The promising ruling earlier last week declaring the European Arrest Warrant (EAW) used in Lynda Thyer’s extradition case null and void because it had been issued by a French Prosecutor rather than a judge “after an amazing, Oscar-award-worthy courtroom argument made by (lawyer) Chloé Arnoux,” according to attorney Scot Tips, was reversed in Friday the 13th’s hearing in Paris, in contravention, many note, of the base requirements of the European Court of Human Rights and the Nice and Lisbon Treaties.
By all counts, Lynda Thyer, as also David Noakes, CEO, Immuno BioTech, have been wrongfully prosecuted in the UK by the MHRA, UK’s regulatory body, falsely claiming their curing of cancer and autism patients with supplementation of a naturally-occurring bodily protein GcMAF was accomplished with an unlicensed substance, mischaracterized in propaganda coverage as a “quack remedy” while hard scientific evidence exists of its efficacy. While hundreds of cancer patients in the UK wait for GcMAF to become available in NHS hospitals, the OCLAESP, the French regulatory body has busied itself in responding to the MHRA’s efforts to protect the pharmaceutical industry by making false charges on both Ms. Thyer and Mr. Noakes, and issuing an extradition European Arrest Warrant on the words of a prosecutor.
Scott Tips, President of the National Health Federation and attorney notes:
The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) based in Strasbourg, France has repeatedly ruled that such arrest warrants are illegal and invalid. Yet, tone deaf to the ECHR, the EU Court of Justice has ignored such precedent and all obvious legal morality in deciding that such warrants were indeed valid.
This means that now both David and Lyn will have to defend on the facts — which are still hugely in their favor — instead of being able to get the case thrown out on a legal technicality, which would have been quicker and easier, and less expensive to our NHF Legal Team, led in court by the formidable lawyer Chloé Arnoux.
Lyn Thyer, whose release from prison after wrongful prosecution, extradition, and incarceration in horrific conditions was reported here earlier, appeared before Judge Jean-Luc Gadaud on Friday despite continuing protests on Paris streets for interrogation (which the judge cancelled since the translator had not been able to navigate filled streets to get to court) while her lawyers filed a motion to keep her from being sent back to prison.
The French Court of Appeals is now set to hear and decide the continued appeal from the French Government in her case on Monday, December 16. Scott Tips is hopeful the Court will honor the motion filed and be “loath to send Lyn Thyer back to prison” even as he concludes “it is highly likely that this Court of Appeals will also disregard the European Court of Human Rights and follow instead the EUCJ decision upholding French prosecutorial arrest warrants.”
All EU Member States Must Abide By European Convention of Human Rights
Scott Tips writes:
“In the opinion of several knowledgeable legal commentators, the December 12th ruling by the EU Court of Justice really has no effect on the 2008 and 2010 rulings (Affaire Medvedyev Et Autres vs. France, Requête No. 3394/03) made by the European Court of Human Rights, as both the EUCJ and the EU must abide by the Lisbon and Nice Treaties that hold at their constitutional core the European Convention of Human Rights” to which all EU member states must abide. The legal precedent, which clearly stated that the French public prosecutor was not a judicial authority and therefore not entitled to issue any such arrest warrants, was lawfully decided by the European Court of Human Rights and is a mandatory ruling for the EUCJ. Therefore, yesterday’s EUCJ decision is not only illegal and unconstitutional but violates the very treaties upon which the EU has been constructed. To these commentators, the first French judge’s ruling in the Thyer case absolutely still stands.
It appears now to be a battle between the universal human rights espoused by the European Court of Human Rights, on the one hand, and the unbridled corporatism espoused through the European Court of Justice. Put another more legalistic way, it is now a battle to see which legal precedents rule over which and which of the two courts will have the final say. The fight over the legal validity of the undemocratic prosecutorial arrest warrants is by no means over. And it will be interesting to see how the French Court of Appeals in Paris rules on this matter on Monday afternoon, December 16th.”
Essentially, evidence has now been obtained of criminal conspiracy at the highest levels by judges, law enforcement, and politicians by way of the Sussex Police refusing to admit notice of citizen cases into the Parliament session file which could correctly inform Lord Lieutenants and thereby the Crown of crimes — this proof of criminal conspiracy to withhold vital information from the Parliamentary record constitutes election fraud, says Mr. Ellis.
Newsbreak 47: Edward Ellis explains why the corruption remedy process is at a breakthrough moment
“What has happened is, organized crime had such a grip on Parliament that they were able to control who won the leadership election. Prime Minister Mr. Johnson made protection fraud deals with organized crime in order to get leadership support so all of the deals were subject to viable execution conditions so citizens took cases to get unviable execution condition proof and releases from his protection fraud deals.
It didn’t stop the frauds so what has happened is the judges have been put under remorseless pressure by citizens–have committed repeated frauds, have started to worry about it very badly, have demanded protection reassurance from the Cabinet and so during the election, cabinet officers have had to commit deliberate election fraud so we are facing a general election where the Crown and the Lord bishops will have proof of the scale of the frauds.
…On the 4th of December this year Sussex police refused to allow access to the building or to the office in order to file the papers. The Crown Prosecutors refused to answer the telephone so that nobody would come down to escort the citizens to do the filing. So what we had was criminal conspiracy proof against Sussex Police and Sussex Crown Prosecutors to prevent citizen papers getting on the Parliament Session File.
…The Crown and the Lord Bishops need notice of the filing denial frauds committed on the 4th of December.
So what I’ve done is I sent an email last night and you’re included in the list and all that people need do is file the document dated the 8th of December with the local authorities who provide secretarial services for the Lord Lieutenants. Now the Lord Lieutenants are the representatives of the Crown in each constituency in each County.
..The Council Officers are only deputies and assistants so the Lord Lieutenants have a primary responsibility to report election frauds. The filing denial fraud committed by Sussex Police and Sussex crown prosecutors on the 4th of December was an election fraud to deny the crown and the Lord bishops access to the election fraud proof that would have been filed.
…But the key thing is people can actually do something. They can file–go into the local authority with a print of that document and ask for a receipt and by that device the Lord Lieutenants should have notice. Now you will see from the letter which is written to the President of the Privy Council, there is about more than 730 Privy Councillors. They’re all people who have been involved in politics in one way or another and by giving notice to the Privy Councillors we’re saying all of them have a duty to inform the Lord Lieutenants and ensure that the Crown knows. If they don’t they are jointly responsible for the election frauds.
They have to make their minds up. They’re for the people or against the people. There’s nowhere in between.”
Edward’s Dec 9 Email (referenced in Newsbreak 47), reporting these latest, pivotal events of note in the remedy process to Privy Council President Alan Rees Mogg, copied to Prime Minister Boris Johnson, the attorney-general, party leaders, a number of politicians, MPs, courts, Redbridge county councilors, Metropolitan Police, and citizens is printed below:
Privy Council President Mr Rees Mogg,
Equity Governance requires the Lord Lieutenants to be Returning Officers and give Election Fraud Notices to the Crown.
Please ensure that All Privy Councillors know that have a duty to ensure the Lord Lieutenants have the attached documents for use when giving Election Fraud Notices to the Crown
Please ensure Prime Minister Mr Johnson knows the People want Mass Remedies. He can start with the Immediate Release of the Political Prisoners and Stolen Children.
Equity Lawyer Mr Ellis
Email, Dec 9, 2019, Edward Ellis to Privy Council President
The Privy Council advises the Queen and is currently presided over by Jacob Rees Mogg, Conservative Candidate for North East Somerset.
2019-12-08 Remedy Process + Office Unfitness Cases + Parliament Session File + Business Theft Interview Event Report from Equity Lawyer to Privy Council
The December 8 document, attached to the above email, and delineating the remedy process status currently, which Edward recommends all citizens of the UK take to their local county councilors, to further inform these local authorities and help post this information to the Lord Lieutenants and the public record, is here:
Report | Ramola D & Neelu Berry | Posted Dec 8, 2019, Updated with Photo, Dec 14
Lynda Thyer, biochemist and GcMAF healthcare scientist who has helped heal hundreds, yet wrongfully prosecuted by the MHRA (Medicines and Health Regulatory Association) and extradited from the UK to France while being medically deemed unfit for travel, was released this morning at 11:35 am from French prison Fleury-Mérogis where she had held a long hunger strike and been deemed “vulnerable” after two suicide attempts.
Lyn Thyer with attorney Scot Tips & friend in Paris after Release, Dec 7 | Image from Twitter, @IanRCrane
She is now in the safe company of friends and her attorneys from the NHF, the National Health Federation.
David Noakes reports: “Lyn has lost a lot of weight on hunger strike, which she says was made easier by the food, which was revolting. Last week co-defendant David Halsall said she was unrecognizable. News of her imminent release has caused her to recover, although she looks 5-10 years older, and apparently she was in remarkably fine fettle.”
This has become a landmark case, attorney Scott Tips notes, with massive implications as well for everyone else wrongfully incarcerated in Europe on European Arrest Warrants since a French judge has ruled that all EU Arrest Warrants are illegal: prosecutors have long been issuing these warrants and acting as judges, in base contravention of European Law.
David Noakes, CEO of Immuno Bio Tech, target of a prolonged witch-hunt by the MHRA—along with smear campaigns by the BBC and other British mainstream media—apparently for healing people of cancer and autism with a scientifically-proven natural substance, GcMAF, and depriving the pharmaceutical industry of profits says, of the EAW signed by a prosecutor: “The EU has been complaining about this since 2008. Around 100 prisoners may have to be released. The government is appealing tomorrow – it’s a landmark case.”
This entire case, covered as it played out here via reports and Newsbreaks earlier, has been attended by wrongful prosecution, perjury by judges, miscarriage of justice, and clear evidence of MHRA wrongdoing with extreme violation of human rights, but it has also been attended by high concern from alt-media, huge public outcry, dedication in reportage and questioning of the MHRA from a small group of focused British activists and indy journalists, highlighted by successful defense of Lyn Thyer by her team at the National Health Federation.
It is to be hoped that this will also have positive implications for David Noakes, who also faces extradition on the same identical wrongful charges on a EAW signed by a prosecutor, which has now been deemed illegal.
Lynda Thyer has a court hearing tomorrow, where it is hoped and anticipated that her release from Fleury-Mérogis prison will be made permanent.
End of the Global Corporate Empire – Start of Natural Remedy Mandates with GcMAF Cancer + Autism Miracle Cure
By Neelu Kumari Chaudhari, 02 Dec 2019
On 29th of November 2019, two senior judges of the Tribunal Grande Instance, TGI, Paris, France, including Judge Jean-Luc Gadaud, and a more Senior Judge, decided that all European Arrest Warrants issued in France, to Citizens in the UK, were invalid, if they had been issued by a French prosecutor, not a judge. In fact, the EAW had not even been signed by any Prosecutor, only a Translator. Clearly this is just the tip of the iceberg how the Organised Crime Network operates its Extra-Judicial disappearances and assassinations of whistleblowers, billionaires and talent.
The same applies to the European Arrest Warrants for David Noakes (1) and Lynda Thyer (2), pioneer GcMAF makers and researchers, who amongst dozens of other staff were raided, robbed and ruined of everything, their homes, savings and even millions of GBP worth of supplies of GcMAF which left 200 Cancer sufferers, who were recovering from stage 4 Cancer, on GcMAF, dead.
GcMAF had already saved 9000 lives of private patients and had the potential to reverse autism in millions of autistic children, damaged by vaccines, in 1 week flat, from non-speaking child to speaking child and save millions of Cancer lives every year. Lynda Thyer, a Biomedical Scientist and Researcher had worked with Dr Jeffrey Bradstreet on autistic children and had fine-tuned the treatment plans of 50 other life-threatening diseases with GcMAF using the behaviour of Cancer fighting white cells, macrophages, as seen under the microscope.
Due to a fierce public campaigns on social media, the French Embassy in the UK were alerted to evidence of perjury in the amount alleged to have been money laundered by the makers of GCMAF, in the sum of over €11 million. Subsequently the amount was corrected by the Right Honourable Mr Justice Supperstone in para 3 of his judgement dated 10th of May 2019 (3), to €11,000 which is not money laundering at all. The case should have been thrown out by the London Royal Courts of Justice but was not.
Lynda Thyer was denied an appeal in the admin court because she had not been issued with a Home Office Reference Number and did not have any criminal charges issued against her in the UK or a criminal trial. She was adopted into the proceedings for David Noakes and 3 others based purely on the photocopy of David Noakes’ invalid EAW, both sharing the same French reference number.
Suspiciously, she was issued with train tickets (4), by Kent border police, via email, and blackmailed into attending Dover on Monday 10th June or Heathrow Airport on Tuesday 11th June 2019.
She collapsed on the long train journey from Cornwall to London, at Ashford, on the way to Heathrow and was stranded there because she had missed an apparent flight, which she had no details of, and she did not have a passport to pass customs. She was to present herself to a private agent of Kent Police, outside of the official Airport services which was bizarre.
After being stranded at the airport for hours, she made her way by London Underground, 30 miles East to the home of Neelu Berry’s late sister, (who died of Cancer from being denied GcMAF), to stay with Neelu Berry, whistleblower pharmacist persecuted, subjected to State Terrorism and made homeless by the Organised Crime Network of the UK.
Within an hour, an ambulance suspiciously arrived at the same address, having evidently tracked Lynda’s mobile phone, (which she was required to keep switched on as part of her bail conditions). There was also an official car that waited outside with lights on all night in full view of the ambulance and the home (5).
Clearly these were privately hired officials participating in the disappearances and assassinations of whistleblowers in the UK.
This proves that there was no airplane flight booked, only an ambulance. The ambulance would have lay in waiting, collected her in the middle of the night and disappeared her.
On 24th of July, after several emergency admissions to hospital with collapses and vomiting of blood, medically deemed unfit to travel, Lynda was kidnapped by Cornwall Police from Penzance Railway Station in Cornwall and deposited in Bronzefield Prison near Heathrow Airport, run by Sodexo, a French company, without any court papers or warrant. Her passport was stolen by Cornwall Police. A public outcry may have prevented her disappearance in the prison.
On 8th August, Lynda Thyer was smuggled on a ferry to France, via Dover, without a passport or valid Court warrants. She was due to appear in the Tribunal Grande Instance, TGI, Paris, on the 8th of December but the hearing was brought forward to 29th of November by the French authorities, most probably due to the public outcry in the UK and evidence of the perjury submitted to the French Embassy in London by supporters.
The USA’s National Health Federation’s President, Scott Tips and Chairman, David Noakes, privately hired a local French Criminal Attorney to represent Lynda Thyer at the recent hearing. The perjury was not considered as relevant as the technicality that all European Arrest Warrants that have been issued by prosecutors and not by judges, are invalid, void and ineffective. In other words, the French judges considered the UK Judges acted without law by relying on an invalid authority which was clearly not authentic.
Because David Noakes has an identical EAW, it follows that his extradition proceedings must fail if the UK is to finally admit that it Extra-judicially relied on the perjury of an invalid EAW for the purposes of framing France for her inevitable corporate murder outside UK jurisdiction.
However, the further proof that the British Embassy in France, has not taken any initiative to remove Lynda Thyer from Fleury Merogis Prison in Paris on the 29th of November, or to return her to the UK, to date, 4 days on, adds to the evidence of a framing fraud and utter contempt against the French Courts and French Judiciary by the UK Westminster Magistrates Court and UK Judiciary, to rely on the perjury in an invalid EAW in an extra-judicial assassination outside the UK jurisdiction in France.
Credit to Judge Gadaud that he sat with a more senior judge to do the right thing, so he was acting on good faith on misinformation from MHRA handed to OCLAESP.
No doubt the French will carry out a full investigation into the breach of their security at the Ferry Port entry without passport, and tighten their procedures to ensure they are not susceptible to Framing Frauds by UK’s Criminal Networks infiltrating France and French public services.
The Westminster Magistrates Court now has a mandate to investigate the false criminal prosecutions of the makers of GcMAF and the ongoing fraudulent extradition proceedings of David Noakes in the UK. This will inevitably result in the dissolution of the MHRA and the FDA with their monopoly on patented medicines and mandate natural remedies such as GcMAF on the NHS and USA health services.
The UK Foreign and Commonwealth Office, FCO, is actually a call centre in Malaga, Spain, (6) which takes all calls from all British embassies in the world and redirects all local numbers dialled in any part of any country, to Spain. This proves that there is no Home Office or Government service based in the UK and all Parliamentarians are nothing more than script readers reading scripts written by aliens. The entire Western Corporate structure including its media, has imploded with this case of GcMAF, which has been boycotted by all mainstream media.
All UK prisons’ local telephone numbers are diverted to a call centre in South Wales and all staff trained to deny remedies.
The entire UK Parliament has been dissolved for denying Mass Remedies and is being replaced by whistleblowers on the basis of their ability to provide Mass Remedies. (7) Election Fairness Claims are being made to give whistleblowers the finances required for them to fight in elections.
The recent London Bridge Bombings were proved a false flag with the tweets from Boris Johnson at 7.09am and 8.39am, giving condolences and thanks for bravery to the public and services, 5 hours prior to the incident. (8)
(1) + (2) Invalid EAW’s processed routinely by UK courts and Judiciary in Extra-judicial disappearances of whistleblowers globally
(3) Judgement of M J Superstore – Perjury deemed a Typing error by UK High Court Judge as he validates an invalid EAW to extradite Lynda Thyer without charge or trial
(4) 2006 old Train tickets routinely issued “by hand” in extra-judicial disappearances
(5) Ambulance tracked Lynda’s phone from Heathrow airport, 30 miles to East London,
RAE (Report, Analysis, Op-Ed) | Ramola D | Posted December 1, 2019
Documentary Evidence since 1994 of Covert High-Tech Electronic-Weapon and Neurotechnology Use in Targeted Surveillance, Experimentation, Operations by US Government on Americans: A Series
(1) The DOD/DOJ Memorandum of Understanding on OOTW/LE, 1994
Unremarked in mainstream media, deliberately hidden from wider readership, there have been a series of declassified document FOIA-releases over the past few years which astonishingly reveal many facets of the now-known covert use ofelectronic-weapon and neurotechnology surveillance, experimentation, weapons-tests, and operations on the American public by various agencies and departments of the US Government and their contractors.
Similarity with Covert Global High-Tech Policing Operations: Similar operations have been unleashed worldwide, as reported extensively at this site and others online earlier. Some documentation in the public domain testifies to this global program, and will be reported more fully here shortly. For now, please see this Twitter thread, which discloses NATO High-Tech Non Lethal Weapon/Neuro Policing operations in Europe and discusses also how Non-Lethal Weapons Testing & Neuro Surveillance have been unleashed inside the USA:
From Riot Control Tear Gas to Pulsed Microwaves and “Acoustic Psycho-Correction”The irritant chemical weapons of riot control of the 1960s and ’70s—the original non-lethal weapons–have steadily given way to a plethora of non-lethal technologies in the range of electromagnetic, acoustic, scalar, and other exotic neuro/bio technologies steadily released by military weapons research into law enforcement, and currently also into futuristic crime-prevention or Pre-Crime use over the ’80s, ’90s, and beyond.
Public Domain Disclosure on Non Lethal Weapons Has Ramped Up Lately
This series aims to address the public disclosures in recent FOIA releases of ongoing US Government use of Electronic Weapons and Neurotechnologies on Americans.
“Electronic Weapon” herein refers to the spectrum weapons used in Electronic Warfare as defined by the Department of Defense (DOD) in documents, particularly relates to anti-personnel weapons, includes all labeled as non-lethal-weapon, less-than-lethal weapon, psychotronic weapon, neuroweapon, next generation and emerging technologies, and includes RFID (Radio Frequency IDentification) and BCI (Brain Computer Interface) tech.
The Memorandum of Understanding Between Department of Defense and Department of Justice on Military Operations Other Than War and Law Enforcement, 1994
This Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) was preceded by decades of reported development of non-lethal energy weapons and neuroweapons by different departments of the US Government, including Defense, Justice, Energy, US Army, Navy, Air Force, DARPA, NSA, CIA, and NIJ, as indicated by various conferences held through the ’80s and early ’90s, by white papers from military and intelligence personnel, by declassified documents currently in the public domain as released by DOJ, CIA, NSA, and DOD, inclusive of the CIA’s MK Ultra documents and Project Stargate archives, and by information preserved in the Congressional record.
For instance, information on the growing focus by the Justice Department through the ’80s and ’90s on electromagnetic weapons can be gleaned from government reports on NIJ (National Institute of Justice) conferences on electromagnetic weapons.
Numerous military reports in journals detail the military development of infrasonic, radar, microwave weapons from the ’50s onward; their use in US Law Enforcement seems to have occurred particularly from the ’70s and ’80s upward.
Significant, in the ’80s-’90s lead-up to this MOU, are the following sampling of reports, white papers, and articles:
The 1993 Los Alamos-sponsored Classified DOJ/DOD Conference on Non Lethal Defense
The singular and secretive Los-Alamos-sponsored Justice/Defense classified conference on Non-Lethal Defense in 1993 at Johns Hopkins Applied Physics Laboratory no doubt had a direct connection to this Memorandum of Understanding, signed in 1994. The agenda for that conference is posted here.
Please see my earlier discussion on that deliberately-kept-secret conference and its consequences for Americans in these two critically questioning articles here—which include disclosures from multiple researchers, writers, and investigative journalists including Dr. Nick Begich, Dr. John Hall, Dr. Robert Duncan, and Renee Pittman Mitchell:
Lack of Media Coverage, Human Rights Coverage, Public Disclosure & Debate of Non-Lethal & Neurotechnologies Promised by This MOU
Significantly, there have been no public debates, discussions facilitated by Media and human rights or civil liberties groups, disclosure from the Justice Department, nor disclosure from the Defense department on the intended or ongoing use of non-lethal Remote Human Access Weapons and Neurotechnologies on Americans, which this MOU promises.
The purpose of this article is to report the content of this MOU—which is not fully transparent–highlight its main points, and offer insight into its intent with an eye to more fully informing the American public on what exactly has transpired here, what exactly this MOU has permitted, who is aware, who is involved, and who needs to be held accountable.
Significant, as stated, in this MOU are the following.
From the Section titled General, A and B:
This was an agreement to permit Defense and Justice to jointly share and develop certain kinds of technology and systems for shared purposes, for Military Operations Other Than War (MOOTW), and for Law Enforcement (LE).
This agreement sought to “conduct a program to enhance” both MOOTW and LE operations. (Was this also the kept-quiet political persecution program to target innocent Americans, activists, journalists–falsely labeled as terrorists–extrajudicially under Watchlist Fraud, and covertly use their bodies and brains for target practice in OOTW?)
This agreement came on the heels of DARPA, NIJ, and FBI deciding to gift Law Enforcement with these certain advanced technologies on the basis of findings of “convergence” they made regarding the applicability of these technologies—still not described–to both military and law enforcement operations.
DARPA, NIJ, FBI also felt these advanced technologies would “enhance the effectiveness” of both military and law enforcement missions.
From the Section titled Concept:
The objective of this joint program was to “develop and exploit” this advanced technology for military operations and law enforcement operations both—and does not refer to this technology as weaponry here, although it clearly is, if being applied militarily or forcibly by military or police. This is weaponry.
This joint program intended to open a “development and application program” contract creation industry where competing technologies, components, and systems—presumably from Defense/Security Service companies–could compete; the implication appears to be the promotion of competition in the development and testing of these advanced technologies, which have still not been described, in this Concept section. This Joint Program was unleashing a mercenary competition between rival tech weaponry companies—Defense/Security Service contractors–to develop, test, and fine-tune these sophisticated advanced anti-personnel technologies inside America, on Americans. (The involvement of Law Enforcement implies anti-personnel technology.)
“Testing and objective evaluation” was legitimized as necessary to ensure “quality of the competition.”
From the Section titled Implementation:
This was a 5-year MOU, which presumably has been extended periodically (to be confirmed).
A Joint Program Steering Group (JPSG) was created, with someone from DARPA chairing it and DOJ appointing a deputy chair, with technical program managers from both Defense and Justice. Significantly, a representative from US Army is designated to be on the JPSG, in addition to reps from DARPA and DOJ.
This Steering Group, chaired by DARPA, would make decisions on technologies of interest (to jointly share and develop presumably), plan, manage development, test, “conduct technology demonstrations and evaluations” – which suggests that military tech, already developed, would be demonstrated for law enforcement use – and make decisions on “transition strategies.”
“Test bed units” or “user organizations” would test the “transitioning products” (meaning the up-til-then secret or classified tech from DARPA, perhaps) and suggesting: * for LE operations: different police/sheriffs’ departments possibly, or corrections departments—prisons and juvenile detention centers; * and for MOOTW (which could include information warfare, psychological operations—Psy Ops/MISO, counter-terrorism and counter-drug operations, show-of-force operations et al): military units (such as the Marine Corps, Air Force, Navy, Army) or special operations forces. The implication appears to be that those groups intending to use this technology would serve as testers of it. There is a connection here to Non Lethal Weapons Testing contracts announced by US Air Force Secretary Michael Wynne in 2006, when he stated weapons would be tested on Americans, which needs to be further explored; these military weapons-testing-contracts continue, and notice of them can be found in the public domain.
The JPSG would move physically to DARPA in the first quarter of 1995 to begin “intensive management of the OOTW/LE program” from DARPA. (Then called ARPA; Note that DARPA is a weapons research and development agency for the Department of Defense, and not part of the Department of Justice. This MOU establishes military management of Justice, Law Enforcement, and FBI programs using these “advanced technologies”.)
Policy guidance would be provided by a Senior Review Group which would include the Deputy Secretary of Defense and the Deputy Attorney-General. This implies that both parties—and it is significant that the DAG is involved, FBI Directors frequently serve first as DAG (witness, Mueller and Comey) —would have full cognizance of these particular advanced technologies to be deployed by Law Enforcement and Military divisions both, and would make decisions to “facilitate technology transition to applications.”
JPSG projects would be of 3 types—transitioning or transferring existing military tech to DOJ (Corrections & Law Enforcement) where DOJ would test these; transitioning ongoing in-development-military-tech in “current programs” to DOJ where DOJ would modify as needed and test these; or jointly developing new tech, where DOD and DOJ would separately modify and apply tech as they needed. From analysis of conference reports from DOJ prior to this MOU as well as materials from DOD, some linked above, it appears that many forms of Biometric Identification, Pre-Crime Monitoring, and Neuro Surveillance technologies might well have fallen within the aegis of these categories. There is a connection here also to C4ISR (C4 (Command,Control,Computers,Communications)Intelligence,Surveillance,andReconnaissance) technologies, many being tested now via Non Lethal Weapons Testing contracts, e.g., by the US Air Force Research Laboratory, which needs to be further explored. (Please see my Twitter thread at head of this article, for links.)
From the Section titled Responsibilities:
Defense would identify tech and systems, existing and in-process, to hand over to Justice for testing, modification, and use as above.
DOJ would identify those requisite military technologies and systems in process at DOD found attractive for use by DOJ; interestingly—perhaps for obvious reasons, since it implies DOD has all the technology already that it could choose from to hand over–it appears that DOD is the primary party responsible to identify and select already-extant technology for DOJ use, but DOJ would be made privy to current military technology programs in process. This probably also implies that a lot of this DARPA tech is classified, and DOD would pick from extant tech to hand over to DOJ, leaving DOJ out of the loop there; with regard to in-process tech, DOJ would be permitted disclosure and be allowed to choose.
Yet both departments are required to identify their own requirements and “candidate technologies,” presumably within the constraints above.
Security classifications would be used as per whichever department was acting as the Executive Agent for specific projects.
Specific projects would be described in Annexes.
Important to note is the fact that the Attorney-General would be fully cognizant of this joint program and its essentially military activities, as reported to him or her by the DAG in charge of the senior review group. This is a program of testing advanced military technology on the streets of America by military units and special operations forces, and in America’s prisons and detention centers by sheriffs and police departments and all contractors interfacing with them, that the AG, DAG, and FBI would be fully aware of.
Notice of Joe Biden’s Omnibus Counter-Terrorism Act of 1995, which predated the 2001 Patriot Act, and established Military interference in domestic Law Enforcement, created the “Terrorist” label for domestic use, permitted indefinite detention without judicial review, and stripped Due Process from Americans.
This 1994 MOU establishes that the Attorney-General and DOJ and FBI and local Law Enforcement nationally in the USA were fully cognizant and partaking in joint military-justice advanced-tech weapons testing operations on Americans from that time onward and, significantly, during milestone moments in American history, such as the very next year at the time of the Oklahoma Bombing on April 19, 1995 followed by Joe Biden’s Omnibus Counter-Terrorism Act of 1995 (proposed in February 1995, passed in May 1995), then seven years later at the time of the 9/11 event in 2001 and the passing of the Patriot Act in 2001, and one decade later, at the time of the President’s Bioethical Commission hearings in 2011.
Americans testify at the President’s Bioethical Commission, 2011
“Advanced Technologies”: Remote Human Access Non-Lethal Weapons and Neurotechnologies
In the entirety of this opaque MOU, nowhere is it mentioned in so many words what exactly these technologies are. However, from the lead-up news reportage prior to this MOU, the many preceding technology conferences, succeeding documents released on FOIA-request, and succeeding execution of Directed Energy Bio Behavioral Research projects using Non Lethal Weapons contracted publicly by DOD, USAF, USMC, others, it becomes evident that these technologies DOJ and DOD jointly sought to deploy—and are currently deploying–are less-than-lethal weapons, non-lethal weapons, through-wall-surveillance weapons, weapons-detection technologies, behavior-modification technologies, medical monitoring technologies, and—secret of secrets–neuroweapons.
Details on some of these technologies now emerging from other FOIA-released documents will be explored in succeeding articles in this series covering these documents.
Four days ago, on Tuesday Nov 26, 2019, I woke to an extraordinary text on Skype from Dr. Eric Karlstrom, Professor Emeritus with 30 years of teaching experience in his field, Physical Geography and Environmental Geography, who retired from California State University, runs many websites, interviews on alt-media, and has been doing interview and conversation podcasts with me at Ramola D Reports over the past 2 years, including the well-known Global Gestapo live-streamed series probing the truth behind the worldwide oppressors of humanity currently running totalitarian, weaponized operations on one and all:
OK, that’s that…. you are fucking CBA- citizen based agent. A con-woman. A piece of shit.
Dr. Eric Karlstrom to Ramola D, Nov 26, 2019, Skype
Just prior to that, he had sent me this series of texts, on Saturday, 23 November, 2019:
Global Gestapo 12, as many know, since I have written about it before was pulled twice off Youtube, despite my Video Note and appeal to them, questioning why they would pull a video which did not even meet the bar for their community violation guidelines, & neither espoused violence nor hatred of anyone, even as it probed the historic involvement of Zionist Jews in the persecution of others worldwide, including other Jews.
As I have stated before, I personally think that video was pulled because it was a little too candid and a little too powerful in its statements on the actual reality of Electromagnetic Weapon and Neurotechnology use on targets-being-tortured of the Organized Crime Superstate – which the famed “White Hats” we hear about from Q circles have done nothing to stop yet, and in its candid discussion of infiltration Psy Ops and Containment Ops as evidenced by Disinfo artists and agent provocateurs supporting each other in the TI activist movement– or perhaps we should call it the TI Containment Ops Community fracas.
However I have a little more to reveal on GG 12 and its aftermath as I experienced them and will do so below.
Dr. Eric Karlstrom did not receive a response from me for those texts he left on Nov 23, because he had already distinguished himself earlier with me with the peculiar and insulting accusation of being an operative acting within a “chain of command” – sounding thereby the death knell to our association.
This occurred directly after an email from me suggesting the closing out of the Global Gestapo series, explaining briefly why I felt GG 12 had been problematic to me, why the series felt like it had run its course, and disclosing that I was working on three other projects, but would do more to promote the GG series and looked forward to his own future podcasts. Nothing in my email – the last email or textual communication I sent him – can possibly be construed as insulting—nor can it be construed in the blatantly false way characterized by Dr. Karlstrom in his Skype texts: I was not closing the GG series because Youtube had pulled GG 12, but for other reasons, explicit and implicit in my email. Nor was I quivering with fear and needing admonitions of courage to go on doing what I am doing already, and have never stopped doing—speaking truth to ill-gotten and abusive power. I relay the entire communication below.
And now I am going to be candid.
GG 12 had been set up – planned – to be a conversation focusing on writer Gloria Naylor’s groundbreaking fictionalized memoir 1996 early revealing NSA chicanery, FBI COINTELPRO she had been subjected to as a sudden target after run-ins with a neighbor who had high-level NSA connections, and encountering the Zionist Satanist aspects of targeting and harassment, and Stephen O’ Keefe who has written and posted videos online about community ZersetZung essentially being Zionist or Masonic Jewish counterintelligence stalking. The title mentioned the “Counterintelligence Zionist Superstate.”
What occurred in GG 12 however was a deviation into the Protocols of the Elders of Zion and indeed framing quite a bit of the conversation in those terms. Conversations do tend to freefall in podcast so I did not yank it back although I tried a couple times; we also ended up talking about infiltration, psy ops, disinfo, containment operations in TI activism, etc., and I got to speak my mind candidly about these, as always is my intent. I openly discussed Targeted Justice’s, Midge Mathis’s, and Richard Lighthouse’s public rejection of my voice and work while supporting Dr. Katherine Horton—who had long established herself as an agent provocateur and saboteur, as detailed extensively at this site—and about the publication of disinfo and misdirection in a recent Horton-Lighthouse podcast.
However, I was not comfortable with how GG 12 devolved into a focus on those Protocols and in our after-talk, which was a little longer than usual, I let Dr. Karlstrom know my thoughts. During this conversation we detoured to speak about other actions and TI activists in our midst. I had indeed been exchanging notes freely with Dr. Karlstrom for quite some time on this subject, having trusted him enough.
Significantly, twice during this after-talk, Zoom crashed me abruptly out of the video-meeting directly after Dr. Karlstrom leaned forward and stroked his nose suggestively, as if signaling to a watching party on one part of his monitor. I won’t draw any conclusions here yet, I am reporting this fact.
The first time I was crashed out (on my infinitely cyber-hacked laptop–and then returned automatically to the meeting by an apparently-compromised Zoom), I had been talking about FBI lies, about how the FBI goes around to our neighborhoods, fabricating and spreading lies about targets they wish to neutralize while spreading fairy-tales about “investigations” and coercing neighbors’ consent to and participation in the target being harassed in her own home and neighborhood.
The second time I was crashed out–also mysteriously returned to the meeting automatically after a few minutes by Zoom–I had been talking about Dr. Tomo Shibata, who had left her home in California (or so she said) and seemed to be intent on suddenly visiting me in Massachusetts while supposedly heading to Maine without a plan or place to stay, and who had started to make numerous uncalled-for controlling, interfering, and directive statements to me over the phone, while making frequent calls–frantic, urgency-filled–in which she was never able to explain to me exactly what was going on at her end.
Regardless, despite these peculiar and pointed interruptions, I mentioned to Dr. Karlstrom my discomfort with his focus on the Protocols and with his inevitable confusions of Zionism with Judaism – which I always make it a point in podcasts to distinguish between: as far as my own thoughts on these matters go, I have no issues with people practicing their religions, whatever they are, Hinduism or Judaism or Christianity—in fact (despite the failings of organized religion) I think all religions are great in their practice of caring for humanity and conscience–but I do think it is an issue of significance when people impose power and persecution over others, as in Zionism and Satanism, or as in 7th-century-or-earlier interpretations of repressive-to-women-and-children strictures contained in their scriptures (many religions are guilty of this—eg Islam, Judaism, Christianity). I did not however get any sense from Dr. Karlstrom that he wished to make any distinctions between Zionism and Judaism; while we have discussed Babylonian Talmudic Satanism where the Satanists hide as Jews inside Judaism, Dr. Karlstrom often makes statements about Judaism itself being Satanic—which I can hardly accept.
I was left after this after-talk with much feeling of perturbation and discussed this matter with a few trusted confidantes.
Who exactly is Dr. Eric Karlstrom?
Dr. Karlstrom has stated earlier to me, in fact on podcast, that he had very high-up CIA connections, with his uncle being a very high-up-in-CIA persona. I have never looked into his background and in fact would not know where to start. I have taken him as I have found him and have engaged in what I thought was a very cordial relationship with him throughout.
Dr. Karlstrom has stated—on podcast & pre-podcast—that the DOD/CIA is indeed interested in my brain and probably wanted to make a “digital clone” of same, since I have a science background and am a poet. No idea if he said that because he knew, or if he was merely surmising. I have presumed the latter, but I do wonder now.
Dr. Karlstrom has stated to someone else, a sister researcher, that she is on the target list; this person has insisted to me that he made this statement to her as if he knew. In my asking him about this, the subject was brushed off.
Dr. Karlstrom made a comment to me as he entered the last Zoom video-meeting (for GG 12) suggesting he may have been in the meeting much earlier than he let on, silently watching me as I adjusted my camera and hair as I waited for him—only possible if he were working undercover for some Intelligence entity in some capacity.
Dr. Karlstrom has long insisted it is a Jewish Masonic conspiracy behind the targeting scenarios I continue to research and write about. In his recent text, he states: “But the best understanding of the whole “gang stalking” phenomena is to see it as a part of this larger Jewish/Illuminati coup against the civilized world. So in that sense, we finally got the context right for this torture/takedown program.”
In trying to understand—after the conclusion of my conversation post-GG 12 with him–why Dr. Karlstrom would focus so intensively on the Zionist Masonic/Illuminati aspect of the undercover Satanist/Luciferian power structure that seems to rule police departments, intelligence agencies, and governments, I have thought briefly of all those who are thus obscured by such a focus: the Anglo-American secret societies, Yale’s Skull and Bones, the Oxford “Group,” the Jesuits, the Vatican, the Black Venetian Nobility, the Swiss Nazi Templars, the British Crown, the British East India Company which never closed up shop, Tavistock, Thule, Club of Rome, the Trilateral Commission, the CFR, the RIIA, the Committee of 300, all of whom I am still reading about. No doubt there are wealthy, sociopathic Zionists owning media, publishing, intelligence and so on, but they are not the only ones at the top of the pyramid, which seems to be represented differently by different researchers and misdirectors both. (The Pope, the Vatican, the Queen, the Gray Pope, Rothschilds, ETs and so on.)
Is Dr. Karlstrom’s notion of a “Jewish/Illuminati coup against the civilized world” a red herring, a deliberate misdirective trope into which I—by continuing podcasts with him—was also being mis-led?
Is this part of a larger intelligence effort to derail my time, my research, my work, my focus? Is he working for the CIA? Or is he an FBI Confidential Human Source engaging in privileged access to a certain group or individual/s, as their recently-declassified policy manual delineates?
Strikingly, there is a whole group of claimants in alt-media who fixate on wealthy Satanist crypto-Jews as primary and sole oppressors, including it appears Rick Wiles of Tru News, whose broadcasts Dr. Karlstrom has been urging I should watch. Both claim to be Christian (Rick Wiles and Dr. Karlstrom.)
John Coleman, former MI6 agent, offers a clue in his book on the Committee of 300:
“I pursued my investigations, pressing on in the face of severe risks, attacks on myself and my wife, financial losses, continual harassment, threats and calumny, all part of a carefully-crafted and orchestrated program to discredit me, run by government agents and informers, embedded in the so-called Christian rightwing, the “Identity Movement” and rightwing “patriotic” groups. These agents operated, and still operate, under cover of strong and fearless outspoken opposition to Judaism their main enemy, they would have us believe.”
John Coleman posits the Committee of 300, the Olympians, and the Crown as primary controllers:
There is much in these final texts from Dr. Karlstrom to me—prior to his clincher at head of this report—that makes me uneasy.
To call me (and him) a high-profile target who may suddenly find myself in added danger is absurd. I am fending off heart-hits with radar as I write; drones and helicopters have been flying as usual over the house and street. If that denotes my being a high-profile target, it means this has been the case for a few years now, and picks up in urgency with the publication and posting of certain reports and podcasts.
As I have noted earlier, it is particularly when infiltrators are being exposed at my keyboard that I am hit the most; it is no different currently.
To suggest that I leave the US and go resettle in India or Mexico because a pogrom may start here in the US reads as fear-mongering, of the kind he has previously laughed at Bryan Tew for. I have been hit with pulsed microvaves, ELFs, ultrasonics, nanotech, other exotic close-to-body tech in London, Frankfurt, Dubai, and various cities in India including Bangalore and Chennai just as much as in Boston, Washington DC, Myrtle Beach, Orleans in Cape Cod, Provincetown, Grenwich-Connecticut, Kalamazoo-Michigan, Newport-Rhode Island, Burlington-Vermont, and many other cities in the USA. Others have reported online and to me how they have been hit in pretty much every country in the world.
Especially interesting is the suggestion that my notices, appeals, and memos to Trump and friends might “have the opposite effect”: “BTW, I like your worldwide appeal that Nina shared…. and it’s a good strategy to do that sort of thing…. as it was to write Trump about these horrors. But you (we) have to know that asking Lenin to stop sending state enemies to the gulags of the Soviet Union would not have worked…. likewise these efforts to ask our torturers to please stop will not have the effect and could have the opposite effect.”
Is this an attempt to stop my impassioned writing of letters and memos and putting people to shame, worldwide, who have sanctioned these programs of cruelty with Stealth Assault Neuroweapons—who may actually be exposed and prosecuted for their crimes if enough powerful and persistent writing blankets the Net?
The pogrom is already here. It is worldwide. Populations are being “pacified” with Remote Access Human Control neuroweapons. People are being silently irradiated, burned, and killed in their own homes—by others, persuaded to surrender their humanity to fear by ruthless and corrupt employees/contractors of agencies, governments, and their-controllers.
Writing is powerful–and, with speaking, filming, recording, documenting, art, podcasts, documentaries, books, still the primary means I see to disseminate the truth of these crimes to the world.
It is also interesting to me that in these texts he has sought to backtrack and seek my continued collegiateship and work with him, attempting to suggest that his own knee-jerk insults sent my way could have been prompted by “cyber-warfare” and the “censoring and tampering” of my email (none that I can see). I have worked for a long time with Dr. Karlstrom, both doing interviews on subjects of his expertise and conversations on subjects of mutual interest; these are interesting podcasts—even if incomplete in their disclosure–and will continue to be featured at my website and at my video channels at Youtube, Vimeo, Bitchute, Ramola D Reports. I recommend that all watch them. I am not afraid of history, and I do not remove people’s podcasts and articles from my sites.
But I reject entirely all attempts, surreptitious and overt, sneaky and in-your-face, to exploit, manipulate, and patronize me, to misdirect, trample, smear, and corrupt my own efforts to expose these crimes against humanity. I reject entirely insults made against me as a writer, interviewer, podcaster, journalist. I am seriously disappointed, in fact appalled and taken aback at Dr. Karlstrom’s unprecedented and unwarranted attack on me with his words—remarkably Luciferian, I may add, in their fixation on excreta—and I am herewith dissociating entirely all connection with him. I ask those who communicate with me on email and elsewhere to kindly never include me in email lists with him. I have no idea who he really is, what his real agenda may be, which agency he may be in cahoots with, but at this point, nor do I care!
I will add that he has not been the only one lately to send insults, demands, or frenzied appeals my way, as efforts escalate among the infiltrator-infidels to derail me from my own intended focus as an independent journalist, and my innate calm as a writer. I will publish on this as well shortly. It’s been ridiculous.
This report is being published both to inform all and let Dr. Karlstrom know his abusive, cyber-bullying, unChristian actions and words to me, particularly after our long, cordial association, are repugnant and unacceptable, and call into question the entire body of his work. Any further abusive communication from him will be ignored or/and immediately published.
Re-posted with thanks to CIA Whistleblower Barbara Hartwell for her friendship, support and candor in speaking out.
I posted her article in a brief thread on Twitter yesterday (link below) with some thoughts & much gratitude. To clarify, as Barbara notes, I was pleasantly surprised and appreciative but did not ask Barbara to write in my support. It is a pure testament to Barbara Hartwell’s integrity and sense of rightmindedness and justice that she would write in support of a friend and sister journalist working for Truth and Justice as she is, and there really is no-one else in the world like her, uncompromising in her integrity and clear-seeing of Dark and Light, rock-solid reliable in her alignment with Light. I am honored therefore and grateful beyond words for her freely-given friendship and her incisive, history-making writing.
#NEWReport Thanks v. much to CIA Whistleblower Barbara Hartwell for writing and posting this report in my defense.
“Good name in man and woman, dear my lord,
Is the immediate jewel of their souls:
Who steals my purse steals trash;
’tis something, nothing;
’twas mine, ’tis his, and has been slave to thousands;
But he that filches from me my good name
Robs me of that which not enriches him,
And makes me poor indeed.”
― William Shakespeare,Othello
Katherine Horton has been running a massive smear campaign against a former colleague, Ramola D, for at least the past 18 months. I do not know Katherine Horton, but I have witnessed the damages to Ramola’s reputation, as a journalist, and as a person, as her character has been vilely assassinated and her professional work trashed.
To add insult to injury, Katherine Horton has enlisted many others among her gaggle of sycophants (her followers on social media, supporters of her website and audience of her You Tube channel) to engage in mob tactics against Ramola, to attack her, to defame her good name, to publish outrageous lies against her and her family.
Additionally, Horton has targeted others for her lies and calumny, including Barbara Hartwell.
EXCERPT from previous report:
Horton then began a smear campaign against Barbara Hartwell, promoting outrageous falsehoods for which she had no evidence whatsoever. Horton has claimed from the beginning that I am a CIA agent. Having no facts at her disposal, she simply parroted the mantra of long-running counterintelligence ops against me: Barbara Hartwell is a CIA disinfo agent.
I wrote several reports in which I refuted her false claims, and further exposed her as a malicious liar and promoter of violence and murder, using HER OWN PUBLISHED WORDS as evidence.
In my considered professional opinion, as an intelligence analyst and former profiler for the US government, based on my observations of her words and actions, from March 2018 until the present time, Katherine Horton is a despicable fraud whose prolific criminal conduct makes her a danger to anyone associated with her.
What is of great concern to me is that so few people will stand up and tell the unvarnished truth about Katherine Horton, though the writing is on the wall, clear as crystal for those with eyes to see.
Nor will they stand up publicly in defense of Ramola. What I have witnessed (aside from those rabid Horton supporters openly participating in the witch hunt) are the fence-sitters, the compromisers, who refuse to take a firm stand, to name names of those engaged in unscrupulous actions, some of which are criminal in nature.
No, apparently they would rather sit silently on the sidelines, waiting to see which way the wind blows, rather than stand up and be counted in defense of Ramola against her enemies, those who clearly wish to destroy her.
For the record, I stand with Ramola, not just because she is my friend; not just because she has supported me and my work (for which I know she has taken tremendous heat). I stand with her because I see her value as one of very few people I have known who DOES stand up against evil, against oppression, against tyranny, without compromising her principles, without concern for the approval of others, whatever the consequences to herself.
Ramola did not ask me to write this, though I dare say she may not be surprised that I did. As her friend and colleague, I know the terrible price she has paid for telling the truth and for standing up for what she knows to be right, even if she has to stand alone. That is the stuff of which heroes are made and I cannot be silent in the face of these vile attacks on her name, her character and her work on behalf of those many decent, law-abiding persons, worldwide, being targeted for harassment, torture, terror, wrongful incarceration and life-destroying crimes.
Report & Joint Statement | Ramola D | November 23, 2019
Subsequent to the extraordinary year and a half of outright falsehoods and slander propagated against me by former colleague Dr. Katherine Horton in an endless public display via several media including Youtube, Twitter, and her website, inflicting tremendous damage on my name and reputation while inciting others to engage nonstop in similar smears, mobbing, and cyber-bullying, it was recently decided to issue a joint statement to refute one of Dr. Horton’s most outstanding lies regarding how Techno Crime Fighters Forum ended.
This particular false-narrative-construct states that I “single-handedly blew up Techno” and is the primary lie this Joint Statement from all members of the TCFF team bar Dr. Katherine Horton intended to address.
This Joint Statement has come about thanks to the thoughtful efforts of an independent observer encouraging us to revisit this matter and jointly publish the truth of what occurred, in the interests of serving the truth and refuting the slander adversely affecting my name and journalism.
Over the past two or more weeks we have sought to do so, deciding on the text of this statement jointly after much conversation, contemplation, correction, edits, additions.
This statement was approved by all three members of the group on November 20.
Regrettably and unexpectedly, just before finalizing and publication, Karen Melton-Stewart sought to delay publication for four weeks, stating the timing could be seen as coinciding with Dr. Katherine Horton’s court case. Given that this entire effort—slicing into time much needed for other work including my journalism—has been undertaken to address new damage inflicted by Dr. Katherine Horton, whose continued slanderous attacks on me I have sought often to quell, I expressed my disinterest in such a consideration, pointing out that Dr. Katherine Horton’s court case schedules—which no-one had been keeping tabs on–were irrelevant to the historic matter being addressed by the Joint Statement. Nor, in my view, was it necessary to give credence and consideration to activities of dubious merit being undertaken by Dr. Katherine Horton, who had necessitated these very efforts, onerous and time-consuming, to repudiate her outrageous actions of slander and defamation against me.
Karen Stewart then stated that she withdrew her support for the Joint Statement–after she had already given her approval for the Statement as it is published below.
I highly regret that this has occurred, but I bear no animosity toward a sister warrior fighting for the truth about these crimes against humanity to be heard. I am honored to have worked alongside her, to have supported her voice and work, and to have reported at length on her story.
I am publishing the Joint Statement currently, as earlier intended, and as written, edited, and approved by all three of us in the service of truth, to repudiate wanton slander, and in the spirit of informing the public at large what really transpired.
November 19, 2019
JOINT STATEMENT ON HOW TECHNO CRIME FIGHTERS FORUM ENDED
Correction of Dr. Katherine Horton’s False Narrative Changing Facts
Because there continues to be confusion among some on this matter, definitively speaking, we jointly need to establish that Techno did NOT end by way of Ramola “singlehandedly blowing up Techno,” as Dr. Katherine Horton has wrongfully mischaracterized it several times, including recently, on her website, in many videos, and on Twitter; Techno ended because of a primary issue we three–Millicent, Ramola and Karen–had tried hard over time and over that last week, via emails, to resolve with Dr. Horton but alas could not.
The major issue, brought to a head by her offer to host TCFF weekly at her channel while others wished to make TCFF monthly (thanks to the unstructured, time-wasting form some felt TCFF had degraded to, which had raised issues of changing its periodicity), was Dr. Katherine Horton’s calls for violence on some of our shows against those leaders running heinous operations against us; whether serious or sardonic, it was deemed by us all as unwise. A minor issue was Dr. Katherine Horton’s peppering her commentary with profanity not readily acceptable in American society, which struck us as unprofessional, and unwise.
Other reasons and issues have been documented by Ramola in her account The End of Techno Crime Fighters Forum: The Real Backstory — an account published only after review and approval by Millicent, Karen, and Melanie- -which unwound over a longer period of time than just that last week when conflict in conversation with Dr. Katherine Horton on the subject of those primary issues above, accentuated by her refusing to accept culpability for her own previous calls to violence, brought Techno to an end.
It also needs to be definitively stated that all 4 of us had understood that Techno Crime Fighters Forum had already come to an end, as a re-perusal of the email exchange between us establishes, before the occasion of the Video Note presented on August 2, 2018 by Karen, Millicent, and Ramola, which was only meant to be a note to viewers by one portion of the former group that the forum had closed.
Dr. Horton’s frequent statements that she was excluded from a TCFF episode are factually wrong. So also her statements that “Karen was shocked” to get a call that TCFF was to be announced as ended, when more accurately we understand now after much conversation, that Karen’s inability to be present for long at a 3-person conference call the night before (Aug 1) meant that she herself, sad at the impasse with Katherine, but aware (like all 4 of us) at that point that TCFF was over, was not expecting a call from Ramola and Millicent the next day (Aug 2) to publicly address the issue of TCFF closing; cyber-hacking on the day (Aug 2) also prevented Karen from being present earlier that morning to more fully discuss the matter before going on-air for a Video Note to say goodbye; all of which combined to her being “indeed surprised” when eventually reached late that morning, as she has stated earlier. However, it is important to note that the decision to go on-air to present that Note without Dr. Katherine Horton (and the distinct possibility of unpleasantness on-air) was taken by all three together, even if in haste, to honor the time-slot, and even if the Note itself, intended originally to be a brief and neutral announcement of the unfortunate end of TCFF, expanded unexpectedly into candor from Ramola as to why TCFF closed, after Katherine unexpectedly showed up in Chat and made statements there about “being excluded from the broadcast.” It is important to note Katherine herself did not label this in Chat a TCFF episode, which it most certainly was not, because she like all three of us knew full well by then TCFF was over. Her subsequent labelings of this being a TCFF episode from which she was excluded are questionable and erroneous.
Dr. Katherine Horton was indeed excluded from a notification podcast to wish viewers goodbye—on group consensus– only because she had already, prior to that podcast, rejected in-depth attempts, together and separately, from all three women to reason with her and find a solution. This was the primary reason for the breakup of the group, with much frustration and bad feelings generated by her refusal to further discuss the primary issue the group found problematic. TCFF as a group and a forum no longer existed at that point, and as a result, communications were strained and unfruitful or just finally non-existent.
Finally, it is important to note that Dr. Katherine Horton at the time, on email, denounced all three for not including her on that final Video Note, and all three stopped working with her on the Joint Investigation Team which she later erroneously cast as a team she had “led” when it had been agreed throughout it was a collegiate, not a hierarchized group, which certainly did not recognize her as a leader.
Dr. Katherine Horton’s repeated mis-characterizations since then and recently, scapegoating Ramola D as the prime cause or instigator of TCFF’s demise and publishing such mis-characterized interpretations and accusations against Ramola D— which may rise from her own denial that her calls to violence were inappropriate or had even been done, or as a desire to deflect attention from her own culpability in an unwise course of action which ultimately brought TCFF to an end– should be repudiated.
Karen Melton-Stewart, Dr. Millicent Black, Ramola D
Newsbreak 51, Jan 5, 2020: Discussions of Remedy & Call to Action on Lynda Thyer's Birthday
Global Jury Meeting 2, Jan 3, 2020/RT Pod 7: Addressing International Cases
Global Jury Meeting 1, Dec 20, 2019/RT Pod 6: Public Interest Panel for Lynda Thyer
Newsbreak 50, Dec 18, 2019: Update on Lynda Thyer with Scott Tips and Neelu Berry
Newsbreak 49: Update with Frederic Laroche Post Court Hearing in France
Newsbreak 48: Lynda Thyer Once More Wrongfully Arrested at French Court Hearing
Newest Reports Smear Ops and Containment Ops to Contain the Narrative
Ramola D | Info-Talks: A New Series | #DisclosureOnTargeting
Info-Talk 3 | 11/23/2019: Notices Posted: FISA/Patriot Act Crimes, Crimes Against HumanityInfo-Talk 2 | 8/30/2019: White House Notified of FISA Abuse, Patriot Act & DOD/CIA CrimesInfo-Talk 1 | 3/22/2019: Millions in US Targeted With RF/Scalar/Sonic Weapons, Nano, Neuro, Chem, Bio WeaponsGlobal Gestapo, A Series with Dr. Eric Karlstrom, Has Closed
Free Keene’s web site/A peace-liberty-voluntarism project pursuing and promoting peaceful living in Free Keene, New Hampshire
Free State Project
Free State Project’s website/A Liberty in our Lifetime project in New Hampshire, pursuing liberty, community, and peaceful living
New Earth Project
New Earth Project website/Open platform to unite humanity and create initiatives to support the emergence of absolute freedom and sovereign creative expression for all
Public Intelligence Blog
Blog for Earth Intelligence Network, Phi Beta Iota the Public Intelligence Blog/Promotes hybrid transparent governance, collective intelligence, true cost economics, and whole systems understanding