Monthly Archives: June 2023

Neuro-AI Convergence, NBIC, And a “New Global Order” Embodying Asymmetry in Ethics

Note & Op-Ed | Ramola D | 28 June 2023

Updated July 5 2023 | Updating July 6 2023

From the startling opener noting that neuroscientists simply don’t know “how mind occurs in the brain” to much of this surprising conversation focused on Nano-Bio-Info-Cogno convergence (covered earlier here), this June 15, 2023 radio podcast discussion at the US Army “Mad Scientist” Convergence Podcast featuring Dr. James Giordano and Dr. James Canton, offers up quite some food for concern for all:

449. One Brain Chip, Please! Neuro-AI with two of the Maddest Scientists

Dr. James Giordano is the Chief of Neuroethics and a Professor of Neurology and Biochemistry at Georgetown University, primarily a “neuroscientist by trade, by profession,” as he avers on this podcast, curiously now also introducing himself as an adjunct professor of Psychiatry at the Uniformed Services University of Health Sciences in Bethesda, which suggests that this military neuroscientist is scrambling to corral the dubious fields of Psychiatry, “Behavioral Health,” and Mental Health into Weaponized Neuroscience, or perhaps just gain the credentials to preside over both–to unravel why, we must listen to this podcast.

Dr. James Canton is the author of several books aiming at techno-futures, a former Apple exec, with affiliations ranging from the National Science Foundation to the National Science and Technology Council, Stanford, Wharton, the U.S. Army and Naval War Colleges, the Joint Special Operations University, the Singularity University at NASA, who, curiously, appears to have functioned as a management consultant and advisor not merely to the US Government–White House, Departments of State, Defense–but also Health and Human Services–on various subjects including especially on nanotechnology. His stated focus is on “Emerging Technologies” though (a subject for greater exploration soon given coverage at this site earlier), and “threats and opportunities” thereof, on which he says he’s advised four White Houses, while also working in the space of AI in the private sector, holding positions as CEO of 5 private companies; a special focus today, he notes is the NBIC from NSF covered allusively later in this podcast (excerpts from the 2002 NSF Convergence report below).

While both of these military/managing men–one presented (on the “Mad Sci blog”) as a “hard science” expert, the other as a “soft science” visionary–present a complex view of an intended future within the framework of national security and defense, the actual content of their references in terms of takeover of the human mind, brain, body, agency must be questioned: Is it really possible that demolishing human–in this case American–individuality, independence, autonomy, uniqueness, creativity, intelligence can contribute to keeping our country safe from our “adversaries” or “competitors”? (One would think “National Security” inheres in platforming and promoting American brilliance, not seeking to disappear it.)

Neuro-AI Convergence

Neuro-AI seeks the convergence of Neuroscience with Artificial Intelligence, which is discussed here as necessary for advancement in the sciences and military. Ways of bringing these sciences together, we’re told include nano-bio-info-cogno, which seems to be pretty much everything Mil-Intel Mad Science has dreamed up including nanotechnology, synthetic biology, powerful database systems, cognitive processing underlying the creation of AI, and a seeking to bring the worlds of Cogno: Artificial Intelligence, Neuroscience, the BRAIN Initiative, Robotics, Bio: The study of Life, Biology, Medicine, Genetics, putatively also “Behavioral Health” and Psychiatry, Info: Supercomputing, Big Data, Telecom, Nano: Nanobiosensors, Nanobioelectronics, Nanomedicine et al together under one management umbrella, all of it wanting sadly to head Humanity and Life in the direction of full-on brain implantation and Borg’ing into a cerebral Internet, body, brain, and behavior to be continually manipulated. (Covered often earlier at this site including with former US Navy Mark Trump on this podcast.)

Report #147: Mark Trump & Barbara Hartwell, Podcast 1: Alerting All to the Techno-Abyss

This kind of merging of man with machine is insistently posited as the future of both warfare and society, with much predicated on its intended successes in numerous fields of endeavor.

Dr. Giordano talks about implications for Public Health and Safety, BioMedicine, Performance Optimization and “making people better,” mentioning National Security, military and Intelligence goals in securing “multi-domain” security (Air, Space, Cyber, et al) while also alluding to Global Biosecurity and a Global Bio Economy. The US he concedes has a modest lead in the field over its adversaries and competitors, but more needs to be done, Dr. Canton also notes, to connect and link the fields of AI and Neuroscience. “We’ve invented this technology, we haven’t converged and linked it.”

“Performance Optimization” enters the conversation, with Dr. Giordano hastening to surface (in presumptive Orwellian wise) how “making people better” via the Brain Sciences could contribute to the good–the problem there of course is the eternal one of fox guarding the henhouse which he surely knows by now is The primary problem with his dual-stance neuromilitaryscience/neuroethics discourse: Where are the voices of the writers, the journalists, the scholars, the ethical biologists and physicists, the true healers, the working professionals and citizenry alluded to here as the “people”, the mothers, the fathers, the children in this debate?

Weaponized Neurotechnology to Affect Behavior

Addressing the notion of Convergence, Dr. Giordano states his particular focus is “the intersection of the Brain Sciences and those technologies that are going to be vital for not only Public Health and Bio Medicine but also for key aspects of lifestyle, which would then include things like Performance Optimization, but of course what you can do in terms of rendering Good, making people better, there’s a flip side to that coin, you can also make people Worse, and of course, what’s good for me may not be good for you–which then brings us to the whole stage of how the Brain Sciences are being leveraged multi-nationally for a variety of nationalistic Goods–economically, biomedically, technologically, socially, of course militarily, and on the Intelligence front.” (We mustn’t miss the fact he’s actually given it all away quite successfully here, acknowledging that the Neuroweaponry /Nanoweaponry /Microweaponry (brain sciences and other tech) Collective is quite possibly likely to Destroy brains while it’s busy aiming apparently to modify behavior for the “Good,” much as MK ULTRA in “Behavioral Health” functions.) (Or, in other words, Neuroweaponry IS MK ULTRA, and MK ULTRA IS Neuroweaponry: Top Secret (until it’s not).)

Brain sciences he goes on to say must include the social sciences, humanities, or “soft sciences” while Dr. Canton calls for the NeuroAI, NeuroSci and NeuroCog communities to talk to each other, all of which requires further research for further reportage, but the rising implication here of using neuroscience and other technologies–putatively nanotechnology, imaging, scanning, facial recognition AI, remote sensing technologies, gene-editing technologies, EMF technologies utilizing wifi, telecom, telemetry to affect lifestyle, daily life, and effect a paternalistic hold on people’s “performance” at work or play–being referred to here and being along the same spectrum as the DEW Bio-Behavioral Research contracts inflicting physical damage on people reported often here earlier, is unmistakable. Are military energy technologies slated for dual-use now being intended or used (in hard-to-believe tech-transfer of historic CIA MK ULTRA neuro control tech) for “behavioral health” purposes?

And it turns out, indeed they are, as many modern technologies, “emerging” or “innovative”, being introduced into doctors’ offices and psychiatry treatments suggest: Military Brain Technologies Revealed: Therapy or Weaponry? (Please also see the documents and notice of military contracts in Public Disclosure of Anti-Personnel DEWS and Neuroweapons… and US and NATO Weapons-Testing for more.)

Brain Control rather quickly becomes Mind Control here, with much nebulous allusion to the psycho and the social sciences, conjuring up visions of such awkward, human-erasive inventions as sentient simulation, metaverses and virtual reality, immersive AI and brain cloning, voice cloning and RHIC-EDOM (radio hypnosis and dissolving memory), synthetic telepathy and so on, a combination of disclosed, being-experimented-with, and reported-by-non-consensual-Neuro-experimentation-victims tech:

“Understanding the Brain Sciences as they exist today–and I’ve had the opportunity to be a neuroscientist for about 40 years now– is that the capabilities of the brain sciences and the technologies it both uses and evolves are highly dependent on the interaction with other sciences, not just the physical sciences, natural and life sciences which I think are axiomatic to the brain sciences–the Brain is a biological organ—but understanding the functions of the brain are psycho-social, and therefore the social sciences, in identifying what those investigative targets are going to be for the brain sciences—

In other words, what are we looking at? What cognitions, emotions, and behaviors are going to be vital to understand the structural, functional mechanisms, correlations but then also, how are we going to affect those things, how are we actually going to intervene in the Brain in these ways or in some way that is capable of modifying, modulating (which is a fancy way of saying Manipulating) those things that we colloquially refer to as Mind – but soon as you get there then you’re also dealing with not just the social sciences inclusive of Law but the Humanities – What is ethically correct to do and not correct to do, and of course with what philosophy, based upon what type of epistemology, what do we know and how do we know itShouldn’t we go forward with these things even though we don’t know what the manifest effects are going to be?

That said, the Brain Sciences are axiomatic to what we now consider to be Advanced Integrative Scientific Convergence – in other words you can’t do effective brain science without Convergence and desiloing other sciences both natural and physical sciences as well as social sciences and more broadly the humanities—what are sometimes called soft sciences. So brain sciences Are convergent, it’s that Convergent that enables and force-multiplies the brain sciences to be used in the Social Science Public and obviously National Security Military and Intelligence milieu.”

–Dr. James Giordano, Episode 79/449, Mad Science Convergence Podcast: One Brain Chip, Please! Neuro-AI with two of the Maddest Scientists

Remote-Access Neuro Takeover of “the Human System, the Biological Organism”

With Dr. Canton delineating five key domains within the Neuro-AI Convergence (militarily) envisioned comprising Chips and Hardware, Software, Cloud Platforms and Satellites, Systems like Tele-Robotics, Decision Support Systems, Decision Analysis, and Wearables meaning BCI-AI (brain computer interfaces and supercomputer AI), Dr. Giordano ruminates on challenges ahead regarding “how these five…are going to be yoked to the human system, the biological organism” and suggests looking to “other species as proxies, biomimetic systems, hierarchical systems”.

Neuro Cognitive science, he says, cannot be done “without actuating Big Data and Machine Learning” (the latter referring silently to artificial neural networks) — which is ominous in itself, given the military’s disclosures on Neuro Cognitive Weapons in recent times: Is it possible that human brains and human intelligence, in this dystopian view, are being prepped for downgrading, degrading, occluding and harm through techno Artificial Intelligence overlays?

The domain of wearables he notes includes implantables, injectables, nano levels of chemicals, with migration to key areas (an echo of intelligent targeting bioweapons there), real-time remote sensing (via nanobiosensors presumably) “real time reading from the living brain and writing into the living brain,” all of which he now confirms is part of a “global bio economy” with “peer competitors” and its own train of implications for National Security, Military, and Intelligence.

Listen again (past Cyberhacking) and we hear the whole of it, he Does go into that whole messy concept of nano NSA Neurosurveillance, reading brains in real time, and writing into them too, meaning with gaps and spaces and wiping out of memory so Neuro Cog, as Biodefense names it, or Neurology Live, takes on its real Black Ops Cloak of nanobiosensor nets :

…so yah, Wearables, are Certainly a Domain, but Wearables in what way? Things that are donnable and doffable? Or things that are Intrinsics—in the scale of properties that Dr. Canton mentioned, working down at that low Nano Level Scale whether we’re talking about nano level concentrations of chemicals and/or nanoscale engineering devices–are highly implantable, inhalable, swallowable, injectables, migrated into key areas where My work intersects, in the Brain, and then form literally Vast Arrays of Sensors and Transmitters that allow Real Time Remote Sensing and Engagement of the Brain—in other words, Real Time Reading from the Living Brain and Writing Into the Living Brain.

–Dr. James Giordano, Episode 79/449, Mad Science Convergence Podcast: One Brain Chip, Please! Neuro-AI with two of the Maddest Scientists
Converging Technologies for Improving Human Performance NANOTECHNOLOGY, BIOTECHNOLOGY, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND COGNITIVE SCIENCE | NSF/DOC-sponsored report | June 2002

This is information from the military-intelligence world which every person on the planet needs to be aware of and needs to track, question and speak out about. But there is more, and that relates to the “Human Performance Optimization” mentioned earlier. Dr. Canton, asserting that AI and Neuro AI systems are going to supersede human intelligence in decision-making and data analysis soon enough (a point of contention with many I would imagine given that we don’t have NeuroAI playing chess with either yet), suggests a seeming need to enforce in the average human being this belief-in-the-unproven-yet-intended (forcing humans to roll over and cave to NeuroAI takeover?) via human augmentation with brain technology: “You either enhance the human to understand that–Rapid Decisionmaking, Rapid Deployment, Rapid Analysis–and we can Do that, there are lots of ways that are non-invasive–Neuralink and other companies are playing with ways to Do that–but that same technology could be hacked and used against us–so there are much broader much bigger social ethical issues here, I am confident we can navigate this properly…”

The implication being also that top “adversary” countries like Russia and China are engaged in the same “race” to the fore, requiring constant vigilance and padding of budgets, an old story from the military on every score, while Ethics of course remains an exclusive stronghold of the West, much waffling about ancient cultures, traditional cultures and so on gilding the conversation on China–with some surface attention paid to the obvious history we are familiar with of Communism in those parts. “That’s not to advocate an authoritarian US,” assures Dr. Giordano, as he meanders through thickets of a “whole of Government approach” needing to “conjoin whole of nation approaches” then fixes his sights on “bipartisan Unity” being essential to ensure the US remains competitive with a “definite strategic plan” and unchanging posture given that our adversaries had gotten ahead by way of a “triple helix” of conjoined sectors–Government, research, commercial.

Neuroethics Contemplates “Revising Certain Ethical Principles (for) a New Global Order”: (“A More Dialectical Approach to Ethical Realities”)

Ethics remains, if only in cosmetic cover, a topic for discussion, with “asymmetry in ethics” of course skewed only in favor of the US, still seen in this rose-colored light as Leader in Virtue (of whatever dubious means): “We provide a Global Security,” explains Dr. Canton, as he looks to a “War for the Future” while longing for a “Future that is not a War but is a negotiation, is a collaboration, is an understanding…” yet grumbles about our need for an “Innovation Detente to not go hot” given that China is racing ahead supposedly cramming into 20 years our 200 of sci-tech: “Our thesis is NeuroAI convergence is important…We need to move up our game. We invented ChatGpt, We invented Mapping the Human Genome… You don’t stop innovating, you raise the bar…” (This is either before or after he mentioned Sam Altman and Einstein in the same breath–on the other hand, is he talking about the Military inventing these things or the frontmen for same…?)

Either way, there’s that tiny question of Disclosure which now seems to be pouring out of the Mad Science Podcast as also from a ton of documents and videos from various branches of Military and US Gov–which suggests really, given the sweep of Global ventures mentioned, historically speaking, the Worldwide Internet itself may have heralded our plunge into what Dr. Giordano calls a “New Global Order” for which Ethics itself must be twisted out of itself to fit. Pondering this spiky notion of traditional Ethics to “keep our honor clean” Dr. Giordano offers the alternative (more pleasing no doubt to those apologists for AI, being perhaps less endowed in the human department themselves) to simply fudge it, phrasing this offer in genteel puzzlement: “Do we stoop to conquer and do we compromise what may be longstanding Western ethics or do we engage a more dialectical approach to ethical realities where we Revise certain Ethical Principles or perhaps Renew some others aNew so as to create a New Global Order that may be far more Co-operatively Competitive and does so in a way that honors if you will Certain Moral Precepts not only those of our own but that of others, and does so in a more Metered Way–but that Speaks to the Future?”

“Where we are right now is that the United States and its international allies maintains a very modest lead in Key Areas across the NBIC framework – nano bio informational cogno and Cogno here conjoining Neuro obviously – and doing so reciprocally both in terms of Cognitive-Based-Systems that are AI-based-systems, using neuromorphic design and then utilizing AI Machine Learning Systems to facilitate what we know about Organic Brains and the Organisms in Which They Live

But what I foresee is over the next 5 to 10 years that will be a fairly short-lived advantage—for 3 reasons, Number 1, because the actual technological capabilities are being infused by the triple helices of at least our major, at least Trans-Pacific peer competitor, And, the Overwhelming and Ubiquitous if you will Juggernaut of their economy, not only nationally but internationally, Number 2 is that, the Nature of What Can Be Done, in China, is in some ways Flexible. Dealing with this on an international level, trying to get some level of organizational and industrial co-operation, in other words if we’re looking for economic co-operative models that also recognize competition, our Chinese Peer Competitors are very savvy in recognizing that a key aspect of Much of Western philosophy is acknowledgment of Competing Viewpoints—and an Openness, or at least Readiness to engage that as axiomatic to the philosophy itself—and their viewpoint here is there are wonderful aspects of Western philosophy that are wholly intrinsic with their value systems but ..

We must now appreciate that we are dealing with a very old culture, equivalently as old as the cultures of the West, and that culture for a number of years, hundreds of years, has been essentially isolated, the last 100 years have been viewed as the Century of Humiliation, and only moving into the current period, notably over a Sentinel year, since 1949, has that culture been Allowed to gain some Global Stature and Status, in many ways playing Catch’up! But it’s no longer a question of playing Catch-up. Now those values, and those values and desires of that culture are becoming paramount based upon the economic capability of that culture on a number of different global scales and markets.

Therefore the Posture is, it’s sort of an aspect of a Golden Rule if you will, yeah, Those with all the Gold Rule, and our Trans-Pacific peer competitor is coming to the table and very realistically saying, Got a lot of gold! There’s a lot of things we can do.

And we’re not closing our doors, we’re Opening our doors, we’re inviting, and soliciting, and attracting Individuals to be Collaborative, but the thorny part of that collaboration is that there are also Intellectual Property laws, that are not only in China, but that have now been leveraged Globally, that while being attractive to international co-operation around much of the IP to Chinese national property, which then creates tremendous leverageable capability and hegemony on the global stage at least legally and economically. So what we’re seeing is, that although we’re very keen to talk about if you will maintaining our fight for Right and Freedom, and those Freedoms how they can then be Realized through Technological and Scientific Readiness, we also have to maintain at least some attitude toward what it means to keep our honor clean. Do we stoop to conquer and do we compromise what may be longstanding Western ethics or do we engage a more dialectical approach to ethical realities where we Revise certain Ethical Principles or perhaps Renew some others aNew so as to create a New Global Order that may be far more Co-operatively Competitive and does so in a way that honors if you will Certain Moral Precepts not only of our own but that of others, and does so in a more Metered Way–but that Speaks to the Future?

–Dr. James Giordano, Episode 79/449, Mad Science Convergence Podcast: One Brain Chip, Please! Neuro-AI with two of the Maddest Scientists

The Brave New World of “Non-Sovereign Rogues (and Non-Rogues)”: Multi-Domain Engagement with Innovative Warfare (Bio-Hacking Tech) to Roll out Neuro-Communism & Communism-With-Consent (Teamwork Neuro AI)

The New Word of “Co-optition” introduced earlier by Dr. Giordano notwithstanding, Dr. Canton provides in a whispery, blustery way the right way to go about wearing the thin skin of Ethics AI (one presumes) to foil China–still flailing about building (unnamed) new technologies likely to flay the US supposedly–while professing Collaboration with the rest of the DEW/Neurotech/Cyber/AI-building contingent of crowns worldwide in order to run full-on Engagement (replete with lasers masers RNM drones NeuroAI et al) on the People of the world–the next World War presumably which is already here, as some of us know–with particular (dosimetric) attention to brains, bones, veins, nerves, eyes, hearts, organs, genes, cell nucleii and so on, along with the obvious NBIC covers noted above to bring about that dream confection they’re all baking away with Double Speak, the Brave New World for Rogues (and Non-Rogues):

I take a bit of a more, let’s say, Pragmatic View on all this but I agree with everything Dr. G has said, we’re involved in a War for the Future, China too, because of the Background, and the History, and the Context, that’s the Background of Obviousness…..If wiser heads would prevail, you’ll end up with a leadership in China that recognizes hey! Wait a minute! There’s a Fundamental Economic Basis, for if you attempt to kill off your biggest customer, maybe that might have an impact on our economy—so let’s just step back for a moment. The Global Economy is a collaborative, interlinked co-dependent System. (It wasn’t at any other time up till very recently.) 80, 90% of their entire Income is derived from Us walking into Targets and buying stuff. This is the bottomline, right, the bottomline.

Now why is this important? The Demographic Debacle of the One-Child Policy is going to leave within a decade China at a deficit, of not being able to Replace their Replacement, which is critical to any kind of hegemonic desires that you have to go ahead and operate your own country from an economic point of view, but that they’re trying to do in 20 years what we did in maybe 200 years. So the economic underpinnings of all this—that really is a Core foundational reality.

Now the Chinese are betting, and to a certain extent the US and EU—and these are the 3 Major Forces on the Planet if you will—they’re trying to figure out a new kind of—and they should have an Innovation Detente to Not Go Hot—so at the end of the day, I like where Dr. G is going in terms of a “Cooler Heads Will Prevail with a Collaborative Basis”—but at the End of the Day before that happens, this War for the Future is going to get tried out – and I think it’s going to be surprising—so we should, you know, Hope for the Best but Prepare For Engagement—Space, Oceans, Multi Domains, Cyber, and that’s where again, coming back to our Thesis—Our Thesis is that ‘Neuro-AI Convergence is Critically Important’–are we moving fast enough in this? No we’re not! Are we behind on this? Yes we are.

A big part of us doing this podcast is to say, Look, we are Insiders in the Game, but we need to move up our game. We need to not sit back and say, Ok We invented ChatGpT, we invented, you know, Mapping the Human Genome, this is great…we are, our biggest weakness is our biggest strength. You don’t stop innovating, you raise the bar. We need to get back and think through the next Opportunities for Neuro AI so that we can provide a Peaceful Secure Global Security which has been the role of the United States and will continue to be that role–while we continue engagement with China and many other adversaries, you know, in the what I call The Dark Network of Non Sovereign Rogues, and Non-Rogues–we need to use these technologies to provide a more secure – It’s going to be a tough ride! over the next decade, having new frontiers.

Now what’s the Drag on those? Well we have some Moral Issues. I mean they’re not discussing in their 5 year plan—you want to know what China’s going to do, they’re publishing it every 5 years right? The Chinese—and many of our Peer Adversaries are not just publishing it but they don’t have the same Value System as we have. And having been part of the many briefs and developments on you know, ‘You always have to have a human in the KillZone’, you know, ‘at the end of the day for Kinetic AI’, you know, we’re going to have to develop a let’s say, a kind of New Appreciative Way of ‘What are the conditions of Engagement so we can deter and make it let’s say a Future that is Not a War but is a Negotiation, is a Collaboration, is an Understanding’-can only be, only be successful if you have the right stuff, to be able to stand things down.

So that’s just my, my Sense about this, this is an imperative to Step on the Gas. Should we do something about it? Yes we should. So I’m hoping a listener here will reach out to us and say Yeah, I’m in a position to do something about it, and I want to talk to you guys.

–Dr. James Canton, Episode 79/449, Mad Science Convergence Podcast: One Brain Chip, Please! Neuro-AI with two of the Maddest Scientists

Russia’s “Fully Autonomous Robots” Versus Humans in the Decision Making: Reversing Ethics with Machine-Intelligent Humans?

“Complete autonomy” we learn is not going to be turned over, in Robots (or Artificial Intelligence?) despite human engagement being acknowledged as requisite.  “Ethical Posture” becomes a goal, which seems to require Tailoring a few disparate pieces together: Light Wars and Brain Hacking, brain cloning and “human enhancement” technology, Neuralink and Neuro AI to replace human thinking, machine intelligence to replace human brains–“Human Robots” examined briefly here earlier.

So here’s the Scenario—you know as Futurists we like to write Scenarios and I’ve done a number of them for Mad Sci about Defense and Intel – Secenario No 1 is that we’ve already adopted, for certainly the Defense Department and Defense Posture if you will that a human has to be in the Kill Chain, right—You’re not going to turn over Complete Autonomy. Well, we already know, from an adversarial point of view, Russia, has already deployed Robots – let’s say Defensive Robots that are fully autonomous. Now I don’t think their Science is as good as ours, but you know, they’re Russian! Science, theyr’e pretty damn good! So we’re going to have a Scenario where we adopt an Ethical Posture that says, Human Beings have to be in the decisionmaking before an autonomous system–regardless of how powerful–has access to either a weapons system or IS a weapons system –that goes away when we lose the East Coast, Ok?–that Goes Away—

Now that’s One Scenario. Now the Other Scenario says, we have a Bifurcated or Trifurcated Set of Conditions, that what happens is, we have Human Engagement based on these conditionsand then Autonomy is part of the mix, in the event there needs to be—and I’m not talking about MAD (Mutually Assured Destruction)–I am saying that these are various levels of Tools that are gonna impact the Battalion Level, the Soldier Level, the Battalion Level…and Citizenry, because you have to now look at Ghost Wars and the Whole New World of Space and Cyber and everything in between—That’s where we should be playing and modeling Scenarios Now—Because you can tailor the Action Engagement and Rules of Engagement Now—Because we have So many Light Wars that are going on Now–now if you look at those, and the implications for Brain Hacking or—we’ve talked a lot about the Text Stack we’ve talked a little bit about the Scenarios, but Autonomy and Ethics—we have to have a Failsafe, to be able to deploy what we need, what we need–

Here’s the reality that nobody really wants to hear, is that AI Systems today, and Tomorrow’s Neuro AI Systems—and I do mean very shortly—will be able to make decisions and analyze data faster than humans—Done! – You either enhance the human to understand that—Rapid Decisionmaking Rapid Deployment, Rapid Analysis—we can Do that!—and there are lots of ways that are non-invasive–Neuralink and other companies are playing with ways to Do that–but that same technology can be hacked and used against us–so there are much broader bigger social ethical Impact Issues here, but I am confident we can navigate these properly…but if we don’t invent if we don’t keep moving forward, with safeguards, but also proper safeguards, that are adjustable and adaptable –in other words we may need an AI to govern AIs—ok Got it!

Now how many policy makers in Government and in our Congress understand that and have created a Taxonomy for that? None! So—I’m advising most of them, Microsoft…all most of them I advise most of these in the private scene – We need the Private and the Public sector to come together—we’ll get there—but this Threat Matrix of Potential is Going to Be More Exasperated and our Ability to be able to have an Ethical, let’s say Label and Constraints, are going to be tested and there’s things like you know our Survival—as a Nation and as a Species–will be on the Line, and I’m not the first to say that!

–Dr. James Canton, Episode 79/449, Mad Science Convergence Podcast: One Brain Chip, Please! Neuro-AI with two of the Maddest Scientists


“Find the Convergence”: Neuro Cog, BCIs, Human Brains, and NanoBIC

You know, just bringing together people from varied areas just to Find the Convergence, that seems to me to be something Mad Sci could do—there’s so much, and Jim knows this of Neuro Cog space, of people actually doing applied work and looking into the brain and understanding the processes and all—in other words if you look at Neuralink, what Elon Musk is doing, right, BCI Development right, very interesting—it’s probably the only venture, being as bold, and they got FDA approval to do this, this

(Reuters: Elon Musk’s Neuralink wins FDA approval for human study of brain implants: In other words, the Whitewash Phenom of Military-Intel Rushing to Cover Up Probably Over 50 Years of Using Humans Nonconsensually For Deadly Brain Experiments Rolled In With MK ULTRA & Disappearing All Pre-”FDA-Approved” Human Torture Experiments Sheathed by CIA-NSA-Media As “Targeted Individuals”)

So part of the pathway is and we learned this at NSF…and if you’re doing stuff and you had this follow up to NBIC Convergence which had to do with Enhancing Human Performance –those were the key technologies—if you start to think differently about Convergence—and you have these 3 or 4 poles you can put together, what does it look like, you can create new systems.

So we haven’t done that one—so if you put in a room, simply put Neuroscientists, and you curate them well—they’re Open and all that (huh?)–and Jim blesses them (Occult Blessing Ritual for Neuroscientists by Jim Prior to Release from FishPond and Just After Curation Which Involves Opening Them Up Like Fish?)-and then you’ve got AI Folks who are spending 2-3 million dollars a day (chortle chortle) and have Commitments of Billions of Dollars—and you say, let’s find that Interaction and Collaboration, that would be best for these kinds of Missions—How do we deal with Autonomy? (Whose really? Certainly not the Robots’!) How do we deal with Faster Decisionmaking (Through Neurodamage and Brain Takeover?) What does a Neuro AI system look like? (Like a Brain Star in its own ANN Lane…?) How could we do Better Prediction?

If you could do Bad Guy Hunting faster and then predict better – in other words – if you create a couple Vectors of Scenarios and say, OK, This is what we’re thinking about, might make a difference, and you bring people together, you might also bring together funding sources that Should Be Alerted, that this is a Cabal, a Conspiracy, a GOOD Conspiracy, (eyeroll) (Look into copyrighting/and assigning ownership over your own brains, everyone (to YourSelf)) That’s how you Make Change.”

–Dr. James Canton, Episode 79/449, Mad Science Convergence Podcast: One Brain Chip, Please! Neuro-AI with two of the Maddest Scientists

“How Can We Leverage Government Labs (and) Technologies Which Nobody Knows about”? 

I’ll just throw in one more practical, ‘What to Do,’ and all that. So when I was at SOCOM, and that’s actually ONE of the ways I met Jim—I was Tasked with seeing what Private Sector has going on –you know, what’s happening with Venture Capital and Startups, and Mature Companies and all that—how can we leverage Government Labs, Technologies Which Nobody Knows About

So there is (deep throated chortle) a Fertile Landscape of Opportunities (full bellied laugh) there’s Money, there’s Innovation, what we need to do is have Better Bulk-Ons, and revisit how to Collaborate more –and that’s why Jim and I you know are Mad Scientists (attempted-irascible-giggle) (What Is a Mad Scientist – a kind of Anything Goes, don’t blow our (Obvious) Cover Now…?)

And we represent that kind of—We need better Real World Collaboration—and There’s Not That Much! And it could make a big difference in terms of our Survival—and, our Our Way of Life. [reaching for help and finding it in that tried (and false) trope from past US Presidents (and the obviously propped-up Writers who virtuously cite them)] 

–Dr. James Canton, Episode 79/449, Mad Science Convergence Podcast: One Brain Chip, Please! Neuro-AI with two of the Maddest Scientists

Now both these speakers calling for a future subjugation of the human brain and human intelligence as we know it seem to have a touching faith in (Invasive asserted as Non-Invasive) Science and Technology leading the way to a better tomorrow filled with power for the wealthy and the warmongering–“fertile landscape of opportunities”–“some of these AI companies make 2-3 million dollars a day with a commitment of a billion dollars” “there’s money, there’s innovation” (but we do need “better world collaboration…for our survival and way of life”)–yet the corralling of humans into Human Performance Optimization through nano-bio-info-cogno, the use of AI to downgrade human intelligence, the casual recourse to brain chips and vibrational energy technologies to affect brains can hardly be considered “innovations” and forward-moving sci-tech to marvel at and make one’s own: as nations, as nationals, as citizens, as Americans, as humans with intelligence and soul who value our own and our children’s unique and perfect lives and brains, we need to do way, way more. We each need to stand up and question every part of what is going on in these spaces, we need to know that basic, extant Ethics and Human Rights by our side make it rather simple really to just say No. And Keep saying No.


Red Alert! Graphene Oxide Found in Pfizer/AstraZeneca Vaccines–Used in Biosensors and Neural Interfaces–Could Be the Secret Link to Nano-Bio-Info-Cogno (NBIC) Human-Machine Convergence for AI Singularity & Full Spectrum Brain/Bio Control Intended by Anti-Human Transhumanists, Globalists, Governments

“Global Health Security” Versus AI-Run Digital Health: Does the WHO, European Commission’s Partnership Respect Human Rights or Aim for Cerebral Internet Cyborgism?

The Future of Intelligence or The Rise of Human Rights? | Artificial Intelligence, Neural Networks, Deep Learning Vs Preserving The Sanctity of Human Brains And Lives

Military Brain Technologies Revealed: Therapy or Weaponry?

Drop Copyright, Ban Artificial Intelligence: Question Where Neural Networks Come From First

Mr. Edward Ellis, Equity Lawyer Leading Mass Corruption Remedy Process in UK Unlawfully Custodially Sentenced: Dr. Julia Spivack Writes Back

Report | Ramola D | June 22, 2023

In a series of letters addressing the unlawful imprisonment and withholding of needed medical treatment which Mr. Edward Ellis has endured at Pentonville Prison since early May, 2023, Dr. Julia Spivack, a Natural Medicine Physician qualified and experienced in Osteopathy, Homeopathy and Ayurvedic Medicine, has recently been addressing various Government Ministers and High Court Justices in the UK, writing directly to His Majesty the King Charles III, as well as King’s Bench judge Mr. Justice Kerr, Rishi Sunak the British Prime MInister, Suella Braverman the Home Secretary, the Prison Governor Ian Blakeman, and others, in powerful support of those innocent citizens seeking remedy from lifelong harm inflicted by the UK judicial system.

Thankfully, His Majesty’s Court and Tribunal Service has begun to write back, heralding an obvious change on the horizon for one and all–even if such has to involve appeal to a higher court.

Ironic then is the fact that Mr. Edward Ellis, working on behalf of His Majesty King Charles and the Rule of Law, has been denied access to appeal forms and use of the prison library in order to fashion an appeal to the Supreme Court, which, as Dr. Spivack remarks in her email note back to the HMCTS “Customer Investigations Officer,” puts the Court and Justice Kerr “in contempt of his own remit” essentially “invalidat(ing) any jurisdiction he may claim to have in respect of Mr. Ellis or indeed anyone else.”

“What makes this fraudulent imprisonment particularly egregious,” Dr. Spivack relays, “is the fact that Mr. Ellis suffers from Chronic End Stage Renal Failure and is dependent upon renal dialysis as well as additional measures of medical support which are not being adequately provided. Those who know Mr. Ellis and the background to his fraudulent imprisonment are of the opinion that this is a secret Death Penalty. The death penalty is illegal in the United Kingdom.” (More on this can be found in Dr. Spivack’s letter to the Prison Governor Ian Blakeman, Justice Kerr, PM Rishi Sunak dated 9 June, letter 2 posted below.) “All of these restrictions,” Dr. Spivack notes to this writer, “are clear violation of his rights as a prisoner in the UK.”

Dr. Spivack’s email dated June 19, 2023 (Email PDF below) seeks Mr. Edward Ellis’s release, requiring termination of the unlawful custodial sentence conferred by an apparently recalcitrant judicial body unclear as to the core import of the Equity Monarchy Trusts–which Mr. Edward Ellis and Neelu Berry Chaudhari (also a whistleblower on pharmaceutical and hospital corruption and crime, incidentally also an aunt to Rishi Sunak) have previously discussed at Reports and Newsbreaks at this writer’s channels, first discussed here earlier.

The Equity Monarch Trusts, as Edward has often explained on podcasts, offers an ethical court of remedy affiliated with the reigning monarch, essentially a justice restoration mechanism which fell into dormancy for 45 years. Dr. Spivack notes it was revived and serviced by the late Queen Elizabeth II who taught it to her son Charles.

A Custodial Sentence, also known as imprisonment, is acknowledged by the UK’s Sentencing Council to be “the most severe sentence available to the courts,” “reserved for the most serious offences and…imposed when the offence committed is ‘so serious that neither a fine alone nor a community sentence can be justified for the offence'”. This as we all know in Edward Ellis’s case in particular is patently absurd. As Dr. Spivack notes in her email of June 19 to the Litigation Team, Courts and Tribunals, HMCTS, Mr. Ellis has committed no crime.

In fact, as we know from all correspondence he has provided from inside the prison, in addition to his nearly two decades of toil on the Mass Corruption Remedy Process exposing the failures of the UK court system, Mr. Ellis has been working hard on behalf of others also falsely imprisoned while being denied proper life-saving medical treatment needed for his chronic end-stage kidney problem. Imprisonment itself he has shown is the problem.

In brilliant insight calling attention to Justice Kerr’s contempt of his own remit and invalidation of his “contempt” judgment, Dr. Spivack reminds the HMCTS litigation team that dismissal of victims of corruption today is akin to historic elimination practices in both recent times in the UK against osteopaths and against Jews in Nazi Germany, and promises a new day for justice in International Criminal Court.

–Excerpt, Email from Dr. Julia Spivack to Customer Investigation Team, HMCTS), June 19, 2023

Email Correspondence, Litigation Team, HMCTS and Dr.Spivack:

Fraudulent Conviction, Malicious Neglect, Gross Human Rights Abuses

It is not clear in fact why Mr. Ellis has been arrested and detained in Pentonville Prison, which occurred on the 3 May 2023 at the Royal Courts of Justice, Dr. Spivack reports.

Arrests appear to have been frivolous and on false grounds. An earlier “offence” in fact for which Mr. Ellis had been arrested, Dr. Spivack notes in a letter to Home Secretary Suella Braverman on 26 May, 2023 (letter 1 posted below), comprised accidental contact with a court staff-member while at an appeals hearing on 17 March for another osteopath, whereupon Mr. Ellis was arrested for “Assault by Beating” yet another fabricated crime leveled at a whistleblower and true advocate for the people.

That letter details Dr. Julia Spivack’s significant rebuttal to the false judgment against Mr. Ellis, noting the fraudulence of the conviction, malicious neglect of his medical condition, and gross human rights abuses he has been subjected to in prison.

Of particular interest is the fact that the false judgment leveled against Mr. Ellis has sought to dismiss the Mass Corruption Remedy Process under the aegis of the Equity Monarchy Trusts as an “apparently internally consistent belief system in corruption” which has attracted recruits and adherents (phrasing which relates to historical ideas pulled directly from “behavioral health”-fixated paradigms in psychology, DSM psychiatry, used punitively against people in unlawful CIA MK ULTRA programs, and, shockingly, being recycled today into AI-run human resource management) when in fact most of us know, objectively speaking, corruption in the judicial system (or any other aspect of government) is a fact.

Dr. Spivack’s rebuttal to this profound misrepresentation using her own corruption case to support the authenticity of victim-reportage Mr. Ellis has collected is powerful and exemplary, and must be read in full by all: while personal, it rebuts presumption and deploys thoughtfulness in countering false claims by so-called authority figures who often try to discredit victim-reportage through crafted appeal to misdirective contrivance in fiction, not fact.

Letter from Dr. Spivack to Home Secretary Suella Braverman, 26 May 2023

Earlier Coverage

As many know, Mr. Edward Ellis has been working, now for over 19 years, it seems, to bring forward the numerous cases of harm that highly productive and civic-minded citizens, activists, whistleblowers in the UK have reported, many suffering egregious loss of job, career, profession, health or tragic confiscation of their homes, children, property, all experiencing censorship, judicial injustice, or whistleblower retaliation of some kind–including, often, Mental Health Frauds involving false and forced psychiatric evaluations or false imprisonment to discredit their witness. Mr. Ellis has earlier stated that this persecution of whistleblowers especially calls attention to the state of dictatorship in the UK, whose entrenchment can be traced to the falling into disuse of the Equity Monarchy Trusts which he has now revived.

Some earlier coverage here:

Mr. Edward Ellis, Equity Lawyer, Reports the Launch of a Mass Corruption Remedy Process in the United Kingdom and Calls for Principled Independents and Empowered Citizens to Step Forward

Transcript of Newsbreak 47: Mass Corruption Remedy Process in UK at Breakthrough Moment, with Edward Ellis and Neelu Berry

Newsbreak 74: Whistleblower Update with Edward Ellis and Neelu Berry Chaudhari | Corruption Proven

BREAKING: Mass Corruption Remedy Process in UK at Breakthrough Moment, Citizen Input Needed | Mr. Edward Ellis Informs the Privy Council President, Mr. Jacob Rees Mogg

Common law or equity governance, Mr. Ellis has taught us all, offers a route for citizens to recognize the power of their natural rights and human rights, express grievances not merely in courts but through private process of correspondence and communication, persisting in thus publicizing such notice of harm in order to prove abuse of powers and unfitness of those elected or appointed who have engaged in harm and judicial misconduct, and thus paving the way to positive change and redressal of all grievance. Citizen leaders could help in collecting cases and evidence in order to speak thus for all harmed–what Edward Ellis has indeed done, along with others who have assisted in the Mass Corruption Remedy Process, such as Dr. Julia Spivack, Neelu Berry Chaudhari, Anthony Badaloo, Andrew Devine, some of whose work has been covered at my channels.

Dr. Julia Spivack Details Crimes Against Humanity and Seeks Redress for All

Dr. Spivack’s letter of 9 June, 2023 (letter 2 posted below) to the Prison Governor Ian Blakeman, Prime Minister Rishi Sunak, and Justice Kerr of the High Court, King’s Bench, further details her own case and that of others’, advocating for Mr. Ellis’s release and seeking compensation for damages to all.

Notably, Dr. Spivack mentions her own work in collecting cases of misfeasance in statutory healthcare regulators and subsequent whistleblower retaliation corruption she endured, which included the kind of false mental health labeling fraud which has been visited on numerous activists, journalists, whistleblowers, and victims to discredit their reportage, a subject previously covered and of evolving interest at this site. This letter is the one responded to by Her Majesty’s Court and Tribunal Service Litigation Team (Email Correspondence in PDF above).

Letter from Dr. Spivack to Prison Governor, Justice Kerr, PM Rishi Sunak, June 9, 2023

Letters to the King

Of particular note are Dr. Spivack’s earlier letters to the King which draw attention to Mr. Ellis’s work for the Equity Monarchy Trusts, managed, she notes, through the Royal Commission, reminding the King of his coronation oaths to the people according to the statutes of God and Natural Justice. Her letter of 5 May written just before the day of the Coronation of King Charles on 6 May is below.

This story will be updated as information comes in. Letters and notes from Mr. Edward Ellis can be found on the Equity Governance site and will be posted here as time permits.

It must be remembered that the work Mr. Ellis and Dr. Spivack and numerous writers, citizen journalists, private investigators working to support the Mass Corruption Remedy Process in the UK are doing is extraordinarily noble, and seeks to redress historic wrongs across all classes of people, in all professions, all walks of life. Sometimes it takes the candor and persistence of writers and public speakers to remind those in power where their true value lies, and one can only hope these direct communications succeed in moving this entire Corruption Remedy Process in the UK forward sooner, rather than later.

Many thanks to Dr. Julia Spivack for her correspondence and provision of emails and letters for wider circulation.


The Edward Ellis Files

Equity Governance UK/Introduction to Common Law and Equity Governance (External site)

Constitution of the UK, More on Equity Law, Other UK Historic Acts/Peacekeepers (External site)

Mr. Edward Ellis, Equity Lawyer, Reports the Launch of a Mass Corruption Remedy Process in the United Kingdom and Calls for Principled Independents and Empowered Citizens to Step Forward

Transcript of Newsbreak 47: Mass Corruption Remedy Process in UK at Breakthrough Moment, with Edward Ellis and Neelu Berry

Newsbreak 74: Whistleblower Update with Edward Ellis and Neelu Berry Chaudhari | Corruption Proven

BREAKING: Mass Corruption Remedy Process in UK at Breakthrough Moment, Citizen Input Needed | Mr. Edward Ellis Informs the Privy Council President, Mr. Jacob Rees Mogg

Redbridge Council Cites “Personal Care” Exemption in Refusing to Explain Aggressive & Fraudulent Sectioning Attempts on Mr. Edward Ellis, Equity Lawyer

Egregious Sectioning and Kidnap Attempts on Equity Lawyer Edward Ellis As the Completing Mass Corruption Remedy Process Exposes Pervasive Crime & Corruption in UK Courts, Police Departments, and Hospitals

Ramola D Reports/NewsBreak 30: Wave of Mental Health Frauds in UK, New Zealand | Queen’s Hospital Fraudulently Reports Edward Ellis as Absconded Dialysis Patient

See, also: Writing Back to Dr. Julia Spivack Post Addled Slander | June 29, 2023

Drop Copyright, Ban Artificial Intelligence: Question Where Neural Networks Come From First

Note and Op-ed | Ramola D | June 12, 2023

A few hearings lately on Artificial Intelligence and Intellectual Property held by House Judiciary subcommittees have started to point to some of the essential problems with US Copyright and Copyright law, IP law, case law, precedents in law, definitions of the terms “copyright” “patents” “intellectual property” et al, while seemingly all rushing to approve AI as a new technology for the future supposedly to establish technological supremacy and maintain a “global technological leadership” edge over countries like China.

Copyright, Neural Networks, Brains

Artificial Intelligence and Intellectual Property: Part I — Interoperability of AI and Copyright Law | House Judiciary Subcommittee on Courts, Intellectual Property, and the Internet hearing on Wednesday, May 17, 2023 at 10:00 a.m. ET

None are actually pausing to examine comprehensively the shadowy subject of “inputs to train AI models” which Senator Hank Johnson draws attention to in his opening speech at this hearing (AI and IP: Part 1 – Interoperability of AI and Copyright Law, House Judiciary Subcommittee on Courts, Intellectual Property, and the Internet, May 17, 2023) yet relates purely to “copyrighted works” (itself obviously a subject for much debate and discussion if you take the route of Hollywood’s lawyers or just a subject to reject outright, as any writer, artist, or musician can do anytime, in this new age of Copyright thieving via AI: simply withdraw copyright, retain copyright, return copyright to yourself, and refuse to hand it over in licenses or permissions to be misused and exploited by tech mavens who will never fully acknowledge, credit, or compensate you). What are these inputs? Are they purely copyrighted works? Or do they include neural networks–biological neural networks–at whatever stage of construction of AI models? And what are AI models exactly–simulation models seeking to replicate brain networks in the act of cognitive processing? And whose brains exactly are being studied, heterodyned, cloned, harvested for this purpose? Can brains be copyrighted?

Listening to some of these lawyers speak we begin to get a sense of what the argument is being framed as, but we do not exactly hear much resounding dissent and questioning of the limitations of the term “copyright” itself.

The question of outputs–work generated using these supposedly trainable AI models–being copyrightable or not pales in significance beside the enormity of this primary questioning, which every one of us should be engaging in, worldwide, if we want to preserve–for ourselves and our children and all future generations–the sanctity and autonomy of our brains, our biological neural networks, our rights to our own thinking, perceiving, sensing, cogitating, ruminating, writing, speaking, moving, singing, and all else of our own supremely singular and unique human capabilities at any time.

We must keep in mind that behind the entire phenomenon of Artificial Neural Networks lies the study of biological neural networks, and the examination of brains in the process of cognitive processing.

Questions of Safety, Regulation, Control

While Sam Altman, CEO of OpenAI, mentions large neural networks in his testimony at this other hearing around the same time (Oversight of AI: Rules for Artificial Intelligence, House Judiciary Subcommittee on Privacy, Technology, and the Law, May 16, 2023), he fails to mention that Artificial Neural Networks are built on biological neural networks, that they have to do with the translation of human brain processing mechanisms and methodologies into software applications via the quantitative sciences which inform simulation modeling, that this translation is essentially brain theft–especially when arrived at non-consensually, and that all Artificial Intelligence so built is vastly inferior to human intelligence which it seeks but fails to emulate.

The dangers and risks of AI which he points to and which are more expansively addressed here, in one of his referenced papers, suggest that, well beyond what is overtly expressed at these hearings, generative AI seeks to become a tool for oligarchic repression of the populace on the one hand through governing access to superior–yet ill-gotten–tools for base cognitive processing (the neural networks of experts), and on the other, degrading human brains through destroying human creative and critical thinking, enforcing new kinds of cognitive processing which seem solipsistic and limiting and essentially enacting information warfare or “unconventional warfare” on all, which military-deception/Psy Ops practices could tell us a great deal about.

All of these are subjects to be more closely looked at. Most especially, the questions of “regulating” (what precisely?), enforcing (what precisely?) and protecting from harm (what precisely?) need addressing.

Much could be simplified if only these “witnesses” at government hearings could state a little more clearly that what they are selling as futuristic AI and seek to have passed on freely to enslave impressionable young minds is nothing but a form of Cliff’s Notes and content-generation software (built on unethical research) for which they now seek personally-profitable content management.

A cursory look at the “observed safety challenges” of GPT-4 listed and elaborated on here at this referenced article which seems to inform Sam Altman’s testimony quite a bit suggests alarming intent to replace whole bodies of critical enquiry, online language analysis, law enforcement concerns, psychology concerns, journalism concerns, law concerns with in-house “red-teaming” while establishing new and arbitrary norms (whose precisely?) for all thinking, speaking, expression, communication and apparently replacing surveillance-censorship online and in brains with private-party-censorship. The use of language such as “enforce” is doubly problematic when no-one is quite sure what exactly needs to be enforced and why–how is this not a major issue behind the whole construct of Artificial Intelligence, how has the study of AI even got this far as to warrant usage of such a word? Yet regulation implies enforcement, and these hearings on AI seem to want to rush through to regulation sans discussion. This conversation with Jack Kornfeld and Soren Gordhamer has Sam Altman bring up “enforcing” again here: “I think we just need to do the same thing here, we need to come together, decide what we want, decide we’re going to enforce it and accept the fact the future is going to be very different and probably like wonderfully better.”

Clearly, pushback in Congress needs to continue.

Neural Network Mapping, Unethical Human and Animal Research, and Human Rights

One of the primary questions to ask however is where neural networks in AI come from, and whether they include the neural network maps which many of those unlawfully targeted have whistleblown about, including French software engineer Frederic Laroche at my channel, who speaks of witnessing French and American brain researchers display and refer to neural maps at his Hewlett-Packard workplace: essentially, are those unlawfully targeted and wrongfully watchlisted being used in secret experiments to map their brains and neural circuits, information from which is then supplied to private-party tech companies intent on making a private profit and rolling out software applications for their own self-aggrandizement off essentially the political persecution and abuse of the innocent? Does the study of neural networks in animals, especially primates, as well fall in this same continuum of abuse of humans? These are human rights questions of devastating importance, since all who report being so targeted and abused essentially report torture, bio-hacking, neuro-hacking, and a complete abrogation of their basic human rights; animals, we all know, have indeed been tortured in multiple ways for military and public-domain neuroscience.

AI and Emerging Technologies: To Be Questioned, Not Expanded and Protected

Meanwhile, Rama G. Elluru, a thinktank patent attorney with apparent over-Government connections, and rather patently sheathed inside the National Security state (she testifies she’s worked as staff for the National Security Commission on Artificial Intelligence (now playing defunct with reports coyly archived at a “cybercemetery” online), lays out a plan for Congress to follow at this recent hearing (Artificial Intelligence and Intellectual Property — Part I: Patents, Innovation, and Competition, Subcommittee on Intellectual Property, June 7, 2023), seeking reform of IP policies to “establish new IP policies and regimes to incentivize, expand, and protect AI and emerging technologies.”

Artificial Intelligence and Intellectual Property – Part I: Patents, Innovation, and Competition |

“Emerging technologies” a nebulous enough term to permit a host of concealments, but one surfacing more these days in seeming attempts to legitimize all including under “emerging technology foreign policy” as covered here earlier, and desperately in need of human rights oversight: US Department of State Sets Up a New Office for Critical and Emerging Technology Diplomacy and Foreign Policy: Human Rights Oversight Urgently Needed/January 5, 2023.

Too much is happening too fast while in actuality the entire edifice of Artificial Intelligence needs to be questioned, not taken for granted. We don’t need to look to AI to “transform our societies, economies, and security” as US Secretary of State Antony Blinken stated in January, using the trope of foreign partnership that time (versus the current one of global tech competition and leadership) to rustle in public consent without disclosure, very thinly referring to emerging technologies then as “including biotechnology, advanced computing, artificial intelligence, and quantum information technologies.”

We need to ask what AI really is, what it has been built on, and what it uses as base: Inevitably, these questions will run into the large ethical questions behind the incredible abuses of animals and humans underpinning all neuroscience research, military and public-domain, which are not being asked, but which have certainly been addressed continuously at this writer’s desk and broadcast channels.

The new subcommittee hearing slated for tomorrow, June 13, 2022, one can only hope, will address this matter openly: Artificial Intelligence and Human Rights. (Curious however that this subcommittee is focused on Human Rights and the Law, while the others are focused on IP and copyright: Will they speak to each other?)

Artificial Intelligence Built on Unlawful Exploitation of Brains and Brain Outputs Needs Banning Outright

The world needs to be apprised of the great harms behind AI research. AI should be banned, not lauded, glorified, or legitimized. Ask first where those neural networks came from, ask what ChatGPT is actually based on, ask what the brain research projects in which “Targeted Individuals” have been buried are really all about, ask what DARPA, DOJ, NIJ and others have been doing for the last two decades in their brain research projects supposedly to help the “mentally-ill” and make society “safe” from falsely-labeled terrorists and falsely-labeled “psychiatric patients.”

Ask how Informed Consent has been jettisoned for absolute carnage, as both academics and agencies have permitted the public to be openly harmed: No Waivers of Informed Consent, PERIOD: The Public Reports Ongoing Non-Consensual Experimentation and Demands the Common Rule Protect Citizens, Not Covert Activities/17 July, 2016.

There is a great danger to all of humanity–and especially all our children, all our generations to come–in the arbitrary use of AI to replace human intelligence and human brain processes with artificial neural networks or machine learning through nifty software apps or neurological enhancements and thence hand over rights to one’s own creativity in any field, art, music, science, whatever, to the tech gurus who now assure us such appropriation is well within the scope of extant copyright and IP law, as described for instance by UCLA Professor of Law and Electrical Engineering John Villasensor in this testimony addressing concepts of “conception.”

Returning all “Copyright” Ownership, Conception, and Origin Rights to Oneself As Artists, Writers, Scientists, Human Beings with Brains and Biological Neural Networks Belonging Only to Ourselves

So if you are a writer, artist or scientist of any kind, or human being who believes your brain and neural networks, published works, or body of knowledge, experience, and expertise are being attacked, exploited, used and abused by unethical AI researchers–as many report–then it’s time to go beyond these lax notions of protection available in Copyright Law and IP Law and start acting in your own power as living men and women, as Americans on the land–not subject to statutory law but keeping to God-given rights in natural law, common law, international law, stating, declaring, and returning all power over your own self to yourself, as I have done here–a statement I hope to keep updating as I too begin to understand more clearly what exactly needs to be said out loud to stop the interminable exploitation of our creative and living human selves: Statement of Ownership as Statement of Fact Exceeding and Superseding all Copyright Notices | June 11, 2023

“Global Health Security” Versus AI-Run Digital Health: Does the WHO, European Commission’s Partnership Respect Human Rights or Aim for Cerebral Internet Cyborgism?

Note and Op-Ed | Ramola D | 6th June, 2023

While the WHO and European Commission’s sad little partnership to run a “global health security” digital health initiative predicated entirely on certification to promote COVID-19 fallacies and lies is utterly transparent in its intent–no-one can travel (“global mobility”) or work except by kowtowing to the absurdity of nasal swabs, interminable COVID tests, painfully useless face-masks, and harmful untested experimental “vaccines” to quell viruses which have not been proved to exist–what’s really at stake is what’s not being said.

We must remember all corporations, even global and worldwide, are only private corporations and each of us must exercise personal discernment and continue to make private health choices as we read this information–while also working quietly within our own families, neighborhoods, cities, counties, to inform our local officials and help save each of their as well as our own children from the incredibly invasive implications of such ventures as this.

Yesterday’s news:

Digital Health, AI, Innovative Tech, Synthetic Biology

“Digital Health” has become a catch-all word here for way too much — many scientists, investigative analysts, whistleblowers, and podcasters have in recent times been taking apart the very serious implications for all humanity in permitting the use of the highly deleterious nanotechnologies, neurotechnologies, surveillance and monitoring “emerging technologies,” “innovative technologies” and historic sweep of human and animal studies in brain functioning, neurology, cognitive processing, language modeling which inform Artificial Intelligence (AI) and make “digital health” “telemedicine” and other forms of remote-access health monitoring happen, subjects often explored here.

While Artificial Intelligence and the concept of IP theft examined briefly here continue to be discussed in the US Congress, some of the harms and the call for a moratorium on its development were recently aired at this earlier May 2023 hearing (to be further reported on by this writer):

The intersection of nanotechnology, neurotechnology, and synthetic biology has been examined in recent times by such scientists and researchers as Dr. Ana Maria Mihalcea, Dr. Robert Young, Celeste Solum.

Hydrogel and Graphene Oxide Used For Neuron Stimulation ( AKA Mind Control) Via Injection Or Inhalation | Dr. Ana Maria Mihalcea

Newsbreak 133: Team of Scientists Confirm Presence of Toxins Graphene, Aluminium, Cadmium Selenide, Stainless Steel, LNP-GO Capsids, Parasites, Other Toxins Variously in 4 COVID Vaccines: Pfizer, Moderna, AstraZeneca, Johnson & Johnson

Synthetic Biology webinar with Celeste Solum

Virology Fraud versus Natural Health

The fallacies of virology versus the intuitive healing and natural health approaches to living in tune with Nature, our human bodies and our planet as well as the ways in which AI, 5G, nanotech and neurotech converge have been often discussed at my channel including with Dr. Tom Cowan, Dr. Andy Kaufman, Dr. Robert Young, Dr. John Reizer, Dr. Amandha Vollmer, Dr. Zara Anne Bourgeois, Dr. Beverly Rubik.

Report 284 | Dr. Tom Cowan Exposes Virus/Infection Fallacies, & Describes True Health & Healing


Report 279: Panel on Terrain: Hidden Science: Greater Cause of Disease Not Germs but Terrain with Dr. Andy Kaufman and Dr. Robert Young



Report #162: Zara Anne Bourgeois, Homeopath:Vaccine Risks/Harms, Natural Remedies, Immunity, Healing

The Great Need to Continuously Research, Monitor, and Challenge Invasive Science and Technology Research and Development

The great harms of turning our health over to large private corporations which have been working for decades to develop technologies harmful, surveillant, and pigeonholing of humans must be questioned, challenged, and stopped before they can take hold in our world. Where AI, 5G, impacting biofields and blood, nerves, cells, brains, and nervous systems has been headed, often under covers such as dual-use technologies which emphasize health while practicing harm in secret, needs to be widely known and continuously researched and questioned as pioneer scientists and researchers, activists and journalists Elana Freeland, Clifford Carnicom, Frances Leader, Dr. Salinas Flores have shown us.



Worldwide Reveal of New, Destructive SynBio ”Cross-Domain Bacteria” Linked to Chem Trails, Morgellons, Now in Everyone’s Bodies “Transforming the Human Species”: The Carnicom Institute Disclosure Project Overview


“Disruptive Technologies”, 4IR, Cerebral Internet

Closer focus on the “Cerebral Internet” exposed in films and books was highlighted here early with Dr. David Salinas Flores’s work, which has also converged with others’ exposing the nanotechnology underpinnings behind “disruptive technologies” and the much-touted but sadly lacking-in-EQ “Fourth Industrial Revolution” or 4IR (subjects further to be explored here).

Professor David Salinas Flores, MD | The Secret of “Person of Interest”: The Cerebral Internet

Dr. David Salinas Flores | The Fourth Industrial Revolution: The First Robotization of Africans

New FOIA Request Reveals Entire Pandemic Based on Scientific Fraud: CDC Concedes Inability to Locate Purified Isolate of SARS-COV-2/COVID-19 Virus or Delta Variant by Koch’s Postulates, Says Viruses can be Isolated “Only by Growth in Cell Culture”

CONFIRMED: COVID-19 Plandemic a Known, Live “Training and Simulation Exercise” under WHO, Treasonously Agreed to by 196 Countries

Scientific Fraud Must be Detected Early and Dismantled Early to Avert and End Cerebral Internet Cyborgism

The great harms of scientific fraud perpetrated by the COVID deception could have been stopped months and years ago if only the reportage of those meticulously working against tremendous odds to uncover the truth had been heeded. It is never too late however to do the right thing, to acknowledge all reporters of this endless trainwreck which “public health”/allopathic or medical managed healthcare systems has become, and move forward in more inclusive ways to bring healing, personal health freedom, and absolute neuro privacy and bodily autonomy to our world, free of the harms dreamed up by greedy private corporations and their elitist CEOs keen to tear down our hard-won rights and freedoms on the land in every part of the world.

Make 2022 the Year to Wise Up and Stand Up: Reject Vaccine Mandates, Reject the Public Health Paradigm, Reject Germ-Creation in the Pandemics-Forever-Plan, Reject Nanobiosensors, Reject the Internet of Bio Nano Things, Reject the “Common Good,” Reject Media/Pharma/Govt Lies-for-Profit, Reject Digital Currencies, Reject Vaxx Passports & Biometric IDs, Reject COVID, Reclaim Your Sovereignty

Cerebral Internet Cyborgism must be averted and ended altogether as an end-goal for science and technology research and development worldwide by each of us having the courage to stand up and speak up, sharing our knowledge and our thoughts, our dreams, our words for a better world ahead for us all, especially our children.

Healing Our Human Bodies and the World with Water

Note & Links | Ramola D | June 3, 2023

Water heals and restores us, water soothes and invigorates. Water is powerful yet gentle as it seeps and flows over rock into earth, water insistently restores our cells from the inside out when we need it to.

The healing power of water is a huge subject, which has come into focus recently with awareness rising of the health of our people and planet in peril. Several doctors and naturopaths I have interviewed over the last few years have shared their expertise with healing remedies including water on my reports and newsbreaks, highlighting the importance of the simple–water, exercise, sunshine, clay, nutrition, vitamins, minerals in healing and detoxing the human body from numerous pollutants, in diseases like cancer, brain diseases, vaccine damage.

The power of Water and Alkalinity in Healing Tissue and Cell, Blood and Brain

The pH of water and restoring the alkalinity of our tissues and cells with healthful living has been especially highlighted by the well-known scientist, nutritionist, naturopath Dr. Robert Young, author of several books including the groundbreaking The Ph Miracle: Balance Your Diet, Reclaim Your Health (by Dr. Young and Shelley Redford Young) in several interviews including this one:

Newsbreak 136 | Life-Saving Information: Dr. Young Discusses Vaccine Damage and Powerful Detox Protocols

Dr. Young has listed some of the numerous other interviews and panels he has done here, including one with Dr. Ariyana Love, nutritionist and naturopath, covering various Solutions to Pollution where he speaks about the importance of the pH of water bathing our tissues and combating the harms of radiation damage to human bodies.

Water as Sentient, Listening, Aware, Expressive, Communicative, Therapeutic

The ways in which water responds to human thought and emotion and speaks to us in its own language of geometry and more has been explored by Dr. Masaru Emotu and those who have studied and sought to replicate and extend his work.

Michiko Hayashi, Director of the Emoto Peace Project, describes Dr. Emoto’s work and talks about how water has extraordinary receptive power to expressed intention and feeling, and how water responds powerfully to emotion, in ways that can be scientifically observed.


Veda Austin, author of The Secret Intelligence of Water studies the language of water, seeking to document the language of water, sharing her findings and extraordinary photographs of crystal formations in frozen water called hydroglyphs here:


For more Consciousness posts, please see the links and posts under Consciousness here.

For more on restoring your health with water and other natural solutions, please see the podcasts at the Ramola D Reports video channels and many of the articles and posts here.

These subjects and more to be covered here soon, please stay tuned.