Record and document in detail the entire narrative of covert-implant assault and radiation-technology assault the reporting victim offers.

  1. Open 24-Hour Radiation Assault Watch: Put thereporting victim of EMF/Neurotech Crime on a 24-Hour Radiation Assault Watch, recording and reporting all Spectrum Assaults and sonic assaults on this person, using meters and detectors as noted above.

  1. Scan Victim’s Home: Send an EMF Detection team to reporting victim’s home, so they can take scientific readings of incoming pulse radiation or sonic attacks at a variety of different times and locations inside the home over a 72-hour period.

  1. Map the Cell-towers, Antennas, Satellites, Drones Near Home: Map the pattern of cell-towers and antennas surrounding the home. Map the satellites recorded over home and neighborhood. Map the presence and frequency of drones over home and neighborhood.

  1. Call for Diagnostic Testing, Toxicology & Forensics: Use DNA damage kits and Live Blood Cell Analysis to detect radiation damage. Add testing for altered sugar metabolism and detection of internal infections like Dysbiosis, Systemic Candida, Scalp Candida, SIBO, SIFO, etc. Send reporting victim to Toxicology for forensic analysis of nanotechnology lodged or self-assembling in body and brain. Research and establish origins of nanotechnology

  1. Call for Surgery: Send reporting victim to Surgery for theremovalof all detected RFID implants, Bio-MEMs and others which can be removed. Retain all removed implants for the record.

  1. Create a Detox & Support Regimen: Start the reporting victim on a Detox and Support Regimen using powerful natural detoxing and cleansing methods, while also providing a supportive atmosphere for the reporting victim to rest, recover, and rejuvenate post this criminal Mil/Intel/Electronic Enslavement ordeal.