–Ramola D/Posted 5/3/2019
In a series of explicatory conversations at Ramola D Reports over the past few weeks, the third being Report #128 livestreamed on Tuesday evening, April 30, and at Sean Maguire’s Out of the Bag podcast, Mr. Edward Ellis, an Equity Lawyer in the tradition of a small minority of 60 Equity Lawyers (once numbering 6000) in England guarding the flame of Truth, Honesty, and Justice through management of the Equity Monarchy Trusts, reports the cornerstone launch of a Mass Corruption Remedy Process in the UK, one he has been working on, he says, mostly alone but with others behind the scenes and a few by his side, for over 15 years, through the course of much change in both the US and UK, where the recent change of guard in terms of US Presidents has not disrupted the process with both Mr. Obama and Mr. Trump supporting the Remedy Process.
Corruption Remedy Process Seeks to Halt Dictatorships
What this process addresses is nothing less than the advance of totalitarianism upheld by entrenched corruption in UK courts, government and Parliament, he reports. The Corruption Remedy Process seeks to oust the underhand reach of the vast organized crime syndicate responsible for the longstanding general abuse of powers across the spectrum where citizens are stripped of basic human rights, and retaliation against whistleblowers in every sphere, with confiscation of homes, children, and vehicles, and imposition of censorship and limitations on citizens’ free speech and activism by an over-reaching Dictator State has become an egregious norm.
Indeed, Edward Ellis notes that the proof that the UK is a Dictatorship stems from “in particular, the persecution of whistleblowers who have witnessed State Terrorism” who have called attention to their cases but been denied State Protection.
How the Dictator State has become rooted in the UK, he suggests dates back to 45 years ago when the Equity Monarchy Trusts fell into disuse through the politicians’ establishment of the European Constitution and when nothing less than Election Fraud sealed the British Referenda Acceptance of the EU Constitution. By obtaining proof of this election fraud in 2004, Mr. Ellis revived use of the Equity Monarchy Trusts, which “started a Corruption Remedy Process that has continued for 15 years.”
Equity Law and the Equity Monarch Trusts Offer Corrective Measure
Recognizing that it was going to fall on his generation to use the legacy of knowledge Equity lawyers held, to definitively address corruption, Edward explains in his third interview Report # 128, how he chose to abandon an earlier intention to run for Parliament from his home county of Northern Shrophire to focus instead on the larger and more pressing matter of addressing wide-scale corruption and criminality in the UK.
In his first interview, Report #124, Edward reached deep into UK history, pre- and post the establishment of Roman Catholicism, the Papacy and the Vatican to trace how the gifts of intelligence, leadership, and morality of the gnostic Christians who traveled to the UK have been preserved to this day in Equity Lawyers and will ultimately make the difference in swinging the world back to remedying corruption.
Because the Equity Monarch Trusts—a powerful means of correction extant always behind the facade of ongoing Government, and now being invoked– govern Parliament session powers, he says much has already come out of it, starting with the removal of Mr. Blair in 2006, after he engaged in Extradition Fraud of Mr. Ellis’s business partner who had invented a foolproof means of securing Advanced Electronic Signatures to benefit citizens rather than permit this to become a tool for control and dominance, for instance over people’s bank balances or free exchange of goods, services, and money by the Dictator State; this technological effort to protect Citizen Powers, just when they were in line to get 5 or 6 opening contracts which would prime demand for further sales was quelled by Mr. Blair and the underground organized-crime network clamping down on it, although everything was in place at the time to make the technology available also to other countries.
The ways by which the inventor was framed and wrongfully implicated in a drug deal by using his address as a decoy address for drug trafficking, thence arrested and jailed and extradited, with many unlawful acts committed along the way including permitting Dutch police to come onto British soil to make arrests, were unearthed and traced back by Mr. Ellis and his team to top levels in British government, including Mr. Blair. “I got the Corruption Proof and served a Corruption Notice on the Crown and Parliament, and revived use of the Equity Monarchy Trusts, and from that time on, Blair was doomed.”
Prime Ministers Apprised of the Corruption Remedy Process
“In 2006 the choice for Prime Minister Mr Blair was to sign a 10-Month retirement Notice or face a Parliament Session Refusal and Forced General Election with Mass Publicity for the Corruption Proof and Remedy Denial Fraud Proof. He signed the Retirement Notice.” Mr. Blair offered to retire but apparently did not repudiate his partners in crime—the powerful organized crime syndicate which supported him—and “spent the rest of his time in office making Protection Fraud Arrangements in the hope they would last his lifetime.” Part of the deals made with these unseen parties, Edward reports, included the Peace Envoy to the Middle East position that he enjoyed post his retirement as Prime Minister.
The Corruption Remedy Process continued during Mr Gordon Brown’s reign as Prime Minister. “In 2007, the choice for Prime Minister Mr Brown was to accept the Corruption Remedy Conditions in the Parliament Session Agreement or face a Forced General Election. He tried to resist, lost confidence, and signed. Organised Crime controlled the Labour Governing Majority. He had no hope of performing the Remedy Conditions. The result was a Remedy Failure Finding, Unfitness Finding and Dismissal Priority Finding against him and the Labour Majority. The 2009 Expense Account Scandals were used to execute it.”
Citizens Have Corruption Control Jurisdiction
Corruption and crime in government can through Equity be addressed by citizens who are empowered by natural rights under Common Law or Equity Governance, Mr. Ellis notes, to investigate instances of corruption, and activate the Remedy Process whereby a mass general election can be forced and new principled candidates selected to replace the corrupt ones. “The Citizen, Crown and Lord Bishops have Corruption Control Jurisdictions that govern parliament Session Powers. The Citizen has Investigation Jurisdiction. The Crown has Prosecution Jurisdiction. The 24 Lord Bishops have Adjudication Jurisdiction. Up to 12 Lord Bishops sit as Trial Jurors. Up to 12 Different Lord Bishops sit as Appeal Jurors. Nothing happens until the Citizen gets Corruption Proof. The action starts when the Citizen does get Corruption Proof.”
This Corruption Proof is provided when people and whistleblowers in the community step forward to reveal criminality and corruption wreaked against them under cover of official action or misuse of authority; the collecting of all their cases as evidence of corruption and fraud of various kinds permits the Remedy process to posit a collection of documented claims as a first step in addressing the corruption. Over the past 15 years, Mr. Ellis has been collecting people’s cases; these include cases of child removal by the State, or foreclosure on homes, or confiscation of property such as vehicles. Not all of these cases can find remedy today, he says, since some of these children have aged out of the foster system into which they were wrongfully subsumed, but the effort of seeking remedy for all is still a valuable one.
In all, the power of the Citizen to exert critical enquiry and claim rightful jurisdiction over investigation of government corruption and complaint as well as to make reasoned choices over structures of government such as staying in the EU is significant. “Politicians misjudged the influence it had. It was a Significant Influence that got the Leave Decision from the Brexit Referenda.”
Citizens Need to Empower Themselves, Study Common Law, Make Claims, Run for Office
Yet citizens will not achieve much if they do not gain the mindset of being empowered and recognizing they can indeed act to make changes in their local Councils or governments. Such empowerment would come from reading, studying and understanding the Common Law and Equity Governance, recognizing their innate rights and taking action to express their grievances in the form of a claim so that the Remedy Process involving the Crown and Lord Bishops can proceed with findings of Unfitness against the corrupt MPs and councilmen, and citizens can endorse new candidates in a forced general election. What is needed indeed are people of integrity in communities stepping forward to run in every constituency in order to bring an end to the fascist hold on communities by corrupt candidates and syndicates.
The Forced General Election will flush a lot out in a short time. The Remedy Process needs Independent Candidates in every constituency who at short notice can be Substitute Candidates for Discredited Candidates of the Major Political Parties. The Independent Candidates will need Credible Policies.” Adam Mustafa, an Independent Candidate in the Council Elections is currently doing Election Research in a trial run, says Mr. Ellis, to discover how the Media and Voters respond to an Election Campaign for Equity Governance using the Equity Monarchy Trusts and the Common Law against Dictator Governance using the European Constitution. Then this “Equity Governance Policy” can be used as a “Core Policy.” The Independents will have to apply it as relevant for local voters.
Replacement Candidates, Media Coverage, and Caretaker Prime Minister
Not ruled out either are independent candidates from the existing political parties, who are invited to make the change and present viable replacement candidates for the soon-to-be-discredited MPs.
Mainstream media journalists, Mr. Ellis notes, although not yet covering this matter currently have been cautiously expressing cognizance of Mr. Ellis’s equity Remedy work by beginning to use the language of decrying “corruption” and emphasizing “citizen” rights as opposed to previous focus on “public interest” alone.
Remarkably his proposition and wording of deploying a “Caretaker Prime Minister”appears to have caught on and has been mentioned in mainstream media, indicating their awareness of the Corruption scandal. “We might even reach the stage where there is a short session of Parliament with a caretaker prime minister to enable the parties to organize themselves because the prime minister and the opposition leader have both been involved in the protection frauds.“
For journalists to maintain their profile and reputation through the upcoming changes, Mr. Ellis suggests, they will have to start covering the new candidates running on principled platforms and seeking to set right historic wrongs.
Honorable Officers versus Corrupt Officers and Courts
Corruption in the current government has come under scrutiny. “In 2017 the choice for Prime Minister Mrs May was to call a Surprise General Election or face a Forced General Election. The Corruption Remedy Conditions needed an Election Free Period to enable a Long Session for Remedy Management. The Corrupt Officers had many chances to choose between Remedy Co-operation and Continuing Corruption.”
Honorable professionals at every level stepped forward to support the Corruption Remedy process. This is a point Edward stressed in Reports 124, 125, and 128, that many in Government, including the British Secret Services currently recognize the advanced state of decay and out-of-control totalitarianism in the UK government and courts and have sought to help by providing confirmation of corruption from the inside.
“Ordinary Officers deserted the Corruption Controllers. The result is Proof Sets that validate the Forced General Election with Mass Publicity for the Corruption Proof. Some of the Honourable MPs believe they need a Forced General Election for Remedy Management against the Law Professions and Law Courts.”
UK Government Actions Against Julian Assange
The current UK government action against Wikileaks founder and whistleblowing journalist Julian Assange of dramatic public removal from the Ecuadorian Embassy, arrest and incarceration, under clouds of Extradition threat, which got underway directly after Mr. Ellis’s first conversation where he spoke about the Extradition Fraud Mr. Blair had enacted, is one that appears to have media and celebrity spotlight associated with it. “I don’t know if Mr. Assange has committed any crime,” says Mr. Ellis, making reference to the leaks of classified material Wikileaks has put out (while protecting its government sources), but in case of extradition or a call for same, he cautions Mr. Trump to wait to see what the UK government does, which at time of writing appears to be the extraordinary conviction (for jumping bail) of 50 weeks or a near-year in prison, before he issues any action on the matter if he does.
While he has stated he has not contacted Julian Assange or further intervened, Mr. Ellis notes that “any whistleblowers imprisoned in false prosecutions will be subjected to Immediate Release on Grounds of the evidence of State Dictatorships and State Terrorism against Whistleblowers.”
Next Step is to Empower Leaders and Top Activists to Move from Protest to Remedy
Mr. Ellis calls for Remedy publicity and further coverage by media in the UK and online so that people may learn about what is happening and step forward in their own counties and councils as people of integrity offering new and principled platforms and campaigns. The next step, he says, is to empower leaders and activists in all spheres, while also transferring this methodology to other Republics such as Ireland, France, Spain: “The Popular Leaders need to progress from Protest Behaviour to Remedy Management. They need Corruption Control Jurisdictions for the Citizen in the Republics.”
Noting that he supports Mr. Gilroy in Ireland, he suggests that a knowledge of equity governance will greatly help him: “I heard an Audio Record of Irish Citizen Mr Gilroy. He has courage, generosity and passion. I have not researched him or his work. I have listened to a few minutes of him speaking. The Audio Record Evidence suggests he has exactly the right issues. It is the Legal Case Management Monopoly of Qualified Lawyers and Career Bribery and Career Blackmail of Qualified Lawyer to Manage Case Sabotage Frauds against Corruption Victims. Irish Citizen Mr Gilroy did not appear to know that Citizen Jurisdiction includes providing Legal Case Management for Corruption Victims. The Case Management Monopoly for Qualified Lawyers was a Sabotage Fraud against the Citizen Jurisdiction. All he needs to know is to claim Citizen Jurisdiction and enough background to explain what it is.”
Using Citizen Jurisdiction to Move From Victim Protester to Authority Figure
Much will lie in the recognition by people of Citizen Jurisdiction. Currently, Edward notes: “Protesters are asserting the Citizen Identity. They are taking Citizen Responsibilities and protesting about Citizen Disempowerment. All they need to do is claim Citizen Jurisdiction. They will stop being Victim Protesters and be Authority Figures.” The transition from complaint and protest to claiming citizen jurisdiction and becoming authority figures—whereby citizens question and challenge corruption and openly hold politicians responsible and engage in legal case management of corruption and fraud cases themselves—needs to be made.
From what Edward Ellis says, rolling changes are underfoot. Officials within the administration—many of whom are “honorable officers”–have recognized the untenability of the corruption pervasive at the top levels and are seeking to assist citizens to make a sea-change.
“The Remedy Process has Criminal Conspiracy Proof against Top Judges, the Attorney General, Prime Minister Mrs May, and Opposition Leader Mr Corbyn. The Cabinet Ministers have Joint Responsibility with the Prime Minister. They need Knew Nothing Defences to avoid Joint Liability. The Cabinet Leaks about Non-Disclosure Frauds by the Prime Minister were needed for the Knew Nothing Defences to avoid Joint Liability…The challenge now is helping the Dictator Republics to convert to Equity Republics by use of Corruption Control Jurisdictions for the Citizen. It needs the Populist Leaders.”
“Preparations are underway to collect grievances from the public on a mass scale but all those seeking to have their cases heard are advised to label documents as requested and volunteer to assist with the case management process. For a deeper look at what exactly has transpired here and understand the enormity of the accomplishment Edward Ellis is reporting, please listen to all three podcasts. Equity Lawyer Edward Ellis may be contacted at email@example.com.