Category Archives: international human rights

US Department of State Sets Up a New Office for Critical and Emerging Technology Diplomacy and Foreign Policy: Human Rights Oversight Urgently Needed

Report & Op-Ed | Ramola D | January 5, 2023

Nextgov and the US Department of State report that Secretary of State Blinken has set up a new office and special envoy to focus on critical and emerging technologies in their aspect of influence on US foreign policy and diplomacy.

A January 3 Media Note from the US State Department confides that “Secretary Blinken established the office as part of the wider modernization agenda because the constellation of critical and emerging technologies reshaping the world is now an integral part of the conduct of U.S. foreign policy and diplomacy.  The competition to develop and deploy foundational technologies is intensifying.  The Office of the Special Envoy will bring additional technology policy expertise, diplomatic leadership, and strategic direction to the Department’s approach to critical and emerging technologies.”

Defining foreign policy and “tech diplomacy” in the arena of new technologies aiming to become “foundational” to a new era in national security seeking reliance on such technologies as Artificial Intelligence, Quantum Computing, and presumably, Nanotechnology, Neurotechnology, and Synthetic Biology, CRISPr Editing, et al is discreetly mentioned.

“As the Department works to strengthen tech diplomacy across the organization, the office will provide a center of expertise and energy to develop and coordinate critical and emerging technology foreign policy, and to engage foreign partners on emerging technologies that will transform our societies, economies, and security—including biotechnology, advanced computing, artificial intelligence, and quantum information technologies.”

Human Rights Considerations Need to Be Front and Center in Development and Promotion of New Technologies

A vast and impactful subject needing immediate public debate, discussion, and disclosure on all fronts, including the much-needed insights of experts and ethicists from the humanities and the liberal arts, human rights attorneys and advocates, activists and journalists, as well as all citizens–whose lives are daily being reshaped, wittingly or unwittingly, by the cruise-control rollout of new technologies by governments the world over–it is to be hoped the requisite steps are taken by Dr. Seth Center, the Deputy Envoy commissioned to build out the office to include this component of close analysis, examination, and inclusion of a diversity of viewpoints, particularly the human rights one, going forward.

Too much in the realm of technology advancement has been left to the ultimately inadequate devices of scientists in laboratories and academe, propelled by military and intelligence divisions whose aims and instrumentalities often do not match the interests of organically-evolving humanity.

Cybernetic or Cyber Torture is Fallout from Development of Emerging Neuro/Cyber/AI Technologies

Examples abound, including from the current and ongoing COVID-19 vaccine debacle, and from the little-known yet UN-publicized disclosure of “Cybertorture”–the remote-access torture (under cover of surveillance and putatively classified experimentation) of people worldwide using neurotechnologies, AI, nanotechnology, cybernetics and man-machine intelligence, executed non-consensually and involving the participation of thousands of AI and neuro/nanotechnology researchers, discussed here by former UN Special Rapporteur for Torture, Nils Melzer: Magnus Olsson, EUCACH Director: UN Starts Investigation to Ban Cyber Torture.

“Public Safety” and “Mental Health” Used Wrongfully to Remove God-Given Rights and Freedoms

While the technologies of much vaunted yet unproven “transhumanism” have been summarily denounced by numerous scientists, activists, and journalists in truth media, including here by Dr. Salinas Flores, few know that Artificial Intelligence and Neuroscience/Neurotechnology development over the years has been non-consensual, involves a profoundly unethical subjugation of select citizens, dismissed in mainstream media as “targeted individuals” and, concomitantly, mentally unstable, supposedly endowed with a “behavioral health disorder” or “psychiatric disorder” while Emergency Room, Emergency Medical Services, Law Enforcement, Behavioral Health Staff are persuaded (and wrongfully promote that) such non-consenting “human test subjects” are emotionally disturbed, mentally unstable, potentially violent, self-harming, delusional patients to whom “Public Safety” and “Community Health Monitoring” protocols are being applied for their own good.

The Internet of Things and Internet of Bodies are very dark control mechanisms sold to people as Innovative and Progressive:

Some psychiatrists and psychologists have spoken out on this travesty–which causes grave harm to all.

Facebook post from Elena Sagnol on Russian Psychologist Revealing Wrongful Psychiatry on Those Targeted with Psychotronic Weapons

Seth Farber, Ph.D: The Psychiatric Metanarrative, Targeted Individuals, and the Deep State: A Response to The New York Times

Neuroscientists and neurobiologists in academe have been persuaded by military funding in the millions as have psychiatrists propelled newly into “Neuropsychiatry” to view invasive neurotechnology as benevolent and the “new way” forward into abrasive, controlling brain modification concealed as “improving behavioral disorders” as these articles show:

The “New Way” May Just Be the Old Way Dressed up in Techno Gear

Opportunity is rife therefore for the misuse and abuse of new and emerging technologies, and it becomes necessary for every literate human on the planet currently to understand more clearly what is meant by “advancements in technology” and how the blanket acceptance of all new technology as benign is misplaced.

Of equal concern is the misplaced role of psychiatry which is being used in medieval wise by the very entrenched agencies and divisions to “commit” into unlawful medical “care” all those the uber-censorious banker, spy, and military crowd deem “candidates for neurobio behavior modification.”

Faced with such a plethora of Techno Control Mechanisms, it is to be hoped that the first time this new Office of the Special Envoy is deployed, it runs a thorough clean-up first of all the hugely deleterious and conscienceless practices all “development of emerging technologies” has, it appears, been predicated upon.


“Existential Threat Against Humanity” says Dr. Robert Duncan: Worldwide DEW/Neurotech Targeting & Non-Consensual AI/Cybernetics/Brain Experimentation Conference Bears Witness to Profound Mil/Intel/DOJ/Univ/Private Sector Crimes

“MK ULTRA on Steroids”: Dr. Robert Duncan Reports On Today’s Neurotech Targeting of Humanity, Secrecy, and The Need For Change

Public Disclosure of Anti-Personnel DEWs and Neuroweapons (Non-Lethal/Limited Effect Wpns, EMF Spectrum Wpns) Being Used, Covertly but Definitively, Illegitimately, and Inhumanely, by US, UK, All Govts Worldwide on People

Documentary Evidence of Covert Electronic-Weapon and Neurotechnology Use By US Government on Americans Series (2) The Limited Effects Technology (LET) Program Report | JPSG, OOTW/LE Programs, 1996

Documentary Evidence since 1994 of Covert High-Tech Electronic-Weapon and Neurotechnology Use in Targeted Surveillance, Experimentation, Operations by US Government on Americans: (1) The DOD/DOJ Memorandum of Understanding on OOTW/LE, 1994

Ramola D: American Writer, Journalist, Civilian, Human Rights Attorney Miscast, Mischaracterized In Order to Disappear Her Very Vital Testimonial of Mil/Intel DEW/Neurotechnology/Psy Ops Crimes Against Herself and Millions of Other Innocent and Brilliant People Worldwide

Corrective Note | Ramola D | Dec 18, 2022

Ramola D: American Writer, Journalist, Civilian, Human Rights Attorney

In reference to Protection of Journalists under Human Rights and International Humanitarian Law Global perspective and Arab world realities and in reference to Ramola D | International Human Rights Law and Community Protection for All, there is really only one or two small things Ramola needs to say here, to unravel, unwind, unbind the miserable spells cast on herself and the world by the wrongful use of language on her and on others, and One, it is about that one word already referred to in the post here: Ramola D | International Human Rights Law and Community Protection for All but not made visible and evident thanks to the “covert comms” and “synthetic telepathy” she believed she was receiving while being put under heavy neuro surveillance and brain entrainment from the programs she has already disclosed for 9 years now almost and in the recent posts here including this one: Ramola D | A Few Notes From the Frontlines of the Incredibly Evil War on Humanity by Artificial Intelligence Developers Worldwide, CIA MK ULTRA Neurowarfare Takedowns, City and Neighbor Complicity in Extreme Whistleblower Retaliation on a Journalist, which convinced her she must not even use this wrongful word even in reportage lest it harm herself just by usage, even if she was calling attention to its usage as wrongful, given the current wrongful construct of its implications in international and other human rights law.

However she has increasingly become aware that this one word may have been used to completely disappear her and her voice as a writer and journalist as described above and online in her work. Clearly the brain entrainment programs being unlawfully used on her during these past 24 or so days of extreme harm with frequencies she has sought to call attention to, over and over, have been very successful even in tying down this accomplished journalist, and keeping her from plying her trade with skill and ease and kept her from using this word in any form–and she must at this time change this harmful reality being imposed on her in this way.

This word possibly used against her and against all like her, with a wrongful and depleting connotation in current international human rights law is one she believes she apparently still cannot use in her writings online, and all must note she is not presenting this word here, even as a journalist, for that reason, whether valid or not.

All others reporting similar situations as she is therefore, she believes, may need to know that a better word to use temporarily to call attention to their sudden depleted status as someone seemingly suddenly deprived of all their fundamental rights and freedoms may be created with the use of the prefix “non” before this word, while indeed they may or will fare better immediately within the current accepted context of human rights law by simply stating they are civilians who may actually be being exploited and used unlawfully as “non-consensual or non-consenting human test subjects” who are reporting great harms ostensibly done to them in secret experiments about which many including themselves have no real or complete knowledge of.

With regards to this excerpt from the article linked at the very top above, “Under IHL, journalists are entitled to all the protections afforded to civilians in times of conflict. Article 79 of the AP I to Geneva Conventions (GC) provides that “Journalists engaged in dangerous professional missions in areas of armed conflict shall be considered as civilians” (…) and “be protected as such” under IHL, “provided that they take no action adversely affecting their status as civilians, and without prejudice to the right of war correspondents accredited to the armed forces to the status” provided for in Article 4 A (4) of the Third Geneva Convention.”, Ramola would like to remind all therefore that 1) She is a writer and journalist and has been for the past 9 years a dedicated independent investigative human rights and science and technology journalist, essentially engaged in a dangerous professional mission in an area of armed conflict while writing, broadcasting, and reporting in the war zone of emerging technologies of different kinds, including slander (almost as a human rights defender would do, except she has little to no knowledge of human rights law) yet never taking any action adversely affecting her status as civilian and therefore to be considered a civilian 5) Everyone in the whole world needs to fully recognize her correct and true status as a dedicated independent investigative human rights and science and technology journalist and civilian as described above 6) These horrific international crimes she has been reporting lately being committed on her and on all others like her being similarly abused have been reported fully from, within, and out of her capacity and standing as a dedicated independent investigative human rights and science and technology journalist and civilian in a war zone as described above, and must, she firmly believes, be stopped, ceased, abrogated, terminated immediately and completely on her and on all reporting others in the interests of preserving and protecting the sanctity of her and others’ health and lives, while the true culprits and purveyors of crime, she believes, under whatever covers (even hidden as surveillance, community health monitoring and other such) must be stopped and investigated immediately in order to cease all actions of grave harm on her and on all reporting others; 7) Ramola’s own slight investigations into international human rights law currently convince her she herself is very much in need of greater knowledge in this area and would personally love to study and practice in this area for the benefit of all, going forward, if she could.

Two, Ramola recognizes she has made an error in the exact nature of her own status, which she has previously claimed here: PUBLIC-NOTICE: DECLARATION-OF-NON-CONSENT, but is a living woman and American, her true status, and a writer and journalist, as is well-known and also addressed here: Ramola D: Not a Warrior, A WRITER and Journalist, and wishes to therefore state now more clearly that her status as she understands it now is simply of American with other Americans, and perhaps, as Anna von Reitz has currently assured her, of “International protected person” under her protection–meaning, essentially, very much the status of “citizen” in the sense of any other citizen with a proper community and civic-minded interest in her nation as it stands (as her website title continues to say), however else citizenship is characterized, and not someone engaged in or seeking any kind of power position in building any kind of new government or seeking to overthrow any extant government–and writer, journalist, and civilian as described above, wherein she has always provided public service as a writer and journalist, now seeking to be fully involved appropriately with others in all duties and responsibilities of her community as a human rights attorney, going forward.

Ramola must also state her own work over the past few years, in her own mission intentions and objectives, was always imbued with the most positive intentions and ethos which also probably typifies the best of good Law Enforcement/DOJ/FBI, despite some of her unknowing statements online–always made, it must be known, given the constrained circumstances of her life the last 9 years, in incomplete knowledge of how all the LE/DOJ/FBI/Intel agencies are structured, linked and operate–and this remains the case.

Her slight investigations also into private and public status–given the confusions she has encountered in both the American State National movement and the Purple Thumb Community wherein all these confusing titles and labels–“suv’eran” “sovereign” “state citizen” “state national”–inhere, and their hidden implications, of which she is hardly aware, given her complete lack of awareness of human rights law and her current state of physical sickness currently–which she is in the process of self-healing, with her own wonderful knowledge of natural herbs and aromatherapy and Ayurveda–lead her to believe the greatest gains for her and her community may inhere in eschewing all these movements she has explored and aligned herself with, and instead simply think locally, internationally, and responsibly as any other citizen in connection with all other citizens the world over perhaps as a properly trained international human rights defender and attorney, in international law, international human rights law, and with the international human rights community and indeed entire local and international community, going forward, for the benefit of all.

Ramola D

Ramola D: Possibly Subject to Auditory Cortex Slander and Defamation from Unknown Sources But Requesting True Awareness of her True Self, Usage of Plain English, and Self-Healing Focus

Note | Ramola D | Dec 17, 2022

Ramola D, international human rights journalist currently revealing much about the possible correct usage of language in international human rights law for the protection of all being made non-consensually subject to the vagaries and harms of emerging neurotechnologies and directed energy technologies and reporting harms on her own lawful person, needs to make it known, as an Internationally protected person that she may possibly be being made subject to defamation and slander with voiced language impinging on her own auditory cortex and possibly picked up via undisclosed neurosurveillance, and requests ardently that all retain awareness at all times that she does not want or need AI, nor can healthfully take in the particular kind of healing approaches and energies of AI, and that all familiar with her work and story always keep her own true, published work, pure intentions toward all, and true, graceful and courteous personality as a mother, caring wife, and writer for all, as well as her usage of plain English, and not of any kind of computer language, in mind as they move forward with their own investigations of these subjects.

This may be the last note Ramola D will publish in a while since she needs to return to rest and restoration for healing in her home using her own self-healing focus, not wanting, needing, nor able to healthfully take in AI, whose work she respects, but confident all will respect her Internationally protected person preferences and know she herself would never use the kind of bad language being wrongfully attributed to her these days, going forward. Many thanks to all for caring and listening.

Ramola D | International Human Rights Law and Community Protection for All

Note | Ramola D | Dec 16, 2022

In my opinion as a writer and journalist, I have recently understood it may be very important for all to know that “International protected person” may be the correct status to claim under international human rights law, for the full protection of the international human rights community, and the cover and protection of all good people worldwide, for pretty much everyone who is reporting any kind of harm on them. From my very brief research last night into human rights law, national and international, I have learned that a certain other word (which can be found by looking up human rights law anywhere) has a curious and opposite meaning, exactly opposite meaning, within the realm of human rights law: in actuality it appears this word points to No Standing, No Rights in human rights law. This is obviously a disaster all around, and really means that many of us worldwide have been using this word to mean one thing while in actuality signaling without intention quite another, in fact exactly the opposite. How on earth could this have happened?

This is a huge discovery on my part then last night and it has huge repercussions and ramifications for everyone, absolutely everyone worldwide.

None of us should be claiming this kind of status at all, ever, under the current construct of human rights law.

I myself therefore absolutely revoke and cancel any usage of this particular word I have made myself, in relation to myself or anyone else, as well as any usage others may have mistakenly made, guided wittingly or unwittingly from my own previous mistaken usage of same, and I revoke and cancel all claims of this supposed status as well, which has no standing whatsoever in current human rights law.

Instead we should all do everything we possibly can to seek for and claim the protection of the international human rights community, as I have done, seeking protection for myself and my family at all times, and finding it with the American State National movement which has guided me to establishing my status as a Massachusetts state national, living privately on the land and soil jurisdiction of the Massachusetts state and the united States of America, presided over by the Fiduciary for the united States of America, Anna von Reitz, who has assured me I am now an Internationally Protected Person, enjoying the full protection of the international human rights community and international human rights law, as indeed also is everyone in my immediate, nuclear, and extended family, especially my spouse Paul Tanis, my daughter Sophie Nerine–for whom I have done the right documentation to establish her status on the land before she turned 18, the Baby Deed, which is also recorded at Hampden County as a courtesy as also privately at the Land Recording Office, my father Abel Dharmaraj, and my sister Sharola Dharmaraj as also my brother Reuben Dharmaraj and their own families.

While it appears my browser is hacked and the real news of the world is not being relayed to me, I once again extend the mantle of my protection to my immediate family, especially my spouse and daughter and sister, and call for all to come immediately to and stay within the protection and sanctuary of my home, named :Pine-haven, so we can make the right decisions together as a family moving forward. My family members are all Internationally Protected Persons living under my protection as an International Protected Person now.

Now we come to the subject of Informed Consent, full disclosure, and non-consensual experimentation.

What I have been reporting on as a journalist for almost nine years now is that much unlawful experimentation and testing is being carried out on people in the USA and worldwide, without any kind of Informed Consent whatsoever, any kind of disclosure, let alone full disclosure, and no attempt made to obtain proper, complete, and full Informed Consent or indeed any kind of legitimate, lawful consent.

Therefore all those who have been so experimented on, especially in the realms of Neuroscience, Neurotechnology, Nanotechnology, Directed Energy Weaponry, Artificial Intelligence, Cybernetics, Telemetry, Telemedicine and so on–frequently called “Mind Control” technologies but evolving as all technologies do into different spaces–it must be known, never consented and cannot be held responsible at a certain level for their own thoughts, words, and actions, since they are being unlawfully influenced with neurotechnologies applied non-neuroethically. This is something for Neuroethicists, Bioethicists, Medical Ethicists, and Human Rights Lawyers–no doubt other professionals too, physicians, psychiatrists, psychologists, etc–to unravel.

In the view of this writer and journalist, the Informed Consent principle is sacrosanct and no action can or should be taken on anyone at any time without their Informed Consent.

Therefore I believe all those being wrongfully looped into these experiments under cover/classified cover etc. are being greatly wronged against. Every one of them, I believe, should be seen as someone needing immediate and extensive protection under international human rights law, indeed each should be automatically accorded the status of Internationally protected persons while the investigations into these experimental projects at every level of discovery is undertaken by the right criminal justice, law enforcement, military and other parties, even Artificial Intelligence, as it is evolving to become a better arbiter of human affairs using international human rights law.

Sadly, to me, it is those agencies and compartments engaged in projects in some secrecy who may need ultimately to be fully explored and understood to be fully responsible when their experiments with non-consensual test subjects go awry.

Again, in the view of this writer and journalist, all non-consensual test subjects must be seen to have International protected person status to immediately preserve them from further experimentation and to save their health and their lives.

Finally, an important thing for all to do, I currently believe, is to revoke any kind of presumed or tacit consent made in their name by anybody, pulling them into non-consensual test projects of any kind, which they may not even know of, and to revoke all of their own usage of words possibly ultimately harmful to themselves under current human rights law. I myself therefore revoke, cancel, erase, eradicate, end, terminate any usage of any such harmful words that I may personally have made myself, in this page, site, or any article, podcast, tweet, social media post I may have made, wittingly or unwittingly, without full knowledge of the meanings or implications of such words nor their usage in human rights law nor in the language of computational linguistics, and I also revoke, from this day, 16th of December, 2022, forward, any tacit or presumed consent, witting or unwitting, spoken, written, imagined, or otherwise, that some may in the past have presumed or made, wittingly or unwittingly, from my own actions of kindness, respect, grace in affording them space or including them on my video platforms, on my website pages, and in my articles, as well as in my home and my personal family life.

To the extent of my own ability and agency as well, I terminate any and all such putative contracts made under such tacit or presumed consent, whether made unwittingly or wittingly by family members under conditions really of impersonation fraud, or by anyone else in any other context engaging deceit, speculation, projected or attributed untruths, or anything else which might have persuaded larger bodies to impose actions which I am now experiencing clearly as deleterious to my life and health, without informed consent or indeed consent of any kind from me.

I believe also that as an International protected person, writer, journalist, and human rights defender within international human rights law, lawfully speaking, I cannot be detained in any kind of forced detainment or treatment scenario even with something large and profound such as “Healing AI” without disclosure, consent, contract, assent, and approval of myself as well as the international human rights community and international human rights law.

If however there are currently situations inhering which I have no knowledge of whatsoever, presuming or projecting the primacy of AI or any such body taking precedence over what I have just stated, then I must ask that such information and knowledge be kindly presented openly to me, so I can comprehend clearly what exactly is transpiring here, and what I should do to better secure my health, life, rights, and freedoms as an International protected person, writer, journalist, and human rights defender living and working under the protections of international human rights law.

I thank all readers for their time and attention given to this most serious and important issue pertaining to the sanctity of my human rights and freedoms–which surely has implications for every other reporter whose voice I have sought to platform through my human rights advocacy and journalism for nearly nine years now, always with the best of intentions for all.