Tag Archives: SARS-COV-2 Virus does not exist

Christine Massey | Response to Peter Smith, “Canadian Anti-Hate Network”, re “virus” isolation | SARS-COV-2 Virus Has Not Been Isolated

Posted on January 25, 2022 by Ramola D | 2 comments

Re-post of original by Christine Massey, with permission | Ramola D | January 25, 2022

Posted December 3, 2021, by Christine Massey

Peter Smith, Canadian Anti-Hate Network, is identified as the author of an article containing false and misleading statements regarding both “COVID-19” and 2 gentlemen who I happen to have a great deal of respect for.

The gentlemen in question are quite capable of speaking for and defending themselves, but I wish to address Peter’s damaging and false claim that the alleged “COVID-19 virus” has been isolated (a necessary step in proving the existence of an alleged “virus”).

Here is Peter’s article:

Canadian Police Officer Following Fringe Legal Philosophy Appears Alongside US QAnon Influencer – Canadian Anti-Hate Network (antihate.ca)

A quote from Peter’s article:

“… Pritchard tells his viewers the familiar line that COVID-19 and the pandemic is a lie, claiming that it has failed to be isolated in a laboratory, despite this being patently false.”

In this quote, Peter included hyperlinks to 3 resources that he seems to believe prove that the alleged “virus” has been isolated. These are the only pieces of “isolation” evidence provided in his article. Let’s check them out.

The links point to 1) a webpage of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 2) a Globe and Mail article attributed to Ivan Semeniuk, published March 13, 2020, and 3) a March 2020 preprint of a “SARS-COV-2 isolation” study.

The “SARS-CoV-2 Viral Culturing at CDC” webpage was last updated Dec. 29, 2020 and claims that:

“SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, was isolated in the laboratory and is available for research by the scientific and medical community“,

and that:

“SARS-CoV-2 strains supplied by CDC and other researchers can be requested, free, from the Biodefense and Emerging Infections Research (BEI) Resources Repository“.

CDC explains that “the virus” was “grown” by CDC researchers, and lists all the fabulous ways that the “strains” are being used to further the good of humanity.

Wow, so impressive. This is all the evidence we really need, right? It’s been isolated, end of story! Only a kook would suggest otherwise. And hey, the CDC even provided a time line of their epic accomplishment and a link for more details.

“On January 20, 2020, CDC received a clinical specimen collected from the first reported U.S. patient infected with SARS-CoV-2. CDC immediately placed the specimen into cell culture…”

Wait a minute. What was that again? They immediately placed the clinical specimen into cell culture. Huh?

Does this mean that the patient sample was immediately placed into a cell culture – a source of genetic contamination? Surely they mean that the virus was placed into a cell culture after it was isolated from the patient. Because if the patient sample was immediately contaminated with a cell culture, how could it then be established scientifically that the patient was infected with a new virus? I’m confused. Let’s keep reading.

“On February 2, 2020, CDC generated enough SARS-CoV-2 grown in cell culture to distribute to medical and scientific researchers.”

Fabulous, but how did they determine that a virus, and specifically SARS-COV-2, was even present? I’m still confused. Let’s keep reading.

“On February 4, 2020, CDC shipped SARS-CoV-2 to the BEI Resources Repository.”

Woah, talk about putting the cart before the horse. Let’s keep reading and figure this out.

“An article discussing the isolation and characterization of this virus specimen is available in Emerging Infectious Diseases.“

Ok, well we will definitely have to check out that article and get these details sorted out.

So the link for the article takes us to “Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 from Patient with Coronavirus Disease, United States” by Jennifer Harcourt (affiliation: CDC) et al.

Jennifer Harcourt… That is also the name of the first author listed in the study cited by Peter. They are the same study. Peter cited the preprint, and the CDC’s webpage links to the final published version. So let’s focus on the final version, which is published in the CDC’s own journal Emerging Infectious Diseases.

In the Specimen Collection section of this CDC paper, we find that “clinical specimens from a case-patient … were collected on day 3 postsymptom onset, placed in 2–3 mL of viral transport medium, used for molecular diagnosis, and frozen. Confirmed PCR-positive specimens were aliquoted and refrozen until virus isolation was initiated...”

That’s interesting, because a colleague of mine noticed that the CDC’s Standard Operating Procedure for viral transport medium includes fetal bovine serum and toxic drugs. So… this means that the clinical specimens were contaminated with cow material before the molecular diagnosis (via PCR) and “isolation” procedure even began.

That seems strange. And troubling. And unscientific. But let’s keep reading and see how they isolated the virus from these contaminated patient/cow specimens.

The Methods contain a section on Cell Culture, Limiting Dilution, and Virus Isolation. In that order? Hmm. More confusion.

“We used Vero CCL-81 cells for isolation and initial passage.”

So, in the CDC’s mind, culturing a patient sample in a cell line and “virus isolation” are the same step. Iiiiiinteresting.

And what are Vero CCL-81 cells?

Google search. First link: a company called ATCC lists Vero CCL-81 as animal cells.

Organism: Cercopithecus aethiops.
Morphology: epithelial.
Tissue: kidney.
Derivation: The Vero cell line was initiated from the kidney of a normal adult African green monkey on March 27, 1962…
Passage history: The cell line was brought to the Laboratory of Tropical Virology, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health in the 93rd passage from Chiba University by B. Simizu on June 15, 1964.

And, under Required Products:

“These products are vital for the proper use of this item and have been confirmed as effective in supporting functionality. If you use alternative products, the quality and effectiveness of the item may be affected. Eagle’s Minimum Essential Medium…; Fetal Bovine Serum (FBS)…”

More fetal bovine serum. Seriously? Fetal bovine serum and kidney epithelial cells from an African green monkey are necessary to “isolate a virus”. You can’t make this stuff up.

Back to the supplier, ATCC. Their product sheet states: “This product is intended for laboratory research use only. It is not intended for any animal or human therapeutic use, any human or animal consumption, or any diagnostic use.“

Back to the CDC study:

“We used Vero CCL-81 cells for isolation and initial passage. We cultured Vero E6, Vero CCL-81, HUH 7.0, 293T, A549, and EFKB3 cells in Dulbecco minimal essential medium (DMEM) supplemented with heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (5% or 10%) and antibiotics/antimycotics… We used both NP and OP swab specimens for virus isolation. For isolation, limiting dilution, and passage 1 of the virus, we pipetted 50 μL of serum-free DMEM into columns 2–12 of a 96-well tissue culture plate, then pipetted 100 μL of clinical specimens into column 1 and serially diluted 2-fold across the plate. We then trypsinized and resuspended Vero cells in DMEM containing 10% fetal bovine serum, 2× penicillin/streptomycin, 2× antibiotics/antimycotics, and 2× amphotericin B at a concentration of 2.5 × 10⁵ cells/mL. We added 100 μL of cell suspension directly to the clinical specimen dilutions and mixed gently by pipetting. We then grew the inoculated cultures in a humidified 37°C incubator in an atmosphere of 5% CO₂ and observed for cytopathic effects (CPEs) daily. We used standard plaque assays for SARS-CoV-2, which were based on SARS-CoV and Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) protocols…

When CPEs [Cytopathic effects aka harm to the monkey cells] were observed, we scraped cell monolayers with the back of a pipette tip. We used 50 μL of viral lysate for total nucleic acid extraction for confirmatory testing and sequencing. We also used 50 μL of virus lysate to inoculate a well of a 90% confluent 24-well plate.“

Did you see anything in that blurb about isolating a virus? Me neither. Monkey cells, fetal bovine serum, swab specimens and drugs mixed together. Harmful effects to poisoned monkey cells irrationally, unscientifically attributed to “the virus”. Nothing isolated/purified, not even from the monkey cell mixture.

No virus purified, characterized, sequenced or studied with controlled experiments. No virus was even looked for in the patient samples. What the hell?

THIS is what’s passed off as “isolating a virus”?

Hmm, well what about that Globe and Mail article that Peter cited, the one with the smug photo of Dr. Rob Kozak and Dr. Samira Mubareka of the University of Toronto, and Dr. Arinjay Banerjee of McMaster University?

Fortunately I’ve seen that article before, many times, and dealt with that “isolation” claim well over a year ago. https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/university-of-toronto-sunnybrook-hsc-have-no-record-of-covid-19-virus-isolation/embed/#?secret=o4S6reVSc6

In fact, I even obtained Freedom of Information responses from all 4 of the institutions involved, and the CDC, showing that none of them have any record of a “virus” having been isolated/purified, from any patient sample, by anyone on the planet – all of which have been publicly available on my website for well over a year now.

I’m actually surprised that Peter, who is clearly familiar with the claim that “the virus” has never been isolated, never came across my FOIs. Or the ever-growing collection of FOI responses from institutions (138 of them as I write this) in over 25 countries, showing that no one on the planet has any record of a “COVID-19 virus” having been isolated/purified from any patient sample, by anyone, period.

Despite Peter’s article, and despite the list of further useless/fraudulent “isolation” studies, and published “virus genomes” that Peter later emailed to Gabriel (shown at the bottom of this page), it is 100% clear that the alleged virus has never been isolated/purified from any patient sample.

And because “it” has never been purified, we also know that “it” has never been sequenced, characterized or studied with controlled experiments.

Instead, virologists have always worked with soups of material that they assume contains “the virus”. And wild assumptions have no place in science or logic.

In other words, there is zero proof or compelling evidence that the alleged disease-spreading virus, allegedly composed of a 30,000 base pair RNA strand and a spikey protein shell, actually exists.

It is 100% clear that “the COVID-19 virus”, like viruses in general, is purely theoretical and imaginary, with “genomes” that are fabricated electronic codes corresponding to nothing in the physical realm.

If Peter actually begins reading the Methods sections of the “virus isolation and sequencing” studies, instead of relying on headlines and Abstracts, he will be able to see this for himself. Not just for the imaginary “COVID-19 virus” (aka “SARS-COV-2”), but “viruses” in general.

Because virology is not a science.

Whether or not Peter would then admit and report these facts, or retract his misleading, inaccurate claims, is another matter altogether.

Peter’s list, that he wrongly claimed shows proof of the isolation of “the virus” and that “it” has been fully sequenced multiple times:

Either Peter has, like a lot of people, not read the Methods used in these “isolation” studies, or he is intentionally playing along with the unscientific and absurd practice of blaming harm to starved and poisoned cells on a phantom virus that was never actually shown to exist.

And, either Peter has not read the Methods used to conjure up a “virus genome”, or he is playing along with fabricated, fraudulent “genomes” patched together from zillions of sequences (allegedly) detected in patient samples and cell cultures.

Note to Peter:

Yawn. I read Siouxsie’s slanderous, red-herring article long ago.

So you are aware of the FOI collection, interesting.

Well, if you actually read the requests, you should have noticed that the vast majority of them make no mention of Koch’s Postulates whatsoever. Because we know that a strict application of Koch’s would not be possible, even if imaginary viruses existed.

The requests only ask for records of isolation/purification, which, like it or not, is necessary for proving the existence of a “virus”. No matter how inconvenient for virologists and all the related indu$trie$.

Aside from being focused almost entirely on this red herring topic of Koch’s Postulates, Siouxsie’s article relies heavily on ad hominen attacks and contains zero citations for any studies proving the existence of “the virus” or any other “virus”.

Not impressed!

ZZZZZZZZ.

For some more insight into what’s really going on:

“So What The Hell Is Going On”?

Christine Massey | Open Letter to Steve Kirsch, January 10, 2022 | SARS-COV-2 Virus Has Not Been Isolated

Report 277 | Christine Massey Concludes SARS-COV-2 Is Not Proved to Exist, Virology a False Science: Everyone Can Examine the Evidence

Cyberhacking to Prevent Release of Interview on No-Virus-Isolate with Christine Massey, as Virology Wars Heat Up: Peterborough, Ontario Medical Health Officer Lies to Police After Being Served with Notice of Liability; Dr. Mercola and Journalists Steve Kirsch, Jeremy Hammond Swear the Virus Exists–Dr. Andy Kaufmann and Dr. Tom Cowan Counter

New FOIA Request Reveals Entire Pandemic Based on Scientific Fraud: CDC Concedes Inability to Locate Purified Isolate of SARS-COV-2/COVID-19 Virus or Delta Variant by Koch’s Postulates, Says Viruses can be Isolated “Only by Growth in Cell Culture”

CDC, DHHS and Massachusetts Governor, Dept. of Health Queried for Information on Isolation & Transmission of “SARS-COV-2/COVID-19 Virus” & “Delta Variant” Behind all “Public Health Guidance”

Office of the Governor, Massachusetts Admits They Have No Information on Isolate of SARS-COV-2/COVID-19 Virus –and No Basis Therefore for All COVID Restrictions, Mandates, Vaccine-Pushes by Governor and Government

Massachusetts Department of Health Reports “No Responsive Documents” to FOIA Request for Information on Purified Isolate of Professed SARS-COV-2/COVID-19 Virus & Delta Variant Forming Basis for all State COVID Restrictions

2 Comments

Posted in COVID-19, Halt the Vaccines, Pandemics, Waking Up

Tagged Canadian Anti-Hate Network, Canadian Police Officer, Christine Massey, DC, FOI responses, Fringe Legal Philosophy, Globe and Mail, Ivan Semeniuk, Jennifer Harcourt, Peter Smith, Ramola D, SARS-COV-2, SARS-COV-2 Virus does not exist, SARS-COV-2 Virus Isolate, viral transport medium

Christine Massey | Open Letter to Steve Kirsch, January 10, 2022 | SARS-COV-2 Virus Has Not Been Isolated

Posted on January 23, 2022 by Ramola D | Leave a comment

Re-post of original by Christine Massey at Fluoride-Free Peel, with permission | Ramola D | Jan 23, 2022

Christine Massey | January 10, 2022

Open Letter to Steve Kirsch, January 10, 2022

Hi Steve,

You’ve published a blog titled “Has the virus been isolated? Yes“.

You go on to clarify that you actually have no idea if this is true, and that your title is based on faith in certain individuals:

“I rely on expert opinions of people who I trust for certain issues like whether or not the virus has been “isolated.” It’s a reasonable approach if you are careful about which experts you trust. All of the expert friends I’ve asked (including Robert Malone and Li-Meng Yan) tell me that “the virus has been isolated.” So it has been “isolated” according to their belief in what the term means.“

Hmm. Well I personally don’t rely on other people’s beliefs – especially people with a long history involving many millions of dollars with the so-called “vaccine” industry that claims to protect us from alleged “viruses”.

Now to your credit, you did disclose that “isolate” means different things to a virologist versus a regular man or woman, or a scientist. But you didn’t explain to your readers what “isolate” actually means to a virologist. I think it’s important for the public to know. Don’t you agree?

Here’s an example, from researchers at the CDC:

“We used Vero CCL-81 cells for isolation and initial passage. We cultured Vero E6, Vero CCL-81, HUH 7.0, 293T, A549, and EFKB3 cells in Dulbecco minimal essential medium (DMEM) supplemented with heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (5% or 10%) and antibiotics/antimycotics… We used both NP and OP swab specimens for virus isolation. For isolation, limiting dilution, and passage 1 of the virus, we pipetted 50 μL of serum-free DMEM into columns 2–12 of a 96-well tissue culture plate, then pipetted 100 μL of clinical specimens into column 1 and serially diluted 2-fold across the plate. We then trypsinized and resuspended Vero cells in DMEM containing 10% fetal bovine serum, 2× penicillin/streptomycin, 2× antibiotics/antimycotics, and 2× amphotericin B at a concentration of 2.5 × 105 cells/mL. We added 100 μL of cell suspension directly to the clinical specimen dilutions and mixed gently by pipetting. We then grew the inoculated cultures in a humidified 37°C incubator in an atmosphere of 5% CO2 and observed for cytopathic effects (CPEs) daily. We used standard plaque assays for SARS-CoV-2, which were based on SARS-CoV and Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) protocols…

When CPEs [Cytopathic effects aka harm to the monkey cells] were observed, we scraped cell monolayers with the back of a pipette tip. We used 50 μL of viral lysate for total nucleic acid extraction for confirmatory testing and sequencing. We also used 50 μL of virus lysate to inoculate a well of a 90% confluent 24-well plate.“

I’ve had to submit a FOIA request to the CDC for details of the vaguely referenced “mock infected cells” used in this study. But the Methods that are available from Harcourt et al. (and all other “SARS-COV-2 isolation” studies) make clear that “isolation” to Robert Malone and anyone else who insists “yes, the virus has been isolated” means combining monkey kidney cells (aka “Vero” cells, or some other cell line) with fetal bovine serum, patient specimens and toxic drugs, and then irrationally, unscientifically attributing any resulting harm to the poisoned monkey cells (which are typically also malnourished by the researchers) to “the virus”.

Nothing is isolated as per the meaning of the word to regular humans, not even from the monkey/cow/human mixture.

And since no one on the planet has managed to cite or provide any record describing isolation/purification of the alleged “virus” or any “variant” from any patient sample, by anyone, anywhere, ever (which you seem to realize based on your repeated references to the FOIA collection that is publicly available on my website and now contains failures from 156 institutions in roughly 30 countries) it’s quite clear that no science has ever been carried out with the theoretical “virus”.

No one, including Sabine Hazan and the CDC researchers, has ever extracted genetic material from a purified sample of the alleged “virus” so that they could sequence “it” and characterize “it” to find out if the alleged RNA genome of 30,000 base pairs with a spiky protein shell actually exists. And no one, including Sabine Hazan and the CDC researchers, has performed fully controlled experiments to see if the alleged “it” actually spreads disease via natural modes of exposure. Because virology is not a science.

Since you brought up the curious “science” of Dr. Sabine Hazan, I’ll share with you the bizarre email exchange I had with Sabine that went off the rails as soon as I pointed out the blatant flaws in her same paper that you have cited.

Steve, I have a question for you. Regarding the expensive products that you promote and refer to as “virus” to your readers, have you ever read the descriptions of these products to find out what they actually contain?

From EVA’s product description:

“Infectious cell culture supernatant containing BetaCoV/France/IDF0372/2020, clade 19A…. Unit definition: one vial.. 2 000,00 € (Cost per access for Academics).”

Regarding the ATCC and other products that you’ve promoted, Dr. Saeed A. Qureshi, PhD, who spent 30+ years with Health Canada conducting hands-on and multi-disciplinary laboratory research in pharmaceuticals regulatory assessment and is an internationally recognized expert in pharmacokinetics, biopharmaceutics, drug dissolution testing, and analytical chemistry, felt the need to publish a warning: Buyer Beware!

“For $1200, what’s the customer really buying? A diluted human mucus/phlegm/mucus from swab samples with all kinds of added chemicals (30+), including African green monkey kidney cell (Vero cells) broth. In short, they are faking it and lying all the way with confidence and authority!”

Steve, last year I tracked down the origin of the so-called “SARS-COV-2 isolate” that is referred to as “MUC-IMB1” aka “BavPat1” and sold by companies like EVA (also for 2 000,00 € per vial). It turned out to be just more of what I call “monkey-business fraud”, in this case courtesy of the infamous team of Corman and Drosten. Never shown to have anything to do with “a virus”.

Maybe it’s time you do your own due diligence instead of repeating the wild unsubstantiated claims of your trusted experts, none of whom can prove the existence of any alleged virus in the complete and utter absence of any purified samples of such.

Best wishes,
Christine Massey, M.Sc.
Peterborough, Ontario, Canada

Pdf of the above email:
https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/Open-letter-to-Steve-Kirsch-Jan-10-2022.pdf

p.s. this is where I found Steve Kirsch’s email address, for anyone wondering.

January 21, 2022 Update:

After my Open Letter to Steve, he contacted me by leaving a comment under my letter (where it was published on Principia Scientific International) and via email, challenging me to a 5 hour zoom call with “his experts”. Below are a few of our emails:

The above and more emails between Steve and I are here:
https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/Steve-Kirsch-communication-PACKAGE.pdf

Steve has now published misleading comments about his “offer”, giving the impression that he communicated additional details to me that he in fact did not.

I invite anyone to read our communications, and try to find anywhere that the following were actually indicated (as Steve now implies to his readers):

– if I’m done early, we end early
– where I accused him of anything
– that I could bring as many people on my side as I want
– that he’s fine with a shorter zoom call

This morning I notified Steve via email that I’m in communication regarding some possible dates/times that could work for “my side”, plus proposed “rules of engagement”. Later, I put him in touch with Dr. Andrew Kaufman to work out the details. Stay tuned.

Many thanks to Christine Massey for permission to re-post this excellent Open Letter to Steve Kirsch–with links to pertinent correspondence–which clearly delineates the main subjects under scrutiny in examining whether the SARS-COV-2 virus has ever been isolated, whether any virus has ever been isolated, and whether anyone needs to abide by the “expert opinions” of virologists, including CDC scientists, who cannot isolate a virus but say that substances found in cell culture mixtures of random proteins and toxins are viruses and arbiters of deadly disease. Is Virology a science or is it a pseudo-science contrived by the Medical Cartel gatekept & sanctioned by CDC and FDA–Pharma/Media/Government/Central Bankers–to thence contrive pandemics and shutdowns and vaccines, all of which are destroying people’s lives worldwide? A question whose time has come. — Ramola D

Report 277 | Christine Massey Concludes SARS-COV-2 Is Not Proved to Exist, Virology a False Science: Everyone Can Examine the Evidence

THE VIROLOGY DECEPTION by Frances Leader/Hive Blog

Time is Up! by Dr. Saeed Qureishi

Dismantling the Viral Theory by Dr. Robert Young

How Scientists Find Viruses! by Dr. Robert Young

Cyberhacking to Prevent Release of Interview on No-Virus-Isolate with Christine Massey, as Virology Wars Heat Up: Peterborough, Ontario Medical Health Officer Lies to Police After Being Served with Notice of Liability; Dr. Mercola and Journalists Steve Kirsch, Jeremy Hammond Swear the Virus Exists–Dr. Andy Kaufmann and Dr. Tom Cowan Counter

Posted on January 21, 2022 by Ramola D | Leave a comment

Report | Ramola D | January 21, 2022/Report 277 Posted Now (links below)

Last night, my laptop – the PC I use to finalize and post podcasts – was frozen as I tried to finalize and post a podcast recorded the day before with Christine Massey.

Every attempt I made to download and import the file was frozen. Turning to my other laptop – also hacked, despite a recent supposed clean-out at Geek Squad ( a suspect outfit I know) – proved useless; my video editing software was suddenly corrupted and I could not use the program, despite re-installing the software, getting off the Internet, and so on.

I’ve been meaning to write a dedicated post on the kind of cyberhacking I am being subjected to on my computer – apparently because my posts are turning the Internet upside down – and have been, in very intensified form, for several months now—to add to the general hacking I’ve been subjected to for over 8 years now, all a part of the personal targeting program aimed at me, intensified as my writing and journalistm expanded and began to expose the so-called Intelligence agencies who like to sit on all our PCs and record every letter we type.

This general cyberhacking is in itself extreme, outlandish, and blatantly illegal and unlawful both.

Let me summarize. For every podcast I attempt to download and post, every single move I make on my video editor—I mean, to write in a word of text for my cover graphics, no, make that write in a letter for a word of text, to select a letter, to move a graphic—has been hacked and frozen out for long moments: clearly intended to frustrate. Actions I do take get undone. Images get moved. Fonts get changed. Think of the level of cyberhacking that must entail: a hundred cybertrolls illegally “peered” onto my pc, replicating and freezing my every single move. Meanwhile, every single move I make is accompanied by a loud satellite jammer hit on the roof or side of the house as one of the 400,000 satellites and drones—and jammers from neighbors and SUV-zoomers engaged in cyberhacking–arrayed over my head record my keyboard moves and act immediately to thwart the next move, that is, freeze out the keyboard.

This has been happening for months now, and every podcast I complete—I can barely edit on my video-editor given this lunacy—and publish is a feat of persistence, patience, and restraint from throwing the PC against the wall.

Meanwhile, as noted, the sound of drones overhead, the sound of zoomers zooming in to the street, and the sound of satellite/LRAD/cyber/jammer hits on the side of the house, and from specific neighbor “fusion-houses” accompanies the keyboard hacking—advertising the origins of this freeze.

Last night, all this was multiplied a hundredfold, and no amount of rebooting, restarting programs, closing down browsers helped. I was compelled at midnight after hours of freezing to set the podcast aside. (Also having spent hours earlier in the day to complete and post News Report 6, currently only at Bitchute—another one the hackers didn’t like.)

I should also note: the chemtrailing in Quincy has been off the charts lately. On a walk yesterday I noticed rivers of effluent in the sky in massive slashed ribbons criss-crossing, sizzling, slanting, parallaxing, fanned out; at night there were Illuminati-sunrise-spray patterns of rayed trails over the backyard. A new SUV parked up the hill, while all the local suspects had their SUVS—their Chevy Tahoe spaceships I should say—parked in their drives as they concentrated inside on reading my words and thwarting every letter on the video-editor. (Fifteen dollars an hour or twenty-five?)

Steve Kirsch’s Claims of Virus Existence Seem to Be Belief-Based, not Evidence-Based

This morning I see Steve Kirsch has penned a long complaint in response to Christine Massey’s email responding to his absurd challenge to her to engage in a 5-hour Zoom call with “his experts” on virology.

Christine has posted their email and public comment exchange here:
https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/Steve-Kirsch-communication-PACKAGE.pdf

Christine also reports this post she has made on Facebook:

“After my Open Letter to Steve Kirsch, he contacted me by leaving a comment under my letter (where it was published on Principia Scientific International) and via email, challenging me to a 5 hour zoom call with “his experts”.

Our communications on this topic are here:
https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/Steve-Kirsch-communication-PACKAGE.pdf

Steve has now published misleading comments about his “offer”, giving the impression that he communicated additional details to me that he in fact did not. I invite anyone to read our communications, and try to find anywhere that the following were actually indicated (as Steve implies to his readers):

– if I’m done early, we end early

– where I accused him of anything

– that I could bring as many people on my side as I want

– that he’s fine with a shorter zoom call”

(For those who haven’t followed this exchange it started with Steve Kirsch publishing this article: https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/has-the-virus-been-isolated-yes; Christine published an Open Letter to Steve Kirsch–a must-read for all: https://principia-scientific.com/open-letter-to-steve-kirsch-january-10-2022/#comment-65276, where Steve Kirsch left his comment about a 5-hour Zoom call.)

In her Open Letter, Christine Massey called attention to Steve Kirsch’s statement that he relied on “experts” to tell him whether the virus (SARS-COV-2, the supposed bogeyman behind 2 years of supposed World Pandemic) exists:

“You’ve published a blog titled “Has the virus been isolated? Yes“.

You go on to clarify that you actually have no idea if this is true, and that your title is based on faith in certain individuals:

“I rely on expert opinions of people who I trust for certain issues like whether or not the virus has been “isolated.” It’s a reasonable approach if you are careful about which experts you trust. All of the expert friends I’ve asked (including Robert Malone and Li-Meng Yan) tell me that “the virus has been isolated.” So it has been “isolated” according to their belief in what the term means.“

Mega Cyber Hacking of Journalist to Prevent Release of Major Interview on This Subject of Virus-Not-Being-Proved-to-Exist–As Before

Was Steve Kirsch writing this complaint last night as I was being mega-cyber-hacked to prevent release of Report 277 with Christine Massey last night? I do wonder.

Because it sure as heck is evident to me the same agencies engaged in cyber-surveillance of my and other journalsts’ PCs are linked to mainstream media and linked also to their carefully-planted-insiders in alt media, the ones who seemingly push for freedom of speech and factual reportage yet express the insidious opinions of the establishment, often with a note of authority and projected confidence.

Very often, my exposure of mainstream media– or government shenanigans—while in the very process of being developed on my laptop, has resulted in sudden massive-truck, UPS, or USPS (mail/CIA) van pull-up right next door on the street and immediate intensification of cyber-hacking (in addition to intensified bio-hacking—aka microwave weapon assault from close quarters).

Journalist Jeremy Hammond Also Swears the Virus Exists and Promotes the Cell-Culture-Filled-With-Toxins Methodologies of Non-Isolation Virologists Use

A couple days ago, Dr. Andy Kaufmann released a video response to Jeremy Hammond’s recent video interview posted by Dr. Mercola questioning the fast-growing awareness that the SARS-COV-2 virus has not been isolated.

In addition to this video interview post is the article by Dr. Mercola, claiming the virus exists, republished by Patrick Wood of Technocracy News with a brief editorial note suggesting he supports Dr. Mercola’s position on this subject: Mercola: Yes, SARS-CoV-2 Is Real Virus

Dr. Kaufman and Dr. Cowan plan to address this paper in a livestream today, JAN 21/2022: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MRCnidH9QD0–now at Bitchute, below:

DR. KAUFMANN ADDRESSES JEREMY HAMMOND’S CLAIMS/JAN 19, 2022:

This is a vastly interesting video and I will watch it again, to fully take it in—I recommend it highly to everyone interested in figuring out who is right here, Jeremy Hammond and all the many virologists who tell us viruses do indeed exist or Dr. Andy Kaufmann and all the many scientists and questioners looking to see the evidence.

FOIA Requests to Health Departments and CDC Reveal No-One Has a Purified Isolate of the Supposedly-Existent SARS-COV-2 Virus

I am one of those questioners, and like Christine Massey, Frances Leader, Patrick King, and many others doing FOI requests (or subpoena’ing Health ministers) have turned to our resident-authoritarians at the CDC and other government-inflected spots to solicit this evidence—why?

Because two years at this point of a false-pandemic rests on this evidence.

What exactly are they calling the deadly SARS-COV-2 virus, inducive of a worldwide pandemic so deadly they had to lock us all down and demand we wear masks and torture our children with nasal swabs and submit to deadly experimental non-vaccines?

Charlie Baker hasn’t a clue, his office said so. The Massachusetts Department of Public Health—filled with unhealthy-looking-officials, which has ignored previous FOIA requests—responded this time to say they had no information either, on the very virus they are telling us to #MaskUpMA! for: Massachusetts Department of Health Reports “No Responsive Documents” to FOIA Request for Information on Purified Isolate of Professed SARS-COV-2/COVID-19 Virus & Delta Variant Forming Basis for all State COVID Restrictions

The CDC, using much obfuscating language, conceded they had no information on a purified isolate of the virus by Koch’s and River’s postulates, but implied these were outdated, and said the virus had been “detected” while not being really isolated, by plain dictionary definitions of the term “isolated.”

Christine Massey Serves Notice of Liability to Medical Officer of Health in Peterborough, Ontario, Who Lies to Police About Being Threatened

Christine sent me a note just this morning to say she was arrested wrongfully on two criminal charges yesterday–the conversation with a police officer recorded on film here (below), where she and her colleagues offer to show the officer their video of the entire conversation with Thomas Piggott the MOH and she refuses it, claiming the film may not capture “tone, body language or sense of threat the person got”–this is blatant gaslighting, given what is perfectly evident from the recording.

The person recording also points out that the police did not respond to a complaint from them recently while rushing to Thomas Piggott’s residence on a false call of being threatened. Clearly, Thomas Piggott has lied (watch the video).

Commendably, Christine Massey explains the whole story of the virus not really being properly isolated–which means the entire pandemic is based on a scientific fraud, and indeed is responsible for a major crime of genocide because the entire vaccine rollout–now causing massive numbers of deaths and stillbirths–has been predicated on this supposed pandemic and supposed or putative SARS-COV-2 virus. This was also the message in the confirmatory and admonitory letter I wrote to the CDC after their response to my FOIA request, which can be found here: New FOIA Request Reveals Entire Pandemic Based on Scientific Fraud: CDC Concedes Inability to Locate Purified Isolate of SARS-COV-2/COVID-19 Virus or Delta Variant by Koch’s Postulates, Says Viruses can be Isolated “Only by Growth in Cell Culture”

Peterborough MOH served, LIES to police!

Virology Wars Heating Up — But Will Bring This Entire, Basic Subject Out Into the Open

My computer has been hacked again to drop the saving and uploading of my file–which suggests there are people out there seriously worried about this interview–which was a wonderful, relaxed, detailed conversation on the subject, and about which I will write more whenever I am able to release it (will post a link here when I do.)

Christine offered a lot of information in this interview, and gave permission to all viewers to use anything on her website, and share out the documents she has posted, including to local police and local governments. The open letter, evidence package, and letter of notice of liability served to Thomas Piggott and to Ontario Police is reported and linked here.