It’s a fact that no American President, Governor, or Mayor (of a private Government corporation–yes, all Governments, including the bankrupt US Inc. are registered as corporations) can issue LAWS pertaining to any of us.
When Governors of American States and Mayors of American cities and counties get in front of podiums in their best Brooke Brothers suits with their purple polka-dotted ties and a 100 American flags waving behind them while an ASL interpreter pantomimes their every spoken word and issue demands for the entire state to “wear masks” “take a flu shot” “get a COVID vaccine” “stand 666 feet apart” and “self-isolate” and smother their children to death with 2 masks, not one — as the irresponsible Today Show/NBC News plus Fauci Inc. first broadcast & the irresponsible New York Times pushes –they are merely doing their best to push the envelope as far as they lucidly can without appearing completely NWO-manipulated and imbecilic. (Which they are: hence the global/ist lunacy of these massively deceptive public statements.)
Every statement that such deceivers have made is a deception and a lie and these titled frontmen and frontwomen should be ashamed of themselves.
Lawmaking is a process after all which none of these CEOs and talking heads are a part of, as members of the Executive branch. None of them can announce laws or edicts or “mandates” or rules or guidelines or guidance or Executive Orders which have not been converted into statutes–codes in fact pertaining only to employees of their private corporation, even then, not to every living man and woman living in the state on the land and bound only to the laws and Constitution of “original jurisdiction” in standing on the soil, not corporate statutes–by their own set legislative process.
For further understanding regarding the State corporations being run rather blatantly by NWO/globalist foreign entities under centuries-long British and Roman piracy–endangering all our freedoms–and what Original Jurisdiction means, please see Anna von Reitz’s article Freedom is as Close, or as Far, as Original Jurisdiction
“5. Pushing any form of mask mandate or forced vaccination program on the General Public under color of law is a crime of constructive fraud.
6. Any publicly organized corporation (holding a charter or articles of incorporation from the United States Government or from any State-of-State franchise) is obligated to obey the Public Law, including the Constitutions, and cannot assume rights or authorities depriving any member of the General Public of any right guaranteed by the Constitutions or Public Laws — including the right of privacy, religious freedom, and self-determination. “
Anna von Reitz,The Brits Again — Monotonous, Isn’t It?
“Public Health” and “Public Safety” Cannot Propel Mandates on Medical Interventions Legally
The statements they have made and are currently making in front of podiums and flags which are transmitted and broadcast into printed word and spoken lie all relate in fact to medical interventions which cannot legally be mandated, whether mask, test, or vaccine, whether in name of “Public Health” “Public Safety” or “Public Anything Else” without all the requirements for Informed Consent being met (more on this subject below).
By word-trickery and sleight-of-hand, these public figures have succeeded in deceiving massive numbers of people into thinking everyone HAS to wear a mask out in public or in a store, everyone HAS to “social-distance,” and, as they are hoping now to deceive everyone into thinking everyone at some point HAS to take the (genome-deforming, nanobot-implanting, cyborging) COVID vaccine, or COVID test, and everyone HAS to “self-isolate” each time you cross a border
The word “mandate” has no significance, in terms of law, because it is not a law.
The words “guidance” and “guideline” are not references to a law.
The word “rule” is not a reference to a law.
For clear and candid discussion on this entire subject of Mandates absolutely not being laws, with reference to publications and the US Constitution, please watch and share Peggy Hall’s vitally important videos below:
Peggy Hall:No president can make a law. There is no “mask mandate” that applies to you unless you work for the federal government. Even then, it can be appealed. That’s because you have the right to life, and life requires oxygen. It is unlawful for someone to restrict your oxygen against your will.Learn more about your rights and how to protect them here: http://www.thehealthyamerican.org
“1. Stop staying “mandate” — as that word has no meaning.
2. No individual can make a law.
3. There are no laws requiring you to wear a mask.
4. Why the science of masks doesn’t even matter.
5. No one has authority over your body and your property except you.
6. You can reject any medical intervention, including masks, testing and vaccines.” — Peggy Hall/The Healthy American
No President or Governor or Mayor or store-owner or store manager or business owner citing their deceptive blather-in-front-of-podiums-and-flags can mandate any personal action involving YOUR breathing, YOUR nose, YOUR mouth, YOUR immune system, YOUR health, YOUR body, or your childrens’–even though they are daring to try to pull off this Massive Public Deception, telling you it’s all for Public Health and Public Safety. Your body and health belong to you–not to me, not to people playing President, not to Governors and misanthropes like Bill Gates who are seeking to link you up to the Cloud and supercomputing AI with their deadly mRNA vaccines and digitally-enslaving dreams of Humans 2.0.
None of these people can demand that you wear a mask, which is a medical device regulated by the FDA.
The FDA does not and cannot require you to wear a medical device–this has and always is a matter of your own choosing. Without Informed Consent succeeding a Health Risk Assessment provided by the government (which they haven’t done and cannot do), the FDA cannot and is not demanding you wear a mask.
The CDC does not and cannot require you to wear a mask–they can only push Fauci to the podium to variously bleat about wearing One Mask Two Masks or maybe Three Masks to finish off the Public Asphyxiation in style–and word their non-requirements carefully as “Considerations” while telling you to check “your locality’s mask rules.”
(Your locality cannot make rules on masks for anyone–they are a medical device, regulated by the FDA, which requires your locality to provide adequate Risk information for Informed Consent, see below.)
IMPORTANT MASK INFORMATION
From Anna de Buisseret
The Government has FAILED to conduct a Risk Assessment of the risks to the individual members of the public for the harms caused to them by mask wearing- or wearing a face covering.
Without such a Risk Assessment, the individual is NOT providing “informed consent” to wear a “medical device” (which a mask is as defined under the Medical Devices Regulations 2002).
A face “covering” falls to be regulated under the Consumer Protection Regulations. The Face Coverings Regulations are therefore - prima facie - unlawful and should not be enforced.
In the view of our legal team, the Face Coverings Regulations are ultra vires the Government’s powers but that legal argument is ongoing.
None of the supermarkets are providing their customers with a Risk Assessment either - so their customers are also not able to provide their “informed consent” to wearing a face covering/mask.
This is unlawful as “informed consent” must be obtained.
Anyone being asked to wear or use a medical device - such as a mask - should be medically assessed by an Occupational Health team for their INDIVIDUAL risk posed to them by wearing a mask.
Failure to conduct a Health & Safety Risk assessment is both a civil and a potentially criminal offence.
Therefore both the Government and the supermarkets - and anyone else enforcing mask mandates in the absence of a full Health & Safety Risk assessment in the workplace -, is acting unlawfully and can be held PERSONALLY liable for the damage caused to the individual.
Legal challenges are already being run against the “mask perpetrators” to challenge this unlawful and harmful mask mandate and cases are already being won, and damages for harm caused paid out.
I’m a specialist disability discrimination lawyer who also has a stream of claimants lining up to bring legal claims for damages from this mask mandate. Countless people are being harmed by wearing a mask and others are being harmed from the discrimination they are enduring from being mask exempt.
The flood of litigation is going to be Tsunami-like!!! Be warned: perpetrators will be held to account.
Anyone enforcing or imposing this mandate should be warned that they are acting unlawfully and will be held personally liable for the harm they cause.
I advise anyone harmed by this mask mandate in a work environment (which supermarkets are) to file a report of your harm to the Health & Safety team and ask them to conduct an investigation into whether the employer or supermarket or other “mask perpetrator" has conducted a valid H&S Risk Assessment.
The local council’s Environmental Health Officer is responsible for ensuring that commercial premises in their area are safe for the public. This includes whether it’s safe for the public to be forced to wear a face covering or mask whilst in a supermarket or other commercial premises. Without a full Risk Assessment, no one should be required or forced to wear a face covering or mask - it’s a breach of the Health & Safety laws and a potentially criminal offence.
If the employer or other “mask perpetrator “ hasn’t followed the law in forcing you to wear a mask, criminal investigations can follow under Health & Safety laws.
The Equality Act 2010 does not permit anyone to discriminate against a disabled person on the grounds of their disability.
Refusing entry to a shop or access to public services to a disabled person is prima facie disability discrimination. No evidence can be lawfully demanded. It’s a breach of both the right to privacy and the Equality Act 2010 to ask for medical evidence in this manner.
Masks worn by the public in community settings, do not prevent transmission of a virus particle as tiny as SARS-CoV-2: that’s what the scientific research evidence shows.
Masks can INCREASE the risk of transmission if not face-fitted and fit-tested for the individual wearer as leakage occurs.
Masks can INCREASE the risk of secondary bacterial and fungal infections due to incorrect putting on and taking off of the mask, incorrect storage and lack of sterilisation of the contamination collecting on the surfaces of the mask.
These contaminates are then inhaled: the moisture and humidity of the mask is a perfect breeding ground for bacteria and fungus which multiply in the mask fibres.
These are then inhaled deeply into the lungs where they multiply further, along with the loose fibres of the mask which collect in the lungs.
Secondary bacterial lung infections are a major risk factor from inhaling bacteria into the lungs. Secondary bacterial lung infections were the major cause of death in the Spanish Flu. They had cloth mask mandates then too. See a correlation??
Masks cause multiple organ damage - some of which is irreparable and permanent.
Masks cause social, cognitive, emotional and psychological harm too.
Have YOU been fully informed of all the harms that wearing a mask causes to YOU??
Have YOU had a H&S Risk Assessment by an Occupational Health Team for the risks posed to you - as an individual- for mask wearing?? If not, how do YOU know what the risks are?? How are YOU providing YOUR individual informed consent to wearing this medical device without a full H&S Risk Assessment?? You’re not able to.
You’re simply guessing that it won’t harm you in the absence of a full Risk Assessment.
I have 55 pages of scientific research evidence proving the many harms caused to the mask wearer.
I’ve prepared a detailed Risk Assessment and a Health & Safety Risk Assessment on mask wearing for any of you who would like to be informed of the harms and risks of mask wearing.
There are a team of around 70 of us professional lawyers, medics, Health & Safety inspectors, industrial hygienists, psychologists, scientists and others who are collaborating to raise legal challenges against the unlawful and harmful mask laws and mandates and policies. Our evidence is therefore drawn from top experts in their fields.
Katia Smith #COVID19
Additional Information on American Laws and Rights from Anna von Reitz
Full text of The Brits Again — Monotonous, Isn’t It?/Nov 25, 2020
There are over 200 known and separate strains of coronavirus, which is associated with influenza, otherwise known as a common cold.
The specific variety from which the still-unidentifiable and un-isolated Covid-19 virus purportedly derives is patented by the British Pirbright Institute and funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.
Oh, go figure. Again.
Meantime, many Americans are just now waking up to the following facts:
1. The CDC and NIH are not government institutions. Both are private entities that are in the business of producing and profiting from vaccines. Both compete for government contracts to carry out research and do statistical analysis, but they are not part of the government.
2. There is no provision in any Federal or State-of-State Constitution authorizing any government official to mandate anything at all about our health or medical options. Their only power is over their own employees and dependents as a condition of employment or of receiving benefits.
3. Forced vaccination is banned under the Nuremberg Code, Article 6, Sections 1 and 3, and anyone involved in a forced vaccination program is liable.
4. There is nobody responsible for harm caused by a vaccine. The pharmaceutical companies have been off the hook since the 1980’s and the governmental services corporations that accepted the liability for them are bankrupt. There remains an industry-funded “Vaccine Court” but it has a reputation for protecting the industry.
5. Pushing any form of mask mandate or forced vaccination program on the General Public under color of law is a crime of constructive fraud.
6. Any publicly organized corporation (holding a charter or articles of incorporation from the United States Government or from any State-of-State franchise) is obligated to obey the Public Law, including the Constitutions, and cannot assume rights or authorities depriving any member of the General Public of any right guaranteed by the Constitutions or Public Laws — including the right of privacy, religious freedom, and self-determination.
7. “My body, my choice.” applies to more than just abortions.
8. If someone doesn’t have the right to make you brush your teeth, they don’t have the right to make you stay home and wear a mask. Contrary to what some people and corporations have been assuming, we don’t live in a Nanny State. —————————- See this article and over 2800 others on Anna’s website here: www.annavonreitz.com
Many thanks to Peggy Hall for her outstanding video discussions, to Anna von Reitz for her profound historical excavations and writings, to the Know Your Rights group and Anna de Buisseret for their important posting on laws and rights in face of unlawful and supremely deceptive “mandates.”
This article may be re-posted anywhere online with attribution and a linkback. Please share and re-post widely.
CDC will tell you that vaccines don’t cause autism. (https://www.cdc.gov/vaccinesafety/concerns/autism/cdc2004pediatrics.html) Vaccines are safe and effective. What they don’t tell you is no vaccine has ever been tested for safety or efficacy— unlike all other drugs. It is the only medical product which is not required by law to be tested with a control group taking an inert placebo. No vaccine has ever been compared to an inert placebo–which is the routine way of testing all other drugs. No vaccine has been safety tested for more than days or weeks, but autoimmune diseases and cancer can take months or years to develop. The crazy thing is that no test is done to determine if the vaccine is effective. There is only one criterion for CDC–does the vaccine produce antibodies? If it does, the FDA approves it and CDC puts it on schedule.
It is no accident that you are not told all the facts. It is the policy of government agencies to keep you in the dark. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) stated their policy on this issue clearly: “any possible doubts, whether or not well founded, about the safety of the vaccine cannot be allowed to exist in view of the need to assure that the vaccine will continue to be used to the maximum extent consistent with the nation’s public health objectives”(Stoller, 2019.p.21) The agencies that are supposed to protect children from the consequences of corporate greed are working in tandem with Big Pharma and their goal is not to protect the health of Americans but to expand the program—at the expense of our health.
“Any possible doubts about the safety of the vaccine cannot be allowed to exist”–that is the credo of the government and the mainstream media. It explains why critics of the vaccine program are ridiculed and vilified, if not demonized, as conspiracy nuts, and anti-scientific “anti-vaxxers.”
HHS has a National Vaccine Plan. Barbara Loe Fisher aptly commented that “the National Vaccine Plan is really a Vaccine Marketing Plan for the pharmaceutical industry.” https://www.nvic.org/NVIC-Vaccine-News/March-2020/the-national-plan-to-vaccinate-every-american.aspx described in 2010 its plan for our future. The Plan is described in HHS literature beginning in 2010: “Coverage rates[of vaccinations] across the lifespan will increase, lowering outbreaks of VPDs [vaccine-preventable diseases] and decreasing geographic pockets of low coverage. Provider and public confidence in both vaccines and the entities involved in licensing, recommending, and monitoring vaccine safety will increase while the worry, concerns, and anxiety regarding vaccines, particularly with respect to safety, will decrease. Providers, parents, and the public will also support vaccines as an important and necessary part of our nation’s health system.” (https://www.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/nvpo-midcourse-review-final.pdf,p25)
To paraphrase the above: The public will realize that vaccines are safe and effective, even if they aren’t–they will have confidence both in vaccines and in government agencies which are pushing these vaccines, like CDC. The booklet leaves out one sentence: “Big Brother loves you.”
So, in HHS’s ideal scenario “worry, concerns, and anxiety regarding vaccines, particularly with respect to safety, will decrease.” But from a humanitarian perspective if the vaccine is not safe it is not desirable that concern should decrease. The FDA stated that it is determined that the vaccine “will continue to be used to the maximum extent”–as long as this is consistent with public health objectives. But what happens when it isn’t? That possibility is not even considered by HHS––which speaks volumes. Parents” concern is for the health of their children, whether or not vaccines will continue to be used to the maximum extent.
The documents I quoted are not anomalies. In June 2000 a now famous meeting took place at Simpsonwood Conference Center in Georgia. The meeting included about 60 vaccine program high-level officials from the CDC and the Food and Drug Administration, the top vaccine specialist from the World Health Organization, and representatives of every major vaccine manufacturer.
The discussions at this meeting demonstrate that the policymakers have internalized the FDA credo that doubts about safety cannot be allowed to exist. Kennedy wrote a seminal article in 2005 (published in both Salon and Rolling Stone) that helped to publicize the meeting, aptly titled Deadly Immunity. It was in fact after Kennedy read the Simpsonwood transcript that he became convinced that there is a link between vaccines and autism.
In the article Kennedy wrote, “I devoted time to study this issue because I believe that this is a moral crisis that must be addressed. If, as the evidence suggests, our public-health authorities knowingly allowed the pharmaceutical industry to poison an entire generation of American children, their actions arguably constitute one of the biggest scandals in the annals of American medicine.” https://childrenshealthdefense.org/news/deadly-immunity-government-cover-mercuryautism-scandal-2/Since Kennedy wrote those words further evidence has been revealed that heightens the CDC’s culpability–and that of the press for helping to cover this up to this day.
Kennedy noted more recently: “All of the barriers that are meant to protect our children: the government, the lawyers, the regulatory agencies and the press – the checks and balances in our democratic system that are supposed to stand between corporate power and our little children have been removed… “https://ahrp.org/why-is-the-cdc-petrified-of-the-film-vaxxed/
The purpose of the Simpsonwood meeting was to discuss a new study by CDC epidemiologist, Tom Verstraeten– based on a CDC database containing the medical records of 100,000 children– that made it clear that there was a link between a mercury-based preservative in the vaccines (thimerosal) and a dramatic increase in autism and numerous other neurological disorders.
“I was actually stunned by what I saw,” Verstraeten told those assembled at Simpsonwood, citing not only his data but the large number of earlier studies that indicate a link between thimerosal and speech delays, attention-deficit disorder, hyperactivity and autism. Since 1991 when CDC and the FDA had recommended that three additional vaccines laced with the preservative thimerosal be given to extremely young infants —in one case, within hours of birth– the estimated number of cases of autism had increased fifteenfold, from one in every 2,500 children to one in 166 children in 2005 when Kennedy was writing.
(It is several times higher today than in 2000, when the Simpsonwood meeting took place; even though thimerosal has been eliminated, children are being given higher amounts of other toxins, such as aluminum.)
Of course, Verstraeten was stunned, but he ought not to have been surprised. At the time of the Simpsonwood meeting, at the age of two months, infants routinely received three inoculations that contained a total of 62.5 micrograms of ethylmercury — a level 99 times greater than the EPA’s limit for daily exposure to methylmercury, a related neurotoxin.
On the second day of the meeting an interesting event occurred. The meeting chairman, Dr. Richard Johnston, a pediatrician, was called out for an emergency call. When he returned he shared: “[M]y daughter-in law delivered a son.. Our first male in the line of the next generation and I do not want that grandson to get a thimerosal containing vaccine…I want that grandson to only be given thimerosal-free vaccines” (Wilcox, 2018, p159.)
This sounds like an impassioned argument to ban vaccines with thimerosal and he did argue that “it was desirable to remove thimerosal from US vaccines,” but he had no objection to hiding the revelations from the public, and saw no need to remove thimerosal from vaccines exported to “developing countries” (Ibid, p.160).
Dr. John Clements, who represented the WHO at the EIS conference, expressed alarm about the direction of the research, which he viewed as a threat to the vaccination program. He warned that the information should not be allowed to reach the public, and he bluntly stated the study should not have been done “because the outcome could have… been predicted.” In other words, he knew all along that the vaccines were harmful, but “doubts about the safety cannot be allowed to exist”:
“And I really [don’t] want to risk offending everyone in the room by saying that perhaps this study should not have been done at all, because the outcome of it could have, to some extent, been predicted…, and we have all reached this point now where we are left hanging, …I know how we handle it from here is extremely problematic.” — Dr. John Clements, World Health Organization
“[T]hrough the freedom of information that will be taken by others and will be used in ways beyond the control of this group.And I am very concerned about that as I suspect it is already too late to do anything regardless of any professional body and what they say.”
“I am very concerned that this has gotten this far, and that having got this far, how you present in a concerted voice the information to the ACIP [Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices] in a way they will be able to handle it and not get exposed to the traps which are out there in public relations.
“My mandate as I sit here in this group is to make sure at the end of the day that 100,000,000 are immunized with DTP, Hepatitis B and if possible Hib, this year, next year and for many years to come, and that will have to be with Thimerosal-containing vaccines unless a miracle occurs and an alternative is found quickly and is tried and found to be safe.” In other words, it did not matter to Clements how harmful the vaccines were—as long as`100 million kids were immunized (and the vaccines were sold).
Quoted in Vera Sharav, “The Vaccine Program: Betrayal of Public Trust & Institutional Corruption. Part 1 of 7.” JANUARY 22, 2018
“The Vaccine Program: Betrayal of Public Trust & Institutional Corruption. Part 1 of 7.”
Dr Robert Chen:
“The issue is that it is impossible, unethical to leave kids unvaccinated..” (Wilcox,2018, p160)
The fear was that if the information got out many people would be less likely to vaccinate at all.
Other comments from those present include: “We could exclude the lowest exposure children from the database”; “We could remove children that got the highest exposure levels since they represented an unusually high percentage of the [adverse] outcomes”; “We can push and pull this data any way we want to get the results we want;” “We could have predicted the outcomes.”
A discussion ensued about how to hide and manipulate the data to conceal the link between mercury and autism. CDC’s Roger Bernier reminded everyone to : “consider this embargoed information…and very highly protected information.” There was a consensus that— to quote the FDA– “any possible doubts, whether or not well founded, about the safety of the vaccine cannot be allowed to exist in view of the need to assure that the vaccine will continue to be used to the maximum extent …”(Stoller, 2019, p.21) The qualifying phrase “consistent with the nation’s public health objectives” was obviously not a factor.
After the Simpsonwood meeting William Egan of the FDA fulfilled his appointed task and told a Congressional hearing, “The FDA considers all vaccines to be safe and effective. It is essential that all children receive all vaccines according to the currently recommended schedule” (Wilcox, 2018, p.164).
But while maintaining mercury was safe, the FDA decided to use another “preservative” in place of Thimerosal – evidently since they feared that the vaccine program would attract negative publicity. (This was years before the media took its vow of silence.)
The CDC allowed the drug companies to sell off their stock of mercury-based vaccines until 2004, they bought up the remaining vaccines from Big Pharma to export to developing countries (evidently poisoning poor children was not a problem) and allowed the companies to continue using the preservative in some American vaccines — including several pediatric flu shots as well as tetanus boosters routinely given to eleven-year-olds.
The uppermost concern of the officials entrusted with the safety of America’s children was to protect the reputation of the program— not to protect the children. Although they removed the mercury, they allowed Big Pharma to sell off their existing stocks of vaccines. Rep. Dan Burton’s House Government Reform Committee concluded in its final report. “This epidemic [autism] in all probability may have been prevented or curtailed had the FDA not been asleep at the switch regarding a lack of safety data regarding injected thimerosal, a known neurotoxin.” The FDA and other public-health agencies failed to act, the committee added, out of “institutional malfeasance for self protection” and “misplaced protectionism of the pharmaceutical industry.” (https://childrenshealthdefense.org/news/deadly-immunity-government-cover-mercuryautism-scandal-2/)
But the public health technocrats were not alone. The mainstream media, fattened with revenue from drug industry ads, has helped to conceal the dangers of vaccines with The New York Times to this day describing (in an editorial) “anti-vaxxers” as “the enemy” and dishonestly assuring readers that science has proved vaccines are harmless, “Scientists, especially, are uncomfortable with black-and-white statements, because science is all about nuance. But, in the case of vaccines, there are some hard truths that deserve to be trumpeted. Vaccines are not toxic, and they do not cause autism. Full stop.”
There is a postscript to this incident. In 2013, Dr. William Thompson a head scientist found himself talking on the phone to Brian Hooker, a scientist and father of a vaccine-injured child. Overwhelmed with guilt Thompson made a confession to Hooker. Under orders of his supervisors in 2002, he had destroyed data from a CDC experiment which showed a link between vaccines and autism. Hooker was excited because he knew the study to which Thompson referred was one frequently used to demonstrate that vaccines do not cause autism. (https://ahrp.org/why-is-the-cdc-petrified-of-the-film-vaxxed/)
Thompson had wanted to reveal this in 2002 but he was threatened with the loss of his job and he kept quiet. But after talking to Hooker he could keep silent no longer. “When I talk to you, you have a son with autism, I have great shame now when I meet families with kids with autism because I have been part of the problem…[T]he CDC is so paralyzed now by anything related to autism….they’re afraid to look for things that might be associated [with autism]” (Wilcox,2018, p.172).
In 2019, the World Health Organization (to which vaccine evangelist Bill Gates was the second largest donor, after the government of the US) declared vaccine hesitancy “the growing resistance to widely available lifesaving vaccines” (New York Times)–was one of the top ten health threats in the world, alongside air pollution, climate change, HIV. The editorial Board of The New York Times sprung into action, declaring that “anti-vaxxers” are “the enemy” and called on the U.S. government to “get tough” by waging a “bold and aggressive” pro-vaccine campaign that includes eliminating religious exemptions for vaccination and includes “tightening restrictions around how much leeway states can grant families that want to skip essential vaccines.” https://www.nvic.org/nvic-vaccine-news/january-2019/who,-pharma,-gates.aspx.In other words the paper long considered a bastion of liberalism takes a stand against informed consent, against our constitutional rights, and urges the state to force families to submit to “essential” vaccines.
The title of the editorial was, “How to Inoculate Against Anti-Vaxxers”
It states, “Yes, there are chemicals in vaccines, but they are not toxic”–either a dishonest or a delusional assertion, as a cursory glance at the ingredients reveals! They claim of course to speak in the name of science, “No, vaccines can’t overwhelm your immune system, which already confronts countless pathogens every day.” The Times told its readers, “It’s also O.K. to get out of the gray zone. Scientists, especially, are uncomfortable with black-and-white statements, because science is all about nuance. But, in the case of vaccines, there are some hard truths that deserve to be trumpeted. Vaccines are not toxic, and they do not cause autism. Full stop.” https://www.nytimes.com/2019/01/19/opinion/vaccines-public-health.html?action=click&module=Opinion&pgtype=Homepage Vaccines are not toxic.
That is a lie. If it is not a lie, it is an irresponsible and appalling statement for a paper esteemed for investigative journalism.
J. B. Handley, the father of an autistic boy, states in his book How to End the Autism Epidemic that he read all 27- 29 of the studies that are purported to prove that vaccines don’t cause autism (p88). The testing is conducted by the industry. Only one vaccine is studied, MMR (measles, mumps, rubella), and none of the studies use the proper control group – unvaccinated children. To determine whether vaccines cause autism one should not focus on one vaccine when children are given 16 vaccines and over 70 injections. As David Kirby, former NY Times investigative journalist wrote, “It is illogical to exonerate all vaccines, all vaccine ingredients, and the total US vaccine program as a whole, based solely on a handful of epidemiological studies of just one vaccine and one vaccine ingredient” (p.87, Handley, 2018).
Nor should one use as a control group subjects who are injected with another toxin, as is invariably done in vaccine studies. That is cheating. It is like comparing Salem with Marlboro, and concluding Salem does not increase the risk of cancer. Furthermore, safety testing for drugs lasts 5 years. With vaccines adverse events are recorded for a week or less, despite the fact that autoimmune illnesses take weeks or years to manifest. (Handley, p.229). The fact that this kind of “safety” testing is permitted – only for vaccines — tells us that the government is covering for the pharmaceutical industry and that it is not protecting children
For example, one study CDC used to demonstrate vaccines don’t cause autism compared children who received more mercury in their vaccines to children who received slightly less mercury (Handley, p.88). Yet, CDC was forced to admit, that even this study with a bogus placebo could “neither prove nor disprove” an association between mercury and autism. The same is true of the other “signature” study–referred to as the Tozzi study— which compared children who received 62.5 mcg to those who received 137.5 mcg of ethyl mercury, published in 2009 in Pediatrics and reached no conclusion (p90).
But that is not the end of it– the mainstream media also comes into play. The media might as well be a PR firm hired by Big Pharma.. As Handley points out: “The PR machine for these studies is something to behold. The Academy of Pediatrics [the pro-vaccine guild of pediatricians], publishes these studies, and on the day they are released, every major news organization in the country reports on the studies, and every article sends the same basic message: Vaccines are safe, and they don’t cause autism” (p.91). For example the AP headline for the Tozzi study was, “Study Adds to Evidence of Vaccine Safety.” This is the same message, the same lie, The New York Times asserted in the name of Science.
There is a religious aspect to the vaccine crusade: “The powerful vaccine ‘gospel’ has swept up regulators, medical trade associations, physicians, science journals, the popular press and others in a kind of consensus dogma that has become more important than the children [these institutions were] supposed to protect.” (CHD, 2018, p1). The children do not matter– these institutions exist to serve the State which itself exists primarily to serve the interests of corporate America. The children are of no more value than raw materials in a factory. Those who dissent, even parents of vaccine-injured children, are ridiculed as anti-science, “anti-vaxxers” and treated by the press as malefactors– in another era they would have been denounced as heretics and burned at the stake.
Again, I remind readers that the strongest evidence that vaccines are harmful is provided by the mass “experiment” brought about by the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act (NCVIA) in 1986. In this “experiment” we compare those born before the act and those born afterwards. We are not looking at the results of one vaccine but all vaccines–since by the late 1990s almost all school children were adhering to the schedules mandated in all states. And although the control group (those who received half as many vaccines or even less in the 1950s) was not unvaccinated, the difference was stark, as mentioned. In the 1960s 1 in 10,000 kids had autism; in 1985, 1 in 2,500 10 yr old kids had autism; in 1989, 1 in 1,000; in 1999, 1 in 500; in 2000, 1 in 150; in 2008, 1 out of 88; in 2016:1 in 68. In the following section I will look at other illnesses caused by vaccines (https://www.nvic.org/getdoc/6cd24653-fd19-49e5-842a-3917e15de533/medical-science—public-trust.aspx).
I think most parents who think vaccines are safe have no idea about these statistics. I would guess that they never read the ingredients in the vaccines with which their children are injected.
Here is a partial list of the ingredients:thimerosal, aluminum, formaldehyde, antibiotics, egg protein, monosodium glutamate (MSG), squalene, gelatin, polysorbate 80, phenoxyethanol, aborted human fetal lung tissue, monkey kidney cells.
Thimerosal (mercury)–although it was supposedly removed from all vaccines it is still in the tetanus toxoid vaccine (Tt), and meningococcal vaccines and in flu shots, including some given to children and pregnant women. Like aluminum it is a neurotoxin–both have been implicated in autism. Aluminum is in at least half the vaccines mandated for children. J.B. Handley who read all the scientific studies on autism believes it is a most potent toxin, the one most responsible for autism. If we calculate the total aluminum dose from 36 vaccines given to the baby in the first few years, we see that the total dose is 30.6 mg—many times the 0.85 mg considered safe by the FDA. https://www.vaccinationinformationnetwork.com/vaccines-brain-development-and-autism-dr-russell-blaylock-md
MSG is an excitotoxin. Phenoxyethanol is a derivative of ethylene glycol, or antifreeze–it is currently used in 2 vaccines. The cell lines upon which the vaccine is grown include fetal lung tissue and monkey kidney cells.
These are a few of the more common ingredients that are intentionally included in vaccines. But contamination has been a continuous problem. For example, two contaminants were monkey virus in polio vaccines and pig viruses in rotavirus vaccines. In the 1950s up to a third of polio vaccines in the U.S. were contaminated with simian virus 40 (SV40), which came from the monkey kidney cell cultures used to make the vaccines. Institute of Medicine stated in 2002 that this could contribute to human cancer. Every time you grow human virus on animal tissue you run the risk of picking up an animal virus which would be included in the vaccine. Dr Judy Mikovits wrote, “Every scientist who works with these viruses …recognized the possibility that if you put human tissue and mouse tissue together, the possibility is that you’re going to pick up a virus that is silent in the mouse…but it kills the human or causes serious disease in the human. …[But] you might not see the cancer for two decades.”
Are all those toxins necessary for the efficacy of the vaccine? We don’t know but, as Kennedy notes, what we do know is that since Big Pharma has no liability there is no incentive for Big Pharma to spend the money to even try to make safer vaccines.
(https://childrenshealthdefense.org/news/truth-with-robert-f-kennedy-jr-episode-10/?itm_term=home) But with all those toxic ingredients, does not common sense indicate that vaccines are likely to entail considerable risk of harm? (We will see below that there is strong evidence that children vaccinated according to CDC mandates– and thus their doctor’s recommendations– are much sicker than unvaccinated children.) Would there be any readers here surprised and shocked if it turned out that injecting a stew of poisons into babies and toddlers every few months would have long lasting deleterious effects on their bodies?
When I first read the list of ingredients in vaccines my first thought was that there is no way I would voluntarily allow anyone to inject that into me! My second thought was: How could anyone inject those ingredients into a poor tiny baby? I think there are two kinds of people–those who are appalled when they read the list of ingredients, and those who think, “If the experts say so, it must be fine.”
I expect Everyday Concerned Citizen readers will be appalled. I think ordinary Americans would tend to agree, if they knew – but most don’t bother to investigate. They are convinced by the word of their doctor that vaccines are safe and effective. (Even today’s vaccine safety activists– like Polly Tommey— once trusted their doctors.) Not that their doctors know much if anything about vaccines but Americans assume they know.
Americans assume physicianss are the one profession to which they can safely surrender the care of their bodies and souls —in today’s disenchanted secular world, in the popular imagination doctors are our angels, they are messengers of the gods. The physician is Moses carrying the tablets down from the mountaintop where he or she communed with the Most-High.
To doubt the doctor, to doubt the vaccine, is to question the accumulated wisdom of civilization itself, the goodness of the social order in which we live, it is to disdain, to disrespect, the greatest achievement of the modern world – Medical Science. This is apostasy from civilized society, it is heresy, it is barbarism. Such persons, such contemptible “anti-vaxxers,” deserve to be excommunicated from the civilized world –in another era these blasphemers would have been executed.
By refusing to be vaccinated, they declare their defiance of civilization— these selfish miscreants, refusing the purification of the vaccine, threaten to pollute the tribe which has been purified and consecrated by vaccination. These potential carriers of the dangerous germs can contaminate the community, infest the innocent– they are a menace to society. (It is never explained why the vaxxed are not protected by the vaccines—but no matter, a scapegoat is needed.)
According to the sacred narrative of the Vaccine religion, it was vaccines that saved us from the scourges of smallpox and polio. The fact that historical research casts doubt upon this trope— casts doubt upon the decisive and indispensable role of vaccines, and that there were other factors that accounted for the disappearance of these epidemics (e.g. sanitation, improved hygiene) is irrelevant – to even assert this is itself a sacrilege (Humphries, 2013). Anathema upon the anti-science heretics who doubt vaccines!
The fundamentalist Christian knows that Jesus was the son of God who died for our sins and on the third day rose from the dead. So, the epigones of the Vaccine religion know that vaccines saved humanity from epidemics that threatened the existence of humanity itself, that protected us from suffering, death, pestilence, chaos. The memory of this collective trauma is activated every time the selfish ex-vaxxers attack vaccines today.
They are not only impugning the value of CDC’s ever growing schedule of vaccines—72 jabs for children– they implicitly threaten to undermine the hegemony of the narrative of the triumph of medical Science over chaos, over nature, they depreciate the sacred story of our miraculous redemption by the vaccine, by medical Science. Thus they threaten to destroy the sacred narrative which undergirds the multi-billion dollar vaccine industry–the vaccine industrial complex including Big Pharma, CDC, NIH, pediatricians, politicians and the mainstream media.
Such heretics, such malefactors who seek to convince others to shun vaccines do not deserve an audience. Civilized people should not enter into a debate with “enemies” of society, as The New York Times called them—most of these whiners are parents of vaccine-injured children.
Wrapped in the mantle of Science, the corrupted Editorial Board and publisher of The New York Times declare: “Scientists, especially, are uncomfortable with black-and-white statements, because science is all about nuance. But, in the case of vaccines, there are some hard truths that deserve to be trumpeted. Vaccines are not toxic, and they do not cause autism. Full stop.”
As I have demonstrated here this is categorically not the verdict of science. It is an edict of modern Inquisitors.
Polly Tommey was once deceived by the Times. Most of today’s “anti-vaxxers” were once true believers. They allowed the doctors to vaccinate their children, although they had no idea what was in the vaccines. They trusted the doctors. They became ex-vaxxers because of what they saw happen to their children. But they have never been anti-science.
More now than ever genuine scientists–not those employed by Big Pharma–are confirming the claims of parents of vaccine-injured children. It’s the vaccines that cause autism–in a subset of children who are less resilient. And it’s not just autism– they give many more children less severe chronic illnesses. But vaccine evangelists still want to claim they have the imprimatur of science.
The New York Times claimed in 2005 as it does today, that parents of vaccine-injured children have pitted themselves against science. Kennedy wrote in response that these parents are pitted not against science but against public health authorities who rely not on science but on the reputations of their agencies to exonerate vaccines.
J. B. Handley is an educated layperson who knows his science. Handley is a graduate of Stanford and father of an autistic child—and author of a book on the science of autism praised by leading scientists in the field (Handley, 2018). According to Handley it is the aluminum that causes autism. But although Handley says little about it, before aluminum became the object of attention, critics of vaccines thought it was mercury that caused autism and were able to demonstrate a correlation between mercury in the vaccines and autism. But when mercury was replaced by aluminum autism continued to rise.
Barbara Loe Fisher, a vaccine safety activist and mother of a vaccine injured child stated that “repeated use of multiple vaccines throughout childhood may cause neuroimmune dysfunction [including autism] via a variety of biological mechanisms” (Fisher, 2008, p.95). There are so many toxins in vaccines I do not believe we can put the responsibility on any one chemical. In other words, it is not just the mercury or aluminum that are the critical variables triggering autism–it is all the toxins and how they interact synergistically—and it is at the age at which the vaccines are given.
Nevertheless, scientific progress has been made in the last few years. Scientists who have studied the issue are convinced that vaccines cause autism in a subset of vulnerable children. In the light of what leading scientists who study toxiocology are saying, it is absurd for The New York Times to say science has determined vaccines are safe. This demonstrates that it has failed to uphold minimal standards of responsible journalism–and become little more than an organ of State and corporate propaganda. To reiterate, The Times had declared: “Vaccines are not toxic, and they do not cause autism.” The dirty secret is that it is not the anti-vaxxers who are “anti-science”–it is The New York Times and the mainstream press.
We know now that the brains of autistic children and adults are in a state of permanent inflammation, and there are unusually high concentrations of aluminum in the brains of autistics. Blaylock notes that in a study done in 2005 (Vargas et al study) researchers examined the brains of 11autistics from age 5 years to 44 years of age who had died without active infectious diseases as compared to age-matched controls. “That is, they found widespread activation of inflammatory cells (microglia and astrocytes) in the brains of the autistic patients.”https://www.vaccinationinformationnetwork.com/vaccines-brain-development-and-autism-dr-russell-blaylock-md
Chris Exley, “the world’s leading expert on aluminum neurotoxicity,” found in his famous 2017 study that autistics’ brain were loaded with aluminum: “My group has measured the aluminum content of probably more than one hundred human brains, and these brain tissues taken from the individuals with a diagnosis of autism were some of the highest we’ve measured bar none.” https://jbhandleyblog.com/home/2018/4/1/international2018
Handley explains that this discovery combined with the discovery that autistic brains are in a state of constant inflammation is the key to understanding autism. Handley says the brain’s immune system is in a constant battle with the aluminum that it doesn’t know how to get out of its body (p. 154). Handley notes his son was born in 2002: “He seemed to get sicker with every vaccine appointment and his head was always hurting.” (p.162) Inflammation would lead to a large brain and a swollen forehead. “Is that why children with autism are known to head bang?” (p.162). “We have new credible biological science showing us we are deliberately damaging our babies, and likely creating the autism epidemic” (p162).
The Scientists Talk Back to CDC
The FDA claims that aluminum is safe, a claim of course accepted by the CDC. But what have our regulatory agencies been relying upon to assess the safety of injected aluminum? One single study published in 2011 by Dr. Robert J. Mitkus in the journal Vaccine. Mitkus concluded that “for infants, our study demonstrates that there is little risk for aluminum toxicity following immunizations administered according to ACIP[CDC] recommendations even with maximal exposures to aluminum adjuvant.” (https://vaccinepapers.org/wp-content/uploads/FDA-aluminum-paper.pdf)
As Handley notes, “In no other drug on the planet (except vaccines) would safety standards be determined without using the actual product (aluminum hydroxide) administered in proper way (intramuscularinjection) into proper population (infants).” (Handley, 2018, p.156) Handley quotes a scientist- critic: “Why do the vaccine promoters rely on oral-ingestion studies to defend Al adjuvant safety? It is because they have no experimental research showing that injecting Al adjuvant is safe! They are empty-handed” ( p156-7).
But CDC did not go unanswered. In Canada, France and England scientists who cared about children had been investigating on their own the toxicity of vaccines. In 2017 three of the leading toxicologists in the world got together and decided to jointly write letters to the three organizations supposedly protecting public health–the CDC, FDA and NIH. They obviously consulted each other since their letters were almost identical.
Dr. Christopher Shaw of the University of British Columbia wrote that the studies he did and “the broader existing literature regarding aluminum toxicity lead almost invariably to the conclusion that aluminum in any form is always neurotoxic.” In vaccines “they [adjuvants] may contribute to neurological disorders across the lifespan….In children there is growing evidence that aluminum adjuvants may disrupt developmental processes in the central nervous system and therefore contribute to ASD [autism spectrum disorder] in susceptible children.” He concluded: “In regard to the above it is my belief that CDC’s claim on its website that ‘Vaccines Do Not Cause Autism’ is wholly unsupported.” (Handley, 2018, p.166)
Dr. Chris Exley, a tenured professor at Keele University of Bioinorganic Chemistry and according to Handley, “without peer the leading expert in the world on the neurotoxicity of aluminum” described himself in his letter as“an expert in field of aluminum adjuvants and aluminum toxicity for 30 years during which time I have written in excess of 150 peer reviewed scientific publications.” He continued, “I strongly support the contention that aluminum adjuvants may have a role in the etiology of autism spectrum disorder.” His view is founded on “a scientific and burgeoning body of peer reviewed scientific evidence…The claim of CDC’s website that vaccines do not cause autism is unsupported with respect to aluminum adjuvants and this view stifles important research to determine the safety of aluminum adjuvants used in vaccines.” (Ibid, p.166)
Dr. Romain Gherardi of Universite Paris-Est is an expert in the field of aluminum adjuvant toxicity who has written 40 peer reviewed scientific publications and 1 book on the topic. He wrote, “I strongly support the contention that aluminum adjuvants may have a role in the etiology of autism spectrum disorder.” His view is founded on “a scientific and burgeoning body of peer reviewed scientific evidence.” “The claim of CDC’s website that vaccines do not cause autism is unsupported with respect to aluminum adjuvants…”(p.166)
Thus we see that the public perception shamelessly promoted by the press that vaccines are safe is contested by some of the leading toxicologists in the world. But they are not alone. Even the government’s own experts are now speaking out and contradicting CDC.
Andrew Zimmerman, MD and Richard Kelley, MD are “the two leading mainstream autism scientists in the world” (Handley, 2018, p.170). They were both key witnesses for many years for the government in the Vaccine Court. They were the experts who disputed parents’ claims that vaccines caused their children’s autism–until both of them changed their positions and concluded vaccines caused autism in a subset of children–25-40% of the autistic children, according to Kelley. Zimmerman’s testimony had helped deny the claims of over 5,000 children. Dr Zimmerman was the former director of medical research at the Kennedy Krieger Institute at Johns Hopkins University. Kelley was Professor of Pediatrics at Johns Hopkins University (Ibid,p.170).
In 2008 as a result of his friendship with a colleague who had an autistic daughter, Zimmerman changed his mind. He testified to the Vaccine Court that vaccines caused Hannah Poling’s autism (Handley, p.178). Hannah’s case was settled in her favor with a gag order on the family in 2007 (p.180). This was the end of Zimmerman’s career as a witness for the government in Vaccine Court (p.182).
In 2006 Zimmerman had co-authored with Jon Poling MD an essay about Hannah titled “Developmental Regression and Mitochondrial Dysfunction in a Child with Autism” in the The Journal of Child Neurology (Handley, 2018, p.179). But Hannah was not a singular case–the author had reevaluated the records of all the other patients with autism at Kennedy Krieger Institute and concluded that children with “mitochondrial dysfunction” (which he assumed was genetic) are more likely to become autistic between 18- 30 months if they are vaccinated (Handley, p.179).
In 2016 both Dr. Zimmerman and Dr. Richard Kelley testified in legal depositions in favor of Yates Hazlehurst whose parents claimed he had incurred autism as a result of his sensitivity to repeated vaccinations. Dr. Zimmerman testified that “people who work in the field of autism commonly see a relationship between infection, inflammation and the onset of [autistic]regression” (p195). In other words, inflammation triggered by vaccines leads to autism in susceptible populations. Kelley placed the percentage at 25- 40%.
Kelley acknowledged that he was now arguing for a link between vaccines and autism. The lawyer upon cross-examination inquired “Your opinion is contrary to.. the opinion of the CDC, correct?” Dr. Kelley responded: “It is contrary to their conclusion. It is not contrary to their data” (Handley, p. 199). Kelley could not be more blunt. In other words, As Handley notes: The data shows that vaccines cause autism but CDC does not admit this. This was testimony by 2 men who had been government witnesses for many years.
This testimony was given 3 years before The New York Times wrote that science had concluded “Vaccines are not toxic, and they do not cause autism. Full stop”. The editors of The Times had urged state and federal officials to launch an “aggressive and targeted social media campaign” of surveillance; to “monitor anti-vaccine websites” in order to defeat “the enemy” (See above.) Now it is over a year since the New York Times declared war. A censorship campaign has been launched on Youtube, Facebook, Google — at the behest of our government.
In March, U.S. Congressman Adam Schiff wrote to urge CEOs of Amazon, Facebook, and Google, to censor and delete content that raises doubt about vaccine safety. Other social media and internet giants followed suit including: YouTube, GoFundMe, Twitter, Instagram, Wikipedia, Pinterest, Etsy, and Mail Chimp. In 2019, news outlets such as Huffington Post have also removed dozens of articles about vaccine safety from their website. The press and the politicians are doing the bidding of Big Pharma at the expense of the 1st Amendment (https://ahrp.org/beware-of-medicine-marching-in-lockstep-with-government-personal-reflections)
Vera Sharav, Holocaust survivor and president of Alliance for Human Research Protection, writes that “these industry-funded pro-vaccine collaborators in government, the media, and academia” will not have an open public discussions about vaccines. I would add that Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is not even allowed on any television station. As Vera Sharav writes, “They won’t engage in public debate because their science is rigged, it can’t stand up to independent scrutiny…Caught in a web of deceptions, vaccine stakeholders are resorting to strong-arm police tactics to silence once and for all, those who challenge them. What is at issue globally is the human right to conscientious objection to medical interventions; freedom of choice and freedom of speech — a very dangerous combination.” (https://ahrp.org/beware-of-medicine-marching-in-lockstep-with-government-personal-reflections/)
(To Be Contd. Part Three of this article to follow shortly.)
“NO REAL PANDEMIC, Overestimation of COVID-19 Risk, Informed Consent Needed, Multiple Adverse Events & Animal Deaths in Trials, Humans Are Being Used as Guinea Pigs, Vaccines Can Make the Disease Worse, High Danger to Human Genome & Humanity, Stand Up for Your Children”
Highly qualified physicians, scientists, nurses, academics, and science and medical journalists from the USA, UK, and Europe have come together to present their deep concerns about the novel mRNA COVID vaccines using lipid nanotechnology being rolled out at high speed all over the world by over-eager pharmaceutical corporations and governments, in a video titled “Ask the Experts” which has been banned on Youtube and Facebook and was in fact pulled off Youtube at record speed.
Thankfully, many vigilant citizens and websites have downloaded and preserved the video, posted here below. The video is made by Oracle Films and can also be viewed here at their BrandNewTube site.
While each of the experts speaking on this video tackle different concerns surrounding the COVID “pandemic”–which many state is not a real pandemic and an outright fraud–they all seem to have consensus on the great dangers of this vaccine which is now being pushed by governments as necessary “to return life to normalcy” and state unequivocally that this vaccine has not been proven safe.
In fact, several emphasize that this novel mRNA vaccine has shown high rates of animal deaths in clinical trials, that the UK Government is expecting high rates of adverse events as indicated by their recent advertisement for AI software to database the expect adverse events, that no human studies of the usual kind–taking many years–have been done on this vaccine, and that the novel features of this vaccine including the use of nanotechnology coupled with lack of long-term human studies suggest great uncertainty in terms of long-term effects on the human body, the human genome, and therefore the future of humanity.
Say NO to the Dangerous and Unsafe COVID Vaccine, Say NO for Your Children
Powerful and hard-hitting, this is a video every human on earth should watch and listen to; these are experts whose voice needs heeding. As Dr. Rashid Buttar says in his statement, standing up to say NO is something we need to do for our children at this point if we care about preserving the human genome, human health, and the future of humanity.
A simple awareness to keep in mind is that every single one of the organizations pushing this vaccine worldwide (eg., CDC, WHO, US DOD) has close ties and/or contracts with pharmaceutical corporations–who have been inflicting dangerous vaccines on humans for decades and currently stand to make billions off these COVID vaccines.
Meanwhile, the many public figures in governments and global organizations (such as the WEF) worldwide who are striving to push vaccines on us and threaten vaccine mandates have close ties to the globalist groups (Club of Rome, CFR, Trilateral Commission, Bilderbergers) linked to long-standing secret societies with eugenicist agendas who seek massive depopulation of the planet worldwide.
Of interest is the fact that this video is now being frantically marked by mainstream media — also propped up by Big Pharma and owned by the globalists — as presenting false information. An article by AP News on Dec 9 tries to contest many of the statements in the video, using the deceptive “Fact-Checking” paradigm which has been invented by the entire conglomerate of mainstream media propaganda-masquerading-as-journalism mavens as a means to stop readers from exploring any criticism whatsoever of the pharmaceutical industry and its dangerous bloodstream-injections aka vaccines, while simply reinforcing and restating the falsehoods and false figures invented as part of the worldwide COVID Psy Op holding the world in limbo: Video contains a litany of false claims about COVID-19 and vaccines
However, several writers, journalists, and websites today thankfully are pointing out the harms of mainstream media’s destructive ignoring of the facts and truth being presented by scientists and physicians worldwide, including this group of medical experts whose #AskTheExperts video has gone viral.
Covileaks, which has helped make the video offers more information, please visit for more articles and videos offering the facts and deeper investigation into the many fraudulent and deceiving aspects of the worldwide “COVID pandemic”: Covileaks.
Please watch and share this post and video widely. If anyone knows of a transcript to this video, please post in comments or send on to me at firstname.lastname@example.org–I will post it, thanks.
Post from Facebook/Posted at Anti Corruption Ireland 11/28/2020 | Ramola D | 11/30/2020
This is a deeply disturbing video of a young woman “tased in Spain for the crime of bringing her mother to a medical appointment.” Not merely is the young woman in grievous fear and pain at being beset by a group of bulky police officers, she is then brutally injured with a taser–a violent conducted-energy device which shoots a physical projectile into the body causing extreme shock and pain, covered earlier at this site here–and jumped on physically by this group of young armed men, causing both physical shock and injury and psychological trauma. She is then tased Multiple times!
Imagine if this young girl were your daughter, or sister. What is also shocking is that the police do not heed calls from bystanders to stop hurting her, and stop people from approaching to help her, and that people do not push through and stop these men from assaulting her. Note: this is most definitely Assault and Battery, in addition to grievous electroshocking and terrorizing.
This video establishes the brutality of these Spanish governmental actions in permitting police to behave this way, with no concern for the basic human rights of this young woman. This is a grave human rights atrocity and a violation of all civil society.
This is not Public Health, when police can electroshock an innocent young woman citing imaginary fears over an imaginary virus which no government has proved exists, which, by CDC/WHO’s own estimates has a 99.97% recovery rate, and which has not been proven to cause a single death worldwide–although lots of varying data regarding cases and deaths keeps being flung about by governments, none of whom can prove that old age and co-morbidities was not the cause of death in all cases.
This is tyranny pure and simple, and should not be tolerated. Please share this post and video widely, send it to every member of the Spanish government, demand the immediate suspension of the entire group of police officers involved and demand that police be stopped from using tasers.
For too long, people have sat back and permitted police to keep arming themselves, regulating themselves, and permitting themselves to use deadlier and deadlier weapons on people. Tasers are listed as “non-lethal” or “less-lethal” weapons in the United States, but they are as can be seen in this video, just extremely savage in their mechanism and effect, and have no place among humans (or animals for that matter), and should be Banned.
Police also have no business terrorizing a young woman like this.
It is time for each of us to speak up for each other. Please speak up for this victimized young girl and her mother, please let the world know the Spanish government cannot be permitted to behave in this fashion, this is absolutely unacceptable. It is not human, it is not normal, it should be stopped.
David Noakes, CEO, Immuno Biotech, known internationally for his successful treatment of terminal-cancer and autism patients with GcMAF, long hounded by the MHRA (British equivalent to the FDA), a regulatory organization apparently run by the pharmaceutical cartel and keen to protect cancer-drug profits, was arrested yesterday in a disgraceful travesty of justice and held overnight at Exeter Prison.
John Smith, Common Law Court founder, who was apprised of David Noakes’ arrest by his previous lawyers Doughty Chambers, states that these actions are unlawful and criminal because he was arrested on a void order, and indicates further in conversation at Newsbreak 72 with Neelu Berry Chaudhari, pharmacist and child rights whistleblower, that he was arrested because of Judge Laraine-Smith’s impending retirement, in an effort to push through on long-attempted incarceration of David Noakes.
The MHRA’s primary beef with Immuno Biotech as stated earlier is the fact that they have not licensed GcMAF and have used it as a treatment for cancer–which Big Pharma maintains has no cure, only management with drugs and radiation therapy, but as often pointed out to them, including by Neelu Berry on today’s Newsbreak, GcMAf is a naturally occurring substance in the body, part of the body’s immune system complex, and therefore has never needed licensing; MHRA cannot license such natural products.
Please Attend the Hearing, Show Support
John Smith, who speaks about his expectations for the hearing in Newsbreak 72, requests that all concerned people in the area who can attend to please attend David Noakes’ hearing tomorrow to show solidarity and support. VENUE: FRIDAY, 11 AM, SOUTHWARK CROWN COURT, 22 MAY 2020, DAVID NOAKES
Newsbreak 72: David Noakes Unlawfully Arrested: Whistleblower Update with Neelu Berry Chaudhari and John Smith
Prison Call, Public Notice
Neelu Berry reports that she called Exeter Prison on a recorded call (below) but was not given any meaningful information, including his “Prisoner Number” but directed, on mention of a kidnapping of an internationally renowned public figure and VIP whistleblower (by the police) to call the police. That call is here:
In a letter to Edward Ellis, Equity Lawyer, copied to various personalities in Parliament including PM Boris Johnson, Foreign Secretary Matt Hancock, Home Secretary Priti Patel, and others, Neelu Berry wrote:
Dear Edward Ellis,
My call this morning to Exeter Prison switchboard for Governor David Atkinson on 01392 415650 today was received by an arrogant, incompetent operator, who finds it funny that the Prime Minister, Boris Johnson will be removed for the alleged kidnap of VIP Whistleblower David Noakes, yesterday. I was threatened for demanding the remedy of a Notice to the Prison Governor. She refused to provide the Prisoner Number or to confirm his presence.
Lynda Thyer is still held under USA FDA Extra-judicial Gun Control in Fleuris Merogis Prison, France, which controls the MHRA regulator (Ex-Sussex Police).
There are 102 another Gun-Assassined Naturopath Murders to be investigated in the USA, including the shot-dead, late Dr Jeffrey Bradstreet, Research colleague of Lynda Thyer, where this Big Pharma Dictatorship originates.
SHOCKING NEWS! DAVID NOAKES dob 7 March 1953 GOT KIDNAPPED FROM ST MAWES YESTERDAY AND TAKEN TO EXETER PRISON
PRAYERS ARE NEEDED TO GET HIM RELEASED IMMEDIATELY AND ALSO FOR LYNDA THYER TO BE RELEASED FROM FLEURY MEROGIS PRISON IN FRANCE
HEALTH, HOME, JUSTICE & FOREIGN MINISTERS AND MINISTRIES ARE HEREBY DEMANDED TO IMMEDIATELY RELEASE DAVID NOAKES FROM EXETER PRISON
HE IS CEO OF IMMUNOBIOTECH, MAKERS OF GCMAF, A NATURAL REMEDY WHICH DOES NOT REQUIRE LICENSING
MHRA HAS ALSO TRICKED THE JUSTICE, HEALTH & HOME MINISTERS AND MINISTRIES TO KIDNAP RESEARCHER LYNDA THYER TO FLEURY MEROGIS PRISON IN FRANCE
THESE PUBLIC NOTICES WILL BE FOLLOWED UP BY PUBLIC DEMANDS BY TELEPHONE TO +44
A. HEALTH MINISTER MATTHEW HANCOCK 0207 210 4850 B. HOME MINISTER PRITI PATEL 0207 035 4848 C. JUSTICE MINISTER ROBERT BUCKLAND 0203 334 3555 D. FOREIGN MINISTER DOMINIC RAAB 0207 008 1500
E. ALSO BY PHONE TO HOUSES OF PARLIAMENT ON 0207 219 3000 TO DEMAND HIS RELEASE VIA YOUR MP ON GROUNDS OF YOUR SUPPORT FOR GCMAF AND NATURAL CURES
F. GOVERNOR OF EXETER PRISON Phone: 01392 415650
www.gcmaf.se Natural Remedies and Naturopaths are being hunted down by Big Pharma! When will this Corporate Terrorism End?
May 22: Belinda McKenzie writes that David Noakes will appear in court this morning at Southwark Crown Court, near to London Bridge Station. The case is listed as Court 4 at 11.30 before Judge Loraine-Smith, but please try to get there earlier.
This announcement on May 21 by John Smith publishes news of the wrongful arrest of David Noakes on May 20:
Re-post | From Email, UK resident, May 2 | 5/5/2020
Received, from an engaged and aware British Christian resident, a brilliant letter sent to MP Liz Kendall over the tyrannical UK Coronavirus Bill designed to strip away human rights and bring in unvarnished fascism, which MPs approved as it was rushed through the House of Commons and Lords in six days and made (statutory/corporate) law.
In his email, this resident wrote: “I recently wrote to my MP to let her know where I stand – I suggest everyone does the same – they need to know what people will do – it’s a chess game.” He also says, “People can use what I wrote as a template – it’s important people respond QUICKLY and in a forceful fashion – since these gangsters make their next chess piece move according to the ‘force”of the public response based on their previous action (we are dealing with murderers, Nazis, callous hateful people who are fearful of resistance). The best site to use for writing to a UK MP, is: https://www.writetothem.com/.”
The point being it is important to express your dissent and establish to the corporate government—which relies on consent of the governed, and takes your silence for tacit consent–they are engaging in extreme overreach which is not acceptable nor will be tolerated.
While many people think they are powerless against the flexing of muscle by an increasingly totalitarian government, in truth, say others, everyone’s words and stated intentions of No-Consent actually do make an impact and have an effect. Thousands of people writing in will no doubt have a greater impact and a non-ignorable one.
Exceptional in its candor, this letter spells out the perfidy of police, the complicity of government officials in the vaccine industry, and the part played by wealthy Freemasons and corporate crooks in pushing a pernicious vaccine-mandate agenda on everyone.
Many thanks to the writer for sending on this letter for others to read & emulate.
1 – The police will be given powers to detain those believed to be infected with coronavirus and a danger to the public. Other changes will allow the police and immigration officers to detain and isolate individuals to protect public health. [RESPONSE: THE POLICE ARE CORRUPT – AS PROVEN IN OPERATION TIBERIUS AND THE SCOTT INQUIRY – THEY ARE RIDDLED WITH FREEMASON MAFIA CRIMINALS CONTROLLING MOST POLICE FORCES – THEIR POWERS NEED TO BE REDUCED – THE POLICE ARE A DANGER TO PUBLIC SAFETY BECAUSE OF THE HIGH LEVEL OF CORRUPTION AND COVER-UPS. THEIR LINKS TO THE MAFIA ARE DOCUMENTED IN THE BOOK: THE BROTHERHOOD BY STEPHEN KNIGHT(1984). THE POLICE ARE NOTHING BUT CRIMINALS IN UNIFORM – ON OCTOBER 25, 2018 A 50 PAGE REPORT PUBLISHED ON THE PARLIAMENTARY WEBSITE STATED THAT 90% OF ALL CRIMES ARE GOING UNSOLVED AND THE POLICE WAS IN DANGER OF BECOMING IRRELEVANT: https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-44884113]
2 – Making arrangements for statutory sick pay for those self-isolating without symptoms from day one [RESPONSE: THE COVID-TEST IS PROVEN TO BE 80% ERROR PRONE AND EVERYONE NATURALLY CARRIES THE CORONAVIRUS, IT’S PART OF OUR HEALTHY IMMUNE SYSTEM – THIS IDEA IS FOOLISH AND A PERVERSION IN ERROR AND WILLFUL WASTE OF PUBLIC TAX MONEY]
3 – Allowing small businesses to reclaim statutory sick pay payments from HMRC [RESPONSE: SMALL BUSINESSES MUST BE SUPPORTED AND NOT CORPORATES WHICH HAVE BILLIONS STASHED AWAY IN OFF-SHORE TAX HAVENS]
4 – Allowing more phone or video hearings for court cases to stop the spread of the virus in courts [RESPONSE: I WANT JURIES’ HEARINGS RESUMED IMMEDIATELY, HOW DARE THESE NAZIS STOP THEM. I WANT THESE £100,000 A YEAR PROSTITUTES POSING AS JUDGES TO BE KICKED OUT OF THE COURTS AND ELDER INDEPENDENT PEERS OF SOCIETY MEN AND WOMEN WHO FEAR GOD TO REPLACE THESE EX-LAWYER SNAKE SCUM MASON MAFIA]
5 – TOWN halls will be given the green light to ration social care for the elderly at the height of a pandemic under emergency legislation. It will allow councils to prioritise services ‘to ensure the most urgent and serious care needs are met, even if this means not meeting everyone’s assessed needs in full’. [RESPONSE: WE CANNOT COMPROMISE ON THE POOR AND ELDERLY AT THIS TIME – THIS IS AN NHS DOCTOR DECISION NOT FOR THOSE USELESS COMMUNIST SOCIALIST SCUM IN THE LOCAL COUNCILS]
6 – The laws will allow the Government to step in to force schools to stay open even if class sizes have to rise or if school meal standards have to be reduced. But, if the Government so decides, the legislation also gives ministers the power to shut schools and childcare providers. [RESPONSE: SCHOOL MEALS ARE PROVIDED FOR POOR CHILDREN – AT THIS TIME MEALS AT HOME MAY BE LIMITED AND OF POOR NUTRITION WITH EMPTY SHOP SHELVES – THE GOVERNMENT MUST PROVIDE THE HIGHEST NUTRITION FOOD FOR THESE CHILDREN AS IT MAY BE THE ONLY FOOD THEY EAT DURING THE DAY – GIVEN OVER 4 MILLION CHILDREN LIVE BELOW THE POVERTY LINE IN THIS COUNTRY AND WITH CORONAVIRUS THAT WILL RESULT OVER 5 MILLION LIVING UNDER THE POVERTY LINE IN THE SIXTH RICHEST BLOODY COUNTRY IN THE WORLD]
7 – Unveiling the legislation, Health Secretary Matt Hancock said: ‘The measures we will be introducing in the Emergency Coronavirus Bill this week will only be used when it is absolutely moved to an area outside their day-to-day duties. [RESPONSE: THIS IS WHAT HITLER SAID. I WANT THIS NAZI HANCOCK REMOVED FROM OFFICE SINCE HE OWNS A VACCINE COMPANY THAT SUPPLIES THE GOVERNMENT WITH PRODUCTS AND THERE IS CONFLICT OF INTEREST – HE IS PUSHING VACCINES ON THE PUBLIC BECAUSE HE WILL PROFIT PERSONALLY: https://beta.companieshouse.gov.uk/company/09331560/officers AND https://www.portonbiopharma.com/products-2/pipeline/]
8 – I DO NOT WANT AND WILL NOT TAKE VACCINES – NOW OR EVER. THIS AGENDA OF THE VACCINE INDUSTRY MUST BE STOPPED. THESE PAID PROSTITUTES MP FRONT MEN CALLING THEMSELVES ‘GOVERNMENT’ WHEN THEY ARE NOTHING BUT WOLVES IN SHEEP’S CLOTHING WORKING FOR COMMERCIAL AND FINANCIAL INTERESTS OF CORPORATES AND BANKS AND RICH FAMILIES MUST BE REMOVED SINCE THEY ARE CORRUPT AND HAVE MAJOR CONFLICTS OF INTEREST AND NOT THE COUNTRY’S AND PEOPLE’S BEST INTEREST AT HEART.
In a newly published December 2018 letter (provided to this writer in an Exclusive video interview on February 1, 2020) reporting the Croydon Magistrate Court’s investigations into a case of non-payment of Council tax alleged by a London group which “served” a Court Order “Summons” for this action, a Croydon Magistrates Court manager, Yvonne Membu, has stated clearly that no such order had actually been issued by the Court and that the paperwork which had been used to threaten and intimidate the recipient, thence proved fraudulent and masquerading as a court order, had been traced back to Croydon Council.
This letter, marked Confidential, and obtained in response to a complaint sent in through a third-party site, Resolver.co.uk had been previously withheld by the recipient on advice from many and is now being publicly revealed for the first time, in what surely is a breakthrough revelation promising redressal of injustice for millions.
“No one should ever have to be robbed, jailed or tortured, on false claims to court authority, for Council Tax, ever again. And as a matter of fact, no other false court process shall stand after this.”
Anthony Badaloo, Press Release, Death to Council Tax
The implications of this disclosure are profoundly far-reaching and affect every citizen, says Anthony Badaloo, British CPA and financial advisor who spoke to this writer last week in a revelatory video interview where he explained the current dismal situation in the UK where corruption at the level of local government (the Councils) meshes with corruption among police to wreak predatory havoc among the citizenry on a daily basis.
Newsbreak 58: Anthony Badaloo, UK Accountant | Death of Council Tax: Bombshell Reveal on Council Crimes and Court Order Scam
As a consequence, thousands have lost their homes and property to organized crime syndicates working inside the Councils, egregiously using fake county bailiffs, sheriffs, police, and judges to do their bidding, in actions of clear police threat, intimidation and harassment, essentially using the fraudulent office of their positions in criminal actions of racketeering and fraud to steal people’s lawfully-owned property and businesses and evict lawful owners–whether as part of a slowly-unfolding Agenda 2030 land and rights grab or just long-standing piracy on the land.
Fake Court Orders, Fake Bailiffs, Fake Sheriffs, Fake Police, Fake Judges, Fake Courtrooms Run Eviction Fraud, Child Stealing, Vehicle Theft on Unknowing Populace
People across the UK–and the entire Commonwealth which apparently follows the same blueprint of criminality entrenched at the lowest and highest levels of government both in the UK, and the USA as well–are accustomed now it seems to the threat of eviction, child kidnapping, home repossession, or incarceration and the sight of bailiffs, sheriffs, and police targeting people and evicting them or using a battering ram to break down their door, as this 2016 image of bailiffs destroying a 300-year-old cottage in Glossop owned by a teacher (after claims by a neighbor of her removing roof stones) shows.
These are not just a few bad eggs engaged in scamming random members of the public and protected by corrupt police or sheriffs, it appears, but an entrenched and networked criminality operative in like mode across the boroughs and Councils, and across the Commonwealth and possibly many other nations of the world.
“It’s not protected by the government,” says Anthony Badaloo, “It is run by the government..the Queen is at the top of it. In England here we call it Her Majesty’s Courts and Tribunals Services–she can’t get out of it, I mean you can see even her children don’t want to be part of it anymore or her grandchildren or whatever–it’s a rotten system.”
“In this case now with the Croydon Council, what is happening–the Police force comes under the umbrella of the Council right, and at the same time what we found is that the Councils are actually stealing more properties than all the banks and building societies added together…this has left the Councils with a surplus in excess of 22 Billion Pounds.”
Anthony Badaloo, Newsbreak 58 and Press Release, Death to Council Tax
Who this benefits and who this is run by include the Council members themselves. “Well only men and women can do things, can the corporation on paper do things?” Further, these actions of asset-stripping and property theft are facilitated by a network of criminally-acting judges. These judges who preside over the supposed court proceedings, Anthony Badaloo reveals, are usually solicitors who work part-time for the banks, receiving high salaries, who are thus essentially being bribed to play judge in this mighty extortion and fraud racket through this false court-order scam–which ultimately makes money, in a giant returning pyramid scheme, for all fraudsters and banksters involved.
How entrenched into the fabric of things this is can also be seen in the peculiar fact that it has apparently become an accepted practice that courtrooms can be leased, and anyone can use them for a fee, as delineated in this Croydon court manager’s letter, and witnessed by Anthony Badaloo: “I went into the Opera Tribunal Courthouse in the High Court in London, and they’ve actually got the advert on the door of each courtroom: To book this room please call in this number–it’s on every door, and so the people are just hiring the courtroom and pretending to be judges.”
The labeling of people being targeted for asset-stripping as “clients,” as this Court manager’s words reveal (screenshot below), is also quite curious, because those being sent these letters and notices of impending evictions are actually being threatened with extremely dire consequences: committal to prison, repossession of their homes, etc., (see below excerpt from the Summons to Anthony Badaloo’s wife) and are not in any way aware they are “clients of the Council” being offered a contract.
Very often as well, explains Anthony Badaloo, those who challenge these evictions are “sectioned” on Mental Health frauds, so that they become doubly enslaved, by the Mental Health Subjugation system and the Police/Prison system both. Targets for asset-stripping are in fact inundated with charges and “court orders” claiming illegally that their residing in their own home is unlawful, that they owe money to the banks. They are subjected to multiple intimidation-visits by people claiming to be bailiffs, or wearing the uniform of police; targets are arrested and jailed after being hit with unsubstantiated charges of having failed to pay property taxes.
Outright Asset Stripping and Child Kidnapping: 150 Cases Per Day of Home and Property Stealing by Councils Across the United Kingdom
Those who are targeted for such property grabs are anyone with assets, anyone who owns real estate, anyone who owns a house, particularly if the house is paid off. Currently Anthony Badaloo estimates that one hundred and fifty cases occur every day across the United Kingdom, cases where people are subjected to illegal evictions and their property stolen.
While this is shocking enough in itself, Anthony notes that similarly, people are also losing their children to Child Protective Services in Child Protection Frauds, and losing their vehicles as well as their businesses and homes. On the petition page at Change.org where he has called for people across the United Kingdom to join the “campaign for a Public Inquiry, being commanded by the people, into the massive COURT ORDER SCAM, in the name of Her Majesty The Queen (HMCTS) which leaves millions of Victims made Homeless and Destitute,” he characterizes this multi-frontal theft as HSBCC: Homes, Savings, Businesses, Cars, and Children. Numbers across all these various crimes therefore would exponentially increase (from 150 cases of house theft per day) into hundreds of thousands, if not millions, of people being thus persecuted, across the years.
Anthony Badaloo himself has been the victim of such lawless eviction crimes, where both he and his young family, including a 3-year-old with a heart condition– as well as young children from his tenants’ families were thrown out on the street.
“When they stole my property, they stole four properties of mine, not just where I live–and I have tenants in them, and these tenants are children, so they’ve thrown loads of children on the street–that’s what hurt me the most, my little boy at 3 years old he had a heart condition–some minor heart operation thing and he was on recovery–and they still threw him on the street; I could not believe it, we have it on video … they’re all pretending and pretending and pretending and that’s why this case we have here from the Magistrate’s Court, it’s a criminal court, where the Court Manager has confessed and written, put it in writing, and signed it on the court-headed paper–I believe it’s gonna blow up the planet.”
Anthony Badaloo, Newsbreak 58
Never Fail to Question “Local Authority” if Targeted for Eviction, Child-Theft, Vehicle Theft– Push For Answers, Keep Writing Letters, Ask for Confirmation via Digital Records Directly From the Court
Anthony recommends that anyone facing similar situations ask simple questions, and ask pertinent questions, continuously, in addition to asking always for the computerized or digital record of proceedings issued against them directly from the Court–which, as evident from the Croydon Court Manager’s letter here, yielded absolute gold. Moral of that story apparently is: When HM Courts and Tribunal Service or the local Council comes knocking with an unlawful “Summons” missing a court case number, go directly to the Court and ask for the digital record of proceedings. Further, the magic sentence to include in this request for confirmation and record and which seeks to elicit the truth is, he says, the most powerful sentence in law for anyone to use: “I have never been served with any proceedings issued by the court.”
Anthony’s pertinent questioning of a police officer who arrested him and informed him he was going to be subjected to a noxious bulldozer “interview” after directing bogus charges his way, of “squatting” in his own home, and owing Council tax, included the question, “Who has made the allegation?” This interview, a clear record of police harassment, was recorded by the police on video and can be viewed on YouTube:
What is interesting to know is that several events have transpired it seems as a consequence of Anthony Badaloo’s actions to reveal and question the fraudulent court orders, both on his own behalf and on behalf of others who have sought his counsel in dealing with the courts and false authorities involved in stealing their houses or children. Police officers (including the one above, interrogating Anthony) have resigned their positions and disappeared. A CPS Chief has resigned. Council members and heads have resigned and left or moved counties. (Please see the list of names and actions at the Stop Court Order Scams petition.)
He is hopeful therefore that if everyone who has been wronged stands up and asks the right questions–not aggressively, but insistently–justice will indeed be served and this whole system of fraud and deception will collapse in on itself overnight.
Please stay tuned for updates and posts here of Anthony Badaloo’s documents referenced here, his press release on this momentous occasion of publicly releasing this accidentally-whistleblowing letter, and a template for people to use to question all fraud-running cartels and Councils.
RAE (Report, Analysis, Op-Ed) | Ramola D | Posted December 1, 2019
Documentary Evidence since 1994 of Covert High-Tech Electronic-Weapon and Neurotechnology Use in Targeted Surveillance, Experimentation, Operations by US Government on Americans: A Series
(1) The DOD/DOJ Memorandum of Understanding on OOTW/LE, 1994
Unremarked in mainstream media, deliberately hidden from wider readership, there have been a series of declassified document FOIA-releases over the past few years which astonishingly reveal many facets of the now-known covert use ofelectronic-weapon and neurotechnology surveillance, experimentation, weapons-tests, and operations on the American public by various agencies and departments of the US Government and their contractors.
Similarity with Covert Global High-Tech Policing Operations: Similar operations have been unleashed worldwide, as reported extensively at this site and others online earlier. Some documentation in the public domain testifies to this global program, and will be reported more fully here shortly. For now, please see this Twitter thread, which discloses NATO High-Tech Non Lethal Weapon/Neuro Policing operations in Europe and discusses also how Non-Lethal Weapons Testing & Neuro Surveillance have been unleashed inside the USA:
From Riot Control Tear Gas to Pulsed Microwaves and “Acoustic Psycho-Correction”The irritant chemical weapons of riot control of the 1960s and ’70s—the original non-lethal weapons–have steadily given way to a plethora of non-lethal technologies in the range of electromagnetic, acoustic, scalar, and other exotic neuro/bio technologies steadily released by military weapons research into law enforcement, and currently also into futuristic crime-prevention or Pre-Crime use over the ’80s, ’90s, and beyond.
Public Domain Disclosure on Non Lethal Weapons Has Ramped Up Lately
This series aims to address the public disclosures in recent FOIA releases of ongoing US Government use of Electronic Weapons and Neurotechnologies on Americans.
“Electronic Weapon” herein refers to the spectrum weapons used in Electronic Warfare as defined by the Department of Defense (DOD) in documents, particularly relates to anti-personnel weapons, includes all labeled as non-lethal-weapon, less-than-lethal weapon, psychotronic weapon, neuroweapon, next generation and emerging technologies, and includes RFID (Radio Frequency IDentification) and BCI (Brain Computer Interface) tech.
The Memorandum of Understanding Between Department of Defense and Department of Justice on Military Operations Other Than War and Law Enforcement, 1994
This Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) was preceded by decades of reported development of non-lethal energy weapons and neuroweapons by different departments of the US Government, including Defense, Justice, Energy, US Army, Navy, Air Force, DARPA, NSA, CIA, and NIJ, as indicated by various conferences held through the ’80s and early ’90s, by white papers from military and intelligence personnel, by declassified documents currently in the public domain as released by DOJ, CIA, NSA, and DOD, inclusive of the CIA’s MK Ultra documents and Project Stargate archives, and by information preserved in the Congressional record.
For instance, information on the growing focus by the Justice Department through the ’80s and ’90s on electromagnetic weapons can be gleaned from government reports on NIJ (National Institute of Justice) conferences on electromagnetic weapons.
Numerous military reports in journals detail the military development of infrasonic, radar, microwave weapons from the ’50s onward; their use in US Law Enforcement seems to have occurred particularly from the ’70s and ’80s upward.
Significant, in the ’80s-’90s lead-up to this MOU, are the following sampling of reports, white papers, and articles:
The 1993 Los Alamos-sponsored Classified DOJ/DOD Conference on Non Lethal Defense
The singular and secretive Los-Alamos-sponsored Justice/Defense classified conference on Non-Lethal Defense in 1993 at Johns Hopkins Applied Physics Laboratory no doubt had a direct connection to this Memorandum of Understanding, signed in 1994. The agenda for that conference is posted here.
Please see my earlier discussion on that deliberately-kept-secret conference and its consequences for Americans in these two critically questioning articles here—which include disclosures from multiple researchers, writers, and investigative journalists including Dr. Nick Begich, Dr. John Hall, Dr. Robert Duncan, and Renee Pittman Mitchell:
Lack of Media Coverage, Human Rights Coverage, Public Disclosure & Debate of Non-Lethal & Neurotechnologies Promised by This MOU
Significantly, there have been no public debates, discussions facilitated by Media and human rights or civil liberties groups, disclosure from the Justice Department, nor disclosure from the Defense department on the intended or ongoing use of non-lethal Remote Human Access Weapons and Neurotechnologies on Americans, which this MOU promises.
The purpose of this article is to report the content of this MOU—which is not fully transparent–highlight its main points, and offer insight into its intent with an eye to more fully informing the American public on what exactly has transpired here, what exactly this MOU has permitted, who is aware, who is involved, and who needs to be held accountable.
Significant, as stated, in this MOU are the following.
From the Section titled General, A and B:
This was an agreement to permit Defense and Justice to jointly share and develop certain kinds of technology and systems for shared purposes, for Military Operations Other Than War (MOOTW), and for Law Enforcement (LE).
This agreement sought to “conduct a program to enhance” both MOOTW and LE operations. (Was this also the kept-quiet political persecution program to target innocent Americans, activists, journalists–falsely labeled as terrorists–extrajudicially under Watchlist Fraud, and covertly use their bodies and brains for target practice in OOTW?)
This agreement came on the heels of DARPA, NIJ, and FBI deciding to gift Law Enforcement with these certain advanced technologies on the basis of findings of “convergence” they made regarding the applicability of these technologies—still not described–to both military and law enforcement operations.
DARPA, NIJ, FBI also felt these advanced technologies would “enhance the effectiveness” of both military and law enforcement missions.
From the Section titled Concept:
The objective of this joint program was to “develop and exploit” this advanced technology for military operations and law enforcement operations both—and does not refer to this technology as weaponry here, although it clearly is, if being applied militarily or forcibly by military or police. This is weaponry.
This joint program intended to open a “development and application program” contract creation industry where competing technologies, components, and systems—presumably from Defense/Security Service companies–could compete; the implication appears to be the promotion of competition in the development and testing of these advanced technologies, which have still not been described, in this Concept section. This Joint Program was unleashing a mercenary competition between rival tech weaponry companies—Defense/Security Service contractors–to develop, test, and fine-tune these sophisticated advanced anti-personnel technologies inside America, on Americans. (The involvement of Law Enforcement implies anti-personnel technology.)
“Testing and objective evaluation” was legitimized as necessary to ensure “quality of the competition.”
From the Section titled Implementation:
This was a 5-year MOU, which presumably has been extended periodically (to be confirmed).
A Joint Program Steering Group (JPSG) was created, with someone from DARPA chairing it and DOJ appointing a deputy chair, with technical program managers from both Defense and Justice. Significantly, a representative from US Army is designated to be on the JPSG, in addition to reps from DARPA and DOJ.
This Steering Group, chaired by DARPA, would make decisions on technologies of interest (to jointly share and develop presumably), plan, manage development, test, “conduct technology demonstrations and evaluations” – which suggests that military tech, already developed, would be demonstrated for law enforcement use – and make decisions on “transition strategies.”
“Test bed units” or “user organizations” would test the “transitioning products” (meaning the up-til-then secret or classified tech from DARPA, perhaps) and suggesting: * for LE operations: different police/sheriffs’ departments possibly, or corrections departments—prisons and juvenile detention centers; * and for MOOTW (which could include information warfare, psychological operations—Psy Ops/MISO, counter-terrorism and counter-drug operations, show-of-force operations et al): military units (such as the Marine Corps, Air Force, Navy, Army) or special operations forces. The implication appears to be that those groups intending to use this technology would serve as testers of it. There is a connection here to Non Lethal Weapons Testing contracts announced by US Air Force Secretary Michael Wynne in 2006, when he stated weapons would be tested on Americans, which needs to be further explored; these military weapons-testing-contracts continue, and notice of them can be found in the public domain.
The JPSG would move physically to DARPA in the first quarter of 1995 to begin “intensive management of the OOTW/LE program” from DARPA. (Then called ARPA; Note that DARPA is a weapons research and development agency for the Department of Defense, and not part of the Department of Justice. This MOU establishes military management of Justice, Law Enforcement, and FBI programs using these “advanced technologies”.)
Policy guidance would be provided by a Senior Review Group which would include the Deputy Secretary of Defense and the Deputy Attorney-General. This implies that both parties—and it is significant that the DAG is involved, FBI Directors frequently serve first as DAG (witness, Mueller and Comey) —would have full cognizance of these particular advanced technologies to be deployed by Law Enforcement and Military divisions both, and would make decisions to “facilitate technology transition to applications.”
JPSG projects would be of 3 types—transitioning or transferring existing military tech to DOJ (Corrections & Law Enforcement) where DOJ would test these; transitioning ongoing in-development-military-tech in “current programs” to DOJ where DOJ would modify as needed and test these; or jointly developing new tech, where DOD and DOJ would separately modify and apply tech as they needed. From analysis of conference reports from DOJ prior to this MOU as well as materials from DOD, some linked above, it appears that many forms of Biometric Identification, Pre-Crime Monitoring, and Neuro Surveillance technologies might well have fallen within the aegis of these categories. There is a connection here also to C4ISR (C4 (Command,Control,Computers,Communications)Intelligence,Surveillance,andReconnaissance) technologies, many being tested now via Non Lethal Weapons Testing contracts, e.g., by the US Air Force Research Laboratory, which needs to be further explored. (Please see my Twitter thread at head of this article, for links.)
From the Section titled Responsibilities:
Defense would identify tech and systems, existing and in-process, to hand over to Justice for testing, modification, and use as above.
DOJ would identify those requisite military technologies and systems in process at DOD found attractive for use by DOJ; interestingly—perhaps for obvious reasons, since it implies DOD has all the technology already that it could choose from to hand over–it appears that DOD is the primary party responsible to identify and select already-extant technology for DOJ use, but DOJ would be made privy to current military technology programs in process. This probably also implies that a lot of this DARPA tech is classified, and DOD would pick from extant tech to hand over to DOJ, leaving DOJ out of the loop there; with regard to in-process tech, DOJ would be permitted disclosure and be allowed to choose.
Yet both departments are required to identify their own requirements and “candidate technologies,” presumably within the constraints above.
Security classifications would be used as per whichever department was acting as the Executive Agent for specific projects.
Specific projects would be described in Annexes.
Important to note is the fact that the Attorney-General would be fully cognizant of this joint program and its essentially military activities, as reported to him or her by the DAG in charge of the senior review group. This is a program of testing advanced military technology on the streets of America by military units and special operations forces, and in America’s prisons and detention centers by sheriffs and police departments and all contractors interfacing with them, that the AG, DAG, and FBI would be fully aware of.
Notice of Joe Biden’s Omnibus Counter-Terrorism Act of 1995, which predated the 2001 Patriot Act, and established Military interference in domestic Law Enforcement, created the “Terrorist” label for domestic use, permitted indefinite detention without judicial review, and stripped Due Process from Americans.
This 1994 MOU establishes that the Attorney-General and DOJ and FBI and local Law Enforcement nationally in the USA were fully cognizant and partaking in joint military-justice advanced-tech weapons testing operations on Americans from that time onward and, significantly, during milestone moments in American history, such as the very next year at the time of the Oklahoma Bombing on April 19, 1995 followed by Joe Biden’s Omnibus Counter-Terrorism Act of 1995 (proposed in February 1995, passed in May 1995), then seven years later at the time of the 9/11 event in 2001 and the passing of the Patriot Act in 2001, and one decade later, at the time of the President’s Bioethical Commission hearings in 2011.
Americans testify at the President’s Bioethical Commission, 2011
“Advanced Technologies”: Remote Human Access Non-Lethal Weapons and Neurotechnologies
In the entirety of this opaque MOU, nowhere is it mentioned in so many words what exactly these technologies are. However, from the lead-up news reportage prior to this MOU, the many preceding technology conferences, succeeding documents released on FOIA-request, and succeeding execution of Directed Energy Bio Behavioral Research projects using Non Lethal Weapons contracted publicly by DOD, USAF, USMC, others, it becomes evident that these technologies DOJ and DOD jointly sought to deploy—and are currently deploying–are less-than-lethal weapons, non-lethal weapons, through-wall-surveillance weapons, weapons-detection technologies, behavior-modification technologies, medical monitoring technologies, and—secret of secrets–neuroweapons.
Details on some of these technologies now emerging from other FOIA-released documents will be explored in succeeding articles in this series covering these documents.
Report & Joint Statement | Ramola D | November 23, 2019
Subsequent to the extraordinary year and a half of outright falsehoods and slander propagated against me by former colleague Dr. Katherine Horton in an endless public display via several media including Youtube, Twitter, and her website, inflicting tremendous damage on my name and reputation while inciting others to engage nonstop in similar smears, mobbing, and cyber-bullying, it was recently decided to issue a joint statement to refute one of Dr. Horton’s most outstanding lies regarding how Techno Crime Fighters Forum ended.
This particular false-narrative-construct states that I “single-handedly blew up Techno” and is the primary lie this Joint Statement from all members of the TCFF team bar Dr. Katherine Horton intended to address.
This Joint Statement has come about thanks to the thoughtful efforts of an independent observer encouraging us to revisit this matter and jointly publish the truth of what occurred, in the interests of serving the truth and refuting the slander adversely affecting my name and journalism.
Over the past two or more weeks we have sought to do so, deciding on the text of this statement jointly after much conversation, contemplation, correction, edits, additions.
This statement was approved by all three members of the group on November 20.
Regrettably and unexpectedly, just before finalizing and publication, Karen Melton-Stewart sought to delay publication for four weeks, stating the timing could be seen as coinciding with Dr. Katherine Horton’s court case. Given that this entire effort—slicing into time much needed for other work including my journalism—has been undertaken to address new damage inflicted by Dr. Katherine Horton, whose continued slanderous attacks on me I have sought often to quell, I expressed my disinterest in such a consideration, pointing out that Dr. Katherine Horton’s court case schedules—which no-one had been keeping tabs on–were irrelevant to the historic matter being addressed by the Joint Statement. Nor, in my view, was it necessary to give credence and consideration to activities of dubious merit being undertaken by Dr. Katherine Horton, who had necessitated these very efforts, onerous and time-consuming, to repudiate her outrageous actions of slander and defamation against me.
Karen Stewart then stated that she withdrew her support for the Joint Statement–after she had already given her approval for the Statement as it is published below.
I highly regret that this has occurred, but I bear no animosity toward a sister warrior fighting for the truth about these crimes against humanity to be heard. I am honored to have worked alongside her, to have supported her voice and work, and to have reported at length on her story.
I am publishing the Joint Statement currently, as earlier intended, and as written, edited, and approved by all three of us in the service of truth, to repudiate wanton slander, and in the spirit of informing the public at large what really transpired.
November 19, 2019
JOINT STATEMENT ON HOW TECHNO CRIME FIGHTERS FORUM ENDED
Correction of Dr. Katherine Horton’s False Narrative Changing Facts
Because there continues to be confusion among some on this matter, definitively speaking, we jointly need to establish that Techno did NOT end by way of Ramola “singlehandedly blowing up Techno,” as Dr. Katherine Horton has wrongfully mischaracterized it several times, including recently, on her website, in many videos, and on Twitter; Techno ended because of a primary issue we three–Millicent, Ramola and Karen–had tried hard over time and over that last week, via emails, to resolve with Dr. Horton but alas could not.
The major issue, brought to a head by her offer to host TCFF weekly at her channel while others wished to make TCFF monthly (thanks to the unstructured, time-wasting form some felt TCFF had degraded to, which had raised issues of changing its periodicity), was Dr. Katherine Horton’s calls for violence on some of our shows against those leaders running heinous operations against us; whether serious or sardonic, it was deemed by us all as unwise. A minor issue was Dr. Katherine Horton’s peppering her commentary with profanity not readily acceptable in American society, which struck us as unprofessional, and unwise.
Other reasons and issues have been documented by Ramola in her account The End of Techno Crime Fighters Forum: The Real Backstory — an account published only after review and approval by Millicent, Karen, and Melanie- -which unwound over a longer period of time than just that last week when conflict in conversation with Dr. Katherine Horton on the subject of those primary issues above, accentuated by her refusing to accept culpability for her own previous calls to violence, brought Techno to an end.
It also needs to be definitively stated that all 4 of us had understood that Techno Crime Fighters Forum had already come to an end, as a re-perusal of the email exchange between us establishes, before the occasion of the Video Note presented on August 2, 2018 by Karen, Millicent, and Ramola, which was only meant to be a note to viewers by one portion of the former group that the forum had closed.
Dr. Horton’s frequent statements that she was excluded from a TCFF episode are factually wrong. So also her statements that “Karen was shocked” to get a call that TCFF was to be announced as ended, when more accurately we understand now after much conversation, that Karen’s inability to be present for long at a 3-person conference call the night before (Aug 1) meant that she herself, sad at the impasse with Katherine, but aware (like all 4 of us) at that point that TCFF was over, was not expecting a call from Ramola and Millicent the next day (Aug 2) to publicly address the issue of TCFF closing; cyber-hacking on the day (Aug 2) also prevented Karen from being present earlier that morning to more fully discuss the matter before going on-air for a Video Note to say goodbye; all of which combined to her being “indeed surprised” when eventually reached late that morning, as she has stated earlier. However, it is important to note that the decision to go on-air to present that Note without Dr. Katherine Horton (and the distinct possibility of unpleasantness on-air) was taken by all three together, even if in haste, to honor the time-slot, and even if the Note itself, intended originally to be a brief and neutral announcement of the unfortunate end of TCFF, expanded unexpectedly into candor from Ramola as to why TCFF closed, after Katherine unexpectedly showed up in Chat and made statements there about “being excluded from the broadcast.” It is important to note Katherine herself did not label this in Chat a TCFF episode, which it most certainly was not, because she like all three of us knew full well by then TCFF was over. Her subsequent labelings of this being a TCFF episode from which she was excluded are questionable and erroneous.
Dr. Katherine Horton was indeed excluded from a notification podcast to wish viewers goodbye—on group consensus– only because she had already, prior to that podcast, rejected in-depth attempts, together and separately, from all three women to reason with her and find a solution. This was the primary reason for the breakup of the group, with much frustration and bad feelings generated by her refusal to further discuss the primary issue the group found problematic. TCFF as a group and a forum no longer existed at that point, and as a result, communications were strained and unfruitful or just finally non-existent.
Finally, it is important to note that Dr. Katherine Horton at the time, on email, denounced all three for not including her on that final Video Note, and all three stopped working with her on the Joint Investigation Team which she later erroneously cast as a team she had “led” when it had been agreed throughout it was a collegiate, not a hierarchized group, which certainly did not recognize her as a leader.
Dr. Katherine Horton’s repeated mis-characterizations since then and recently, scapegoating Ramola D as the prime cause or instigator of TCFF’s demise and publishing such mis-characterized interpretations and accusations against Ramola D— which may rise from her own denial that her calls to violence were inappropriate or had even been done, or as a desire to deflect attention from her own culpability in an unwise course of action which ultimately brought TCFF to an end– should be repudiated.
Karen Melton-Stewart, Dr. Millicent Black, Ramola D
With thanks to early reviewers especially biomedical scientist Tracy W for review and contributions to this checklist.
In light of the continuing use, worldwide, of Remote Human Access neuro/bio/chemical/RF/sonic/scalar/nano weapons which are causing untold suffering to millions, both physical and psychological, via unconsented-to Bio-Hacking and Neuro-Hacking, and which essentially constitute Torture, prohibited by all nations of the world, healthcare and law enforcement professionals in particular are called on today to wake up, get informed, and take action to protect, care for, and support the reporting victimsof Fusion Center, Intelligence Agency, Military, Security Service, Telecom, Defense contractor, and University/Research Institution crimesof non-consensual human experimentation, harassive Electronic Weaponry persecution, and subjugatory Electronic Surveillance, permitted and being hidden by massive Watchlist Fraud, as described in the Notices, Memos, and articles listed below, as well as disclosed elsewhere widely by other writers in articles, books, and websites online.
This Ten-Step Checklist with preface offers all concerned citizens, human rights advocates and activists, civil rights groups, media, medical professionals and ethical law enforcement officers a document listing the suggested steps hospitals, law enforcement, and doctors should take to honor the reports of genuine victims, to investigate these reports from a human rights and healthcare perspective, and to respond appropriately in the face of Intelligence agency, Fusion Center, Deep State/Military crime and political persecution with high-tech remote human access weapons and life-takedown operations to assist reporting victims and provide basic health care and community care–starting with checking for RFID implants, measuring EMF pulses on their bodies, doing X-rays, MRIs, Scada analyses, and generally honoring their witness and further exploring and assessing it with the help of radiology, medical physics, and other sciences.
High-Tech Remote Access Weapons Being Operated Worldwide Today on Humanity
Note: Psychiatry is being used to disappear these crimes, and is the problem here, not the answer. The profound irony of doctors, psychologists, and psychiatrists daring to suggest that reporting victims are “Mentally Ill” and hustling them into Psychiatry Wards & Mental Institutions, forcing them to take brain-damaging drugs, and refusing basic medical healthcare–based on their ignorance of Mil/Intel High-Tech Crimes today, their blind indoctrination by collusive mainstream media, and their own lacking medical education, or by way of their avarice and avid complicity–in essence, re-victimizing already traumatized and terrorized victims who need caring physical healthcare, not mental–must be addressed.
Law Enforcement — despite being fully aware of ongoing National Institute of Justice advanced-technology testing, US Defense and Air Force and NATO microwave/milliwave/other weapons-testing & Directed Energy Bio Behavioral Research, military-academic social engineering and Psychological Operations–is still trained to run community mental health interventions or 5150/302/Baker Act Mental Health Involuntary Holds on anyone complaining of DEW harassment, Neurotechnology harassment, or other harassment from neighbors or satellites and celltowers: this is entrenched perfidy, enabling the crimes of torture of citizens with Remote Human Access weapons andmust be stopped.
Key Articles on Mass FISA Abuse and State-Run Domestic Terrorism: Fraudulent Targeting, Watchlisting, Subjugating with Electronic Warfare Neuroweaponry, Blacklisting, Community Policing, Human Trafficking into Barbaric Human Experimentation
This checklist should be provided to all doctors, psychologists, psychiatrists, Law Enforcement officers, EMS personnel, nurses, hospital staff, technicians, administrators, all medical staff in Emergency Rooms in hospitals.
In conjunction with this check-list, a badge of Citizens Rescuing Citizens from Surveillance & “National Security” State Abuse should be presented.
This is because Defense, Security, and Intelligence agents flash badges, court-orders, and warnings to doctors and psychiatrists, stating the reporting victim is under a “National Security” protocol and demanding the withholding of all services and help to the reporting victim, also stating that the reporting victim is “mentally unstable” and is under surveillance; all this, while using, abusing, exploiting, and enslaving the reporting victim in terminal, torturous, persecutory and inhumane experimentation involving covert RFID implants, EMF/Neurotech Assault, DEW Testing, DEW Operator Training Psychological Warfare, Blacklisting, Character Assassination, Organized Stalking, Community Persecution and Life and Career Sabotage.
Extreme Human Rights Violations Ongoing Must Be Stopped
Women and men and children are being raped, burned, and mutilated with these EMF/Neuro weapons. Pulsed microwaves are being shot at people’s faces, throats, heads, lungs. Pulsed microwaves are being shot into people’s genitals. Organs are being destroyed, Knees are being destroyed, Heart attacks are being induced. Respiratory infections are being induced. Invasive and degrading sounds, smells, sensations, images, dreams, emotions are being injected into their brains. Additionally, they are being stalked, Psy Opped, and assaulted verbally in public. Then they are named “Mentally Unstable” by Mil/Intel so they can be isolated and guinea-pigged for life.
In Case of EMF/Neurotech Crime Reports by Reporting Victims of Covert Tracking Implants, Microwave/Directed-Energy-Weapons Assault, Invasive Brain Technology Assault, Anti-Personnel Electromagnetic Technology Assault, Organized Stalking & Harassive Community Surveillance
Call on Radiology: Send reporting victim of EMF/Neurotech Crime to Radiology for thorough and complete scanning to detect the presence of RFID chips or other kinds of emitting/receiving micro/nanotech all over body, particularly in upper arm, brain, spine, teeth/jaw, and cochlear implants in ear. Obtain FCC license markers from FCC RF registration tables for all radio frequencies detected.
Record burns and scars: Examine and record all scars, breaks, scabs, burn marks on victim’s body, and record with detail any narrated incident related to each.
Scan with Spectrum Analyzers, Acoustic and EMF Detectors: Isolate and observe if pulsed or other radiation directed on the reporting victim of EMF/Neurotech Crime can be detected in a ward which is kept as secluded from WiFi and EMF radiation as possible, using Spectrum Analyzers, EMF Detectors, Acoustic Detectors, and other means of radiation detection which radiologists and radio/electrical engineers can advise on.
Document the Report of Assault: Record and document in detail the entire narrative of covert-implant assault and radiation-technology assault the reporting victim offers.
Open 24-Hour Radiation Assault Watch: Put thereporting victim of EMF/Neurotech Crime on a 24-Hour Radiation Assault Watch, recording and reporting all Spectrum Assaults and sonic assaults on this person, using meters and detectors as noted above.
Scan Victim’s Home: Send an EMF Detection team to reporting victim’s home, so they can take scientific readings of incoming pulse radiation or sonic attacks at a variety of different times and locations inside the home over a 72-hour period.
Map the Cell-towers, Antennas, Satellites, Drones Near Home: Map the pattern of cell-towers and antennas surrounding the home. Map the satellites recorded over home and neighborhood. Map the presence and frequency of drones over home and neighborhood.
Call for Diagnostic Testing, Toxicology & Forensics: Use DNA damage kits and Live Blood Cell Analysis to detect radiation damage. Add testing for altered sugar metabolism and detection of internal infections like Dysbiosis, Systemic Candida, Scalp Candida, SIBO, SIFO, etc. Send reporting victim to Toxicology for forensic analysis of nanotechnology lodged or self-assembling in body and brain. Research and establish origins of nanotechnology
Call for Surgery: Send reporting victim to Surgery for theremovalof all detected RFID implants, Bio-MEMs and others which can be removed. Retain all removed implants for the record.
Create a Detox & Support Regimen: Start the reporting victim on a Detox and Support Regimen using powerful natural detoxing and cleansing methods, while also providing a supportive atmosphere for the reporting victim to rest, recover, and rejuvenate post this criminal Mil/Intel/Electronic Enslavement ordeal.
Free Keene’s web site/A peace-liberty-voluntarism project pursuing and promoting peaceful living in Free Keene, New Hampshire
Free State Project
Free State Project’s website/A Liberty in our Lifetime project in New Hampshire, pursuing liberty, community, and peaceful living
New Earth Project
New Earth Project website/Open platform to unite humanity and create initiatives to support the emergence of absolute freedom and sovereign creative expression for all
Public Intelligence Blog
Blog for Earth Intelligence Network, Phi Beta Iota the Public Intelligence Blog/Promotes hybrid transparent governance, collective intelligence, true cost economics, and whole systems understanding