Report | Ramola D | May 17, 2020
In an extended conversation last week covering his work to help free child abuse whistleblower and former social worker Carol Woods from a mental health facility, and anti-corruption and whistleblower activist John Paterson from same, in situations where both are being subjected to Mental-Health-Fraud–in positive medieval or KGB wise–indy-media Truth activist and journalist :Andrew: Devine reports that Carol Woods has been victimized and persecuted thus for 19 years, while John Paterson, a UK Navy veteran was quite recently kidnapped by the Navy himself, prior to which he has been alternately moved from mental health facilities to jails in confusion of jurisdiction and with an arbitrary designation of mental illness–all on wrongful arrest after reporting fraud, theft, pedophilia and money laundering among politicians to Sussex Police, BBC and other media.
In both cases, letters written to the CQC have fallen on deaf ears, with the CQC actually seemingly being on board with forced-medication, accepting the patently wrong “diagnoses” as clinical matters well-settled and beyond their purview–in a convenient abdication of responsibility, while protecting the unethical psychiatrists who conferred these wrongful diagnoses on whistleblowers who should be celebrated and rewarded for their courage and diligence in speaking out.
In both cases, in addition to whistleblowing on child abuse in the Care system, prominent politicians had been found out engaging in corruption and money-laundering, which perhaps explains the clamp-down here where criminals in power ensure that anyone who dares expose their crimes is massively retaliated against.
The cases of Carol Woods and John Paterson were previously covered here:
:Andrew reports that previous coverage that he and other indy media outlets provided online of Carol Woods’ wrongful captivity in psychiatry at Orchard Health led directly to her recent release (staff had mentioned Internet coverage)–which did not last long; her home was broken into and she was arrested again in a continuing pattern of persecution which has now lasted 19 years. It is for this reason, he emphasizes, that he seeks to continue highlighting her case and that of John Paterson and others, because silence and inattention causes disappearance and persecution–and seems to give inattentive bureaucrats carte blanche to continue their crimes.
Writing to the CQC has met with bland responses, and a recent letter received from them (posted toward end of post here) indicates their refusal to address the primary issue of wrongful clinical diagnosis–:Andrew read this letter out on-air.
THE CLAIM OF THE FACTS WITH THE CORRECT-SENTENCE-STRUCTURE-COMMUNICATION-PARSE-SYNTAX-GRAMMAR/QUANTUM-GRAMMAR-PERFORMANCE
Also significant, :Andrew notes, is the fact that he has been writing to the CQC as a living man, in Correct-Sentence-Structure-Parse-Syntax-Grammar, the “Quantum Grammar” invented by :Russell-Jay: Gould and :David-Wynne: Miller unveiling the underlying mathematical substrate of language and pursuing correctness in meaning and usage — but the CQC persists in ignoring his status and addressing him in legal fiction terms as “Mr.” thereby also ignoring the message of accountability and dissection of language fraud –the fictitious conveyance of language –which parse-syntax-grammar brings.
The address also suggests an insistence by the UK government on returning the matter to legal-fiction space, where living men and women are excluded, and statutory laws related to the CQC corporation are held against the strawmen/legal fictions of the all-caps-names from birth-certificate-fraud–even by which yardstick, “deprivation of rights under color of law” has occurred here, with perfectly sane people being condemned as mentally ill, just because they have whistleblown on major governmental and private-sector crime.
Baron David Ward Affidavit Establishes Liberty For All
Of special note in this conversation is the fact that :Andrew: Devine points out that the Coronavirus Act passed by the UK Parliament in a flurry of days is not legal and not lawful, since none of the people (population of UK) to whom the Act purports to apply signed the Bill, with a wet-ink signature. Those who did sign it are MPs, to whom alone the Act, or any other statutory law applies.
There is in fact no law except by consent, and this was given the Royal Assent in an affidavit by Baron David Ward found at this website.
This unrebutted affidavit–which therefore spells out the truth–is also downloadable here (clicking on this link downloads it to your PC): Affidavit of Baron David Ward
We Need to All Be Standing Up With Claims-Of-The-Life
The best way forward, :Andrew says, is for people to wake up, declare themselves alive with a live-life-claim, and to stand in truth and own their lives and self. “We need the people to realize it and stand up and own it, stand up and own yourself, own who you are, know who you are, know yourself, and that’s–let’s clean up what we’ve got, we’ve let these people get away with this far too long. Then it’s time we cleaned up and it’s alternative is either we do it now or–you know they’re not gonna–the fiction will never reclaim the world, will never remove itself, we need to be the ones that stand up and does it, we need to do it.”
RELATED
Visit :Andrew: Devine’s channel at Youtube.
Visit :Andrew: Devine’s blog at Linked-In.
:Andrew’s Bitchute Channel: https://www.bitchute.com/profile
:Andrew’s Gab Updates: https://gab.com/Andy114
To support and supplement :Andrew’s letters to MPs, Councillors, and the CQC, please send your own letters demanding the release of Carol Woods and John Paterson who are being unlawfully and illegally held on bogus charges of mental illness and jailed without charge or trial.
Two of :Andrew’s Letters below, with answers from the CQC.
Letters from :Andrew: Devine Sent to CQC, Police, MPs
Letters, sent widely to MPs and the CQC by :Andrew: Devine are posted below.
Re: Contact with CQC
| From | Andy Devine <devinebar@hotmail.com> hide details create a rule |
|---|---|
| To | MHA Enquiries <MHAEnquiries@cqc.org.uk>, kate.terroni <kate.terroni@cqc.org.uk>, Enquiries <Enquiries@cqc.org.uk>, matthew.docherty <matthew.docherty@cqc.org.uk>, Ian.Trenholm <Ian.Trenholm@cqc.org.uk>, caroline.dinenage.mp <caroline.dinenage.mp@parliament.uk>, robert.buckland.mp <robert.buckland.mp@parliament.uk>, MOUSTAFA.SAOUD@sussexpartnership.nhs.uk <MOUSTAFA.SAOUD@SUSSEXPARTNERSHIP.NHS.UK>, peter.wyman <peter.wyman@cqc.org.uk> |
| Cc | mail <mail@ppo.gov.uk>, enquiries <enquiries@policeconduct.gov.uk>, ah <ah@stephenrimmer.com>, Andy 2054 <Andy.Grimwood@surrey.pnn.police.uk>, westminster.ij <westminster.ij@justice.gov.uk>, Prime Minister MP Rt HonBoris Johnson <boris.johnson.mp@parliament.uk>, president <president@whitehouse.gov>, Privy Counsellor + Chingford and WoodfordGreen MP <Iain.duncansmith.mp@parliament.uk>, Independent Police Conduct Authority <case.resolution@ipca.govt.nz>, Alan.Pughsley <Alan.Pughsley@kent.pnn.police.uk>, Adrian.Leppard <Adrian.Leppard@cityoflondon.pnn.police.uk>, SGT <sgtreport@gmail.com>, Stephen.Kavanagh <Stephen.Kavanagh@essex.pnn.police.uk>, House of Commons Speaker Rt Hon Sir Lindsay Hoyle <Lindsay.hoyle.mp@parliament.uk>, forthedirector <forthedirector@outlook.com>, gbloom <gbloom@outlook.com>, Attorney General Rt Hon Geoffrey Cox <coxg@parliament.uk>, Attorney General Representative + Government Lawyer <Alice.Haynes@governmentlegal.gov.uk>, Free The Hampstead 2 <freethehampstead2@gmail.com>, Antonio Sergio Ismael <aismael@sorocaba.sp.gov.br>, DPA <DPA@lancashirecare.nhs.uk>, mentalhealthmatters <mentalhealthmatters@lancashirecare.nhs.uk>, Complaints <Complaints@cqc.org.uk>, HQ – Professional Standards <HQ-ProfessionalStandards@lancashire.pnn.police.uk>, england.ce <england.ce@nhs.net>, Katie.Latham <Katie.Latham@met.police.uk> |
| Sent | Saturday, May 9, 2020 at 6:12 AM |
| Encrypted | No |
| Signed | No |
:PRIVATE & CONFIDENTIAL:
C.S.S.C.P.S.G.-P.-Flag of this EMAIL-VENUE-PERFORMANCE.
:SYNTAX-KEY.
:~0-:Conjunction.
:~1-:Adverb[sic].
:~2-:Verb.
:~3-:Adjective[sic].
:~4-:Pronoun[sic].
:~5-:Positional.
:~6-:Lodial.
:~7-:Fact.
:~8-:Past-Tense.
:~9-:Future-Tense.
:~0- FOR THIS CLAIMANT’S-SENSATION OF THE COGNITION IS WITH THE CLAIM OF THE FACTS WITH THE CORRECT-SENTENCE-STRUCTURE-COMMUNICATION-PARSE-SYNTAX-GRAMMAR/QUANTUM-GRAMMAR-PERFORMANCE AND RULE-ŒN/1, RULE-ÆQUAL-VOLITION BY THIS CLAIMANT. :~1- FOR THE ŒTI-CLAIM OF THE BRACKETS[and italics, parenthesis, quotations] IS WITH THE FUNCTION OF THE COMMUNICATION WITH THE EASE OF THE CONVEYANCE WITH THE FRAME OF THE [fiction-english-babble]LANGUAGE WITH THIS CONSIDERATION BY THIS CLAIMANT.
:~ devinebar@hotmail.com
:Andrew: Devine.
:Copy-Right/Copy-Claim.
: 07495 409168.
:~ Ian.Trenholm@cqc.org.uk, Enquiries@cqc.org.uk, enquiries@cqc.org.uk, caroline.dinenage.mp@parliament.uk, HQ – Professional Standards, england.ce@nhs.net. matthew.docherty@cqc.org.uk,”MOUSTAFA.SAOUD@sussexpartnership.nhs.uk” peter.wyman@cqc.org.uk
:Greet: Ian: Trenholm,: Moustafa: Saoud,:Peter: Wyman,: Robert: Buckland,: Kate: Terroni,: Keeley: Lewandowski/:Men/Women-Ployees of the C.Q.C’s National Complaints Team and All those in Public Office in this Email Cc list.
[“ We are aware of the multiple wrongs being committed and for the clarity We will use Correct Sentence Structure Communication Parse Syntax Gramma Language and plain English for the ease of the understanding. We have asked many questions which you have consistently dishonoured by failing to answer and are breaching your official/moral duty by failing to give closure or remedy.
:~ 1: We: Andrew: Devine,: John-Alexander: Paterson,: Carol: Woods and All other whistle-blowers are Men/Women(Facts) and this We have pointed out many times, yet you still write us as the Fictitious name branding Us with titles “Mr or Ms etc.”, For the record that is a crime: (18 U.S. Code §1342. Fictitious or address and/or 18 U.S. Code §100. Statements or entries generally), kindly correct yourselves.
:~ 2: We have given yourselves the affidavit of the Baron David Ward’s multiple times asking for closure and that Affidavit is in Fact the Truth in Law, which you all fail to give closure and wilfully ignore the request it requires closure. The Affidavit and Statement attached below proves void-ab-inititio any lawful or Legal enforcement of any legislated Act or Statute without the consent and consent is equal to a wet ink Autograph(Signature), the revocation of power of attorney of the Victims: Carol: Woods and: John-Alexander: Paterson you have been provided with proves the fact: Carol: Woods and: John-Alexander: Paterson who have never wilfully given consent and that anything that was coerced in null and void, on that fact alone this proves Malfeasance and/or Nonfeasance by the perpetrators in public office and your complicity in allowing the continuance of the wrongs.
:Baron David Ward’s Affidavit and Statement:
:~ 3: We have multiple times requested the acknowledgement and confirmation that: Ian: Trenholm has had visual sensation of the email conveyance(s) content which you still wilfully ignore which would void his claim of plausible deniability, we kindly request this confirmation again.
:~ 4: We are aware that you may not be cognitive of the importance of giving the finite meaning and cipher for the written word, or Correct-Sentence-Structure-Communication-Parse-Syntax-Quantum-Grammar-Language these facts are vital for the cognition of the stoping and correcting wrongs. For the clarity and help We require All Public Servants contact: Russell-Jay: Gould who will clear this matter up and provide the solutions for this Problem, as We don’t want anything other than what is correct and factual. Kindly contact: Russell-Jay: Gould for the closure on the correct language performance and why you are wrong for failing multiple times for failing to provide a cipher to the written words you send Us, even though you have been asked multiple times to provide those details.
:~ 4: We have shown the fact that there has never been a Lawful/Legal Section 135 Warrant presented, shown or given for the lawful/legal taking of: Carol: Woods, We have shown the emails from the Court alleged to have created the warrant and that the alleged Court did not issue any warrant for the Lawful/Legal Taking of: Carol: Woods therefore proving the fraud and Kidnap, which void-ab-inititio any authority of: Carol: Woods detention and forcing of the psychotic dugs, You have all been made aware of this fact so kindly give the closure for the failure to provide the remedy of the stop and correct this wrong.
:~ 5: We would like closure on what you have stated, We quote: “When a person is being treated/detained under the Mental Health Act (MHA) certain care and treatment can be given without a person’s consent and is considered lawful under the MHA Code of Practice.” End quote: Why would you wilfully ignore the Fact that when a fraud has been committed example: NO WARRANT any treatment/detention is unlawful and illegal, therefore the Treatment/Detention are crimes being committed after the original crime of the kidnap with the use of a Fraudulent/Fictitious warrant. Kindly give closure for the record.
:~ 6: We Kindly ask you to start taking these claims serious as this matter is not going away without the correct result/remedy and We don’t wish to see innocent Public Servant employees in prison because they couldn’t understand the facts of the matter, and any further ignoring the questions and requests within our email conveyances will end in our concern of the outcome, be that a fine or imprison for those complicit in allowing these crimes to continue any further.
:~ 7: We would also for the record note that the Whistle-Blowers you are failing to provide remedy for have forensic evidence/proof of very serious/horrendous crimes on Corrupt MP’s, Heads of Councils, Judges, Police, Freemasons etc. that could and more than likely are coercing/influencing those freemasons within the public office positions and more than likely the reason to why you are all failing to provide remedy for the Whistle-Blowers. We urge you all to think wisely as your actions are also conspiring to aid in the cover up of the crimes the Whistle-Blowers are blowing the whistle on.”]
FOR THE COGNITION/KNOWLEDGE OF THE FACTS(TRUTH) IS WITH THE PARAMOUNT-(RE)QUIREMENT OF THE NECESSARY-CONDITION OF THE WISDOM-PERFORMANCE(Being Correct) WITH THE HONOURABLE/RIGHTEOUS-DUTY BY ALL MEN/WOMEN/PUBLIC-SERVANT-(EM)PLOYEES.
FOR THE CORRECT-PERFORMANCE-CLAIM OF THE WISDOM IS WITH THE FULL-COGNITION AND COMPREHENSION OF THE COMPLETE-FACT(S) WITH THE CORRECT-DUTY-PERFORMANCE OF THE DEED AND FEAT(Action) WITH THE VERACIOUS-VOLITION/PERFORMANCE AND HONOURABLE-DUTY BY ALL MEN/WOMEN/PUBLIC-SERVANT-(EM)PLOYEE-CLAIMANT(S).
FOR THIS CLAIMANT’S-PENALTY-CLAIM OF THE CORRECT-PERFORMANCE-FAILURE/MALFEASANCE/NONFEASANCE IS WITH THE EMAIL-JOURNAL-LOG OF THE LAWFUL/LEGAL-DUTY-BREACHES AND STOP-AND-CORRECT-WRONG-FAILURE(S) AND CORRECT-LANGUAGE-PERFORMANCE-FAILURE(S) OF THE MEN/WOMEN-(PUBLIC-OFFICE-(EM)PLOYEE(S)) WITH THE WILFUL-IGNORANCE AND DISPARAGE OF THE FACTUAL-EMAIL-CONVEYANCE(S)-FACTUAL-CONTENT WITH THE HONOURABLE-DUTY BY AN: Andrew: Devine.
FOR THIS CLAIMANT’S-QUEST OF THE HELP/AID IS WITH THE CORRECT-PERFORMANCE OF THE LAWFUL/LEGAL-DUTIES WITH THE CORRECT-SOLUTION/REMEDY-PERFORMANCE OF THE MEN/WOMEN-(PUBLIC-OFFICE-(EM)PLOYEE(S)) WITH THE RIGHTEOUS/HONOURABLE-DUTY BY THIS CLAIMANT-:Andrew: Devine.
FOR THE COGNITION/KNOWLEDGE OF THE LAWS IS WITH THE COPY/PASTE OF THE CODE(S)-BELOW WITH HUMBLE-DUTY BY THIS CLAIMANT.
18 U.S. Code § 1001.Statements or entries generally
prev | next
(a)Except as otherwise provided in this section, whoever, in any matter within the jurisdiction of the executive, legislative, or judicial branch of the Government of the United States, knowingly and willfully—
(1)
falsifies, conceals, or covers up by any trick, scheme, or device a material fact;
(2)
makes any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or representation; or
(3)
makes or uses any false writing or document knowing the same to contain any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or entry;
shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 5 years or, if the offense involves international or domestic terrorism (as defined in section 2331), imprisoned not more than 8 years, or both. If the matter relates to an offense under chapter 109A, 109B, 110, or 117, or section 1591, then the term of imprisonment imposed under this section shall be not more than 8 years.
(b)
Subsection (a) does not apply to a party to a judicial proceeding, or that party’s counsel, for statements, representations, writings or documents submitted by such party or counsel to a judge or magistrate in that proceeding.
(c)With respect to any matter within the jurisdiction of the legislative branch, subsection (a) shall apply only to—
(1)
administrative matters, including a claim for payment, a matter related to the procurement of property or services, personnel or employment practices, or support services, or a document required by law, rule, or regulation to be submitted to the Congress or any office or officer within the legislative branch; or
(2)
any investigation or review, conducted pursuant to the authority of any committee, subcommittee, commission or office of the Congress, consistent with applicable rules of the House or Senate.
(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 749; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, § 330016(1)(L), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147; Pub. L. 104–292, § 2, Oct. 11, 1996, 110 Stat. 3459; Pub. L. 108–458, title VI, § 6703(a), Dec. 17, 2004, 118 Stat. 3766; Pub. L. 109–248, title I, § 141(c), July 27, 2006, 120 Stat. 603.)
18 U.S. Code § 1342.Fictitious name or address
Whoever, for the purpose of conducting, promoting, or carrying on by means of the Postal Service, any scheme or device mentioned in section 1341 of this title or any other unlawful business, uses or assumes, or requests to be addressed by, any fictitious, false, or assumed title, name, or address or name other than his own proper name, or takes or receives from any post office or authorized depository of mail matter, any letter, postal card, package, or other mail matter addressed to any such fictitious, false, or assumed title, name, or address, or name other than his own proper name, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.
(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 763; Pub. L. 91–375, § 6(j)(12), Aug. 12, 1970, 84 Stat. 778; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, § 330016(1)(H), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147.)
18 U.S. Code § 242.Deprivation of rights under color of law
Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or to different punishments, pains, or penalties, on account of such person being an alien, or by reason of his color, or race, than are prescribed for the punishment of citizens, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if bodily injury results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.
(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 696; Pub. L. 90–284, title I, § 103(b), Apr. 11, 1968, 82 Stat. 75; Pub. L. 100–690, title VII, § 7019, Nov. 18, 1988, 102 Stat. 4396; Pub. L. 103–322, title VI, § 60006(b), title XXXII, §§ 320103(b), 320201(b), title XXXIII, § 330016(1)(H), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 1970, 2109, 2113, 2147; Pub. L. 104–294, title VI, §§ 604(b)(14)(B), 607(a), Oct. 11, 1996, 110 Stat. 3507, 3511.)
42 U.S. Code § 1986.Action for neglect to prevent
Every person who, having knowledge that any of the wrongs conspired to be done, and mentioned in section 1985 of this title, are about to be committed, and having power to prevent or aid in preventing the commission of the same, neglects or refuses so to do, if such wrongful act be committed, shall be liable to the party injured, or his legal representatives, for all damages caused by such wrongful act, which such person by reasonable diligence could have prevented; and such damages may be recovered in an action on the case; and any number of persons guilty of such wrongful neglect or refusal may be joined as defendants in the action; and if the death of any party be caused by any such wrongful act and neglect, the legal representatives of the deceased shall have such action therefor, and may recover not exceeding $5,000 damages therein, for the benefit of the widow of the deceased, if there be one, and if there be no widow, then for the benefit of the next of kin of the deceased. But no action under the provisions of this section shall be sustained which is not commenced within one year after the cause of action has accrued.
(R.S. § 1981.)
: Andrew: Devine.
Copy-Right/Copy-Claim.
07495 409168.
On 6 May 2020, at 1:30 PM, MHA Enquiries <MHAEnquiries@cqc.org.uk> wrote:
Dear Mr Devine I am writing to you in response to the number of emails you have sent to the Care Quality Commission (CQC), including those sent for the attention of Ian Trenholm, Chief Executive and Peter Wyman, Chair in relation to concerns regarding individuals who are currently receiving treatment under the Mental Health Act (MHA). Ms Carol Woods I understand from your correspondence that it is your belief that the injections currently being administered to Ms Woods should be stopped and that she was kidnapped and kept against her will and treatment given to her that she did not consent to or require. You have also stated that those responsible should be brought to justice and recompense be awarded. Mr John-Alexander Paterson. You have also expressed your view that Mr Paterson was kidnapped, incarcerated that medical documents were falsified and that like Ms Woods, many of his rights were breached. In both cases you have stated that these individuals were both whistle blowers and the actions that followed towards them were as a result of the information that they shared. When a person is being treated/detained under the Mental Health Act (MHA) certain care and treatment can be given without a person’s consent and is considered lawful under the MHA Code of Practice. It has been explained in previous correspondence that our MHA complaints powers do not extend to providing a clinical review of the decisions to detain a person under the MHA, this would also exclude decisions around diagnosis and medication. This being the case I am sorry that we are unable to take forward your concerns as a MHA complaint. Judging by your perseverance to date in raising these matters I can see that you may not adhere to a request to no longer contact us regarding these issues, therefore I should make you aware that the CQC will not necessarily acknowledge receipt or reply to future correspondence. It has also come to my notice that we have received contact from other individuals who are part of your campaign. I would appreciate it if you could make them aware of our position as this will not alter in relation to issues around clinical decisions, whoever the patient may be and failure to receive a response may only cause them disappointment.
In the event that you remain unhappy with the actions of CQC you can refer your concerns to the Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman, for details on how to make a complaint, please visit their website atwww.ombudsman.org.uk.
Yours sincerely Mental Health Act Complaints Team
Re: URGENT ATTENTION DO NOT IGNORE: WRONGS REQUIRE STOPPING AND CORRECTING: NCT ENQ1-8815195163 Care Quality Commission
| From | Andy Devine <devinebar@hotmail.com> hide details create a rule |
|---|---|
| To | kate.terroni <kate.terroni@cqc.org.uk>, Enquiries <Enquiries@cqc.org.uk>, matthew.docherty <matthew.docherty@cqc.org.uk>, Ian.Trenholm <Ian.Trenholm@cqc.org.uk>, caroline.dinenage.mp <caroline.dinenage.mp@parliament.uk>, robert.buckland.mp <robert.buckland.mp@parliament.uk>, MOUSTAFA.SAOUD@sussexpartnership.nhs.uk <MOUSTAFA.SAOUD@SUSSEXPARTNERSHIP.NHS.UK>, peter.wyman <peter.wyman@cqc.org.uk> |
| Cc | mail <mail@ppo.gov.uk>, enquiries <enquiries@policeconduct.gov.uk>, ah <ah@stephenrimmer.com>, Andy 2054 <Andy.Grimwood@surrey.pnn.police.uk>, westminster.ij <westminster.ij@justice.gov.uk>, Prime Minister MP Rt HonBoris Johnson <boris.johnson.mp@parliament.uk>, president <president@whitehouse.gov>, Privy Counsellor + Chingford and WoodfordGreen MP <Iain.duncansmith.mp@parliament.uk>, Independent Police Conduct Authority <case.resolution@ipca.govt.nz>, Alan.Pughsley <Alan.Pughsley@kent.pnn.police.uk>, Adrian.Leppard <Adrian.Leppard@cityoflondon.pnn.police.uk>, SGT <sgtreport@gmail.com>, Stephen.Kavanagh <Stephen.Kavanagh@essex.pnn.police.uk>, House of Commons Speaker Rt Hon Sir Lindsay Hoyle <Lindsay.hoyle.mp@parliament.uk>, forthedirector <forthedirector@outlook.com>, gbloom <gbloom@outlook.com>, Attorney General Rt Hon Geoffrey Cox <coxg@parliament.uk>, Attorney General Representative + Government Lawyer <Alice.Haynes@governmentlegal.gov.uk>, Free The Hampstead 2 <freethehampstead2@gmail.com>, Antonio Sergio Ismael <aismael@sorocaba.sp.gov.br>, DPA <DPA@lancashirecare.nhs.uk>, mentalhealthmatters <mentalhealthmatters@lancashirecare.nhs.uk>, Complaints <Complaints@cqc.org.uk>, HQ – Professional Standards <HQ-ProfessionalStandards@lancashire.pnn.police.uk>, england.ce <england.ce@nhs.net>, Katie.Latham <Katie.Latham@met.police.uk> |
| Sent | Saturday, May 9, 2020 at 6:11 AM |
| Encrypted | No |
| Signed | No |
:PRIVATE & CONFIDENTIAL:
C.S.S.C.P.S.G.-P.-Flag of this EMAIL-VENUE-PERFORMANCE.
:SYNTAX-KEY.
:~0-:Conjunction.
:~1-:Adverb[sic].
:~2-:Verb.
:~3-:Adjective[sic].
:~4-:Pronoun[sic].
:~5-:Positional.
:~6-:Lodial.
:~7-:Fact.
:~8-:Past-Tense.
:~9-:Future-Tense.
:~0- FOR THIS CLAIMANT’S-SENSATION OF THE COGNITION IS WITH THE CLAIM OF THE FACTS WITH THE CORRECT-SENTENCE-STRUCTURE-COMMUNICATION-PARSE-SYNTAX-GRAMMAR/QUANTUM-GRAMMAR-PERFORMANCE AND RULE-ŒN/1, RULE-ÆQUAL-VOLITION BY THIS CLAIMANT. :~1- FOR THE ŒTI-CLAIM OF THE BRACKETS[and italics, parenthesis, quotations] IS WITH THE FUNCTION OF THE COMMUNICATION WITH THE EASE OF THE CONVEYANCE WITH THE FRAME OF THE [fiction-english-babble]LANGUAGE WITH THIS CONSIDERATION BY THIS CLAIMANT.
:~ devinebar@hotmail.com
:Andrew: Devine.
:Copy-Right/Copy-Claim.
: 07495 409168.
:~ Ian.Trenholm@cqc.org.uk, Enquiries@cqc.org.uk, enquiries@cqc.org.uk, caroline.dinenage.mp@parliament.uk, HQ – Professional Standards, england.ce@nhs.net. matthew.docherty@cqc.org.uk,”MOUSTAFA.SAOUD@sussexpartnership.nhs.uk” peter.wyman@cqc.org.uk
:Greet: Ian: Trenholm,: Moustafa: Saoud,: Robert: Buckland,: Peter: Wyman,: Kate: Terroni,: Keeley: Lewandowski/:Men/Women-Ployees of the C.Q.C’s National Complaints Team and All those in Public Office in this Email Cc list.
[“ We are aware of the multiple wrongs being committed and for the clarity We will use Correct Sentence Structure Communication Parse Syntax Gramma Language and plain English for the ease of the understanding. We have asked many questions which you have consistently dishonoured by failing to answer and are breaching your official/moral duty by failing to give closure or remedy.
:~ 1: We: Andrew: Devine,: John-Alexander: Paterson,: Carol: Woods and All other whistle-blowers are Men/Women(Facts) and this We have pointed out many times, yet you still write us as the Fictitious name branding Us with titles “Mr or Ms etc.”, For the record that is a crime: (18 U.S. Code §1342. Fictitious or address and/or 18 U.S. Code §100. Statements or entries generally), kindly correct yourselves.
:~ 2: We have given yourselves the affidavit of the Baron David Ward’s multiple times asking for closure and that Affidavit is in Fact the Truth in Law, which you all fail to give closure and wilfully ignore the request it requires closure. The Affidavit and Statement attached below proves void-ab-inititio any lawful or Legal enforcement of any legislated Act or Statute without the consent and consent is equal to a wet ink Autograph(Signature), the revocation of power of attorney of the Victims: Carol: Woods and: John-Alexander: Paterson you have been provided with proves the fact: Carol: Woods and: John-Alexander: Paterson who have never wilfully given consent and that anything that was coerced in null and void, on that fact alone this proves Malfeasance and/or Nonfeasance by the perpetrators in public office and your complicity in allowing the continuance of the wrongs.
:Baron David Ward’s Affidavit and Statement:
:~ 3: We have multiple times requested the acknowledgement and confirmation that: Ian: Trenholm has had visual sensation of the email conveyance(s) content which you still wilfully ignore which would void his claim of plausible deniability, we kindly request this confirmation again.
:~ 4: We are aware that you may not be cognitive of the importance of giving the finite meaning and cipher for the written word, or Correct-Sentence-Structure-Communication-Parse-Syntax-Quantum-Grammar-Language these facts are vital for the cognition of the stoping and correcting wrongs. For the clarity and help We require All Public Servants contact: Russell-Jay: Gould who will clear this matter up and provide the solutions for this Problem, as We don’t want anything other than what is correct and factual. Kindly contact: Russell-Jay: Gould for the closure on the correct language performance and why you are wrong for failing multiple times for failing to provide a cipher to the written words you send Us, even though you have been asked multiple times to provide those details.
:~ 4: We have shown the fact that there has never been a Lawful/Legal Section 135 Warrant presented, shown or given for the lawful/legal taking of: Carol: Woods, We have shown the emails from the Court alleged to have created the warrant and that the alleged Court did not issue any warrant for the Lawful/Legal Taking of: Carol: Woods therefore proving the fraud and Kidnap, which void-ab-inititio any authority of: Carol: Woods detention and forcing of the psychotic dugs, You have all been made aware of this fact so kindly give the closure for the failure to provide the remedy of the stop and correct this wrong.
:~ 5: We would like closure on what you have stated, We quote: “When a person is being treated/detained under the Mental Health Act (MHA) certain care and treatment can be given without a person’s consent and is considered lawful under the MHA Code of Practice.” End quote: Why would you wilfully ignore the Fact that when a fraud has been committed example: NO WARRANT any treatment/detention is unlawful and illegal, therefore the Treatment/Detention are crimes being committed after the original crime of the kidnap with the use of a Fraudulent/Fictitious warrant. Kindly give closure for the record.
:~ 6: We Kindly ask you to start taking these claims serious as this matter is not going away without the correct result/remedy and We don’t wish to see innocent Public Servant employees in prison because they couldn’t understand the facts of the matter, and any further ignoring the questions and requests within our email conveyances will end in our concern of the outcome, be that a fine or imprison for those complicit in allowing these crimes to continue any further.
:~ 7: We would also for the record note that the Whistle-Blowers you are failing to provide remedy for have forensic evidence/proof of very serious/horrendous crimes on Corrupt MP’s, Heads of Councils, Judges, Police, Freemasons etc. that could and more than likely are coercing/influencing those freemasons within the public office positions and more than likely the reason to why you are all failing to provide remedy for the Whistle-Blowers. We urge you all to think wisely as your actions are also conspiring to aid in the cover up of the crimes the Whistle-Blowers are blowing the whistle on.”]
FOR THE COGNITION/KNOWLEDGE OF THE FACTS(TRUTH) IS WITH THE PARAMOUNT-(RE)QUIREMENT OF THE NECESSARY-CONDITION OF THE WISDOM-PERFORMANCE(Being Correct) WITH THE HONOURABLE/RIGHTEOUS-DUTY BY ALL MEN/WOMEN/PUBLIC-SERVANT-(EM)PLOYEES.
FOR THE CORRECT-PERFORMANCE-CLAIM OF THE WISDOM IS WITH THE FULL-COGNITION AND COMPREHENSION OF THE COMPLETE-FACT(S) WITH THE CORRECT-DUTY-PERFORMANCE OF THE DEED AND FEAT(Action) WITH THE VERACIOUS-VOLITION/PERFORMANCE AND HONOURABLE-DUTY BY ALL MEN/WOMEN/PUBLIC-SERVANT-(EM)PLOYEE-CLAIMANT(S).
FOR THIS CLAIMANT’S-PENALTY-CLAIM OF THE CORRECT-PERFORMANCE-FAILURE/MALFEASANCE/NONFEASANCE IS WITH THE EMAIL-JOURNAL-LOG OF THE LAWFUL/LEGAL-DUTY-BREACHES AND STOP-AND-CORRECT-WRONG-FAILURE(S) AND CORRECT-LANGUAGE-PERFORMANCE-FAILURE(S) OF THE MEN/WOMEN-(PUBLIC-OFFICE-(EM)PLOYEE(S)) WITH THE WILFUL-IGNORANCE AND DISPARAGE OF THE FACTUAL-EMAIL-CONVEYANCE(S)-FACTUAL-CONTENT WITH THE HONOURABLE-DUTY BY AN: Andrew: Devine.
FOR THIS CLAIMANT’S-QUEST OF THE HELP/AID IS WITH THE CORRECT-PERFORMANCE OF THE LAWFUL/LEGAL-DUTIES WITH THE CORRECT-SOLUTION/REMEDY-PERFORMANCE OF THE MEN/WOMEN-(PUBLIC-OFFICE-(EM)PLOYEE(S)) WITH THE RIGHTEOUS/HONOURABLE-DUTY BY THIS CLAIMANT-:Andrew: Devine.
FOR THE COGNITION/KNOWLEDGE OF THE LAWS IS WITH THE COPY/PASTE OF THE CODE(S)-BELOW WITH HUMBLE-DUTY BY THIS CLAIMANT.
18 U.S. Code § 1001.Statements or entries generally
prev | next
(a)Except as otherwise provided in this section, whoever, in any matter within the jurisdiction of the executive, legislative, or judicial branch of the Government of the United States, knowingly and willfully—
(1)
falsifies, conceals, or covers up by any trick, scheme, or device a material fact;
(2)
makes any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or representation; or
(3)
makes or uses any false writing or document knowing the same to contain any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or entry;
shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 5 years or, if the offense involves international or domestic terrorism (as defined in section 2331), imprisoned not more than 8 years, or both. If the matter relates to an offense under chapter 109A, 109B, 110, or 117, or section 1591, then the term of imprisonment imposed under this section shall be not more than 8 years.
(b)
Subsection (a) does not apply to a party to a judicial proceeding, or that party’s counsel, for statements, representations, writings or documents submitted by such party or counsel to a judge or magistrate in that proceeding.
(c)With respect to any matter within the jurisdiction of the legislative branch, subsection (a) shall apply only to—
(1)
administrative matters, including a claim for payment, a matter related to the procurement of property or services, personnel or employment practices, or support services, or a document required by law, rule, or regulation to be submitted to the Congress or any office or officer within the legislative branch; or
(2)
any investigation or review, conducted pursuant to the authority of any committee, subcommittee, commission or office of the Congress, consistent with applicable rules of the House or Senate.
(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 749; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, § 330016(1)(L), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147; Pub. L. 104–292, § 2, Oct. 11, 1996, 110 Stat. 3459; Pub. L. 108–458, title VI, § 6703(a), Dec. 17, 2004, 118 Stat. 3766; Pub. L. 109–248, title I, § 141(c), July 27, 2006, 120 Stat. 603.)
18 U.S. Code § 1342.Fictitious name or address
Whoever, for the purpose of conducting, promoting, or carrying on by means of the Postal Service, any scheme or device mentioned in section 1341 of this title or any other unlawful business, uses or assumes, or requests to be addressed by, any fictitious, false, or assumed title, name, or address or name other than his own proper name, or takes or receives from any post office or authorized depository of mail matter, any letter, postal card, package, or other mail matter addressed to any such fictitious, false, or assumed title, name, or address, or name other than his own proper name, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.
(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 763; Pub. L. 91–375, § 6(j)(12), Aug. 12, 1970, 84 Stat. 778; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, § 330016(1)(H), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147.)
18 U.S. Code § 242.Deprivation of rights under color of law
Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or to different punishments, pains, or penalties, on account of such person being an alien, or by reason of his color, or race, than are prescribed for the punishment of citizens, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if bodily injury results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.
(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 696; Pub. L. 90–284, title I, § 103(b), Apr. 11, 1968, 82 Stat. 75; Pub. L. 100–690, title VII, § 7019, Nov. 18, 1988, 102 Stat. 4396; Pub. L. 103–322, title VI, § 60006(b), title XXXII, §§ 320103(b), 320201(b), title XXXIII, § 330016(1)(H), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 1970, 2109, 2113, 2147; Pub. L. 104–294, title VI, §§ 604(b)(14)(B), 607(a), Oct. 11, 1996, 110 Stat. 3507, 3511.)
42 U.S. Code § 1986.Action for neglect to prevent
Every person who, having knowledge that any of the wrongs conspired to be done, and mentioned in section 1985 of this title, are about to be committed, and having power to prevent or aid in preventing the commission of the same, neglects or refuses so to do, if such wrongful act be committed, shall be liable to the party injured, or his legal representatives, for all damages caused by such wrongful act, which such person by reasonable diligence could have prevented;
and such damages may be recovered in an action on the case; and any number of persons guilty of such wrongful neglect or refusal may be joined as defendants in the action; and if the death of any party be caused by any such wrongful act and neglect, the legal representatives of the deceased shall have such action therefor, and may recover not exceeding $5,000 damages therein, for the benefit of the widow of the deceased, if there be one, and if there be no widow, then for the benefit of the next of kin of the deceased.
But no action under the provisions of this section shall be sustained which is not commenced within one year after the cause of action has accrued.
(R.S. § 1981.)
: Andrew: Devine.
Copy-Right/Copy-Claim.
07495 409168.
On 6 May 2020, at 1:30 PM, MHA Enquiries <MHAEnquiries@cqc.org.uk> wrote:
Dear Mr Devine
I am writing to you in response to the number of emails you have sent to the Care Quality Commission (CQC), including those sent for the attention of Ian Trenholm, Chief Executive and Peter Wyman, Chair in relation to concerns regarding individuals who are currently receiving treatment under the Mental Health Act (MHA).
Ms Carol Woods
I understand from your correspondence that it is your belief that the injections currently being administered to Ms Woods should be stopped and that she was kidnapped and kept against her will and treatment given to her that she did not consent to or require. You have also stated that those responsible should be brought to justice and recompense be awarded.
Mr John-Alexander Paterson.
You have also expressed your view that Mr Paterson was kidnapped, incarcerated that medical documents were falsified and that like Ms Woods, many of his rights were breached.
In both cases you have stated that these individuals were both whistle blowers and the actions that followed towards them were as a result of the information that they shared.
When a person is being treated/detained under the Mental Health Act (MHA) certain care and treatment can be given without a person’s consent and is considered lawful under the MHA Code of Practice.
It has been explained in previous correspondence that our MHA complaints powers do not extend to providing a clinical review of the decisions to detain a person under the MHA, this would also exclude decisions around diagnosis and medication.
This being the case I am sorry that we are unable to take forward your concerns as a MHA complaint.
Judging by your perseverance to date in raising these matters I can see that you may not adhere to a request to no longer contact us regarding these issues, therefore I should make you aware that the CQC will not necessarily acknowledge receipt or reply to future correspondence.
It has also come to my notice that we have received contact from other individuals who are part of your campaign. I would appreciate it if you could make them aware of our position as this will not alter in relation to issues around clinical decisions, whoever the patient may be and failure to receive a response may only cause them disappointment.
In the event that you remain unhappy with the actions of CQC you can refer your concerns to the Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman, for details on how to make a complaint, please visit their website at
www.ombudsman.org.uk. Yours sincerely Mental Health Act Complaints Team
————– The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential to the intended recipient. They may not be disclosed to or used by or copied in any way by anyone other than the intended recipient. If this email is received in error, please notify us immediately by clicking “Reply” and delete the email. Please note that neither the Care Quality Commission nor the sender accepts any responsibility for viruses and it is your responsibility to scan or otherwise check this email and any attachments. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the sender specifically states them to be the views of the Care Quality Commission. Information on how the Care Quality Commission processes personal data is available here http://www.cqc.org.uk/about-us/our-policies/privacy-statement
To support and supplement :Andrew’s letters to MPs, Councillors, and the CQC, please send your own letters demanding the release of Carol Woods and John Paterson who are being unlawfully and illegally held on bogus charges of mental illness and jailed without charge or trial for years now.
Letters posted by permission of :Andrew: Devine.
Many thanks to :Andrew: Devine for his tireless work in speaking out and drawing attention and making demands and requests for the release of long-persecuted whistleblowers.
