David Noakes, CEO, Immuno Biotech, known internationally for his successful treatment of terminal-cancer and autism patients with GcMAF, long hounded by the MHRA (British equivalent to the FDA), a regulatory organization apparently run by the pharmaceutical cartel and keen to protect cancer-drug profits, was arrested yesterday in a disgraceful travesty of justice and held overnight at Exeter Prison.
John Smith, Common Law Court founder, who was apprised of David Noakes’ arrest by his previous lawyers Doughty Chambers, states that these actions are unlawful and criminal because he was arrested on a void order, and indicates further in conversation at Newsbreak 72 with Neelu Berry Chaudhari, pharmacist and child rights whistleblower, that he was arrested because of Judge Laraine-Smith’s impending retirement, in an effort to push through on long-attempted incarceration of David Noakes.
The MHRA’s primary beef with Immuno Biotech as stated earlier is the fact that they have not licensed GcMAF and have used it as a treatment for cancer–which Big Pharma maintains has no cure, only management with drugs and radiation therapy, but as often pointed out to them, including by Neelu Berry on today’s Newsbreak, GcMAf is a naturally occurring substance in the body, part of the body’s immune system complex, and therefore has never needed licensing; MHRA cannot license such natural products.
Please Attend the Hearing, Show Support
John Smith, who speaks about his expectations for the hearing in Newsbreak 72, requests that all concerned people in the area who can attend to please attend David Noakes’ hearing tomorrow to show solidarity and support. VENUE: FRIDAY, 11 AM, SOUTHWARK CROWN COURT, 22 MAY 2020, DAVID NOAKES
Newsbreak 72: David Noakes Unlawfully Arrested: Whistleblower Update with Neelu Berry Chaudhari and John Smith
Video/Newsbreak 72
Prison Call, Public Notice
Neelu Berry reports that she called Exeter Prison on a recorded call (below) but was not given any meaningful information, including his “Prisoner Number” but directed, on mention of a kidnapping of an internationally renowned public figure and VIP whistleblower (by the police) to call the police. That call is here:
In a letter to Edward Ellis, Equity Lawyer, copied to various personalities in Parliament including PM Boris Johnson, Foreign Secretary Matt Hancock, Home Secretary Priti Patel, and others, Neelu Berry wrote:
Dear Edward Ellis,
My call this morning to Exeter Prison switchboard for Governor David Atkinson on 01392 415650 today was received by an arrogant, incompetent operator, who finds it funny that the Prime Minister, Boris Johnson will be removed for the alleged kidnap of VIP Whistleblower David Noakes, yesterday. I was threatened for demanding the remedy of a Notice to the Prison Governor. She refused to provide the Prisoner Number or to confirm his presence.
Lynda Thyer is still held under USA FDA Extra-judicial Gun Control in Fleuris Merogis Prison, France, which controls the MHRA regulator (Ex-Sussex Police).
There are 102 another Gun-Assassined Naturopath Murders to be investigated in the USA, including the shot-dead, late Dr Jeffrey Bradstreet, Research colleague of Lynda Thyer, where this Big Pharma Dictatorship originates.
SHOCKING NEWS! DAVID NOAKES dob 7 March 1953 GOT KIDNAPPED FROM ST MAWES YESTERDAY AND TAKEN TO EXETER PRISON
PRAYERS ARE NEEDED TO GET HIM RELEASED IMMEDIATELY AND ALSO FOR LYNDA THYER TO BE RELEASED FROM FLEURY MEROGIS PRISON IN FRANCE
PUBLIC NOTICE
HEALTH, HOME, JUSTICE & FOREIGN MINISTERS AND MINISTRIES ARE HEREBY DEMANDED TO IMMEDIATELY RELEASE DAVID NOAKES FROM EXETER PRISON
HE IS CEO OF IMMUNOBIOTECH, MAKERS OF GCMAF, A NATURAL REMEDY WHICH DOES NOT REQUIRE LICENSING
MHRA HAS ALSO TRICKED THE JUSTICE, HEALTH & HOME MINISTERS AND MINISTRIES TO KIDNAP RESEARCHER LYNDA THYER TO FLEURY MEROGIS PRISON IN FRANCE
PUBLIC DEMANDS
THESE PUBLIC NOTICES WILL BE FOLLOWED UP BY PUBLIC DEMANDS BY TELEPHONE TO +44
A. HEALTH MINISTER MATTHEW HANCOCK 0207 210 4850 B. HOME MINISTER PRITI PATEL 0207 035 4848 C. JUSTICE MINISTER ROBERT BUCKLAND 0203 334 3555 D. FOREIGN MINISTER DOMINIC RAAB 0207 008 1500
E. ALSO BY PHONE TO HOUSES OF PARLIAMENT ON 0207 219 3000 TO DEMAND HIS RELEASE VIA YOUR MP ON GROUNDS OF YOUR SUPPORT FOR GCMAF AND NATURAL CURES
F. GOVERNOR OF EXETER PRISON Phone: 01392 415650
www.gcmaf.se Natural Remedies and Naturopaths are being hunted down by Big Pharma! When will this Corporate Terrorism End?
May 22: Belinda McKenzie writes that David Noakes will appear in court this morning at Southwark Crown Court, near to London Bridge Station. The case is listed as Court 4 at 11.30 before Judge Loraine-Smith, but please try to get there earlier.
This announcement on May 21 by John Smith publishes news of the wrongful arrest of David Noakes on May 20:
Recently, like many other human rights activists and wrongful targets reporting Crimes Against Humanity from fusion centers, military branches, and Intelligence agencies freely using anti-personnel microwave, milliwave, acoustic neuroweapons on the populace—for the past 20-30 years–as if it were their right to do so—in stealth mode, undisclosed publicly, yet well-documented in many ways, as covered here and here and here by me earlier—I was appalled to learn that NSA whistleblowers Bill Binney and Kirk Wiebe were planning an appearance on Katherine Horton’s channel, and later appalled to witness their gatekeeping performance by her side on her channel.
A few years ago, Bill and Kirk made a big splash on Ella Free’s Talkshoe conference-call, issuing a call for information along with Cait Ryan and Karla Smith, announcing a survey to collect victim experience information on EMF/Neurotech assault. This was covered by me here.
This survey eventually fell into a turbid silence as no news whatsoever was provided and months and years rolled by and nothing was done, reported, or published on the matter by all original named parties above—and no substantive responses offered to queries by many including myself.
Nevertheless, several activists including myself frequently kept Bill and Kirk informed, sending in evidence, visual or recorded, of high-tech assault, sending in accounts of Stasi behavior from neighbors—with few getting any acknowledgment, including myself. The most Bill has written back to me was two words, Thank You, when I offered to send in reports of information as I received them, plus send in declassified and public-domain military and Intelligence documents on the weaponry and bio-effects I knew of and thought would be useful to their investigation. This was at the time of their appearance on Ella’s call, when I too called in to speak with them and did.
Kirk Wiebe is on Twitter and I have frequently tagged him in tweets. My letters to Bill invariably included him in the recipient list.
Over the one and a half years of public witness that I was on Techno Crime Fighters Forum, I continued to write to Bill and Kirk, as a reporting journalist of crimes against humanity being reported by Americans, Europeans, and others worldwide, despite their peculiar refusal to respond to me. I also invited them to interview with me, in print or podcast, several times—all of these invitations were ignored—including very recently, after I heard and saw Bill Binney speak openly for the first time about people in the community reporting microwave weapons assault to Chris Hedges on RT, in April 2020.
Over the past 6 years, since I was first singled out by the corrupt and criminal FBI/DHS/CIA mechanism in Boston for special treatment with EMF weapons, having a little too much integrity to their liking apparently—reported earlier at Washington’s Blog and Dr. Marko’s Pine Cone Utopia—I have researched, investigated, documented, written, podcasted, and published extensively on the subject of targeting, surveillance overreach, FISA abuse, non-consensual experimentation, surveillance technology used by fusion centers, in addition to other, related subjects in science and technology, human rights, and ethics. My articles and interviews have striven to unearth the means by which such perfidy could have been rolled out on the American public, and world public, and have highlighted the testimonial of many including CIA whistleblower Barbara Hartwell, FBI whistleblower Geral Sosbee, NSA whistleblower Karen Melton-Stewart, writer Paul Baird, actor Steve Shellen, many others. Additionally, I have authored, co-authored, and sent off memoranda and letters to various politicians, academics, and Commission heads including President Trump, Senators Ed Markey and Elizabeth Warren, and SACHRP committee chairs and members. I mention this to underline the fact that my writing on these matters—which occurred in a void, when no other journalist was covering these issues—except Barbara Hartwell, whose work I regrettably only discovered later but am indeed most grateful for—was well-known to all engaging in testimonial reportage and activism on these matters, and also to many in alt-media who occasionally republished, or made mention of my work.
During and after the time Karen Stewart, Katherine Horton, Millicent Black, and I worked on Techno Crime Fighters Forum, significantly, it was only Katherine Horton who received responses from Bill Binney and Kirk Wiebe that I know of (perhaps Millicent did, I do not recall this currently); Karen Stewart has reported that she too was long ignored and not recognized, certainly never publicly recognized, by these two stalwarts from the very same NSA she too had been employed in.
After Techno Crime Fighters Forum closed, as everyone following this matter knows, Katherine Horton embarked on a profoundly vicious, malicious, and vindictive smear campaign on me—publishing outright lies and false-allegations, in clear attempt to sully my character and name, which I documented and rebutted in numerous articles, videos, and Twitter threads. Her extensive actions as an infiltrator in the midst of victims and activists, functioning as agent-provocateur, saboteur, NLP controller were covered by me extensively here and here. Katherine Horton was also running smear campaigns at the time on others, including CIA whistleblower Barbara Hartwell, and other human rights advocates Cassandra, Thomas McFarlan, and Melanie Vritschan. Despite several Cease and Desists to her, her malicious slander and libel on all of us continues to be maintained at her website, stop007.org. This is defamation and character assassination, for which she could be and still can be sued. CIA whistleblower Barbara Hartwell has also documented and rebutted Katherine Horton’s smears and false-allegations against her in numerous articles on her site. Writer and activist Thomas McFarlan has documented and published in video the clear evidence of Katherine Horton’s lies and agent-provocateur calls to violence on her own videos which she later denied—but continued, including in her tweets on Twitter. Writer and activist Cassandra has documented and published the facts regarding Katherine Horton’s smear campaigns in threads on Twitter. Founder and President of ICATOR Melanie Vritschan has documented and rebutted in video the numerous lies, smears, and false-allegations directed at her by Katherine Horton, whose hand in the wrongful medical kidnap removal of Ms. Vritschan’s newborn, and refusal to help get her back is well-documented, well-reported (by me) and well-known.
In fairly recent times—November and December 2019—Karen Melton-Stewart, whose case I have consistently covered for years as a journalist, abruptly turned on me after we worked on a Joint Statement to rebut Katherine’s continued smears and tedious lies indicting and scapegoating me as means to deflect attention from her (Katherine’s) own culpability; thereafter Karen Stewart began to publish—exactly like Katherine Horton—outright lies, insults, and false allegations against me, all of which was documented, responded to, and rebutted extensively by me here and here and here.
Karen Stewart’s inexplicable turnaround from decrying Katherine’s behavior to suddenly condoning, “forgiving,” and lauding it while libelously and baselessly calling me names and denigrating me publicly with malicious lies and insults was abrupt, extreme, and publicly noticeable—as Karen splashed her false allegations all over Facebook and Twitter. Karen Stewart also libeled and denigrated CIA whistleblower Barbara Hartwell, which was documented and rebutted by Barbara Hartwell in numerous articles at her site.
Since Karen Stewart’s public and supernasty attacks on me, several other activists came forward publicly and privately to me to report malicious attacks by Karen Stewart on them. Writers and activists who witnessed Karen Stewart’s wrongful attacks on me at Twitter and Facebook published their observations and reminded her of the facts—which she was twisting, distorting, and ignoring—in Twitter threads, linked here, in this Statement I was compelled to make on her extreme-lying and defamation campaign against me. Karen Stewart also can be sued for her malicious defamation and libel against me, which she continues to maintain at her Facebook and Twitter pages and at a page she names “Perps and Nutcases” on Facebook—daring to include me in this group, along with others who are equally outraged at this extreme act of character-assassination and libel against them with this kind of noxious labeling by a now proven liar.
A prime contention (as stated by herself) of Karen Stewart against me – after the Joint Statement was approved by all co-authors and published – centered around a court case Katherine Horton was supposedly then filing, mischaracterized by Karen Stewart as a group or class action for European targets. This case, as I understand was later reported by Katherine Horton, was apparently thrown out of court for lack of paperwork or photocopies.
It is apparently this same court-case that Bill Binney and Kirk Wiebe are now suddenly popping out of the woodwork to say they are supporting publicly.
What exactly is happening here?
Why would Bill and Kirk step forward to shore up the image of someone who has long been operative as an agent-provocateur, saboteur – literally sabotaging and ending various projects prematurely, as covered earlier here and here — and smear-artist – unless they are all part of the same Intelligence network seeking to play the same game of Limited Reveal, acknowledging perhaps the worst, or some of the most extreme Crimes Against Humanity being reported by targets, while protecting a large part of the numerous and immense roster of classified, compartmentalized military-academic neuro experimentation and weapons-testing programs that they are casually experimenting on, exploiting and using hundreds and thousands of targets to nefarious end?
Is it possible that two senior former officers from the National Security Agency (Agency that loves to snoop!) have not, as another activist puts it “analyzed & monitored Katherine Horton’s social profile, videos, websites, case record of sabotaged projects and working relationships, published lies, provocations, insults yet want to align themselves with her as opposed to other targets with evidence/testimony?”
Why did Karen Stewart suddenly turn on me – as if coached to do so, and, peculiarly at the very time that Katherine Horton, by her recent stating on video, was in the United States, seeking out NSA whistleblowers to support her public image and become “experts” in her court case – unless she too is a part of this Intelligence network engaging in Limited Reveal while just co-incidentally, no doubt, working to bury my name, work, and journalistic and scientific disclosure on targeting?
Notably, Katherine Horton, like Ella Free, and like Midge Mathis of the probably-CIA-set-up Targeted Justice, has never mentioned my journalism or technical coverage as significant; she has however, sought openly to act as a technical gatekeeper, with absolutely meaningless blather on the technology herself, often saying she had no clue about it, as she puts out disinformation about the technology and supports others doing the same, such as former NASA “Richard Lighthouse,” and actively gatekeeps to repress reportage and analysis from others including myself of the technologies which apparently the Intelligence agencies and local governments and fusion centers want hidden forever—as I have often covered earlier.
Clearly, Bill Binney and Kirk Wiebe – ex-NSA officials of high stature, who have high-level secret clearances, who signed NDAs, who are privy to classified information, who surely know a lot more of SIGINT – as revealed by John St. Clair Akwei in his lawsuit – than they’ve ever let on in public, although Bill has let slip once that nefarious “classified programs” had been unleashed on the public (Tommy Collins interview), and another time that “ambient signals” were known to be picked up by the NSA (such as brain waves?) (Abby Martin interview) – also have never mentioned my journalism or technical coverage as significant.
My undergraduate degree in Physics and science-based interest in the various covert technologies of political targeting have led to my continued research and reportage on the putative technologies in use, as reported in many articles, and most recently in the listing of extrajudicial targeting technologies here and in the reporting of the 1996 DARPA/NIJ Limited Effects Program Report here.
There are several Facebook groups I am a part of where I regularly witness and read the highly erudite and probing analyses of various science graduates, Ph Ds, scientists, and engineers worldwide on the nature of the neurotechnologies and radiation and sonic technologies being used on targets, and ways to record these.
It is curious therefore, to see Bill Binney, once Technical Director of the NSA, cryptologist par excellence, Math major and codebreaker, and Kirk Wiebe, retired senior intelligence analyst, suddenly line themselves up with supposed high-energy particle physicist Katherine Horton, and all three of them hold forth on the opacity and complexity of the technology that “even they” could not comprehend, and the difficulty of measuring or recording any impact of this technology on human bodies.
(Meanwhile, many engineers, scientists, analysts, accountants, audio technicians, musicians among targets are busy experimenting and recording the high EMF hits, the bio-effects, even the V2K and projected sound attacks.)
It is even more curious to hear Kirk Wiebe – who has never responded to emails (from me and others who have copied me in on emails to him) proffering information on these EMF and Neurotech/Nanotech and covert implantation assaults – say on this video that people should send their questions about the technology to him, a line of action Katherine Horton appears also to be pushing as she refers to Kirk as an expert. Relaying a commonly-known, children’s textbook understanding of audible sound frequencies as between 20 and 20,000 Hz, Kirk Wiebe in fact suggests he has been informed of this as if he had been “read-into” a highly classified matter!
I have seen no evidence – nor communication from Kirk Wiebe – to suggest he has any knowledge whatsoever of the kind of ELFs, EMFs, microwaves, milliwaves, carrier waves, acoustics, or neurotech targets are reporting that he is willing to speak openly about, and therefore no indication that he should be regarded as a technology expert in this matter.
In speaking of the emails sent to him on the TI survey, Bill Binney—who says he is not an expert on these technologies, and, significantly, never reported the results of this survey, dismisses emails from targets as from bots or fraudulent in their reportage—but how would he know to judge?
Katherine Horton, who worked hard on her video to get Bill Binney to say he witnessed her being hit, presents Reflectix/aluminium coated bubble-wrap as a means to record sub-audible pulse shots.
My own shield made of Reflectix over steel-core baking sheet, with a layer of sticky-back foam-craftpaper over the Reflectix more definitively and distinctly records sub-audible microwave pulses and shots (more than Reflectix alone, which I have long experimented with) – something I have spoken and written about for ages; in tandem with an EMF meter, it offers irrefutable proof and directionality of external EMF pulse-shot hits.
I did not hear this mentioned by the new TechnoGate trio, nor did I hear mentioned any of the other means of recording that many targets have spoken of, privately and publicly, in emails and social media, to me and to others.
This is of course only one recording method, and one putative tech being used on targets. There are indeed a whole range of technologies being used against targets today, and huge difficulties in attempting to record and expose many of them; the bio-effects-reports of targets were summarized here in this second memo to President Trump; the many DEW/neuro targeting-tech reports from targets were summarized here in this document. Many of these coincide with bio-effects disclosed in military documents, and weapons disclosed in military documents, and by whistleblowers.
There is no doubt neither Bill, Kirk, nor Katherine are technical experts here, nor should they be considered as such. Yet this is how they are presenting each other and themselves—while also suggesting the impossibility of learning more about these technologies or of recording them. This is fraudulent. It is also a clear push to contain classified projects as classified – which is doing a huge disservice to the victims of these technologies, who deserve every single one of these technologies to be declassified and openly acknowledged as in use against them, while restorative technologies, countermeasures and compensation also need to be openly meted out to them.
The very detailed discussion of the technologies DARPA and the DOJ have confessed to be using, as evidenced in the recently released-on-FOIA-request document, The Limited Effects Program Report, the many surveillance technologies and crowd-control technologies DHS and local law is using, the weaponized and portable millimeter wave and sonic tech the military is using as evident from their weapons manuals, the many radiation, sensor, and radar technologies the AFRL and USAF is testing, the neurotechnolgies which scientists Dr. Robert Duncan and Dr. James Giordiano expose, all of which I have reported on, is completely ignored by this crew which fixates on the difficulty of measuring, does not once mention the many invasive neurotechnologies targets report being hit with, and conveniently buries the reportage and patents that I and other writers online have published on these matters.
It is my opinion therefore that Bill and Kirk are either playing a NSA game or a NSA/CIA game to continue to keep most things opaque and secret and vague, right alongside with Katherine playing a JTRIG/GCHQ/MI5/MI6/Swiss Intel/CIA game to do the same—while it is entirely plausible Karen Stewart, with her touching faith in the “white hats” culled from unreliable and deceiving NSA/FBI/CIA (who have twice distinguished themselves with false Intel on me fed to her, as proved in Twitter threads linked here) has been roped in to participate in these limited-hangout operations—as is evident in the bizarre hatchet job she has wrongfully swung against my character in recent times. In other words, a high-tech military Intel op designed to deceive, placate, control-the-disclosure, keep most of the tech classified, secret, sacrosanct and still-in-use, while palliating and misdirecting the victims—not to mention data-collect in the process, and keep victims subjugated for years with these technologies while data-collecting.
Notably, Bill and Kirk mention a long period of years to collect information and bring cases to court – when they could call up RT or Info Wars or any of the big alt-media channels right now and speak openly—whistleblow!–about what targets are relaying to them!
My being publicly slandered, lied-about, insulted, and defamed by Katherine Horton from July 2018, and publicly slandered, lied-about, insulted, and defamed by Karen Stewart from November 2019 is, it seems to me, very much a part of this scenario: my published sci-tech journalism on targeting and targeting technologies is apparently intended to be buried by their smear ops. Why? Why do I need to be disappeared as a journalist by this crew—and also by the Targeted Justice/other targeted-organization crews, who have all engaged in supernasty smear ops on me online?
Because the singular investigative technology, testimonial, whistleblowing, documentary, and analytical reportage I have published over 6 years as a writer and journalist exposes the Intelligence agencies and military and local/federal governments quite irrefutably—and exposes the actual nature of the sinister and deadly technologies they are using against us.
Which, I should remind all, is also completely in line with the investigative journalism and historic disclosure of investigative journalists, writers, whistleblowers, and scientists Dr. Nick Begich, Mark Rich, Cheryl Welsh, Dr. Rauni Kilde, Renee Pittman Mitchell, Deborah Dupre, Mojimir Babacek, Gloria Naylor, Magnus Olsson, Richard Alan Miller, Mary Gregory, Dr. John Hall, Dave Case, and Dr. Robert Duncan, as well as international human rights organization founders and advocates Galina Kurdina and Melanie Vritschan (and many others with sites online) and many reporting victims whom I have interviewed and written about—all of whose voices and work I frequently refer to and showcase.
Karen Stewart teaming up with Katherine Horton to attack my name and character is most definitely an attempt to disappear my name and silence my work and voice in these matters; Bill Binney and Kirk Wiebe’s propping up Katherine Horton currently both discredits them completely and is a clear attempt to gatekeep (everyone/all reporting victims) on all target-talk, speculation, and reportage of the anti-personnel radiation, sonic, bioweapon, and neural weapons technologies being used. (Don’t look at or refer to anyone’s work such as Ramola’s recent published work—or anyone else’s historic, published work, eg., Welsh, Kilde, Begich, Rich, Duncan etc.–on the actual technology or disclosures from documentation analysis, look here at TechnoGate which tells you “even we” cannot make statements on the tech being used.)
This is especially pernicious in the current atmosphere of media-neglect, as a wrongfully targeted writer-colleague points out:
“Because the targeted community as a whole is ignored by mainstream media/public, there is no widespread public social commentary, critical analysis, checking over facts/details, other experts giving their analysis/expertise–which allows for gatekeepers to use any kind of professional credentials, made-up or otherwise, Whistleblower status, and public profile, to come along and control the narrative, isolate real targets, truth-tellers, and journalists, and make vulnerable targets feel they must follow certain groups/self-proclaimed leaders out of fear of being left behind, isolated, or publicly ignored/denigrated if they dare give a genuine point of view about targeting and the weaponry/technology used for remote access torture.
Public scrutiny is always necessary regardless if it is an authoritative government/independent body, non-profit, charity, or activist group, especially when crimes against humanity and insidious torture are being exposed; it makes those of us targeted vulnerable to set-ups, cover-ups, punitive psychiatry, and counterintelligence operations used to: control the narrative, minimize the full extent and horror of what has happened, limit disclosures, delay or even prevent justice and recompense for the millions of us targeted.”
Pointing up this fact: For the past 30 years, ALL mainstream media – DOD/CIA-run – has, criminally, published lies—open lies—as well as disinformation, mockery, ridicule, downplayings, denigration, deprecation, distortions, skewings of fact, omissions of fact, in their limited and concealing coverage of targeting crimes with high-tech weaponry reported by citizens and supported by whistleblower scientists: The New York Times, The Washington Post, Wired, The Daily Beast, CBS, Chicago Sun-Times currently come to mind. My commentary on a few of these publications—which also point up this media treason is here:
So yes, most savvy activists are aware the “TI” community is bristling with infiltrators and gatekeepers— some of whom I have written about and exposed – who lean on email lists, conference calls, newsletters to cuttingly interrogate and censor targets. Infiltrators and gatekeepers also seem to have either Phd credentials or Intelligence Agency history or both, or run media ops to play “Spokesperson”—this is clearly by snaky Intelligence Community design.
It is also my opinion that, given Katherine’s past record with her court cases, given State Secrets and Official Secrets acts—which usually stop such cases in courts very early, given that she has not taken her case to the UK Investigatory Tribunal for classified matters but a regular court in the UK, her court case is a fraudulent artifact, for show, merely for use in the live action role play she appears to be a part of. Others have expressed to me that her court case may be a way to set precedent and prevent others with clear evidence from getting a hearing in court.
I do think everyone who is targeted with stealth technology needs to write a detailed affidavit–and while people are interested in building cases to take the Intelligence agencies to court, and dreaming of class-actions, I myself have been learning about the fraudulence of the judicial system, the recalcitrance of the military and Intelligence agencies (to the point of murder) in maintaining classified covers and extreme deception, and am exploring other definitive ways of exposing and terminating these assaultive crimes against humanity – but I would not advise anyone to hand their affidavits over to a group of Techno Gatekeepers with Intelligence and military roots: whose technical credentials and output regarding targeting technologies is non-existent, who have disdained from communication with and interviewing with a science-and-tech truth-journalist publishing extensively on targeting, who are instead supporting libel-practicing charlatans, poseurs, saboteurs, who have rejected the data from numerous victims on a past survey, and yet who are now clearly engaged again in supporting data collection—for handover to whom in which covert agency, and for what purpose—of further tabulating effects of these deadly, inhumane tech?–one can only speculate on.
All of it bodes ill, and does not offer hope for the saving of lives of present-day targets or future generations (when classified military/Intelligence actions against citizens are kept concealed, the lives and health of those citizens—and everyone else’s by extension—are in grave danger). Currently it seems classified torture or stealth-mode torture – which is what this is, essentially – is being protected, camouflaged, concealed by these elaborate bogus-courtcase-support operations by two NSA whistleblowers whose word—based on their actions and inactions–I can no longer trust.
I also note that Katherine Horton apparently recently disappeared from public view on her channel where she had been running her own show after Techno Crime Fighters Forum closed, without a word to her viewers (causing much anxiety amongst them, to the point of people openly, online, asking me—subject of her attacks—what had happened to her!), yet surfaced in others’ videos recently publishing notice of her having “been declared legally incompetent,” and hiring a public relations firm to clean up and defend her public image – which she herself has successfully sullied. In these videos and documentation by others she has distinguished herself most notably for apparently claiming a peculiar “right to be forgotten,” presumably in an attempt to reframe herself and her public image in a new light succeeding the many ways in which her execrable lies and smear operations in addition to other infiltration actions have recently been exposed, including by the Joint Statement.
There is no clarity, no authenticity, no truth, no integrity, no disclosure—but much obfuscation–in this group; I would not trust them, nor rely on them to fully expose targeting or procure justice.
This is my opinion, I have been made aware others share it. I am publishing it to surface some of the disquietude others have mentioned to me, just as much as to express my thoughts on the matter—and to make this a matter for open public discussion. This seems to be a classic Limited Hangout or Controlled Opposition scenario.
Rely on yourself to fully expose targeting crimes and obtain redress, would be my advice. High-flying NSA whistleblowers who don’t answer emails or complete survey-projects or speak openly of these crimes on all media are not going to do it. Bill Binney and Kirk Wiebe have had ample opportunity to publish the truth about the reportage many who are targeted have meticulously presented to them over the past few years, as they have the stature and credentials as NSA whistleblowers to command mainstream media attention, but they have not done so. Mainstream media and the Intelligence agencies in any case are intimately tied to each other, we know now, through much investigative excavation including by Americans for Innovation and German journalist Udo Ulfkotte’s disclosures in recent times.
The limited reveal Bill Binney offered on the Chris Hedges show this April seems to be in line with that paradigm; if Chris Hedges himself were a real journalist, he would have (much earlier) spoken to and highlighted the testimonial of targets, the whistleblowing of military scientists, and acknowledged the historic work of journalism of Dr. Nick Begich, Mark Rich, Dr. Rauni Kilde, myself, others. In his long silence, he reveals himself to be merely one of a whole train of well-known journalists, including those who purport to cover surveillance matters and technologies, who has been schooled to ignore the real reports of targets and the real work of journalists (such as myself and others wrongfully consigned to the “fringes” and “conspiracy theory” margins such as Miles Johnston, Alfred Webre, Kerry Cassidy) of exposing the true horrors of surveillance targeting with bio weapons, neuro weapons, nano weapons, and Psy Ops weapons being used widely on world populations today by layers of US/Five Eyes/ NATO/UN government, military, and Intelligence barbarism.
If people hadn’t noticed, the noose of totalitarianism is striving currently with the COVID-19 Plandemic Scam to tighten around the necks of every human on the planet, and it is increasingly vital for every human on the planet to know exactly what kind of supremely evil technology is being used against us all, and against some of us in extreme measure—so these actions and technologies can be halted in their tracks.
There is no doubt whole governments, whole Intelligence agencies, whole departments of the military, “healthcare”–read traitorous medical institutions who contract callously with Military/Intelligence to use, abuse, traumatize and persecute targets with the New Technologies of Torture which comprise neuro/DEW targeting—academic, and weapons industries will be intimately exposed as CRIMINALS if the whole truth about these targeting crimes is exposed – and that I think is the reason so many limited-reveal and palliative operations have been set in place around targets, including this one, to which Bill and Kirk are lending their names and credentials, but not, sadly, their credibility, in aligning with proven smear artists and liars such as Katherine Horton and Karen Stewart (not an idle statement, please see all articles posted on these two, with screenshot evidence of their libel and lies against me).
None of the (military/academic/Intelligence/law enforcement/private) groups and individuals involved in these Crimes Against Humanity should be protected, in my view, nor the classified projects, nor the classified weaponry being used on targets. We do not need TechnoGatekeepers but an unstoppable stream of voices and testimonials from all who experience or know of these crimes; the old structures of criminal Intelligence, law enforcement, and military agencies practicing crime in secret with stealth tech need to be torn down.
Humanity needs openness, truth, transparency – not limited-reveals so classified crime can continue and Remote Access Human Weapons and Psy Ops persist. Industries, agencies, governments, and militaries creative of and dependent on the barbarically invasive, intrusive, persecutory remote-access, degradation, and control, today AI-driven, of human bodies and brains need to be torn down.
In the balance lies all human bodily integrity, neuro privacy, cognitive rights, neuro rights, DNA rights, basic human rights to breathe, live, and exist as individual and independent human beings—basic humanity, in other words, which is today being corralled for cyborging destruction and transhumanizing by Satanists in power who are striving to remake man in their own image, as brain-dead slaves and robots.
Limited-hangouts are not going to save humanity, and it is regrettable to see Bill Binney and Kirk Wiebe embody one. (Joining Edward Snowden, in fact, in this continuing saga of Deceiving the People: Put (20-70 years of) Bio-Hacking and Neuro-Hacking on ice, let’s all flail about raving about NSA email and phone intercepts instead until kingdom come.)
To me, the base fact that both these gentlemen blew me off so thoroughly, disdaining to acknowledge the surveillance-tech journalism along with the emails and several requests for interview, while choosing to appear on Katherine Horton’s channel instead to prop up her self-tarnished public image and her more-than-dubious UK court case, speaks volumes about the nervous, high-anxiety state the so-called “Intelligence Community” is clearly in, to be using these well-known NSA whistleblowers—now protecting DOD/NSA/CIA?–to limit the damage from full disclosure of these extreme Techno-Torture Crimes Against Humanity—which cannot be stopped, despite their efforts, is already here, in multiple ways, from a multitude of voices—not least from my own desktop–and will continue to starkly inform the world.
RELATED
Report #182: Galina Kurdina on Neurotargeting Activism; Betrayal, Slander of TI Activists by NSA WBs | Published May 17, 2020
Galina Kurdina: Government agents, provocateurs and slanderers in TI Community. NSA agent Karen Melton Stewart.
Round Table Podcast 10 at Ramola D Reports: Media Check-In with Andrew Devine
In an extended conversation last week covering his work to help free child abuse whistleblower and former social worker Carol Woods from a mental health facility, and anti-corruption and whistleblower activist John Paterson from same, in situations where both are being subjected to Mental-Health-Fraud–in positive medieval or KGB wise–indy-media Truth activist and journalist :Andrew: Devine reports that Carol Woods has been victimized and persecuted thus for 19 years, while John Paterson, a UK Navy veteran was quite recently kidnapped by the Navy himself, prior to which he has been alternately moved from mental health facilities to jails in confusion of jurisdiction and with an arbitrary designation of mental illness–all on wrongful arrest after reporting fraud, theft, pedophilia and money laundering among politicians to Sussex Police, BBC and other media.
In both cases, letters written to the CQC have fallen on deaf ears, with the CQC actually seemingly being on board with forced-medication, accepting the patently wrong “diagnoses” as clinical matters well-settled and beyond their purview–in a convenient abdication of responsibility, while protecting the unethical psychiatrists who conferred these wrongful diagnoses on whistleblowers who should be celebrated and rewarded for their courage and diligence in speaking out.
In both cases, in addition to whistleblowing on child abuse in the Care system, prominent politicians had been found out engaging in corruption and money-laundering, which perhaps explains the clamp-down here where criminals in power ensure that anyone who dares expose their crimes is massively retaliated against.
The cases of Carol Woods and John Paterson were previously covered here:
:Andrew reports that previous coverage that he and other indy media outlets provided online of Carol Woods’ wrongful captivity in psychiatry at Orchard Health led directly to her recent release (staff had mentioned Internet coverage)–which did not last long; her home was broken into and she was arrested again in a continuing pattern of persecution which has now lasted 19 years. It is for this reason, he emphasizes, that he seeks to continue highlighting her case and that of John Paterson and others, because silence and inattention causes disappearance and persecution–and seems to give inattentive bureaucrats carte blanche to continue their crimes.
Writing to the CQC has met with bland responses, and a recent letter received from them (posted toward end of post here) indicates their refusal to address the primary issue of wrongful clinical diagnosis–:Andrew read this letter out on-air.
THE CLAIM OF THE FACTS WITH THE CORRECT-SENTENCE-STRUCTURE-COMMUNICATION-PARSE-SYNTAX-GRAMMAR/QUANTUM-GRAMMAR-PERFORMANCE
Also significant, :Andrew notes, is the fact that he has been writing to the CQC as a living man, in Correct-Sentence-Structure-Parse-Syntax-Grammar, the “Quantum Grammar” invented by :Russell-Jay: Gould and :David-Wynne: Miller unveiling the underlying mathematical substrate of language and pursuing correctness in meaning and usage — but the CQC persists in ignoring his status and addressing him in legal fiction terms as “Mr.” thereby also ignoring the message of accountability and dissection of language fraud –the fictitious conveyance of language –which parse-syntax-grammar brings.
The address also suggests an insistence by the UK government on returning the matter to legal-fiction space, where living men and women are excluded, and statutory laws related to the CQC corporation are held against the strawmen/legal fictions of the all-caps-names from birth-certificate-fraud–even by which yardstick, “deprivation of rights under color of law” has occurred here, with perfectly sane people being condemned as mentally ill, just because they have whistleblown on major governmental and private-sector crime.
Baron David Ward Affidavit Establishes Liberty For All
Of special note in this conversation is the fact that :Andrew: Devine points out that the Coronavirus Act passed by the UK Parliament in a flurry of days is not legal and not lawful, since none of the people (population of UK) to whom the Act purports to apply signed the Bill, with a wet-ink signature. Those who did sign it are MPs, to whom alone the Act, or any other statutory law applies.
There is in fact no law except by consent, and this was given the Royal Assent in an affidavit by Baron David Ward found at this website.
This unrebutted affidavit–which therefore spells out the truth–is also downloadable here (clicking on this link downloads it to your PC): Affidavit of Baron David Ward
We Need to All Be Standing Up With Claims-Of-The-Life
The best way forward, :Andrew says, is for people to wake up, declare themselves alive with a live-life-claim, and to stand in truth and own their lives and self. “We need the people to realize it and stand up and own it, stand up and own yourself, own who you are, know who you are, know yourself, and that’s–let’s clean up what we’ve got, we’ve let these people get away with this far too long. Then it’s time we cleaned up and it’s alternative is either we do it now or–you know they’re not gonna–the fiction will never reclaim the world, will never remove itself, we need to be the ones that stand up and does it, we need to do it.”
To support and supplement :Andrew’s letters to MPs, Councillors, and the CQC, please send your own letters demanding the release of Carol Woods and John Paterson who are being unlawfully and illegally held on bogus charges of mental illness and jailed without charge or trial.
Two of :Andrew’s Letters below, with answers from the CQC.
Letters from :Andrew: Devine Sent to CQC, Police, MPs
Letters, sent widely to MPs and the CQC by :Andrew: Devine are posted below.
mail <mail@ppo.gov.uk>, enquiries <enquiries@policeconduct.gov.uk>, ah <ah@stephenrimmer.com>, Andy 2054 <Andy.Grimwood@surrey.pnn.police.uk>, westminster.ij <westminster.ij@justice.gov.uk>, Prime Minister MP Rt HonBoris Johnson <boris.johnson.mp@parliament.uk>, president <president@whitehouse.gov>, Privy Counsellor + Chingford and WoodfordGreen MP <Iain.duncansmith.mp@parliament.uk>, Independent Police Conduct Authority <case.resolution@ipca.govt.nz>, Alan.Pughsley <Alan.Pughsley@kent.pnn.police.uk>, Adrian.Leppard <Adrian.Leppard@cityoflondon.pnn.police.uk>, SGT <sgtreport@gmail.com>, Stephen.Kavanagh <Stephen.Kavanagh@essex.pnn.police.uk>, House of Commons Speaker Rt Hon Sir Lindsay Hoyle <Lindsay.hoyle.mp@parliament.uk>, forthedirector <forthedirector@outlook.com>, gbloom <gbloom@outlook.com>, Attorney General Rt Hon Geoffrey Cox <coxg@parliament.uk>, Attorney General Representative + Government Lawyer <Alice.Haynes@governmentlegal.gov.uk>, Free The Hampstead 2 <freethehampstead2@gmail.com>, Antonio Sergio Ismael <aismael@sorocaba.sp.gov.br>, DPA <DPA@lancashirecare.nhs.uk>, mentalhealthmatters <mentalhealthmatters@lancashirecare.nhs.uk>, Complaints <Complaints@cqc.org.uk>, HQ – Professional Standards <HQ-ProfessionalStandards@lancashire.pnn.police.uk>, england.ce <england.ce@nhs.net>, Katie.Latham <Katie.Latham@met.police.uk>
Sent
Saturday, May 9, 2020 at 6:12 AM
Encrypted
No
Signed
No
:PRIVATE & CONFIDENTIAL:
C.S.S.C.P.S.G.-P.-Flag of this EMAIL-VENUE-PERFORMANCE.
:SYNTAX-KEY.
:~0-:Conjunction.
:~1-:Adverb[sic].
:~2-:Verb.
:~3-:Adjective[sic].
:~4-:Pronoun[sic].
:~5-:Positional.
:~6-:Lodial.
:~7-:Fact.
:~8-:Past-Tense.
:~9-:Future-Tense.
:~0- FOR THIS CLAIMANT’S-SENSATION OF THE COGNITION IS WITH THE CLAIM OF THE FACTS WITH THE CORRECT-SENTENCE-STRUCTURE-COMMUNICATION-PARSE-SYNTAX-GRAMMAR/QUANTUM-GRAMMAR-PERFORMANCE AND RULE-ŒN/1, RULE-ÆQUAL-VOLITION BY THIS CLAIMANT. :~1- FOR THE ŒTI-CLAIM OF THE BRACKETS[and italics, parenthesis, quotations] IS WITH THE FUNCTION OF THE COMMUNICATION WITH THE EASE OF THE CONVEYANCE WITH THE FRAME OF THE [fiction-english-babble]LANGUAGE WITH THIS CONSIDERATION BY THIS CLAIMANT.
:Greet: Ian: Trenholm,: Moustafa: Saoud,:Peter: Wyman,: Robert: Buckland,: Kate: Terroni,: Keeley: Lewandowski/:Men/Women-Ployees of the C.Q.C’s National Complaints Team and All those in Public Office in this Email Cc list.
[“ We are aware of the multiple wrongs being committed and for the clarity We will use Correct Sentence Structure Communication Parse Syntax Gramma Language and plain English for the ease of the understanding. We have asked many questions which you have consistently dishonoured by failing to answer and are breaching your official/moral duty by failing to give closure or remedy.
:~ 1: We: Andrew: Devine,: John-Alexander: Paterson,: Carol: Woods and All other whistle-blowers are Men/Women(Facts) and this We have pointed out many times, yet you still write us as the Fictitious name branding Us with titles “Mr or Ms etc.”, For the record that is a crime: (18 U.S. Code §1342. Fictitious or address and/or 18 U.S. Code §100. Statements or entries generally), kindly correct yourselves.
:~ 2: We have given yourselves the affidavit of the Baron David Ward’s multiple times asking for closure and that Affidavit is in Fact the Truth in Law, which you all fail to give closure and wilfully ignore the request it requires closure. The Affidavit and Statement attached below proves void-ab-inititio any lawful or Legal enforcement of any legislated Act or Statute without the consent and consent is equal to a wet ink Autograph(Signature), the revocation of power of attorney of the Victims: Carol: Woods and: John-Alexander: Paterson you have been provided with proves the fact: Carol: Woods and: John-Alexander: Paterson who have never wilfully given consent and that anything that was coerced in null and void, on that fact alone this proves Malfeasance and/or Nonfeasance by the perpetrators in public office and your complicity in allowing the continuance of the wrongs.
:Baron David Ward’s Affidavit and Statement:
:~ 3: We have multiple times requested the acknowledgement and confirmation that: Ian: Trenholm has had visual sensation of the email conveyance(s) content which you still wilfully ignore which would void his claim of plausible deniability, we kindly request this confirmation again.
:~ 4: We are aware that you may not be cognitive of the importance of giving the finite meaning and cipher for the written word, or Correct-Sentence-Structure-Communication-Parse-Syntax-Quantum-Grammar-Language these facts are vital for the cognition of the stoping and correcting wrongs. For the clarity and help We require All Public Servants contact: Russell-Jay: Gould who will clear this matter up and provide the solutions for this Problem, as We don’t want anything other than what is correct and factual. Kindly contact: Russell-Jay: Gould for the closure on the correct language performance and why you are wrong for failing multiple times for failing to provide a cipher to the written words you send Us, even though you have been asked multiple times to provide those details.
:~ 4: We have shown the fact that there has never been a Lawful/Legal Section 135 Warrant presented, shown or given for the lawful/legal taking of: Carol: Woods, We have shown the emails from the Court alleged to have created the warrant and that the alleged Court did not issue any warrant for the Lawful/Legal Taking of: Carol: Woods therefore proving the fraud and Kidnap, which void-ab-inititio any authority of: Carol: Woods detention and forcing of the psychotic dugs, You have all been made aware of this fact so kindly give the closure for the failure to provide the remedy of the stop and correct this wrong.
:~ 5: We would like closure on what you have stated, We quote: “When a person is being treated/detained under the Mental Health Act (MHA) certain care and treatment can be given without a person’s consent and is considered lawful under the MHA Code of Practice.” End quote: Why would you wilfully ignore the Fact that when a fraud has been committed example: NO WARRANT any treatment/detention is unlawful and illegal, therefore the Treatment/Detention are crimes being committed after the original crime of the kidnap with the use of a Fraudulent/Fictitious warrant. Kindly give closure for the record.
:~ 6: We Kindly ask you to start taking these claims serious as this matter is not going away without the correct result/remedy and We don’t wish to see innocent Public Servant employees in prison because they couldn’t understand the facts of the matter, and any further ignoring the questions and requests within our email conveyances will end in our concern of the outcome, be that a fine or imprison for those complicit in allowing these crimes to continue any further.
:~ 7: We would also for the record note that the Whistle-Blowers you are failing to provide remedy for have forensic evidence/proof of very serious/horrendous crimes on Corrupt MP’s, Heads of Councils, Judges, Police, Freemasons etc. that could and more than likely are coercing/influencing those freemasons within the public office positions and more than likely the reason to why you are all failing to provide remedy for the Whistle-Blowers. We urge you all to think wisely as your actions are also conspiring to aid in the cover up of the crimes the Whistle-Blowers are blowing the whistle on.”]
FOR THE COGNITION/KNOWLEDGE OF THE FACTS(TRUTH) IS WITH THE PARAMOUNT-(RE)QUIREMENT OF THE NECESSARY-CONDITION OF THE WISDOM-PERFORMANCE(Being Correct) WITH THE HONOURABLE/RIGHTEOUS-DUTY BY ALL MEN/WOMEN/PUBLIC-SERVANT-(EM)PLOYEES.
FOR THE CORRECT-PERFORMANCE-CLAIM OF THE WISDOM IS WITH THE FULL-COGNITION AND COMPREHENSION OF THE COMPLETE-FACT(S) WITH THE CORRECT-DUTY-PERFORMANCE OF THE DEED AND FEAT(Action) WITH THE VERACIOUS-VOLITION/PERFORMANCE AND HONOURABLE-DUTY BY ALL MEN/WOMEN/PUBLIC-SERVANT-(EM)PLOYEE-CLAIMANT(S).
FOR THIS CLAIMANT’S-PENALTY-CLAIM OF THE CORRECT-PERFORMANCE-FAILURE/MALFEASANCE/NONFEASANCE IS WITH THE EMAIL-JOURNAL-LOG OF THE LAWFUL/LEGAL-DUTY-BREACHES AND STOP-AND-CORRECT-WRONG-FAILURE(S) AND CORRECT-LANGUAGE-PERFORMANCE-FAILURE(S) OF THE MEN/WOMEN-(PUBLIC-OFFICE-(EM)PLOYEE(S)) WITH THE WILFUL-IGNORANCE AND DISPARAGE OF THE FACTUAL-EMAIL-CONVEYANCE(S)-FACTUAL-CONTENT WITH THE HONOURABLE-DUTY BY AN: Andrew: Devine.
FOR THIS CLAIMANT’S-QUEST OF THE HELP/AID IS WITH THE CORRECT-PERFORMANCE OF THE LAWFUL/LEGAL-DUTIES WITH THE CORRECT-SOLUTION/REMEDY-PERFORMANCE OF THE MEN/WOMEN-(PUBLIC-OFFICE-(EM)PLOYEE(S)) WITH THE RIGHTEOUS/HONOURABLE-DUTY BY THIS CLAIMANT-:Andrew: Devine.
FOR THE COGNITION/KNOWLEDGE OF THE LAWS IS WITH THE COPY/PASTE OF THE CODE(S)-BELOW WITH HUMBLE-DUTY BY THIS CLAIMANT.
18 U.S. Code § 1001.Statements or entries generally
(a)Except as otherwise provided in this section, whoever, in any matter within the jurisdiction of the executive, legislative, or judicial branch of the Government of the United States, knowingly and willfully—
(1)
falsifies, conceals, or covers up by any trick, scheme, or device a material fact;
(2)
makes any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or representation; or
(3)
makes or uses any false writing or document knowing the same to contain any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or entry;
shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 5 years or, if the offense involves international or domestic terrorism (as defined in section 2331), imprisoned not more than 8 years, or both. If the matter relates to an offense under chapter 109A, 109B, 110, or 117, or section 1591, then the term of imprisonment imposed under this section shall be not more than 8 years.
(b)
Subsection (a) does not apply to a party to a judicial proceeding, or that party’s counsel, for statements, representations, writings or documents submitted by such party or counsel to a judge or magistrate in that proceeding.
(c)With respect to any matter within the jurisdiction of the legislative branch, subsection (a) shall apply only to—
(1)
administrative matters, including a claim for payment, a matter related to the procurement of property or services, personnel or employment practices, or support services, or a document required by law, rule, or regulation to be submitted to the Congress or any office or officer within the legislative branch; or
(2)
any investigation or review, conducted pursuant to the authority of any committee, subcommittee, commission or office of the Congress, consistent with applicable rules of the House or Senate.
Whoever, for the purpose of conducting, promoting, or carrying on by means of the Postal Service, any scheme or device mentioned in section 1341 of this title or any other unlawful business, uses or assumes, or requests to be addressed by, any fictitious, false, or assumed title, name, or address or name other than his own proper name, or takes or receives from any post office or authorized depository of mail matter, any letter, postal card, package, or other mail matter addressed to any such fictitious, false, or assumed title, name, or address, or name other than his own proper name, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.
Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or to different punishments, pains, or penalties, on account of such person being an alien, or by reason of his color, or race, than are prescribed for the punishment of citizens, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if bodily injury results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.
Every person who, having knowledge that any of the wrongs conspired to be done, and mentioned in section 1985 of this title, are about to be committed, and having power to prevent or aid in preventing the commission of the same, neglects or refuses so to do, if such wrongful act be committed, shall be liable to the party injured, or his legal representatives, for all damages caused by such wrongful act, which such person by reasonable diligence could have prevented; and such damages may be recovered in an action on the case; and any number of persons guilty of such wrongful neglect or refusal may be joined as defendants in the action; and if the death of any party be caused by any such wrongful act and neglect, the legal representatives of the deceased shall have such action therefor, and may recover not exceeding $5,000 damages therein, for the benefit of the widow of the deceased, if there be one, and if there be no widow, then for the benefit of the next of kin of the deceased. But no action under the provisions of this section shall be sustained which is not commenced within one year after the cause of action has accrued.
(R.S. § 1981.)
: Andrew: Devine.
Copy-Right/Copy-Claim.
07495 409168.
On 6 May 2020, at 1:30 PM, MHA Enquiries <MHAEnquiries@cqc.org.uk> wrote:
Dear Mr Devine I am writing to you in response to the number of emails you have sent to the Care Quality Commission (CQC), including those sent for the attention of Ian Trenholm, Chief Executive and Peter Wyman, Chair in relation to concerns regarding individuals who are currently receiving treatment under the Mental Health Act (MHA). Ms Carol Woods I understand from your correspondence that it is your belief that the injections currently being administered to Ms Woods should be stopped and that she was kidnapped and kept against her will and treatment given to her that she did not consent to or require. You have also stated that those responsible should be brought to justice and recompense be awarded. Mr John-Alexander Paterson. You have also expressed your view that Mr Paterson was kidnapped, incarcerated that medical documents were falsified and that like Ms Woods, many of his rights were breached. In both cases you have stated that these individuals were both whistle blowers and the actions that followed towards them were as a result of the information that they shared. When a person is being treated/detained under the Mental Health Act (MHA) certain care and treatment can be given without a person’s consent and is considered lawful under the MHA Code of Practice. It has been explained in previous correspondence that our MHA complaints powers do not extend to providing a clinical review of the decisions to detain a person under the MHA, this would also exclude decisions around diagnosis and medication. This being the case I am sorry that we are unable to take forward your concerns as a MHA complaint. Judging by your perseverance to date in raising these matters I can see that you may not adhere to a request to no longer contact us regarding these issues, therefore I should make you aware that the CQC will not necessarily acknowledge receipt or reply to future correspondence. It has also come to my notice that we have received contact from other individuals who are part of your campaign. I would appreciate it if you could make them aware of our position as this will not alter in relation to issues around clinical decisions, whoever the patient may be and failure to receive a response may only cause them disappointment.
In the event that you remain unhappy with the actions of CQC you can refer your concerns to the Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman, for details on how to make a complaint, please visit their website atwww.ombudsman.org.uk.
Yours sincerely Mental Health Act Complaints Team
Re: URGENT ATTENTION DO NOT IGNORE: WRONGS REQUIRE STOPPING AND CORRECTING: NCT ENQ1-8815195163 Care Quality Commission
mail <mail@ppo.gov.uk>, enquiries <enquiries@policeconduct.gov.uk>, ah <ah@stephenrimmer.com>, Andy 2054 <Andy.Grimwood@surrey.pnn.police.uk>, westminster.ij <westminster.ij@justice.gov.uk>, Prime Minister MP Rt HonBoris Johnson <boris.johnson.mp@parliament.uk>, president <president@whitehouse.gov>, Privy Counsellor + Chingford and WoodfordGreen MP <Iain.duncansmith.mp@parliament.uk>, Independent Police Conduct Authority <case.resolution@ipca.govt.nz>, Alan.Pughsley <Alan.Pughsley@kent.pnn.police.uk>, Adrian.Leppard <Adrian.Leppard@cityoflondon.pnn.police.uk>, SGT <sgtreport@gmail.com>, Stephen.Kavanagh <Stephen.Kavanagh@essex.pnn.police.uk>, House of Commons Speaker Rt Hon Sir Lindsay Hoyle <Lindsay.hoyle.mp@parliament.uk>, forthedirector <forthedirector@outlook.com>, gbloom <gbloom@outlook.com>, Attorney General Rt Hon Geoffrey Cox <coxg@parliament.uk>, Attorney General Representative + Government Lawyer <Alice.Haynes@governmentlegal.gov.uk>, Free The Hampstead 2 <freethehampstead2@gmail.com>, Antonio Sergio Ismael <aismael@sorocaba.sp.gov.br>, DPA <DPA@lancashirecare.nhs.uk>, mentalhealthmatters <mentalhealthmatters@lancashirecare.nhs.uk>, Complaints <Complaints@cqc.org.uk>, HQ – Professional Standards <HQ-ProfessionalStandards@lancashire.pnn.police.uk>, england.ce <england.ce@nhs.net>, Katie.Latham <Katie.Latham@met.police.uk>
Sent
Saturday, May 9, 2020 at 6:11 AM
Encrypted
No
Signed
No
:PRIVATE & CONFIDENTIAL:
C.S.S.C.P.S.G.-P.-Flag of this EMAIL-VENUE-PERFORMANCE.
:SYNTAX-KEY.
:~0-:Conjunction.
:~1-:Adverb[sic].
:~2-:Verb.
:~3-:Adjective[sic].
:~4-:Pronoun[sic].
:~5-:Positional.
:~6-:Lodial.
:~7-:Fact.
:~8-:Past-Tense.
:~9-:Future-Tense.
:~0- FOR THIS CLAIMANT’S-SENSATION OF THE COGNITION IS WITH THE CLAIM OF THE FACTS WITH THE CORRECT-SENTENCE-STRUCTURE-COMMUNICATION-PARSE-SYNTAX-GRAMMAR/QUANTUM-GRAMMAR-PERFORMANCE AND RULE-ŒN/1, RULE-ÆQUAL-VOLITION BY THIS CLAIMANT. :~1- FOR THE ŒTI-CLAIM OF THE BRACKETS[and italics, parenthesis, quotations] IS WITH THE FUNCTION OF THE COMMUNICATION WITH THE EASE OF THE CONVEYANCE WITH THE FRAME OF THE [fiction-english-babble]LANGUAGE WITH THIS CONSIDERATION BY THIS CLAIMANT.
:Greet: Ian: Trenholm,: Moustafa: Saoud,: Robert: Buckland,: Peter: Wyman,: Kate: Terroni,: Keeley: Lewandowski/:Men/Women-Ployees of the C.Q.C’s National Complaints Team and All those in Public Office in this Email Cc list.
[“ We are aware of the multiple wrongs being committed and for the clarity We will use Correct Sentence Structure Communication Parse Syntax Gramma Language and plain English for the ease of the understanding. We have asked many questions which you have consistently dishonoured by failing to answer and are breaching your official/moral duty by failing to give closure or remedy.
:~ 1: We: Andrew: Devine,: John-Alexander: Paterson,: Carol: Woods and All other whistle-blowers are Men/Women(Facts) and this We have pointed out many times, yet you still write us as the Fictitious name branding Us with titles “Mr or Ms etc.”, For the record that is a crime: (18 U.S. Code §1342. Fictitious or address and/or 18 U.S. Code §100. Statements or entries generally), kindly correct yourselves.
:~ 2: We have given yourselves the affidavit of the Baron David Ward’s multiple times asking for closure and that Affidavit is in Fact the Truth in Law, which you all fail to give closure and wilfully ignore the request it requires closure. The Affidavit and Statement attached below proves void-ab-inititio any lawful or Legal enforcement of any legislated Act or Statute without the consent and consent is equal to a wet ink Autograph(Signature), the revocation of power of attorney of the Victims: Carol: Woods and: John-Alexander: Paterson you have been provided with proves the fact: Carol: Woods and: John-Alexander: Paterson who have never wilfully given consent and that anything that was coerced in null and void, on that fact alone this proves Malfeasance and/or Nonfeasance by the perpetrators in public office and your complicity in allowing the continuance of the wrongs.
:Baron David Ward’s Affidavit and Statement:
:~ 3: We have multiple times requested the acknowledgement and confirmation that: Ian: Trenholm has had visual sensation of the email conveyance(s) content which you still wilfully ignore which would void his claim of plausible deniability, we kindly request this confirmation again.
:~ 4: We are aware that you may not be cognitive of the importance of giving the finite meaning and cipher for the written word, or Correct-Sentence-Structure-Communication-Parse-Syntax-Quantum-Grammar-Language these facts are vital for the cognition of the stoping and correcting wrongs. For the clarity and help We require All Public Servants contact: Russell-Jay: Gould who will clear this matter up and provide the solutions for this Problem, as We don’t want anything other than what is correct and factual. Kindly contact: Russell-Jay: Gould for the closure on the correct language performance and why you are wrong for failing multiple times for failing to provide a cipher to the written words you send Us, even though you have been asked multiple times to provide those details.
:~ 4: We have shown the fact that there has never been a Lawful/Legal Section 135 Warrant presented, shown or given for the lawful/legal taking of: Carol: Woods, We have shown the emails from the Court alleged to have created the warrant and that the alleged Court did not issue any warrant for the Lawful/Legal Taking of: Carol: Woods therefore proving the fraud and Kidnap, which void-ab-inititio any authority of: Carol: Woods detention and forcing of the psychotic dugs, You have all been made aware of this fact so kindly give the closure for the failure to provide the remedy of the stop and correct this wrong.
:~ 5: We would like closure on what you have stated, We quote: “When a person is being treated/detained under the Mental Health Act (MHA) certain care and treatment can be given without a person’s consent and is considered lawful under the MHA Code of Practice.” End quote: Why would you wilfully ignore the Fact that when a fraud has been committed example: NO WARRANT any treatment/detention is unlawful and illegal, therefore the Treatment/Detention are crimes being committed after the original crime of the kidnap with the use of a Fraudulent/Fictitious warrant. Kindly give closure for the record.
:~ 6: We Kindly ask you to start taking these claims serious as this matter is not going away without the correct result/remedy and We don’t wish to see innocent Public Servant employees in prison because they couldn’t understand the facts of the matter, and any further ignoring the questions and requests within our email conveyances will end in our concern of the outcome, be that a fine or imprison for those complicit in allowing these crimes to continue any further.
:~ 7: We would also for the record note that the Whistle-Blowers you are failing to provide remedy for have forensic evidence/proof of very serious/horrendous crimes on Corrupt MP’s, Heads of Councils, Judges, Police, Freemasons etc. that could and more than likely are coercing/influencing those freemasons within the public office positions and more than likely the reason to why you are all failing to provide remedy for the Whistle-Blowers. We urge you all to think wisely as your actions are also conspiring to aid in the cover up of the crimes the Whistle-Blowers are blowing the whistle on.”]
FOR THE COGNITION/KNOWLEDGE OF THE FACTS(TRUTH) IS WITH THE PARAMOUNT-(RE)QUIREMENT OF THE NECESSARY-CONDITION OF THE WISDOM-PERFORMANCE(Being Correct) WITH THE HONOURABLE/RIGHTEOUS-DUTY BY ALL MEN/WOMEN/PUBLIC-SERVANT-(EM)PLOYEES.
FOR THE CORRECT-PERFORMANCE-CLAIM OF THE WISDOM IS WITH THE FULL-COGNITION AND COMPREHENSION OF THE COMPLETE-FACT(S) WITH THE CORRECT-DUTY-PERFORMANCE OF THE DEED AND FEAT(Action) WITH THE VERACIOUS-VOLITION/PERFORMANCE AND HONOURABLE-DUTY BY ALL MEN/WOMEN/PUBLIC-SERVANT-(EM)PLOYEE-CLAIMANT(S).
FOR THIS CLAIMANT’S-PENALTY-CLAIM OF THE CORRECT-PERFORMANCE-FAILURE/MALFEASANCE/NONFEASANCE IS WITH THE EMAIL-JOURNAL-LOG OF THE LAWFUL/LEGAL-DUTY-BREACHES AND STOP-AND-CORRECT-WRONG-FAILURE(S) AND CORRECT-LANGUAGE-PERFORMANCE-FAILURE(S) OF THE MEN/WOMEN-(PUBLIC-OFFICE-(EM)PLOYEE(S)) WITH THE WILFUL-IGNORANCE AND DISPARAGE OF THE FACTUAL-EMAIL-CONVEYANCE(S)-FACTUAL-CONTENT WITH THE HONOURABLE-DUTY BY AN: Andrew: Devine.
FOR THIS CLAIMANT’S-QUEST OF THE HELP/AID IS WITH THE CORRECT-PERFORMANCE OF THE LAWFUL/LEGAL-DUTIES WITH THE CORRECT-SOLUTION/REMEDY-PERFORMANCE OF THE MEN/WOMEN-(PUBLIC-OFFICE-(EM)PLOYEE(S)) WITH THE RIGHTEOUS/HONOURABLE-DUTY BY THIS CLAIMANT-:Andrew: Devine.
FOR THE COGNITION/KNOWLEDGE OF THE LAWS IS WITH THE COPY/PASTE OF THE CODE(S)-BELOW WITH HUMBLE-DUTY BY THIS CLAIMANT.
18 U.S. Code § 1001.Statements or entries generally
(a)Except as otherwise provided in this section, whoever, in any matter within the jurisdiction of the executive, legislative, or judicial branch of the Government of the United States, knowingly and willfully—
(1)
falsifies, conceals, or covers up by any trick, scheme, or device a material fact;
(2)
makes any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or representation; or
(3)
makes or uses any false writing or document knowing the same to contain any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or entry;
shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 5 years or, if the offense involves international or domestic terrorism (as defined in section 2331), imprisoned not more than 8 years, or both. If the matter relates to an offense under chapter 109A, 109B, 110, or 117, or section 1591, then the term of imprisonment imposed under this section shall be not more than 8 years.
(b)
Subsection (a) does not apply to a party to a judicial proceeding, or that party’s counsel, for statements, representations, writings or documents submitted by such party or counsel to a judge or magistrate in that proceeding.
(c)With respect to any matter within the jurisdiction of the legislative branch, subsection (a) shall apply only to—
(1)
administrative matters, including a claim for payment, a matter related to the procurement of property or services, personnel or employment practices, or support services, or a document required by law, rule, or regulation to be submitted to the Congress or any office or officer within the legislative branch; or
(2)
any investigation or review, conducted pursuant to the authority of any committee, subcommittee, commission or office of the Congress, consistent with applicable rules of the House or Senate.
Whoever, for the purpose of conducting, promoting, or carrying on by means of the Postal Service, any scheme or device mentioned in section 1341 of this title or any other unlawful business, uses or assumes, or requests to be addressed by, any fictitious, false, or assumed title, name, or address or name other than his own proper name, or takes or receives from any post office or authorized depository of mail matter, any letter, postal card, package, or other mail matter addressed to any such fictitious, false, or assumed title, name, or address, or name other than his own proper name, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.
Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or to different punishments, pains, or penalties, on account of such person being an alien, or by reason of his color, or race, than are prescribed for the punishment of citizens, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if bodily injury results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.
Every person who, having knowledge that any of the wrongs conspired to be done, and mentioned in section 1985 of this title, are about to be committed, and having power to prevent or aid in preventing the commission of the same, neglects or refuses so to do, if such wrongful act be committed, shall be liable to the party injured, or his legal representatives, for all damages caused by such wrongful act, which such person by reasonable diligence could have prevented;
and such damages may be recovered in an action on the case; and any number of persons guilty of such wrongful neglect or refusal may be joined as defendants in the action; and if the death of any party be caused by any such wrongful act and neglect, the legal representatives of the deceased shall have such action therefor, and may recover not exceeding $5,000 damages therein, for the benefit of the widow of the deceased, if there be one, and if there be no widow, then for the benefit of the next of kin of the deceased.
But no action under the provisions of this section shall be sustained which is not commenced within one year after the cause of action has accrued.
(R.S. § 1981.)
: Andrew: Devine.
Copy-Right/Copy-Claim.
07495 409168.
On 6 May 2020, at 1:30 PM, MHA Enquiries <MHAEnquiries@cqc.org.uk> wrote:
Dear Mr Devine
I am writing to you in response to the number of emails you have sent to the Care Quality Commission (CQC), including those sent for the attention of Ian Trenholm, Chief Executive and Peter Wyman, Chair in relation to concerns regarding individuals who are currently receiving treatment under the Mental Health Act (MHA).
Ms Carol Woods
I understand from your correspondence that it is your belief that the injections currently being administered to Ms Woods should be stopped and that she was kidnapped and kept against her will and treatment given to her that she did not consent to or require. You have also stated that those responsible should be brought to justice and recompense be awarded.
Mr John-Alexander Paterson.
You have also expressed your view that Mr Paterson was kidnapped, incarcerated that medical documents were falsified and that like Ms Woods, many of his rights were breached.
In both cases you have stated that these individuals were both whistle blowers and the actions that followed towards them were as a result of the information that they shared.
When a person is being treated/detained under the Mental Health Act (MHA) certain care and treatment can be given without a person’s consent and is considered lawful under the MHA Code of Practice.
It has been explained in previous correspondence that our MHA complaints powers do not extend to providing a clinical review of the decisions to detain a person under the MHA, this would also exclude decisions around diagnosis and medication.
This being the case I am sorry that we are unable to take forward your concerns as a MHA complaint.
Judging by your perseverance to date in raising these matters I can see that you may not adhere to a request to no longer contact us regarding these issues, therefore I should make you aware that the CQC will not necessarily acknowledge receipt or reply to future correspondence.
It has also come to my notice that we have received contact from other individuals who are part of your campaign. I would appreciate it if you could make them aware of our position as this will not alter in relation to issues around clinical decisions, whoever the patient may be and failure to receive a response may only cause them disappointment.
In the event that you remain unhappy with the actions of CQC you can refer your concerns to the Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman, for details on how to make a complaint, please visit their website at
————– The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential to the intended recipient. They may not be disclosed to or used by or copied in any way by anyone other than the intended recipient. If this email is received in error, please notify us immediately by clicking “Reply” and delete the email. Please note that neither the Care Quality Commission nor the sender accepts any responsibility for viruses and it is your responsibility to scan or otherwise check this email and any attachments. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the sender specifically states them to be the views of the Care Quality Commission. Information on how the Care Quality Commission processes personal data is available here http://www.cqc.org.uk/about-us/our-policies/privacy-statement
To support and supplement :Andrew’s letters to MPs, Councillors, and the CQC, please send your own letters demanding the release of Carol Woods and John Paterson who are being unlawfully and illegally held on bogus charges of mental illness and jailed without charge or trial for years now.
Letters posted by permission of :Andrew: Devine.
Many thanks to :Andrew: Devine for his tireless work in speaking out and drawing attention and making demands and requests for the release of long-persecuted whistleblowers.
DHS Fusion Centers installed post 2001 in the wake of 9/11 with counter-terrorism aims in mind have failed the country absymally, it appears, according to a new aptly-titled report released in late March, 2020—just before all the COVID-19 Lockdowns hit & froze out this article too–from Open The Government “The Cost of Fear: Long-Cited Abuses Persist at U.S. Government-Funded Post -9/11 Fusion Centers” after a 6-month investigation of “freedom of information requests, court documents, grant records, interviews, and news reports.”
Not merely do the 80 fusion centers, created by state and major urban governments across the United States, “exhibit a persistent pattern of violating Americans’ privacy and civil liberties, producing unreliable and ineffective information, and resisting financial and other types of standard public accountability,” they have failed to follow the recommendations for reporting and accountability laid out by a 2012 investigation conducted by the US. Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations.
2012 Senate SubCommittee Investigation Had Earlier Determined Fusion Centers Produced Irrelevant Intelligence & DHS Had Lied to the Public about Fusion Center Successes
That 2012 Congressional investigation had already determined that little intelligence of counterterrorism use was obtained from the then-70 fusion centers, that secrecy and rejection of oversight had marked attempts to analyze fusion-center intelligence efforts, which were of “uneven quality” and often endangered civil liberties and Privacy Act protections, and that “DHS did not effectively monitor how federal funds provided to state and local fusion centers were used to strengthen federal counter-terrorism efforts.” DHS had then broadly estimated public funds between $289 million to $1.4 billion had been used from 2003 on, but could not provide adequate accountability for how these funds were spent in counter-terrorism.
“The investigation revealed staggering deficiencies, rampant secrecy, and violations of civil liberties. The subcommittee concluded that, in the decade following 9/11, fusion centers had failed to meet the objectives of their core mission of identifying terrorist plots and preventing acts of terrorism.
“The Subcommittee investigation found that the fusion centers often produced irrelevant, useless or inappropriate intelligence reporting to DHS, and many produced no intelligence reporting whatsoever.”
The report further found that DHS had lied to the public about fusion centers’ successes and, despite internal reviews that found serious flaws, had neglected to share information about such problems with Congress. Above all, the subcommittee concluded that fusion centers simply weren’t effective counterterrorism tools, recommended an overhaul of the program and called for Congress to “revisit the statutory basis for DHS support of fusion centers.”
Opacity in Reportage: Fusion Centers Do Not Provide Clear Program Descriptions
That was in 2012.
Now in 2020, The Cost of Fear reports that while DHS’s FEMA has allocated $1.14 billion via grant programs and President Trump has signed H.R. 504, the “DHS Field Engagement Accountability Act,” a 5-year plan to continue fusion center engagement with federal efforts, and clearly the scope of programs conducted by fusion centers has expanded—into disaster preparedness and public safety, with increased use of advanced, privacy-invasive technologies like facial recognition—Open the Government has found that fusion centers do not maintain clear, descriptive records of counter-terrorism programs funded either federally or through state means.
Curiously, in one case, close scrutiny of Illinois state funds to fusion centers revealed that neither the granting agency nor the receiving agency maintained descriptive program records:
“Open The Government used Illinois’s Freedom of Information Act to obtain years of grant records from the Illinois Emergency Management Agency (IEMA), a state-level agency similar to FEMA that disburses federal dollars to programs in the state, including fusion centers. But records of such transfers to local entities over five years showed that all basic description fields were blank. In addition, the local agencies receiving the funds also are not required to provide detailed descriptions.”
Fusion Centers in 2020 | Waste and Opaque Funding, The Cost of Fear
This does raise the question: what exactly were these funds transferred for, and what were they used for?
Were they perhaps used for unConstitutional and extrajudicial privacy-invasive, high-technology-using targeting, surveillance, and monitoring activities, as thousands of Americans have been reporting for two decades now, and as covered here earlier?
Privacy-Intrusions, Civil Rights Violations: Fusion Centers Monitor & Share Info on First-Amendment-Protected Activities
Emails, news reports, and court records obtained and examined by Open the Government reveal that certain Chicago plans for First-Amendment-protected protests and rallies, non-violent and legal, calling for the abolition of ICE, a DHS agency, were monitored on social media and email; that demonstrators at a protest rally in Memphis were pre-tracked on social media by Chicago Police for “chatter” after a police shooting, curiously, on a State Department intelligence directive, plans for a rally then quickly forwarded to DHS, New York. This covert tracking apparently went on for three months, before legal counsel was queried for advice.
The creation of inter-agency sharing by fusion centers, it turns out, was not marked by caution and vigilance; the Tennessee Fusion Center for instance was quick to share public social-media-monitored information with police departments, Tennessee DHS and FBI units citing, in July 2016, “credible threats to law enforcement” which they were obliged to note were non-specific in nature.
Were these “credible threats” in reality the mere expression of free speech, a Constitutionally-protected right—and not really “credible threats” at all? Were they taken out of context–and therefore being mis-attributed? Were they wrongfully used to “tar everyone with the same brush”?
Is no-one permitted to speak openly on social media of such things as police misbehavior/crime/brutality anymore—without being marked a threat?
“Yet the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Brandenburg v. Ohio that speech that has no nexus to an immediate threat to commit violence is protected by the First Amendment.”
Privacy and Civil Liberties Concerns, Case Study: Tennessee Fusion Center, The Cost of Fear…
Journalists too have been unduly scrutinized and worse. Manuel Duran, a Memphis journalist was arrested alongside protesters and placed in ICE deportation proceedings, compelled into 15 months of detention, although charges against him were dropped. In Boston, Dan Feidt, a writer for Unicorn Riot, who had covered the so-called “straight pride” parade in Boston in 2019, was visited by Boston police and FBI who began pumping him regarding upcoming protests, which Feidt interpreted as gathering intelligence and halted by refusing to engage. He reported that the detectives who visited him had repeated “they were primarily concerned about “keeping everyone safe,”
““Unaccountable joint police forces like the JTTF have a long history of involving themselves in political activity that has nothing to do with terrorism,” Feidt told OTG. “This is a substantial risk to the freedom of expression and the press, and is likely to create chilling effect that is far disproportionate to their core mission.”
Privacy and Civil Liberties Concerns, Case Study: Boston Regional Intelligence Center, The Cost of Fear…
Essentially, both in Memphis and in Boston, police and fusion centers had been tracking activists in person and online, monitoring their plans and activities, sharing information gleaned presumably from surveilling desktops and iPads and iPhones, with FBI and DHS—all of it unConstitutional, given that freedom of speech and freedom to assemble, rally, and protest are all First-Amendment rights.
Fusion Centers (like Police Departments) Use Invasive Facial Recognition & Other Surveillance Tech While Collecting Unreliable Intelligence
Invasive monitoring has been aided in the past two decades by a plethora of controversial surveillance technologies including facial recognition, license-plate reading, and other more exotic surveillance technologies, several covered here in this report on another FOIA-released DARPA-DOJ report, The Limited Effects Technology Program report, which reveals, shockingly, that (among other tech) millimeter-wave sensors, infra-red sensors, and acoustic weapons are being tested under joint Defense & Justice programs on the public.
Excerpt, The Limited Effects Technology Program Report
(A large subject which needs further scrutiny and reportage.)
Open the Government reveals that documents they received on FOIA request and released recently to The New York Times disclosed the involvement of the tech company Clearview AI in unethically harvesting the images of thousands of social media users without their permission and making these available to fusion centers, which are rapidly making use of facial recognition tech, as also are hundreds of police departments, DHS, ICE, Border Patrol, and other federal agencies, also revealed by FOIA request and reported in Buzzfeed News, which reports May 7, 2020 that Clearview AI is currently cancelling its relationships with private companies in midst of heightened scrutiny and potential lawsuits.
Such technologies have however made it possible for JTTF at the FBI and police departments to monitor by stealth, and keep monitoring, despite exposure.
BRIC, the Boston Regional Information Center, was critiqued in 2015 by ACLU for “Policing Dissent” unlawfully, using a social media monitoring tool, Geofeedia, to monitor religious groups, protesters, keywords, and hashtags such as #MuslimLivesMatter and #BlackLivesMatter, even after public backlash forced Boston police to drop overt pursuit of social media monitoring tech in 2014. The monitoring of First Amendment-protected activities by BRIC was found by Open the Government “to be a constant and persistent issue.”
Chicago police were found to be using facial recognition tech minus any kind of local council oversight, with no privacy policy in place even as they blithely made use of the extensive 22,000-unit CCTV network around the city.
SARs (Suspicious Activity Reports) filled out at the Chicago fusion center were found to be race-based, unreliable, and unlawful in their targeting of citizens guilty of no crime; DHS and FBI therefore received faulty reports on citizens from them.
“Open The Government obtained a series of reports from the Crime Prevention and Information Center (CPIC), the local Chicago-area fusion center, that were prepared under DHS’s Suspicious Activity Reporting (SAR) process, better known as the “If You See Something, Say Something” campaign. OTG found numerous cases of SARs filled out on suspicious males based in part on their ethnic origin. All of the alerts were determined by the fusion center to be unreliable but nonetheless forwarded to DHS and the FBI. Cancellation of the SARs happened after analysts had already collected information on potential U.S. citizens without any evidence of a crime.”
Collection of Unreliable Data Continues, case Study: Crime Prevention and Information Center (CPIC), The Cost of Fear…
Recommendations to Congress and Homeland Security
Among the recommendations the report makes to Congress are suggestions to monitor the activities of fusion centers to see if they met the earlier recommendations, to see if actionable and accurate sharing of information is evident, to physically review DHS records—rather than their obfuscating statements—to see whether terrorist plots have been identified and averted, to audit the acquisition of surveillance technologies such as facial recognition and social media monitoring, and to predicate any further funding on compliance with civil rights and liberties and federal law.
The report makes recommendations to DHS as well, advising them to be more responsive to Congressional oversight requests, strengthen oversight by the Office of Civil Rights and Liberties, halt First-Amendment-protected monitoring, and audit the SARS program.
Report Recommendations Could Be More Pointed and Forceful: Fusion Centers Have Failed Us Abysmally
While this is a much-needed and most useful report, putting into language via investigation much that many observers can see already of the failure of fusion centers in the USA, these appear to be uniformly weighted recommendations, somewhat reticent in their tone, which, given their discoveries, could certainly have been a lot more pointed and forceful.
Judging from what’s been reported here, Fusion Centers have failed abysmally:
They don’t keep proper records or document program descriptions: Meaning, they’re hiding something.
They spy on social media and report free speech there as “credible threats”: Meaning, they’re attacking freedom of speech.
They steal images from social media: Meaning, they’re ignoring privacy protections and laws.
They spy on and harass journalists for info on protests: Meaning, they’re attacking freedom of press and privacy.
They are not “foiling terrorist plots” as they (say they) set out to do after 9/11, they’re obsessively fixating on free speech and freedom to assemble. Meaning: They are targeting activists, media, journalists, community leaders.
They are using highly invasive surveillance technology, some of which is widely publicly known and some not: Meaning, they’re ignoring citizen rights to privacy and to be informed.
They use SARs in a racially-inflected and other-inflected way: Meaning, innocent citizens are frequently wrongfully targeted, watchlisted, and permanently recorded (as criminals: putative criminals, suspected criminals, under-investigation criminals, or, as ACLU reported in April, 2016 (Trapped In A Black Box: Growing Terrorism Watchlisting In Everyday Policing), “non-investigative persons”–who can apparently be covertly experimented on, with deadly LET Program weapons, neuroweapons, and other “non-lethals” while being disappeared in media as mentally-ill “Targeted Individuals”) in DHS and FBI files.
Aren’t these crimes? I mean, just MAJOR crimes?
What is not being said here in this OTG report, of course, is even more deadly than what is being said. Thousands of people have come forward over the past 20 years to report pernicious use of EMF and acoustic neuroweapons on their person, unlawful targeting, offensive community-monitoring by neighbors and malicious character-assassination in their neighborhoods, in conjunction with blacklisting for jobs, cyber-hacking, and frequent vandalism and break-ins at their property—which no amount of reporting to police or FBI is able to stop.
This perhaps accounts for all those records not filled in by the Illinois Fusion Center, as public-private partnerships via fusion centers conceal AI-run slow-kill and remote-human-access neuro/bio experimentation and EMF weapons-testing contracts—as reported here to President Trump last summer—and will perhaps be openly addressed by OTG in their next report.
A pertinent question to ask at this point indeed is: Why is OTG–like the ACLU, like EFF, like Defending Rights and Dissent, like many other prominent civil rights and liberties groups–ignoring the testimonials of thousands of American citizens on this matter–when what they are reporting represents the acme of Fusion Center and FISA Surveillance Overreach and Abuse crimes?
By all counts, fusion centers have failed us abysmally, have overreached into unlawful dragnetting and snooping, have targeted and still target citizens wrongfully and extremely, and should be dissolved.
CoronaVirus/COVID-19 Lockdowns To Hide DHS/FBI/Police Crimes, Failures, Attacks on Citizens?
Now of course, with COVID-Mania, the Gestapo activities of fusion centers and law enforcement departments have been stepped up to the point of absurdity – all this to hide the facts of their uselessness, invasiveness, and illegality, as described in this OTG report?
As FISA and DHS activities both come under scrutiny this year, it is time for citizens to put an end to the excesses of fusion centers and demand a roll back of the extreme surveillance technology and monitoring activities being indulged in by fusion centers as they wrongfully target the populace and keep getting paid for it.
The natural, God-given, civil and human rights and liberties of citizens must be honored at all times.
Not the needs of power-hungry bureaucrats to test unlawfully invasive technology on the people, in guise of “counter terrorism” or “public safety,” and newly and deceptively, “public health.”
The whole concept of America “land of the free, home of the brave” hangs in the balance.
Claiming violation of community guidelines after a viewer submitted this video for review, Youtube sent me a note this morning saying it had been removed.
Further, they did offer a link for an appeal, but following that gave me a one-sentence box to state a reason.
Then, sending in the appeal garnered an instant email–literally a minute after I submitted it–saying the appeal had been reviewed (right–by a bot?) and “violation of community guidelines” held the floor. (Email receipt times below.)
So, let me redline that: Youtube didn’t bother with reviewing my appeal, nor did it allow me a proper accommodation online for a proper appeal–letting me put in one 10-word sentence as “Reason for appeal” is absurdity profound. This is fraudulent. As a public media platform provider — which benefits from content creators — Youtube needs to be fully responsive to its users and creators, but clearly is not, and has moved into becoming a Censor rather than a Media provider.
Youtube is owned by Google which is owned by Alphabet which is owned by the CIA which is owned by those-we-cannot-name? It is time to blow the lid off this Mockingbird enterprise which is currently freezing free speech and free press.
This video was the first in my channel to be registered as having over 22K views — since it appears all my videos are massively censored on Youtube. It’s not right, and it’s never been right. My work to reveal the crimes of intelligence agencies, governments, and corporations has been severely suppressed on Youtube ever since I opened a channel and started podcasting. The most I see is 2K views, or 3K views — while the people I interview are dropping mega-disclosures which should be garnering way more views and attention. Clearly these videos are being shadowbanned extremely.
Dr. Sherri Tenpenny’s blockbuster conversation can be viewed here:
I will post it also to Bitchute and Brighteon, where I hope to start posting all my videos.
This is my second video slammed by Google this week. The first was Ole Dammegard’s video revealing bombshell information about the false flags in Sweden and the aversion of a mega-catastrophe beyond the horrors of the COVID-19 plandemic, of which it was to be a part–which I will write about more shortly. I have reposted that at Vimeo and Bitchute at my channels there (Ramola D Reports).
It is significant that all truth about COVID-19 is being censored, particularly this terrific conversation with Dr. Sherri Tenpenny, which I wrote about earlier here:
Re-post | From Email, UK resident, May 2 | 5/5/2020
Received, from an engaged and aware British Christian resident, a brilliant letter sent to MP Liz Kendall over the tyrannical UK Coronavirus Bill designed to strip away human rights and bring in unvarnished fascism, which MPs approved as it was rushed through the House of Commons and Lords in six days and made (statutory/corporate) law.
In his email, this resident wrote: “I recently wrote to my MP to let her know where I stand – I suggest everyone does the same – they need to know what people will do – it’s a chess game.” He also says, “People can use what I wrote as a template – it’s important people respond QUICKLY and in a forceful fashion – since these gangsters make their next chess piece move according to the ‘force”of the public response based on their previous action (we are dealing with murderers, Nazis, callous hateful people who are fearful of resistance). The best site to use for writing to a UK MP, is: https://www.writetothem.com/.”
The point being it is important to express your dissent and establish to the corporate government—which relies on consent of the governed, and takes your silence for tacit consent–they are engaging in extreme overreach which is not acceptable nor will be tolerated.
While many people think they are powerless against the flexing of muscle by an increasingly totalitarian government, in truth, say others, everyone’s words and stated intentions of No-Consent actually do make an impact and have an effect. Thousands of people writing in will no doubt have a greater impact and a non-ignorable one.
Exceptional in its candor, this letter spells out the perfidy of police, the complicity of government officials in the vaccine industry, and the part played by wealthy Freemasons and corporate crooks in pushing a pernicious vaccine-mandate agenda on everyone.
Many thanks to the writer for sending on this letter for others to read & emulate.
1 – The police will be given powers to detain those believed to be infected with coronavirus and a danger to the public. Other changes will allow the police and immigration officers to detain and isolate individuals to protect public health. [RESPONSE: THE POLICE ARE CORRUPT – AS PROVEN IN OPERATION TIBERIUS AND THE SCOTT INQUIRY – THEY ARE RIDDLED WITH FREEMASON MAFIA CRIMINALS CONTROLLING MOST POLICE FORCES – THEIR POWERS NEED TO BE REDUCED – THE POLICE ARE A DANGER TO PUBLIC SAFETY BECAUSE OF THE HIGH LEVEL OF CORRUPTION AND COVER-UPS. THEIR LINKS TO THE MAFIA ARE DOCUMENTED IN THE BOOK: THE BROTHERHOOD BY STEPHEN KNIGHT(1984). THE POLICE ARE NOTHING BUT CRIMINALS IN UNIFORM – ON OCTOBER 25, 2018 A 50 PAGE REPORT PUBLISHED ON THE PARLIAMENTARY WEBSITE STATED THAT 90% OF ALL CRIMES ARE GOING UNSOLVED AND THE POLICE WAS IN DANGER OF BECOMING IRRELEVANT: https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-44884113]
2 – Making arrangements for statutory sick pay for those self-isolating without symptoms from day one [RESPONSE: THE COVID-TEST IS PROVEN TO BE 80% ERROR PRONE AND EVERYONE NATURALLY CARRIES THE CORONAVIRUS, IT’S PART OF OUR HEALTHY IMMUNE SYSTEM – THIS IDEA IS FOOLISH AND A PERVERSION IN ERROR AND WILLFUL WASTE OF PUBLIC TAX MONEY]
3 – Allowing small businesses to reclaim statutory sick pay payments from HMRC [RESPONSE: SMALL BUSINESSES MUST BE SUPPORTED AND NOT CORPORATES WHICH HAVE BILLIONS STASHED AWAY IN OFF-SHORE TAX HAVENS]
4 – Allowing more phone or video hearings for court cases to stop the spread of the virus in courts [RESPONSE: I WANT JURIES’ HEARINGS RESUMED IMMEDIATELY, HOW DARE THESE NAZIS STOP THEM. I WANT THESE £100,000 A YEAR PROSTITUTES POSING AS JUDGES TO BE KICKED OUT OF THE COURTS AND ELDER INDEPENDENT PEERS OF SOCIETY MEN AND WOMEN WHO FEAR GOD TO REPLACE THESE EX-LAWYER SNAKE SCUM MASON MAFIA]
5 – TOWN halls will be given the green light to ration social care for the elderly at the height of a pandemic under emergency legislation. It will allow councils to prioritise services ‘to ensure the most urgent and serious care needs are met, even if this means not meeting everyone’s assessed needs in full’. [RESPONSE: WE CANNOT COMPROMISE ON THE POOR AND ELDERLY AT THIS TIME – THIS IS AN NHS DOCTOR DECISION NOT FOR THOSE USELESS COMMUNIST SOCIALIST SCUM IN THE LOCAL COUNCILS]
6 – The laws will allow the Government to step in to force schools to stay open even if class sizes have to rise or if school meal standards have to be reduced. But, if the Government so decides, the legislation also gives ministers the power to shut schools and childcare providers. [RESPONSE: SCHOOL MEALS ARE PROVIDED FOR POOR CHILDREN – AT THIS TIME MEALS AT HOME MAY BE LIMITED AND OF POOR NUTRITION WITH EMPTY SHOP SHELVES – THE GOVERNMENT MUST PROVIDE THE HIGHEST NUTRITION FOOD FOR THESE CHILDREN AS IT MAY BE THE ONLY FOOD THEY EAT DURING THE DAY – GIVEN OVER 4 MILLION CHILDREN LIVE BELOW THE POVERTY LINE IN THIS COUNTRY AND WITH CORONAVIRUS THAT WILL RESULT OVER 5 MILLION LIVING UNDER THE POVERTY LINE IN THE SIXTH RICHEST BLOODY COUNTRY IN THE WORLD]
7 – Unveiling the legislation, Health Secretary Matt Hancock said: ‘The measures we will be introducing in the Emergency Coronavirus Bill this week will only be used when it is absolutely moved to an area outside their day-to-day duties. [RESPONSE: THIS IS WHAT HITLER SAID. I WANT THIS NAZI HANCOCK REMOVED FROM OFFICE SINCE HE OWNS A VACCINE COMPANY THAT SUPPLIES THE GOVERNMENT WITH PRODUCTS AND THERE IS CONFLICT OF INTEREST – HE IS PUSHING VACCINES ON THE PUBLIC BECAUSE HE WILL PROFIT PERSONALLY: https://beta.companieshouse.gov.uk/company/09331560/officers AND https://www.portonbiopharma.com/products-2/pipeline/]
8 – I DO NOT WANT AND WILL NOT TAKE VACCINES – NOW OR EVER. THIS AGENDA OF THE VACCINE INDUSTRY MUST BE STOPPED. THESE PAID PROSTITUTES MP FRONT MEN CALLING THEMSELVES ‘GOVERNMENT’ WHEN THEY ARE NOTHING BUT WOLVES IN SHEEP’S CLOTHING WORKING FOR COMMERCIAL AND FINANCIAL INTERESTS OF CORPORATES AND BANKS AND RICH FAMILIES MUST BE REMOVED SINCE THEY ARE CORRUPT AND HAVE MAJOR CONFLICTS OF INTEREST AND NOT THE COUNTRY’S AND PEOPLE’S BEST INTEREST AT HEART.
I DO NOT SUPPORT THE ORCHESTRATED LIE OF A COVID PANDEMIC NEEDING VACCINES, TESTS, VAXX IDS, MASKS, QUARANTINES, LOCKDOWNS & COMPLIANCE
Support the Crucial Work of Sci-Tech, Human Rights, & Consciousness Reportage at ECC/Ramola D Reports
Independent Investigative Journalism
Investigative Sci-Tech, human rights, public interest journalism. Please support the unique ongoing reportage at Ramola D Reports video channels & this website.
On the Richie Allen Show, Thurs May 5, 2022, on the saga of the unlawful 4/14-19 Psych Hold & Backdrop of EMF Tech Use on Civilians by LE/DOD/DOJ: The Richie Allen Show Thursday May 5th 2022
On The Richie Allen Show, Wed Feb 23, 2022, on
Canada and Canberra, DEWS and #HavanaBanana, Germs and Vaccines (Wrong Forks in the Road for True-Science)–2nd Half of Show:
Guest Appearance | InfoWars with Dr. Andy Kaufman |Back to School Tyranny and Do the World’s Governments Have Proof the Virus Even Exists? | Sep 8, 2021
Guest Appearance | The Richie Allen Show
Guest Appearance | Hardline with James Grundvig | AMP, June 15, 2021
Remove Nano Tech with Dr. Marina Carew’s Recommendation: Clean Slate/Root Brands Detox
Exclusive Reportage on Counter-Terrorism “Manufactured-Target” Targeting & Gross Human Rights Violations in Amoral Human Experimentation Crimes by Intelligence Agencies, Law (Lie) Enforcement, & US/NATO Military Divisions: Off-the-Charts Torture & Abuse of “Targeted Individuals”
Ramola D | Newsflash Radio: They’ve Gone Too Far OR Black Ops Revealed
Newsflash Radio | Chapter 1 | COVID Scenario Today Is Preceded by the Global Uber Surveillance State
Media Crimes in Concealing Counter-Terrorism & Surveillance Torture & Abuse with Anti-Personnel DEWs, AI/Neurotech, Stasi Lie-Enforcement & Community Monitoring
GLOBAL BRAIN ENSLAVEMENT, DNA BIORESONANCE, & EXOTIC MILITARY TECH: TARUN RAVI REPORTS | REPORT 296 | At Bitchute | At Brighteon | At Odysee | At Rumble | Posted Oct 4, 2022
CARNICOM DISCLOSURE UPDATE 2022 – PANEL 2 | BIOTECH TRANSFORMATION VS RESILIENCE IN DIVINE CREATION | At all channels | Posted Sep 28, 2022 Report 295 | Michelle Ford/California Assembly on Restoring Your Status as American on Land & Soil | At Bitchute | Brighteon | Odysee | Rumble| Posted Sep 25, 2022
Co-Creating Our Future on Planet Earth
News, views, news analyses, supporting the struggle for truth, sovereignty, and restoration of the US/Jean Haines
The Truth Denied
Radio show and news website run by activist and musician Roxy Lopez
Thrive Movement
Foster and Kimberly Gamble’s film Thrive’s Community News Blog
Transpicuous News/Removing the Shackles
News analyses, radio shows, with Dani Arnold Kenny and Lisa Harrison–critical thinking from a perspective of sovereignty
Free Keene
Free Keene’s web site/A peace-liberty-voluntarism project pursuing and promoting peaceful living in Free Keene, New Hampshire
Free State Project
Free State Project’s website/A Liberty in our Lifetime project in New Hampshire, pursuing liberty, community, and peaceful living
New Earth Project
New Earth Project website/Open platform to unite humanity and create initiatives to support the emergence of absolute freedom and sovereign creative expression for all
Public Intelligence Blog
Blog for Earth Intelligence Network, Phi Beta Iota the Public Intelligence Blog/Promotes hybrid transparent governance, collective intelligence, true cost economics, and whole systems understanding
