Category Archives: United Kingdom

UK Parliament Notified of Massive Insolvency Fraud Indicative of Malfeasance by Judges, Barristers, Banks, Courts, Law Firms Using Fraudulent Court Documents, Fabricated Debt, Repeated Violations of Statutory Law and Human Rights

Report | Ramola D | October 6, 2021

Progress in an ongoing investigation of fraud, corruption, and complicity among Insolvency practitioners in the UK court system–where collusive white-collar crime networks of corrupt courts, judges, barristers, accountants, law firms and banks engaging in planned systemic fraud and money laundering using offshore havens have been asset-stripping and impoverishing hundreds of citizens with bankruptcy fraud, effected through fabricated debts, unrecorded court hearings, fraudulent court documents, secret courts, and multiple procedural and statutory violations–was reported in News Panel 24/Report 266 at Ramola D Reports on Sunday, October 3.

News Panel 24/Report 266 at Bitchute

Ramola D Reports | News Panel 24 | Report 266 | The Great Insolvency Scam Update

Michelle Young, known for the loss of her 4 billion pound estate succeeding the tragic death of her ex-husband Scot Young (her case described earlier here, in News Panel 1/UK Mothers Across Socio-Economic Lines Reveal the Crimes, Corruption, and Fraud Rampant in UK Family Courts and Bankruptcy Courts Which Unlawfully Asset-Strip and Defraud Women & Kidnap, Foster, Traffick, and Disappear Their Children and Babies, and here, in Michelle Young and the Transparency Task Force Expose the UK’s Great Insolvency Scam), who was herself wrongfully bankrupted and subjected to theft of her assets by corrupt solicitors and fraudulent court practices, reports that nine significant bankruptcy fraud cases have now been submitted to members of the UK Parliament Lord Prem Sikka and Kevin Hollinrake, who hopefully will present this information to all others in Parliament and initiate an investigation of the money and assets which have been stolen in all cases.

Anthony Stansfeld, Former PCC, Thames Valley, UK

Anthony Stansfeld, former Police and Crime Commissioner of the Thames Valley, London, who has followed Michelle’s case closely and examined numerous cases of bankruptcy fraud, says “It’s clear that insolvencies are being set up as a complete racket for people who are not insolvent, and insolvencies are manufactured to steal assets: This has been going on in a multitude of cases–these are nine of the larger cases, but the fact that forged documents are being used, forged signatures, forged bank guarantees, and forged debts–it’s extraordinary.”

He echoes Michelle’s hope that this will initiate a larger inquiry, and that Lord Prem Sikka and Kevin Hollinrake who is the Chair of the All Parliamentary Party Group (APPG) on Fair Banking will be able to ask Parliament to investigate. “Of course they are not statutory bodies themselves and all they can do is ask Parliament to investigate, and I very much hope they do that.”

Part of the problem, he says is that “for far too long, these cases have always been treated as civil cases and of course, when people have been artificially bankrupted they don’t have the money to appeal in court, this is the great strength of the people doing it–and why the Insolvency Service is being used so dishonestly, and also complicitly, I think. What you have to do is prosecute these cases as criminal cases and take them on as criminal cases–and we don’t put them in front of judges who seem to come up in the same sort of cases time and time again and will always side with the accountants’ companies or the banks and simply will not look at the documents–so there is something smelly going on indeed in the Establishment with the Insolvency Services.”

He also says these cases need to be prosecuted publicly, by the Crown Prosecution Service, as criminal cases–“but to get the establishment to take on fraud is almost impossible today.” His experience with the HBOS Reading fraud comprising 245 million pounds, he says, revealed that “it was being done out of other banks on an industrial scale” and banks network and protect each other while judges, he says succinctly, are “either complacent, complicit or incompetent” and fail in their duties.

Michael Ough

Michael Ough, retired police officer, agrees and goes one step further saying “The first thing I will say is what those who are involved in this have done is to use the British civil justice system as a means to commit a crime.” Numbers of crimes have been committed, he notes, including Conspiracy to Commit a Fraud and violations of various acts and statutory laws, each of which carries sentences of several years in prison. He also says it is not just accountants, barristers, solicitors who face these prosecutions of fraud, but paralegals, legal secretaries, and others working in law offices who have engaged in these crimes of forging documents, in a long line of hierarchy, and each is complicit even if only as accessory and should be held accountable. “This is how serious this is…and it’s no good saying, I was only doing what my boss told me to do, that’s not a defense or an excuse, sorry, you’re going to jail.”

“The civil justice system is toxic” he says, and does not offer remedy which is why these cases need to be prosecuted now in criminal courts, since crimes have clearly been committed. Examining the statutes and bringing to bear his ten years of police officer experience and retired research knowledge on this matter, he says it is clear that numerous procedural and statutory violations have occurred in each case, with crimes of omission and commission being committed at every step, and blatant forgery of documents and signatures.

Paula Davies

Paula, who has like Michelle, herself suffered at the hands of insolvency practitioners who wrongfully pursued her succeeding her father’s passing, with statutory demands and bankruptcy petitions which culminated in unrecorded county court hearings and prejudgments, agrees, saying that county courts within the Insolvencies do what they want to do and do not adhere to the statutory requirements of the law or Parliament to maintain records–as in all the nine cases mentioned “neither the county court nor the high court have kept the records as stated,” that debts are fabricated or “purported to exist when they do not exist,” that hearings are wrongfully held in the private behind closed doors, which gives rise to further violations of procedure. “When it’s held in the private, we’re not going to have a justice system that’s open or transparent. Justice must not only be done, it must be seen to be done–and it’s not even seen to be done because it’s held in the private, and they can do and say what they want and break the statutory provisions laid down by Parliament–they can do what they want within those hearings and they do.” Which, in the case of financial matters, is also a violation of the European Convention of Human Rights, note both Paula and Michael Ough.

Paula also agrees with Michelle that these are now matters of larger import, likely to impact UK economy and national security, since solvent people are being targeted for theft of asset and bankruptcy fraud, effectively removing their cash and assets from the economy, and causing entrepreneurs and businesspeople to stop investing further, points which Michelle makes in an email sent to members of Parliament and others (PDF below).

In terms of scale of the crimes, Anthony Stansfeld notes that at least 700 cases of similar bankruptcy fraud have been collected, with Trevor Mealham in Bristol having an additional 100 cases, while these nine comprise the larger cases–so it would appear the kinds of fraudulent activities attending these nine and carefully documented (in the Final Bankruptcy Reports, PDF below) are not restricted alone to the larger cases of asset theft but appear to have become a practice among a certain connected, criminal set ensconced in the UK Insolvency Services, courts, banks, law firms, and auditing firms. Anthony Stansfeld suggests that in addition to criminal prosecution of these cases, Serious Fraud Units should be set up in all police branches, and properly budgeted for so police can expect to be more equipped to investigate such cases, going forward.

The panel’s discussion of the findings in the nine large cases involving false instruments–forged court documents, unsigned documents, unrecorded hearings, etc., are summarized in the Final Bankruptcy Reports submitted to Parliament (PDF below) and are listed below:

Summary of Findings in Close Investigation of Nine Bankruptcy Cases Totaling Syndicate Theft of Nearly Seven Billion Pounds

Excerpt, Final Bankruptcy Reports

FRAUDULENT BANKRUPTCY CASES
Common Factors
1 Claimants have no locus standi due to the fact they are agents and have falsely
represented to the court their ability to have a right to such a thing in action. Have
also failed to provide a Notice of Assignment or Deed of Assignment or any form of
Power of Attorney in accordance with the law.
2 Debt has been manufactured;
3 Debt is someone else’s debt;
4 Alleged debtor has been treated as a business and not an individual and vice versa,
i.e. wrong capacity, and this has been ignored by court when pointed out to them;
5 Purported hearings of County Court Judgment (CCJ) and/or Bankruptcy hearings
are not showing on court records and no evidence of fees being paid to court as
required;
6 Purported judgments not showing on Trust Online, except in one case, where the
case number has been found to be invalid. Any action taken must be recorded by
Trust Online in accordance with Regulation 9, Register of Judgments, Orders and
Fines Regulations 2005;
7 Bankruptcy Petitions not verified by an affidavit rendering Bankruptcy Petitions void;
8 Purported Trustee in Bankruptcy has not been correctly appointed and appointment
has not been listed in the London Gazette
9 Bankruptcy hearings conducted in wrong jurisdiction, i.e. court is not authorised to
hear bankruptcy cases;
10 Bankruptcy hearings conducted in wrong bankruptcy district to alleged debtor’s
home/business address;
11 Hearings not conducted in accordance with Article 6, European Convention of
Human Rights (ECHR), i.e. holding hearings in private when Article 6 requires
cases to be heard in public;
12 Courts breached Section 6(1), Human Rights Act 1998 by holding hearings in
private (Unlawful for public authorities to act in a way which is incompatible with a
person’s Convention rights). Courts are public authorities for the purposes of the
Act by virtue of Section 6(3)(a);
13 Judges and courts not adhering to Civil Procedures Rules;
14 Judges and courts not adhering to Practice Directions;
15 Judges and courts not adhering to Insolvency Act 1986 and Insolvency Rules 1986-
2016;
16 Purported Trustee in Bankruptcy Certificates of Appointment by Secretary of State
found to be suspicious due to absence of court name;
17 Purported Trustee in Bankruptcy Certificate of Appointment by Secretary of State
found to bear a ‘copy and paste’ signature of a civil servant whose authority to sign
and the validity of the Certificate are both in question;
18 Court paperwork shows name of court previously authorised to conduct bankruptcy
hearings, now closed, but Individual Insolvency Register (IIR) shows name of
different court which is authorised to conduct bankruptcy hearings;
19 What is written on documents, such, as Statutory Demand is not supported by fact;
20 Witness Statement of Process Server serving Statutory Demand missing;
21 Person sued for bankruptcy who has funds and/or assets to meet purported debt, in
which case the court should have struck-out the Petition as an abuse of process,
but failed to do so and allowed case to continue;
22 Making of Bankruptcy Order not published in the London Gazette.
23 Court Seal either not on documents as required by Insolvency Act and Insolvency
Rules, or seal is suspicious, i.e. does not appear to be that authorised by H.M.
Courts and Tribunals Service (HMCTS).
24 Documents found to be missing fro
m court files.

Email to Members of Parliament with Final Bankruptcy Reports

The sending of the Final Bankruptcy Reports to Members of Parliament in an email from Michelle Young and Michael Ough follows a seminar held by Lord Prem Sikka and Kevin Hollinrake, MP, Chair on APPG Fair Business Banking on Resolving Insolvency–Restoring confidence in the system – Report Launch Webinar on 14 September, 2021, a summary of which is posted at the APPG Banking website. In the email, reference is made to 26 files of similar cases of fraud investigated by Anthony Stansfeld, PCC, which were also covered in greater detail by Mr. Stansfeld and Michelle Young at previous podcasts at Ramola D Reports. (Report 214 | Michelle Young and Anthony Stansfeld, PCC Discuss Her Case & Bankruptcy Fraud in the UK | Dec 5, 2020; Report #220 | Dec 16, 2020 | Resolving Insolvency Fraud in Context of Loan Fraud & Rigged Audits | Anthony Stansfeld Police and Crime Commissioner with Michelle Young Exposing the Financial Crimes)

(For a listing and description of all panels and podcasts with video links since October 2020 covering the Great Insolvency Scam, conducted through the outstanding focus and persistence of Michelle Young, please see: Michelle Young and the Transparency Task Force Expose the UK’s Great Insolvency Scam.)

The email to Members of Parliament is below:

Final Bankruptcy Reports (PDF)

Statement from Anthony Stansfeld, Former Police and Crime Commissioner, Thames Valley, London, Regarding Engineered Bankruptcy and Theft of Michelle Young’s Assets

Anthony Stansfeld has supplied a statement remarking on the extravagant theft of billions in engineered bankruptcy fraud suffered by Michelle Young and her family, as well as on the failure of the London Metropolitan Police to fully investigate either the violent, untimely death of her ex-husband Scot Young or the disappearance of his considerable fortune and assets, stating his willingness to testify as a witness in the class action with Michelle and the others of the nine cases. This statement was sent by email (PDF below) and reposted here:

Statement by Anthony Stansfeld on the Michelle Young Case/29 July 2021:

Until May of this year I was the Police and Crime Commissioner (PCC) for the Thames Valley, a
role I held for nearly nine years. During my time Thames Valley Police prosecuted, through the
Crown Prosecution Service, the Reading HBOS Fraud. This fraud involved nearly £1Bn, though
only £245m was used in the court case. The Serious Fraud Office and two other police forces had
turned the case down. If TVP had not followed the complaints of a great many victims the crime
would have gone unpunished. The defendants receives a combined prison sentences of 48 years.
As PCC what became apparent to me was that the Reading HBOS case was part of a far wider
ranging system of fraud being perpetrated through 3 major UK banks, and allied accountancy
companies and legal practices.

The case of Michelle Young is symptomatic of frauds carried out against private individuals of
wealth who seem to be picked for their vulnerability. A disproportionate number are women. The
bankruptcy case against her seems to be totally corrupt. There was no debt, the bankruptcy
petition was never registered, the litigants against her did not act in accordance with the
Insolvency Rules, forged documentation was used, and lawyers were used who did not have the
Right of Audience in the High Court. The considerable wealth owed to Michelle Young and her
two daughters disappeared through nominee bank accounts. The trustees of her ex husband
appear to have been complicit in both the bankruptcy against her and the disappearance of the
assets she and her two daughters were entitled to. The violent death of her ex husband is still
unexplained.

Of all the great many cases I have looked at the Michelle Young case stands out as the sums of
money involved are so large, and the bankruptcy against her so manifestly engineered to take
over the wealth she was entitled to. I find it extraordinary that the London Metropolitan Police
have never carried out any proper investigation into the death of her ex husband, or what
happened to the considerable assets which he owned. Various Regulatory Authorities should
have looked into this case as the sums claimed to have disappeared exceed £4Bn, most has
been laundered abroad.

I am prepared to act as a witness in court in the class action on Michelle Young’s case and the
seven other cases. I can produce the 26 files that cover these and other cases in which it is clear
forged documentation and signatures have been used in courts to bankrupt and steal assets from
not only those in the class action, but many hundreds of others,

Anthony Stansfeld.

The email from Anthony Stansfeld in PDF:

Watch News Panel 24/Report 266 at Brighteon

Watch News Panel 24/Report 266 at Odysee

Watch News Panel 24/Report 266 at Bitchute

RELATED

UK Mothers Across Socio-Economic Lines Reveal the Crimes, Corruption, and Fraud Rampant in UK Family Courts and Bankruptcy Courts Which Unlawfully Asset-Strip and Defraud Women & Kidnap, Foster, Traffick, and Disappear Their Children and Babies

Michelle Young and the Transparency Task Force Expose the UK’s Great Insolvency Scam

Report #198: News Panel on High Level UK Crime, Fraud, Corruption in Banks, Courts, Audit Agencies

Report 214 | Michelle Young and Anthony Stansfeld, PCC Discuss Her Case & Bankruptcy Fraud in the UK

Report #220 | Dec 16, 2020 | Resolving Insolvency Fraud in Context of Loan Fraud & Rigged Audits

Uninformed Professor Devi Shridhar Blatantly Lies to Children on BBC Newsround, Dr. Vernon Coleman & UK Medical Freedom Call Her Out, Demand Public Retraction & Apology

Report | Ramola D | June 15, 2021

Devi Shridhar, the much touted media spokesperson chairing “Global Public Health” at the University of Edinburgh and apparently keen to push experimental vaccines on the world including now on children, has publicly lied on a major news program reaching millions, BBC Newsround, where she answered questions and assured children and parents the experimental Pfizer mRNA vaccine was “100% safe and effective, ” risks outweighed benefits, children were not likely to get COVID-19 after the vaccine based on clinical trials, and the only downside was another shot in the arm.

On the BBC Newsround website the following is noted:

“The Pfizer coronavirus vaccine has been approved for 12 to 15 year-olds in Britain.

The UK’s medicine regulator, the MHRA, says the injections are “safe and effective” for children in that age group and that the “benefits far outweigh any risk”.

However, a final decision on whether children will or won’t receive the jab hasn’t been made yet.

More than half of all adults in the UK have now had both doses of a coronavirus vaccine, the final decision on whether kids will also be vaccinated is now up to the UK’s vaccines committee.”

Devi Shridhar downplays the reported side-effects as she tells children they might “experience fatigue, feeling tired, feeling a little unwell” as “some children in the clinical trials” but that “these cleared in a day or two, and it seems a small price to pay to protect from the real disease when it comes.”

In Actuality, Children like Adults are Experiencing Dangerous Side-Effects from the mRNA Vaccines: Strokes, Bell’s Palsy, Heart Problems

This clearly-uninformed Oxford academic also downplayed the adverse effects of the vaccine as possibly making a child feel unwell for a day but then subsiding, in stark contrast to the information pouring out of the MHRA Yellow Card Scheme, the Eudravigilance database, and the CDC’s VAERS website.

Thousands of anguished relatives have taken to social media, posting images and videos of loved ones convulsing, showing signs of major rashes, vibrating from head to foot, and evidencing Bell’s Palsy, where one side of the face is frozen. Children, teenagers, young women and men in their 20s, 30s, and 40s as well as older women and men in their 50s, 60s and 70s are recorded as dead shortly after the vaccine, across a range from a few hours after the vaccine or weeks and months afterward.

Do Not Take the COVID-19 Vaccines: Reports & Videos of Convulsions, Seizures, Palsy, Death Are Increasing

News Panel 21: Detox from the mRNA & Nanotech in COVID Vaccines, Neural Dust & Nanometallic Particulates from Aerosols/Chem Trails, Cleanse Your Pineal Gland with Clean Slate & Natural Remedies

Dangers of ALL Vaccines Highlighted as Deaths and Injuries From the Experimental mRNA COVID Vaccines Pile Up

Newsbreak 107 | Feb 12, 2021 | Unsafe Vaccines in Light of Vaccine Injuries: Focus on COVID Vaccine Adverse Events & Deaths with Dr. John Reizer

Dr. Vernon Coleman: How Many People Are The Vaccines Killing?

Newswatch Live | Censorship & Media Deception Sheathes the Truth about COVID Vaccine Dangers, Deaths & Global Biosurveillance, Biosecurity Intentions

Data from the CDC VAERS website for US deaths and disability from the COVID vaccines through June 4, 2021, which are said to be only 1% of the actual reactions; Dr. Peter McCullough says it is possible we are looking at 50,000 deaths from the vaccine, not almost 6000.

Medical Academics, Cardiologists, Epidemiologists Are Calling for an Immediate Halt to the Vaccines for Children

Professor Roger Hodgkinson has issued a passionate call for the immediate halting of the vaccine for children, as also has Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi, who has cautioned parents they will be committing a crime by subjecting their children to the vaccine, given the numbers of clotting formation disorders being reported, as well as reports of brain clots and heart inflammation in teens.

Dr. Peter McCullough , a world renowned cardiologist, in a new interview with Reiner Fuellmich, says the vaccines are extremely dangerous for children and teenagers and should be halted immediately, as does Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg, a pulmonary specialist and epidemiologist who says “this is just another coronavirus, there is nothing to be worried about regarding the virus, we know how to deal with it” but cautions “be very worried about the vaccine.”

UK Medical Freedom Alliance Doctors Call Out Devi Shridhar

UK Medical Freedom Alliance has published an open letter to Professor Devi Shridhar, calling her out for her irresponsible and false statements to children, and demanding a public retraction and apology. They point out the main areas of concern in Shridhar’s statements as follows:

“1. You state the benefit of the vaccine for children would be that they then “don’t need to worry about Covid-19”. Children are already in a position where they do not have to worry about Covid-19, as the risk to them is close to zero.

2. You state that another benefit would be that they then are likely to not infect their parents. Children do not play a major role in transmission, and there is also no evidence from the regulatory trials that the vaccines prevent transmission. This is clearly a statement intended to provoke an emotional response of guilt followed by a sense of duty, and as such it is propaganda rather than factual advice.

3. You state that the main downside of getting the vaccine is that it is “another injection into your arm”. This is a gross misrepresentation of the known and unknown risks of potential serious adverse effects of the Covid-19 vaccines for children. We are sure you are aware that the CDC in the US is calling an emergency meeting, specifically to discuss the hundreds of cases of myocarditis that have occurred in young people after the vaccine (https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9672233/The-Latest-WHO-warns-delta-variant-hold-Europe.html).

Life-threatening effects and deaths have been reported in young adults and children in the US and Israel, which you do not refer to at all.”

The doctors penning this letter also direct Devi Shridhar to their earlier letter to MHRA, delineating the many problems with the vaccine, cautioning about lack of knowledge regarding medium and long-term effects, and demanding that the vaccine not be authorized and used on children, which was covered here earlier:

UK Medical Freedom Alliance Sends Urgent Open Letter to the MHRA, Boris Johnson, Matt Hancock, Chris Witty et al to Halt All Plans to Vaccinate Children on Pfizer EUA Immediately Given Mounting Evidence of Vaccine Harm

How is Devi Shridhar Qualified to Reassure Children the Pfizer Vaccine is Safe? She’s Not

It is salutary to note that Devi Shridhar is not a physician herself and has no medical training but has apparently been groomed for a public position as media “Public Health” academic with a D. Phil from Oxford, historically linked to government, media, and intelligence services in the UK, a Rhodes scholarship at 18, and close ties with the globalist coterie running this false pandemic, with an 8-month study of health issues in India through a public health lens and later analysis at Oxford of global health governance by GAVI, the World Bank, the UN, which somehow led to her co-authoring a book with Chelsea Clinton on Global Health Governance, as this painfully-gushy Lancet article reveals.

None of these “global health governance” activities however have conferred a medical or other health qualification on this well-supported Rhodes scholar with Wellcome Trust funding who publishes much on Bill and Melinda Gates’ colonizing of countries whose systems of traditional medicine (including her own ancestrally-connected one, India) have been imperialistically ravaged by Rockefeller pharmaceuticals under guise of “philanthropy” and “global health governance” and are now suffering sterilizing under eugenicist cover, including with the COVID vaccines.

Devi Shridhar is therefore not at all qualified to be issuing public assurances to children or parents regarding the “safety” of what have really proved to be dangerous and death-dealing vaccines.

Several years in University as well both as a student and now a teacher have not helped her either to distinguish truth from lies, it seems.

Dr. Vernon Coleman Issues Blistering Riposte to Devi Shridhar’s False Assurances on Safety of Vaccine: Lies on the BBC WIll Result in Children Dying

In a no-holds barred must-watch video talk, Dr. Vernon Coleman recently called out the same June 8 program where Devi Shridhar, aided by the BBC and propelling the party line which is sending hundreds and thousands of adults to their deaths-by-vaccine, assured the world it was quite alright for children to be pierced with the Death Jab.

Both entertaining and instructive, this video lecture publishes the truth about the numbers of recorded deaths and serious adverse effects, in addition to denouncing Devi Shridhar’s “gold-plated lies.”

Pointing out that the BBC has close ties with the drug industry and is known for rampant deceit, he bemoans the fact that “the BBC is now deliberately lying to children.”

Excerpt:

“Second, Sridhar says this experimental vaccine, which only has a temporary approval let us not forget, is 100% safe for children.

And that is a downright, 100%, solid gold, lie.

And for that lie alone this bloody woman should be hung, drawn quartered, boiled in oil and tarred and feathered.

Sridhar is lying to children who are susceptible and vulnerable and terrified out of their wits by a year of unremitting propaganda.

So, what’s the truth?

The truth is that in America, the data up to the 28th May 2021 for 12 to 17-year-olds shows that there have been 4,740 total adverse events including 117 rated as serious and four reported deaths. Two 15-year-olds died and a 16-year-old and a 17-year-old. Those are the confirmed deaths. There are others not yet confirmed.

And this grinning, ignorant Professor Devi Sridhar of the University of Edinburgh says it’s safe.

Well, you horrid woman, death isn’t safe. Death is final. It means it’s all over. And this experimental jab is safe like being run over by a bus is safe.”

Quick Retraction from the BBC of Shridhar’s “100% Safe and Effective” Statement, Without Public Acknowledgement and Apology

Especially interesting is the fact that the BBC have apparently made a quick retraction of Shridhar’s original statement on air, that the Pfizer vaccines were 100% safe, rewording their verbiage thus:

Correction: This article has been amended to remove a reference by a contributor that the Pfizer vaccine is “100% safe”.

The UK’s Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) has said:

“We have carefully reviewed clinical trial data in children aged 12 to 15 years and have concluded that the Pfizer/BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine is safe and effective in this age group and that the benefits of this vaccine outweigh any risk.

The UKMFA doctors point to this correction, noting:

“We note that the currently accessible version of your statement on Newsround has already been redacted, as you originally claimed 100% safety for the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine.

You must have been aware that declaring any medical intervention100% safe undermines anyone’s credibility.

Editing a feature after it has already been circulated and viewed by huge numbers of the public and children, without a publicized explanation or apology, is highly irregular. The comment at the end of the written transcript, merely noting a correction, will not reach the majority of the audience who have heard and assimilated your initial claim.”

The statements noted by BBC on their website regarding the vaccine are highly questionable, considering the numbers of deaths and adverse reactions being reported on all vaccines including the Pfizer vaccine. Statements reportedly made by the MHRA are as questionable: The MHRA “safety surveillance strategy in place” for children and teens can scarcely be trusted when the safety surveillance strategy for adults in the UK appears to be non-existent: no halting of the vaccines has occurred despite nearly 2000 deaths and thousands of adverse reactions recorded by the Yellow Card Scheme.

It is becoming fairly clear now that if the vaccines are rolled out and children start dying or suffering serious side-effects, the BBC and Professor Devi Shridhar, along with the MHRA and several other medically negligent parties, can be held fully responsible.

Open Letter from the UK Medical Freedom Alliance to Devi Shridhar

The UKMFA Letter to Devi Shridhar is posted below. Visit their website for other Open Letters, resources and information.

In the complete clampdown of vaccine truth by lying media, who have colluded with Big Tech (deplatforming indy media including this writer) to run a “media whiteout” on the critical subject of Vaccine Deaths and Injuries–fully supported by the pharma industry which advertises on their platforms and pays their yacht-club bills–please share this information widely, so it can reach as many as possible on all your social media platforms.

Exposing their lies will inevitably lead to the rise of the truth.

RELATED

UK Medical Freedom Alliance Sends Urgent Open Letter to the MHRA, Boris Johnson, Matt Hancock, Chris Witty et al to Halt All Plans to Vaccinate Children on Pfizer EUA Immediately Given Mounting Evidence of Vaccine Harm

News Panel 20: UK Military Veterans Report High Fraud, Extortion, Aggression from Child Support Agency/Child Maintenance Services Causing Psychological Harm & Suicide

Report & Video Link | Ramola D | May 17, 2021

Veterans from the Royal Air Force, Royal Navy and British Army recently came together on News Panel 20 to report a common factor of concern in their lives during and post retirement from Military Service: a variety of harms from Child Support Agency (CSA) and Child Maintenance Services (CMS) engaging in aggressive collections, false-claims of arrears, wrongful assessments of income, bullying, stonewalling, and harassment. The impact on their lives has been severe, they report, with several veterans reporting exacerbated depression, psychological stress, suicidal feelings, and tragically in the case of Gavin Briggs, a 15-year veteran of the RAF and son of Ian Briggs, also a Royal Air Force veteran, the ultimate destruction of one’s life, suicide.

Insignia of British Army, Royal Navy logo, Graduation day for Royal Air Force cadets

False Claims of Fictitious Arrears and Fraudulent Assessments of Income Lead to Psychological and Mental Health Stresses

A common thread in the accounts is the leveling of false-claims by CMS, demanding sums much in excess of payments these UK dads and veterans had already agreed to pay, and issuing claims of arrears which can only be named fictitious, since they run counter to the facts of payments already made.

What is worse, they report, is the attitude of hostility, avid aggression and outright intimidation and bullying from the personnel at these agencies, who refuse to check records to set right the false-arrear-claims, refuse to act as supportive staff and frequently threaten debt-collection and property-confiscation.

These actions essentially comprise extortion and asset theft, says Brian Hudson, not a veteran himself but also a dad who has run up against CMS, who has started an organization, United Parents, to help UK dads come together and tell their stories as he collects statistics and seeks to find help. Very often, the next step that CMS uses when unable to collect on the high arrears, falsely claimed, is to send a bailiff.

The antagonistic responses and stonewalling of CMS and CSA staff to veterans already battling PTSD and life changes of divorce add to the pressure of the situation and cause mental health breakdowns, veterans report.

Craig Bulman, a former paratrooper with the 2nd Battalion the Parachute Regiment, Red Devils Freefall Team, and the Blues and Royals of the Household Cavalry, who himself reports psychological stress and PTSD from the pursuit of CMS in his case, says CMS only got involved by threatening to withhold benefits from his ex-wife if she did not open a case against him while deceitfully informing Craig she had opened a case. “That caused conflict between us,” says Craig. CMS claimed 4000 pounds in arrears, although he had been paying on private arrangement on his own. All this happened before he set off on an operational tour to Bosnia, he reports, amplifying the stresses on him, which he returned to, when false-claims of 12,000 pounds in arrears were made on him. “As soon as I challenged them they became hostile and militant towards me.” They also enforced unaffordably high payments on him, up to 800 pounds a month, which set off PTSD: “the wheels came off”–as they rendered him homeless. The Parliamentary Health Ombudsman was finally reached and led to CSA admitting culpability and paying 5000 pounds in reparation, a smaller sum than they should have, and nothing to compensate for the long stress. “The government is letting it happen.”

Elite Forces More Frightened of Their Government than Terrorists They Pursue

“Every one of the people here I would venture to state has contemplated the taking of their own lives, due to the way the call-handlers operate,” says Clive Spencer, who interviews veterans at his Youtube channel and has helped bring to light many cases of injustice at the hands of the CSA and CMS.

“We’ve got serving personnel in the most elite forces of the British military who are more frightened of their Government they serve than of the terrorists they pursue–something’s got to change, this is wrong.” Clive reports that he has experienced the loss of several veteran friends to suicide, and the murder of a close friend in the throes of mental health breakdown which was blacked out in the media, which latter led him to work with Craig Bulman in supportive efforts to bring cases to light.

Mark McLeish, in reporting his own case of being slammed with sudden high arrears and removal of funds from his paychecks with 25,000 pounds in claimed-arrears currently likely to be addressed in a tribunal also reports the case of Matt who “went out to the moors and took his own life because they left him with five pence to live on.”

The crushing loss of a parent then to suicide, likely to leave a lasting psychological impact on children, is what CSA helps provide for the children: a macabre irony which needs turning around. CMS and CSA are adversarial and intimidatory about money that is fabricated, note several of the panelists. Mark says, “They’re nasty, they’re taught to be very nasty people, they’re taught to bring you down.”

Writing to MPs and seeking their help has not yielded much. “We’ve got letters back from the MPs and the Cabinet saying there is no problem.”

Suicide of Gavin Briggs Caused by Persecution by Child Maintenance Service Making False Claims Plus Whistle-blowing Retaliation at Work

Ian Briggs, father of Gavin Briggs

Ian Briggs also reports that his own attempts after his son’s demise to consult with MPs and have CMS address the case with him so the truth of his son’s persecution and wrongful arrears and income-assessments could be acknowledged have been met with refusal by MP Theresa Cofee to respond and a minimal response by other MPs only after 7 months of persisting “I badgered him and badgered him and think I finally embarassed him into doing something about it.”

Ian Briggs has also been working to inform the coroner about the CSA where Gavin was wrongfully hit with false-claims of arrears, “which left him with nowhere to go.” Gavin Briggs, the son of Ian Briggs, and Air Force veteran himself, sadly took his own life last summer, hounded by CMS to pay amounts he did not owe and did not have. Ian also reports work stresses at the same time–where Hitachi Trains, Gavin’s employer, had not heeded Gavin’s efforts to change things for the better at work but had instead sought to fire him in retaliation for whistleblowing–something they seemed to have changed now, Ian reports, after his and Gavin’s fiancee’s visit to Hitachi post Gavin’s passing.

Deeper focus on Gavin’s case is provided in this interview with Ian Briggs where he expanded on the story of Gavin’s persecution.

Family Court Frauds Seem to Involve Collusion Between the Lawyers and Judges while “Modern Slavery” Run by CSA & Stealth Tax Benefits the Government

Michelle Young says “In the family court frauds, the lawyers, some of the judges have blood on their hands. It’s time we the people organize to stop this…secrecy in the courts needs to be stopped.” Michelle Young, herself a victim of the family courts and bankruptcy courts suggests a syndicate of attorneys and judges seems to be in operation, permitting numerous irregularities in all Family Court procedures.

The travails of UK mothers whose children are being taken from them while they are wrongfully named mentally unstable or aggressive as their funds are stripped in fraudulent practices of second-loan funding was covered in the very first panel in the Saturday News Panel series and written about here:

UK Mothers Across Socio-Economic Lines Reveal the Crimes, Corruption, and Fraud Rampant in UK Family Courts and Bankruptcy Courts Which Unlawfully Asset-Strip and Defraud Women & Kidnap, Foster, Traffick, and Disappear Their Children and Babies

The criteria for calculation of child support payments comprise income level, number of children and number of days of the week for shared custody of the children, says Brian Hudson, but the CSA seems to be engaging in fraudulent calculations in each case and is making money off their unsubstantiated demands for more from each parent. When parents earn more, they are taxed more–“There is a direct incentive for the government to ensure that each paying parent is under as much financial pressure as possible because in most circumstances they will do whatever is needed to get a higher paying job.” Which may still not be enough.

“The government is benefiting from not utilizing the tax-free allowance from the receiving parent–when you calculate all that, as I’ve done in my report, based on the average paying parent profile, you’re looking at 3.65 billion a year in stealth tax-that the government is pocketing–(taxes from second jobs, property taxes from second homes, etc.) this is an extortion racket which comes from an increase in employer’s insurance (among other stealth fees).”

Brian’s own situation involved a convoluted and fraudulent assessment of “unearned income,” he says, which left him being charged very high amounts, which combined with his ex-wife’s spending to make him lose his company as well as made him homeless and eventually led him to “restraint of trade” where he is unwilling to take up high-paying jobs since he would be charged at a higher level–leading to a situation of modern slavery, he says.

“Some dads are so desperate to make their basic costs that they are committing crime to pay the CMS these fictitious arrears, it’s encouraging desperate acts–they are driven to such despair that they might harm themselves or someone else…you wouldn’t treat dogs this way.” The CMS is able to extort in this fashion through self-created permissions. “They have written regulations which allow them to do it, to defraud someone.”

Hundreds of thousands of paying parents in the UK are subjected to these situations, he says, with case numbers doubling in the last five years, despite lower birth and divorce rates. Spouses also fabricate claims, he suggests. “Sixty percent of claiming parents are claiming domestic abuse to waive the 20-pound application fee–and that’s ridiculous.”

The phenomenon of the “deadbeat dad” as well seems to have been created and talked up in media against the bankrupting and impoverishing, not to mention psychological traumatizing of the hundreds and thousands of engaged fathers who do care for their children and are actively engaged in their welfare, support, and raising past divorce.

Estimated 90% of UK Family Court Judges Have Partnerships in Law Firms and Get Dividends from the Raiding of Family Estates Which Means This is Collusion and Racketeering on a Grand Scale

Social dysfunction is being created through the family courts and the CSA, notes Brian Hudson, and almost every ill in society could be traced back to them. “This industry doesn’t seem to want to fix problems but seems to want to perpetuate them–because the careers require that. Family law solicitors are making hugely inflated incomes through raiding family estates. It’s estimated that family court judges –90% of them have partnerships in law firms–this is a clear conflict of interest.”

What this translates to is that judges “want as much dysfunction as possible because the law firm you have shares in gives you dividends, you benefit from it, plus you’re getting 150-200 grand a year from listening to parents squabble all day.”

This situation has transpired, he suggests because the Ministry of Justice allows it, since the progression is usually from lawyer to barrister to judge or to MP–“20% of Parliament are former lawyers.”

Michelle Young points out this is huge information since what was not exposed in News Panel 1 with the UK mothers where the subject of judge and lawyer collusion was discussed “is that 90% of the court judges are involved in the law firms. How are you supposed to go in there and get justice–they’re colluding. It’s racketeering. ” (Brian Hudson notes this is an estimate, he cannot exactly cite sources, but the judge-lawfirm connection seems to be widespread.)

Brian reports a statement made by the President of the Family Division on Radio Four saying the rise in cases was a “head-scratcher.” “It’s not a head-scratcher, ” he counters, “it’s plainly obvious what the problems are.”

The System Also Incentivizes Fabrications of Domestic-Abuse Claims, Report Veterans

This industry would not even exist, notes Brian Hudson, if pre-nuptial separation contracts and laws on mandatory joint-custody with needed-evidence for any domestic-abuse-claims were instituted. “This industry has been created–if there were no incentive for parental alienation, it would stop overnight.” But it has all become an industry now, which permits fraud.

Also notable, says Brian is the fact that 88% of British divorcing parents turn to Family Court–while only 2% do so in Sweden, for instance, and there is a huge incentive also for false-allegations of domestic abuse; he reports he has seen documents in a certain case where the lawyer is grooming the divorcing spouse to make invented claims of domestic abuse.

Triggered PTSD, Mental Health Breakdowns, Lowered Productivity, Dropping Jobs, Suicide are the Outcomes

Mark Appleby

Mark Appleby reports that he was paying 33% in child support for a child succeeding a one-night stand in Germany with a British citizen, which he lowered to 15% on an army official’s advice, after which CSA pursued him for years for arrears, making him homeless.

His debt was transferred to debt collection services, Cabot Financial and Evershed, he says, and constant pressure led to mental breakdowns and working overseas. It’s easier for him now to live modestly off his war pension and savings and not get a job, he says, because of fear that CSA will “hammer him for 40% of his wage.” He also says he has never seen his child who is now 18 and has paid 22,000 pounds to date; she did not let him see the child and at this point he is in a new relationship with two children and does not wish to have any connection with that family any more. “Better for my mental health not to make money and risk being pursued again by CSA.”

Making money made him also a target, says Brian Hudson, and he wishes to be a target no more. This is a widespread and under-reported problem, he says. “The Government, industry, Press won’t take it on–the rate of growth in this industry suggests this will keep happening.” He believes it will happen to the next generation of young men, “even to my son who is 9 now.” The cost paid by society in the psychological harm caused to fathers, especially in cases of suicide, is extreme. “Ripples caused to family and friends extend and it’s obscene–suicide deeply impacts everyone…I would rather be poor and not targeted.”

“There are about 500,000 or so paying parents now, under the Child Maintenance Service–quite a number of them would have been pretty bloody productive and they’re being much less productive, because they’re like, what’s the point? So while they are extracting money on one side, they’re losing money in potential productivity of all those people on the other side. So it’s a false-economy anyway and downright crime against humanity,” say Brian, while Clive Spencer points out “they still make their money.”

Several other anomalies such as records being found to be in Belfast, Northern Ireland while veterans have served in the UK conflicts with Northern Ireland cause veterans concern.

PTSD and Being Pushed to Suicide Don’t Slow CMS Harassment & Fraud

Leonard Lawrence, a pilot with the Royal Air Force who has flown UK & Irish Prime Ministers and the Royal Family reveals a case of asset theft–his million-dollar home seized as well as simultaneous persecution for invented high sums of money by the Family Courts, Department of Work and Pensions, Revenue and Customs, and an arbitrary investigation opened on him by the London Met Police, exacerbating PTSD and causing great stress. He reports he was saved from the Mental Health Act being used against him through the intercession of a chief constable in the Security Services, as well as Wing Commander Professor Turnbull, “a world authority on PTSD at RAF,” and the Attorney-General Geoffrey Cox who helped with his case and gave him the legal process for CPS to set his case aside.

Leonard reveals also that he learned later from a police whistleblower that he had been deliberately targeted for all this harassment including with false investigations by a solicitor in the High Courts to stop his case from going to the Court of Appeals. Court of Protection certificates had been used to hold him for 1.5 years–none with a court seal–and despite Professor Turnbull’s report for him assessing PTSD over 20 years, “what Helen Cliff, the government lawyer did was obtain another report” on him, without reference to his being held on the basis of the false Court of Protection certificates.

In the UK, taking court action against agencies or MPs usually unleashes Mental Health Act frauds on people, Len reports, which is used to marginalize and disappear people via imprisonment, asset theft or both.

The issue of Order of Protection certificates not really having the proper court seals or an audit trail points to deception which can be exposed, says Michelle Young. “I think the whole system is such a scam–on the bankruptcy documents there are no proper seal stamps–we need to investigate all our documents to show these are fraudulent documents, they are asset-stripping us,” she says.

Tony Booth reveals that he too like many other veterans was falsely charged with high amounts for the support of a child from his first marriage even after his ex-wife’s death when, peculiarly enough, he was asked to pay the ex-wife’s partner as the executor of her estate, which funds his daughter later revealed had never reached her. CMS had in fact raised the amount he was due and refused to listen when he tried to address the figures, so he “just paid,” after they “laughed in his face,” enduring hardship with his second family where the children had to stint given lack of available parental income. The people at CMS also seemed to threaten him and reveal their larceny at one point, saying “Just pay up or we’ll raise the amount.” The situation at many times was so stressful, including the false-charge of a suspended prison sentence, that Tony, who reports being diagnosed with PTSD, confesses he was suicidal at one point. He was asked to pay 800 pounds a month which was a huge drain on his resources. “I’m a truck driver not a bank manager.” It was Clive Spencer and Craig Bulman who helped him (after he met them) with speaking to CMS, he says, who also falsely accused him that he had not told them about a second relationship, which he had–a situation which should have affected the support payments they calculated. Tony is currently working to regain some of the false arrears he had been forced to pay earlier.

Mark Pryce

Mark Pryce notes that “For every one of us, there’s 30-40 guys who have fallen by the wayside. We are still fighting–but there’s numbers who don’t have the gumption or fortitude, who have given in to the bullies at CMS. We are lots of us ex-Service personnel, trying to put ourselves at the front, to protect everyone else. We still have that cape on our backs, we want to jump into fires–but there’s 30-40 guys who can’t take this, who have fallen behind us. We’ve got to get everyone together.”

“I agree, and we have to get the men and the women together — this is about a system,” says Michelle Young.

Mark Pryce responds,”The system is disgusting– if all of us get together we could move mountains. But get together cohesively and then we can do something.”

“We need to march on Parliament”, says Mark Macleish, “all of us.”

Private companies such as SERCO and Capita Services have been found to be behind CMS, says Clive Spencer.

Ian Briggs notes that as Mark Pryce points out there are high numbers of people who simply pay the false arrears demanded by CMS “because there is nowhere for them to turn to and no-one will listen to them.”

“People are forced out of work, do not pay tax and Government is paying for their benefits–which means Government is out of pocket in this way; every suicide causes the Government 1.7 million pounds,” says Craig Bulman. Brian Hudson notes that all Government policies are driven by particular people–“it is career-driven corruption, and in family law, individuals are directly financially benefiting.” He also notes “they must know what this does to people so you have to ask do they want this dysfunction–no-right minded people would like to see this harm–and if they had been concerned they would have remedied it instead of letting it go for 20 years.”

Clive Spencer reminds all the Queen has said government officials are also not above the law.

Mark Pryce, a 12 year Army veteran, notes that he was subjected to false allegations of domestic abuse in the case of his divorce, as well as false-allegations of child abuse of his 1-year-old child and other allegations–127 allegations, he says–which were all later found to be false reports. The harassment led to a mental breakdown, he says, well beyond anything he saw in the Army; he could not focus on work in his small business or function, he had to close it down. In 2010, after his company was closed, CMS estimated the company was worth half a million pounds and he was charged 9000 pounds in arrears. This figure was held against him for years and he says they wanted to get an Order for Sale for his own property. In 2011 he was able to see his daughter with a Contact Order; in 2018/19, false-arrears persecution started up again; Craig helped him with his case and finally in November 2019, the court agreed the figures were fictitious; CMS told the mother she had lost the case and would not get the 9000 pounds or the house; in 3 months, the mother stopped him seeing his daughter, they are back in court now to fight the alienation from his daughter.

Mark Pryce reports he is especially disappointed that the British Army has let him down, with no support. Promises of a house in three months dissolved to nothing. “We have a justice system,” notes Clive, “where you are innocent until proven guilty, but as Mark says, in this CMS system you are guilty until you prove yourself innocent.”

Solicitors would not touch his case, reports Mark, not even Legal Aid–not one would trust him against the CSA, or CMS. Ian notes that no-one will take on the CMS, and in Gavin Briggs’ case, it also means the coroner is unheedful. “They’re shutting all the doors., and the coroner won’t listen to the evidence.”

Michelle Young suggests building a database of everyone’s cases and information so that it becomes more evident which judges, which lawyers, which law firms are involved, and then run class action lawsuits.

“We Served Our Country–We Don’t Deserve This”

As this powerful panel of testimonials drew to a close, several overarching sentiments were aired.

“We served our country,” says Mark McLeish. “We don’t deserve this. We don’t deserve to be penalized–we don’t owe this money. Why is it so many veterans are being penalized like this?”

Mainstream media does not cover this situation or these cases, notes Craig Bulman. “We have Special Forces now more frightened of the CMS than special tours–Armed Forces are easy targets for CMS–and it affects operational effectiveness.” A wing commander he knows “doing an operation sortie had to cancel his sortie because he could not function” because of CSA being after him, causing high stress.

More than Services, it’s a lot of people working for Government in other ways who are being gypped, notes Clive.

All suggest the system needs tearing down and reform, and Michelle Young suggests “we need to get rid of the head of the snake” while focusing on the Constitution and Bill of Rights and compelling public servants to serve the people, as they are bound to do.

“Police and Service personnel need to come together,” says Clive, “because Govt acts to stop the Common Law route.”

Closing out the show, Clive issues a call to all viewing Servicemen and fathers facing similar travails to connect. “There’s always light at the end of the tunnel, you need to connect, if anyone is out there in a bad place–get in touch, talk to someone, it is only when you talk that there is hope.”

Anyone viewing this panel who finds themselves in similar circumstances and keen to connect with this group and others may write to j4gav.briggs@gmail.com. Please visit Justice 4 Gavin Briggs, stay tuned for further coverage.

RAMOLA D REPORTS | NEWS PANEL 20 | REPORT 246: UK FATHERS AND VETERANS REPORT PSYCH WARFARE, CHILD SUPPORT AGENCY CRIMES/Co-Hosted with Michelle Young

WATCH AT BRIGHTEON: News Panel 20/Brighteon

WATCH AT BITCHUTE: News Panel 20/Bitchute

WATCH AT ODYSEE: News Panel 20/Odysee

WATCH AT AHAVA 528: News Panel 20/Ahava 528

(Please subscribe to these channels so you’ll be automatically apprised of new podcasts posted there. Subscribe at Ahava528 for notification of Livestreams.)

RELATED:

Neelu Berry/Mass Remedy Process | Notice to Greater London Lord Lieutenant of Election Frauds to Deny Mass Remedies to the Citizens of the UK

 Notice | Neelu Berry | 12-16-2019

2019 12 16 Notice to Greater London Lord Lieutenant of Election Frauds to deny Mass Remedies to the Citizens of the UK

On Behalf of Millions of Aggrieved Whistleblowers and their supporters
being subjected to State Terrorism by the
Organised Crime Network hijacking all Public Services in the UK
Neelu Berry Chaudhari
Private Investigator for Mass Remedy Process of the
Equity Monarchy Trusts for the Crown and Lord Bishops and the Royal Commissions, managed by
Equity Lawyer Edward William Ellis
of no fixed abode
c/o XXX

The Lord-Lieutenant of Greater London,
Sir Kenneth Olisa OBE,
Lieutenancy Office
Gwydyr House
Whitehall
SW1A 2NP020 7270 0412

info@greaterlondonlieutenancy.com

To Thomas Chan Deputy Lieutenant Redbridge,

Dear Lord-Lieutenant of Greater London, Sir Kenneth Olisa OBE, https://greaterlondonlieutenancy.com/:

I write to you after 19 years of persecutions, to deny remedy, following my whistleblowing of high death rates, torture and mutilation of babies in the NHS (1), by the Health professional and regulatory bodies, Police, Coroner, Redbridge Council, Bexley Council, Greenwich Council, Hampstead Police, City of London Police, and Greater London Police, to conspire to terrorise me, deny me benefits, impoverish me and steal my home worth £700,000 (2). My family, friends and I have been falsely prosecuted, terrorised, subjected to Mental Health Frauds (3) and made homeless by Redbridge Council despite Notices to Cease & Desist issued to the CEO Andy Donald, Leader of the Council, Jas Athwal. Other family members murdered within the NHS.

There are many other whistleblowers who have been made homeless with theft of assets, homes, businesses, savings and children. The Whistleblowers are still in captivity in prisons and mental health secure units in Greater London and the rest of the UK. Millions of children are stolen from loving parents to be groomed in UK State Care for the Global Criminal Empire.

Equity Lawyer, Edward William Ellis has been managing the Mass Remedy Process of the Equity Monarchy Trusts for the Crown and Lord Bishops and the Royal Commissions. The Attorney General and the Government Law Department have made further formal threats of false prosecutions to myself and him for our contributions to that process. It is a National and Global State of Emergency until all political prisoners are freed and whistleblowers protected, given remedies and compensated so they may stand for elections.

Neelu Berry Chaudhari

Private Investigator for Mass Remedy Process of the Equity Monarchy Trusts for the Crown and Lord Bishops and the Royal Commissions managed by Equity Lawyer Edward William Ellis

(1) http://sunaina2007.tripod.com

UK Organ Scandal: Baby Sunaina body taken from UK to India

(2) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6hUUgi2GVmY

20 July 2018: 1 of 2 UK STATE TERRORISM STEALING homes of CHILD PROTECTORS

(3) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aInJJ3X7Yss

26 June 2019: Camera 1 Mental Health Fraud 6th attempt with Tazer on Equity Lawyer Mr Ellis on CCTV

 

START see attached documents and text of first document dated 8th Dec below

Crown Parliament The People v Corrupt MPs + Top Judges Mass Remedies
Court of Appeal Citizen Ms Berry v State + Bank Fraud Appeals 2018 0307 + 2325 + 2477
Court of Appeal Citizen Mr Cant v Mr Seton Protection Denial Fraud Appeal 2019 1483
Court of Appeal Citizens Mr Awodiya v Party Leaders + State + Media Election Fraud Appeals 2019 0563 + 2700
High Court Citizen Mr Yediali v Buyers + State Frauud Claims QB 2019 003741 + 3984
Crown Court Citizen Mr Pead v State Restraint Trial Fraud 2017 0417
Crown Court Citizen Mr Paterson v State Protection Breach Contempt Frauds
Benefits Agency Citizen Mrs Can Say v State Benefits Entitlement Investigation JR940425B
Magistrates Court Citizen Mrs Smith v Party Leaders + State Family Sabotage Fraud + Child Identity Theft
Citizen Mr Mustafa v Cheshire Police Mental Health Fraud + Custody Fraud

Remedy Process + Office Unfitness Cases + Parliament Session File + Business Theft Interview Event Report

8th December 2019

Criminal Witness Statement of Citizen Mr Yediayli + Citizen Interpreter Mr Can Say of 83 Priory Gardens, Highgate London N6 5QU

It is on 2 pages signed by me. It is true to the best of my knowledge and belief and I make it knowing that, if it is tendered in evidence I shall be liable to prosecution if I have willfully stated anything, which I know to be false, or do not believe to be true.

Page 1 of 1

From: Equity Lawyer Mr Edward William Ellis To: Privy Council President Mr Jacob Rees Mogg
Parliament Session File Arrangements+ Business Theft Complaint Interview Event Report

On 9th October 2019 Citizen Mr Bayram Yediayli made a Business Theft Complaint. The Complaint Statement Interview was arranged for 15.00 on Complaint Day 59, which was Saturday 7th December 2019.

Citizen Complainant Mr Yediayli and Citizen Interpreter Mr Can Say and Equity Lawyer Edward Ellis attended. The Equity Lawyer gave Metropolitan Police Officer Ms Newton a Short Remedy Process Briefing, a Case Background Briefing, a Day 59 Case Progress Briefing, notice of the Integrity Test of High Court Justices planned for Monday 9th December 2019 and the following documents:

3/12/2019 Parliament Session File Notice to the Chingford Candidates
Parliament Session File Arrangements DRAFT Claim Form if the Chingford Candidates

5/12/2019 Parliament Session Filing Denial Fraud Notice to Privy Councillor Mr Iain Duncan Smith + Chingford Candidates

6/1/2019 Fraud Notices from Equity Lawyer to Privy Councillors and Lord Lieutenants

6/12/2019 Parliament Session Filing Denial Fraud Papers Schedule

7/12/2019 Business Theft Remedy Application Notice of Citizen Mr Yediayli as an Integrity Test of High Court Justices

7/12/2019 Business Theft + Corruption Claim Briefing for Citizen Mr Yediayli

7/12/2019 Chronology + Documents Schedule for Citizens Mr Say and Mr Yediayli

The Equity Lawyer explained the Chingford Candidates were chosen for the Parliament Session File Arrangements Notice because Mr Iain Duncan Smith was one of them. In 2003, as Opposition Leader, he used the Quiet Man Speech to give notice of Dictator Powers and Accountability Failures.

The Equity Lawyer explained that Honest Officers have serviced the Remedy Process. He explained QC MP Mr Keith Vaz had for 9 years served the Remedy Process as Parliament Committee Chairman. When Mrs May got office as Prime Minister he committed Reputation Suicide to evidence that a Committee Chairman was no longer able to manage Effective Accountability.

Metropolitan Police Officer Ms Newton listened with Intelligent Interest, accepted the Case Papers and agreed to make a Case Reference to Superior Officers.

Attached Documents

2019 12 06 Remedy Process + Election Fraud Appeals 2019 0563 + 2700 Parliament Session File Denial Fraud Papers of Citizen Mr Awodiya v State

2019 12 05 Remedy Process + Office Unfitness Cases + Parliament Session Filing Denial Fraud Notice from Equity Lawyer to Privy Counsellor + Chingford Candidates

2019 12 03 Remedy Process + Office Unfitness Cases + Parliament Session File of Equity Lawyer v Chingford Candidates

2019 12 03 Parliament Session Filing Arrangements Claim Form of Parliamentary Candidates v Director of Public Prosecutions n1-eng

2019 12 08 Remedy Process + Office Unfitness Cases + Parliament Session File + Business Theft Interview Event Report from Equity Lawyer to Privy Council President

2019 12 07 Remedy Process + Office Unfitness Cases + Fraud Cases Brief Explanation for Citizen Mr Yediayli v Liable Parties

2019 12 06 Remedy Process + Fraud Appeals 2019 0563 + 2700 + Fraud Notices to Privy Counsellors + Lord Lieutenants

Related:

BREAKING: Mass Corruption Remedy Process in UK at Breakthrough Moment, Citizen Input Needed | Mr. Edward Ellis Informs the Privy Council President, Mr. Jacob Rees Mogg

 

While Paris Protests, European Union Court of Justice Reverses EAW Ruling in GcMAF Scientist Lynda Thyer’s Case in Contravention of European Human Rights Law Under Treaty

News Report | Ramola D | December 14, 2019

The promising ruling earlier last week declaring the European Arrest Warrant (EAW) used in Lynda Thyer’s extradition case null and void because it had been issued by a French Prosecutor rather than a judge “after an amazing, Oscar-award-worthy courtroom argument made by (lawyer) Chloé Arnoux,” according to attorney Scot Tips, was reversed in Friday the 13th’s hearing in Paris, in contravention, many note, of the base requirements of the European Court of Human Rights and the Nice and Lisbon Treaties.

Image: National Health Federation

By all counts, Lynda Thyer, as also David Noakes, CEO, Immuno BioTech, have been wrongfully prosecuted in the UK by the MHRA, UK’s regulatory body, falsely claiming their curing of cancer and autism patients with supplementation of a naturally-occurring bodily protein GcMAF was accomplished with an unlicensed substance, mischaracterized in propaganda coverage as a “quack remedy” while hard scientific evidence exists of its efficacy. While hundreds of cancer patients in the UK wait for GcMAF to become available in NHS hospitals, the OCLAESP, the French regulatory body has busied itself in responding to the MHRA’s efforts to protect the pharmaceutical industry by making false charges on both Ms. Thyer and Mr. Noakes, and issuing an extradition European Arrest Warrant on the words of a prosecutor.

Scott Tips, President of the National Health Federation and attorney notes:

The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) based in Strasbourg, France has repeatedly ruled that such arrest warrants are illegal and invalid. Yet, tone deaf to the ECHR, the EU Court of Justice has ignored such precedent and all obvious legal morality in deciding that such warrants were indeed valid.

            This means that now both David and Lyn will have to defend on the facts — which are still hugely in their favor — instead of being able to get the case thrown out on a legal technicality, which would have been quicker and easier, and less expensive to our NHF Legal Team, led in court by the formidable lawyer Chloé Arnoux.

Lyn Thyer, whose release from prison after wrongful prosecution, extradition, and incarceration in horrific conditions was reported here earlier, appeared before Judge Jean-Luc Gadaud on Friday despite continuing protests on Paris streets for interrogation (which the judge cancelled since the translator had not been able to navigate filled streets to get to court) while her lawyers filed a motion to keep her from being sent back to prison.

Image: National Health Federation

The French Court of Appeals is now set to hear and decide the continued appeal from the French Government in her case on Monday, December 16. Scott Tips is hopeful the Court will honor the motion filed and be “loath to send Lyn Thyer back to prison” even as he concludes “it is highly likely that this Court of Appeals will also disregard the European Court of Human Rights and follow instead the EUCJ decision upholding French prosecutorial arrest warrants.”

All EU Member States Must Abide By European Convention of Human Rights

Scott Tips writes:

“In the opinion of several knowledgeable legal commentators, the December 12th ruling by the EU Court of Justice really has no effect on the 2008 and 2010 rulings (Affaire Medvedyev Et Autres vs. France, Requête No. 3394/03) made by the European Court of Human Rights, as both the EUCJ and the EU must abide by the Lisbon and Nice Treaties that hold at their constitutional core the European Convention of Human Rights” to which all EU member states must abide. The legal precedent, which clearly stated that the French public prosecutor was not a judicial authority and therefore not entitled to issue any such arrest warrants, was lawfully decided by the European Court of Human Rights and is a mandatory ruling for the EUCJ. Therefore, yesterday’s EUCJ decision is not only illegal and unconstitutional but violates the very treaties upon which the EU has been constructed. To these commentators, the first French judge’s ruling in the Thyer case absolutely still stands.

It appears now to be a battle between the universal human rights espoused by the European Court of Human Rights, on the one hand, and the unbridled corporatism espoused through the European Court of Justice. Put another more legalistic way, it is now a battle to see which legal precedents rule over which and which of the two courts will have the final say. The fight over the legal validity of the undemocratic prosecutorial arrest warrants is by no means over. And it will be interesting to see how the French Court of Appeals in Paris rules on this matter on Monday afternoon, December 16th.”

Scot Tips, NHF:
BREAKING NEWS on GcMAF SCIENTIST LYNDA THYER &
GcMAF EXECUTIVE DAVID NOAKES CASES

Please visit the National Health Federation for more background and details on this story. Also subscribe at Youtube to Ramola D Reports for breaking news updates at Newsbreak.

RELATED:

BREAKING: Lynda Thyer Released From French Prison in Landmark Ruling on EAW Signed By Prosecutor Found Illegal; Neelu Berry Reports on Global Corporate Implications in GcMAF Cancer & Autism Cure

Emergency Appeal: GcMAF Cancer Cure Scientist Lynda Thyer in Danger of Dying in French Prison, Urgent Action Needed

Mr. Edward Ellis, Equity Lawyer, Reports the Launch of a Mass Corruption Remedy Process in the United Kingdom and Calls for Principled Independents and Empowered Citizens to Step Forward

–Ramola D/Posted 5/3/2019

In a series of explicatory conversations at Ramola D Reports over the past few weeks, the third being Report #128 livestreamed on Tuesday evening, April 30, and at Sean Maguire’s Out of the Bag podcast, Mr. Edward Ellis, an Equity Lawyer in the tradition of a small minority of 60 Equity Lawyers (once numbering 6000) in England guarding the flame of Truth, Honesty, and Justice through management of the Equity Monarchy Trusts, reports the cornerstone launch of a Mass Corruption Remedy Process in the UK, one he has been working on, he says, mostly alone but with others behind the scenes and a few by his side, for over 15 years, through the course of much change in both the US and UK, where the recent change of guard in terms of US Presidents has not disrupted the process with both Mr. Obama and Mr. Trump supporting the Remedy Process.

Corruption Remedy Process Seeks to Halt Dictatorships

What this process addresses is nothing less than the advance of totalitarianism upheld by entrenched corruption in UK courts, government and Parliament, he reports. The Corruption Remedy Process seeks to oust the underhand reach of the vast organized crime syndicate responsible for the longstanding general abuse of powers across the spectrum where citizens are stripped of basic human rights, and retaliation against whistleblowers in every sphere, with confiscation of homes, children, and vehicles, and imposition of censorship and limitations on citizens’ free speech and activism by an over-reaching Dictator State has become an egregious norm.

Indeed, Edward Ellis notes that the proof that the UK is a Dictatorship stems from “in particular, the persecution of whistleblowers who have witnessed State Terrorism” who have called attention to their cases but been denied State Protection.

How the Dictator State has become rooted in the UK, he suggests dates back to 45 years ago when the Equity Monarchy Trusts fell into disuse through the politicians’ establishment of the European Constitution and when nothing less than Election Fraud sealed the British Referenda Acceptance of the EU Constitution. By obtaining proof of this election fraud in 2004, Mr. Ellis revived use of the Equity Monarchy Trusts, which “started a Corruption Remedy Process that has continued for 15 years.”

Equity Law and the Equity Monarch Trusts Offer Corrective Measure

Recognizing that it was going to fall on his generation to use the legacy of knowledge Equity lawyers held, to definitively address corruption, Edward explains in his third interview Report # 128, how he chose to abandon an earlier intention to run for Parliament from his home county of Northern Shrophire to focus instead on the larger and more pressing matter of addressing wide-scale corruption and criminality in the UK.

In his first interview, Report #124, Edward reached deep into UK history, pre- and post the establishment of Roman Catholicism, the Papacy and the Vatican to trace how the gifts of intelligence, leadership, and morality of the gnostic Christians who traveled to the UK have been preserved to this day in Equity Lawyers and will ultimately make the difference in swinging the world back to remedying corruption.

Because the Equity Monarch Trusts—a powerful means of correction extant always behind the facade of ongoing Government, and now being invoked– govern Parliament session powers, he says much has already come out of it, starting with the removal of Mr. Blair in 2006, after he engaged in Extradition Fraud of Mr. Ellis’s business partner who had invented a foolproof means of securing Advanced Electronic Signatures to benefit citizens rather than permit this to become a tool for control and dominance, for instance over people’s bank balances or free exchange of goods, services, and money by the Dictator State; this technological effort to protect Citizen Powers, just when they were in line to get 5 or 6 opening contracts which would prime demand for further sales was quelled by Mr. Blair and the underground organized-crime network clamping down on it, although everything was in place at the time to make the technology available also to other countries.

The ways by which the inventor was framed and wrongfully implicated in a drug deal by using his address as a decoy address for drug trafficking, thence arrested and jailed and extradited, with many unlawful acts committed along the way including permitting Dutch police to come onto British soil to make arrests, were unearthed and traced back by Mr. Ellis and his team to top levels in British government, including Mr. Blair. “I got the Corruption Proof and served a Corruption Notice on the Crown and Parliament, and revived use of the Equity Monarchy Trusts, and from that time on, Blair was doomed.”

Prime Ministers Apprised of the Corruption Remedy Process

In 2006 the choice for Prime Minister Mr Blair was to sign a 10-Month retirement Notice or face a Parliament Session Refusal and Forced General Election with Mass Publicity for the Corruption Proof and Remedy Denial Fraud Proof. He signed the Retirement Notice.” Mr. Blair offered to retire but apparently did not repudiate his partners in crime—the powerful organized crime syndicate which supported him—and “spent the rest of his time in office making Protection Fraud Arrangements in the hope they would last his lifetime.” Part of the deals made with these unseen parties, Edward reports, included the Peace Envoy to the Middle East position that he enjoyed post his retirement as Prime Minister.

The Corruption Remedy Process continued during Mr Gordon Brown’s reign as Prime Minister. “In 2007, the choice for Prime Minister Mr Brown was to accept the Corruption Remedy Conditions in the Parliament Session Agreement or face a Forced General Election. He tried to resist, lost confidence, and signed. Organised Crime controlled the Labour Governing Majority. He had no hope of performing the Remedy Conditions. The result was a Remedy Failure Finding, Unfitness Finding and Dismissal Priority Finding against him and the Labour Majority. The 2009 Expense Account Scandals were used to execute it.”

Citizens Have Corruption Control Jurisdiction

Corruption and crime in government can through Equity be addressed by citizens who are empowered by natural rights under Common Law or Equity Governance, Mr. Ellis notes, to investigate instances of corruption, and activate the Remedy Process whereby a mass general election can be forced and new principled candidates selected to replace the corrupt ones. “The Citizen, Crown and Lord Bishops have Corruption Control Jurisdictions that govern parliament Session Powers. The Citizen has Investigation Jurisdiction. The Crown has Prosecution Jurisdiction. The 24 Lord Bishops have Adjudication Jurisdiction. Up to 12 Lord Bishops sit as Trial Jurors. Up to 12 Different Lord Bishops sit as Appeal Jurors. Nothing happens until the Citizen gets Corruption Proof. The action starts when the Citizen does get Corruption Proof.”

This Corruption Proof is provided when people and whistleblowers in the community step forward to reveal criminality and corruption wreaked against them under cover of official action or misuse of authority; the collecting of all their cases as evidence of corruption and fraud of various kinds permits the Remedy process to posit a collection of documented claims as a first step in addressing the corruption. Over the past 15 years, Mr. Ellis has been collecting people’s cases; these include cases of child removal by the State, or foreclosure on homes, or confiscation of property such as vehicles. Not all of these cases can find remedy today, he says, since some of these children have aged out of the foster system into which they were wrongfully subsumed, but the effort of seeking remedy for all is still a valuable one.

In all, the power of the Citizen to exert critical enquiry and claim rightful jurisdiction over investigation of government corruption and complaint as well as to make reasoned choices over structures of government such as staying in the EU is significant. “Politicians misjudged the influence it had. It was a Significant Influence that got the Leave Decision from the Brexit Referenda.”

Citizens Need to Empower Themselves, Study Common Law, Make Claims, Run for Office
Yet citizens will not achieve much if they do not gain the mindset of being empowered and recognizing they can indeed act to make changes in their local Councils or governments. Such empowerment would come from reading, studying and understanding the Common Law and Equity Governance, recognizing their innate rights and taking action to express their grievances in the form of a claim so that the Remedy Process involving the Crown and Lord Bishops can proceed with findings of Unfitness against the corrupt MPs and councilmen, and citizens can endorse new candidates in a forced general election. What is needed indeed are people of integrity in communities stepping forward to run in every constituency in order to bring an end to the fascist hold on communities by corrupt candidates and syndicates.

The Forced General Election will flush a lot out in a short time. The Remedy Process needs Independent Candidates in every constituency who at short notice can be Substitute Candidates for Discredited Candidates of the Major Political Parties. The Independent Candidates will need Credible Policies.” Adam Mustafa, an Independent Candidate in the Council Elections is currently doing Election Research in a trial run, says Mr. Ellis, to discover how the Media and Voters respond to an Election Campaign for Equity Governance using the Equity Monarchy Trusts and the Common Law against Dictator Governance using the European Constitution. Then this “Equity Governance Policy” can be used as a “Core Policy.” The Independents will have to apply it as relevant for local voters.

Replacement Candidates, Media Coverage, and Caretaker Prime Minister

Not ruled out either are independent candidates from the existing political parties, who are invited to make the change and present viable replacement candidates for the soon-to-be-discredited MPs.

Mainstream media journalists, Mr. Ellis notes, although not yet covering this matter currently have been cautiously expressing cognizance of Mr. Ellis’s equity Remedy work by beginning to use the language of decrying “corruption” and emphasizing “citizen” rights as opposed to previous focus on “public interest” alone.

Remarkably his proposition and wording of deploying a “Caretaker Prime Minister”appears to have caught on and has been mentioned in mainstream media, indicating their awareness of the Corruption scandal. “We might even reach the stage where there is a short session of Parliament with a caretaker prime minister to enable the parties to organize themselves because the prime minister and the opposition leader have both been involved in the protection frauds.“

For journalists to maintain their profile and reputation through the upcoming changes, Mr. Ellis suggests, they will have to start covering the new candidates running on principled platforms and seeking to set right historic wrongs.

Honorable Officers versus Corrupt Officers and Courts

Corruption in the current government has come under scrutiny. “In 2017 the choice for Prime Minister Mrs May was to call a Surprise General Election or face a Forced General Election. The Corruption Remedy Conditions needed an Election Free Period to enable a Long Session for Remedy Management. The Corrupt Officers had many chances to choose between Remedy Co-operation and Continuing Corruption.”

Honorable professionals at every level stepped forward to support the Corruption Remedy process. This is a point Edward stressed in Reports 124, 125, and 128, that many in Government, including the British Secret Services currently recognize the advanced state of decay and out-of-control totalitarianism in the UK government and courts and have sought to help by providing confirmation of corruption from the inside.

“Ordinary Officers deserted the Corruption Controllers. The result is Proof Sets that validate the Forced General Election with Mass Publicity for the Corruption Proof. Some of the Honourable MPs believe they need a Forced General Election for Remedy Management against the Law Professions and Law Courts.”

UK Government Actions Against Julian Assange

The current UK government action against Wikileaks founder and whistleblowing journalist Julian Assange of dramatic public removal from the Ecuadorian Embassy, arrest and incarceration, under clouds of Extradition threat, which got underway directly after Mr. Ellis’s first conversation where he spoke about the Extradition Fraud Mr. Blair had enacted, is one that appears to have media and celebrity spotlight associated with it. “I don’t know if Mr. Assange has committed any crime,” says Mr. Ellis, making reference to the leaks of classified material Wikileaks has put out (while protecting its government sources), but in case of extradition or a call for same, he cautions Mr. Trump to wait to see what the UK government does, which at time of writing appears to be the extraordinary conviction (for jumping bail) of 50 weeks or a near-year in prison, before he issues any action on the matter if he does.

While he has stated he has not contacted Julian Assange or further intervened, Mr. Ellis notes that “any whistleblowers imprisoned in false prosecutions will be subjected to Immediate Release on Grounds of the evidence of State Dictatorships and State Terrorism against Whistleblowers.”

Next Step is to Empower Leaders and Top Activists to Move from Protest to Remedy

Mr. Ellis calls for Remedy publicity and further coverage by media in the UK and online so that people may learn about what is happening and step forward in their own counties and councils as people of integrity offering new and principled platforms and campaigns. The next step, he says, is to empower leaders and activists in all spheres, while also transferring this methodology to other Republics such as Ireland, France, Spain: “The Popular Leaders need to progress from Protest Behaviour to Remedy Management. They need Corruption Control Jurisdictions for the Citizen in the Republics.”

Noting that he supports Mr. Gilroy in Ireland, he suggests that a knowledge of equity governance will greatly help him: “I heard an Audio Record of Irish Citizen Mr Gilroy. He has courage, generosity and passion. I have not researched him or his work. I have listened to a few minutes of him speaking. The Audio Record Evidence suggests he has exactly the right issues. It is the Legal Case Management Monopoly of Qualified Lawyers and Career Bribery and Career Blackmail of Qualified Lawyer to Manage Case Sabotage Frauds against Corruption Victims. Irish Citizen Mr Gilroy did not appear to know that Citizen Jurisdiction includes providing Legal Case Management for Corruption Victims. The Case Management Monopoly for Qualified Lawyers was a Sabotage Fraud against the Citizen Jurisdiction.  All he needs to know is to claim Citizen Jurisdiction and enough background to explain what it is.”

Using Citizen Jurisdiction to Move From Victim Protester to Authority Figure

Much will lie in the recognition by people of Citizen Jurisdiction. Currently, Edward notes: “Protesters are asserting the Citizen Identity. They are taking Citizen Responsibilities and protesting about Citizen Disempowerment. All they need to do is claim Citizen Jurisdiction. They will stop being Victim Protesters and be Authority Figures.” The transition from complaint and protest to claiming citizen jurisdiction and becoming authority figures—whereby citizens question and challenge corruption and openly hold politicians responsible and engage in legal case management of corruption and fraud cases themselves—needs to be made.

From what Edward Ellis says, rolling changes are underfoot. Officials within the administration—many of whom are “honorable officers”–have recognized the untenability of the corruption pervasive at the top levels and are seeking to assist citizens to make a sea-change.

The Remedy Process has Criminal Conspiracy Proof against Top Judges, the Attorney General, Prime Minister Mrs May, and Opposition Leader Mr Corbyn. The Cabinet Ministers have Joint Responsibility with the Prime Minister. They need Knew Nothing Defences to avoid Joint Liability. The Cabinet Leaks about Non-Disclosure Frauds by the Prime Minister were needed for the Knew Nothing Defences to avoid Joint Liability…The challenge now is helping the Dictator Republics to convert to Equity Republics by use of Corruption Control Jurisdictions for the Citizen. It needs the Populist Leaders.”

Preparations are underway to collect grievances from the public on a mass scale but all those seeking to have their cases heard are advised to label documents as requested and volunteer to assist with the case management process. For a deeper look at what exactly has transpired here and understand the enormity of the accomplishment Edward Ellis is reporting, please listen to all three podcasts. Equity Lawyer Edward Ellis may be contacted at edward.w.ellis@gmail.com.