Tag Archives: Ramola D

5G Live Cellphone Surveillance, Active Denial Burning, & Neurotech Wake Up Call: Dutch State Secretary Reveals 5G Will Be Used for Crowd Control While EU Documents Show Crowd Control Tech Includes Neurotechnologies

Report | Ramola D | 3/9/2020

Where is the Public Assurance of Safety, Ethics, Privacy in Using Weaponized Brain Stimulation, Skin-Burning, Live Data-Scanning 5G and EMF Technologies On All?

Dutch State Secretary Mona Keijzer Reveals 5G is going to be used for crowd control

In a blockbuster reveal at a recent meeting on 5G, Dutch State Secretary for Economic Affairs and Climate Mona Keijzer—perhaps the first public official to make a statement of this nature–stated that 5G will be used as a tool to ensure crowd control, with a rollout intended at the Amsterdam Arena where a 5G mast has already been set up for the June 22 Euro 2020 football champioship games.

Image: Screenshot from the Relevant Today video above | Amsterdam Arena with 5G masts

Amsterdam, along with other European cities, has been preparing to roll out 5G for the last few years, with the Amsterdam Arena working with the research institute TNO to equip the arena for 5G as this article from 2017 reveals:

AMSTERDAM ARENA TO PLAY KEY ROLE IN 5G MOBILE NETWORK DEVELOPMENT | 2/28/2017

Amsterdam is one of 13 European cities which will host football matches in the Euro 2020. Amsterdam wants to use the new 5G network to transmit high quality video images during the European Football Championships. The initiators believe it can also be used in projects on public transport and public order. “Euro2020 offers an excellent opportunity for a pan-European test with 5G”, according to the initiators. 

5G Rollout Globally is Blazing Ahead Despite Profound Health Concerns

It is true that some European cities and countries are currently putting the brakes on the Global Rollout of 5G past concerns about Huawei infrastructural tech and possible international IP theft through such tech – and perhaps now more cities will halt 5G launches as more concerning information surfaces regarding the “Coronavirus” outbreak in Wuhan, where 5G has been set up and rolled out over the past two years as well as in other places worldwide where 5G has already been rolled out, but the fact remains that overall the European, American, Australian and other regions’ rollout of 5G is not being stopped.

In the US, Digital Trends has this to say on March 3, 2020:

“AT&T won the cutthroat competition with Verizon to be the first carrier to offer 5G — sort of. Just months after Verizon launched a pre-standards version of fixed 5G, AT&T deployed mobile 5G NR in a handful of areas across the U.S. Who was first with “real” 5G, winning the race? Who cares? With either network, consumers enjoy blazing-fast speeds — and lots more.”

Despite continuous health concerns and impassioned call for moratorium from scientists, doctors, researchers, and activists, the commercial 5G Rollout in the Americas is blazing ahead, as also in Europe, Asia, Africa, and Australia where in many cities 5G has already been launched, with others engaging in pilots and beta tests.

https://www.5gspaceappeal.org/the-appeal
https://www.5gspaceappeal.org/the-appeal

Lifewire has published updated information on the 5G rollout.

Lifewire article March 6, 2020 on 5g US rollout
Excerpt, Lifewire article on US 5G rollout

5G Rollout in the USA

5G Rollout Worldwide

5G Will Be Used for Crowd Control

Defending 5G’s use for a variety of applications, Dutch official Mona Keijzer mentioned increased data, greater connectivity, competitive and greater speeds not merely “for fun” as in streaming films, but in use for crowd control.

(Rough Google translation and transcript from video below)

“I think it’s good to start with actually the question why are we here today, what is the importance of 5g –that is the subject where I am mainly concerned with this discussion, what is the importance of the multiband auctions. Because we all have more and more data, we consume the data that comes in all kinds of ways–in our email traffic, in our mutual communication, in streaming services, increasingly in new ways—-possibilities that the 5g technology gives us is going to be cloud control with more and more people. It is also important to join major events in a fast adequate way, respond fast to incidents, as with scanning someone’s heart in an ambulance so the hospital is ready for them. So Chairman, it is not something just for fun, such as when it comes to streaming good films for example. It is also that new opportunities will offer benefits as a society, it is also a topic wherever other countries are developing very hard.

There are also implications for crowd control, a connection between 5g and crowd control–at the moment there is at Amsterdam Arena a 5g mast placed already for crowd control. Using data driven assignments under the name of Location Based Service, the data from mobile phones from visitors can be scanned, then stored and analyzed. This is so applied for assuring safety and behavior –so scanning cell phones is therefore an essential part of crowd control.”

Live Cellphone Scanning and Surveillance Supposedly for Safety Reasons & Crowd Control

This KPMG video features an interview with an Amsterdam Arena data management consultant and describes this 5G cell scanning & monitoring along with “data governance” using Internet of Things sensors for high-speed real-time human-traffic management:

Crowd control in Amsterdam Arena using 5G for live cellphone scanning and IOT sensors

What is likely to happen after people’s cell phones are scanned involuntarily and their texts and emails analyzed (breaking all privacy laws worldwide)?

Note that while Ms. Keijzer’s remarks suggest that visitors’ cell phones can be instantly tapped and data analyzed by Location Based Services, they also suggest that 5G will be used for “assuring safety and behavior.”

How exactly will this be accomplished?

Will 5G be used then to bio-hack citizens–burn skin with high radio frequencies– with portable or parked Active Denial Systems–a documented military people-management technology, as many speculate?

Pentagon’s Millimeter-Wave (5G) Active Denial System is Now Portable

Military ADS use the same millimeter-wave technology as 5G, and their bio-effects have been extensively studied by the military worldwide, including by the US Air Force and Air Force Research Labs in multiple field weapons-testing projects, partially disclosed in the public domain. Millimeter-wave, high-powered-microwave, and acoustic weapons of various kinds (including to project sound and voices into people’s heads) to attack and bio-hack humans exist; portable weapons have been developed, and as this recently reported DARPA/DOJ document reveals, are being developed for Law Enforcement use just as much as the military.

Bio-effects of microwave and millimeter-wave frequency technologies include burning and itching of the skin and scalp in addition to known tumor formation, as many studies suggest. The Pentagon’s Active Denial System–now portable–takes skin-burning a few thousand steps further.

European Documents Reveal That Crowd Control Technologies Include Bio-Hacking and Neuro-Hacking Technologies: Active Denial “Non-Lethal” Tech and Remote Neuro Modification Tech

And then there is the quiet disclosure of anti-personnel electromagnetic weapons and neuroweapons in documents published over the last 20 years discussing Crowd Control technologies. This is actually blockbuster information, because the existence of these weapons has been seriously downplayed, concealed, lied about, and glossed over by mainstream media for decades.

Declassified documents in recent times have slowly revealed that the military has been studying bio-effects of EMF radiation since the ’50s and ’60s, that, revealingly, the CIA and DOD have worked with Russian scientists in the development of psychotronic “psycho-correction” technologies for mind control as these archived news reports indicate, that DARPA and the DOJ have been developing and testing acoustic neuroweapons and other anti-personnel non-lethal weapons together for both military and law enforcement use, that many forms and technologies for effecting brain and behavioral control from ESP, remote viewing, and other projects have been studied and patented.

2008 Dutch Ministry of Justice Report Mentions Weaponized Neurotech to Modify Brains and Behavior

The Dutch article first reporting this information subsequently republished elsewhere notes a 2008 Ministry of Justice report which casually mentions technology to influence behavior by way of transcranial magnetic stimulation of brain regions while also mentioning remote blocking of moving cars (both privacy-invasive in different ways, not equivalent in intrusiveness). This is an astounding admission of neurotechnology to hack brains and neuromodify brains via TMS to produce a desired behavioral outcome as a Crowd Control weapon.

What it suggests is that neuromodifying technology — a powerfully unsettling concept to most — is being surreptitiously rolled out by Justice Departments in Europe without fanfare or public disclosure, that government officials think it is perfectly alright to suggest modifying brains–akin to lobotomizing people, now an archaic barbarism–is not grossly human-rights-violative, unethical, and inhumane, and can be used today on humans with nary a whisper of wide media coverage and open public debate.

“But perhaps it is also important to look back, as in a 2008 report from the Ministry of Justice, which can be found under ‘Judicial reconnaissance’, specifically under volume 34 n1, 2008, including page 8:

‘Technologies that are aimed at influencing behavior and maintaining safety. Examples of this are the remote blocking of moving cars, or the transcranial magnetic stimulation of certain brain regions.”We expect that the following applications in the field of monitoring and intervention as a technical reality will be feasible in 2022 (the short-term explanation indicates that we expect this earlier, within 5 years).”

Source

2000 European Union STOA Report on Crowd Control Tech Discusses Human Rights Violations in Use of Neurotechnologies and Electromagnetic Weapons

This EU Panel for the Future of Science and Technology (STOA) document, “Crowd Control Technologies : An Assessment Of Crowd Control Technology Options For The European Union/(An Appraisal of the Technologies of Political Control)(EP/1/1V/B/STOA/99/14/01),” an Omega Foundation report to the EU reveals the shocking intended use of brain-modification weapons and electromagnetic weapons to supposedly disperse crowds, target specific individuals, and subject them to remote electroshocking or high heat or remote brain modification or race-specific DNA attack in the covert and misnamed “non-lethal” way. Excerpts below.

Profound Dangers of Millimeter Wave (5G) Technology to Human Skin, Immune System, Fertility, DNA

Can 5G alter DNA and cellular structure? Weaponized, beamforming 5G set to aim precision high-pulse beams at targets–both their cell phones and their human bodies and brains–comprise a genocidal military weapon, says weapons expert Mark Steele, intending to alter your DNA.

Dr. Martin Pall, retired professor of Biochemistry and Medical Sciences and well-known EMF health expert discusses briefly the extreme damages to health, extensively documented, of electromagnetic radiation, including fertility effects, neurological effects, cellular and DNA damage, increased likelihood of cancers, dementia and other brain damages, and speaks about basic destruction of plasma surrounding cells caused by EMF here:

Studies on the helical-antenna-effects in spiral-shaped sweat ducts examine the correlation between 5g wavelengths and skin cell structure and suggest there is a profound danger to all human and animal life from the high-power pulsed frequencies operating at the extremely microscopic scale of cell structure, which is what 5G is. This presentation by scientist Dr. Paul Ben-Ishai is startling and dismaying in its revelations on how this works:

Further information on scientific research on the undeniably chilling roster of 5G health effects can be found widely online including here at the Environmental Health Trust website.

Are Governments Trying to Sneak 5G Crowd Control and Remote Brain Control Technologies Past Citizens By Keeping It All Largely Covert?

The profound and sinister implications of 5G intended for use as a Crowd Control weapon, both as a physically-impacting nonlethal technology and privacy-impacting cellphone monitor just as much as of a variety of pernicious remote neurotechnologies being slated for similar use as Crowd Control cannot be overstated.

Add 5G’s millions of base stations and satellites, inescapable blanketing presence of high-energy pulsed radiation and precision beamforming with ELF’s remote brain monitoring and modification (possible today through a variety of EMF, optical imaging, acoustic, and BCI technologies), and you get the horrifying formula for a telecom-assisted high-tech concentration camp replete with pre-crime surveillance and totalitarian Harrison-Bergeron-style thought modification.

Is this where we are headed? Those targeted by military, Intelligence, and security contractors wielding remote DEWs and neurotechnologies today know this reality is already here. Their testimonial—suppressed ruthlessly by mainstream media, who disappear all reporting victims as delusional “Targeted Individuals”-– is vindicated by these recent disclosures.

Anti-personnel crowd-control technologies using spectrum radiation and sonics are here, remote-access brain modification technologies are being used already – without public consent. Much is being kept hidden, and the implications are not reassuring.

Concerned readers may wish to research further, inform themselves further, and take steps to make their concerns known immediately in all public forums. Words count. Voices count. Intentions count. Very often, it’s not more than a small effort from a large intentionality which makes the difference. If we care about our physical bodies and brains—and our children’s’ and grandchildren’s—we may want to act Now.

5G will not be stopped by standing by, and remote neuro-modification to stop us thinking about 5G or anything else cannot be rolled back without people speaking out.

In the absence of mainstream media coverage of this critical issue, please share this information widely.

Reposting is fine, with attribution and linkback.

Related:

Public Disclosure on Neuro Weapons and Neuro Technologies In Use Today

Ramola D/No Longer True: The NSA “Isn’t Getting Violent Internally in the US”: Millions Today in US Are Targeted with RF/Scalar/Sonic Weapons, Nano Weapons, Neuro Weapons, Chem/Bio Weapons

Public Notice: The Remote Access of Human Beings is a Crime Against Humanity

Targeting is Real

“MK ULTRA on Steroids”: Dr. Robert Duncan Reports On Today’s Neurotech Targeting of Humanity, Secrecy, and The Need For Change

Disclosure on Targeting

Documentary Evidence of Covert Electronic-Weapon and Neurotechnology Use By US Government on Americans Series (2) The Limited Effects Technology (LET) Program Report | JPSG, OOTW/LE Programs, 1996

“MK ULTRA on Steroids”: Dr. Robert Duncan Reports On Today’s Neurotech Targeting of Humanity, Secrecy, and The Need For Change

Report | Ramola D | 2/24/2020

There are hundreds of undisclosed Mind Control programs ongoing today, possibly with many different names, all indicative of the ’50s-’70s MK ULTRA programs going underground and continuing, reveals Dr. Robert Duncan, Artificial Intelligence and computer scientist, whistleblower, author of The Matrix Deciphered and Project Soulcatcher, with an impressive array of credentials including degrees from Harvard and Dartmouth, and work for DARPA, the US Navy, Army, NATO, and the private sector.

Compartmentalization in Defense and Intelligence has assured that people working on these programs believe they are working patriotically for the good of their country, while in actual fact, he notes, in an interview with this writer last week, that he learned “people were using my work for amoral activities not just for defense of my country and to catch criminals; they were using it for other purposes within my own country.”

Interview at Youtube: Ramola D Reports | Report #165

Reports from the field began to indicate that people were being targeted with neurotechnologies and brain-computer-interface (BCI) technologies of the kind he had helped develop, he says, for purposes of use on battlefields against enemy personnel. The excitement of being involved in developing BCI communications suddenly changed.

“I got into this line of research because I thought I would be the first to do computer to human brain communications, and I found now this group of targeted individuals who were complaining about the exact thing that you would expect from a weaponized version of BC and computer interface technologies …and I’m like, this is a bit coincidental. And rarely am I the first to discover anything so I did more research, thoroughly convinced after working on portions of it for DARPA and then realizing oh my gosh, this is my work they’re using to harm people.”

Dr. Robert Duncan tried to alert Congress in 2000, he says, along with trusted friends in the FBI, but to no avail.

“I even went with the former head of the LA FBI to Congress, spoke to the Judiciary Committee, the Armed Forces community, 23 senators and most importantly the Intelligence Committee, and they are supposed to be the oversight, it was obvious to me that this was MKULTRA on steroids, same tactics being used–the blank control, the breakdown of the human will, and using as programmed assassins or Manchurian candidates or whatever their desire may be–just eliminate the target. And the further I followed the White Rabbit down the hole, the more disturbing it got.”

Congressmembers in this millenium seem to have reacted very differently to those in the 1970s during the Frank Church Committee hearings.

“This is when I lost faith in my government–it was that event. The Senate Intelligence Committee said we’ve never heard of MK Ultra and that’s their one job –to know the background of Mk Ultra–the head of the FBI and I are looking at each other like oh this is not gonna go well, they’re starting off with a lie, they’ve never heard of this.”

Project MK ULTRA was the CIA’s Multi-Sub-Projected Behavior Modification Program, Currently Being Exposed as Ongoing

As most informed readers know, MK Ultra was one of the unethical experimental behavior modification and mind control programs with many subprojects run by the CIA (MK Delta, MK Naomi, Mk Often, Project Bluebird, Project Artichoke were some of the others) from the ’50s upward, exposed at the Church Committee Hearings before Congress in 1975, and further exposed by other journalists and writers afterward, including, especially, John Marks in his book The Search for the Manchurian Candidate.

Cover, Joint Hearing of Select Intelligence and Health & Scientific Research Committee Hearings Report on MK ULTRA, 1977

You can read the full report here: https://www.intelligence.senate.gov/sites/default/files/hearings/95mkultra.pdf

Contents, The Search for the Manchurian Candidate by John Marks

Now it is becoming clear to many that the unethical and invasive programs of MK ULTRA, in addition to various other clandestine projects from the DoD and CIA are regrettably flourishing. Dr. Duncan also notes that now MK Ultra “has gone through so many name changes, we just use it as an anchor point, but who knows what the new budget and the new name is at this point.”

Secrecy and compartmentalization have served to keep the actuality of the horrors of these brain-experimentation programs—which reporting victims assert openly is torture, comprising both brain and body takeover—hidden for decades, but Dr. Duncan hints that change is just around the corner, meaning a few years away, and says this may occur over the next ten years.

“Only a very few at the highest level know what’s going on so they have to fool everybody down the chain; and it works well, it works well but their house of cards and lies is going to collapse and there’ll be quite a blowback.”

Neuro Targeting of All Humanity Today Includes No-Boundaries Neuro Modification Experiments on Some Unlawfully Targeted for Terminal Neuro Study: Targeted Individuals

Neuromodification experiments that feckless military and intelligence scientists have been working on include setting up thought filters to prevent crime, replacing inner voice, voice morphing, synthetic dreams, hiving minds, creating brain nets, and laying software layers over the hardware of the brain, says Dr. Duncan. The sensations of hive minds speaking inside someone’s skull, V2K (Voice to Skull), and synthetic telepathy which many report are highly invasive and essentially constitute soul-stealing, taking away someone’s personal privacy, soul, and will. Dr. Duncan also points viewers and readers to his recent MIT lecture, Hacking the Human Mind: The Art and Science of Neuroweapons–Ethical Considerations of Capable Weapons, where he has spoken more extensively on different modalities of neuro hacking in use today.

Counterintelligence Has Ensured Disinformation and Secrecy, New World Order Rollouts Have Ensured Worldwide Neuro/DEW Targeting

How the CIA and DOD—whose neurotargeting and brain stealing programs span the Earth, via military-intelligence agreements and overarching New World Order encroachments (Dr. Duncan references George Bush Sr’s well-known pronouncements on an impending NWO and Joe Biden’s recent mention of same)–have gotten away with keeping these mind control programs hidden has to do largely with counterintelligence, says Dr. Duncan.

 

Efforts have been made deliberately to sow disinformation in the media, with focus on stories of UFOs, aliens, abductions, while insidious mind control technologies inclusive of television programming have been used on all over several decades; according to Dr. Duncan, these technologies have been in use over 60 years and scientists in the intelligence and military echelons of power are not going to come forward now to confess to having long manipulated the minds of people to affect placements of power in various places, or create Manchurian assassins for espionage or other agendas.

JFK was killed, Dr. Duncan suggests, because he was getting ready to reveal these mind control programs which have embraced secrecy like a second skin; the rise of the military industrial complex that President Eisenhower warned against has given great power today to the military and created a war economy and invincibility of secrecy in their ranks.

Image: AllNewsPipeline.com

Dr. Duncan believes the rollout of the New World Order we are already immersed in will worsen as military technologies are rolled out to Law Enforcementsomething which has already occurred, over various programs, including the JPSG (DoD-DOJ Joint Program Steering Group) programs discussed in this recent report, set up by way of a DOD-DOJ agreement to jointly develop non-lethal technologies in 1994, reported here earlier.

Cover, LET Program Report, reported here

DOD-DOJ MOU, 1994, reported here

Public Discussions on Neuroethics Needed, Commercial Neurotechnologies Being Positioned to Take the Fall for Unethical Clandestine Military/Intelligence Neuro Research

Yet it is a hopeful sign, Dr. Duncan notes, that the fields of neuroethics and bioethics exist today and that questions are being raised about the ethicality of these experiments and initiatives to control people’s minds with acoustic and radiation and BCI technologies.

A fan of Elon Musk, who has made public statements that Neuralace is being tested via injection and hinted at awareness of undisclosed Defense programs, Dr. Duncan does not believe Elon Musk is necessarily an insider in that respect but in developing neurotechnologies himself, such as Neuralink, represents the commercializing of neurotechnologies which the DOD hopes will surface the news of Mind Control and Brain Tech to the masses and eventually also take the fall for all invasive uses of same.

Image: Zerohedge article

Regarding Dr. Giordiano, whose many lectures are now widely online, revealing the use of invasive neuromodulating neuroweaponry, Dr. Duncan agreed with this writer’s point of view that there appeared to be a rather obvious conflict of interest in a military neuroscientist and neuroweapons creator being lead neuroethicist at Georgetown University.

Image: Screenshot from Public Disclosure which includes a few videos from Dr. Giordiano

It must be noted that this writer is aware that Dr. Duncan is probably unable to speak openly about many aspects of this situation because of his previous classified work for military and Intelligence agencies and related non-disclosure agreements, and also probably does not wish to address too closely the actions of colleagues in the same space.

Stating he can “only speak of technologies known to the public” he expresses nevertheless a great need for public discussions and conversations such as this one, in order to raise public awareness of the many issues surrounding neurotechnologies, such as: Who is the real criminal if a person is neuromodified to commit crime?

“How can you have justice if you don’t know whose mind was behind the actions of the body–and so it’s gonna turn the justice system on its head. They can erase memories, reprogram them with false memories and so you can’t even use the polygraph test.”

Image: BCI Security, UW Biorobotics Lab

Technologies cannot be uncreated, he states, but they can and should be regulated. Or banned. While the number of non-consensual military and Intelligence brain-experimentees he estimates at the low end to be 10,000, Dr. Duncan suggests that the wide variety of mind control tech in use today being leveled to various degree at all suggests that at the high end, everyone in the entire world is being subjected to mind control of one sort or another.

Steps to Take Moving Forward, Importance of a Moral Compass

What can people do about this, is an abiding question, and Dr. Duncan suggests a good start may be to contact your Senators before March 15, 2020 to ensure the non-renewal of Section 215 of the Patriot Act which permits warrantless surveillance. What to Expect of the Patriot Act Reauthorization by the Project on Government Oversight covers some of the basics on this matter.

His own conviction is that a complete reorganization of the US government is needed, and that certainly seems to be indicated as reports of those targeted deleteriously with stealth neurotechnologies continue to mount. Reports and testimonials from suffering victims attesting to torture can be found widely online including at this media site and at the video YouTube channel Ramola D Reports.

It is a rare scientist with a conscience who is willing to speak to whatever extent about these still “classified” matters being concealed under veils of supposed “National Security” and we are privileged that Dr. Robert Duncan has chosen to speak out.

“I will tell you I’ve worked with some of the most brilliant scientists in the world but only a few of them were not morally flexible and that’s the term they use in the CIA – they didn’t really care, they don’t care–and I just wasn’t born that way. I adhere to my primary directive which is to optimize happiness, minimize suffering, and a sustainable way of life for all living creatures on this planet–very simple, and maybe my formula’s different from others but it keeps my moral compass.”

Also hopeful is his report that many behind the curtains of non-disclosures and top-secret clearances are watching all our many activism efforts to surface the crimes of non-consensual neuro-experimentation and are “cheerleading” our work. It is to be hoped that many of these observers will indeed also come forward one day soon to further the disclosure and halt these criminal experimentation programs executing profound crimes against humanity on Americans and people worldwide.

Many thanks to Dr. Robert Duncan for his vitally important writings and his willingness despite all costs to himself to engage in public conversation on this critical subject. Dr. Duncan’s many interviews and video talks can be widely found on YouTube and elsewhere online. Links to some to be posted here shortly.

RELATED:

Dr. Robert Duncan: Hacking The Human Mind | The Art and Science of Neuroweapons | Ethical Considerations of Capable Weapons

Public Disclosure on Neuro Weapons and Neuro Technologies In Use Today

Documentary Evidence of Covert Electronic-Weapon and Neurotechnology Use By US Government on Americans Series (2) The Limited Effects Technology (LET) Program Report | JPSG, OOTW/LE Programs, 1996

Documentary Evidence since 1994 of Covert High-Tech Electronic-Weapon and Neurotechnology Use in Targeted Surveillance, Experimentation, Operations by US Government on Americans: (1) The DOD/DOJ Memorandum of Understanding on OOTW/LE, 1994

Robert Duncan, Regarding 6/10 NYT Article on Gang-Stalking & Targeted Individuals: “When Weapons Are “Field Tested” They Need To Be Very Secretive”

The “Neutralizing” of US Dissent With Neuroweaponry: Open Letter to Journalists and Human Rights Advocates and Organizations in the USA and Worldwide

Targeting is Real

Major Exposé & Impending Breakthrough for Millions as UK Council & Police Crimes of House, Property, Child Theft Via Court Order Scams Are Revealed As Such by Honest Court Manager

Report | Ramola D | 2/4/2020

In a newly published December 2018 letter (provided to this writer in an Exclusive video interview on February 1, 2020) reporting the Croydon Magistrate Court’s investigations into a case of non-payment of Council tax alleged by a London group which “served” a Court Order “Summons” for this action, a Croydon Magistrates Court manager, Yvonne Membu, has stated clearly that no such order had actually been issued by the Court and that the paperwork which had been used to threaten and intimidate the recipient, thence proved fraudulent and masquerading as a court order, had been traced back to Croydon Council.

Motif at House of Lords used in the Court Seal

This letter, marked Confidential, and obtained in response to a complaint sent in through a third-party site, Resolver.co.uk had been previously withheld by the recipient on advice from many and is now being publicly revealed for the first time, in what surely is a breakthrough revelation promising redressal of injustice for millions.

“No one should ever have to be robbed, jailed or tortured, on false claims to court authority, for Council Tax, ever again. And as a matter of fact, no other false court process shall stand after this.”

Anthony Badaloo, Press Release, Death to Council Tax
Court seal on top of the fraudulent Summons letter purporting to be a Court document
Court seal on the Magistrate Court Manager’s letter excerpted below
Excerpt, Letter sent to Anthony Badaloo from the Croydon Magistrate Court Manager attesting (indirectly) to Fraud and Misdirection committed by Croydon Council

The implications of this disclosure are profoundly far-reaching and affect every citizen, says Anthony Badaloo, British CPA and financial advisor who spoke to this writer last week in a revelatory video interview where he explained the current dismal situation in the UK where corruption at the level of local government (the Councils) meshes with corruption among police to wreak predatory havoc among the citizenry on a daily basis.

Newsbreak 58: Anthony Badaloo, UK Accountant | Death of Council Tax: Bombshell Reveal on Council Crimes and Court Order Scam

As a consequence, thousands have lost their homes and property to organized crime syndicates working inside the Councils, egregiously using fake county bailiffs, sheriffs, police, and judges to do their bidding, in actions of clear police threat, intimidation and harassment, essentially using the fraudulent office of their positions in criminal actions of racketeering and fraud to steal people’s lawfully-owned property and businesses and evict lawful owners–whether as part of a slowly-unfolding Agenda 2030 land and rights grab or just long-standing piracy on the land.

Fake Court Orders, Fake Bailiffs, Fake Sheriffs, Fake Police, Fake Judges, Fake Courtrooms Run Eviction Fraud, Child Stealing, Vehicle Theft on Unknowing Populace

People across the UK–and the entire Commonwealth which apparently follows the same blueprint of criminality entrenched at the lowest and highest levels of government both in the UK, and the USA as well–are accustomed now it seems to the threat of eviction, child kidnapping, home repossession, or incarceration and the sight of bailiffs, sheriffs, and police targeting people and evicting them or using a battering ram to break down their door, as this 2016 image of bailiffs destroying a 300-year-old cottage in Glossop owned by a teacher (after claims by a neighbor of her removing roof stones) shows.

Bailiffs and Enforcement Agents Destroying Teacher’s Door/Video at https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/moment-bailiffs-smashed-maths-teachers-8240906

These are not just a few bad eggs engaged in scamming random members of the public and protected by corrupt police or sheriffs, it appears, but an entrenched and networked criminality operative in like mode across the boroughs and Councils, and across the Commonwealth and possibly many other nations of the world.

“It’s not protected by the government,” says Anthony Badaloo, “It is run by the government..the Queen is at the top of it. In England here we call it Her Majesty’s Courts and Tribunals Services–she can’t get out of it, I mean you can see even her children don’t want to be part of it anymore or her grandchildren or whatever–it’s a rotten system.”

Britain’s Queen Elizabeth II (L) seated on the throne in the House of Lords next to Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh (R) delivers the Queen’s Speech during the State Opening of Parliament at the Palace of Westminster in London on May 27, 2015. The State Opening of Parliament marks the formal start of the parliamentary year and the Queen’s Speech sets out the governments agenda for the coming session. AFP PHOTO / POOL / BEN STANSALL/AFP/Getty Images)

“In this case now with the Croydon Council, what is happening–the Police force comes under the umbrella of the Council right, and at the same time what we found is that the Councils are actually stealing more properties than all the banks and building societies added together…this has left the Councils with a surplus in excess of 22 Billion Pounds.”

Anthony Badaloo, Newsbreak 58 and Press Release, Death to Council Tax

Who this benefits and who this is run by include the Council members themselves. “Well only men and women can do things, can the corporation on paper do things?” Further, these actions of asset-stripping and property theft are facilitated by a network of criminally-acting judges. These judges who preside over the supposed court proceedings, Anthony Badaloo reveals, are usually solicitors who work part-time for the banks, receiving high salaries, who are thus essentially being bribed to play judge in this mighty extortion and fraud racket through this false court-order scam–which ultimately makes money, in a giant returning pyramid scheme, for all fraudsters and banksters involved.

How entrenched into the fabric of things this is can also be seen in the peculiar fact that it has apparently become an accepted practice that courtrooms can be leased, and anyone can use them for a fee, as delineated in this Croydon court manager’s letter, and witnessed by Anthony Badaloo: “I went into the Opera Tribunal Courthouse in the High Court in London, and they’ve actually got the advert on the door of each courtroom: To book this room please call in this number–it’s on every door, and so the people are just hiring the courtroom and pretending to be judges.”

The labeling of people being targeted for asset-stripping as “clients,” as this Court manager’s words reveal (screenshot below), is also quite curious, because those being sent these letters and notices of impending evictions are actually being threatened with extremely dire consequences: committal to prison, repossession of their homes, etc., (see below excerpt from the Summons to Anthony Badaloo’s wife) and are not in any way aware they are “clients of the Council” being offered a contract.

Excerpt, Letter from Croydon Magistrate Court Manager to Anthony Badaloo
Excerpt from the Summons or fake Court-Order sent to Mrs. Badaloo

Very often as well, explains Anthony Badaloo, those who challenge these evictions are “sectioned” on Mental Health frauds, so that they become doubly enslaved, by the Mental Health Subjugation system and the Police/Prison system both. Targets for asset-stripping are in fact inundated with charges and “court orders” claiming illegally that their residing in their own home is unlawful, that they owe money to the banks. They are subjected to multiple intimidation-visits by people claiming to be bailiffs, or wearing the uniform of police; targets are arrested and jailed after being hit with unsubstantiated charges of having failed to pay property taxes.

Outright Asset Stripping and Child Kidnapping: 150 Cases Per Day of Home and Property Stealing by Councils Across the United Kingdom

Those who are targeted for such property grabs are anyone with assets, anyone who owns real estate, anyone who owns a house, particularly if the house is paid off. Currently Anthony Badaloo estimates that one hundred and fifty cases occur every day across the United Kingdom, cases where people are subjected to illegal evictions and their property stolen.

While this is shocking enough in itself, Anthony notes that similarly, people are also losing their children to Child Protective Services in Child Protection Frauds, and losing their vehicles as well as their businesses and homes. On the petition page at Change.org where he has called for people across the United Kingdom to join the “campaign for a Public Inquiry, being commanded by the people, into the massive COURT ORDER SCAM, in the name of Her Majesty The Queen (HMCTS) which leaves millions of Victims made Homeless and Destitute,” he characterizes this multi-frontal theft as HSBCC: Homes, Savings, Businesses, Cars, and Children. Numbers across all these various crimes therefore would exponentially increase (from 150 cases of house theft per day) into hundreds of thousands, if not millions, of people being thus persecuted, across the years.

https://www.change.org/p/prime-minister-boris-johnson-stop-court-order-scams-and-illegal-homelessness?source_location=topic_page

Anthony Badaloo himself has been the victim of such lawless eviction crimes, where both he and his young family, including a 3-year-old with a heart condition– as well as young children from his tenants’ families were thrown out on the street.

“When they stole my property, they stole four properties of mine, not just where I live–and I have tenants in them, and these tenants are children, so they’ve thrown loads of children on the street–that’s what hurt me the most, my little boy at 3 years old he had a heart condition–some minor heart operation thing and he was on recovery–and they still threw him on the street; I could not believe it, we have it on video … they’re all pretending and pretending and pretending and that’s why this case we have here from the Magistrate’s Court, it’s a criminal court, where the Court Manager has confessed and written, put it in writing, and signed it on the court-headed paper–I believe it’s gonna blow up the planet.”

Anthony Badaloo, Newsbreak 58

Never Fail to Question “Local Authority” if Targeted for Eviction, Child-Theft, Vehicle Theft– Push For Answers, Keep Writing Letters, Ask for Confirmation via Digital Records Directly From the Court

Anthony recommends that anyone facing similar situations ask simple questions, and ask pertinent questions, continuously, in addition to asking always for the computerized or digital record of proceedings issued against them directly from the Court–which, as evident from the Croydon Court Manager’s letter here, yielded absolute gold. Moral of that story apparently is: When HM Courts and Tribunal Service or the local Council comes knocking with an unlawful “Summons” missing a court case number, go directly to the Court and ask for the digital record of proceedings. Further, the magic sentence to include in this request for confirmation and record and which seeks to elicit the truth is, he says, the most powerful sentence in law for anyone to use: “I have never been served with any proceedings issued by the court.”

Anthony’s pertinent questioning of a police officer who arrested him and informed him he was going to be subjected to a noxious bulldozer “interview” after directing bogus charges his way, of “squatting” in his own home, and owing Council tax, included the question, “Who has made the allegation?” This interview, a clear record of police harassment, was recorded by the police on video and can be viewed on YouTube:

What is interesting to know is that several events have transpired it seems as a consequence of Anthony Badaloo’s actions to reveal and question the fraudulent court orders, both on his own behalf and on behalf of others who have sought his counsel in dealing with the courts and false authorities involved in stealing their houses or children. Police officers (including the one above, interrogating Anthony) have resigned their positions and disappeared. A CPS Chief has resigned. Council members and heads have resigned and left or moved counties. (Please see the list of names and actions at the Stop Court Order Scams petition.)

He is hopeful therefore that if everyone who has been wronged stands up and asks the right questions–not aggressively, but insistently–justice will indeed be served and this whole system of fraud and deception will collapse in on itself overnight.

Please stay tuned for updates and posts here of Anthony Badaloo’s documents referenced here, his press release on this momentous occasion of publicly releasing this accidentally-whistleblowing letter, and a template for people to use to question all fraud-running cartels and Councils.

Documentary Evidence of Covert Electronic-Weapon and Neurotechnology Use By US Government on Americans Series (2) The Limited Effects Technology (LET) Program Report | JPSG, OOTW/LE Programs, 1996

RAE (Report, Analysis, Op-Ed) | Ramola D | Posted January 30, 2020

Documentary Evidence since 1994 of Covert High-Tech Electronic-Weapon and Neurotechnology Use in Targeted Surveillance, Experimentation, Operations by US Government on Americans: A Series

(1) The DOD/DOJ Memorandum of Understanding on OOTW/LE, 1994

(2) The Limited Effects Technology (LET) Program Report | JPSG, OOTW/LE Programs, 1996

Unremarked in mainstream media, deliberately hidden from wider readership, there have been a series of declassified document FOIA-releases over the past few years which astonishingly reveal many facets of the now-known covert use of electronic-weapon and neurotechnology surveillance, experimentation, weapons-tests, and operations on the American public by various agencies and departments of the US Government and their contractors.

Similarity with Covert Global High-Tech Policing Operations: Similar operations have been unleashed worldwide, as reported extensively at this site and others online earlier. Some documentation in the public domain testifies to this global program, and will be reported more fully here shortly. For now, please see this Twitter thread, which discloses NATO High-Tech Non Lethal Weapon/Neuro Policing operations in Europe and discusses also how Non-Lethal Weapons Testing & Neuro Surveillance have been unleashed inside the USA:

HTML Page: Thread on Non-Lethal DEW Operations in USA, Europe, world, with references to US, NATO documents, articles 

On Twitter: Thread on Non-Lethal DEW Operations in USA, Europe, world, with references to US, NATO documents, articles

This series aims to address the public disclosures in recent FOIA releases of ongoing US Government use of Electronic Weapons and Neurotechnologies on Americans.

“Electronic Weapon” herein refers to the spectrum weapons used in Electronic Warfare as defined by the Department of Defense (DOD) in documents, particularly relates to anti-personnel weapons, includes all labeled as non-lethal-weapon, less-than-lethal weapon, psychotronic weapon, neuroweapon, next generation and emerging technologies, and includes RFID (Radio Frequency IDentification) and BCI (Brain Computer Interface) tech.


(2) The Limited Effects Technology (LET) Program Report | JPSG, OOTW/LE Programs, 1996

PDF: The Limited Effects Technology (LET) Program Report | JPSG, OOTW/LE Programs, 1996

Recent document releases into the public domain include this Limited Effects Technology Program Report (linked above) released by the US Department of Defense on FOIA request on May 31, 2019 to Harun Krasna via Muckrock News, on a multi-document request made in January 2018, where initial notice of delays from the DOD FOI Office (until September 2018) suggesting high volume of responsive records seems to have petered out by May 2019 into return of a single report from DARPA, as their final response letter shows.

This FOIA request was made in January 2018 and asked DOD for “Copies of all research reports, annual reports, and indices of the Joint Program Steering Group (JPSG) as established by the 1994 MOU between the Department of Justice and Department of Defense, dating from 1994 to the present.”

(NOTE: The same request was sent by Mr. Krasna to the Department of Justice in January 2018 and yielded several documents in February 2018, including the 1994 DOD-DOJ MOU reported here earlier. Of note, this writer had also queried the DOJ for this very same 1994 MOU in 2015, and was at that time denied this document, citing “no responsive records” and several claimed exemptions.)

The purpose of this article is to report on the structure, disclosure, and highlights of this JPSG LET Program Report, and offer insight into its content with an eye to more fully informing the American public what the implications and ramifications are regarding the use of anti-personnel military weaponry by domestic law enforcement and military branches on the American public, which is what this JPSG LET Program Report is premised on.

Notable About This Foia-Request Response

  1. DARPA chose to return one single document, after a 1.5 year delay, on this multi-document request for documents dating back (from 2018, time of request) to 24 years. (This should not be found acceptable to the American public—other reports obviously exist and are being withheld; DARPA should be queried again.)

  2. This document is dated 1996; no recent reports were released by DARPA; no notice of the ending of these JPSG joint DOD-DOJ programs has been given in this May 2019 response.

  3. This document is not redacted and is released in full, which implies that the disclosure of technology and policy in this document is acceptable now to DARPA; this is in line with the slow release of information on Non Lethal Weapons, Electronic Warfare, and Neuroweaponry the DOD has made online and in print—via notice of programs, weapons, conferences, articles, and recorded lectures in public-domain documents and sites online–in recent years. However it also implies the JPSG (a DOD-DOJ entity) chooses currently to reveal what’s in this document as applicable to Law Enforcement—which could be a way of corralling tacit public consent to Law Enforcement use by thus publishing notice of this insidious and pernicious weaponry.

  4. It is essential therefore for Media, human and civil rights groups to take note now of the disclosure here and ask further questions, examine implications for all, and delve deeper into what is really at stake with this “Limited Effects Technology Program.”

Basic Structure of This Limited-Effects Technology Report

This 9-page report with the JPSG Defense-Justice logo on the cover and naming David Fields as the Program Manager is divided into the following sections:

Background

Program Thrusts

The Limited Effects Technology Program

Electric Stun Projectile

Laser Surveillance and Dazzler System

Handheld Laser Dazzler

Pyrotechnic Devices

Acoustic Study

Summary

The Section Titled “Background”

Notable from the information in this section titled “Background” is the following:

  1. This Limited Effects Technology Program is acknowledged to be a JPSG program resulting from the MOU from 1994, reported earlier.

  2. The need for such a joint program merging the efforts of Defense and Justice in developing technology applicable to both is being rationalized and legitimized by recourse to stated historical reference of common “need” as technology requirements for both “converge.” This is assertion which is neither specific, transparent, nor explicatory. It is presumption which seeks to hide the fact that what is being discussed here, as the immediate technological lead-up to the 1994 DOD-DOJ MOU, discussed here, demonstrates, are Remote Human Access-and-Control Neuro/Bio Weapons—Non Lethal Weapons and Neurotechnologies (to some extent revealed in “Program Thrusts”), which are arguably highly invasive of bodily and brain privacy, integrity, health, and safety.

Please see the section Some Context to this MOU in Article 1 of this series for historic Non Lethal/EMF Spectrum & Acoustic/Neuro/Bio Weapons-Development background to the MOU and all technology programs the MOU has given rise to.

  1. Examples given of operations sharing this need are “the (Defense) provision of humanitarian assistance, peacekeeping, countering the flow of drugs into the United States, counterterrorism, etc.–and (Justice) law enforcement forces engaged in LE operations.” We are expected to agree that military operations, even “peacekeeping” (which should not be considered a military activity in the first place: weapons cannot “peacekeep,” they subjugate) share a common need for “limited effects” tech i.e., silent Human Access Weapons—which, it should be noted, are not being named as such here. This notion of “need” is presumption, and emblematic of coercion of consent.

  2. The Need to Limit Force or apply only a “minimum amount of force” as primary principle of action is posited here—again without corroboration from real-life where war casualties and police violence abound—as a severe constraint to military and police ability to function. The solution to this false claim (false because it does not seem to be a real-life principle by which either police or military adheres) then funnels down to Non Lethals or Limited-Effects weapons, which are being characterized as force-limiting weapons within a claimed hierarchy of severity which completely ignores the unethical, human-rights-violating aspects of bio-hacking and neuro-hacking weapons, which is what they are (as will be seen shortly). More accurately, this section should be headed The Need to Be Seen to Limit Force, with Public-Image-Boosting Non-Visible Weapons.

  3. Common Threats posit militarized drug-smugglers and terrorists with access to military and LE Tech, which in real-life is made possible (as we understand now from much investigative and whistleblowing reportage including from journalist Gary Webb, LAPD investigator and government whistleblower Michael Ruppert and others) by gun-running, drug-running, and open arms sales by government, military, CIA, mafia, and private-sector alike, which makes this a circular argument: Military and LE fuel the arms/police weapons industry which creates these weapons, as well as tools such as electro-optic imaging devices to aid night vision goggles and Electronic Weapon countermeasures. This circular view also promises endless escalation via blackmarket sales of new weapons. “The criminals have our guns so we need new guns” could go on forever.

  1. Common Missions which name the War on Drugs and the War on Terrorism imply that these are both military campaigns just as much as law enforcement campaigns, which would explain both the military-style DEA and LE SWAT team “drug” raids on homes, terrorizing children and families, and the non-lethal weapons-operations via DOD/USAF weapons-testing contracts on people wrongfully labeled “terrorists” as ensured by the Omnibus Counterterrorism Act of 1995 after the Oklahoma Bombing (a staged insider event, as per whistleblower evidence), and later the Patriot Act of 2001 post 9/11 (another staged insider event, as per much public analysis and testimonial). Yet, in mainstream media and government press releases, these missions are not disclosed as such—the military aspect kept hidden–with much secrecy especially attending the field testing aspect of otherwise openly-disclosed non-lethal weapons testing contracts inside America.

  2. The most significant disclosure from this section comprises notice of 1) the members of the Joint Program Steering Group, as deriving from DARPA, the National Institute of Justice, the FBI, the Bureau of Prisons, and the US Army; 2) their ability to engage at any point in R&D of the weapons mentioned here; 3) the notion that they could participate in “demonstrations” of this technology just as much as developments. Are demonstrations then, what people are reporting today as 24/7 silent microwave/milliwave/infra-red/neurotech weapons operations in their neighborhoods, with use of drones, small planes, satellites, helicopters, zooming cars, parked vans and cars, antennas, cell towers, smart meters, backpack stalkers? (These also appear to be weapons-testing activities, weapons-training activities, and weapons-operations activities.)

  3. Also significant is the information that the Limited Effects Technology Program is only one part of a multi-technology program established by the JPSG to address joint tech priorities of Defense and Justice in 1995. The other tech programs are described in Program Thrusts.

The Section Titled “Program Thrusts”

This section in the LET report discusses the actual technology programs of the JPSG, names certain technologies being developed, tested, and used in training, reveals that most if not all of these are Remote Human Access spectrum and sonic technologies, yet maintains quite some obscurity in disclosing certain of these technologies, for example using vague terms like “communications security technologies.”

It is interesting indeed that this document titled The Limited Effects Technology Program Report in actuality presents information on all JPSG DOD-DOJ programs (or all deemed safe to record), yet focuses only on some LE tech, and uses the same opening Background section to preface notice of all JPSG programs—which implies commonality of context and nature of weaponry, i.e., Non-Lethal, Remote Human Access/Control (as will be seen below).

Significant, in this section, are the following.

  1. The JPSG Program—the most essential program ensuring DOD-DOJ liaison re. “advanced technology development” as per the 1994 DOD-DOJ MOU—focuses on 7 technology areas, which, on close perusal, cover quite a bit of territory. This program in other words is being used to develop, test, and demonstrate sophisticated and secretive wireless, remote, radiation, EMF spectrum, acoustic, bio-communications detection, monitoring, tracking, and communications technologies with major implications for all individuals and the entire urban environment.

  2. The first six program areas are presented only in summary, with slightly more elaboration of the Limited Effects Technology program which titles the report. Notably, even this seventh section is not comprehensive in its coverage of the LET it purports to cover: the devices highlighted do not comprise the whole of the LET program, only that portion DARPA is willing to put in a document clearly intended for eventual public-release (after 25 years!) into the public-domain, which has happened now. (More on this subject in the LET Program section below.) 

  3. Concealed Weapons Detection:

Concealed- Weapons-Detection technologies the JPSG reports here it seeks to develop are “unobtrusive” —read, concealable in plain sight–systems which can detect weapons of various kinds, including those with little to no metallic content, from over 9 meters—27 feet, width of a couple rooms–away. Initial efforts were to cover stationary devices—but clearly this 1996 wording suggests mobile devices would also be developed.

Actual detection technologies in process then in 1996 included:

3.1 An X-ray sensor: which refers to sensor technology; X-ray sensors are variously used in medical/dental radiography and in scanning systems as in airport scanners for people or baggage.

They are possibly also used in Backscatter X-ray technology as reportedly carried in NYPD vans, about which NYPD, although sued by ACLU, was protected by the NY Appeals Court from divulging much about, while companies contracting with the US Government to produce “Z-Backscatter-Vans” offer more information on the X-ray imaging of vehicles they do;

3.2. Combined passive millimeter wave and infra-red sensors: which are sensors used in scanning systems which can detect objects by their relative millimeter wave glow or infra-red heat signature profile, literally see through clothes better than X-rays and give rise to images highly invasive of personal privacy. Both millimeter wave sensors and infra-red sensors are energy sensors, detecting bio-field energy and thermal signatures; the distance from which such sensors can be used is a matter for further research. Some infra-red sensors are used in cameras mounted on aircraft and satellites.

Interestingly, a document online from the Air Force Research Lab, written by an apparent contractor, Decision-Science Applications Inc., found online after the bulk of this article was written, reports in 1998 on Concealed Weapons Detection programs run on grants from the NIJ and DARPA--which suggests a possible connection to these JPSG programs, while revealing that NIJ and DARPA were funding the Air Force Research Lab, which in turn funded a private contractor, in a chain of inter-agency connections–and points to sensor technologies being intentionally developed to penetrate clothing.

Concealed Weapon Detection Program, AFRL Report/https://apps.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a359699.pdf

https://www.millivision.com/technology.html

Camera with Infra-red sensor showing heat signatures/https://www.wisegeek.com/what-is-infrared-imaging.htm#

3.3 Combined ultrasound and radar sensors: which translates to:

a) Ultrasonic sensors: the use of high-frequency ultrasonic pulsed transmitter/receiver sensors to send and receive waves in echo from materials to determine their composition or proximity (used in a variety of industries including healthcare, agriculture, target-tracking of animals or humans from UAVs or manned aircraft, water-level sensing, car or obstacle detection), used in short-range, up to 10-meters application;

b) Radar sensors used in short and long range (up to 100 meters) object detection, tracking target movement, collision avoidance in cars, and to detect materials with guided wave radar or special antennas which ultrasonics may miss, such as softer, powdery, foamier, dustier materials, using either Doppler pulses or frequency-modulated continuous wave radar.

https://www.maxbotix.com

3.4 Low Frequency Magnetic sensor: Magnetic sensors use a variety of physical effects related to magnetism, such as eddy current sensing, measuring small relative changes in earth’s magnetic field created by variations in magnetic material, to detect flaws in metal, movement of metals (as in weapons) carried on a person’s body, movement of large metallic objects such as cars, etc. Magnetic sensors detect metal carried on persons when radar alone, stopped by metallic-walls or reflective insulation barriers, is not enough.

Low magnetic fields relate to biofields; low frequency magnetic sensors can pick up low frequency (ELF, ULF body resonance frequency below 10 Hz, below 30 KHz) magnetic fields as indicated in rise and fall of chest cavity; this capacity is used in earthquake life-detection and through-wall surveillance in combination with radar sensors.

Then there are super-conducting quantum interference devices (SQUIDs) which also pick up very low emfs, such as brain ELFs.

MEMS and nanosensors using thin film magnetic technology also exist. (On this subject: Radar sensors used in prisons are taking recourse to radar tagging to distinguish inmates from  guards—implying the use of nanosensors in tracking, which appear to be of different kinds.)

Through-the-wall surveillance technologies/https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/07_01.pdf

Squid/Wikipedia

Finally, this section’s disclosure on then-current use notes that the X-Ray sensor was being “demonstrated”–meaning, operated–in a correctional institution in California—a prison or juvenile detention center. The use of sensor and imaging technologies in correctional and detention institutions must be thoroughly investigated, in relation to the bioeffect harms from such technology usage.

What Is Not Being Explicitly Stated But Implied In This Entire Section?

  1. These sensor technologies are being tested on populations as per the 1994 DOD-DOJ MOU in joint military-police programs, which means they are being used silently and experimentally on people.

  1. All sensor technologies, unless passive, require emission as well as reception of signal. This means that people—unwittingly, without being informed—are being subjected to X-rays, ultrasound radiation, millimeter wave technologies, radar technologies, ULFs, ELFS, and magnetic fields, at short-range and long-range, close-in and remote, ostensibly for weapons-detection testing purposes, in any number and type of environments, including but not limited to airports, train stations, public areas, and private homes. These technologies could be directed at people from inside buildings and homes, from inside cars, pickups, trucks, vans, from mountings in public locations, from parked vehicles in parking-lots and from moving vehicles while driving.

  1. Sensor technologies being tested at short and long range include low frequency magnetic sensors which track biofields, breathing activity, body resonance emfs, and low frequency brainwaves, plausibly using superconducting quantum interference and tunneling technologies, and comprising earthquake-life-detection monitoring or through-wall-surveillance as described in various other public documents, and plausibly also Remote Neural Monitoring or neurosurveillance, of the kind spoken about 28 years ago in the ex-NSA employee John St. Clair Akwei lawsuit against the NSA.

  1. As in the found document Silent Weapons for Quiet Wars, which posits the surreptitious use of socio-economic weapons of degradation to disable and disarm entire populations without their conscious awareness, the surreptitious testing of sensor technologies on populations is essentially the leveling of silent military spectrum weapons technologies on the bodies of citizens, without their knowing.

  1. The surreptitious leveling and usage of silent military spectrum weapons of bodily and brain monitoring, assault, and modification is precisely what thousands of reporting victims of EMF/Neuro DEW crimes worldwide—often labeled and dismissed as Targeted Individuals—are currently reporting, both inside the USA and out. Could it be that the testing of sensor technologies in concealed weapons detection constitutes one aspect of this surreptitious assault on citizens?

  1. Factually speaking, the disclosure in this document along with the disclosure in the 1994 DOD-DOJ MOU that these technologies are being tested is, at minimum, evidence that invisible, spectrum technologies are being operated and tested on the bodies of people, from a distance and from close-by, exactly as thousands of highly credentialled and credible people– often labeled as “Targeted Individuals” and falsely characterized for credibility-disappearance as “Mentally Ill” by mainstream Govt-propaganda-pushing media–are reporting.

4.Geolocation/Navigation/Communications:

Three aspects to location, ID, and tracking technology are being covered in these JPSG programs, as delineated in this section on Geo-Location/Navigation/Communications in the LET Program Report:

4.1 Locating or precision-finding, precision-targeting of specific people, objects, or vehicles—this implicates GPS (Global Positioning Satellite) and other satellite technologies, including handheld satellites, for GPS-tracking of RFID human/object tags, cell phones; as well as human/object RFID/other, Nano/Micro tagging technologies to facilitate GPS-tracking, in other words, Surveillance and Tagging-for-Surveillance technologies.

4.2 Identifying or pinpointing identity of individuals & things—this suggests Identifying Biometric Surveillance & Tagging-for-ID- Surveillance: Facial/Gait/Iris/Fingerprint/Body/DNA/Other Recognition Surveillance; Unique RFID Tagging (Nano/micro biosensors & object tags) & WBANS (Wireless Body Area Networks) for Identification. Again, Surveillance and Tagging-for-Surveillance technologies. Involves Biometric Data Collection.(Law Enforcement has long been involved in this.)

4.3 Monitoring or tracking movement of people and things—this suggests Surveillance & Tagging-for-Surveillance: Audio/Visual Surveillance using microphones and cameras; Cyber Surveillance of computers; Through-Wall Surveillance with RF/ULF/Magnetic sensor technologies; Medical/Health monitoring & continuous detection of RF/other Implants & WBANs using Radar, Wifi; ISR (Intelligence, Surveillance, Reconnaissance) surveillance using Radar from drones, spy/commercial planes, satellites, ground vehicles; Tagging-for-Surveillance: Unique RF/Spectrum & Nano/Micro tagging (correctional, medical) technologies, CCTL—Continuous Clandestine Tracking and Locating (military, intelligence) technologies; Sensor technologies (as discussed in the previous Concealed Weapons-Detection section). Again, Surveillance and Tagging-for-Surveillance technologies. (USAF, AFRL, USMC are currently conducting Non Lethal Weapons tests and ISR tests using these.)

Notably, “reduction of power consumption” is mentioned as a DARPA interest in tracking technologies; this might account for the increased development of passive or inert nanosensors which can be activated or energized by energy signals sent to them, rather than relying on inbuilt battery packs.

4.4 The two JPSG efforts mentioned here include Tagging, as discussed above, very slightly referenced with this line about tiny wireless sensors, termed “devices,” notably marked “modular” as in implantable WBANs, which do indeed have modules or nodes in a network. These are not just object-tagging devices, they are human-tagging devices.

Military tracking of objects and humans using sensors

The fully-implanted and centrally-monitored human

Sensors at level of cell, molecule, DNA

And this is not a slight JPSG effort at all: Tagging and sensor technologies constitute multi-billion dollar businesses and are intimately linked to all aspects of Geo-Location, Navigation, and Communications, as discussed above. Again, here too, DARPA should be more definitively and minutely questioned about these tagging technologies and how they are being used inside America, on Americans—especially since thousands of Americans, as also people worldwide, are reporting violative, non-consensual RFID micro and nano implants in their bodies.  

4.5 The first JPSG effort mentioned here, Soldier 911, is mentioned in DARPA literature as an emergency radio to help find soldiers in crisis.

However from the description in the LET report, it also sounds like a handheld satellite linked in to an emergency response network, functioning as a device to locate, identify, and track “the movement of individuals and vehicles,” which, if an additional feature (undisclosed in DARPA literature) on this device, is only possible through the use of pre-tagging of said individuals and vehicles with sensor and tagging technologies–or the use of SIGINT Remote Neural Monitoring, as described in the John St. Clair Akwei lawsuit vs the NSA in 1992, in the case of humans.

5. Sniper DetectionSniper Detection systems as mentioned here were intended to be of various kinds, including manually-portable, bodily-worn, and vehicle-mounted.

These systems, as stated above in the LET Program report–being explored and tested publicly from 1996 on–involve sensors: acoustic sensors, infra-red sensors, and integrated infrared-acoustic and infrared-laser sensors.

Interestingly, this section appears to be discussing technologies for detection of actual gunshot or sniper fire—not non-lethal fire, not spectrum-weapon-related shots. However the detection technologies themselves are spectrum technologies.

Brief research of these detection technology sensors indicates that acoustic, infra-red, and laser technologies are being developed and used by militaries to determine with pin-point precision the direction and location of fire from a weapon after a first shot. Sensors today are becoming highly sophisticated with universities (working on military grants, partnering with private firms) also involved in developing bio-mimetic systems of detection, using neural network learning and studying how bats and dolphins process sound and vibration.

It is notable that this program of Sniper Detection has been included as a JPSG program in this Limited-Effects Technology report as one of the multi-technology program thrusts of the JPSG.

JPSG, we recall, is the Joint Program Steering Group formed by the 1994 DOD-DOJ MOU employing parties from both Defense and Justice in mutually-relevant matters and projects of security and law enforcement, OOTW and LE, intending to jointly develop and test “advanced technologies” of common interest.

Some Undisclosed Conclusions

1. Could it be therefore that Sniper Detection is related to matters of Mass Shooters, the phenomenon of supposedly crazed “lone gunmen”–plausibly mind-control victims of MK ULTRA RHIC-EDOM (radio hypnosis intra-cerebral electronic dissolution of memory) radio-hypnosis—shooting up people in random settings, as well as the Live Action Drills with Active Shooters run by the Department of Homeland Security?

If so, this offers a connection not merely between the DOD and DOJ but also with the DHS; all three departments are in some way involved in these sniper detection programs.

This also offers a connection to War on Terror programs and funding, since mass shooters are characterized internally as Domestic Terrorists—even if their “Manchurian Candidate” creation is by covert agencies in Defense/Justice/DHS/CIA, undercover of Live Action Drills, for purposes of driving Agenda 21/2030 Gun Control agendas, as is often surmised by many analysts.

2. Further, the JPSG efforts noted here to develop sensors, in its inclusion of biomimetic systems and neuroscience research, now used in sniper detection in the field, may well involve the use of neuroprosthetics, as indicated by the acknowledged use of cochlear implants in medical and neuroscience research over several decades by a Defense contractor, Biomimetic Systems, Inc.

3. It is plausible therefore—and a matter for further investigation—that the non-consensual use and implantation of cochlear and other neurological implants—which numerous citizens have come forward to report, over the last three to four decades–for the study of neural networks and auditory processes has accompanied the JPSG efforts in this area of Sniper Detection.

6. Information Technology:While this section is quite opaque, a few conclusions can be drawn:

  1. The JPSG states that it is addressing the needs for instant and secure communications needs in LE and Military by taking advantage of advances in civilian and govt-sponsored IC technologies. This would not however require a separate program to do so, unless undisclosed advances were being acquired.

  1. These advances, hinted at but not specified, could include Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, autonomous systems, cybernetics, cognitive computing, Internet of Things, Internet of Humans, lesser-known Neuro/Bio-communications technologies such as V2K (Voice to Skull) and Synthetic Telepathy, Hive Minds and Brain Nets revealed by whistleblowers like Richard Alan Miller and Robert Duncan (while some brain projects are openly revealed by public-domain DARPA information and known to exist via academic/government focus in US and worldwide), robotics, nanotechnology, the miniaturization of electronics, quantum computing, and other aspects of modern ICT which are left unnamed here. Simulating all 100 billion neural connections of brain on future supercomputers/https://www.kurzweilai.net/new-algorithm-will-allow-for-simulating-neural-connections-of-entire-brain-on-future-exascale-supercomputers

    Brainternet-Connecting a Brain to the Internet as an IOT device/Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LSdN–axYbA

This possibility—of such undisclosed advanced projects being part of the IT program sketchily noted here–is once more underlined by the opaque disclosure of “innovative exploitation” of existing ICT infrastructure intended in the creation of interagency crisis management systems.

  1. Communications security technology” in common parlance includes encryption and authentication technologies which today include biometrics and RFID microchips, but is not further specified in this section.


Considering that the rollout of biometrics (iris, fingerprint, face, voice recognition) at airports and borders is being overseen by TSA, a part of DHS, and that DNA is collected by LE at jails and detention centers, it can be safely concluded that any joint program of Defense and Justice in this area would indeed encompass all of these certainly exploitative technologies.

  1. “Sharing information among agencies” points to shared information from different databases collected by different parties, including DNA collection databases managed by LE, and recently exposed for massive privacy violations. Police databases are apparently highly insecure, and corrupt officers have made it a practice to sell databases to private companies for thousands of dollars, a practice revealed by recent news articles, including by Chief Jones on Ramola D Reports.

Information Sharing across Law Enforcement/RAND report/https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR645.html

Law enforcement investigators seek out private DNA databases/Mashable

Police Are Collecting DNA From People Without Telling Them/Futurism

Police use of surveillance technology raises privacy concerns/MintPressNews

Across US, police officers abuse confidential databases/AP

Agencies Behaving Badly: Government Surveillance and Privacy Act Violations/Jurist

Ramola D Reports| Report # 120: Retired Police Chief Daymond Jones on Policing in America Today

  1. To conclude, the opacity of this section on Information Technology appears to hide much. It is entirely possible that non-consensual, clandestine implantation of RFIDs, as part of developments in Military/LE cybernetics, telemetry, biometrics, neuroinformatics in “innovative exploitation” of communications security technologies, is being executed by this JPSG program—as reported by high numbers of Americans. Again, this presents therefore an issue to be examined further with DARPA and the Justice Department.

7. Personnel Armor:This section, like the Sniper Detection section, seems to pertain explicitly to lethal weapons and not non-lethal or spectrum weapons.

However, it notes that lethal weapons threats—bullets from rifles and handguns—affect OOTW and LE operations both.

Protection from rifle bullets via advanced lightweight body armor in the course of OOTW/LE operations of any kind appears to be the focus here; the implication appears to be that such operations could involve rifle threats; it is possible therefore that this pertains, as also the Sniper Detection section, to mass shooters and the weapons (assault weapons, rifles) some have used, as well as to regular LE activities, which do involve lethal exertion of force, warranted or unwarranted, in situations of gun violence.

It’s interesting that this has been designated an area for Defense-Justice collaboration; plenty of Defense contractors exist who research and develop body armor, as any cursory inquiry into the market shows. LE also has a dedicated market producing police gear. For the JPSG to enter this arena suggests a corralling of new Federal funds perhaps, or some kind of development of new technology – countermeasure shielding for spectrum technology? – that is not being fully disclosed here. Note that what is being stated above as aspects of this program are presented as inclusions (“efforts include”), not all-encompassing and exclusive.

8.Biomedical Technology:

This is also a relatively opaque section suggesting telemedicine application in penitentiaries and OOTW rescue operations, which implies audio-video consultation and data transmission of medical detail perhaps but does not expand on the suggestions implicit in the label of “biomedical technology” which could include medical telemetry, meaning implants, body area networks, biosensors, and implanted biomonitors, at nano- and micro-levels, to aid in remote patient monitoring and other telehealth initiatives.

New Atlas article, 2018/https://newatlas.com/profusa-health-monitoring-biosensors/53870/

To reiterate, the incidence of such biomedical implants found to have been non-consensually implanted in what can only be understood to be undisclosed and covert human experimentation and tracking operation projects involving variably, academic, medical, and military/Intelligence personnel has been reported in large numbers by Americans as also people worldwide. It is possible therefore that the opacity of the language in this section obscures the larger truths of such non-consensual implantation being part and parcel of a plethora of telehealth processes and technologies being tested silently on people.

This latter possibility in fact has increasingly been reported by people experiencing invasive radar activation of non-consensual implants within contexts of seemingly being probed in public by a rotating army of stalkers masquerading as community monitors and healthcare workers.

9. Limited Effects Technologies:


Significant, from this brief introduction (further screenshotted below):

  1. As noted earlier, this section, which titles the report and occupies 5 of the 9 pages of this report yet details only one portion of the multi-technology JPSG program.
  2. Further, its detailing is incomplete, as indicated by the language in the opening section.

  1. Crowd control and deterrence devices being studied and developed under this LET program are presented here as innocuous, benign, and needed—as per a nonspecific claim of need. There is no indication however of actual studies to establish they are such, or actually “eyesafe” or “less lethal” as stated.

A significant fact to note is the language referring to “sponsoring” and “funding” programs and projects to develop these limited-effects technologies, which means JPSG is handing out grants and contracts to Defense/LE contractor companies to develop these weapons. This might well be the protocol by which all JPSG programs work, and could explain the AFRL contract with Decision-Sciences Applications, Inc. on NIJ and DARPA grants, mentioned above in the Concealed Weapons Detection section. 

Electric Stun Projectile

This “effort” relates to a physical projectile using wireless, gas, or “conventionally propelled” means intended to electrically shock and stun a human target, as Tasers also do. Hardly a “Limited Effect” weapon, this is a stun gun intended to be used as a  shock-defence if a soldier or LE officer is attacked. Note that the intent is still incapacitation, blunt trauma, high impact force–but using an electrical charge, not a high-velocity bullet. 

Developed in San Diego, tested on the Marine Corps, probably rolled out and in use now, post 1997. Notice that the photograph is blacked out almost and reveals nothing. DARPA is not going out of its way to provide clear information here.

A look into Jaycor, the company, online, now subsumed into Titan Corporation, a larger Defense contractor engaged in large-scale DEW, satellite, and navigational systems manufacture, reveals their interest in other counter-personnel stun-gun non-lethal weapons and crowd-control devices. Titan Corporation is therefore now manufacturing both large-scale DEWs to take out battleships and smaller-scale non-lethal weapons (being characterized here as “Limited-Effects”) to take out human beings, or fell them for a while–no doubt with damages, as “crowd-control.”

Laser Surveillance and Dazzler System

While blinding lasers were banned by the European Parliament in 1995, the use of lasers to dazzle and disorient human targets did not stop, as BOSS, developed by the US Air Force’s Phillips Lab in Albuquerque, New Mexico demonstrates. It is interesting that this surveillance and dazzler system was developed for and presumably funded by the JPSG at an Air Force laboratory.

From Defense Review, 2005/Laser_Battlefield_Optical_Surveillance_System_BOSS

Notably, this system 1) involves the use of infra-red thermal sensors to find targets plus lasers to dazzle targets, 2) can be applied remotely from a considerable distance, and 3) intends both a psychological effect in alerting targeted individuals to being targeted by way of Show-of-Force bright illumination and the physical effect of deleterious uber-brighting or dazzling of the target’s eyes.

Again, not exactly Limited Effects, but labeled as such.

Finally, it is notable that further integration of this “Limited Effect” optical sensor-and-weapon system with acoustic sniper detection systems already developed under JPSG (as indicated above also by the AFRL/Decision-Sciences Applications 1998 Report) was also being explored in 1996, further evidence that sensor and “non-lethal” spectrum technologies were being developed and tested by the JPSG for multiple uses.

Handheld Laser Dazzler

Also developed by the US Air Force’s Phillips Lab, the handheld laser dazzler—whether portable in a backpack or camouflaged as a flashlight—demonstrates that non-lethal energy weapons, including lasers, promising limited-effects were being made by the JPSG on a smaller scale, at lesser power, for purposes of portability and ease of use.

Portable Handheld Laser Dazzlers/https://www.tech-lasers.com/dazzlers/portable

Again, as per the 1994 DOD-DOJ MOU, the non-lethal Spectrum/Acoustic sensor-and-weapon technologies being developed by the joint Defense-Justice partnership here were being tested—are being tested, have been tested for the past 25 years—and “demonstrated” on real targets.

Pyrotechnic Devices

The publishing of flash-bang devices designed to fast-bloom-smoke, dazzle, whistle, and other such is the one consistent element that disclosure on non-lethal weapons has maintained. Unwilling to speak openly of radar and sonic devices with silent and invisible physical bio-effects on humans, literature from the Joint Non Lethal Weapons Program has not refrained from pointing openly to these dazzle and vibrate devices, in obvious attempts to misdirect focus away from the far deadlier bio-hacking and neuro-hacking devices of non-lethal sensor technologies and neuroweapons.

Acoustic Study

This is evidence that infra-sound (below 20 Hz, the threshold of human hearing) weaponry for crowd-control was being researched in 1996 and tested on people, specifically to determine the biological effects of such transmissions, and explore means of incapacitating individuals for crowd-control purposes with infra-sound.

Prior information, available online, shows that infrasound had long been known to produce bio-effects and brain-effects–nausea, disorientation, brain fog–in humans, since Dr. Gavreau’s discoveries and experiments with infrasound in the 1950s, and efforts had already been made to create devices and systems to use infrasound in a weaponized way against humans, as in the published US Patent 3612211, screenshotted below.  

A salient point to note is that infrasound weapons (like other emerging weapons technologies) had been reviewed in the 1970s by United Nations conferences on disarmament, and efforts had been made, particularly by the Soviet Union, to halt the development of all such new weapons then seen as weapons of mass destruction. The US and UK were prominent naysayers to this plan in 1978 at the Conference of the Committee on Disarmament, where Hungary presented a paper on infrasound weapons and their effects. Now it appears that not only were such weapons not halted in development between 1978 and 1996, DARPA was arranging in 1996 for further development and testing of these dangerous acoustic weapons, long known to harm human bodies and brains.

The Section Titled Summary

While this document has touched on major program areas of the JPSG, its title and detail elaborate the more obvious flash-bang aspects of the “Limited-Effects Technology” program, while the Summary remains opaque. Notable however is the casual mention of “corrections” being aligned with the main parties involved in these joint programs, as in “military, law enforcement, and corrections” as the primary “user communities” being awarded “new, more effective tools,” with little description or specificity on the nature or kind of tools, and no summation of the high points of this document.

However, some definite conclusions can be reached regarding this entire document, in addition to all noted above at end of sections.

CONCLUSIONS

  1. DARPA returned this one 1996 document to a multi-document request on JPSG programs begun 25 years ago, after 25 years.

  2. This is not a fully disclosive document; much is being obscured, summarized, glossed over.

  3. The Limited-Effects Technology program is only one of several JPSG programs mentioned in this document.

  4. All these JPSG programs need to be understood, as stated, as deriving from the 1994 DOD-DOJ MOU which announced the testing and demonstration of “advanced technologies.” That MOU followed on the heels of a classified Non-Lethal Weapons conference in 1993, and several decades of development and study of Non-Lethal technologies and “Psycho-Corrective” Neurotechnologies. (See Background & Context, MOU.)

  5. The need to limit force is reiterated as primary motivator in bringing DOD and DOJ together in a quest to find and use common modalities in wars on drugs and terrorism—a need which points directly to Anti Personnel Non Lethal Weapons—which are EMF Spectrum and Acoustic Weapons.

These JPSG OOTW/LE programs therefore are definitely focused on Non Lethal Weapons, that is, EMF Spectrum and Acoustic Weapons, which, by nature of the physical bio-effects they have on humans’ bodies and brains, are also Bioweapons and Neuroweapons—not mentioned as such in this document, but elsewhere disclosed, as for instance, by Debra Schnelle at the 2019 Blue Ribbon Emerging Biodefense Conference as Neuro Cognitive Weapons, by Dr. James Giordiano as Neuroweapons in numerous lectures, and discussed at length in the declassified US Army document Bio-Effects of Selected Non-Lethal Weapons as Bioweapons and Neuroweapons, with intended damage to the human body and human brain.

  1. The JPSG comprises members from DARPA, US Army, National Institutes of Justice, Bureau of Prisons, and the FBI. Stands to reason that each of these institutions therefore—and their overseers, the Department of Defense and the Justice Department and leaders, the Secretary of Defense Mark Esper and the Attorney-General William Barr–is fully cognizant of the JPSG programs developing and testing sensor-and-weapon technologies on the streets of America described in this report.

  2. Further, each of these institutions is being permitted to participate in all aspects of the RDA (Research, Development, Acquisition) spectrum, meaning it is acknowledged that these non lethal neuro/bio EMF/acoustic technologies can be tested and demonstrated by the Bureau of Prisons (on prisoners), FBI, and NIJ (on watchlisted citizens? on unwitting members of the public at airports, train stations, hospitals, stores, roadways?) just as much as by DARPA and the US Army (on military personnel? On civilians near military bases? on “indefinite detainees”?) and just as much as jointly developed.

  3. Concealed weapons-detection technologies being developed indicate that people—unwittingly, without being informed—are being subjected to X-rays, ultrasound radiation, millimeter wave technologies, radar technologies, ULFs, ELFS, and magnetic fields, at short-range and long-range, close-in and remote, ostensibly for weapons-detection testing purposes, in any number and type of environments, including but not limited to airports, train stations, public areas, and private homes. These technologies could also be directed at people from inside buildings and homes, from cars, pickups, trucks, vans, from mountings in public locations, from parked vehicles in parking-lots and from moving vehicles while driving.

  4. Sensor technologies for weapons-detection being tested at short and long range include low frequency magnetic sensors which plausibly track biofields, breathing activity, body resonance emfs, and low frequency brainwaves, using superconducting quantum interference and tunneling technologies, and comprising through-wall earthquake-life-detection monitoring, remote neural monitoring, and the surveillance and monitoring of brain states and emotion states.

  5. GPS Tracking and identification technologies being tested and developed imply tagging-for-surveillance sensor technologies inclusive of RFID microchips, WBANs, biosensors, and nanosensors, and include monitoring and surveillance technologies such as different kinds of radar being tested and operated under ISR and military/Air Force Non Lethal Weapons Testing programs.

  6. Sensor technologies being developed for sniper detection, based on biomimetic systems, could include the use of cochlear implants and other neuroprosthetics in the study of auditory and neurological processes, as indicated by companies developing such systems.

  7. Innovative exploitation” of IT communications infrastructure & new technology here could include hive-minding AI projects, nanobots, Brain Nets, quantum computing, and synthetic telepathy, among other undisclosed technologies, involving non-consensual, clandestine implantation of RFIDs and BCI Tech, as well as biometrics/DNA data collection and sharing—as part of developments in Military/LE cybernetics and telemetry, and as reported today by high numbers of Americans.

  8. Personnel armor” being developed as a JPSG program could include research and development of countermeasure shielding for spectrum and acoustic non-lethal bio/neuroweapons, although not expressly stated here.

  9. Biomedical technology initiatives involving telemedicine and telehealth could include medical telemetry, meaning implants, body area networks, biosensors, and implanted biomonitors, of nano- and micro-levels, to aid in remote patient monitoring and other telehealth initiatives. Non-consensual implantation may well be part and parcel of a plethora of telehealth processes and technologies being tested silently on people, in prisons, as noted, and elsewhere.

  10. Limited-effects technologies being developed and tested under JPSG include electric stun projectiles, dazzling laser devices of both mountable and portable kinds, and other crowd-control devices.

  11. Acoustic devices using infrasound to produce physical effects for use in crowd-control to “incapacitate” was being studied at an Air Force Laboratory—and possibly being field-tested and “demonstrated” on populations to provide the needed “hard evidence” mentioned here.

  1. Factually speaking, the disclosure in this document along with the disclosure in the 1994 DOD-DOJ MOU that these technologies are being tested is, at minimum, incontrovertible evidence that invisible, spectrum technologies are being operated and tested on the bodies of people, from a distance and from close-by, exactly as thousands of highly credentialled and credible people– often labeled as “Targeted Individuals” and characterized for credibility-disappearance as “mentally ill” by mainstream Govt-propaganda-pushing media –are reporting.

  2. This document’s disclosure therefore—notwithstanding that much of its details have been withheld–is profoundly important in establishing that non-lethal weapons and sensor technologies, specifically EMF Spectrum and Acoustic Bio/Neuro Weapons have been developed, demonstrated and tested on populations under the aegis of joint Defense-Justice JPSG programs, since 1994.

Related

Documentary Evidence since 1994 of Covert High-Tech Electronic-Weapon and Neurotechnology Use in Targeted Surveillance, Experimentation, Operations by US Government on Americans: (1) The DOD/DOJ Memorandum of Understanding on OOTW/LE, 1994

Public Disclosure on Neuro Weapons and Neuro Technologies In Use Today

Extrajudicial Targeting Technologies (Weapons Use/Tests/Abuse); Biometric Surveillance, Non Lethal Weapons, Neuroweapons

False-Claim of Mental Illness in the Microwave, Millimeter Wave, Other “Non Lethal” Weapons Testing on Citizens in USA & Worldwide

Ramola D/No Longer True: The NSA “Isn’t Getting Violent Internally in the US”: Millions Today in US Are Targeted with RF/Scalar/Sonic Weapons, Nano Weapons, Neuro Weapons, Chem/Bio Weapons

UK Descends Into Gulag As Prominent Child Abuse Whistleblowers & Advocates are Sectioned & Jailed on Mental Health Frauds; Hospital CEOs, Boards of Governors, Doctors, Police, and Ministers Must Be Held Accountable

Report | Ramola D | 1/30/2020

Members of the Global Jury, an international coalition of concerned citizens and human rights advocates, convened on Friday 1/24/2020 to discuss the cases and situations of whistleblowers and child rights advocates in the UK currently sectioned or incarcerated after taking actions of speaking out to report child abuse and criminal acts of pedosadism, ritual abuse, and child killings by protected elite criminal networks.

In a compelling round-table of opinions and experiences relayed, enlivened by whistleblower Adam Mustafa calling in from the Mental Health unit where he is wrongfully being held, Andrew Devine, Neelu Chaudhari, Kaley Einav, :David-william and this writer addressed the issue of total breakdown of sanity, decency, law and order in the UK as ministers, councilors, law enforcement, and hospital personnel have all utterly failed to be responsive to citizen needs and basic principles of humanity as they mechanically and forcibly “section” human rights advocates and whistleblowers, engaging in carte blanche arrests, medication by force, psychiatric committal and wrongful incarceration on flimsy, non-existent, and fabricated pretext.

In both Mental Health hospital-commits under scrutiny in fact–those of electoral candidate Adam Mustafa and social services worker and whistleblower Carol Woods– it seems hospital staff have understood they are in no way delusional or mentally ill, yet continue to hold and forcibly medicate them.

Global Jury 3, addressing Mental Health Fraud on whistleblowers fighting for children

What this indicates is nothing less than an absolute travesty of the health care system which appears to have devolved into a tool of repressive tyranny for venally corrupt officials occupying public office, who are engaged in or parked-to-protect elite criminal practices of Satanic child abuse, pedophilia, ritual abuse & murder of children, and seek to shut down and silence the whistleblowers and activists exposing their horrific crimes.

The notion of Involuntary Holds and Community Mental Health interventions, under the aegis of the Mental Health Act becomes utterly meaningless therefore as completely sane people, engaging in civic endeavor, humanitarian cause, and clear human rights advocacy are captured by supposed “health-care” workers and over-zealous or co-opted law enforcement officers, targeted for life-takedown, and carted off to Psychiatry Wards where they are admitted with the false-label of “delusional” already binding them down.

These are acts of political repression, undertaken to conceal the increasingly visible crimes of crime syndicates operating inside the halls of government.

:David-william informs all that all courts are bankruptcy administrations, judges have no jurisdiction over real living humans–since they deal (in courts) only with the legal fiction of the corporate all-caps entity, the Strawman, and all involved in unlawful incarcerations of this nature are liable for their actions and can be prosecuted “in private”–to which end he says that notice of liability followed with a notice of claim can and will be filed in all cases.

Kaley suggests that people come together to send letters and emails en masse for each whistleblower or activist wrongfully targeted and arrested; send letters to CEOs and Board of Governors of the hospitals, and the doctors involved. “The power of the pen is mightier than the sword,” notes Andy Devine; never underestimate the power of words on paper or in an email. The combined power of many speaking out will indeed make a change.

Adam Mustafa, Electoral Candidate, Anti-Corruption and Child Rights Whistleblower Subjected to Mental Health Fraud

Adam Mustafa, father of three, an independent electoral candidate in the May 2019 East Cheshire Council elections, anti-corruption campaigner, and whistleblower on child abuse cases, including Neelu Chaudhari’s baby niece Sunaina’s case, who exposed election sabotage was targeted for a mental health fraud apparently by political rivals in the Labor Party, subjected to pedophilia defamation frauds on Facebook, wrongfully arrested in December 2019 by Cheshire Police for theft of his own car, forcibly subjected to a mental health assessment in Chester Hospital, and then forced to submit to forced-medication by a group of aggressive hospital staff and training students, who literally jumped on him and held him down to be force-injected with high dosages of neuro-damaging anti-psychotic medications.

Not merely is this a clear case of political silencing, Neelu Chaudhari, pharmacist whistleblower with a background in mental health care, relays that the dosages far exceeded normal doses administered to patients. Clearly not mentally ill but being named mentally ill by police, hospital staff, and University of Chester students, Neelu Chaudhari concludes this is a kidnapping and mental health fraud to stop Adam Mustafa from heading to Parliamentary elections as an independent anti-corruption candidate.

Currently Adam Mustafa is still being held in a mental health unit and requires external advocacy. He reports painful side-effects on his body from the overdose of various drugs.

Adam Mustafa spoke about his experience on Dec 5, 2019 to Neelu Chaudhari here:

NEELU CHAUDHARI LIVE WITH ADAM MUSTAFA IN MENTAL HEALTH SECURE UNIT WILLOW WARD, Bowmere Hospital, The Countess of Chester Health Park, Chester, CH21BQ

Adam spoke about his experiences with the forced-medication on January 1, 2020 to Neelu Chaudhari here:

Adam Mustafa’s case was included in the corruption and election fairness claims made by Edward Ellis, Equity Lawyer working to provide proof of corruption and election frauds to the Equity Monarchy Trusts and Royal Commission.

Reach Adam Mustafa: Held at Brooklands Unit, Clatterbridge hospital: 01513435536

Suggestions for Advocacy: Please write to or call the Directors of the Cheshire and Wirral Partnership Trusts to politely but firmly demand release of Adam Mustafa, who is in no way mentally ill but being wrongfully characterized and medicated as mentally ill in what appear to be criminal acts of fraud and battery by Chester Hospital staff:

Trust HQ: 01244 397397
Andy Styring, Cheshire & Wirral Partnership NHS Foundation Trust
Customer Service: 020 7593 5500

List of CWP Executive Directors, with email ids and phone numbers, please check here before you send emails: http://www.cwp.nhs.uk/about-us/our-board-and-governors;

Anushta.Sivananthan@nhs.net, andrea.campbell2@nhs.net, andy.styring@nhs.net, anne.boyd6@nhs.net, david.harris23@nhs.net, e.jenner@nhs.net, faouzi.alam@nhs.net, g.flockhart@nhs.net, james.oconnor1@nhs.net, mike.maier@nhs.net, p.bowen@nhs.net, rebecca.burkesharples@nhs.net, sheena.cumiskey@nhs.net, tim.welch1@nhs.net

Carol Woods, Social Worker and Child Abuse Whistleblower Subjected to Mental Health Fraud

Carol Woods, a conscientious social worker whistleblower, reports that her persecution began in 2000 when she made complaints against management handling of cases in Lancashire County Council of Social Services child protection and was met with management intimidation and later police corruption. She had sought to report cases of child abuse in the care system where records were falsified and families misrepresented, but her concerns were ignored. Internal harassment at work gave way to police harassment, threats, and intimidation, after she wrote a letter succeeding Mrs. Sheila Bridges, a pensioner’s death. Hounded out of her job, she reports court negligence and deliberate ignoring of crime in the verbal affidavit recorded Sep 6, 2019: “I couldn’t accept that the court, seeing evidence of serious tampering of files of small, vulnerable children and their families, serious tampering to discredit the work I had done but also to malign my clients – that was seen, and it was totally ignored.”

Cases she brought to court and complaints she made to the Investigatory Tribunal overseeing police were met with “revision history” by Lancaster police who denied knowing her. Included in her efforts to bring to light cases of organized crime and corruption was a case of attempted land seizure for casino development where PM Tony Blair’s wife Cherie Blair represented Lancaster County Council “on 8th August, 2003, seeking permission to seize the land in Blackpool, 134 acres, close all the homes for disturbed adolescent boys on the site, close the farm, close the working school, evict all the families from the homes on the site: and what Cherie Blair forgot to tell the court, was that they had already done it two years earlier. That was so they could back take everything, and pretend that Sheila Bridge was not the victim of corporate manslaughter. And that is the history of everything they do now. Nothing is new, everything is history revision.” Continuous harassment and intimidation over 19 years by police ensued–Lancashire Police, Greater Manchester Police, London Metropolitan Police– while she sought justice in courts and tribunals.

On Sep 3, 2019, police and a Mental Health team arrived at her home with a battering ram–whose use she obviated by letting them in–and took her under duress to a Mental Health hospital, saying the council had determined she needed a mental health assessment. Reports now published detailing Orchard psychiatrist Dr. Jyothi Nallapuneni’s assessment show lack of historic context of Carol Woods’ whistleblowing while matron Margaret Jenkins’ statements on a warrant being obtained under the Mental Health Act were found to be lies. Naming all of Carol’s recounting of her experience with exposing corruption as paranoia and persecutory beliefs, Dr. Nallapuneni has put Carol on anti-psychotic medications and restricted all outside contact. As Carol wrote: “I told her (Margaret Jenkins) that people come in to be made well but I came in (forcibly) to make me ill.” Carol Woods is still at Orchard Mental Health, and has been denied communications, visitors, books, packages while being unlawfully and criminally dosed with psychiatric medication she does not need.

The supreme irony in this entire situation is that Carol Woods, a concerned social worker, who has spoken out sanely–as any normal, ethical and strong-minded human being would–for children and families being abused, refused to give in to pedophile, child-grabbing CPS management who asked her to change “Baby well-cared-for” to “Baby abused” so the baby could be grabbed (see the video Don’t mention the casino (or the child abuse)), is now in the grip of psychiatrists who distort her affidavits of truth and her decades-long struggle against police corruption and persecution into “persecutory beliefs” and “paranoid beliefs” and set up “treatment plans” to cure her of “delusions,” in actions which prove their own insane alignment with the criminality practiced by the police and the Masonic pedophile systems they protect. Documented police corruption, intimidation, and persecution is being dismissed as “delusions of persecution” by these psychiatrists at Orchard Health.

Are these psychiatrists being naively exploited or are they part and parcel of the organized crime network in action here? Psychiatrists are being used, in protective inversion for criminals, to label sanity as insanity and medicate anyone marked-by-Freemasons for silencing; in a sane society focused on caring for humanity, this should not be acceptable: both the criminals in power and the psychiatrists they use should be exposed and removed from public service.

Carol Woods speaks from Orchard Mental Health on Jan 21, 2020 to supporters, confirming she is being force-medicated:

A recent letter on January 17th to a supporter is here: Carol Woods Letter Jan 17, 2020.

Her affidavit given verbally over the phone on Sep 6, 2019, is here: Carol Woods Affidavit September 2019.

Her video affidavit recorded earlier is here:

Please visit :Andrew: Devine’s page for detailed coverage: Coverage on Carol Woods

Reach Carol Woods: Direct line to The Orchard:
01524 550558; also 01524 65944

Suggestions for advocacy: Please write or call the Care Quality Commission and the Lancashire and South Cambria NHS Trust responsible for Orchard Health to protest the false-labeling, false-holding, forced-medicating of Carol Woods under pretence of mental delusion, and to demand her immediate release. Write or call the Lancaster Council chief, Kieran Keene; Caroline Donovan of the Lancashire Trust; Chief Executive of the Care Quality Commission, Ian Trenholm: https://www.cqc.org.uk/about-us/meet-our-team/ian-trenholm

Write or call the Trust Governors at: governors@lancashirecare.nhs.uk or 01772 520388.

Trust Board Members: https://www.lscft.nhs.uk/Trust-Board

Report this hospital to the Care Quality Commission: https://www.cqc.org.uk/provider/RW5

John Paterson, Citizen Journalist, Ex-Navy Military Veteran, & Child Abuse/Killings/ Pedophilia Whistleblower Wrongfully Incarcerated to Shut Down Exposés of Prominent Persons & Police, MP, Govt. Crimes

John Paterson, a concerned citizen and Navy veteran who became an investigator, journalist, and whistleblower was targeted for harassment and mental health fraud after he uncovered and tried to report fraud, theft, pedophilia and money laundering among politicians to Sussex Police, BBC and other media. He was subjected to a mental health sectioning by Sussex Police at the Royal Courts of Justice and has currently been arrested and is being held in Chelmsford Prison after fraudulent accusations of harassive Facebook posts.

The real story lies in what he seeks to blow wide open to a larger public. “FOURTEEN YEARS of hard forensic documents are available exposing £trillions that have been stolen from the UK Treasury over a FORTY YEAR PERIOD. We have all the money trails and names of MP’s and members of the House of Lords linked to this corruption etc, and we can get this money back into the UK Treasury, as it is currently in off-shore accounts.” (See John Paterson’s full letter to the BBC exposing their own cover-ups of these crimes here.)

Among the investigations he has made are the Hampstead case where testimonials of child abuse and Satanic ritual abuse and killings were covered up, he and others report, by a group called Hoaxted running trolling and discrediting operations of all researchers online, and where connections between Hampstead, site of multiple child pornography exposes, and a seedy network of organized crime involving police, politicians, and others in public service have been unfolding.

:Andrew: Devine, private investigator, attorney for John Paterson and reporter writes: “THIS VIDEO DIRECTLY BELOW EXPOSES THE SIZE OF THE CRIMES AND THE POWER OF THE PEOPLE INVOLVED THAT :John-Alexander: Paterson HAS BEEN TRYING FOR YEARS TO STOP AND CORRECT BY INFORMING MULTIPLE AGENCIES-POLICE FORCES, SCOTLAND-YARD, MI5, MP’s etc. ONLY TO BE HARASSED AND IMPRISONED:”

:Andrew: Devine explains to Essex Police the nature of the forensic investigations and discoveries John Paterson has made while reporting a crime for him on a firefighter missing since mid-December:

Message from John Paterson as recorded by Kaley, Umbrella Grape Solutions, 12/30/2019:

John Paterson has been working with equity lawyer Edward Ellis in reporting corruption under the mass corruption fraud remedy process, his own case covered here.

Please visit Andrew Devine’s page on John Paterson for extensive coverage.

From :Andrew: Devine: FOR ANYONE WISHING TO CONTACT :John: Paterson, Please Send A Prepaid Return Envelope, Unless Wishing To Just Send a Birthday Card For :John’s 70th on the 2nd: February: 2020

Write to John Paterson: PRISON ADDRESS:
:John-Alexander: Paterson.
Prison No: A1251EL
HMP/YOI Chelmsford, Address
200 Springfield Park Hill, Chelmsford CM2 6LQ, United Kingdom.

Suggestions for Advocacy: Write to MPs and Ministers to demand John Paterson’s immediate release. List of Ministers to choose from to copy in the letter and send by email via www.writetothem.com
https://www.gov.uk/government/ministers
https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/cabinet-office

Further advice from Neelu Berry Chaudhari:

Anyone who is concerned about mental health frauds against Carol Woods and Adam Mustafa must notify Care Quality Commission of their remedy demands for their mental health frauds to be reversed and them released, restituted and rehabilitated immediately: 03000616161

Please mention the Royal Commission set up by the Queen in her speech on 19 December 2019 to look into the effectiveness and efficiency of the criminal justice system (being criminally covered up in mental health frauds); the NHS Trusts, Home and Health Ministers have 2 weeks to meet the public interest remedy demands or be shut down: https://youtu.be/r3wwvuwvff4

So, I would urge again, anyone seeking a remedy of the return of their property, children, homes, businesses, stolen assets, that they write to Her Majesty The Queen to request that the appropriate Ministers are asked to provide the remedy sought, sending a copy of the letter to those relevant Ministers….just as I have done here:

Neelu Berry Writes To The Queen About Freeing Whistleblowers, Humanity & Receives a Response

Here is the list of Ministers to choose from to copy in the letter and send by email via www.writetothem.com
https://www.gov.uk/government/ministers
https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/cabinet-office
https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations#cabinet-office

Stay Tuned For Further Coverage, Please Follow These Channels:

Follow :Andrew: Devine:

Follow :Andrew: Devine: Youtube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCEjQILPHMgNuOn9nshQizaQ?view_as=subscriber Bitchute Channel:https://www.bitchute.com/profile Gab Updates:https://gab.com/Andy114

Related:

Ramola D Reports/NewsBreak 30: Wave of Mental Health Frauds in UK, New Zealand | Queen’s Hospital Fraudulently Reports Edward Ellis as Absconded Dialysis Patient

Global Jury 2, Jan 3, 2020
Global Jury 1, Dec 20, 2019

While Paris Protests, European Union Court of Justice Reverses EAW Ruling in GcMAF Scientist Lynda Thyer’s Case in Contravention of European Human Rights Law Under Treaty

News Report | Ramola D | December 14, 2019

The promising ruling earlier last week declaring the European Arrest Warrant (EAW) used in Lynda Thyer’s extradition case null and void because it had been issued by a French Prosecutor rather than a judge “after an amazing, Oscar-award-worthy courtroom argument made by (lawyer) Chloé Arnoux,” according to attorney Scot Tips, was reversed in Friday the 13th’s hearing in Paris, in contravention, many note, of the base requirements of the European Court of Human Rights and the Nice and Lisbon Treaties.

Image: National Health Federation

By all counts, Lynda Thyer, as also David Noakes, CEO, Immuno BioTech, have been wrongfully prosecuted in the UK by the MHRA, UK’s regulatory body, falsely claiming their curing of cancer and autism patients with supplementation of a naturally-occurring bodily protein GcMAF was accomplished with an unlicensed substance, mischaracterized in propaganda coverage as a “quack remedy” while hard scientific evidence exists of its efficacy. While hundreds of cancer patients in the UK wait for GcMAF to become available in NHS hospitals, the OCLAESP, the French regulatory body has busied itself in responding to the MHRA’s efforts to protect the pharmaceutical industry by making false charges on both Ms. Thyer and Mr. Noakes, and issuing an extradition European Arrest Warrant on the words of a prosecutor.

Scott Tips, President of the National Health Federation and attorney notes:

The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) based in Strasbourg, France has repeatedly ruled that such arrest warrants are illegal and invalid. Yet, tone deaf to the ECHR, the EU Court of Justice has ignored such precedent and all obvious legal morality in deciding that such warrants were indeed valid.

            This means that now both David and Lyn will have to defend on the facts — which are still hugely in their favor — instead of being able to get the case thrown out on a legal technicality, which would have been quicker and easier, and less expensive to our NHF Legal Team, led in court by the formidable lawyer Chloé Arnoux.

Lyn Thyer, whose release from prison after wrongful prosecution, extradition, and incarceration in horrific conditions was reported here earlier, appeared before Judge Jean-Luc Gadaud on Friday despite continuing protests on Paris streets for interrogation (which the judge cancelled since the translator had not been able to navigate filled streets to get to court) while her lawyers filed a motion to keep her from being sent back to prison.

Image: National Health Federation

The French Court of Appeals is now set to hear and decide the continued appeal from the French Government in her case on Monday, December 16. Scott Tips is hopeful the Court will honor the motion filed and be “loath to send Lyn Thyer back to prison” even as he concludes “it is highly likely that this Court of Appeals will also disregard the European Court of Human Rights and follow instead the EUCJ decision upholding French prosecutorial arrest warrants.”

All EU Member States Must Abide By European Convention of Human Rights

Scott Tips writes:

“In the opinion of several knowledgeable legal commentators, the December 12th ruling by the EU Court of Justice really has no effect on the 2008 and 2010 rulings (Affaire Medvedyev Et Autres vs. France, Requête No. 3394/03) made by the European Court of Human Rights, as both the EUCJ and the EU must abide by the Lisbon and Nice Treaties that hold at their constitutional core the European Convention of Human Rights” to which all EU member states must abide. The legal precedent, which clearly stated that the French public prosecutor was not a judicial authority and therefore not entitled to issue any such arrest warrants, was lawfully decided by the European Court of Human Rights and is a mandatory ruling for the EUCJ. Therefore, yesterday’s EUCJ decision is not only illegal and unconstitutional but violates the very treaties upon which the EU has been constructed. To these commentators, the first French judge’s ruling in the Thyer case absolutely still stands.

It appears now to be a battle between the universal human rights espoused by the European Court of Human Rights, on the one hand, and the unbridled corporatism espoused through the European Court of Justice. Put another more legalistic way, it is now a battle to see which legal precedents rule over which and which of the two courts will have the final say. The fight over the legal validity of the undemocratic prosecutorial arrest warrants is by no means over. And it will be interesting to see how the French Court of Appeals in Paris rules on this matter on Monday afternoon, December 16th.”

Scot Tips, NHF:
BREAKING NEWS on GcMAF SCIENTIST LYNDA THYER &
GcMAF EXECUTIVE DAVID NOAKES CASES

Please visit the National Health Federation for more background and details on this story. Also subscribe at Youtube to Ramola D Reports for breaking news updates at Newsbreak.

RELATED:

BREAKING: Lynda Thyer Released From French Prison in Landmark Ruling on EAW Signed By Prosecutor Found Illegal; Neelu Berry Reports on Global Corporate Implications in GcMAF Cancer & Autism Cure

Emergency Appeal: GcMAF Cancer Cure Scientist Lynda Thyer in Danger of Dying in French Prison, Urgent Action Needed

BREAKING: Mass Corruption Remedy Process in UK at Breakthrough Moment, Citizen Input Needed | Mr. Edward Ellis Informs the Privy Council President, Mr. Jacob Rees Mogg

Report | Ramola D | December 10, 2019, Updated with Transcript Dec 13

Edward Ellis, Equity Lawyer, who has been working hard for years to bring notice of corruption in many victim cases in the UK proving entrenched corruption by an organized crime syndicate at the highest levels of the judicial system and Parliament, drops in this morning at Newsbreak to share some groundbreaking news.

Mr. Edward Ellis, Dec 10, 2019, London

Essentially, evidence has now been obtained of criminal conspiracy at the highest levels by judges, law enforcement, and politicians by way of the Sussex Police refusing to admit notice of citizen cases into the Parliament session file which could correctly inform Lord Lieutenants and thereby the Crown of crimes — this proof of criminal conspiracy to withhold vital information from the Parliamentary record constitutes election fraud, says Mr. Ellis.

He also notes that the intent of the Mass Corruption Remedy Process to force a general election has now been fulfilled: Prime Minister Theresa May has been removed, and a new election, the first to be held in December since 1923, hastily arranged in October 2019, is around the corner, slated for December 12.

Newsbreak 47: Edward Ellis explains why the corruption remedy process is at a breakthrough moment

“What has happened is, organized crime had such a grip on Parliament that they were able to control who won the leadership election. Prime Minister Mr. Johnson made protection fraud deals with organized crime in order to get leadership support so all of the deals were subject to viable execution conditions so citizens took cases to get unviable execution condition proof and releases from his protection fraud deals.

 It didn’t stop the frauds so what has happened is the judges have been put under remorseless pressure by citizens–have committed repeated frauds, have started to worry about it very badly, have demanded protection reassurance from the Cabinet and so during the election, cabinet officers have had to commit deliberate election fraud so we are facing a general election where the Crown and the Lord bishops will have proof of the scale of the frauds.

…On the 4th of December this year Sussex police refused to allow access to the building or to the office in order to file the papers. The Crown Prosecutors refused to answer the telephone so that nobody would come down to escort the citizens to do the filing. So what we had was criminal conspiracy proof against Sussex Police and Sussex Crown Prosecutors to prevent citizen papers getting on the Parliament Session File.

…The Crown and the Lord Bishops need notice of the filing denial frauds committed on the 4th of December. 

So what I’ve done is I sent an email last night and you’re included in the list and all that people need do is file the document dated the 8th of December with the local authorities who provide secretarial services for the Lord Lieutenants. Now the Lord Lieutenants are the representatives of the Crown in each constituency in each County. 

..The Council Officers are only deputies and assistants so the Lord Lieutenants have a primary responsibility to report election frauds. The filing denial fraud committed by Sussex Police and Sussex crown prosecutors on the 4th of December was an election fraud to deny the crown and the Lord bishops access to the election fraud proof that would have been filed.

…But the key thing is people can actually do something. They can file–go into the local authority with a print of that document and ask for a receipt and by that device the Lord Lieutenants should have notice. Now you will see from the letter which is written to the President of the Privy Council, there is  about more than 730 Privy Councillors. They’re all people who have been involved in politics in one way or another and by giving notice to the Privy Councillors we’re saying all of them have a duty to inform the Lord Lieutenants and ensure that the Crown knows. If they don’t they are jointly responsible for the election frauds.

They have to make their minds up. They’re for the people or against the people. There’s nowhere in between.” 

–Edward Ellis, Equity Lawyer, Newsbreak 47

FULL TRANSCRIPT NEWSBREAK 47 HERE

Edward’s Dec 9 Email (referenced in Newsbreak 47), reporting these latest, pivotal events of note in the remedy process to Privy Council President Alan Rees Mogg, copied to Prime Minister Boris Johnson, the attorney-general, party leaders, a number of politicians, MPs, courts, Redbridge county councilors, Metropolitan Police, and citizens is printed below:

Privy Council President Mr Rees Mogg,

Equity Governance requires the Lord Lieutenants to be Returning Officers and give Election Fraud Notices to the Crown.

Please ensure that All Privy Councillors know that have a duty to ensure the Lord Lieutenants have the attached documents for use when giving Election Fraud Notices to the Crown   

Please ensure Prime Minister Mr Johnson knows the People want Mass Remedies. He can start with the Immediate Release of the Political Prisoners and Stolen Children.

Equity Lawyer Mr Ellis

Email, Dec 9, 2019, Edward Ellis to Privy Council President

The Privy Council advises the Queen and is currently presided over by Jacob Rees Mogg, Conservative Candidate for North East Somerset.

Privy Council President Jacob Rees Mogg

Excerpt, https://www.supremecourt.uk/docs/beginners-guide-to-the-jcpc.pdf

2019-12-08 Remedy Process + Office Unfitness Cases + Parliament Session File + Business Theft Interview Event Report from Equity Lawyer to Privy Council

The December 8 document, attached to the above email, and delineating the remedy process status currently, which Edward recommends all citizens of the UK take to their local county councilors, to further inform these local authorities and help post this information to the Lord Lieutenants and the public record, is here:

2019 12 08 Remedy Process + Office Unfitness Cases + Parliament Session File + Business Theft Interview Event Report from Equity Lawyer to Privy Council President

All other attachments to Edward’s email above are posted here for reference and purposes of public information:

2019 12 07 Remedy Process + Office Unfitness Cases + Fraud Cases Brief Explanation for Citizen Mr Yediayli v Liable Parties

2019 12 06 Remedy Process + Fraud Appeals 2019 0563 + 2700 + Fraud Notices to Privy Counsellors + Lord Lieutenants

2019 12 06 Remedy Process + Election Fraud Appeals 2019 0563 + 2700 Parliament Session File Denial Fraud Papers of Citizen Mr Awodiya v State

2019 12 05 Remedy Process + Office Unfitness Cases + Parliament Session Filing Denial Fraud Notice from Equity Lawyer to Privy Counsellor + Chingford Candidates

2019 12 03 Remedy Process + Office Unfitness Cases + Parliament Session File of Equity Lawyer v Chingford Candidates

2019 12 03 Parliament Session Filing Arrangements Claim Form of Parliamentary Candidates v Director of Public Prosecutions n1-eng

Edward Ellis has a new website, please check there on an ongoing basis for updates to this story:

Equity Governance