On the eve of the anniversary of the massacre at Tiananmen Square, on June 4, 1989, in Beijing, China, when 100s or 1000s of Chinese students seeking democracy were victimized by a massive military attack crushing basic human rights and freedoms (estimates of deaths range from 800 to 4000 and have been officially downplayed (as 241) and suppressed), it seems fitting to post further notice of the worldwide “TI Program” which many who are being unlawfully targeted under cover of surveillance and counter-terrorism laws in the “democratic-in-name-only” West and worldwide today attest is being levied against them–while all in their neighborhoods, social circles, and employment circles can also attest exists, since these very self-deceiving “upright citizens” (corralled by the local fusion-center Gestapo) willingly participate in actions of social ostracism, character assassination, and facilitation of electronic assault-and-battery masquerading as “surveillance” and “community monitoring” against them.
“TI” has come to be short form for “Targeted Individual,” a term in itself conflicted and questionable, since it has come to be used pejoratively as a label and pigeonholing device, while the associations with it of mental-illness–studiously cultivated by propaganda-pushing and openly deceitful mainstream media (such as VICE News in this film it terms “empathetic of mentally ill TIs”), complicit psychiatrists, and the whole syndicate of funded criminals in “Law Enforcement,” “Homeland Security,” and “Bureaus of Investigation” who work with local corporate informants and corrupt public officials in local and state government to target innocents, as reported here in the US and here earlier to President Trump in 2017 and in 2019, across a range: activists, journalists, whistleblowers, artists, writers, poets, civic-minded community leaders, anyone who speaks out to a “connected” School Board official or city councilor or crosses the path of local Freemasons and Secret Society occultists or non-illumined “Illuminati” whether these be Mayors, School Board Presidents, or Governors, and label them “suspects,” “terrorists,” “violent extremists”–are intentional, deliberate, and succeed in deceiving many.
The “TI Program” has also come to be recognized worldwide–and the extreme forms of persecution and COINTELPRO previously reported only by Intelligence agency whistleblowers and activists who made the mistake of acting with integrity on the job and have been hounded for it forever are now being reported in selfsame guise by hundreds of thousands of once-free Americans, British, Europeans, Asians, Australians. Some analysts and observers say however there is no one program under which people are being targeted and persecuted (as for instance CIA whistleblower Barbara Hartwell, who distinguishes political persecution as separate, as she exposes those fraudulently playing target and victim as they attack others in COINTELPRO smear campaigns), and indeed it appears there are many, but all who are not necessarily political targets–never having been activists or whistleblowers–but who report the same kind of abusive physical torture and social ostracism protocols seem to concur that the methodologies of public and covert harassment they experience are very similar.
Whistleblowers from Defense, the CIA, Intelligence & Security agencies, information from FOIA requests, declassified documents have now confirmed what many report, that unacknowledged neuro-experimentation and non-lethal weapons testing is underway, both via US DOD and NATO diclosures, that “crowd-control technologies” using spectrum (EMF) weapons and acoustic (neuro) weapons are being tested and operated, that AI and supercomputing along with controlling synthetic biology and nanotechnology, cybernetics and robotics is being tested and developed competitively by companies and countries, as reported in this recent report:
It becomes clear therefore that the vagaries of “counter-terrorism” and “countering violent extremism” and “surveillance” have been used abusively by Intelligence agencies and DHS to acquire or manufacture targets for use in covered research, weapons-testing, and experimentation projects, as new technologies of BCI-AI, V2K, millimeter wave weapons and microwave pulse weapons have (without public debate or consideration for ethics and human rights) emerged from military research into use on the streets by Justice & Law Enforcement, as described in depth recently by Finnish policy analyst Ville Helleberg in his report to the OHCR:
Those told their friend, colleague, or neighbor is “under investigation” are recruited to participate in the Neuro Linguistic Programming and other Psychological Warfare protocols, under threat of high fines or jail time–as FBI whistleblower Geral Sosbee has revealed is common practice when false warrants and court orders are issued in secret by corrupt Federal Magistrate Judges or FISA court judges seeking to bury targets alive. Those targeted are stripped of all human and civil rights, pursued, persecuted, and subjected to high-tech torture in their homes, on their couches, in their beds at night–in ways that obliterate the Nuremberg Code, the Geneva conventions, all human rights laws, and tear common shame and decency to bits.
Secrecy needs to be ripped wide open, and classified research involving human subjects–and permitting such extreme atrocity–needs to be stopped, as CIA and DOD whistleblower Dr. Robert Duncan has stated:
Amy Rayboun, a “TI” investigator, researcher, advocate, and human rights activist who works to offer support and insight to those targeted whom she encounters, offers this information on the “TI Program” for all who may have no idea such cruelty and such atrocity can exist today, and for all “true-TIs” in support and acknowledgment of their infinite suffering. Many have been killed, this should also be known, through various means: attrition and health breakdown through constant frequency weapon attack or pushed-suicide through radio-hypnosis and frequency weapon attack or provoked police-shootings: these are nothing but Satanic programs of torture, abuse, life takeover, and human guinea-pigging, they are egregious in every way, and they should be stopped.
Many thanks to Amy Rayboun for this summary and confirmation of the gross violations of human and civil rights that those targeted are being subjected to. The physical abuse and torture being reported by those targeted establishes definitively that the use of classification to conceal the atrocities being wrought on targets is a criminal use of such classification.
May all reading be awakened to and act on the urgency of the need to bring these programs to an immediate end.
And on this 32nd anniversary of the Tiananmen massacre, may the world and China break free of the clutches of Communism & totalitarianism and return to sanity and freedom.
THE PROGRAM ALL TRUE TIs ARE BLACKLISTED IN TO….SILENT WAR TACTICS, TECHNIQUES, BOMBARDMENTS, AND INDUCTIONS DESCRIBED IN THE PROGRAM (PART 1) AND (PART 2)….
THE PROGRAM (PART 1)…
– done to destroy one’s personal and professional life
– half-truths, rumors, and lies are strategically spread into their lives
– may be the basis for a bogus investigation
– rumors circulated are shocking and repulsive. rumors are one is a pedophile, prostitute, terrorist, racist, anti-government, mentally ill, drug addict, drug dealer, or a threat
– those spreading the lies are acquaintances and/or family members who were recruited, lied to, intimidated, and blackmailed into becoming informants
– law enforcement has used tactics to destroy people that they either wanted to recruit as informants or those they knew they could not recruit and wanted to destroy
– done for the purpose of constant harassment with planned destructiveness and destroying relationships. done simultaneously with the goal of breaking someone down
– rumors spread to neighbors, friends, family, employers, etc. spent to separate/induce isolation for a TI from their friends and families.
– labeling one a pedophile is damaging and produce optimum leverage for gaining community support
– harassed by neighbors and vigilante groups to the point where they are driven out of communities, forced out of work, and driven out of multiple states
SENSITIVITY PROGRAMS (USED FOR BEHAVIOR MODIFICATION)
– borderline-subliminal attacks designed to induce phobias
– uses anchors and triggers
– goal is to condition people with damaging emotions linked to triggers such as objects, colors, movements, and sounds
– TIs are covertly injured openly in public AND may happen with or without the TI’s conscious awareness
– purpose is to get TI to “respond emotionally to a particular trigger.” negative emotions are then built into the protocol
– sound, movement, or object becomes the trigger that will invoke the emotion
– process of creating anchors has also been called Emotional Transference
– patterns of behavior can be installed AND then reactivated whenever a similar situation is encountered or created. perps intentionally install anchors to return the TI to specific emotional states. first, the perp will create the desired emotional state in the TI
– deliberate infliction of emotional pain is an act of violence
– TIs world wide have witnessed this being done with sounds, gestures, cell phones, laptops, pens, cars, watches, clothing, symbols, colors, and other items. perps will reinforce these anchors and triggers with an occasional “blitz attack”
– TIs stalked by multiple people who carry that object, wear that color, or utter that phrase. brings to the surface all the emotional pain a TI suffered during that particular experience
– stockholm syndrome, pavlovian conditioning program, etc…
SPACE INVASION (CROWDING)
– includes blocking, cut-offs, and swarming
– TIs may be encircled by people wearing colors or holding objects that has been used to sensitized them. prolonged crowding can have an extremely negative effect on your mental/emotional health
– deliberate space invasion is designed to look like normal cut-offs and collisions. it can happen with vehicles, on foot, or a combination
– intended to startle people and make them tense. used in blind areas such as corners, hallways, restrooms, or intersections where TIs have people or cars cutting them off OR almost hitting them in a calculated manner
– happens in stores, buildings and on the street, with people and vehicles
– can be induced crowding
– perps adjust their timing so that they meet the TI at the exact point where there is the least amount of space for all parties to pass which maximizing the invasion of the TI’s space
– purpose is to get the TI’s attention and make them uncomfortable
– happens in stores while making purchases, restaurants, businesses, where targets have people frequently cutting them off, invading their space, using sensitivity programs, or other harassment tactics
– TIs experience a steady stream of noise consisting of different types of noise disturbances around their residence. includes but not limited to door slamming, yelling, car alarms, horns, tires screeching, loud music, engines revving, and frequent construction projects from heavy machinery and tools
– other types of disturbances include frequent noise from lawn mowers, snow blowers, vehicles with loud exhaust systems, and ambulance sirens, etc…
– noise will be synchronized with some type of activity
– made as TI leaves to appear to serve as a form of communication to alert perps in the area to begin pursuit
– used as a weapon to inflict pain
– produces adverse physiological AND psychological health effects, i.e., high blood pressure, a rise in cholesterol, damage to the circulatory, cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, and musculoskeletal systems
HARASSMENT SKITS (STREET THEATRE)
– used during group stalking and contains verbal and non-verbal harassment, threats, insults, intimidation, and violence, conveyed overtly, or covertly using themes, symbolism, or other medium
– harassment can be relayed with metaphors, verbal remarks, and symbolism using clothing or other items
– perps stomp their feet, clear their throat, or cough to indicate that they are part of the program. perps speaking on their cell phone and loudly accent the insult as they walk by and stare at the TI. blatant, hostile, or smirking stares, overtly insults as TI walks by are all common
– TIs are harassed, insulted, and threatened with symbolism using articles of clothing, newspapers, and other items. symbolism used with articles of clothing, especially during a wave attack where a TI is “blitzed” by a crowd of perps who smile, laugh, stare at them, and cut them off as TI passes.
PATTERNS FOR COVERT ATTACKS
– they attack covertly
– conceal their harassment by using existing events that occur naturally
– usually cover for the harassment
– conceal much of the harassment using a basic, simple formula
the basic, simple formula is…
– frequency: how often an event occurs AND the number of acts within a single event.
– duration: length of a single event AND the non-stop nature of the harassment in general.
– intensity: amplification of acts such as sound, sight, crowding, etc. within an event.
– noise disturbances emanate from areas surrounding one’s residence.
– happens simultaneously, strung together, AND one right after the other.
– disturbances may be synchronized with one’s activity, such as one’s arrival or departure.
– disturbances may be a part of a NOISE CAMPAIGN consisting of an alteration of other types of noise.
– frequency and duration formula is also used in MOBBING.
– noise disturbances can be overused for an individual tactic when the tactics are combined and used in a round-the-clock fashion resulting in amplification of their overall potency.
BASIC PROTOCOL/TACTICS (purpose: TIs personality traits can be cataloged AND designed to make someone to appear that they are suffering from a mental disorder)…
– surveillance of targets
– monitoring of their private lives
– entry into their homes (break-ins)
– “singled out” for preliminary stages of harassment
– gang stalking (overt surveillance) ensues
– harassment gradually increases to extreme conditions
– can be attacked with microwave weapons (DEWs)
– neuro-linguistic Programming (NLP) (a type of mind-control)
– can have street theatre or staged events
– can have planned harassment skits aka BLOCKING or SWARMING
– includes informants who surround TIs (targets) for the purpose of conversations intended to be overheard that contains information about the TIs personal life
– may be emotionally drained
– unable to properly identify or explain what is happening to them
– psychological warfare tactics are intended to drive people crazy
MENTAL HEALTH SYSTEM
– US has used doctors to help abuse and discredit people
– collaboration between doctors and the military when experiments were carried out in prisons, hospitals, and universities on unwitting people in North America
– psychiatrist and psychologists provide cover for THE PROGRAM
– in Russia, enemies of the dictatorship would be thrown into mental institutions and drugged beyond recovery
– APA’s refusal to acknowledge the impact of terrorization upon the human psyche
– DSM (Diagnostic Statistical Manual) is a cover for THE PROGRAM
– paranoia and schizophrenia for anyone who ‘complains’ of THE PROGRAM
– NSA DOMINT (Domestic Intelligence) has the ability to covertly assassinate US citizens by running covert psychological control operations to cause TIs to be diagnosed with ill mental health
– THE PROGRAM itself is designed to mimic mental illness
– mental health professionals participate in THE PROGRAM, wittingly or unwittingly label targets as mentally ill; allowing THE PROGRAM to continue to operate covertly
– once a person is singled out, dwellings surrounding the TI will be sublet and used as bases of operation and training
– unusual patterns of occupancy, lots of people coming and going into these “bases”
– vehicles and license plates used by the “occupants” of the bases may change periodically
– the people who move into these bases have been linked to the DOJ, CIA, and other federal agencies, universities, and government defense contractors
– information obtained by surveillance is used for no ethical reason
– other than to establish a harassment protocol that follows that TI (targeted individual) for the rest of his or her life
– uses very sophisticated equipment that can locate TIs through walls. the equipment is used in combination with Directed Energy Weapons (DEWs) and other “non-lethals.”
– miniature microphones and cameras may be planted in one’s residence or through-the-wall infrared devices may be used to monitor one’s movement. for example, Life Assessment Detector System (LADS) have a range of about 135 feet and can detect heartbeat and respiration.
SOLDIER (SURVEILLANCE TECHNOLOGY)
– radar flashlight that has a standoff distance of 30 feet and detects motion behind a wall at 30 feet
– display images in 3D format. can detect respiration, and can see through, wood, brick, plasterboard, glass, and concrete
– used on TIs worldwide and is much more advanced (not available to the public)
THE PROGRAM (PART 2)…
SETUPS AND CONFRONTATIONS
– frame TIs for crimes and/or to participate in staged events that foster character assassination
– provoke TIs into confrontations
– will get into setup and staged confrontations with homeless TIs who are well-dressed and very clean to create big public scenes
– confrontations can aid with recruitment
– photos or video footage taken of an enraged TI after they have been antagonized (setup) assists with smear campaigns AND when leveraging support of the community, facilitates the removal of the TI
– multiple complaints filed independently which entail the same report may expedite removal of the TI
– setups and staged confrontations are done to get TIs into the penal or mental health system
– local police participate in stalking and framing TIs for crimes
– Cointelpro has routine setups and fabrication of evidence that is used to destroy a person’s character OR have them imprisoned
– FBI framed innocent people (TIs) for crimes by having informants commit perjury. some of the informants were murderers (20+ murder informants used by FBI). to protect them (FBI), federal law enforcement worked diligently to prevent homicide cases from being resolved
– DOJ personnel are liars, perverts, frame-up artists, and assassins AND the elite used the FBI to orchestrate the cover-up
STORES AND RESTAURANTS
– staff work in tandem with informants to harass TIs
– staff appears to be friendly as they stick their elbows in a TI’s face, repeatedly kick their chair, crowd them while taking an order, crowd while delivering food, intentionally mess-up orders, and appear clumsy or incompetent by accidentally dropping food or silverware on TIs
– CROWDING, blocking, cut-offs, and swarming while TI goes to restroom and dining table; staff (informants) repeats information about the TIs personal life via cell phone
– sensitization by staff perps wearing a specific color to harass TIs
– harass TIs to invoke a sense of helplessness in the TI so he/she will not be believed if he/she told someone about the harassment
– store clerks work with informants in their store to crowd, block, and cut TIs off
– store clerks participate in noise campaigns by banging merchandise on shelves, throwing boxes on the floor as TIs passes by, slams doors, slams items on counters, and other types of loud commotion
– noise campaigns and street theatre are intended to create a hostile environment to persuade TI to leave AND let the TI know they are being watched (surveillance)
– products from vendors over the phone or online; the TI frequently encounters representatives who does not return calls AND appears vague or incompetent. TIs receive poor service that is recurrently consistent
FRIENDS AND FAMILY
– may be recruited to break TI down
– may participate in harassment skits intended to make the TI look incompetent, inconsistent, hypocritical, mock, and demoralize TI
– ‘new friends’ pose as confidants who abruptly end ‘friendships’ under deliberate, degrading, and humiliating circumstances to purposely heighten emotional trauma in the TI in order to provoke an uncontrolled response and induce heightened isolation
– family forced to carry out some of the harassment tactics. at home, family may frequently slam doors, cabinets, draws, and other types of noises. in addition, family may crowd and/or block TI
– family members are forced by their handlers to guide the TI through participating in street theatre. family will interact with other informants to harass the TI. skits are intended to make the TI feel foolish, incompetent, or inconsistent
THEFTS AND BREAK-INS
– no sign of forced entry
– occur when TI is sleeping or elsewhere
– occur despite home security system in place
– leave evidence of their visits by relocating objects or committing petty/not-so-petty acts of vandalism
– informants commit small-scale damage which includes but is not limited to the following: ripping TI’s clothing, pouring out milk, coffee, and other items
– informants will steal items and bring back at a later date. they will relocate items by placing them in slightly different spots. the purpose is to gaslight TI. (gaslighting tactics)
– vandalism of property, theft of items, and relocation of items is used for the purpose of driving the TI insane (psychological warfare)
– TIs reporting small vandalism to law enforcement will appeared to have gone insane
– surreptitious break-ins, thefts, and sabotage were a staple part of old Cointelpro
SABOTAGE, VANDALISM, AND STAGED EVENTS
– electronic equipment frequently fails, i.e., electrical systems in their cars, brand new appliances, TVs, radios, PCs, and other electronic equipment suddenly dies OR acts strangely…frequent, ongoing computer trouble/problems is common which does not follow any logical pattern
– electronics sudden malfunction/failing can be attributed to the E-bomb (electronic mail bomb)
– minor vandalism is for the purpose of informing the TI that he/she is under surveillance
– large-scale property damage is done to homes/vehicles. large-scale property damage is but not limited to the following: slashed tires, broken/smashed windows, tampering with break lines, draining oil out of cars, tampering with electronic components and batteries, cutting break lines, breaks failing suddenly, clutches failing, and the destruction of electrical equipment
– pets die suddenly of mysterious illness
– vandalism and pets being tortured is in retaliation for a TI taking action to expose informants and their crimes
– deliberately attempted collisions by drivers aka informants who speed away quickly (staged event)
– intentionally being run off the road has caused fatal car accidents and TI’s vehicles being totaled, leaving TI deceased or with a non-operable vehicle
– multiple independent vehicles are used to facilitate an accident (staged event). the main purpose is for the accident to appear as though it was caused by the TI (framing the TI for the accident happening)
– informants recipe for murder OR framing the TI for any “accidental” deaths that would have occurred if a staged event is successful for vehicular homicide
– TIs experience more tailgating and cut-offs
– vehicles pull out past stops signs as TI approaches intersection (done to startle TI)
– rotation of vehicles that surround TI on highway AND rotation of people tailgating TIs
– when rotation/tailgating of TI is done in a recurrent manner by multiple vehicles; it can antagonize the TI’s behavior and may serve to encourage the TI to accelerate his/her speed. as a direct result of accelerating, the TI could get pulled over (very effective if one is not aware he/she is targeted)
– vehicles marked with an identifying feature or color is used as a sensitization tactic to trigger negative emotions which have been anchored to that ‘feature’ (features may include but not limited to: a uniform; a shade of red, have their lights on even during daytime, etc…). purpose is used as a method to unite the group of informants and promote informants’ group cohesiveness on highway
– common vehicles/aircraft used to stalk TIs include but are not limited to: city/state vehicles, off-duty metro buses, school buses, local restaurant delivery vehicles, city/construction vehicles, fire trucks, ambulances, police cars, postal/UPS vehicles, taxis, 18 wheelers, helicopters, and small planes
– vehicles belong to organizations selected for recruitment into the ‘citizen informant programs’
– convoys of vehicles all spaced the same distance and traveling at the same speed will stalk the TI
– vehicular brighting is an attack
– brighting tactics are maximized when a vehicle has one headlight grossly misaligned and the misalignment produces a hi-beaming effect
– frequency and duration play an important role in brighting
– lights are shined into a TI’s windows
– the most common ‘non-lethal weapons’ are bright lights (brighting)
– the intent is to reduce risks of injury by temporarily ‘hindering’ the eyesight of the TI
– job opportunities are destroyed
– TIs who are employed are MOBBED
– progressive financial depletion induced by TIs loss of employment AND compounded by the extra expenses from the harassment
– termination of employment involved prefatory harassment by employer and co-workers aka MOBBING AND will coincide with other overt forms of harassment
– blacklisting originally used as a foreign-policy tool
– slander plays a critical role in blacklisting
– law enforcement sends ‘watch lists’ to corporations which contain the names of individuals who are NOT under official investigation or wanted. agencies/corporations target and harass TIs by deliberately destroying his/her careers on a massive scale
– applicants denied work because their names appeared on the watch list of applicants that the corporation reviewed
– TI is treated like a leper, only getting the worst jobs
– if one is uncooperative with the state, then one will live in poverty (economic warfare)
– not permitted to enter into universities
– MOBBING continues on to interviews for the purpose of further traumatizing the TI AND designed to humiliate the TI
– interviewers can commit harassment to the TI with little fear of being caught/consequences
– harassment is masked in layers of accommodation to help strengthen the illusion that ‘the TI is not working because the TI chooses not to’
– TIs experience tampering or lost mail because the mail is intercepted
– the purpose is to get as much information as possible that it will aid in the harassment and intimidation of the TI
– one main objective for communication interference is to disrupt the communication systems of the TI
– TIs receive lots of harassing telephone calls. the phone itself is utilized as a tool for harassment
– search engine results are filtered (blocked) and replaced with information pertaining to a TI’s personal life. websites that a TI visits are spoofed to contain information that is intended to let the TI know he/she is being stalked in/on the internet
– online version of public stalking
– purpose of tactic is used for inductions of a sense of hopelessness and isolation
– TIs receive “unsolicited” email that parallels a current event in his/her life
– TIs receive covert insults and threats
– TIs receive harassment via threads posted on message boards
– the topics of these message board threads are about events unfolding in the TI’s personal life that may contain covert directed threats/insults to TI
– TI’s email is blocked/filtered AND web activity monitored
– the harassment of some TIs is broadcasted around the country via closed circuit TV
– in the workplace, harassment is done by surveillance systems
– surveillance films of TIs gang stalked in the office is for the purpose of facilitating perp group cohesiveness and in identifying TIs
– presently, surveillance film serves as a major source of entertainment for the informants participating in harassment as more overt degenerates are known to record the TIs actions so they can “re-live” the experience
– covert workplace surveillance is big business….$$$$
– surveillance system equipment is installed after hours which includes miniature cameras hidden inside but not limited to the following locations: thermostats, light switches, on walls and in ceilings, changing areas, locker rooms, break rooms, and bathrooms
NON-LETHAL WEAPONS (NLW)
– weapons exist and are being used on the civilian population
– NLWs are the following: Directed Energy Weapons (DEW), Psychotronic Weapons, Less-lethal Weapons, and Electromagnetic Weapons
– most TIs are hit with these weapons
– located in bases of operation which surround TIs
– NLWs may be satellite or tower-based
– TIs receive DEW attacks while traveling via airplanes or vehicles
– briefcase-sized portable weapons are used to attack TIs
– some of these non-lethal weapons (NLW) are Through-The-Wall (TTW) weapons
– presently used on a massive scale against citizens of North America and other NATO nations
– outsourced to the FBI to put NLWs in all the police departments in the US
– NLWs are deliberately misused on a global scale as a traceless form of slow kill/torture
– types of unclassified DEWs cause nausea, fatigue, headaches, liquefy bowels, and a variety of other symptoms
– TIs are disoriented by low-frequency acoustic beams that provokes vomiting and diarrhea
– some NLWs are used on both land and space based
– NWLs uses are the following but not limited to: the use of the electrical grid throughout the country, the use of microwave towers, and devices affixed to poles that are connected to power lines.
– NLWs systems are used by neighbors surrounding the TI who is singled out as the target
– NLWs have been used on the civilian population for decades
Report by Ville Hellberg | Posted by Ramola D | 31.05.2021
Note: This is a major report from a European policy analyst exposing the horrors of counter-terrorism and mass surveillance torture programs being run worldwide since 9/11 by US, Five-Eyes, Fifteen-Eyes, EU member nations under agreement with US intelligence and security agencies, self-labeled as surveillance and counter-terrorism, self-permissive of bio-hacking and neuro-hacking, using invasive anti-personnel Electronic Warfare neuroweaponry, self-permissive of “No-Touch Torture” and remote-access physical and neurological abuse, shrouded in secrecy and propaganda, deeply invasive of human privacy, and unleashing Stasi, Nazi, Mengele-style programs of atrocity, torture, physical, and psychological abuse in concentric circles of control on millions of innocent civilians, wrongfully labeled “suspects” and “terrorists” for purposes of competitive development worldwide of supercomputing AI, cybernetics, robotics, neuroprosthetics, Brain Nets, Mind Hives, Cerebral Internets, and brain-degrading Neuroweaponry all at the cost of massive human suffering and human lives, revealing a complete breakdown of ethics and consideration for human rights among governments, militaries, security, and Intelligence agencies, seen through the eyes of European policy analysis and human rights convictions examining US Foreign Policy just as much as state of the art Surveillance Technology and Neurotechnology.
While these programs of political persecution and hidden torture are the same ones American human rights campaigners and others worldwide have been discussing widely in articles and books (see Targeting is Real), this report is groundbreaking and unique in its close examination of the US “War on Terror” declared by George Bush in 2001, which has influenced US Foreign Policy and coerced European submission to a worldwide fixation on counter-terrorism and mass surveillance inducive of clampdowns and removals of civil rights and liberties, and destroyed the concepts, principles, and protections of democracy worldwide, including European concepts of human dignity and rights completely at odds with American imperialism. “Europeans do not wish to bring the War on Terror to European soil,” writes Ville Hellberg from Finland.
What few people know–thanks to mainstream media propaganda and long-term occlusion of human rights reportage with deprecating, discrediting cover, intended to obfuscate, of “Targeted Individuals” who have been reporting extreme torture and abuse now for over three decades–is that American counter-terrorism and surveillance programs and laws have gone well beyond the revelations of Edward Snowden and permitted egregious torture, abuse, and removal of rights on American soil, as reported by this writer and others to President Trump in 2017 and 2019:
What Ville Hellberg brings to this disclosure is keen insight into the structure of global security agreements, the excessive role played by US “War on Terror” foreign policy demands, the rise of new technologies permitting extreme invasion of human, bio and neuro privacy, the false legalizing of “sources and methods” of interrogation and investigation granted to Intelligence and Security agencies, and the crying need to address and end the silent suffering of thousands of innocent citizens, wrongfully targeted, blacklisted, ostracized, tortured, maimed, disfigured, continually abused, destroyed, and yes, also murdered–in a complete breakdown of recognition of human rights–worldwide. Many thanks to Ville Hellberg for this powerful and deeply thoughtful analysis and report, which is surely going to pave the path to positive change, going forward.
RENDITION FLIGHTS, ANYONE? INTER- AND CROSS-GOVERNMENTAL TORTURE PROGRAMS MANIFESTED UNDER THE NEW SURVEILLANCE AND COUNTER-TERRORISM LAWS WITHHOLD LEGAL PROTECTION, HUMAN RIGHTS, AND CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS FROM CIVILIANS, THEIR TARGETS
Ville Hellberg | May 31, 2021
WE ARE WITNESSING GLOBAL ELECTRONIC WARFARE BY SUPERPOWERS WHERE INDIVIDUALS, POPULATIONS, AND INFRASTRUCTURE ARE TARGETED. DUE TO THE WAR CIRCUMSTANCE, GOVERNMENTS HAVE PERMITTED THEMSELVES TO DIVERT FROM LAWS AND DEMOCRATIC PRINCIPLES.
”Torture is a horrific topic and most minds will turn away from it because it can’t be comprehended that humans can be motivated, or computer programs can be run to do this to other sentient beings. Just when we believed we were becoming more civilized as a culture, the technology for torture has advanced more than a hundred fold in recent decades.” – Robert Duncan, ‘Neuropsychological and electronic “no-touch torture”. The spectrum of “interrogation” and torture techniques used by the US and its allies’. 
Electronic Warfare (EW) anti-personnel applications such as DEW (directed energy weapons) and AW (acoustic weapons), as well as their distant cousins neuropsychological electronic (neurotech) applications RNM (remote neural monitoring)/RMI (remote mental imaging) /EEG (electroencephalogram), and the product of these, V2K (microwave hearing), among other techniques, are being directed to civilians globally. With the exception of capital-intensive neurotech applications or other mass operations, the tech can be operated by private sector agencies and corporates, whilst the operations are in general run by military and law enforcement agencies from multifunctional radar and antenna platforms globally. Even though the applications are used in connection with psychological operations, they have the fatal capacity and produce pain, suffering and psychological trauma, even fatalities in their targets; civilians. Thus, the utilisation supports the definition of torture. Under governments’ execution, the operations are run by the military whose clientele the national security, law enforcement, intelligence societies are. Whether the implementation and targeting of this technology on civilians constitute a war crime should be evaluated. The technology ’consumes’ the human body, especially the neurological system, as directed to its targets for over inhumanly prolonged periods. Other scientists say the neurotech mass surveillance AI applications should be considered as a WMD. It is imperative indeed to acknowledge that the vast increase in numbers of targeted civilians indicates a widespread attack on human rights.
Due to its stealth nature, the technology has attracted military budgets globally. Other governments have developed sophisticated global operations and are well advanced in the utilisation of this technology. However, due to the low cost of operations most governments have utilised their own version of the technology. This also involves increased non-consented human testing and yet another armament. Human testing on dissidents, activists and whistleblowers, even their descendants, seems common. Whilst the effects of resonance spectrum frequencies on the human body and nervous system were discovered to their full potential by the midst of the 1970s , it still needed an agenda and strategy for implementation. The new millennium has brought us “the War on Terror” in which counter-terrorism and mass surveillance laws introduced legal instruments to allow the use of “mass surveillance neurotechnology” under which the resonance technologies are operated. The use of anti-terrorism as an agenda is an unconstitutional plan of the Western coalition that has significantly strengthened sovereign national power at the expense of human rights and democratic systems through surveillance laws.
The new dynamics of global geopolitics have also impacted the global power balance and foreign and security policies. We may have to accept that there are several superpowers capable of globally utilising this technology against the citizens of other countries. International laws should regulate the imperialistic execution of these technologies by regime and purpose e.g. automatized targeting, target selection, technology and intergovernmental co-operation should be regulated and watched carefully. There are some parallel operations and agendas that further increase the number of targeted people and populations. When the operations are global it is likely the resonances are directed through OTHRs (over-the-horizon-radar) and satellites which in turn facilitates the discovery of the source radar. For the sake of clarity, it is sensible to acknowledge that cellular phones have a key role in locating targets and delivering biometrics. The MSM is full of cover articles when one government is caught using the technology and blaming the others. Recently, we have seen evidence of purposely leaked material in MSM regarding global Electronic Warfare, in attacks where resonance technologies have been used, such as the attacks to White House officials  and Cuban embassy staff  by assumed DEW microwave technologies. These operations have been leaked not only to inform the public and other governments of the ongoing global Electronic Warfare but also to blame the other governments. It is reasonable however, to recognise that these attacks really are lightweight samples of the use of the WMDs. People should be suspicious in view of the recent bushfires also. In other words, it is the infrastructure, populations and individuals that are being targeted in this global war and not discussed in the MSM. We are indeed viewing the evidence of a global war.
The technology is poorly understood by lawmakers, practioners and politicians it is presented by military and law enforcement lobbyist and therefore, become approved and utilised globally. Human rights activists are in search of political co-operation whereas the political or administrative powers will not touch the topic. There is a significant number of similarities in details of this “play” to the events of WWII where the messengers of the Holocaust had not been taken seriously either.
Brain invasive neurotechnology applications (RNM/RMI/EEG) are claimed to have been used in mass surveillance operations. The applications are commonly called “cybernetics” although finding common global terminology for the EW applications seems problematic. We suggest the use of military terminology since the technology is based on military design. Each technology presented in this paper should be defined as Electronic Warfare anti-personnel applications, including the mass surveillance neurotechnology applications.
The mass surveillance operations target civilians and their neural systems. The operation is automated and run by supercomputers through multifunctional radar or antenna systems which means robotic elements are involved. In the investigations of the neural systems of the targeted civilians, the cortex is being stimulated by a spectrum of electromagnetic pulses for years in order to clone the entire neural system. The methodology is called synthetic telepathy since it may investigate and implant thoughts and mind patterns into the targeted brains. The term “mind control” implies the domination of the conscious nervous system. The process is not painless, hence the term “no-touch torture”. A group of brains can be linked together as “brain network” which in turn assists supercomputers to develop a competitive advantage in the field of AI. In “neuropsychological electronic torture” painful stimulants help to cause a reaction in the targets’ cortex that is measured and biometrics collected. Synthetic telepathy refers to reading and replacing one’s thoughts with “synthetic thoughts” or even by another mind replacement. The recent development where mobile devices, phones, can be used to collect and introduce these emissions i.e., ICT and 5G networks are in use. Scientists have developed systems to take nanotech to the brains which then receive the resonances. It has been presented that the mass delivery of this nanotech would occur through public vaccinations. The nanotech operates using the body energy (piezoenergetics) or by energy delivered resonances. Thus, the resonances deliver both the energy and the informantion in form of commands. The delivery of these resonances can be arranged from any platform, even by mobile device emissions. The mass surveillance utilises satellites and OTHRs. This allows continued mass observations of the feelings, senses, thoughts, and actions of the target. The fact is that individual’s free will and degree of autonomy are hugely affected.
As a result of the recent breakthrough of technological development different forms of applications are being utilized in many areas in the society, such as police, customs office, border control, prosecutor, judicial system, and intelligence community but also in the private sector. The technology remains unregulated and lacks sufficient measures of supervision, monitoring, and control due to the covert nature of the operations. In Europe, the situation is being recognized  by lawmakers to a certain extent. Whilst the EU has been speculated to push through a reform  on the laws of AI mass surveillance to ban the use of AI for mass surveillance (from the private sector alone) and some other uses this has not been ratified. There has been a good progress made to impose further regulation on automated weapons systems  and interrogation methodologies . In addition, the consistency of surveillance laws is being evaluated in the EU by the ECHR . It seems lawmakers do not understand the technology since they only have the military introduction to it. In the absence of ethical aspects, international laws, regulation, and compassion, solidarity the torture-like execution continues to be conducted, hence the phenomenon of targeted individuals.
Too little is spoken in public about white-collar law enforcement and intelligence community operations’ military tactics that produce pain, suffering, and psychological problems to civilians. Resonance technologies are at the core of the Western intelligence community and law enforcement operations today, executed by the military among others. Yet it is unclear which government agencies and how many countries are abusing neurotech methodologies. The military technologies have been introduced to politicians under anti-terrorism agenda by a Western intelligence coup as surveillance methodologies with a major detail left ignored, that the technology causes significant pain, suffering, physical and psychological trauma, even fatalities. The technologies are also being widely misused in operations lacking supervision in an unregulated industry in the absence of ethical aspects.
Such tactics as DEW (directed energy weaponry; laser, maser, high power microwave and radio frequencies as well as particle beams), AW (acoustic weaponry), RNM (remote neural monitoring), reverse EEG (electroencephalogram), and V2K (microwave hearing) to mention a few are somewhat creatively executed from multifunction radars and a series of antennas and directed to their living targets from a diversity of platforms with satellite assistance. Despite the fact that these are military tactics, and a crucial part of Electronic Warfare anti-personnel operations, they are being directed towards civilians to cause pain and suffering when misused and therefore, must be considered as torture. Should that not constitute a war crime? In addition to a law (Finland: Rikoslaki luku 11 pykälä 9a) that defines torture as a crime, most of these nations have signed on the UN Convention on Torture.
”Anyone can be put into these programs. Justice and rule of law does not exist at the highest levels of government. Treaties are worthless because the #1 agreement in the rules of war, a ban against torture, is not obeyed. This creates a more brutal and barbaric society lead by example.”  This is the explanation of the “War on Terror”. It seems the police, prosecutor, in particular, border control, customs, judicial system, intelligence community and military operations are all in favor of this type of implementation, the citizens themselves being bypassed. Probably, the entire clientele favours this technology which allows direct participation in the activation of the targeted suspects’ sensors. This is the end of privacy as we know it, the film ‘Minority Report’ in steroids.
Coercive Measures and the Use of “No-Touch Torture”
In Finland, military intelligence confirmed on 06.05.2021  that some of their coercive measures are similar to the ones used in the local law enforcement. More interestingly, the article confirms that the district court (of Helsinki) regulates the use of coercive measures which in turn may be interpreted that the judicial system in Finland allows the use of military tactics that are sometimes referred to as “no-touch torture” (torture caused without visible connection to the targeted) to be used to target the Finnish citizens. In view of the fact that law treats any torture or intentionally caused pain as a crime (Rikoslaki Ch 11 §9a among the UN Convention against Torture) in Finland, the arrangement is somewhat disputable. Another trick to hold back the argument on war crime?
In Finland, the chiefs of military and law enforcement select the technologies used under coercive measures and self-supervise the utilisation of these. It is indeed wishful thinking that the lawmakers, law practitioners and politicians approving the use of the technologies would also understand them. Some targets have been targeted for decades even though the permitted period is supposed to be 6 months each time before renewal. The renewal process would not stand any closer evaluation. The law enforcement officers manufacture the evidence to present the suspect in a negative frame. There is no alternative explanation on why the same targets are under the execution for decades unless, they are the targets of military exercise. The former ptotocol is called target manufacturing. It surely seems the technologies have become a punitive instrument for the political and administrative cultures.
One acknowledged problem seems to be the new surveillance law that allows the use of resonance technologies together with counter-terrorism laws which in turn allows the removal of civil rights. Finnish Defence Forces (FDF) are investing in cyberwar in the future  and confirms that AI is involved in order to handle significant amounts of data. The terminology appear to cause problems with interpretation since the term “cyberwar” has been used in the media to cover resonance methodologies also. Bear in mind the ICT sector is a part of the mass surveillance structure and 5G infra based on resonance technologies. Since 10bn Euros is being invested in the new fighter jet fleet which in turn supports cybertechnologies by multifunctional radar systems it is clear the technology is in use. Kivinen, the Chief of Defence, states that in developing a cyber defence programme the Finnish Defence Forces co-operate with other members of the EU cyber defence projects . It was brought to the knowledge of Finnish Prime Minister Antti Rinne in 2019 that what mistakenly is called cyber weaponry instead of anti-personnel EW technologies were being used to target civilians and even children. Rinne publicly aimed a reminder to the Chief of Defence who in turn publicly mentioned the technology related to an international war exercise . As it has been brought to the discussion earlier the EU seems to have security policies that conflict with human rights and indeed, with the EU policies for human rights. Since the EU does not possess an organised military compartment or co-ordination for the common defence the EU member nations practice with who they will. Human rights are left under the observation of the military in this war exercise, a light operation if any.
Since the views of targets have not been heard in preparation of the surveillance and counter-terrorism laws in the EU, the understanding of the technology is based on military reviews. This is an excellent reason why targeted should be heard by lawmakers, law practitioners, and politicians instead of copying military methodologies from other societies supported by massive lobbying. If not legal risks, at least political and reputational risks will acknowledged by the Governments of the EU [17, 20, 26]. The use of these weapons should be regulated more aggressively and indeed, take into account that the same targeted civilians, shockingly, remain the targets of international war exercises for years, as long as their physiology can withstand for the attacks of the energy weapons.
The Intelligence Ombudsman in Finland supervises the legality of civil and military intelligence and the realisation of basic and human rights in intelligence activities (The Act on the Oversight of Intelligence Gathering entered into force in February 2019) states the website of the Intelligence Ombudsman. The Ombudsman has produced recently (05.05.2021) a second opinion on the operations of military intelligence and intelligent services in Finland according to which he approves the operations. The Intelligence Ombudsman is aware of the use of the technologies brought to discussion in this report in Finland. He has been presented with 26 accounts of personal reports of targeted civilians on Finnish soil. These technologies have been used on the targeted well before the surveillance law came into force. An independent external review is suggested on the surveillance laws in the EU as there is no consistency among them. Similarly, the coercive measures used and the principles on what basis they are being used on civilians in the EU [20, 23, 26] should be put under review.
The Rights of the Targeted
”Governments may mistake their citizens as enemies in the same way that an immune system may lose its ability to distinguish between the body’s own cells and pathogens. ” 
The above is a very polite articulation of the fact that human targets are required to develop military technologies. The targets are approved through a judicial system that operates law approved by politicians and lawmakers. By practice, we know that most of the targeted individuals are manufactured targets and presented in a frame that has very little to do with reality in order to allow the use of counter-terrorism and mass surveillance laws.
“If an intelligence law is not well-conceived and rational, it could easily become a formidable weapon of repression. An intelligence law should not only protect citizens against terrorism, but also against the State… There is a total absence of control in this law.” M Trevidic 
The EU security strategy has been impacted by the Western agenda for anti-terrorism and allows such resonance technologies to be utilised under the law enforcement and intelligence operations of its member countries against the earlier knowledge of the topic (art. 30 Resolution on the Environment, Security and Foreign Policy from January 28, 1999, Nr.A4-005/99) to civilians. No human rights, no rights of the accused nor legal protection is respected in the process to which civilians are exposed. Constitutional rights are removed by these counter-terrorism acts. The counter-terrorism laws and mass surveillance laws both are used against democracy and human rights. The suspects do not have rights nor legal protection against coercive measures. In fact, the suspects have been stripped of their rights during the implementation of this protocol. The accused supposedly have rights (ignored), the rights of the accused, however, only a very few ever are being accused. The unconditional nature of implementation indicates it is not about seeking the truth under district court approval but the aim is to degrade the individual. It takes time for civilian targets to recognise their life is over as they used to know it. Dramatically enough no instance informs targets of their amended status in society. Even members of families with small children are placed under the torture scheme in which situation everyone is affected physically and psychologically (an acknowledgement based on empirical observation).
“As Lord Hoffmann noted in a concurring opinion in A Secretary of State for the Home Department, ”The real threat . . . comes not from terrorism but from [practices] such as these.”” referring to the impact of counter-terroristic measures in the society.
”Why torture? The CIA claims it works. The assumption is that it works to gain actionable intelligence. Torture is often used for revenge, punishment, interrogation, and behavior modification. In other terms torture is used to remove the continuity of thought to confuse the target to reveal information, erase brain patterns such as values and beliefs, or to break down the human spirit to make them submit and obey their handlers.” 
– Robert Duncan – “Neuropsychological and electronic “no-touch torture”. The spectrum of “interrogation” and torture techniques used by the US and its allies”
Neuropsychological and electronic “no-touch torture” [7, 9] is used as the spectrum of “interrogation” and torture techniques by the US and its allies says Robert Duncan, a former CIA analyst and engineer, who has been developing such methodologies as a CIA, DoD engineer. Robert has an opinion the neurotech mass surveillance technology is indeed a WMD.
”The intelligence agents can also use low level microwaves to cause mental and physical confusion that leads to illness. Beaming microwaves at victims makes them fatigued, damages their immune system, causes neurological damage that affects their thinking and ability to carry out tasks, induces premature aging, cancer, and cataracts. ” T Rifat. 
The mass surveillance neurotechnological weaponry causes a spectrum of effects depending on the computer program, the technology chosen, and the team running the execution. It may be sensible to make a note that we are indeed talking about piezoelectric mechanisms  (NB. Figure 15. Piezoelectric energy harvesting from the human body) within the human body (biochemical balance within the body e.g. various proteins electrically reacting towards each other). Antioxidants alleviate the potential risks of EMF exposures . The following effects are reported among others : Synthetic telepathy (reading and broadcasting of thoughts), microwave hearing, forced visions some synched with body motion, forced memory blanking, controlled dreams, forced waking visions, artificial tinnitus, wildly racing heart at rest, forced muscle quaking, the sensation of tapping, intense general pain or hot-needles-pushed-deep-into-flesh sensations, sensations of electrical shocks, burning sensations, intense pain in a larger area of body e.g. face or chest (technical capability to amend the spread of the beam as well as the spectrum), special attention to the genital area; itching, forced orgasms, intense pain, forced thoughts and feelings and sleep deprivation (sleep being constantly disturbed with the above).
In Finland, a survey of a population of nearly 100 victims of Electronic Warfare anti-personnel applications was taken in 2020-21. The research involved questionnaires and interviews and produced very consistent information on the symptoms and observations of the victims. Reported health damages and symptoms appeared to be far more serious than what was expected. There also seems to be an apparent division of symptoms and observations by different executions of DEW and neuropsychological resonances. The findings of this research will be published in another context; however, it can be noted here that the following psychological disorders or physical symptoms were reported among others: Memory lapse, PTSD, long-term stress, panic attack, state of fear, severe depression, suicidal thoughts, paranoia, schizophrenia, anxiety, lack of concentration, ADHD, sleep deprivation, desire for sex /food etc, cardiac arrhythmia, headache, hearing voices, sensation of disturbance in cognitive processes, orgasms, erections, sensation of pressure in brains, pain in eyes, chest pain, difficulty to breathe, stomack pain, digestive problems, temporary paralysis, pain in genitals, twitches, sudden increase in blood pressure, brain fog, neurological symptoms, strokes, tinnitus, sensations of burns, temporary feelings of blood clots and numbness anywhere in the body, cosmetic injuries such as burnt skin and physical and psychological exhaustion among other. The targets reported that their head, heart or genital area was attacked the most. In addition, some Electronic Warfare anti-animal attacks have been conducted to their pets and anti-material attacks were reported in which mobile devices or computers were either used remotely or entirely damaged their hard discs. In connection to preparing this documentation many methods were conducted to potentially prevent the submission of this material. Many targeted people have reportedly been targets of an attempted murder also. The dilemma here is that potential injury cannot be connected to the resonance technologies. Another argument being used by the supporters of the neuropsychological technologies is that whenever there is pain, no injury has necessarily taken place. The definition of torture is based on the concept of experiencing pain. Therefore, whether the pain is physically caused or ‘only’ the idea of pain being delivered to the brains, the pain is still being experienced.
The long-term effects are not well published expept for long-term sleep deprivation which is a major catalyst to changes in the human body causing, for instance, high blood sugar and other signs of exceptions leading to long-term diseases. The radiation may impose a threat on internal organs, especially the liver and heart. An exposure to radiation in the long-term is very likely to cause heart diseases such as cardiac muscle inflammation which in turn may cause the failure of the heart muscle. Exhaustion seems to be one of the common symptoms that also was shown in the results of the Finnish research.
If anyone was to argue that the aforementioned symptoms were based on civil applications, such as the 5G or electricity grid, they are not entirely wrong. The ICT (information communications technology) infrastructure is being utilised within these operations; together with electricity, radar, and satellite technologies they create a strong electromagnetic field that enables the surveillance and introduction of “brainwaves” and what not. It is however, the effect of the radar that amplifies within the strong electromagnetic field and causes the symptoms by signals delivered via satellites and ICT network. Due to the nature of the scientific research, the findings are kept secret and the health concerns remain unpublished to cover the economic model within the industry. The business model is a cash cow and supports also related industries and business models. The symptoms reported in the Finnish research are consistent, the experiences are similar and indicate a clear correlation of the presence of strong electromagnetic fields. Such an electromagnetic field requires radar or antenna series for targeting. Also the observations on the use of OTHR (over-the-horizon-radar) and satellite delivery correlate with the symptoms. The impacts of long-lasting combined microwave exposure on the human body may not have been adequately investigated and approved by the medical scientific society. It seems it is the currently targeted population which produces this critical empirical knowledge since the biometrics are available for reading at all times. The Military/ Intelligence/ Private sector execution seems more interested in the development of their projects, in the development of AI and in spying on civilian targets as well as the profits produced, than in the health and wellbeing of the targeted people. The cortex is being stimulated by overlapping applications and new “products” are constantly being developed. By now the audience should acknowledge that the radar technology eanbles 360-degree imaging of the target.
”Neurological research found the brain to have specific frequencies for each voluntary movement called preparatory sets. By firing at your chest with a microwave beam containing the ELF signals given off by the heart, this organ can be put into a chaotic state, the so-called heart attack.” – T. Rifat 
The aforementioned effects reconcile well with the methods of interrogation and behavior modification illustrated by R Duncan in his report on torture  where Duncan introduces 18 tactics of torture that can be implemented via physical or “no-touch torture”. ”Coercing and torturing people to suicide is very common. Both tactics in physical or no-touch torture involves plausible deniability.”
The Target Selection
The problem is persistent since there is a vastly growing number of operations that aim to benefit neuro-invasive technologies. There are private AI developers in the sector and many of them are known for entirely another type of consumer products. As a result of long-running operations their resources have developed a pattern of excellence and now are looking to gain a technological advantage in neuroscience and supercomputing. Some corporations or countries may own satellites which in turn allow a significant access to the field of research. These companies consider their employees as a resource by clauses in their contract of employment that allow the use of “brain data” in form of any inventions made by the employees.
A significant amount of States are utilizing the technology and having a “brainrace” causing perhaps overlapping execution on international individuals since there are also a number of individual government agencies whose operations may be run from their independent facilities. This explains the vast increase in the headcount of targeted individuals. The law enforcement body involving the prosecution and judicial system is becoming dependent on the technology which is likely used during trials and pre-trial examinations already.
The resonance methodologies have their roots in military technologies. Recently, the security sector and law enforcement agencies have owned the technology and the defense industry has developed new applications . Also, international white-collar organizations such as the NSA under the national Foreign Ministries’ military wing, the DSA, execute the operations . The technology is operated by the military using multifunctional radar signal intelligence for law enforcement and intelligence community (DSA) white-collar agencies acting as their ”clientele”. NSA officers can globally flag any individual and set them up under the execution without hearing the person. The justice systems and law enforcement agencies are used actively to get hold of the citizen to manufacture them a target . The targeted are not informed of their amended status as a suspect which in turn prevents the target to kick-start legal action. Supervising instances are claiming to use legal protection and reminder of remedies the society may offer. It is difficult to get a message across that no tricks are left, no authority takes responsibility. Taking the matter into the court which has just approved the use of the methodologies sounds illogical. Usually, terrorism, national threat, or serious crime are being used as the excuse to approve the use of the technologies under the coercive measures . In doing so, it seems the EU acting as an ally also is unaware it backs the implementation of the anti-democratic measure that ignores citizens’ human rights, the international rights of the accused, and leaves the targets without legal protection and due process. No questions being asked from the individual themselves.
Since the manufacturing of the targets seems relatively careless and no oversight committee or set of regulations or auditable institution is monitoring how targets are being selected, the protocol may be used for an extension of personal and political, even economical interests. Picking and setting up random targets, no legal groundings necessary. Certainly, dissidents, activists, or whistleblowers are not there by accident. Random people, people who have been in the wrong place at the wrong time are selected to reach the critical mass, the amount of targets to allow for technological breakthrough. The execution does not seem to have a deadline. Anyone could become the future’s target; the extrajudicial implementation does not recognize social statuses, unless social scoring is involved. The targeted people will experience their life being demolished in all areas, holistically, and therefore, their profile is on the downhill. The execution of such a program requires inter-and cross-governmental implementation, hence the “international torture program”. The targeting is inhumane, unjust, unreasoned, and unaccountable .
It may well be that the private sector acts as the developer of the product and runs the experiment whereas the governments are backing the research and delivering the resources, the brains in the execution of neurological mass surveillance.
The Human Rights Issues
”Obviously, silencing dissidents, oppositions of political parties, and whistleblowers are included in the lists of applications. The most disturbing of the trends in torture is testing and improving it. No-touch torture is much more complex than physical torture. Testing design flaws and weaknesses of the signal intelligence is one reason why it is necessary to test on innocent targets.” 
The usage of resonance technologies is observed to be at times politically orientated, or not adequately justified, and is always questionable, strongly subjugating human rights or constitutional rights let alone moral aspects. This is because i) the technology produces a spectrum of pain in the target (and injuries of which some fatal), ii) sleep deprivation in long term preventing full participation in society, iii) the technology is being directed towards civilians (against the Geneva Convention), iv) the technology is being utilized without the permission or consent of the targeted person (against the Nuremberg Treaty), v) the operations lean on self-supervision and monitoring to the extent the human rights aspects are not being considered appropriately (no measures on corruption), vi) the technology is being directed to people inhumanly while asleep and vii) towards bystanders (especially children while also asleep disturbing their sleep and causing them pain), viii) the technology is being directed to homes of the targeted citizens (against constitutional rights for privacy, domestic peace, etc), ix) the period the technologies are being implemented to targets is matter-of-factly inhuman, reportedly from less than a decade up to 30 years (in which time most of the targets are forced outside of their societies and health, social structure, career, and families have all been destroyed), x) the technology may cause fatal injuries that are impossible to trace back to the usage of this technology and xi) torture, definition, of which the use of this methodology fulfills, hardly is an argumentative solution. Finally, xii) targets do not possess constitutional rights, nor legal protection from the practitioner or executor of this torture on them since it is with significant likelihood the local or other government. In addition, xiii) law enforcement and healthcare have been instructed to deny the matter. Local regulators, political power, legislators, and courts approving the use are not understanding and aware of these aspects due to the fact that the military traditionally has been the only institution with this knowledge. Yet this technology has lobbied its way into our societies. The substantial list of shortcomings above leads us to conclude the technologies have not been adequately investigated. The lawmakers, practioners, politicians have only listened to the military and law enforcement arguments as the marketer of these technologies .
Under the anti-terrorism agenda, the constitution and human rights can be occluded, it seems, by the declaration of War on Terror which yet allows derogation of the civil rights on a temporary basis only . When a civilian is targeted by goverment and presented as a terrorist they can be exposed, it seems, to methods of interrogation (e.g. coercive measures neurotech mass surveillance). This derogation should be however a temporary measure. How is it explained that some individuals have been targeted for a decade and more? Indeed, the neurotech mass surveillance is a “no-touch torture” protocol that causes long periods of serious pain, suffering, and even fatalities. By now we should agree that the execution is conducted as a counter-terrorism measure.
“The European Convention on Human Rights requires that a member state availing itself of the derogation clause inform the Secretary-General of the Council of Europe of the measures the state has taken and the reasons for them.” 
“Although the idea of temporality is not expressed in the derogation provisions of the ICCPR or the European Human Rights Convention, it has been understood to have been implied by the notion of emergency. According to the U.N. Human Rights Committee, article four of the ICCPR requires that “measures derogating from the provisions of the Covenant . . . be of an exceptional and temporary nature.“ and ““Derogations from human rights obligations are permitted in order to deal with emergencies. They are intended to be temporary.’” Thus, the suspension of ordinary processes must end when the emergency that required the suspension ceases to exist.“ The targeted under counter-terrorism law could argue that the temporary state has been maintained for purpose since no evidence of terrorism has been found for those accused. In a case where implementation has taken 10 years, the government should be prosecuted for inefficiency in dealing with the matter and thus, violating human rights. This is hardly a temporary measure in the aspect of human life.
Currently, there are no specific laws protecting humans or animals, neither any medical support for them, during cybernetic torture. “The situation is created by the fact that scientists do not leave any information about the illegal mind reading technologies.” How should “we protect people that by utilitarian grounds, without informed consent, are used for brain studies with brain-computer-interfaces in Cyber Psychological Systems, illegal stealing of brain data” ?
In view of the above intellectual rights are important but the human rights violations probably the core of concern. It seems governments have agreed with a single-minded informal agreement that they have the right to remove legal protections from the citizens. They have interpreted that in certain circumstances (that have been artificially created by themselves) they have the right to degrade the human rights, constitutional rights and strip the citizens of legal protection. The torture and inhumane, unjust, unreasoned, and unaccountable targeting  may lead to significant compensation requests from the victims for the use of WMD mass surveillance protocols once they become organized. The UN should support this idea. The periods under execution seem to be unlimited which demonstrates the enslaving nature of the implementation.
There is simply no privacy at all when the privacy of thoughts, feelings, senses, and life overall is demolished. The targets’ households are trespassed physically and technologically, and subjected to domestic disturbance from outside by the resonances (some evidence on this will be published in connection with the field examination). No government is capable of replacing what has been taken away from these people. The terror in their life has been unspeakable. What about the immaterial rights such as the stolen brain data?
“Article 1 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2000) states that “Human dignity is inviolable. It must be respected and protected”.”
The Psychic Driving/System Programming
States have used the same tactics for centuries to put away activists and dissidents who do not buy into the explanations of the power elite and publicly challenge the administration. The targeted people are many times activists, whistleblowers, or dissidents in addition to random people. During the execution of the “no-touch torture program ”, targeted individuals are being treated as mentally ill by the government. The police and healthcare, who are the emergency services, the first point of contacts, have been programmed to handle these patients with a certain presumption. The programming, or inadequate education/ omission of the education, is a part of the design of the torture program . States have a national manual of diseases where identical symptoms the targeted experience have been added indicating alleged neurosis / mental illnesses that correlate with medication designed to worsen the condition of the targeted and strengthening the impact of the resonance. Doctors do find themselves in a helpless position with neurotechnology victims since the illnesses could be induced into the patient . Linking specific medicines with microbiological structured molecules a desired impact can be delivered on the purposed area of the brain. Also, nanotechnologies can be used to deliver nanotechnological engineering into the brains . These are used in combination with EMF resonances to activate certain viruses, bacteria, even cells, synapses to deliver their function. Dr. J. Giordano also specifies neurotoxins that can be used to gain a certain effect. This technology can force the human brain to think certain thoughts, feel certain emotions, and can theoretically override motor control functions. This knowledge must have been obtained by investigating human bio-effects and experiences.
”By specialising on the pulse frequency you could induce psychiatric ilnesses to the point where a psychatrist could not tell if it is a genuine psychiatric illness or an induced psychiatric illness.” – Barry Trower – Microwave Warfare.
”The body is an electromagnetic chemical reaction. Yes, chemicals like drugs can help the body and be used as countermeasures to electromagnetically induced problems. Drugs can be used to affect the body’s electrical-chemical processes.” – R. Duncan, How to Tame a Demon – A Short Practical Guide to Organized Imtimidation Stalking, Electronic Torture, and Mind Control
Many States maintain laws under which the patients can be forced to receive medication and mental help when deemed necessary (by labels of neurosis, imminent threat of violence, self-harm, etc). Due to the inter-and cross-governmental nature of the implementation, the treatment is being coordinated from a co-ordinative structure above the staff treating the patient. The entire process can be evaluated by the supervisory co-ordinative team and depending on the content that the patient discloses as well as his/her behavior the team makes the decision on the most practical plan for him/her. Medication can be used to assist neurotechnological implementation. In some societies, implantable devices are injected into the targeted civilians to assist the chemical balance or observation of the biometrics. These military developed devices are not painless either whilst nowadays merely replaced by nanotechnological materials that may be only inconveniencing to digestion.
The biological and socio-psychological aspects of the targeted’s lives are heavily influenced. Many are pushed outside of their societies and the social networks that are crucial for well-being. A target that intends to disclose the program may experience imminent measures of discrediting or a form of punitive measures that strips social status from the target. Informal reporting and social scoring by the administration is impacted immediately which also derogates the rights of the targeted. They become outlawed. The accused have rights, the rights of the accused but the suspects do not have any. The term “suspect” refers to the removal of civil rights and being made a target. They are profiled internationally and presented as a terrorist, serious criminal, or national threat. The torture that has many faces and sides may go on for decades, in which time the target has lost his social status, fellows, health, financial sustainability, earning model, and credibility.
When the target intends to approach separate parts of the administration to deliver information on potential consipiracy and illegal government activity it is imperative the target has a well argumented, well-written and comprehensible statement to deliver intended content since their profile will be attacked severely by those in the administration who lobby on behalf of the implementation of mass surveillance. Measures will also be taken to prevent any electronic submissions or hard copies delivery to authorities. The informal nature of the execution and coercive measures ensure that the targeted cannot defend themselves against implementation that does not officially exist.
Indeed, an annulment is a common practice. It has become visible and reported that some implementations of systematic programming of discrimination are directed towards the same bloodline or family over the generations. Genetic information hardly provides us a decent explanation for this type of execution.
There are governments with a significant number of totalitarian attributes that have disguised themselves as a democracy. It goes without saying the social sector of administration supports the governmental agenda and is in a position to set up any individual with a variety of methods. Similarly, the judicial system that not only regulates the use of coercive measures but also operates a governmental agenda as the steering mechanism in relation to these individuals. A target cannot possibly receive objective and equal treatment in court. The judicial system reflects the will of the Government.
The method by which the CIA and intelligence community control masses and MSM is to publish fiction that involves similar elements that are involved in the news they want to deny or shut down. They create stories and mix them with the original report (in this case my analysis) and because the topic is complicated the masses are unable to separate the two, only a marginal audience understands what is going on.
There are countless tactics to discredit individual revelations made in media. A common tactic is to descredit the author/content of a revelation that is harmful to government. Another trick is to confuse the original message to an imaginary content that has similar elements. Perhaps involving aliens or conspiracy models that ridicule or make fun of the actual revelation.
Controlling the public is a game of capturing the opinion of masses by using MSM (main stream media). Governments are participating in the information war (between governments) and propaganda (inside the nation) either by direct or indirect ownership of the media. “Regulation, legislation, physical attacks, and threats against journalists or media owners are effective methods used to capture the media. But funding is arguably the most effective method of all. By financing media and journalists willing to toe the government line and by not funding independent, critical media, authorities manage to suppress large parts of the media sector.” [10, 36]”
Resonance methodologies are at the core of Electronic Warfare (EW) operations. DEW, AW, RNM/RMI/EEG, and V2K are tactics being used on targets under anti-personnel execution. DEW and AW are purposed to cause physical injuries whereas the neurotechnological applications used under AI mass surveillance programs such as NRM/RMI/EEG cause psychological effects and pain. RNM Remote Neural Monitoring is used along with the EEG for cloning the neurostructures of the target. A heterodyne is a signal frequency that is generated by combining or mixing two other frequencies using a signal processing technique called heterodyning. Heterodyning is utilised to shift one frequency range into another, new frequency range, and is also involved in the processes of modulation and demodulation. Heterodyning and technology based on TMS (Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation) can be used for the synthetic telepathy. Neurotechnological implementation can be fatal in multiple ways it can drive the targeted to suicidal thoughts but it also has physical health effects that may weaken the body and immune system of the targeted in the long term fatally. V2K can also be produced in a multiple ways but one of the most sophisticated ones is as an AI computer software, developed to learn, which can communicate with the target in real-time and read their memory, thoughts and is able to manipulate targets psychologically and emotionally . The V2K can be used for behavior modification when the technology is based on a psychiatric medical technology called Neurofeedback – EEG Biofeedback. The software acts as an alternative roadmap for the brain (an AI software accesses brain waves emitted by the brain ie ELF waves) by harvesting brainwaves when the brain reacts negatively and the cloning this type of brain wave (ELF waves). V2K technology can be used to clone or mime different medical pathologies, including psychiatric ones. This is why many targets are diagnosed with Schizophrenia or other mental illness. When the use of mobile device emissions is introduced to affect a targeted brain we are in uncontrolable territory.
The operational implementation does not differ. The resonances are delivered from multifunctional radars (active electronically scanned array [AESA]) or antennas on any platform, also by using satellite targeting. Similar radar antennas are used in fighter jets. Networks similar to GWEN (Ground Wave Emergency Network) can be used to create EMPs. In DEW implementation the effect is based on transmitted high amplified energy pulses that cause pain or injuries, even fatalities. Physical obstacles may be overcome by maser technology. In the neurotechnological implementation, the impact is based on heterodyne which combines by intermodulation (two alternating signals, eg radio signals) to produce two or more signals having frequencies corresponding to the sum and the difference of the original frequencies that cause pain or the wanted effect in the target. Depending on the purpose there are custom-designed handheld platforms to be used inside buildings also. An electromagnetic field is created around the target to read the target’s biometrics and run them in a computer simulation in real-time that aims to clone and link the targeted brains. The computer program executes a chosen torture method for interrogation and behavior modification and to the targeted, the execution naturally appears entirely ruthless and cruel. This means the entire process is being automated [7, 9]. Also entire thought patterns, feelings, and images can be induced to the target . The concern in view of the future is whether the transmitting technology will be integrated with our handheld ICT technology and its infrastructure. The handheld mobile devices may already emit resonances below 100Hz that are closely linked to our biology.
DEW (directed energy weapons) can be broadly defined as systems that produce “a beam of concentrated electromagnetic energy or atomic or subatomic particles” which is used as a direct means to incapacitate, injure or kill people, or to incapacitate, degrade, damage or destroy objects . Execution by microwaves, lasers, masers and particles.
AW (acoustic weapons) Acoustic weapons aim to use the propagation of sound – a variation in pressure that travels through a fluid medium (such as air) to affect a target. Most of the acoustic weapons that have been speculated upon are based on either ultrasound (above 20 kilohertz, kHz),
low frequencies (below 100 hertz, Hz) or infrasound (below 20 Hz) deployed at high levels. The human range of hearing is commonly given as between 20 Hz and 20 kHz. In reality, the upper hearing-threshold frequency decreases significantly with age, whereas sounds with lower frequencies can be heard and otherwise perceived if the level is high enough.
We should not forget the ionosphere radar or over the horizon radar (“OTHR”) of which the most famous is the HAARP (The High-Frequency Active Auroral Research Program) which is capable of producing a very high amount of energy in beams and wanted resonance to exact locations at any time. Other nations have revealed their concern with regard to this. HAARP is located in Gakona, Alaska, and was developed by DARPA (Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency). Another OTHR is EISCAT in Longyearbyen, Norway which was originally designed by France, Germany, and the three Nordic countries (Norway, Sweden, and Finland). The Targets in Finland have seen evidence of weather modification as well as traces in the clouds as a marker of the use of OTHR and satellite co-ordination beaming. In view of the European Parliament Resolution on the Environment, Security and Foreign Policy from January 28, 1999, Nr.A4-005/99 art 30 states “Calls in particular for an international convention for a global ban on all research and development, whether military or civilian, which seeks to apply knowledge of the chemical, electrical, sound vibration or other functioning of the human brain to the development of weapons which might enable any form of manipulation of human beings, including a ban on any actual or possible deployment of such systems.” Is it a coincidence that the commonly operated facility has been set into a country that locates in Europe but is not a member of the EU?
When delivering resonances that imitate body functions a satellite becomes a very operative assistance and used seamlessly with the execution of OTHR. Especially for these radar systems, living human targets are a necessity to develop the operating systems, their accuracy, amount of energy directed, and before anything the psychological impact on the individual. A spontaneous EKG can potentially discover the operation whereas a planned scrutiny for healthcheck results in a pause in the execution of the beaming.
The entire multilayer strategy of implementation involves remote execution with satellites and OTHR, local operation by field operatives with a gangstalking element from ordinary local people hired from social media, as well as the utilisation of the ICT infrastructure via mobile devices and the mobile antenna infrastructure. The latter is controlled by software applications that are run within the network. A huge step forward in synthetic telepathy has been the introduction of nanotechnology which has greatly assisted the transportation of AI technology to human brains but also facilitated the access to brains from AI frameworks [34, 35].
“You’re either with us or against us in the fight against terror.”
– George W Bush on 6.11.2001
It is breathtaking how few politicians have understood the larger picture. The anti-terrorism movement by states is an agenda that allows the rights of citizens to be removed for the greater “good of the State” and therefore, a very unconstitutional movement. The strategy, however, was at first implemented by the Western coalition ’Five-Eyes’ to hijack the foreign and security policies of targeted nations, including the allies in the EU. The Western coalition finger-pointed allies saying there is a terroristic activity spotted within the population of the EU countries defining who is a terrorist and what is a terroristic act. Something the European leaders should quickly accomplish is figure out whether they have been treated as allies or subservients by Western Five Eyes coalition manufacturing targets and addressing to the EU member nations that they have citizens with terroristic tendencies (naturally artificial and false accusations) which in turn may be used to force the foreign and security policy of the EU member nations to remove reputational risk and potential risk of conflict. We quote a journalist from RT Neil Clark’s article on 25 Feb, 2021: ”The ‘War on Terror’ was based on a fundamental deceit. It was a deep state/neocon con trick. Not only was it a war that could never be won, it was never meant to be won. It was meant to be permanent.” Indeed, the idea of the anti-terrorism agenda is the declaration of war on those who beg to differ by opinion. There should be only one interpretation of the world events and no exception to the “Western” one is tolerated. The bully-tempered narrow-mindedness quite often leads to a point where sensible analysis is not conducted. There is no need to disagree to juxtapose.
The agenda is an imperialistic tool to force governments to operate similar foreign policies and line up with the West. To make the EU a participant in the War on Terror and bring the conflict onto the European soil. Originally terrorism has been an inconvenience of those nations practicing imperialistic and clumsy foreign policies intervening in the internal politics of other nations. Now, the EU is taking moral responsibility for this against better understanding.
We do not need conflict in the EU and our younger generations should be psychologically free of this type of liability.
There are several pillars to this operation. Strategies are linked to the technological advantage of the Western technology. Signing up as a user a nation agrees with certain conditions and integrates the operations. This happens for the sake of maintenance alone. For instance, for fighter jet fleets, which carry multifunctional radars, their maintenance and updating require a common technological strategy. States which purchase fighter jet fleets will be committed to one strategy due to the maintenance and development of the system. It is a deep integration of defense strategies.
Terrorism, serious crime, a national threat is used as the rationale to justify the manufacturing of the targets to European allies. Must say the manufacturing of the consent has been a bit careless not to forget the implementation. The Western military-intelligence complex coup has won the intelligence communities over by their advanced technology. An average American taxpayer supports the military industry to the extent that equals the cost of free healthcare. By creating suspects in each nation the Western coalition has been enabled to a) force the State to take care of the terrorism and b) offer the Government technology to be used in connection with this which in turn means more dollars for the military complex. Manufacturing targets is a trillion-dollar plan since their resources can be linked to develop AI. “The more brains you have collected in your pool the better AI you will be able to develop”.
Terrorism is indeed a very gloomy and poisonous projection to deliver to our next generation which has already been psychologically affected by the speech of terrorism constantly present in the MSM. We may not be able to estimate the damage caused but we could do something to stop building horrible scenarios. It is indeed recommended that this bellicose agenda is abandoned since the rest of the world, especially our new generation, do not wish to live under such a narrow-minded scenario. A return to international democracy is recommended.
What will the Governments do next to defend their position? It is apparent that so far some of the terroristic attacks in Western societies have been provoked if not financially and operationally supported by Western intelligence itself. We would not expect to see this level of governmental radicalism anymore. The strategy of governments will be to temporarily rate higher the threat of terrorism so that any criticism would not question their undertakings. The Western governments will put the curriculum vitae of their funded researchers (eg Magnus Ranstorp) against those who have been forced to independently investigate the field. This is to the benefit of the researchers since they strengthen their position and ego in supporting the idea of War on Terror. They market the war on behalf of terrorism. It is better to have war to cover the agenda than admit the imperialistic effort to control global population. This is a fight between David and Goliath and the Goliath owns the MSM (mainstream media). Also. the MSM is turned selectively towards other areas of interest.
War on Terror? Not exactly. The methodologies used to harness innocent individuals for something so evil as WMD targeting them are a crime against humanity. We must re-think the role of Western surveillance within society not alone the supervision and monitoring aspects. The execution appears as Robert Duncan (CIA officer and engineer) illustrates: ’It was a clever tactic used by the Germans in WWII to take people away slowly so no revolt occurred. As one CIA agent says, “The Nazis didn’t lose the war they just had to move.” It is not about the Jews now. It is something much more complex and evil’. One should hope the Covid-19 pandemic is not an agenda to enhance governmental control over individuals . Oh no, it is not. There is a chance that it is indeed a part of the very same operation to deliver access to brains of the population.
A senior officer J. Karsikas responsible for digitalisation in the Finnish Defence Forces states that considering super powers it is unlikely they would commit themselves in any regulation and ratify any international agreements in the development of AI . This is due to the fact that AI technologies may constitute the next strategic advantage.
What is the most disappointing aspect of the Electronic Warfare between superpowers, in which populations and individuals are constantly targeted by military technologies is that for these living targets who have become the instruments of global war, no government seems to have a social sector strategy? No civil defence strategy. Societies have created multimillion Euro plans to cover the infrastructure, but the civilian targets are left to die, not being overly dramatic. A meritocratic society is programmed to think there is something seriously wrong with these individuals which leads to isolation of the targeted individuals. That is as intimidating as is the implementation of WMDs. The lack of will to improve the lives and circumstances of the victims speaks thousands of words.
“Wanton killing of innocent civilians is terrorism, not a war against terrorism.” – Noam Chomsky
Electronic Warfare (EW) anti-personnel resonance-based applications that cause pain, suffering, even fatalities are being directed to civilians globally by means of energy- and psychological effects. The governments responsible for the implementation, under which the execution is operated, are utilizing at diversity of military platforms to conduct these operations based on the resonance spectrum. The “Torture Program” is based on the idea of using pain and suffering as a stimulant, an instrument of interrogation to cause a reaction in the targets. The operation is to intentionally cause pain and suffering in its targets for a prolonged period of time. Scientists are in opinion the technological implementation should be reviewed as a weapon of mass destruction. It is a technical legal aspect of international laws of human rights whether the operation should be viewed as a war crime. Execution of a technology that causes pain and suffering, even fatalities, in innocent civilians and bystanders, even children, is now left to supercomputers to run? We are seeing the evidencing of a phenomenon that reminds me in detail of the human experiments during the WWII conducted by Nazis. Even the public demonstrates similar ignorance and prejudice. It seems this psychological cycle repeats itself in human history when a part of the society comes to think of itself as “too invincible”. A result of meritocracy. It is imperative to acknowledge the vast increase in numbers of targeted civilians indicates a widespread attack on human rights.
The resonance spectrum-based technology that now abuses human targets had been developed to its full potential in the midst of the 1970s. The knowledge was kept tight in the military instead of considering civil applications. The War on Terror offered a suitable basis for an imperialistic global agenda and strategy of implementation. The mass surveillance neurotechnology is operated under the agenda of the Western coalition to force new order among states. Anti-terrorism as an agenda is an unconstitutional plan of the Western coalition not only to strengthen sovereign state power at the expense of human rights and democratic systems through surveillance and counter-terrorism laws but also to hijack the foreign and security policies of other nations. War naturally speeds military spending. And speaking of an entirely new niche of technologies the War on Terror is a blessing to the defense industries. The concept of war has been creatively introduced to legally eclipse human rights and democratic decision-making. The erosion of the Constitution is significant.
As for private citizens in terms of pain and suffering caused also their rights have been removed under the counter-terrorism and mass surveillance acts. Suspects do not have the rights of the accused since they will never be accused instead, they have been stripped of their civil rights complete families affected at once. Measures that were purposed as an exceptional and temporary tool to deal with emergencies are now used on an unlimited basis under surveillance laws. It is clear the aforementioned laws are abused to target innocent people. A significant majority of the targeted are not brought to courts of justice and officially accused due to the fact that they are not guilty. These people and their human rights are degraded once abandoned under technology-driven human experiments that remove entirely their privacy and domestic peace. The fact is that individuals’ free will and degree of autonomy are hugely affected. It is the question of a plan with multilayer agenda. It seems that the counter-terrorism and mass surveillance laws are used to manufacture candidates for the human experiment. The selection protocol is inhumane, unjust, unreasoned, and unaccountable. What a convenient tool for governments to root out and yet benefit from the physical existence of political opponents, whistleblowers, activists, or dissidents. At the same time, a significant element of opponents to the political power is being created.
The execution was based on the idea that the targeted would not organize themselves and see through the plan. Now the life cycle of this agenda is different. It is indeed imperative to increase public awareness on the ongoing torture to impact on the life cycle. No totalitarian method can tolerate public awareness as European history points out.
The War on Terror has been successfully used as an extension of the imperialistic foreign policy of foreign nations to destabilize the peace in Europe and the seed of war has been implanted in the soil of the EU. We European citizens do not approve of the War or Terror on European soil. Citizens do find it difficult to believe that European leaders who were supposed to look after the civil rights and peace in Europe are taking a role in such an imperialistic agenda. We expect the EU to be built upon the idea of democracy that guarantees equal rights to everyone. It has been a result of ignorance, shortsightedness, and poor judgment that this sort of plan has gone past our due diligence processes impacting greatly on the future beliefs of young generations who are at the core of well being of any nation.
Making Torture legal is a very questionable agenda. We suggest an urgent review of surveillance laws as well as counter-terrorism laws. The laws have now been used as a punitive measure allowing unequal and inhumane treatment and abuse of civilians by the governments and an underpinning of sovereign state power. The laws have become a formidable weapon of repression. An intelligence law should not only protect citizens against terrorism but also against the State. The modern holocaust has revealed significant weaknesses in our societies. Lawmakers, law practitioners, and politicians, even human rights activists poorly understand the technologies being approved for use on citizens for a prolonged period of time. The role and the strategies of intelligence function in societies European wide should be revisited and some consistency introduced. Military and intelligence functions in eroded society are meant to represent a marginal mechanism, but not the role of the decision-maker. It seems there is a psychological cycle in the collective consciousness of humanity, the need to repeat the pattern of pain and suffering. Perhaps the revised agenda could take a sustainable look to raise the standards of performance we all need to evidence and take part in for the mental growth of the human society. We would choose “trust” among people instead of synthetic telepathy that indeed demonstrates the opposite.
The new generation is experiencing the world as a threatful place today. Continuous airtime on news of terrorism by MSM creates psychological expectations that will last decades. The citizen’s belief in the future is constantly heavily impacted. There are so many areas in society that require improvement that the civilization hardly has time to handle them if crises similar to the War on Terror are intentionally created. I think there might be confusion on where the civilization is going from here. It seems politicians are lost on their way. It is known that beliefs in the future is directly correlated with the well-being and prosperity of national economies. Should the beliefs be a little more positive than they are? One should think the War on Terror hardly is an agenda for a nation looking for well-being to follow. Europeans do not wish to bring the War on Terror to European soil. Therefore, the message for the politicians goes accordingly in terms of foreign and security policies.
The EU should develop its independent defense, especially in terms of technologies, to reduce its dependence on NATO and the Western military-intelligence complex. Therefore the military spending and exercises internally should be coordinated. The EU should seriously review its relation to Western allies, to determine whether the role of European allies is viewed as subservient. The abuse of intelligence operations and aggression in foreign politics that do not respect sovereign EU member nation decision-making as well as the dynamics of ongoing confrontation among powers have taken so many years.
It is apparent the EU has chosen a homeland security strategy that confronts its human rights agenda. Mass surveillance and counter-terrorism laws should be reviewed from the European perspective alone and not as an ally to someone with an imperialistic agenda. The security strategy and following surveillance laws are a result of a poor understanding of Electronic Warfare and its technologies. It would be to the benefit of European democracy to drop the ignorance and bring to the table the representatives of the targeted so that all aspects are indeed understood.
SOME SUGGESTED ELEMENTS FOR A PLAN TO MAKE PROGRESS:
What should be done to prevent the abuse of innocent victims:
1. Increasing awareness of the public of the cybernetic abuse and means of Electronic Warfare being tested on civilians is at the core of tackling the crime against humanity.
2. Breaking the ignorance. It is imperative that the viewpoint and experiences of the targeted must not be ignored or bypassed since understanding the perspective of victims allows for democratic decision making. The victims should be permitted to offer consultation and expertise, the perspective of the targeted to law- and decision-makers for the creation of appropriate EU legislation to protect civil citizens from covert cybernetic crimes and other Electronic Warfare applications.
3. Organisation of the resources. In order to defend the civil rights of the targeted and support the targeted, a global organization should be created which would set up a representation globally for human rights and could enhance “best practices for the establishment of clear ethical boundaries to strictly regulate the use of cyber systems enabling the manipulation and control of human beings” .
To be clear, a), no torture should be tolerated, and both torture and “no-touch torture” protocols should NOT be allowed as an interrogation tactic even though “neuro-surveillance” for purposes of safeguarding national security may be intended; b), Surveillance permission- granting process should be adequately and closely monitored. Mass surveillance of innocent citizens should not be allowed; c) The intel gathered in any possible surveillance method should not be misused and only used in the form it has been approved by court. We may need to allow surveillance but no method of neuro-surveillance or bio-surveillance should use targeted pain or pain at all as a catalyst. Also, the surveillance, of whatever kind, should be limited to a 6-month period with renewal permissions significantly tightened to say only 15% of the applications for renewals, firmly overseen, and with detailed, documented reports delineating reasons for applied renewals, which can be audited, overseen, and withdrawn at any time; d) Human rights auditors from outside Intelligence and Security agencies need to be involved in the continuous monitoring and auditing process, to prevent abuse and torture of targets, as we have now; e) No covered experimentation using pain and torture techniques as “sources and methods” of gathering information, as for instance, the US intelligence community , and other intelligence agencies and militaries are currently doing, under classified cover, to prevent scrutiny of their torture for neural network mapping and neuro behavior modification. What should be allowed instead are strict protocols, regulation, and monitoring of the intelligence community in place as well as surveillance laws that are consistent globally, and the intelligence community held responsible for potential misconduct.
Global consistence in surveillance laws, country-specific regulations, supervision, and monitoring as well as civil channels for reporting potential misconduct is a good start. What is the problem in the US as K Shipp and W Binney [10, 11] indicate, is that the intelligence community may not observe the law, i.e., there is a constitutional conflict since secrecy and classification are currently being used to classify and conceal extreme crime against humanity and actual torture and assassination of human beings.
The message to the governments is to support democracy and avoid planting foreign agendas against democracy to the European audiences. The concern relates to the younger generation which have been entirely forgotten with the anti-terrorism . There is no excuse for bullying civilians and taxpayers since it seems that the EU has increasingly plans for common taxation. No threat exists on this planet that justifies harming and torturing civilians.No collective rationale would speak for the torture without the consent and permission for the implementation. What has been done to civilians on the watch of governments is unforgivable.It is apparent that the administrations involved, have had a need to identify from a worst-case scenario, even though they could afford to see democracy and citizens as a positive reserve and potential, not as a threat.
The targeted individuals are put through a spectrum of social, medical, legal, financial and professional discrimination in their societies. Since the victims or their relatives do not receive the redress, reparation, and rehabilitation they are entitled to under international law (A/73/207) there are some important measures the UN could take to reduce that ’accountability gap’ and to improve the position of the targeted civilians. Perhaps one of the most important measures is to implement pressure on the local governments by holding them responsible to 1) investigate the reported torture and other cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment or punishment by the law enforcement. Currently, the police systematically ignores the reports of these crimes and in an unprofessional manner suggest mental health problems for those reporting their findings to the police. Also, healthcare should be put responsible to 2) guarantee access to healthcare to receive the redress, reparation, and rehabilitation of victims. 3) Compensations on the targeted civilians should be paid to ensure they are able to return to normal life. The first step, however, would be to request the governments to recognise the issue of targeted individuals. The governments should be requested to prepare a statement in view of this matter. These people should be made to once more become socially accepted and full members of the societies. There should be a program available for the rehabilitation of these individuals where consultation and support would be available for each of them. When a government fails to implement basic standards of living for these individuals, they should be submitted a candidate for the Universal Periodic Review protocol (UPR) for the following decade to follow up their progress. The UPR mechanism should be started by each government to reach a common view and statement on the recognition of the issue. The status of each government should be reported annually and compared to the quality of issues and the number of reports received from targeted individuals. Reputational risk should be made obvious to steer some of the governments. Where no progress had been visible the governments could be made legally responsible for the violation of civil rights in the Court of Human Rights globally and the targets should be entitled to compensations. Indeed, a creation of political, legal, financial, and reputational risks to balance the enthusiasm to participate in the aggressive military resonance programs would be advisable.
(1) TARGETING PEOPLE – ARTICLE36.ORG – Key issues in the regulation of autonomous weapons systems, Convention on Conventional Weapons (CCW) Geneva, November 2019
(2) ACOUSTIC WEAPONS – ARTICLE36.ORG – Discussion paper for the Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons (CCW) Geneva, November 2018
(3) DIRECTED ENERGY WEAPONS – ARTICLE36.ORG – Discussion paper for the Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons (CCW) Geneva, November 2017
(4) TARGETED USE OF DEW MILITARY TECHNOLOGY APPLICATIONS (THAT CAUSE FATAL OR SERIOUS INJURIES AS WELL AS SERIOUS PAIN AND SUFFERING FOR INHUMANLY EXTENSIVE PERIODS OF TIME) TO CIVILIANS IN FINLAND – OHCHR SUBMISSION 08.2020 – V. Hellberg
(5) INTERNATIONAL TORTURE PROGRAM MANIFESTED UNDER ANTI-TERRORISM LAWS WITHHOLDS LEGAL PROTECTION AND CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS FROM ITS
TARGETS? – TECHNOLOGY TESTED ON CIVILIANS 09.2020 – V. Hellberg
(6) Barry Trower – Microwave Warfare
(7) Robert Duncan – Neuropsychological and electronic “no-touch torture”. The spectrum of ‘interrogation” and torture techniques used by the US and its allies
(8) The Verge – The EU is considering a ban on AI for mass surveillance and social credit scores
(35) An Implantable Wireless Network of Distributed Microscale Sensors for Neural Applications: Jihun Lee; Ethan Mok; Jiannan Huang; Lingxiao Cui; Ah-Hyoung Lee; Vincent Leung; Patrick Mercier; Steven Shellhammer; Lawrence Larson; Peter Asbeck; Ramesh Rao; Yoon-Kyu – 2019 9th International IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering (NER)
(36) Control the money, control the media: How government uses funding to keep media in line – Marius Dragomir, Center for Media, Data and Society (CMDS), School of Public Policy, Central European University
CORRESPONDENCE TO THE EU COMMISSION
The UN Convention against torture was signed by nations, many of them only partially, on 10.12.1984. Since that time the world has changed significantly in terms of torture. What the EU intends to do with common legislation on torture? A very timely matter.
What the EU Commission intends to do by the fact that the EU strategy for homeland security is in conflict with its policies for human rights?
The coercive measures of law enforcement of western countries are based on resonance methodologies such as electronic warfare anti-personnel technologies DEW, AW, RNM, EEG, V2K, etc. The usage of this technology at times politically orientated, or the usage is not adequately justified, and is questionable, strongly mitigating human rights or constitutional rights let alone moral aspects. This is because i) the technology produces a spectrum of pain in the target (and injuries of which some fatal), ii) sleep deprivation in long term preventing full participation to the society, iii) the technology is being directed towards civilians (Genova Convention), iv) the technology is being utilized without the permit or consent of the targeted person (Nurnberg Treaty), v) the operations lean on self-supervision and monitoring to the extent the human rights aspects are not being considered appropriately (no measures on corruption), vi) the technology is being directed to people inhumanly while asleep and vii) towards bystanders (especially children while also asleep disturbing their sleep and causing them pain), viii) the technology is being directed to homes of the targeted citizens (constitutional rights for privacy, domestic peace, etc), ix) the period the technologies are being implemented to targets is matter-of-factly inhuman, reportedly from decade up to 30 years (in which time most of the targets are forced outside of their societies and health, social structure, career, and families have been destroyed), x) the technology may cause fatal injuries that are impossible to trace back to the usage of this technology and xi) torture, which by definition the use of this methodology fulfills, hardly is an argumentable solution. Finally, xii) targets do not possess constitutional rights, nor legal protection from practitioner since it is with the significant likelihood the local or other government. In addition, xiii) law enforcement and healthcare have been instructed to deny the matter. Local regulators, political power, legislators, and courts approving the use are not aware of these aspects due to the fact that the military traditionally has been the only instance with this knowledge. The intelligence community has gained an imbalanced position with this tech and now abuses it in each member country. Also, justice system is becoming addicted to this tech. W Binney quite correctly points out concern about democracy, human rights, constitution, and legal protection of our citizens in the following: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xF_VYNtDgN8&t=441s
What the EU intends to do in view of human rights in Europe?
Most of the member nations do not have legislation on torture, they rely on the UN convention from 1984. For instance, in the case of Finland, this convention is only partially recognized (article 21 paragraph 1 and 22 paragraph 1).
The security strategy strongly relies on technologies of which use conflicts with human rights and the EU policy for HR. These have a significant impact on 1) democracies, 2) corrosion on constitutional rights and 3) confidence in the future which in turn defines the development of wellbeing in any nation. The security strategy supports electronic warfare (EW) anti-personnel resonance methodologies. These are being proposed as a surveillance tech by the intelligence community and defense forces who do not reveal these technologies have the capacity to cause pain, suffering, and fatalities (Resolution on the Environment, Security and Foreign Policy from January 28, 1999, Nr.A4-005/99) and the capacity is in heavy use and not supervised, controlled properly. The national supervision and control mechanisms are not sufficient. The massive and growing audience of TI (targeted individuals) is a remarkable sign of this issue.
The technology is being supported by the western agenda for anti-terrorism and benefits the defense industry. Why would the EU cast this type of future for itself? There is an interesting phenomenon ongoing in western societies. The intelligence community has been allowed to step up and guide societies. A function that has been purposed to a marginal mechanism within the society now manufactures the consent.
The resonance technology provides the intelligence community and defense function a role during the time of peace that conflicts with the idea of democracy. These instances appear to paint pictures of horror to advance their agenda under national security, threats and crisis constantly to argue stronger participation within the society. A good example of this is the agenda of anti-terrorism that defines the form of society today. We lay an artificial threat to our younger generation. The confidence for the future of the new generation is being tested with the current threats created by geopolitical agendas and the birth rate has sunken significantly in many societies. Why would a society inflict upon itself such a curse?
Does the EU understand that by buying the idea of the threat of terrorism it accepts the idea of the ‘war on terror’ and casts it to Europe? We must remember that terrorism has been defined by the ’west’ and the recent issue may be seen as a result of heavy-handed foreign policy, poor diplomacy of nations from past decades that refer to themselves as the empire. By accepting the idea of the war on terrorism we accept the war is in Europe. As citizens of the EU we are looking for a less gloomy picture for the future and rather would identify from positive models of the future. The human mind operates from the level it identifies. We should do better than this.
How does the EU intend to do to control surveillance activities in the EU?
There is a lack of consistency in surveillance laws among the EU nations. When a surveillance law of a member nation prevents e.g. use of RNM/RMI (remote neuromonitoring/remote mind imaging) towards its citizen the intelligence community turns to the nation where the use of the technologies is allowed. The intelligence community serves each other thus the rights of a citizen or legal protection does not hold anymore. The ruling is awaited that prevents where forbidden technology in one country is being used from another to target civilians. The EU would benefit from resonance-free zones. Social media: Reading an individual’s social media communication private of nature the intelligence community from Finland may turn to Swedish intelligence who is a member of ’nine eyes’ and has access to XkeyScore.
The US intelligence services have become desirable among the European intelligence community due to the technological advantage but also by US anti-constitutional approach their strategy to enhance the sovereign rights by the cost of civilians. A part of the imperialistic agenda is to create security concerns that overrule any rights of citizens and also underpin the position of intelligence communities in democracy. The US has won the European intelligence community on their side by integrating the individual intelligence services by technology that also defines the strategy for the user. In the anti-terrorism agenda, the US hijacks security and foreign policies by defining who is a terrorist and what is a terroristic act. Since a nation identifies from the frame it is given why provide the EU with a gloomy pic? Mass surveillance laws to consider seriously the aspect from resonance technologies, AI, robotics, neuroscience (https://lbry.tv/@RamolaDReports:8/Invasive-Neurotech-True-Neuroethics—Panel-2:e). Fighter jet fleets use EMP to target citizens without their permit or concent torturing civilians with multifunctional radars and manipulating their biometrics.
In Finland, the constitution was amended to provide intelligence service power and tools to operate. The community is asking for more eg allowing trespassing. An analysis was completed from the perspective of resonance technologies why this should not be allowed. Civilians are targeted by military tech to their homes, bystanders, even babies, and children intentionally produced pain, suffering, and even fatal injuries. The big picture indicates absolutely no reason other than the paranoia and profile rise effort by the intelligence service why such powerful tools should be allowed. No legal protection for targets to rely on, constitutional rights, or human rights not respected. The international rights of the accused are being orbited by presenting the target as a suspect. The targets are manufactured to test the ultimate control over an individual. Trust is gone. Testing periods are inhumane.
How are the EU law enforcement agencies regulated, monitored? How does the EU inland security strategy recognize the fact that resonance-based mass surveillance systems (RNM, EEG, RMI) are being targeted to civilians? How common is the knowledge that these cause pain, suffering, psychological trauma even fatal injuries in their targets, bystanders, civilians, even babies, and children? Is it known the execution is careless? How are the individuals chosen for these ’torture programs’? What principles are being met to prevent politically-minded targeting? How does the EU recognize the rights of suspects since there are no rights similar to the rights of the accused? How are the periods of targeting regulated? A large number of govt agencies, also from foreign communities, have access to these programs. Torturing is illegal by law in most EU nations and against human rights, constitutional rights. No legal protection for citizens exists against this crime against humanity. Operations are run by the national military agencies thus, can be defined as a war crime. How the EU intends to root out the problem of torture by state agencies and private sector partners foreign intelligence community? A good memory of the operation ’rendition flights’, that had no legal ground, of which distant cousin this operation is. What the EU intends to do to improve the approach of national law enforcement and healthcare systems to the targets of resonance technologies (government-directed mass surveillance protocol that cause pain and psychological trauma) that clearly degrade their rights? How is the legal protection of these citizens improved? Are these people still degraded and treated as mentally ill in front of police or healthcare? What an uncivilized, backward, and inhumane approach. How is the idea of democracy with this implementation?
Having made myself familiar with the SOCTA 2021 report among other reports it seems the Europol does not make a note of such a problem at all albeit the headcount of targeted civilians is piling up. Pretending such a problem does not exist? The global market reports as well as the manufacturers’ technological guides, scientific articles, etc confirm electronic warfare anti-personnel technology is based on military multifunctional radars and signal tech soon to be operated from ICT framework and indeed, operated by the military. An issue of a war crime? Are we really doing this? Pretending that there is no problem and allowing the extrajudicial purge similar to the holocaust ongo at the EU watch? Even though human rights, the constitutional rights are severely and violently attacked there is no word on the phenomenon of targeted civilians? Individuals, someones’ children, are targeted without consequence, perhaps overlapping. Targets do not have rights, no legal protection. Since the technology in question is operated as an extension of political decision-making as a punitive instrument. We will never know who is going to be the next target. No status will bring a shield in the future.
Is that due to fact that it is the law enforcement and intelligence community in the EU who are targeting civilians with military equipment electromagnetic pulses that cause pain, suffering, and fatal injuries as well as psychological trauma? We have a serious concern since the EU’s strategy for homeland security conflicts with the strategy for human rights.
As Finnish citizens, we experience it difficult to reach information from officials in Finland on our rights and therefore we approach the Commission for this matter.
In 1995 Joseph Biden introduced a bill called the Omnibus Counterterrorism Act of 1995. It previewed the 2001 Patriot Act by 1) allowing secret evidence to be used in prosecutions, 2) expanding the Foreign Intelligence Act and wiretap laws, 3) creating a new federal crime of ’terrorism’ that could be invoked based on political beliefs, permitting the US military to the used in civilian law enforcement, and allowing permanent detection of non-US citizens without judicial review.
The Center for National Security Studies commented the bill would erode ’constitutional and statutory due process protections’ and would ’authorise the Justice Dept to pick and choose crimes to investigate and prosecute based on political beliefs and associations’.
We share the concerns addressed and would urge to review the rights of the accused and suspects of serious crime or terrorism in Finland. It seems the rights of the accused have been degraded and the legal protection of suspects has been eroded similar to their constitutional rights. Coercive measures such as neurotech applications (RNM/RMI) cause pain, suffering, likely fatalities are being misused and directed to homes of investigated for long periods of time.
Who overviews the methodologies of coercive measures? Who supervises the technology is being used correctly? How is the ethical aspect present when technology is being chosen? There is no adequate control.
To what extent it is permitted in the EU (Finland) to benefit materials in a prosecution that a) has been obtained by coercive measures b) that is classified (the accused has no chance to verify the material nor defend themselves against it)?
To what extent are neurotech applications being used in courts? To what extent the technology steers the decision-making of judges? It seems the accused has the role of the bystander in their trial.
The permission-granting process is not controlled properly. To what extent the evidence to open a secret investigation is being verified and examined by the district court of Helsinki? How political or personal interests of investigation are prevented? Coercive measures are used to manufacture state will. The state interest as an investigator is to make the suspect appear guilty or question their integrity, crecitability, and the suspect does not have the position to defend themselves in the process. To convict a terrorist suspect of a felony of any kind reduces the impact of miscalculation or political ambition by the state. There is evidence of implantable devices injected into the bodies of citizens without their permit producing agony and pain. The current correct practice of investigation is not so much to seek the truth that it is to degrade an individual.
JUDICAL SYSTEM AND DEMOCRACY IN FINLAND
The rights of the accused are not self-evident today. In practice, the burden of proof is often shifted to the accused. The accused is granted a chance to make himself heard albeit this rule is being broadly violated. A significant moral dilemma exists also in the access of the accused to counsel. Whilst compensated in quality it is allowed at a good rate in the national courts. Whereas trial above the national judicial system, at the time when legal process often becomes the case of state integrity, no assistance is granted anymore. This remarkably reduces the number of processes reaching the ECtHR and limits the possibility of discovery of potential malpractice of the national judicial system. White collars should follow ethical practices which highlight fairness and equality. The relation of the police and prosecutor seems to put the values to the test(pre-trial). Instead of justice, the national court appears to deliver the ’will of the State in relation to the accused’.
The counter-terrorism laws are used against democracy. Suspects do not have rights nor legal protection against coercive measures. The accused have rights, the rights of the accused. Very few are ever being accused.
Coercive measures are being abused with the assistance of the court and target suspects for an inhumanly long period of time with investigation methodologies that cause pain, suffering, and even fatalities to the targets or family members, even babies. During this time the suspect does not have proper legal protection, even constitutional rights are removed by the execution.
Neuropsychological and remote electronic ’no-touch torture’ applications used under coercive measures compromise heavily human rights and are thought of as WMD by its engineers. Since there is no adequate fair inspection in place suspects are abused during investigations likely for wrong reasons. Counter-measures are being used to manufacture trials directed against the suspect by State or individuals advised to do so. This tactic guarantees further investigation permitted. The accused should never be found guilty on the basis of evidence that has not been brought to light and examined by the accused. The evidence is not presented to the accused to ward coercive measures.
There have been several serious incidents that indicate deep structured corruption of critical infrastructure of Govt institutions under the monitoring of the Parliament. Inadequate supervision has become a significant problem. The role of the political power as the inspector raises many questions of which the least important is not ’whether Finland should have its Constitutional court?’. Although ’professional judges must have a higher university degree in law’ it does not prevent corruption especially since the judicial system is ’independent’. A mature member of society understands, by human nature this is impossible. The judicial system does not seem to convince the citizens anymore.
What mechanisms the EU has to evaluate the level of democracy in member nations? Democracies to be re-evaluated.
How does the EU regulate, overview or monitor the preparation of counter-terrorism and surveillance laws by member states? How is the consistency of the laws being monitored between the nations? How do civil rights and legal protection survive in these circumstances?
By observation, globally ‘the war on terror’ seems to underpin the sovereign power at the expense of civil rights. We have a constant dilemma on how the ‘act of terror’ is being defined and how it has been communicated to the citizen. Similarly, we do have a problem by definition with what may trigger the need for surveillance over an individual. A matter of interpretation is not good enough? In practice, some crimes or anti-social behavior now turn into an ‘act of terror’ by definition or interpretation? Citizens may not even understand their commitment to an act of terror or being a part of a society of which status is turned to be suspected of terroristic activity by the administration. Grey lines everywhere. It seems politicians have created an extrajudicial tool to ensure sovereign access to ultimate power over the citizen. Why the ultimate control?
How are the surveillance technologies and methods overviewed? How are the periods of surveillance regulated by law and human rights? There has been a vast increase of reports coercive measures are indeed producing pain, suffering, and even fatal injuries. The suspects are receiving rough treatment over prolonged periods of time but never accused.
“Although the idea of temporality is not expressed in the derogation provisions of the ICCPR or the European Human Rights Convention, it has been understood to have been implied by the notion of emergency. According to the U.N. Human Rights Committee, article four of the ICCPR requires that “measures derogating from the provisions of the Covenant . . . be of an exceptional and temporary nature”” – “Informal” Suspencion of Normal Processes: The “WAR ON TERROR” as an Autoimmunity Crisis by A. ADDIS, Boston University Law Review.
How is this informality being monitored? How is it supervised no coercive measure or interrogation method consist of an element of torture, cause pain or suffering in the targeted? By observation, most of the suspects will never be accused. Is it possible that being a target of coercive measures is a worse option than imprisonment? How are the rights and legal protection of suspects ensured? We have still countries where even the rights of the accused materialize poorly.
Every question addressed here points to a system error. The ultimate cost is borne by the citizen. We have totalitarian states disguised as democracies. It is the culture of execution and power balance, the relationship between the citizen and the administration. We must measure these things to correct them.
The supervision of the Finnish police relies on internal self-supervision. Recently, there have been a number of court cases questioning the integrity of the entire National Bureau of Investigation. How does the sole internal monitoring compare among the European peer group? By observation of the public reports, news, and personal experience there is a need for a European authority for investigation of police practices to improve and support the moral standards. An external unit, in particular.
The police would not investigate reports of electronic warfare attacks targeting citizens. This has been addressed to the National Police Commissioner Seppo Kolehmainen. No response has been received. Whether this is rather a matter of national security, the activity may continue uninterrupted and the targeted civilians suffer pain, psychological illnesses, even fatalities. On many occasions, the police have reportedly annulled and questioned the mental health of citizens who have requested an investigation on their constant concern. There are reports some individuals have been taken to mental institutions or mental evaluation by force while others proposed to visit their therapist or doctor suggesting an issue with mental health. Kolehmainen has been addressed. No response has been received. Police do not possess the capability to assess the mental health of an individual. What sort of guidance has been given to police in view of this vastly growing issue?How the citizen reporting DEW and resonance attacks should be minded according to police, whether the practice is indeed consistent with this?
The emergency services in Finland are operated by Emergency Response Centres managed by the Ministry of the Interior in cooperation with the Ministry of Social Affairs and Health ie the police and healthcare functions. We would like to understand what sort of guidance there is given to the police and healthcare in terms of individuals who suffer the symptoms of electromagnetic attacks?
The permission granting process for police’s coercive measures by the District Court of Helsinki, in particular, requires monitoring. Since the judges do not know the individuals whose surveillance is on the table the decisions are made on an application basis. How is this process monitored externally? How many times an extension on an existing permission can be granted? How is it controlled the coercive measures are not being used for business, political or personal interests? How is the resilience of individual police officers and the judges, in particular, is being monitored in terms of corruption?
The Finnish police maintain formal and informal databases of citizens, involving profiles of them. This information is not available to the citizen by data access request. Is informal reporting used in cross-governmental communication?
Reports exist the NBI maintains a form of co-operation with the equivalent of Russia. Is this co-operation is indeed approved and formal?
A joy to reconnect with Peggy Hall of TheHealthyAmerican.org, who has been working hard all year since the Mass Psy Op of the “Pandemic” began last March, when I was still in India with my family and unable to return until early July when flights began again and I was able to get a ticket to fly back to Massachusetts.
During that time while I was in India, Peggy Hall’s videos stood out online as a beacon in the dismal stress of lockdowns, shutdowns, and mass “virus panic” that the WHO and CDC set in motion: in India I read the news of the thousands of stranded migrant workers all across the country, hit hardest by the lockdown, suddenly made jobless, literally starving, then terrorized and oppressed by police as they sought to return to their home states. (My video reports on what was happening then are posted now at Lbry after Youtube decided to advance its suppression of crimes against humanity by deplatforming my channel.) Millions in India have descended into even greater poverty by way of small business shutdown and crashing of the small-business economy–which is a mainstay of Indian culture; this is a direct result of complying with the genocidal policies of the WHO in crashing the country’s economy and establishing a police state–as the Belarussian President has proved is being done, with his whistleblowing disclosure that he was offered 940 million dollars in funding from the IMF and World Bank to do so.
While in India last spring, I also read the news of what was happening in the US, particularly in Massachusetts, with some trepidation, wondering what I was going to be returning home to — and it was in this pursuit that I discovered Peggy Hall’s groundbreaking work to parse the language of the “guidances” “orders” and “mandates” being freely issued by various opportunistic tyrants playing Governor in various states, including New York and Massachusetts and California.
Peggy’s meticulous attention to detail, her fearless deconstruction of the language of these “orders,” her bright and outspoken commentaries published in videos on Youtube, and her insistence on the primacy of American freedoms and rights have educated millions of Americans today on what “law” is, within the statutory-law-construct of the US Corporation, who Federal law applies to, who State law applies to, how laws do exist protecting the rights and freedoms of Americans to not be discriminated against, and how the Communist rollout of absurd demands to wear masks, self-isolate, self-quarantine, and “socially” distance–all supposed “Public Health” measures disputed and rejected by multiple doctors and scientists today, who understand that Health is not maintained by such measures–can be challenged and pushed back by simply refusing to consent, refusing to comply.
Those who wear the masks and agree to self-isolate are indeed assisting the State in a violent assault on our God-given rights and freedoms, as noted here yesterday.
Peggy Hall inspired these reports, as well (where I also focus on language at the CDC and FDA websites), and the creation of my Courtesy Notice to Businesses in Massachusetts, modeled on her Notice, which she has constructed on consultation with constitutional law experts.
For those who question my own insistence on God-given rights and freedoms, my outspokenness in the face of obvious State tyranny, my persistence in covering issues of freedoms, rights and encroachments on same, one has only to look at all the reports I have made on the profound assault on my human rights, in numerous videos, articles, memoranda to silent Presidents, and letters to silent “Honorable” officials, including this recent one: what I and a handful of other whistleblowers are pointing to is such aggressive invasion of rights and freedoms that most people cannot believe it or are too afraid to touch: this subject is one I continue to expose, and will indeed be writing further about, because it affects all Americans, all citizens worldwide, all humanity, and all life on planet Earth.
My interest in creating media for continuous exposure and public address of all subjects of State aggressions–which threaten the rights and freedoms of every person–I mean living human being–on this planet has been buoyed and supported by the great humanitarians–doctors, lawyers, scientists, activists, whistleblowers, writers, researchers, analysts, executives, organizers, public speakers–who have interviewed with me over 4 years at my channel and over 7 years at this website; I’m grateful for and honored by every one of these interviews–the video interviews are now posted mostly at Lbry and Odysee but to be fully reinstated at Bitchute, Brighteon, and this website shortly.
This conversation with Peggy Hall touched on the subjugation of masks, the dangers of masks, the misleading of the American public by the CDC and State Governors and City Mayors, the assault on people’s freedoms and rights by Show-of-Force police, the unlawfulness of the mask-needed restrictions on public transportation, decreed unlawfully by the CDC–a huge subject to be fully covered separately on these pages shortly, with focus on Peggy Hall’s recent video on this subject–the freedom in claiming and acting on one’s God-given rights and freedoms, which all of us as Americans need to freely and bravely claim if we want to get this country back from the Deep Staters and Globalists currently still running it. Listen especially to Peggy’s powerful advice at the end of this podcast, where she offers practical advice for every freedom-loving American, and indeed, citizen worldwide.
Please watch and share widely as we hope to continue these check-in conversations, going forward. Many thanks to Peggy Hall for this interview and for her continuing work.
Newsbreak 110 | Peggy Hall & Ramola D: Stand Up For Your Rights & Freedoms, Dig Deep, Speak Out
Around the world, reports of police brutality against those protesting the unlawful lockdowns and subjugatory masks continue. This video report of police violence from the Netherlands was posted on March 14 on Twitter:
This image of protesters in Argentina mutilated with rubber bullets–a key element in the inhumane “Non Lethal Weapons” arsenal of police departments worldwide today, which should be banned, by reason of their deadly bio-hacking effects destroying the human body–was posted below that tweet.
As Professor Denis Rancourt notes in his retweet, this is State-run, State-sponsored, State-manifesting violence which should be condemned by all humanity. How do the higher-ups in police departments permit this brutality? Where do they get their authority from? Do they really think it is okay to maul protesters with violence as shown above, that this is part of their ambit, as “Law Enforcement”? Where are the genteel and elegant government officials in this scene, the ones who wear pristine ties and suits and lie fluidly before cameras? Why are they still in power? How do they permit such crimes against humanity?
We hear a lot — through the mass deceivers at mainstream media — about how government and the police intend to tackle protesters and crowds, while budgets are diverted toward the development of deadly weapons–wrongfully termed “non-lethal,” to repress and subjugate people. Why do we not see mainstream media write about the clear criminalizing of protesters? Why is this dichotomy being maintained? Police officers are employees too, of a business corporation, which has essentially armed itself to attack people trying to run their own businesses, their own lives; it is a business corporation used by the government service corporations to push their monopolies, their right to exist, in direct opposition to the right to exist of all other businesses they are helping to crash, the right to exist of all humans seeking normalcy and freedom.
As many people know at this point, all this armed violence, Show of Force, and tyranny is building toward an even darker dystopia: the “Great Reset, Agenda 21, Agenda 2030” techno-enslavement intended by a group of billionaires who are working hard now through bought-out governments to tamp down humanity in addition to running genocidal vaccine operations with dangerous mRNA “vaccines” which many doctors are telling us is going to cause an even greater holocaust of death and disability than we see reported today at the CDC.
See Dr. Sherri Tenpenny’s recent interview at Daystar TV which clearly lays it out:
The “State” around the world needs to be called out Now, before their abuse of power extends and entrenches even further. Who needs to do this calling out? Every educated human being on this planet: if you know how to write, write someone a letter! Letters, Articles, Videos, Op-Eds, Tweets, Posts sent to people in governments and police are needed. If police in your locale are engaging in brutality such as this, call them out locally! Publish articles calling them out!
While many are awakening to the truth of our current reality today, much is being done to keep the majority in a state of entranced, submissive mask and lockdown compliance. The time is now, to see clearly what is happening and speak out and take positive, powerful action–in speech and words–both from outside the halls of government and inside to stop this tyranny.
People inside government and Law Enforcement worldwide should understand Agenda 2030 is 100% aimed at them too–they are going to be as enslaved as the rest of the planet if they do not put a stop to this kind of brutality and swing the boat back toward the shores of freedom, liberty, humanity and protection for all, and become useful Peace Officers again–as several of the Saturday News Panels at Ramola D Reports have emphasized (please visit Ramola D Reports at Lbry & Bitchute & Brighteon for these panels for now, since Youtube, in flagrant globalist support of Crimes Against Humanity and silencing human rights journalism and truth about COVID has removed the channel; to be collected at a separate website soon). Note that UK police whistleblowers, retired Metropolitan Police, and the Thames Valley Police and Crime Commissioner have spoken on these panels, discussing ways forward that will include police in a supportive and non-criminal way for society.
See Alison McDowell’s recent conversation with this writer, covered here, for an understanding of just how tight their intended digital dictatorship is meant to be–this Dystopia must be stopped by all thinking and feeling humans, and the time is now to call out the State for all violence against the people, to push such waves of tyranny back. Law Enforcement needs to wake up!
Disarming of police and military is really what is needed. When they overstep their bounds and neither provide the public safety, security, nor protection, they have invalidated themselves.
Stuttgart, Germany, March 14, Police attack lockdown protesters:
In a letter of notification sent in paper copy last week (and email earlier) to local public officials in the City of Quincy and the State of Massachusetts, comprising a Notice of Liability, a Cease and Desist, and an abbreviated Affidavit of Fact, this writer has publicly notified these local governments in Quincy and Massachusetts of the profoundly depraved neuro and bio hacking crimes committed on her over a period of eight years by various parties which include, putatively, the US Air Force, US Army, the CIA, General Dynamics Corporation, the FBI, the DIA, DARPA, the US Department of Defense, the US Justice Department, the US Marine Corps, Special Operations, and the Joint Non Lethal Weapons Directorate.
This letter was also sent in copy by email to a few of the many advocates and activists for humanity this writer has interviewed and knows of or is currently in contact with, in hopes both of informing them of the grave nature of the crimes committed on her body and brain–as well as her name and reputation–and alerting them to the immense human rights crisis currently prevalent in USA, as well as worldwide. These include Nils Melzer, Special Rapporteur of Torture for the United Nations, John Whitehead of the Rutherford Institute, NSA Whistleblower Kirk Wiebe, and Founder of the International Tribunal for Natural Justice, Sacha Stone.
In addition, copies of this letter were mailed today to Secretary of State Antony Blinken and Norfolk County Sheriff Patrick McDermott.
The outrageous assault and battery with electromagnetic weapons, scalar weapons, RFID weapons, and acoustic neuroweapons this writer has been subjected to, since November 2013, has been previously reported publicly, and is being more fully reported at this website under the section Ramola D: Personal Reports, which will be updated shortly to publish all testimonials, interviews, and broadcasts made on this subject.
In 2014 when it became clear that an Air Force operation was being carried out over her house and neighborhood with the constant overflight of small planes, drones, helicopters, and concomitant vehicular zoomers on the street using their car horns to alert the drone brigade (now found by her to be part of the AI-run Distributed Common Ground System, linked to the Air Force), along with concomitant radar flickers on her body, forceful activation of covertly-implanted RFIDs, and subsequent rain of microwave pulse assault, several FOIA requests were submitted to US Government departments and agencies to attempt to unearth the nature, reason, and meaning for these unexpected assaults on her person.
Citing “Public Safety,” Intelligence and Law Enforcement Agencies are Justifying Using Anti-Personnel Energy Weapons on Anyone They Please As Well As Permitting Human Trafficking into Military/CIA Mengele-Style Weapons-Tests & Experimentation Projects
While this writer has covered the subject of these extreme human rights violations on people in the US and worldwide for over seven years now, this letter, which follows on the Demand Letter sent last August to then Attorney-General William Barr expressly details–although not comprehensively, in partial summary only–the nature of the brutalities visited on her person through the use of Remote Access Human Control weapons in a variety of overt and covert operations,clearly classified to conceal crime, by the motley lot of Defense, Intelligence, Criminal Justice, Homeland Security, Law Enforcement and private-party perpetrators operating via Fusion Center and FISA/FMJ permissions to assault, as FBI Whistleblower Geral Sosbee has reported constitute the primary gateway mechanism to target, traffick, and assault American citizens.
Modalities of assault include the use of cell towers, antennas on neighboring houses, portable antennas, portable and locally installed emitters, repeaters, sensors, magnetrons, as well as a variety of exotic scalar, radar, and acoustic devices wrongfully permitted for use, demonstration, and operation on the streets of Massachusetts and every state in America by the NIJ and DARPA’s Limited-Effects Technologies program, euphemistically named since these are profound invasions of human rights and bodily integrity being effected by these bio-hacking and neuro-hacking technologies.
Fusion Houses Set Up in All US Neighborhoods, Drones & Satellites Used to Monitor Targets with Tracking Radar and LRADs for Full Spectrum Surveillance and 360 Degrees Full Spectrum Assault: Outright, Abysmal Crime
Fusion center contractors installed in neighboring houses, as well as commercial contractors–which include utility vans, telecom trucks, Verizon, Comcast, Xfinity, National Grid, UPS, USPS, FedEx, Trash and Recycling vans, landscaping vans as well as sedans, mini-vans, and SUVs–permitted to zoom into neighborhoods at high volume at all hours of the day and night, along with the use of drones, aerostats, satellites, and LRADs permitted to issue loud acoustic cracks on house pipes and radiators are primary perpetrators of bio-hacking crimes, using microwave pulse weapons, tracking radar, and through-wall millimeter-wave technology to pulse-hit, heart-hit, nerve-hit, and skin-crawl, as well as sleep-deprive with heat-hits and radio frequencies from right next door in the neighbor’s driveway, on the street, or two doors down.
The totality of this assault, while seemingly unbelievable, has been built over time, it appears through clear consent of local governments, especially post 9-11 and the unlawful Patriot Act, including Mayors, City Councils, Governors, and State Governments, who have essentially opened the door, inside USA, in US neighborhoods, to the construction of Electronic Concentration Camps akin to Guantanamo to permit the “Indefinite Detainment” via Directed Energy of the NDAA, first announced by Bush and Rumsfeld, subsequently renewed by all US administrations and openly acknowledged in the currently operative NDAA 2020.
Regressing infinitely therefore from the days of the Tuskegee Syphilis experiments and the Plutonium radiation experiments which journalist Eileen Welsome uncovered and whistleblew about, the stage has been unlawfully set by corrupt public institutions through the aegis of the NDAA, NSA 1947, Revised Common Rule, 1994 DOD-DOJ Memo of Understanding to “legally” permit clandestine torture, rape, assault and battery, frequency assault on organs, joints, nerves, Active Denial burning, covert implanting, nanotech assault, chemical weapon assault, neuroweapon assault and any other kind of high-tech military grade weapon assault remotely, using the stealth weapons of Electronic Warfare, Neuro Warfare, Information Warfare, and Cyber Warfare–which translate to radio frequency weapons, sonic weapons, scalar weapons, wifi, and various exotic weapons such as quantum tunneling weapons and scalar weapons, some described here.
Legal departments in all organizations, starting with local city, county, and State governments, Law Enforcement, federal departments such as the Justice Department, DOD, USAF, CIA and others have clearly permitted these atrocities to occur; attorneys and General Counsels in these organizations are therefore fully cognizant, aware, permitting, and liable for the execution of these crimes on people’s bodies.
These activities are apparently being budgeted for and reported to Congressional Committees as needed human bio-effects weapons testing of anti-personnel DEWs, needed human testing of Neuro Warfare and Cognitive Warfare weapons, needed acquisition of intelligence using RINT, SIGINT, HUMINT and Neuro Surveillance, needed AI-Cybernetics testing, needed Crowd-Control Device and Deterrence-Weapon testing, in the interests of counterintelligence, counter-terrorism, crowd-control, “peace-enforcement,” and homeland security.
In actuality, they comprise actions of profound and depraved Government over-reach and abuse, and have been enacting crimes of brutal, sadistic, and cruel Remote-Access assault and battery, 24/7 electromagnetic rape, ELF vibrational assault, radiation burns, inflammation, organ damage, neurodegradation, disability, and death on hundreds of thousands of people wrongfully labelled “Terrorist” and “Extremist” and exploited for all manner of Satanic target practice by trigger-happy sadists operating these weapons, which should be vociferously condemned, exposed, and decried by all members of sane, moral, sentient, thinking humanity–in order to fully halt and terminate these execrable activities.
These activities are also being partaken in unlawfully, wrongfully, and exploitatively by a wide network of telecom companies, media networks, Departments of Education worldwide, Defense contractors, Universities and research institutions, hospitals and health care providers working through the DOD and CIA on multiple Brain, Behavior, AI, Machine-Learning, Gaming, Simulation Modeling, and Data Collection projects–as the IP trail on the computers of all being wrongfully targeted and trafficked, including this writer, readily show (to be more fully reported shortly).
These activities evidence the extension and intensification of the CIA’s MK ULTRA activities revealed in the 1970s, among other evil experimentation projects by Operation Paperclip Nazi scientists and their progeny, as acknowledged by DOD/CIA scientist Dr. Robert Duncan, who has participated in the creation of brain-energy-harvesting, EEG Cloning/Modifying projects, and as discussed by him in conversation with this writer as reported here.
These evidences as well as others point to exploitation and human trafficking on a tremendous global scale, involving all state, city, and national governments as well as the United Nations, NATO, and various globalist organizations keen to establish a One World Government, a New World Order, Agenda 21, Agenda 2030, Global Digital Enslavement, a Brain Internet, Cerebral Net, Internet of Bodies, Internet of Things, Internet of Nano Bio Things, and Nanobotized transhumans Humans 2.0.
Thousands of Americans as well as thousands worldwide have attested to similar crimes on their person, as these various petitions currently to stop electromagnetic weapon assault on human beings attest:
Suppression of Wide Public Knowledge of These Fusion Center, Military, Law Enforcement, and Intelligence Crimes Has Influenced the Current COVID Fraud and Communist Psy Ops Regarding Masks, Nasal Swabs, Vaccines
The concealing of these Surveillance crimes through co-opted human rights organizations such as ACLU and Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch, American Red Cross, Physicians Committee for Human Rights and through co-opted and participating mainstream media networks has led to the current totalitarian situation where lies regarding a virus which has not been proven to exist, and the promotion of deadly mRNA vaccines which are causing high numbers of deaths continues to hold sway: clearly, people have been indoctrinated, co-opted, corralled, silenced, and terrorized into docility and coerced consent as Satanic modalities of Depopulation Eugenics by Gene-Injections are run on the populace succeeding twenty years of Stasi indoctrination and neighborhood subjugation to Patriot-Act-run Communism and Stealth Weapon Assault, all over the USA.
A primary means of suppression has been to name all reporting victims of these EMF/Neuroweapon assaults “Mentally Ill,” and local governments, Law Enforcement, local EMS have all had a part in that–as widely reported, including through this writer’s coverage (see especially the many video interviews at Ramola D Reports).
No Way Forward Without Exposing These Profound Atrocities Being Committed by Local and State Governments and Mil/Intel/LE While Running a Massive “Public Health” Psy Op on All
This writer, in her quest for answers, has interviewed various people on issues of freedom, rights, law, liberty, sovereignty, including :Russell-jay: Gould and Lady-Crown: Tutikatuku III, and chosen to obtain a live-life-claim with :Lady-Crown, Crown of the Mauri Nations and the Purple Thumb Community, as she continues to explore the accurate use of grammar, law, and flag protocols within the context of needing to communicate clearly and issue a meaningful and binding Cease and Desist to any and all parties enacting Remote-Access EMF crimes on her body: this is why the letter uses a flag (the Great Iroquois Flag of Peace) on the document, semi-colons, and strange punctuation–however, her learning is in process and the punctuation she uses continues to evolve.
Regardless of format, protocol, or punctuation, the intent of this letter — which has to date not been honored in request, as she continues to be assaulted with radio frequencies, microwave pulse hits to head and heart, with zoomers and honkers on the street and in the air proceeding as if they plan to keep going to Kingdom Come — is to inform and notify, both addressees and world, as to the nature of the crimes ongoing here in Quincy, Massachusetts and worldwide, and highlight the need for people to start taking action from within all their professions and spheres of influence, to halt these profound depravities, atrocities, and crimes against humanity on all.
These deadly weapons which permit stealth assault need to be banned — and currently, there’s a whole arsenal of them in use. All our lives, including our children’s and future generations to come are in danger through the use of these myriad Spectrum/Sonic/Scalar/Neuro weapons and systems of assault.The situation in fact is so dire currently that literally the entire Department of Defense, CIA, Department of Justice, Homeland Security, Law Enforcement and all contractors need to be shut down immediately to address these atrocities and halt these profound Crimes Against Humanity.
What this writer can see clearly now, with the assistance of several FBI, CIA, and NSA whistleblowers–and after the eye-opening experiences of betrayal and defamation she has personally experienced in her 7-year-quest to expose and halt these crimes in partnership with other human rights advocates (many of whom have turned out to be COINTELPRO infiltrators)–is that the Black Opsters running these criminal assault programs believe themselves invincible, unassailable, unrevealable, unprosecutable, and behave accordingly, with impunity, and with savagery. There is every need therefore to expose them continually.
Previous notifications and letters (all unanswered) to public officials locally include:
Seven, a musician, producer, concept-creator and innovator who reports being targeted in retaliation in various ways including with death threats, harassment and the sudden deaths of various family-members after she sued various powerful media groups in the UK for intellectual property theft (memoir, TV-show concepts, music) and won millions–yet received none of her winnings in court is a powerful voice today for Truth and Justice. She currently serves on a Tribunal exposing and addressing various environmental and humanitarian issues and publishes videos offering incisive news analysis and commentary at her Brighteon channel based on her long research into and material encounters with the hidden power structure in the world, which has a financial center in the City of London and has very dark Luciferian and Satanic roots and intentions.
Especially powerful in Seven’s insights and public speaking is her clear-eyed look at the unabashedly evil nature of this power structure–the system as we have it, the Matrix, the global-governance, the mesh of government and private corporations feeding on the energies of people and communities, as well as the tremendous mainstream media mechanism holding it up and lying to the world on a daily basis–and her fearlessness and candor in calling it out, and in reminding people that what we are dealing with here is evil incarnate: do not support the evil, she exhorts, expose it and defund it, do not feed it, do not work for it. If people only understood how evil this system is, how intent on the subjugation and genociding of humanity–a return to the eighteenth century and earlier, she says, where slavery is the norm–we could collectively end this charade overnight.
“It’s a genocide program and it’s based on eugenics,” she emphasizes, pointing to the centuries-long Rockefeller Eugenics efforts run through the pharmaceutical industry and now being promoted, funded, and run by Bill Gates and employing vaccines as kill agents. “The bioweapon is not the virus but the vaccine.”
Just as 250 million farmers in India got on the road last November to head to New Delhi and rallied to stop Narendra Modi’s Farm Bills which hand over farming management and profits to a coterie of Indian billionaires, Seven says what is needed is a major strike run by people in every profession to halt the deadly vaccine rollout which is being pushed by mainstream media, pharma-industry scientists, and brainwashed (or bribed) celebrities. “No-one is talking about the deaths,” she notes.”Why is no-one talking about the deaths caused by this vaccine–in nursing homes, among health workers, among people who have taken it?”
She also points to the fact that several doctors (Dr. Sherri Tenpenny, among others) who understand how mRNA vaccines, with viral, toxin, and nanoparticle load from vaccines work have publicly stated that the people who take these vaccines will be dead within a few years, a subject everyone needs to further research (some links to articles and videos below).
Included are video excerpts from a British military veteran calling to police to stop assaulting people and recognize this is the last great fight for humanity, and observers in the UK pointing to how vaccines as bioweapons are being used to genocide the people of Africa.
This is a powerful and urgently-needed video with the intensity of intent and passion that only Seven with her power of voice and compassion for humanity can deliver–please watch and share widely:
It’s a fact that no American President, Governor, or Mayor (of a private Government corporation–yes, all Governments, including the bankrupt US Inc. are registered as corporations) can issue LAWS pertaining to any of us.
When Governors of American States and Mayors of American cities and counties get in front of podiums in their best Brooke Brothers suits with their purple polka-dotted ties and a 100 American flags waving behind them while an ASL interpreter pantomimes their every spoken word and issue demands for the entire state to “wear masks” “take a flu shot” “get a COVID vaccine” “stand 666 feet apart” and “self-isolate” and smother their children to death with 2 masks, not one — as the irresponsible Today Show/NBC News plus Fauci Inc. first broadcast & the irresponsible New York Times pushes –they are merely doing their best to push the envelope as far as they lucidly can without appearing completely NWO-manipulated and imbecilic. (Which they are: hence the global/ist lunacy of these massively deceptive public statements.)
Every statement that such deceivers have made is a deception and a lie and these titled frontmen and frontwomen should be ashamed of themselves.
Lawmaking is a process after all which none of these CEOs and talking heads are a part of, as members of the Executive branch. None of them can announce laws or edicts or “mandates” or rules or guidelines or guidance or Executive Orders which have not been converted into statutes–codes in fact pertaining only to employees of their private corporation, even then, not to every living man and woman living in the state on the land and bound only to the laws and Constitution of “original jurisdiction” in standing on the soil, not corporate statutes–by their own set legislative process.
For further understanding regarding the State corporations being run rather blatantly by NWO/globalist foreign entities under centuries-long British and Roman piracy–endangering all our freedoms–and what Original Jurisdiction means, please see Anna von Reitz’s article Freedom is as Close, or as Far, as Original Jurisdiction
“5. Pushing any form of mask mandate or forced vaccination program on the General Public under color of law is a crime of constructive fraud.
6. Any publicly organized corporation (holding a charter or articles of incorporation from the United States Government or from any State-of-State franchise) is obligated to obey the Public Law, including the Constitutions, and cannot assume rights or authorities depriving any member of the General Public of any right guaranteed by the Constitutions or Public Laws — including the right of privacy, religious freedom, and self-determination. “
Anna von Reitz,The Brits Again — Monotonous, Isn’t It?
“Public Health” and “Public Safety” Cannot Propel Mandates on Medical Interventions Legally
The statements they have made and are currently making in front of podiums and flags which are transmitted and broadcast into printed word and spoken lie all relate in fact to medical interventions which cannot legally be mandated, whether mask, test, or vaccine, whether in name of “Public Health” “Public Safety” or “Public Anything Else” without all the requirements for Informed Consent being met (more on this subject below).
By word-trickery and sleight-of-hand, these public figures have succeeded in deceiving massive numbers of people into thinking everyone HAS to wear a mask out in public or in a store, everyone HAS to “social-distance,” and, as they are hoping now to deceive everyone into thinking everyone at some point HAS to take the (genome-deforming, nanobot-implanting, cyborging) COVID vaccine, or COVID test, and everyone HAS to “self-isolate” each time you cross a border
The word “mandate” has no significance, in terms of law, because it is not a law.
The words “guidance” and “guideline” are not references to a law.
The word “rule” is not a reference to a law.
For clear and candid discussion on this entire subject of Mandates absolutely not being laws, with reference to publications and the US Constitution, please watch and share Peggy Hall’s vitally important videos below:
Peggy Hall:No president can make a law. There is no “mask mandate” that applies to you unless you work for the federal government. Even then, it can be appealed. That’s because you have the right to life, and life requires oxygen. It is unlawful for someone to restrict your oxygen against your will.Learn more about your rights and how to protect them here: http://www.thehealthyamerican.org
“1. Stop staying “mandate” — as that word has no meaning.
2. No individual can make a law.
3. There are no laws requiring you to wear a mask.
4. Why the science of masks doesn’t even matter.
5. No one has authority over your body and your property except you.
6. You can reject any medical intervention, including masks, testing and vaccines.” — Peggy Hall/The Healthy American
No President or Governor or Mayor or store-owner or store manager or business owner citing their deceptive blather-in-front-of-podiums-and-flags can mandate any personal action involving YOUR breathing, YOUR nose, YOUR mouth, YOUR immune system, YOUR health, YOUR body, or your childrens’–even though they are daring to try to pull off this Massive Public Deception, telling you it’s all for Public Health and Public Safety. Your body and health belong to you–not to me, not to people playing President, not to Governors and misanthropes like Bill Gates who are seeking to link you up to the Cloud and supercomputing AI with their deadly mRNA vaccines and digitally-enslaving dreams of Humans 2.0.
None of these people can demand that you wear a mask, which is a medical device regulated by the FDA.
The FDA does not and cannot require you to wear a medical device–this has and always is a matter of your own choosing. Without Informed Consent succeeding a Health Risk Assessment provided by the government (which they haven’t done and cannot do), the FDA cannot and is not demanding you wear a mask.
The CDC does not and cannot require you to wear a mask–they can only push Fauci to the podium to variously bleat about wearing One Mask Two Masks or maybe Three Masks to finish off the Public Asphyxiation in style–and word their non-requirements carefully as “Considerations” while telling you to check “your locality’s mask rules.”
(Your locality cannot make rules on masks for anyone–they are a medical device, regulated by the FDA, which requires your locality to provide adequate Risk information for Informed Consent, see below.)
IMPORTANT MASK INFORMATION
From Anna de Buisseret
The Government has FAILED to conduct a Risk Assessment of the risks to the individual members of the public for the harms caused to them by mask wearing- or wearing a face covering.
Without such a Risk Assessment, the individual is NOT providing “informed consent” to wear a “medical device” (which a mask is as defined under the Medical Devices Regulations 2002).
A face “covering” falls to be regulated under the Consumer Protection Regulations. The Face Coverings Regulations are therefore - prima facie - unlawful and should not be enforced.
In the view of our legal team, the Face Coverings Regulations are ultra vires the Government’s powers but that legal argument is ongoing.
None of the supermarkets are providing their customers with a Risk Assessment either - so their customers are also not able to provide their “informed consent” to wearing a face covering/mask.
This is unlawful as “informed consent” must be obtained.
Anyone being asked to wear or use a medical device - such as a mask - should be medically assessed by an Occupational Health team for their INDIVIDUAL risk posed to them by wearing a mask.
Failure to conduct a Health & Safety Risk assessment is both a civil and a potentially criminal offence.
Therefore both the Government and the supermarkets - and anyone else enforcing mask mandates in the absence of a full Health & Safety Risk assessment in the workplace -, is acting unlawfully and can be held PERSONALLY liable for the damage caused to the individual.
Legal challenges are already being run against the “mask perpetrators” to challenge this unlawful and harmful mask mandate and cases are already being won, and damages for harm caused paid out.
I’m a specialist disability discrimination lawyer who also has a stream of claimants lining up to bring legal claims for damages from this mask mandate. Countless people are being harmed by wearing a mask and others are being harmed from the discrimination they are enduring from being mask exempt.
The flood of litigation is going to be Tsunami-like!!! Be warned: perpetrators will be held to account.
Anyone enforcing or imposing this mandate should be warned that they are acting unlawfully and will be held personally liable for the harm they cause.
I advise anyone harmed by this mask mandate in a work environment (which supermarkets are) to file a report of your harm to the Health & Safety team and ask them to conduct an investigation into whether the employer or supermarket or other “mask perpetrator" has conducted a valid H&S Risk Assessment.
The local council’s Environmental Health Officer is responsible for ensuring that commercial premises in their area are safe for the public. This includes whether it’s safe for the public to be forced to wear a face covering or mask whilst in a supermarket or other commercial premises. Without a full Risk Assessment, no one should be required or forced to wear a face covering or mask - it’s a breach of the Health & Safety laws and a potentially criminal offence.
If the employer or other “mask perpetrator “ hasn’t followed the law in forcing you to wear a mask, criminal investigations can follow under Health & Safety laws.
The Equality Act 2010 does not permit anyone to discriminate against a disabled person on the grounds of their disability.
Refusing entry to a shop or access to public services to a disabled person is prima facie disability discrimination. No evidence can be lawfully demanded. It’s a breach of both the right to privacy and the Equality Act 2010 to ask for medical evidence in this manner.
Masks worn by the public in community settings, do not prevent transmission of a virus particle as tiny as SARS-CoV-2: that’s what the scientific research evidence shows.
Masks can INCREASE the risk of transmission if not face-fitted and fit-tested for the individual wearer as leakage occurs.
Masks can INCREASE the risk of secondary bacterial and fungal infections due to incorrect putting on and taking off of the mask, incorrect storage and lack of sterilisation of the contamination collecting on the surfaces of the mask.
These contaminates are then inhaled: the moisture and humidity of the mask is a perfect breeding ground for bacteria and fungus which multiply in the mask fibres.
These are then inhaled deeply into the lungs where they multiply further, along with the loose fibres of the mask which collect in the lungs.
Secondary bacterial lung infections are a major risk factor from inhaling bacteria into the lungs. Secondary bacterial lung infections were the major cause of death in the Spanish Flu. They had cloth mask mandates then too. See a correlation??
Masks cause multiple organ damage - some of which is irreparable and permanent.
Masks cause social, cognitive, emotional and psychological harm too.
Have YOU been fully informed of all the harms that wearing a mask causes to YOU??
Have YOU had a H&S Risk Assessment by an Occupational Health Team for the risks posed to you - as an individual- for mask wearing?? If not, how do YOU know what the risks are?? How are YOU providing YOUR individual informed consent to wearing this medical device without a full H&S Risk Assessment?? You’re not able to.
You’re simply guessing that it won’t harm you in the absence of a full Risk Assessment.
I have 55 pages of scientific research evidence proving the many harms caused to the mask wearer.
I’ve prepared a detailed Risk Assessment and a Health & Safety Risk Assessment on mask wearing for any of you who would like to be informed of the harms and risks of mask wearing.
There are a team of around 70 of us professional lawyers, medics, Health & Safety inspectors, industrial hygienists, psychologists, scientists and others who are collaborating to raise legal challenges against the unlawful and harmful mask laws and mandates and policies. Our evidence is therefore drawn from top experts in their fields.
Katia Smith #COVID19
Additional Information on American Laws and Rights from Anna von Reitz
Full text of The Brits Again — Monotonous, Isn’t It?/Nov 25, 2020
There are over 200 known and separate strains of coronavirus, which is associated with influenza, otherwise known as a common cold.
The specific variety from which the still-unidentifiable and un-isolated Covid-19 virus purportedly derives is patented by the British Pirbright Institute and funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.
Oh, go figure. Again.
Meantime, many Americans are just now waking up to the following facts:
1. The CDC and NIH are not government institutions. Both are private entities that are in the business of producing and profiting from vaccines. Both compete for government contracts to carry out research and do statistical analysis, but they are not part of the government.
2. There is no provision in any Federal or State-of-State Constitution authorizing any government official to mandate anything at all about our health or medical options. Their only power is over their own employees and dependents as a condition of employment or of receiving benefits.
3. Forced vaccination is banned under the Nuremberg Code, Article 6, Sections 1 and 3, and anyone involved in a forced vaccination program is liable.
4. There is nobody responsible for harm caused by a vaccine. The pharmaceutical companies have been off the hook since the 1980’s and the governmental services corporations that accepted the liability for them are bankrupt. There remains an industry-funded “Vaccine Court” but it has a reputation for protecting the industry.
5. Pushing any form of mask mandate or forced vaccination program on the General Public under color of law is a crime of constructive fraud.
6. Any publicly organized corporation (holding a charter or articles of incorporation from the United States Government or from any State-of-State franchise) is obligated to obey the Public Law, including the Constitutions, and cannot assume rights or authorities depriving any member of the General Public of any right guaranteed by the Constitutions or Public Laws — including the right of privacy, religious freedom, and self-determination.
7. “My body, my choice.” applies to more than just abortions.
8. If someone doesn’t have the right to make you brush your teeth, they don’t have the right to make you stay home and wear a mask. Contrary to what some people and corporations have been assuming, we don’t live in a Nanny State. —————————- See this article and over 2800 others on Anna’s website here: www.annavonreitz.com
Many thanks to Peggy Hall for her outstanding video discussions, to Anna von Reitz for her profound historical excavations and writings, to the Know Your Rights group and Anna de Buisseret for their important posting on laws and rights in face of unlawful and supremely deceptive “mandates.”
This article may be re-posted anywhere online with attribution and a linkback. Please share and re-post widely.
CDC will tell you that vaccines don’t cause autism. (https://www.cdc.gov/vaccinesafety/concerns/autism/cdc2004pediatrics.html) Vaccines are safe and effective. What they don’t tell you is no vaccine has ever been tested for safety or efficacy— unlike all other drugs. It is the only medical product which is not required by law to be tested with a control group taking an inert placebo. No vaccine has ever been compared to an inert placebo–which is the routine way of testing all other drugs. No vaccine has been safety tested for more than days or weeks, but autoimmune diseases and cancer can take months or years to develop. The crazy thing is that no test is done to determine if the vaccine is effective. There is only one criterion for CDC–does the vaccine produce antibodies? If it does, the FDA approves it and CDC puts it on schedule.
It is no accident that you are not told all the facts. It is the policy of government agencies to keep you in the dark. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) stated their policy on this issue clearly: “any possible doubts, whether or not well founded, about the safety of the vaccine cannot be allowed to exist in view of the need to assure that the vaccine will continue to be used to the maximum extent consistent with the nation’s public health objectives”(Stoller, 2019.p.21) The agencies that are supposed to protect children from the consequences of corporate greed are working in tandem with Big Pharma and their goal is not to protect the health of Americans but to expand the program—at the expense of our health.
“Any possible doubts about the safety of the vaccine cannot be allowed to exist”–that is the credo of the government and the mainstream media. It explains why critics of the vaccine program are ridiculed and vilified, if not demonized, as conspiracy nuts, and anti-scientific “anti-vaxxers.”
HHS has a National Vaccine Plan. Barbara Loe Fisher aptly commented that “the National Vaccine Plan is really a Vaccine Marketing Plan for the pharmaceutical industry.” https://www.nvic.org/NVIC-Vaccine-News/March-2020/the-national-plan-to-vaccinate-every-american.aspx described in 2010 its plan for our future. The Plan is described in HHS literature beginning in 2010: “Coverage rates[of vaccinations] across the lifespan will increase, lowering outbreaks of VPDs [vaccine-preventable diseases] and decreasing geographic pockets of low coverage. Provider and public confidence in both vaccines and the entities involved in licensing, recommending, and monitoring vaccine safety will increase while the worry, concerns, and anxiety regarding vaccines, particularly with respect to safety, will decrease. Providers, parents, and the public will also support vaccines as an important and necessary part of our nation’s health system.” (https://www.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/nvpo-midcourse-review-final.pdf,p25)
To paraphrase the above: The public will realize that vaccines are safe and effective, even if they aren’t–they will have confidence both in vaccines and in government agencies which are pushing these vaccines, like CDC. The booklet leaves out one sentence: “Big Brother loves you.”
So, in HHS’s ideal scenario “worry, concerns, and anxiety regarding vaccines, particularly with respect to safety, will decrease.” But from a humanitarian perspective if the vaccine is not safe it is not desirable that concern should decrease. The FDA stated that it is determined that the vaccine “will continue to be used to the maximum extent”–as long as this is consistent with public health objectives. But what happens when it isn’t? That possibility is not even considered by HHS––which speaks volumes. Parents” concern is for the health of their children, whether or not vaccines will continue to be used to the maximum extent.
The documents I quoted are not anomalies. In June 2000 a now famous meeting took place at Simpsonwood Conference Center in Georgia. The meeting included about 60 vaccine program high-level officials from the CDC and the Food and Drug Administration, the top vaccine specialist from the World Health Organization, and representatives of every major vaccine manufacturer.
The discussions at this meeting demonstrate that the policymakers have internalized the FDA credo that doubts about safety cannot be allowed to exist. Kennedy wrote a seminal article in 2005 (published in both Salon and Rolling Stone) that helped to publicize the meeting, aptly titled Deadly Immunity. It was in fact after Kennedy read the Simpsonwood transcript that he became convinced that there is a link between vaccines and autism.
In the article Kennedy wrote, “I devoted time to study this issue because I believe that this is a moral crisis that must be addressed. If, as the evidence suggests, our public-health authorities knowingly allowed the pharmaceutical industry to poison an entire generation of American children, their actions arguably constitute one of the biggest scandals in the annals of American medicine.” https://childrenshealthdefense.org/news/deadly-immunity-government-cover-mercuryautism-scandal-2/Since Kennedy wrote those words further evidence has been revealed that heightens the CDC’s culpability–and that of the press for helping to cover this up to this day.
Kennedy noted more recently: “All of the barriers that are meant to protect our children: the government, the lawyers, the regulatory agencies and the press – the checks and balances in our democratic system that are supposed to stand between corporate power and our little children have been removed… “https://ahrp.org/why-is-the-cdc-petrified-of-the-film-vaxxed/
The purpose of the Simpsonwood meeting was to discuss a new study by CDC epidemiologist, Tom Verstraeten– based on a CDC database containing the medical records of 100,000 children– that made it clear that there was a link between a mercury-based preservative in the vaccines (thimerosal) and a dramatic increase in autism and numerous other neurological disorders.
“I was actually stunned by what I saw,” Verstraeten told those assembled at Simpsonwood, citing not only his data but the large number of earlier studies that indicate a link between thimerosal and speech delays, attention-deficit disorder, hyperactivity and autism. Since 1991 when CDC and the FDA had recommended that three additional vaccines laced with the preservative thimerosal be given to extremely young infants —in one case, within hours of birth– the estimated number of cases of autism had increased fifteenfold, from one in every 2,500 children to one in 166 children in 2005 when Kennedy was writing.
(It is several times higher today than in 2000, when the Simpsonwood meeting took place; even though thimerosal has been eliminated, children are being given higher amounts of other toxins, such as aluminum.)
Of course, Verstraeten was stunned, but he ought not to have been surprised. At the time of the Simpsonwood meeting, at the age of two months, infants routinely received three inoculations that contained a total of 62.5 micrograms of ethylmercury — a level 99 times greater than the EPA’s limit for daily exposure to methylmercury, a related neurotoxin.
On the second day of the meeting an interesting event occurred. The meeting chairman, Dr. Richard Johnston, a pediatrician, was called out for an emergency call. When he returned he shared: “[M]y daughter-in law delivered a son.. Our first male in the line of the next generation and I do not want that grandson to get a thimerosal containing vaccine…I want that grandson to only be given thimerosal-free vaccines” (Wilcox, 2018, p159.)
This sounds like an impassioned argument to ban vaccines with thimerosal and he did argue that “it was desirable to remove thimerosal from US vaccines,” but he had no objection to hiding the revelations from the public, and saw no need to remove thimerosal from vaccines exported to “developing countries” (Ibid, p.160).
Dr. John Clements, who represented the WHO at the EIS conference, expressed alarm about the direction of the research, which he viewed as a threat to the vaccination program. He warned that the information should not be allowed to reach the public, and he bluntly stated the study should not have been done “because the outcome could have… been predicted.” In other words, he knew all along that the vaccines were harmful, but “doubts about the safety cannot be allowed to exist”:
“And I really [don’t] want to risk offending everyone in the room by saying that perhaps this study should not have been done at all, because the outcome of it could have, to some extent, been predicted…, and we have all reached this point now where we are left hanging, …I know how we handle it from here is extremely problematic.” — Dr. John Clements, World Health Organization
“[T]hrough the freedom of information that will be taken by others and will be used in ways beyond the control of this group.And I am very concerned about that as I suspect it is already too late to do anything regardless of any professional body and what they say.”
“I am very concerned that this has gotten this far, and that having got this far, how you present in a concerted voice the information to the ACIP [Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices] in a way they will be able to handle it and not get exposed to the traps which are out there in public relations.
“My mandate as I sit here in this group is to make sure at the end of the day that 100,000,000 are immunized with DTP, Hepatitis B and if possible Hib, this year, next year and for many years to come, and that will have to be with Thimerosal-containing vaccines unless a miracle occurs and an alternative is found quickly and is tried and found to be safe.” In other words, it did not matter to Clements how harmful the vaccines were—as long as`100 million kids were immunized (and the vaccines were sold).
Quoted in Vera Sharav, “The Vaccine Program: Betrayal of Public Trust & Institutional Corruption. Part 1 of 7.” JANUARY 22, 2018
“The Vaccine Program: Betrayal of Public Trust & Institutional Corruption. Part 1 of 7.”
Dr Robert Chen:
“The issue is that it is impossible, unethical to leave kids unvaccinated..” (Wilcox,2018, p160)
The fear was that if the information got out many people would be less likely to vaccinate at all.
Other comments from those present include: “We could exclude the lowest exposure children from the database”; “We could remove children that got the highest exposure levels since they represented an unusually high percentage of the [adverse] outcomes”; “We can push and pull this data any way we want to get the results we want;” “We could have predicted the outcomes.”
A discussion ensued about how to hide and manipulate the data to conceal the link between mercury and autism. CDC’s Roger Bernier reminded everyone to : “consider this embargoed information…and very highly protected information.” There was a consensus that— to quote the FDA– “any possible doubts, whether or not well founded, about the safety of the vaccine cannot be allowed to exist in view of the need to assure that the vaccine will continue to be used to the maximum extent …”(Stoller, 2019, p.21) The qualifying phrase “consistent with the nation’s public health objectives” was obviously not a factor.
After the Simpsonwood meeting William Egan of the FDA fulfilled his appointed task and told a Congressional hearing, “The FDA considers all vaccines to be safe and effective. It is essential that all children receive all vaccines according to the currently recommended schedule” (Wilcox, 2018, p.164).
But while maintaining mercury was safe, the FDA decided to use another “preservative” in place of Thimerosal – evidently since they feared that the vaccine program would attract negative publicity. (This was years before the media took its vow of silence.)
The CDC allowed the drug companies to sell off their stock of mercury-based vaccines until 2004, they bought up the remaining vaccines from Big Pharma to export to developing countries (evidently poisoning poor children was not a problem) and allowed the companies to continue using the preservative in some American vaccines — including several pediatric flu shots as well as tetanus boosters routinely given to eleven-year-olds.
The uppermost concern of the officials entrusted with the safety of America’s children was to protect the reputation of the program— not to protect the children. Although they removed the mercury, they allowed Big Pharma to sell off their existing stocks of vaccines. Rep. Dan Burton’s House Government Reform Committee concluded in its final report. “This epidemic [autism] in all probability may have been prevented or curtailed had the FDA not been asleep at the switch regarding a lack of safety data regarding injected thimerosal, a known neurotoxin.” The FDA and other public-health agencies failed to act, the committee added, out of “institutional malfeasance for self protection” and “misplaced protectionism of the pharmaceutical industry.” (https://childrenshealthdefense.org/news/deadly-immunity-government-cover-mercuryautism-scandal-2/)
But the public health technocrats were not alone. The mainstream media, fattened with revenue from drug industry ads, has helped to conceal the dangers of vaccines with The New York Times to this day describing (in an editorial) “anti-vaxxers” as “the enemy” and dishonestly assuring readers that science has proved vaccines are harmless, “Scientists, especially, are uncomfortable with black-and-white statements, because science is all about nuance. But, in the case of vaccines, there are some hard truths that deserve to be trumpeted. Vaccines are not toxic, and they do not cause autism. Full stop.”
There is a postscript to this incident. In 2013, Dr. William Thompson a head scientist found himself talking on the phone to Brian Hooker, a scientist and father of a vaccine-injured child. Overwhelmed with guilt Thompson made a confession to Hooker. Under orders of his supervisors in 2002, he had destroyed data from a CDC experiment which showed a link between vaccines and autism. Hooker was excited because he knew the study to which Thompson referred was one frequently used to demonstrate that vaccines do not cause autism. (https://ahrp.org/why-is-the-cdc-petrified-of-the-film-vaxxed/)
Thompson had wanted to reveal this in 2002 but he was threatened with the loss of his job and he kept quiet. But after talking to Hooker he could keep silent no longer. “When I talk to you, you have a son with autism, I have great shame now when I meet families with kids with autism because I have been part of the problem…[T]he CDC is so paralyzed now by anything related to autism….they’re afraid to look for things that might be associated [with autism]” (Wilcox,2018, p.172).
In 2019, the World Health Organization (to which vaccine evangelist Bill Gates was the second largest donor, after the government of the US) declared vaccine hesitancy “the growing resistance to widely available lifesaving vaccines” (New York Times)–was one of the top ten health threats in the world, alongside air pollution, climate change, HIV. The editorial Board of The New York Times sprung into action, declaring that “anti-vaxxers” are “the enemy” and called on the U.S. government to “get tough” by waging a “bold and aggressive” pro-vaccine campaign that includes eliminating religious exemptions for vaccination and includes “tightening restrictions around how much leeway states can grant families that want to skip essential vaccines.” https://www.nvic.org/nvic-vaccine-news/january-2019/who,-pharma,-gates.aspx.In other words the paper long considered a bastion of liberalism takes a stand against informed consent, against our constitutional rights, and urges the state to force families to submit to “essential” vaccines.
The title of the editorial was, “How to Inoculate Against Anti-Vaxxers”
It states, “Yes, there are chemicals in vaccines, but they are not toxic”–either a dishonest or a delusional assertion, as a cursory glance at the ingredients reveals! They claim of course to speak in the name of science, “No, vaccines can’t overwhelm your immune system, which already confronts countless pathogens every day.” The Times told its readers, “It’s also O.K. to get out of the gray zone. Scientists, especially, are uncomfortable with black-and-white statements, because science is all about nuance. But, in the case of vaccines, there are some hard truths that deserve to be trumpeted. Vaccines are not toxic, and they do not cause autism. Full stop.” https://www.nytimes.com/2019/01/19/opinion/vaccines-public-health.html?action=click&module=Opinion&pgtype=Homepage Vaccines are not toxic.
That is a lie. If it is not a lie, it is an irresponsible and appalling statement for a paper esteemed for investigative journalism.
J. B. Handley, the father of an autistic boy, states in his book How to End the Autism Epidemic that he read all 27- 29 of the studies that are purported to prove that vaccines don’t cause autism (p88). The testing is conducted by the industry. Only one vaccine is studied, MMR (measles, mumps, rubella), and none of the studies use the proper control group – unvaccinated children. To determine whether vaccines cause autism one should not focus on one vaccine when children are given 16 vaccines and over 70 injections. As David Kirby, former NY Times investigative journalist wrote, “It is illogical to exonerate all vaccines, all vaccine ingredients, and the total US vaccine program as a whole, based solely on a handful of epidemiological studies of just one vaccine and one vaccine ingredient” (p.87, Handley, 2018).
Nor should one use as a control group subjects who are injected with another toxin, as is invariably done in vaccine studies. That is cheating. It is like comparing Salem with Marlboro, and concluding Salem does not increase the risk of cancer. Furthermore, safety testing for drugs lasts 5 years. With vaccines adverse events are recorded for a week or less, despite the fact that autoimmune illnesses take weeks or years to manifest. (Handley, p.229). The fact that this kind of “safety” testing is permitted – only for vaccines — tells us that the government is covering for the pharmaceutical industry and that it is not protecting children
For example, one study CDC used to demonstrate vaccines don’t cause autism compared children who received more mercury in their vaccines to children who received slightly less mercury (Handley, p.88). Yet, CDC was forced to admit, that even this study with a bogus placebo could “neither prove nor disprove” an association between mercury and autism. The same is true of the other “signature” study–referred to as the Tozzi study— which compared children who received 62.5 mcg to those who received 137.5 mcg of ethyl mercury, published in 2009 in Pediatrics and reached no conclusion (p90).
But that is not the end of it– the mainstream media also comes into play. The media might as well be a PR firm hired by Big Pharma.. As Handley points out: “The PR machine for these studies is something to behold. The Academy of Pediatrics [the pro-vaccine guild of pediatricians], publishes these studies, and on the day they are released, every major news organization in the country reports on the studies, and every article sends the same basic message: Vaccines are safe, and they don’t cause autism” (p.91). For example the AP headline for the Tozzi study was, “Study Adds to Evidence of Vaccine Safety.” This is the same message, the same lie, The New York Times asserted in the name of Science.
There is a religious aspect to the vaccine crusade: “The powerful vaccine ‘gospel’ has swept up regulators, medical trade associations, physicians, science journals, the popular press and others in a kind of consensus dogma that has become more important than the children [these institutions were] supposed to protect.” (CHD, 2018, p1). The children do not matter– these institutions exist to serve the State which itself exists primarily to serve the interests of corporate America. The children are of no more value than raw materials in a factory. Those who dissent, even parents of vaccine-injured children, are ridiculed as anti-science, “anti-vaxxers” and treated by the press as malefactors– in another era they would have been denounced as heretics and burned at the stake.
Again, I remind readers that the strongest evidence that vaccines are harmful is provided by the mass “experiment” brought about by the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act (NCVIA) in 1986. In this “experiment” we compare those born before the act and those born afterwards. We are not looking at the results of one vaccine but all vaccines–since by the late 1990s almost all school children were adhering to the schedules mandated in all states. And although the control group (those who received half as many vaccines or even less in the 1950s) was not unvaccinated, the difference was stark, as mentioned. In the 1960s 1 in 10,000 kids had autism; in 1985, 1 in 2,500 10 yr old kids had autism; in 1989, 1 in 1,000; in 1999, 1 in 500; in 2000, 1 in 150; in 2008, 1 out of 88; in 2016:1 in 68. In the following section I will look at other illnesses caused by vaccines (https://www.nvic.org/getdoc/6cd24653-fd19-49e5-842a-3917e15de533/medical-science—public-trust.aspx).
I think most parents who think vaccines are safe have no idea about these statistics. I would guess that they never read the ingredients in the vaccines with which their children are injected.
Here is a partial list of the ingredients:thimerosal, aluminum, formaldehyde, antibiotics, egg protein, monosodium glutamate (MSG), squalene, gelatin, polysorbate 80, phenoxyethanol, aborted human fetal lung tissue, monkey kidney cells.
Thimerosal (mercury)–although it was supposedly removed from all vaccines it is still in the tetanus toxoid vaccine (Tt), and meningococcal vaccines and in flu shots, including some given to children and pregnant women. Like aluminum it is a neurotoxin–both have been implicated in autism. Aluminum is in at least half the vaccines mandated for children. J.B. Handley who read all the scientific studies on autism believes it is a most potent toxin, the one most responsible for autism. If we calculate the total aluminum dose from 36 vaccines given to the baby in the first few years, we see that the total dose is 30.6 mg—many times the 0.85 mg considered safe by the FDA. https://www.vaccinationinformationnetwork.com/vaccines-brain-development-and-autism-dr-russell-blaylock-md
MSG is an excitotoxin. Phenoxyethanol is a derivative of ethylene glycol, or antifreeze–it is currently used in 2 vaccines. The cell lines upon which the vaccine is grown include fetal lung tissue and monkey kidney cells.
These are a few of the more common ingredients that are intentionally included in vaccines. But contamination has been a continuous problem. For example, two contaminants were monkey virus in polio vaccines and pig viruses in rotavirus vaccines. In the 1950s up to a third of polio vaccines in the U.S. were contaminated with simian virus 40 (SV40), which came from the monkey kidney cell cultures used to make the vaccines. Institute of Medicine stated in 2002 that this could contribute to human cancer. Every time you grow human virus on animal tissue you run the risk of picking up an animal virus which would be included in the vaccine. Dr Judy Mikovits wrote, “Every scientist who works with these viruses …recognized the possibility that if you put human tissue and mouse tissue together, the possibility is that you’re going to pick up a virus that is silent in the mouse…but it kills the human or causes serious disease in the human. …[But] you might not see the cancer for two decades.”
Are all those toxins necessary for the efficacy of the vaccine? We don’t know but, as Kennedy notes, what we do know is that since Big Pharma has no liability there is no incentive for Big Pharma to spend the money to even try to make safer vaccines.
(https://childrenshealthdefense.org/news/truth-with-robert-f-kennedy-jr-episode-10/?itm_term=home) But with all those toxic ingredients, does not common sense indicate that vaccines are likely to entail considerable risk of harm? (We will see below that there is strong evidence that children vaccinated according to CDC mandates– and thus their doctor’s recommendations– are much sicker than unvaccinated children.) Would there be any readers here surprised and shocked if it turned out that injecting a stew of poisons into babies and toddlers every few months would have long lasting deleterious effects on their bodies?
When I first read the list of ingredients in vaccines my first thought was that there is no way I would voluntarily allow anyone to inject that into me! My second thought was: How could anyone inject those ingredients into a poor tiny baby? I think there are two kinds of people–those who are appalled when they read the list of ingredients, and those who think, “If the experts say so, it must be fine.”
I expect Everyday Concerned Citizen readers will be appalled. I think ordinary Americans would tend to agree, if they knew – but most don’t bother to investigate. They are convinced by the word of their doctor that vaccines are safe and effective. (Even today’s vaccine safety activists– like Polly Tommey— once trusted their doctors.) Not that their doctors know much if anything about vaccines but Americans assume they know.
Americans assume physicianss are the one profession to which they can safely surrender the care of their bodies and souls —in today’s disenchanted secular world, in the popular imagination doctors are our angels, they are messengers of the gods. The physician is Moses carrying the tablets down from the mountaintop where he or she communed with the Most-High.
To doubt the doctor, to doubt the vaccine, is to question the accumulated wisdom of civilization itself, the goodness of the social order in which we live, it is to disdain, to disrespect, the greatest achievement of the modern world – Medical Science. This is apostasy from civilized society, it is heresy, it is barbarism. Such persons, such contemptible “anti-vaxxers,” deserve to be excommunicated from the civilized world –in another era these blasphemers would have been executed.
By refusing to be vaccinated, they declare their defiance of civilization— these selfish miscreants, refusing the purification of the vaccine, threaten to pollute the tribe which has been purified and consecrated by vaccination. These potential carriers of the dangerous germs can contaminate the community, infest the innocent– they are a menace to society. (It is never explained why the vaxxed are not protected by the vaccines—but no matter, a scapegoat is needed.)
According to the sacred narrative of the Vaccine religion, it was vaccines that saved us from the scourges of smallpox and polio. The fact that historical research casts doubt upon this trope— casts doubt upon the decisive and indispensable role of vaccines, and that there were other factors that accounted for the disappearance of these epidemics (e.g. sanitation, improved hygiene) is irrelevant – to even assert this is itself a sacrilege (Humphries, 2013). Anathema upon the anti-science heretics who doubt vaccines!
The fundamentalist Christian knows that Jesus was the son of God who died for our sins and on the third day rose from the dead. So, the epigones of the Vaccine religion know that vaccines saved humanity from epidemics that threatened the existence of humanity itself, that protected us from suffering, death, pestilence, chaos. The memory of this collective trauma is activated every time the selfish ex-vaxxers attack vaccines today.
They are not only impugning the value of CDC’s ever growing schedule of vaccines—72 jabs for children– they implicitly threaten to undermine the hegemony of the narrative of the triumph of medical Science over chaos, over nature, they depreciate the sacred story of our miraculous redemption by the vaccine, by medical Science. Thus they threaten to destroy the sacred narrative which undergirds the multi-billion dollar vaccine industry–the vaccine industrial complex including Big Pharma, CDC, NIH, pediatricians, politicians and the mainstream media.
Such heretics, such malefactors who seek to convince others to shun vaccines do not deserve an audience. Civilized people should not enter into a debate with “enemies” of society, as The New York Times called them—most of these whiners are parents of vaccine-injured children.
Wrapped in the mantle of Science, the corrupted Editorial Board and publisher of The New York Times declare: “Scientists, especially, are uncomfortable with black-and-white statements, because science is all about nuance. But, in the case of vaccines, there are some hard truths that deserve to be trumpeted. Vaccines are not toxic, and they do not cause autism. Full stop.”
As I have demonstrated here this is categorically not the verdict of science. It is an edict of modern Inquisitors.
Polly Tommey was once deceived by the Times. Most of today’s “anti-vaxxers” were once true believers. They allowed the doctors to vaccinate their children, although they had no idea what was in the vaccines. They trusted the doctors. They became ex-vaxxers because of what they saw happen to their children. But they have never been anti-science.
More now than ever genuine scientists–not those employed by Big Pharma–are confirming the claims of parents of vaccine-injured children. It’s the vaccines that cause autism–in a subset of children who are less resilient. And it’s not just autism– they give many more children less severe chronic illnesses. But vaccine evangelists still want to claim they have the imprimatur of science.
The New York Times claimed in 2005 as it does today, that parents of vaccine-injured children have pitted themselves against science. Kennedy wrote in response that these parents are pitted not against science but against public health authorities who rely not on science but on the reputations of their agencies to exonerate vaccines.
J. B. Handley is an educated layperson who knows his science. Handley is a graduate of Stanford and father of an autistic child—and author of a book on the science of autism praised by leading scientists in the field (Handley, 2018). According to Handley it is the aluminum that causes autism. But although Handley says little about it, before aluminum became the object of attention, critics of vaccines thought it was mercury that caused autism and were able to demonstrate a correlation between mercury in the vaccines and autism. But when mercury was replaced by aluminum autism continued to rise.
Barbara Loe Fisher, a vaccine safety activist and mother of a vaccine injured child stated that “repeated use of multiple vaccines throughout childhood may cause neuroimmune dysfunction [including autism] via a variety of biological mechanisms” (Fisher, 2008, p.95). There are so many toxins in vaccines I do not believe we can put the responsibility on any one chemical. In other words, it is not just the mercury or aluminum that are the critical variables triggering autism–it is all the toxins and how they interact synergistically—and it is at the age at which the vaccines are given.
Nevertheless, scientific progress has been made in the last few years. Scientists who have studied the issue are convinced that vaccines cause autism in a subset of vulnerable children. In the light of what leading scientists who study toxiocology are saying, it is absurd for The New York Times to say science has determined vaccines are safe. This demonstrates that it has failed to uphold minimal standards of responsible journalism–and become little more than an organ of State and corporate propaganda. To reiterate, The Times had declared: “Vaccines are not toxic, and they do not cause autism.” The dirty secret is that it is not the anti-vaxxers who are “anti-science”–it is The New York Times and the mainstream press.
We know now that the brains of autistic children and adults are in a state of permanent inflammation, and there are unusually high concentrations of aluminum in the brains of autistics. Blaylock notes that in a study done in 2005 (Vargas et al study) researchers examined the brains of 11autistics from age 5 years to 44 years of age who had died without active infectious diseases as compared to age-matched controls. “That is, they found widespread activation of inflammatory cells (microglia and astrocytes) in the brains of the autistic patients.”https://www.vaccinationinformationnetwork.com/vaccines-brain-development-and-autism-dr-russell-blaylock-md
Chris Exley, “the world’s leading expert on aluminum neurotoxicity,” found in his famous 2017 study that autistics’ brain were loaded with aluminum: “My group has measured the aluminum content of probably more than one hundred human brains, and these brain tissues taken from the individuals with a diagnosis of autism were some of the highest we’ve measured bar none.” https://jbhandleyblog.com/home/2018/4/1/international2018
Handley explains that this discovery combined with the discovery that autistic brains are in a state of constant inflammation is the key to understanding autism. Handley says the brain’s immune system is in a constant battle with the aluminum that it doesn’t know how to get out of its body (p. 154). Handley notes his son was born in 2002: “He seemed to get sicker with every vaccine appointment and his head was always hurting.” (p.162) Inflammation would lead to a large brain and a swollen forehead. “Is that why children with autism are known to head bang?” (p.162). “We have new credible biological science showing us we are deliberately damaging our babies, and likely creating the autism epidemic” (p162).
The Scientists Talk Back to CDC
The FDA claims that aluminum is safe, a claim of course accepted by the CDC. But what have our regulatory agencies been relying upon to assess the safety of injected aluminum? One single study published in 2011 by Dr. Robert J. Mitkus in the journal Vaccine. Mitkus concluded that “for infants, our study demonstrates that there is little risk for aluminum toxicity following immunizations administered according to ACIP[CDC] recommendations even with maximal exposures to aluminum adjuvant.” (https://vaccinepapers.org/wp-content/uploads/FDA-aluminum-paper.pdf)
As Handley notes, “In no other drug on the planet (except vaccines) would safety standards be determined without using the actual product (aluminum hydroxide) administered in proper way (intramuscularinjection) into proper population (infants).” (Handley, 2018, p.156) Handley quotes a scientist- critic: “Why do the vaccine promoters rely on oral-ingestion studies to defend Al adjuvant safety? It is because they have no experimental research showing that injecting Al adjuvant is safe! They are empty-handed” ( p156-7).
But CDC did not go unanswered. In Canada, France and England scientists who cared about children had been investigating on their own the toxicity of vaccines. In 2017 three of the leading toxicologists in the world got together and decided to jointly write letters to the three organizations supposedly protecting public health–the CDC, FDA and NIH. They obviously consulted each other since their letters were almost identical.
Dr. Christopher Shaw of the University of British Columbia wrote that the studies he did and “the broader existing literature regarding aluminum toxicity lead almost invariably to the conclusion that aluminum in any form is always neurotoxic.” In vaccines “they [adjuvants] may contribute to neurological disorders across the lifespan….In children there is growing evidence that aluminum adjuvants may disrupt developmental processes in the central nervous system and therefore contribute to ASD [autism spectrum disorder] in susceptible children.” He concluded: “In regard to the above it is my belief that CDC’s claim on its website that ‘Vaccines Do Not Cause Autism’ is wholly unsupported.” (Handley, 2018, p.166)
Dr. Chris Exley, a tenured professor at Keele University of Bioinorganic Chemistry and according to Handley, “without peer the leading expert in the world on the neurotoxicity of aluminum” described himself in his letter as“an expert in field of aluminum adjuvants and aluminum toxicity for 30 years during which time I have written in excess of 150 peer reviewed scientific publications.” He continued, “I strongly support the contention that aluminum adjuvants may have a role in the etiology of autism spectrum disorder.” His view is founded on “a scientific and burgeoning body of peer reviewed scientific evidence…The claim of CDC’s website that vaccines do not cause autism is unsupported with respect to aluminum adjuvants and this view stifles important research to determine the safety of aluminum adjuvants used in vaccines.” (Ibid, p.166)
Dr. Romain Gherardi of Universite Paris-Est is an expert in the field of aluminum adjuvant toxicity who has written 40 peer reviewed scientific publications and 1 book on the topic. He wrote, “I strongly support the contention that aluminum adjuvants may have a role in the etiology of autism spectrum disorder.” His view is founded on “a scientific and burgeoning body of peer reviewed scientific evidence.” “The claim of CDC’s website that vaccines do not cause autism is unsupported with respect to aluminum adjuvants…”(p.166)
Thus we see that the public perception shamelessly promoted by the press that vaccines are safe is contested by some of the leading toxicologists in the world. But they are not alone. Even the government’s own experts are now speaking out and contradicting CDC.
Andrew Zimmerman, MD and Richard Kelley, MD are “the two leading mainstream autism scientists in the world” (Handley, 2018, p.170). They were both key witnesses for many years for the government in the Vaccine Court. They were the experts who disputed parents’ claims that vaccines caused their children’s autism–until both of them changed their positions and concluded vaccines caused autism in a subset of children–25-40% of the autistic children, according to Kelley. Zimmerman’s testimony had helped deny the claims of over 5,000 children. Dr Zimmerman was the former director of medical research at the Kennedy Krieger Institute at Johns Hopkins University. Kelley was Professor of Pediatrics at Johns Hopkins University (Ibid,p.170).
In 2008 as a result of his friendship with a colleague who had an autistic daughter, Zimmerman changed his mind. He testified to the Vaccine Court that vaccines caused Hannah Poling’s autism (Handley, p.178). Hannah’s case was settled in her favor with a gag order on the family in 2007 (p.180). This was the end of Zimmerman’s career as a witness for the government in Vaccine Court (p.182).
In 2006 Zimmerman had co-authored with Jon Poling MD an essay about Hannah titled “Developmental Regression and Mitochondrial Dysfunction in a Child with Autism” in the The Journal of Child Neurology (Handley, 2018, p.179). But Hannah was not a singular case–the author had reevaluated the records of all the other patients with autism at Kennedy Krieger Institute and concluded that children with “mitochondrial dysfunction” (which he assumed was genetic) are more likely to become autistic between 18- 30 months if they are vaccinated (Handley, p.179).
In 2016 both Dr. Zimmerman and Dr. Richard Kelley testified in legal depositions in favor of Yates Hazlehurst whose parents claimed he had incurred autism as a result of his sensitivity to repeated vaccinations. Dr. Zimmerman testified that “people who work in the field of autism commonly see a relationship between infection, inflammation and the onset of [autistic]regression” (p195). In other words, inflammation triggered by vaccines leads to autism in susceptible populations. Kelley placed the percentage at 25- 40%.
Kelley acknowledged that he was now arguing for a link between vaccines and autism. The lawyer upon cross-examination inquired “Your opinion is contrary to.. the opinion of the CDC, correct?” Dr. Kelley responded: “It is contrary to their conclusion. It is not contrary to their data” (Handley, p. 199). Kelley could not be more blunt. In other words, As Handley notes: The data shows that vaccines cause autism but CDC does not admit this. This was testimony by 2 men who had been government witnesses for many years.
This testimony was given 3 years before The New York Times wrote that science had concluded “Vaccines are not toxic, and they do not cause autism. Full stop”. The editors of The Times had urged state and federal officials to launch an “aggressive and targeted social media campaign” of surveillance; to “monitor anti-vaccine websites” in order to defeat “the enemy” (See above.) Now it is over a year since the New York Times declared war. A censorship campaign has been launched on Youtube, Facebook, Google — at the behest of our government.
In March, U.S. Congressman Adam Schiff wrote to urge CEOs of Amazon, Facebook, and Google, to censor and delete content that raises doubt about vaccine safety. Other social media and internet giants followed suit including: YouTube, GoFundMe, Twitter, Instagram, Wikipedia, Pinterest, Etsy, and Mail Chimp. In 2019, news outlets such as Huffington Post have also removed dozens of articles about vaccine safety from their website. The press and the politicians are doing the bidding of Big Pharma at the expense of the 1st Amendment (https://ahrp.org/beware-of-medicine-marching-in-lockstep-with-government-personal-reflections)
Vera Sharav, Holocaust survivor and president of Alliance for Human Research Protection, writes that “these industry-funded pro-vaccine collaborators in government, the media, and academia” will not have an open public discussions about vaccines. I would add that Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is not even allowed on any television station. As Vera Sharav writes, “They won’t engage in public debate because their science is rigged, it can’t stand up to independent scrutiny…Caught in a web of deceptions, vaccine stakeholders are resorting to strong-arm police tactics to silence once and for all, those who challenge them. What is at issue globally is the human right to conscientious objection to medical interventions; freedom of choice and freedom of speech — a very dangerous combination.” (https://ahrp.org/beware-of-medicine-marching-in-lockstep-with-government-personal-reflections/)
(To Be Contd. Part Three of this article to follow shortly.)
“NO REAL PANDEMIC, Overestimation of COVID-19 Risk, Informed Consent Needed, Multiple Adverse Events & Animal Deaths in Trials, Humans Are Being Used as Guinea Pigs, Vaccines Can Make the Disease Worse, High Danger to Human Genome & Humanity, Stand Up for Your Children”
Highly qualified physicians, scientists, nurses, academics, and science and medical journalists from the USA, UK, and Europe have come together to present their deep concerns about the novel mRNA COVID vaccines using lipid nanotechnology being rolled out at high speed all over the world by over-eager pharmaceutical corporations and governments, in a video titled “Ask the Experts” which has been banned on Youtube and Facebook and was in fact pulled off Youtube at record speed.
Thankfully, many vigilant citizens and websites have downloaded and preserved the video, posted here below. The video is made by Oracle Films and can also be viewed here at their BrandNewTube site.
While each of the experts speaking on this video tackle different concerns surrounding the COVID “pandemic”–which many state is not a real pandemic and an outright fraud–they all seem to have consensus on the great dangers of this vaccine which is now being pushed by governments as necessary “to return life to normalcy” and state unequivocally that this vaccine has not been proven safe.
In fact, several emphasize that this novel mRNA vaccine has shown high rates of animal deaths in clinical trials, that the UK Government is expecting high rates of adverse events as indicated by their recent advertisement for AI software to database the expect adverse events, that no human studies of the usual kind–taking many years–have been done on this vaccine, and that the novel features of this vaccine including the use of nanotechnology coupled with lack of long-term human studies suggest great uncertainty in terms of long-term effects on the human body, the human genome, and therefore the future of humanity.
Say NO to the Dangerous and Unsafe COVID Vaccine, Say NO for Your Children
Powerful and hard-hitting, this is a video every human on earth should watch and listen to; these are experts whose voice needs heeding. As Dr. Rashid Buttar says in his statement, standing up to say NO is something we need to do for our children at this point if we care about preserving the human genome, human health, and the future of humanity.
A simple awareness to keep in mind is that every single one of the organizations pushing this vaccine worldwide (eg., CDC, WHO, US DOD) has close ties and/or contracts with pharmaceutical corporations–who have been inflicting dangerous vaccines on humans for decades and currently stand to make billions off these COVID vaccines.
Meanwhile, the many public figures in governments and global organizations (such as the WEF) worldwide who are striving to push vaccines on us and threaten vaccine mandates have close ties to the globalist groups (Club of Rome, CFR, Trilateral Commission, Bilderbergers) linked to long-standing secret societies with eugenicist agendas who seek massive depopulation of the planet worldwide.
Of interest is the fact that this video is now being frantically marked by mainstream media — also propped up by Big Pharma and owned by the globalists — as presenting false information. An article by AP News on Dec 9 tries to contest many of the statements in the video, using the deceptive “Fact-Checking” paradigm which has been invented by the entire conglomerate of mainstream media propaganda-masquerading-as-journalism mavens as a means to stop readers from exploring any criticism whatsoever of the pharmaceutical industry and its dangerous bloodstream-injections aka vaccines, while simply reinforcing and restating the falsehoods and false figures invented as part of the worldwide COVID Psy Op holding the world in limbo: Video contains a litany of false claims about COVID-19 and vaccines
However, several writers, journalists, and websites today thankfully are pointing out the harms of mainstream media’s destructive ignoring of the facts and truth being presented by scientists and physicians worldwide, including this group of medical experts whose #AskTheExperts video has gone viral.
Covileaks, which has helped make the video offers more information, please visit for more articles and videos offering the facts and deeper investigation into the many fraudulent and deceiving aspects of the worldwide “COVID pandemic”: Covileaks.
Please watch and share this post and video widely. If anyone knows of a transcript to this video, please post in comments or send on to me at firstname.lastname@example.org–I will post it, thanks.
Post from Facebook/Posted at Anti Corruption Ireland 11/28/2020 | Ramola D | 11/30/2020
This is a deeply disturbing video of a young woman “tased in Spain for the crime of bringing her mother to a medical appointment.” Not merely is the young woman in grievous fear and pain at being beset by a group of bulky police officers, she is then brutally injured with a taser–a violent conducted-energy device which shoots a physical projectile into the body causing extreme shock and pain, covered earlier at this site here–and jumped on physically by this group of young armed men, causing both physical shock and injury and psychological trauma. She is then tased Multiple times!
Imagine if this young girl were your daughter, or sister. What is also shocking is that the police do not heed calls from bystanders to stop hurting her, and stop people from approaching to help her, and that people do not push through and stop these men from assaulting her. Note: this is most definitely Assault and Battery, in addition to grievous electroshocking and terrorizing.
This video establishes the brutality of these Spanish governmental actions in permitting police to behave this way, with no concern for the basic human rights of this young woman. This is a grave human rights atrocity and a violation of all civil society.
This is not Public Health, when police can electroshock an innocent young woman citing imaginary fears over an imaginary virus which no government has proved exists, which, by CDC/WHO’s own estimates has a 99.97% recovery rate, and which has not been proven to cause a single death worldwide–although lots of varying data regarding cases and deaths keeps being flung about by governments, none of whom can prove that old age and co-morbidities was not the cause of death in all cases.
This is tyranny pure and simple, and should not be tolerated. Please share this post and video widely, send it to every member of the Spanish government, demand the immediate suspension of the entire group of police officers involved and demand that police be stopped from using tasers.
For too long, people have sat back and permitted police to keep arming themselves, regulating themselves, and permitting themselves to use deadlier and deadlier weapons on people. Tasers are listed as “non-lethal” or “less-lethal” weapons in the United States, but they are as can be seen in this video, just extremely savage in their mechanism and effect, and have no place among humans (or animals for that matter), and should be Banned.
Police also have no business terrorizing a young woman like this.
It is time for each of us to speak up for each other. Please speak up for this victimized young girl and her mother, please let the world know the Spanish government cannot be permitted to behave in this fashion, this is absolutely unacceptable. It is not human, it is not normal, it should be stopped.
Exclusive Reportage on Counter-Terrorism “Manufactured-Target” Targeting & Gross Human Rights Violations in Amoral Human Experimentation Crimes by Intelligence Agencies, Law (Lie) Enforcement, & US/NATO Military Divisions: Off-the-Charts Torture & Abuse of “Targeted Individuals”
Free Keene’s web site/A peace-liberty-voluntarism project pursuing and promoting peaceful living in Free Keene, New Hampshire
Free State Project
Free State Project’s website/A Liberty in our Lifetime project in New Hampshire, pursuing liberty, community, and peaceful living
New Earth Project
New Earth Project website/Open platform to unite humanity and create initiatives to support the emergence of absolute freedom and sovereign creative expression for all
Public Intelligence Blog
Blog for Earth Intelligence Network, Phi Beta Iota the Public Intelligence Blog/Promotes hybrid transparent governance, collective intelligence, true cost economics, and whole systems understanding