Category Archives: Corruption

Redbridge Council Cites “Personal Care” Exemption in Refusing to Explain Aggressive & Fraudulent Sectioning Attempts on Mr. Edward Ellis, Equity Lawyer

–Ramola D/Posted August 3, 2o19

Letters  of inquiry and concern sent earlier to Redbridge Council Press Office and to the Care Quality Commisssion overseeing NHS Trust Hospitals at Brighton, Sussex, and Essex regarding the recent multiple and aggressive sectioning attempts on Mr. Edward Ellis, Equity Lawyer were replied to on July 30, with a terse refusal to address by Redbridge Council. Citing the 2000 Freedom of Information Act, the Adult Care, Public Health and Well-being Team stated, “We are unable to provide a response as this relates to a matter of personal care and treatment that falls outside of the FOI process.”

Considering that the letter requesting information had raised a number of concerning issues about Mr. Ellis’s being pursued by the Mental Health workers at Redbridge Council on multiple occasions, including with police officers carrying tasers as they entered the home they broke into on 26 June and on another occasion as reported here earlier, and also considering that earlier coverage had established quite definitively that Mr. Ellis was hardly mentally ill and had become instead the victim of fraudulent sectioning attempts by Redbridge Council on the basis of faulty information from NHS Trust doctors, particularly the questionable Dr. Lever, head nephrologist at Queen’s Hospital, this is hardly an adequate response to a concerned public.

Among the questions raised by this reporter in her request for information from the press office were the following:

Why was this action taken on 26 June 2019 to break down Mr. Ellis’s door in intention of “search and capture” of Mr. Ellis?

Why was Police Officer EO 4333 holding a taser in his hand behind his back just as he entered the home?

Are you aware of the extreme dangers of tasers–which have caused numerous deaths and cardiac arrests, and which harm people in relation to the level of their physical health? (Please see my Community Care…article linked above, which links to many articles reporting these dangers.)

Are you aware Mr. Edward Ellis is a kidney patient, who has moreover been the recipient of a fistula surgically placed in him by Sussex University hospital with no follow-up for dialysis over 7 months, who is himself working on acquiring the best treatment for his kidney issues?

Are you aware that Redbridge Council has essentially approved the use of a taser on a 66-year-old kidney patient–if this police officer acted in a pre-approved manner, that is? If he did not, are you aware that this is a serious matter of concern and that Law Enforcement in the whole of the UK needs to be made aware of the extreme dangers of taser use on unwell people, who are for obvious reasons, in a vulnerable physical state–and that Law Enforcement should not therefore be permitted to use or threaten use of tasers on people known to be medical patients?

Failure to answer such basic questions is inexplicable, given their intent to elucidate why the Council would embark on such pernicious actions against a senior citizen and NHS patient who is also a whistleblower and equity lawyer of high international repute, working to end corruption crimes against upstanding citizens, who is known and loved by millions, if not billions. 

Questions of Concern Regarding Taser Use and Wrongful Sectioning Attempts Shockingly Left Unanswered

Questions of concern regarding taser use when left unanswered by an “Adult Care, Public Health, and Well-Being” team surely suggest a blithe and unsettling lack of concern on this subject by this team. More than shocking given that the very presence of police officers accompanying a mental health team taking the extreme step of breaking down a resident’s door with force, citing the Mental Health Act, has obviously been decreed by the council.

Given that the Council sent that team, with police escort, to Mr. Ellis’s home, it follows that the Council is responsible both for the wrongful citation of the Mental Health Act (in absence of any evidence of mental illness, as discussed earlier here in Egregious Sectioning and Kidnap Attempts on Equity Lawyer Edward Ellis As the Completing Mass Corruption Remedy Process Exposes Pervasive Crime & Corruption in UK Courts, Police Departments, and Hospitals) and for attempts by police officers to knock people out with tasers, perhaps occasioning their sudden death by cardiac arrest, as doctors and lawyers have attested is an ever-present danger with 50,000-volt-shock-delivering tasers, discussed earlier here: Community Care or Deranged “Mental Health Team”? UK Police Carry Taser Into Home Break-In to Attack Whistleblower Patient with Kidney Failure

6 July, 2019 Visit of Officer with Taser/Covered Here

On a later occasion also recorded by human rights activist and reporter Neelu Berry, it is clear the police officer who sought to enter and search her home is prominently carrying a taser.  

On the occasion of the dramatic and thickly-peopled break-in on 26 June where not one mental health nurse or social worker but several bustled in on the officers’ heels to look under beds and peer into closets with intent to capture a hardworking equity lawyer, it is further clear the officer with the taser had full intent to use it, or keep it handy for swift use, as he whipped it out from under his vest and carried it behind his back as he entered.

26 June 2019, Nurse Smiles as Officer Holds Taser Behind Back/Covered Here

If this is not a betrayal of the public trust, what is? How is a Mental Health team engaging in adult care, public health or well-being by delivering 50,000 volt shocks using a deadly conducted energy device which shoots prongs into people’s bodies, designed to paralyze and incapacitate, and known cause of several deaths by cardiac arrest in the past?

And how is the Adult Care, Public Health, and Well-being Team at Redbridge Council justified in maintaining a cool silence over this matter? Does the Council wish to imply that they intend to continue in this practice and believe it is perfectly alright to knock out and quite possibly kill senior citizens in this fashion? It is quite clearly not a matter of public health, public safety, or personal well-being but its opposite when a police officer is permitted to brandish and deploy a deadly energy device on a member of the public, under the aegis of “Mental Health Care.”

It becomes painfully obvious rather that such an extreme police action in accompaniment with a team intent on a psychiatric arrest is intending primarily to subjugate and subdue a non-mentally-ill citizen, for purposes of political silencing, in flagrant violation of all protected freedoms of speech and expression in a democracy.

Neelu Berry notes that the Redbridge Council should respond to the taser held by the police officer and the Mental Health nurse smiling, also the fact that there was no incident that invoked the Mental Health Act. “The fact that the taser being used before the Mental Health Team Assessment was proof of an assassination of character or intellectual property. All the above actions of the team were contrary to Section 4 of the Criminal Law act 1967 which mandates wide publicity for crimes being committed, especially by corrupt state officers against Whistle.blowers who are protected Witnesses.”

Questions of Concern on Evidence of Fraud and Medical Malpractice by Queen’s Hospital Nephrologist Left Unanswered

The primary matter of medical malpractice evinced by wrongful attribution as mentally-ill of perfectly sane and mentally-well professionals like Mr. Ellis, covered at length earlier, was also left unanswered:

5) Are you aware that, as Ms. Berry spells out below, there does not appear to be any cause whatsoever for a Mental Health sectioning to have been indicated by any hospital or doctor in recent contact with Mr. Ellis: “The Mental Health Team of 8 had no reason to believe Mr Ellis had Mental Health issues because Dr Lever confirmed there was no evidence of it during a consultation.” Please note that this matter of Dr. Lever stating clearly it was not in his remit to make mental health evaluations while oxymoronically and peculiarly asking Mr. Ellis to submit to his recommendation that someone else should make a mental health evaluation–for no reason whatsoever–was discussed in my article Egregious Sectioning….linked above. Dr. Lever’s attitude and actions suggest that he is unreasonably and suspiciously persecuting a whistleblower reporting high-level corruption including hospital corruption.

The claiming of a personal data exemption to withhold information on the sectioning attempts on Mr. Ellis–a matter of vast public concern, and not in any way purely private, given its implications for all members of the UK and world public–also reads as an unnecessarily lax and expedient refusal to discuss the matter further, a commentary on the evasion of transparency and public accountability by the London Borough of Redbridge.

Questions of Concern on General Practice and Protocol also Left Unanswered

Questions regarding general practice and protocol in the matter of the Council pursuing a mentally sound citizen under false-labeling as mentally ill were equally left unanswered, with a “personal data” exemption being claimed, when the questions themselves indicate an interest in general procedure.

7) Why were there so many staff workers of whatever kind attendant, who are they, what is their professional qualification, and why were they all storming the bastion of Mr. Ellis’s home that morning?

8) What had these staff workers been told to warrant their all being there, en masse, as if they all needed to be there?

9) What is your understanding (I am asking Redbridge Council and the Care Quality Commission Health Service Regulating Body here) of the rationale behind getting a warrant under the Mental Health Act to section a completely sane and sound citizen, who in no way has engaged in harm to self or society and has never been in danger of same–and has given no-one, no doctor, no nurse, no medical professional, no neighbor, no friend, no interviewer any evidence whatsoever of such imputed harm?

The Council’s blanket response:

“The information is exempt from disclosure under Section 40(2) of the Freedom of Information Act (FoIA). The information is personal data as defined by the Data Protection Act 1998 (DPA). As it is information about someone else I’m unable to give this to you; release of this information would constitute a breach of Principle 1 of the DPA. Principle 1 states that personal data shall be processed (used) fairly and lawfully and, in particular, shall not be used unless at least one of the conditions in Schedule 2 of the DPA is met; in this case none of those conditions have been met. This response therefore acts as a refusal notice under section 17 of the FoIA.”

This matter continues therefore to be of great concern, and while the Council suggested Mr. Ellis could protest his treatment–“If Mr Ellis wishes to complain about his treatment he can do so by contacting the NELFT complaints team at nelftcomplaints@nhs.net“–this writer intends to submit an appeal for internal review, as suggested by the Information Request and Compliance team at the Council, as per their letter. 

It is also regrettably clear from this cover-all response that the officials at the Council penning it have sought to screen themselves from scrutiny and public accountability on a matter of grave concern to all citizens in a democracy; every citizen is at risk if a democratically-elected government can sink into syndicated corruption, protect people in authoritative positions who engage in medical malpractice, and unleash over-arching actions of harm on citizens in the name of psychiatric well-being.

Anyone and everyone could be subjected to a Mental Health Arrest-With-Taser on any doctor’s fraudulent, false-labeling recommendation then, it seems–and no need for the Council Mental Health teams to explain these actions: a situation which calls for immediate reform in both the Freedom of Information Act and the Mental Health Act.

Concerned citizens should be doubly alarmed and might wish to subject each member of this Council to closer scrutiny of platform and agenda for integrity and true interest in public health and safety. 

American Journalist Covering this British Government Debacle Retaliated Against with Anti-Personnel Weapons in India

It should also be reported that directly after completing a draft of this article and sending it in to the London Borough of Redbridge and their Press Office for review and comment as per their request, this reporter was hit immediately with intense anti-personnel “non-lethal” weapons AKA Stealth Assault Anti-Humane Weapons, inclusive of resounding ELFs from a local construction mixer and precision-hit Microwave Weapons from nearby cell towers or satellites, as well as intense scalar weapon-hits on private parts–all sounded on external shields, inducing projectile vomiting, migraines, and burning for over 48 hours. (The program of stealth assault involving electronic-warfare weaponry now installed in the US and UK to stifle freedom of speech and expression is worldwide, from all reporting victim accounts, and has been installed in India in exactly the same format.)

Clearly, the reason this story–as also many others of international import–is not being covered by mainstream media outlets in the UK or elsewhere is because such coverage is being stifled and repressed, by brutal attack of the journalists attempting coverage.

This information is being reported in the interests of informing the world public and UK public that Freedom of the Press in the UK is quite literally dead, despite fake attempts by the UK Government with the recent Global Conference on Media Freedom touting interest in media freedom–which perhaps translates more accurately to propaganda freedom for government use.

This information regarding anti-personnel assault on this writer was also provided earlier today to the Redbridge Council with a second request for comment, which elicited the following anonymized and opaque reply from the Press Office, London Borough of Redbridge:

“A council spokesperson said: “The council has responded to your FOI request and we have nothing further to add.”

Clearly, the London Borough of Redbridge believes it is possible to maintain an impenetrable silence on all matters related to their fraudulent Mental Health Act invocations on sane and mentally sound citizens and get away with it. This should be deeply concerning to all sane and mentally sound UK residents, and this writer advises that all in UK concerned by this matter make their feelings about Redbridge Council’s actions known publicly to them in writing.

This writer also requests that all readers take note of what is being reported here, about anti-personnel anti-humane weapon retaliation against journalists with gravitas.

British, American, and all Western governments seem to think they can maintain a semblance of “democracy” while assaulting all questioners, writers, journalists, activists, and whistle-blowers in stealth, with electronic-warfare weapons–and not be held accountable for it. As many know from reading my reports and watching my interviews, I believe these weapons, whose thrust I have been on the receiving-end of for almost six years now, are profoundly inhumane and should be banned.

My most recent correspondence with Redbridge Council reporting Anti-Personnel Stealth Weapon retaliation and their response to my request for comment: Response from Redbridge Council Press Office & Report of Anti-Personnel Assault on Journalist

The Redbridge Council Response letter is here: Response (information exempt)

My Letter of Concern to Redbridge Council and other members of the UK Government is here: Letter of Concern_Request to Stop All Wrongful Mental Health Sectioning Attempts on Mr. Edward Ellis, Equity Lawyer – Ramola D

My Request for Information to the Press Offices at Redbridge Council and the Care Quality Commission, along with Neelu Berry’s letter to the Care Quality Commission is here: Request for Information on Wrongful Sectioning Attempts on Mr. Edward Ellis, Equity Lawyer, 26 June 2019

Related:

Egregious Sectioning and Kidnap Attempts on Equity Lawyer Edward Ellis As the Completing Mass Corruption Remedy Process Exposes Pervasive Crime & Corruption in UK Courts, Police Departments, and Hospitals

Community Care or Deranged “Mental Health Team”? UK Police Carry Taser Into Home Break-In to Attack Whistleblower Patient with Kidney Failure

Ramola D Reports/NewsBreak 30: Wave of Mental Health Frauds in UK, New Zealand | Queen’s Hospital Fraudulently Reports Edward Ellis as Absconded Dialysis Patient

Mr. Edward Ellis, Equity Lawyer, Reports the Launch of a Mass Corruption Remedy Process in the United Kingdom and Calls for Principled Independents and Empowered Citizens to Step Forward

Egregious Sectioning and Kidnap Attempts on Equity Lawyer Edward Ellis As the Completing Mass Corruption Remedy Process Exposes Pervasive Crime & Corruption in UK Courts, Police Departments, and Hospitals

–Ramola D/Posted 6/28/2019/Corrections & Updates, 6/29/2019

In a series of extraordinary incidents last week as he strove to complete a final document detailing the corruption proofs derived over 20 years from cases of intellectual property theft and home theft to concealed murder operations and human organ theft in NHS hospitals, all protected by corrupt police protections accorded to people in positions of power including top judges, hospitals, doctors, and prime ministers, and exposing the unmistakable crime syndicate networked into UK courts, police departments, and hospitals, Equity Lawyer Edward Ellis became the target of sudden panicked attempts at medical kidnap and sectioning.

While Mental Health Fraud is now, shockingly enough, routinely being conducted against whistleblowers and activists by corrupt or corralled mental health professionals working with governments, both in the UK and it seems worldwide, it must be seen anew each time for what it really is: an extreme abuse of power, a Show of Force, purposive intimidation and attempt to silence important work, an illegal grab at one’s rights to autonomy, mental and physical, and, as resolute activist Neelu Berry notes, outright State Terrorism.

The work that Equity Lawyer Edward Ellis has been doing—and publishing notice of at various channels online lately (including Andy Devine’s channel and Ramola D Reports) as well as via email lists and filings to Parliament and all UK Ministers is nothing short of earth-shattering, and exposes crime, fraud, trickery, and entrenched corruption fraud at its roots, exposing and challenging the UK’s pervasive system of protection by crime-syndicate-police for all abuse-of-power crimes.

In Edward’s case, it appears the purpose of pursuing him for forced Mental Health Assessments has been twofold: both to stifle his voice and work exposing systemic UK corruption and cover up evidence of medical negligence crime committed against him by the very hospitals that have now run panicked mental health frauds—wrongful sectioning attempts–on him.

Preparation for Dialysis Which Never Happened

This goes back to December 2018 when Edward was told he had a deteriorating kidney condition and needed dialysis by doctors at Sussex University hospital administered through the Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust—incidentally, not long after Edward had exposed corrupt activities by Sussex police in drug-growing and firearms-stealing in the case of a wrongfully accused and imprisoned Sussex farmer whose land was stolen.

Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals/bsuh.nhs.uk

Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals/bsuh.nhs.uk

They then proceeded to instal a “fistula” on him, as first step in helping ready veins and arteries for dialysis. This tube is supposed to be left in for only a few days in between dialysis sessions, notes Neelu Berry. The problem was, they then left it in for seven months, saying they had put him on a dialysis list, which they apparently hadn’t because they never called him.

This tube which connects the artery and the vein is to connect to the dialysis machine so that the dirty blood in the vein is cleaned by the machine and put back into the artery as clean blood. By leaving the tube in place, the dirty blood is mixing with the clean blood, bypassing the lungs, kidneys and all cleaning organs. It is a slow execution. Edward is shrinking, losing weight, his food is going straight through him and he is having a bug and hayfever, unable to fight the infection. Immunity is zero. The heart becomes enlarged so the patient does feel more energetic than ever.

In efforts to combat the effects of the fistula and keep his immunity up, Edward had embarked on a rigorous exercise program which involved walking several miles and swimming as well.

Numerous Mental Health Fraud Attempts

Recent attempts to section Edward and fraudulently label him mentally ill when the Sussex hospital it seems had incurred liability on themselves by surgically inserting a fistula in him –which they neither utilized appropriately with immediate dialysis nor removed–began on 17 June 2019, when a Redbridge Council Mental Health team called and offered their services to him on the phone, which he declined.

Prior to this, in Dec 2018, it also appears that Dr. MacDiarmid-Gordon of Sussex University Hospital had engaged in what Edward characterizes as Blackmail Fraud, demanding that he submit to a psychiatric evaluation and apparently withholding kidney dialysis treatment until he did so—it is not clear why a mental health evaluation was suggested.

The regularity with which Mental Health Evaluations are used in hospitals to permit authoritarian takeover of patients’ rights was remarked in Edward’s Remedy process document: “The National Health Service Doctors repeatedly commit Torture and Blackmail using Treatment Denial Frauds to support Mental Examination Consent Demands. They are Technically Clever but Judgmentally Impoverished. Some are Power Obsessed.”

This fraudulent medical-tyranny attempt to discredit Edward was also referred to later by Dr. Lever of Queen’s Hospital who said Edward had been “labelled” “historically” as mentally ill by Dr. Gordon (discussed below). (Labeling is indeed right; this appears to be exactly what Authoritarian Psychiatry seeks, to label and dismiss whistleblowers as mentally ill to discredit their whistleblowing. It is ironic and interesting that Dr. Lever made recourse to precisely this truth-telling term.)

As he fought off his hayfever last week and completed the final document in the Mass Remedy process he had initiated, Edward Ellis was informed through his GP that Dr. Lever, the Clinical Lead Kidney Specialist at Queen’s Hospital in Romford, Essex was suddenly bumping his appointment up from the end of July to the 19th of June without notice.

Then, both on the 18th of June and 19th of June, a Mental Health team arrived unannounced at his residence, presumably to section him, meaning forcibly remove him to a mental health facility for evaluation, citing the Mental Health Act which permits this infamy. (Click links for CCTV footage on these visits.)

18 June 2019 Mental Health team unannounced uninvited visit

19 June 2019 Mental Health Team unannounced, uninvited visit

Neelu Berry notes beneath the videos that these attempts to section a whistleblower are intended to discredit him—which does ring true, given that Edward’s physical condition had suddenly been transmuted by a network of culpable doctors into a mental health issue, with no evidence whatsoever of any kind of sudden-onset mental illness!

It does beg the question how many hundreds of mental health “patients” locked away in Psych wards are really whistleblowers. Neelu Berry notes that these bogus sectioning attempts prove the “failure of the Care Quality Commission to maintain safety standards in its Health & Care services” and calls for “the immediate review and release of all patients admitted in Mental Health Institutions.”

Seamy Backstory: Child Trafficking, Organ Trafficking, and Kidnap for Rituals In NHS Hospitals

Darker, seamier sides to what lies behind dialysis diagnoses and urgent appointments must also be noted. This is where it becomes impossible not to see that assassination of patients, as Neelu Berry notes, particularly vulnerable ones like kidney dialysis or cancer patients is not an idle claim, that it can be accomplished very easily with DNRs (Do Not Resuscitate order) and Mental Health frauds run by criminal insider doctors working for the corrupt crime syndicate rooted in secret-society occultism and bizarre rituals. Is this really happening? Those who have experienced anomalous care at NHS hospitals suggest it is.

Edward’s Remedy Process document, which reports on an investigation of widespread corruption and crime remarks: “The Corruption Investigations had discovered how the Renegade Professional Groups function. They are Thug Gangs. Professional Qualifications + Post Appointments get Gang Membership but Professional Standards do not govern them. The Budget Managers do. Judges became dependent on Court Frauds and the Budget Managers who buy them.

Queen’s Hospital, Romford, Essex/Image: Romford Recorder

On the 19th of June when Edward had been told Dr. Lever would see him straight away if he attended the Ambulatory Care Unit and informed reception, he visited Queens Hospital with two friends. Apparently when he informed Reception he found there was no record of Dr. Lever making an appointment with him. (The peculiarity of Ambulatory Care Units set up in hospitals and the potential for their use in secretive isolation, disappearance, and assassination attempts is discussed by Neelu Berry in Ramola D Reports/Newsbreak 29.)

It must be noted that Dr. Nicholas Lever, oddly enough, was the very same clinician who issued a DNR or “Do Not Resuscitate” order when Neelu’s sister, Sadhana Chaudhari, suffering from breast cancer, was admitted in June 2018 to the very same Queen’s Hospital, bizarrely and inappropriately to a Kidney ward under Dr Lever, and “it was Edward’s documents to the CEO which had it reversed.”

At heart of the Mass Corruption Remedy process Mr. Ellis has been working on, Sadhana’s child, baby Sunaina features as one of the main Corruption Fraud Proof cases, since a whole slew of unconscionable crimes tragically attended her brief life and death; semen was found in her mouth at death, blisters on lip; organs had been removed; this was after doctors had wrested control of her care from the mother Sadhana with a Mental Health Fraud; prior to that Baby Sunaina, who had been wrongfully diagnosed with a genetic defect and doomed-life prognosis even before birth, and been operated on for a diaphragmatic hernia had been given an abnormally high dosage of a potent drug, Ranitidine; when the mother sought further care, the dosage was reduced but still high, an adult dosage, and administered in a protracted program of medical malpractice which Neelu Berry, her aunt, a pharmacist discerned immediately as malfeasant; what she was subjected to points to an entrenched and callous practice of human organ theft, with secrecy aiding in sexual abuse of child-patients, and possibly even darker, ritualistic abuse. The mother and aunt were also silenced with an unlawful restraining order in protection of these crimes (later nullified by common law grand juries).

(This entire situation was reported here earlier, in Newsbreak 8; Neelu Berry, Baby Protection Pharmacist, Made Homeless by UK Parliament and also in a recent ITNJ testimonial.)Neelu Berry notes in Newsbreak 29 that the occulted, secret-society breed of rich, protected criminals which runs hospitals and courts has many dark uses for death and dead bodies.

What was the rationale behind Dr. Lever’s hurried change of appointments to compel Edward to visit Queen’s Hospital on the 19th of June? Neelu suspects entrapment for sectioning and discrediting of a most powerful whistleblower, as well as quite possibly an intended assassination. This latter she bases also on the overnight-in-hospital experience of her “Black Dad” Dr. Akena Adoko who reported, shortly before he died, men stealing in to inject him in the arm twice at night in King’s College Hospital as well as transport him secretly somewhere at night where he said hundreds stood around looking at him; he died unexpectedly in the middle of the night after his niece had seen him improved earlier.

(For further details, please see Neelu Berry’s Report, linked below.)

Queen’s Hospital Nephrologist Dr. Lever Caught Impersonating a Psychiatrist, Having Mental Health Team on Standby

The entire incident at Queen’s Hospital where it is clear to all from the audio recording Neelu made (linked below), that a highly unsavory and deliberate attempt to fraudulently section Edward Ellis as mentally ill was being made despite no “delusion evidence” and despite the fact that nephrologists—or any other kind of specialist—have no business trying to suggest their patients are mentally ill really highlights what terrifying power doctors have been given in hospitals.

When Edward was ushered into a meeting with Dr. Lever, he was initially in the room on his own; raised voices and talk of “psychiatric assessment” prompted Neelu Berry to turn on her recorder and knock on the door to be let in. But what the recorder captured indicates quite clearly that Dr. Lever, a nephrologist, is demanding that Edward be admitted immediately and consent to a psychiatric assessment, while refusing to listen to his patient’s explanations regarding his  need to finish his important work before a hospital admission. (Remember too that Edward’s work exposes hospital crime and reports to Parliament.)

EXCERPT FROM AUDIO TRANSCRIPT/Recorded through door:

Dr Lever: I want you to be seen by, I think you should be seen by the psychiatric services here.

Mr Ellis: I refuse

Dr Lever: Yes but at the moment these processes are not absolutely not going to recognise….

Mr Ellis: They’ve screwed up

Dr Lever: I’m not going to argue with you. I’d rather, What I am saying is, all I want to do…

Mr Ellis: I am giving Notice to Parliament

Dr Lever: I’m not interested, I am saying

Mr Ellis: I’ll finish

Dr Lever: Please, I’m saying I’m not interested, I’m not interested, I am saying for you to have a mental health assessment

Mr Ellis: A decision is being made this week, I will finish the grounds this week

KNOCK KNOCK (Neelu enters at this point)

Rejecting utterly Edward’s information on the mass corruption remedy process, Dr.Lever initially focused on the kidney situation with Neelu but when reminded by her it was not in his remit to play psychiatrist, agreed, yet persisted in his stance about needing a mental health assessment. Correctly assessing the situation as dangerous, Neelu Berry informed Dr. Lever they would get a second opinion and tried to hurry Edward out of the office.

Dr. Lever pressed the alarm bell, saying loudly he wished to get “somebody else” into the office, code-word for Mental Health staff, Neelu surmised, and as they hurried out, gestured to another doctor to follow them, prompting staff to say, revealingly, “Do you want us to section him?” Suggesting “somebody else” was right there, waiting, and a whole crew as well, ready to forcibly section Dr. Lever’s interviewee at the drop of a hat.

All of which brings sharply into view the pre-arranged nature of this apparent hospital ambush, with a Mental Health Team waiting to exert Authoritarian Psychiatry on a fully-sane, mentally-sound patient.

EXCERPT FROM AUDIO TRANSCRIPT:

Neelu Berry: Edward I think we should just walk out of here, we don’t require your services

Dr. Lever: But you do require our services

Neelu Berry: We don’t

Edward Ellis: Neelu

Dr. Lever: I am the Clinical Lead of Kidney Services in this Hospital

Neelu Berry: But you are outside your remit with the Mental Health

Dr. Lever: No no no no, I know I am, I know I am, absolutely, and I agree with that I agree with that I completely agree with that in terms of the

Neelu Berry: It’s that conflict that you’ve abused and we are not interested in your services

Edward Ellis: No please allow me to conduct

Dr. Lever: Allow me to speak please

Dr. Lever: What I am saying is what I would like to do in order to deal with this and as you are quite right I am not a mental health specialist at all

Edward Ellis: And you’ve got no delusion evidence

Dr. Lever: No

Edward Ellis: In which case what are you doing requiring mental services with a delusion deficit?

Dr. Lever: Because of the fact that you’ve been labelled as having that historically so I would like to

Edward Ellis: Yes and that has been subject to a blackmail criminal investigation

Dr; Lever: All I was asking for was

Edward Ellis: No no no, you have taken crime proceeds and said that you want to use them for medical purposes. That’s what you’ve done

Dr. Lever: All I’m saying that I would welcome a further assessment by somebody

Edward Ellis: You are not having, you are enforcing a mental health fraud which itself was crime proceeds, that ends.

Dr. Lever: I’ve started a new assessment

Edward Ellis: That is not a new assessment

Dr. Lever: It’s the first time, I haven’t met you before

Edward Ellis: What you haven’t done is asked for any of the evidence to support my position

Dr. Lever: I am asking simply

Edward Ellis: No no It is how they run the frauds is they ignore the evidence of the citizen and just decide..

Dr. Lever: Right I’m going to get somebody else in here

Neelu Berry: No we are going

The entire transcript, which reads like something out of a Hollywood script for a KGB Crime novel is reproduced below this article, under RELATED, and the audio recording can be listened to here:

Neelu Berry’s Report on the multiple sectioning attempts, Dr. Lever’s impersonation of a psychiatrist as well as backstory on Sunaina Chaudhuri, Sadhana Chaudhuri, and Dr. Akena Adoko is here: 2019 06 19 Mental Health Fraud + Assassination Attempts on Equity Lawyer Mr Ellis Report by Neelu Berry

Neelu Berry discussed the entire experience June 22, 2019 in Newsbreak 29, where she also discussed the harassment she is herself, facing, as a whistleblower:

Arrest Warrants, Police Breaking Down Doors, Changing Locks, Nonstop Mental Health Fraud Attempts

The hospital attempts to section Edward continued after the escape from Queens Hospital on the 19th of June at 3 pm.

At 5 pm that day, June 19, the Mental Health team called on the phone in another attempt to force through a Mental Health Fraud kidnap attempt.

Shockingly, on June 26, 2019, the house at which Edward was staying, taking refuge, along with Neelu Berry–herself a whistleblower of hospital crimes who had gone through relentless Police raids in Aug 2017, Jan 2018 before her home was stolen by 22 men and women in July 2018–was broken into, Neelu reports, “by 10 thugs including 2 dressed as Police,” in an arrest and kidnap attempt under the Mental Health Act.  Neelu had felt unsafe and moved out days before this third Mental Health Sectioning Raid. Notices were left on the door, the locks changed, and a key left with a neighbor. Correction re. earlier reportage: Neelu reports a friend sent her pictures of the note on the door and what she describes is a fake unsealed warrant.

While some may find this hardly believable in a democracy, it appears that Authoritarian Psychiatry has taken over now as a tool of a corrupt State devolved into tyranny. Notices left suggest fraudulently and baselessly that the patient, Edward Ellis, is a “person believed to be suffering from mental disorder and….being unable to care for himself, is living alone” and authorizes police to remove him to a “place of safety” or make arrangements for his treatment or care.

Edward Ellis is Most Certainly Not Mentally Ill

How is this even legal, and how do hospitals and Councils get away with such transparent crime? Even on the count of physical health, Edward’s regimen of physical fitness casts into doubt the numbers and diagnoses produced by Romford Hospital which suggest a dialysis is needed immediately. If a dialysis is indeed indicated shouldn’t the Sussex hospital have provided it—instead of delaying for 7 months as the fiasco with the fistula demonstrates? Where does Mental Health enter this picture? And how does anyone—let alone a supposedly highly educated team of doctors and specialists from Sussex and Romford Hospitals—conclude that a person of Edward’s intellect, integrity, and firm anti-corruption and humanitarian resolve, as evidenced in all his public work and appearances, as also on my show in several interviews, is “suffering from mental disorder”?

Obviously, he is not. Nor does it appear to anyone watching his interviews that he is unable to care for himself nor a danger to self or society, which should, one would think, be the only criteria prompting a community mental healthcare visit in any reasonable society.

This insistent series of kidnap attempts does not seem to be however about Health Care, Concern, or Humanity, but its opposite—and a transparently retaliatory and panicky preventive attempt to stop the disclosure of crimes which Edward’s Mass Corruption Remedy Process threatens to unleash on the whole of the UK Protected-Crime-and-Corruption Fraud network.

Reminder of Liability, Demand for Remedy, Immunity Offer

Over the last couple days, Neelu Berry has served immunity offers and liability notices with a demand for remedy on Sussex and Romford Hospitals, suggesting pre-paid dialysis at a top facility in exchange for immunity, and a liability notice to both hospitals and Redbridge Council, reminding them of personal liability in any continued attempt to section Edward Ellis. The intent being to stem the fraudulent Mental Health sectioning attempts which essentially aim to stifle the voice of a whistleblower and take control of his personal affairs and healthcare decisions–thereby disappearing him.

A conversation with the assistant to the CEO at Brighton and Sussex that Neelu Berry had after these notices were sent suggests the hospital is taking the notices seriously and will return a response shortly. (Audio file recording of this phone call is linked below.)

Concerned citizens and those with influence are requested to speak on Edward’s behalf and join in the efforts to restrain Council members and NHS hospitals from persisting in these fraudulent and baseless attempts to section and discredit Edward Ellis, whose work as a trained equity lawyer protecting the rights of citizens is needed today more than ever, as the whole world engages currently in the revelation of hidden crimes and hopefully a changeover soon to a better reality.

Neelu Berry requests: Citizens who wish to take action to stop the State Terrorism against Whistleblowers can call 0207 219 3000 and demand their MP act by inviting Edward Ellis for an admission into an NHS Kidney Hospital outside of the 2 implicated NHS Trusts. 

Many thanks to Neelu Berry for her outstanding work as a human rights advocate and practitioner of equity law in this matter, and for her terrific reportage, recording, and broadcasting throughout the past week as she has kept viewers and readers closely informed, both on her own channel, via Facebook, and through conversations online at Andy Devine’s Facebook and Youtube channel, DeVine Bar, and Ramola D Reports.

RELATED

FULL AUDIO TRANSCRIPT/2019 06 19 Transcript of Queens Hospital, Romford Kidney Ambulatory Care Unit Mental Health Fraud in Equity Lawyer Edward William Ellis/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sZa7z-r7Yic,

19 June 2019 4pm: Queens Hospital, Romford Kidney Specialist Caught Impersonating a Psychiatrist in Kidnap Attempt of Mr. Ellis

Dr Lever:I want you to be seen by, I think you should be seen by the psychiatric services here.

Mr Ellis:I refuse

Dr Lever:Yes but at the moment these processes are not absolutely not going to recognise….

Mr Ellis:They’ve screwed up

Dr Lever:I’m not going to argue with you. I’d rather, What I am saying is, all I want to do…

Mr Ellis:I am giving Notice to Parliament

Dr Lever:I’m not interested, I am saying

Mr Ellis:I’ll finish

Dr Lever:Please, I’m saying I’m not interested, I’m not interested I am saying for you to have a mental health assessment

Mr Ellis:A decision is being made this week, I will finish the grounds this week

KNOCK KNOCK

Ms Berry:Sorry, Hi,

Mr Ellis:Hello Do Sit down

Dr Lever:Who are you

Ms Berry:I’m with Edward

Mr Ellis:This is Neelu Berry

Dr Lever:Oh Hello! Hi

Mr Ellis:She has consent to sit

Dr Lever:Hi I’m Dr Lever I am a kidney Consultant Hi So what I am saying is, what I am saying to Edward is that he has, so I have received correspondence from his GP, and I’ve also received correspondence fromDrDiarMaid-Gordon who was one of his consultants when he was seen at the Royal Sussex County in Brighton in March 2019. DrDiarMaid-Gordon,dr Bukhari and myself have concerns 1. About Edwards kidney failure OK Right Because Edward does have kidney failure in terms of his kidney function is less than 10% of what it should be. So Edward is at the level where we need to think about starting dialysis treatment

Ms Berry:Can you show me the tests that you’ve done

Dr Lever:So I’ve got all the tests over here. This is the creatinine level. The creatinine level today is 791

Ms Berry:And can I see that it is his blood test and not somebody else’s blood test

Dr Lever:This is his address Edward Ellis Ok Alright It’s been around that time.

Ms Berry:He’s just started a lot of activities with the swimming and walking

Mr Ellis:I just swam 36 lengths on Friday

Dr Lever:His Creatinine was 686 in March and now it’s 791. The normal level for someone like Edward would be less than 90

Ms Berry:Yeah but He is very fit for his age, he’s not a very good drinker, he’s been dehydrated because he doesn’t drink very well

Dr Lever:Right ok so this is going to be very helpful What I want to do is I would like to admit Edward to hospital today in order for us to review both the requirements and both how we logistically can start dialysis treatment

Ms Berry:What he would like is an independent second opinion

Dr Lever:So he has been seen by Dr MacDiarMaid-Gordon

Mr Ellis:Please let us cut to the chase on this

Dr Lever:mmm

Mr Ellis:I need to give priority to the next communications for the lord Bishops I will do that tonight.

Ms Berry:Right so he will come back tomorrow

Mr Ellis:What you need to know is there are many Doctors who are subject to Disclosure restraint frauds

Ms Berry:Edward I think we should just walk out of here, we don’t require your services

Dr Lever:But you do require our services

Ms Berry:We don’t

Mr Ellis:Neelu

Dr Lever:I am the clinical lead of kidney services in this Hospital

Ms Berry:But you are outside your remit with the mental health

Dr Lever:No no no no, I know I am, I know I am, absolutely, and I agree with that I agree with that I completely agree with that in terms of the

Ms Berry: It’s that conflict that you’ve abused and we are not interested in your services

Mr Ellis: No please allow me to conduct

Dr Lever: Allow me to speak please What I am saying is what I would like to do in order to deal with this and as you are quite right I am not a mental health specialist at all

Mr Ellis: And you’ve got no delusion evidence

Dr Lever: No

Mr Ellis: In which case what are you doing requiring mental services with a delusion deficit?

Dr Lever: Because of the fact that you’ve been labelled as having that historically so I would like to

Mr Ellis: Yes and that has been subject to a blackmail criminal investigation

Dr Lever: All I was asking for was

Mr Ellis: No no no, you have taken crime proceeds and said that you want to use them for medical purposes. That’s what you’ve done

Dr Lever: All I’m saying that I would welcome a further assessment by somebody

Mr Ellis: You are not having, you are enforcing a mental health fraud which itself was crime proceeds, that ends.

Dr Lever: I’ve started a new assessment

Mr Ellis: That is not a new assessment

Dr Lever: It’s the first time, I haven’t met you before

Mr Ellis: What you haven’t done is asked for any of the evidence to support my position

Dr Lever: I am asking simply

Mr Ellis: No no It is how they run the frauds is they ignore the evidence of the citizen and just decide..

Dr Lever: Right I’m going to get somebody else in here No we are going

Ms Berry: Edward let’s go

Mr Ellis: You cannot be trusted with the process. I have to write the next set of Communications to the lord Bishops tonight

Dr LEVER PRESSES AN ALARM BUTTON

Dr Lever: Can I have somebody else in here please

Mr Ellis: Let me have the written evidence on which you rely
Ms Berry: Edward Edward
Dr Lever: Come back and sit down again
Mr Ellis: No
Ms Berry: Let’s go
Mr Ellis: You are going down for this
Ms Berry: Edward stop it
Irish Doctor: Hi my name is Dr [Irish accent doctor 45 years old 6ft 2″]
Ms Berry:I told you they were going to do this to you, Edward, you’re not listening to me
Mr Ellis:Please allow me to conduct
Mr Ellis:I am fed up
Irish Doctor: Please stop its just me
Ms Berry:We don’t require your services
Mr Ellis:No I don’t care who you are
Irish Doctor: Just stop and talk to me
Ms Berry:You don’t know what you’re letting yourself in to
Irish Doctor: Just stop and talk to me
Ms Berry:No because you’re going to lose your job and I don’t want you to.
Irish Doctor: Stop You can walk with me
Irish Doctor: Just stop and talk to me
Mr Ellis:No
Ms Berry:Go back to Ireland it’s a lot safer, it’s a lot safer
Irish Doctor: If we could have a chat
Ms Berry:Come this way please Edward Edward
Ms Berry:Go back to Ireland
Irish Doctor:Stop and chat to me
Ms Berry:Go back to Ireland
Ms Berry:Let’s get on a bus, they’re going to try and catch you

END

LETTER SENT BY EMAIL by Neelu Berry to Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals CEO:24 Hour Remedy Demand + Immunity Offer – Personal Liability of all Officers of Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals

Phone-call by Neelu Berry on the subject of the Liability Notice Letter Sent By Email to the Brighton/Sussex CEO:

LETTER SENT BY EMAIL by Neelu Berry to Queens’ Hospital and Redbridge Council: 6th Mental Health Fraud Kill Attempt on Edward Ellis 26th June at 450 New North Road Hainault Essex IG6 3EB PERSONAL LIABILITY NOTICE_ TO REDBRIDGE COUNCIL + CQC OFFICERS

Edward Ellis’ Completion Document of June 24, 2019 in the Mass Corruption Remedy Process in the UK: 2019 06 24 Remedy Process + Judicial Office Unfitness Cases + Health Fraud Remedy Application Grounds of Equity Lawyer v State

Dr. Daniel Lebowitz/Senate Hearing, 2014: Targeted Individuals: Covert Repression in the 21st Century

–Posted 10/27/2018

Many thanks to Dr. Daniel Lebowitz for this detailed and historic presentation on the subject of politically targeted individuals and the extreme and inhumane nature of the Program of Targeting within the emergent police and surveillance state presented at a Senate Hearing in 2014 on The State of Civil and Human Rights in the United States, and to Targeted Justice for posting this document online. This document in PDF is here: Dr. Daniel Lebowitz 2014 Senate Presentation.

200px-Emblem_Stasi.svg modified

Sign of the Stasi/Seal of the Ministry of State Security of the GDR/Wikipedia

For all those unaware of the extent of unlawful, invasive, illegal and over-reaching surveillance, targeting, and persecution with deadly anti-personnel electromagnetic weapons, character-assassination, psychological warfare and organized stalking operative today in the United States, and played out identically worldwide, these words on The Program will be an eye-opener:

THE PROGRAM

What is the Targeted Individual program that these people are complaining of? It is many things all at once. It is a discrediting and disruption campaign, similar to COINTELPRO. In some cases (not all) it is a torture/trauma-based brainwashing and mind-control program like MK-Ultra. It is a secret form of repression, persecution and psychological warfare, carried out in the community largely by regular people, along the lines of Stasi or Zersetzen torture. It is a political abuse of psychiatry, as has been carried out in many countries as a way to torture and discredit dissidents. Finally, it is unethical non-consensual human experimentation on unwitting subjects with advanced directed energy and psychotronic weapons systems.

Overall, it represents a coming together of the most vicious and effective tools and weapons for covert harassment and political control of dissidents, activists, whistleblowers, agitators, and other so-called “undesirables” that the world has ever seen.

What are the goals and purposes of the program? Again, they are many. But, in a word, the neutralization of the target.

To combat the ongoing spate of propaganda issuing forth from the Mainstream Media Government Propaganda machine, seeking to bury the truth of these barbaric and sadistic Globalist torture- and trauma-based targeting and persecution programs in the United States, all Five Eyes (Anglo-American/Commonwealth) countries, European countries, Asian countries, Latin American countries, the words of individual researchers, writers, and human rights activists exposing these programs become critically important for all to hear. Many thanks once again to Dr. Lebowitz, whose stature as a medical doctor adds to the weight and scholarship of this presentation.

–Ramola D

***

Presentation submitted to the Senate Hearing on “The State of Civil and Human Rights in the United States”

Tuesday December 9, 2014

by

Dr. Daniel Lebowitz

My name is Dr. Daniel Lebowitz. I’m a medical doctor. Over the past two years, I have worked with a Human Rights organization called Freedom From Covert Harassment and Surveillance, or FFCHS. People in this organization state that they are being targeted by an illegal and unethical government program that represents a modern version of COINTELPRO and MK-ULTRA combined. These victims call themselves targeted individuals, or T.I.’s.

I have worked with the leadership of FFCHS, and I have worked with the medical committee as well as with the Board of directors. As a result, I have communicated with hundreds of self-described targeted individuals.

Additionally, I have worked with two other activist physicians on behalf of targeted individuals: Dr. John Hall and Dr. Terry Robertson. I have also worked with Dr. Robert Duncan, a scientist turned whistleblower, who states that he has worked on some of the very weapons systems that are used in the remote electronic harassment that many targeted individuals say they experience.

My presentation today is entitled:

Targeted Individuals: Covert Repression in the 21st Century

OVERVIEW

To understand the Targeted Individual phenomenon, you need to understand several things about it. You need to understand the societal and political and human rights trends which allow it to occur. You need to understand what the program is. You need to understand what the goals and the purpose of the program are. You need to understand who gets targeted. You need to understand where the program came from, in other words, compare it to counterintelligence programs and unethical human experimentation of the past. And you need to understand the implications of the program, and what it means for the future. Finally, we’ll take a look about what must be done about it.

STATE OF HUMAN AND CIVIL RIGHTS IN THE US: THE EMERGING POLICE AND SURVEILLANCE STATE

In the United States, in short, we are seeing the emergence of a police and surveillance state. Former President Jimmy Carter recently wrote in the New York Times, “The United States is abandoning its role as the global champion of human rights.” In his article, Carter points out that top US officials are now openly targeting US citizens for political assassination, “disappearance,” unlimited surveillance, and other forms of gross human rights abuse. Are people prepared to call a former U.S. President a conspiracy theorist? Or has the U.S. strayed far from its roots as a democracy where rule of law and human rights are uniformly respected?

THE PROGRAM

What is the Targeted Individual program that these people are complaining of? It is many things all at once. It is a discrediting and disruption campaign, similar to COINTELPRO. In some cases (not all) it is a torture/trauma-based brainwashing and mind-control program like MK-Ultra. It is a secret form of repression, persecution and psychological warfare, carried out in the community largely by regular people, along the lines of Stasi or Zersetzen torture. It is a political abuse of psychiatry, as has been carried out in many countries as a way to torture and discredit dissidents. Finally, it is unethical non-consensual human experimentation on unwitting subjects with advanced directed energy and psychotronic weapons systems.

Overall, it represents a coming together of the most vicious and effective tools and weapons for covert harassment and political control of dissidents, activists, whistleblowers, agitators, and other so-called “undesirables” that the world has ever seen.

What are the goals and purposes of the program? Again, they are many. But, in a word, the neutralization of the target. Let’s start with understanding the mindset of the state. President Obama’s information czar, former Harvard Law professor Cass Sunstein, co-authored a paper in 2008 which advocated that the government should “cognitively infiltrate” and “disable” those who have ideas the government finds threatening, for example, 9/11 truth activists. Now, at a minimum, this suggests running illegal COINTELPRO-type disruption campaigns against people. But, more interestingly, let’s parse the words carefully: “cognitively infiltrate” and “disable”. Cognition refers to the mind, or to thought. Infiltrate means to penetrate with hostile intent. So, literally, this means to penetrate the minds or thought processes of so-called “troublesome” individuals, with the intent to disable them. Fascinating, in light of what targeted individuals say that they experience.

So, more specifically, what are the goals of the program?

  1. Force the target to stop “unacceptable” activity (whistleblowing, activism, exposing corruption, etc.). Silence the target both about their original activism and about their targeting.
  2. Subject target to noise campaigns, swarming, colors, or repetitive behaviors as a form of harassment.
  3. Attack any psychological weaknesses. Cause target to blame themselves for their targeting and as such destroy the will to fight back.
  4. Create a track record of so-called “mental illness”, useful for both discrediting and plausible deniability.
  5. Discredit the target.
  6. Isolate the target from all forms of support using secret notifications, slander, and covert harassment carried out largely by regular people.
  7. Encourage the target to lose hope and lash out in suicidal or homicidal rage secondary to covert harassment, and destruction of the target’s life.
  8. Set target up for possible institutionalization or arrest.
  9. Damage or ruin the career and/or finances. In some cases, break up the family. In some cases, cause the target to lose their home.
  10. After breaking the target’s will to fight, in some cases, attempt to change the mindset, politics, ethics of the target. Create a mindset more useful to the state. Evaluate the potential for corruption or even recruitment.
  11. To summarize: the goal is the neutralization of the target. Exactly the goal pursued by the former COINTELPRO.

THE TARGETS

Ok. So, who gets targeted by this program? There’s a lot of overlap with COINTELPRO. COINTELPRO targeted “Perceived threats to the Established Political and Social Order”. Which, in practice during COINTELPRO meant primarily those pursuing greater social and economic equality, peace activists, dissidents, so-called “unfriendly” politicians, and even non-conformists. In some cases, it can be proven that counter-intelligence operations have been undertaken against those aware of high-level criminality or wrong-doing. Like everyone else, many targets have weaknesses, foibles, flaws, problems, etc. Some have addictions. Any perceived weaknesses (manufactured, real, or exaggerated) are used viciously to aid in the discrediting of the target. Let’s learn from some actual examples of people who became targets for covert operations:

  1. Thomas Drake, NSA Whistleblower: Forced out of his job, blacklisted, financially ruined, forced to defend himself against criminal charges, placed under physical and electronic surveillance.
  1. Jean Seberg. Actress and civil rights activist. Supporter of the Black Panther Party. Experienced FBI Surveillance, harassment, stalking, break-ins, intimidation, defamation and discrediting. Victim of a false FBI story that she was pregnant by a Black Panther Party member, while married to a white husband. The stress of this caused premature delivery of her baby, which died at 2 days of age. The baby was white. Eventually committed suicide.
  1. Arnold Lockshin. A Cancer researcher and supporter of socialism. Experienced surveillance, harassment and threats by strangers, break-ins, psychological warfare, implied death threats through the 1970’s and 1980’s. Eventually sought asylum from Russia and was immediately fired, blacklisted, accused in retrospect of mental instability and deteriorating work performance. Notably, reported that even his children’s classmates and his own father had been brought into a Stasi-like campaign against him and his family. Wrote a book about the ordeal in 1988 called “Silent Terror: One family’s history of political persecution in the US.” The book was never published or distributed in the US. On the web: ArnoldLockshin.Wordpress.com. By the way, his work performance and mental stability in Russia are apparently just fine.
  1. Adrian Schoolcraft. Blew the whistle on corruption, wrongful arrests, arrest quotas, and the stop and frisk program within the NYPD in 2009. Received on the job harassment and was shunted to the NYPD psychologist. Within 3 weeks after reporting corruption he was involuntarily committed to a psychiatric ward, handcuffed to a bed and prevented from using a telephone. He was portrayed as paranoid during his hospital stay, which lasted 6 days. After discharge, he was suspended from the force without pay. Tapes he had made were eventually reported by the New York Times and others and he has been largely vindicated.
  2. Dr. Lawrence Doerr. Orthopedic surgeon. As reported in the NY Times, wrote an open letter to fellow surgeons in 2008 warning about a flawed hip prosthesis. Subsequently became the target of a whisper-campaign that questioned his skills and competence as a surgeon.
  1. Russell Roderick. Insulted a powerful, politically connected firm by refusing continued employment. Unclear if he was aware of high-level wrong-doing. Has been the target of a 25 year, multi-national campaign (you will find that these programs are multi-national and follow targets wherever they go) including slander, character assassination, allegations of incompetence, paranoia, drug-addiction, sexual deviance, and being “a deranged, suicidal maniac.” Has experienced blacklisting, financial devastation, isolation, stalking and overt surveillance, street theather, telephone/computer and mail tampering, Stasi-like manipulation of people into a campaign against him, death threats, intimidation, harassment, and a shut-down of all avenues of support. He refers to this as Zersetzen torture. On the web: Zersetzen.wikispaces.com.
  2. Greenham Common Women’s Peace Protestors. In the 1980’s, were protesting the presence of US cruise missiles at an English air force base. Came under microwave weapon attack in 1984. Scientists from Electronics Today demonstrated the presence of electromagnetic waves. Dr. Robert Becker, twice nominated for the Nobel prize, found their symptoms were consistent with exposure to a microwave weapon. Every time a cruise missile convoy was ready to drive by, these women were experiencing severe headaches and unbearable fatigue, etc.
  3. Andy Lewis and friends. A group of former British soldiers. Became targets of full-on gang stalking in 1996 after attempts to draw attention to what they viewed as an unethical experimental vaccine program that had been given to Gulf War soldiers in 1991. These men have experienced blacklisting, covert harassment, directed energy and psychotronic weapons attacks, overt and covert surveillance, stalking, secret notifications, etc. They have made two excellent websites: targeted-individuals.com and gang-stalking.com.
  4. A long list of 9/11 truth activists have reported being targeted with electromagnetic weapons and death threats. Some have died under suspicious circumstances. US Army Major Doug Rokke, PhD physics from University of Illinois, former head of the US Army depleted uranium cleanup project after Gulf War I, says these weapons are very real, and commonly used in military circles. He has described how he personally used such weapons on a regular basis while training with Special Forces at US Army facilities: “We had them van-mounted, truck-mounted, plane-mounted, and hand-carried. We would go around zapping each other for fun. This was during exercises, or sometimes just as a practical joke.” Rokke further stated that, based on his firsthand knowledge of US military mind-set and capabilities, 9/11 truth activists have undoubtedly been targeted by exotic non-lethal (and lethal) weapons. Remember again Cass Sunstein, who openly advocated cognitive infiltration and disabling of 9/11 truth activists. Is he talking about psychotronic weapons attacks?
  5. Jill Hansen. Professional surfer, model and entrepreneur. She received wide acclaim for her performance in a TED speech in 2010 about her spiritual values and altruistic beliefs, Entitled “Open Mind, Open Heart”. In the talk she espouses values including compassion, honesty, integrity, generosity, belief in God, charity, hope, faith and love. She concludes by stating that the world would be a more beautiful place if we all thought this way. Within weeks after this talk, which received a lot of publicity, she found herself the victim of stalking and electronic harassment. Fast forward a few years. Unfortunately, In May 2014, she was charged with attempted homicide for allegedly running over a woman intentionally with her car. TI’s report that attempting to get them to act out inappropriately with strangers is a common protocol. A couple interesting facts: 1) none of the news stories mention that she considered herself a TI and 2) Interestingly, The local Neighborhood Watch Group’s 500 members had been alerted about Hansen—supposedly for reckless driving. A representative of the group was reported as saying, “We need everybody to be on the lookout for her, it’s that scary.” So here we have someone reporting being a victim of organized stalking, and it turns out that—HELLO—there was a group of at least 500 people deliberately on the lookout for her.
  6. Ted Gunderson. Worked for the FBI from 1950 – 1979. Former head of the Los Angeles FBI, where he was in charge of 700 personnel and had a budget of over 22 million dollars. In 1979 he was one of a handful interviewed for the job of FBI director, which ultimately went to William H. Webster. He retired and started a private investigation firm. He became a whistleblower and eventually filed an affidavit in support of attorney and targeted individual Keith Labella in his FOIA request from the FBI regarding gang stalking. Gunderson explained: “It is my professional opinion based on information, knowledge and belief that the information sought by Mr. Labella in this FOIA suit regarding gang stalking…reasonably describes an ongoing, active, covert, nationwide program that is in effect today and…has been in effect since at least the 1980’s…[and] has increased in scope, intensity and sophistication by adapting to new communications and surveillance technology.” As a whistleblower, Gunderson was himself targeted. He experienced whisper campaigns, surveillance, phone tapping, computer hacking, poisonings, group stalking, aerial stalking and more. Stated that based on his experience, victims are targeted for a variety of reasons including government and corporate whistleblowers, parties to financial and employment disputes, parties to marital disputes (usually divorced women), and even jilted paramours. Journalists covering controversial issues, and, even attorneys and private investigators representing unpopular clients or interests. Gunderson’s affidavit can be viewed on the internet, and in my opinion, is a fascinating read.
  7. William Binney– An NSA whistleblower. Has stated he is well-aware of mind control technologies.
  8. There has been a steady increase of mass shootings every year since 2000 from 5 per year until now, about 16 per year. Many of them were complaining of electronic harassment and/or organized stalking, stating that this led them to attack. This is being largely ignored and/or covered up by the media. Does a faction of our government actually want gun violence in the US, perhaps as a pretext to reversing gun rights, or even individual rights in general? Let’s discuss 3 mass shooters.
  9. Jiverly Wong– Chinese Immigrant. Reported being targeted with covert harassment for 18 years. Reported experiencing: stalking, harassment, chemical attacks, nausea, shortness of breath, job harassment and job loss, spreading of rumors, phantom touching at night while sleeping, home entry and theft of funds from his home, vehicular stalking and harassment, electronic body shocks. Became a mass shooter of 14 people including himself. Blamed his harassers for the killings. Paranoid? Or victim of a high-tech covert operation that he could not even begin to understand? Let’s not forget that some goals of COINTELPRO included trying to get people to commit suicide (e.g. MLK) or trying to get people to commit serious crimes (e.g. Black Panther Party members) in order to discredit and destroy them.
  10. Aaron Alexis– Ex-Navy veteran. Navy yard shooter. Contacted FFCHS stating he was under ELF weapons attack and was being stalked and surveilled, and he believed this was at the hands of the Navy. Interesting things about his case. 1) Although he corresponded with FFCHS, thus identifying himself as a TI, and stating his belief that the Navy was attacking him, the FBI after investigating and speaking with FFCHS Board members, insisted that he was a random shooter with no motive. 2) A heavily armed SWAT team was in the vicinity of the Navy Yard when Alexis started his shooting rampage and was on site within 5 minutes. Inexplicably, they were ordered to stand down and leave the area. The shooting rampage subsequently went on for 45 minutes.
  11. Myron May. A promising, young black attorney. Worked first for a well-known law firm and subsequently trying to help disadvantaged children. Cared about people and about God. Reported being recently targeted with directed-energy weapons and law enforcement harassment. Decided to draw attention to the abuse by mailing packages of information to 10 people, shooting people, and “suicide by cop”. He made his goal clear by ending his letter saying, “what targeted individuals need more than anything is media attention.” These packages were confiscated by Federal agents. His suicide note described, “financial, emotional, and psychological pain….a living hell” inflicted upon him as a targeted individual. He stated: “Our government is able to capitalize on [the] lack of knowledge among the general population to curb sentiments toward questioning the mental health of targeted individuals rather than admitting the truth: that there is a system of covert torture of ordinary innocent citizens that is happening within our borders.” He believed there was no hope for him and so he stated, “Consequently, I am making a sacrifice so that others in my same position might have a chance at a normal, harassment-free life.” He shot three people. None of them died. I wonder if, even when driven to extremes by secret government torture, whether he was still too moral to bring himself to kill…

Ok, so we know who it happens to. We know this is the most sophisticated take-down program the world has ever seen. So, where do all these tactics and techniques come from? Well, as I mentioned before, a look at historical programs is highly instructive here.

RELEVANT HISTORY: COINTELPRO, MK-ULTRA, STASI / ZERSETZEN TORTURE

So- COINTELPRO. Known tactics included: Discrediting, smearing, character assassination. Covert campaigns to destroy interpersonal relationships, Harassment, Conspicuous surveillance (also known as stalking), anonymous letters and phone calls, IRS tax audits, legal harassment, Manipulation or strong-arming of parents, employers, landlords, school officials and others to create problems for targets. Threats, intimidation, surreptitious home searches and “black bag” jobs, vandalism, Constant surveillance.

MK-ULTRA features and goals included: Create a subject who is easier to control and manipulate, create programmed assassins, develop more effective means of torture and interrogation, break down the personality of the subject and insert new belief systems, ethics, politics, personality traits; performed on unwitting and unwilling subjects; manipulate mental states and alter brain function; surreptitious drugging; isolation; verbal and sexual abuse; various forms of torture employed; promote illogical thinking and impulsiveness in the subject so that they will be discredited in public; attempt to produce amnesia for periods of time; surreptitious production of shock or confusion in subject over extended periods of time; attempt to alter the subject’s personality to become dependent on the tormentors; attempt to lower the subject’s ambition and work efficiency; attempt to impair eyesight and/or hearing; attempt to activate specific behavior by remote means.

Stasi tactics, also known as Zersetzen torture, included such features as: secret persecution, secret methods of control and manipulation, involved even the personal relationships of the target, extensive use of unofficial collaborators–also known as regular people; used the State’s influence to turn public and private institutions against the target, psychological attack intended to deprive the target of the ability to mount hostile political action, often causes irreversible damage to the target, attempt to gain influence over the target in such a way that undesirable attitudes and beliefs would be slowly changed to more preferable traits over time, Attempt to cause fragmentation, paralysis, disorganization and isolation of target, Attempt political and ideological “re-education”, used in situations when judicial procedures are not convenient for political reasons, a.k.a. extrajudicial punishment, attempts to frame or entrap targets, slander/character assassination involving some true and some false, but always degrading information, orchestrating a series of social and professional failures in order to damage self-confidence, creation of doubts about future, stimulation of mistrust or paranoia, exploitation of target’s personality weaknesses, addictions etc., shaming due to the spreading of rumors to those around the target, overt and covert surveillance, intercepting mail, calls, etc., tampering with property and vehicles, poisoning the food and tampering with medications, entering the residence and leaving traces of evidence in order to threaten or intimidate the target by adding removing or modifying objects.

The items on these lists will sound very familiar to targeted individuals. Nearly all of them apply to the current program. And nearly all of them are reported by Targeted Individuals. I have no reason to not believe them. Now, add in the use of advanced directed energy and neuro-weapons, and you have a very potent takedown program.

THE WEAPONS

Ok so at this point we have a pretty good understanding of the program. But there’s one more thing that needs to be understood about this program. The advanced weaponry that is being used.

Evidences/Examples:

  1. The Moscow Signal: low-power microwave beams were directed into the US embassy for more than two decades, from 1953 until 1976. Discovered in 1962, US scientists studied the signal until the 1970’s before finally telling the diplomats it was there, and offering them hazard pay. Many got sick, some died. Was not exposed to the public until 1976 when unearthed by an investigative reporter. This led to DoD’s ARPA Project Pandora
  1. From 1965 through to 1970, Defense Advanced Projects Research Agency (DARPA), with up to 70-80% funding provided by the military, set in motion operation PANDORA to study the health and psychological effects of low intensity microwaves with regard to the so called “Moscow signal”. This project was quite extensive and included (under US Navy funding) studies demonstrating the ability to: induce heart stoppage, create leaks in the blood brain barrier, and production of auditory hallucinations. Nervous system function could easily be degraded with properly pulsed signals. Memoranda of Richard Cesaro, Director, DARPA, confirmed that the program’s initial goal was to “discover whether a carefully controlled microwave signal could control the mind.” Cesaro urged that further studies be made “for potential weapons applications.” This was 1970, and very specific neurological and physiological weapons capabilities of microwaves had already been recognized.
  1. Jose Delgado—the scientist who stopped the charging bull by remote control. Dr. Jose Delgado’s secret work in Project Pandora was directed towards the creation of a “psycho-civilized” society. In his paper “Intracerebral Radio Stimulation and recording in Completely Free Patients”, using radio waves, Delgado observed that: “Radio Stimulation on different points in the amygdala and hippocampus in the four patients produced a variety of effects, including pleasant sensations, elation, deep thoughtful concentration, odd feelings, super relaxation, colored visions (hallucinations), and other responses.” Speaking in 1966, Delgado asserted that his research “supported the distasteful conclusion that motion, emotion and behaviour can be directed by electrical forces and that humans can be controlled like robots by push buttons. Delgado stated that EM weapons were “more dangerous than atomic destruction.” “With knowledge of the brain, we may transform, we may shape, direct, roboticize man. I think the great danger of the future is that we will have roboticized human beings who are not aware that they have been roboticized.” He created a brain transponder that was IN FACT used to roboticize human subjects.
  1. Dr Ross Adey, formerly of the Brain Research Center at the University of Southern California, worked on the CIA’s infamous Pandora project. His research involved inducing of specific behavior modifications by electromagnetic means. In his pioneering work, Dr. Ross Adey determined that emotional states and behavior can be remotely influenced merely by placing a subject in an electromagnetic field. He also demonstrated that EM radiation, properly modulated and pulsed, can induce calcium efflux events to interfere with brain’s function—the so-called “confusion weaponry”. Again, this is by 1970.
  1. Lawrence Pinneo, a neurophysiologist and electronic engineer working for Stanford Research Institute (which is a leading military contractor), “developed [in 1974] a computer system capable of reading a person’s mind. It correlated brain waves on an electroencephalograph (EEG) with specific commands.
  1. Dr. Eldon Byrd, a Navy medical engineer with a graduate degree from George Washington University, worked on the Polaris weapon system as an engineer, worked for Naval Surface Weapons Office, was tasked in 1980- 1981 by the US Marine Corps as Project manager to develop non-lethal electromagnetic weapons for purposes including “riot control”, clandestine operations and hostage removal. Worked on ELF, non-linear magnetics. He worked with Ross Adey, Dr. Elizabeth Roscher, Michael Persinger on the ability to entrain human brainwaves at a distance. And he said, “We accomplished it.” 1980. His project went dark after that. It was taken away from him. He had it confirmed from a senator—Senator Pell—confirmed for him that his project went dark. Byrd was quoted in a lecture around 2001 as saying, “Is Mind Control Possible? Absolutely. There is a mountain of evidence.” He went on to say that, Today we know there are technologies that can induce sound into the brain at a distance, can monitor and alter brainwaves at a distance, can alter behavior at a distance, can induce images into the brain at a distance, can target individual organs at a distance. Can disrupt the calcium ions binding on individual cell surfaces at a distance, creating pain and other effects anywhere in the body. Mind control technology exists, without a question.” Less than a year later, Dr. Byrd was dead. Maybe it was a coincidence.
  1. A 1980 NASA document [NASA abstract Report Number: AD-A090426, June 1, 1980] described that one can remotely create the perception of noise in the heads of personnel by exposing them to low power, pulsed microwave…. By proper choice of pulse characteristics, intelligible speech may be created . 1980. Yes, 1980.
  1. For further documentation, I recommend the following webpage: http://educate-yourself.org/mc/listofmcsymptoms05jun03.shtml. This webpage documents that there is truly a mountain of evidence about these terrifying weapons. Some highlights include the PROVEN capabilities to induce false memories in the brain, Subliminal command implantation into the brain to modify behavior (including suppressing dissidents).
  1. Finally, In July 1996, the Spotlight, a widely circulated right-wing U.S. newspaper, reported that well-placed DoD sources have confirmed a classified Pentagon contract for the development of “high-power electromagnetic generators that interfere with human brain waves.” Dr. Emery Horvath, a professor of physics at Harvard University, has stated in connection to these generators,”These electronic ‘skull-zappers’ are designed to invade the mind and short circuit its synapses… in the hands of government technicians, it may be used to disorient entire crowds, or to manipulate individuals into self-destructive acts. It’s a terrifying weapon.”

To quote José Delgado in his book Physical Control of the Mind: Toward A Psychocivilized Society, p. 116:

Individuals whose brain centers are electrically stimulated believe their evoked actions are their own ideas; their conscious mind rationalizes the evoked actions away. People experiencing this electrical stimulation aren’t consciously aware of an external influence.

In summary, these weapons have the ability to mentally and physically torture people, and to influence human psychological behavior. With, or even WITHOUT the target’s knowledge or awareness.

SUMMARY OF THE PROGRAM AND ITS IMPLICATIONS

In summary, we have a program which includes the earmarks of past programs including COINTELPRO and MK-Ultra. It also uses collaboration of regular people to carry out much of the harassment, similar to Stasi or Zersetzen torture of the prior East Germany. Furthermore, it uses advanced neuro-weapons to mentally and physically torture victims from a distance– whether in their homes, workplaces, or wherever they may go. The goals of the program are many, but ultimately boil down to torture, control, discrediting, and neutralization–exactly the same goals as the prior COINTELPRO, MK-ULTRA, and Stasi or Zersetzen torture. While some victims may be chosen at random, many cases, upon examination, are shown to be perpetrated against activists, whistleblowers, and those who have spoken out against corruption. The consequences are severe. Most targets lose their jobs, homes, and/or their families. Many end up on dangerous medications or institutionalized. Some end up committing suicide or homicide.

Of course, the implications for humanity are frightening. Is it possible we are heading toward a synthetic reality, where people’s thoughts, conversations, hopes, dreams, illnesses, major life events are controlled by supercomputers and handlers, all without their knowledge?

Is our society becoming one in which no-one can be trusted, with everyone spying on everyone else? With a large percentage of the population becoming government informants and spying collaborators?

Are we developing a class of people with “less” rights, who can be harassed at will, even as we all slowly have our rights eroded? If so, doesn’t that sound like a totalitarian regime such as Nazi Germany?

WHAT NEEDS TO BE DONE ABOUT THE PROGRAM

Several things. First of all, targets must speak out. Especially those who have their wits about them. This program is highly disruptive, and is specifically designed to make even the most solid citizen look as if they have become delusional. Compounding the problem, many targets are either forced to, or willingly take powerful psychiatric medications in hopes of decreasing the severe attacks they are suffering, or to appease skeptical friends and family members. In the case of real mental illness, this should resolve the symptoms. In the case of TI’s, it does not stop the torture and harassment and manipulation of their lives.

So, that leads to the next point. If you know someone who this is happening to—don’t count them as crazy. They may be a victim of this program. Recognize that the issues they were speaking about before they got into their current situation are still just as valid now as they were before . In fact, it was probably the very legitimacy of their issues that led powerful forces to want to discredit them so thoroughly. Remember that.

Whistleblowers must come forward who are aware of this program.

Fearless journalists must pursue the story. It was investigative journalists who brought widespread attention to MK-ULTRA, COINTELPRO, and much of the unethical experimentation that has occurred in the USA.

Targets must come together. There is strength in numbers. Targets should never give up the fight.

Finally, Congress MUST thoroughly investigate the intelligence agencies, DOD research programs, and black operations. The targeted individual program is happening. It’s not science fiction. It needs to be EXPOSED AND SHUT DOWN FOREVER. Thank you for your attention.

***

Community Notice: Notice of Crimes Against Humanity/Patriot Act Crimes

–Ramola D/Posted 4/18/2018

NoticeofCrimes1

Posted below is the Community Notice of Crimes Against Humanity/Patriot Act Crimes endorsed and supported by FBI, CIA, and NSA whistleblowers and the US-Europe Joint Investigation Team, a group which investigates crimes involving directed-energy weapons and military neuro/biotechnology, published earlier on this site at Flyers for Public Education. Please download this document for use as a flyer in pdf format here. Given that these Crimes Against Humanity are occurring nationwide and worldwide, please download this document in doc format here and replace place-names in the header with your own place-names as appropriate and relevant. (Note: To use this flyer with the named endorsements, please ONLY change place-names as relevant, and no other text, thanks.) Please feel free to re-post and re-publish this Notice on your own websites with linkback.

This notice is being published to raise public awareness, to educate the American and world public, and to inform local communities and neighborhoods. The information in this flyer is not speculative and is fully backed up by the sourced, cumulative investigative reportage at this site (and elsewhere), and follows on recent informative interviews in print and audio with FBI, CIA, and NSA whistleblowers published here at The Everyday Concerned Citizen as well as at YouTube/Ramola D Reports.

Human rights advocates and organizations, investigative journalists, scientists,  whistleblowers, ethicists, and concerned American and world citizens are encouraged to step forward to openly support this Community Notice as the global human rights and bioethical movement to expose and end these pernicious and extreme 21st-century Crimes Against Humanity daily expands. Please email to endorse.

This notice is also supported by the 28 August 2017 Notice of Crimes Against Humanity Using Energy and Neuro/Bio Weapons citing Article 7 of the Rome Statute of the 1998 International Criminal Court, published here earlier.  Please print and distribute widely. 

COMMUNITY NOTICE

from The Everyday Concerned Citizen/US-Europe Joint Investigation Team

Notice of Crimes Against Humanity/Patriot Act Crimes

Notice to One is Notice to All

Psychological Warfare, Operations, & Deception Along with Electromagnetic Anti-Personnel Assaults Are Being Run in Quincy & Boston, Massachusetts by Govt Agencies–FBI, DHS, CIA, NSA, DOD, DOJ;

All Participating are Accomplices to Potential Murder

Source: FBI, CIA, NSA Whistleblowers/The Everyday Concerned Citizen/US-Europe Joint Investigation Team

THE FBI IS SPREADING LIES, SLANDER, LIBEL, AND DEFAMATION ABOUT OUTSTANDING COMMUNITY MEMBERS AND OBTAINING WRONGFUL & ILLEGITIMATE “COURT-AUTHORIZATIONS” FROM CORRUPT JUDGES TO CONVINCE BUSINESSES, SCHOOLS, LIBRARIES, OTHERS, THAT THESE AMERICANS ARE “UNDER FEDERAL INVESTIGATION” AS SUSPECTED TERRORISTS, EXTREMISTS, MENTALLY UNSTABLE, PROSTITUTES, PEDOPHILES, & OTHER UNSAVORY LABELS

IN ORDER TO COERCE AMERICAN COMMUNITIES AND NEIGHBORHOODS INTO JOINING REPRESSIVE COMMUNITY POLICING PROGRAMS AND HELPING CONDUCT CARCINOGENIC ELECTRONIC SURVEILLANCE WITH RADIO FREQUENCY WEAPONRY ON THE BODIES OF AMERICANS AS WELL AS HUMAN TRAFFICKING SURVEILLEES INTO DEADLY NON-CONSENSUAL MILITARY/INTEL NEURO-EXPERIMENTATION & WEAPON-TEST PROGRAMS

These programs are extrajudicial COINTELPRO Character-Assassination, Mutilation, Destruction, Blacklisting, Life-Sabotage, Torture, and Murder campaigns, intending to fully destroy the lives of outstanding community activists, journalists, writers, teachers, professors, whistleblowers, and civic-minded citizens.

Thousands of Americans are being destroyed like this by the FBI/CIA/DHS.

FBI WHISTLEBLOWER GERAL SOSBEE:

Remember please that only FBI/CIA have powers with Fusion Centers globally to run horrendous campaigns for torture and murder. Also, FBI has a duty to investigate the crimes we describe. The FBI and FMJ (Federal Magistrate Judges) authorize these offenses and could stop them. (April 11, 2018/Leaked Gangstalker Recruitment Video, The Everyday Concerned Citizen)

The FBI is spearheading the most colossal and evil attacks on people ever conceived on the face of the Earth, and they are using Deep Space-based technology, they are using Bio-Chemical Viral Warfare Elements and Agents, and they’re using Psychological Warfare to destroy people. (April 1, 2018/Ramola D Reports/Report #56-Geral Sosbee, FBI Whistleblower Reports Massive Crime By FBI)

NSA WHISTLEBLOWER KAREN MELTON-STEWART:

The scam goes like this, random people, or people who are dissidents or whistleblowers are purposely mislabeled as “terrorists” and put on an Enemies List, which is then turned over to Defense Contractors to target under perverted interpretations of NDAA and PAA (Patriot Act)...Police are even used as liaisons to citizen vigilante groups like Infragard, or other “civic minded” organizations who are lied to about the target (being a terrorist/ traitor/ criminal) and enticed/paid to stalk and harass them 24/7. (May 26, 2016/NSA Whistleblower, Karen Stewart: Synopsis of the Silent Holocaust Taking Place in the United States)

CIA WHISTLEBLOWER BARBARA HARTWELL:

I can’t hone it down to just CIA, but I can tell you, all these people, they’re all connected. For instance, in a Town Hall, every little town in the United States, every city, you’ll get people–there’s a Town Hall and there’s a City Government or a Town Government, they’ve got people in there…they have them in the Post Office…What they’re doing is they’re recruiting an army of Citizen Spies and Busybodies—and the People, who don’t even know what’s going on, some of them, they gladly become a part of it, thinking “Oh, I’m doing a service to my country!” But they’re NOT. (April 10, 2018/Barbara Hartwell, CIA Whistleblower Discusses CIA History, Propaganda, Targeting)

PATRIOT ACT CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY ARE BEING CONCEALED BY COLLUDING DOCTORS LABELING & DISCREDITING REPORTING VICTIMS AS PARANOID, SCHIZOID, AND DELUSIONAL.

Jeff Godwin/Campaign for Decency: Stand Before Parliament 7 Feb 2018 and Demand An End to Surveillance Abuse!

–Ramola D/Posted 6 Feb 2018

JeffCampaign1a

Documentary filmmaker, humanitarian activist, and Campaign for Decency founder Jeff Godwin is calling on all concerned citizens in London and the whole of UK to join his crew on Wednesday, the 7th of February, in front of Parliament at noon, to silently or vocally protest the rash of Surveillance Abuse sweeping the United Kingdom. Please join Jeff and his crew there, to make your presence known, and to stand up to inform the world of wrongful targeting and Surveillance Abuse riding the coattails of “Surveillance.”

Campaign for Decency is the new human rights campaign founded by Jeff Godwin, in concert with police whistleblowers, seeking the termination of child abuse and pedophilia crime as well as an end to targeting crimes.

JeffCFD

It’s Not Surveillance, It’s Surveillance Abuse!

JeffCampaign2

Does anyone today doubt that the Intelligence agencies, the Security agencies, and Military groups, along with a vast coterie of well-padded Intel/Security/Defense contractors are currently running extra-judicial targeting, surveillance, and stealth-radiation weapons operations on huge numbers of innocent civilians and veterans for reasons of justifying their inflated and unnecessary budgets for their contrived and constantly pumped-up War on Terror?

DECENCY  flyer FEB 7TH.jpgEND SURVEILLANCE ABUSE - The effects of which everyone in the UK
is now experiencing in one way or another - this is not 
for your safety and security - Home office stalking campaigns - 
GCHQ invasion of Privacy on behalf of private corporations / 
financial gain and MI5 ... God knows what. Join us to say 
ENOUGH IS ENOUGH.
                                   --Jeff Godwin/Facebook

As many know, these subjects are frequently covered here, and continue to be reported here: the fact is, British and American and European and Australian and New Zealand and Asian citizens are today reporting massive Surveillance Abuse, dirty political psychiatry, repressive COINTELPRO, electromagnetic/sonic weapon assault, and extremely invasive, completely non-consensual mind-control/neurotechnlogy experiments and operations on their bodies and brains. The very first common denominator in all these reports is Surveillance Abuse.

Please listen to Jeff’s impassioned pleas for humanity to wake up and start speaking out. In this gloves-off candid conversation on Friday, Feb 2, with Jeff, on the ongoing crimes of Surveillance Abuse in the UK, US, and elsewhere, both of us speak openly about the need for civilians worldwide to wake up to the reality of targeting by Mil/Intel in order to combat and help terminate it, in a time when the numbers of those being wrongfully surveilled, monitored, and hit covertly with EMF neuroweapons is simply growing larger.

2018 is the year to get off your couch and make your voice and presence felt, says Jeff.

There is an added factor to consider. Today, everyone is being targeted and Surveillance-Abused, not just those reporting they are being hit with stealth electromagnetic weapons hidden under “Electronic Surveillance” and experiencing organized COINTELPRO-style stalking and harassment being run as Psychological Warfare operations against targets.

Everyone is being dosed with the deadly mix of heavy metals, chemicals, fungi, and nanotechnology raining down on us from Chem Trail planes in ostensible Solar Radiation Management, which points via research also to trans-humanizing synthetic biology and Agenda 21/Depopulation operations.

Everyone is being injected with nanobiosensors, a focus Jeff Godwin covers in a recent talk he gave on The Kev Baker Show. Everyone is being made supremely conductive as nanobot sensors are being encouraged to embed themselves in human central nervous systems, soon to become transhuman cybernetic brains and nervous systems.

Everyone really, who cares about humanity remaining human should be standing up to the technocrats and Security/Intel/Defense industry minions running Cyborg’izing Takeover ops on humanity and speaking out, right now.

parlIf you live in London or close-by, if you are targeted yourself, if you care about life on earth and your children’s lives, please take the trouble to ride or drive down to Parliament tomorrow: 7 Feb, 12 noon. Jeff Godwin can be reached at jeffgodwin@startmail.com. He offers his telephone details as well, at the end of the Gloves Off video.

Please share this information widely!

Ramola D Reports/Report #39: Dr. Helen Tsigounis – Australian Illuminati Blacklist A Brilliant Doctor

–Ramola D/Posted 1/19/2018

Helen3In an intimate and explosive conversation revealing the hand of the powerful but maliciously petty network of Satanic pedophilic Illuminati elite infiltrating Australian Medicine, Law, Media, Intelligence, and Government, Dr. Helen Tsigounis, author of the memoir The Red Back Web describes a twenty-year ordeal of targeting which pursued her from medical school in Victoria to her work as a doctor in Queensland and beyond to Greece, the country of her heritage, forced wrongful psychiatric conditions on to her registration, fabricated charges to bar her from the medical profession, and engaged in collusive fraud and conspiracy in the court system—among well-known lawyers and judges–to prevent her from gaining justice.

Singled out possibly for her ethnic background, her natural intelligence, empathy, Christian values, and integrity, Dr. Tsigounis narrates a shocking story of targeting, harassment, bullying and negative attention during her medical studies when a high-level Freemason sub-Dean and his protege worked to sabotage her future.

Despite high commendations from her professors and high marks in exams, she was failed on one occasion and had to repeat a year; later she was forced to sign a document imposing fabricated psychiatric conditions on her registration to the effect that she suffered from a “lack of insight.”

Later work as a doctor saw a renewal in harassment and a sustained effort by the Medical Board—almost a year after she had completed a stint post-residency as a RMO at a hospital in Townsville, Queensland, with a Medical Board doctor being sent to go back and ask questions–to derail her career with grave but trumped-up charges of medical malfeasance brought against her, charges found to be completely fabricated as her evidence proved in court, yet curiously upheld, through avid legal sabotage by her own lawyers and a corrupt Masonic judge.

An extraordinary aspect of her targeting inheres in her being compelled to argue her own case in court, as her solicitor dropped her just before the hearing, and stand-ins were dismissed by the judge.

Working full-day shifts as a doctor, she stayed up at night to study the law and gather her evidence and prepare to cross-examine witnesses—who kept getting switched around on her without warning, almost everyday. Indeed, every effort was made, it appeared, to sabotage her court case.

Regardless, her brilliant handling of the case and determined self-advocacy impressed even the misogynistic judge; the transcripts, included partially in her book, make for engrossing reading.

Especially intriguing about Dr. Tsigounis’s experience is the insider look she offers of an unfortunately usurped medical profession, which appears to be run like a minor fiefdom, with its vassals and serfs propped up by a bevy of Luciferian cardinals and clowns in Board clothing who enact plays of power and prejudice against those they seek to destroy.

Dr. Tsigounis is seeking the help of a competent and ethical barrister to help gain justice and regain her professional and human rights in society.

Dr. Tsigounis’s book can be downloaded in pdf from here: https://www.docdroid.net/dOiUm27/the-red-back-web-text.pdf

This story will be covered further here.

Please share this post widely. It is only wide publicity and just legal action against powerful criminals that can bring such crimes to an end.

Permission to re-post in full online with attribution and linkback.

Interview with Paul Baird/Surveillance Issues: “Bogus National Security Laws Have Enabled Big Brother to Monitor Everyone and Harass Many”

by Ramola D/Posted 3/1/2017

The truth is, we in the Western democracies are no freer than our counterparts elsewhere in the world. In fact, serfs in feudal England or slaves in ancient Egypt served masters no more evil than some of those we deal with today. The only difference is that the ruling classes today hide their crimes and attitudes better. They can’t drag “do-gooders” out of bed at 2:00 am and have them thrown into some hellhole to be tortured to death. Here, in a “democracy”, they have to use satellite spying and harassment technologies, media feedback, political maneuvering, conspiracy, etc. As a result, none will be questioned, let alone caught and punished. Instead, while opponents are silenced and discredited, “their” attitudes permeate society, drawing others to accept that invasions of privacy, drugs, corruption and all manner of criminal conduct are to go unquestioned, as an acceptable part of life. Their delusions and our apathy must be challenged.  Paul Baird, Surveillance Issues

paul_baird_top1Paul Baird, B.Ec., LLb, is a Privacy and Human Rights Campaigner from Australia with a background in Law and Economics, who has worked for the Australian Tax Office, ANZ Bank, the State Chamber of Commerce, and Roads and Traffic Authority amongst other responsible positions. In 1990/’91, he wrote the novel “In the Year 2252,” widely distributed in draft form and covertly banned. The full story behind all responses and retaliation to his futuristic science-fiction novel which critiqued elitist crime may be found on the Case Study page of his website, Surveillance Issues, where he discusses covert electronic surveillance, monitoring, and assault technologies.

Covert Electronic Assaults Protect Organized Elitist Crime

Ramola D: Paul, first thanks so much for agreeing to do this interview. Your website is rather iconic in that it’s one of the oldest, most authoritative, reliable, and revealing about these covert programs of high tech remote brain surveillance and directed-energy weapon use on civilians—that appear to have been going on now for more than 3 decades, perhaps earlier even.

Interestingly, people from around the world—including the USA—can relate to what you describe: the programs of covert targeting, uber-surveillance, CO-INTELPRO, and 24/7 assault with undisclosed energy weapons and neuroweapons are very similar. Marshall Thomas names it the New Monarch program, many relate it to the gradual unrolling of a rather sinister high-tech New World Order. Even more sinister than what’s being revealed to those of us being targeted, it seems.

You state quite unequivocally that these covert assaults are being run by governments on citizens to protect organized crime.

“The US Patriot Act, for example, protects governments and connected criminals from criticism and/or detection and prosecution. Under this act, anyone whistleblowing or fighting the system on a major concern is arbitrarily deemed to be unpatriotic (when it’s the criminals they criticise who betray us). They can then be listed (by a senior politician or at the request, through them, of a connected criminal) as a security risk and harassed covertly; using secret technologies….This leaves them neutralised and possibly even silenced on the issue they originally raised. This, along with various research aspects, is the purpose of the exercise.” Surveillance Issues

Can you tell us more about that assessment of what has been and still is going on globally with these programs—just as much in Australia as in the UK or US or India or Canada? (And many other places, worldwide.)

Paul Baird: Thank you, Ramola. Yes, I’m afraid this sort of thing goes back as far as the end of World War II and the military/NASA/CIA employment of Nazi scientists through Project Paperclip. I recall an autobiography by a man named Kaufmann that was from the ’70s, I think. There are also victims on my help files who are quite old now and they say this has been going on for most of their lives.

Anyway, we’ve seen MK ULTRA and other programs exposed, and Ed Snowden was recently allowed to blow the whistle on mass surveillance (I suggest that was to condition the public to the surveillance state). However, The “New Monarch Project” you refer to remains relatively unknown and hidden. With over 5,000 devices covered by The Inventions Secrecy Act, 20,000 satellites in play and countless supercomputers, there may well be, as you say, worse to come.

The NSL thing seems to have fizzled out but the monitors have no interest in curbing terrorism, but rather use it as an excuse to oppress their detractors: writers, activists, whistleblowers and such. As fomer CIA director John Brennan boasted: “The CIA controls terrorism”. That then justifies the alterations to the Constitution and other law, which limit human/democratic rights, and excuse the covert oppression of the innocent by the guilty, who abuse their power/position/celebrity.

Lucrative elitist crime like trafficking (drugs, weapons, humans), as well as pedophile networks, false flag operations, and more are hidden/protected as true critics are attacked with weapons that could wipe out terrorism and crime in the right hands.

Ramola D: National Security as excuse, you’ve noted, for increased surveillance and repression, is actually a means to hide crime.

“…bogus National Security laws are also an obvious attempt to hide military/agency crimes that the public should know about.”

In other words, you are saying these laws have been made just to protect ongoing crimes while pretending to care about the safety of citizens and the nation. Could you expand on that?

From Surveillance Issues:

For example, the US government just passed the National Defense Authorisation Act, 2012, giving the President (and others) the power to target and silence anyone questioning State corruption. When this is done openly in other countries, the US is the first to condemn such evil, yet when they are guilty of the same, they do it in secret and no-one dares to criticise lest they join the ranks of those they persecute. So much for gov’t of the people, for the people, and by the people. The criminals who do such things abuse their authority, betray our trust, and secretly mock the democratic ideals they publicly support. They don’t serve us, they simply help themselves and their criminal associates. By using stealth, they can feign ignorance and hide their true nature from most.

For example: In the USA, over 300,000 NSL’s (National Security Letters) have already been issued. These allow the agency-targeting of innocent civilians whose objections to corruption/crime in high places have been deliberately skewed or misinterpreted as a threat to powerful people. Once placed in a program, people can be abused and experimented on, from a distance (using satellites/high tech.). This effectively silences and discredits them while providing agency researchers with guinea pigs for experiments in control, brain function, dreams, health, robotics, and much more. Post 9/11, $750 billion per year has been spent on satellite weapons used for human experimentation/targeting. Most of this has found its way from gov’t coffers to about 80 defense contractors who are also culpable for the crimes against humanity that are addressed on this site.

Paul Baird: Criminals try to hire their own kind, exclusively. That’s the same for a bank robbery, running a TV propaganda campaign, or a country. All entering public life or key roles are surveillance- vetted. Where blackmail, bribery, and fear don’t work, the person is usually rejected or worse. Those remaining have non-official cover.

The worst group are the MSM.  William Colby, ex-CIA Director, said: “The CIA controls everyone of significance in the major media”. That sums up the core of the problem with relaying the truth on many important matters. The control of the flow of information and public perception is crucial to their plans.

Ramola D: Your website, www.surveillanceissues.com, pretty extensively details what happened with the sci-fi novel you wrote—which met with some quite extraordinary agent acclaim and sounds like it might have become a bestseller had you continued with publication—which apparently excited the ire of criminals in high places who unleashed this high-tech targeting on you. Do you want to address a bit how long it’s been going on, and why you think it continues? (Not in any way to have you try to find reasons for this obvious atrocity and crime—which bears no excuse–but to hear your own thinking on the subject.)

Paul Baird: My web site is worth a look. Most of what I’ve learned is there. I don’t want to dwell on my own situation, only to use it as the example that I clearly know the most about.

The published feed off the unpublished. I think most know that. Covert censorship is rife. They may not know that. My novel “In the year 2252” was covertly used, banned, mocked, and abused by many in Hollywood, and the personal surveillance I endure led to much covert harassment/feedback. The book criticised elitist betrayals, the space program (an obscene waste of money directed secretly at surveillance and other weapons for human manipulation, when so many are starving, etc.), the NWO, drug proliferation, etc., etc.

From Surveillance Issues:

“Before a second draft was prepared, it was clear covert censorship would prevent any possibility of publication… I was already under 24-hour-a-day surveillance and was fielding feedback from corrupt sections of the entertainment industry, especially the media.

The reasons for their objections are many. Although the fictional novel was ultimately to be placed in a “virtual reality” setting, the submitted draft drew too much attention because it was critical of many things which criminals in high places do to get what they want and control others. Corruption, drugs, war, media deception, and all manner of immorality were openly attacked in the novel. I also lobbied on privacy laws.

No media player would want the general public becoming fully aware of the invasions of privacy and crimes which journalists and agency officials commit. Remember, I lobbied heavily on privacy laws for years with [ex-Prime Minister] John Howard himself supporting my views, in writing.

“Ethic” Rather than “Ethnic” Cleansing”

Ramola D: One of the most outstanding aspects of your experience is that you have spoken to and communicated with hundreds of people who variously worked for Intelligence agencies, the military, elected politicians, journalists, neuroscientists, neurologists, and in the process learned a great deal about the way the very real “system” of covert political repression works, what’s behind it, and what chance the average person has, of exposing it, or affecting it.

Do you still think it is next to impossible to stop or expose this system?

Paul Baird: I never thought it was impossible just difficult. Equally difficult struggles have taken longer. We just need to persevere and trust in God.

From Surveillance Issues:

AFP (Australian FBI)(NH) – Head of surveillance unit: “Even if a head of state or a Prime Minister was to wade in on these matters, they would be out of office that same day. That is what you’re up against here”. When I asked who was primarily responsible for these crimes– spy agencies, the military, politicians, or journalists–he answered: “Well, they all have ready access”, meaning all of the above. With this, he confirmed my earliest observations that this was elitist/class crime directed by criminals in high places at those who challenged them in some way.

US Embassy in Canberra – Chief US spy in Australia: Standing on the lawn outside (they would not have me in the building), and looking skyward, then panning his hand across the city skyline below, he bragged: “I know everything that happens in every office in this city. Everything. Understand?” I wrote to every Federal MP and told them what he had said. None responded. All are clearly compromised by the surveillance.

…The overall message is that this is politics first and foremost: political psychiatry, political oppression, political crime. Science is employed but politics is the reason for choosing the targets.”

As for what it’s all about: After 26 years on this, it has become clear to me that this is more about politics than anything else–suppression, oppression, experimentation, and eugenics.

In fact, my personal view is that this is a new “silent holocaust” (Look up the term on Wikipedia–I added the third definition: “‘Ethic’ rather than ‘Ethnic’ cleansing whereby whistleblowers, activists, and writers critical of a government or the powers that be can find themselves the subject of programs designed to persecute, oppress, and indirectly prevent reproduction….”).

Those with gene trait combinations that indicate they may challenge the Powers That Be (PTB) (or those that have already done so in some way) are placed in a sort of electronic, mobile concentration camp and harassed/stressed so that none (or few) reproduce from that point. It is extermination by natural attrition: the removal of those traits from the gene pool by stealth.

And that 60% that will not question authority at all (the CIA estimate) will grow while the 1% that stick their necks out will dwindle. Whether that succeeds or not, I believe that is their thinking….One arm harasses the targets so their complaints mirror mental illness (paranoia, schizophrenia, etc.), while the other observes the results, pretends it’s natural, and approves the necessary social engineering. I believe this helps sell it to those who know but acquiesce.

From Surveillance Issues:

NASA Inspector-General’s Office: After admitting that they knew all about NASA’s role in delivering payloads into space and the capabilities of the satellite technology in question, and being asked what could be done to stop them, I was told: “Nothing. I suggest you pray”. This was repeated, as I was clearly incredulous. It was said with resignation and certainty as the only solution. This, more than any other comment from any other source summed up the difficulty of the situation faced by all targeted persons.

Bogus National Security laws have enabled Big Brother to monitor everyone and harass many, any that challenge the status quo.

Ramola D: Many you spoke to revealed a great deal about the true nature of surveillance—which we still don’t read about in The Guardian or The Intercept or The Washington Post. (In fact, we read about it primarily at Surveillance Issues, World CACH, ICAACT, US CACH, The Everyday Concerned Citizen, Mind Justice, Targeted Individuals Canada, Mind Control in America, and other informative websites like I Want to Know and Educate Yourself, covering classified technologies and covert operations, often run by those actually being wrongfully, covertly, or remotely radiation-/neuro-targeted and assaulted, worldwide.)

As part of your own experience, when you were first hit, in 1991, you record communications from various politicians, including a letter of support from ex-Prime Minister John Howard, which told you many were aware of your high-tech surveillance and harassment, yet they could not help, their “hands were tied.” You’ve since understood that many policemen and politicians are aware that people are being assaulted with these remote technologies—yet won’t help; how do you read that?

Paul Baird: To be clear: John Howard’s letter of support, which can be seen on my web site, came before he was PM. I did not talk with or meet John Howard; he sent me a supportive letter, that’s all. However, I did speak with members of his staff. After he was PM, his aides told me it was awkward and his hands were tied, as did aides in other Ministerial offices. It is awkward because acquaintances and foreign politicians are involved. I discovered that those targeted people with federal police complaint files had them marked “Politically Sensitive” for the same reason.

Media Treason & Complicity In Covering Up Covert Global Neuro-Weapon and EMF Weapon Use on Populations

Ramola D: I am especially interested in addressing the part that Media plays in covering up the worldwide usage of neuro-weapons and directed-energy weapons on the populace.

Obviously, such a gigantic cover-up could not have been pulled off without Mainstream Media playing a very active role—in not merely suppressing this information by not covering it, but by pandering to their CIA/DOD overseers in distorting, denying, degrading the information out there on it, in the process deliberately discrediting those targeted persons and those being non-consensually experimented-on today who speak out.

cialies1We see evidence of this malicious campaign today in publications such as The New York Times, The Washington Post, Mother Jones, The Daily Beast, Rational Wiki, Wikipedia and other mainstream rags. But most—not all—alternative media also refuse to acknowledge the very existence of this crime. You’ve stated, not just about this but crime in general, “By owning/controlling the media, criminals avoid open challenge.” What have you learned about journalists regarding this particular cover-up?

Paul Baird: Yes, as you say, the CIA-controlled MSM as well as the marginalised media, even publications like Nexus, refuse to run anything but the most derogatory items on TIs. The New York Times, Washington Post, and other misinformation strongholds, in particular, have attacked some of our better campaigners after luring them into an interview situation. They run with some mass hysteria line and ignore that all the targets have done something to annoy the PTB. Personally, I would never even talk with these snakes and this is the first interview I’ve ever given, and that’s only being done because I’m convinced that you understand the issues and are totally sympathetic.

operationmockingbirdcia-owns-the-media1Look, as ex-CIA director William Colby admitted: “The CIA controls everyone of importance in the major media”. They’re not going to rat on themselves, nor will they help an agency-target or anyone attempting to expose crimes of the corporate/military/political conglomerate. Those entering the MSM sort of sell their souls on matters like this and are brainwashed into believing it’s justifiable, and that they couldn’t do anything about it anyway. They’re all scared when confronted on this. It’s also all covered by bogus National Security legislation, so they lean on that as another excuse when there aren’t any real excuses, just criminal delusions fostered by elitists.

And sections of the media don’t just acquiesce on all of this and attack those trying to highlight it, they actively take part in harassing TIs. In fact, in my own case, and that of others who’ve been targeted by the entertainment industry villains, the attacks can be overwhelming and brutal….I see the MSM media as evil traitors and criminals.

Marginalised journalists and MSM execs, presenters that do not approve told me that surveillance results can be handed over with a “Find a place for this on tonight’s news/current affairs” -type instruction. Surveillance frequencies can be handed to stations. Direct computer to teleprompter connections can be arranged. The target is oppressed and discredited if they tell anyone, but this practice is as old as eavesdropping and predates all the technologies that aid today’s elite criminal. Again, insiders don’t care for the truth, only ego, income, and celebrity.

Hearing Voices, the Neurophone, and What Neurologists Know

Ramola D: I’d like to focus a bit on the issue of hearing voices, which many of those being assaulted with covert and classified technologies report, often as “synthetic telepathy” or the military term,Voice to Skull or V2K. Evidence for this military technology has been provided on FOIA request, and can be seen in patents.

Reporting such technologically-induced voices as evidence of covert neuroweapon assault to local law enforcement or physicians, still, today, ends with the target being taken to a Psych Ward and shot up with neuroleptics and anti-psychotics, essentially being disbelieved, dismissed, and discredited as mentally ill, schizophrenic, and hallucinatory.

This is absurd, because there are many known and patented technologies today to induce voices in people’s heads, such as the Frey effect, the microwave hearing effect, and bone conduction—which whistleblowers and scientists have also spoken about, and some of which are beginning to see coverage in mainstream media–but the Neurophone predates them all, and was used as a Voice of God weapon during the Iraq war, according to many analysts. What is so important about the Neurophone?

Paul Baird: Neurophone technology is the basis for developments that see many targeted people fielding personal “broadcasts” from Spy Central. From ignorant police and medicos to complicit journos and MPs, any discussion of this can lead to the complainant being institutionalised.

neurophoneThe device was invented in 1958, and was classified soon after. The developments from direct to remote, to vehicles, to satellites which deliver it via laser (slower sound riding faster directional light over the insignificant distance from a geo-synchronously-orbiting Deeper Space satellite to the Earthly target) followed.

It was used by spies for silent communication (no touching ear pieces, etc.), to drive Iraqi soldiers out of bunkers, to fire up and delude Manchurian candidates, and to discredit and/or institutionalise many political targets. It is subtly referred to in many songs.

It is the only term in our repertoire that cannot be denigrated, misrepresented, covered with other meanings or used elsewhere. There are countless pages of web site listings on the word, yet it still remains out of all dictionary listings, because the psych’ branding of sufferers as mad is central to the oppression of the righteous. On top of that, the reaction I get from perps/Government infiltrators in our midst is out of proportion. If others knew of it (even audiologists etc.,) it would become known world-wide, and the secrecy and misuse over 50 years would come out.

The education of people as to the existence of Neurophone technology and its development is one way we CAN break through. Other terminologies can be attacked. Other devices don’t have such specific names and cannot be actually bought from a real inventor who is still alive.

Ramola D: You have spoken with several neuroscientists on this subject, how have they reacted, when told of these technologies to remotely induce voices in people’s heads? I would think it’s very important to have psychiatrists communicate with neuroscientists, and vice versa, so psychiatrists begin to understand that hearing voices can no longer be considered symptomatic exclusively of schizophrenia.

Paul Baird: My experiences talking to brain experts indicate that they see all of this as interesting and say things like “Where can I get hold of these technologies”, that’s if they aren’t already involved. In other words, the humanitarian aspect is lost on them and all they see is New Science. They are part of the problem, not the solution. That’s not to say honest, caring ones don’t exist, and cannot be found, just that it would be difficult with the “Year/Decade/Century of the Brain” brigade.

My preferred target, based on positive feedback and confessions from the profession, would be NEUROLOGISTS. Many know. Some sympathise. Any that say they’re not interested (especially in a device like a NEUROphone) are liars. Any and all neurologists would be interested and they, in turn, could be used to convince others. The extraordinary efforts and manpower used to stop me telling an entire conference room full of neurologists is evidence enough for me…This avenue, like Net films, is a concern to “them” because it may work.

Challenging the inexact science of psychiatry with neuroscience is what I’m on about too. Neurologists know. If they would just relay that, then the psych’ profession could not ignore it.

Ramola D: When you say Neurologists, I presume you don’t mean Neuroscientists (as above/brain researchers)? (Correct me if I’m wrong.). And are you serious, have you actually met brain researchers who professed immediate interest (in technologies that could remote-target brains)? That would suggest that a majority of researchers are Not focused on the humane or ethical aspects of brain research? That seems huge in itself–can you elaborate?

Paul Baird: I use Neuroscience to mean the branch of medicine/science dealing with the nervous system and the brain. Its practitioners are neurologists. I see neurologists as just one of many groups that deal with brain disorders. Neuroscience is the broader field they operate under and that can include psychiatry, pharmacology, biochemistry and so on. And, yes, I’m always serious on the topic of covert harassment…The flippant “Where do I get it?” type responses are there but I don’t even recall the names, as once I hear that sort of inhumane response, I dismiss the person; I’m looking for compassionate, knowledgeable people, not corrupt or uncaring, would-be criminals. The names of those honest neurologists who knew or quickly accepted the truth are logged, but must remain concealed unless and until they choose to come forward; though some are briefly mentioned on my web site.

Ramola D: So generally speaking, one would think all neurologists today should be interested in learning about what TIs are experiencing? And a Neurophone would be of interest to all, you’d think? Did you want to elaborate on that experience of being stopped from telling a conference full of neurologists about the Neurophone?

Paul Baird: The Neurophone is a device that allows non-verbal communication as signals directed at the body to travel the nervous system and register in the brain–by-passing normal hearing mechanisms. It is attuned to the individual bio-electronic resonance frequency of the target, and so is not heard by others in the signal’s path. For any neurologist to say they neither know of nor care about knowing of such a device would be clear evidence of corruption or knowledge. 

Indeed, for any specialist, be they neurologists or psychiatrists etc., to say they’re not interested in any device that allows signals to travel the human nervous system must raise suspicion of complicity. Like a corrupt cop who says he has no interest in learning of a new crime technique, it would be more than suspicious. The Psych’ professionals are almost all corrupt, many are involved but not the neurologists.

neurophone2Sometime in the early ’90s, I attended a huge Neurologists’ convention at the Sydney Hilton. Expecting to be unable to speak directly to the attendees, I brought flyers in envelopes addressed to each attendee and posted them on the giant notice board. The names and permission to do this had been given to me by the organisers, who later told me that when I left, many men in black suits filed in and took one each. None of them were conference attendees who remained in the hall at the time. Consequently, not one received my posting. When I started contacting them individually, I found that many knew of the research, the Neurophone, the brain-wave scanning and brain-wave interpretation software.

Example 1: One admitted he had been harassed for inventing his own Neurophone, and offered to use hospital scanning equipment to scan targets–people who were being interfered with by remote technologies. The hospital equipment could only be accessed for official research so 40 targeted people would be needed as volunteers to be able to call the testing a research project and thus gain access to the oscillating scanners. He warned that if the monitors interfered with brainwave signals during scanning, which they could easily do, that he would be obliged to report anyone whose brainwave patterns matched those of known criminals on file. The risk was assessed by both of us as too high so we told no one.

(Personally, I believe that part of the framing we suffer includes bogus brainwave results that they fudge). The neurologist was later offered a job at Sydney University’s Centre for The Mind which studies creativity, facial expressions, and such, and is supported by Richard Branson, Peter Adams, Baz Lurman,The Dalai Lama and others. At this point this neurologist’s attitude was corrupted, and he claimed that not everything about such human research is black and white but grey. Potentially one of our greatest supporters, and a man who had offered so much hope over so many discussions, had been compromised and was lost to us.

Example 2: Another neurologist shared that illegal human research (non-consensual) had been going on for years. She said they used to hide brain-wave scanners in computer screens and wall cavities in neurologists’ offices, and would illegally scan patients’ brain-waves for research. Today, she said, the US military scans brain-waves from satellites, and does most of the research themselves. She feared for her job/life and told me to never use her name, though I could repeat what she had told me.

Challenging the inexact science of psychiatry with neuroscience is what I’m on about too. Neurologists know. If they would just relay that, then the psych’ profession could not ignore it.

The Criminal Silencing of Critics with Deadly Weaponry, Discrediting, and Psychiatry

Ramola D: Psychiatrists and doctors are being used to name victims mentally ill (schizoid or paranoid or both) if they report hearing voices or covert harassment on the street, or airplane/helicopter stalking, being followed, being swarmed in stores, etc.

Dr. Seth Farber recently wrote about this in his article, “The Psychiatric Metanarrative, Targeted Individuals, and the Deep State: A Response to The New York Times”, saying that psychiatrists didn’t have to be wittingly complicit, they were generally oblivious of covert agency actions, and could just be expressing the innately authoritarian and conformist attitude of Psychiatry, which is eager to name all deviations from a norm they subjectively designate as sign of mental illness.

In essence though, psychiatrists are co-operating with the State in diagnosing victims as schizoid and helping to cover up this Crime-With-Technology. In the US and Europe, victims can be committed to institutions by such psychiatrists. Have you spoken with psychiatrists and neuropsychiatrists, what have you learned?

Paul Baird: Yes. Most scientists have no interest in ethics or human rights. Some others have organised groups to look into that. Professional prostitution or a “guns for hire” approach is common across many professions. Over 60% of people will now do whatever they’re told for money or advantage according to the CIA. “It is appallingly obvious that our technology has exceeded our humanity.” Albert Einstein.

Psychiatrists’ bread-and-butter diagnoses include schizophrenia; only an honest, intelligent, brave one with little ego would accept the truth. Voices in the head are their favourite money spinner–and who supplies much of that money? The government, elite employers, etc.

It is very dangerous to speak to psychiatrists, especially if they’re corrupt. Even the best ones will accept stalking, harassment, and victimisation scenarios but draw the line at hearing voices broadcast from Spook Central.

Ramola D: You’ve stated that this is class warfare, where people in power use criminal tactics of silencing potential critics with deadly weaponry, and Media helps by ruthlessly suppressing and ridiculing targets’ testimonials, while also attacking them with the information gained from constant surveillance, “Surveillance Results”–could you expand on that?

Paul Baird: The elite all know. MPs, celebrities, “businessmen”, senior military personnel, etc. They salve their consciences on the conspiracy of silence by rabbiting the CIA line that it’s a matter of National Security. They know who’s in the wrong but just don’t care. Remember, the CIA sifts and places people for the shadow government, selecting from that 60% I keep referring to. For example: A rep’ of the top security firm here told me that the “Word is out to wash our hands of you”–the Pontius Pilate approach. Having all sold their souls with their silence and complicity, the elitists do what they can to discredit the innocent. The prince of lies controls their hearts and minds.

From Surveillance Issues.com:

Legal Aide: “It’s common for corporate criminals to covertly harass and blacklist people and many of them wind up on the street. They enjoy seeing that as they present as hopeless/mad. I’m only using this job as a stepping-stone and have a family. If I try to help any of those I know they did this to or spill the beans, my career will stall.”

Lawyer/Partner: “We’ve discussed it and would dearly like to help, but if we do, “They” will come at us from the side; we’ll lose all clients from any connected source, and that means we’d be out of business.”

Neuro Surveillance: Celebrities and Public Figures Both Controlled and Complicit

Ramola D: You’ve said that celebrities and public figures are also controlled by threat of use of these technologies against them. Many are also used, via Surveillance Results, via television, radio, film, to further harass targets. What do you think public figures know about all of this and why won’t they help?

Paul Baird: As for what celebrities know: This is again what I’ve brought to the table time and time again, but no-one wants to hear it. I’ve been hit by these people for decades and met some of them, some others who work for them, and many others who’ve been similarly hit. Most celebs are chosen, through agency vetting and syndicate approval, and are in that 60% I told you about. They have no editorial control, especially the journalists, and just present what they’re told to BUT they know of the targeting and, over time, if they hit the same targets, they’re in on the joke/crime.

The whole “don’t trust public figures” thing is so hard to relay in the age of celebrity worship that it’s frustrating. There are fence-sitting celebrities who don’t really approve of all this surveillance and oppression, but see it differently to you and I; as a sort of necessary trade-off. So many subtly refer to V2K and mind-reading technologies. With many, many songs mentioning “voices in my head” and “reading minds”, with the colloquial references used as covers if and when they are asked.

What am I saying? It’s back to that 60% thing again. 60% of people will do as they’re told, so the selections are made from that pool of talent, and the other 40% are shunted out.

In the case of public figures, Satan, through his minions, exacts the surveillance price from celebrities and they accept it because: that’s what they do for a living, and if they don’t do it, some lesser talent will take their place and do it anyway. Pretty much the same defence you’d get from hired assassins, give or take some large egos.

As for the price they pay (covert surveillance above the papparazzi thing being a big part of it): they pay a price, but their silence on the matter means that others also pay that same price with nothing to counter-balance it; all of us are also monitored, etc., because they remain silent. So we all pay, and only they benefit.

I say we all stand up and tell, and to hell with the monitors and their technology; it’s undemocratic, immoral, and criminal, and no government has a mandate to do it or allow it to be done.

The Few Exceptions: “Too Afraid to Do More”

Ramola D: So: people in public office and in prominent positions in media are generally corruptible, or they would not have attained their office. This brings us to the present, to all the implications of Pizzagate, the dark stories of blackmail and pedophilia propping up people in public office. Have you met or know of any exceptions, and what is your feeling about corrupt people in power today—have things changed, do we have a greater chance of exposing them?

Paul Baird: Yes, I’ve met some exceptions; that’s where a lot of my information came from in the first place. However, they will not go public as their careers/lives may be in jeopardy. Around the time I was talking to PM Howard’s people, the chief AFP (Australian Federal Police) surveillance expert told me that even if the PM were to try to help a targeted person, that he would be out of office that same day; one way or another. Such is the power of those that foster this system of oppression.

The honest/brave ones that helped a lot were mainly State and Federal Police, ex-spies and such — a few ex-politicians, TV presenters, TV/radio execs, and presenters were honest and supportive, but they were too afraid to do more than that.

Could Pizzagate and Pedogate Help Expose High-Tech Targeting?

Ramola D: What do you think about the connections of high-placed criminals to Pizzagate today, and the exposure of pedophilia/Satanism, etc.? Ted Gunderson and others have spoken about child trafficking and abuse, and many researchers have written about Satanism in the security and Intelligence agencies. Any chance, you think, that the exposure of this evil will help expose high-tech targeting as well?

Paul Baird: There’s always a chance, I suppose, but I tend to think that pedophilia in elitist circles is so out of control that it’s spilling out into the public arena. So many celebrites are caught up in rings or personal situations that there are two LA law firms that deal with nothing but celeb’ pedo’ cases or sexual-harassment-type matters. I personally see how we protect our children as a gauge of how well society is progressing. At the moment we are in a very sick, disgraceful place.

“The Ability of Government to Classify Crime is What Must be Fought.”

Ramola D: Going back to classified crime: I would think any victim of such “classified” assault on their bodies and brains would agree with this statement of yours:

“Classifying” information and calling it a matter of National Security negates the need for the criminals involved to even create excuses for their conduct. The ability of government to classify crime is what must be fought.”

Yet this is crime that malingers in shadows, that is systemically being protected and covered-up. How can such crime be exposed, and how can the classifying of such crime be fought?

Paul Baird: That’s the big question, isn’t it. Exec. Order 13526 is supposed to outlaw the classifying of matters to hide crime, yet it happens every day.

Sec. 1.7. (Executive Order 13526) Classification Prohibitions and Limitations.

(a) In no case shall information be classified, continue to be maintained as classified, or fail to be declassified in order to:

(1) conceal violations of law, inefficiency, or administrative error;
(2) prevent embarrassment to a person, organization, or agency;
(3) restrain competition; or
(4) prevent or delay the release of information that does not require protection in the interest of the national security.

To stop it, we need advice from National Security experts. However, the governments employ most of them, creating a conflict of interest in much the same way that the MSM makes sure it uses all media lawyers to create the same conflict. Those few experts left charge too much for targeted people to afford and, as we all know, you only get the justice you can afford. The elitist criminal will always price you out on civil matters and hide on criminal ones. That’s why 98% of crime (mostly white-collar crime) goes unpunished.

Ramola D: Finally, several initiatives supported by your extensive writing and reportage and run by Dr. Nick Begich and Lynn Surgalla of the US Psychotronics Association made great headway in 1999 at the European Parliament and UNIDIR (United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research) in creating legislation banning the use of weapons to remotely manipulate humans. Yet they were not enforced, and were indeed fully ignored by the US Government. What can we do today to once more bring this vital issue to international attention?

Paul Baird: The European Parliament passed The Resolution on the Environment, Security and Foreign Policy, A4-0005/99 on Jan 28th, 1999. This called for a world-wide convention to ban the use of all weapons for human manipulation. UNIDIR passed a similar resolution. Both were ignored by the media and the US gov’t. (UNIDIR 2002 Media Guide to Disarmament.)

The European Parliament and UNIDIR, in recognising our concerns, did mention Weapons of Mass Destruction but grouped it all into a category called “Weapons for Human Manipulation” and that’s what they wanted banned.

The point I often make about the US, which all countries know rules the planet but they dare not spell out how, is that UN Weapons Inspectors and various “Inspector Generals” etc. are nigh on impotent when it comes to the US stockpile of Weapons of Mass Destruction and covert, classified weapons. It’s as if all other countries are potential villains but not the country in the best position to be just that, and which commits more crimes against humanity than any other. This exclusion from scrutiny is one of the ways you can tell how tightly the US fist holds the reins of power worldwide. Equally, they can bolster and expand their National Security laws to cover concealing, spying, harassing re. the entire planet, but anyone else that tried that would be denounced as criminals by the CIA-controlled Media.

Again, National Security laws and the inability of UN Weapons Inspectors to study evil, classified technologies are, for me, two of the biggest obstacles we face.

With the MSM controlled by the CIA and the US government clearly behind all of this, only public education, through the marginalised media, can get the result we need.

Ramola D: Any other thoughts on how collective humanity can end these horrific elitist criminal practices of covert EMF weapon and neuro-tech assault?

Paul Baird: Can I just emphasize that despite the various other angles to all of this–the oppression, the experiments (AI, Dream Studies, Mind Control, Brain Studies, etc., etc.) that there is clearly a Eugenics angle as well. Much like their Nazi predecessors, these people not only want to disable us and put us in a mobile concentration camp and run their evil experiments, they also want to remove all trait combinations from the gene pool that lead to the make up of those who provide resistance to their evil operations–curiosity. persistence, honesty, spirituality, etc. I know of no targeted person that had children after the stressful harassment started, and most would see their offspring would also suffer if they did. Like Poles, gays, Jews and others during WWII, today the ethical, compassionate, and law-abiding are also in danger of extermination.

Only by exposing these practices can we end them. We need to work at finding ways to let the general population know that they live not in democracies but totalitarian/fascist states and (that they must work) to restore true democracy.

Finally, the answers lie with the marginalised media and articles prepared by people like yourself, Ramola. If enough people can learn of these atrocities through such writings, then pressure can be brought to bear on the powers that be to stop what is effectively a silent holocaust: the remote incarceration, torture, experimentation, and extermination of people of integrity who have the temerity to challenge elite crime.

With much gratitude to Paul Baird for this singular interview, conducted over a long period and several emails. Please visit Surveillance Issues for more information.

Please share widely. Re-posting with permission only, please contact Ramola D, thanks.

RELATED:

Paul Baird/Surveillance Issues: Covert Oppression Using Classified Technologies

Memorandum to President Donald J. Trump on Domestic US Torture Programs Running Under Cover of Surveillance

Intel Agency Crimes: False Flags, Lies, Media Control, & Mind Control Psy Ops

Dr. Katherine Horton to All Americans with Integrity: Global Nazi Extermination Program Underway–Why You Need to Help Rescue Electronic Concentration Camp Victims Now!

Bigger Than Snowden: A Spotlight on Whistleblowers/Electromagnetic Weapons Are Being Used to Torture and Subjugate Countless American Citizens

Seth Farber, Ph.D: The Psychiatric Metanarrative, Targeted Individuals, and the Deep State: A Response to The New York Times

Ex-CIA and MI5 Agent and Whistleblower Carl Clark Reveals Covert Electromagnetic Torture of Civilians by Intel Agencies in US/UK/Europe/Asia with Directed Energy “Non-Lethal” Neuroweapons

Open Season on Targets: Blacklisted Individuals, Extreme Abuse in Targeting, Secretive Lab-Rat Exploitation, & Massive Establishment Cover-Up

In the Name of National Security? Secret, Classified Human Subject Experimentation and Research in 2015: Where is the Public Outrage?