Tag Archives: CDC

Dr. Seth Farber: Big Pharma, Mandatory Vaccination and the Emerging Bio-Fascist State | Part Two

Report | Seth Farber, Ph. D | Dec 30, 2020

Contd. from Part One: Dr. Seth Farber: Big Pharma, Mandatory Vaccination and the Emerging Bio-Fascist State | Part One


Doubts Cannot be Allowed to Exist

CDC will tell you that vaccines don’t cause autism. (https://www.cdc.gov/vaccinesafety/concerns/autism/cdc2004pediatrics.html) Vaccines are safe and effective. What they don’t tell you is no vaccine has ever been tested for safety or efficacy— unlike all other drugs. It is the only medical product which is not required by law to be tested with a control group taking an inert placebo. No vaccine has ever been compared to an inert placebo–which is the routine way of testing all other drugs. No vaccine has been safety tested for more than days or weeks, but autoimmune diseases and cancer can take months or years to develop. The crazy thing is that no test is done to determine if the vaccine is effective. There is only one criterion for CDC–does the vaccine produce antibodies? If it does, the FDA approves it and CDC puts it on schedule.

(https://childrenshealthdefense.org/protecting-our-future/facts-you-can-use/10-facts-every-parent-needs-to-know-about-vaccinations )

It is no accident that you are not told all the facts. It is the policy of government agencies to keep you in the dark. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) stated their policy on this issue clearly: “any possible doubts, whether or not well founded, about the safety of the vaccine cannot be allowed to exist in view of the need to assure that the vaccine will continue to be used to the maximum extent consistent with the nation’s public health objectives”(Stoller, 2019.p.21) The agencies that are supposed to protect children from the consequences of corporate greed are working in tandem with Big Pharma and their goal is not to protect the health of Americans but to expand the program—at the expense of our health.

Any possible doubts about the safety of the vaccine cannot be allowed to exist”–that is the credo of the government and the mainstream media. It explains why critics of the vaccine program are ridiculed and vilified, if not demonized, as conspiracy nuts, and anti-scientific “anti-vaxxers.”

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) stated their policy on this issue clearly: “any possible doubts, whether or not well founded, about the safety of the vaccine cannot be allowed to exist in view of the need to assure that the vaccine will continue to be used to the maximum extent consistent with the nation’s public health objectives”(Stoller, 2019.p.21)

Any possible doubts about the safety of the vaccine cannot be allowed to exist”–that is the credo of the government and the mainstream media. It explains why critics of the vaccine program are ridiculed and vilified, if not demonized, as conspiracy nuts, and anti-scientific “anti-vaxxers.”

DR. SETH FARBER | Big Pharma, Mandatory Vaccination and the Emerging Bio-Fascist State

HHS has a National Vaccine Plan. Barbara Loe Fisher aptly commented that “the National Vaccine Plan is really a Vaccine Marketing Plan for the pharmaceutical industry.” https://www.nvic.org/NVIC-Vaccine-News/March-2020/the-national-plan-to-vaccinate-every-american.aspx described in 2010 its plan for our future.  The Plan is described in HHS literature beginning in 2010: “Coverage rates[of vaccinations] across the lifespan will increase, lowering outbreaks of VPDs [vaccine-preventable diseases] and decreasing geographic pockets of low coverage. Provider and public confidence in both vaccines and the entities involved in licensing, recommending, and monitoring vaccine safety will increase while the worry, concerns, and anxiety regarding vaccines, particularly with respect to safety, will decrease. Providers, parents, and the public will also support vaccines as an important and necessary part of our nation’s health system.” (https://www.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/nvpo-midcourse-review-final.pdf,p25)

To paraphrase the above: The public will realize that vaccines are safe and effective, even if they aren’t–they will have confidence both in vaccines and in government agencies which are pushing these vaccines, like CDC. The booklet leaves out one sentence: “Big Brother loves you.”

So, in HHS’s ideal scenario “worry, concerns, and anxiety regarding vaccines, particularly with respect to safety, will decrease.” But from a humanitarian perspective if the vaccine is not safe it is not desirable that concern should decrease. The FDA stated that it is determined that the vaccine “will continue to be used to the maximum extent”–as long as this is consistent with public health objectives. But what happens when it isn’t? That possibility is not even considered by HHS––which speaks volumes. Parents” concern is for the health of their children, whether or not vaccines will continue to be used to the maximum extent.

The documents I quoted are not anomalies. In June 2000 a now famous meeting took place at Simpsonwood Conference Center in Georgia. The meeting included about 60 vaccine program high-level officials from the CDC and the Food and Drug Administration, the top vaccine specialist from the World Health Organization, and representatives of every major vaccine manufacturer.

Simpsonwood Conference Center and Retreat, Norcross, Georgia

The discussions at this meeting demonstrate that the policymakers have internalized the FDA credo that doubts about safety cannot be allowed to exist. Kennedy wrote a seminal article in 2005 (published in both Salon and Rolling Stone) that helped to publicize the meeting, aptly titled Deadly Immunity. It was in fact after Kennedy read the Simpsonwood transcript that he became convinced that there is a link between vaccines and autism.

In the article Kennedy wrote, “I devoted time to study this issue because I believe that this is a moral crisis that must be addressed. If, as the evidence suggests, our public-health authorities knowingly allowed the pharmaceutical industry to poison an entire generation of American children, their actions arguably constitute one of the biggest scandals in the annals of American medicine.” https://childrenshealthdefense.org/news/deadly-immunity-government-cover-mercuryautism-scandal-2/Since Kennedy wrote those words further evidence has been revealed that heightens the CDC’s culpability–and that of the press for helping to cover this up to this day.

Kennedy noted more recently: “All of the barriers that are meant to protect our children: the government, the lawyers, the regulatory agencies and the press – the checks and balances in our democratic system that are supposed to stand between corporate power and our little children have been removed… “https://ahrp.org/why-is-the-cdc-petrified-of-the-film-vaxxed/

The purpose of the Simpsonwood meeting was to discuss a new study by CDC epidemiologist, Tom Verstraeten– based on a CDC database containing the medical records of 100,000 children– that made it clear that there was a link between a mercury-based preservative in the vaccines (thimerosal) and a dramatic increase in autism and numerous other neurological disorders.

“I was actually stunned by what I saw,” Verstraeten told those assembled at Simpsonwood, citing not only his data but the large number of earlier studies that indicate a link between thimerosal and speech delays, attention-deficit disorder, hyperactivity and autism. Since 1991 when CDC and the FDA had recommended that three additional vaccines laced with the preservative thimerosal be given to extremely young infants —in one case, within hours of birth– the estimated number of cases of autism had increased fifteenfold, from one in every 2,500 children to one in 166 children in 2005 when Kennedy was writing.

(It is several times higher today than in 2000, when the Simpsonwood meeting took place; even though thimerosal has been eliminated, children are being given higher amounts of other toxins, such as aluminum.)

Of course, Verstraeten was stunned, but he ought not to have been surprised. At the time of the Simpsonwood meeting, at the age of two months, infants routinely received three inoculations that contained a total of 62.5 micrograms of ethylmercury — a level 99 times greater than the EPA’s limit for daily exposure to methylmercury, a related neurotoxin.

(https://childrenshealthdefense.org/news/deadly-immunity-government-cover-mercuryautism-scandal-2/ )

On the second day of the meeting an interesting event occurred. The meeting chairman, Dr. Richard Johnston, a pediatrician, was called out for an emergency call. When he returned he shared: “[M]y daughter-in law delivered a son.. Our first male in the line of the next generation and I do not want that grandson to get a thimerosal containing vaccine…I want that grandson to only be given thimerosal-free vaccines” (Wilcox, 2018, p159.)

This sounds like an impassioned argument to ban vaccines with thimerosal and he did argue that “it was desirable to remove thimerosal from US vaccines,” but he had no objection to hiding the revelations from the public, and saw no need to remove thimerosal from vaccines exported to “developing countries” (Ibid, p.160).

Verstraeten’s findings were alarming to all the discussants but “instead of taking immediate steps to alert the public and rid the vaccine supply of thimerosal, the officials and executives at Simpsonwood spent most of the next two days discussing how to cover up the damaging data,” Kennedy wrote. (Deadly Immunity – Government Cover-up of a Mercury/Autism Scandal • Children’s Health Defense).

Dr. John Clements, who represented the WHO at the EIS conference, expressed alarm about the direction of the research, which he viewed as a threat to the vaccination program. He warned that the information should not be allowed to reach the public, and he bluntly stated the study should not have been done “because the outcome could have… been predicted.” In other words, he knew all along that the vaccines were harmful, but “doubts about the safety cannot be allowed to exist”:

“And I really [don’t] want to risk offending everyone in the room by saying that perhaps this study should not have been done at all, because the outcome of it could have, to some extent, been predicted…, and we have all reached this point now where we are left hanging, …I know how we handle it from here is extremely problematic.” — Dr. John Clements, World Health Organization

“[T]hrough the freedom of information that will be taken by others and will be used in ways beyond the control of this group. And I am very concerned about that as I suspect it is already too late to do anything regardless of any professional body and what they say.”

“I am very concerned that this has gotten this far, and that having got this far, how you present in a concerted voice the information to the ACIP [Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices] in a way they will be able to handle it and not get exposed to the traps which are out there in public relations.

“My mandate as I sit here in this group is to make sure at the end of the day that 100,000,000 are immunized with DTP, Hepatitis B and if possible Hib, this year, next year and for many years to come, and that will have to be with Thimerosal-containing vaccines unless a miracle occurs and an alternative is found quickly and is tried and found to be safe.” In other words, it did not matter to Clements how harmful the vaccines were—as long as`100 million kids were immunized (and the vaccines were sold).

Quoted in Vera Sharav, “The Vaccine Program: Betrayal of Public Trust & Institutional Corruption. Part 1 of 7.” JANUARY 22, 2018

“The Vaccine Program: Betrayal of Public Trust & Institutional Corruption. Part 1 of 7.”

Dr Robert Chen:

“The issue is that it is impossible, unethical to leave kids unvaccinated..” (Wilcox,2018, p160)

The fear was that if the information got out many people would be less likely to vaccinate at all.

Other comments from those present include: “We could exclude the lowest exposure children from the database”; “We could remove children that got the highest exposure levels since they represented an unusually high percentage of the [adverse] outcomes”; “We can push and pull this data any way we want to get the results we want;” “We could have predicted the outcomes.”

A discussion ensued about how to hide and manipulate the data to conceal the link between mercury and autism. CDC’s Roger Bernier reminded everyone to : “consider this embargoed information…and very highly protected information.” There was a consensus that— to quote the FDA– “any possible doubts, whether or not well founded, about the safety of the vaccine cannot be allowed to exist in view of the need to assure that the vaccine will continue to be used to the maximum extent …”(Stoller, 2019, p.21) The qualifying phrase “consistent with the nation’s public health objectives” was obviously not a factor.

Kennedy noted, “the government has proved to be far more adept at handling” the damaging data than at protecting children’s health. “https://childrenshealthdefense.org/news/deadly-immunity-government-cover-mercuryautism-scandal-2/

The CDC and FDA went to work to cover up the evidence. The CDC withheld Verstraeten’s findings, even though they had been scheduled for immediate publication, and they told other scientists that his original data had been “lost” and could not be reconstructed. And to thwart the danger of Freedom of Information Act lawsuits, CDC gave its large database of vaccine records to a private company, thus preventing researchers from seeing it.

Dr. Seth Farber | Big Pharma, mandatory vaccinations, and the emerging bio-fascist state

(https://childrenshealthdefense.org/news/deadly-immunity-government-cover-mercuryautism-scandal-2/ )

After the Simpsonwood meeting William Egan of the FDA fulfilled his appointed task and told a Congressional hearing, “The FDA considers all vaccines to be safe and effective. It is essential that all children receive all vaccines according to the currently recommended schedule” (Wilcox, 2018, p.164).

But while maintaining mercury was safe, the FDA decided to use another “preservative” in place of Thimerosal – evidently since they feared that the vaccine program would attract negative publicity. (This was years before the media took its vow of silence.)

The CDC allowed the drug companies to sell off their stock of mercury-based vaccines until 2004, they bought up the remaining vaccines from Big Pharma to export to developing countries (evidently poisoning poor children was not a problem) and allowed the companies to continue using the preservative in some American vaccines — including several pediatric flu shots as well as tetanus boosters routinely given to eleven-year-olds.

The uppermost concern of the officials entrusted with the safety of America’s children was to protect the reputation of the program— not to protect the children. Although they removed the mercury, they allowed Big Pharma to sell off their existing stocks of vaccines. Rep. Dan Burton’s House Government Reform Committee concluded in its final report. “This epidemic [autism] in all probability may have been prevented or curtailed had the FDA not been asleep at the switch regarding a lack of safety data regarding injected thimerosal, a known neurotoxin.” The FDA and other public-health agencies failed to act, the committee added, out of “institutional malfeasance for self protection” and “misplaced protectionism of the pharmaceutical industry.” (https://childrenshealthdefense.org/news/deadly-immunity-government-cover-mercuryautism-scandal-2/)

But the public health technocrats were not alone. The mainstream media, fattened with revenue from drug industry ads, has helped to conceal the dangers of vaccines with The New York Times to this day describing (in an editorial) “anti-vaxxers” as “the enemy” and dishonestly assuring readers that science has proved vaccines are harmless, “Scientists, especially, are uncomfortable with black-and-white statements, because science is all about nuance. But, in the case of vaccines, there are some hard truths that deserve to be trumpeted. Vaccines are not toxic, and they do not cause autism. Full stop.”

There is a postscript to this incident. In 2013, Dr. William Thompson a head scientist found himself talking on the phone to Brian Hooker, a scientist and father of a vaccine-injured child. Overwhelmed with guilt Thompson made a confession to Hooker. Under orders of his supervisors in 2002, he had destroyed data from a CDC experiment which showed a link between vaccines and autism. Hooker was excited because he knew the study to which Thompson referred was one frequently used to demonstrate that vaccines do not cause autism. (https://ahrp.org/why-is-the-cdc-petrified-of-the-film-vaxxed/)

Thompson had wanted to reveal this in 2002 but he was threatened with the loss of his job and he kept quiet. But after talking to Hooker he could keep silent no longer. “When I talk to you, you have a son with autism, I have great shame now when I meet families with kids with autism because I have been part of the problem…[T]he CDC is so paralyzed now by anything related to autism….they’re afraid to look for things that might be associated [with autism]” (Wilcox,2018, p.172).

In 2014 CDC Thompson volunteered to testify to Congress but Congress refused to subpoena him. Thus, his revelations are known to only a few. Dr. William Thompson wrote that he wanted to talk to Congress: “I have waited a long time to tell my story and I want to tell it truthfully. I have been involved in deceiving millions of taxpayers regarding the potential negative side effects of vaccines. We lied about the scientific findings. The CDC can no longer be trusted to do vaccine safety work. Can’t be trusted to be transparent. The CDC can’t be trusted to police itself”. William E. Thompson, Ph.D, Senior Scientist, US Centers, circa 2014

Dr. seth Farber | Big pharma, mandatory vaccinations, and the emerging bio-fascist state

(https://childrenshealthdefense.org/wp-content/uploads/Ken-Stoller-Immunization-Informed_Consent.pdf)

The New York Times did not cover the story.

Vaccines are Not Toxic: The Vaccine Faith

In 2019, the World Health Organization (to which vaccine evangelist Bill Gates was the second largest donor, after the government of the US) declared vaccine hesitancy “the growing resistance to widely available lifesaving vaccines” (New York Times)–was one of the top ten health threats in the world, alongside air pollution, climate change, HIV. The editorial Board of The New York Times sprung into action, declaring that “anti-vaxxers” are “the enemy” and called on the U.S. government to “get tough” by waging a “bold and aggressive” pro-vaccine campaign that includes eliminating religious exemptions for vaccination and includes “tightening restrictions around how much leeway states can grant families that want to skip essential vaccines.” https://www.nvic.org/nvic-vaccine-news/january-2019/who,-pharma,-gates.aspx. In other words the paper long considered a bastion of liberalism takes a stand against informed consent, against our constitutional rights, and urges the state to force families to submit to “essential” vaccines.

The title of the editorial was, “How to Inoculate Against Anti-Vaxxers”

It states, “Yes, there are chemicals in vaccines, but they are not toxic”–either a dishonest or a delusional assertion, as a cursory glance at the ingredients reveals! They claim of course to speak in the name of science, “No, vaccines can’t overwhelm your immune system, which already confronts countless pathogens every day.” The Times told its readers, “It’s also O.K. to get out of the gray zone. Scientists, especially, are uncomfortable with black-and-white statements, because science is all about nuance. But, in the case of vaccines, there are some hard truths that deserve to be trumpeted. Vaccines are not toxic, and they do not cause autism. Full stop.” https://www.nytimes.com/2019/01/19/opinion/vaccines-public-health.html?action=click&module=Opinion&pgtype=Homepage Vaccines are not toxic.

That is a lie. If it is not a lie, it is an irresponsible and appalling statement for a paper esteemed for investigative journalism.

J. B. Handley, the father of an autistic boy, states in his book How to End the Autism Epidemic that he read all 27- 29 of the studies that are purported to prove that vaccines don’t cause autism (p88). The testing is conducted by the industry. Only one vaccine is studied, MMR (measles, mumps, rubella), and none of the studies use the proper control group – unvaccinated children. To determine whether vaccines cause autism one should not focus on one vaccine when children are given 16 vaccines and over 70 injections. As David Kirby, former NY Times investigative journalist wrote, “It is illogical to exonerate all vaccines, all vaccine ingredients, and the total US vaccine program as a whole, based solely on a handful of epidemiological studies of just one vaccine and one vaccine ingredient” (p.87, Handley, 2018).

Nor should one use as a control group subjects who are injected with another toxin, as is invariably done in vaccine studies. That is cheating. It is like comparing Salem with Marlboro, and concluding Salem does not increase the risk of cancer. Furthermore, safety testing for drugs lasts 5 years. With vaccines adverse events are recorded for a week or less, despite the fact that autoimmune illnesses take weeks or years to manifest. (Handley, p.229). The fact that this kind of “safety” testing is permitted – only for vaccines — tells us that the government is covering for the pharmaceutical industry and that it is not protecting children

For example, one study CDC used to demonstrate vaccines don’t cause autism compared children who received more mercury in their vaccines to children who received slightly less mercury (Handley, p.88). Yet, CDC was forced to admit, that even this study with a bogus placebo could “neither prove nor disprove” an association between mercury and autism. The same is true of the other “signature” study–referred to as the Tozzi study— which compared children who received 62.5 mcg to those who received 137.5 mcg of ethyl mercury, published in 2009 in Pediatrics and reached no conclusion (p90).

But that is not the end of it– the mainstream media also comes into play. The media might as well be a PR firm hired by Big Pharma.. As Handley points out: “The PR machine for these studies is something to behold. The Academy of Pediatrics [the pro-vaccine guild of pediatricians], publishes these studies, and on the day they are released, every major news organization in the country reports on the studies, and every article sends the same basic message: Vaccines are safe, and they don’t cause autism” (p.91). For example the AP headline for the Tozzi study was, “Study Adds to Evidence of Vaccine Safety.” This is the same message, the same lie, The New York Times asserted in the name of Science.

It is a sick society in which children cannot even depend on the government or honest people in the media to protect them. One would hope that journalists would feel some responsibility for the hundreds of thousands of children injured by their deceitful misrepresentations. But none have come forward to say as William Thompson said, “I have great shame now when I meet families with kids with autism because I have been part of the problem.”(See above) Yet they have all been complicitous in the deception of American families, in the poisoning of children.

Dr. Seth Farber ” Big Pharma, Mandatory Vaccinataions, and the Emerging Bio-Fascist State

There is a religious aspect to the vaccine crusade: “The powerful vaccine ‘gospel’ has swept up regulators, medical trade associations, physicians, science journals, the popular press and others in a kind of consensus dogma that has become more important than the children [these institutions were] supposed to protect.” (CHD, 2018, p1). The children do not matter– these institutions exist to serve the State which itself exists primarily to serve the interests of corporate America. The children are of no more value than raw materials in a factory. Those who dissent, even parents of vaccine-injured children, are ridiculed as anti-science, “anti-vaxxers” and treated by the press as malefactors– in another era they would have been denounced as heretics and burned at the stake.

Again, I remind readers that the strongest evidence that vaccines are harmful is provided by the mass “experiment” brought about by the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act (NCVIA) in 1986. In this “experiment” we compare those born before the act and those born afterwards. We are not looking at the results of one vaccine but all vaccines–since by the late 1990s almost all school children were adhering to the schedules mandated in all states. And although the control group (those who received half as many vaccines or even less in the 1950s) was not unvaccinated, the difference was stark, as mentioned. In the 1960s 1 in 10,000 kids had autism; in 1985, 1 in 2,500 10 yr old kids had autism; in 1989, 1 in 1,000; in 1999, 1 in 500; in 2000, 1 in 150; in 2008, 1 out of 88; in 2016:1 in 68. In the following section I will look at other illnesses caused by vaccines (https://www.nvic.org/getdoc/6cd24653-fd19-49e5-842a-3917e15de533/medical-science—public-trust.aspx).

I think most parents who think vaccines are safe have no idea about these statistics. I would guess that they never read the ingredients in the vaccines with which their children are injected.

Here is a partial list of the ingredients: thimerosal, aluminum, formaldehyde, antibiotics, egg protein, monosodium glutamate (MSG), squalene, gelatin, polysorbate 80, phenoxyethanol, aborted human fetal lung tissue, monkey kidney cells.

Thimerosal (mercury)–although it was supposedly removed from all vaccines it is still in the tetanus toxoid vaccine (Tt), and meningococcal vaccines and in flu shots, including some given to children and pregnant women. Like aluminum it is a neurotoxin–both have been implicated in autism. Aluminum is in at least half the vaccines mandated for children. J.B. Handley who read all the scientific studies on autism believes it is a most potent toxin, the one most responsible for autism. If we calculate the total aluminum dose from 36 vaccines given to the baby in the first few years, we see that the total dose is 30.6 mg—many times the 0.85 mg considered safe by the FDA. https://www.vaccinationinformationnetwork.com/vaccines-brain-development-and-autism-dr-russell-blaylock-md

Formaldehyde is a well known carcinogen that is in a handful of vaccines. Gelatin can provoke an allergic response, including anaphylaxis.https://www.nvic.org/Doctors-Corner/Lawrence-Palevsky/Aluminum-and-Vaccine-Ingredients.aspx

Dr. Larry Palevsky

Many suspect the squalene-containing anthrax vaccine was responsible for Gulf War syndrome. (https://vaxxter.com/the-worst-ingredient-of-all/) Polysorbate 80 is in several vaccines; it is an emulsifier which caused cancer in animal tests but most importantly it is used in pharmacology to assist in the delivery of certain drugs across the blood-brain barrier. Pavelsky asks, “What viral, bacterial, yeast, heavy metal or other vaccine containing ingredient need to pass into the brains of our children?” It may account for the high concentrations of aluminum found in the brains of autistics. https://www.nvic.org/Doctors-Corner/Lawrence-Palevsky/Aluminum-and-Vaccine-Ingredients.aspx

MSG is an excitotoxin. Phenoxyethanol is a derivative of ethylene glycol, or antifreeze–it is currently used in 2 vaccines. The cell lines upon which the vaccine is grown include fetal lung tissue and monkey kidney cells.

These are a few of the more common ingredients that are intentionally included in vaccines. But contamination has been a continuous problem. For example, two contaminants were monkey virus in polio vaccines and pig viruses in rotavirus vaccines. In the 1950s up to a third of polio vaccines in the U.S. were contaminated with simian virus 40 (SV40), which came from the monkey kidney cell cultures used to make the vaccines. Institute of Medicine stated in 2002 that this could contribute to human cancer. Every time you grow human virus on animal tissue you run the risk of picking up an animal virus which would be included in the vaccine. Dr Judy Mikovits wrote, “Every scientist who works with these viruses …recognized the possibility that if you put human tissue and mouse tissue together, the possibility is that you’re going to pick up a virus that is silent in the mouse…but it kills the human or causes serious disease in the human. …[But] you might not see the cancer for two decades.”

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/news/looking-back-looking-forward-cancer-and-vaccines/ Glyphosate, a carcinogen, was also found in several vaccines.

Of course very few patients–and few doctors–know what is in vaccines.According to Dr Lawrence Palevsky, “All the vaccine ingredients are poisonous, carcinogenic or potentially harmful to the skin, gastrointestinal, pulmonary, immune and neurological systems in our bodies.https://www.nvic.org/Doctors-Corner/Lawrence-Palevsky/Aluminum-and-Vaccine-Ingredients.aspx

Are all those toxins necessary for the efficacy of the vaccine? We don’t know but, as Kennedy notes, what we do know is that since Big Pharma has no liability there is no incentive for Big Pharma to spend the money to even try to make safer vaccines.

(https://childrenshealthdefense.org/news/truth-with-robert-f-kennedy-jr-episode-10/?itm_term=home) But with all those toxic ingredients, does not common sense indicate that vaccines are likely to entail considerable risk of harm? (We will see below that there is strong evidence that children vaccinated according to CDC mandates– and thus their doctor’s recommendations– are much sicker than unvaccinated children.) Would there be any readers here surprised and shocked if it turned out that injecting a stew of poisons into babies and toddlers every few months would have long lasting deleterious effects on their bodies?

When I first read the list of ingredients in vaccines my first thought was that there is no way I would voluntarily allow anyone to inject that into me! My second thought was: How could anyone inject those ingredients into a poor tiny baby? I think there are two kinds of people–those who are appalled when they read the list of ingredients, and those who think, “If the experts say so, it must be fine.”

I expect Everyday Concerned Citizen readers will be appalled. I think ordinary Americans would tend to agree, if they knew – but most don’t bother to investigate. They are convinced by the word of their doctor that vaccines are safe and effective. (Even today’s vaccine safety activists– like Polly Tommey— once trusted their doctors.) Not that their doctors know much if anything about vaccines but Americans assume they know.

Americans assume physicianss are the one profession to which they can safely surrender the care of their bodies and souls —in today’s disenchanted secular world, in the popular imagination doctors are our angels, they are messengers of the gods. The physician is Moses carrying the tablets down from the mountaintop where he or she communed with the Most-High.

To doubt the doctor, to doubt the vaccine, is to question the accumulated wisdom of civilization itself, the goodness of the social order in which we live, it is to disdain, to disrespect, the greatest achievement of the modern world – Medical Science. This is apostasy from civilized society, it is heresy, it is barbarism. Such persons, such contemptible “anti-vaxxers,” deserve to be excommunicated from the civilized world –in another era these blasphemers would have been executed.

By refusing to be vaccinated, they declare their defiance of civilization— these selfish miscreants, refusing the purification of the vaccine, threaten to pollute the tribe which has been purified and consecrated by vaccination. These potential carriers of the dangerous germs can contaminate the community, infest the innocent– they are a menace to society. (It is never explained why the vaxxed are not protected by the vaccines—but no matter, a scapegoat is needed.)

According to the sacred narrative of the Vaccine religion, it was vaccines that saved us from the scourges of smallpox and polio. The fact that historical research casts doubt upon this trope— casts doubt upon the decisive and indispensable role of vaccines, and that there were other factors that accounted for the disappearance of these epidemics (e.g. sanitation, improved hygiene) is irrelevant – to even assert this is itself a sacrilege (Humphries, 2013). Anathema upon the anti-science heretics who doubt vaccines!

The fundamentalist Christian knows that Jesus was the son of God who died for our sins and on the third day rose from the dead. So, the epigones of the Vaccine religion know that vaccines saved humanity from epidemics that threatened the existence of humanity itself, that protected us from suffering, death, pestilence, chaos. The memory of this collective trauma is activated every time the selfish ex-vaxxers attack vaccines today.

They are not only impugning the value of CDC’s ever growing schedule of vaccines—72 jabs for children– they implicitly threaten to undermine the hegemony of the narrative of the triumph of medical Science over chaos, over nature, they depreciate the sacred story of our miraculous redemption by the vaccine, by medical Science. Thus they threaten to destroy the sacred narrative which undergirds the multi-billion dollar vaccine industry–the vaccine industrial complex including Big Pharma, CDC, NIH, pediatricians, politicians and the mainstream media.

Such heretics, such malefactors who seek to convince others to shun vaccines do not deserve an audience. Civilized people should not enter into a debate with “enemies” of society, as The New York Times called them—most of these whiners are parents of vaccine-injured children.

Wrapped in the mantle of Science, the corrupted Editorial Board and publisher of The New York Times declare: “Scientists, especially, are uncomfortable with black-and-white statements, because science is all about nuance. But, in the case of vaccines, there are some hard truths that deserve to be trumpeted. Vaccines are not toxic, and they do not cause autism. Full stop.”

As I have demonstrated here this is categorically not the verdict of science. It is an edict of modern Inquisitors.

Polly Tommey was once deceived by the Times. Most of today’s “anti-vaxxers” were once true believers. They allowed the doctors to vaccinate their children, although they had no idea what was in the vaccines. They trusted the doctors. They became ex-vaxxers because of what they saw happen to their children. But they have never been anti-science.

More now than ever genuine scientists–not those employed by Big Pharma–are confirming the claims of parents of vaccine-injured children. It’s the vaccines that cause autism–in a subset of children who are less resilient. And it’s not just autism– they give many more children less severe chronic illnesses. But vaccine evangelists still want to claim they have the imprimatur of science.

The New York Times claimed in 2005 as it does today, that parents of vaccine-injured children have pitted themselves against science. Kennedy wrote in response that these parents are pitted not against science but against public health authorities who rely not on science but on the reputations of their agencies to exonerate vaccines.

J. B. Handley is an educated layperson who knows his science. Handley is a graduate of Stanford and father of an autistic child—and author of a book on the science of autism praised by leading scientists in the field (Handley, 2018). According to Handley it is the aluminum that causes autism. But although Handley says little about it, before aluminum became the object of attention, critics of vaccines thought it was mercury that caused autism and were able to demonstrate a correlation between mercury in the vaccines and autism. But when mercury was replaced by aluminum autism continued to rise.

Barbara Loe Fisher, a vaccine safety activist and mother of a vaccine injured child stated that “repeated use of multiple vaccines throughout childhood may cause neuroimmune dysfunction [including autism] via a variety of biological mechanisms” (Fisher, 2008, p.95). There are so many toxins in vaccines I do not believe we can put the responsibility on any one chemical. In other words, it is not just the mercury or aluminum that are the critical variables triggering autism–it is all the toxins and how they interact synergistically—and it is at the age at which the vaccines are given.

As Dr. Blaylock writes, “[S]equential, multiple vaccinations in newborns and small children maximizes the inflammation of the brain and as a consequence dramatically enhances the excitotoxic pathology, and does so for prolonged periods (decades). The more vaccines that are added to the vaccine schedule, the more frequently this devastating effect will be seen and in worse forms.” https://www.vaccinationinformationnetwork.com/vaccines-brain-development-and-autism-dr-russell-blaylock-md

Nevertheless, scientific progress has been made in the last few years. Scientists who have studied the issue are convinced that vaccines cause autism in a subset of vulnerable children. In the light of what leading scientists who study toxiocology are saying, it is absurd for The New York Times to say science has determined vaccines are safe. This demonstrates that it has failed to uphold minimal standards of responsible journalism–and become little more than an organ of State and corporate propaganda. To reiterate, The Times had declared: “Vaccines are not toxic, and they do not cause autism.” The dirty secret is that it is not the anti-vaxxers who are “anti-science”–it is The New York Times and the mainstream press.

Dr. Russell Blaylock

We know now that the brains of autistic children and adults are in a state of permanent inflammation, and there are unusually high concentrations of aluminum in the brains of autistics. Blaylock notes that in a study done in 2005 (Vargas et al study) researchers examined the brains of 11 autistics from age 5 years to 44 years of age who had died without active infectious diseases as compared to age-matched controls. “That is, they found widespread activation of inflammatory cells (microglia and astrocytes) in the brains of the autistic patients.” https://www.vaccinationinformationnetwork.com/vaccines-brain-development-and-autism-dr-russell-blaylock-md

Dr. Chris Exley

Chris Exley, “the world’s leading expert on aluminum neurotoxicity,” found in his famous 2017 study that autistics’ brain were loaded with aluminum: “My group has measured the aluminum content of probably more than one hundred human brains, and these brain tissues taken from the individuals with a diagnosis of autism were some of the highest we’ve measured bar none.” https://jbhandleyblog.com/home/2018/4/1/international2018

(https://www.vaccinationinformationnetwork.com/vaccines-brain-development-and-autism-dr-russell-blaylock-md)

Handley explains that this discovery combined with the discovery that autistic brains are in a state of constant inflammation is the key to understanding autism. Handley says the brain’s immune system is in a constant battle with the aluminum that it doesn’t know how to get out of its body (p. 154). Handley notes his son was born in 2002: “He seemed to get sicker with every vaccine appointment and his head was always hurting.” (p.162) Inflammation would lead to a large brain and a swollen forehead. “Is that why children with autism are known to head bang?” (p.162). “We have new credible biological science showing us we are deliberately damaging our babies, and likely creating the autism epidemic” (p162).

The Scientists Talk Back to CDC

The FDA claims that aluminum is safe, a claim of course accepted by the CDC. But what have our regulatory agencies been relying upon to assess the safety of injected aluminum? One single study published in 2011 by Dr. Robert J. Mitkus in the journal Vaccine. Mitkus concluded that “for infants, our study demonstrates that there is little risk for aluminum toxicity following immunizations administered according to ACIP[CDC] recommendations even with maximal exposures to aluminum adjuvant.” (https://vaccinepapers.org/wp-content/uploads/FDA-aluminum-paper.pdf)

But look closer and you will see this is not science. This is a transparent scam. The study tested a much weaker substance (aluminum citrate instead of aluminum hydroxide),which was ingested not injected into the body, and it was administered to grown adults! And on the basis of this the FDA concluded that it is safe to inject a stronger chemical into a tiny baby! And then it assured parents on its website that it is safe to inject aluminum hydroxide into their babies. And The New York Times writes, “Vaccines are not toxic, and they do not cause autism. Full stop.” (https://www.nytimes.com/2019/01/19/opinion/vaccines-public-health.html)

Dr. Seth Farber | Big Pharma, Mandatory Vaccinations, and the emerging bio-fascist state

As Handley notes, “In no other drug on the planet (except vaccines) would safety standards be determined without using the actual product (aluminum hydroxide) administered in proper way (intramuscular injection) into proper population (infants).” (Handley, 2018, p.156) Handley quotes a scientist- critic: “Why do the vaccine promoters rely on oral-ingestion studies to defend Al adjuvant safety? It is because they have no experimental research showing that injecting Al adjuvant is safe! They are empty-handed” ( p156-7).

But CDC did not go unanswered. In Canada, France and England scientists who cared about children had been investigating on their own the toxicity of vaccines. In 2017 three of the leading toxicologists in the world got together and decided to jointly write letters to the three organizations supposedly protecting public health–the CDC, FDA and NIH. They obviously consulted each other since their letters were almost identical.

Dr. Christopher Shaw of the University of British Columbia wrote that the studies he did and “the broader existing literature regarding aluminum toxicity lead almost invariably to the conclusion that aluminum in any form is always neurotoxic.” In vaccines “they [adjuvants] may contribute to neurological disorders across the lifespan….In children there is growing evidence that aluminum adjuvants may disrupt developmental processes in the central nervous system and therefore contribute to ASD [autism spectrum disorder] in susceptible children.” He concluded: “In regard to the above it is my belief that CDC’s claim on its website that ‘Vaccines Do Not Cause Autism’ is wholly unsupported.” (Handley, 2018, p.166)

Dr. Chris Exley, a tenured professor at Keele University of Bioinorganic Chemistry and according to Handley, “without peer the leading expert in the world on the neurotoxicity of aluminum” described himself in his letter as “an expert in field of aluminum adjuvants and aluminum toxicity for 30 years during which time I have written in excess of 150 peer reviewed scientific publications.” He continued, “I strongly support the contention that aluminum adjuvants may have a role in the etiology of autism spectrum disorder.” His view is founded on “a scientific and burgeoning body of peer reviewed scientific evidence…The claim of CDC’s website that vaccines do not cause autism is unsupported with respect to aluminum adjuvants and this view stifles important research to determine the safety of aluminum adjuvants used in vaccines.” (Ibid, p.166)

Dr. Romain Gherardi of Universite Paris-Est is an expert in the field of aluminum adjuvant toxicity who has written 40 peer reviewed scientific publications and 1 book on the topic. He wrote, “I strongly support the contention that aluminum adjuvants may have a role in the etiology of autism spectrum disorder.” His view is founded on “a scientific and burgeoning body of peer reviewed scientific evidence.” “The claim of CDC’s website that vaccines do not cause autism is unsupported with respect to aluminum adjuvants…”(p.166)

Thus we see that the public perception shamelessly promoted by the press that vaccines are safe is contested by some of the leading toxicologists in the world. But they are not alone. Even the government’s own experts are now speaking out and contradicting CDC.

Andrew Zimmerman, MD and Richard Kelley, MD are “the two leading mainstream autism scientists in the world” (Handley, 2018, p.170). They were both key witnesses for many years for the government in the Vaccine Court. They were the experts who disputed parents’ claims that vaccines caused their children’s autism–until both of them changed their positions and concluded vaccines caused autism in a subset of children–25-40% of the autistic children, according to Kelley. Zimmerman’s testimony had helped deny the claims of over 5,000 children. Dr Zimmerman was the former director of medical research at the Kennedy Krieger Institute at Johns Hopkins University. Kelley was Professor of Pediatrics at Johns Hopkins University (Ibid,p.170).

In 2008 as a result of his friendship with a colleague who had an autistic daughter, Zimmerman changed his mind. He testified to the Vaccine Court that vaccines caused Hannah Poling’s autism (Handley, p.178). Hannah’s case was settled in her favor with a gag order on the family in 2007 (p.180). This was the end of Zimmerman’s career as a witness for the government in Vaccine Court (p.182).

In 2006 Zimmerman had co-authored with Jon Poling MD an essay about Hannah titled “Developmental Regression and Mitochondrial Dysfunction in a Child with Autism” in the The Journal of Child Neurology (Handley, 2018, p.179). But Hannah was not a singular case–the author had reevaluated the records of all the other patients with autism at Kennedy Krieger Institute and concluded that children with “mitochondrial dysfunction” (which he assumed was genetic) are more likely to become autistic between 18- 30 months if they are vaccinated (Handley, p.179).

In 2016 both Dr. Zimmerman and Dr. Richard Kelley testified in legal depositions in favor of Yates Hazlehurst whose parents claimed he had incurred autism as a result of his sensitivity to repeated vaccinations. Dr. Zimmerman testified that “people who work in the field of autism commonly see a relationship between infection, inflammation and the onset of [autistic]regression” (p195). In other words, inflammation triggered by vaccines leads to autism in susceptible populations. Kelley placed the percentage at 25- 40%.

Kelley acknowledged that he was now arguing for a link between vaccines and autism. The lawyer upon cross-examination inquired “Your opinion is contrary to.. the opinion of the CDC, correct?” Dr. Kelley responded: “It is contrary to their conclusion. It is not contrary to their data” (Handley, p. 199). Kelley could not be more blunt. In other words, As Handley notes: The data shows that vaccines cause autism but CDC does not admit this. This was testimony by 2 men who had been government witnesses for many years.

This testimony was given 3 years before The New York Times wrote that science had concluded “Vaccines are not toxic, and they do not cause autism. Full stop”. The editors of The Times had urged state and federal officials to launch an “aggressive and targeted social media campaign” of surveillance; to “monitor anti-vaccine websites” in order to defeat “the enemy” (See above.) Now it is over a year since the New York Times declared war. A censorship campaign has been launched on Youtube, Facebook, Google — at the behest of our government.

In March, U.S. Congressman Adam Schiff wrote to urge CEOs of Amazon, Facebook, and Google, to censor and delete content that raises doubt about vaccine safety. Other social media and internet giants followed suit including: YouTube, GoFundMe, Twitter, Instagram, Wikipedia, Pinterest, Etsy, and Mail Chimp. In 2019, news outlets such as Huffington Post have also removed dozens of articles about vaccine safety from their website. The press and the politicians are doing the bidding of Big Pharma at the expense of the 1st Amendment (https://ahrp.org/beware-of-medicine-marching-in-lockstep-with-government-personal-reflections)

Vera Sharav, Holocaust survivor and president of Alliance for Human Research Protection, writes that “these industry-funded pro-vaccine collaborators in government, the media, and academia” will not have an open public discussions about vaccines. I would add that Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is not even allowed on any television station. As Vera Sharav writes, “They won’t engage in public debate because their science is rigged, it can’t stand up to independent scrutiny…Caught in a web of deceptions, vaccine stakeholders are resorting to strong-arm police tactics to silence once and for all, those who challenge them. What is at issue globally is the human right to conscientious objection to medical interventions; freedom of choice and freedom of speech — a very dangerous combination.” (https://ahrp.org/beware-of-medicine-marching-in-lockstep-with-government-personal-reflections/)

(To Be Contd. Part Three of this article to follow shortly.)

Part One: Dr. Seth Farber: Big Pharma, Mandatory Vaccination and the Emerging Bio-Fascist State | Part One

The other references are in the article. I listed Blaylock here because his article is on multiple sites.

REFERENCES

Blaylock, R. (2008), “Vaccines, Neurodevelopment and Autism Spectrum Disorders: The Danger of Excessive Vaccination During Brain Development:The Case for a Link to Autism Spectrum Disorders” www.vaccinationinformationnetwork.com/vaccines-brain-development-and-autism-dr-russell-blaylock-md

Bruesewitz, R. (2012), “Justice Disserved: The Hannah Bruesewitz Odyssey” in L.K. Habakus and Mary Holland, Vaccine Epidemic, NY: Skyhorse Publishing.

Children’s Health Defense (2018), Conflicts of Interest Undermine Children’s Health, ebook, Children Health Defense.

Colbin, Annemarie (2012), “A Holistic Health Perspective,” in L.K. Habakus and Mary Holland, Vaccine Epidemic, NY: Skyhorse Publishing.

Converse, Judy, (2012), “Sick is the New Healthy,” in L.K. Habakus and Mary Holland, Vaccine Epidemic, NY:Skyhorse Publishing.

Cowan, Thomas (2018), Vaccines, Autoimmunity and the Changing Nature of Childhood Illness, White River Junction Vt: Chelsea Green Publishing.

Fisher, Barbara Loe (2008), Vaccines, Autism & Chronic Inflammation: The New Epidemic Worthington, Ohio: P.B.Industries.

Fitts, Catherine Austin ( 2020), ”Special Solari Report: Vaccine Mandates with Mary Holland, J.D.” https://home.solari.com/special-solari-report-vaccine-mandates-with-mary-holland-j-d, February 25, 2020

Handley,J. B.(2018), How to End the Autism Epidemic,White River Junction, Vt:: Chelsea Green Publishing

Holland, Mary (2010), “Reconsidering Compulsory Childhood Vaccination,” Public Law Research Paper,No. 10-64, NY:New York University School of Law.

Humphries, Suzanne and Roman Bystrianyk, (2013), Dissolving Illusions:Disease, Vaccines, and The Forgotten History, New York, CreateSpace Publishers (https://www.amazon.com/Dissolving-Illusions-Disease-Vaccines-Forgotten-dp-1480216895/dp/1480216895/ref=mt_other?_encoding=UTF8&me=&qid=1600662412).

Klein, Naomi (2008), The Shock Doctrine: The Rise of Disaster Capitalism, New York: Picador.

Moskowitz, Richard (2006), “How Do Vaccines Work,” Pathways to Family Wellness, Issue 10, June-July 2006.

Moskowitz, Richard (2009) “On Anti-vaxxers,” Age of Autism, Jan, 2019. https://www.ageofautism.com/2019/01/dr-richard-moskowitz-md-on-anti-vaxxers.html

Moskowitz, Richard (2017), Vaccines: A Reappaisal, New York: Skyhorse Publishing.

Proctor, Robert. (1999) The Nazi War on Cancer. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press..

Stoller,K.P. (2019), “The Denial of Adverse Event Risk Following Immunization and the Loss of Informed Consent – A Perspective, ” ACTA SCIENTIFIC PAEDIATRICS, Vol. 2 Issue 1 January 2019

Szasz, Thomas (2001),The Therapeutic State:The Tyranny of Pharmacracy, Volume V, Number 4, Spring 2001,Independent Review.

Wilcox, Brent (2018), Jabbed: How the Vaccine Industry, Medical Establishment, and Government Stick It to You and Your Family, New York: Skyhorse Publishing.

Whitaker, Robert (2011), Anatomy of an Epidemic: Magic Bullets, Psychiatric Drugs, and the Astonishing Rise of Mental Illness in America, New York: Broadway Books.

Dr. Seth Farber: Big Pharma, Mandatory Vaccination and the Emerging Bio-Fascist State | Part One

Report | Seth Farber, Ph.D | Dec 27, 2020

PART ONE

“We are not going to let you take our democracy away. We are not going to let you take our health away. We are not going to let you take our children away. We are not going to let you take our freedom away.”

–Robert Kennedy Jr

”(2) Fascism should rightly be called corporatism as it is the merger of government and corporate power.”

— Benito Mussolini

I was prompted to write this by my frustration with the silence of the radical left in the face of one of the greatest crimes against humanity of the modern era: I refer to the harm inflicted upon American children by the vaccine industry since the law re. the administration of vaccines was changed in 1986. And I refer to what appears now to be an attempted (ongoing) global fascist coup d’état, the success of which depends upon our continued acquiescence.

Image: DANGEROUS SECRECY: The CDC hides stats revealing number of Americans tested for the coronavirus as last shred of government transparency collapses in America

As Darren Allen, writing from England, aptly put it, (3) “the entire political left” meaning both the official left (the Democratic Party) and the radical left (he names Noam Chomsky, Caitlin Johnstone, John Pilger and Glenn Greenwald among others) “stood behind the crime of the century wholly and unequivocally.” They all agreed: “We just had to put millions and millions of people out of work then shut them up in a heavily policed panic room.” Allen posed a number of astute questions: “(4) Did they ask if anything else might have been motivating their leaders than altruistic concern for human life? Did they question the extraordinarily repressive measures governments have taken to contain the problem? Did they sound any alarm bells about rather suspicious proposed solutions such as an express vaccine, contact-tracing and so forth? Did any of these people ask any seriously critical, or even very interesting, questions? The answer to all of these questions was an almost entirely predictable no. Every man jack of them fell straight into line.”

((5)https://off-guardian.org/2020/08/15/the-reaction-of-the-left-to-lockdown/) Caitlin Johnstone, whose deconstruction of Russiagate had been brilliant, responded to Allen, “(6) I find the whole thing [Covid-19]ultimately irrelevant and boring and have nothing to add to the debate.”

(7) https://twitter.com/caitoz/status/1283547746411003904 This time around sadly Caitlin had drunk the Kool-Aid.

Phil Shannon also wrote an astringent critique of the left. His assessment was spot-on, “(8)The contemporary left’s support for an economically devastating, authoritarian lockdown, which doesn’t even achieve its limited public health aims, is one of the more remarkable developments in current politics.”

((9) https://lockdownsceptics.org/why-the-left-should-oppose-lockdown)

Almost all the iconic left-wing figures have been silent about this crime—and often supportive of the medical establishment. In a typical left trope, embraced even by many Marxists, Dr Fauci is the hero qua Scientist battling against the reactionary evil anti-science rube, Trump. Leftists have been so disoriented by TDS (Trump Derangement Syndrome) that they have not even noticed the merger of the state and Big Pharma and the dangers such an alliance poses. However, it should be noted, this failure predated Trump’s ascension as leftists have been giving a pass to CDC and vaccines for decades.

To be fair, Naomi Klein did make a powerful critique of the threat to democracy and individual rights represented by the solutions crafted by Silicon Valley and the government under the pretext of combatting the virus—but tellingly she accepted without reservations the official public health bureaucracy’s dubious claims about the virus. Thus, it never occurs to, her that this is a health crisis that is largely manufactured and she does not question the specious assumption that a vaccine is the ultimate solution.

(10) https://theintercept.com/2020/05/08/andrew-cuomo-eric-schmidt-coronavirus-tech-shock-doctrine/

The left should be in the forefront criticizing the lockdown. Brilliant critiques have been written by holistic doctors or scientists (usually with liberal or radical left orientations) such as Thomas Cowan M.D. or Joseph Mercola, D.O., by paleo-conservatives, by Libertarians, and by America’s most famous living iconic liberal Democrat, Robert Kennedy Jr. (Obama is not a liberal.) Kennedy, the founder of Children’s Health Defense, has taken a heroic and robustly non-conformist stance. Affirming the democratic legacy of his famous martyred forbears, influenced by the past writings of Klein herself, Kennedy has rued the dereliction of the left and put his finger on the economic and political impediments to the realization of “American values” — the title of his political memoir.

Kennedy points out the tragic irony: Infatuated with the idols of Science and “public health” the left has forgotten its own bedrock principle—that corporate power and corporate money corrupt. Thus, with no hope of financial gain itself, the ideological left has allied itself with corrupt government agencies and corrupted government officials. Kennedy writes, “Slate and other liberal online publications including Salon, Huffington Post and Daily Beast customarily block articles that critique vaccine safety in order, they argue, to encourage vaccination and protect public health. Motivated by this noble purpose, the liberal media—the supposed antidote to corporate and government power—has helped insulate from scrutiny the burgeoning vaccine industry and its two regulators, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Both agencies have pervasive and potentially corrupting financial entanglements with the vaccine manufacturers, according to extensive congressional investigations.”

(11) https://childrenshealthdefense.org/news/vaccines-and-the-liberal-mind/

As a result of this alliance citizens are being poisoned by their own government acting as a tool and a beneficiary of Big Pharma. The left itself, by its silence, and its cheerleading for “science” and vaccines has unwittingly aided in the cover-up of these crimes. Dr Anthony Fauci said “there is a general anti-science, anti-authority, anti-vaccine feeling among some people in this country – an alarmingly large percentage of people..” https://www.collective-evolution.com/2020/07/08/dr-fauci-says-individual-institutions-may-make-the-coronavirus-vaccine-mandatory/

Sadly much of the left seems to accept Fauci’s claim— they fail to realize that the critics of vaccines are not against science but against the pseudo-science that results from the corruption and greed of scientists.

This essay is thus a call to the left to affirm democracy and individual rights and take a stand against Big Pharma and mandatory vaccination, against bio-fascism. To do anything less is to betray the tradition of which the left is heir, from Jesus to Karl Marx to Eugene Debs —as champion of the rights of all human beings and critics of a system in which the elites mobilize the power of the State to pursue their own interests to the detriment of the demos, the citizenry. Today that means unmasking the pretensions of those who claim to act as guardians of the greater good of all, as agents of a “sanitary utopia” (Proctor, p.11) in which there is a vaccine for every conceivable illness– which every individual will be forced to take for the greater good.

The Nuremberg Code— The Defense of the Individual and Informed Consent

On December 9, 1946, after the defeat of the Nazis, an American military tribunal opened criminal proceedings against 23 leading German doctors and administrators charged with crimes against humanity for their participation either in medical experiments against inmates in concentration camps, or in the Euthanasia Program, the extermination of those deemed mentally or physically defective.

General Telford Taylor who was Chief of Counsel during the “Doctors’ Trial” stated in his opening statement, “These defendants…are not ignorant men. Most of them are trained physicians and some of them are distinguished scientists. Yet these defendants, all of whom were fully able to comprehend the nature of their acts, and most of whom were exceptionally qualified to form a moral and professional judgment in this respect, are responsible for wholesale murder and unspeakably cruel tortures.” https://www.ushmm.org/information/exhibitions/online-exhibitions/special-focus/doctors-trial/opening-statement/charges. These words underline a cautionary tale for those readers today who think doctors can do no wrong.

Several of the doctors on trial argued that their experiments were undertaken for the greater good of humanity. Before rendering their judgment, the judges felt compelled to respond to the argument of the defense that the experiments were undertaken “for the greater good.” The first principle of the Code on “medical experiments” was: “The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential.” And thus the code affirmed the right of, and spelled out the conditions for, truly informed consent (https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/the-nuremberg-code). No collective goal however noble, can ever trump the rights of the individual. To put it in other terms, our bodies are not the property of the state. Nor of Bill Gates. We are not slaves. We are endowed with inalienable rights, including life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness—so says the tradition of which we as Americans are heirs.

The Nuremberg Code deals with medical experimentation—as we will see, vaccines are experimental because none of them had been safety- tested before the (corrupted) “regulatory” agency (CDC) gave them their approval. But the Nuremberg Code has since been expanded, The latest convention is the 2005 UNESCO Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights adopted by over 190 countries. It states: “Any preventive, diagnostic and therapeutic medical intervention is only to be carried out with the prior, free and informed consent of the person concerned, based on adequate information.” https://en.unesco.org/themes/ethics-science-and-technology/bioethics-and-human-rights. The mandatory vaccination of children is a violation of the right of informed consent. And the mandatory vaccination of adults with experimental vaccines now being implemented in the developed world is even more ominous.

As a dissident psychologist, for many years I have supported the right of informed consent, of freedom from torture and coercion, of two different groups whose autonomy was abrogated, whose bodies were violated by the State. I supported the rights of “mental patients” – many of whom now choose to call themselves “psychiatric survivors” — to resist the forced administration of toxic psychiatric drugs, authorized by the State and Psychiatry, subsidized by Big Pharma. And later, five years ago, I first discovered that there were “targeted individuals” (TIs), individuals who claimed (most, accurately) to be victims of “group stalking” or torture with “directed energy weapons” in the hands of US Intelligence or US military or rogue elements from these groups. (See my discussion The Psychiatric Metanarrative, Targeted Individuals, and the Deep State: A Response to The New York Times (https://everydayconcerned.net/2016/12/12/seth-farber-ph-d-the-psychiatric-metanarrative-targeted-individuals-and-the-deep-state-a-response-to-the-new-york-times/#Torture))

These claims are continually mocked by the mental health establishment and the corporate press, which claims the people reporting these attacks are really “paranoid-schizophrenics” who are hearing voices. In a lengthy article I excoriated the mental health establishment for its negligence in failing to examine the evidence (presented by TIs and whistle-blowers)—and thus wittingly or unwittingly participating in a cover-up. Finally in 2020 the United Nations Human Rights Council Special Rapporteur for Torture, Professor Nils Melzer affirmed that the technology that TIs claim has been used to torture them does indeed exist. Professor Melzer has met with Magnus Olsson, Director of EUCACH, the European Coalition Against Covert Harassment and recognizes that TIs are legitimate victims of cyber-torture. Professor Melzer is developing an international legal framework to regulate the use of cyber technologies and prevent the torture of innocent persons.

(https://everydayconcerned.net/2020/03/14/magnus-olsson-eucach-director-un-starts-investigation-to-ban-cyber-torture)

This country has a history of treating the bodies of its citizens as if they were the property of the state or the deep state. Americans have been subjected to nonconsensual experimentation, exploitation and (12) abuse about which they often receive no information–a clear violation of the Nuremberg Code. President Clinton apologized in the mid-90s to individuals and their surviving family members “who were harmed by human radiation experiments conducted by the federal government during the Cold War.” (https://www.chicagotribune.com/news/ct-xpm-1995-10-04-9510040315-story.html) The MK-Ultra program of the CIA is the most infamous example of experiments performed on unwitting and /or involuntary subjects. The program involved more than 150 human experiments/tortures involving psychedelic drugs, paralytics and electroshock therapy. (https://www.history.com/topics/us-government/history-of-mk-ultra)

The right to informed consent, to control one’s own body, is under attack today–and parents have been robbed of the right to exercise the authority to determine which medical procedures their children will undergo. Vaccine mandates place the authority for determining what is best for children not in the hands of their parents, nor even of their personal physicians, but of government bureaucrats more committed to the interests of Big Pharma than to the well-being of children. Vaccine mandates became common between the late 1960s and 1970s. By 1980 all 50 states had required school vaccines for measles and several other vaccine-preventable childhood diseases. But there were only a few vaccines in 1980. (Reconsidering Compulsory Childhood Vaccination, https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1677565)

Vera Sharav, Holocaust survivor and president of Alliance for Human Research Protection (AHRP) wrote.

“As was the case in 1935, state-supported censorship and recent government decrees eviscerating fundamental parental rights and the professional judgment of medical doctors, have failed to raise protests from mainstream medicine, from the Ivy Towers of academia or from the corporate-controlled media. Instead, these powerful institutions are protecting their financial stake in the business of vaccines.”

(https://efvv.eu/content/mrs-vera-sharav)

Furthermore, something new and even more ominous has been occurring since COVID-19. With COVID-19 as pretext, the State is beginning to force toxic vaccines upon adults, upon all Americans. Vaccine evangelist and fanatic Bill Gates says he wants to force vaccines upon “almost” the entire world population. (https://childrenshealthdefense.org/news/gates-and-companys-covid-19-vaccine-boosterism-ignores-significant-sars-coronavirus-vaccine-risks-known-for-over-a-decade) Del Bigtree, film producer and vaccine rights activist aptly said on his cable show, The Highwire, “Big Pharma is trying to take over the world.” This is not hyperbole.

The Autism Epidemic

The assault on informed consent by Big Pharma and the state began as soon as vaccines began to become popular—with vaccine mandates. Before we look at how the state came to preempt the rights of parents, I want to emphasize that in no sense is this a process of benevolent paternalism. Although the State claims to be acting in the interest of public health and the greater good, when it arrogates parents’ rights to make medical decisions for their children, the results indicate that it is acting to further the interests of Big Pharma and those in government who profit from sale of vaccines at the expense of children’s safety and health. Although mandates exist in all states, in some states (e,g., California, New York, Maine), religious exemptions have been eliminated and even medical exemptions are not left to child’s own physician but must conform to narrow criteria devised by Centers for Disease Control (CDC)— and the child’s doctor can be overruled by school officials (in NY) or government bureaucrats (CDC is the regulatory agency discussed below).

The most obvious and the most tragic consequence, albeit just one of many, of the domination of Big Pharma and the State over public health has been the autism epidemic. In the early 1980s, 1 in 10,000 children had autism; in 1989, 1 in 1,000; in 1999, 1 in 500; in 2000, 1 in 150; in 2008, 1 out of 88; in 2016:1 in 68. (https://childrenshealthdefense.org/news/enough-already-autism-needs-to-be-declared-a-national-health-crisis/) Why the jump between the early 80s and 1989? According to Children’s Health Defense, in 1989, the CDC dramatically changed the vaccine schedule, increasing mercury exposures to American children from 70 to 237.5 mcg before age two. Even the EPA calls 1989 “The Gateway Year,” because of the epidemic of neurodevelopmental and immune system diseases that suddenly appeared in children born that year and afterward. (Later mercury was removed but aluminum was increased.)

In 1983 the CDC-recommended vaccine schedule was 22 doses of 7 vaccines by 6 years old. In 2017 it had more than doubled to 50 doses of 14 vaccines by age 6. From birth to 18 it jumped from 24 doses of 7 vaccines to 69 doses of 16 vaccines. (And more are on the way.) (https://www.nvic.org/cmstemplates/nvic/pdf/downloads/1983-2017-vaccine-schedules.pdf) And there are more children being vaccinated today and the load of toxins in the vaccines has increased exponentially. Thus, the mercury dosage tripled in the 1990s before it was replaced by aluminum.

Furthermore in 1983, the CDC directed doctors to give a child no more than 4 vaccines (DPT, polio) at one time. By 2013, the CDC directed a child can receive 8 or more vaccines at once.(https://www.nvic.org/cmstemplates/nvic/pdf/49-doses-posterb.pdf)

These numbers tell a very simple story. The autism epidemic began in the late 1980s after the enactment of National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act (NCVIA) in 1986 –this is when the number of vaccines increased and the percentage of children taking vaccines increased most dramatically (https://childrenshealthdefense.org/news/cdc-still-paralyzed-by-autism-epidemic-report-shows-one-in-59-children-in-the-us-now-affected/).

There is scientific evidence–denied by CDC and the press– that vaccines cause autism among the most vulnerable, which I will discuss below. But for the casual observer I think the strongest evidence that vaccines cause autism comes from two sources. First, is the verdict of common sense. Is it purely coincidental that the incidence of autism increases with the number of toxic vaccines to which children are subjected and with the number of children taking the vaccines as a result of government mandates, i.e. coercion?

Second, is the testimony of parents, chiefly mothers—most of whom regard themselves not as “anti-vaxxers” but “ex-vaxxers.” These were people who trusted vaccines, who trusted their doctors, but who later became convinced on the basis of their experiences with their own autistic infants that they had been injured by vaccines. They believed, they trusted, they were betrayed –by their government, by pediatricians who never warned them of the risks and who often coaxed them to vaccinate if they manifested “vaccine hesitancy.” And thus, these mothers became the mass base and the backbone of the movement against vaccine mandates.

Their voices can be heard in the movie Vaxxed 2 (not Vaxxed). It is a painful movie to watch, but it presents the most powerful argument against vaccines– or at least against the promiscuous use of them mandated by Centers for Disease Control– that I’ve seen or read, more so than any text, or scientific study. They are interviewed by Polly Tommey, a former actress and mother of an autistic child, who traveled across the country interviewing people for the film.

One after another the parents speak, and all tell the same story of innocence destroyed: a happy precocious child who had one jab too many and he/she regressed forever into an agonizing scarcely human autistic state. This is the archetypal myth of Garden of Eden, the loss of paradisaical innocence. And in the movie one actually sees the innocent pre-injury baby (e,.g., “home movies” –videos– taken of joyous babies before the event) and then one sees a withdrawn tormented baby and one sees these anguished parents fixated on images of their happy baby before the vaccination, burdened with regret and guilt and haunted forever by the memory of a happy curious baby–before the Fall—, haunted by their dreams of what might have been, if only they had listened to their own gut feeling, and not their doctor.

Polly is herself an ex-vaxxer. As she told us in the previous Vaxxed movie, when her “hippie” mother warned her that vaccines were dangerous, she scoffed, “Oh Mother, don’t be ridiculous. If vaccines were harmful it would be on the front page of The New York Times, my pediatrician would be calling me up to warn me.” Now Polly is a leading activist, a close ally of Robert Kennedy Jr.

In Vaxxed 2, Polly interviews not only parents whose infants were seriously damaged (mostly autistic) by the vaccines but also teenagers who were crippled by the vaccine for human papillomavirus given to kids between 9 and 26, recently expanded to 46 yrs old. (https://childrenshealthdefense.org/news/molecular-mimicry-body-confusion-of-self-and-non-self-more-evidence-on-hpv-vaccines-and-autoimmunity/).

This vaccine is largely responsible for an increase in infant mortality (https://childrenshealthdefense.org/news/childrens-health/sudden-cardiac-deaths-in-young-people/)

She described the experience of the film crew: “What we saw, none of us were prepared for….We knew there was a problem with autism… but nothing prepared us for what I described as a war zone out here in America. It was like a blood bath of death and injury. It was literally like walking out onto a battlefield…. But the death, the dead babies, the dead toddlers, the dead teenagers…—all this death was being silenced…[N]othing but death, destruction, paralysis, injury beyond belief here in America.”

(https://www.ageofautism.com/2019/10/video-interview-with-vaxxed-ii-executive-producer-polly-tommey.html)

We will discuss below how and why the State came to abdicate its regulatory function. What I want to do first is to convey a sense of the scope of the tragedy with which many Americans are living and of which most of us are unaware primarily because of the role of the government and the press in covering it up.

Robert Kennedy Jr. describes the characteristics of the autistic–the majority are severe cases, not the cases on the “mild” end of Autistic Spectrum Disorder that used to be called Asperger’s. “Twenty-five percent will be non-verbal. Half of them are prone to wandering. Thirty percent have seizures. Many of them will have horrific bowel disease and classic sleep disorders. Most of them will have extreme light and noise sensitivities. They will focus on spinning objects. They will endlessly repeat phrases (Echolalia). They will read without understanding (Hyperlexia). Their heads may be enlarged (Macrocephaly). They will be unable to point their finger or engage in eye contact.” (https://childrenshealthdefense.org/news/autism-epidemic-real/)

Let’s look at a typical autism case, Hannah Bruesewitz, whose suit against Big Pharma was rejected by the Supreme Court in 2011, described poignantly by her father. Hannah was a normal child–at 6 months old in 1992 she was given her 3rd DPT (diphtheria, pertussis, and tetanus) shot. That evening shortly after putting Hannah to bed, her mother heard her scream. Her mother rushed in and found her in the midst of a grand mal seizure. Hannah was soon on her way “to the first of many hospitalizations.” (Bruesewitz, p.105) Hannah remained in ICU for several days. The first hospital stay lasted 15 days during which Hannah had over 125 seizures. Her father writes, “To this day, I look back at that time as one of watching the light go out of my daughter’s eyes, a light that has never returned” (Ibid, p106)

Over the next 16 months hospitalization was required whenever a succession of seizures would not stop. Hannah “progressed physically, but she was regressing cognitively.” When it was necessary to give her Valium to stop the seizures, she became agitated in response, screaming and “flailing” so that her parents had to put a cage top on her crib for her safety. When not agitated, her demeanor was “flat and expressionless,” no longer smiling as she did in the past. (Ibid, p.106) Any vocabulary she had was lost. Finally, in 2011 the Supreme Court ruled that Hannah had no right to sue the manufacturers because vaccines were “unavoidably unsafe” and therefore the manufacturers deserved complete immunity—a non-sequitur delivered by a callous corporate friendly Court, with 2 dissenting judges (p.113)

Encephalitis or brain inflammation is common after vaccine injections. “High-pitched crying inconsolable screaming head banging, rocking, seizures, convulsions, and staring episodes…are all indications of brain inflamation.” (Colbin, p.283) Russell Blaylock MD notes that after a series of vaccinations babies will cry in a “very pitched tone” that often will continue for weeks or months along with lethargy and poor eating. These symptoms are “secondary to brain inflammation – resulting in what we call an encephalitic cry” ( https//www.vaccinationinformationnetwork.com/vaccines-brain-development-and-autism-dr-russell-blaylock-md)

Parents know that cry well. It is because of the permanent brain inflamation that autistic children often repeatedly bang their head against a wall–as if they are trying to put the fire out.

Robert Kennedy Jr. knows well their plight. Kennedy, an environmentalist and lawyer, best known because of his revered father Robert F. Kennedy and uncle, President John F. Kennedy Jr., was beseeched by mothers of vaccine-injured children 15 years ago to take up their cause and after he investigated their claims he decided they were right. So, Kennedy, an extremely eloquent and erudite intellectual, heroically risked his reputation and friendships to become the leader and spokesman of a controversial highly maligned cause—- probably the only person of his stature to become an “anti-vaxxer,” as he is contemptuously termed by the press. Bobby, as he is usually called by friends and supporters, described their nightmare eloquently in an interview, “Just spend some time with a child who has severe autism. Life for these children is an endless agonizing progression of twilight and terror. The tormenting gut aches, excruciating sensory sensitivities, the serial head banging and screaming, the isolation and perpetual joylessness. The entire family is permanently devastated. Now multiply that by ten million.” (https://childrenshealthdefense.org/about-us/mercury-vaccines-cdcs-worst-nightmare/)

Autistic children remain imprisoned for life in their own private hell. What kind of country is this where our own government allows children to be poisoned so that Big Pharma can make billions of dollars and pediatricians and government bureaucrats can pad their incomes? And what is the rationale? So Johnny does not get measles? It is not only those who oppose vaccines who are pilloried but even those doctors or parents who want to modify the schedule (24-25 injections by age 2) are likely to incur the wrath of the establishment.

Of course, CDC says this is all for health of the children. Dr. Russell Blaylock MD responds, “And I can assure the elite of the American Academy of Pediatrics and the CDC that over one million autistic children far exceeds the danger measles, mumps, diphtheria, chickenpox, tetanus, rotavirus, HiB meningitis and hepatitis pose to our youth. Also, keep in mind that for every fully autistic child, there are ten times that many with lesser degrees of impairment.” (https://www.vaccinationinformationnetwork.com/vaccines-brain-development-and-autism-dr-russell-blaylock-md)

But the physical agony of the child and the loss of an opportunity for a ordinary life is not the only cost Americans pay to enrich their doctors and Big Pharma. Katie Wright, mother of an autistic child, describes the life of the autistic family. “These families often have siblings who watch their ASD brother bang his head with a closed fist. Parents and siblings sometimes endure hours of screaming meltdowns while frantically trying to soothe the child with autism.” Families rarely get a normal night’s sleep. Socializing is often impossible. “Family events or trips to a restaurant or park can quickly go from good to bad,” requiring a sudden departure. The finances of these families are drained by autism-related expenditures. Near death experiences due to seizures are common. “Parents often live in a permanent “fight or flight” mode. Careers are curtailed, marriages ruined, vacations not taken, and siblings’ college plans go unfunded.” (https://childrenshealthdefense.org/news/natures-a-primer-in-autism-ignores-pain-and-illness-of-individuals-with-autism-katie-wright-sounds-off/)

The National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act–Crimes against Humanity

In the 1960s, the federal government began to assume the role of establishing vaccine immunization policy. Government experts within the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) adopted the goal of eradicating infectious disease. The federal government arranged for the establishment of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) which first met in 1964. ACIP was created under the Public Health Service Act to “assist states in the prevention and control of communicable diseases” (Holland, 2010 p.16). Its charter required it to prepare a list of vaccines for federal subsidy. States today under the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act adopt the ACIP-recommended vaccines for vaccine schedules for children.

Previous to the creation of ACIP, vaccine mandates were rare and used in emergencies–in accord with Supreme Court’s 1905 Jacobson v Massachusetts’ ruling, But ACIP has created an “infrastructure” that pushes mandates for any and every ostensible vaccine-preventable illness. Thus, as multiple vaccines were required for school attendance in all 50 states, the number of children injured by vaccines began increasing.(https://childrenshealthdefense.org/news/vaccine-mandates-results-dont-safeguard-childrens-rights-or-health-how-did-we-get-here/) Because the costs of paying for the damages to vaccine-injured children were high, Big Pharma threatened to stop manufacturing vaccines. According to Holland this is why the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act (NCVIA) was passed. “The rationale for this protection of industry was to ensure a stable childhood vaccine supply and to keep vaccine prices affordable.” (p.22)

The National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act (NCVIA) passed in 1986 was a watershed for Big Pharma. The vaccine supply at the time the Act was passed was comprised of the seven vaccines children then received – polio, diphtheria, pertussis, tetanus, measles, mumps and rubella. ACIP now recommends 70 doses of 16 vaccines to children, including vaccines for diseases rarely fatal in the United States, such as varicella and rotavirus, and diseases not contagious through ordinary social contact, such as hepatitis B and human papilloma virus. (Holland, p26). Clearly the Act let loose forces that were more interested in making money than ensuring a safe and stable vaccine supply: The more vaccines, the more money. For Big Pharma the Act triggered “a new gold rush,” as Kennedy Jr put it.

The Act granted pharmaceutical companies blanket immunity from liability for injuries and deaths resulting from all childhood vaccines that were on the ACIP’s recommended childhood schedule –- “no matter how toxic the ingredients, how negligent the manufacturer or how grievous the harm,” as Kennedy put it. (Kennedy, Jr. RF. “Vaccines and the liberal mind.” Children’s Health Defense, June 14, 2018. https:// childrenshealthdefense.org/news/vaccines-and-the-liberal-mind/)

The law enabled Big Pharma to avoid the kind of rigorous and costly safety testing required for other drugs, and removed the potential penalties involved in marketing vaccines that were harmful. Further it “also removed lawyers, judges and courts from their traditional roles as guardians of vaccine safety.” Since the law’s passage, Big Pharma’s revenues from vaccines have skyrocketed from a mere $1 billion to $44 billion. (Ibid). The Bill unwittingly created the conditions for what became a war not so much on diseases but on children, a war on American citizens by their own government in league with the pharmaceutical industry.

(Kennedy, Jr. RF. “Vaccines and the liberal mind.” Children’s Health Defense, June 14, 2018. https:// childrenshealthdefense.org/news/vaccines-and-the-liberal-mind)

NCVIA also created a system of government compensation for vaccine injuries and deaths, National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP), commonly referred to as Vaccine Court. The state itself, Department of Health and Human Services, is the respondent of all vaccine injury claims. (Holland,p.21) The Vaccine Court accorded victims at best a tiny amount of what could be attained in a civil trial– for example, a maximum of a mere quarter million dollars for a child’s death resulting from a vaccine.

As the number of mandated childhood vaccines skyrocketed, so did deaths and injuries. And although it is estimated that only 1% of vaccine injuries are reported, the financial strain on Vaccine Court (subsidized by the American taxpayer) led it to be more reluctant to grant compensation than was initially planned. Thus in the 3 decades since its creation only one third of the petitioners (1% of the injured)`have been compensated, at a total of $4 billion– the tip of the iceberg of immense suffering (CHD, 2018, p.5).

A large part of the reason for this debacle was because the laws that applied to childhood vaccination mandates did nothing to establish neutral and conscientious regulatory agencies, an absolutely essential measure to protect the public in light of Big Pharma’s exemption from liability. It was not only that the regulatory agencies were captured, i.e., staffed by persons with egregious conflicts of interest—worse, these agencies became part of the vaccine industry, subsidiaries of Big Pharma. Thus the members of these agencies mobilized all the powers of the state in order to further the interests of the pharmaceutical industry. (Kennedy, Jr. RF. “Vaccines and the liberal mind.” Children’s Health Defense, June 14, 2018. https:// childrenshealthdefense.org/news/vaccines-and-the-liberal-mind)

The Act located “vaccine promotion, safety and compensation” under one umbrella at the Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) (Holland, p25), as if organizations involved in the promotion of vaccines could at the same time be entrusted to protect the safety of children! The seeds of corruption were implanted from the start. The result, as Holland noted, was that promotion of vaccines and other profit-making activities, not the safety and welfare of children, came to be the priority of the government agencies–of HHS, FDA, CDC and ACIP. The main regulatory agency for vaccines, Centers for Disease Control was aptly described by Kennedy as a subsidiary of the pharmaceutical industry. (https://childrenshealthdefense.org/about-us/mercury-vaccines-cdcs-worst-nightmare) The result of these developments was one of the great American tragedies of the 20th century– the most severe health crisis in modern American history. It must also be described as one of the greatest crimes of the 20th century state against its own citizens.

The Act located “vaccine promotion, safety and compensation” under one umbrella at the Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) (Holland, p25), as if organizations involved in the promotion of vaccines could at the same time be entrusted to protect the safety of children!

Dr. Seth Farber | Big Pharma, Mandatory Vaccination and the Emerging Bio-Fascist State 

Those very groups that Americans assumed were their most trustworthy protectors betrayed their moral mandate. Vera Sharav, Holocaust survivor and President of the Alliance for Human Research Protection wrote: “Public health officials and the medical profession have abrogated their professional, public, and human responsibility, by failing to honestly examine the iatrogenic harm caused by expansive, indiscriminate, and increasingly aggressive vaccination policies” (https://childrenshealthdefense.org/news/vaccine-program-betrayal-public-trust-institutional-corruption-part-3-7/)

Thus, as Holland observed, there was inadequate safety testing; under-compensation of vaccine-injured children; failure to inform parents about the risks of vaccines—on the other hand, parents were subjected to severe penalties for non-compliance with vaccination mandates (Holland, 24-5). Even when religious exemptions exist, courts have sometimes found parents liable for child neglect –they have mandated child removal and forced vaccination of children in families who have asserted religious objections. (Holland, pp13-4)

Barbara Loe Fisher, a vaccine-safety activist also noted that DHHS (Department of Health and Human Services) was not a neutral body–no wonder safety was never prioritized: “It is a conflict of interest for DHHS to be in charge of vaccine safety and also license vaccines, and take money from drug companies to fast-track vaccines, and partner with drug companies to develop and share profits from vaccine sales, and make national vaccine policies that get turned into state vaccine laws….” (https://www.nvic.org/NVIC-Vaccine-News/September-2014/Remove-Vaccine-Safety-Oversight-From-DHHS.aspx)

Each government agency failed to fulfill its role in protecting the safety of children for predictable reasons. The FDA is responsible for the initial licensing phase of the vaccines, and the specific FDA committee charged with vaccine licensing is the Vaccine and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee (VRBPAC.) There was an investigation of VRBPAC by the US Government Reform Committee of Congress and they concluded, “The overwhelming majority of members, “both voting members and consultants, “have substantial ties to the pharmaceutical industries,” which is making huge profits on those vaccines. (https://childrenshealthdefense.org/about-us/frequently-asked-questions) Thus it is no wonder that toxic vaccines were licensed.

Once FDA approves a vaccine, it goes over to the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) and they decide whether or not to add that vaccine to the schedule of mandated vaccines. In 2000, an investigation by the US Government Reform Committee of the United States Congress found the same kind of conflicts of interest in CDC as they had initially found in FDA. In 2009 nothing had changed. A government report in 2009 concluded that most of the experts who served on advisory panels to evaluate whether vaccines were safe had “potential conflicts of interest that were never resolved….Some were legally barred from considering the issue but did so anyway” “Most of the advisers ..had either a job or a grant from a {pharmaceutical] company or other entity whose interests were affected by the committees’ discussions, and a considerable number also owned stock in such companies.” (Harris Gardiner, Dec 17, 2009.)

Advisers on Vaccines Often Have Conflicts, Report Says (https://www.nytimes.com/2009/12/18/health/policy/18cdc.html) (https://childrenshealthdefense.org/about-us/frequently-asked-questions)

To call the CDC a captured agency would be an understatement. It is a subsidiary of the pharmaceutical industry. (https://childrenshealthdefense.org/about-us/mercury-vaccines-cdcs-worst-nightmare) It is “a major player in the vaccine marketplace”: It buys half of all childhood vaccines in the U.S. and then sells them at a profit to public health agencies through the Vaccines for Children (VFC) Program, which pushes free and low-cost vaccines on indigent children. Over the past three decades, the CDC’s vaccine purchases have increased 15-fold, as the number of vaccines children are mandated to take has skyrocketed–while vaccine companies have raked in the profits. (https://childrenshealthdefense.org/news/close-ties-and-financial-entanglements-the-cdc-guaranteed-vaccine-market/)

A 2017 analysis of Google patents results showed that the CDC held 56 patents pertaining to various aspects of vaccine development, manufacturing, delivery and adjuvants. By April 2019, a new search found CDC held155 patents, and a separate legal website display, both vaccine- and non-vaccine-related. The author of the 2017 analysis suggests that the large number of patents held by the CDC “deserves an in-depth review to determine exactly what current financial relationships with vaccine makers now exist and what…current impact those revenue streams are likely having on vaccine safety positions” (Conflicts, p.12).

To call the CDC a captured agency would be an understatement. It is a subsidiary of the pharmaceutical industry. (https://childrenshealthdefense.org/about-us/mercury-vaccines-cdcs-worst-nightmare) It is “a major player in the vaccine marketplace”: It buys half of all childhood vaccines in the U.S. and then sells them at a profit to public health agencies through the Vaccines for Children (VFC) Program, which pushes free and low-cost vaccines on indigent children.

DR. SETH FARBER | BIG PHARMA, MANDATORY VACCINATION AND THE EMERGING BIO-FASCIST STATE 

Robert Kennedy Jr aptly asked, “So the American people have to wonder, are the scheduled vaccines that CDC is advising them to take, which become mandatory under state law, are those being added to advance public health or..because..somebody is making a profit from them?” (Wilcox 2018, p.122)

As the vaccine program expanded and as the state was brought in to promote vaccines and to coerce parents into vaccinating, it was increasingly important to obtain the cooperation of the medical establishment which helped to “manufacture consent”– the consent of the pediatricians who promoted and administered the vaccines, and of the parents mandated to submit their children to an ever growing number of vaccines. This manufacture of consent has been accomplished to an unprecedented degree. CHD writes, “The powerful vaccine “gospel” has swept up regulators, medical trade associations, physicians, science journals, the popular press and others “in a kind of consensus dogma” that has become “more important than the children [these institutions were] supposed to protect.” (p1 Conflicts.)

But above all, doctors, the secular priesthood in modern society, lent these programs a facade of legitimacy. Vera Sharav, holocaust survivor and president of Alliance for Human Research Protection wrote, “The plight of thousands [millions] of real children, who have suffered irreversible neurological harm following the administration of multiple vaccinations simultaneously, is willfully ignored by the medical establishment…” Worse it is the medical establishment which manufactures consent, by insisting that ”vaccines are safe and effective” (https://ahrp.org/beware-of-medicine-marching-in-lockstep-with-government-personal-reflections/)

In addition to the steady stream of customers generated by the vaccine schedule, pediatricians are given financial incentives per fully vaccinated child in their practice by insurance companies. (https://childrenshealthdefense.org/news/the-normalization-of-corruption-big-pharma-takes-tobacco-tactics-to-a-new-level/) Blue Cross Blue Shield Compensation and Bonus Program for pediatricians provided a $40 bonus to the pediatrician for every on-time vaccine up to $400 per child. A typical medical practice could include 1500 children which would be a half million dollar annual incentive to vaccinate according to the schedule and not to ask too many questions about safety. Even worse, the program punishes doctors who fail to fully vaccinate at least 63% of their practice on time. Those doctors lose 100% of the bonus.



The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) benefits substantially from pharmaceutical industry advertisements in their affiliated medical journals, with advertising representing anywhere from a tenth to a third of the organization’s total revenues. The AAP receives funding from Merck, Pfizer, Sanofi, GSK and others. Considering its revenue from Big Pharma ads, it’s not surprising that AAP journal Pediatrics has led the way in promoting strategies to overcome “vaccine hesitancy” among parents: Parental refusal to vaccinate or their decision to “delay” and spread out the injections (to not give the child so many vaccines in a short window of time) are viewed as if they were manifestations of psychopathology, rather than informed rational choices (Children’s Health Defense, 2018, p.29).

The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) benefits substantially from pharmaceutical industry advertisements in their affiliated medical journals, with advertising representing anywhere from a tenth to a third of the organization’s total revenues. The AAP receives funding from Merck, Pfizer, Sanofi, GSK and others.

Children’s Health Defense

The 1986 Law has revolutionized the pharmaceutical industry and the vaccine program. Big Pharma revenues from vaccines has grown from a $170 million industry in the early 1980s to $60 billion in 2019. (https://jbhandleyblog.com/home/2019/2/20/jb-handley-is-there-a-path-to-end-the-autism-epidemic). Thanks largely to no-liability-vaccines the pharmaceutical industry is now the most profitable industry in the U.S. In a single year in the early 2000s, “the combined profits of the ten largest drug companies in the Fortune 500 had higher net profits, of $35.9 billion more than all the other 490 companies [in the Fortune 500] combined. This translated into political power: “There are more full-time pharmaceutical industry lobbyists on Capitol Hill than there are legislators in both Houses of Congress” (Holland, 2010, p36).

The collusion of medical establishment, government, and Big Pharma in promoting vaccines is exactly what occurred after the passage of the 1986 NCVIA Act. The state stepped in to protect the private sector, then “regulatory” agencies were created that were in the vaccine business, and promoted vaccines. Doctors were co-opted. Since Pharma is allowed to advertise on television the media was co-opted. But what makes the Vaccine dogmas so impregnable, and transformed vaccine critics into a figure of derision in the public eye, even on the anti-corporate left, is the virtual consecration of vaccines as elixirs of “public health” by the press and the medical establishment––even as they make children sicker and sicker. “Vaccines cured small pox and polio”–this is part of the catechism many people will scream at you – if you express any doubt about the 72 injections children are given today.

Dr. Richard Moskowitz, pediatrician and author, writes, “Most doctors nevertheless continue to believe what the CDC tells them, that vaccines are uniformly safe and effective, even though the Supreme Court has ruled that they are inherently unsafe…. This, I submit, is not science, but scientism, a blind dogmatism and quasi-religious faith that whatever passes for science at the moment is the absolute truth, beyond question or doubt, to which everyone must pledge allegiance, the main result of which is to stifle the critical thinking, questioning, and doubting of seemingly settled truths that real science requires.” (https://www.ageofautism.com/2019/01/dr-richard-moskowitz-md-on-anti-vaxxers.html)

(To Be Contd. Part Two and Part Three of this article to follow shortly.)

The other references are in the article. I listed Blaylock here because his article is on multiple sites.

REFERENCES

Blaylock, R. (2008), “Vaccines, Neurodevelopment and Autism Spectrum Disorders: The Danger of Excessive Vaccination During Brain Development:The Case for a Link to Autism Spectrum Disorders” www.vaccinationinformationnetwork.com/vaccines-brain-development-and-autism-dr-russell-blaylock-md

Bruesewitz, R. (2012), “Justice Disserved: The Hannah Bruesewitz Odyssey” in L.K. Habakus and Mary Holland, Vaccine Epidemic, NY: Skyhorse Publishing.

Children’s Health Defense (2018), Conflicts of Interest Undermine Children’s Health, ebook, Children Health Defense.

Colbin, Annemarie (2012), “A Holistic Health Perspective,” in L.K. Habakus and Mary Holland, Vaccine Epidemic, NY: Skyhorse Publishing.

Converse, Judy, (2012), “Sick is the New Healthy,” in L.K. Habakus and Mary Holland, Vaccine Epidemic, NY:Skyhorse Publishing.

Cowan, Thomas (2018), Vaccines, Autoimmunity and the Changing Nature of Childhood Illness, White River Junction Vt: Chelsea Green Publishing.

Fisher, Barbara Loe (2008), Vaccines, Autism & Chronic Inflammation: The New Epidemic Worthington, Ohio: P.B.Industries.

Fitts, Catherine Austin ( 2020), ”Special Solari Report: Vaccine Mandates with Mary Holland, J.D.” https://home.solari.com/special-solari-report-vaccine-mandates-with-mary-holland-j-d, February 25, 2020

Handley,J. B.(2018), How to End the Autism Epidemic,White River Junction, Vt:: Chelsea Green Publishing

Holland, Mary (2010), “Reconsidering Compulsory Childhood Vaccination,” Public Law Research Paper,No. 10-64, NY:New York University School of Law.

Humphries, Suzanne and Roman Bystrianyk, (2013), Dissolving Illusions:Disease, Vaccines, and The Forgotten History, New York, CreateSpace Publishers (https://www.amazon.com/Dissolving-Illusions-Disease-Vaccines-Forgotten-dp-1480216895/dp/1480216895/ref=mt_other?_encoding=UTF8&me=&qid=1600662412).

Klein, Naomi (2008), The Shock Doctrine: The Rise of Disaster Capitalism, New York: Picador.

Moskowitz, Richard (2006), “How Do Vaccines Work,” Pathways to Family Wellness, Issue 10, June-July 2006.

Moskowitz, Richard (2009) “On Anti-vaxxers,” Age of Autism, Jan, 2019. https://www.ageofautism.com/2019/01/dr-richard-moskowitz-md-on-anti-vaxxers.html

Moskowitz, Richard (2017), Vaccines: A Reappaisal, New York: Skyhorse Publishing.

Proctor, Robert. (1999) The Nazi War on Cancer. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press..

Stoller,K.P. (2019), “The Denial of Adverse Event Risk Following Immunization and the Loss of Informed Consent – A Perspective, ” ACTA SCIENTIFIC PAEDIATRICS, Vol. 2 Issue 1 January 2019

Szasz, Thomas (2001),The Therapeutic State:The Tyranny of Pharmacracy, Volume V, Number 4, Spring 2001,Independent Review.

Wilcox, Brent (2018), Jabbed: How the Vaccine Industry, Medical Establishment, and Government Stick It to You and Your Family, New York: Skyhorse Publishing.

Whitaker, Robert (2011), Anatomy of an Epidemic: Magic Bullets, Psychiatric Drugs, and the Astonishing Rise of Mental Illness in America, New York: Broadway Books.

Youtube, Keen to Keep Truth on Deadly (Unsafe) COVID Vaccines & Deadly (Unsafe) 5G from the World, Yanks Report 222, News Panel 12 Exposing Both, Citing “Safety”

Brief note | Ramola D | Dec 22, 2020

Brief Video Note on Report 222, News Panel 12:

The video (R 222/NP 12) is currently posted at Brighteon, and will be uploaded here shortly as well.

Report 222/News Panel 12:

https://www.brighteon.com/embed/38ce86a2-4d24-40c1-a5d6-dc8d914bf55c

NOW UPLOADED BELOW, CAN BE PLAYED RIGHT HERE —

REPORT 222/NEWS PANEL 12: Shutting down AI/5G Takeover of Humanity, Resisting Genocide at Time of Great Conjunction

Famous last words from the platform being run by Information Constrainers and Drainers:

So, looks like “strikes” of some kind are in effect since YT won’t let me upload this note currently either, posting here for reference.

Please subscribe to Youtube.com/RamolaDReports nevertheless and to Brighteon & Bitchute, (Ramola D Reports both places) for now.

I am exploring LBRY, Rumble, and BrandNewTube as well and will move somewhere shortly.

This is not just “censorship”–too mild a word to cover these actions of selective discrimination, this is Information Warfare on the people of the world. Forcing people to swim around in the stagnant waters of MSM pushing turbid narratives of deadly flying TRex viruses one has to stand 6 feet from while asphyxiating oneself to death in a useless paper or cloth mask is the action of Communist propaganda platforms and Orwellian Ministries of Truth. Youtube is making itself obsolete as platform of choice for all thinking and sentient humans currently. As for the “local health authorities” and WHO pushing false narratives on all, they are frequently informed by such as myself of the fallacy of their statements, but ignore all, being steeped in a large-scale agenda-driven Psy Op on the world population — which they hope will lead them forward to the holy land of #GreatKraitReset on wings (of genocide, sterility, mass culling of the world’s population).

Youtube employees reading this note are advised to start reading up on what is really happening with the New World Disorder No Virus, No Pandemic scenario ongoing currently and research the COVID vaccine a little better: a Crime Against Humanity making lab rats of humans and seeking the deforming of the human genome forever: Leave Youtube, or reform from within, act to end this Information Black Hole Youtube is supporting.

ALARM CALL: American, British, European Physicians, Nurses, Scientists, & Medical Journalists Report the High-Speed-Rolled-Out mRNA COVID Vaccines are Unsafe, Dangerous, & Unnecessary–“Do NOT Take This Vaccine”

COVID Vaccine Intended to Destroy the Human Genome and Humanity

COVID Psy Op Needs to Stop Right Now: Children Are Dying From the Masks, Children Are Committing Suicide

BREAKING: Gemma O’Doherty Reports that UK Dept of Health Concedes SARS-COV-2 Virus Not Isolated, “No Information,” Meaning, It’s Not a Real Pandemic

UK Community Leaders Express Dissent & Educate All on Common Law Protections: “We Do NOT Consent to Another Lockdown”

BREAKING: Major Investigative Report by Association of French Reserve Army Officers Finds COVID-19 “Pandemic” to Have a Hidden Agenda for Global Totalitarianism, Nanotech Chipping of All, 5G Irradiation, & Genocide

CONFIRMED: COVID-19 Plandemic a Known, Live “Training and Simulation Exercise” under WHO, Treasonously Agreed to by 196 Countries

Dr. Sherri Tenpenny’s Interview Blowing the Lid off the COVID-19 Pandemic Scare, with Faulty Tests, Faulty Data, and Dangers of Vaccines Has Been Removed by Youtube

Misled (& Misleading) Governments & Police Attack Citizens Openly While People Converge in High Numbers in Sydney, Berlin, London, Boston, Dublin, Edinburgh, Geneva, Athens, Montreal, Melbourne to Protest Lockdowns, Lies, Fascist Government Action, Masks, & Vaccine Mandates

AL Whitney/Parents Against Mandatory Vaccines: Do Not Sign the Refusal to Vaccinate Form!

Re-posted, with thanks, (and redistribution permission, as stated online), from Parents Against Mandatory Vaccines. Please click over there for all comments and responses from the author, who is knowledgeable on this issue, and for more articles on this and similar subjects. 

DDeesVaccinesAs awareness grows worldwide about the dangers of vaccines, the dubious content of vaccines, and the true history of vaccines–which links to pharmaceutical corporation history–non-vaccinating parents in the US are now being asked to sign a Refusal to Vaccinate form.

This article specifically points out that physicians (to avoid being sued) who are now asking non-vaccinating parents to sign this CDC/American Academy of Pediatrics Legal Dept. Refusal to Vaccinate form, and parents themselves, seeking to protect their child, who sign without thought, may not realize the implications: that this is a legal document, which could be used against you in a custody battle with Child Protective Services or with the other parent, which essentially presupposes that vaccines are all-good and very necessary, and anyone signing it is essentially saying they are, with foreknowledge, exposing their children and everyone else to possible harm, and are okay with their child being isolated and medically evaluated and tested by any healthcare worker for any of the diseases he/she is not vaccinated against.

A proposed alternative to this document is the Vaccination Notice, linked below, at end of this article, which is re-printed in full below.

 ********************

DO NOT SIGN the Refusal to Vaccinate form!

IT IS A TRAP!

By AL Whitney © copyround 2015
Permission is granted for redistribution if linked to original and Parents Against Mandatory Vaccines is acknowledged.

THE REFUSAL TO VACCINATE DOCUMENT

The Refusal to Vaccinate document was created by the CDC or the American Academy of Pediatrics ‘legal department’ as a response to the growing number of toxic vaccines recommended by them and the growing number of parents who are becoming educated on this issue. According to CDC recommendations, our children should now receive 37 doses of vaccines between 0-16 years. [See Vaccine Schedule]

This document, now being used to overcome vaccine awareness, is the most diabolical strategy possible! It is unlikely that physicians have any idea what they are asking their patients to sign . . . or to sign away. It is essentially a signed confession. So please read and understand why no one should sign it and why it is really something other than what it appears to be.

TWELVE REASONS YOU CANNOT SIGN REFUSAL TO VACCINATE

Here are 12 reasons why no parent can sign this document unless they are interested in being statutorily charged with neglect or intentionally causing harm. Repeating more boldly: this document, if signed, could be used to have your child(ren) removed from your custody! It was created to stand up in court, which is why they require the parent’s signature to be “witnessed”?

Refusal to Vaccinate 3

#1
The document attaches a child ID # that will be identifiable in the electronic records system across the country. Everyone from the school to the NSA will be able to determine who is and who is not vaccinated.

#2
The scientific term for HPV vaccine is listed to discourage parents from making the connection to the dangerous vaccine for HPV called Gardasil. [See Gardasil: Former Merck Doctor predicts greatest medical scandal of all time]

#3
Establishing a vaccination history is part of the Police state registry system being set up to track your vaccination status.

#4
The CDC Vaccine Information Statement is pure unadulterated propaganda. The vaccination information coverup was documented and exposed in an extremely important paper Health Hazards of Disease Prevention (2011). Also see info about the CDC – #9 (below).

#5
Again the parent is misled to think the truth about vaccine risks is on the CDC web site.The doctor has the vaccine package inserts right in his/her office. Why is it not offered and explained to the parent? The physicians themselves may or may not have read them. However, physicians are certainly aware that if the parents read the ‘official risks’ put out by the drug corporations, they would refuse the vaccines. Full disclosure is almost NEVER a part of the process.

#6
“I understand the following: The risks and benefits of the recommended vaccine(s).” This of course would be agreeing to a false statement. You cannot understand the risks without reading and understanding the package inserts, therefore how can you answer in the affirmative? And what about all of the vaccine facts that aren’t even listed in the package inserts that have been ‘covered up’ for many years?

#7
Parents are falsely told that without vaccines their children could suffer dire illnesses but are not told the dire illnesses/injuries the vaccines themselves could cause . . . including death.

#8
This refers to the “herd immunity myth” of 1933, which has been proven unscientific over and over and over again. Simply put: if other children have been vaccinated – and the vaccines work – they won’t contract a disease from your child.

#9
Entities are listed as “strongly recommending” the vaccine schedule. Again however, parents are NOT given full disclosure as to exactly who/what the entities are and what their motivations might be. Listed on the Refusal to Vaccinate document are the following entities and a brief description of their motivation:

  • The ‘physician’ – is rewarded for administering vaccines by higher reimbursements for his fees. His vaccine “rates” are checked to determine whether or not he/she is entitled to more money. Physicians, public health workers, and drug companies have all been given immunity from any possible lawsuits that may arise as a result of vaccine-caused injury or illness. In other words, if a vaccine harms your child or causes autism you cannot sue any of them. They all have a liability exemption.
  • The American Academy of Pediatrics which is a corporation headquartered in the STATE OF ILLINOIS – that receives lots of money from drug corporations for advertising in their journal, etc. This organization relies heavily on what they falsely believe to be a “government” health advocacy agency known as the Center for Disease Control (CDC).
  • The American Academy of Family Physicians which is a corporation headquartered in the STATE OF KANSAS – that also receives lots of money from drug corporations for advertising in their journal, etc. This organization also relies heavily on what they falsely believe to be a “government” health advocacy agency known as the Center for Disease Control (CDC).
  • The Center for Disease Control (CDC) which is a corporation headquartered in the STATE OF GEORGIA. The CDC IS NOT PART OF A LEGITIMATE GOVERNMENT. Repeat: the CDC IS NOT PART OF A LEGITIMATE GOVERNMENT! It is a private for-profit corporation listed on Dun and Bradstreet that is chartered under the umbrella of the private for-profit UNITED STATES corporation with extremely close ties to the pharmaceutical companies and a sordid history of corruption. [See: CDC Exposed]

Bottom line: all of the above “entities” make more money if they vaccinate our children and even more if our children get sick from the vaccines . . . including the pediatricians themselves.

#10
This is the broadest and most nefarious part of this document.
“Nevertheless, I have decided at this time to decline . . . I know that failure to follow the recommendations about vaccination may endanger the health or life of my child and others . . . I therefore agree to tell all health care professionals in all settings what vaccines my child has not received because he or she may need to be isolated or may require immediate medical evaluation and tests that might not be necessary if my child had been vaccinated.”

This is not only deceptive and untruthful [see numbers 2-8] it is asking you to confess that you know you are harming your child (and others) and don’t care. It is asking you to agree to inform any/all people who represent themselves as healthcare “professionals” (not defined) of your child’s vaccination record. You are also consenting to allow undefined healthcare professionals to remove your son or daughter from your care and place him or her in isolation for unproven or unknown exposure to a myriad of undefined communicable diseases – with or without testing.

#11
This is an admission that you understand this contractual document – and its significance – ‘in its entirety’. This means that you accept the false information sited as factual, chose NOT to do what you now know to be good for your child and others (are negligent), obligate yourself to embarrass and confuse your child by tracking and reporting on the vaccines you protected your child from, and give permission for your child to be tested or removed from your care and put in isolation for any ‘supposed’ exposure to any ‘undefined’ communicable disease by anyone calling themselves a healthcare worker. [Ohio Revised Code 3701.13]

In short, the form wants you to attest to the following . . . in writing and in the presence of a witness:

  • You understand you are signing a contract with performance requirements
  • You accept false information as factual and don’t care
  • You don’t care if your child or others are harmed by your decision
  • You agree to volunteer to all pretend healthcare workers your child’s vaccine record
  • You agree to allow others to test and/or isolate your child for unproven exposure to a disease

#12
Here is the kicker. As you are asked to sign, initial and date this document in front of a witness, should a custody dispute ever arise (either between parents or with Child Protective Services) this document could be used against the mother or father that signed it.

In defense of physicians, they have been told – via the instructions accompanying the Refusal to Vaccinate document – that parents could sue them should their sons or daughters come down with any of the diseases vaccines are supposed to prevent. Their fear of being sued is why physicians are so insistent that parents sign the Refusal to Vaccinate document.  An excellent alternative, for both physician and parent, is the Vaccination Notice.  This notice corrects misconceptions about vaccines, the herd immunity myth, and the CDC. It also brings the liability (or lack thereof) to the physicians attention. See The Vaccination Notice.

NOTE

If you have already signed the Refusal to Vaccinate document, go to this page for suggestions as how to rescind or nullify it:  So you’ve signed the Refusal to Vaccinate document

******************

Please visit the excellent website Parents Against Mandatory Vaccines to view this article there, with author and other comments, and to review all their other information on Mandatory Vaccines.

RELATED:

Jeremy R. Hammond/Foreign Policy Journal: A Measles Death, Vaccines, & Media’s Failure to Inform

Mother Nature and You: The Most Truthful List of All Vaccines Published to Date Including All of the Official Ingredients!

(Also Search using “vaccines” on this site for links to more articles.)