News Report & Op-Ed | Ramola D | September 14, 2026
Dr. Sherrie Tenpenny draws our attention to this September 2024 Pact for the Future, approved and released by the United Nations in a bid apparently to go around the World Health Organization’s failed Pandemic Treaty, offering much in the way of “sustainable development” and “global governance” and “climate change” policies and goals for what they imagine will be a shared international future where any deviation from their planned AI and digital-enslavement–read brain enslavement and life enslavement, social-credit-based, nanobioelectronics-based–will be tagged “disinformation” “misinformation” or “hate speech” and countered and disciplined.
https://www.un.org/sites/un2.un.org/files/sotf-pact_for_the_future_adopted.pdf
https://www.un.org/en/summit-of-the-future/pact-for-the-future
Commentary by Dr. Tenpenny: https://www.bitchute.com/video/vwakY0OKv92b
There are numerous problems with this overarching set of promises to take care of everyone worldwide and their data, the most insidious of all being the embrace of Open Data, Data Governance, and a Global Digital Compact which won’t say outright this is all about the theft of your personal private data including your “brain data” and intellectual property, all to be governed by Artificial Intelligence.
The UN Doesn’t Honor Human Rights Reports of Torture and Clandestine AP-DEW Abuse of People’s Bodies and Brains by CIA, Military, Security, Police, Criminal Justice Abusers
Promises to honor human rights in data collection and usage cannot be believed in the face of the UN’s utter refusal to recognize the rights of people worldwide to the autonomy of their own brains and bodies, severely assailed by the practice, now decades-long, of governments worldwide using Secrecy to conceal unlawful and inhumane brain experimentation and anti-personnel directed energy weapons testing on bodies and brains in every country.
Because these gratuitous-violence-in-silence Radar/Radio/Electrical projects have been wrongfully (unlawfully, illegally, illegitimately) protected by “Secrecy”, Special Access Program, Controlled Access Program, and Sensitive Compartmented Information labels, the UN, like all Governments permitting it, ignore the undeniable, continuous cries of harm, torture and abuse accruing from the use of these through-wall electronic bioweapons and acoustic neuroweapons reported by hundreds of thousands of highly credible people of all ages and professions and permits this extreme, violative, domestic abuse of human rights to continue.
Governments don’t stop any of it, and nor does the UN–which went so far at one point to acknowledge torture reports from people as “cybertorture” but did nothing to stop it. Magnus Olsson, EUCACH Director: UN Starts Investigation to Ban Cyber Torture. [See links to articles under Human Rights Reports and AP-DEW/Neuro Tech for more.]
That’s proof that verbiage in this Pact for the Future document alleging great care for women, girls, and human rights is just so much Foam and Seawrack, nothing to be believed, heeded or listened to.
State, city, and county governments in fact encourage police to push reporters of AP-DEW/Neurotech Abuse into Psych Wards for forced-medication and false labeling as they rush to silence all reportage of this deadly domestic abuse and torture they are fostering; there is a huge increase in Mental Health Grant programs and collusive Justice-Mental Health programs now in all states, and much talk of the “increase in mental illness nationwide.” That’s Repression on Steroids–and most people consuming mainstream media reports seem to have no clue this is happening.
Has the UN Stopped the Rollout of Digitizing, Graphene-Laden Vaccines Forming Self-Assembling Electronic Networks Inside the Human Body?
Nor has the UN curbed the rollout of the COVID-19 nanoparticle-laden vaccines which set up self-assembling syn bio networks inside the human body, and respond to EMF signals–and which have caused millions of deaths and disabilities worldwide. Both of these are part and parcel of the current completely shameless use of Secrecy to run programs of Human Control and Abuse on people, without their knowledge and without their consent. Pfizer in fact recently refused to open its Australian Government contracts to supply mRNA digitizing vaccines for public perusal, citing “confidentiality”: how can such a contract affecting people be confidential? And isn’t the Senate considered part of the government?
“Any indemnity agreements between Pfizer and the Australian government are confidential, and we are not able to discuss it in this forum.” (around 2:38 below)
Senator Malcolm Roberts Exposes Pfizer Use of Secrecy Against Australians
Mik Anderson | Intracorporal NanoNetwork, Brief Summary
Digital technologies and remote-access biotechnologies are now being rolled into Public Safety and Mental Health as “medical technologies”–as revealed by the Philadelphia Department of Mental Health, and witnessed by this writer in use by “mental health worker” operatives on patients held wrongfully for long periods at the Worcester Hospital recently.
Forcing Dangerous Psychiatric Drugs Into People’s Bodies with Digital Ingested Sensors for Compliance
Now Coercive and Repressive “Digital Psychiatry” plans to use sensors inside bodies to track noxious medication to destroy minds:
Medical Devices of all kinds now offer digital tracking: https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/digital-health-center-excellence/medical-devices-incorporate-sensor-based-digital-health-technology
When there is no consent, there is only Repression, Violence in Silence, Abuse, and Slavery: That’s Digital Psychiatry.
Universal Health Coverage Will Come With Caveats Too–Forced Vaccines, Drugs, Screenings, Labeling Alleging Diagnosis, Dangerous mRNA “Therapies” and Nano AI in Your Brain
Then there’s talk of “universal health coverage” and “access to healthcare” for all–well, are we back to forced vaccines, anti-fertility vaccines, genome-altering vaccines, and lipid nano graphene-loaded vaccines for Open Data collection from your brain? That’s a form of “health coverage” we can all give a miss.
Putting AI into our brains is envisioned to be the future of Artificial Intelligence by brain scientists such as Dr. Rafael Yuste, head of the US Brain Initiative, again presented benevolently and sinisterly as offering “access” to an augmented human condition, couched in the language of human rights as Dr. Yuste reported to me in October, 2020:
UN Press Release from September 2024: https://news.un.org/en/story/2024/09/1154671
UN’s current covers, the High Level Political Forum on Sustainable Development: https://hlpf.un.org/2026/programme/we-the-peoples-shaping-the-future-of-the-un
The Pact for the Future purports to build from a Common Agenda report, issued earlier: https://www.un.org/en/content/common-agenda-report/.
Overwhelmingly, this document seeks worldwide acceptance of anonymous “science-based” Artificial Intelligence models and programs to govern data collection, analysis, and use–essentially silencing the human mind, the diversity of human thought, and all human rights to autonomy of thought, critique, analysis, speech, action, creativity, ownership of self-expression.
A Pact to enslave future generations, one to say No to. As Dr. Tenpenny suggests, this is something to counter at the local level. Increasingly, we need to become more private, not less, and challenge all organizational attempts to create “open” “public” and “commons” digital spaces built on principles which monetarily benefit bankers at the top and exploit all being encouraged to enter and participate in such spaces. Will your independence of spirit and thought be honored, your creativity, your separateness? Will you have control over what you personally choose to consume from the Internet or social media and what you choose to publish? Is your life going to be wholly Digital or are you going to exist in the physical world as an independent physical being, living in Nature, in connection with others, and reading Books?
What is being passed off as Artificial Intelligence seems to vary, and needs to be questioned. There is much to say No to. There is no such thing as one unilateral direction for Science, Progress, or the Future–people use these terms for their own purposes, their own diabolical dreams of control. “Evidence-based” and “science-based” are constructs arising out of these subjective obsessions with control, not absolutes–they need interrogation every single time they’re used.
Drop Copyright, Ban Artificial Intelligence: Question Where Neural Networks Come From First
