Tag Archives: fraud

UK Mothers Across Socio-Economic Lines Reveal the Crimes, Corruption, and Fraud Rampant in UK Family Courts and Bankruptcy Courts Which Unlawfully Asset-Strip and Defraud Women & Kidnap, Foster, Traffick, and Disappear Their Children and Babies

Ramola D | Report | Nov 4, 2020

In the first of a series of News Panels exposing rampant crime, corruption, and fraud in the UK Family Courts and Bankruptcy Courts, several UK mothers of varying socio-economic strata came together recently to discuss the bankruptcies, destitution, loss of custody, and theft of children they have suffered at the hands of the UK Family Courts and Bankruptcy Courts.

What emerges from this discussion is that the criminal actions of highly-placed barristers, solicitors, judges, accountants and financiers appear to be interlinked (via secret-society handshakes and brownpaper-envelope-bribes) and appear to be maliciously focused on targeting women in a vulnerable life-situation: wives and mothers recently divorced or bereaved, depriving them wholesale of all assets, estates, and hard-earned wealth, while shamelessly running abduction schemes in broad daylight to steal, traumatize, often disappear or dubiously farm-out-to-foster-care, force-adopt, and sex-traffick their children.

This situation points to systemic and entrenched corruption, driven by lucrative rewards for participants—not dissimilar to blatant highway robbery or piracy on the high seas, where each thuggish minion gets a share of the bounty.

Image of Highway Robbers: Screenshot, http://stand-and-deliver.org.uk/articles.html

The only difference today is these are white-collar professionals with a salary, prestigious title, and deceptive badge of authority. Social workers, law enforcement, and psychologists partake in these management-driven “Child Protective Services” crimes, as many police and social worker whistleblowers have revealed, including Carol Woods, Jon Wedger, Melanie Shaw, and others.

Social Workers, Psychologists, Police Become Accomplices to Crime

The tragedy also is that possibly upright and well-meaning social workers, policemen, psychologists associated with the Family Courts then get caught up in the tide of what can only be called outright crime, and end up as accomplices to crime, assisting this now-derelict and cynical system in removing children from good, caring homes and callously ripping babies from the arms of loving, caring mothers.

British mothers in fact are being targeted on a large scale for victimization, often subjected to extreme trauma in removal of their children, refusal of custody, and worse: actual physical assault at the hands of police, wrongful psychological profiling and misdiagnosing by court psychologists for purposes of criminalizing and stigmatizing good mothers and stealing their children.

Michelle Young

“It seems to be the majority of women not the minority. Mothers are losing their children in some cases and then losing everything they’ve worked for all their lives with their partners,” says Michelle Young, a mother with a particularly prominent case, who reports the loss of her estates and wealth despite having sunk millions into solicitor-fees, who started a foundation to help destitute women, and is now an impassioned advocate for mothers and helping to publicize the truth of these crimes.

Children too, all over the United Kingdom are being traumatized. “It’s absolutely devastating the effect it has on the children,” says Michelle Young, “it’s absolutely the whole court system. The family court system is not fit for purpose. They are ignoring the law and they are ignoring the evidence.”

SECRET FAMILY COURTS AND INSOLVENCY COURTS SO DYSFUNCTIONAL THEY NEED TO BE ABOLISHED

The failures of the court system, in particular the secret family courts and the insolvency courts are so extreme at this point that what really needs to be done is to abolish them completely, suggests Michelle, who reports hers was “the biggest case in British divorce history” and involved the loss of millions of pounds in solicitor fees, being forced into bankruptcy, and the loss of her estates succeeding her divorce from billionaire Scot Young, whose connections with Russian oligarchs who also met tragic ends have been reported following his tragic death in suspicious circumstances. The story was covered in British mainstream media, including in The Tatler: Did Scot Young and his high-rolling friends really die by their own hands?

Intelligence UK News notes that the bankruptcy Michelle was forced into was engineered and the assets disappeared, all by sleight of hand of high-rolling insolvency lawyers. “Ms Young was awarded a mere £26.6 million out of the vast estate, plus half of the value of the assets of Mr Young’s estate recovered by the bankruptcy trustees. The problem is, none of those assets were ever recovered, they appeared to “disappear” without a trace. Ms Young was very soon stripped of her judgment debt, a case of giving with one hand and taking back with another.” Michelle Young / Scot Young grand corruption and insolvency fraud 

Even more terrifying is the systemic stealing of children from mothers and divorced wives.

The either-complicit or indoctrinated social workers who take children from good homes on the flimsy basis of a report from a vengeful ex – and then disappear them, whether into foster homes or sex-trafficking (as many police whistleblowers have alerted lately) – will apparently say anything to stop mothers from being able to get their children back.

Maria, a mother whose 2 year old boy and 10 year old girl were snatched from their beds when in the safe house of their grandmother by police and social workers (videos on Facebook) was told she was never getting her children back because “of the chance of her getting into a new abusive relationship with a man in her future,” a baseless, absurd projection which no social worker or government agency should be permitted to make, given the enormous loss of child and family it then permits.

Image: Stills from the (terribly tragic) Videos on Facebook showing Maria’s 2-year-old snatched from bed and 10-year-old weeping and clinging to family as “Social Workers” ripped the children away from their beds, their homes, their mother, and never gave Maria any information on where they were taken and where they now are, 5 years later. The woman social worker pictured above lied the next morning in court about the mother being violent to her in front of the children when she arrived, when it is clear from the videos the children were in bed, sleeping, when she arrived.

Worse, this loving mother, whose troubles started after her ex-husband began calling CPS and reporting lies. was glibly characterized by venal social workers as a violent criminal, beaten in jail by police to the extent that her ribs were broken, a new baby removed at birth, and ambushed by a posse of police in 10 squad cars on the occasion her kidnapped daughter ran out of school back to her home and mother close-by.

Maria

“I ended a ten year relationship with a quite wealthy man and because he wasn’t getting on with my elder children he instantly started phoning up social services and making false allegations and financially destituted myself and my children–and it went from there really. My children were illegally kidnapped from my mother’s house—We were in a safe place, I’d taken my children out of that environment to put them in a safe place and they came and they took my children illegally. And from there really just constant lies, making up allegations–I was accused of being a drug user, an alcoholic. I’ve done hair strand tests that came back negative and yet it still states in all my children’s documents I’m an alcoholic and a drug user.”

“It’s so traumatizing. I, literally, I had a mental breakdown as soon as they took my children. I lost everything– I lost my home, I lost my job, I was left on the street sleeping on a park bench. I went to every single service possible to ask for help, nobody would help me. Social services were actually telling people that I had hit my son over the head with a hammer, that I had been arrested, did crimes –completely made up stories.

I didn’t even have a criminal record at the time. My first criminal record: seven weeks after they took my children, I hadn’t seen my children for seven weeks and I was completely distraught, crying continuously—my children were ten and two; my two and a half year old is severely autistic, my little girl was ten years old and they took them out of their beds.

My brother video-recorded it and it is on Facebook for people to see my baby being taken out of his bed. She then went into the court on the Monday morning and she told the judge that they came round to check on the children and that I was violent towards the social worker in front of the children. The children were in bed, and you can see them on the video recording going up to the bedroom taking them out of bed, sitting down, having a conversation with my mum.

She told my mum my children would be returned in 72 hours and they refused to allow me any contact for seven weeks, and my solicitor was phoning and I finally went to Contact and I turned up 10 minutes late because I stood outside crying and they told me I couldn’t see my children if I was crying so I sorted myself out and I went inside. I was sat there 45 minutes and then she came out and told me I couldn’t see my children– it was Mother’s Day. She handed me a Mother’s Day card and I snatched it out of her hand, I angrily snatched the card out the hand and I went to jump off the motorway bridge. I left the building and I went to jump off the motorway bridge. And I was arrested that night and taken to the police station, to the psychiatric hospital, they tried to have me sectioned but let me go. And then two days later it was my little boy’s third birthday and I was sat in Contact for an hour and two police officers walked in and they arrested me violently, dragged me out the building. I was locked in the cell for my baby’s third birthday–the social services building, Telford Social Services, Healthcare & Social Services.

I was having the police arrest me every time I left my house for obstructing police. They would phone me up and convince me they just wanted to check how I was because obviously I was distraught and traumatized and they would make me go and meet them somewhere and I’ll go meet them and they’d arrest me, beat me up, because I’m trying to defend all the lies that they’re throwing at me constantly.

I’d been a mum 17 years–at the time I had a 17 year old who was training to be a police officer, I had a 15 year old that was on the gifted and talented register, he could have passed the GCSCs when he was eight. All of my children are very intelligent, very forward, they all went to school, they never had a bad word said about me as a parent until I ended this relationship and he started phoning up social services, and from there I realized that the police was in on it, the police were helping, the police were making up allegations and it was awful, it was a year of complete and utter hell. I had a mental breakdown eventually and I tried to take my life and I ended up in a psychiatric hospital for two months.”

For the whole of Maria’s riveting and tragic testimonial, please watch the video, linked below.

Flagrant Deception and Clear Subjugation of Women in UK as Beefy Police (Mis)characterize Women as Violent Aggressors in Order to Steal Their Children

In addition to concocting stories and false-allegations, UK police and social workers it seems frequently characterize mothers as violent–Maria’s experience like many others indicates that social workers will lie freely–and engage in serious intimidation which includes violence against them. Maria reports that her ribs were broken by police, that she was beaten by police, that she was accused of aggression and obstruction by police when she simply spoke up and used her voice. How is a petite woman with a voice (whose children are being kidnapped and who must necessarily speak) considered violent and aggressive by a group of brawny policemen and women equipped with tasers, handcuffs, and pistols who engage in brutal acts of violence against women–except as a matter of flagrant deception?

Parental Responsibility and Residency Rights Handed to Abusive Ex-Husbands & Partners

Conversely, many mothers report that their children are handed right back to the abuser in the family. Women often lose custody, losing both residency-rights for their children and “parental responsibility” although they are proven to be good and responsible mothers. Why are children being handed back to abusers? Libby, an academic whose case is particularly shocking reveals that her ex-wife was given full custody and parental responsibility for her three year old (now seven) even though she herself was the breadwinner and biological mother.

Libby

“I had my daughter on my own– by law, literally by law she cannot have parental rights and they didn’t care at all they just gave her parental responsibility, and the reason was that she lived with us for a year so my daughter knows who she is and I appealed this and I brought also a bunch of other proofs of domestic abuse, lots of police reports – and then my daughter sustained a burn, quite a serious burn that was reported to social services. My ex admitted that it happened because she wasn’t watching my daughter and you know the story changes but she sustained this burn, she also had lots of bruises and she was constantly getting injured – so social services wrote this down and I was told at the appeals hearing that an abusive person or abuse is not a reason that someone shouldn’t get parental responsibility.”

Libby reports that since she has worked with caring people as a child protection officer in South Africa she had believed UK social workers would offer support and justice, yet was shocked that the CAFCASS workers whom she initially trusted neither listened to the child nor chose to act in her best interests, along with lawyers and judges, separating her instead from her mother.

Screenshot, Wikipedia

“My daughter has been traumatized, she is terrified now—she used to be the brightest light, now she’s scared to even talk– they wanted to break our bond, they did everything imaginable to do that. And my daughter was just so young –we started court when she was three and a half years old and she just turned seven.”

Libby reports that she took loans to pay the legal fees for barristers, continually appealed earlier court decisions, yet was compelled to do a psychological evaluation (with a psychologist Hessell Willemson who featured in other ladies’ cases as well on the panel, and who has been reported as not being fit for purpose) which accused her of a “borderline personality disorder” and restricted her visits with her child to two hours every other week, which she is once more appealing–while her ex aggressively “drove her nanny off the road, kidnapped the child” and absconded to Greece, her native country, yet has been permitted to keep the child–who seems to have been the victim here of targeted trauma.

Racketeering in Litigation Loan Funding by Solicitors and Loan Companies

Michelle Young makes the remark that “What will happen is they will run Libby until she’s got no money left,” a prediction agreed to by the other women on the panel. Rosie Heys who said she “ended up with a legal bill of half a million pounds that amounted to over a third of the marital assets” points out that solicitors and loan firms never stop milking their clients for funds.

Rosie Heys

“The minute you employ a solicitor and start going through the court process your money just disappears as if by magic and it doesn’t seem to have any relationship to what work is actually done, it seems to be far more related to what they think they can get. That’s where I begin to talk now about something Shelley and I have in common which is these litigation loans which became legal only in 2011. And these are partnerships between solicitors’ firms and lending companies, high interest lending companies charging up to 29% interest and the solicitors sell these loans.

In my case I went for advice on divorce and the solicitor there I used the same solicitors as Prince Charles used in his divorce from Princess Diana, a firm called Paine Hicks Beach, the first thing that the senior partner told me about was that I should get one of these litigation loans and they didn’t stop until I’d signed on the dotted line. They wheeled me around the corner to their colleagues at another law firm who actually–I was standing up when I signed the documents and that started the whole ball rolling not for any equitable settlement but for the solicitors to walk off with half a million pounds and that’s something–this monetary problem this issue of the finances taints everything…

At my second hearing as a litigant in person…my ex was seeking possession proceedings to get me and the children made homeless and as a litigant in person I managed to get the house transferred into my sole name and walked away from court thinking why did the solicitors never do that why did the barrister, why did no one ever do that in all of these proceedings, why has it taken me going in on my own to achieve that and I think the answer is they had no interest in the house being in my name because if it was in my name all of the loan was secured against the house and they were risking their own chance to get the money.

It’s all about racketeering. When Michelle says it’s a business model I completely agree with her. The first questions they ask you seem very very reasonable–how much money is there, what is there, what’s the equity that you have and then they’ll spend up to that amount–there’s absolutely no justification for that level of legal fees and throughout I kept saying, you know, the spending has to stop, this has to stop this is ridiculous, it starts off with an idea it’ll cost you fifty thousand, within a few months they spend a hundred thousand, then they ask for another on top of which the valuations of the property against which all this lending was secured were exaggerated.

So I put in subject access requests to try and work out what had gone on and that’s when I found out that the solicitors had been corresponding with the loan companies who they’re in partnership with, and had given false and exaggerated valuations for my property– so they had exaggerated the house by something in the region I’m trying to remember off the top of my head but I think it was about thirty thousand pounds, forty thousand pounds—they exaggerated the value of the house by.”

Not merely are women’s savings fully exploited, as Rosie points out, during a time of desperate stress in a woman’s life, the family home is also put at risk by these practices of mortgage fraud which put money directly into solicitors’ pockets. Further, solicitors moonlight as judges in the family courts, as in Rosie’s case where a senior partner at Paine Hicks Beach also sashayed as Judge, a situation of clear judicial fraud which permits exploitative recycling of faulty judgments and fresh funds back to the less-than-adequate solicitors who don’t win cases for their clients. Judges are not regulated independently, notes Michelle, and that’s a big problem. Nor, notes Libby, are social workers and CAFCASS workers–the Law Society, notes Michelle Young, seems to be a Lawless Society and the SRA (Solicitors’ Regulation Authority) does nothing; the whole system is rigged to empower solicitors, judges, social workers, and police to engage in white-collar brigandry at the expense of divorcing wives and traumatized mothers. Not to mention causing infinite trauma for those who suffer most as home, family, and mother are ripped from them: the children.

Reporting a similar case of coerced litigation loan funding (which she reports the family did not need), Shelley also reports being targeted for slander, stalking, and stigmatizing via false labels from the same psychologist Libby has mentioned, Hessel Williamson, while her ex obtained Occupancy of her home (major share of which had actually been awarded by the court to her in equity), and then also obtained Residency rights for her children. Losing custody of her children, she reports not being able to communicate with them and not having seen them for a year.

Shelley

“I was saying to my solicitors, no no no, I don’t think we need the litigation funding because we have funds. You know he took a golden handshake from a company he had just recently left before the divorce proceedings and that money just went up in thin air–so the house is actually now for sale and the equity from that house would be, the majority of it is is mine, however he’s managed to get an Occupancy order and live in the house that I was awarded, with my children. And from the Occupancy order he then got residency. Now in between all of that, there’s been slander, there’s been stalking, there’s been emotional abuse, there’s been financial abuse–so much so that he’s left me homeless, desolate without my children.

So God only knows how my children have coped – you know if I’m going through grief you know my priority is my children – I don’t know how they’re coping because I’m not able to find that out. He’s stopping all contact with my children, I’ve not seen them for a year – my two boys are of adult age and he coercively controls them through money, he’s told them to block me so I’ve not hardly spoken to them on a personal level. I speak to them once every other week. I don’t see them because they’re too scared of their father.

And my 14 year old, God knows how she’s doing, you know I speak to her on the phone, however he stalks and monitors all the phone calls–he’s obviously told a different narrative to the school as well. The school are not exactly supporting my situation, this is the new school that I found for for her because my ex-husband took my children out of private schooling because he was keeping up the pretense of having no funds.

All of it went to court, all my evidence on the stalking, the bugging, everything else wasn’t even accounted for– all my disclosures; they didn’t even see all my witnesses, they didn’t even hear them even though they turned up at court. The judge just saw his witnesses and mine were left just waiting around, she wouldn’t see them. So I’ve had involvement of CAFCASS social services, NYAS (National Youth Advocacy Services) and psychologists, the whole corrupt court system is a joke, there is no justice and actually you’re paying for a service …you know they’re not really there to support the family in fact if you can avoid social services, avoid at all costs, do not get involved with social services.”

Rosie Heys points out that so much hinged on the fraudulent diagnoses of Dr. Hessel Willemson, who had been foisted on Shelley and the other women as a matter of prescription not choice by the court; in Shelley’s case he appeared to have cut-and-pasted text on a diagnosis used in another patient’s case, one which had the serious repercussions of greatly limiting her time spent with the children, to their own detriment, particularly since they all wanted to live with her.

“The harm to the children as a result is just beyond imagination,” says Rosie Heys.

Audrey’s story of being forced to see a court-appointed psychologist, the same infamous Dutch doctor, Hessel Willemsen, who removed custody for her children from her, handing it over to her ex, a man found provably abusive to the children, has the same overtones of misogynistic denial of the mother’s rights.

Audrey

I was married to an airline captain. He remortgaged the family home, took ninety thousand pounds out, splashed it on himself and his little partner of foreign origin ie Asia –and then he continued to have a lavish expensive lifestyle. We went into financial hearing, he was ordered then to pay me Spousal – he refused to sell the house so it was back in court, then eventually he accepted an offer for the property.

In the meantime he had abused the children. Being in Aviation I’d phoned the police from Florida to come to the children’s rescue and of course because he’s got four stripes on his shoulders, you know he played the sweet and innocent person that nothing has happened to the children. That was then dismissed and the police obviously left the home.

Then we had the psychologist ordered whilst it’s a Dutch psychologist who practices medicine in the same village as his father, and I contested that, I said absolutely no chance – that was denied. And then I got to final hearing and him and the guardian who was ordered through court sat there laughing and giggling and making jokes whilst I was giving evidence you know, proper intimidating – and then we continued. The household, the children were taken off me. I was allowed to have the children two hours every three weeks until December…Bear in mind I’m the mom that does everything with the children, you know the school uniforms, yeah everything really realistically with the children I’ve done.

He got ordered that he could have the kids through this Dutch psychologist Hassell Willemson–and the father has never really had an interest in the children. The kids then ended up being forced into residence with their father with me having two hours contact for six months with them, with like two hours every three weeks with the children. The children met the judge and said, We don’t want to live with him. My children met the guardian, said, We don’t want to live with him. My oldest was bruised, yanked over bed and bruised, I’ve got doctors’ records, police records.

I had another issue where the child–actually I was in Uzbekistan and the children–the child ran away from home– he was nine years old. In the middle of the night, running away because his father and grandfather threw him to the floor and bruised him again. But now he’s a good father to take care of his kid. The judge dismissed him in Chelmsford, dismissed him on discipline of reasonable grounds and my question goes: since when is bruising and injuring a child reasonable grounds for discipline?

So the children of now like the age of 14 have been forced to live with their father. My oldest now sits in the bedroom day in and day out, doesn’t even eat dinner at the family table, sits in his bedroom. They don’t even communicate, what kind of life is that for a child? So subsequently my ex has you know the spousal payments. I was in court on Monday and he claims that he has no money to pay me my spousal–but then he has 25,000 pounds to spend on legal costs.”

Systemic Injustice, Old Boys’ Clubs, Social Circles, & Stealing Children: Is There Remedy?

“What we all have in common,” notes Shelley, “is obviously most of us no longer have custody of our children, number two we’ve all been asset stripped, number three is financially abused, and number four we’ve been left desolate and homeless.” All through the process as well, the women have been traumatized and left unsupported.

“That’s the main reason, ” says Michelle, “because it’s not just these ladies I’ve brought on the call today, and believe you me this is systemic, as I said we’re working on the frauds across the country and this is the majority– I’m sorry to say, the majority of the judges are unlawfully practicing in those courts and with everything they are doing, the majority of them need removing. I think we should go back, stop the usury of all these law firms and go back to common law which is not usury, which is the people’s law.”

Problems abound it appears, that are glossed over and entrenched: the psychologists foisted on women through courts and solicitors are not qualified, many of them, and seem to have connections with the solicitors and ex-husbands, always favoring the latter. Solicitors and financiers party together, along with the judges who play solicitor and family court judge both, sometimes, in the same social circles, which cements the racketeering bonds they forge together, it appears.

Fraternities, secret societies, old boys’ clubs, Freemason oaths and networked power syndicates have a lot to do with it, Bibi Bacchus, UCC code expert explains in Report #203, when some of the group reconvened to discuss solutions and remedies, after News Panels 2, 3, and 4 examining networked crime and the parts played by police, bankers, and solicitors were aired. “Women need to organize, to learn the law, to get back the Birth Certificates for their children, and to support other women in court.”

Stealing children for adoptions is big business, apparently. Forced adoptions bring 30,000 pounds for each child to Social Services, which gives them the twisted incentive to steal children from good homes, as Maria’s case demonstrates. The spectre of child trafficking into prostitution, of ritual abuse and gory, murderous use for Satanic practice is today a macabre reality that no-one can deny, given the amount of whistleblowing on this subject and continuous surfacing of information we have seen in recent times. Women need to rise up together to stop these crimes, suggests Bibi. When you know the law in certainty–UCC law or contract law, under Maritime or Admiralty Law–and take action to protect yourself and your family based on it, no-one can touch you.

Is it possible for all these disenfranchised women to retrieve their children, their assets, their homes? Yes, says Bibi Bacchus.

Listen in to Report # 203, News Panel 5 for more:

RELATED

News Panel 2

News Panel 3

News Panel 4

Launching Real Talk True Media with Ramola D & Ahmad Enani: Midge Mathis & Karen Stewart Discuss Financial Underpinnings & Fraud Behind Covert EMF/Neuro Targeting

— Ramola D and Ahmad Enani/Posted 7/02/2017

booksWith much excitement, resolve, and intent, we’re pleased to finally launch our new podcast series Real Talk with Ramola D and Ahmad Enani, and finally release these two opening group conversations with researcher and realtor Midge Mathis and retired Intelligence analyst and NSA whistleblower Karen Stewart, on the subject of the discoveries Midge has made recently that seem to relate to and reveal the financial understructure of the EMF/Neuro targeting, testing, experimental and political repression operations being run today on civilians in the USA and worldwide.

Real Talk with Ramola D and Ahmad Enani/Real Talk True Media on Youtube

Real Talk with Ramola D and Ahmad Enani is a podcast series that has been in the works for some time now, stymied for quite a while by excessive sabotage attempts centered around massive cyberhacking on all sides. As you’ll note however, particularly in the first video, which we ran on Google Hangout, we pushed through despite obvious tampering with my video feed and Ahmad’s audio feed, set-up audio delays, and consequent disjointedness. We think this evidence of sabotage of our very first podcast is historic, related quite possibly to Google’s close connections with the CIA, and related as well to the fact that each one of us, particularly both hosts, is being surveilled and obstructed quite heavily these days as we expand our True Media and journalism efforts, in the interests of keeping the world informed. 

Ultimately, we think, these glitches are a reflection of the video platform we used, and a reflection on the selective viability of Google Hangout and Youtube. For our second video as well, where we recorded from Skype, and uploaded to Youtube, delays in uploading and downloading were excessive. Unforeseen glitches developed, prompting us to re-examine the intention of launching our series with these two videos. We continue to research better platform options, and will aim to improve audio and video quality as we go along.

Candid Conversations on 21st-Century Science/Technology,  Related Ethics/Human Rights, & Covert Crime

Real Talk with Ramola D and Ahmad Enani has been launched with the express intent of offering both of us–and our guests–a means to engage openly in Candid Conversations on 21st-Century Science/Technology and Ethics/Human Rights issues, as well as Covert Crime, which latter we unfortunately see flourishing all around us today, as Secrecy is funded copiously and Freedom flails. We believe in the great value of open, untramelled conversation, in free speech, in public discussion and debate, in the paramountcy of privacy, individuality, independence, free will, human rights, and in public education–even as Global Totalitarianism runs amuck in our midst.

As we launch this quest to openly discuss the realities of watchlisting, uber-surveillance with electronic weaponry/RF and sonic weapons–dismissed and lied about in Mockingbird-run Mainstream Media’s government propaganda coverage of “Targeted Individuals” (TIs)–as well as other current-day realities such as chem trails, 5G, and military quests for full-spectrum dominance, we’d like to note that no subject related to the ongoing covert criminal assaults on humanity will be forbidden to us. We hope as we go along to run both small-group conversations and one-on-one interviews on the most vital subjects of our time, bringing in both experts and individuals; we will aim as well to collect and publish (in our podcasts) targeting testimonials and personal stories, in the interests of creating a 21st-Century Documentation Archive, a recorded, documented archive of this dark and inexplicable time period in history.

Episode 1: Midge Mathis and Karen Stewart

In this first conversation, MIdge Mathis relates the story of her own targeting, her background as a realtor and real estate developer, and describes how she began to make a series of discoveries of front companies and backdoor interconnections with security and Intelligence services such as the DHS and the NSA, of fraudulent trust funds and insurance fraud. Are there companies and people hiding in Covert America making money off the targeting operations on Americans, where innocent Americans are being covertly implanted and assaulted with microwave weapons, night and day, on a 24/7 basis, in New Phoenix “extermination programs”? How are telecom companies, banks, research institutions, medical equipment companies, Defence contractors involved? How are top executives in the NSA involved? Who benefits from secretive weapons testing, electronic surveillance, and neurotechnology experimentation on innocent, non-consensual citizens–and how?  This episode seeks to find out.

Episode 2: Midge Mathis and Karen Stewart

This podcast continues the wide-ranging conversation begun in Episode 1, recorded in Skype with Ahmad Enani on audio, and Ramola D on video, along with researcher Midge Mathis and former NSA Intelligence analyst Karen Stewart on video. In this episode, Midge describes searches she has run on her county assessor website’s database in quests to understand the material understructure of illegal targeting activities being run undercover today by fusion centers, military contractors, and Intelligence agencies which reveal astonishing and peculiar connections between agencies like DARPA and DHS’ “Surveillance Role Players,” between doctors and local businesses, between DHS and mental health hospitals, and others.  Midge relates discovery of frequencies emitted by implants not recorded in FCC frequency allocation tables, and discusses how those innocents and activists who are targeted are channeled into misdiagnoses by mental health professionals and discredited, while being implanted and assaulted with covert EMF/neuroweapons. Connections between various businesses, including banks, telecom companies, microchip technology companies, Defence contractors, Air Force, and agencies in Surveillance activities are explored. While many questions remain, these database explorations offer a basis for further analysis and investigation, as these illegal targeting and experimentation activities in the USA and worldwide continue to be investigated.

Real Talk True Media Schedules

These conversations with Midge Mathis and Karen Stewart continuing these database explorations and exposes of the corporate profit structure behind targeting, surveillance, and human experimentation, and examining the significance for humanity will be resumed in future podcasts. On this particular subject, “white hat” hacker and computer experts are urged to step forward and work with us to help us understand the information that these databases are storing, apparently in plain sight. Will these discoveries offer Americans a means to start taking our country back? And from there, a means also to take the entire world back from the criminal and corporate NWO Globalists? It seems entirely possible. 

Real Talk True Media schedules and upcoming guests will be announced shortly on a separate website, with all information posted here at The Everyday Concerned Citizen as well, please stay tuned for updates. We hope to run these podcasts weekly, and invite comment and participation from all viewing these videos.  Our interests are nothing less than exploring the truth, speaking the truth, and publishing the truth. Please join us!

Our Backgrounds

Ahmad Enani is a film and media professional, an actor and director with experience working out of Los Angeles with over 25 plays in his repertoire, including a lead role in the Mark Taper Forum’s “For Here Or To,” which took home Garlands for Ensemble and Play of the Year. He is a former longstanding member of Independent Shakespeare Company, a nationally renowned professional theatre based in Los Angeles. With a degree in philosophy from Vanderbilt, he is a Teach for America alumni and former inner city high school teacher. With a background and interest in science, he has worked as an IT consultant for many years. Active in radio and new media journalism, he is an activist for human rights and targeted individuals all over the world with a deep understanding of the web of conspiracies that saturate our present world.

Ramola D is a writer, journalist, and activist investigating issues related to 21st-century science and technology, ethics, and human rights in relation to surveillance, military contracts, and non-consensual experimentation. Publisher of the solutions-journalism site The Everyday Concerned Citizen, she edits Delphi Quarterly and runs creativity workshops at ArtCreateWrite. With an MFA in Poetry, an MBA, and a BS in Physics, she has taught Creative Writing and Composition for 17 years at Washington, DC universities, recently at The George Washington University and The Writer’s Center, Bethesda. Her awards include an AWP Grace Paley Prize in Short Fiction and a National Endowment for the Arts Fellowship in Poetry. Her second collection of short fiction, For the Sake of the Boy, is forthcoming from Paycock Press in 2018.

Judge Anna von Reitz: Great Britain, Fiduciary Trust Fraud, The Federal United States, The British Crown, All Countries Once Under the British Empire

Re-posting three recent posts from Judge Anna von Reitz, from Paulstramer.net, with many thanks. Please visit Paulstramer.net for the original posts and comments from readers. On the subjects of the wide-ranging and long-lasting (and immense) trust fraud against the peoples of the USA, Commonwealth countries including Canada, Australia, others. I thought it might help to post these three together, so the subject under discussion–the historical role played by the British Crown and the Federal United States  in creating our present reality–in the USA, Canada, Australia, Ireland, Scotland, Wales, many other Commonwealth countries–through trust fraud–is better comprehended.

For other Judge Anna posts covering this history on this site, please click here. For updated posts and for an archive of her recent writings, please visit annavonreitz.com and paulstramer.net.

 Excerpt from the post on Great Britain (first post below): Foxes in the hen house doesn’t begin to express the gravity of the international criminality and breach of trust that we have suffered at the hands of the Federal United States and the British Crown and the parade of “Royal Majesties” since Edward VIII stepped down—- and what is true for us is also true for Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Japan, Germany, India, most of Europe, Ireland, Scotland, Wales……

The Enfranchisement Act of 1867 championed by Benjamin D’Israeli toppled the English government from within, engaged Queen Victoria in unlawful acts against the people of Britain and betrayed their established government all the way back to the Magna Carta. D’Israeli enslaved the people of Great Britain to finance the enslavement of the Indian Subcontinent under the Raj. As long as Queen was going rogue at home and secretively enslaving the people of Britain, what did she care about pillaging and betraying her allies in Europe, the Americans, the Australians and a few Canooks?

This is the thanks we all get from the British Royals for our sacrifices and loyalty through two World Wars and countless police actions ever since: press ganging, enslavement, inland piracy, unlawful conversion, personage, barratry, and fraud, fraud, fraud.

We are dealing with exactly the same criminality and the same evil that Gandhi faced in India, but unlike Gandhi, we are not facing it alone.

In evaluating this deceptive and perfidious Enemy of all free people everywhere, consider the lack of conscience and morality involved when a government taxes poor people for salt that they need to live and which they have harmlessly harvested from the sea for millenia?

That’s what the Raj did in India. That’s what the British Crown is capable of.

That is what Prince William’s throne is built upon. It’s not his fault. He is inheriting the situation his Great-great-great Grandmother left him and he will be hard pressed to make sense of it or find a way forward out of this system of betrayal and criminality without a velvet boot up his backside pointing him the right direction.

It’s our job to be that boot and make sure that this system of things is brought to a peaceful and sane conclusion in which still more innocent people do not suffer. Gandhi and Jesus have both showed us the way to defeat this Evil in high places—- millions of people must join hands and expose the cruelty and criminality and oppressive nature of the British government so that it becomes so embarrassing, so obvious, so insurmountably distasteful that both from within and without the denizens of Westminster are forced to relinquish their vile claims of ownership and control over the rest of us..

*****

Saturday, December 19, 2015

A Message To, For, and About Great Britain

JudgeAnna
By Anna Von Reitz
 

Here are some pearls from Ed Johnston—
16th American Jurisprudence Section 177
(16 Am Jur. 2d. Const. Law Sect. 256)

The State did not give the Citizen his rights and thus cannot take them away as it chooses. The State did not establish the settled maxims and procedures by which a citizen must be dealt with, and thus cannot abrogate or circumvent them. It thus is well settled that legislative enactments do not constitute the law of the land, but must conform to it.

From the 16th American Jurisprudence, Second Edition, Section 177:
“The general misconception is that any statute passed by legislators bearing the appearance of law constitutes the law of the land. The U.S. Constitution is the supreme law of the land, and any statute, to be valid, must be in agreement. It is impossible for both the Constitution and a law violating it to be valid; one must prevail. This is succinctly stated as follows:

The general rule is that an unconstitutional statute, though having the form and name of law, is in reality no law, but is wholly void, and ineffective for any purpose; since unconstitutionality dates from the time of its enactment, and not merely from the date of the decision so branding it.

As unconstitutional law, in legal contemplation, is as inoperative as if it had never been passed. Such a statute leaves the question that it purports to settle just as it would be had the statute not been enacted. Since an unconstitutional law is void, the general principles follow that it imposes no duties, confers no right, creates no office, bestows no power or authority on anyone, affords no protection, and justifies no acts performed under it… A void act cannot be legally consistent with a valid one. An unconstitutional law cannot operate to supersede any existing valid law. Indeed, in so far as a statute runs counter to the fundamental law of the land, it is superseded thereby. No one is bound to obey an unconstitutional law and no courts are bound to enforce it.”

Any court, government or government officer who acts in violation of, in opposition or contradiction to the foregoing, by his, or her own actions, commits treason and invokes the self-executing Sections 3 and 4 of the 14th Amendment and vacates his or her, office.
__________________
Please note that The Constitution is for inhabitants of the Federal United States LITERALLY the law of the land— because when they come in from their watery international jurisdiction, they are required to operate by the rules established by The Constitution on the land.

When reading Federal law, you must always read it from the Federal perspective. They operate in the international Jurisdiction of the Sea, so, of course, the national law they are obligated to respect when dealing with us is –from their perspective— the Law of the Land.

It’s the same reversal when they speak of “inhabitants”—- we are “peaceful inhabitants of the land” (14th Amendment of the corporate Constitution) from their perspective, whereas they are “inhabitants” of the “maritime regions and insular states” from ours.

We did not suddenly lose our political status as one of the “free sovereign and independent people of the United States” under the terms of the Definitive Treaty of Peace 1783 because they called us “inhabitants of the land” in their private corporate “constitution” of 1868—-even though the two different uses of the same word in two completely different documents was no doubt meant to confuse identities and issues of political status that should never have been confused at all.

Why call a corporate “constitution” the Constitution of the United States of America, if you did not mean to confuse it with The Constitution for the united States of America?

Why call us “peaceful inhabitants of the land” if you did not mean to confuse us with the British Subject “inhabitants” referred to in the Definitive Treaty of Peace 1783?

This use of “deceptively similar names” has been carried on throughout the long effort to mischaracterize and defraud the people of the United States by operatives of the British Crown and the British government.

How better to undermine our lawful government, if not to do it under a veil of “friendship” and treaties promising “perpetual amity” and while acting in the guise of being our “Trustees” in the realm of international commerce and as our”allies” in war? Who could ever suspect our “Mother Country” of seeking our demise?

Foxes in the hen house doesn’t begin to express the gravity of the international criminality and breach of trust that we have suffered at the hands of the Federal United States and the British Crown and the parade of “Royal Majesties” since Edward VIII stepped down—- and what is true for us is also true for Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Japan, Germany, India, most of Europe, Ireland, Scotland, Wales……

The Enfranchisement Act of 1867 championed by Benjamin D’Israeli toppled the English government from within, engaged Queen Victoria in unlawful acts against the people of Britain and betrayed their established government all the way back to the Magna Carta. D’Israeli enslaved the people of Great Britain to finance the enslavement of the Indian Subcontinent under the Raj. As long as Queen was going rogue at home and secretively enslaving the people of Britain, what did she care about pillaging and betraying her allies in Europe, the Americans, the Australians and a few Canooks?

This is the thanks we all get from the British Royals for our sacrifices and loyalty through two World Wars and countless police actions ever since: press ganging, enslavement, inland piracy, unlawful conversion, personage, barratry, and fraud, fraud, fraud.

We are dealing with exactly the same criminality and the same evil that Gandhi faced in India, but unlike Gandhi, we are not facing it alone.

In evaluating this deceptive and perfidious Enemy of all free people everywhere, consider the lack of conscience and morality involved when a government taxes poor people for salt that they need to live and which they have harmlessly harvested from the sea for millenia?

That’s what the Raj did in India. That’s what the British Crown is capable of.

That is what Prince William’s throne is built upon. It’s not his fault. He is inheriting the situation his Great-great-great Grandmother left him and he will be hard pressed to make sense of it or find a way forward out of this system of betrayal and criminality without a velvet boot up his backside pointing him the right direction.

It’s our job to be that boot and make sure that this system of things is brought to a peaceful and sane conclusion in which still more innocent people do not suffer. Gandhi and Jesus have both showed us the way to defeat this Evil in high places—- millions of people must join hands and expose the cruelty and criminality and oppressive nature of the British government so that it becomes so embarrassing, so obvious, so insurmountably distasteful that both from within and without the denizens of Westminster are forced to relinquish their vile claims of ownership and control over the rest of us..

Now that we have identified at least a large part of The Problem, let us quietly and determinedly proceed to hold the Lord Mayor of London, the Lords of the Admiralty, and the Queen fully accountable for these outrages against the British people and against all the rest of us, too. We were all promised and guaranteed certain things and we all know what we have received instead.

As it was in the days of King John, it is again, when the leaders of the people must rise up and demand their rights or lose them, must expose the criminality we have lived with too long or condemn our children. It is time for the Natural Rights of Mankind to be asserted and for idolatry to end. They may kill our bodies, but they cannot kill our spirits; and they shall not win.

See this article and over 100 others on Anna’s website here:  www.annavonreitz.com

*****

Monday, December 28, 2015

Land at peace, sea at war for 150 years – Anna Von Reitz

Britain Guilty of Fiduciary Trust Fraud Against Americans, Canadians, and Aussies

Seen from that perspective you can see why Congress acted as it did. From their perspective the land was at peace and in control of whatever the sea did or did not do, as the sea jurisdiction operated by the Federal United States has always been just a delegation of 19 enumerated functions to be done in behalf of the States. They don’t even have all of the powers on the Sea— just some of the sea jurisdiction has been delegated. And if the States want to get together and amend the deal to give the Federal entity more or less power, they can convene a Continental Congress and do so.

 The problem is that in a sense, we have forgotten who we are and what our powers are and what powers we delegated to them and how we can also take back any power delegated to them.

 They are in effect just serving us with “essential governmental services”– but like runaway housemaids they have been defining what those services are and how much they are going to charge for them and how they are going to “represent” us, etc.

 Just imagine that the servants have taken over a grand estate, pretended that the lawful heirs are “missing”, and wrecked all sorts of destruction, run the Master’s credit cards up to the hilt, failed to do basic maintenance, charged a hundred times more than reasonable for basic services and worst of all, enslaved and made the actual heirs miserable.

 That is the situation we have here. The government of Britain is responsible, has acted in Breach of Trust, and deserves to go down in flames for it. They might have pleaded “wartime necessity” during WWII, but at no time since then has there been any rational excuse for any of this abuse of the rest of us and the violation of our contracts.

 This has all only been possible because the American People trusted the British Monarch to perform their duty as their Trustee on the High Seas and Navigable Inland Waterways. It is now clear that that trust was tragically misplaced and that the British Monarch has instead attacked and victimized the trusting Americans and has behaved in the severest kind of Dishonor imaginable to us, to the Canadians, Australians, and other Allies of the WWII Era.

 The blame for the current situation lies squarely on the British Monarch, the Lords of the Admiralty, FDR, and the Members of Congress.

 As the Federal United States is a separate nation with respect to the Continental United States, this egregious betrayal is a matter of international law and treaty violation. All member nations of the former British Empire have been similarly abused and defrauded as well as many other countries worldwide.

 For the Americans, Canadians, and Aussies it is summed up as blatant fiduciary trust fraud.

 Please post this under a heading — Britain Guilty of Fiduciary Trust Fraud Against Americans, Canadians, and Aussies– because that is the major portion of what has gone on since WWII.

 They have enslaved us and their own people on the British Isles proper and have attempted as much as possible to enslave other nations, too, for no very apparent purpose other than to accrue ill-gotten gold and silver reserves for the Queen and numerous Royal Slush Funds.

 The aim appears to have been to steal all the gold and silver of other nations in order to later sell it all back to them at vastly inflated prices.

 In the Americans case the stooges in “Congress” set up a fixed exchange rate between “Federal Reserve Notes”– private I.O.U’s– and actual United States Dollars defined as an ounce of pure silver. They thus “exchanged” their worthless promises to pay for our actual silver and gold, then claimed bankruptcy and discharged the entire debt they owed to the American People for this outrage.

 I haven’t inquired but it is virtually certain that they did the same to Canada and Australia and as many other nations as possible.

 This leaves the perpetrators in possession of vast amounts of precious metals which are now grossly overvalued in comparison with all the fiat currencies.

 Consider that gold traded at about $30 USD per ounce in the 1930’s and now trades for around $1300 per ounce and you can see that the rats hope to realize an over 4000% profit from their crimes against the innocent people who trusted them to act as their Trustees on the High Seas and Inland Waterways and that they have pretended to excuse this vile behavior by purposefully entrapping and mischaracterizing the political status of their victims— attacking us while still babies in our cradles and falsifying public records without our knowledge or consent so as to give themselves an excuse for their criminality.

 Well, it isn’t going to work.

You and I and all the others who have been mistreated and lied to and lied about by these monsters now completely understand their motives and their methods and their time on Earth is at an end.

Having been recognized for what they are and having their methods recognized for what they are makes it impossible for them to continue or to profit from their schemes.

They have virtually every nation on this planet arrayed against them, including the people of the Continental United States.

Both the Queen and Jacob Rothschild are revealed to be nothing more than criminals. Their fortunes must be forfeit to the people they have been stolen from and the gold standard– or any standard based on one or a few commodities– must ultimately be rejected.

 I repeat– does it make any sense to use a single commodity — the supply of which is controlled by evil men– the standard of value against which all other commodities including human labor are measured?

 Doesn’t it make more sense to admit the truth that the only sources of value on Earth are labor and natural resources and to use ALL these sources of value as collateral backing a single universal currency?

 This immediately foils all attempts by the criminals to control and manipulate the world economy, to profit themselves via their theft of gold and fraudulent claims against their victims, and leave themselves in control of all the rest of us.

 Time to cut the shackles of gold, of verminous Queens, of incompetent Popes, and dishonest “Trustees” and also time to deal with employees run amok.

 ————————————-

See this article and over 100 others on Anna’s website here:www.annavonreitz.com

Tuesday, January 5, 2016

Brief Explanation of the Fundamental Fraud Against Us

 What is the Nature of the Fraud Against Us?

by Anna Von Reitz

The fraud against us begins when the governmental services corporation misrepresents itself as the lawful government and gets us to trust it and go along with it under the false presumption that it is our government when in fact it is just a corporation in the business of selling governmental services.

The next fraud is when they seize upon your given name and copyright it and steal your identity without telling anyone they are doing this.

The third fraud is when they create a trust in your NAME and change your birthright political status without telling anyone.

The fourth fraud is when they fail to tell you that you have the right to reclaim your birthright status and have to take action to do so.

The fifth fraud is when they fail to provide a simple and official process by which to correct the records and repatriate to your native status.

Fraud occurs anytime a Material Fact is misrepresented or omitted so that the victim takes an action which is detrimental to him or fails to take an action resulting in harm to him.

And fraud has no statute of limitation.

As you can see, the self-interested governmental services corporation benefits greatly financially and in terms of holding power over you from doing all this behind the scenes paper-pushing and copyrighting and political status changing—without telling you anything about it.

And as you can also see, it’s all pure fraud.

————————————-

See this article and over 100 others on Anna’s website here:www.annavonreitz.com

Three other posts by Judge Anna re-posted here related to the above are:

There are Two Systems of Law in this Country

The Jurisdiction of the Land

Solving the Problem of Individual Freedom and Sovereignty

Related:

Breaking News: Landmark Win in West Virginia for We the People: In the Face of Jade Helm’s Secret Agenda, Urgent Need for US Citizens to Take Action Now in Their Own States to Help Restore Constitutional Government

Of Thumbprints, Names in ALL CAPS, Legal Fictions, and Name Fraud–David Robinson: Do Not Use Your Thumbprint — Ever!!!

Doreen Agostino/Our Greater Destiny: Democracy In A Transparent World

Doreen Agostino, Our Greater Destiny/Before Voting Pls Read: Next Elections Every Vote SEALS The FATE of Humanity

The Truth About US Govt–USA 101

The Truth About US Govt–USA 101: (1) Judge Anna von Reitzinger: You Know Something is Wrong When….: An American Affidavit of Probable Cause

The Truth About US Govt–USA 101: (2) PL Chang: Proof That the USA is Controlled by Foreign Corporations

The Truth About US Govt–USA 101: (3) Doreen Agostino: CALL TO DUTY!

The Truth About US Govt–USA 101: (4) Judge Anna von Reitz: Beyond BRICS: Exposing the Rats

The Truth About US Govt–USA 101: (5) Stillness in the Storm: Commentary on Beyond BRICS, Exposing the Rats–How the Cabal Maintains Their Power And What You Need To Do To Stop It – Un-Consent

The Truth About US Govt–USA 101: (6) SGT Report: The UNITED STATES is a CORPORATION — Sofia Smallstorm

The Truth About US Govt–USA 101:(7) Judge Anna: “Each and every one of us has more civil authority on the land than the entire federal government.”

The Truth About US Govt–USA 101: (8) Stamper Commentary: We Are Currently (Still) Under “Martial Rule,” a National Emergency, And a Suspended Constitution, As Per The Emergency Banking/War Powers Act, 1933

The Truth About US Govt–USA 101: (9) Central Spot for Judge Anna von Reitz’s Writings

The Truth About US Govt–USA 101: (10) AL Whitney/Anti-Corruption Society: Our ‘government’ is just another corporation!

 

Spiro/Coverage of the Dennis Hastert Scandal: Sibel Edmonds Exposes Exactly What Could Bring Down This Entire Corrupt System!

Posted below is independent video journalist Spiro‘s recent interview with Sibel Edmonds, author of Classified Woman: The Sibel Edmonds Story and the novel, The Lone Gladio, ex-FBI translator and whistleblower, George Mason University alum (like myself:), and force extraordinaire in the world of independent investigative journalism, who runs the website Boiling Frogs Post, and has published long-standing coverage of the Dennis Hastert story, which, she notes, is being covered up in mainstream media. 

Please visit her website for this coverage–small excerpt below–and listen to all her interviews on this subject, including the one below–for a very inspiring call to action to all of Us, independent and individual readers, writers, and thinkers everywhere, who, she notes (and Spiro agrees), are the only force, truly, who can most powerfully oppose, expose, challenge, and force the termination of all the corruption, evil, and injustice endemic in this system we are all caught up in, please stop in at 48:30 of this video, you will be fired up.

Excerpt from her website on this issue:

Let’s Counter the Complicit US Media with Our Own!

We have been singlehandedly covering The Real Hastert Case here at Boiling Frogs Post. As we all know the complicit US media has been doing exactly the opposite: blacking out and censoring the real case together with all directly relevant facts and historical context. I believe we have a choice to make: Do we let them win again by shrugging in disgust and going away? Or do we give it our best and use every means and every channel to counter and challenge the institutionalized criminality and cover-up? Sure. They have all the mega print and TV outlets. But we have the power of numbers, resolve and persistence. And we have this website, the internet and all the social networks and forums that go with it.

Can we use these mediums and means and show that we are not as powerless and irrelevant as they want us to believe we are?

Can we use our numbers, our collective voices and various internet mediums and means to get out the quashed facts and the truth?

I cannot answer these questions. But together, we can. The least we can do is to try- and try our best. We can make this our own campaign- the people’s campaign.

– See more at: http://www.boilingfrogspost.com/2015/10/19/the-peoples-campaign-the-real-hastert-case-all-in-one-place/#sthash.M8S55G8b.53Hf1kkh.dpuf

If you’re new to the Dennis Hastert issue, this 16-minute video by James Corbett (also available on Sibel Edmonds’ site above) will get you up to speed on all the seamy sides of this story, including a “political retaliation plan” put together by Clinton’s White House team: