Tag Archives: Corruption Remedy Process

UK Whistleblower Calls for Australian High Commission to Issue Witness Protection Order for Julian Assange and Reminds Jeremy Corbyn to Express Public Interest and Provide Witness Protection for Persecuted Whistleblowers Sabine McNeill, Melanie Shaw and Julian Assange

Posted on May 18, 2019 by Ramola D | Leave a comment

–Posted by Ramola D/5/17/2019

Expressing the public interest, speaking for millions of supporters of Julian Assange, and forthright in her approach to the Australian High Commission in London, whistleblower, child & human rights advocate, pharmacist by profession and powerful public speaker Neelu Berry has issued a call this week to both the Australian High Commission and the Opposition Leader Jeremy Corbyn to step forward to issue witness protection and safe passage to whistleblower Julian Assange and to other politically persecuted whistleblowers in the UK who are currently wrongfully imprisoned, Sabine McNeill and Melanie Shaw.

Neelu Berry, who is also publishing the ongoing work of redressal of cases of corruption and crime reported by UK citizens, has been working alongside Equity Lawyer Edward William Ellis who has initiated and is commandeering the Mass Corruption Remedy Process in the UK as a revived function of the Equity Monarch Trusts, reported earlier here, and covered in ongoing conversations, with this latest, at Ramola D Reports.

In a verbal statement made over the telephone to Daniel Holden of National Intelligence at the Australian High Commmission, she demanded Julian Assange’s extradition to Australia and restitution in his job as a journalist, stating this was “a formal notice against all the corrupt officials in Australia who are continuing to ignore the public interest, to ignore the public demand for his immediate release from HMP Belmarsh, to silence him for the truths that he and WikiLeaks (have brought forward)”.

Statement to Australian High Commission, National Intelligence Office by Whistleblower Neelu Berry on Behalf of Millions of Supporters of Julian Assange

“We are the million supporters of Julian Assange and we demand his extradition to Australia on grounds that he’s been held a political prisoner by the UK state terrorists and this government in the UK is conspiring with the USA to end his life.

His life is in danger, he requires urgent medical attention, and the Australian government and the Australian Embassy in London will be held fully responsible for all the tortures he’s been subjected to in the UK and in the Ecuadorian Embassy over the last seven years, and the false prosecutions against him to persecute him for being a whistleblower of mass assassinations and massacres of civilians and women and children in the Middle East by the USA in conspiracy with the UK and the global media, so this is a formal notice of treason against all government officials who refuse to take appropriate action to bring Julian Assange to safety in his country where he is an Australian citizen.

The Australian government has so far failed in its duty to its citizens and has conspired with the UK and USA to terrorize him in the last seven years, and this is a formal notice against all the corrupt officials in Australia who are continuing to ignore the public interest, to ignore the public demand for his immediate release from HMP Belmarsh, to silence him for the truths that he and the work of WikiLeaks (has brought forward).

And the Australian government is part and parcel of the crimes of treason, of denying humanity the truth of the terrorism this planet is being subjected to by the USA UK pirate currencies in conspiracy with Ecuadorian–Ecuador and the Ecuadorian Embassy in London—government and Australian government and the Australian Embassy in London and I speak on behalf of the million supporters of Julian Assange of WikiLeaks.

And this is a demand for a witness protection order to be issued by the Australian Government to extradite him to safety where he can be rehabilitated, recuperated and restituted in his job as a journalist.”

Personal Liability Claim for Jeremy Corbyn, Opposition Leader for Failing to Enforce Witness Protections for Whistleblowers

In earlier calls made to the Australian Embassy and Jeremy Corbyn’s office, where Ms. Berry sought to relay the immediacy of the need for Julian Assange to be offered witness protection and removed from custody of the prison system because his health was in danger, she was met with cool disinterest and canned advice to call instead for an emergency vehicle from “police authorities,” obviously a meaningless suggestion.

On May 14 however, speaking to a person named Louie at Jeremy Corbyn’s office whose voice appeared oddly distorted, and who spoke repeatedly over her, Neelu Berry brought up the situation of Sabine McNeill wrongfully incarcerated in Bronzefield Prison since January this year, sentenced for 9 years (and who recently won permission to appeal her conviction in the Criminal Appeal Court in Royal Courts of Justice, London) after whistleblowing on crimes against children, and of Julian Assange in Belmarsh Prison, and stated that “Jeremy Corbyn was personally liable for all the crimes committed by the prison service, the courts; as the Opposition Leader it’s his job to ensure that witnesses are protected and protected witnesses are not held in jails as political prisoners by the organized crime network in the UK.”

She also stated fearlessly and unequivocally that it was a “treasonous crime to deny remedy to whistlebowers in the UK, and Jeremy Corbyn cannot continue in his office if Julian Assange is not released” adding that Louie needed to send him this recording, and would be obstructing remedy if he could not listen to and convey concerns from the public to an elected public servant. To Louie’s neutral note that Corbyn did not have the authority to release Assange, she said “If he does not have authority he should step down because he has failed to protect Julian Assange,” as also Prime Minister Theresa May, she noted.

Especially powerful was her concluding statement where she urged Louie to pass on the information that this was notice of “personal liability of Jeremy Corbyn and he is unfit for office and he will be removed from office as of 24 hours from now if Julian Assange and Sabine McNeill are not released from these prisons, and Theresa May as well.”

{Click on graphic for video link to Neelu’s conversation with Jeremy Corbyn’s office on Facebook.]

Australian High Commission Consul Says He Cannot Discuss War-Crimes-Whistleblower Julian Assange Because of the Privacy Act

In a truly astounding conversation with Mr. Gerrard Woodward, a Consul at the Australian High Commission on May 15, Neelu Berry, who introduced herself as a spokesperson for the millions of supporters of Julian Assange was first asked peremptorily if she was calling about a consular matter then told the Consul could not speak with her about this matter because of the Privacy Act.

Neelu corrected him, reminding him that Julian Assange was a whistleblower on mass massacres of civilians who qualified for whistleblower protections for protected witnesses under the Public Interest Disclosure Act and the Criminal Law Act of 1967, where “he is protected from any prosecutions pending the corruption investigations of the Mass Remedy Process of the Equity Monarchy Trusts.”

She also informed him that by refusing to act he was criminally covering up the fact that Julian Assange was actually a “protected witness who is being tortured in a prison in the UK–I have demanded his release and I have demanded the Australian Embassy is responsible for his false persecution.”

The consul sounded affronted when told he was criminally covering up and demanded to know his caller’s name and number and the exact allegations, at which point Ms. Berry, informing him he was threatening and intimidating her, referred him to Edward Ellis, the Equity Lawyer, on whose behalf she said she was speaking, which he did not seem to appreciate.

He also seemed to think it was critical to state that this was not the Australian Embassy but the Australian High Commission, to which Ms. Berry responded, classically: “It doesn’t matter what you call yourself you are failing to do what you’re supposed to do for the Australian citizen.”

Two matters of note: One, the Consul actually stated that if she had “imminent concern” for him being in imminent harm or danger, she needed to report it to the local police, not the Australian High Commission. Is there anyone in the UK or world who is not aware Julian Assange has been imprisoned? How exactly would reporting his situation to the local police—who arrested and assisted in incarcerating him—help? But of course, the Consul was striving to ignore it was Assange being spoken of here, and stated again he could not help with this.

Neelu responded: “You’re just proving to me that you’re subservient to the state terrorists in the UK, USA, and Europe, you’ve just confirmed that to me the Australian Embassy is subservient to criminals.”

Two, the consul appeared irate and stated, “As a consul I am posted to the UK and under the Vienna Conventions I am an internationally protected person –and for you to ring up and make allegations against me, I can take action against you.”

Neelu pointed out that he had not provided any public service and was now “threatening (her) with legal action for demanding public service, for demanding the rescue of Julian Assange who is an Australian citizen,” and was proving he was not fit for public service. She also stated, “I hope this call is recorded and sent to the Commissioner for your immediate dismissal” stating “This is a criminal complaint this is a formal complaint, this is a formal complaint against you for embezzling public money.”

The nature and tenor of this exchange suggests that the Australian High Commission—or this Consul speaking for them–has little interest currently in protecting Julian Assange. It also establishes that Neelu Berry is an outstanding advocate for humanity, willing and able to speak out for persecuted whistleblowers. Her emphasis on the need for witness protections for Julian Assange is an important one; it’s true, whistleblowers are protected on paper, they need to be protected in fact. Crime to cover up crime—incarcerating a whistleblower who published evidence of war crimes and much else does seem to be a way of drawing attention away from and concealing the massive war crimes of Iraq and Afghanistan wreaked by corrupt UK and US governments — when in reality, more of those actions should be exposed and prosecuted.

This conversation which Neelu notes comprises a complaint about the denial of remedy and public service regarding a whistleblower who should be protected is here:

Many thanks to Neelu Berry for her actions of speaking truth to installed bureaucrats, and her insistence on witness protections for whistleblowers.

(Information on Sabine McNeill above updated 5/18/2019.)

***

Mr. Edward Ellis, Equity Lawyer, Reports the Launch of a Mass Corruption Remedy Process in the United Kingdom and Calls for Principled Independents and Empowered Citizens to Step Forward

Posted on May 3, 2019 by Ramola D | 1 comment

–Ramola D/Posted 5/3/2019

In a series of explicatory conversations at Ramola D Reports over the past few weeks, the third being Report #128 livestreamed on Tuesday evening, April 30, and at Sean Maguire’s Out of the Bag podcast, Mr. Edward Ellis, an Equity Lawyer in the tradition of a small minority of 60 Equity Lawyers (once numbering 6000) in England guarding the flame of Truth, Honesty, and Justice through management of the Equity Monarchy Trusts, reports the cornerstone launch of a Mass Corruption Remedy Process in the UK, one he has been working on, he says, mostly alone but with others behind the scenes and a few by his side, for over 15 years, through the course of much change in both the US and UK, where the recent change of guard in terms of US Presidents has not disrupted the process with both Mr. Obama and Mr. Trump supporting the Remedy Process.

Corruption Remedy Process Seeks to Halt Dictatorships

What this process addresses is nothing less than the advance of totalitarianism upheld by entrenched corruption in UK courts, government and Parliament, he reports. The Corruption Remedy Process seeks to oust the underhand reach of the vast organized crime syndicate responsible for the longstanding general abuse of powers across the spectrum where citizens are stripped of basic human rights, and retaliation against whistleblowers in every sphere, with confiscation of homes, children, and vehicles, and imposition of censorship and limitations on citizens’ free speech and activism by an over-reaching Dictator State has become an egregious norm.

Indeed, Edward Ellis notes that the proof that the UK is a Dictatorship stems from “in particular, the persecution of whistleblowers who have witnessed State Terrorism” who have called attention to their cases but been denied State Protection.

How the Dictator State has become rooted in the UK, he suggests dates back to 45 years ago when the Equity Monarchy Trusts fell into disuse through the politicians’ establishment of the European Constitution and when nothing less than Election Fraud sealed the British Referenda Acceptance of the EU Constitution. By obtaining proof of this election fraud in 2004, Mr. Ellis revived use of the Equity Monarchy Trusts, which “started a Corruption Remedy Process that has continued for 15 years.”

Equity Law and the Equity Monarch Trusts Offer Corrective Measure

Shropshire Hills

Recognizing that it was going to fall on his generation to use the legacy of knowledge Equity lawyers held, to definitively address corruption, Edward explains in his third interview Report # 128, how he chose to abandon an earlier intention to run for Parliament from his home county of Northern Shrophire to focus instead on the larger and more pressing matter of addressing wide-scale corruption and criminality in the UK.

In his first interview, Report #124, Edward reached deep into UK history, pre- and post the establishment of Roman Catholicism, the Papacy and the Vatican to trace how the gifts of intelligence, leadership, and morality of the gnostic Christians who traveled to the UK have been preserved to this day in Equity Lawyers and will ultimately make the difference in swinging the world back to remedying corruption.

Because the Equity Monarch Trusts—a powerful means of correction extant always behind the facade of ongoing Government, and now being invoked– govern Parliament session powers, he says much has already come out of it, starting with the removal of Mr. Blair in 2006, after he engaged in Extradition Fraud of Mr. Ellis’s business partner who had invented a foolproof means of securing Advanced Electronic Signatures to benefit citizens rather than permit this to become a tool for control and dominance, for instance over people’s bank balances or free exchange of goods, services, and money by the Dictator State; this technological effort to protect Citizen Powers, just when they were in line to get 5 or 6 opening contracts which would prime demand for further sales was quelled by Mr. Blair and the underground organized-crime network clamping down on it, although everything was in place at the time to make the technology available also to other countries.

The ways by which the inventor was framed and wrongfully implicated in a drug deal by using his address as a decoy address for drug trafficking, thence arrested and jailed and extradited, with many unlawful acts committed along the way including permitting Dutch police to come onto British soil to make arrests, were unearthed and traced back by Mr. Ellis and his team to top levels in British government, including Mr. Blair. “I got the Corruption Proof and served a Corruption Notice on the Crown and Parliament, and revived use of the Equity Monarchy Trusts, and from that time on, Blair was doomed.”

Prime Ministers Apprised of the Corruption Remedy Process

“In 2006 the choice for Prime Minister Mr Blair was to sign a 10-Month retirement Notice or face a Parliament Session Refusal and Forced General Election with Mass Publicity for the Corruption Proof and Remedy Denial Fraud Proof. He signed the Retirement Notice.” Mr. Blair offered to retire but apparently did not repudiate his partners in crime—the powerful organized crime syndicate which supported him—and “spent the rest of his time in office making Protection Fraud Arrangements in the hope they would last his lifetime.” Part of the deals made with these unseen parties, Edward reports, included the Peace Envoy to the Middle East position that he enjoyed post his retirement as Prime Minister.

The Corruption Remedy Process continued during Mr Gordon Brown’s reign as Prime Minister. “In 2007, the choice for Prime Minister Mr Brown was to accept the Corruption Remedy Conditions in the Parliament Session Agreement or face a Forced General Election. He tried to resist, lost confidence, and signed. Organised Crime controlled the Labour Governing Majority. He had no hope of performing the Remedy Conditions. The result was a Remedy Failure Finding, Unfitness Finding and Dismissal Priority Finding against him and the Labour Majority. The 2009 Expense Account Scandals were used to execute it.”

Citizens Have Corruption Control Jurisdiction

Corruption and crime in government can through Equity be addressed by citizens who are empowered by natural rights under Common Law or Equity Governance, Mr. Ellis notes, to investigate instances of corruption, and activate the Remedy Process whereby a mass general election can be forced and new principled candidates selected to replace the corrupt ones. “The Citizen, Crown and Lord Bishops have Corruption Control Jurisdictions that govern parliament Session Powers. The Citizen has Investigation Jurisdiction. The Crown has Prosecution Jurisdiction. The 24 Lord Bishops have Adjudication Jurisdiction. Up to 12 Lord Bishops sit as Trial Jurors. Up to 12 Different Lord Bishops sit as Appeal Jurors. Nothing happens until the Citizen gets Corruption Proof. The action starts when the Citizen does get Corruption Proof.”

This Corruption Proof is provided when people and whistleblowers in the community step forward to reveal criminality and corruption wreaked against them under cover of official action or misuse of authority; the collecting of all their cases as evidence of corruption and fraud of various kinds permits the Remedy process to posit a collection of documented claims as a first step in addressing the corruption. Over the past 15 years, Mr. Ellis has been collecting people’s cases; these include cases of child removal by the State, or foreclosure on homes, or confiscation of property such as vehicles. Not all of these cases can find remedy today, he says, since some of these children have aged out of the foster system into which they were wrongfully subsumed, but the effort of seeking remedy for all is still a valuable one.

In all, the power of the Citizen to exert critical enquiry and claim rightful jurisdiction over investigation of government corruption and complaint as well as to make reasoned choices over structures of government such as staying in the EU is significant. “Politicians misjudged the influence it had. It was a Significant Influence that got the Leave Decision from the Brexit Referenda.”

Citizens Need to Empower Themselves, Study Common Law, Make Claims, Run for Office
Yet citizens will not achieve much if they do not gain the mindset of being empowered and recognizing they can indeed act to make changes in their local Councils or governments. Such empowerment would come from reading, studying and understanding the Common Law and Equity Governance, recognizing their innate rights and taking action to express their grievances in the form of a claim so that the Remedy Process involving the Crown and Lord Bishops can proceed with findings of Unfitness against the corrupt MPs and councilmen, and citizens can endorse new candidates in a forced general election. What is needed indeed are people of integrity in communities stepping forward to run in every constituency in order to bring an end to the fascist hold on communities by corrupt candidates and syndicates.

The Forced General Election will flush a lot out in a short time. The Remedy Process needs Independent Candidates in every constituency who at short notice can be Substitute Candidates for Discredited Candidates of the Major Political Parties. The Independent Candidates will need Credible Policies.” Adam Mustafa, an Independent Candidate in the Council Elections is currently doing Election Research in a trial run, says Mr. Ellis, to discover how the Media and Voters respond to an Election Campaign for Equity Governance using the Equity Monarchy Trusts and the Common Law against Dictator Governance using the European Constitution. Then this “Equity Governance Policy” can be used as a “Core Policy.” The Independents will have to apply it as relevant for local voters.

Replacement Candidates, Media Coverage, and Caretaker Prime Minister

Not ruled out either are independent candidates from the existing political parties, who are invited to make the change and present viable replacement candidates for the soon-to-be-discredited MPs.

Mainstream media journalists, Mr. Ellis notes, although not yet covering this matter currently have been cautiously expressing cognizance of Mr. Ellis’s equity Remedy work by beginning to use the language of decrying “corruption” and emphasizing “citizen” rights as opposed to previous focus on “public interest” alone.

Remarkably his proposition and wording of deploying a “Caretaker Prime Minister”appears to have caught on and has been mentioned in mainstream media, indicating their awareness of the Corruption scandal. “We might even reach the stage where there is a short session of Parliament with a caretaker prime minister to enable the parties to organize themselves because the prime minister and the opposition leader have both been involved in the protection frauds.“

For journalists to maintain their profile and reputation through the upcoming changes, Mr. Ellis suggests, they will have to start covering the new candidates running on principled platforms and seeking to set right historic wrongs.

Honorable Officers versus Corrupt Officers and Courts

Corruption in the current government has come under scrutiny. “In 2017 the choice for Prime Minister Mrs May was to call a Surprise General Election or face a Forced General Election. The Corruption Remedy Conditions needed an Election Free Period to enable a Long Session for Remedy Management. The Corrupt Officers had many chances to choose between Remedy Co-operation and Continuing Corruption.”

Honorable professionals at every level stepped forward to support the Corruption Remedy process. This is a point Edward stressed in Reports 124, 125, and 128, that many in Government, including the British Secret Services currently recognize the advanced state of decay and out-of-control totalitarianism in the UK government and courts and have sought to help by providing confirmation of corruption from the inside.

“Ordinary Officers deserted the Corruption Controllers. The result is Proof Sets that validate the Forced General Election with Mass Publicity for the Corruption Proof. Some of the Honourable MPs believe they need a Forced General Election for Remedy Management against the Law Professions and Law Courts.”

UK Government Actions Against Julian Assange

The current UK government action against Wikileaks founder and whistleblowing journalist Julian Assange of dramatic public removal from the Ecuadorian Embassy, arrest and incarceration, under clouds of Extradition threat, which got underway directly after Mr. Ellis’s first conversation where he spoke about the Extradition Fraud Mr. Blair had enacted, is one that appears to have media and celebrity spotlight associated with it. “I don’t know if Mr. Assange has committed any crime,” says Mr. Ellis, making reference to the leaks of classified material Wikileaks has put out (while protecting its government sources), but in case of extradition or a call for same, he cautions Mr. Trump to wait to see what the UK government does, which at time of writing appears to be the extraordinary conviction (for jumping bail) of 50 weeks or a near-year in prison, before he issues any action on the matter if he does.

While he has stated he has not contacted Julian Assange or further intervened, Mr. Ellis notes that “any whistleblowers imprisoned in false prosecutions will be subjected to Immediate Release on Grounds of the evidence of State Dictatorships and State Terrorism against Whistleblowers.”

Next Step is to Empower Leaders and Top Activists to Move from Protest to Remedy

Mr. Ellis calls for Remedy publicity and further coverage by media in the UK and online so that people may learn about what is happening and step forward in their own counties and councils as people of integrity offering new and principled platforms and campaigns. The next step, he says, is to empower leaders and activists in all spheres, while also transferring this methodology to other Republics such as Ireland, France, Spain: “The Popular Leaders need to progress from Protest Behaviour to Remedy Management. They need Corruption Control Jurisdictions for the Citizen in the Republics.”

Noting that he supports Mr. Gilroy in Ireland, he suggests that a knowledge of equity governance will greatly help him: “I heard an Audio Record of Irish Citizen Mr Gilroy. He has courage, generosity and passion. I have not researched him or his work. I have listened to a few minutes of him speaking. The Audio Record Evidence suggests he has exactly the right issues. It is the Legal Case Management Monopoly of Qualified Lawyers and Career Bribery and Career Blackmail of Qualified Lawyer to Manage Case Sabotage Frauds against Corruption Victims. Irish Citizen Mr Gilroy did not appear to know that Citizen Jurisdiction includes providing Legal Case Management for Corruption Victims. The Case Management Monopoly for Qualified Lawyers was a Sabotage Fraud against the Citizen Jurisdiction. All he needs to know is to claim Citizen Jurisdiction and enough background to explain what it is.”

Using Citizen Jurisdiction to Move From Victim Protester to Authority Figure

Much will lie in the recognition by people of Citizen Jurisdiction. Currently, Edward notes: “Protesters are asserting the Citizen Identity. They are taking Citizen Responsibilities and protesting about Citizen Disempowerment. All they need to do is claim Citizen Jurisdiction. They will stop being Victim Protesters and be Authority Figures.” The transition from complaint and protest to claiming citizen jurisdiction and becoming authority figures—whereby citizens question and challenge corruption and openly hold politicians responsible and engage in legal case management of corruption and fraud cases themselves—needs to be made.

From what Edward Ellis says, rolling changes are underfoot. Officials within the administration—many of whom are “honorable officers”–have recognized the untenability of the corruption pervasive at the top levels and are seeking to assist citizens to make a sea-change.

“The Remedy Process has Criminal Conspiracy Proof against Top Judges, the Attorney General, Prime Minister Mrs May, and Opposition Leader Mr Corbyn. The Cabinet Ministers have Joint Responsibility with the Prime Minister. They need Knew Nothing Defences to avoid Joint Liability. The Cabinet Leaks about Non-Disclosure Frauds by the Prime Minister were needed for the Knew Nothing Defences to avoid Joint Liability…The challenge now is helping the Dictator Republics to convert to Equity Republics by use of Corruption Control Jurisdictions for the Citizen. It needs the Populist Leaders.”

“Preparations are underway to collect grievances from the public on a mass scale but all those seeking to have their cases heard are advised to label documents as requested and volunteer to assist with the case management process. For a deeper look at what exactly has transpired here and understand the enormity of the accomplishment Edward Ellis is reporting, please listen to all three podcasts. Equity Lawyer Edward Ellis may be contacted at edward.w.ellis@gmail.com.