Several critically-enquiring journalism sites, media analysts, and writers have examined the construct of Newsguard and revealed its ties to major pharmaceutical companies, arms companies, foreign and domestic governments, military divisions of governments, intelligence agencies, and security agencies.
Propaganda Upholding and Promoting is Not Journalism: Newsguard Should Be Called Propagandaguard
The agenda of arms companies–Defense contractors of every stripe, drug companies, surveillance technology companies, banks, military and security agencies, agricultural companies, biotech companies, food and drink companies is writ large daily in the biased reportage of every newspaper, television station, radio station owned and operated by the conglomerate of corporations who currently run the face of major publishing in the USA and world.
This is why none of the media outlets featured in this infographic (right) from Webfx cover crime, corruption, and entrenched hostility to independent media and human and civil rights advocates, as expressed in the incredible and ongoing practices of EMF/Neurotech/Life Takedown targeting the outspoken, the aware, the critically-thinking, the conscious, the spiritual, the dynamic, the powerful, the individualistic, the truthtelling, which governments, local law, federal agencies, military divisions, Universities, and the medical industry are together executing, in complete defiance of all morality, lawfulness, decency, civility, and humanity–while continuing to uphold the practices of illegal watchlisting and promoting the Communist and Fascist aims of the AI-Transhumanist crowd pursuing Global Slavery Digitalism (misleadingly titled the Great Reset or Fourth Industrial Revolution).
The “New World Order” is a Very Old Disorder with Some UltraNew Tech being run by the overly-egoistic, massively amoral contingent comprising the corporate oligarchy behind all governments today.
And that is only one aspect–but a very large and very central one–of the kind of biased coverage and propagandizing reportage promoting the products and operations which equip and produce profit for unethical Defense/Well, Really Offense technology, drugs, vaccines, pesticides, GMO biotech and related corporations today.
Many talented writers are employed to high tune at the spots “greenlabeled” by Newsguard to obfuscate the harms of extremely intrusive bio-hacking/neuro-hacking technology now being used by the Surveillance Industry and Medical Industry, the harms of pharmaceutical drugs, the harms of the poison-injections many of us have been miseducated to believe are medicinal and healing “vaccines,” the harms of propaganda and lies behind the long-running and currently-escalated thrust of Psy Ops AKA Cognitive Warfare today being run by the banking-military-intelligence-industrial-corporate-crime-syndicate on their own populations, as evinced most readily by the recent Coronavirus/Covid “pandemic” hoax, and the ongoing cascade of fabricated dangerous-viruses-and-variants: Delta Plus, Omicron, Monkeypox (and Orangutanpox, just round the corner, right next to Elephantpox, just wait!).
Meanwhile sites like LifesiteNews which report the horrors of COVID vaccine damage and The Epoch Times, Gateway Pundit, Zero Hedge, Breitbart.com which question corporate-media narratives and lies get red-labeled by Newsguard, as this article examining Newsguard’s sloppy and openly false ratings of Breitbart reveals:
In fact, it appears Newsguard promotes hoaxes, false-narratives, and fake news–that’s called promoting propaganda and Psy Ops put out by the corporate faction seeking to wreak profit from people’s ignorance and gullibility:
Obviously, they have piqued my interest in finding out who they are, hence this current probe and reveal.
Back in 2018 when Newsguard first started up their operations, publishing their association with Publicis Group which holds up Big Pharma and their roots in mainstream corporate media which had already distinguished itself to me as publishing cover stories and psy-ops to conceal the modern-day barbarism of EMF/Neurotech/Life Takedown Targeting which I have been covering since 2014, it was apparent to me the psy-opping set operative in corporate media was seeking desperately to shore up their narratives with fake and foolish “labels of credibility” and invincible “badges of journalistic accuracy” and “trustworthiness”–a venture I like many dismissed as misled, transparently off-color, and false-reality-enhancing, which it patently is.
It is clear from looking into who owns and runs Newsguard, what it promotes and what it demotes, what it greenlabels and what it redlabels, that the Council on Foreign Relations, the Atlantic Council, the DOD, the CIA, the NSA, the clique of governments, corporates, Big Tech, Big Pharma et al who sit behind it and seek to keep spinning their stories and lies to suppress, misinform, disinform, repress us all while keeping their own motors running interminably into people-suppressing and truth-suppressing futures are the ones working hard to marginalize, disappear, shut down, and discredit truth-telling, fact-reporting, openly questioning and candidly free-speech sites such as this one.
When “News Reviewing Sites” Win Prizes from the Pentagon & State Department, You Know What That Means: Propaganda Alert!
Another brilliant article ripping the blinders off Newsguard:
Especially check out the video clips of Richard Stengel (embedded in that article) whose unhinged espousal of “Master Narratives” to deceive people has to be listened to to be believed:
And then there’s the DOD/State Dept awardwinning for merging bizarre red and green labeling to disappear journalism with AI to deceive AI as well and turn AI into Deceptor AI and Communism Full Spectrum AI:
What School Students and Journalism Students Should Really Know
The narratives being promoted by “fact-checkers” like Newsguard are false and false-reality-building: these narratives are the ones published by their patrons, advisers, sponsors and greenlabeled pals in media.
The “misinformation” touted by Newsguard is Deviance-from-the-Official-Narrative: they promote the Official Narrative in everything, whether it be about a cold virus called the Big Bad Wolf of COVID or about a deadly mRNA-technology killing people called “Safe and Effective”.
The “disinformation” “false news” “fake news” Newsguard warns of is information Big Pharma, Big Tech, Big Government doesn’t want you to examine closely–because it’s true.
The “greenlabels” “redlabels” are ways to get you to stop thinking for yourself and rely on fake labels from Establishment mavens instead, hiding behind “journalistic truth and accuracy” touted by a non-independent, non-journalistic organization with openly advertised ties to Pharma, Government, Military et al.
Are you really going to accept what Anyone says is “journalistic truth and accuracy” “trustworthy” “credible” without checking it out for yourself?Which journalism school teaches blind belief in a label?
The labeling in fact is a way to brainwash children and journalism students into reliance long-term on someone else doing your thinking for you.
Welcome to the AI-run, Neuro-Modifying Age of Brain Takeover in Interests of Full Spectrum Compliance, little ones! Is this what parents want for their children?
Newsguard is Targeting Schoolchildren and Students for Patent Imbecility, while Trojan Communism-Embracing Teachers Greenlight This Disgrace
Not merely insidious, what Newsguard is doing is promoting the agenda of widespread Communist brainwashing.
Making things easy with an app or browser add-on and then getting large numbers of schools, libraries, and federations of teachers to install this app and promote this app is an act of technological colonization–and one which every thinking child, journalism student, and concerned parent should reject in its entirety, if they care about independent thinking, discerning truth from Psy Ops, and learning with their own minds, that is.
A January 2022 press release from the American Federation of Teachers reads:
“The American Federation of Teachers has launched a national partnership with a leading anti-misinformation tool NewsGuard(link is external) to protect and champion legitimate journalism and fact-based reporting and to help educators and their students navigate a sea of online disinformation.
Under the terms of the pathbreaking licensing agreement, coinciding with National News Literacy Week(link is external), the AFT’s 1.7 million members, tens of millions of kids they teach, and their families, can now receive free, real-time “traffic light” news ratings and detailed “Nutrition Label” reviews, via a licensed copy of NewsGuard’s browser extension, whenever they search the web for news and information….
AFT President Randi Weingarten hailed the deal as a game-changer for teachers and families drowning in an ocean of online dishonesty: “We are constantly trying to help our students, particularly our middle, high school and postsecondary students, separate fact from fiction, as we help them develop their critical-thinking and analytical skills.
“NewsGuard is a great tool in this regard. It is a beacon of clarity to expose the dark depths of the internet and uplift those outlets committed to truth and honesty rather than falsehoods and fabrications. This historic deal will not only help us steer clear of increasingly fetid waters—it will provide a valuable lesson in media literacy and a discussion point for teachers in class on what can, and can’t, be trusted.”
Noble goals, but the problem is Newsguard is not committed to truth and honesty anymore than any of its greenlit outlets are–in fact, the dedication to falsehood, fabrication, propaganda, company-speak these outlets display clarifies they’re not practicing journalism but Pharmalism–or Armalism and certainly in all cases Harmalism.
And I can assure AFT’s sadly-deceived teachers out there, as a 20-year college teacher of critical thinking, expository writing, creative writing, English composition, and Literature, you don’t help your students “separate fact from fiction” and “develop their critical-thinking and analytical skills” by feeding them labels from an organization flown by Establishment corporations, you seek instead to facilitate their thinking for themselves–by probing sources and affiliations themselves, thinking deeply, researching widely, discussing openly, and speaking and writing freely. The opposite of accepting canned labels in fact.
When Evidence is Dismissed as Not-Evidence, and Facts Dismissed as Insignificant, No-One Need Pay Attention to Newsguard
I won’t therefore be responding to Newsguard’s transparently invalid attacks (which I’ll post below) which falsely allege “false-claims” in face of published evidence, and parrot the words of insider operatives who prop up extant propaganda narratives (5G harms no-one, VAERS reports mean nothing, no evidence children have died from the COVID vaccine, Graphene Oxide is not in the vaccines, nor is nanotechnology, etc.).
Someone Called Anicka Slachta Emailed Me Twice from Newsguard
Unlike Anicka Slachta, I don’t work for a corporate front organization, I don’t engage in investigative journalism with a set of rote questions requiring someone else to do my work for me, I don’t make false-accusations, and I don’t imagine Newsguard’s ratings mean anything other than further attack and attempt to discredit and marginalize both truth journalism and truth journalists from the same Establishment corporate crowd running Psy Ops and Terror Ops on the populace.
It is time we began to expose the entire cartel of lying media and their supportive fact-wreckers and truth-cremators for what they really are.
No doubt Newsguard will seek out their brightest red for a label for this media site and magazine (any labeling of which I reserve the right to further address in writing and notice as I see fit)–being incapable of recognizing truth, fact, or opinion when they see it apparently–but if I were in the business of handing out colors for labels to pin to Arma-Pharma-Harma apologists, they can be assured the Colors of Communism are what they’d receive from me.
Newsguard is practicing Psy Opping of an entire populace on a very large scale — but as many true-media journalists note, the reading, listening, and questioning populace worldwide is awakening at a very rapid rate today, and can indeed discern the truth for themselves.
Report & Op-Ed | Ramola D | January 10, 2022/Updated Jan 12, 2022
with Evidence of Nanotech in Nasal Test Swabs
On January 7, the US Department of Defense put out a press release marking a $51.6 million contract to Goldbelt Security LLC in Virginia for antigen test kits intended for 500 million at-home free test kits to be handed out to Americans.
Goldbelt Security is a seemingly modest native-owned, Alaskan company with under two million in annual sales revenue apparently run by a group of retired Special Operations veterans focused on partnering with larger companies and moving supplies from manufacturers to government in domestic and foreign sales, in particular, curiously, Defense and Medical equipment, from ammunition, weapons, trucks, explosives to PPE, farm implements, and survival gear. It also, astonishingly, provides custom shipping and law enforcement training: the Hicks Police Training System which “utilizes manipulation of the nervous and skeletal system. Every sequence of manipulation is controlled until the suspect submits.”
This is in fact a hard-core military Defense contractor which offers the Federal Government “sole source contracting” which is non-competitive; in a pinch, it can direct Federal monies–without a long-drawn-out RFP, competitive process–directly to its network of providers, an easy channel for material establishment of Federal agenda, which in the case of COVID, many of us know, is a DARPA and WEF/WHO and UN agenda, as evidenced by “The Great Reset” and pandemic preparedness plans covered here earlier. It also seems to be connected to this Goldbelt Inc. corporation with much larger revenue, native shareholders, and land holdings bringing the people of Alaska into direct participation in the Federal military agenda.
Curiously, this contractor has its feet in both Defense and Medical worlds–the growing connection between these is increasingly becoming chillingly clear as we peruse documents and plans: all evidence points to the slow but definitive build-up of an impending military-medical dictatorship, global and local, to be resisted at all cost by anyone who treasures organic humanity, life, and freedom.
Note for one, that Goldbelt was one of the first Operation Warp Speed contractors, pocketing $125 million to deliver 530 million syringes and needles: “This CARES Act-funded effort is part of the ongoing collaboration between HHS and the DOD’s Joint Acquisition Task Force (JATF) to supply the SNS with critical medical resources.”
The SNS is the Strategic National Stockpile, which stockpiles all manner of medical and emergency products in case of weather, medical, or other emergencies in the USA. That DOD and DHHS–Defense & Health and Human Services–are becoming increasingly chummy was noted in this must-read article examining the testing landscape earlier:
MOUS, Contracts, Plans, Strategies: These Mark the Direction to Dictatorship They’re Headed In
The Defense Assisted Acquisition Cell–DA2–in fact represents the setting-in-stone of the military takeover of Health and Public Health in the name of national security, “bio-security,” and “health security,” callwords used by the WEF and Klaus Schwab as well as by the WHO, rationalizing organizational appropriation of people’s individual choices in healthcare worldwide, a key target for takedown: “Public Health” is the mega callword there, striving to erase individual latitude in healthcare forever.
The DA2 was organized on a Memorandum of Understanding. A FOIA request I made to the DOD for that MOU between Defense and Health projecting a pandemic-preparedness agenda for eternity was lobbed into DHHS’ court and remains unanswered, to be further appealed. What exactly are they hiding?
But their plans are writ large in other documents, a few considered below.
Let’s note first that before that Goldblatt contract, Millipore Sigma, a subsidiary of Merck, a mega German pharmaceutical company, was awarded a 3-year $136.7 million contract to manufacture nitrocellulose membranes for use in antigen testing kits in Sheboygan, Wisconsin–engaging the people of Wisconsin, many deprived of jobs and businesses no doubt by the depredations of COVID-constraints and lockdowns in manufacturing test-materials all the way up to 2025.
83.3 (Freemasonic 33 signaling) million tests are slated for production per month “for COVID-19 testing and future needs.” Multiply that by 36 (3 years worth of production) and you get nearly 3 billion tests: 2.998,800, 000.
Ponder that for a minute: Sheboygan, Wisconsin plans to belt out (nitrocellulose membranes for) 3 billion COVID tests by 2025. Very clear therefore that DOD–along with friendly neighborhood arm DHHS–envisions continuous roll-out of these tests, meaning continued fear-pushing and narrative-building of pandemic, along with constraints, restraints, protocols, all the way into 2025 (after which other pandemics will pick up the agenda, as shown below).
Batteile, Eurofins, and Perkins-Elmer were earlier awarded large contracts to facilitate the forced testing of schoolchildren and other groups through 2022, 2023, 2024, as reported here.
A Reuters article on this contract notes that there are many such testing contracts being handed out, and soon we’ll be seeing a lot more press releases about a lot more companies being pulled into test-manufacturing.
“The government is invoking the Defense Production Act (DPA) to award the contract and has many more similar contracts in the works, the official said. The Biden administration has used the DPA – a 1950s Korean war-era law which gives federal agencies the power to prioritize procurement orders related to national defense – to speed production of swabs and pipettes for COVID-19 test production previously.”
Antigen Tests Still Need Invasive Nasal Swabs
Nitrocellulose membranes are used in pregnancy tests and offer a convenient, snappy, portable portmanteau for COVID tests.
Nasal swabs being pushed into nostrils and throats therefore have not ended.
What is especially concerning is that these tests are being slated for regular and repeated use for children, and for all adults making regular visits to their doctors’ offices. What they presage is a complete overturning of bodily freedom as we have it and a complete paradigm shift into slavish submission to medical technicians, primary care doctors, and school nurses on a permanent basis as children are forced to test continually–every day in public schools in fact if they evidence one little sniffle or cough–as well as mask continually and be sent off to get the mRNA-based vaccines continually, as the COVID-narrative expands into the Delta-variant-narrative, and Omicron-variant-narrative, and Next-Greek-letter-narrative.
Invasive, Continuous Testing-and-Compliance is Rolled Out in Public Schools Under Cover of Omicron Narrative
This is the letter from a local high school sent last week to Quincy Public School parents, as Massachusetts sinks into the dark fog of deceitful Omicron-Narratives and seeks to inflict the most horrific Mind Control as well as enslaving Body Control on public schoolchildren as prerequisite for continuing to attend school:
This is my letter to the school and to the superintendent, which no-one has responded to. I am aware I am not the only parent in Quincy appalled by the masking and forced-testing of our children, nor in Massachusetts, as thousands of parents have assembled on social media to publish their protest–again, being ignored by school bureaucrats.
School Refusal to Respond to Parental Concerns Occurs Within Context of Militarized Subjugation of American Communities
That Massachusetts and the USA have become a crude Banana Republic with a secret Gestapo in action is therefore already well-known to this writer, who has covered this subject extensively, including in Memoranda to President Trump in 2017 and in 2019. Documented evidence of Military/Intelligence/Law Enforcement crimes being enacted on the populace using anti-personnel technologies can be found here.
Most people shielded from this knowledge by media deceptions and blackouts however have not known a State-and-Military coup has already been run on the populace and is continuously in action, until the COVID fraud hit.
Now, with this intensification of stricture and directive in schools, testing contracts binding Pharma to Military, Omicron-narratives picking up in media as COVID-vaccine deaths, injuries are ignored, despite thousands of doctors and scientists speaking out, the intended full-on subjugation of pretty much every single American, man, woman, and child becomes clear.
It is both insidious and sinister.
Red Alert: Paradigm Shift Ahead
The intention appears to be to transform reality into a continuous, subjugating round of tests, masks, and vaccines, and getting people used to 1) staying masked and masking their children–a surefire way to increase toxin load and perpetuate disease, as many scientists and physicians have pointed out (only to be censored off all mainstream media and social media, which clearly points to Agenda, not Science); 2) submit nonstop, month after month and year after year to invasive nasal and throat procedures in the name of “COVID tests”; and 3) then line up compliantly for the next round of booster shots and doses laced variably with nanographene and other delectables massing together inside once-organic-human bodies to form synthetic electronic meshes and circuits intended to permit even more invasive remote-access-by-radiation and remote manipulation of body functions and human behavior.
All by way of rationalizing nanobiosensors as “emerging technologies” and inevitable Next-Level progress in telemedicine. A “Public Health” handover to a sweeping Military-Medical appropriation aptly labeled a Military Coup, as Dr. Robert Young describes in the statement to all humanity he shared recently on Newsbreak 142, which can also be read here.
White House Vision for Pandemics Forever: The DARPA Virus-to-Vaccine Pipeline Advertised
DARPA takes full credit for the creation of the mRNA vaccine as a transformer of the human body into a bioreactor–such a remarkable use of language–to create pathogens/biothreats deployed to attack itself. (Something the FDA didn’t notice apparently when they approved the Pfizer and Moderna EUAs.) “Prophylactic antibodies” surely came after. (In Germ Theory, the immune system kicks into action after being attacked by “viruses”; in Terrain Theory, the immune system sends in cleaner cells after toxins invade. We must all be reminded continually that Germ Theory, as Dr. Young, Dr. Kaufman, and many other discerning physicians tell us, with its cornucopia of Viruses, has never been proved.)
DARPA’s ADEPT:PROTECT Vignette tells us mRNA-vaccines were worked on from 2012. (The use of mRNA in drug-delivery for cancer predates this, as discussed in other articles here earlier. DARPA’s Regina Duggan and Dan Wittendorf’s part in this was discussed here.) The intention to use these gene-based vaccines as immediate-use-for-pandemics was built into their design.
EXCERPTS, ADEPT:PROTECT VIGNETTE:
And the intention to take mRNA-vaccines well into the future is discussed quite candidly in American Pandemic Preparedness where plans to develop such “programmable platforms” for 26 families of viruses are mentioned, and the military-sounding “Transformation of our Medical Defenses” includes global strategizing.
Expect 26 New Pandemics Ahead with Gene-Modifying mRNA “Programmable Platforms” for Each: Snip by Snip to Humans 2.0
One of the key thrusts of this projective document–to be fully-addressed in a Techno Talk at my subscriber-channel soon–is that new pandemics and nonstop testing in diagnostics and vaccines in “protection” are fully intended; not foreseen, not predicted, not prophesied, but fully intended. The nonstop-pandemic scenario addressed on this site earlier is writ large in this document; there is no other way to read this text. “Serious biological threats will occur at an increasing frequency.”
The gist of this document and the advertised Strategy on Biodefense and Pandemic Preparedness it aims to build envisions the creation of a very large infrastructure to support a new era of absolute obsession with viruses, virus-detection, virus-spread along with “biomonitoring,” “biosurveillance,” global “pandemic monitoring,” contact-tracing, continuous-testing, continuous submission to new mRNA vaccines (for 26 families of viruses, to be developed), boosters and directives from Pharma-run-CDC-and-Public-Health to isolate, quarantine, lockdown, line up, offer nostrils, mask up, breathe less (masks inhibit breathing), speak less (masks inhibit speaking), double down and comply with every single inane “guidance,” “directive,” and “mandate” from a Virus-Obsessed Government.
What is intended is nothing less than a complete paradigm shift from individual responsibility for your health to a handover of your health completely to the Gestapo of Public Health departments and officials, trusting helplessly in virologists, epidemiologists, and their vast train of physicians, technicians, nurses well-trained by the pharmaceutical industry to believe in the Virus-to-Vaccine pipeline as salvation, surrendering all ability to think for yourself.
What is intended is a complete transformation of reality as we have it into submission and compliance–much as Australia is modeling today (although a great movement is building there and one hopes, will overturn the ongoing tyranny).
What is intended, particularly, is an acceptance of Biodefense, Biosurveillance, Biosecurity: military terms in line with the aggressions and overreach of the ongoing “national security state” also known as a police state. The language of military domineering is not incidental, it appears to have been carefully chosen to fall into the continuum of “Surveillance” which has today become overwhelmingly present, across all arenas of existence. Biosurveillance is an extension of Surveillance, which the ever-growing behemoth of “Security” has appropriated for itself as a right, incrementally no doubt across decades but at this point overwhelmingly, post 9-11 and the incessant War on Terror.
It is this transformation which the merging of Defense and Health in the acquisition arm DA2 portends; the use of language like Medical Defense and Bio Defense attempts to transform how we see health into Battlefield Central–a space for constant fighting-back, as Viruses attack us, and the great Military and Public Health there as our defenders, helping us fight back.
For those still unclear what this is, the Borg of Star Trek offer a clue. Cyborg as a word is the combination of Cybernetics and Organism. The mad scientists working for the slaveowners, the central bankers and privateers of the ruthless bloodline Mafia families who have been oppressing humanity for centuries, as Dean Henderson described in Report 206, have a mighty dream: to transform all humans into cyborgs. Nanobioelectronics shows the way.
In this paradigm of transformation, every medical intervention consented-to by the populace will comprise a route to that intended hybridizing–which has already begun with the chem-trails (denied by perpetraitor-governments but well established by whistleblower scientists, researchers, investigative journalists), investigated at length by Clifford Carnicom, Tony Pantelleresco, Suzanne Mahr, Celeste Solum, many others, testified to by many “targeted individuals” unlawfully abused and tortured in military experimentation with nanotechnology, well-described by Elana Freeland in Geo-Engineered Transhumanism: masks, tests, nasal swabs, vaccines.
Several whistleblowers examining the planned digital financial system have exposed how nanotechnology is intended for use in digital bio surveillance, including recently Melissa Ciummei,Alison MacDowell and Catherine Austin Fitts (Planet Lockdown interviews).
It appears now that the entire field of virology–exposed as a false science by many scientists–with its steadily building Virus-to-Vaccine pipeline has been building up to this moment for decades.
It is profound government corruption and a treasonous betrayal of humanity which aligns with pharmaceutical and banker power and turns viscerally on the citizenry, devising massive paradigm and infrastructural change to do so.
Nano graphene in the COVID injections is thought to be responsible for the blood clotting and breathing problems bringing the double vaccinated in droves into the hospitals–and being re-diagnosed as COVID-sufferers. Dr. Charles Hoffe and Dr. Bhakdi have described the phenomenon of micro-clotting which all vaccinated patients are manifesting. Thousands of doctors and scientists have called for an immediate halt to the deadly mRNA vaccines.
“Pandemic Preparedness” a Careful Narrative, to Push Virus-Fear and Vaccine-Reliance: When Vaccines (& Nasal Swabs, Masks) Are Vectors for Transforming Humans Into Cyborgs, Just Say NO
When governments fail the people and push forward self-profiting but vastly destructive paradigms–such as “pandemic preparedness” and “biodefense”–it is up to the people to get informed and take independent action to reject such harms: by saying NO to all pernicious medical interventions intending stealth-cyborging: tests, nasal swabs, masks, vaccines, and focus on real routes to real health instead–offered by all the great traditions of healing, worldwide, alternative medicine, holistic medicine, energy medicine, nutrition, herbals, exercise, yoga. The route to toppling vast and entrenched behemoths of power intending serious harm to the entire world starts at a very plausible point: the individual. You and I–although we’re incessantly told otherwise by The Establishment–have the power to topple this crude and insane narrative of the Pandemic Platform to the ground. Just say NO.
I ask everyone therefore to share my work widely on your social media and other platforms (please download/upload my videos on your channels; re-post my articles, reports, posts, reposts at your websites, with linkback) so all those being deceived by mainstream media may learn the truth and save their children from the harms and planned digital enslavement intended by the non-vaccines, aerosols (chem trails), radiation, and other means of humanity-takeover being used against us.
In a must-watch interview at the Critically Thinking with Dr. P and Dr. T show on September 30, 2021, Dr. Carrie Madej discusses (with Dr. Larry Palevsky and Dr. Christiane Northrup) what she has found under the microscope in a couple of vials of the Moderna and Johnson and Johnson vaccines and reveals the horrifying discovery of a very strange and seemingly self-aware organism which viewers of the Stew Peters Show where she recently revealed these findings have identified as possibly Hydra Vulgaris.
Dr. Carrie’s findings were first discussed anonymously in this article with pictures earlier here:
In that article, which included the publication of flouroscent fibres, self-assembling nano particulates, and apparent carbon nanotubes, Dr. Madej also mentioned a seemingly self-conscious spidery-looking organism coming to the edge of the plate and seemingly rising up to look at the eyepiece of the microscope. Here in the Dr. T and Dr. P interview, she describes this further, explaining that after viewers informed her about the Hydra Vulgaris which does have the capacity to balance on adhesive feet, she thinks that what she saw may well be this very organism since it did seem to be able to balance itself on one sticky leg and rise up in space to weave about.
This was further pictured on the Stew Peters Show on Sep 29, 2021:
Further delving into this information online she found that Hydra Vulgaris is seen as one of the 6 “model organisms” by the Human Genome Project and is being studied at the University of Davis in the biology department at the level of gene sequences as illustrated here for its remarkable properties of regeneration and renewal and seeming immortality.
Turns out the National Genome Research Institute has a whole project devoted to this organism titled the Hydra 2.0 Genome Project Portal and has several Universities engaged in the study of this organism, a strain of which has been created from a single polyp picked up from a Japanese swamp.
Dr. Madej also mentions that she found that the hydra vulgaris is being studied in cancer research in mRNA usage for drug delivery along with gold nanorobots and DNA-coated gold nanoparticles, as in this article: DNA – Coated gold nanoparticles for the detection of mRNA in live Hydra vulgaris animals.
Clearly, she says this opens up a new field of inquiry for all serious researchers regarding how these organisms are being used and studied in the Human Genome Project, their connections to the Humans 2.0 transhumanism project, and their implications for the current ongoing conversion of human biology to transhuman biology–a non-consented human-transformation project which really should be named a major scientific Crime Against Humanity.
This latter, Dr. Christiane Northrup notes, is something that has been ongoing for a long time through the aerosols, the water, the chem trails: we probably all have these and other organisms, she says–both actual biological organisms and parasites at the micro level, as well as synthetic biology with AI-fibres or carbon nanotubes, Morgellons’ fibres–in our bodies and we all need to work on removing these parasites from our bodies. She mentions detox protocols from Gene Decode (Blessed 2 Teach) and alfalfa baths to draw out the organisms.
Notably, the Carnicom Disclosure Project has been revealing the findings of transhumanism intentions from the aerosols–as evidenced in Morgellons fibres, strange syn-bio bacteria, and nanoparticulates and nanobiology found in rainwater, soil, blood, urine, tissue–for over twenty years now, and confirmation of what Dr. Northrup suggests can be found in Clifford Carnicom’s reports and papers, as discussed here earlier.
Other microorganisms have been found earlier in the Moderna and Pfizer vaccines, notably Trympanosoma Cruzi, as reported here earlier:
The big question now of course is, as Dr. Palevsky enumerates: how does a “model organism” get into a vaccine, how much do the vaccinated have to suffer before scientists in government and Universities step forward to examine the vaccines themselves, under microscopes, and how contaminated does a vaccine have to be before it is pulled from the market?
Very bad actors with very dark transhumanist intentions clearly are experimenting on a horrific scale with these vaccines, much as history teaches us other manic experimenters and controlling despots have in the past; the main focus now is, how can they be stopped–and how can this information reach the world?
Given Moderna’s funding by DARPA, it must be noted this vaccine is clearly a Military Bioweapons Experimentation Project, with, as has been established, complete lack of research controls, no clinical trials, no disclosure on vaccine ingredients--now found by multiple teams of researchers to be extremely dangerous to human health, loaded with nanometallics, graphene, PEG lipids, self-assembling nanotech, flourescing nanotech, and now also parasites and microorganisms, in addition to their base bioweapons profile of thrusting mRNA into cells to provoke the manufacture of pathogenic spike proteins. Deaths and vaccine injuries continue to mount into the millions at VAERS databases--and the reason is now clear, given what we are learning has been put into these killer vaccines. Dr. Northrup recently named these vaccines a “murder weapon” and that does not seem to be an exaggeration.
Other Parasites Traced to the Blood of Vaccinated People
A significant discovery that has been made recently is that parasites–the same parasites identified in the vaccines– have been found in the blood of vaccinated people.
The parasite Trympanosoma Cruzi found in the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine by a team of scientists as reported here, has been found in the blood of a vaccinated person who recorded her adverse reactions in the CDC VAERS database and in several others recorded in the MHRA Yellow Card database, as reported here. These parasites are linked to heart disease–which is indeed being reported by thousands who have taken the Pfizer and other vaccines.
Now, in breaking news today (Oct 2, 2021), Dr. Young has published two new micrographs in his cornerstone Electron Scanning Microscopy article, showing the presence of Graphene and Parasites in blood clots found in dried blood from a vaccinated individual, which he has described in detail in Newsbreak 134 at Ramola D Reports recorded today, to be published shortly.
This is a larger and highly unsettling story in itself, which will be reported separately at this site shortly.
Nanolipids and Flouroscence Found in Johnson and Johnson Vaccine; Micro Creature with Tentacles Found in Moderna Vaccine
Dr. Carrie Madej’s descriptions of her findings on the Sep 29 Stew Peters show (video linked below) reveal that the Johnson and Johnson vaccine, supposedly a viral vector vaccine and not an mRNA vaccine such as the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines, are also loaded with allergenic fatty lipids and greasy PEG (polyethylene glycol) as her pictures of what she found under her optical compound microscope (posted below) illustrate.
In addition, she says she found all kinds of bright and vibrant colors emerging from the drops of vaccine on her plate, which, in conversation with nanotechnologists and biotech engineers she has found to be superconductive nanoparticulates flourescing on activation with white light (which the microscope is equipped with) and possibly related to injectable computer systems–of the kind being surmised to form nanobiosensors which are indeed part of the documented transhumanist, bio-digitizing plans for humanity the transhumanism-pushers have published (some of which was reported here earlier).
She also describes in this conversation the micro-organism with tentacles and adhesive feet pictured above and identified tentatively as Hydra Vulgaris, from viewer comments and information after this interview.
New images shared by Dr. Carrie Madej from her microscopy examinations of Johnson and Johnson vaccine and Moderna vaccine are below:
Dr. Madej reports crying over these findings in the vaccine and says that what all of this microscopy in conjunction with the vaccine deaths and injuries is revealing is very dark harmful intent for Artificial Intelligence intrusion into the human body by the pharmaceutical and military industries, and no-one should stand back and let it continue. “This is the time that we do not–we do not take this kind of oppression and suppression anymore. We are children of God–we choose to be, right–and I for one will not stand for it.”
Please share this article and information widely. See Toxins Found in COVID Vaccines, Masks, Swabs for a listing of all articles here and at a few other sites reporting the findings of toxins in the COVID vaccines. Please send these articles to mainstream media reporters as well as friends and family to inform all about the catastrophe facing humanity today with these identified toxins and nanobio elements in the vaccines–and the need to halt the vaccines immediately.
Disturbing information about nano graphene oxide is now surfacing after the recent bombshell report by La Quinta Columna scientists and University of Almeria marking a high volume–98-99% of contents–of Nano Graphene Oxide and only a tiny fraction of the much-touted mRNA in the Pfizer and Astrazeneca vaccines, with the Pfizer vaccine content covered earlier here , Astrazeneca content covered here.
Delving into the public-domain scientific literature published on nano graphene oxide or GO, the fact that GO has long been researched and developed for use as biosensor and electrochemical sensor, as well as in neuroscience applications to breach the Blood-Brain Barrier and convey biomolecules, magnetic nanoparticles, drugs, and mRNA to the brain for neuro imaging, magnetic resonance imaging, gene therapy and cancer therapy is readily available.
Couple that with information from a number of White House, NASA, Rand Corporation, and other strategy and futurism documents on the intended NBIC (Nano Bio Info Cogno) Convergence or Human-Machine Convergence which the transhumanists and WEF globalists have decided–without consultation, without public consent, without open discussion–is the direction all of humanity is going to be steered in, add in statements made by Elon Musk and Ray Kurzweil on their dreamed-of AI Singularity needing millions of brains tied-in, toss in a side of crackly Secrecy, and you have all the makings here for a Mega Crime Against Humanity.
It’s not just a few “mad scientists” and transhumanists though, its entire agencies, divisions of military and governments, entire University programs and research institutions, thousands of glossy-eyed graduate students and academics fired up about neuro imaging of whole brains and apolitically roped into biosurveillance without recognizing the larger ramifications of their involvement, who have been slowly but surely steering the ship toward Full Spectrum Borg: brain enslavement & 24/7 bio surveillance of human beings, Internet of Bodies, Internet of Bio Nano Things, Cerebral Internet, and given no choice about it.
Any wonder they have been obsessed with “a needle in every arm” and needing “all 7 billion vaccinated”? It’s not just about genome takeover with mRNA insertions and spike protein factory-making but full spectrum brain and bio control, transformation of health freedom into Public-Health-run, centralized digital “health” monitoring, management, and control–all via nano biosensors and 5G/6G, exactly as Dr. Carrie Madej has been describing. There also appear to be intentions to transform–or degrade–the energy and vibrational signature of humans at the molecular level via effecting changes in cellular and DNA resonance.
No matter apparently if thousands die and hundreds of thousands suffer horrific adverse reactions to their investigational drug delivery via experimental “vaccine”: the goal is humanity brain and body takeover for Assimilation-into-the-Borg (predictive programming courtesy Star Trek) and collateral damage to be ignored.
Not until and unless humans across the planet recognize the gravity of the situation and act decisively and collectively to halt these vaccines, as well as all efforts by governments to subjugate and enslave them through a myriad of means focused around the unproven and entirely fraudulent “pandemic” will these atrocities come to an end.
The possibility for intravenous injection of electrochemical and magnetic nanosensors intending continuous and real-time bio-monitoring and neuro-monitoring as well as neuromodulation definitely exists, this is proved in a basic perusal of the scientific literature on the subject.
1. High Graphene Oxide Content in the Pfizer Vaccine is Indicated by Optical and Electron Microscopy as well as now UV Fluoroscence Analysis.
The latest information from La Quinta Columna scientist Dr. Jose Sevillano suggests that UV Fluoroscence analysis conducted by Dr. Pablo Campo Madrid indicates the presence of Graphene Oxide.
The translated University report, courtesy Tim Brown, at Scribd, is here:
2. Biosensing/Nanotechnology Biosensing has long been studied by the military and Air Force for stated purposes of health monitoring, real-time cognitive monitoring, performance enhancement, “Supersoldiering,” and targeted “read-write” access to brain functions.
It is possible that the study of nano bio-sensing and nano neural monitoring in Universities has largely been led by Defense grants under “dual-use” focus (military and civilian use), with obvious implications for the development of neuroweaponry, as openly discussed in recent times by various military neuroscientists such as Dr. James Giordano and Dr. Charles Morgan, some of their work reported here: Public Disclosure on Neuro Weapons and Neuro Technologies In Use Today, but also under projected guise of aiding airmen and supporting soldiers: the implications for manipulating physiology, cognition, brain functions of every kind are obviously enormous:
“The Air Force Research Laboratory’s Materials and Manufacturing Directorate (AFRL/RX) at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base is conducting ground-breaking research in how the molecular structures that make up some of nature’s most interesting materials interact with nonbiological materials to create effective, low-cost and easily manufactured sensing platforms….
The team is developing non-invasive platforms that include a comfortable, long-lasting patch made from biocompatible materials that can be printed with electronic sensors and worn on the body for several days at a time.
Also being developed are sensors made of lightweight, inexpensive filter paper that optically detect miniscule changes in the body’s chemistry and a platform that uses graphene’s unique electronic capabilities to develop biosensing capabilities that are selective for “state-of-the-body” markers they detect.”
The AFRL (Air Force Research Laboratory) awarded a research grant in 2009 to the no-doubt deliberately named BIONIC (Bio-nano-enabled Inorganic/Organic Nanostructures and Improved Cognition) Center at Georgia Tech, with intended collaboration from Ohio State University, Emory University, and mega Defense contractor Lockheed Martin.
“The $10.5 million Center, known as the Bio-nano-enabled Inorganic/Organic Nanostructures and Improved Cognition (BIONIC) center, is being led by Vladimir Tsukruk and Kenneth Sandhage, professors in Georgia Tech’s School of Materials Science and Engineering.
“Advanced materials is an area of importance for the Air Force since the landscape of materials science is rapidly changing and bio-nano-materials are classes of pervasive materials that exhibit unique capabilities and have the potential to address Air Force needs,” explained Rajesh Naik, a scientist in the U.S. Air Force Research Laboratory (AFRL) Materials and Manufacturing Directorate. “In addition, improved cognition tools are required for assessing the cognitive ability of the warfighter as we ask for more from our human operators in the most demanding environments.”
The BIONIC center includes a group of core members from six departments within the Georgia Tech Colleges of Sciences and Engineering, a researcher at The Ohio State University, and scientists and engineers at AFRL. Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Company is also an industrial collaborator….
U.S. Air Force analysts must remain attentive to computers and controls for hours at a time, so we aim to find a molecular signature of cognition that is sensitive to changes in stress levels and correlate these molecules with functional brain maps using magnetic resonance imaging techniques,” said LaPlaca. “We want to learn about a warfighter’s physiological response to different situations and use this information to optimize training and work effectiveness.”
Among their aims was “designing, fabricating, characterizing and simulating the performance of inorganic/organic nanocomposites for tunable, adaptive materials” and “develop(ing) tools and assessment methods to optimize critical cognitive processes of the modern warfighter.”
The rather technical but vastly interesting report which came out of five years of research projects by those BIONIC scientists probing bio-sensing, cognition, “real-time cognitive monitoring” and “targeted intervention in brain activities” is posted online here and can be perused below.
Graphene is mentioned as well, in its utility as a nano electronics delivery platform for bio sensing and drug delivery.
3. Graphene Oxide Biosensors have been widely studied for use in Nano Bio Medicine as also in other fields of use.
There is a great deal of scientific literature–and a lot of excitement in these circles–on the use of Graphene and Graphene Oxide in electrochemical biosensing and nano electronics, by virtue of the properties of Graphene–a single, 2-dimensional layer of carbon atoms arranged in a honeycomb lattice which is just one-atom-thick, and derived from the naturally-occurring Graphite, isolated in its single-layer form in 2004, by two scientists who won the 2010 Nobel Prize in Physics, Andre Geim and Konstantin Novoselov, now both at the University of Manchester, for this accomplishment. Graphene’s “exceptional” properties spanning “quantum mechanical, electrical, chemical, mechanical, optical, magnetic” fields have made it meteorically important, it has particularly made a splash in the world of nanotechnology and neural technology.
“Graphene oxide (GO) is one of the most attributed materials for opening new possibilities in the development of next generation biosensors. Due to the coexistence of hydrophobic domain from pristine graphite structure and hydrophilic oxygen containing functional groups, GO exhibits good water dispersibility, biocompatibility, and high affinity for specific biomolecules as well as properties of graphene itself partly depending on preparation methods. These properties of GO provided a lot of opportunities for the development of novel biological sensing platforms, including biosensors based on fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET), laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry (LDI-MS), surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS), and electrochemical detection.”
Graphene Oxide is used in conjunction with magnetic nanoparticles and biomolecules:
Graphene-Based Biosensors offers a good overview of graphene use in biosensors, DNA-sensors for the monitoring of glucose levels, DNA-sensing, and testing for bacteria and viruses.
Not surprisingly, the graphene market is accelerating in size and application. The EU recently invested 1Billion Euros to create a research project titled The Graphene Flagship:
“Six years ago, the European Union (EU) embarked on an ambitious project to create a kind of Silicon Valley for the “wonder material” of the last decade: graphene. The project—called the Graphene Flagship—would leverage €1 billion over 10 years to push graphene into commercial markets. The project would bring together academic and industrial research institutes to not only ensure graphene research would be commercialized, but to also make Europe an economic powerhouse for graphene-based technologies.”
4. Graphene Oxide Biosensors have especially been studied and are in use for Neural Interfaces with Neurons, Drug and Gene/mRNA delivery past the Blood Brain Barrier, Neuro Imaging, Brain Mapping, Real-Time Cognitive Monitoring.
Brain and Central Nervous System
The use of nano graphene in studying the functioning of brains and the Central Nervous System (CNS) especially for transmission of drugs across the Blood Brain Barrier (BBB) in vivo in real-time has been heralded as a breakthrough.
The review cited above focuses on specific aspects of nano graphene considered vital to future neuroscience applications, “(i) G as nano-carrier for drug and gene delivery; (ii) G interaction with the BBB; and (iii) G-based 2D and 3D composites for neural regeneration, stimulation and recording” which includes study of Graphene Oxide-PEG (Poly Ethylene Glycol) composites.
(PEG has been reported as an ingredient in the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines, and also studied as a cause for anaphylaxis in reaction to these vaccines:
Nanographene oxide in particular has been used in drug-delivery and RNA/gene-delivery in cancer gene-therapy and chemotherapy. Further, graphene oxide properties are used in magnetic resonance and fluoroscence imaging:
“Smart nanocarriers that are responsive to external stimuli, such as heat, glutathione, light, pH or magnetic fields, are also necessary for the controlled release of genes or drugs at suitable sites15,16,17,18.
Several types of nanocarriers, containing carbon nanotubes, liposomes, graphene oxide (GO), silicon nanomaterial and polymer micelles have been developed to co-deliver siRNA and chemotherapy drugs both in vitro and in vivo to enhance therapeutic action against cancer cells exhibiting MDR in recent years19,20,21,22.
Among the nanocarriers, graphene oxide nanocarrier could be used for chemotherapy drug delivery, because of its good biocompatibility, high drug-loading capacity, and adsorption of aromatic drug molecules through π–π stacking and hydrophobic interaction, as well as the surface can be functionalized easily23,24,25,26.”
Zeng, Y., Yang, Z., Li, H. et al.Multifunctional Nanographene Oxide for Targeted Gene-Mediated Thermochemotherapy of Drug-resistant Tumour.Sci Rep7, 43506 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep43506
5. High biomedical use despite the fact that Graphene and Graphene Oxide toxicity is reported as significant
Studies published online report that graphene nanoparticles have been found to be toxic to multiple organs. Intravenous injection to convey graphene nanoparticles into the bloodstream has also been studied in mice. Several papers report that biocompatibility and toxicity of Graphene in biomedical applications has been insufficiently studied.
“GFNs (Graphene Family Nanoparticles) can induce acute and chronic injuries in tissues by penetrating through the blood-air barrier, blood-testis barrier, blood-brain barrier, and blood-placenta barrier etc. and accumulating in the lung, liver, and spleen etc. For example, some graphene nanomaterials aerosols can be inhaled and substantial deposition in the respiratory tract, and they can easily penetrate through the tracheobronchial airways and then transit down to the lower lung airways, resulting in the subsequent formation of granulomas, lung fibrosis and adverse health effects to exposed persons [2, 29].“…
“Intravenous injection is also widely used to assess the toxicity of graphene nanomaterials, and graphene circulates through the body of mice in 30 min, accumulating at a working concentration in the liver and bladder [32, 50–52].“
Human-Machine interfaces via “smart skin,” nanobioelectronics (using such tools as graphene oxide/carbon nanotubes biosensors and imprintable sensing sheets), along with “digital nervous systems” linking implantable/injectable nanobiosensors with Wireless Body Area Networks (WBANs) and Cloud Computing/IoT have been long studied and are being developed and tested.
Remote Influence of Bodily Functions, Remote Drug Delivery
It’s not just neurons and brain behaviors but cells and physiological functions which can be influenced remotely, as this very peculiar 2016 research project involving “cognitive load,” radio-frequency EMFS, metal nanoparticles and nano DNA robots suggests: Thought-Controlled Nanoscale Robots in a Living Host
7. DARPA is running numerous research and development projects with multiple technologies involving Nanobiosensors to remotely access, activate, deactivate, monitor, control and manage Human Brains and the Central Nervous System.
Under cover of “health care for our warfighters,” DARPA’s ElectrX program essays full-spectrum human body takeover: “Potential new approaches include in vivo, real-time biosensors and novel neural interfaces using optical, acoustic, electromagnetic, or engineered biology strategies to achieve precise targeting with potentially single-axon resolution.”
The defense agency announces funding for 7 projects under its new ElectRx program
Polina Anikeeva, one of the awardees under that DARPA ElectRx program is an Associate Professor in Materials Science and Electronics at MIT whose group “has created flexible multifunctional fibers capable of electrophysiological recordng, optical neuromodulation, and delivery of genes and drugs into the mammalian brain and spinal cord. In addition, her group has demonstrated that magnetic nanomaterials can wirelessly transduce magnetic fields into thermal and chemical stimuli to neurons in deep brain.”
The dizzying array of neurotechnologies now available, from wireless radiation to ultrasound to fMRI to optical imaging to magnetogenetics to remote-access, monitor, study, neuromodulate, neurostimulate, and otherwise neurotransform the human brain at the level of individual neurons, in a precision-targeted way using magnetic nanoparticles and neural dust, among other means, is indicated by this impressive summary penned by Dr. Anikeeva and Dr. Liqun Luo, a Neurobiology Professor from Stanford University for an edition of Current Opinion in Neurobiology in 2018: Editorial Opinion: NeuroTechnologies
Obviously this is now a major field of cross-disciplinary scientific inquiry with implications for both the improvement of human health within a consensual medical context and the remote-access and modification of human brains without consent within an Orwellian neuroweapons and neurocontrol, neuro-behavioral context, with potential for totalitarian military subjugation of individuals and groups: a field which urgently needs further study and reportage by all concerned citizens on the planet.
8. Universities and Private Foundations under military or non-military contracts and programs are also studying Neuromodulation and Neurocontrol of the Human Brain.
Also a subject requiring further investigational and journalistic scrutiny, this June 2018 report by Neely, Piech, Maharbiz, Carmena at Current Opinions in Neurobiology on Neural Dust and neural interface platforms–Recent advances in Neural Dust: Towards a Neural Interface Platform— reveals much regarding the interest in permanent access of human brains using ultrasound and neural dust–note the interest in “chronic neural interfaces” and the fact that at least one of the researchers here has ties to the Chan Zuckerberg Hub:
“The neural dust platform uses ultrasonic power and communication to enable a scalable, wireless, and batteryless system for interfacing with the nervous system. Ultrasound offers several advantages over alternative wireless approaches, including a safe method for powering and communicating with sub mm-sized devices implanted deep in tissue. Early studies demonstrated that neural dust motes could wirelessly transmit high-fidelity electrophysiological data in vivo, and that theoretically, this system could be miniaturized well below the mm-scale. Future developments are focused on further minimization of the platform, better encapsulation methods as a path towards truly chronic neural interfaces, improved delivery mechanisms, stimulation capabilities, and finally refinements to enable deployment of neural dust in the central nervous system.”
9. Human-Machine Symbiosis with Artificial Intelligence is Seen as Inevitable by Elon Musk, Ray Kurzweil, Other Transhumanists (who are working to make it happen, classified and non-classified).
In recent interviews and talks, Elon Musk has spoken about the need to “solve the bandwidth problem”–by which he means the speed of communication with one’s “digital tertiary layer” (or smart phone or digital self online) by implanting a neural interface such as Neuralink, which would allow for “conceptual telepathy” or direct download of concepts and thoughts from one brain to another minus the slow and laborious “compression-decompression” of verbalizing & comprehension which language embodies (in his view). The fact that computers communicate information at trillions of bits per second while human brains operate at a dismally slow pace and human fingers type at 10 bits per second could be leveraged via neural interfaces to accelerate “human-machine symbiosis with AI” which many transhumanists immersed in technological visions for the future see as inevitable.
While references to Neuralink made by Musk and others reference a “voluntary” implanting of the neural interface, Elon Musk has also worked on and spoken about Neuralace or a mesh of electronic fibres colonizing the brain as being introduced–possibly non-consensually–into the brain via injection.
Nanotechnology–specifically nano-devices or nanobots have long been envisioned by Ray Kurzweil, author of The Singularity is Near, as the means by which humans will eventually merge into machines and be linked to AI. Interestingly, it is the decade of the 2020s-2030 that Kurzweil predicted would see the acceleration of nanotechnology to the point of sophistication of Blood-brain-barrier breaching which indeed is what graphene oxide, carbon nanotubes and other nanoparticles are found to be capable of today.
In the clip below which pulls together a few of Musk’s statements from different interviews and talks, Musk talks about the need for “widespread” adoptance of neural interfaces in order for AI and human-machine symbiosis to occur. Many neuroscientists see BCI-AI (Brain Computer Interface linked to Artificial Intelligence) as inevitable within the next ten years, something Dr. Rafael Yuste spoke about in this interview where he also introduced his Neuro Rights Initiative now adopted by the Chilean Parliament: Report #197: Prof. Rafael Yuste, Director, Neurotech, Columbia Univ. on Neurotech, AI & Neuro Rights
Given the inherent “stealth” profile of nanotechnology such as Graphene Oxide (so tiny it can be hidden in anything) and given the amount of work being done by military divisions on nanotechnology and neural interfaces, one must wonder whether voluntary human consent will be taken into consideration in the drive by transhumanist neuroscientists to merge humanity with computers and AI. Chem trails and vaccines could be two areas or delivery mechanisms for neural dust and nanotech where consent is being overridden.
Elon Musk’s original Neuralink presentation, where his interest in merging everyone via Brain Machine Interfaces with AI –“This is extremely important”–is palpable:
10. The work of Clifford Carnicom and others in analyzing aerosol-sourced Synthetic Biology filaments, nanoparticulates, novel cross-domain bacteria, and Morgellons points to long-term Transhumanism/Colonization by Smart Nano being visited on all Without Consent.
Tremendous work has been done by Clifford Carnicom in his meticulous study of soil, water, blood, airborne filament samples from around the world, recorded in his 350 research papers stored for further investigation at his site. Military operations lie behind the ubiquitous chem trails, it appears, and the undisclosed agendas of Transhumanism and Bio/Digital Convergence via breathed-in nanoparticulates might well be behind the constant spraying.
This article covers an overview of Clifford Carnicom’s findings, and carries links to the Carnicom disclosure Project video interviews from Transparent Truth Media, a must-watch for all interested in piecing this classified/no public disclosure puzzle together:
11. The US Government has advertised its interest and obsession with leading a Global Nano-Bio-Info-Cogno (NBIC) Convergence which includes Human-Machine Symbiosis with AI, and is clearly led by crazed Transhumanists keen to end Humanity and usher in Homo Cyberneticus, Humans 2.0, Robotus Multitudinus and Borg Consume-all-of-Us.
One has to wonder who exactly permits such (juvenile) science-fiction “strategizing” in Government but it becomes clear soon enough that the Transhumanists and and Borg’ists have taken over.
The Nano-Bio-Info-Cogno (NBIC) Convergence is not the fantasy of a thirteen-year-old brought up on Star Trek dreams of the Borg colonizing the multiverse–or perhaps it is!–but the considered lunacy of several transhumanist technocrats ensconced deep in government.
The following images are representative and taken from the stellar “Converging Technologies for Improving Human Performance/NANOTECHNOLOGY, BIOTECHNOLOGY, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND COGNITIVE SCIENCE NSF/DOC-sponsored report/Edited by Mihail C. Roco and William Sims Bainbridge, National Science Foundation/June 2002” document, posted below, which makes for scintillant reading Under the Influence to quell panic (wine, beer, or cognac a must) and establishes rather definitively that the writers and strategists behind it –NASA, NIH, Navy, NSF, DARPA, Sandia, Universities of California, Virginia, Arkansas, to name a few–are profoundly anti-human, anti-organic, anti-natural, and anti-creation.
Convergence Education: The Future of Brainwashing in K-12 Schools
Perusal of this absurdist document (above) (might lead to palpitations) quickly establishes there is an obsession with nanotechnology here, borne out by the slides in the 2017 presentation below by Mihail C. Roco of the National Science Foundation, who educates all on who exactly is involved (various departments of US Government) and what their intentions for “Convergence” globally (“You Vill be Assimilated”) are, with emphasis on how the education of children is aimed to change, with “Convergence Education”:
It’s like the arrival of Nano on the scene has heralded a Halleluia moment for the Transhumanists, from which they will never recover.
Admittedly Mad Scentists
Then there’s the “Mad Scientists” Futures vision from Futurist Dr. Ian Pearson of Futurizon, whose projections probably match closely with those of Klaus Schwab and Ray Kurzweil–This slideshow is (accurately) titled Mad Scientists:
Nanoelectronics and Brain Monitoring
At the base of it all, stands Nanotechnology, hand in hand with Biotech. This map of Nanoelectronics programs in Universities across America, for instance, published in “Science and technology convergence: with emphasis for nanotechnology-inspired convergence” by Mihail Roco, Senior Advisor for Nanotechnology at the National Science Foundation (NSF) and “a key architect of the National Nanotechnology Initiative, founding Chair of the U.S. National ScienceandTechnology Council’s Subcommittee on Nano scale Science, Engineering and Technology (NSET)” reveals a pervasive interest in the semi-conductor, thin film transistor properties of nano materials such as graphene and graphene oxide–qualities which enhance their use as biosensor and neural interface for use in physiological and brain monitoring:
12. Speculation: Given all above, it is entirely possible that Graphene Oxide biosensors, concocted as nano-composites wth PEG lipid nanoparticles, mRNA, and magnetic nanoparticles, able to cross the BBB with gene-load and drug-load, have been included in the COVID vaccines with BCI-AI “Convergence” intent.
The truth will be known (more definitively) with further testing of vaccine contents and futher analyses from the La Quinta Columna and University of Almeria scientists, as well as corroboration by other scientists willing to test the vaccines and uncover their contents worldwide.
As it stands, all the ingredients are gathered here together for a most plausible Crime Report.
The NBIC initiative, coupled with “covered research” and incomplete vaccine trials suggest that it is entirely possible these COVID vaccines have been used, in stealth, as a delivery mechanism for nanobiosensors and neurobiosensors.
Given the massive blood clotting post-vaccine being reported, the high numbers of deaths, and the connections with graphene noted (graphene is toxic and causes thrombi or blood clots), it is past time to halt these vaccines.
And for all those who question the validity of the research published by La Quinta Columna and challenge the plausibility of Graphene Oxide being found in the vaccines, no doubt time–and further analyses by others–will reveal the truth; meanwhile, it is clear that Graphene Oxide is being used widely in nanobiosensors and neural interfaces, that it is toxic, and that it can be induced into the human body via injection and aerosol.
Report by Ville Hellberg | Posted by Ramola D | 31.05.2021
Note: This is a major report from a European policy analyst exposing the horrors of counter-terrorism and mass surveillance torture programs being run worldwide since 9/11 by US, Five-Eyes, Fifteen-Eyes, EU member nations under agreement with US intelligence and security agencies, self-labeled as surveillance and counter-terrorism, self-permissive of bio-hacking and neuro-hacking, using invasive anti-personnel Electronic Warfare neuroweaponry, self-permissive of “No-Touch Torture” and remote-access physical and neurological abuse, shrouded in secrecy and propaganda, deeply invasive of human privacy, and unleashing Stasi, Nazi, Mengele-style programs of atrocity, torture, physical, and psychological abuse in concentric circles of control on millions of innocent civilians, wrongfully labeled “suspects” and “terrorists” for purposes of competitive development worldwide of supercomputing AI, cybernetics, robotics, neuroprosthetics, Brain Nets, Mind Hives, Cerebral Internets, and brain-degrading Neuroweaponry all at the cost of massive human suffering and human lives, revealing a complete breakdown of ethics and consideration for human rights among governments, militaries, security, and Intelligence agencies, seen through the eyes of European policy analysis and human rights convictions examining US Foreign Policy just as much as state of the art Surveillance Technology and Neurotechnology.
While these programs of political persecution and hidden torture are the same ones American human rights campaigners and others worldwide have been discussing widely in articles and books (see Targeting is Real), this report is groundbreaking and unique in its close examination of the US “War on Terror” declared by George Bush in 2001, which has influenced US Foreign Policy and coerced European submission to a worldwide fixation on counter-terrorism and mass surveillance inducive of clampdowns and removals of civil rights and liberties, and destroyed the concepts, principles, and protections of democracy worldwide, including European concepts of human dignity and rights completely at odds with American imperialism. “Europeans do not wish to bring the War on Terror to European soil,” writes Ville Hellberg from Finland.
What few people know–thanks to mainstream media propaganda and long-term occlusion of human rights reportage with deprecating, discrediting cover, intended to obfuscate, of “Targeted Individuals” who have been reporting extreme torture and abuse now for over three decades–is that American counter-terrorism and surveillance programs and laws have gone well beyond the revelations of Edward Snowden and permitted egregious torture, abuse, and removal of rights on American soil, as reported by this writer and others to President Trump in 2017 and 2019:
What Ville Hellberg brings to this disclosure is keen insight into the structure of global security agreements, the excessive role played by US “War on Terror” foreign policy demands, the rise of new technologies permitting extreme invasion of human, bio and neuro privacy, the false legalizing of “sources and methods” of interrogation and investigation granted to Intelligence and Security agencies, and the crying need to address and end the silent suffering of thousands of innocent citizens, wrongfully targeted, blacklisted, ostracized, tortured, maimed, disfigured, continually abused, destroyed, and yes, also murdered–in a complete breakdown of recognition of human rights–worldwide. Many thanks to Ville Hellberg for this powerful and deeply thoughtful analysis and report, which is surely going to pave the path to positive change, going forward.
RENDITION FLIGHTS, ANYONE? INTER- AND CROSS-GOVERNMENTAL TORTURE PROGRAMS MANIFESTED UNDER THE NEW SURVEILLANCE AND COUNTER-TERRORISM LAWS WITHHOLD LEGAL PROTECTION, HUMAN RIGHTS, AND CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS FROM CIVILIANS, THEIR TARGETS
Ville Hellberg | May 31, 2021
WE ARE WITNESSING GLOBAL ELECTRONIC WARFARE BY SUPERPOWERS WHERE INDIVIDUALS, POPULATIONS, AND INFRASTRUCTURE ARE TARGETED. DUE TO THE WAR CIRCUMSTANCE, GOVERNMENTS HAVE PERMITTED THEMSELVES TO DIVERT FROM LAWS AND DEMOCRATIC PRINCIPLES.
”Torture is a horrific topic and most minds will turn away from it because it can’t be comprehended that humans can be motivated, or computer programs can be run to do this to other sentient beings. Just when we believed we were becoming more civilized as a culture, the technology for torture has advanced more than a hundred fold in recent decades.” – Robert Duncan, ‘Neuropsychological and electronic “no-touch torture”. The spectrum of “interrogation” and torture techniques used by the US and its allies’. 
Electronic Warfare (EW) anti-personnel applications such as DEW (directed energy weapons) and AW (acoustic weapons), as well as their distant cousins neuropsychological electronic (neurotech) applications RNM (remote neural monitoring)/RMI (remote mental imaging) /EEG (electroencephalogram), and the product of these, V2K (microwave hearing), among other techniques, are being directed to civilians globally. With the exception of capital-intensive neurotech applications or other mass operations, the tech can be operated by private sector agencies and corporates, whilst the operations are in general run by military and law enforcement agencies from multifunctional radar and antenna platforms globally. Even though the applications are used in connection with psychological operations, they have the fatal capacity and produce pain, suffering and psychological trauma, even fatalities in their targets; civilians. Thus, the utilisation supports the definition of torture. Under governments’ execution, the operations are run by the military whose clientele the national security, law enforcement, intelligence societies are. Whether the implementation and targeting of this technology on civilians constitute a war crime should be evaluated. The technology ’consumes’ the human body, especially the neurological system, as directed to its targets for over inhumanly prolonged periods. Other scientists say the neurotech mass surveillance AI applications should be considered as a WMD. It is imperative indeed to acknowledge that the vast increase in numbers of targeted civilians indicates a widespread attack on human rights.
Due to its stealth nature, the technology has attracted military budgets globally. Other governments have developed sophisticated global operations and are well advanced in the utilisation of this technology. However, due to the low cost of operations most governments have utilised their own version of the technology. This also involves increased non-consented human testing and yet another armament. Human testing on dissidents, activists and whistleblowers, even their descendants, seems common. Whilst the effects of resonance spectrum frequencies on the human body and nervous system were discovered to their full potential by the midst of the 1970s , it still needed an agenda and strategy for implementation. The new millennium has brought us “the War on Terror” in which counter-terrorism and mass surveillance laws introduced legal instruments to allow the use of “mass surveillance neurotechnology” under which the resonance technologies are operated. The use of anti-terrorism as an agenda is an unconstitutional plan of the Western coalition that has significantly strengthened sovereign national power at the expense of human rights and democratic systems through surveillance laws.
The new dynamics of global geopolitics have also impacted the global power balance and foreign and security policies. We may have to accept that there are several superpowers capable of globally utilising this technology against the citizens of other countries. International laws should regulate the imperialistic execution of these technologies by regime and purpose e.g. automatized targeting, target selection, technology and intergovernmental co-operation should be regulated and watched carefully. There are some parallel operations and agendas that further increase the number of targeted people and populations. When the operations are global it is likely the resonances are directed through OTHRs (over-the-horizon-radar) and satellites which in turn facilitates the discovery of the source radar. For the sake of clarity, it is sensible to acknowledge that cellular phones have a key role in locating targets and delivering biometrics. The MSM is full of cover articles when one government is caught using the technology and blaming the others. Recently, we have seen evidence of purposely leaked material in MSM regarding global Electronic Warfare, in attacks where resonance technologies have been used, such as the attacks to White House officials  and Cuban embassy staff  by assumed DEW microwave technologies. These operations have been leaked not only to inform the public and other governments of the ongoing global Electronic Warfare but also to blame the other governments. It is reasonable however, to recognise that these attacks really are lightweight samples of the use of the WMDs. People should be suspicious in view of the recent bushfires also. In other words, it is the infrastructure, populations and individuals that are being targeted in this global war and not discussed in the MSM. We are indeed viewing the evidence of a global war.
The technology is poorly understood by lawmakers, practioners and politicians it is presented by military and law enforcement lobbyist and therefore, become approved and utilised globally. Human rights activists are in search of political co-operation whereas the political or administrative powers will not touch the topic. There is a significant number of similarities in details of this “play” to the events of WWII where the messengers of the Holocaust had not been taken seriously either.
Brain invasive neurotechnology applications (RNM/RMI/EEG) are claimed to have been used in mass surveillance operations. The applications are commonly called “cybernetics” although finding common global terminology for the EW applications seems problematic. We suggest the use of military terminology since the technology is based on military design. Each technology presented in this paper should be defined as Electronic Warfare anti-personnel applications, including the mass surveillance neurotechnology applications.
The mass surveillance operations target civilians and their neural systems. The operation is automated and run by supercomputers through multifunctional radar or antenna systems which means robotic elements are involved. In the investigations of the neural systems of the targeted civilians, the cortex is being stimulated by a spectrum of electromagnetic pulses for years in order to clone the entire neural system. The methodology is called synthetic telepathy since it may investigate and implant thoughts and mind patterns into the targeted brains. The term “mind control” implies the domination of the conscious nervous system. The process is not painless, hence the term “no-touch torture”. A group of brains can be linked together as “brain network” which in turn assists supercomputers to develop a competitive advantage in the field of AI. In “neuropsychological electronic torture” painful stimulants help to cause a reaction in the targets’ cortex that is measured and biometrics collected. Synthetic telepathy refers to reading and replacing one’s thoughts with “synthetic thoughts” or even by another mind replacement. The recent development where mobile devices, phones, can be used to collect and introduce these emissions i.e., ICT and 5G networks are in use. Scientists have developed systems to take nanotech to the brains which then receive the resonances. It has been presented that the mass delivery of this nanotech would occur through public vaccinations. The nanotech operates using the body energy (piezoenergetics) or by energy delivered resonances. Thus, the resonances deliver both the energy and the informantion in form of commands. The delivery of these resonances can be arranged from any platform, even by mobile device emissions. The mass surveillance utilises satellites and OTHRs. This allows continued mass observations of the feelings, senses, thoughts, and actions of the target. The fact is that individual’s free will and degree of autonomy are hugely affected.
As a result of the recent breakthrough of technological development different forms of applications are being utilized in many areas in the society, such as police, customs office, border control, prosecutor, judicial system, and intelligence community but also in the private sector. The technology remains unregulated and lacks sufficient measures of supervision, monitoring, and control due to the covert nature of the operations. In Europe, the situation is being recognized  by lawmakers to a certain extent. Whilst the EU has been speculated to push through a reform  on the laws of AI mass surveillance to ban the use of AI for mass surveillance (from the private sector alone) and some other uses this has not been ratified. There has been a good progress made to impose further regulation on automated weapons systems  and interrogation methodologies . In addition, the consistency of surveillance laws is being evaluated in the EU by the ECHR . It seems lawmakers do not understand the technology since they only have the military introduction to it. In the absence of ethical aspects, international laws, regulation, and compassion, solidarity the torture-like execution continues to be conducted, hence the phenomenon of targeted individuals.
Too little is spoken in public about white-collar law enforcement and intelligence community operations’ military tactics that produce pain, suffering, and psychological problems to civilians. Resonance technologies are at the core of the Western intelligence community and law enforcement operations today, executed by the military among others. Yet it is unclear which government agencies and how many countries are abusing neurotech methodologies. The military technologies have been introduced to politicians under anti-terrorism agenda by a Western intelligence coup as surveillance methodologies with a major detail left ignored, that the technology causes significant pain, suffering, physical and psychological trauma, even fatalities. The technologies are also being widely misused in operations lacking supervision in an unregulated industry in the absence of ethical aspects.
Such tactics as DEW (directed energy weaponry; laser, maser, high power microwave and radio frequencies as well as particle beams), AW (acoustic weaponry), RNM (remote neural monitoring), reverse EEG (electroencephalogram), and V2K (microwave hearing) to mention a few are somewhat creatively executed from multifunction radars and a series of antennas and directed to their living targets from a diversity of platforms with satellite assistance. Despite the fact that these are military tactics, and a crucial part of Electronic Warfare anti-personnel operations, they are being directed towards civilians to cause pain and suffering when misused and therefore, must be considered as torture. Should that not constitute a war crime? In addition to a law (Finland: Rikoslaki luku 11 pykälä 9a) that defines torture as a crime, most of these nations have signed on the UN Convention on Torture.
”Anyone can be put into these programs. Justice and rule of law does not exist at the highest levels of government. Treaties are worthless because the #1 agreement in the rules of war, a ban against torture, is not obeyed. This creates a more brutal and barbaric society lead by example.”  This is the explanation of the “War on Terror”. It seems the police, prosecutor, in particular, border control, customs, judicial system, intelligence community and military operations are all in favor of this type of implementation, the citizens themselves being bypassed. Probably, the entire clientele favours this technology which allows direct participation in the activation of the targeted suspects’ sensors. This is the end of privacy as we know it, the film ‘Minority Report’ in steroids.
Coercive Measures and the Use of “No-Touch Torture”
In Finland, military intelligence confirmed on 06.05.2021  that some of their coercive measures are similar to the ones used in the local law enforcement. More interestingly, the article confirms that the district court (of Helsinki) regulates the use of coercive measures which in turn may be interpreted that the judicial system in Finland allows the use of military tactics that are sometimes referred to as “no-touch torture” (torture caused without visible connection to the targeted) to be used to target the Finnish citizens. In view of the fact that law treats any torture or intentionally caused pain as a crime (Rikoslaki Ch 11 §9a among the UN Convention against Torture) in Finland, the arrangement is somewhat disputable. Another trick to hold back the argument on war crime?
In Finland, the chiefs of military and law enforcement select the technologies used under coercive measures and self-supervise the utilisation of these. It is indeed wishful thinking that the lawmakers, law practitioners and politicians approving the use of the technologies would also understand them. Some targets have been targeted for decades even though the permitted period is supposed to be 6 months each time before renewal. The renewal process would not stand any closer evaluation. The law enforcement officers manufacture the evidence to present the suspect in a negative frame. There is no alternative explanation on why the same targets are under the execution for decades unless, they are the targets of military exercise. The former ptotocol is called target manufacturing. It surely seems the technologies have become a punitive instrument for the political and administrative cultures.
One acknowledged problem seems to be the new surveillance law that allows the use of resonance technologies together with counter-terrorism laws which in turn allows the removal of civil rights. Finnish Defence Forces (FDF) are investing in cyberwar in the future  and confirms that AI is involved in order to handle significant amounts of data. The terminology appear to cause problems with interpretation since the term “cyberwar” has been used in the media to cover resonance methodologies also. Bear in mind the ICT sector is a part of the mass surveillance structure and 5G infra based on resonance technologies. Since 10bn Euros is being invested in the new fighter jet fleet which in turn supports cybertechnologies by multifunctional radar systems it is clear the technology is in use. Kivinen, the Chief of Defence, states that in developing a cyber defence programme the Finnish Defence Forces co-operate with other members of the EU cyber defence projects . It was brought to the knowledge of Finnish Prime Minister Antti Rinne in 2019 that what mistakenly is called cyber weaponry instead of anti-personnel EW technologies were being used to target civilians and even children. Rinne publicly aimed a reminder to the Chief of Defence who in turn publicly mentioned the technology related to an international war exercise . As it has been brought to the discussion earlier the EU seems to have security policies that conflict with human rights and indeed, with the EU policies for human rights. Since the EU does not possess an organised military compartment or co-ordination for the common defence the EU member nations practice with who they will. Human rights are left under the observation of the military in this war exercise, a light operation if any.
Since the views of targets have not been heard in preparation of the surveillance and counter-terrorism laws in the EU, the understanding of the technology is based on military reviews. This is an excellent reason why targeted should be heard by lawmakers, law practitioners, and politicians instead of copying military methodologies from other societies supported by massive lobbying. If not legal risks, at least political and reputational risks will acknowledged by the Governments of the EU [17, 20, 26]. The use of these weapons should be regulated more aggressively and indeed, take into account that the same targeted civilians, shockingly, remain the targets of international war exercises for years, as long as their physiology can withstand for the attacks of the energy weapons.
The Intelligence Ombudsman in Finland supervises the legality of civil and military intelligence and the realisation of basic and human rights in intelligence activities (The Act on the Oversight of Intelligence Gathering entered into force in February 2019) states the website of the Intelligence Ombudsman. The Ombudsman has produced recently (05.05.2021) a second opinion on the operations of military intelligence and intelligent services in Finland according to which he approves the operations. The Intelligence Ombudsman is aware of the use of the technologies brought to discussion in this report in Finland. He has been presented with 26 accounts of personal reports of targeted civilians on Finnish soil. These technologies have been used on the targeted well before the surveillance law came into force. An independent external review is suggested on the surveillance laws in the EU as there is no consistency among them. Similarly, the coercive measures used and the principles on what basis they are being used on civilians in the EU [20, 23, 26] should be put under review.
The Rights of the Targeted
”Governments may mistake their citizens as enemies in the same way that an immune system may lose its ability to distinguish between the body’s own cells and pathogens. ” 
The above is a very polite articulation of the fact that human targets are required to develop military technologies. The targets are approved through a judicial system that operates law approved by politicians and lawmakers. By practice, we know that most of the targeted individuals are manufactured targets and presented in a frame that has very little to do with reality in order to allow the use of counter-terrorism and mass surveillance laws.
“If an intelligence law is not well-conceived and rational, it could easily become a formidable weapon of repression. An intelligence law should not only protect citizens against terrorism, but also against the State… There is a total absence of control in this law.” M Trevidic 
The EU security strategy has been impacted by the Western agenda for anti-terrorism and allows such resonance technologies to be utilised under the law enforcement and intelligence operations of its member countries against the earlier knowledge of the topic (art. 30 Resolution on the Environment, Security and Foreign Policy from January 28, 1999, Nr.A4-005/99) to civilians. No human rights, no rights of the accused nor legal protection is respected in the process to which civilians are exposed. Constitutional rights are removed by these counter-terrorism acts. The counter-terrorism laws and mass surveillance laws both are used against democracy and human rights. The suspects do not have rights nor legal protection against coercive measures. In fact, the suspects have been stripped of their rights during the implementation of this protocol. The accused supposedly have rights (ignored), the rights of the accused, however, only a very few ever are being accused. The unconditional nature of implementation indicates it is not about seeking the truth under district court approval but the aim is to degrade the individual. It takes time for civilian targets to recognise their life is over as they used to know it. Dramatically enough no instance informs targets of their amended status in society. Even members of families with small children are placed under the torture scheme in which situation everyone is affected physically and psychologically (an acknowledgement based on empirical observation).
“As Lord Hoffmann noted in a concurring opinion in A Secretary of State for the Home Department, ”The real threat . . . comes not from terrorism but from [practices] such as these.”” referring to the impact of counter-terroristic measures in the society.
”Why torture? The CIA claims it works. The assumption is that it works to gain actionable intelligence. Torture is often used for revenge, punishment, interrogation, and behavior modification. In other terms torture is used to remove the continuity of thought to confuse the target to reveal information, erase brain patterns such as values and beliefs, or to break down the human spirit to make them submit and obey their handlers.” 
– Robert Duncan – “Neuropsychological and electronic “no-touch torture”. The spectrum of “interrogation” and torture techniques used by the US and its allies”
Neuropsychological and electronic “no-touch torture” [7, 9] is used as the spectrum of “interrogation” and torture techniques by the US and its allies says Robert Duncan, a former CIA analyst and engineer, who has been developing such methodologies as a CIA, DoD engineer. Robert has an opinion the neurotech mass surveillance technology is indeed a WMD.
”The intelligence agents can also use low level microwaves to cause mental and physical confusion that leads to illness. Beaming microwaves at victims makes them fatigued, damages their immune system, causes neurological damage that affects their thinking and ability to carry out tasks, induces premature aging, cancer, and cataracts. ” T Rifat. 
The mass surveillance neurotechnological weaponry causes a spectrum of effects depending on the computer program, the technology chosen, and the team running the execution. It may be sensible to make a note that we are indeed talking about piezoelectric mechanisms  (NB. Figure 15. Piezoelectric energy harvesting from the human body) within the human body (biochemical balance within the body e.g. various proteins electrically reacting towards each other). Antioxidants alleviate the potential risks of EMF exposures . The following effects are reported among others : Synthetic telepathy (reading and broadcasting of thoughts), microwave hearing, forced visions some synched with body motion, forced memory blanking, controlled dreams, forced waking visions, artificial tinnitus, wildly racing heart at rest, forced muscle quaking, the sensation of tapping, intense general pain or hot-needles-pushed-deep-into-flesh sensations, sensations of electrical shocks, burning sensations, intense pain in a larger area of body e.g. face or chest (technical capability to amend the spread of the beam as well as the spectrum), special attention to the genital area; itching, forced orgasms, intense pain, forced thoughts and feelings and sleep deprivation (sleep being constantly disturbed with the above).
In Finland, a survey of a population of nearly 100 victims of Electronic Warfare anti-personnel applications was taken in 2020-21. The research involved questionnaires and interviews and produced very consistent information on the symptoms and observations of the victims. Reported health damages and symptoms appeared to be far more serious than what was expected. There also seems to be an apparent division of symptoms and observations by different executions of DEW and neuropsychological resonances. The findings of this research will be published in another context; however, it can be noted here that the following psychological disorders or physical symptoms were reported among others: Memory lapse, PTSD, long-term stress, panic attack, state of fear, severe depression, suicidal thoughts, paranoia, schizophrenia, anxiety, lack of concentration, ADHD, sleep deprivation, desire for sex /food etc, cardiac arrhythmia, headache, hearing voices, sensation of disturbance in cognitive processes, orgasms, erections, sensation of pressure in brains, pain in eyes, chest pain, difficulty to breathe, stomack pain, digestive problems, temporary paralysis, pain in genitals, twitches, sudden increase in blood pressure, brain fog, neurological symptoms, strokes, tinnitus, sensations of burns, temporary feelings of blood clots and numbness anywhere in the body, cosmetic injuries such as burnt skin and physical and psychological exhaustion among other. The targets reported that their head, heart or genital area was attacked the most. In addition, some Electronic Warfare anti-animal attacks have been conducted to their pets and anti-material attacks were reported in which mobile devices or computers were either used remotely or entirely damaged their hard discs. In connection to preparing this documentation many methods were conducted to potentially prevent the submission of this material. Many targeted people have reportedly been targets of an attempted murder also. The dilemma here is that potential injury cannot be connected to the resonance technologies. Another argument being used by the supporters of the neuropsychological technologies is that whenever there is pain, no injury has necessarily taken place. The definition of torture is based on the concept of experiencing pain. Therefore, whether the pain is physically caused or ‘only’ the idea of pain being delivered to the brains, the pain is still being experienced.
The long-term effects are not well published expept for long-term sleep deprivation which is a major catalyst to changes in the human body causing, for instance, high blood sugar and other signs of exceptions leading to long-term diseases. The radiation may impose a threat on internal organs, especially the liver and heart. An exposure to radiation in the long-term is very likely to cause heart diseases such as cardiac muscle inflammation which in turn may cause the failure of the heart muscle. Exhaustion seems to be one of the common symptoms that also was shown in the results of the Finnish research.
If anyone was to argue that the aforementioned symptoms were based on civil applications, such as the 5G or electricity grid, they are not entirely wrong. The ICT (information communications technology) infrastructure is being utilised within these operations; together with electricity, radar, and satellite technologies they create a strong electromagnetic field that enables the surveillance and introduction of “brainwaves” and what not. It is however, the effect of the radar that amplifies within the strong electromagnetic field and causes the symptoms by signals delivered via satellites and ICT network. Due to the nature of the scientific research, the findings are kept secret and the health concerns remain unpublished to cover the economic model within the industry. The business model is a cash cow and supports also related industries and business models. The symptoms reported in the Finnish research are consistent, the experiences are similar and indicate a clear correlation of the presence of strong electromagnetic fields. Such an electromagnetic field requires radar or antenna series for targeting. Also the observations on the use of OTHR (over-the-horizon-radar) and satellite delivery correlate with the symptoms. The impacts of long-lasting combined microwave exposure on the human body may not have been adequately investigated and approved by the medical scientific society. It seems it is the currently targeted population which produces this critical empirical knowledge since the biometrics are available for reading at all times. The Military/ Intelligence/ Private sector execution seems more interested in the development of their projects, in the development of AI and in spying on civilian targets as well as the profits produced, than in the health and wellbeing of the targeted people. The cortex is being stimulated by overlapping applications and new “products” are constantly being developed. By now the audience should acknowledge that the radar technology eanbles 360-degree imaging of the target.
”Neurological research found the brain to have specific frequencies for each voluntary movement called preparatory sets. By firing at your chest with a microwave beam containing the ELF signals given off by the heart, this organ can be put into a chaotic state, the so-called heart attack.” – T. Rifat 
The aforementioned effects reconcile well with the methods of interrogation and behavior modification illustrated by R Duncan in his report on torture  where Duncan introduces 18 tactics of torture that can be implemented via physical or “no-touch torture”. ”Coercing and torturing people to suicide is very common. Both tactics in physical or no-touch torture involves plausible deniability.”
The Target Selection
The problem is persistent since there is a vastly growing number of operations that aim to benefit neuro-invasive technologies. There are private AI developers in the sector and many of them are known for entirely another type of consumer products. As a result of long-running operations their resources have developed a pattern of excellence and now are looking to gain a technological advantage in neuroscience and supercomputing. Some corporations or countries may own satellites which in turn allow a significant access to the field of research. These companies consider their employees as a resource by clauses in their contract of employment that allow the use of “brain data” in form of any inventions made by the employees.
A significant amount of States are utilizing the technology and having a “brainrace” causing perhaps overlapping execution on international individuals since there are also a number of individual government agencies whose operations may be run from their independent facilities. This explains the vast increase in the headcount of targeted individuals. The law enforcement body involving the prosecution and judicial system is becoming dependent on the technology which is likely used during trials and pre-trial examinations already.
The resonance methodologies have their roots in military technologies. Recently, the security sector and law enforcement agencies have owned the technology and the defense industry has developed new applications . Also, international white-collar organizations such as the NSA under the national Foreign Ministries’ military wing, the DSA, execute the operations . The technology is operated by the military using multifunctional radar signal intelligence for law enforcement and intelligence community (DSA) white-collar agencies acting as their ”clientele”. NSA officers can globally flag any individual and set them up under the execution without hearing the person. The justice systems and law enforcement agencies are used actively to get hold of the citizen to manufacture them a target . The targeted are not informed of their amended status as a suspect which in turn prevents the target to kick-start legal action. Supervising instances are claiming to use legal protection and reminder of remedies the society may offer. It is difficult to get a message across that no tricks are left, no authority takes responsibility. Taking the matter into the court which has just approved the use of the methodologies sounds illogical. Usually, terrorism, national threat, or serious crime are being used as the excuse to approve the use of the technologies under the coercive measures . In doing so, it seems the EU acting as an ally also is unaware it backs the implementation of the anti-democratic measure that ignores citizens’ human rights, the international rights of the accused, and leaves the targets without legal protection and due process. No questions being asked from the individual themselves.
Since the manufacturing of the targets seems relatively careless and no oversight committee or set of regulations or auditable institution is monitoring how targets are being selected, the protocol may be used for an extension of personal and political, even economical interests. Picking and setting up random targets, no legal groundings necessary. Certainly, dissidents, activists, or whistleblowers are not there by accident. Random people, people who have been in the wrong place at the wrong time are selected to reach the critical mass, the amount of targets to allow for technological breakthrough. The execution does not seem to have a deadline. Anyone could become the future’s target; the extrajudicial implementation does not recognize social statuses, unless social scoring is involved. The targeted people will experience their life being demolished in all areas, holistically, and therefore, their profile is on the downhill. The execution of such a program requires inter-and cross-governmental implementation, hence the “international torture program”. The targeting is inhumane, unjust, unreasoned, and unaccountable .
It may well be that the private sector acts as the developer of the product and runs the experiment whereas the governments are backing the research and delivering the resources, the brains in the execution of neurological mass surveillance.
The Human Rights Issues
”Obviously, silencing dissidents, oppositions of political parties, and whistleblowers are included in the lists of applications. The most disturbing of the trends in torture is testing and improving it. No-touch torture is much more complex than physical torture. Testing design flaws and weaknesses of the signal intelligence is one reason why it is necessary to test on innocent targets.” 
The usage of resonance technologies is observed to be at times politically orientated, or not adequately justified, and is always questionable, strongly subjugating human rights or constitutional rights let alone moral aspects. This is because i) the technology produces a spectrum of pain in the target (and injuries of which some fatal), ii) sleep deprivation in long term preventing full participation in society, iii) the technology is being directed towards civilians (against the Geneva Convention), iv) the technology is being utilized without the permission or consent of the targeted person (against the Nuremberg Treaty), v) the operations lean on self-supervision and monitoring to the extent the human rights aspects are not being considered appropriately (no measures on corruption), vi) the technology is being directed to people inhumanly while asleep and vii) towards bystanders (especially children while also asleep disturbing their sleep and causing them pain), viii) the technology is being directed to homes of the targeted citizens (against constitutional rights for privacy, domestic peace, etc), ix) the period the technologies are being implemented to targets is matter-of-factly inhuman, reportedly from less than a decade up to 30 years (in which time most of the targets are forced outside of their societies and health, social structure, career, and families have all been destroyed), x) the technology may cause fatal injuries that are impossible to trace back to the usage of this technology and xi) torture, definition, of which the use of this methodology fulfills, hardly is an argumentative solution. Finally, xii) targets do not possess constitutional rights, nor legal protection from the practitioner or executor of this torture on them since it is with significant likelihood the local or other government. In addition, xiii) law enforcement and healthcare have been instructed to deny the matter. Local regulators, political power, legislators, and courts approving the use are not understanding and aware of these aspects due to the fact that the military traditionally has been the only institution with this knowledge. Yet this technology has lobbied its way into our societies. The substantial list of shortcomings above leads us to conclude the technologies have not been adequately investigated. The lawmakers, practioners, politicians have only listened to the military and law enforcement arguments as the marketer of these technologies .
Under the anti-terrorism agenda, the constitution and human rights can be occluded, it seems, by the declaration of War on Terror which yet allows derogation of the civil rights on a temporary basis only . When a civilian is targeted by goverment and presented as a terrorist they can be exposed, it seems, to methods of interrogation (e.g. coercive measures neurotech mass surveillance). This derogation should be however a temporary measure. How is it explained that some individuals have been targeted for a decade and more? Indeed, the neurotech mass surveillance is a “no-touch torture” protocol that causes long periods of serious pain, suffering, and even fatalities. By now we should agree that the execution is conducted as a counter-terrorism measure.
“The European Convention on Human Rights requires that a member state availing itself of the derogation clause inform the Secretary-General of the Council of Europe of the measures the state has taken and the reasons for them.” 
“Although the idea of temporality is not expressed in the derogation provisions of the ICCPR or the European Human Rights Convention, it has been understood to have been implied by the notion of emergency. According to the U.N. Human Rights Committee, article four of the ICCPR requires that “measures derogating from the provisions of the Covenant . . . be of an exceptional and temporary nature.“ and ““Derogations from human rights obligations are permitted in order to deal with emergencies. They are intended to be temporary.’” Thus, the suspension of ordinary processes must end when the emergency that required the suspension ceases to exist.“ The targeted under counter-terrorism law could argue that the temporary state has been maintained for purpose since no evidence of terrorism has been found for those accused. In a case where implementation has taken 10 years, the government should be prosecuted for inefficiency in dealing with the matter and thus, violating human rights. This is hardly a temporary measure in the aspect of human life.
Currently, there are no specific laws protecting humans or animals, neither any medical support for them, during cybernetic torture. “The situation is created by the fact that scientists do not leave any information about the illegal mind reading technologies.” How should “we protect people that by utilitarian grounds, without informed consent, are used for brain studies with brain-computer-interfaces in Cyber Psychological Systems, illegal stealing of brain data” ?
In view of the above intellectual rights are important but the human rights violations probably the core of concern. It seems governments have agreed with a single-minded informal agreement that they have the right to remove legal protections from the citizens. They have interpreted that in certain circumstances (that have been artificially created by themselves) they have the right to degrade the human rights, constitutional rights and strip the citizens of legal protection. The torture and inhumane, unjust, unreasoned, and unaccountable targeting  may lead to significant compensation requests from the victims for the use of WMD mass surveillance protocols once they become organized. The UN should support this idea. The periods under execution seem to be unlimited which demonstrates the enslaving nature of the implementation.
There is simply no privacy at all when the privacy of thoughts, feelings, senses, and life overall is demolished. The targets’ households are trespassed physically and technologically, and subjected to domestic disturbance from outside by the resonances (some evidence on this will be published in connection with the field examination). No government is capable of replacing what has been taken away from these people. The terror in their life has been unspeakable. What about the immaterial rights such as the stolen brain data?
“Article 1 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2000) states that “Human dignity is inviolable. It must be respected and protected”.”
The Psychic Driving/System Programming
States have used the same tactics for centuries to put away activists and dissidents who do not buy into the explanations of the power elite and publicly challenge the administration. The targeted people are many times activists, whistleblowers, or dissidents in addition to random people. During the execution of the “no-touch torture program ”, targeted individuals are being treated as mentally ill by the government. The police and healthcare, who are the emergency services, the first point of contacts, have been programmed to handle these patients with a certain presumption. The programming, or inadequate education/ omission of the education, is a part of the design of the torture program . States have a national manual of diseases where identical symptoms the targeted experience have been added indicating alleged neurosis / mental illnesses that correlate with medication designed to worsen the condition of the targeted and strengthening the impact of the resonance. Doctors do find themselves in a helpless position with neurotechnology victims since the illnesses could be induced into the patient . Linking specific medicines with microbiological structured molecules a desired impact can be delivered on the purposed area of the brain. Also, nanotechnologies can be used to deliver nanotechnological engineering into the brains . These are used in combination with EMF resonances to activate certain viruses, bacteria, even cells, synapses to deliver their function. Dr. J. Giordano also specifies neurotoxins that can be used to gain a certain effect. This technology can force the human brain to think certain thoughts, feel certain emotions, and can theoretically override motor control functions. This knowledge must have been obtained by investigating human bio-effects and experiences.
”By specialising on the pulse frequency you could induce psychiatric ilnesses to the point where a psychatrist could not tell if it is a genuine psychiatric illness or an induced psychiatric illness.” – Barry Trower – Microwave Warfare.
”The body is an electromagnetic chemical reaction. Yes, chemicals like drugs can help the body and be used as countermeasures to electromagnetically induced problems. Drugs can be used to affect the body’s electrical-chemical processes.” – R. Duncan, How to Tame a Demon – A Short Practical Guide to Organized Imtimidation Stalking, Electronic Torture, and Mind Control
Many States maintain laws under which the patients can be forced to receive medication and mental help when deemed necessary (by labels of neurosis, imminent threat of violence, self-harm, etc). Due to the inter-and cross-governmental nature of the implementation, the treatment is being coordinated from a co-ordinative structure above the staff treating the patient. The entire process can be evaluated by the supervisory co-ordinative team and depending on the content that the patient discloses as well as his/her behavior the team makes the decision on the most practical plan for him/her. Medication can be used to assist neurotechnological implementation. In some societies, implantable devices are injected into the targeted civilians to assist the chemical balance or observation of the biometrics. These military developed devices are not painless either whilst nowadays merely replaced by nanotechnological materials that may be only inconveniencing to digestion.
The biological and socio-psychological aspects of the targeted’s lives are heavily influenced. Many are pushed outside of their societies and the social networks that are crucial for well-being. A target that intends to disclose the program may experience imminent measures of discrediting or a form of punitive measures that strips social status from the target. Informal reporting and social scoring by the administration is impacted immediately which also derogates the rights of the targeted. They become outlawed. The accused have rights, the rights of the accused but the suspects do not have any. The term “suspect” refers to the removal of civil rights and being made a target. They are profiled internationally and presented as a terrorist, serious criminal, or national threat. The torture that has many faces and sides may go on for decades, in which time the target has lost his social status, fellows, health, financial sustainability, earning model, and credibility.
When the target intends to approach separate parts of the administration to deliver information on potential consipiracy and illegal government activity it is imperative the target has a well argumented, well-written and comprehensible statement to deliver intended content since their profile will be attacked severely by those in the administration who lobby on behalf of the implementation of mass surveillance. Measures will also be taken to prevent any electronic submissions or hard copies delivery to authorities. The informal nature of the execution and coercive measures ensure that the targeted cannot defend themselves against implementation that does not officially exist.
Indeed, an annulment is a common practice. It has become visible and reported that some implementations of systematic programming of discrimination are directed towards the same bloodline or family over the generations. Genetic information hardly provides us a decent explanation for this type of execution.
There are governments with a significant number of totalitarian attributes that have disguised themselves as a democracy. It goes without saying the social sector of administration supports the governmental agenda and is in a position to set up any individual with a variety of methods. Similarly, the judicial system that not only regulates the use of coercive measures but also operates a governmental agenda as the steering mechanism in relation to these individuals. A target cannot possibly receive objective and equal treatment in court. The judicial system reflects the will of the Government.
The method by which the CIA and intelligence community control masses and MSM is to publish fiction that involves similar elements that are involved in the news they want to deny or shut down. They create stories and mix them with the original report (in this case my analysis) and because the topic is complicated the masses are unable to separate the two, only a marginal audience understands what is going on.
There are countless tactics to discredit individual revelations made in media. A common tactic is to descredit the author/content of a revelation that is harmful to government. Another trick is to confuse the original message to an imaginary content that has similar elements. Perhaps involving aliens or conspiracy models that ridicule or make fun of the actual revelation.
Controlling the public is a game of capturing the opinion of masses by using MSM (main stream media). Governments are participating in the information war (between governments) and propaganda (inside the nation) either by direct or indirect ownership of the media. “Regulation, legislation, physical attacks, and threats against journalists or media owners are effective methods used to capture the media. But funding is arguably the most effective method of all. By financing media and journalists willing to toe the government line and by not funding independent, critical media, authorities manage to suppress large parts of the media sector.” [10, 36]”
Resonance methodologies are at the core of Electronic Warfare (EW) operations. DEW, AW, RNM/RMI/EEG, and V2K are tactics being used on targets under anti-personnel execution. DEW and AW are purposed to cause physical injuries whereas the neurotechnological applications used under AI mass surveillance programs such as NRM/RMI/EEG cause psychological effects and pain. RNM Remote Neural Monitoring is used along with the EEG for cloning the neurostructures of the target. A heterodyne is a signal frequency that is generated by combining or mixing two other frequencies using a signal processing technique called heterodyning. Heterodyning is utilised to shift one frequency range into another, new frequency range, and is also involved in the processes of modulation and demodulation. Heterodyning and technology based on TMS (Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation) can be used for the synthetic telepathy. Neurotechnological implementation can be fatal in multiple ways it can drive the targeted to suicidal thoughts but it also has physical health effects that may weaken the body and immune system of the targeted in the long term fatally. V2K can also be produced in a multiple ways but one of the most sophisticated ones is as an AI computer software, developed to learn, which can communicate with the target in real-time and read their memory, thoughts and is able to manipulate targets psychologically and emotionally . The V2K can be used for behavior modification when the technology is based on a psychiatric medical technology called Neurofeedback – EEG Biofeedback. The software acts as an alternative roadmap for the brain (an AI software accesses brain waves emitted by the brain ie ELF waves) by harvesting brainwaves when the brain reacts negatively and the cloning this type of brain wave (ELF waves). V2K technology can be used to clone or mime different medical pathologies, including psychiatric ones. This is why many targets are diagnosed with Schizophrenia or other mental illness. When the use of mobile device emissions is introduced to affect a targeted brain we are in uncontrolable territory.
The operational implementation does not differ. The resonances are delivered from multifunctional radars (active electronically scanned array [AESA]) or antennas on any platform, also by using satellite targeting. Similar radar antennas are used in fighter jets. Networks similar to GWEN (Ground Wave Emergency Network) can be used to create EMPs. In DEW implementation the effect is based on transmitted high amplified energy pulses that cause pain or injuries, even fatalities. Physical obstacles may be overcome by maser technology. In the neurotechnological implementation, the impact is based on heterodyne which combines by intermodulation (two alternating signals, eg radio signals) to produce two or more signals having frequencies corresponding to the sum and the difference of the original frequencies that cause pain or the wanted effect in the target. Depending on the purpose there are custom-designed handheld platforms to be used inside buildings also. An electromagnetic field is created around the target to read the target’s biometrics and run them in a computer simulation in real-time that aims to clone and link the targeted brains. The computer program executes a chosen torture method for interrogation and behavior modification and to the targeted, the execution naturally appears entirely ruthless and cruel. This means the entire process is being automated [7, 9]. Also entire thought patterns, feelings, and images can be induced to the target . The concern in view of the future is whether the transmitting technology will be integrated with our handheld ICT technology and its infrastructure. The handheld mobile devices may already emit resonances below 100Hz that are closely linked to our biology.
DEW (directed energy weapons) can be broadly defined as systems that produce “a beam of concentrated electromagnetic energy or atomic or subatomic particles” which is used as a direct means to incapacitate, injure or kill people, or to incapacitate, degrade, damage or destroy objects . Execution by microwaves, lasers, masers and particles.
AW (acoustic weapons) Acoustic weapons aim to use the propagation of sound – a variation in pressure that travels through a fluid medium (such as air) to affect a target. Most of the acoustic weapons that have been speculated upon are based on either ultrasound (above 20 kilohertz, kHz),
low frequencies (below 100 hertz, Hz) or infrasound (below 20 Hz) deployed at high levels. The human range of hearing is commonly given as between 20 Hz and 20 kHz. In reality, the upper hearing-threshold frequency decreases significantly with age, whereas sounds with lower frequencies can be heard and otherwise perceived if the level is high enough.
We should not forget the ionosphere radar or over the horizon radar (“OTHR”) of which the most famous is the HAARP (The High-Frequency Active Auroral Research Program) which is capable of producing a very high amount of energy in beams and wanted resonance to exact locations at any time. Other nations have revealed their concern with regard to this. HAARP is located in Gakona, Alaska, and was developed by DARPA (Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency). Another OTHR is EISCAT in Longyearbyen, Norway which was originally designed by France, Germany, and the three Nordic countries (Norway, Sweden, and Finland). The Targets in Finland have seen evidence of weather modification as well as traces in the clouds as a marker of the use of OTHR and satellite co-ordination beaming. In view of the European Parliament Resolution on the Environment, Security and Foreign Policy from January 28, 1999, Nr.A4-005/99 art 30 states “Calls in particular for an international convention for a global ban on all research and development, whether military or civilian, which seeks to apply knowledge of the chemical, electrical, sound vibration or other functioning of the human brain to the development of weapons which might enable any form of manipulation of human beings, including a ban on any actual or possible deployment of such systems.” Is it a coincidence that the commonly operated facility has been set into a country that locates in Europe but is not a member of the EU?
When delivering resonances that imitate body functions a satellite becomes a very operative assistance and used seamlessly with the execution of OTHR. Especially for these radar systems, living human targets are a necessity to develop the operating systems, their accuracy, amount of energy directed, and before anything the psychological impact on the individual. A spontaneous EKG can potentially discover the operation whereas a planned scrutiny for healthcheck results in a pause in the execution of the beaming.
The entire multilayer strategy of implementation involves remote execution with satellites and OTHR, local operation by field operatives with a gangstalking element from ordinary local people hired from social media, as well as the utilisation of the ICT infrastructure via mobile devices and the mobile antenna infrastructure. The latter is controlled by software applications that are run within the network. A huge step forward in synthetic telepathy has been the introduction of nanotechnology which has greatly assisted the transportation of AI technology to human brains but also facilitated the access to brains from AI frameworks [34, 35].
“You’re either with us or against us in the fight against terror.”
– George W Bush on 6.11.2001
It is breathtaking how few politicians have understood the larger picture. The anti-terrorism movement by states is an agenda that allows the rights of citizens to be removed for the greater “good of the State” and therefore, a very unconstitutional movement. The strategy, however, was at first implemented by the Western coalition ’Five-Eyes’ to hijack the foreign and security policies of targeted nations, including the allies in the EU. The Western coalition finger-pointed allies saying there is a terroristic activity spotted within the population of the EU countries defining who is a terrorist and what is a terroristic act. Something the European leaders should quickly accomplish is figure out whether they have been treated as allies or subservients by Western Five Eyes coalition manufacturing targets and addressing to the EU member nations that they have citizens with terroristic tendencies (naturally artificial and false accusations) which in turn may be used to force the foreign and security policy of the EU member nations to remove reputational risk and potential risk of conflict. We quote a journalist from RT Neil Clark’s article on 25 Feb, 2021: ”The ‘War on Terror’ was based on a fundamental deceit. It was a deep state/neocon con trick. Not only was it a war that could never be won, it was never meant to be won. It was meant to be permanent.” Indeed, the idea of the anti-terrorism agenda is the declaration of war on those who beg to differ by opinion. There should be only one interpretation of the world events and no exception to the “Western” one is tolerated. The bully-tempered narrow-mindedness quite often leads to a point where sensible analysis is not conducted. There is no need to disagree to juxtapose.
The agenda is an imperialistic tool to force governments to operate similar foreign policies and line up with the West. To make the EU a participant in the War on Terror and bring the conflict onto the European soil. Originally terrorism has been an inconvenience of those nations practicing imperialistic and clumsy foreign policies intervening in the internal politics of other nations. Now, the EU is taking moral responsibility for this against better understanding.
We do not need conflict in the EU and our younger generations should be psychologically free of this type of liability.
There are several pillars to this operation. Strategies are linked to the technological advantage of the Western technology. Signing up as a user a nation agrees with certain conditions and integrates the operations. This happens for the sake of maintenance alone. For instance, for fighter jet fleets, which carry multifunctional radars, their maintenance and updating require a common technological strategy. States which purchase fighter jet fleets will be committed to one strategy due to the maintenance and development of the system. It is a deep integration of defense strategies.
Terrorism, serious crime, a national threat is used as the rationale to justify the manufacturing of the targets to European allies. Must say the manufacturing of the consent has been a bit careless not to forget the implementation. The Western military-intelligence complex coup has won the intelligence communities over by their advanced technology. An average American taxpayer supports the military industry to the extent that equals the cost of free healthcare. By creating suspects in each nation the Western coalition has been enabled to a) force the State to take care of the terrorism and b) offer the Government technology to be used in connection with this which in turn means more dollars for the military complex. Manufacturing targets is a trillion-dollar plan since their resources can be linked to develop AI. “The more brains you have collected in your pool the better AI you will be able to develop”.
Terrorism is indeed a very gloomy and poisonous projection to deliver to our next generation which has already been psychologically affected by the speech of terrorism constantly present in the MSM. We may not be able to estimate the damage caused but we could do something to stop building horrible scenarios. It is indeed recommended that this bellicose agenda is abandoned since the rest of the world, especially our new generation, do not wish to live under such a narrow-minded scenario. A return to international democracy is recommended.
What will the Governments do next to defend their position? It is apparent that so far some of the terroristic attacks in Western societies have been provoked if not financially and operationally supported by Western intelligence itself. We would not expect to see this level of governmental radicalism anymore. The strategy of governments will be to temporarily rate higher the threat of terrorism so that any criticism would not question their undertakings. The Western governments will put the curriculum vitae of their funded researchers (eg Magnus Ranstorp) against those who have been forced to independently investigate the field. This is to the benefit of the researchers since they strengthen their position and ego in supporting the idea of War on Terror. They market the war on behalf of terrorism. It is better to have war to cover the agenda than admit the imperialistic effort to control global population. This is a fight between David and Goliath and the Goliath owns the MSM (mainstream media). Also. the MSM is turned selectively towards other areas of interest.
War on Terror? Not exactly. The methodologies used to harness innocent individuals for something so evil as WMD targeting them are a crime against humanity. We must re-think the role of Western surveillance within society not alone the supervision and monitoring aspects. The execution appears as Robert Duncan (CIA officer and engineer) illustrates: ’It was a clever tactic used by the Germans in WWII to take people away slowly so no revolt occurred. As one CIA agent says, “The Nazis didn’t lose the war they just had to move.” It is not about the Jews now. It is something much more complex and evil’. One should hope the Covid-19 pandemic is not an agenda to enhance governmental control over individuals . Oh no, it is not. There is a chance that it is indeed a part of the very same operation to deliver access to brains of the population.
A senior officer J. Karsikas responsible for digitalisation in the Finnish Defence Forces states that considering super powers it is unlikely they would commit themselves in any regulation and ratify any international agreements in the development of AI . This is due to the fact that AI technologies may constitute the next strategic advantage.
What is the most disappointing aspect of the Electronic Warfare between superpowers, in which populations and individuals are constantly targeted by military technologies is that for these living targets who have become the instruments of global war, no government seems to have a social sector strategy? No civil defence strategy. Societies have created multimillion Euro plans to cover the infrastructure, but the civilian targets are left to die, not being overly dramatic. A meritocratic society is programmed to think there is something seriously wrong with these individuals which leads to isolation of the targeted individuals. That is as intimidating as is the implementation of WMDs. The lack of will to improve the lives and circumstances of the victims speaks thousands of words.
“Wanton killing of innocent civilians is terrorism, not a war against terrorism.” – Noam Chomsky
Electronic Warfare (EW) anti-personnel resonance-based applications that cause pain, suffering, even fatalities are being directed to civilians globally by means of energy- and psychological effects. The governments responsible for the implementation, under which the execution is operated, are utilizing at diversity of military platforms to conduct these operations based on the resonance spectrum. The “Torture Program” is based on the idea of using pain and suffering as a stimulant, an instrument of interrogation to cause a reaction in the targets. The operation is to intentionally cause pain and suffering in its targets for a prolonged period of time. Scientists are in opinion the technological implementation should be reviewed as a weapon of mass destruction. It is a technical legal aspect of international laws of human rights whether the operation should be viewed as a war crime. Execution of a technology that causes pain and suffering, even fatalities, in innocent civilians and bystanders, even children, is now left to supercomputers to run? We are seeing the evidencing of a phenomenon that reminds me in detail of the human experiments during the WWII conducted by Nazis. Even the public demonstrates similar ignorance and prejudice. It seems this psychological cycle repeats itself in human history when a part of the society comes to think of itself as “too invincible”. A result of meritocracy. It is imperative to acknowledge the vast increase in numbers of targeted civilians indicates a widespread attack on human rights.
The resonance spectrum-based technology that now abuses human targets had been developed to its full potential in the midst of the 1970s. The knowledge was kept tight in the military instead of considering civil applications. The War on Terror offered a suitable basis for an imperialistic global agenda and strategy of implementation. The mass surveillance neurotechnology is operated under the agenda of the Western coalition to force new order among states. Anti-terrorism as an agenda is an unconstitutional plan of the Western coalition not only to strengthen sovereign state power at the expense of human rights and democratic systems through surveillance and counter-terrorism laws but also to hijack the foreign and security policies of other nations. War naturally speeds military spending. And speaking of an entirely new niche of technologies the War on Terror is a blessing to the defense industries. The concept of war has been creatively introduced to legally eclipse human rights and democratic decision-making. The erosion of the Constitution is significant.
As for private citizens in terms of pain and suffering caused also their rights have been removed under the counter-terrorism and mass surveillance acts. Suspects do not have the rights of the accused since they will never be accused instead, they have been stripped of their civil rights complete families affected at once. Measures that were purposed as an exceptional and temporary tool to deal with emergencies are now used on an unlimited basis under surveillance laws. It is clear the aforementioned laws are abused to target innocent people. A significant majority of the targeted are not brought to courts of justice and officially accused due to the fact that they are not guilty. These people and their human rights are degraded once abandoned under technology-driven human experiments that remove entirely their privacy and domestic peace. The fact is that individuals’ free will and degree of autonomy are hugely affected. It is the question of a plan with multilayer agenda. It seems that the counter-terrorism and mass surveillance laws are used to manufacture candidates for the human experiment. The selection protocol is inhumane, unjust, unreasoned, and unaccountable. What a convenient tool for governments to root out and yet benefit from the physical existence of political opponents, whistleblowers, activists, or dissidents. At the same time, a significant element of opponents to the political power is being created.
The execution was based on the idea that the targeted would not organize themselves and see through the plan. Now the life cycle of this agenda is different. It is indeed imperative to increase public awareness on the ongoing torture to impact on the life cycle. No totalitarian method can tolerate public awareness as European history points out.
The War on Terror has been successfully used as an extension of the imperialistic foreign policy of foreign nations to destabilize the peace in Europe and the seed of war has been implanted in the soil of the EU. We European citizens do not approve of the War or Terror on European soil. Citizens do find it difficult to believe that European leaders who were supposed to look after the civil rights and peace in Europe are taking a role in such an imperialistic agenda. We expect the EU to be built upon the idea of democracy that guarantees equal rights to everyone. It has been a result of ignorance, shortsightedness, and poor judgment that this sort of plan has gone past our due diligence processes impacting greatly on the future beliefs of young generations who are at the core of well being of any nation.
Making Torture legal is a very questionable agenda. We suggest an urgent review of surveillance laws as well as counter-terrorism laws. The laws have now been used as a punitive measure allowing unequal and inhumane treatment and abuse of civilians by the governments and an underpinning of sovereign state power. The laws have become a formidable weapon of repression. An intelligence law should not only protect citizens against terrorism but also against the State. The modern holocaust has revealed significant weaknesses in our societies. Lawmakers, law practitioners, and politicians, even human rights activists poorly understand the technologies being approved for use on citizens for a prolonged period of time. The role and the strategies of intelligence function in societies European wide should be revisited and some consistency introduced. Military and intelligence functions in eroded society are meant to represent a marginal mechanism, but not the role of the decision-maker. It seems there is a psychological cycle in the collective consciousness of humanity, the need to repeat the pattern of pain and suffering. Perhaps the revised agenda could take a sustainable look to raise the standards of performance we all need to evidence and take part in for the mental growth of the human society. We would choose “trust” among people instead of synthetic telepathy that indeed demonstrates the opposite.
The new generation is experiencing the world as a threatful place today. Continuous airtime on news of terrorism by MSM creates psychological expectations that will last decades. The citizen’s belief in the future is constantly heavily impacted. There are so many areas in society that require improvement that the civilization hardly has time to handle them if crises similar to the War on Terror are intentionally created. I think there might be confusion on where the civilization is going from here. It seems politicians are lost on their way. It is known that beliefs in the future is directly correlated with the well-being and prosperity of national economies. Should the beliefs be a little more positive than they are? One should think the War on Terror hardly is an agenda for a nation looking for well-being to follow. Europeans do not wish to bring the War on Terror to European soil. Therefore, the message for the politicians goes accordingly in terms of foreign and security policies.
The EU should develop its independent defense, especially in terms of technologies, to reduce its dependence on NATO and the Western military-intelligence complex. Therefore the military spending and exercises internally should be coordinated. The EU should seriously review its relation to Western allies, to determine whether the role of European allies is viewed as subservient. The abuse of intelligence operations and aggression in foreign politics that do not respect sovereign EU member nation decision-making as well as the dynamics of ongoing confrontation among powers have taken so many years.
It is apparent the EU has chosen a homeland security strategy that confronts its human rights agenda. Mass surveillance and counter-terrorism laws should be reviewed from the European perspective alone and not as an ally to someone with an imperialistic agenda. The security strategy and following surveillance laws are a result of a poor understanding of Electronic Warfare and its technologies. It would be to the benefit of European democracy to drop the ignorance and bring to the table the representatives of the targeted so that all aspects are indeed understood.
SOME SUGGESTED ELEMENTS FOR A PLAN TO MAKE PROGRESS:
What should be done to prevent the abuse of innocent victims:
1. Increasing awareness of the public of the cybernetic abuse and means of Electronic Warfare being tested on civilians is at the core of tackling the crime against humanity.
2. Breaking the ignorance. It is imperative that the viewpoint and experiences of the targeted must not be ignored or bypassed since understanding the perspective of victims allows for democratic decision making. The victims should be permitted to offer consultation and expertise, the perspective of the targeted to law- and decision-makers for the creation of appropriate EU legislation to protect civil citizens from covert cybernetic crimes and other Electronic Warfare applications.
3. Organisation of the resources. In order to defend the civil rights of the targeted and support the targeted, a global organization should be created which would set up a representation globally for human rights and could enhance “best practices for the establishment of clear ethical boundaries to strictly regulate the use of cyber systems enabling the manipulation and control of human beings” .
To be clear, a), no torture should be tolerated, and both torture and “no-touch torture” protocols should NOT be allowed as an interrogation tactic even though “neuro-surveillance” for purposes of safeguarding national security may be intended; b), Surveillance permission- granting process should be adequately and closely monitored. Mass surveillance of innocent citizens should not be allowed; c) The intel gathered in any possible surveillance method should not be misused and only used in the form it has been approved by court. We may need to allow surveillance but no method of neuro-surveillance or bio-surveillance should use targeted pain or pain at all as a catalyst. Also, the surveillance, of whatever kind, should be limited to a 6-month period with renewal permissions significantly tightened to say only 15% of the applications for renewals, firmly overseen, and with detailed, documented reports delineating reasons for applied renewals, which can be audited, overseen, and withdrawn at any time; d) Human rights auditors from outside Intelligence and Security agencies need to be involved in the continuous monitoring and auditing process, to prevent abuse and torture of targets, as we have now; e) No covered experimentation using pain and torture techniques as “sources and methods” of gathering information, as for instance, the US intelligence community , and other intelligence agencies and militaries are currently doing, under classified cover, to prevent scrutiny of their torture for neural network mapping and neuro behavior modification. What should be allowed instead are strict protocols, regulation, and monitoring of the intelligence community in place as well as surveillance laws that are consistent globally, and the intelligence community held responsible for potential misconduct.
Global consistence in surveillance laws, country-specific regulations, supervision, and monitoring as well as civil channels for reporting potential misconduct is a good start. What is the problem in the US as K Shipp and W Binney [10, 11] indicate, is that the intelligence community may not observe the law, i.e., there is a constitutional conflict since secrecy and classification are currently being used to classify and conceal extreme crime against humanity and actual torture and assassination of human beings.
The message to the governments is to support democracy and avoid planting foreign agendas against democracy to the European audiences. The concern relates to the younger generation which have been entirely forgotten with the anti-terrorism . There is no excuse for bullying civilians and taxpayers since it seems that the EU has increasingly plans for common taxation. No threat exists on this planet that justifies harming and torturing civilians.No collective rationale would speak for the torture without the consent and permission for the implementation. What has been done to civilians on the watch of governments is unforgivable.It is apparent that the administrations involved, have had a need to identify from a worst-case scenario, even though they could afford to see democracy and citizens as a positive reserve and potential, not as a threat.
The targeted individuals are put through a spectrum of social, medical, legal, financial and professional discrimination in their societies. Since the victims or their relatives do not receive the redress, reparation, and rehabilitation they are entitled to under international law (A/73/207) there are some important measures the UN could take to reduce that ’accountability gap’ and to improve the position of the targeted civilians. Perhaps one of the most important measures is to implement pressure on the local governments by holding them responsible to 1) investigate the reported torture and other cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment or punishment by the law enforcement. Currently, the police systematically ignores the reports of these crimes and in an unprofessional manner suggest mental health problems for those reporting their findings to the police. Also, healthcare should be put responsible to 2) guarantee access to healthcare to receive the redress, reparation, and rehabilitation of victims. 3) Compensations on the targeted civilians should be paid to ensure they are able to return to normal life. The first step, however, would be to request the governments to recognise the issue of targeted individuals. The governments should be requested to prepare a statement in view of this matter. These people should be made to once more become socially accepted and full members of the societies. There should be a program available for the rehabilitation of these individuals where consultation and support would be available for each of them. When a government fails to implement basic standards of living for these individuals, they should be submitted a candidate for the Universal Periodic Review protocol (UPR) for the following decade to follow up their progress. The UPR mechanism should be started by each government to reach a common view and statement on the recognition of the issue. The status of each government should be reported annually and compared to the quality of issues and the number of reports received from targeted individuals. Reputational risk should be made obvious to steer some of the governments. Where no progress had been visible the governments could be made legally responsible for the violation of civil rights in the Court of Human Rights globally and the targets should be entitled to compensations. Indeed, a creation of political, legal, financial, and reputational risks to balance the enthusiasm to participate in the aggressive military resonance programs would be advisable.
(1) TARGETING PEOPLE – ARTICLE36.ORG – Key issues in the regulation of autonomous weapons systems, Convention on Conventional Weapons (CCW) Geneva, November 2019
(2) ACOUSTIC WEAPONS – ARTICLE36.ORG – Discussion paper for the Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons (CCW) Geneva, November 2018
(3) DIRECTED ENERGY WEAPONS – ARTICLE36.ORG – Discussion paper for the Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons (CCW) Geneva, November 2017
(4) TARGETED USE OF DEW MILITARY TECHNOLOGY APPLICATIONS (THAT CAUSE FATAL OR SERIOUS INJURIES AS WELL AS SERIOUS PAIN AND SUFFERING FOR INHUMANLY EXTENSIVE PERIODS OF TIME) TO CIVILIANS IN FINLAND – OHCHR SUBMISSION 08.2020 – V. Hellberg
(5) INTERNATIONAL TORTURE PROGRAM MANIFESTED UNDER ANTI-TERRORISM LAWS WITHHOLDS LEGAL PROTECTION AND CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS FROM ITS
TARGETS? – TECHNOLOGY TESTED ON CIVILIANS 09.2020 – V. Hellberg
(6) Barry Trower – Microwave Warfare
(7) Robert Duncan – Neuropsychological and electronic “no-touch torture”. The spectrum of ‘interrogation” and torture techniques used by the US and its allies
(8) The Verge – The EU is considering a ban on AI for mass surveillance and social credit scores
(35) An Implantable Wireless Network of Distributed Microscale Sensors for Neural Applications: Jihun Lee; Ethan Mok; Jiannan Huang; Lingxiao Cui; Ah-Hyoung Lee; Vincent Leung; Patrick Mercier; Steven Shellhammer; Lawrence Larson; Peter Asbeck; Ramesh Rao; Yoon-Kyu – 2019 9th International IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering (NER)
(36) Control the money, control the media: How government uses funding to keep media in line – Marius Dragomir, Center for Media, Data and Society (CMDS), School of Public Policy, Central European University
CORRESPONDENCE TO THE EU COMMISSION
The UN Convention against torture was signed by nations, many of them only partially, on 10.12.1984. Since that time the world has changed significantly in terms of torture. What the EU intends to do with common legislation on torture? A very timely matter.
What the EU Commission intends to do by the fact that the EU strategy for homeland security is in conflict with its policies for human rights?
The coercive measures of law enforcement of western countries are based on resonance methodologies such as electronic warfare anti-personnel technologies DEW, AW, RNM, EEG, V2K, etc. The usage of this technology at times politically orientated, or the usage is not adequately justified, and is questionable, strongly mitigating human rights or constitutional rights let alone moral aspects. This is because i) the technology produces a spectrum of pain in the target (and injuries of which some fatal), ii) sleep deprivation in long term preventing full participation to the society, iii) the technology is being directed towards civilians (Genova Convention), iv) the technology is being utilized without the permit or consent of the targeted person (Nurnberg Treaty), v) the operations lean on self-supervision and monitoring to the extent the human rights aspects are not being considered appropriately (no measures on corruption), vi) the technology is being directed to people inhumanly while asleep and vii) towards bystanders (especially children while also asleep disturbing their sleep and causing them pain), viii) the technology is being directed to homes of the targeted citizens (constitutional rights for privacy, domestic peace, etc), ix) the period the technologies are being implemented to targets is matter-of-factly inhuman, reportedly from decade up to 30 years (in which time most of the targets are forced outside of their societies and health, social structure, career, and families have been destroyed), x) the technology may cause fatal injuries that are impossible to trace back to the usage of this technology and xi) torture, which by definition the use of this methodology fulfills, hardly is an argumentable solution. Finally, xii) targets do not possess constitutional rights, nor legal protection from practitioner since it is with the significant likelihood the local or other government. In addition, xiii) law enforcement and healthcare have been instructed to deny the matter. Local regulators, political power, legislators, and courts approving the use are not aware of these aspects due to the fact that the military traditionally has been the only instance with this knowledge. The intelligence community has gained an imbalanced position with this tech and now abuses it in each member country. Also, justice system is becoming addicted to this tech. W Binney quite correctly points out concern about democracy, human rights, constitution, and legal protection of our citizens in the following: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xF_VYNtDgN8&t=441s
What the EU intends to do in view of human rights in Europe?
Most of the member nations do not have legislation on torture, they rely on the UN convention from 1984. For instance, in the case of Finland, this convention is only partially recognized (article 21 paragraph 1 and 22 paragraph 1).
The security strategy strongly relies on technologies of which use conflicts with human rights and the EU policy for HR. These have a significant impact on 1) democracies, 2) corrosion on constitutional rights and 3) confidence in the future which in turn defines the development of wellbeing in any nation. The security strategy supports electronic warfare (EW) anti-personnel resonance methodologies. These are being proposed as a surveillance tech by the intelligence community and defense forces who do not reveal these technologies have the capacity to cause pain, suffering, and fatalities (Resolution on the Environment, Security and Foreign Policy from January 28, 1999, Nr.A4-005/99) and the capacity is in heavy use and not supervised, controlled properly. The national supervision and control mechanisms are not sufficient. The massive and growing audience of TI (targeted individuals) is a remarkable sign of this issue.
The technology is being supported by the western agenda for anti-terrorism and benefits the defense industry. Why would the EU cast this type of future for itself? There is an interesting phenomenon ongoing in western societies. The intelligence community has been allowed to step up and guide societies. A function that has been purposed to a marginal mechanism within the society now manufactures the consent.
The resonance technology provides the intelligence community and defense function a role during the time of peace that conflicts with the idea of democracy. These instances appear to paint pictures of horror to advance their agenda under national security, threats and crisis constantly to argue stronger participation within the society. A good example of this is the agenda of anti-terrorism that defines the form of society today. We lay an artificial threat to our younger generation. The confidence for the future of the new generation is being tested with the current threats created by geopolitical agendas and the birth rate has sunken significantly in many societies. Why would a society inflict upon itself such a curse?
Does the EU understand that by buying the idea of the threat of terrorism it accepts the idea of the ‘war on terror’ and casts it to Europe? We must remember that terrorism has been defined by the ’west’ and the recent issue may be seen as a result of heavy-handed foreign policy, poor diplomacy of nations from past decades that refer to themselves as the empire. By accepting the idea of the war on terrorism we accept the war is in Europe. As citizens of the EU we are looking for a less gloomy picture for the future and rather would identify from positive models of the future. The human mind operates from the level it identifies. We should do better than this.
How does the EU intend to do to control surveillance activities in the EU?
There is a lack of consistency in surveillance laws among the EU nations. When a surveillance law of a member nation prevents e.g. use of RNM/RMI (remote neuromonitoring/remote mind imaging) towards its citizen the intelligence community turns to the nation where the use of the technologies is allowed. The intelligence community serves each other thus the rights of a citizen or legal protection does not hold anymore. The ruling is awaited that prevents where forbidden technology in one country is being used from another to target civilians. The EU would benefit from resonance-free zones. Social media: Reading an individual’s social media communication private of nature the intelligence community from Finland may turn to Swedish intelligence who is a member of ’nine eyes’ and has access to XkeyScore.
The US intelligence services have become desirable among the European intelligence community due to the technological advantage but also by US anti-constitutional approach their strategy to enhance the sovereign rights by the cost of civilians. A part of the imperialistic agenda is to create security concerns that overrule any rights of citizens and also underpin the position of intelligence communities in democracy. The US has won the European intelligence community on their side by integrating the individual intelligence services by technology that also defines the strategy for the user. In the anti-terrorism agenda, the US hijacks security and foreign policies by defining who is a terrorist and what is a terroristic act. Since a nation identifies from the frame it is given why provide the EU with a gloomy pic? Mass surveillance laws to consider seriously the aspect from resonance technologies, AI, robotics, neuroscience (https://lbry.tv/@RamolaDReports:8/Invasive-Neurotech-True-Neuroethics—Panel-2:e). Fighter jet fleets use EMP to target citizens without their permit or concent torturing civilians with multifunctional radars and manipulating their biometrics.
In Finland, the constitution was amended to provide intelligence service power and tools to operate. The community is asking for more eg allowing trespassing. An analysis was completed from the perspective of resonance technologies why this should not be allowed. Civilians are targeted by military tech to their homes, bystanders, even babies, and children intentionally produced pain, suffering, and even fatal injuries. The big picture indicates absolutely no reason other than the paranoia and profile rise effort by the intelligence service why such powerful tools should be allowed. No legal protection for targets to rely on, constitutional rights, or human rights not respected. The international rights of the accused are being orbited by presenting the target as a suspect. The targets are manufactured to test the ultimate control over an individual. Trust is gone. Testing periods are inhumane.
How are the EU law enforcement agencies regulated, monitored? How does the EU inland security strategy recognize the fact that resonance-based mass surveillance systems (RNM, EEG, RMI) are being targeted to civilians? How common is the knowledge that these cause pain, suffering, psychological trauma even fatal injuries in their targets, bystanders, civilians, even babies, and children? Is it known the execution is careless? How are the individuals chosen for these ’torture programs’? What principles are being met to prevent politically-minded targeting? How does the EU recognize the rights of suspects since there are no rights similar to the rights of the accused? How are the periods of targeting regulated? A large number of govt agencies, also from foreign communities, have access to these programs. Torturing is illegal by law in most EU nations and against human rights, constitutional rights. No legal protection for citizens exists against this crime against humanity. Operations are run by the national military agencies thus, can be defined as a war crime. How the EU intends to root out the problem of torture by state agencies and private sector partners foreign intelligence community? A good memory of the operation ’rendition flights’, that had no legal ground, of which distant cousin this operation is. What the EU intends to do to improve the approach of national law enforcement and healthcare systems to the targets of resonance technologies (government-directed mass surveillance protocol that cause pain and psychological trauma) that clearly degrade their rights? How is the legal protection of these citizens improved? Are these people still degraded and treated as mentally ill in front of police or healthcare? What an uncivilized, backward, and inhumane approach. How is the idea of democracy with this implementation?
Having made myself familiar with the SOCTA 2021 report among other reports it seems the Europol does not make a note of such a problem at all albeit the headcount of targeted civilians is piling up. Pretending such a problem does not exist? The global market reports as well as the manufacturers’ technological guides, scientific articles, etc confirm electronic warfare anti-personnel technology is based on military multifunctional radars and signal tech soon to be operated from ICT framework and indeed, operated by the military. An issue of a war crime? Are we really doing this? Pretending that there is no problem and allowing the extrajudicial purge similar to the holocaust ongo at the EU watch? Even though human rights, the constitutional rights are severely and violently attacked there is no word on the phenomenon of targeted civilians? Individuals, someones’ children, are targeted without consequence, perhaps overlapping. Targets do not have rights, no legal protection. Since the technology in question is operated as an extension of political decision-making as a punitive instrument. We will never know who is going to be the next target. No status will bring a shield in the future.
Is that due to fact that it is the law enforcement and intelligence community in the EU who are targeting civilians with military equipment electromagnetic pulses that cause pain, suffering, and fatal injuries as well as psychological trauma? We have a serious concern since the EU’s strategy for homeland security conflicts with the strategy for human rights.
As Finnish citizens, we experience it difficult to reach information from officials in Finland on our rights and therefore we approach the Commission for this matter.
In 1995 Joseph Biden introduced a bill called the Omnibus Counterterrorism Act of 1995. It previewed the 2001 Patriot Act by 1) allowing secret evidence to be used in prosecutions, 2) expanding the Foreign Intelligence Act and wiretap laws, 3) creating a new federal crime of ’terrorism’ that could be invoked based on political beliefs, permitting the US military to the used in civilian law enforcement, and allowing permanent detection of non-US citizens without judicial review.
The Center for National Security Studies commented the bill would erode ’constitutional and statutory due process protections’ and would ’authorise the Justice Dept to pick and choose crimes to investigate and prosecute based on political beliefs and associations’.
We share the concerns addressed and would urge to review the rights of the accused and suspects of serious crime or terrorism in Finland. It seems the rights of the accused have been degraded and the legal protection of suspects has been eroded similar to their constitutional rights. Coercive measures such as neurotech applications (RNM/RMI) cause pain, suffering, likely fatalities are being misused and directed to homes of investigated for long periods of time.
Who overviews the methodologies of coercive measures? Who supervises the technology is being used correctly? How is the ethical aspect present when technology is being chosen? There is no adequate control.
To what extent it is permitted in the EU (Finland) to benefit materials in a prosecution that a) has been obtained by coercive measures b) that is classified (the accused has no chance to verify the material nor defend themselves against it)?
To what extent are neurotech applications being used in courts? To what extent the technology steers the decision-making of judges? It seems the accused has the role of the bystander in their trial.
The permission-granting process is not controlled properly. To what extent the evidence to open a secret investigation is being verified and examined by the district court of Helsinki? How political or personal interests of investigation are prevented? Coercive measures are used to manufacture state will. The state interest as an investigator is to make the suspect appear guilty or question their integrity, crecitability, and the suspect does not have the position to defend themselves in the process. To convict a terrorist suspect of a felony of any kind reduces the impact of miscalculation or political ambition by the state. There is evidence of implantable devices injected into the bodies of citizens without their permit producing agony and pain. The current correct practice of investigation is not so much to seek the truth that it is to degrade an individual.
JUDICAL SYSTEM AND DEMOCRACY IN FINLAND
The rights of the accused are not self-evident today. In practice, the burden of proof is often shifted to the accused. The accused is granted a chance to make himself heard albeit this rule is being broadly violated. A significant moral dilemma exists also in the access of the accused to counsel. Whilst compensated in quality it is allowed at a good rate in the national courts. Whereas trial above the national judicial system, at the time when legal process often becomes the case of state integrity, no assistance is granted anymore. This remarkably reduces the number of processes reaching the ECtHR and limits the possibility of discovery of potential malpractice of the national judicial system. White collars should follow ethical practices which highlight fairness and equality. The relation of the police and prosecutor seems to put the values to the test(pre-trial). Instead of justice, the national court appears to deliver the ’will of the State in relation to the accused’.
The counter-terrorism laws are used against democracy. Suspects do not have rights nor legal protection against coercive measures. The accused have rights, the rights of the accused. Very few are ever being accused.
Coercive measures are being abused with the assistance of the court and target suspects for an inhumanly long period of time with investigation methodologies that cause pain, suffering, and even fatalities to the targets or family members, even babies. During this time the suspect does not have proper legal protection, even constitutional rights are removed by the execution.
Neuropsychological and remote electronic ’no-touch torture’ applications used under coercive measures compromise heavily human rights and are thought of as WMD by its engineers. Since there is no adequate fair inspection in place suspects are abused during investigations likely for wrong reasons. Counter-measures are being used to manufacture trials directed against the suspect by State or individuals advised to do so. This tactic guarantees further investigation permitted. The accused should never be found guilty on the basis of evidence that has not been brought to light and examined by the accused. The evidence is not presented to the accused to ward coercive measures.
There have been several serious incidents that indicate deep structured corruption of critical infrastructure of Govt institutions under the monitoring of the Parliament. Inadequate supervision has become a significant problem. The role of the political power as the inspector raises many questions of which the least important is not ’whether Finland should have its Constitutional court?’. Although ’professional judges must have a higher university degree in law’ it does not prevent corruption especially since the judicial system is ’independent’. A mature member of society understands, by human nature this is impossible. The judicial system does not seem to convince the citizens anymore.
What mechanisms the EU has to evaluate the level of democracy in member nations? Democracies to be re-evaluated.
How does the EU regulate, overview or monitor the preparation of counter-terrorism and surveillance laws by member states? How is the consistency of the laws being monitored between the nations? How do civil rights and legal protection survive in these circumstances?
By observation, globally ‘the war on terror’ seems to underpin the sovereign power at the expense of civil rights. We have a constant dilemma on how the ‘act of terror’ is being defined and how it has been communicated to the citizen. Similarly, we do have a problem by definition with what may trigger the need for surveillance over an individual. A matter of interpretation is not good enough? In practice, some crimes or anti-social behavior now turn into an ‘act of terror’ by definition or interpretation? Citizens may not even understand their commitment to an act of terror or being a part of a society of which status is turned to be suspected of terroristic activity by the administration. Grey lines everywhere. It seems politicians have created an extrajudicial tool to ensure sovereign access to ultimate power over the citizen. Why the ultimate control?
How are the surveillance technologies and methods overviewed? How are the periods of surveillance regulated by law and human rights? There has been a vast increase of reports coercive measures are indeed producing pain, suffering, and even fatal injuries. The suspects are receiving rough treatment over prolonged periods of time but never accused.
“Although the idea of temporality is not expressed in the derogation provisions of the ICCPR or the European Human Rights Convention, it has been understood to have been implied by the notion of emergency. According to the U.N. Human Rights Committee, article four of the ICCPR requires that “measures derogating from the provisions of the Covenant . . . be of an exceptional and temporary nature”” – “Informal” Suspencion of Normal Processes: The “WAR ON TERROR” as an Autoimmunity Crisis by A. ADDIS, Boston University Law Review.
How is this informality being monitored? How is it supervised no coercive measure or interrogation method consist of an element of torture, cause pain or suffering in the targeted? By observation, most of the suspects will never be accused. Is it possible that being a target of coercive measures is a worse option than imprisonment? How are the rights and legal protection of suspects ensured? We have still countries where even the rights of the accused materialize poorly.
Every question addressed here points to a system error. The ultimate cost is borne by the citizen. We have totalitarian states disguised as democracies. It is the culture of execution and power balance, the relationship between the citizen and the administration. We must measure these things to correct them.
The supervision of the Finnish police relies on internal self-supervision. Recently, there have been a number of court cases questioning the integrity of the entire National Bureau of Investigation. How does the sole internal monitoring compare among the European peer group? By observation of the public reports, news, and personal experience there is a need for a European authority for investigation of police practices to improve and support the moral standards. An external unit, in particular.
The police would not investigate reports of electronic warfare attacks targeting citizens. This has been addressed to the National Police Commissioner Seppo Kolehmainen. No response has been received. Whether this is rather a matter of national security, the activity may continue uninterrupted and the targeted civilians suffer pain, psychological illnesses, even fatalities. On many occasions, the police have reportedly annulled and questioned the mental health of citizens who have requested an investigation on their constant concern. There are reports some individuals have been taken to mental institutions or mental evaluation by force while others proposed to visit their therapist or doctor suggesting an issue with mental health. Kolehmainen has been addressed. No response has been received. Police do not possess the capability to assess the mental health of an individual. What sort of guidance has been given to police in view of this vastly growing issue?How the citizen reporting DEW and resonance attacks should be minded according to police, whether the practice is indeed consistent with this?
The emergency services in Finland are operated by Emergency Response Centres managed by the Ministry of the Interior in cooperation with the Ministry of Social Affairs and Health ie the police and healthcare functions. We would like to understand what sort of guidance there is given to the police and healthcare in terms of individuals who suffer the symptoms of electromagnetic attacks?
The permission granting process for police’s coercive measures by the District Court of Helsinki, in particular, requires monitoring. Since the judges do not know the individuals whose surveillance is on the table the decisions are made on an application basis. How is this process monitored externally? How many times an extension on an existing permission can be granted? How is it controlled the coercive measures are not being used for business, political or personal interests? How is the resilience of individual police officers and the judges, in particular, is being monitored in terms of corruption?
The Finnish police maintain formal and informal databases of citizens, involving profiles of them. This information is not available to the citizen by data access request. Is informal reporting used in cross-governmental communication?
Reports exist the NBI maintains a form of co-operation with the equivalent of Russia. Is this co-operation is indeed approved and formal?
Report & Summary, with Transparent Media Truth Video Post | Ramola D | April 1, 2021
In a series of presentations and round-table conversations at Transparent Media Truth recently hosted by Doug McKenty, environmental scientist, computer scientist, and former government employee Clifford Carnicom revealed the core of his deep research over a period of twenty years into a variety of interlinked phenomena surrounding a highly concerning key finding: that of a strange new microbe isolated first from an airborne filament system in 1999 and found later to exist and affect tissue in lesions reported by Morgellons-sufferers as well as in people’s bodies and the environment.
Working closely with this seemingly partially-synthetic microbial organism, subjecting it to various tests and observations, extracting it from multiple environmentally-obtained samples as well as tissue samples from different people, culturing it, finding it transforming the blood and urine of numerous people, observing its effects, Clifford Carnicom concludes that this “cross-domain bacteria (CDB)” as he calls it is “causal to Morgellons,” now ubiquitous in our environment and found post-aerosol, now present inside all our bodies at the cellular level, now distinctly affecting plant life, fungal life, and human life, in short, transforming all life on planet Earth.
Deeply disturbed by his findings but driven by a passionate desire for the truth and a need to help those suffering from a yet-unacknowledged ailment–Morgellons, dismissed by clearly co-opted or complicit doctors as “delusional”–irony profound when physical manifestations in lesions, filament extrusions, tissue damage are clearly visible, Clifford reports that he has written 350 research papers as well as filled numerous notebooks with his observations and findings.
His remarkable body of work, open to the public and to professionals in the life sciences, physical sciences, law, and journalism who he hopes will step forward to take his findings further with keen interest in sequencing the CDB genome, examining its evolution, cataloguing its effects, and addressing its deleterious impact on human, animal, and plant life, can be found at his website: https://www.carnicominstitute.org
Chem Trails and Wave Clouds: Secret Military Programs with Visible Trace
The story of his first stumbling upon the subject of what would expand into a singular focus over 20 years is described in his document the Santa Fe Conference Transcript and offers an intriguing introduction to the connections between “geo-engineering” which he says goes well beyond weather and is actually a transforming of the earth, and bio-engineering, which formed the subject of a talk he gave in 2019 with author Elana Freeland: Geoengineering and Bioengineering: The Unmistakeable Link
First prompted to examine the phenomenon of chem trails–which he prefers to call aerosol spraying–noticed in New Mexico in 1999, Clifford took a series of photographs on Valentine’s Day over 45 minutes, showing the dissipation of aerosols into thin sweep of hazy cloud, a sight now familiar to us all.
Clifford’s efforts to learn more about these aerosols through early publication of his photos online and online discussion with others resulted, he notes, in a very interesting phenomenon of multiple Defense organizations, naval bases, Defense contractors, and pharmaceutical corporations making multiple visits to his computer, as noted, presumably, in IP (Internet Protocol) trace on his PC.
“Lockheed Martin, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Allergens Pharmaceutical Corporation, Lyon, Texas, Raytheon Defense System, US Defense Logistics Agency, Davis-Moffat Air Force Base, US Naval Sea Systems Command… The point is, you could not ask for a more representative cross-section of what is known as the military-industrial, as well as the pharmaceutical, as well as the media, as well as the intelligence, as well as the governmental complex. I guess I get to extend Eisenhower’s domain a little bit… .”
Clifford Carnicom, Santa Fe Conference Transcript
Stonewalling, Lies, Obfuscation, Deflection, Silencing by US Government Agencies to Prevent Public Disclosure
Early attempts in March 2000, Mr. Carnicom notes, to identify the filamentous, airborne substance seemingly connected with the aerosol sprays by contacting the EPA, Environmental Protection Agency led to stonewalling.
A correspondence from the EPA 18 months after request stated with some hubris that they were under no obligation to analyze unsolicited material–questionable, since, as Clifford notes, the stated mission of this government agency is “protection of the environment.”
Alerts to senators and state representatives resulted in Air Force and Naval denials of “chem trails” with one US Airforce spokesman, Lt. Col. Michael Gibson later found to be a Master Intelligence officer (significant since “Intelligence” today seems to mean Lie-Glibly-to-Public) informing Representative Mike Green that all observed trails in the sky were con trails and nothing to worry about. This correspondence along with a stinging response from Diane Harvey can be found in the Sep 11, 2000 article “Airforce Lies to America,” compiled in the Carnicom_institute_Research-2000.2.pdf downloadable from the Research Papers tab.
Meanwhile, concern was growing among large numbers of residents in California, in many other US states, and in the UK about the observed worldwide spraying from planes, as well as the concomitant rise of chronic respiratory illness, skin rashes, brain fog, and Alzheimer’s and other brain-degrading illness, as evinced by the numbers of websites focused on chem trail research.
Widespread public concern and multiple communications to the CDC on the deleterious health effects and resultant Morgellons (as well as other diseases) from chem trail spraying compelled the CDC to engage in a nationwide study from 2006 to 2009, after which, Clifford Carnicom reports, an obfuscating CDC report was issued alleging addiction and mental health issues to Morgellons-patients studied, while claiming the finding of a protein from samples, but providing no further information or follow-up.
This CDC report is marked by many researchers online as seriously disappointing and evidence of weak methodology and approach. No attempt was made, it is noted, to culture the fibres; those who have sought to do so including Clifford Carnicom report growth, replication, structure of the fibres, and suggest they are dealing with a genetically modified organism.
It is salutary to note at this point that CDC is apparently beholden to many masters, being the recipient of massive funding both from the Government and from a variety of donors via the CDC Foundation, inclusive of numerous pharmaceutical companies, research institutions, Big Tech media such as Google and Facebook, insurance companies, investment companies, Defense contractors, and other foundations such as the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, as revealed recently by the Covid Blog: CDC Foundation is not a government entity, has many conflicts of interest.CDC therefore cannot be relied on to present the truth on any scientific matter whatsoever.(And, as many astute researchers point out, is certainly lying outright about COVID-19, the masks, the “social-distancing,” the self-isolating, the vaccines, none of which are needed for a never-isolated putative flu virus with a 99.97% recovery rate.)
Clifford Carnicom names one more agency of interest, appealed to and found wanting in the investigation of airborne and tissue-sample filaments, the US Patent Office where a patent he submitted in relation to Morgellons has been suppressed by way of claims that the disease is delusional and does not exist.
Research Findings Point To Attempted Transformation of Life, DNA, and Human Species
What Clifford Carnicom is revealing, in this video presentation overview and in his Santa Fe Conference Transcript, both of which somewhat condense his 20 years of labor but do not fully encompass all research and findings, is nothing short of phenomenal.
Findings across the spectrum of the sciences including in Physics, Biochemistry, and Biology, with close study of the physical composition of environmental samples taken from apple trees and rainwater, repeat-recordings of peculiar low-frequency pulses (at bio-resonance frequencies) endemic in the environment at the remotest of spots as well as elsewhere, culturing and growth of the cross-domain bacteria found in lesions in people’s bodies, effects of the bacteria on germinating plants and yeast spores, close electron-miscroscopy observation of the morphing of the bacteria inside blood cells, of the geometric formation of nodes and networks of “bio-film” in the body combine to yield a sinister picture of designed nano-transformation of all plant and animal life, DNA, and the human species in covert global programs to terraform planet Earth and all life in it.
In this video overview, Clifford shares a 14-point summary of his findings, stating unequivocally that a unique microbe found to be toxic to all life worldwide has now been found, including in effluents from aerosol sprays (chem trails), with humans, animals, and plants all being pathologically affected, with distinct, observable symptoms of infection and internal impact.
The microbe has been designated “cross-domain” because it appears to cross biological domains in its life cycle, and proves its nature as a culturable organism with separation of proteins, lipids, and nucleic acids accomplished.
Infrared spectrometry and chromatography have helped define the proteins in the microbe while toxicity studies prove its harmful effects on bacterial, fungal, and plant life. DNA has been successfully repeat-extracted from the microbial culture although not yet fully sequenced and identified.
Germinating-seed deformation and yeast-spore mutation in presence of the microbe protein is pictured in the Santa Fe document–clearly of concern since this shows nascent plant life and fungal life are being destroyed:
Ways to limit the influence of the microbe on health such as detoxing–mitigating strategies–have been offered. Although the microbe has not been “officially” acknowledged, this disclosure with accompanying documentation seeks to inform the world.
Clifford Carnicom further discusses the symptoms of Morgellon’s displayed by reporting sufferers which include a depletion of oxygen in the blood, low body temperature, and transformation of the red blood cells while cellular integrity remains intact. The microbe tends to coagulate, he says at nerve centers and joints inside the body, giving rise to neurological and pain symptoms, and seems to be capable of self-assembling, replicating and creating the fibrous lengths reported to be bursting painfully through skin and provoking ridged skin and itches. The microbe seems also to be transforming the blood cells and affecting DNA.
This information is similar to what other researchers report online, where many conclude that everyone in the world is actually similarly inflicted while the visible breakthroughs and lesions through skin being named Morgellon’s are occurring only in a portion. Certain conditions including pulsed radiation might activate the microbe further to invoke biofilm, itching, and lesion effects. The strange ELFs/ULFs found to be pulsing across the world covertly at ranges from 1.5 to 4 Hz, in the realm of brainwaves and bioresonance, might well be assisting a permeation of cell membranes by the sub-micron-sized microbes while preserving cellular integrity.
The implications for humanity today, worldwide, are catastrophic, if these secretive nanobiology/synthetic biology spraying operations and ELF/ULF operations are not halted: what it currently implies is that we are all being transhumanized without our consent, that bio-engineering mechanisms merging inorganic matter, AI, and biological matter are being surreptitiously stealth-engineered into our human cells, that our health, humanity, and DNA are being compromised.
In her 2017 articles Morgellons Disease/Nano Poisoning and Nano Health Solutions in a 21st Century AI World, investigative journalist and researcher Susan Price quotes Elon Musk saying: “If we can effectively merge with AI, improving the neural link between the cortex and the digital extension of yourself, which already exists, it just had a bandwidth issue, you effectively become an AI-human symbiote.”
Calling all Concerned Medical and Science Professionals
Throughout his presentation even as he offers suggestions on how people with Morgellons could use different modalities such as nutritional approaches, Clifford Carnicom emphasizes the importance of reaching the professional medical and healthcare communities and have them address these issues more thoroughly: “These are some suggestions from one person, namely me, that has been involved in trying to research what is the nature of this microbe and its impact upon biology, the planet, and the human being and really all life in the end…because it needs to be expressly stated that this is the situation, this information is informational and research based only, there is absolutely no diagnostic or therapeutic basis provided with what I’m saying here, and professional health consultation is mandatory to even begin to consider the use of this information–but the catch 22 is if the professional health communities will not acknowledge the existence of something that is directly observable in all simple ways, well now you have a problem because now you’re refusing to help people, but yet your help is required, so that’s the dilemma, that’s the dilemma the world is now facing– the help is required but it’s being refused okay by the very person, the very people that are embedded into a set of ethics that dates back centuries but that is their purpose–Hippocratic Oath, right?”
It is to be hoped that medical and other science professionals will come forward to further explore and address these matters related to this Morgellons AI SynBio microbe, the continuing aerosol spraying which needs immediate halting, and help turn back the clock for all humanity.
All research papers mentioned can be found at The Carnicom Institute Website. These research papers offer fascinating insights and information and will continue to be covered at this site, along with the whole subject of chem trails, Morgellons, nanobiology, synthetic biology, AI-human symbiosis, and transhumanism.
Many thanks to Doug McKenty for hosting this series and to Rob Rubin of Transparent Media Truth for spreading the word on this important summary presentation and critical scientific disclosure.
Without warning. shortly after the premiere-streaming of Report 237 this afternoon (interestingly, on 3-3/21), the Ramola D Reports Youtube channel was crashed. A note from Youtube accused this writer of being in violation of their “medical misinformation policies” a stance taken earlier when all Ramola D interviews with doctors on the dangers of the mRNA vaccines were removed, as reported here and also here.
A truly critical interview and conversation with a dedicated and wide-ranging researcher, the information that Alison McDowell is sharing today, both in many interviews she has given lately, her recorded presentations and talks at various academic and community forums, her blog Wrench in the Gears, and her own Youtube channel (links below) collecting her research and activism online, is so mindblowing that most people cannot quite take in the depth and breadth of what she is reporting.
Apparently however, the planners and minders of dystopian Techno Jails for our children and grandchildren watching our conversation were so threatened by our candid conversation they felt the urgent need to pull the plug on an entire video channel filled with testimonials of human rights violations, rousing public discussion and unique interviews with unique public figures on rights, liberties, and freedoms, as well as much insightful documentary on today’s science and technology, today’s surveillance state, today’s changemakers, and today’s ethics, values, and strides in human consciousness.
As I wrote below the video, describing our conversation, what Alison McDowell is whistleblowing about is sheer techno subjugation and enslavement of the entire human species, with a Slavemaster construct built in, privileging the already filthy-rich billionaires at the top, profiting off ALL human existence, employment, and enterprise:
“Empowering and wide-ranging conversation with Alison McDowell, deep researcher into current and planned finance/surveillance management scenarios involving the complete and full-spectrum takeover of human bodies, human spaces, and human existence through an enmeshed mix of nanotechnologies, surveillance modalities, robotics, AI, and co-opted communities in all arenas of human endeavor, including education, sciences, arts, targeting humans from womb to grave for continuous revenue creation for oligarchs via involuntary brain and body monitoring, neuro/wifi behavior modification paired with predatorial financial creations such as hedge fund betting, social impact investing, and other concoctions designed to use, exploit, manage, and handle human lives and labor.
The Great Reset, the Fourth Industrial Revolution, the futures market and Agenda 21/2030’s sustainable development goals are all intended apparently to turn humans into thoroughbreds at the Kentucky Derby, where the hat-wearing barons get to bet on the legginess of the equines, that is, the neurodegraded, eternally monitored homo sapiens, nanobotized to the hilt (with mRNA creations-at-tip-of-a-syringe ) and dependent in circles on “communitarian” enterprises contrived to watch, brush, feed, and employ them from prior-to-cradle to well-beyond-grave via blockchained avatars, digital twinning, and EEG Cloning: welcome to Techno Enslavement aka “Humans 2.0” or what Schwab & co. would call “Biosecurity” for the Billionaires.
The danger, she says, is blockchain and digital twinning, a scenario where people are being enticed into earning within the blockchain context while being gamified behind the scenes via avatars; the intention of the hedge fund capitalists sinking their all without scruple into deeply-intrusive bio-surveillance capitalism is nothing less than feudalist social control: a dichotomizing of reality into the have-nots and the haves, with the oligarchic “haves’ calling the shots and playing Brave New World with all the new, high-tech and wifi tools of Techno Tyranny at their fingertips.
What stands against that is what we have as humanity with a beating heart and feet on the grounding Earth; people do not know it but we are in a battle for our lives, for our children’s lives, for generations of the unborn, for Earth itself, for Nature as we have known her, for all flora and fauna on the planet–since the push to modify genetically, commodify, patent and colonially acquire all life and all species goes hand in hand with this current push to nanobotize all humanity: fill us up with nanobiosensors, then an mRNA operating system (as Moderna was forced to publicly acknowledge on their website is the truth behind the COVID vaccines) to handle the nanobiotech in our cells, BCI-AI to link our brains to supercomputing and all-devouring AI, wifi and 5G and 6G to hook us up to the Internet of Things, Internet of Nano Bio Things, Internet of Bodies, essentially digitizing, mind-hiving, and brain-netting us, modulating our existence with a “Token” and “Reward” economy built on the famed “digital immunity passports” and the Gene-Deforming vaccines.
Alison speaks eloquently of what kind of stance, resistance, and activism we need then today, faced with this immense dystopia and encroaching tyranny: we need a coming-together of the Moms, she says (and caring Dads too I am sure), we need a global Blockchain Abolition Movement, a modern Abolition Movement against Blockchain, AI, and 5G (and coerced mRNA vaccines, gene therapy, chem trails bleeding nanotech and neural dust into our veins, among much else), we need to stand as the indigenous, the broken, the colonized, the assaulted, the targeted, but all still human–and fight this last fight for ourselves and for all humanity from a place of heart and positive caring and vision for the earth and for humanity.
Soup-gatherings on Sundays and tiny flourishes of Nature in stick, stone, twig, bark, sage brush, and dollops of intention are what she works with, she says, staying close to the earth in her ethos of being a landscape gardener, leaving presents of heart and intent at the doors of Wharton business mavens who are all entering enthusiastically into a well-funded “Globotics” future which might only benefit them and their ilk while destroying humanity as we know it.
“I am only a small person,” she says, “I don’t have weapons, or money or the programming tools of Mk Ultra, but I have heart and intention”–and perhaps, if we all bring our collective souls and intent to the fore, we can beat this behemoth which has already grown large with hubris and is currently steamrolling us around the world: we don’t have a choice but to stand and fight this horror currently: the alternative is the complete erasure of humanity.
Alison McDowel has a large encompassing vision and a generosity of spirit and heart evident in her actions of love and care not just for her own community, as she describes, but for the larger world beyond it, for all of us, worldwide, who are poised now on the edge of the Techno Abyss and need to make a choice, for ourselves and our unborn behind us: to destroy the future of humanity and succumb to nanobotized-BCI-AI Techno Slavery, or stand up for our human souls, bodies, brains, and hearts and act in concert and individually to stop this takeover.
This was a profoundly informative and thought-provoking interview; please watch and share widely worldwide. Alison has optimism and courage in speaking out, and I have infinite hope that her words will ignite a storm of awareness in viewers’ minds and hearts and help inform, educate, and inspire millions to take heed and take the necessary steps to turn this cruise ship to oblivion around.
Read more of Alison’s impressive work at her blog:
Stay tuned for further conversations and unpacking of the End of the World as we know it, from a master seer of all sides of this incredible dystopia!
And please do explore further and start educating others on what is being planned so people know which side of the aisle they’d like to turn down–Total Spectrum Management & Life-in-Restraints-Forever or Escape, Freedom, Liberty, Humanity outside this predatorial construct.
Subscribe to Ramola D Reports also at Bitchute, Brighteon, Lbry to follow all interviews, reports, and info-talks.
Update 3/4/21: The interview is now loaded at Lbry, at Bitchute, and at Brighteon (links below), and can be watched here:
Extensive and detailed post from Dr. Eric Karlstrom, Emeritus Professor of Geography from California State University, publishing the culmination of his years of research on the phenomenon of organized “gangstalking” or Stasi Community-Oriented-Policing and Psychological Warfare being inflicted on populations of all countries especially NATO countries today by Intelligence agencies, militaries, Fusion Centers and the private contractors they deal with, who have consented to use Remote Access, Remote Assault Weapons (AKA “Non-Lethal Weapons” and “Less Than Lethal Weapons”) and Psy Ops to physically and psychologically torture, terrorize, and subjugate large swaths of human populations–in absolute treason and consent to committing the most atrocious Organized Crimes Against Humanity the world has ever seen.
Please also watch the Global Gestapo series which Dr. Karlstrom and I have been running, at Ramola D Reports, where we discuss various aspects of these Crimes and he makes available the vast compendium of his research into the historic underpinnings of these current-day genocide and torture projects, which Western governments and others seek to hide under Mental Health labels, outright denial, and Mainstream Media Treason Propaganda.
Dr. Karlstrom’s Summary of this flagship post on his home page which he has permitted re-posting of at this site:
“The “big lies” of: 1) 9/11, 2) the “Global War on Terrorism” and “National Security Enterprise,” and 3) catastrophic man-caused global warming/climate change are propaganda and coercive PSYOP deceptions designed to justify conquest by global military-police and imposition of totalitarian, world government (UN Agenda 2030). To achieve their long-sought Luciferic empire, Judeo-Masonic-Illuminati-satanists controlling the major nations are waging unconventional-electronic-cyber-netcentric-civil-military and brain (psychotronic) warfare against civilian populations. This “Fourth Generation” warfare deploys special operations forces (SOFs) and psychological operations groups (POGs) of all military branches, government intelligence agencies, FBI, police, private security contractors, first responders, and civilian (“Neighborhood Watch”/”Citizens On Patrol”) and cult-religious groups in conjunction with false-flag, state-sponsored terrorism and weather warfare (geoengineering), “total surveillance/big data,” Global Information Grid (GIG), A.I. (Artificial Intelligence) supercomputers, PSYOPS, satellites, directed energy/”nonlethal” and neuro weapons, the Global Neural Network (hive mind), no-touch torture, “man-machine integrations,” and “brain-to-computer” interface supercomputers for mind and behavioral control of individuals and populations. This system identifies, tracks, targets, and eliminates innocent civilians, whistle-blowers, critics of government policy, etc. who are secretly and extra-judicially classified as “threats”/ “adversaries”/ ”enemies”/”terrorists,” etc. Elite planners expect that by 2030, these A.I. warfare and brain subjugation systems will be fully automated and will combine the above elements with 5G, the Internet of Things (IoT), SmartCities, Smart devices, and the “one-world brain;” the internet.”
A truly outstanding researcher, writer, public speaker and educator, Dr. Karlstrom’s biographical profile marks him as questing and unflinching in his search for the truth on all fronts. From his website, 911nwo.org:
Eric Karlstrom began teaching at California State University, Stanislaus in 1990, after five years as an Assistant Professor at Northern Arizona University, one year as a Visiting Professor at The University of Kansas, and one year as an Adjunct Professor at the University of Wyoming. At CSUS, in addition, to teaching physical and environmental geography courses (Geomorphology, Climatology, Introduction to Physical Geography, Human Ecology), he has also taught courses cross-listed with the Geology department (Geology/Geography of Soils, Physical and Environmental Geology), and an honors course (State of the World: The Environmental Perspective).
Throughout his career, Dr. Karlstrom has continued his research program in soils and geomorphology as means of reconstructing Quaternary paleoclimates. This research has involved field investigations in Montana, northern Arizona, Kansas, Wyoming, Alberta, and British Columbia. In the 1980’s, Karlstrom served as an officer (Treasurer) of the American Quaternary Association.
The following short quotes outline perhaps the major challenge that American’s face today. Whereas Thomas Jefferson noted:
“WHENEVER THE PEOPLE ARE WELL-INFORMED, THEY CAN BE TRUSTED WITH THEIR OWN GOVERNMENT”
CIA Director, William Casey, articulated the exact opposite goal at his first staff meeting under President Reagan in 1981:
“WE’LL KNOW OUR DISINFORMATION PROGRAM IS COMPLETE WHEN EVERY THE AMERICAN PEOPLE BELIEVE IS FALSE.”
Since the corporate media now presents us mostly with “info-tainment) / propaganda rather than facts and the truth, it now seems incumbent upon citizens / researchers to discern the truth from many various sources and disseminate the facts to their fellow citizens. As an educator (University Professor for 30 years), this is my goal. It is my hope that, fortified with accurate information, the American citizens will have the wisdom and ability to implement the solution, articulated by Jefferson over 200 years ago:
“THE TWO ENEMIES OF THE PEOPLE ARE CRIMINALS AND GOVERNMENT, SO LET US TIE THE SECOND DOWN WITH THE CHAINS OF THE CONSTITUTION SO THE SECOND WILL NOT BECOME A LEGALIZED VERSION OF THE FIRST.”
Please share this tremendous post pulling together the multiple military assaults on humanity from this outstanding research scholar and professor. Many thanks to Dr. Eric Karlstrom for his selfless and extraordinary public service to humanity, as he educates the world on the Truth about “Targeted Individuals” and why the world’s governments, particularly the US, struggle to hide the enormous platter of crimes they continue recklessly to commit against them.
Organized Gang Stalking (GISTAPWO – 666), Mind Control, and Cults
INTRODUCTION, SUMMARY, AND CONCLUSIONS (3/24/19):
Webmaster: Dr. Eric T. Karlstrom (ETK), Emeritus Professor of Geography, California State University, Stanislaus
Other websites maintained by webmaster include:
naturalclimatechange.org 911nwo.com sanluisvalleywaterwatch.com erickarlstrom.com
“What’s happening here is that we’re building a domestic military because it’s unlawful or unconstitutional to use American troops on American soil. So what we’re doing here, and let’s not kid about it, we’re building a domestic army and we’re shrinking the military because the government is afraid of its own citizens. We’re building an Army over here and I can’t believe that people aren’t seeing it. Is everybody blind?”
NSA-whistleblower, Bill Binney: “NSA decided that with bulk acquisition of data, US citizens would be the first to have (all) their information collected. The rest of the world are now being treated like US citizens.”
Moderator: “In a recent London Guardian story, you said the NSA was surveilling its own population for “totalitarian population control.” Can you say that again in your own words?”
Binney: Yes, it falls back to the principles of totalitarianism and how dictators have operated down through the centuries. It’s know what your people are doing and find the ones who are not conforming to what you want them to do and then get rid of them. And that’s fundamentally what this process does.
Moderator: … there is a historical relationship between mass surveillance on a population and the crushing of dissent of that population. Can you explain that?
Binney: Well, this goes back to Caesar Augustus. Anybody that opposed him- you needed to know about it first of all, and once that happened, they would disappear. The same was true of the Soviet Union or East Germany with the Stasi. If you said anything out of line, you ended up in jail or in a sanitarium or something or in a gulag somewhere. The same was true of the Nazis and the Gestapo and SS.
This is the way totalitarian states operate. This gathering knowledge about people and the entire population is a totalitarian procedure. This is the domestic threat that our Constitution and the oath of office we took was given to prevent. No other country in the world could have done to us what we have done to ourselves.
This is the time when all good Americans need to stand up and oppose this. … these agencies are threatening what is fundamental to human rights everywhere. (We) have to ensure that we have some way of verifying and keeping these agencies in line.
Government is not reason; it is not eloquence; it is force! Like fire, it is a dangerous servant and a fearful enemy.
It is Rothschild Zionism’s control over the U.S. Military Intelligence complex, and its total subversion of this complex, which the American citizenry must collectively be made aware of. Especially since this Orwellian complex is being used in secret to brain map the entire U.S. population in the interest of ultimately reducing us to a cybernetic race of beings, whose state of consciousness will come from a neural network of artificial intelligence driven computers.
Imagine a race of people all thinking the same thoughts simultaneously while being incapable of having an individual thought – a true slave race – and you can begin to understand the inherent evil which drives those who operate within the very hierarchy of this complex.
“If we are attempting to unravel the secret of the most perplexing mystery of this century, we should acknowledge that certain segments of mankind, in order to accomplish their power-hungry plans, have often been happy to pull a veil over the eyes of (if not put out the eyes of) their fellows who inhabit this earth.
James F. Marino, “The Human Species Is On The Precipice Of Becoming A Race Of Mind-Controlled Cybernetic Slaves”
“The state, with the aid of psychiatrists, can effectively silence people who oppose its policies. State manipulation of psychiatry for political ends is a reality in many countries.”
– “The Breaking of Bodies and Minds: Torture, Psychiatric Abuse, and the Health Professions” (1985)
Brains can be stolen and raped. The authorities do it! In 1977, the New York Times published 30 articles about the CIA’s brain control systems. The most important things brought to light were that this project had already begun in the late 1940’s and that with this technology, they had built a state-within-a-state.
In April 10, 1967, the New York Times editorial, “Push-Button People,” discussed the ongoing (mind control/cybernetics) experiments and warned about the dangers of this technology. They also mentioned that probably there were countries that already planned to subjugate their people using this technique. Both the U.S. and Sweden were countries that had far-reaching plans to subjugate citizens, beyond their knowledge, in brain control systems.”
Also, you should be aware that many of those that sit in the (EU) parliament also have their brain incorporated into the defense departments’ supercomputer control systems. Of course, they become a type of puppets for the will of others.
THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION’s ETHICAL BOARD wrote (2005):
“Brain-computer interface (BCI) or direct brain control are communication technologies: they take information from the brain and externalize it…. Contemporary society is confronted with changes that have to do with the anthropological (ETK- and spiritual) essence of individuals…To what extent might this technology be misused by the military? The Member States and their ethics councils have a responsibility to create conditions for education and constructive, informed debates in this area.”
Throughout the history of mankind, there has never existed anything more totalitarian. There has never been anything more anti-democratic. A dictatorship can never be greater than when its citizens’ brains are linked to computer control.
The State has become a cannibal, a rapist who is eating its citizens. Transforming us into biological manipulable components.
What happened during over 60 years of brain experimentation? Which doctors, professors, what institutions have been involved in the most anti-democratic project that ever existed? By what kinds of methods has it been possible to keep it off the media and from people’s attention? What is the role of the medical corporations? They are involved. FOI’s (Sweden’s DOD/DARPA) and America’s NSA supercomputers must be turned off. We are all about to become the State’s lab rats and chip-regulated behavior-skulls.
(The Phoenix Program) in Vietnam in 1970 used this same brain technology to identify and mass murder 33,000 civilians who were identified, by the technology, as Vietcong sympathizers!”
Webmaster’s Brief Summary Statement: Having explored the topics in this and the above websites extensively over the past years and decades, I can finally summarize my findings in the following paragraph!:
The “big lies” of: 1) 9/11, 2) the “Global War on Terrorism” and “National Security Enterprise,” and 3) catastrophic man-caused global warming/climate change are propaganda and coercive PSYOP deceptions designed to justify conquest by global military-police and imposition of totalitarian, world government (UN Agenda 2030). To achieve their long-sought Luciferic empire, Judeo-Masonic-Illuminati-satanists controlling the major nations are waging unconventional-electronic-cyber-netcentric-civil-military and brain (psychotronic) warfare against civilian populations. This “Fourth Generation” warfare deploys special operations forces (SOFs) and psychological operations groups (POGs) of all military branches, government intelligence agencies, FBI, police, private security contractors, first responders, and civilian (“Neighborhood Watch”/”Citizens On Patrol”) and cult-religious groups in conjunction with false-flag, state-sponsored terrorism and weather warfare (geoengineering), “total surveillance/big data,” Global Information Grid (GIG), A.I. (Artificial Intelligence) supercomputers, PSYOPS, satellites, directed energy/”nonlethal” and neuro weapons, the Global Neural Network (hive mind), no-touch torture, “man-machine integrations,” and “brain-to-computer” interface supercomputers for mind and behavioral control of individuals and populations. This system identifies, tracks, targets, and eliminates innocent civilians, whistle-blowers, critics of government policy, etc. who are secretly and extra-judicially classified as “threats”/”adversaries”/”enemies”/”terrorists,” etc. Elite planners expect that by 2030, these A.I. warfare and brain subjugation systems will be fully automated and will combine the above elements with 5G, the Internet of Things (IoT), SmartCities, Smart devices, and the “one-world brain;” the internet.
Short Definitions of Gang Stalking, Mind Control, Cults, and GISTAPWO-666:
Gang Stalking is the common term for military-intelligence protocols used by the US government, cooperating States, private security firms, and civilian-vigilante and other groups to incrementally and systematically destroy persons secretly designated as “internal enemies/”threats”/terrorists,” “targets,” etc. Most “enemies” are invented to justify and perpetuate the phony, multi-trillion dollar “War on Terrorism”/”National Security Enterprise” system. Many targeted citizens are human trafficked and used as non-consensual human experimentees in military, corporate, and academic neuroweapons and nonlethal weapons testing programs. Synonyms for gang stalking include “Zersetzung” (German scientific term for “decomposition,” “disintegration,” “corrosion”), “counter-intelligence stalking,” “organized stalking,” “workplace mobbing,” etc. This system has been developed and deployed over the past century by “security services;” including the Soviet