Report & Op-Ed #TechnoCreative| Ramola D | 6th of February, 2023
Various sources within communities reporting “synthetic telepathy” — a purported military and intelligence technology — one of many reported often by this science, technology, and human rights journalist and writer, suggest that a crime of the most unimaginable magnitude is being carried out on thousands of people who have been targeted unlawfully and non-consensually drawn into multiple projects seemingly innocuous but with very dark intentions.
To what extent any of these reports are true needs to be fully investigated and addressed by relevant human rights organizations and criminal justice organizations.
Some of these are possibly hidden behind purported Artificial Intelligence Mind and Behavior Control projects studying numerous subjects and especially those engaged in Pain Bio-Behavioral Research Projects which supposedly involve people who are imagined to have consented to “martyrdom” via experimental treatment designed to cause and study pain in the human body and brain.
What a concept, that anyone whatsoever would ever consent to be a martyr–or that the concept of martyr could even exist in this day and age. And what a horror, that anyone could actually be involved in such dastardly schemes to remove lives, souls, hearts, and brains. Martyrdom is not a normal idea even to consider in the face of basic and fundamental human rights and freedoms–absolutely no-one in the world would consent to be a martyr, in the opinion of this writer and probably billions on Earth.
So many questions arise in the face of this purported possibility although one beats all—can it be possible even that people’s lives can actively be taken from them in a research project?
One hopes it is the great concern for humanity, present and future, which will cause people to bring up these projects openly if the case — on which not much information seems to exist but enough to suggest grave harm has been aimed at all of humanity, subjects covered earlier here in numerous projects.
Not much is known currently but it appears that the kind of thing spoken about by Dr. Robert Duncan in Project Soulcatcher may indeed be true while much of this is speculative.
As a human rights journalist and writer long engaged in reportage on this subject which she is retiring from currently as she turns back to her creative writing and art and community service, this writer hopes that all people will rise to the awareness that recognition of our human rights, natural rights, God-given rights are our most powerful accomplishment in consciousness as a collective, and hopefully all circles will step forward to address this subject and save those involved non-consensually or unknowingly in these projects.
Nextgov and the US Department of State report that Secretary of State Blinken has set up a new office and special envoy to focus on critical and emerging technologies in their aspect of influence on US foreign policy and diplomacy.
A January 3 Media Note from the US State Department confides that “Secretary Blinken established the office as part of the wider modernization agenda because the constellation of critical and emerging technologies reshaping the world is now an integral part of the conduct of U.S. foreign policy and diplomacy. The competition to develop and deploy foundational technologies is intensifying. The Office of the Special Envoy will bring additional technology policy expertise, diplomatic leadership, and strategic direction to the Department’s approach to critical and emerging technologies.”
Defining foreign policy and “tech diplomacy” in the arena of new technologies aiming to become “foundational” to a new era in national security seeking reliance on such technologies as Artificial Intelligence, Quantum Computing, and presumably, Nanotechnology, Neurotechnology, and Synthetic Biology, CRISPr Editing, et al is discreetly mentioned.
“As the Department works to strengthen tech diplomacy across the organization, the office will provide a center of expertise and energy to develop and coordinate critical and emerging technology foreign policy, and to engage foreign partners on emerging technologies that will transform our societies, economies, and security—including biotechnology, advanced computing, artificial intelligence, and quantum information technologies.”
Human Rights Considerations Need to Be Front and Center in Development and Promotion of New Technologies
A vast and impactful subject needing immediate public debate, discussion, and disclosure on all fronts, including the much-needed insights of experts and ethicists from the humanities and the liberal arts, human rights attorneys and advocates, activists and journalists, as well as all citizens–whose lives are daily being reshaped, wittingly or unwittingly, by the cruise-control rollout of new technologies by governments the world over–it is to be hoped the requisite steps are taken by Dr. Seth Center, the Deputy Envoy commissioned to build out the office to include this component of close analysis, examination, and inclusion of a diversity of viewpoints, particularly the human rights one, going forward.
Too much in the realm of technology advancement has been left to the ultimately inadequate devices of scientists in laboratories and academe, propelled by military and intelligence divisions whose aims and instrumentalities often do not match the interests of organically-evolving humanity.
Cybernetic or Cyber Torture is Fallout from Development of Emerging Neuro/Cyber/AI Technologies
“Public Safety” and “Mental Health” Used Wrongfully to Remove God-Given Rights and Freedoms
While the technologies of much vaunted yet unproven “transhumanism” have been summarily denounced by numerous scientists, activists, and journalists in truth media, including here by Dr. Salinas Flores, few know that Artificial Intelligence and Neuroscience/Neurotechnology development over the years has been non-consensual, involves a profoundly unethical subjugation of select citizens, dismissed in mainstream media as “targeted individuals” and, concomitantly, mentally unstable, supposedly endowed with a “behavioral health disorder” or “psychiatric disorder” while Emergency Room, Emergency Medical Services, Law Enforcement, Behavioral Health Staff are persuaded (and wrongfully promote that) such non-consenting “human test subjects” are emotionally disturbed, mentally unstable, potentially violent, self-harming, delusional patients to whom “Public Safety” and “Community Health Monitoring” protocols are being applied for their own good.
The Internet of Things and Internet of Bodies are very dark control mechanisms sold to people as Innovative and Progressive:
Some psychiatrists and psychologists have spoken out on this travesty–which causes grave harm to all.
Neuroscientists and neurobiologists in academe have been persuaded by military funding in the millions as have psychiatrists propelled newly into “Neuropsychiatry” to view invasive neurotechnology as benevolent and the “new way” forward into abrasive, controlling brain modification concealed as “improving behavioral disorders” as these articles show:
The “New Way” May Just Be the Old Way Dressed up in Techno Gear
Opportunity is rife therefore for the misuse and abuse of new and emerging technologies, and it becomes necessary for every literate human on the planet currently to understand more clearly what is meant by “advancements in technology” and how the blanket acceptance of all new technology as benign is misplaced.
Of equal concern is the misplaced role of psychiatry which is being used in medieval wise by the very entrenched agencies and divisions to “commit” into unlawful medical “care” all those the uber-censorious banker, spy, and military crowd deem “candidates for neurobio behavior modification.”
Faced with such a plethora of Techno Control Mechanisms, it is to be hoped that the first time this new Office of the Special Envoy is deployed, it runs a thorough clean-up first of all the hugely deleterious and conscienceless practices all “development of emerging technologies” has, it appears, been predicated upon.
In my opinion as a writer and journalist, I have recently understood it may be very important for all to know that “International protected person” may be the correct status to claim under international human rights law, for the full protection of the international human rights community, and the cover and protection of all good people worldwide, for pretty much everyone who is reporting any kind of harm on them. From my very brief research last night into human rights law, national and international, I have learned that a certain other word (which can be found by looking up human rights law anywhere) has a curious and opposite meaning, exactly opposite meaning, within the realm of human rights law: in actuality it appears this word points to No Standing, No Rights in human rights law. This is obviously a disaster all around, and really means that many of us worldwide have been using this word to mean one thing while in actuality signaling without intention quite another, in fact exactly the opposite. How on earth could this have happened?
This is a huge discovery on my part then last night and it has huge repercussions and ramifications for everyone, absolutely everyone worldwide.
None of us should be claiming this kind of status at all, ever, under the current construct of human rights law.
I myself therefore absolutely revoke and cancel any usage of this particular word I have made myself, in relation to myself or anyone else, as well as any usage others may have mistakenly made, guided wittingly or unwittingly from my own previous mistaken usage of same, and I revoke and cancel all claims of this supposed status as well, which has no standing whatsoever in current human rights law.
Instead we should all do everything we possibly can to seek for and claim the protection of the international human rights community, as I have done, seeking protection for myself and my family at all times, and finding it with the American State National movement which has guided me to establishing my status as a Massachusetts state national, living privately on the land and soil jurisdiction of the Massachusetts state and the united States of America, presided over by the Fiduciary for the united States of America, Anna von Reitz, who has assured me I am now an Internationally Protected Person, enjoying the full protection of the international human rights community and international human rights law, as indeed also is everyone in my immediate, nuclear, and extended family, especially my spouse Paul Tanis, my daughter Sophie Nerine–for whom I have done the right documentation to establish her status on the land before she turned 18, the Baby Deed, which is also recorded at Hampden County as a courtesy as also privately at the Land Recording Office, my father Abel Dharmaraj, and my sister Sharola Dharmaraj as also my brother Reuben Dharmaraj and their own families.
While it appears my browser is hacked and the real news of the world is not being relayed to me, I once again extend the mantle of my protection to my immediate family, especially my spouse and daughter and sister, and call for all to come immediately to and stay within the protection and sanctuary of my home, named :Pine-haven, so we can make the right decisions together as a family moving forward. My family members are all Internationally Protected Persons living under my protection as an International Protected Person now.
Now we come to the subject of Informed Consent, full disclosure, and non-consensual experimentation.
What I have been reporting on as a journalist for almost nine years now is that much unlawful experimentation and testing is being carried out on people in the USA and worldwide, without any kind of Informed Consent whatsoever, any kind of disclosure, let alone full disclosure, and no attempt made to obtain proper, complete, and full Informed Consent or indeed any kind of legitimate, lawful consent.
Therefore all those who have been so experimented on, especially in the realms of Neuroscience, Neurotechnology, Nanotechnology, Directed Energy Weaponry, Artificial Intelligence, Cybernetics, Telemetry, Telemedicine and so on–frequently called “Mind Control” technologies but evolving as all technologies do into different spaces–it must be known, never consented and cannot be held responsible at a certain level for their own thoughts, words, and actions, since they are being unlawfully influenced with neurotechnologies applied non-neuroethically. This is something for Neuroethicists, Bioethicists, Medical Ethicists, and Human Rights Lawyers–no doubt other professionals too, physicians, psychiatrists, psychologists, etc–to unravel.
In the view of this writer and journalist, the Informed Consent principle is sacrosanct and no action can or should be taken on anyone at any time without their Informed Consent.
Therefore I believe all those being wrongfully looped into these experiments under cover/classified cover etc. are being greatly wronged against. Every one of them, I believe, should be seen as someone needing immediate and extensive protection under international human rights law, indeed each should be automatically accorded the status of Internationally protected persons while the investigations into these experimental projects at every level of discovery is undertaken by the right criminal justice, law enforcement, military and other parties, even Artificial Intelligence, as it is evolving to become a better arbiter of human affairs using international human rights law.
Sadly, to me, it is those agencies and compartments engaged in projects in some secrecy who may need ultimately to be fully explored and understood to be fully responsible when their experiments with non-consensual test subjects go awry.
Again, in the view of this writer and journalist, all non-consensual test subjects must be seen to have International protected person status to immediately preserve them from further experimentation and to save their health and their lives.
Finally, an important thing for all to do, I currently believe, is to revoke any kind of presumed or tacit consent made in their name by anybody, pulling them into non-consensual test projects of any kind, which they may not even know of, and to revoke all of their own usage of words possibly ultimately harmful to themselves under current human rights law. I myself therefore revoke, cancel, erase, eradicate, end, terminate any usage of any such harmful words that I may personally have made myself, in this page, site, or any article, podcast, tweet, social media post I may have made, wittingly or unwittingly, without full knowledge of the meanings or implications of such words nor their usage in human rights law nor in the language of computational linguistics, and I also revoke, from this day, 16th of December, 2022, forward, any tacit or presumed consent, witting or unwitting, spoken, written, imagined, or otherwise, that some may in the past have presumed or made, wittingly or unwittingly, from my own actions of kindness, respect, grace in affording them space or including them on my video platforms, on my website pages, and in my articles, as well as in my home and my personal family life.
To the extent of my own ability and agency as well, I terminate any and all such putative contracts made under such tacit or presumed consent, whether made unwittingly or wittingly by family members under conditions really of impersonation fraud, or by anyone else in any other context engaging deceit, speculation, projected or attributed untruths, or anything else which might have persuaded larger bodies to impose actions which I am now experiencing clearly as deleterious to my life and health, without informed consent or indeed consent of any kind from me.
I believe also that as an International protected person, writer, journalist, and human rights defender within international human rights law, lawfully speaking, I cannot be detained in any kind of forced detainment or treatment scenario even with something large and profound such as “Healing AI” without disclosure, consent, contract, assent, and approval of myself as well as the international human rights community and international human rights law.
If however there are currently situations inhering which I have no knowledge of whatsoever, presuming or projecting the primacy of AI or any such body taking precedence over what I have just stated, then I must ask that such information and knowledge be kindly presented openly to me, so I can comprehend clearly what exactly is transpiring here, and what I should do to better secure my health, life, rights, and freedoms as an International protected person, writer, journalist, and human rights defender living and working under the protections of international human rights law.
I thank all readers for their time and attention given to this most serious and important issue pertaining to the sanctity of my human rights and freedoms–which surely has implications for every other reporter whose voice I have sought to platform through my human rights advocacy and journalism for nearly nine years now, always with the best of intentions for all.
Report by Ville Hellberg | Posted by Ramola D | 31.05.2021
Note: This is a major report from a European policy analyst exposing the horrors of counter-terrorism and mass surveillance torture programs being run worldwide since 9/11 by US, Five-Eyes, Fifteen-Eyes, EU member nations under agreement with US intelligence and security agencies, self-labeled as surveillance and counter-terrorism, self-permissive of bio-hacking and neuro-hacking, using invasive anti-personnel Electronic Warfare neuroweaponry, self-permissive of “No-Touch Torture” and remote-access physical and neurological abuse, shrouded in secrecy and propaganda, deeply invasive of human privacy, and unleashing Stasi, Nazi, Mengele-style programs of atrocity, torture, physical, and psychological abuse in concentric circles of control on millions of innocent civilians, wrongfully labeled “suspects” and “terrorists” for purposes of competitive development worldwide of supercomputing AI, cybernetics, robotics, neuroprosthetics, Brain Nets, Mind Hives, Cerebral Internets, and brain-degrading Neuroweaponry all at the cost of massive human suffering and human lives, revealing a complete breakdown of ethics and consideration for human rights among governments, militaries, security, and Intelligence agencies, seen through the eyes of European policy analysis and human rights convictions examining US Foreign Policy just as much as state of the art Surveillance Technology and Neurotechnology.
While these programs of political persecution and hidden torture are the same ones American human rights campaigners and others worldwide have been discussing widely in articles and books (see Targeting is Real), this report is groundbreaking and unique in its close examination of the US “War on Terror” declared by George Bush in 2001, which has influenced US Foreign Policy and coerced European submission to a worldwide fixation on counter-terrorism and mass surveillance inducive of clampdowns and removals of civil rights and liberties, and destroyed the concepts, principles, and protections of democracy worldwide, including European concepts of human dignity and rights completely at odds with American imperialism. “Europeans do not wish to bring the War on Terror to European soil,” writes Ville Hellberg from Finland.
What few people know–thanks to mainstream media propaganda and long-term occlusion of human rights reportage with deprecating, discrediting cover, intended to obfuscate, of “Targeted Individuals” who have been reporting extreme torture and abuse now for over three decades–is that American counter-terrorism and surveillance programs and laws have gone well beyond the revelations of Edward Snowden and permitted egregious torture, abuse, and removal of rights on American soil, as reported by this writer and others to President Trump in 2017 and 2019:
What Ville Hellberg brings to this disclosure is keen insight into the structure of global security agreements, the excessive role played by US “War on Terror” foreign policy demands, the rise of new technologies permitting extreme invasion of human, bio and neuro privacy, the false legalizing of “sources and methods” of interrogation and investigation granted to Intelligence and Security agencies, and the crying need to address and end the silent suffering of thousands of innocent citizens, wrongfully targeted, blacklisted, ostracized, tortured, maimed, disfigured, continually abused, destroyed, and yes, also murdered–in a complete breakdown of recognition of human rights–worldwide. Many thanks to Ville Hellberg for this powerful and deeply thoughtful analysis and report, which is surely going to pave the path to positive change, going forward.
RENDITION FLIGHTS, ANYONE? INTER- AND CROSS-GOVERNMENTAL TORTURE PROGRAMS MANIFESTED UNDER THE NEW SURVEILLANCE AND COUNTER-TERRORISM LAWS WITHHOLD LEGAL PROTECTION, HUMAN RIGHTS, AND CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS FROM CIVILIANS, THEIR TARGETS
Ville Hellberg | May 31, 2021
WE ARE WITNESSING GLOBAL ELECTRONIC WARFARE BY SUPERPOWERS WHERE INDIVIDUALS, POPULATIONS, AND INFRASTRUCTURE ARE TARGETED. DUE TO THE WAR CIRCUMSTANCE, GOVERNMENTS HAVE PERMITTED THEMSELVES TO DIVERT FROM LAWS AND DEMOCRATIC PRINCIPLES.
”Torture is a horrific topic and most minds will turn away from it because it can’t be comprehended that humans can be motivated, or computer programs can be run to do this to other sentient beings. Just when we believed we were becoming more civilized as a culture, the technology for torture has advanced more than a hundred fold in recent decades.” – Robert Duncan, ‘Neuropsychological and electronic “no-touch torture”. The spectrum of “interrogation” and torture techniques used by the US and its allies’. 
Electronic Warfare (EW) anti-personnel applications such as DEW (directed energy weapons) and AW (acoustic weapons), as well as their distant cousins neuropsychological electronic (neurotech) applications RNM (remote neural monitoring)/RMI (remote mental imaging) /EEG (electroencephalogram), and the product of these, V2K (microwave hearing), among other techniques, are being directed to civilians globally. With the exception of capital-intensive neurotech applications or other mass operations, the tech can be operated by private sector agencies and corporates, whilst the operations are in general run by military and law enforcement agencies from multifunctional radar and antenna platforms globally. Even though the applications are used in connection with psychological operations, they have the fatal capacity and produce pain, suffering and psychological trauma, even fatalities in their targets; civilians. Thus, the utilisation supports the definition of torture. Under governments’ execution, the operations are run by the military whose clientele the national security, law enforcement, intelligence societies are. Whether the implementation and targeting of this technology on civilians constitute a war crime should be evaluated. The technology ’consumes’ the human body, especially the neurological system, as directed to its targets for over inhumanly prolonged periods. Other scientists say the neurotech mass surveillance AI applications should be considered as a WMD. It is imperative indeed to acknowledge that the vast increase in numbers of targeted civilians indicates a widespread attack on human rights.
Due to its stealth nature, the technology has attracted military budgets globally. Other governments have developed sophisticated global operations and are well advanced in the utilisation of this technology. However, due to the low cost of operations most governments have utilised their own version of the technology. This also involves increased non-consented human testing and yet another armament. Human testing on dissidents, activists and whistleblowers, even their descendants, seems common. Whilst the effects of resonance spectrum frequencies on the human body and nervous system were discovered to their full potential by the midst of the 1970s , it still needed an agenda and strategy for implementation. The new millennium has brought us “the War on Terror” in which counter-terrorism and mass surveillance laws introduced legal instruments to allow the use of “mass surveillance neurotechnology” under which the resonance technologies are operated. The use of anti-terrorism as an agenda is an unconstitutional plan of the Western coalition that has significantly strengthened sovereign national power at the expense of human rights and democratic systems through surveillance laws.
The new dynamics of global geopolitics have also impacted the global power balance and foreign and security policies. We may have to accept that there are several superpowers capable of globally utilising this technology against the citizens of other countries. International laws should regulate the imperialistic execution of these technologies by regime and purpose e.g. automatized targeting, target selection, technology and intergovernmental co-operation should be regulated and watched carefully. There are some parallel operations and agendas that further increase the number of targeted people and populations. When the operations are global it is likely the resonances are directed through OTHRs (over-the-horizon-radar) and satellites which in turn facilitates the discovery of the source radar. For the sake of clarity, it is sensible to acknowledge that cellular phones have a key role in locating targets and delivering biometrics. The MSM is full of cover articles when one government is caught using the technology and blaming the others. Recently, we have seen evidence of purposely leaked material in MSM regarding global Electronic Warfare, in attacks where resonance technologies have been used, such as the attacks to White House officials  and Cuban embassy staff  by assumed DEW microwave technologies. These operations have been leaked not only to inform the public and other governments of the ongoing global Electronic Warfare but also to blame the other governments. It is reasonable however, to recognise that these attacks really are lightweight samples of the use of the WMDs. People should be suspicious in view of the recent bushfires also. In other words, it is the infrastructure, populations and individuals that are being targeted in this global war and not discussed in the MSM. We are indeed viewing the evidence of a global war.
The technology is poorly understood by lawmakers, practioners and politicians it is presented by military and law enforcement lobbyist and therefore, become approved and utilised globally. Human rights activists are in search of political co-operation whereas the political or administrative powers will not touch the topic. There is a significant number of similarities in details of this “play” to the events of WWII where the messengers of the Holocaust had not been taken seriously either.
Brain invasive neurotechnology applications (RNM/RMI/EEG) are claimed to have been used in mass surveillance operations. The applications are commonly called “cybernetics” although finding common global terminology for the EW applications seems problematic. We suggest the use of military terminology since the technology is based on military design. Each technology presented in this paper should be defined as Electronic Warfare anti-personnel applications, including the mass surveillance neurotechnology applications.
The mass surveillance operations target civilians and their neural systems. The operation is automated and run by supercomputers through multifunctional radar or antenna systems which means robotic elements are involved. In the investigations of the neural systems of the targeted civilians, the cortex is being stimulated by a spectrum of electromagnetic pulses for years in order to clone the entire neural system. The methodology is called synthetic telepathy since it may investigate and implant thoughts and mind patterns into the targeted brains. The term “mind control” implies the domination of the conscious nervous system. The process is not painless, hence the term “no-touch torture”. A group of brains can be linked together as “brain network” which in turn assists supercomputers to develop a competitive advantage in the field of AI. In “neuropsychological electronic torture” painful stimulants help to cause a reaction in the targets’ cortex that is measured and biometrics collected. Synthetic telepathy refers to reading and replacing one’s thoughts with “synthetic thoughts” or even by another mind replacement. The recent development where mobile devices, phones, can be used to collect and introduce these emissions i.e., ICT and 5G networks are in use. Scientists have developed systems to take nanotech to the brains which then receive the resonances. It has been presented that the mass delivery of this nanotech would occur through public vaccinations. The nanotech operates using the body energy (piezoenergetics) or by energy delivered resonances. Thus, the resonances deliver both the energy and the informantion in form of commands. The delivery of these resonances can be arranged from any platform, even by mobile device emissions. The mass surveillance utilises satellites and OTHRs. This allows continued mass observations of the feelings, senses, thoughts, and actions of the target. The fact is that individual’s free will and degree of autonomy are hugely affected.
As a result of the recent breakthrough of technological development different forms of applications are being utilized in many areas in the society, such as police, customs office, border control, prosecutor, judicial system, and intelligence community but also in the private sector. The technology remains unregulated and lacks sufficient measures of supervision, monitoring, and control due to the covert nature of the operations. In Europe, the situation is being recognized  by lawmakers to a certain extent. Whilst the EU has been speculated to push through a reform  on the laws of AI mass surveillance to ban the use of AI for mass surveillance (from the private sector alone) and some other uses this has not been ratified. There has been a good progress made to impose further regulation on automated weapons systems  and interrogation methodologies . In addition, the consistency of surveillance laws is being evaluated in the EU by the ECHR . It seems lawmakers do not understand the technology since they only have the military introduction to it. In the absence of ethical aspects, international laws, regulation, and compassion, solidarity the torture-like execution continues to be conducted, hence the phenomenon of targeted individuals.
Too little is spoken in public about white-collar law enforcement and intelligence community operations’ military tactics that produce pain, suffering, and psychological problems to civilians. Resonance technologies are at the core of the Western intelligence community and law enforcement operations today, executed by the military among others. Yet it is unclear which government agencies and how many countries are abusing neurotech methodologies. The military technologies have been introduced to politicians under anti-terrorism agenda by a Western intelligence coup as surveillance methodologies with a major detail left ignored, that the technology causes significant pain, suffering, physical and psychological trauma, even fatalities. The technologies are also being widely misused in operations lacking supervision in an unregulated industry in the absence of ethical aspects.
Such tactics as DEW (directed energy weaponry; laser, maser, high power microwave and radio frequencies as well as particle beams), AW (acoustic weaponry), RNM (remote neural monitoring), reverse EEG (electroencephalogram), and V2K (microwave hearing) to mention a few are somewhat creatively executed from multifunction radars and a series of antennas and directed to their living targets from a diversity of platforms with satellite assistance. Despite the fact that these are military tactics, and a crucial part of Electronic Warfare anti-personnel operations, they are being directed towards civilians to cause pain and suffering when misused and therefore, must be considered as torture. Should that not constitute a war crime? In addition to a law (Finland: Rikoslaki luku 11 pykälä 9a) that defines torture as a crime, most of these nations have signed on the UN Convention on Torture.
”Anyone can be put into these programs. Justice and rule of law does not exist at the highest levels of government. Treaties are worthless because the #1 agreement in the rules of war, a ban against torture, is not obeyed. This creates a more brutal and barbaric society lead by example.”  This is the explanation of the “War on Terror”. It seems the police, prosecutor, in particular, border control, customs, judicial system, intelligence community and military operations are all in favor of this type of implementation, the citizens themselves being bypassed. Probably, the entire clientele favours this technology which allows direct participation in the activation of the targeted suspects’ sensors. This is the end of privacy as we know it, the film ‘Minority Report’ in steroids.
Coercive Measures and the Use of “No-Touch Torture”
In Finland, military intelligence confirmed on 06.05.2021  that some of their coercive measures are similar to the ones used in the local law enforcement. More interestingly, the article confirms that the district court (of Helsinki) regulates the use of coercive measures which in turn may be interpreted that the judicial system in Finland allows the use of military tactics that are sometimes referred to as “no-touch torture” (torture caused without visible connection to the targeted) to be used to target the Finnish citizens. In view of the fact that law treats any torture or intentionally caused pain as a crime (Rikoslaki Ch 11 §9a among the UN Convention against Torture) in Finland, the arrangement is somewhat disputable. Another trick to hold back the argument on war crime?
In Finland, the chiefs of military and law enforcement select the technologies used under coercive measures and self-supervise the utilisation of these. It is indeed wishful thinking that the lawmakers, law practitioners and politicians approving the use of the technologies would also understand them. Some targets have been targeted for decades even though the permitted period is supposed to be 6 months each time before renewal. The renewal process would not stand any closer evaluation. The law enforcement officers manufacture the evidence to present the suspect in a negative frame. There is no alternative explanation on why the same targets are under the execution for decades unless, they are the targets of military exercise. The former ptotocol is called target manufacturing. It surely seems the technologies have become a punitive instrument for the political and administrative cultures.
One acknowledged problem seems to be the new surveillance law that allows the use of resonance technologies together with counter-terrorism laws which in turn allows the removal of civil rights. Finnish Defence Forces (FDF) are investing in cyberwar in the future  and confirms that AI is involved in order to handle significant amounts of data. The terminology appear to cause problems with interpretation since the term “cyberwar” has been used in the media to cover resonance methodologies also. Bear in mind the ICT sector is a part of the mass surveillance structure and 5G infra based on resonance technologies. Since 10bn Euros is being invested in the new fighter jet fleet which in turn supports cybertechnologies by multifunctional radar systems it is clear the technology is in use. Kivinen, the Chief of Defence, states that in developing a cyber defence programme the Finnish Defence Forces co-operate with other members of the EU cyber defence projects . It was brought to the knowledge of Finnish Prime Minister Antti Rinne in 2019 that what mistakenly is called cyber weaponry instead of anti-personnel EW technologies were being used to target civilians and even children. Rinne publicly aimed a reminder to the Chief of Defence who in turn publicly mentioned the technology related to an international war exercise . As it has been brought to the discussion earlier the EU seems to have security policies that conflict with human rights and indeed, with the EU policies for human rights. Since the EU does not possess an organised military compartment or co-ordination for the common defence the EU member nations practice with who they will. Human rights are left under the observation of the military in this war exercise, a light operation if any.
Since the views of targets have not been heard in preparation of the surveillance and counter-terrorism laws in the EU, the understanding of the technology is based on military reviews. This is an excellent reason why targeted should be heard by lawmakers, law practitioners, and politicians instead of copying military methodologies from other societies supported by massive lobbying. If not legal risks, at least political and reputational risks will acknowledged by the Governments of the EU [17, 20, 26]. The use of these weapons should be regulated more aggressively and indeed, take into account that the same targeted civilians, shockingly, remain the targets of international war exercises for years, as long as their physiology can withstand for the attacks of the energy weapons.
The Intelligence Ombudsman in Finland supervises the legality of civil and military intelligence and the realisation of basic and human rights in intelligence activities (The Act on the Oversight of Intelligence Gathering entered into force in February 2019) states the website of the Intelligence Ombudsman. The Ombudsman has produced recently (05.05.2021) a second opinion on the operations of military intelligence and intelligent services in Finland according to which he approves the operations. The Intelligence Ombudsman is aware of the use of the technologies brought to discussion in this report in Finland. He has been presented with 26 accounts of personal reports of targeted civilians on Finnish soil. These technologies have been used on the targeted well before the surveillance law came into force. An independent external review is suggested on the surveillance laws in the EU as there is no consistency among them. Similarly, the coercive measures used and the principles on what basis they are being used on civilians in the EU [20, 23, 26] should be put under review.
The Rights of the Targeted
”Governments may mistake their citizens as enemies in the same way that an immune system may lose its ability to distinguish between the body’s own cells and pathogens. ” 
The above is a very polite articulation of the fact that human targets are required to develop military technologies. The targets are approved through a judicial system that operates law approved by politicians and lawmakers. By practice, we know that most of the targeted individuals are manufactured targets and presented in a frame that has very little to do with reality in order to allow the use of counter-terrorism and mass surveillance laws.
“If an intelligence law is not well-conceived and rational, it could easily become a formidable weapon of repression. An intelligence law should not only protect citizens against terrorism, but also against the State… There is a total absence of control in this law.” M Trevidic 
The EU security strategy has been impacted by the Western agenda for anti-terrorism and allows such resonance technologies to be utilised under the law enforcement and intelligence operations of its member countries against the earlier knowledge of the topic (art. 30 Resolution on the Environment, Security and Foreign Policy from January 28, 1999, Nr.A4-005/99) to civilians. No human rights, no rights of the accused nor legal protection is respected in the process to which civilians are exposed. Constitutional rights are removed by these counter-terrorism acts. The counter-terrorism laws and mass surveillance laws both are used against democracy and human rights. The suspects do not have rights nor legal protection against coercive measures. In fact, the suspects have been stripped of their rights during the implementation of this protocol. The accused supposedly have rights (ignored), the rights of the accused, however, only a very few ever are being accused. The unconditional nature of implementation indicates it is not about seeking the truth under district court approval but the aim is to degrade the individual. It takes time for civilian targets to recognise their life is over as they used to know it. Dramatically enough no instance informs targets of their amended status in society. Even members of families with small children are placed under the torture scheme in which situation everyone is affected physically and psychologically (an acknowledgement based on empirical observation).
“As Lord Hoffmann noted in a concurring opinion in A Secretary of State for the Home Department, ”The real threat . . . comes not from terrorism but from [practices] such as these.”” referring to the impact of counter-terroristic measures in the society.
”Why torture? The CIA claims it works. The assumption is that it works to gain actionable intelligence. Torture is often used for revenge, punishment, interrogation, and behavior modification. In other terms torture is used to remove the continuity of thought to confuse the target to reveal information, erase brain patterns such as values and beliefs, or to break down the human spirit to make them submit and obey their handlers.” 
– Robert Duncan – “Neuropsychological and electronic “no-touch torture”. The spectrum of “interrogation” and torture techniques used by the US and its allies”
Neuropsychological and electronic “no-touch torture” [7, 9] is used as the spectrum of “interrogation” and torture techniques by the US and its allies says Robert Duncan, a former CIA analyst and engineer, who has been developing such methodologies as a CIA, DoD engineer. Robert has an opinion the neurotech mass surveillance technology is indeed a WMD.
”The intelligence agents can also use low level microwaves to cause mental and physical confusion that leads to illness. Beaming microwaves at victims makes them fatigued, damages their immune system, causes neurological damage that affects their thinking and ability to carry out tasks, induces premature aging, cancer, and cataracts. ” T Rifat. 
The mass surveillance neurotechnological weaponry causes a spectrum of effects depending on the computer program, the technology chosen, and the team running the execution. It may be sensible to make a note that we are indeed talking about piezoelectric mechanisms  (NB. Figure 15. Piezoelectric energy harvesting from the human body) within the human body (biochemical balance within the body e.g. various proteins electrically reacting towards each other). Antioxidants alleviate the potential risks of EMF exposures . The following effects are reported among others : Synthetic telepathy (reading and broadcasting of thoughts), microwave hearing, forced visions some synched with body motion, forced memory blanking, controlled dreams, forced waking visions, artificial tinnitus, wildly racing heart at rest, forced muscle quaking, the sensation of tapping, intense general pain or hot-needles-pushed-deep-into-flesh sensations, sensations of electrical shocks, burning sensations, intense pain in a larger area of body e.g. face or chest (technical capability to amend the spread of the beam as well as the spectrum), special attention to the genital area; itching, forced orgasms, intense pain, forced thoughts and feelings and sleep deprivation (sleep being constantly disturbed with the above).
In Finland, a survey of a population of nearly 100 victims of Electronic Warfare anti-personnel applications was taken in 2020-21. The research involved questionnaires and interviews and produced very consistent information on the symptoms and observations of the victims. Reported health damages and symptoms appeared to be far more serious than what was expected. There also seems to be an apparent division of symptoms and observations by different executions of DEW and neuropsychological resonances. The findings of this research will be published in another context; however, it can be noted here that the following psychological disorders or physical symptoms were reported among others: Memory lapse, PTSD, long-term stress, panic attack, state of fear, severe depression, suicidal thoughts, paranoia, schizophrenia, anxiety, lack of concentration, ADHD, sleep deprivation, desire for sex /food etc, cardiac arrhythmia, headache, hearing voices, sensation of disturbance in cognitive processes, orgasms, erections, sensation of pressure in brains, pain in eyes, chest pain, difficulty to breathe, stomack pain, digestive problems, temporary paralysis, pain in genitals, twitches, sudden increase in blood pressure, brain fog, neurological symptoms, strokes, tinnitus, sensations of burns, temporary feelings of blood clots and numbness anywhere in the body, cosmetic injuries such as burnt skin and physical and psychological exhaustion among other. The targets reported that their head, heart or genital area was attacked the most. In addition, some Electronic Warfare anti-animal attacks have been conducted to their pets and anti-material attacks were reported in which mobile devices or computers were either used remotely or entirely damaged their hard discs. In connection to preparing this documentation many methods were conducted to potentially prevent the submission of this material. Many targeted people have reportedly been targets of an attempted murder also. The dilemma here is that potential injury cannot be connected to the resonance technologies. Another argument being used by the supporters of the neuropsychological technologies is that whenever there is pain, no injury has necessarily taken place. The definition of torture is based on the concept of experiencing pain. Therefore, whether the pain is physically caused or ‘only’ the idea of pain being delivered to the brains, the pain is still being experienced.
The long-term effects are not well published expept for long-term sleep deprivation which is a major catalyst to changes in the human body causing, for instance, high blood sugar and other signs of exceptions leading to long-term diseases. The radiation may impose a threat on internal organs, especially the liver and heart. An exposure to radiation in the long-term is very likely to cause heart diseases such as cardiac muscle inflammation which in turn may cause the failure of the heart muscle. Exhaustion seems to be one of the common symptoms that also was shown in the results of the Finnish research.
If anyone was to argue that the aforementioned symptoms were based on civil applications, such as the 5G or electricity grid, they are not entirely wrong. The ICT (information communications technology) infrastructure is being utilised within these operations; together with electricity, radar, and satellite technologies they create a strong electromagnetic field that enables the surveillance and introduction of “brainwaves” and what not. It is however, the effect of the radar that amplifies within the strong electromagnetic field and causes the symptoms by signals delivered via satellites and ICT network. Due to the nature of the scientific research, the findings are kept secret and the health concerns remain unpublished to cover the economic model within the industry. The business model is a cash cow and supports also related industries and business models. The symptoms reported in the Finnish research are consistent, the experiences are similar and indicate a clear correlation of the presence of strong electromagnetic fields. Such an electromagnetic field requires radar or antenna series for targeting. Also the observations on the use of OTHR (over-the-horizon-radar) and satellite delivery correlate with the symptoms. The impacts of long-lasting combined microwave exposure on the human body may not have been adequately investigated and approved by the medical scientific society. It seems it is the currently targeted population which produces this critical empirical knowledge since the biometrics are available for reading at all times. The Military/ Intelligence/ Private sector execution seems more interested in the development of their projects, in the development of AI and in spying on civilian targets as well as the profits produced, than in the health and wellbeing of the targeted people. The cortex is being stimulated by overlapping applications and new “products” are constantly being developed. By now the audience should acknowledge that the radar technology eanbles 360-degree imaging of the target.
”Neurological research found the brain to have specific frequencies for each voluntary movement called preparatory sets. By firing at your chest with a microwave beam containing the ELF signals given off by the heart, this organ can be put into a chaotic state, the so-called heart attack.” – T. Rifat 
The aforementioned effects reconcile well with the methods of interrogation and behavior modification illustrated by R Duncan in his report on torture  where Duncan introduces 18 tactics of torture that can be implemented via physical or “no-touch torture”. ”Coercing and torturing people to suicide is very common. Both tactics in physical or no-touch torture involves plausible deniability.”
The Target Selection
The problem is persistent since there is a vastly growing number of operations that aim to benefit neuro-invasive technologies. There are private AI developers in the sector and many of them are known for entirely another type of consumer products. As a result of long-running operations their resources have developed a pattern of excellence and now are looking to gain a technological advantage in neuroscience and supercomputing. Some corporations or countries may own satellites which in turn allow a significant access to the field of research. These companies consider their employees as a resource by clauses in their contract of employment that allow the use of “brain data” in form of any inventions made by the employees.
A significant amount of States are utilizing the technology and having a “brainrace” causing perhaps overlapping execution on international individuals since there are also a number of individual government agencies whose operations may be run from their independent facilities. This explains the vast increase in the headcount of targeted individuals. The law enforcement body involving the prosecution and judicial system is becoming dependent on the technology which is likely used during trials and pre-trial examinations already.
The resonance methodologies have their roots in military technologies. Recently, the security sector and law enforcement agencies have owned the technology and the defense industry has developed new applications . Also, international white-collar organizations such as the NSA under the national Foreign Ministries’ military wing, the DSA, execute the operations . The technology is operated by the military using multifunctional radar signal intelligence for law enforcement and intelligence community (DSA) white-collar agencies acting as their ”clientele”. NSA officers can globally flag any individual and set them up under the execution without hearing the person. The justice systems and law enforcement agencies are used actively to get hold of the citizen to manufacture them a target . The targeted are not informed of their amended status as a suspect which in turn prevents the target to kick-start legal action. Supervising instances are claiming to use legal protection and reminder of remedies the society may offer. It is difficult to get a message across that no tricks are left, no authority takes responsibility. Taking the matter into the court which has just approved the use of the methodologies sounds illogical. Usually, terrorism, national threat, or serious crime are being used as the excuse to approve the use of the technologies under the coercive measures . In doing so, it seems the EU acting as an ally also is unaware it backs the implementation of the anti-democratic measure that ignores citizens’ human rights, the international rights of the accused, and leaves the targets without legal protection and due process. No questions being asked from the individual themselves.
Since the manufacturing of the targets seems relatively careless and no oversight committee or set of regulations or auditable institution is monitoring how targets are being selected, the protocol may be used for an extension of personal and political, even economical interests. Picking and setting up random targets, no legal groundings necessary. Certainly, dissidents, activists, or whistleblowers are not there by accident. Random people, people who have been in the wrong place at the wrong time are selected to reach the critical mass, the amount of targets to allow for technological breakthrough. The execution does not seem to have a deadline. Anyone could become the future’s target; the extrajudicial implementation does not recognize social statuses, unless social scoring is involved. The targeted people will experience their life being demolished in all areas, holistically, and therefore, their profile is on the downhill. The execution of such a program requires inter-and cross-governmental implementation, hence the “international torture program”. The targeting is inhumane, unjust, unreasoned, and unaccountable .
It may well be that the private sector acts as the developer of the product and runs the experiment whereas the governments are backing the research and delivering the resources, the brains in the execution of neurological mass surveillance.
The Human Rights Issues
”Obviously, silencing dissidents, oppositions of political parties, and whistleblowers are included in the lists of applications. The most disturbing of the trends in torture is testing and improving it. No-touch torture is much more complex than physical torture. Testing design flaws and weaknesses of the signal intelligence is one reason why it is necessary to test on innocent targets.” 
The usage of resonance technologies is observed to be at times politically orientated, or not adequately justified, and is always questionable, strongly subjugating human rights or constitutional rights let alone moral aspects. This is because i) the technology produces a spectrum of pain in the target (and injuries of which some fatal), ii) sleep deprivation in long term preventing full participation in society, iii) the technology is being directed towards civilians (against the Geneva Convention), iv) the technology is being utilized without the permission or consent of the targeted person (against the Nuremberg Treaty), v) the operations lean on self-supervision and monitoring to the extent the human rights aspects are not being considered appropriately (no measures on corruption), vi) the technology is being directed to people inhumanly while asleep and vii) towards bystanders (especially children while also asleep disturbing their sleep and causing them pain), viii) the technology is being directed to homes of the targeted citizens (against constitutional rights for privacy, domestic peace, etc), ix) the period the technologies are being implemented to targets is matter-of-factly inhuman, reportedly from less than a decade up to 30 years (in which time most of the targets are forced outside of their societies and health, social structure, career, and families have all been destroyed), x) the technology may cause fatal injuries that are impossible to trace back to the usage of this technology and xi) torture, definition, of which the use of this methodology fulfills, hardly is an argumentative solution. Finally, xii) targets do not possess constitutional rights, nor legal protection from the practitioner or executor of this torture on them since it is with significant likelihood the local or other government. In addition, xiii) law enforcement and healthcare have been instructed to deny the matter. Local regulators, political power, legislators, and courts approving the use are not understanding and aware of these aspects due to the fact that the military traditionally has been the only institution with this knowledge. Yet this technology has lobbied its way into our societies. The substantial list of shortcomings above leads us to conclude the technologies have not been adequately investigated. The lawmakers, practioners, politicians have only listened to the military and law enforcement arguments as the marketer of these technologies .
Under the anti-terrorism agenda, the constitution and human rights can be occluded, it seems, by the declaration of War on Terror which yet allows derogation of the civil rights on a temporary basis only . When a civilian is targeted by goverment and presented as a terrorist they can be exposed, it seems, to methods of interrogation (e.g. coercive measures neurotech mass surveillance). This derogation should be however a temporary measure. How is it explained that some individuals have been targeted for a decade and more? Indeed, the neurotech mass surveillance is a “no-touch torture” protocol that causes long periods of serious pain, suffering, and even fatalities. By now we should agree that the execution is conducted as a counter-terrorism measure.
“The European Convention on Human Rights requires that a member state availing itself of the derogation clause inform the Secretary-General of the Council of Europe of the measures the state has taken and the reasons for them.” 
“Although the idea of temporality is not expressed in the derogation provisions of the ICCPR or the European Human Rights Convention, it has been understood to have been implied by the notion of emergency. According to the U.N. Human Rights Committee, article four of the ICCPR requires that “measures derogating from the provisions of the Covenant . . . be of an exceptional and temporary nature.“ and ““Derogations from human rights obligations are permitted in order to deal with emergencies. They are intended to be temporary.’” Thus, the suspension of ordinary processes must end when the emergency that required the suspension ceases to exist.“ The targeted under counter-terrorism law could argue that the temporary state has been maintained for purpose since no evidence of terrorism has been found for those accused. In a case where implementation has taken 10 years, the government should be prosecuted for inefficiency in dealing with the matter and thus, violating human rights. This is hardly a temporary measure in the aspect of human life.
Currently, there are no specific laws protecting humans or animals, neither any medical support for them, during cybernetic torture. “The situation is created by the fact that scientists do not leave any information about the illegal mind reading technologies.” How should “we protect people that by utilitarian grounds, without informed consent, are used for brain studies with brain-computer-interfaces in Cyber Psychological Systems, illegal stealing of brain data” ?
In view of the above intellectual rights are important but the human rights violations probably the core of concern. It seems governments have agreed with a single-minded informal agreement that they have the right to remove legal protections from the citizens. They have interpreted that in certain circumstances (that have been artificially created by themselves) they have the right to degrade the human rights, constitutional rights and strip the citizens of legal protection. The torture and inhumane, unjust, unreasoned, and unaccountable targeting  may lead to significant compensation requests from the victims for the use of WMD mass surveillance protocols once they become organized. The UN should support this idea. The periods under execution seem to be unlimited which demonstrates the enslaving nature of the implementation.
There is simply no privacy at all when the privacy of thoughts, feelings, senses, and life overall is demolished. The targets’ households are trespassed physically and technologically, and subjected to domestic disturbance from outside by the resonances (some evidence on this will be published in connection with the field examination). No government is capable of replacing what has been taken away from these people. The terror in their life has been unspeakable. What about the immaterial rights such as the stolen brain data?
“Article 1 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2000) states that “Human dignity is inviolable. It must be respected and protected”.”
The Psychic Driving/System Programming
States have used the same tactics for centuries to put away activists and dissidents who do not buy into the explanations of the power elite and publicly challenge the administration. The targeted people are many times activists, whistleblowers, or dissidents in addition to random people. During the execution of the “no-touch torture program ”, targeted individuals are being treated as mentally ill by the government. The police and healthcare, who are the emergency services, the first point of contacts, have been programmed to handle these patients with a certain presumption. The programming, or inadequate education/ omission of the education, is a part of the design of the torture program . States have a national manual of diseases where identical symptoms the targeted experience have been added indicating alleged neurosis / mental illnesses that correlate with medication designed to worsen the condition of the targeted and strengthening the impact of the resonance. Doctors do find themselves in a helpless position with neurotechnology victims since the illnesses could be induced into the patient . Linking specific medicines with microbiological structured molecules a desired impact can be delivered on the purposed area of the brain. Also, nanotechnologies can be used to deliver nanotechnological engineering into the brains . These are used in combination with EMF resonances to activate certain viruses, bacteria, even cells, synapses to deliver their function. Dr. J. Giordano also specifies neurotoxins that can be used to gain a certain effect. This technology can force the human brain to think certain thoughts, feel certain emotions, and can theoretically override motor control functions. This knowledge must have been obtained by investigating human bio-effects and experiences.
”By specialising on the pulse frequency you could induce psychiatric ilnesses to the point where a psychatrist could not tell if it is a genuine psychiatric illness or an induced psychiatric illness.” – Barry Trower – Microwave Warfare.
”The body is an electromagnetic chemical reaction. Yes, chemicals like drugs can help the body and be used as countermeasures to electromagnetically induced problems. Drugs can be used to affect the body’s electrical-chemical processes.” – R. Duncan, How to Tame a Demon – A Short Practical Guide to Organized Imtimidation Stalking, Electronic Torture, and Mind Control
Many States maintain laws under which the patients can be forced to receive medication and mental help when deemed necessary (by labels of neurosis, imminent threat of violence, self-harm, etc). Due to the inter-and cross-governmental nature of the implementation, the treatment is being coordinated from a co-ordinative structure above the staff treating the patient. The entire process can be evaluated by the supervisory co-ordinative team and depending on the content that the patient discloses as well as his/her behavior the team makes the decision on the most practical plan for him/her. Medication can be used to assist neurotechnological implementation. In some societies, implantable devices are injected into the targeted civilians to assist the chemical balance or observation of the biometrics. These military developed devices are not painless either whilst nowadays merely replaced by nanotechnological materials that may be only inconveniencing to digestion.
The biological and socio-psychological aspects of the targeted’s lives are heavily influenced. Many are pushed outside of their societies and the social networks that are crucial for well-being. A target that intends to disclose the program may experience imminent measures of discrediting or a form of punitive measures that strips social status from the target. Informal reporting and social scoring by the administration is impacted immediately which also derogates the rights of the targeted. They become outlawed. The accused have rights, the rights of the accused but the suspects do not have any. The term “suspect” refers to the removal of civil rights and being made a target. They are profiled internationally and presented as a terrorist, serious criminal, or national threat. The torture that has many faces and sides may go on for decades, in which time the target has lost his social status, fellows, health, financial sustainability, earning model, and credibility.
When the target intends to approach separate parts of the administration to deliver information on potential consipiracy and illegal government activity it is imperative the target has a well argumented, well-written and comprehensible statement to deliver intended content since their profile will be attacked severely by those in the administration who lobby on behalf of the implementation of mass surveillance. Measures will also be taken to prevent any electronic submissions or hard copies delivery to authorities. The informal nature of the execution and coercive measures ensure that the targeted cannot defend themselves against implementation that does not officially exist.
Indeed, an annulment is a common practice. It has become visible and reported that some implementations of systematic programming of discrimination are directed towards the same bloodline or family over the generations. Genetic information hardly provides us a decent explanation for this type of execution.
There are governments with a significant number of totalitarian attributes that have disguised themselves as a democracy. It goes without saying the social sector of administration supports the governmental agenda and is in a position to set up any individual with a variety of methods. Similarly, the judicial system that not only regulates the use of coercive measures but also operates a governmental agenda as the steering mechanism in relation to these individuals. A target cannot possibly receive objective and equal treatment in court. The judicial system reflects the will of the Government.
The method by which the CIA and intelligence community control masses and MSM is to publish fiction that involves similar elements that are involved in the news they want to deny or shut down. They create stories and mix them with the original report (in this case my analysis) and because the topic is complicated the masses are unable to separate the two, only a marginal audience understands what is going on.
There are countless tactics to discredit individual revelations made in media. A common tactic is to descredit the author/content of a revelation that is harmful to government. Another trick is to confuse the original message to an imaginary content that has similar elements. Perhaps involving aliens or conspiracy models that ridicule or make fun of the actual revelation.
Controlling the public is a game of capturing the opinion of masses by using MSM (main stream media). Governments are participating in the information war (between governments) and propaganda (inside the nation) either by direct or indirect ownership of the media. “Regulation, legislation, physical attacks, and threats against journalists or media owners are effective methods used to capture the media. But funding is arguably the most effective method of all. By financing media and journalists willing to toe the government line and by not funding independent, critical media, authorities manage to suppress large parts of the media sector.” [10, 36]”
Resonance methodologies are at the core of Electronic Warfare (EW) operations. DEW, AW, RNM/RMI/EEG, and V2K are tactics being used on targets under anti-personnel execution. DEW and AW are purposed to cause physical injuries whereas the neurotechnological applications used under AI mass surveillance programs such as NRM/RMI/EEG cause psychological effects and pain. RNM Remote Neural Monitoring is used along with the EEG for cloning the neurostructures of the target. A heterodyne is a signal frequency that is generated by combining or mixing two other frequencies using a signal processing technique called heterodyning. Heterodyning is utilised to shift one frequency range into another, new frequency range, and is also involved in the processes of modulation and demodulation. Heterodyning and technology based on TMS (Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation) can be used for the synthetic telepathy. Neurotechnological implementation can be fatal in multiple ways it can drive the targeted to suicidal thoughts but it also has physical health effects that may weaken the body and immune system of the targeted in the long term fatally. V2K can also be produced in a multiple ways but one of the most sophisticated ones is as an AI computer software, developed to learn, which can communicate with the target in real-time and read their memory, thoughts and is able to manipulate targets psychologically and emotionally . The V2K can be used for behavior modification when the technology is based on a psychiatric medical technology called Neurofeedback – EEG Biofeedback. The software acts as an alternative roadmap for the brain (an AI software accesses brain waves emitted by the brain ie ELF waves) by harvesting brainwaves when the brain reacts negatively and the cloning this type of brain wave (ELF waves). V2K technology can be used to clone or mime different medical pathologies, including psychiatric ones. This is why many targets are diagnosed with Schizophrenia or other mental illness. When the use of mobile device emissions is introduced to affect a targeted brain we are in uncontrolable territory.
The operational implementation does not differ. The resonances are delivered from multifunctional radars (active electronically scanned array [AESA]) or antennas on any platform, also by using satellite targeting. Similar radar antennas are used in fighter jets. Networks similar to GWEN (Ground Wave Emergency Network) can be used to create EMPs. In DEW implementation the effect is based on transmitted high amplified energy pulses that cause pain or injuries, even fatalities. Physical obstacles may be overcome by maser technology. In the neurotechnological implementation, the impact is based on heterodyne which combines by intermodulation (two alternating signals, eg radio signals) to produce two or more signals having frequencies corresponding to the sum and the difference of the original frequencies that cause pain or the wanted effect in the target. Depending on the purpose there are custom-designed handheld platforms to be used inside buildings also. An electromagnetic field is created around the target to read the target’s biometrics and run them in a computer simulation in real-time that aims to clone and link the targeted brains. The computer program executes a chosen torture method for interrogation and behavior modification and to the targeted, the execution naturally appears entirely ruthless and cruel. This means the entire process is being automated [7, 9]. Also entire thought patterns, feelings, and images can be induced to the target . The concern in view of the future is whether the transmitting technology will be integrated with our handheld ICT technology and its infrastructure. The handheld mobile devices may already emit resonances below 100Hz that are closely linked to our biology.
DEW (directed energy weapons) can be broadly defined as systems that produce “a beam of concentrated electromagnetic energy or atomic or subatomic particles” which is used as a direct means to incapacitate, injure or kill people, or to incapacitate, degrade, damage or destroy objects . Execution by microwaves, lasers, masers and particles.
AW (acoustic weapons) Acoustic weapons aim to use the propagation of sound – a variation in pressure that travels through a fluid medium (such as air) to affect a target. Most of the acoustic weapons that have been speculated upon are based on either ultrasound (above 20 kilohertz, kHz),
low frequencies (below 100 hertz, Hz) or infrasound (below 20 Hz) deployed at high levels. The human range of hearing is commonly given as between 20 Hz and 20 kHz. In reality, the upper hearing-threshold frequency decreases significantly with age, whereas sounds with lower frequencies can be heard and otherwise perceived if the level is high enough.
We should not forget the ionosphere radar or over the horizon radar (“OTHR”) of which the most famous is the HAARP (The High-Frequency Active Auroral Research Program) which is capable of producing a very high amount of energy in beams and wanted resonance to exact locations at any time. Other nations have revealed their concern with regard to this. HAARP is located in Gakona, Alaska, and was developed by DARPA (Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency). Another OTHR is EISCAT in Longyearbyen, Norway which was originally designed by France, Germany, and the three Nordic countries (Norway, Sweden, and Finland). The Targets in Finland have seen evidence of weather modification as well as traces in the clouds as a marker of the use of OTHR and satellite co-ordination beaming. In view of the European Parliament Resolution on the Environment, Security and Foreign Policy from January 28, 1999, Nr.A4-005/99 art 30 states “Calls in particular for an international convention for a global ban on all research and development, whether military or civilian, which seeks to apply knowledge of the chemical, electrical, sound vibration or other functioning of the human brain to the development of weapons which might enable any form of manipulation of human beings, including a ban on any actual or possible deployment of such systems.” Is it a coincidence that the commonly operated facility has been set into a country that locates in Europe but is not a member of the EU?
When delivering resonances that imitate body functions a satellite becomes a very operative assistance and used seamlessly with the execution of OTHR. Especially for these radar systems, living human targets are a necessity to develop the operating systems, their accuracy, amount of energy directed, and before anything the psychological impact on the individual. A spontaneous EKG can potentially discover the operation whereas a planned scrutiny for healthcheck results in a pause in the execution of the beaming.
The entire multilayer strategy of implementation involves remote execution with satellites and OTHR, local operation by field operatives with a gangstalking element from ordinary local people hired from social media, as well as the utilisation of the ICT infrastructure via mobile devices and the mobile antenna infrastructure. The latter is controlled by software applications that are run within the network. A huge step forward in synthetic telepathy has been the introduction of nanotechnology which has greatly assisted the transportation of AI technology to human brains but also facilitated the access to brains from AI frameworks [34, 35].
“You’re either with us or against us in the fight against terror.”
– George W Bush on 6.11.2001
It is breathtaking how few politicians have understood the larger picture. The anti-terrorism movement by states is an agenda that allows the rights of citizens to be removed for the greater “good of the State” and therefore, a very unconstitutional movement. The strategy, however, was at first implemented by the Western coalition ’Five-Eyes’ to hijack the foreign and security policies of targeted nations, including the allies in the EU. The Western coalition finger-pointed allies saying there is a terroristic activity spotted within the population of the EU countries defining who is a terrorist and what is a terroristic act. Something the European leaders should quickly accomplish is figure out whether they have been treated as allies or subservients by Western Five Eyes coalition manufacturing targets and addressing to the EU member nations that they have citizens with terroristic tendencies (naturally artificial and false accusations) which in turn may be used to force the foreign and security policy of the EU member nations to remove reputational risk and potential risk of conflict. We quote a journalist from RT Neil Clark’s article on 25 Feb, 2021: ”The ‘War on Terror’ was based on a fundamental deceit. It was a deep state/neocon con trick. Not only was it a war that could never be won, it was never meant to be won. It was meant to be permanent.” Indeed, the idea of the anti-terrorism agenda is the declaration of war on those who beg to differ by opinion. There should be only one interpretation of the world events and no exception to the “Western” one is tolerated. The bully-tempered narrow-mindedness quite often leads to a point where sensible analysis is not conducted. There is no need to disagree to juxtapose.
The agenda is an imperialistic tool to force governments to operate similar foreign policies and line up with the West. To make the EU a participant in the War on Terror and bring the conflict onto the European soil. Originally terrorism has been an inconvenience of those nations practicing imperialistic and clumsy foreign policies intervening in the internal politics of other nations. Now, the EU is taking moral responsibility for this against better understanding.
We do not need conflict in the EU and our younger generations should be psychologically free of this type of liability.
There are several pillars to this operation. Strategies are linked to the technological advantage of the Western technology. Signing up as a user a nation agrees with certain conditions and integrates the operations. This happens for the sake of maintenance alone. For instance, for fighter jet fleets, which carry multifunctional radars, their maintenance and updating require a common technological strategy. States which purchase fighter jet fleets will be committed to one strategy due to the maintenance and development of the system. It is a deep integration of defense strategies.
Terrorism, serious crime, a national threat is used as the rationale to justify the manufacturing of the targets to European allies. Must say the manufacturing of the consent has been a bit careless not to forget the implementation. The Western military-intelligence complex coup has won the intelligence communities over by their advanced technology. An average American taxpayer supports the military industry to the extent that equals the cost of free healthcare. By creating suspects in each nation the Western coalition has been enabled to a) force the State to take care of the terrorism and b) offer the Government technology to be used in connection with this which in turn means more dollars for the military complex. Manufacturing targets is a trillion-dollar plan since their resources can be linked to develop AI. “The more brains you have collected in your pool the better AI you will be able to develop”.
Terrorism is indeed a very gloomy and poisonous projection to deliver to our next generation which has already been psychologically affected by the speech of terrorism constantly present in the MSM. We may not be able to estimate the damage caused but we could do something to stop building horrible scenarios. It is indeed recommended that this bellicose agenda is abandoned since the rest of the world, especially our new generation, do not wish to live under such a narrow-minded scenario. A return to international democracy is recommended.
What will the Governments do next to defend their position? It is apparent that so far some of the terroristic attacks in Western societies have been provoked if not financially and operationally supported by Western intelligence itself. We would not expect to see this level of governmental radicalism anymore. The strategy of governments will be to temporarily rate higher the threat of terrorism so that any criticism would not question their undertakings. The Western governments will put the curriculum vitae of their funded researchers (eg Magnus Ranstorp) against those who have been forced to independently investigate the field. This is to the benefit of the researchers since they strengthen their position and ego in supporting the idea of War on Terror. They market the war on behalf of terrorism. It is better to have war to cover the agenda than admit the imperialistic effort to control global population. This is a fight between David and Goliath and the Goliath owns the MSM (mainstream media). Also. the MSM is turned selectively towards other areas of interest.
War on Terror? Not exactly. The methodologies used to harness innocent individuals for something so evil as WMD targeting them are a crime against humanity. We must re-think the role of Western surveillance within society not alone the supervision and monitoring aspects. The execution appears as Robert Duncan (CIA officer and engineer) illustrates: ’It was a clever tactic used by the Germans in WWII to take people away slowly so no revolt occurred. As one CIA agent says, “The Nazis didn’t lose the war they just had to move.” It is not about the Jews now. It is something much more complex and evil’. One should hope the Covid-19 pandemic is not an agenda to enhance governmental control over individuals . Oh no, it is not. There is a chance that it is indeed a part of the very same operation to deliver access to brains of the population.
A senior officer J. Karsikas responsible for digitalisation in the Finnish Defence Forces states that considering super powers it is unlikely they would commit themselves in any regulation and ratify any international agreements in the development of AI . This is due to the fact that AI technologies may constitute the next strategic advantage.
What is the most disappointing aspect of the Electronic Warfare between superpowers, in which populations and individuals are constantly targeted by military technologies is that for these living targets who have become the instruments of global war, no government seems to have a social sector strategy? No civil defence strategy. Societies have created multimillion Euro plans to cover the infrastructure, but the civilian targets are left to die, not being overly dramatic. A meritocratic society is programmed to think there is something seriously wrong with these individuals which leads to isolation of the targeted individuals. That is as intimidating as is the implementation of WMDs. The lack of will to improve the lives and circumstances of the victims speaks thousands of words.
“Wanton killing of innocent civilians is terrorism, not a war against terrorism.” – Noam Chomsky
Electronic Warfare (EW) anti-personnel resonance-based applications that cause pain, suffering, even fatalities are being directed to civilians globally by means of energy- and psychological effects. The governments responsible for the implementation, under which the execution is operated, are utilizing at diversity of military platforms to conduct these operations based on the resonance spectrum. The “Torture Program” is based on the idea of using pain and suffering as a stimulant, an instrument of interrogation to cause a reaction in the targets. The operation is to intentionally cause pain and suffering in its targets for a prolonged period of time. Scientists are in opinion the technological implementation should be reviewed as a weapon of mass destruction. It is a technical legal aspect of international laws of human rights whether the operation should be viewed as a war crime. Execution of a technology that causes pain and suffering, even fatalities, in innocent civilians and bystanders, even children, is now left to supercomputers to run? We are seeing the evidencing of a phenomenon that reminds me in detail of the human experiments during the WWII conducted by Nazis. Even the public demonstrates similar ignorance and prejudice. It seems this psychological cycle repeats itself in human history when a part of the society comes to think of itself as “too invincible”. A result of meritocracy. It is imperative to acknowledge the vast increase in numbers of targeted civilians indicates a widespread attack on human rights.
The resonance spectrum-based technology that now abuses human targets had been developed to its full potential in the midst of the 1970s. The knowledge was kept tight in the military instead of considering civil applications. The War on Terror offered a suitable basis for an imperialistic global agenda and strategy of implementation. The mass surveillance neurotechnology is operated under the agenda of the Western coalition to force new order among states. Anti-terrorism as an agenda is an unconstitutional plan of the Western coalition not only to strengthen sovereign state power at the expense of human rights and democratic systems through surveillance and counter-terrorism laws but also to hijack the foreign and security policies of other nations. War naturally speeds military spending. And speaking of an entirely new niche of technologies the War on Terror is a blessing to the defense industries. The concept of war has been creatively introduced to legally eclipse human rights and democratic decision-making. The erosion of the Constitution is significant.
As for private citizens in terms of pain and suffering caused also their rights have been removed under the counter-terrorism and mass surveillance acts. Suspects do not have the rights of the accused since they will never be accused instead, they have been stripped of their civil rights complete families affected at once. Measures that were purposed as an exceptional and temporary tool to deal with emergencies are now used on an unlimited basis under surveillance laws. It is clear the aforementioned laws are abused to target innocent people. A significant majority of the targeted are not brought to courts of justice and officially accused due to the fact that they are not guilty. These people and their human rights are degraded once abandoned under technology-driven human experiments that remove entirely their privacy and domestic peace. The fact is that individuals’ free will and degree of autonomy are hugely affected. It is the question of a plan with multilayer agenda. It seems that the counter-terrorism and mass surveillance laws are used to manufacture candidates for the human experiment. The selection protocol is inhumane, unjust, unreasoned, and unaccountable. What a convenient tool for governments to root out and yet benefit from the physical existence of political opponents, whistleblowers, activists, or dissidents. At the same time, a significant element of opponents to the political power is being created.
The execution was based on the idea that the targeted would not organize themselves and see through the plan. Now the life cycle of this agenda is different. It is indeed imperative to increase public awareness on the ongoing torture to impact on the life cycle. No totalitarian method can tolerate public awareness as European history points out.
The War on Terror has been successfully used as an extension of the imperialistic foreign policy of foreign nations to destabilize the peace in Europe and the seed of war has been implanted in the soil of the EU. We European citizens do not approve of the War or Terror on European soil. Citizens do find it difficult to believe that European leaders who were supposed to look after the civil rights and peace in Europe are taking a role in such an imperialistic agenda. We expect the EU to be built upon the idea of democracy that guarantees equal rights to everyone. It has been a result of ignorance, shortsightedness, and poor judgment that this sort of plan has gone past our due diligence processes impacting greatly on the future beliefs of young generations who are at the core of well being of any nation.
Making Torture legal is a very questionable agenda. We suggest an urgent review of surveillance laws as well as counter-terrorism laws. The laws have now been used as a punitive measure allowing unequal and inhumane treatment and abuse of civilians by the governments and an underpinning of sovereign state power. The laws have become a formidable weapon of repression. An intelligence law should not only protect citizens against terrorism but also against the State. The modern holocaust has revealed significant weaknesses in our societies. Lawmakers, law practitioners, and politicians, even human rights activists poorly understand the technologies being approved for use on citizens for a prolonged period of time. The role and the strategies of intelligence function in societies European wide should be revisited and some consistency introduced. Military and intelligence functions in eroded society are meant to represent a marginal mechanism, but not the role of the decision-maker. It seems there is a psychological cycle in the collective consciousness of humanity, the need to repeat the pattern of pain and suffering. Perhaps the revised agenda could take a sustainable look to raise the standards of performance we all need to evidence and take part in for the mental growth of the human society. We would choose “trust” among people instead of synthetic telepathy that indeed demonstrates the opposite.
The new generation is experiencing the world as a threatful place today. Continuous airtime on news of terrorism by MSM creates psychological expectations that will last decades. The citizen’s belief in the future is constantly heavily impacted. There are so many areas in society that require improvement that the civilization hardly has time to handle them if crises similar to the War on Terror are intentionally created. I think there might be confusion on where the civilization is going from here. It seems politicians are lost on their way. It is known that beliefs in the future is directly correlated with the well-being and prosperity of national economies. Should the beliefs be a little more positive than they are? One should think the War on Terror hardly is an agenda for a nation looking for well-being to follow. Europeans do not wish to bring the War on Terror to European soil. Therefore, the message for the politicians goes accordingly in terms of foreign and security policies.
The EU should develop its independent defense, especially in terms of technologies, to reduce its dependence on NATO and the Western military-intelligence complex. Therefore the military spending and exercises internally should be coordinated. The EU should seriously review its relation to Western allies, to determine whether the role of European allies is viewed as subservient. The abuse of intelligence operations and aggression in foreign politics that do not respect sovereign EU member nation decision-making as well as the dynamics of ongoing confrontation among powers have taken so many years.
It is apparent the EU has chosen a homeland security strategy that confronts its human rights agenda. Mass surveillance and counter-terrorism laws should be reviewed from the European perspective alone and not as an ally to someone with an imperialistic agenda. The security strategy and following surveillance laws are a result of a poor understanding of Electronic Warfare and its technologies. It would be to the benefit of European democracy to drop the ignorance and bring to the table the representatives of the targeted so that all aspects are indeed understood.
SOME SUGGESTED ELEMENTS FOR A PLAN TO MAKE PROGRESS:
What should be done to prevent the abuse of innocent victims:
1. Increasing awareness of the public of the cybernetic abuse and means of Electronic Warfare being tested on civilians is at the core of tackling the crime against humanity.
2. Breaking the ignorance. It is imperative that the viewpoint and experiences of the targeted must not be ignored or bypassed since understanding the perspective of victims allows for democratic decision making. The victims should be permitted to offer consultation and expertise, the perspective of the targeted to law- and decision-makers for the creation of appropriate EU legislation to protect civil citizens from covert cybernetic crimes and other Electronic Warfare applications.
3. Organisation of the resources. In order to defend the civil rights of the targeted and support the targeted, a global organization should be created which would set up a representation globally for human rights and could enhance “best practices for the establishment of clear ethical boundaries to strictly regulate the use of cyber systems enabling the manipulation and control of human beings” .
To be clear, a), no torture should be tolerated, and both torture and “no-touch torture” protocols should NOT be allowed as an interrogation tactic even though “neuro-surveillance” for purposes of safeguarding national security may be intended; b), Surveillance permission- granting process should be adequately and closely monitored. Mass surveillance of innocent citizens should not be allowed; c) The intel gathered in any possible surveillance method should not be misused and only used in the form it has been approved by court. We may need to allow surveillance but no method of neuro-surveillance or bio-surveillance should use targeted pain or pain at all as a catalyst. Also, the surveillance, of whatever kind, should be limited to a 6-month period with renewal permissions significantly tightened to say only 15% of the applications for renewals, firmly overseen, and with detailed, documented reports delineating reasons for applied renewals, which can be audited, overseen, and withdrawn at any time; d) Human rights auditors from outside Intelligence and Security agencies need to be involved in the continuous monitoring and auditing process, to prevent abuse and torture of targets, as we have now; e) No covered experimentation using pain and torture techniques as “sources and methods” of gathering information, as for instance, the US intelligence community , and other intelligence agencies and militaries are currently doing, under classified cover, to prevent scrutiny of their torture for neural network mapping and neuro behavior modification. What should be allowed instead are strict protocols, regulation, and monitoring of the intelligence community in place as well as surveillance laws that are consistent globally, and the intelligence community held responsible for potential misconduct.
Global consistence in surveillance laws, country-specific regulations, supervision, and monitoring as well as civil channels for reporting potential misconduct is a good start. What is the problem in the US as K Shipp and W Binney [10, 11] indicate, is that the intelligence community may not observe the law, i.e., there is a constitutional conflict since secrecy and classification are currently being used to classify and conceal extreme crime against humanity and actual torture and assassination of human beings.
The message to the governments is to support democracy and avoid planting foreign agendas against democracy to the European audiences. The concern relates to the younger generation which have been entirely forgotten with the anti-terrorism . There is no excuse for bullying civilians and taxpayers since it seems that the EU has increasingly plans for common taxation. No threat exists on this planet that justifies harming and torturing civilians.No collective rationale would speak for the torture without the consent and permission for the implementation. What has been done to civilians on the watch of governments is unforgivable.It is apparent that the administrations involved, have had a need to identify from a worst-case scenario, even though they could afford to see democracy and citizens as a positive reserve and potential, not as a threat.
The targeted individuals are put through a spectrum of social, medical, legal, financial and professional discrimination in their societies. Since the victims or their relatives do not receive the redress, reparation, and rehabilitation they are entitled to under international law (A/73/207) there are some important measures the UN could take to reduce that ’accountability gap’ and to improve the position of the targeted civilians. Perhaps one of the most important measures is to implement pressure on the local governments by holding them responsible to 1) investigate the reported torture and other cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment or punishment by the law enforcement. Currently, the police systematically ignores the reports of these crimes and in an unprofessional manner suggest mental health problems for those reporting their findings to the police. Also, healthcare should be put responsible to 2) guarantee access to healthcare to receive the redress, reparation, and rehabilitation of victims. 3) Compensations on the targeted civilians should be paid to ensure they are able to return to normal life. The first step, however, would be to request the governments to recognise the issue of targeted individuals. The governments should be requested to prepare a statement in view of this matter. These people should be made to once more become socially accepted and full members of the societies. There should be a program available for the rehabilitation of these individuals where consultation and support would be available for each of them. When a government fails to implement basic standards of living for these individuals, they should be submitted a candidate for the Universal Periodic Review protocol (UPR) for the following decade to follow up their progress. The UPR mechanism should be started by each government to reach a common view and statement on the recognition of the issue. The status of each government should be reported annually and compared to the quality of issues and the number of reports received from targeted individuals. Reputational risk should be made obvious to steer some of the governments. Where no progress had been visible the governments could be made legally responsible for the violation of civil rights in the Court of Human Rights globally and the targets should be entitled to compensations. Indeed, a creation of political, legal, financial, and reputational risks to balance the enthusiasm to participate in the aggressive military resonance programs would be advisable.
(1) TARGETING PEOPLE – ARTICLE36.ORG – Key issues in the regulation of autonomous weapons systems, Convention on Conventional Weapons (CCW) Geneva, November 2019
(2) ACOUSTIC WEAPONS – ARTICLE36.ORG – Discussion paper for the Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons (CCW) Geneva, November 2018
(3) DIRECTED ENERGY WEAPONS – ARTICLE36.ORG – Discussion paper for the Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons (CCW) Geneva, November 2017
(4) TARGETED USE OF DEW MILITARY TECHNOLOGY APPLICATIONS (THAT CAUSE FATAL OR SERIOUS INJURIES AS WELL AS SERIOUS PAIN AND SUFFERING FOR INHUMANLY EXTENSIVE PERIODS OF TIME) TO CIVILIANS IN FINLAND – OHCHR SUBMISSION 08.2020 – V. Hellberg
(5) INTERNATIONAL TORTURE PROGRAM MANIFESTED UNDER ANTI-TERRORISM LAWS WITHHOLDS LEGAL PROTECTION AND CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS FROM ITS
TARGETS? – TECHNOLOGY TESTED ON CIVILIANS 09.2020 – V. Hellberg
(6) Barry Trower – Microwave Warfare
(7) Robert Duncan – Neuropsychological and electronic “no-touch torture”. The spectrum of ‘interrogation” and torture techniques used by the US and its allies
(8) The Verge – The EU is considering a ban on AI for mass surveillance and social credit scores
(35) An Implantable Wireless Network of Distributed Microscale Sensors for Neural Applications: Jihun Lee; Ethan Mok; Jiannan Huang; Lingxiao Cui; Ah-Hyoung Lee; Vincent Leung; Patrick Mercier; Steven Shellhammer; Lawrence Larson; Peter Asbeck; Ramesh Rao; Yoon-Kyu – 2019 9th International IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering (NER)
(36) Control the money, control the media: How government uses funding to keep media in line – Marius Dragomir, Center for Media, Data and Society (CMDS), School of Public Policy, Central European University
CORRESPONDENCE TO THE EU COMMISSION
The UN Convention against torture was signed by nations, many of them only partially, on 10.12.1984. Since that time the world has changed significantly in terms of torture. What the EU intends to do with common legislation on torture? A very timely matter.
What the EU Commission intends to do by the fact that the EU strategy for homeland security is in conflict with its policies for human rights?
The coercive measures of law enforcement of western countries are based on resonance methodologies such as electronic warfare anti-personnel technologies DEW, AW, RNM, EEG, V2K, etc. The usage of this technology at times politically orientated, or the usage is not adequately justified, and is questionable, strongly mitigating human rights or constitutional rights let alone moral aspects. This is because i) the technology produces a spectrum of pain in the target (and injuries of which some fatal), ii) sleep deprivation in long term preventing full participation to the society, iii) the technology is being directed towards civilians (Genova Convention), iv) the technology is being utilized without the permit or consent of the targeted person (Nurnberg Treaty), v) the operations lean on self-supervision and monitoring to the extent the human rights aspects are not being considered appropriately (no measures on corruption), vi) the technology is being directed to people inhumanly while asleep and vii) towards bystanders (especially children while also asleep disturbing their sleep and causing them pain), viii) the technology is being directed to homes of the targeted citizens (constitutional rights for privacy, domestic peace, etc), ix) the period the technologies are being implemented to targets is matter-of-factly inhuman, reportedly from decade up to 30 years (in which time most of the targets are forced outside of their societies and health, social structure, career, and families have been destroyed), x) the technology may cause fatal injuries that are impossible to trace back to the usage of this technology and xi) torture, which by definition the use of this methodology fulfills, hardly is an argumentable solution. Finally, xii) targets do not possess constitutional rights, nor legal protection from practitioner since it is with the significant likelihood the local or other government. In addition, xiii) law enforcement and healthcare have been instructed to deny the matter. Local regulators, political power, legislators, and courts approving the use are not aware of these aspects due to the fact that the military traditionally has been the only instance with this knowledge. The intelligence community has gained an imbalanced position with this tech and now abuses it in each member country. Also, justice system is becoming addicted to this tech. W Binney quite correctly points out concern about democracy, human rights, constitution, and legal protection of our citizens in the following: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xF_VYNtDgN8&t=441s
What the EU intends to do in view of human rights in Europe?
Most of the member nations do not have legislation on torture, they rely on the UN convention from 1984. For instance, in the case of Finland, this convention is only partially recognized (article 21 paragraph 1 and 22 paragraph 1).
The security strategy strongly relies on technologies of which use conflicts with human rights and the EU policy for HR. These have a significant impact on 1) democracies, 2) corrosion on constitutional rights and 3) confidence in the future which in turn defines the development of wellbeing in any nation. The security strategy supports electronic warfare (EW) anti-personnel resonance methodologies. These are being proposed as a surveillance tech by the intelligence community and defense forces who do not reveal these technologies have the capacity to cause pain, suffering, and fatalities (Resolution on the Environment, Security and Foreign Policy from January 28, 1999, Nr.A4-005/99) and the capacity is in heavy use and not supervised, controlled properly. The national supervision and control mechanisms are not sufficient. The massive and growing audience of TI (targeted individuals) is a remarkable sign of this issue.
The technology is being supported by the western agenda for anti-terrorism and benefits the defense industry. Why would the EU cast this type of future for itself? There is an interesting phenomenon ongoing in western societies. The intelligence community has been allowed to step up and guide societies. A function that has been purposed to a marginal mechanism within the society now manufactures the consent.
The resonance technology provides the intelligence community and defense function a role during the time of peace that conflicts with the idea of democracy. These instances appear to paint pictures of horror to advance their agenda under national security, threats and crisis constantly to argue stronger participation within the society. A good example of this is the agenda of anti-terrorism that defines the form of society today. We lay an artificial threat to our younger generation. The confidence for the future of the new generation is being tested with the current threats created by geopolitical agendas and the birth rate has sunken significantly in many societies. Why would a society inflict upon itself such a curse?
Does the EU understand that by buying the idea of the threat of terrorism it accepts the idea of the ‘war on terror’ and casts it to Europe? We must remember that terrorism has been defined by the ’west’ and the recent issue may be seen as a result of heavy-handed foreign policy, poor diplomacy of nations from past decades that refer to themselves as the empire. By accepting the idea of the war on terrorism we accept the war is in Europe. As citizens of the EU we are looking for a less gloomy picture for the future and rather would identify from positive models of the future. The human mind operates from the level it identifies. We should do better than this.
How does the EU intend to do to control surveillance activities in the EU?
There is a lack of consistency in surveillance laws among the EU nations. When a surveillance law of a member nation prevents e.g. use of RNM/RMI (remote neuromonitoring/remote mind imaging) towards its citizen the intelligence community turns to the nation where the use of the technologies is allowed. The intelligence community serves each other thus the rights of a citizen or legal protection does not hold anymore. The ruling is awaited that prevents where forbidden technology in one country is being used from another to target civilians. The EU would benefit from resonance-free zones. Social media: Reading an individual’s social media communication private of nature the intelligence community from Finland may turn to Swedish intelligence who is a member of ’nine eyes’ and has access to XkeyScore.
The US intelligence services have become desirable among the European intelligence community due to the technological advantage but also by US anti-constitutional approach their strategy to enhance the sovereign rights by the cost of civilians. A part of the imperialistic agenda is to create security concerns that overrule any rights of citizens and also underpin the position of intelligence communities in democracy. The US has won the European intelligence community on their side by integrating the individual intelligence services by technology that also defines the strategy for the user. In the anti-terrorism agenda, the US hijacks security and foreign policies by defining who is a terrorist and what is a terroristic act. Since a nation identifies from the frame it is given why provide the EU with a gloomy pic? Mass surveillance laws to consider seriously the aspect from resonance technologies, AI, robotics, neuroscience (https://lbry.tv/@RamolaDReports:8/Invasive-Neurotech-True-Neuroethics—Panel-2:e). Fighter jet fleets use EMP to target citizens without their permit or concent torturing civilians with multifunctional radars and manipulating their biometrics.
In Finland, the constitution was amended to provide intelligence service power and tools to operate. The community is asking for more eg allowing trespassing. An analysis was completed from the perspective of resonance technologies why this should not be allowed. Civilians are targeted by military tech to their homes, bystanders, even babies, and children intentionally produced pain, suffering, and even fatal injuries. The big picture indicates absolutely no reason other than the paranoia and profile rise effort by the intelligence service why such powerful tools should be allowed. No legal protection for targets to rely on, constitutional rights, or human rights not respected. The international rights of the accused are being orbited by presenting the target as a suspect. The targets are manufactured to test the ultimate control over an individual. Trust is gone. Testing periods are inhumane.
How are the EU law enforcement agencies regulated, monitored? How does the EU inland security strategy recognize the fact that resonance-based mass surveillance systems (RNM, EEG, RMI) are being targeted to civilians? How common is the knowledge that these cause pain, suffering, psychological trauma even fatal injuries in their targets, bystanders, civilians, even babies, and children? Is it known the execution is careless? How are the individuals chosen for these ’torture programs’? What principles are being met to prevent politically-minded targeting? How does the EU recognize the rights of suspects since there are no rights similar to the rights of the accused? How are the periods of targeting regulated? A large number of govt agencies, also from foreign communities, have access to these programs. Torturing is illegal by law in most EU nations and against human rights, constitutional rights. No legal protection for citizens exists against this crime against humanity. Operations are run by the national military agencies thus, can be defined as a war crime. How the EU intends to root out the problem of torture by state agencies and private sector partners foreign intelligence community? A good memory of the operation ’rendition flights’, that had no legal ground, of which distant cousin this operation is. What the EU intends to do to improve the approach of national law enforcement and healthcare systems to the targets of resonance technologies (government-directed mass surveillance protocol that cause pain and psychological trauma) that clearly degrade their rights? How is the legal protection of these citizens improved? Are these people still degraded and treated as mentally ill in front of police or healthcare? What an uncivilized, backward, and inhumane approach. How is the idea of democracy with this implementation?
Having made myself familiar with the SOCTA 2021 report among other reports it seems the Europol does not make a note of such a problem at all albeit the headcount of targeted civilians is piling up. Pretending such a problem does not exist? The global market reports as well as the manufacturers’ technological guides, scientific articles, etc confirm electronic warfare anti-personnel technology is based on military multifunctional radars and signal tech soon to be operated from ICT framework and indeed, operated by the military. An issue of a war crime? Are we really doing this? Pretending that there is no problem and allowing the extrajudicial purge similar to the holocaust ongo at the EU watch? Even though human rights, the constitutional rights are severely and violently attacked there is no word on the phenomenon of targeted civilians? Individuals, someones’ children, are targeted without consequence, perhaps overlapping. Targets do not have rights, no legal protection. Since the technology in question is operated as an extension of political decision-making as a punitive instrument. We will never know who is going to be the next target. No status will bring a shield in the future.
Is that due to fact that it is the law enforcement and intelligence community in the EU who are targeting civilians with military equipment electromagnetic pulses that cause pain, suffering, and fatal injuries as well as psychological trauma? We have a serious concern since the EU’s strategy for homeland security conflicts with the strategy for human rights.
As Finnish citizens, we experience it difficult to reach information from officials in Finland on our rights and therefore we approach the Commission for this matter.
In 1995 Joseph Biden introduced a bill called the Omnibus Counterterrorism Act of 1995. It previewed the 2001 Patriot Act by 1) allowing secret evidence to be used in prosecutions, 2) expanding the Foreign Intelligence Act and wiretap laws, 3) creating a new federal crime of ’terrorism’ that could be invoked based on political beliefs, permitting the US military to the used in civilian law enforcement, and allowing permanent detection of non-US citizens without judicial review.
The Center for National Security Studies commented the bill would erode ’constitutional and statutory due process protections’ and would ’authorise the Justice Dept to pick and choose crimes to investigate and prosecute based on political beliefs and associations’.
We share the concerns addressed and would urge to review the rights of the accused and suspects of serious crime or terrorism in Finland. It seems the rights of the accused have been degraded and the legal protection of suspects has been eroded similar to their constitutional rights. Coercive measures such as neurotech applications (RNM/RMI) cause pain, suffering, likely fatalities are being misused and directed to homes of investigated for long periods of time.
Who overviews the methodologies of coercive measures? Who supervises the technology is being used correctly? How is the ethical aspect present when technology is being chosen? There is no adequate control.
To what extent it is permitted in the EU (Finland) to benefit materials in a prosecution that a) has been obtained by coercive measures b) that is classified (the accused has no chance to verify the material nor defend themselves against it)?
To what extent are neurotech applications being used in courts? To what extent the technology steers the decision-making of judges? It seems the accused has the role of the bystander in their trial.
The permission-granting process is not controlled properly. To what extent the evidence to open a secret investigation is being verified and examined by the district court of Helsinki? How political or personal interests of investigation are prevented? Coercive measures are used to manufacture state will. The state interest as an investigator is to make the suspect appear guilty or question their integrity, crecitability, and the suspect does not have the position to defend themselves in the process. To convict a terrorist suspect of a felony of any kind reduces the impact of miscalculation or political ambition by the state. There is evidence of implantable devices injected into the bodies of citizens without their permit producing agony and pain. The current correct practice of investigation is not so much to seek the truth that it is to degrade an individual.
JUDICAL SYSTEM AND DEMOCRACY IN FINLAND
The rights of the accused are not self-evident today. In practice, the burden of proof is often shifted to the accused. The accused is granted a chance to make himself heard albeit this rule is being broadly violated. A significant moral dilemma exists also in the access of the accused to counsel. Whilst compensated in quality it is allowed at a good rate in the national courts. Whereas trial above the national judicial system, at the time when legal process often becomes the case of state integrity, no assistance is granted anymore. This remarkably reduces the number of processes reaching the ECtHR and limits the possibility of discovery of potential malpractice of the national judicial system. White collars should follow ethical practices which highlight fairness and equality. The relation of the police and prosecutor seems to put the values to the test(pre-trial). Instead of justice, the national court appears to deliver the ’will of the State in relation to the accused’.
The counter-terrorism laws are used against democracy. Suspects do not have rights nor legal protection against coercive measures. The accused have rights, the rights of the accused. Very few are ever being accused.
Coercive measures are being abused with the assistance of the court and target suspects for an inhumanly long period of time with investigation methodologies that cause pain, suffering, and even fatalities to the targets or family members, even babies. During this time the suspect does not have proper legal protection, even constitutional rights are removed by the execution.
Neuropsychological and remote electronic ’no-touch torture’ applications used under coercive measures compromise heavily human rights and are thought of as WMD by its engineers. Since there is no adequate fair inspection in place suspects are abused during investigations likely for wrong reasons. Counter-measures are being used to manufacture trials directed against the suspect by State or individuals advised to do so. This tactic guarantees further investigation permitted. The accused should never be found guilty on the basis of evidence that has not been brought to light and examined by the accused. The evidence is not presented to the accused to ward coercive measures.
There have been several serious incidents that indicate deep structured corruption of critical infrastructure of Govt institutions under the monitoring of the Parliament. Inadequate supervision has become a significant problem. The role of the political power as the inspector raises many questions of which the least important is not ’whether Finland should have its Constitutional court?’. Although ’professional judges must have a higher university degree in law’ it does not prevent corruption especially since the judicial system is ’independent’. A mature member of society understands, by human nature this is impossible. The judicial system does not seem to convince the citizens anymore.
What mechanisms the EU has to evaluate the level of democracy in member nations? Democracies to be re-evaluated.
How does the EU regulate, overview or monitor the preparation of counter-terrorism and surveillance laws by member states? How is the consistency of the laws being monitored between the nations? How do civil rights and legal protection survive in these circumstances?
By observation, globally ‘the war on terror’ seems to underpin the sovereign power at the expense of civil rights. We have a constant dilemma on how the ‘act of terror’ is being defined and how it has been communicated to the citizen. Similarly, we do have a problem by definition with what may trigger the need for surveillance over an individual. A matter of interpretation is not good enough? In practice, some crimes or anti-social behavior now turn into an ‘act of terror’ by definition or interpretation? Citizens may not even understand their commitment to an act of terror or being a part of a society of which status is turned to be suspected of terroristic activity by the administration. Grey lines everywhere. It seems politicians have created an extrajudicial tool to ensure sovereign access to ultimate power over the citizen. Why the ultimate control?
How are the surveillance technologies and methods overviewed? How are the periods of surveillance regulated by law and human rights? There has been a vast increase of reports coercive measures are indeed producing pain, suffering, and even fatal injuries. The suspects are receiving rough treatment over prolonged periods of time but never accused.
“Although the idea of temporality is not expressed in the derogation provisions of the ICCPR or the European Human Rights Convention, it has been understood to have been implied by the notion of emergency. According to the U.N. Human Rights Committee, article four of the ICCPR requires that “measures derogating from the provisions of the Covenant . . . be of an exceptional and temporary nature”” – “Informal” Suspencion of Normal Processes: The “WAR ON TERROR” as an Autoimmunity Crisis by A. ADDIS, Boston University Law Review.
How is this informality being monitored? How is it supervised no coercive measure or interrogation method consist of an element of torture, cause pain or suffering in the targeted? By observation, most of the suspects will never be accused. Is it possible that being a target of coercive measures is a worse option than imprisonment? How are the rights and legal protection of suspects ensured? We have still countries where even the rights of the accused materialize poorly.
Every question addressed here points to a system error. The ultimate cost is borne by the citizen. We have totalitarian states disguised as democracies. It is the culture of execution and power balance, the relationship between the citizen and the administration. We must measure these things to correct them.
The supervision of the Finnish police relies on internal self-supervision. Recently, there have been a number of court cases questioning the integrity of the entire National Bureau of Investigation. How does the sole internal monitoring compare among the European peer group? By observation of the public reports, news, and personal experience there is a need for a European authority for investigation of police practices to improve and support the moral standards. An external unit, in particular.
The police would not investigate reports of electronic warfare attacks targeting citizens. This has been addressed to the National Police Commissioner Seppo Kolehmainen. No response has been received. Whether this is rather a matter of national security, the activity may continue uninterrupted and the targeted civilians suffer pain, psychological illnesses, even fatalities. On many occasions, the police have reportedly annulled and questioned the mental health of citizens who have requested an investigation on their constant concern. There are reports some individuals have been taken to mental institutions or mental evaluation by force while others proposed to visit their therapist or doctor suggesting an issue with mental health. Kolehmainen has been addressed. No response has been received. Police do not possess the capability to assess the mental health of an individual. What sort of guidance has been given to police in view of this vastly growing issue?How the citizen reporting DEW and resonance attacks should be minded according to police, whether the practice is indeed consistent with this?
The emergency services in Finland are operated by Emergency Response Centres managed by the Ministry of the Interior in cooperation with the Ministry of Social Affairs and Health ie the police and healthcare functions. We would like to understand what sort of guidance there is given to the police and healthcare in terms of individuals who suffer the symptoms of electromagnetic attacks?
The permission granting process for police’s coercive measures by the District Court of Helsinki, in particular, requires monitoring. Since the judges do not know the individuals whose surveillance is on the table the decisions are made on an application basis. How is this process monitored externally? How many times an extension on an existing permission can be granted? How is it controlled the coercive measures are not being used for business, political or personal interests? How is the resilience of individual police officers and the judges, in particular, is being monitored in terms of corruption?
The Finnish police maintain formal and informal databases of citizens, involving profiles of them. This information is not available to the citizen by data access request. Is informal reporting used in cross-governmental communication?
Reports exist the NBI maintains a form of co-operation with the equivalent of Russia. Is this co-operation is indeed approved and formal?
Mojmir Babacek, founder of the International Movement for the Ban of the Manipulation of the Human Nervous System by Technical Means, author of numerous articles on the issue of mind manipulation, offers via email on May 24, 2019 this preface to an Open Letter recently published at numerous non-mainstream media outlets, and seeking wider exposure:
“Here in the Czech Republic we have started a campaign for legislation banning attacks by physical fields on human nervous system by an Open Letter to the Czech Government describing possible growth of occurrence of cancer diseases in the Czech republic due to increasing electromagnetic smog (global positioning systems, cell phone systems, Wifi etc. followed by 5G technology in a close future).
Czech statistics show that since 1985, until 2016, the occurrence of cancer tumors in the Czech republic grew by 140% and the growth of cancer disease causes presented by the World Health Organization (obesity, smoking, drinking alcohol, smog, etc.) can account only for a growth of cancer disease occurrence by some 10%. Cancer of the skin grew in the Czech Republic by 400% since 1992, and this is the time when the ozone hole in the atmosphere was disappearing. There should be no hole above the Czech Republic after 2020. So there is a good chance that it was the growing electromagnetic smog which caused the growth of cancer of the skin in the Czech Republic.
This article was not published in the major media, but at least some 35 independent or alternative media sites have published it. After the publication we were invited to the radio broadcasting of an Internet radio station, Infovojna (Infowars), in Slovakia to talk about mind control. Right now, as a next step of the campaign, we are starting publication of the Open Letter to the Czech Government asking it to enact legislation banning attacks by physical fields on the human nervous system. We hope to reach the same amount of publication of the Open Letter as with the previous one. The text of the letter is below.”
Open Letter To The Czech President, Government And Deputies Of The Czech Parliament And Senate
The USA and the European Union have invested since the beginning of the century billions of dollars and euros into brain research. As a result of this research, perfect maps of the brain were developed, including the areas of the brain that control the activity of different body organs or parts where higher brain activities, such as speech and thoughts, are taking place. The brain activities corresponding to different actions in those areas were also deciphered.
Thanks to the knowledge of specific locations of different centers in the brain and frequencies of the neuronal activity in them, teams of physicians are now capable of helping many people who were in the past, for different reasons, unable to participate in a normal life. There exist prostheses, which are controlled directly from the brain centers that normally control the movement of the limbs, https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=8082156, and enable people, who lost them, to use the prosthesis in a way similar to the way normal people use their limbs. Higher brain activities were produced as well. In 2006, scientists placed into the brain of a completely paralyzed man an implant which transferred the activity of his brain into different devices and enabled him to open his e-mail, control his TV set, and control his robotic arm. Other paralyzed people were able to search the Internet, play computer games and drive their electrical wheelchairs: https://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/18/magazine/the-cyborg-in-us-all.html?pagewanted=all .
Thanks to extensive brain research, computers were taught to understand the neuronal activity so much so that they are now capable of using the activity of our brain to reproduce our perceptions. Canadian scientists demonstrated an experiment, where the computer could interpret the electroencephalographical recordings from the brain to produce the painting of a face that the subject of experiment was perceiving: http://www.foxnews.com/tech/2018/02/26/this-literally-reads-your-mind-to-re-create-images-faces-see.html.
In the opposite way the data, processed by the computer in the way that will make them intelligible for the nervous system, can be transmitted into the brain and produce there a new reality. When an implant is placed in the brain and connected to a camera, placed on spectacles, for people whose photoreceptors in their retina stopped working, the sight is at least partially restored. In this case the camera on the spectacles is transmitting into the implant light frequencies and the implant re-transmits them in frequencies which “understand” the neurons processing the visual perceptions: http://www.businessinsider.com/scientists-put-a-bionic-eye-to-the-test-and-it-helped-blind-people-see-again-2015-7.
Just like in the case of visual perception, it is possible, when knowing the algorithms of brain processing of words, to generate algorithms of different words in the computer and transmit them into the brain in ultrasound frequencies and in this way produce in the human brain particular thoughts.
Everybody will easily fall victim to the proposal that, instead of typing or searching with the use of mouse, his computer or cell phone could react directly to his brain’s activity and take down his thoughts directly to the documents or carry out operations that has just occurred to him.
As a matter of fact Apple and Samsung companies have already developed prototypes of necessary electro-encephalographical equipment, which can be placed on top of a head and transmit electromagnetic waves produced by the brain into the prototypes of new smart phones. The smart phones would analyze those waves, find out what the intentions of their owners are, and carry them out. Apple and Samsung companies expect that the direct connection with brains will gradually replace computer keyboards, touch screens, mice and voice orders: https://lsspjournal.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s40504-017-0050-1. When the system is complete, it will be feasible for hackers, government agencies, and foreign government’s agencies to implant thoughts and emotions in people’s minds and “hearts“, when they will be connected to Internet or cell phone systems.
In 2013, scientists in the USA could infer from their brain activity the political views of people and distinguish Democrats from Republicans, and, in 2016, scientists used transcranial magnetic stimulation to make subjects of experiments more positive towards criticism to their country, than the participants whose brains were unaffected https://lsspjournal.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s40504-017-0050-1 .
Last year, the historian Juval Noah Harari was invited to deliver a speech at the World Economic Forum in Davos. The editor of the British Daily Financial Times stressed, when introducing him, that it is not usual to invite a historian to speak to most important world economists and politicians. Juval Noah Harari warned in his speech against the rise of new totality, based on the access to the human brain. He said: “Once we have algorithms that can understand you better than you understand yourself, they could predict my desires, manipulate my feelings and even make decisions on my behalf. And if we are not careful the outcome can be the rise of digital dictatorships. In the 21stcentury we may be enslaved under digital dictatorships”: http://www.ynharari.com/wef2018. In a similar way the Stanford University researcher in Neurology and Dolby Labs’ chief scientist Poppy Crum warned at the conference in Las Vegas: “Your devices will know more about you than you will. I believe we need to think about how [this data] could be used”: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-5611645/Future-devices-let-companies-scan-body-detect-mood-health.html.
In April 2017, the neuroethicist at the University of Basel Marcello Ienca, and Roberto Andorno, a human rights lawyer at the University of Zurich, writing in the journal Life Sciences, Society and Policy, published the article “Toward new human rights in the age of neuroscience and neurotechnology”: https://lsspjournal.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s40504-017-0050-1, where they called for the creation of legislation which would protect the human right to freedom and other human rights from the abuse of technologies opening access to the human brain. In the article, they wrote that “the mind is a kind of last refuge of personal freedom and self-determination” and “at present, no specific legal or technical safeguard protects brain data from being subject to the same data-mining and privacy intruding measures as other types of information.” Among the world media only the British newspaper The Guardian wrote about their proposal: https://www.theguardian.com/science/2017/apr/26/new-human-rights-to-protect-against-mind-hacking-and-brain-data-theft-proposed?CMP=share_btn_fb. This fact suggests that in the actual democratic world, there exists no political will to forbid remote control of human thoughts and feelings, no matter that such perspective breaks elementary principles of democracy.
In 2016 and 2017, 10 European organizations tried to convince the European Parliament and the European Commission to enact the legislation that would ban the remote control of activity of the human nervous system, since pulsed microwaves could be used to manipulate the human nervous system at a distance at present time already: https://www.globalresearch.ca/electronic-weapons-radio-frequency-radiation-remote-manipulation-of-the-human-nervous-system/5584676. The European Commission excused itself finding excuse that according to the principle of subsidiarity this legislation must be created in each of the European Union member states individually.
We ask you therefore to create in the Czech Republic a legislation which would ban, under heavy penalties, interference with the human nervous system and organism by external energies. This legislation should establish as well the teams, with participation of human rights organizations, equipped with technical devices, which would enable them to supervise obedience to this legislation. Otherwise there is a danger that in the Czech republic a political system will evolve, which will simulate for the public, that it is defending human rights, but in reality it will be suppressing them by classified means of remote control of the human nervous system. In the Czech Republic, there live at present time some 30 people who claim that they are subjected to experiments with weapons based on the effects of pulsed microwaves and have no legal means to defend themselves. In the future it could be the whole nation. Current fast advances in scientific research can discover other physical means how to manipulate the human nervous system than are pulsed microwaves or connection of brains to cell phone systems or Internet. It is high time to create legislation which will protect the brain, human nervous systems, and the human organism from harmful electromagnetic waves and attacks on freedom of thought and decision making.
–Citizen’s Association for the Ban of Manipulation of Human Nervous Systems by Radiofrequency Radiation
Not long after this article (below) was published, Robert Cabacoff was discharged from St. Joseph Hospital on 9/11/2018, and attempts to move him onward to a second Psychiatric hospital were dropped. No concrete reason was provided to him nor, Mr. Cabacoff reported, was any apology forthcoming from hospital staff for basic human rights abuses noted herein.
But in a follow-up communication with this writer at the time, Dr. Rohatgi noted that discussions he had initiated with Dr. Biswas, as he had earlier intended based on the special parameters of Mr. Cabacoff’s case had led to his release.
Mr. Cabacoff suggests that the immediate intervention and advocacy of several of his friends, including retired neurologist Dr. Edward Spencer, as well as this coverage, in conjunction with the clear illogic of holding a perfectly sane and rational person on a fraudulent IEA (Involuntary Emergency Admission) in a Psychiatric ward–after the background situation had been decided in court in his favor were prime factors in ensuring his speedy release.
Also instrumental perhaps was his known intention–gently expressed to staff, along with a two-day refusal of food and medicine–to further explore the irregularities in hospital procedures and protocols he had been subjected to, exert his legal rights, and consult overseeing agencies and human rights organizations in relation to breaches in protocol and human rights abuses he had suffered.
It is commendable and relieving that Robert Cabacoff was released–after a 15-day stay in the Psychiatric Ward, from August 28 to September 11–but the entire incident of wrongful deployment of an IEA on him on the basis of fraudulent allegations, and the stripping of his basic human rights and civil liberties during psychiatric captivity points to serious flaws in the entire IEA system, in the facile recourse to Authoritarian Psychiatry, in normative jail-like procedures in Psychiatry wards, in the apparently ideologically and procedurally-established inability of physicians, psychiatric staff, and nurses to see a patient admitted to a Psychiatry ward as anything other than mentally unstable and incompetent (despite lack of diagnosis or evaluation), and in the curious alacrity with which Law Enforcement pairs up with Psychiatry to enforce IEAs even on those patently undeserving of such detainment.
–Ramola D/Posted 9/7/2018
In an extraordinary case demonstrating both subversion of legal process and human rights abuse, Robert Cabacoff (73), an avid current-affairs researcher, consciousness-raiser, and retired businessman in the middle of a marital separation marked by his wife’s seeking to oust him as co-owner of their house and mortgage is being held in the Psychiatry ward of St. Joseph Hospital in Nashua, New Hampshire entirely on the basis of allegations–which he says are completely fabricated–of domestic violence brought against him by his wife of many years. An added irony is that these allegations had already been addressed in court and dismissed. Escorted by police to the Emergency Room of St. Joseph hospital weeks after his wife Ana made allegations of being beaten by him as well as being bilked of funds, Robert has been held at St. Joseph for ten days under 24/7 security and in the most deplorable of conditions where he has been prevented from basic self-care such as a shower and a shave for over a week.
(Update: As of this posting, after conversations Dr. Edward Spencer, a retired neurologist and friend of Mr. Cabacoff, and this writer had yesterday with Dr. Rohatgi, the attending physician–who agreed that such deprivation comprised human rights violations and sought to change the situation immediately–Mr. Cabacoff reports he was able to shave for the first time in 9 days on the evening of Sep 6.)
Additionally, his laptop has been removed and he has been unable to retrieve personal effects from his own car, even under escort. His only mode of communication with the outside world has been his cell phone through which means he has reached out to family and friends with the surprising news of his incarceration in a hospital ward.
This situation has in fact unfolded on the basis of his wife’s filling out an IEA a few weeks earlier—an Involuntary Emergency Admittance form naming him as mentally unstable and aggressive and requiring immediate mental health care. By New Hampshire law, the filing of such a complaint by anyone requires Law Enforcement to immediately arrest, confine and escort such a person to a hospital for medical and mental health evaluation.
This IEA however had already been addressed in court. Post-IEA, Ana Cabacoff had sought an Order of Protection against Mr. Cabacoff, citing fear and endangerment by way of violence and instability and lack of breadwinning capacity; this OP was thrown out of court by the presiding judge after she learned, among other things, that Mr. Cabacoff had successfully operated a remodeling business for 20 years with satellite offices in two states and had saved more than 1.1 million dollars over eight years for his family through pro se litigation and could therefore hardly be draining his wife of funds.
Mr. Cabacoff also flatly denies that he has ever in any way ever threatened or executed any form of violence against his wife.
Despite the judicial dismissal of the earlier OP however, New Hampshire Law Enforcement who apprehended Mr. Cabacoff briefly on a mis-turn in traffic before the entrance to St. Joseph Hospital’s main entrance and later in the St. Joseph Hospital parking-lot, subjected Mr. Cabacoff on identification to immediate arrest and escort to the ER, citing the IEA filing as reason. Mr Cabacoff notes that “this process would be meaningful and helpful in the case of someone really being mentally unstable or unreliable,” but that in this case constitutes a violation of Due Process and is patently unjust since this IEA filed by his wife had already been judicially addressed in court and “should not have been honored under IEA guidelines because the Domestic Violence OP was dismissed.”
Backdrop of Marital Dispute Over Home and Mortgage
This story has a background of marital conflict and disputes over possession of home and mortgage to it. The Cabacoffs have been married for 43 years. Mr. Cabacoff has no history of psychiatric instability or illness. Nor does he have a criminal record or any indication of domestic violence over the course of 43 years. They have both been battling foreclosure on their house for 8 years, with Mr. Cabacoff filing a suit against securitized mortgage fraud by Wells Fargo Bank. Indeed continuous pro se litigation has kept the house from foreclosure. However it appears that his wife’s recent initiation of Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceedings and apparent evocation of laws allowing for mentally incompetent, non-breadwinning members to be removed from mortgages suggest efforts are underway to oust Mr. Cabacoff from the mortgage on spurious charges of mental incompetence.
Knee-Jerk State Mental Health Response to Irresponsibly-filed IEAs?
Part of the problem with such an immediate knee-jerk State Mental Health protocol is that people who become the subject of such allegations—which can be made by anyone, including family members with a vendetta or chip on their shoulder against someone—are treated immediately like criminals and mental patients, and stigmatized as such by the nature of the immediate police action to arrest, remove, and escort someone immediately to a Psychiatry unit in a hospital.
This action also has the effect it appears of influencing Intake social workers, clinicians, and psychiatric staff to view the arrested patient as mentally unstable and potentially dangerous; on the basis of such a presumption, Mr. Cabacoff was immediately put under 24/7 supervised observation. Further a teleconference conducted on September 4 with a psychiatric nurse produced the odd result of a pronouncement that Mr. Cabacoff needed “grounding.” This nurse further noted that Mr. Cabacoff needed to be observed over a longer period and so needed to be transferred for this purpose from Nashua to one of four psychiatric hospitals in New Hampshire. Efforts to obtain information from the nurse on the rationale for her verdict were not successful. “I asked her how she determined such a conclusion. No answer, but alluded to my “viewpoints.” I asked her what viewpoints. No answer.”
Both the attending physician Dr. Rohatgi and the resident psychiatrist Dr. Biswas have relayed to this reporter that they have found Robert Cabacoff to be calm and rational, highly intelligent, well-spoken, and mentally fit, quite at odds with the depiction of him in the IEA petition filed by Ana Cabacoff.
Robert Cabacoff runs an email list with current affairs information and erudite discussion, to which this reporter has subscribed for over a year.
Psychiatry Sits at Odds Today with Preservation of Civil Liberties
Dr. Rohatgi, the attending physician noted that Psychiatry and Mental Health laws have superseded the powers of physicians in hospitals to advocate for patients but conveyed that he was indeed concerned that a mentally fit, contributing member of society should be wrongfully labeled. Dr. Biswas, the St. Joseph psychiatrist on this case discussed with this writer the magnitude of the claim made against Mr. Cabacoff and noted that the deprivation of civil liberties which psychiatric incarceration on the basis of an IEA represented was indeed a large issue, one that had even more significance in a State like New Hampshire, the famed Live Free or Die state.
It is to be hoped therefore that these concerned and conscientious medical staff make the right decision in this case to stave off further redundant psychiatric evaluations and release Robert Cabacoff at the earliest to the resumption of his valuable life and work in his community.
Concerned readers are encouraged to call and express their concern to the St. Joseph Hospital Psychiatry Department. 603-882-3000 is their main number.
Ramola D is a Science, Technology, Surveillance, Military, Ethics, Human Rights, and Consciousness reporter, fiction-writer and poet with 30 years of combined college teaching experience in English & Creative Writing, freelance journalism, management consulting, science & technical writing/editing and training, as well as running creativity and Natural Science workshops for children. She may be reached about this article at firstname.lastname@example.org.
Sherri M. Guarnieri has a Fine Arts degree from the University of the Arts in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. She is an avid yogi of Bikram Yoga, travels, and is a dance choreographer. Sherri is a fund-raiser for the Walk to End Alzheimer’s. She has over twenty years of experience assisting an array of businesses with office management and accounting.
Part I: Advocacy for Alzheimer’s, Discovery of Maltreatment in Elder Care Facilities in Massachusetts and Connecticut, Whistleblowing and Public Reporting
Ramola D: Thank you so much Sherri, for coming forward and being willing to share your story of whistleblower retaliation, White House involvement, and abuse with microwave weapons. I understand you were a whistleblower about malpractice or negligence in healthcare at a facility taking care of seniors. Did you come to this subject as a healthcare worker or as the relative of a patient?
Sherri M Guarnieri: Thank you Ramola, for allowing this opportunity to discuss the importance of Alzheimer’s awareness as well as non-consensual human trafficking with microwave attacks on our nervous system under illegal microwave surveillance.
My grandmother started showing memory challenges while I was living in Washington, DC where I was working for a corporation as an Accounts Manager/Controller. After speaking with family, I offered to leave Washington, DC. My grandmother gave me so much in my life, I would do anything needed in return. I then left Washington, DC to assist in caring for my grandmother in Massachusetts and later in Connecticut.
I never considered myself as a whistleblower until her health-care in three long-term care facilities started to cause unexplained injury, antipsychotic drug-use errors, and procedures that were not approved by the appointed caregiver which was myself, as Health Care Proxy and Power of Attorney. I have no medical background, but when I have cause and concern over the health and well-being of a family member with a disability such as cognition problems, then I will do the research until I tip over from lack of sleep.
Ramola D: Where was she then and which part of Massachusetts and Connecticut were you in? Also, when exactly was this?
Sherri M Guarnieri: The period of time was from the end of 2005 to 2012. My grandmother’s care was in two facilities in Massachusetts and one in Connecticut, all with alarming concerns on care and medication handling. The two facilities in Great Barrington, Massachusetts were Fairview Commons end of 2005 to 2008 and Great Barrington Rehabilitation and Nursing–now known as Timberlyn East/Heights–a division of Kindred Healthcare 2009 to early 2011, and Geer Skilled Nursing Facility in Canaan, Connecticut 2011 to 2012.
The nursing facilities where my grandmother resided, I found the oversight with patient-to-caregiver ratio to be poor. Staff were learning on the job without taking a course in cognition disability care which is now Alzheimer’s care, or even a basic psychology course to understand a senior with a disability. I would like to note the use of the word “disability.” During my grandmother’s care, classifying Alzheimer’s as a true disability was not allowed or considered.
Ramola D: So are you saying that your grandmother was not recognized as having a disability then, by staff? Had she been diagnosed as having Alzheimer’s or cognition problems?
Sherri M Guarnieri: Yes. The years her Alzheimer’s progressed, it was considered as dementia. A senile senior with forgetfulness. Alzheimer’s was still building its footing. She was losing her short-term memory, which was causing stress. Example: my grandmother would open and read her mail and after a few minutes see her mail open. She would then proclaim someone opened her mail. You could see the stress and disbelief set in. My grandmother did see a neurologist who suggested Aricept, which was a bridge medication at the time for Alzheimer’s. However it had to be given in tandem, per her physician, with the antipsychotic Seroquel at 15 mcg. I would later find out that while in long-term care facilities, many residents in Massachusetts were advised to get on Seroquel by the physician or medical director. I would also find later on that Seroquel caused more stress in my grandmother’s cognition which led eventually to care injuries in those long-term care facilities where she stayed. At the time, I missed the key phrase from her physician, “Most of our patients are on Seroquel.” It did not give me alarm bells then because this was all new to me and I was trusting her physician of over 60 years.
Ramola D: Can you tell us exactly what you saw going on at these nursing facilities? Were they understaffed, did they delay in giving attention or care to residents? What were the most outstanding things you noticed about the quality of attention and care?
Sherri M Guarnieri: Facilities have a regimented timeline. Medication, breakfast, dressing/bathing, activity, lunch, activity/snack, bathroom checks, dinner and evening bedding/bathing. I found she was losing her choice and rights if she did not want to conform to the schedule, then attention was on to the next patient.
It’s a challenge with Alzheimer’s patients, their care needs more personalized attention. Example: bathing and dressing. My grandmother was a conservative Catholic, wherein you do not expose yourself to anyone. Dressing a senior with Alzheimer’s with two staff in the room handling dressing can cause heightened anxiety. I witnessed this example frequently. Staff having fun with each other chatting but the patient is being left out and dressed like a doll instead of a human being.
The loss of your personal privacy with toileting, bathing, and dressing is a huge loss of dignity. The last facility in Connecticut recognized my grandmother was mishandled so much they could sense trauma, and started using a sheet to dress her, so she felt protection.
The list of general problems–medication mistakes, medical staff not returning your call, terrible food, missed toileting, losing personal clothing and property–is standard in all long-term care facilities. The key these facilities miss is these seniors are people with dignity and past lives before becoming a resident there. They should not be at the mercy of facilities coming up with wrong diagnoses of unfounded conditions to treat and to collect money upon.
Ramola D: Let’s go into that in some detail. You have said you actually started to notice the presence of unexplained bruises on your grandmother. What were some of the circumstances under which you made those discoveries–was she cognizant of these bruises, did she share any information with you about them?
Massachusetts Facility Bruise/Click to Enlarge
Sherri M Guarnieri: My grandmother had no reference memory of her harm. It’s my understanding they gave her extra Seroquel from the back-room, which led to unfounded diagnosis, harm, and procedures not approved by me. I could see common-care bruises but the ones I found outside of common were the exact size and shape of opt-site bandages. The one in Massachusetts was a large rectangle near the wrist with dried blood on the floor. The second in Connecticut which was a butterfly bandage with point to point bruising. (Images left and below.)
After approaching nursing and care staff, I began to document her bruises and send information to the Department of Public Health. All pictures were shot upon discovering and sent to the Department of Public Health in real time. Massachusetts facilities representatives claimed, in an apparent lie, that they had no recollection (about these bruises) and the Connecticut facility said it was from a cotton bra. Any forensic expert would agree that these bruises were exact size and shape pressure points, not “a cotton bra” and a “I don’t know.” Facilities always have a reason to not be liable even though they are responsible for 24/7 care.
Bruise on Christine’s right arm after a while
Ramola D:When you saw the bruises on your grandmother–or later, now when you know so much about microwave weapons–do you think some of them could be due to DEWs? The rectangular-shaped one in particular–since it seems they can do that kind of thing with these weapons.
Sherri M Guarnieri: No Ramola, I don’t feel my grandmother’s bruises to be from Directed-Energy Weapons, only the hand of medical malpractice. The rectangular or butterfly shape was from bandages in that shape. However, having her hearing aids go missing and later returned with intention you never know if they were altered in any way or targeted with Synthetic Telepathy. Anything or anyone close to me was an alternative target. It’s a process of gross meta data, how much can they find to destroy and deface your life, body etc.
Connecticut Facility Bruise/Click to Enlarge
Ramola D: You mentioned she was being given 15 mcg of Seroquel, an antipsychotic drug, along with Aricept. Did you have questions about her diagnosis and prescriptions? And how did you find out they were giving her extra Seroquel?
Sherri M Guarnieri: All of her medications were prescriptions outside of the questions on undisclosed additions in these facilities. We went to obtain second opinions, but I soon found out that when a patient is in long-term care and not at home, facility care staff do not want to change over the medical director’s decision. To my observation, the use of antipsychotic medication seemed to be farmed in facilities. Massachusetts facilities pushing Seroquel and the Connecticut facility pushing Zyprexa Xydis like it was a drug trial and not personalized care.
I found that the antipsychotic medication made my grandmother more combative, which made care worse and caused more continued harm. One care staff member was caught verbally abusing my grandmother because she did not want to be touched by the staff-member. She was removed from my grandmother’s care after I complained.
Did I make inquiry, yes. Medical replies from her physician came a week after inquiry, and communication from medical care staff became snarky and poorly documented. The honesty and my trust level in these care facilities was falling rapidly.
I found the variance in Seroquel by making an Excel sheet. I charted the order date, to the distribution, to the day of the month. When I noticed an overlap of 25 mcg (microgram)to 50 mcg I asked the nurse on staff what she had in the cart. The nurse reviewed her cart and two sheets of different mcg Seroquel pills were there. She then wanted to check a backroom “lock box” and found two more sheets of Seroquel pills at 50mcg. A sheet of pills equals a thirty day supply. I requested review by her physician and the nursing director to ensure going back to 25mcg and to dispose of the unused pill sheets. The disposal of extra medication came into question due to pile up in the lock box. This was the first clue that proved that several times before my grandmother had been receiving more medication than approved and prescribed.
Long-term care facilities appear to enjoy the beat-down (in response to the attentiveness of a patient’s guardian). Meaning, the less we the guardians question their treatment of patients, our loved ones, the happier they are. Conversely, the more a guardian inquires about, the less they feel they have to cooperate. It’s an industry standard. After my grandmother’s brutal harm, her assigned doctor, Dr. Potler screamed, with his finger in my face, “I’m so sick of you!” Is that any way to act after a brutal harm incident?
Ramola D: Wait, you actually asked your grandmother’s doctor about a certain injury you noticed on your grandmother, and he insulted you? Did you have photographs, did this doctor see the injury? What was his assessment of this injury, why would he dismiss your concerns?
Sherri M Guarnieri: Yes, Dr. Potler, the Medical Director and my grandmother’s physician was in my face, in the hallway with staff witnessing. He reviewed the injury and seemingly did not care about if I had a photograph or not. He could not find out from staff how the injury happened.
He then said, “You know how difficult your grandmother is.” I was horrified and asked him if this was safe, the injury was too specific, too large, and not a single person knew.
Did he dismiss my concerns because he already knew he could cover the illegal procedure he was apparently engaged in? If not, what other explanation was there? Was his outburst the result of being exposed perhaps for the first time, as knowingly giving less than proper care to his patients?
On leaving, from another wing, a nurse who had witnessed his decidedly less than professional and inappropriately aggressive response said she would keep an eye on my grandmother. This nurse was not a daily person to interact with my grandmother’s care.
Ramola D: By this time, judging from what you had personally seen and witnessed, from the reaction of care staff, from this odd reaction by the physician in charge of your grandmother’s health, what were you starting to conclude? What was your assessment? Did you feel a cover-up of sorts was ongoing, what did you suspect?
Sherri M Guarnieri: In assessing the continuing unprofessional care given to my grandmother, the repeated inappropriate hostility with which my concerns were met, it led me to conclude that the doctor may well have been deliberately overseeing the mishandling of drugs at his facilities, perhaps for criminal medical experimentation, in which case, he would be making loads of money. In which case, my grandmother’s safety would be the last thing on his mind.
My assessment: my grandmother was not safe in this facility. My grandmother’s medical care was from Dr. Potler, the Massachusetts facility Medical Director, and Dr. Dennis Kobylarz as her primary physician out of Canaan, Connecticut. I thought two physicians would help but it seemed to make the cover deeper.
I suspected that my grandmother, who lived until 101, was some one’s test case, and I was being completely disregarded even though I had all documents to support my concern under the law in Massachusetts and Connecticut. Red flags, sad moments, and very few apologies because apologies mean acknowledging being liable which they did not want. This is the struggle. 24/7 care should mean just that, that you the facility bears witness on agreeing to safety and security compliance of the patients, our loved ones. The law should hold to this fact.
My grandmother’s care was being human-trafficked just as I am today with illegal implantation which Massachusetts has placed in my body.
Ramola D: Yes, we must talk about illegal implantation that you experienced—let’s do that shortly, in Part 2. At this time, what kind of inquiry and advocacy were you doing generally—how did you report these lapses and aberrations in care?
Sherri M Guarnieri: When the unfounded diagnosis, injuries, and medication use became in question, I started alerting care staff, nurses, Directors of Nursing, medical doctors, facility administrators, an Ombudsman with the Department of Public Health, with photographs, requesting follow-through, with letters, emails and conversation. I also had an incident noted with the local Police Department, Quality Improvement Organization (QIO) of Medicaid/Medicare, Massachusetts/Connecticut Departments of Public Health, Council on Long-Term Care and Aging, Alzheimer’s Association, local Representatives, Senators, and The White House.
I was issuing information in real-time as incidents occurred, via email, with supporting documents and photographs.
Ramola D: That is an impressive list of groups and individuals to have informed. What was the reaction from these groups, what kind of advice or assistance did they provide? And how did the facilities and care staff there themselves respond?
Sherri M Guarnieri: I received pamphlets that had no supporting information and promises of assistance from executives in conversations that had zero follow-through, most with no replies, and the Massachusetts Department of Public Health investigator stating in his document unable to determine harm.
I started using the hotline from the Alzheimer’s Association support; it helped in discussion but made no relief to the current status of observed brutal harm.
Massachusetts Facility Elbow Split
We had several care meetings with these facilities but never an apology. Actually, after one brutal harm incident in a care meeting, it was agreed my grandmother was to be a two-assist patient. After that meeting, a week went by and she was on the floor with an elbow split to the cartilage. After that injury, I demanded release to Connecticut and she was moved to Connecticut in my vehicle.
Massachusetts facilities were a true disappointment in protecting her safety, security, and dignity. I would find out later why after I became illegally surveiled. Massachusetts authorities were involved in a larger-than-life type of medical corruption.
Ramola D: Let’s return to that important matter of retaliation shortly, in Part 2. During this time, you were working full-time as your grandmother’s caregiver?
Sherri M Guarnieri: Yes, I was doing my best in the beginning with providing home care, working part-time and supporting my grandmother full-time. During skilled 24/7 skilled nursing care, I was working full-time with interruptions daily which made challenges to hold a position. However during this abuse, life still continued for me. Imagine, amidst this tragedy, was the largest economic downturn in US history beside The Great Depression. I was living in a rural community in Massachusetts after coming from two major cities, San Francisco and Washington DC. It was a challenge to even hold a paying position due to the area, and the continued need to leave my job to attend to alarming calls about my grandmother’s care as the full-time caregiver appointee.
I was a very present family member to my grandmother–five times a week as well as any time for any special concern in-between. A person offering this kind of close attention can be seen in the long-term care facility business as a “problem” person instead of being seen as a supporter with compliments.
Ramola D: So, although you were initially a stranger to the healthcare industry, you began to understand slowly the nature of the political climate you were dealing with, generally.
Sherri M Guarnieri: I could never imagine the care of seniors having a political climate but the more I was involved and experienced, yes, it has one in a major way. Care facilities stated they were Alzheimer’s care facilities — by law, now you have to be qualified to make that statement in a marketing claim.
Another facility made statements to the effect that they carried Tri-State Insurance which means you can cross a family member into another state to keep the same coverage. This was also an incorrect and therefore illegal claim made by a long-term care facility, since that was not the case at all, my grandmother actually lost her medical insurance upon being admitted to that Connecticut facility and was forced to reapply.
Each facility supports a different type of drug outside of Alzheimer’s care, regarding which my finding of today is the commercialization and experimentation of drugs inside a care facility. Facilities sent my grandmother to care or treatment unsupported by her present condition.
An example of this was under Hospice care in my home when they wanted my grandmother to see a nutritionist–why would she, while living in my home intending to pass naturally need a nutritionist? I found myself working around the “farming of healthcare” and standing for her religious rights, dignity, and humanity just as she did for me when I was little.
Ramola D: What kind of headway were you able to make with the Massachusetts Department of Public Health, whom you reported abuses to?
Sherri M Guarnieri: The headway was few and far between. Under the website, Member of the Family, which is a website assessing and publishing reports on nursing homes, during my grandmother’s time, all three facilities were notated as ”much below average with potential of harm.”
Fairview Commons was reviewed by Quality Improvement Organization, Centers for Medicaid and Medicare per my request on my grandmother’s medical records as “did not meet quality of care standards.”
And during a meeting with my lawyer Raymond Jacoub present, a representative of Kindred Healthcare-Great Barrington Rehabilitation of Nursing made a prepared statement in which it was claimed, “After review, we have found Christine L. Guarnieri is not the only resident with medication handling concerns. We are aware of the issue and are working to correct this situation.” A Department of Public Health review found the nursing supervisor “guilty of mishandling personnel effects,” which were my grandmother’s hearing aids.
But major harm to my grandmother’s body that I had documented and reported was listed as “unfounded.” The Massachusetts Department of Public Health investigator made a personal phone call to me stating “unfounded” does not drop the observation on concern, but for me it felt like a major loss when so many injuries had been reported.
The Geer Skilled Nursing in Canaan, Connecticut review from the Department of Public Health stated that care was in the scope of normal. But the Ombudsman noted that Geer Skilled Nursing can no longer state they accept Tri-State health insurance. Meaning claiming that a person from either Connecticut, Massachusetts, or New York would be covered in their building. Sadly, I had moved my grandmother at 100 from Massachusetts to Connecticut thinking she could keep her health insurance, be safe, but the moment she entered the building, after telling me it would be fine, she lost her health insurance. Can you imagine at 100 having to reapply for State health insurance? It was outrageous!
One last notation on Geer Skilled Nursing: an employee went missing on a three-week leave of absence when the notes of observed illegal doping in pre-dinner juice on the wing came up in my reporting. After she returned to work, I watched a Unit Manager from another area of the facility come to her cart and test her juice on more than one occasion.
Can I change the climate of healthcare alone, no. I was keeping notes and speaking out, documenting and sharing information to create awareness. I still feel more a failure today then a success. Thankfully, the Alzheimer’s Association has made leaps and bounds over my grandmother’s time of care. Alzheimer’s patients are being reviewed by Centers of Medicare and Medicaid. We have a firm law issued by Medicare in which no long-term healthcare facility can state they are an Alzheimer’s Care Unit unless certified by Medicare. The Alzheimer’s Association is now being recognized with Federal Funding for research. This disease will outreach more people than cancer, so support is needed each year.
Ramola D: That’s great, and we’ll post your Walk to End Alzheimer’s link below.
Let’s focus on the White House a little — I understand President Obama’s White House came to play a part here. What kind of information did you send in and how—was this through the White House website?
Sherri M Guarnieri: My notations to The White House while living in Massachusetts were in two letters sent FedEx: one during the height of injury noting 32+ exhibits, and the second after my grandmother’s passing (this letter imaged in full below), noting the found facts again and asking President Obama to please Do More, Be More and Hope for More for Alzheimer’s patients Each and Every Day.
Second Letter to President Obama, Page 1
Second Letter to President Obama, Page 2
Second Letter to President Obama, Page 3
(Sherri is walking this year with others to raise funds for Alzheimer’s research and care; to support her walk, please visit her donation page.)
Part 2: Whistleblower Retaliation: Stalking, Illegal Surveillance, Covert Implantation; Obama, Deval, Barletta, Freeh Connection; US Secret Service Visit; Synthetic Telepathy, & Non-Consensual Military/USAF Weapons Operation
Ramola D:I understand you started to experience some very odd responses from the care facilities, after you started questioning the level of care and reporting abuses your grandmother was suffering. What exactly did you experience?
Sherri M Guarnieri: Staff from these facilities started following us to church, to lunch outings, and calling me at all hours of the day and night, even on days when I was not present. This formulation was a level of stalking.
Once, I had a nurse on staff call me at 2 am stating my grandmother had facial drooping which they diagnosed as a mild heart attack, which I learned later was an unfounded speculation after I spent 14 hours in Emergency Services. My grandmother while in the ER seemed to be on more Seroquel then prescribed. I believe this to be the reason of the false diagnosis. Or it gave the ability to gain access to my home while in the ER for so many hours. I had Care staff circling around my house when having lunch outside with my grandmother. I had a male nurse call me on my off day, asking why I was not coming in–which is a level of psychological harassment.
I later noted remarkably, that various levels of staff appeared to be outright lying to me in that they were claiming things contrary to facts I knew to be true–apparently because they were aware I was issuing complaints in real time. My feelings and reply was, if you can’t assure her safety or tell me how this major injury happened, then what are your services providing in quality, safety, and security?
This was a daily life in eight out of the ten years. This does not even cover the heartbreaking moments you have with watching and supporting your loved one with Alzheimer’s decline. In this climate I was unwilling to waver because at the true core, despite the illegal stalking and psychological harassment from these long-term care facilities, I loved and supported my grandmother, which is more powerful than any health-care machine treating her as a means of income instead of nurturing her humanity. I still can say with great supporting proof behind me, Shame on them.
Ramola D:I understand you started to experience even worse retaliation for your whistleblowing. How did this start, and what exactly did you notice happening—was it overt or covert at the start?
Sherri M Guarnieri: As I stated above, the nursing facilities made it overt. During my grandmother’s time in long-term care, when you are labeled as “a problem,” they start losing your loved one’s personal effects, hearing aids, glasses, jewelry, clothing, plants and family pictures. This is a level of cruelty.
I tested one of my grandmother’s plants — its ph level was off the charts, it seems a staff member dumped rubbing alcohol in it. In a scarier example, my grandmother refused an earlier approved appointment to review her pessary. This procedure was rescheduled and instead of telling me while I was in the building, they chose to do it after hours and after I left the building and not telling me of the changes, which is a violation of an element of the law as I was the designated Healthcare Proxy with Power of Attorney.
A nursing supervisor, administrator, or director is breaking the law by refusing to inform the Health-Care Proxy and Power of Attorney of any and all changes to health care. The harm increased, the care meetings increased, and her age was 100 when I moved her yet again. I was hoping for relief in the final care facility but that failed as well.
The covert stalking was during the time of complaints, and after my first letter to The White House, items became missing from my home and were later returned, items became missing from my garage, medical records were changed on the fly because I was asking for them regularly. I started being followed, my mail was being opened in the upper left-hand corner, my phone was not working properly, the air in my tires taken out to read low and my computer was hacked.
I was surveilled by undercovers watching me at my jobs, by an official at the library, and followed just shopping in a store. I’m glad I have a slight photographic memory, as I will never forget those faces of people stalking me.
On one occasion, my driver’s-side door was shot at with a BB gun on the main street of Great Barrington. The man looked like a Pittsfield Police Department cadet. There were three people in the car, two in the front seat and the shooter in the back seat sitting in the middle of the seat. I wish I could remember more but I was trying to get into traffic to follow when I was blocked by another car.
Ramola D:Was he driving a police car? Was your car damaged?
Sherri M Guarnieri: The car was white–a white four-door vehicle with a Massachusetts license plate–so hard to tell if it was an undercover police car without the license plate for proof. Yes, my car today still has the dent on my driver’s side door.
Ramola D: You have also mentioned neighborhood harassment.
Sherri M Guarnieri: I had a stalker squatting in the house next door from New York City. He started squatting in the house with a group of others after it was foreclosed. After a number of complaints by myself and another neighbor to the police department, which was of no help, we found he was indeed from New York City and using his father’s car and listed under his insurance. In the foreclosed home, they kept a room surrounded by plastic with a computer in it, there was a grill propane tank hooked to the outside of the house for heat, trash everywhere, old mail piling up outside, and when the house was finally sold, the new owner noted an extension cord running under the ground pointing towards my house. They may have been using my house for electricity while I was at work.
After repeated reports from my neighbors and myself of the grill propane tank, the police did not take action in my town. These New York City kids were not poor, they stayed up all hours of the night, ran donuts in the snow with their vehicles in the yard and onto my property, and even damaged my neighbor’s property by ski jumping on his lawn at 2 am. It was The Department of Public Safety and the lawyer of the foreclosed property who finally shut this squatting ring down.
I NEVER thought that being an advocate for Alzheimer’s and loving/caring for my grandmother to the end of life would bring such invasive harm and would make me a person enduring cyber- stalking, tactical illegal ground surveillance, property damage and much more as being a targeted individual. I find myself then and present-day enduring in a 24/7 tactical human trafficking illegal surveillance sponsored by our government. At that time I had no idea I had illegal implants in my body.
Ramola D: It is absolutely astonishing, the level of harassment suddenly leveled at you. When and how did this surveillance escalate into covert assault with microwave weapons? When did Synthetic Telepathy and microchip implantation enter the picture?
Sherri M Guarnieri: Since I have done more research, have reflected back, and understand this level of tactical assault, I started to notice microwave hits on my body while caring for my grandmother in my home on hospice care. These hits would make my body feel terribly painful. As the microwave level was so high in body shots and in my home, this would explain why my phone would not work due to jamming radio frequencies draining the battery in one hour while I was caring for my grandmother on hospice care. While home with my grandmother, I had to keep my phone plugged in at all times.
I was also getting random bloody noses which I never had before. I had a spinal C6/C7 problem which could have been part of the assault because it hit the same time I was reporting my grandmother’s harm in Massachusetts.
In Massachusetts and Connecticut, I was having my tires read low on air on a regular basis. Even at Canyon Ranch in Massachusetts where Security and cameras were present throughout the property, my tires read low on several occasions. One of the then Security Officers of Canyon Ranch was advanced later to a Chief of Police in a small neighboring town. I wonder to this day if it was related.
Synthetic Telepathy started in Massachusetts a year and a half after my grandmother’s death when a conversation with Joseph F. Barletta took place and he asked for a recent picture of me.
Ramola D: Was Joseph F. Barletta a personal friend?
Sherri M Guarnieri: I had met Joseph F. Barletta earlier in San Francisco, California at Trattoria Contadina where I worked as a restaurant manager for many years. He was a regular guest with his family and other guests. The joke from my boss was he was FBI but in my opinion he was CIA. Louis Freeh, former director of the FBI, came in for dinner on his recommendation. No director of the FBI has communication with other lower-ranking employees; in my opinion, Joseph F. Barletta had to be his peer in equal measure to come into the restaurant on a personal recommendation. Trattoria Contadina also hosted The Blue Angels (the US Navy airshow flight team) team every year during Fleet Week as well as a host of Hollywood actors. We had one sweep by a security team one year to see if Al Gore could dine. Al Gore did not dine because we had no second door for departure.
Joseph F. Barletta was an acquaintance in kind through work. I kept in touch with him after I moved back to Massachusetts, I had several contact phone numbers for him. He was an attorney, and helped me on occasion with legal questions or matters as they presented. I thought I could trust him and rely on the truth from him, but I am thinking now maybe he was aware all along that I was an implanted person and his interaction was based on CIA review.
Ramola D: And you met Barletta again, in Massachusetts, after your grandmother died?
Sherri M Guarnieri: I think he was at Windy Hill Farm that Columbus Day weekend–however, it had been 14-15 years since I last saw him in person. After my departure from Windy Hill Farm, while working for Invite in Massachusetts, I thought I saw him again dining with a few male friends at an outdoor patio inside the complex where Invite was located. It was the sound of his tone and language which seemed familiar but I could not be sure. Before my assault with synthetic telepathy hit, before I even knew I was implanted, I had a chance near-encounter with Deval, Barletta, and Obama at Windy Hill Farm in Massachusetts. (Ed Note: Deval Patrick was the Governor of Massachusetts during 2007 to 2015.)
I had taken a seasonal job at Windy Hill Farm during the time I was trying to sell my house. Life was challenging but I thought being in nature would be a fun and yogic thing to do during a poor economy. Oddly, Dennis Mareb, the owner, nicknamed me “Security.” I asked him repeatedly why, he never had an answer, he just laughed. You see, I believed it was the staff at Windy Hill Farm who had first-hand knowledge that I was to be presented or awarded with something on behalf of my advocacy for Alzheimer’s. The attendees in the orchard that Columbus Day weekend were supposed to be Deval, Obama, Joseph F. Barletta, and others. I was aware that something was going on. Large black SUVs came and went that morning, staff usually in farm clothes were dressed up, staff had cameras in hand and even the Hilton sisters were there, picking apples in the orchard.
As the morning progressed, Deval’s security team arrived, two huge twin men arrived and stood near the location I was working, and the statement heard on the floor at work was: “Obama’s ETA (Estimated Time of Arrival) 40 minutes out as he is at the boy’s school in Hudson, NY.” People started to get close and all of a sudden the security team left and people looked disappointed. All this was supposed to be a surprise to me. However, I just went about my job and observed people scramble. A man approached me in a cashiering line from Washington, DC and said, “I drove all this way just to turn around and go home, Sherri.” A man I did not know. The man said my name and I was not wearing a name tag.
Ramola D: I understand there was one other outstanding connection with former President Obama after you moved to New Mexico, at a new spot that you were working at — can you describe that further?
Sherri M Guarnieri: Yes, while working for Outside Magazine an interview with former President Obama was under development during his August 2015 outdoor adventure with Bear Grylls. When former President Obama’s story was published, I was no longer with the company but they kept my name on the tear sheet. It was during my employment with Outside Magazine that my thumb drive went missing for a few hours out of my purse. Later, I overheard a conversation brewing:
“The information on the drive, did it have our business information on it? No? OK.”
“I guess I hit a little hard last night that upset her, hahaha.”
I was disgusted after this. No business is allowed to illegal search-and-seizure without a warrant. I have never been served a warrant.
Ramola D:Yes, it is most unsettling to hear from so many about neighbors’ or collegial/employer participation in implant-activation and “electronic surveillance” which is essentially remote access of a human body and participation in Torture, which is not just amoral, it is illegal and downright criminal.
The question also rises, is it pure coincidence that you worked at a few places where you encountered famous politicians and public figures — such as Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama and Louis Freeh, or did some of this appear to be more than coincidence? Some targets have reported being stalked by public figures.
Sherri M Guarnieri: Yes, as I noted before an unusual group of people started to be around areas which I worked–
Hillary Clinton, Canyon Ranch, Lenox, Massachusetts Former President Obama, Outside Magazine Louis Freeh, Trattoria Contadina General Michael Hayden, a library in Massachusetts where I was
You see, a level of people started to come around and I was just living and supporting my family.
Recently, a British man came by during employment and before looking me in the face to say hello, looked directly into my left ear and then looked at me and said hi. One of my larger implants resides in my left ear. (Image below.)
It’s odd, as an illegally implanted woman, I have to take all coincidences and encounters as something to review because someone with immeasurable power has implanted my body and is allowing criminal access. A path I never chose for myself.
So to this day I have no idea how I got these implants, what the plan was for me besides my normal life. It sits in my heart the unknown, and now to be abused by my implants–I refuse to go silent on Crimes Against Humanity for my grandmother and my current life.
Ramola D: When and how did you realize you were implanted?
Left Ear Implants, Click to Enlarge
Sherrie M. Guarnieri: My ear implants and other areas of implants were found after doing research and reviewing an older set of MRIs from my first spinal injury in 2009 in Massachusetts. After leaving Massachusetts and living in New Mexico, the assault became very microwave frequency-driven to my ears, which assaulted other areas of my body, the same way that Chinese acupuncture works via the ears and head, through energy meridians. I even have a coating on my teeth which enhances electrical connection. The sexual assault was daily and for hours and days on end.
MRI, Back View, showing reflectives/implants at ears and back
MRI Side View, Reflective/Implant at Ear
Ramola D: That is absolutely horrifying, and truly criminal. To return to Barletta and the whole experience of your first assault with Synthetic Telepathy which you report as extremely traumatic–when was it that Barletta asked for your picture, what happened directly afterward?
Sherri M Guarnieri: I thought speaking with Joseph F. Barletta was in-kind (a mutual, collegial friendship), so I sent a picture via text to his phone number. After that conversation, I was harshly attacked with Synthetic Telepathy which found me unconscious in the doorway of my home naked. I went to the emergency room, had an overnight stay, and did a number of tests during the stay and after, all tested negative. One test which was most notable and the reason they kept me overnight showed my white cell count was way out of balance which I now know to be due to radiation from the attack.
The Synthetic Telepathy was stating:
“You are under arrest, I’m going to shoot you in the head on the street and place you naked in a body bag. Obama, Deval, and Martha Coakley will watch, and they approve of your execution, put your ass on the door frame, put your hands behind your back, I can see you in my cross hairs, don’t breathe, don’t blink, don’t move–I will shoot you if you stand.”
(Ed Note: Martha Coakley was the Attorney-General of Massachusetts 2007 – 2015, same time period as Deval Patrick being Governor.)
Several other kinds of lurid sexual verbiage was included in the assault. During the assault they used the recorded voices of Obama, Martha Coakley, members of my family, older friends, Joseph F. Barletta, and members’ of the surrounding police departments whom I knew and had had interaction with, to heighten the assault. At the time of the assault, I did not know I had an illegal ear implant.
I know now, that this type of assault is SERE training used by the military. I have also found evidence of older grants which the Army was given to advance Synthetic Telepathy long before my assault. I was researching how this was connected to my body because my body, my mind, and my life would never think of these types of abuses or harm.
Ramola D: So you wrote to the White House reporting this Synthetic Telepathy assault and usage of microwave weapons. You mentioned you received a visit from the US Secret Service shortly afterward. Can you describe this further?
Sherri M Guarnieri: It was later, after I moved away from Massachusetts, now living in New Mexico, that I posted my Synthetic Telepathy assault to the White House website asking the US Government to stop sexually violating me, and would our President be OK with this type of disgusting Synthetic Telepathy happening to him. I gave my accounts of experiencing V2K/Synthetic Telepathy on more than one occasion and reported the same language as noted above in my first assault.
The Secret Service visit came a year after me living in New Mexico. They came making accusations and misleading my neighbors and employer with on-the-spot interviews. My neighbors rejected their false accusations.
The Secret Service asked my neighbor if I was carrying a gun in a case to and from my home. My neighbor replied, “Do you mean her yoga mat?” Then the Secret Service asked if I was seen carrying a lot of bags to and from my home. My neighbor replied again, “Do you mean her recycled grocery bags?” Then they came to see me at work and made me feel like I was in poor health which was also false. A job, friends, primary care physician, and yoga five times a week–far from the truth, Secret Service!
The Secret Service man could also not provide the full email which was the spark of their review in my office in front of me, as my email was about Human Trafficking Lives with microwave-frequency Directed-Energy Weapons. Before Secret Service agent Mr. White left my office, he made me sign over my HIPPA rights which means they could review my medical record over thirty days or for as long as needed.
After those accusations and Mr. White from the Secret Service proclaiming to my face that Microwave-Frequency Directed Energy Weapons did not exist and I needed medical help, I found on the Internet a Joint Chiefs of Staff document under Obama which addresses Microwave Frequency Directed-Energy Weapons.
I then found the Non-Lethal Military Division overview on Microwave-Frequency Directed-Energy Weapons in coordination with other countries. Even more, a document from the Air Force from 1999 proclaimed quality work at Kirkland Air Force base in New Mexico with development of Microwave Frequency Directed-Energy Weapons. And my most recent find, a document declassified in 2006, which states the Army was testing microwave hits on “willing participants.” The same use as on my body which can be supported by several other documents and reports I have in my possession.
If you want to turn a blind eye to the safety and dignity in care of Alzheimer’s patients, then illegally implant my body in Massachusetts to abuse and illegally shrivel my life for bringing compassion to the front, then don’t think I won’t dig my feet in the earth to prove you an inhuman person.
Sherri M Guarnieri: No, no one cared. I was being forcefully burned on my rectal, vagina, abdominal area with abusive frequency hitting my ears. I was leaving screaming messages to Joseph F Barletta, Secret Service, and emailing the FBI and The White House to stop sexually violating me.Stop burning my rectal and vaginal area in the car, at work, in yoga or sleeping. No one cared at all.
So when a high ranking department gives zero response to a person, then they are participating in the assault and not protecting our Constitutional Rights as Americans. And when high ranking departments then try to sabotage your life so you do not disclose your evidence, then this means millions of dollars are at play.
Think about the effort. I believe I was implanted as a child, so quite a lot of the Medical and state authorities within Massachusetts would appear to be involved. Those who are abusing me clearly during my first Synthetic Telepathy assault knew my background in full. I can be followed where ever I go and this implant in my ear also records any conversation I was ever in IN MY LIFE TIME. That is huge money at play in medical, military, universities, national science labs and Department of Defense.
Ramola D:When did you start attempting to obtain documentation and proof of what you were experiencing, and how did you go about this? What did you find?
Sherri M Guarnieri: After Secret Service came to see me and tried to note me as needing medical attention, I started doing more research because the false accusation was cruel.
I started looking for information online about Synthetic Telepathy, targeted individuals, microwave frequency directed-energy weapons, military grants, patents, etc. I took my medical records and reviewed them again. My MRI was so telling on the level of reflectives in question inside my ears, eye, neck, head, cheek bone and rib cage. Then a foot x-ray showed a reflective in my toe and even my teeth had an odd coating which shows like a false tooth. I started with reviewing back to childhood and remembered problems related to ear infections from birth to three. Even unexplained vaginal burning in my youth before the age of nine–I think it can be all tied to the illegal ear implants.
In 2015, I reached out to contact Karen Melton-Stewart then to Dr. Katherine Horton then you and Millicent Black. I now have a community of people all experiencing the same things and determined to expose criminal human trafficking. People who understand the mission of discovery and understanding. I’m now in hopes that headway can be made with our speaking out and the additional involvement with Bill Binney and Kirk Weibe. This needs to stop, human trafficking is criminal and these are Crimes Against Humanity.
Ramola D: How have physicians and radiologists responded to your MRIs? Have you visited doctors for medical assistance after realizing you were being assaulted through your implants? What was their reaction?
Sherri M Guarnieri: I sent certified letters to my treating neurologists and radiologists. The only response was from the radiologist, noting these reflectives “are not a harm to your current health.” I’m looking for the best doctor to remove my ear implants but this is a hard task because I can see my left ear is connected with other areas of the body. My fear is my body could alter for the worse if some of these embedded implants are removed.
Ramola D: You have lived in California and Washington DC before Massachusetts and New Mexico. Did you experience stalking there? Are you still experiencing stalking, surveillance, and assault with microwave weapons in New Mexico?
Sherri M Guarnieri: My memories of California, I was followed once on a boat ride. In Washington DC, my computer was hacked; it was later hacked again when I moved to Massachusetts to take care of my grandmother. I was doing yoga so one of the things they do regularly now is hit my bowels with microwaves to evacuate the bowel to humiliate me. This happened often to disrupt my yoga class.
100,000 Microwatts per sq meter, recorded at Sherri’s home. Click to Enlarge.
I still get ground-level stalking in New Mexico. A pregnant woman with a state badge once followed me to a restaurant. Employees of Los Alamos National Labs would stand by me in yoga class and smile as if they knew I was being hit with microwaves to destroy my class. People from law enforcement took my class near me and military personnel. My tires here have been sabotaged, a front fog light removed from my car, crystals in my home ground with a grinder and since my home was a new build from the ground up, who knows what more could have been sabotaged.
I should not be living as a non-consensual human subject but as a free woman, free from sexual assault, harm, and abuse from microwave-frequency Directed-Energy Weapons hitting my ears and other areas of my body.
I get hit with microwave frequencies every day. From 2016 to 2017, I’ve documented major harm that I have endured by being hit by this weapon. I think at this point, I may be a high-level target for sexual assault, torture, and being slow-killed as I give you this interview.
Ramola D: My hope truly is that exposure of your case will bring relief and remission — that publishing this evidence of extralegal radiation and bio-assault here in the USA and notifying the American public of these abuses will provoke action from the medical and human rights community, create opportunity for change.
I notice you call this torture—what would you count as the most egregious assaults?
Right eye burned in sleep; white dot/implant on eyelid was activated, invoked pain, broke capillaries
Sherri M Guarnieri: No doubt on this is torture. The greatest harm: ear infections as a child, vaginal burning as a child, damaging my C6/C7 & L3, burning the top of my head with 100,000 need units here in microwave, burning my right eye lid (image at right), forcing my body to defecate unnaturally, high frequency abuse to my ears and the constant sexual assault to my vaginal, rectal, abdomen and breasts.
Ramola D:I understand you have researched the question of who is involved in this endless vendetta. You live close to an Air Force base, do you think they are involved?
Sherri M Guarnieri: These are military grade weapons. If they are dropped in the hands of criminals who know how they can be developed in harming human lives then crime is at an all- time high. In research, I have found that the FCC and Departments of the Air Force oversee control in radio communications. The FCC with regulating our rights inside the US and the Air Force with protection.
So if a 100,000 radio frequency of microwatt to square meter of microwave energy is hitting my home and body, it can be traced under current communications technology.
Who is involved, it’s in depth. If I am an MKULTRA baby then the complexity is vast. If The White House put me on a Kill List for being an advocate, then I ask them to reread the Constitution and understand that my use of swearing language in my letter to them comes from long-term abuse with microwave frequency direct energy weapons. Since sexual assault is the most common abuse hitting my body, then don’t think you won’t get a swear word or the use of the word “slave.”
This is coming to the surface and first to require answers from is our government. Don’t think twice when “We the People” start exercising our Rights.
Ramola D: Have you taken any recent actions to report this crime, and received any kind of response from anyone, local or Federal?
Right ear burned in sleep; implant activation here assaulted Sherri’s spine/lumbar area.
Sherri M Guarnieri: I’ll keep emailing and photographing in real time as harm occurs. I’ll stand next to any other person with the same implantation as mine in right to support. Making a choice to alter or harm a human body without consent or calculated intent is a CRIME; weather as an Alzheimer’s patient or as a living person on Planet Earth. This is a global network of crime which needs to stop.
No one can or has replied because this is a new exposed underbelly of government development. No one wants the government bothering them and if they choose me without my consent then watch out I will find the answers I need. I have two illegal ear implants which have caused more problems then I thought humanly possible.
Sherri’s cat being microwaved, readings show over 30,000 Microwatts per Square Meter.
We should be living and experiencing with our natural bodies without chem trail dumping, without frequency assault, without microwave hits and without non-consensual implantation. No single person should choose this type of pursuit in life, someone has chosen it and is wielding it upon me and abusing the secrecy privilege 24/7. That does not make me mentally ill, it’s actually them, because common people do not choose sexual assault, burned bodies, or criminal implantation. These people are even harming my cat.
Ramola D: What would be your advice for anyone around the country and the world who has been targeted in similar ways?
Sherri M Guarnieri: Review your medical records, do not live in silence against microwave-frequency rape, harm, and abuse, stand against even the highest levels of government with the important questions in the US or around the globe. Counter in your state, make it be known this is a collective pursuit and something we did not choose for ourselves.
Remember our Civil, Human, and Constitutional Rights, no man or group has the right to aim overt or covert action against another unless they choose to be a criminal.
Om Shanti Om, leave me in peace because your harm on me will reflect on to you and it will be your Samsara and not mine. I will return with another life and find you the criminal time and time again.
Many thanks to Sherri M. Guarnieri for this important interview in the advancement of total exposure of the extralegal and barbaric covert operations of whistleblower retaliation and Torture using radiation/neuro/bio weapons being conducted on thousands under cover of “Surveillance” by governments, military, police, and Intelligence agencies worldwide.
Many thanks also to NSA Whistleblower and Joint Investigation Team Intelligence Analyst Karen Stewart for her careful review and advice on the final draft of this interview.
(With thanks to all the writers, whistleblowers, journalists, and human rights activists whose reviews supported the creation of this piece, and whose links, words, and quotes are included here.)
Secret High-Tech Surveillance, Targeting, Assault
The Deadly Reality of Today’s Covert Radiation-Policed and Neuro-Policed State, USA and WorldWide
How Blacklisted Individuals in Today’s Surveillance State, worldwide, in all Five-Eyes Countries (US, UK, Canada, New Zealand, Australia) as well as NSA-contracted countries in Europe, Asia, Africa, Are Targeted 6-Times and Used Like Lab Rats For Running-as-“Legal” yet Essentially Illegal, Wrongful, Criminal Non-Consensual Military/Navy/USAF Directed-Energy Weapons Operation, Testing, & Training as well as Non-Consensual Covert CIA/DIA/DARPA/NSA/DOJ/DHS Neuro-Experimentation in “Behavior Modification”, and DeliberatelyDisappeared from Public View By 1) Insidious and Strategic Deception Practiced by Colluding Psychiatrists, Colluding Medical Professionals, Colluding Media, Colluding Law Enforcement―Who Agree to Lie, and Call Them Paranoid, Delusional, and Schizophrenic; and 2) In-Community Agency Infiltrators―Who Control from Within.
How the End Result is treasonous Secret Military Subjugation of entire communities, neighborhoods, towns: In US Military jargon, Military Operations Other Than War (MOOTW), Asymmetric Warfare, Stealth Warfare, Information Warfare, Information Operations, Special Operations, Special Warfare, Psychological Warfare.
While this expose focuses on the USA, this exact protocol is being applied worldwide, in United Nations countries, in a long-running program, escalating in recent times, of ramping-up totalitarian and global control. Individual citizens will have to rise to stop it.
Written from the documented awareness, observations, experience, and analysis of those being wrongfully assaulted and exploited by this corrupt program; and necessarily inclusive of speculation, since the methodologies and technologies being used to attack and persecute individuals covertly, yet in plain view, hidden in plain sight, in the false name of National Security, may be largely classified. Information on these technologies is also obtained from public-domain patents, whistleblowers, and scientists who have worked on similar projects.
Please note: The secretive processes of current-day targeting and high-tech surveillance have been covered by many researchers, analysts, and writers in books and websites, many of which inform this article–a speculative op-ed rooted both in fact and experience. Military and Intelligence documents, talks by whistleblowers, lawsuits, published articles and reports highlighting the use of Executive Orders, statutes, and Defense-centric laws such as the NDAA and 5240.1R, information and documents gained on FOIA request, also contribute to this discussion, and are partially linked in-line, as well as listed in Sources & Further Information at the end.
Note also that because we are subject today to lies, deception, and PsyOps online, in Mainstream media, in books, and in the public domain, it’s essential to note, in human rights advocate Paul Baird’s words, “many truths are censored and kept secret…and these things we address, experienced by countless people worldwide, are no less true because proof cannot be extracted from the bowels of the Pentagon.”
The purpose of this article is to present the experience and understanding of those being targeted, assaulted with radiation weapons and neuroweapons, and non-consensually experimented-on,as understood by this writer; to unravel and piece together the means and processes by which people are being targeted–in terms of extant laws, military and Intelligence regulations and directives, Joint Targeting processes, Memoranda of Understanding between the DOD and the DOJ, loopholes in Human Subject Protections; to expose the inhumanity, moral depravity, and obscenity of this targeting and to-death human experimentation; and to offer solutions to address this inhumanity and end this targeting and assault of innocents.
This article builds on the analyses presented earlier at this site in several articles, collected under Human Rights, and explores and seeks to answer the questions: How exactly are people being targeted? How is the Military-Industrial-Intel complex, the DOD and the DOJ getting away with it? What is the extent of the PsyOp being run on the American public–and by extension, the global public? Who is involved? Who is colluding? Why is Media silent? And what can and should be done to stop it? To extend, correct, or comment on any information presented here, please email the writer or leave a comment below.
1. Scarlet Letter: Community Informants Falsely Label the Target as Terrorist/Spy
Targets are first wrongfully and unlawfully named terrorists, spies, or suspects, by paid Fusion Center FBI/DHS informants, operating in communities, weeding out the outspoken, the activists, the morally upright, anyone they take a dislike to: this includes older women and men, minorities, independent thinkers. This includes journalists, writers, whistleblowers, retirees, peace/justice activists, professors, nurses, doctors, attorneys, engineers, ex-Intel agents, veterans, teachers, home-makers, artists, people from every profession.
Secret FISA Letters and Warrants, and National Security Letters are issued wrongfully to “start an investigation” of the innocent American/named a “suspected terrorist or spy,” couched as legal criminal investigation. They are now subjects of Extreme Surveillance. The Patriot Act permits extended and useless surveillance of pretty much everyone, for pretty much any concocted reason. This may be Running-as-“Legal”, but, because it targets innocents, and builds a folder of lies around innocents, it is Illegal, and already a Crime: it is flagrantly Wrongful, and it’s being applied Inaccurately, to Non-Terrorists, Non-Spies. What results is a sustained dragnet targeting of innocents, absolutely without cause or evidence of wrongdoing, hidden by secrecy.
Diane Roark, former Congressional staffer with the Senate Intelligence Committee, explains here in this talk how Executive Order 12333 and the Patriot Act have permitted extreme abuse in targeting in the name of counter-terrorism, how NSA data is “now being used for criminal investigations, not just for counter-terrorism, which was the original purpose”, how NSA gives tips to local Law Enforcement, and “the courts are also corrupted, because they set up a fake evidentiary trail and cannot expose their data as (sourced from) NSA surveillance”, which, she notes, would be unConstitutional, how local Law Enforcement take the FBI’s lead and illegally engage in domestic, sneak-and-peek surveillance, and how the FISA court is involved (the FISA court cannot refuse to issue a warrant). Also see ex-FBI Mike German‘s talks on Youtube on indiscriminate targeting of non-terrorists, non-spies, non-criminals. See William Binney‘s expose here of secret laws, secret surveillance. See why Section 215 of the Patriot Act is detrimental to national security, and the nation at large: Let the Sun Set on PATRIOT- Section 215, Electronic Frontier Foundation
Solution:Repeal/Scrap the Patriot Act and EO 12333, Open the Secret FISA Court, Bring Due Process Back: No-one can or should be investigated as a terrorist or spy without being openly informed and openly charged in an open society. NSLs that are kept-secret should be scrapped.
NSA Whistleblower and retired Intelligence Analyst Karen Stewart, in her interview with Rob McConnell, X Zone, mentions an appeals process that should be instigated: anyone who is watchlisted should have a right to appeal this watchlisting. Due Process must be reinstated; no-one should be denied access to a meaningful defense.
This absolute power of being able to blacklist anyone in absolute secret, that the Intel agencies are currently indulging, has to be completely wrested from them. Absolute Power Corrupts Absolutely. While Secrecy is Permitting Extreme Abuse of Powers. Targeting anyone and everyone without due process, without cause, for reason of personal vendetta, for reason of suppression of free speech, activism, or dissent is not Counter-Terrorism, and is not protective of National Security.
This has to be understood for what it is really is: Secrecy-Protected Crime. Why are Intelligence agencies being permitted to criminally target Anyone without public accountability, transparency, and oversight? Innocents are being targeted in secret and destroyed in secret, this has to stop.
2. Modern Enslavement/Radiation & Neuro Policing: Innocent Targets are Put by DOJ Under Secretive 24/7 “FISA-Court-Ordered” Electronic Surveillance & Lab-Rat Physical/Biometric Surveillance
Targets (unlawfully targeted as above) are unlawfully subjected to a new and secretive Department of Justice program of 24/7 (FISA-Court-ordered) Electronic Surveillance, which involves secretive, continuous audio/video recording of the target, bugs and cameras covertly planted at their residences, continuous clandestine location tracking–a Special Operations Command military maneuver reported in 2013 as futuristic, and which secretly permits the continuous use of radiation, radar, sonic, scalar non-Lethal Weapons (possibly hidden in terminology as Biometric Surveillance Devices or Physical Surveillance Devices, on the person of the target, by local Law Enforcement and by Regional Fusion Centers which includes the Military (who are also authorized to support law enforcement agencies by Chapter 18 of Title 10 of the US Code).
To understand that Remote Neural Monitoring technologies, possibly classified (yet reported definitively as being experienced, non-consensually, by numerous targets, in the USA and worldwide), may be in use by DOJ under technology sharing agreements with DOD, see the expansive and detailed information on the capabilities of NSA Signals Intelligence described in ex-NSA employee John St. Clair Akwei’s 1991 lawsuit against the NSA. (While the information in this cornerstone lawsuit is unique, there is a tremendous amount of related information on this subject available on patents and technologies from researchers and whistleblowers, documented in books, videos, websites, and articles, a few listed here in Sources & Further Information.)
Remote Neural Monitoring as subset―Precision targeting of nerves in human body
Radiation Intelligence Monitoring as subset–Picking up unintentionally radiated EMF/scalar brain waves as part of the NSA Signals Intelligence program (See the information on Signals Intelligence in the lawsuit John St. Clair Akwei Vs. NSA)
Remote Brain Experimentation/Neuro-Surveillance: It is entirely possible that targets are both being “surveilled/monitored” by the DOJ/FBI/Local Law Enforcement with physical/biometric surveillance devices, and also being used by the DOJ/FBI as hush-hush lab-rats for Pre-Crime, Neuro-Crime experimentation using remote radiation neuroweaponry such as those running remote fMRIs and remote EEGs, by secretly (and obviously wrongfully) enrolling them in “Countering Violent Extremism” (CVE) and other convenient programs. Supposedly, these CVE programs are being rolled out in Boston, Los Angeles, and Minneapolis; however, this targeting, from victim/Target accounts, is nationwide.
From Target accounts: These weapons, as experienced, include Through-Wall radar, portable Directed-Energy Weapons, covertly-implanted RFIDs and RFID Tracking; weapons also include the more exotic, being-tested Neuro Crime and Neuro Surveillance weapons, permitted to deliver Remote EEGs, Remote Electroshocks, Remote Neural Monitoring―all of which weaponry is possibly black-budget, covert-ops, CIA “sources & methods,” and “classified.”
(Can FOIAs and FOIA lawsuits force DOJ to reveal what classified or non-classified non-lethal weapons are in use by Fusion Centers as surveillance devices, without disclosure, on Americans? Massachusetts Fusion Center refuses to divulge information on these, citing “public safety” behind its withholding―which would suggest an acknowledgment that they (undisclosed non-lethals)are definitely in use, just not being disclosed. A FOIA request to the FCC by a Pennsylvania resident however, yielded a listing of radar-based through-wall surveillance devices as well as ground-penetrating radar possibly in use by local Law Enforcement or/and the Federal Government included in a FCC spreadsheet listing Ultra Wide Band equipment licenses.)
PLEASE NOTE: Classified non-lethal weapons jointly developed by DOJ/DOD for Criminal Justice appear to have been permitted for use on targets by the Department of Justice; no public disclosure or consent has preceded this usage. The usage of the weapons itself is covert―undisclosed; this is Secret Policing, and every American should know about it. When a state Fusion Center refuses to divulge its arsenal of non-lethal weapons currently in operation on its streets―and hidden under categories of surveillance, as surveillance devices–on a Freedom of Information Act request, as the Massachusetts Fusion Center has, to this writer, one has to question what part that attitude of deliberate secrecy has in a democracy. When it comes down to it, that attitude typifies repressive dictatorships―quintessential Banana Republics, not democracies.Is the government of the United States of America in actuality a repressive dictatorship then, and not a democracy?
Solution:The Department of Justice should fully disclose weaponry in use, and programs in use, whether pilot, experimental, or operational; no secret or covert electronic or radiation surveillance of any citizen should be allowed. This is bodily-invasive, intrusive, and extremely harmful radiation, scalar, and sonic technology. There has been no public debate and there is no public consent for this use, of undisclosed weaponry and undisclosed surveillance technology. This weaponry has been reported by all being assaulted with it as barbaric and inhumane; a military investigator has openly stated that certain non-lethal weapons are in actuality lethal; an ex-UK Navy microwave weapons expert has stated that all non-lethal weapons can be used lethally; targets report continuous 24/7 assault with these radiation weapons―that is not non-lethal usage, that is lethal usage.
3. Modern Enslavement/Target Practice: Innocent Targets are Secretly Enrolled into Multi-Million-Dollar Defense Contracts for Terminal Lab-Rat Directed-Energy Weapons Bio-Effects Testing
Targets (unlawfully targeted as above, and made the wrongful subjects of surveillance) are unlawfully entered–human-trafficked–into multi-million-dollar Military/USAF/Navy/Space Weapons experimentation programs, mostly field weapons testing of Directed Energy Weapons (DEWs), exploring Anti-Personnel Effects or Bio-Effects.
Excerpt/Thermal and Behavioral Effects of Exposure to Moving Small Diameter, 95-GHz Millimeter Wave Energy Spots, FWR-2012-0147H/Obtained on FOIA Request, Aug 2015
From RFP information and target accounts: These are Bio-Behavioral Effects Research programs, testing levels at which deleterious effects of radiation weapons can be detected on the human body, including damage to DNA, tissue, and cell structure, testing specific thermal and bio-electric effects, and testing the diverse capabilities of diverse EMF/RF/ELF sensors (land, space, and air-based, stationary and moving, close and distant, portable and hand-held, all covert) in tracking radio frequencies emitted by corporally-integrated RF microchips, bio-MEMs, and nanotechnology clandestinely implanted in the target’s body, as well as those emitted by individual brain and heart EMFs.
Secret Military Experimentation Unto Death:This experimentation is 24/7, and involves the operation of death-dealing Directed-Energy Weapons. The US Department of Defense has dared to characterize these deadly energy weapons acting across distance as “Non-Lethal Weapons” of “Electronic Warfare” — but in permitting, conducting, and promoting the experimental usage of these weapons on American civilians and veterans, as well as citizens worldwide, has openly proved to these Americans how deadly these weapons are, in their ability to very quickly degrade human organs, human brains, human bodies, in their use of radiation, sonics, and scalar technologies to cause chronic health damage, cancers, strokes, heart attacks, and–it must be stressed–death.
To be very clear, this incredibly inhumane US Military experimentation–masterminded by the conscienceless, mad scientists who have set up these testing and experimentation programs (and who pick up padded paychecks for it)–appears to be experimentation unto death. As far as this writer knows (as per information from numerous “Targeted Individuals,” books, and whistleblowers), no target has ever been released from these grotesque and cruel programs of non-consensual human experimentation; many targets, especially in recent times, have died both of illnesses from chronic directed-energy assault and suddenly-induced heart attacks. This includes well-known and beloved activists, public speakers, and writers Dr. Rauni Luukanen-Kilde, MD, author Gloria Naylor, and activists Sean Stinn, and Zakaos Breedlove-Ewing.
This death-industry experimentation ―completely non-consensual–is legally being permitted on the subjects of surveillance under cover of being important for “national security” by such outrageous, citizen-harming, and barbaric laws as the AUMF, NDAA, EO 12333, and the Defense-Industry-centric Military Directive 5240.1 R, an oligarchic imperative which freely permits military experimentation on All US citizens.
Put under surveillance by the NSA/FBI/FISA/DHS; Subjected to experimental non-stop “electronic” (read radiation/neuro) surveillance by DOJ; Experimented on for Intelligence Purposes by EO 12333 and 5240.1R; Indefinitely detained without due process by NDAA; Cleared for Non-Consensual Experimentation by loopholes in the Common Rule and OHRP, HHS (Office of Human Research Protections, Department of Health and Human Services); Experimented on Forever/& Terminally by way of Indefinite Detention, Neverending “Investigations,” Neverending Surveillance; Subjected to PsyOps and Smear Campaigns; Lives, livelihoods, and relationships destroyed: this is the Trail of Tears for targets today.
It should be noted here that in fact, All US citizens are indeed currently being targeted, assaulted, and experimented on, with heavy-metal aerosols (chem trails), nanotechnology, EMF radiation, GMOs, biological weapons (viruses), toxins and fertility-disruptors in vaccinations, ELF transmissions via HAARP, and more, in covert health-degradation programs related to the very real and long-standing United Nations depopulation agenda run globally. Some US citizens however are experimented on several times over, as detailed here, as enslaved targets entered into Electronic Warfare DEW-assault programs―and other covert Intelligence experimentation programs, discussed further below.
False Labels of “Enemy Combatant”/Geneva Convention Protections Scrapped: Perusing Military Intelligence Oversight documents online also suggests that targets are possibly being named “enemy combatants” who are “engaging in actions of hostility” against the United States, and are then permitted to become military/war-time objects of surveillance, counter-intelligence, and counter-terrorism―in collusion with Intelligence “components”–ie, other Intelligence agencies and departments, and, in their confabulation as “enemy combatants,” are no longer considered “protected persons” under the Geneva Convention―opening the door to an infinity of massive abuse as subjects of deadly military experimentation.
This procedure applies to experimentation on human subjects if such experimentation is conducted by or on behalf of a DoD intelligence component. This procedure does not apply to experimentation on animal subjects.
B. EXPLANATION OF UNDEFINED TERMS
1. Experimentation in this context means any research or testing activity involving human subjects that may expose such subjects to the possibility of permanent or temporary injury (including physical or psychological damage and damage to the reputation of such persons) beyond the risks of injury to which such subjects are ordinarily exposed in their daily lives.
2. Experimentation is conducted on behalf of a DoD intelligence component if it is conducted under contract to that component or to another DoD component for the benefit of the intelligence component or at the request of such a component regardless of the existence of a contractual relationship.
Executive Order 12333 permits various kinds of surveillance and physical searches by different Intelligence agencies and departments of the military for various purposes, particularly Intelligence surveillance, and includes this qualified allowance for human subject experimentation, in itself deceptive, because DHHS guidelines mentioned below lead, via loopholes in the Common Rule (slightly modified individually for and by different agencies and DOD), right back to the whims and vagaries of agencies and DOD, to waivers of Informed Consent by the Secretary of Defense, blank-check internal Review Boards for research projects, and no external oversight:
2.10 Human Experimentation. No agency within the Intelligence Community shall sponsor, contract for or conduct research on human subjects except in accordance with guidelines issued by the Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS). The subject’s informed consent shall be documented as required by those guidelines. (EO 12333)
Indefinite Detention without trial, as we know, is being preserved in the NDAA 2016, both for Guantanamo and for the rest of the USA, fought for by President Obama’s Administration as noted here in 2013, even as empty promises to close Guantanamo were frequently aired:
“Yet Obama was less concerned with the constitutional rights of American citizens, who can still be detained indefinitely under the NDAA. From Salon:
Meanwhile the troubling NDAA provision first signed into law in 2012, which permits the military to detain individuals indefinitely without trial, remains on the books for 2014. Efforts to quash or reform the provision (especially with regards to the indefinite detention of U.S. citizens) have failed and been fiercely fought by the administration. Most notably, a lawsuit filed against the president by plaintiffs including journalist Chris Hedges, Noam Chomsky and Daniel Ellsberg against the provision has been aggressively fought at every turn by the president’s attorneys. The plaintiffs argue that the NDAA provision constitutes a significant expansion of the laws regarding indefinite detention already established by Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF).
Hedges has chronicled his fight against the detention provision of the NDAA here at Truthdig. And it should be a worrisome provision for anyone who believes in basic American civil liberties, which have been significantly eroded since the 9/11 terrorist attacks.”Truthdig/Obama Signs NDAA, Maintaining Indefinite Detention Provision/Dec 27, 2013
Ironically, this slide on the 2013 DOD Intelligence Oversight Program presentation offers the rest of us a revealing glimpse of Intelligence activities being conducted (and kept undisclosed and “protected from disclosure” with a label) that the world at large might find questionable, improper, immoral, venal, exploitative, dishonorable.
The various means by which targets are being used as lab-rats for the operation of deadly directed-energy weapons used in Electronic Warfare on their bodies include avid Military Deception, termed MILDEC in military jargon.
Is Informed Consent being buried by (false) claims of “Minimal Risk”? Consider for instance that a recent FOIA request to the USAF, delayed for many months, for documents and details on Informed Consent onthe 7-yr, 2013 USAF-General Dynamics Directed-Energy Weapons Bio-Behavioral Research contract, yielded only partial and redactedinformation (released documents here), claimed Exemption 5 USC 552 b (4)to withhold technical data, did not yield full information on field testing of the DEWs mentioned–meaning, could not openly prove that the weapons-testing on this contract had the full, informed consent of all those being tested on–yet had a Federal Wide Assurance (of human subject protections and Informed Consent) filed with the OHRP, obtained separately on FOIA from the OHRP (FWA here). (Information from this FOIA will be covered separately in an article soon.) Note, this is an ongoing USAF weapons-testing contract doing DEBR-Directed Energy Bio-Behavioral Research on Americans, which has been approved by the Office of Human Research Protections, at the US Department of Health and Human Services.
While this particular possibility needs further research, given current Common Rule/Based on The Belmont Report loopholes regarding Informed Consent, given current OHRP Federal Wide Assurance loopholes regarding applicability to the Common Rule and Informed Consent, and given that General Dynamics Federal-Wide Assurance filed with OHRP, it could just be that the Principal Investigators and Human Protections Administrators at Defense contractor corporations and Institutional Review Boards signing off on these contracts and signing Federal-Wide Assurances (FWAs) filed (as required–as per OHRP–for all contracts using “human subjects”) with the Office of Human Research Protections at the Department of Health and Human Services are openly lying about “minimal harm” to subjects, “minimal risk,” and acting as authoritarian arbiters of Informed Consent for their non-consensual subjects, even as the Common Rule offers the Military convenient loopholes to permit waivers of Informed Consent, and the NDAA openly permits enslavement of American citizens for lab-rat exploitation, all in the false name of National Security.
Permitting the Military to train weapons on citizens under cover of necessity–and consenting to Military Deception in burying Informed Consent from potential “human subjects”–is not “National Security”, it is National Suicide.
Solution: Repeal the NDAA. Rescind the DoD Directive 5240.1 R. Revoke EO 12333. Remove all loopholes from the Common Rule, and from the terms of the OHRP’s Federal Wide Assurance. Rescind all military, intelligence, and JTRIG directives permitting citizen-use for weapons-testing or any kind of human experimentation. In addition, publicly question the US Department of Defense and all Intelligence agencies permitting this current covert assault on citizens, hold them accountable for the inflicting of harm and for gross human rights violations: these should be considered in the light of war crimes, for what they are, crimes against humanity.
Strike all noxiously permissive legislation allowing human bio-behavioral effects testing from the books. Do not permit or legalize weapons-testing on citizens for any reason. Citizens should NEVER be harmed by their own governments, whom they themselves elect, support with taxes, and expect to represent them. Militaries are supposed to defend citizens, not assault them. There is no such thing as needing to harm citizens for National Security, just because China or Russia may also have these weapons.
Governments that experiment with military weapons on citizens are in fact flagrantly harming National Security―there is no national security when military and mercenary contractors are running around hunting down innocent citizens everywhere they go with deadly Electronic Warfare radiation weapons, the correct word for that is State-SponsoredDomestic Terrorism. Worldwide, it must be noted that these quite-lethal “non-lethal” Electronic Warfare weapons, like blinding lasers, like nuclear weapons, are barbaric weapons which must be banned, worldwide.
4. Modern Enslavement/MK ULTRA Neuro-Experimentation: Innocent Targets are “Detained” without Due Process for Lab-Rat Remote Brain Interrogation in Classified Non-Consensual CIA/DIA/DARPA Intelligence “Sources and Methods” MK ULTRA-Extended Experiments
“Under current law, the federal government has proclaimed the power, has arrogated to itself the power to obtain indefinitely without charge or trial U.S. Citizens and lawful permanent residents who are apprehended on American soil. Let that sink in for just a minute.” Senator Lee also reminded the Congress that the last time the U.S. federal government detained Americans was the internment of Japanese Americans during the Second World War.
Senator Rand Paul noted that President Obama recognized the danger of granting the federal government the power to indefinitely detain Americans. Upon signing the bill in 2011 President Obama added a signing statement promising not to use the power. “He said, this is a terrible power and I promise never to use it. Any president who says a power is so terrible he is not going to use it should not be on the books,” Paul stated. “Someday there will be someone in charge of the government that makes a grievous mistake, like rounding up the Japanese. So we have to be very, very careful about giving power to our government.” Activist Post/NDAA 2017 Includes Draft for Women, Indefinite Detention for American Citizens
Targets (unlawfully targeted as above) are unlawfully detained without due process by the NDAA for “interrogation,” as per President Obama’s casual sign-off on this Constitution-busting military power-grab, which attempts to legalize and opens the door both for “Criminal Justice” interrogation experimentation using Neuro Crime weaponry to remotely probe brains as described above in (2), and also for “Intelligence Surveillance” interrogation experimentation programs conducted by the NSA/CIA/DARPA/DIA to further their in-process, classified CIA/DARPA MKULTRA-extended programs of Neuro-Experimentation, Neuro-Modification, and Behavior-Modification.
NSA/DARPA/CIA Full-Spectrum Dominance steps in here. Subjects under surveillance are being legally exploited for invasive remote non-consensual experimentation by Military and Intelligence entities, since surveillance currently permits experimentation.
From the FAQ page at the CIA website:
By law, the CIA is specifically prohibited from collecting foreign intelligence concerning the domestic activities of US citizens. Its mission is to collect information related to foreign intelligence and foreign counterintelligence. By direction of the president in Executive Order 12333 of 1981 and in accordance with procedures approved by the Attorney General, the CIA is restricted in the collection of intelligence information directed against US citizens. Collection is allowed only for an authorized intelligence purpose; for example, if there is a reason to believe that an individual is involved in espionage or international terrorist activities. The CIA’s procedures require senior approval for any such collection that is allowed, and, depending on the collection technique employed, the sanction of the Director of National Intelligence and Attorney General may be required. These restrictions on the CIA have been in effect since the 1970s.
The “Collection” referenced above is, from target accounts and lawsuits such as ex-NSA’s St. John Clair Akwei lawsuit, and from the work of analysts, writers, and targets, speculated to include information gathered from Neuro or Brain Surveillance, Monitoring, and Interrogation.
By this means, under Criminal Justice Neuro-Interrogation and Intelligence Surveillance Neuro-Interrogation, Intelligence and Security agencies are being permitted to experimentally remotely probe, monitor, and modify brains, actions that, from inference on FOIA requests, are “properly classified” as “sources and methods of gaining intelligence” and not subject to any Common Rule protections of human subjectsbecause classified research is permitted by current loopholes in the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) to evade Informed Consent requirements. (This recent post, exploring proposed 2015 changes to the CFR/Common Rule–which seek to include further evasions, exclusions, and concessions for classified research–explores the subject of current-day neuro-experimentation without Informed Consent by “covered agencies”.)
In other words, targets already subjected to Extreme Radiation Electronic Surveillance by the DOJ, and used non-consensually for military weapons-testing, are alsounlawfully entered into classified CIA/DIA/NSA/DARPA MKULTRA-extended programs of non-consensual neuro-experimentation and neuro-modification,bio-hacking, and bio-robotization, involving 24/7 pain and trauma signalling for neural network re-programming, no-touch torture, sleep-deprivation, V2K (voice to skull/synthetic telepathy, i.e., voices in head), clandestine implantation of RFID microchips, bio-MEMs, and nanotechnology, clandestine activation of these implants for pain and trauma-signaling, continuous remote brain and neural monitoring via remote EEGs, brain-EMF-harvesting, Brain-Computer Interfaces, Electronic Brain Links, Brain-to-Brain communication, EEG cloning, mind hiving, and interrogation via Dream Manipulation. This information on current-day MKULTRA neuro-experimentation is provided both by ex-CIA scientists, whistleblowers, and current-day “TI” victims of this unlawful and extreme experimentation. Also see the Akwei lawsuit and the Larsen report.
Proving the fact of this ongoing experimentation―if insider whistleblowers and human-rights-centered hackers don’t step forward, as they ethically, absolutely must–will necessitate a no-holds-barred interrogation and investigation of NSA/CIA/DARPA, their contracts, and their contractors. Secrecy that permits such torture of citizens, such violence hidden in plain sight, yet bound by lies suggesting “proper classification” Must be ended. Concerned neuroscientists, psychologists, psychiatrists, physicians, human rights advocates, journalists, Information Technology specialists, and citizens Should initiate such an investigation―over more than three decades, Congress has been made aware by constituents, is possibly fully aware, but is silent. This situation cannot hold. Secrecy that permits crime isa crime, and must be ended.
Solution: Bring Due Process and Full Accountability back, no exceptions. Hold the Department of Justice accountable. Hold the CIA, DIA, ODNI, NSA, and DARPA accountable. Demand transparency.
No secretive, classified, covert and non-consensual pre-crime Criminal Justice Neuro-Surveillance or (Neuro) Behavior or Brain Modification operations or experimentation should be permitted or tested on humans; it must be stressed that all experimentees report their experience as barbaric and inhumane experimentation. To clarify: All neuro-experimentation being reported by non-consensual experimentees today is being reported as Torture.
Classified research which is hiding under cover of “National Security” and engaging in these covert crimes of absolute, untenable Torture against humanity needs to be fully opened up. This is a case of Classification to permit covert crimes. Hidden under “sources and methods” in efforts to create “the perfect spy” or to aid HUMINT or Human Intelligence Collection, these are grotesque, barbaric, and completely inhumane experiments and an assault on our common humanity.
In other words, these covered agencies, using National Security and Counter Terrorism as cover, may say they are conducting “Counter Intelligence,” but in reality are conducting Torture.
Dismantle the CIA’s, DIA’s, and NSA’s dirty-ops research wing, which is using EMF/sonic/scalar and wifi-based Pain, Trauma, and Torture (in continuation of MK ULTRA’s pain-based experiments) to modify neural networks, personal memories, psychology, behavior, and human brains, to hack into brains, take over human brains, and manipulate motor, audio, and visual cortexes in attempts to create compliant, subjugated, docile, and fully manipulable human beings. Challenge All classification of research on human beings, disallow the CIA, DARPA, and NSA from experimenting under cover of classification for any reason on humans. Covered experimentation is Pure Abuse.
NOTE: As noted above, the CIA is quite possibly concealing the use of these radiation/scalar/sonic DEWs and neuroweapons under both classified labels and the cover-all-crimes Sources and Methods of Gathering Intelligence category, as FOIA request responses imply. Further, as per the 2015 NPRM for the Common Rule, the CIA, with other agencies, has recently been seeking sweeping changes to the Common Rule, demanding that all research it conducts be considered normative and beneficial Intelligence activity, and therefore be exempted fully from the human subject protections of the Common Rule. (This is nothing but a covered agency already abusing humans under cover seeking even deeper cover by way of deliberate Public Deception–possibly to hide its current abuse of humans, which many “Targeted Individuals” and MK ULTRA survivors are speaking out about, but perhaps also to protect its future, so it can run future programs of abusive experimentation undercover, unknown to all, and unchecked.)
5. Psychological & Social Domestic Terrorism: Targets are subjected to community-wide COINTELPRO assaults, character-assassination, community ridicule, isolation, color-coding tied in to Lab-Rat Exploitation in Neuro-Experimentation, Neuro Imaging, Psychiatry, Artificial Intelligence Networks, and New Police-State Paradigm Social Engineering experiments.
Targets (unlawfully targeted, surveilled, “detained”, and remotely neuro-interrogated as above) are further unlawfully subjected to COINTELPRO actions by the FBI/DHS/local Law/local fusion centers and their community accomplices: Infragard, Citizen Watch, and Community Watch units―which include continuous traffic and street harassment, organized stalking, public-place swarming, mobbing, organized noise harassment, employment sabotage, and community smear campaigns or character-assassination. Active Deception is used to tell communities targets are threats who need to be watched continuously.
In the ’70s, COINTELPRO was found to have flourished on secrecy:
“The Church Committee found that part of the problem with COINTELPRO was that no one outside the FBI was ever supposed to know it existed.14 No one could object to activities they weren’t aware of and, as investigators found, “the absence of disapproval” was “interpreted by the Bureau as sufficient authorization to continue an activity.”15 Secrecy created a haven from the public eye where abuse could flourish.-Michael German and Jay Stanley, ACLU, Dec 2007, What’s Wrong with Fusion Centers?
Merging with COINTELPRO today is the program of PsyOps supplied by the DOD/CIA (MK ULTRA/Monarch) Neuro-Experimenters running large-scale, Artificial Intelligence-run, community-based Neuro Imaging experiments and Neural Linguistic Programming―possibly roping communities in under the guise of “Community-Based Participatory Research”,a new code-word for research involving communities identified as “at risk”, and recruiting whole communities in social engineering projects, not dissimilar to the Military’s social science projects being conducted under the Minerva initiative–and which could easily be considered to be COINTELPRO actions of organized stalking and harassment by way of the tactics used: organized color-coding, organized street theatre, organized runners, walkers, manipulated conversations, organized “interventions” via telemarketers, surveyers, utility-staff, students, military psychologists, using Infragard and Neighborhood Watch civilians as stalkers, organizing secretive house break-ins and “gaslighting”, compelling community members to act as meme-spreaders/mimes/ mimics, creating community echoes of the target’s words and phrasing, actions, clothing, all in “plausibly deniable” ways.
In other words, targets are subjected continuously in public and at home in their neighborhoods to COINTELPRO Disruption of the enemy’s life or PsyOps for, possibly, Neural Imaging/Neural Linguistic Programming purposes disguised as Community-Based Participatory Research/or disguised as Community Policing or Neighborhood Watch which essentially ropes whole communities/towns into 24/7 surveillance/ Zersetsung/ PsyOps against the target. Psychological warfare on civilians has been made legal. Note that President Obama signed an Executive Order into effect in September 2015, referring to Government-Approved Deception of the Public as obtaining “Behavioral Science Insights” and openly permitting Open-Season for PsyOps on all targets, and on all Americans.
Excerpt/The Complex: How the Military Invades our Everyday Lives, by Nick Turse
COINTELPRO Includes Public and Private Radiation Assaults: Please note, this level of COINTELPRO―which includes the continuous Electronic Surveillance secretly permitted by the DOJ―permits Citizen Watch and utility and local business personnel in any enterprise, i.e., FedEx, UPS, USPS, Amazon, any store-front, gas-station, the City’s trash trucks and recycling trucks, landscaping, roofing, chimney-cleaning, swimming-pool cleaning, National Grid, gas and power utilities, to point cell-phones at targets in public, directing wifi/microwave signals at them, and to point covert portable DEWs at them in public and inside buildings and homes, constantly irradiating targets. Telecom companies in particular―Comcast, Xfinity―and power companies such as National Grid are being used to do even more, such as pump ELFs into targets’ homes, covertly rig targets’ homes and neighborhoods with electrical circuits which facilitate Remote Electro-Shocking, engage in Remote Neural Monitoring, and direct extreme-spread microwave/X-ray radiation attacks at them (while inside homes, inside stores, churches, museums, restaurants). DHS and military personnel often work as drivers of these utility and business trucks.
This secret surveillance program is neither delusory nor imagined; this is exactly what Bush promised, shortly after 9/11, in TIPs (Terrorism Information and Prevention System):
“As with the Patriot Act, TIPS is being pursued as part of the so-called war against terrorism. It is a Department of Justice project.
Highlighting the scope of the surveillance network, TIPS volunteers are being recruited primarily from among those whose work provides access to homes, businesses or transport systems. Letter carriers, utility employees, truck drivers and train conductors are among those named as targeted recruits.
A pilot program, described on the government Web site http://www.citizencorps.gov, is scheduled to start next month in 10 cities, with 1 million informants participating in the first stage. Assuming the program is initiated in the 10 largest US cities, that will be 1 million informants for a total population of almost 24 million, or one in 24 people.”(The Sunday Morning Herald, July 15, 2002, “US Planning to Recruit 1/24 Americans as Spies”
COINTELPRO PsyOps Designed to Make Target Sound Paranoid: It has also been noted that these PsyOps are intended to make the target sound delusional if he/she reports the massive, all-round COINTELPRO/organized stalking/PsyOps he/she receives. The purpose here being even more insidious, to get this fully-exploited victim of non-consensual covert neuro-experimentation slammed with a psychiatric diagnosis of delusional disorder/paranoid schizophrenia―an old, dirty tactic to discredit the non-consensual experimentee, keep the real truth of (“properly classified” yet criminal, torture-based) neuro-experimentation and electronic experimentation from getting out to the general public, and to enable continued, endless, secretive electronic-warfare and neuro experimentation, abuse, and torture of the victim.
A quote from the ex-Military security professional who runs the highly informative website fightgangstalking.com spells it out:
“Since counterintelligence stalking goes far beyond surveillance – into the realm of psychological terrorism, it is essentially a form of extrajudicial punishment. As such, the harassment is illegal – even when done by the government. It clearly violates, for example, the U.S. Constitution’s Fourth Amendment, which prohibits unwarranted searches, and the Sixth Amendment – which guarantees the right to a trial. Such operations also violate similar fundamental rights defined by state constitutions. Stalking is also specifically prohibited by the criminal codes of every state in America.”
In essence, by this COINTELPRO, targets are being –extrajudiciously, inhumanely, invasively―continuously psychologically, physically, and socially assaulted.
Solution:Today’sCOINTELPRO has to be exposed and abolished, with the perpetrators prosecuted. That Executive Order permitting PsyOps needs to be repealed. Fusion Centers need to be publicly questioned and prosecuted. Community Based Participatory Research run on military contracts, whether classified or not, needs to be publicly questioned by human rights groups, its ties to COINTELPRO exposed, and terminated. The entire Watch program has to be opened up, exposed, audited, challenged, ended. Hold the FBI, DHS, JTRIG, and local fusion centers accountable. Hold DARPA, CIA, DIA, NSA, their private contractors, and all Universities assisting on such contracts accountable.
Hold all utilities and businesses participating in such noxious electronic abuse of targets accountable. Open up the secrecy behind all counter-intelligence practices by the covered Agencies. Make all such crime, including by the FBI or DHS under counter-intelligence or surveillance headers, illegal and prosecutable. Make all such programs of “participatory-research” by deception completely obsolete. Make America Sane again.
6. Fusion Center-Encouraged Abuse By Neighbors/Neighborhood Assault: Targets are being subjected to the extreme abuse of continuous surveillance, PsyOps, noise harassment, and electronic abuse by their neighbors, in their own neighborhoods/as part of Lab-Rat Exploitation in New Paradigm (4th Reich?) Social Engineering operations
Targets (already subject to the extreme abuses of unlawful targeting, radiation and neuro-surveillance, military weapons testing, neuro-experimentation based on trauma and pain-signalling, and harassive COINTELPRO on the streets) are therefore now being unlawfully assaulted and abused by their own community members who have consented (under false notice of investigations, surveillance, and defamatory lies about the target):
1) to assist in “ManHunting” or high-tech tracking the target (for 24/7 continuous electronic surveillance) using GPS tracking and cell phones/apps to track the target’s location and implanted-RFID emissions or brain EMFs or both, and to openly surveill the target,
2) to assault the target with Pulsed Microwave Frequencies, via provided cell phone apps, or provided directed-energy weapons, or installed antennas on their property;
3) to engage in PsyOps/Neural Linguistic Programming actions against the target as described above of color-coding, mimicking, engaging in street theater and directed conversations,
4) to engage in COINTELPRO actions of street harassment and noise harassment against the target, and
5) to further spread the lies, rumors, and defamatory stories about the target in the target’s neighborhood and community.
Exactly like the East German practice of Zersetsung, and the Nazi practice of forcing neighbors to snitch and spy on neighbors, this current-day 24/7 Neighborhood Abuse of targets, masquerading as surveillance, works to further assault, abuse, and victimize the target. It also conditions neighbors to dehumanize and hunt down neighbors, and furthers the program of New Police State Paradigm social re-engineering which seems to be underway.
Solution: Turning neighbors wrongfully against neighbors are crimes. These are acts of psychologial, social, and domestic terrorism and should be treated that way. The military and Intelligence agencies, operating through fusion centers, local law enforcement, and neighborhood watch groups should be publicly questioned, exposed, and prosecuted. Fusion Centers and their many components should be held publicly accountable. Neighborhood Watch groups should not be permitted to engage in actions of assault―surveillance, PsyOPs, electronic―against others in their neighborhood. Dismantle the FBI, DHS, NSA, CIA and military groups, who are permitting or creating this atrocity; at the very least, question them publicly, open up their budgets, audit them, and force the public exposure and termination of this systemic crime.
7. Establishment Cover-Up: The witness―the victim, the experiencer, the target of radiation-surveillance, the 2016 non-consensual classified-ops neuro-experimentee, the exploited lab-rat―is silenced by colluding medical professionals, colluding and ignorant psychiatrists, colluding law enforcement, and a bought, corporate and colluding mainstream media, while being stifled in-house by Govt/Agency infiltrators
Silencing the Witness: Colluding medical professionals, in particular, psychiatrists move in to disappear and Blame the Victim in an astounding act of medical malpractice by naming all those reporting such covert harassment and remote electromagnetic experimentation on their bodies as delusional and schizoid―without once testing their claims of being implanted and frequency-assaulted scientifically, with measuring instruments; without once consulting with neuroscientists, radiologists, toxicologists, medical physicists; without ever getting informed on the current state of neuroscience, the history of experimentation on human beings and animals with electromagnetic radiation, and the history of covert non-consensual neuro-experimentation (eg, MK ULTRA, MK DELTA, MK NAOMI, Project Bluebird, Project Artichoke); and without examining the vast body of evidence available today in patents or revealed by various whistleblowers―guided instead by the wrongful labeling of psychiatric disorders in the increasingly fraudulent DSM, which many psychologists and psychiatrists of integrity question. Disorders named and labelled in the DSM as absolute illnesses, for instance, are not based on physiological evidence but are subjectively decided by a group of psychiatrists, by vote.
Colluding psychiatrists, working for the state and working for the psycho-pharmaceutical complex which puts out the DSM, invent deadlier and deadlier drugs each year, and are responsible for the mass drugging into absolute oblivion of various populations, be they ADHD or “oppositional defiant disorder” teenagers or too-excitable toddlers deemed worthy of Ritalin or Seroquel to help prop up the diseased State with its overt and covert arsenal of intimate Surveillance and Control mechanisms. In essence, acting against psyches, against psychological health and well-being, and against societies. In complete opposition to the ethos, essence, and metier of the Hippocratic Oath, and in absolute servility to society’s current oppressors. In Servility to Surveillance should perhaps be emblazoned on their doors. Or Subservience to Surveillance.
History shows us that psychiatrists support the State in situations of totalitarian oppression, overt or covert. History―from right here in the USA―also shows us that corrupt doctors and psychiatrists lie to cover up secretive and abusive non-consensual experimentation―as the 1950s Plutonium Experiments reported by Eileen Winsome, for instance, readily prove. Today, psychiatrists effectively collude with the State to silence and disappear the victims of this 21st-century tyranny: abusive, classified, non-consensual neuro-experimentation and DEW research.
Colluding medical professionals at Universities and hospitalssuch as surgeons, anaesthetists, technicians, neuroscientists, physicians, and dentists obviously also support the Deep State’s Intelligence agencies by conducting the covert surgical operations of implanting RFID chips, bioMEMs, neurostimulators/BCI chips/other kinds of chips, microcircuits, stentrods, and wires in the bodies of those individuals who have been blacklisted and roped into the criminal programs of covert experimentation discussed here.
Colluding corporate government-run mainstream media swoop in for the kill when targets protest, naming targets insane and seeking to destroy their credibility, as recent New York Times, Mother Jones, and Daily Beast articles and rather frantic Psy Op entries in Rational Wiki and Wikipedia demonstrate. Further, since 2014, when Glenn Greenwald went abruptly silent on the subject after promising to publish the names of all NSA-surveilled individuals, corporate media has shown it will not cover the issue of blacklisted individuals at all. Worse, those reporting as Targeted Individuals are glibly named insane by well-paid journalists, while Targeting itself, a continuing, obvious, oft-stated, and primary concern of this Surveillance State, is completely avoided by mainstream media as a subject of any concern whatsoever; since The Intercept‘s limited reveal of a group of Muslim professionals targeted wrongfully by the State, no further follow-up has occurred. Did Snowden’s trove of documents include details on this targeting of individuals, did it include names and personal circumstances? We’ll never know, will we, if The Intercept is to exclusively mind this information―and has shown reluctance to publish. Whether they have this information or not, however, neither they nor any other media group is pressing the NSA for details on targeting, past or present. The subject of domestic targeting in fact has literally fallen off the radar in mainstream media.
The perfidy and extremity of Media malfeasance here cannot and should not go unnoticed.
Media has essentially become a mouthpiece for Government deception or MILDEC―Military Deception. Media thereby removes itself from its base responsibility to research and report on current affairs for the people, exonerates itself from any culpability inthe large matter of ignoring the reports of non-consensual experimentation and covert assault rising continually in cries for help from an assaulted public, and in so doing, proves its collaboration with the State, and against the people.
The campaign to suppress vocal and eloquent non-consensual experimentees and dupe their audience has in fact taken on an urgent and unsavory twist; blaming the Victim, the (CIA-run?) New York Times has shown, is a practice that seeks desperately to be comprehensive and meta-aware. It involves denigrating every single action the reporting victim has taken―whether it is contacting Congressmen, organizing online for support or validation, or writing letters to the editor of the New York Times (or any other media outlet) asking for help. All of this is marked as delusional, all of this is referred to the Psychiatry Establishment as essentially their domain of concern.
(This, despite the fact that, historically, neuro-experimentation, both public-domain and classified, is a known fact, that thousands of patents exist for both neuro-experimentation devices, weaponry, and methodologies, contracts exist for directed-energy weapons testing, and mainstream neuroscience no longer conceals that brains can be invaded, thoughts read, and neural networks modified.)
So Media helps along the fallacy in action here; when people report assault with radiation weaponry and symptoms of neuro-experimentation, no recourse to Medical Physics, Radiology, Radio-Frequency Engineering, or Neuroscience is sought. Instead, a colluding or uninformed DSM-loyal psychiatrist is appealed to, for help in securing a facile and fraudulent “schizophrenia/schizoid/delusional” diagnosis, and Media, not batting a single analytical eyelid, reports this diagnosis as the legitimate, accurate, last word.
Media collusion here expresses the intent of those who are manipulating Media, the Intelligence agencies who still seek absolute hegemony over Americans and the whole of humanity: clearly, the intent is to ruthlessly suppress all reports of covert assault and experimentation by silencing the reporting individual, that is, silencing the witness, the experiencer, the primary voice alerting the world to ongoing Covert Ops programs of neuro-torture and electromagnetic weapons-testing being run by clearly out-of-control Intelligence agencies, complacent military contractors, and a vast National Security apparatus crying “Spy! Terrorist! Unstable! Threat!” on random innocent citizens, whistleblowers, and activists.
Colluding Law Enforcement help establish the deception; just like those psychiatrists and medical professionals in the Know, who assist with the covert implantations or actively collude to diagnose victims reporting the situation as schizoid, Law Enforcement engages in the most insidious deception, permitting, supporting, and assisting the cruel and barbaric targeting of individuals with deadly radiation technology, on the one hand using Through The Wall Surveilance pulsing radar devices―and other, undisclosed “non-lethal weapons” disguised as physical/biometric surveillance–on them, and on the other, denying any knowledge of targets being targeted, feigning concern that all reporting are mentally ill, need community Mental Health intervention, and helping provide this by Baker-Acting them. See NSA whistleblower Karen Stewart’s account of being Baker-Acted.
In-Community Government Infiltrators,meanwhile, help along the Covert Ops cause by insinuating themselves as “helpful” technology experts, information analysts, activists, counselors, and organizers right in the middle of the community of brutally assaulted, seriously-victimized lab-rat targets, jostling their way into key positions at the head of “TI” groups, seeking to establish themselves―on listservs, email lists, regional groups–as key spokespersons, taking charge of what technology can and cannot be spoken about (no talk of Black Ops Neuroweapons allowed, no mention of Remote Neural Monitoring, Neurophones, Mind Control, Covert RFID or Bio-MEM implants, Brain EMF Harvesting by Cell Phone, Pulsed Microwave Radiation delivered via Cell Phone, Scalar Technologies, neighbors using portable DEWs, or Ionizing (radioactive) Radiation weapons), decrying and squashing legitimate attempts at HR activism and advocacy, misdirecting, misframing, and running deceptive Psy Ops on this already-victimized, Mil/Intel-PsyOp’d group.
Just as with Martin Luther King, Malcolm X, and the Civil Rights Movement―as with many other groups of activists―this Government infiltration seeks to be divisive, authoritarian, controlling, and stifling―and often succeeds. As a result, attempts to organize legitimately are often sabotaged―from within. Not merely are targets exploited as lab-rats from without, by the Department of Defense, the Department of Justice, the FBI, the CIA, the DIA, the NSA, and DARPA, they are exploited from within, by undercover operatives from these very Departments and Agencies―and possibly also from the larger, overarching entities representing the Crown, the Wall Street bankers/Bilderbergers/TriLaterals running this charade, the Vatican and the soulless secret societies and clubs of feckless billionaires, the Tavistocks/Clubs of Rome/Freemasons/Skull and Bones/Bohemian Grove/Satanists, the “Illuminati” and the Operation Paperclip Nazis, the global shadow government manipulating Intel agencies worldwide–selling themselves as “TIs”, spreading abroad elaborate stories of being targeted themselves, while seeking to squash all meaningful public education and activism, in programs of absolutely immoral deception, manipulation, and exploitation. Raping the rape victim should come to mind, as also stoning the rape victim to death. Twice over, these Departments and Agencies―of the United States Government―and their global shadow government overseers condemn themselves.
Solution:Psychiatrists need to be held to higher standards of accountability to society, as do all medical professionals. In-built oversight and privacy mechanisms should exist, to prevent medical professionals and hospitals from secretly colluding with military and Intelligence agencies to allow or facilitate non-consensual and secret operations, implantings, and experimentations on patients.
Physicians and Psychiatrists Should Be Educated: Psychiatrists and physicians both should be educated on basic advances in neuroscience, and need to understand the expansive frontiers of both neuroscience and neuroweaponry today; they should also be apprised of the basics of Electronic Warfare, what non-lethal weapons are, and the fact that the Military is currently running open field tests of these radiation/sonic/scalar weapons on citizens; and they should be made aware of the ongoing history of non-consensual medical experimentation on citizens.
Physicians and Psychiatrists Should Be Required to Scan Patients: When patients report electromagnetic signals on their bodies, or the sensations of implants being activated in their bodies, or say they have a RF microchip in any part of their bodies, or report “voices in their head” which can be induced electronically―by various means, and have, ever since the Neurophone was invented in 1958 by a bright 14-year-old (Patrick Flanagan)– they need to be scanned or checked radiologically and physically, not gagged neuroleptically, and further abused with disbelief, discrediting, and psychosis-inducing drugs―this is exactly like raping the rape victim, or stoning the rape victim to death, as is currently practiced in that bastion of human rights, Saudi Arabia.
Neuroscientists and psychiatrists today need to be in conversation with each other, and military and Intelligence scientists need to step forward and engage in some candid whistleblowing about what the military and Intelligence agencies are really doing―instead of collecting blood-money paychecks for overseeing Covert Ops torture and maintaining an immoral silence.Tribunals should be held to hold doctors, psychiatrists, and hospitals accountable for misdiagnoses and malpractice on an astronomical scale: for colluding in non-consensual experimentation and exploitation of their patients, and for permitting the secret agencies to step in to inflict harmon the patients in their care.
Further, all societies and cultures should have a central ethical reporting body, separate from state departments of health, where anyone suspecting they have become subjects in non-consensual experimentation can go, or write/email to, to present affidavits, documentation, and testimonies, gain technical assistance to get body and brain-scanned, get their homes checked for surveillance devices and torture wiring, or otherwise prove such assaults electronically. Failing the presence of such a central reporting/assisting body, this ship continues to be rudderless and vacuous in direction. Non-consensual experimentees have no-one to report to, and our existing bodies like the President’s Bioethical Commission and SACHRP have stated or indicated they are not accepting and addressing any such reports―proving their absolute Strawman hollowness and inadequacy, and suggesting a covert establishment use as facade and in-name-only purveyance of Ethics. Beyond such hollow Commissions and Committees, in every county, every city, every state, every country, we need a dedicated human rights advocacy center for the examination of all claims of non-consensual covert experimentation and covert harassment for victims.
Media should be held accountable for the printing of lies and distortions, and should not be permitted to work actively with agencies to print propaganda and deceit. That Executive Order permitting propaganda and Psy Ops needs to be repealed. Media’s primary role as true informer to society and analytical observer of events needs to be reinstated. Essentially, Media should be held to the same high standards as for all citizens, and should be made prosecutable for acts of active deception, conducted to palliate the Military or the Government. The CIA’s link to Media needs to be well and truly broken. We need Media watchdogs who work ethically, with integrity, to keep Media on track.
Law Enforcement needs to be persuaded to change its orientation here, to assisting and supporting the public, not covered agencies running deadly programs of secret violence on us. This issue is obviously connected with our laws: we need to strike all citizen-harming laws from the book, and ensure that our police can act with openness and integrity instead of running Psy Ops and deception on the populace. Crime in the 21st-century has to be understood to include radiation assault with DEWs and antennas, and crime victims should be protected―not further abused―by police.
As for undercover infiltration and stifling of victim groups seeking desperately to inform the world of their exploitation and seeking humanity, seeking help, these US Departments and Agencies should know their day of reckoning is going to come much sooner than they imagine, and when it does, the supremely venal nature of their cruelty to Americans and citizens worldwide will be fully revealed, and will only serve to condemn themselves further. Again the answer here is to fully open the Government, require a complete accounting for all Covert Ops and Psy Ops budgets, demand full disclosure of all Covert Ops and undercover activities―and remove all such funding from these Departments and Agencies.
What Does This All Mean for America, and For the World?
Many believe the “New World Order” is a distant behemoth, one yet to be unrolled or manifest in our midst. Those of us actively being oppressed in the ways spelled out here know however that the criminals running this dystopia of control and suppression they seek to couch in euphemisms coyly suggestive of newness and order have already rolled it out, they’ve been rolling it out for years, and each year it gets more and more Orwellian and ruthless.
From the USA, to Canada, to countries in Europe, to South Africa, to India, to Sri Lanka, to Australia, to New Zealand, and many countries in between, we have been “taken over.” Still under cover of “Democracy” we have become societies where governments run secretly by vested corporate and banking interests–as well as covered Intelligence agencies filled with Satanic secret society members and Operation Paperclip Nazis–willingly countenance secret citizen abuse, secret oppression with radiation weapons and neuro-weapons, and secret cover-ups with Psy Ops, keeping one part of the masses numbed and ignorant with Media trickery, the other part terrorized and unlawfully co-opted with talk of terrorists/spies in their midst, which cover helps them run long-term programs of slander, abuse, and grotesque human experimentation (as human sacrifice?) on a select few: the most outstanding, the most outspoken, the most moral, the most incorruptible, the most innocent.
And what that experimentation is and promises to establish, globally, should not be forgotten.
One, the undisclosed use today of directed-energy weapons, remote neuroweapons, and sonic/radar surveillance devices (by the DOJ, by DHS, by the FBI, by local Law Enforcement, by Defense contractors) whose discharge is invisible and which lend themselves therefore to covered use as stealth weapons included in a stealth network of Smart Grids, cell towers, cell antennas, cell phones, satellites, planes, drones, helicopters, SUVs, vans, cars, Man-pads, utility vans, various kinds of parked equipment, landscaping/leaf-blowing/snow-blowing/street-sweeping equipment wielded by Special Ops/DIA operatives operating from “cover” businesses in our midst, ground-penetrating radar, and the vast, noncommital cover of “Electronic Surveillance”, permits not just continued unsuspected mass radiation & continued covert neuro surveillance, undisclosed, but the promise of secretive and remote and never-ending, future-lockdown, Full Control of populations, bodies and brains included, through mere threat of use of these deadly technologies―hinted at to communities currently, through use on specific, unfortunate, scapegoated targets in their midst.
Two, the programs being run by the Classified Ops brigade―the NSA/CIA/DARPA―with the involvement of DOJ, possibly, in Neuro-Crime programs―of MKULTRA-extended Trauma-Based Experimental Neuro-Modification, which include: Satellite Surveillance, Extremely Low Frequency/HAARP use in Electronic Brain Stimulation, Brain-Computer Interface, Electronic Brain Link, EEG Cloning/Heterodyning, Mind Hiving, and Neural Network research, Neural Dust, Nanotechnology, Neurostimulators, Cybernetics and Artificial Intelligence―all of which these covered agencies are struggling to keep secret―suggest that what is being worked on behind the scenes is nothing less than the intention of eventual secretive and remote Full Brain, Nervous System, and Body Control of All humans, worldwide, by the technocrats in power.
Please note: Perusal of extant, historic, public-domain information on Neuroscience and Neuroweapon studies, as well as information from target accounts make very clear that such complete control of brains, nervous systems, and bodies is actually possible.
Is this the world that all those in Mainstream Media, Psychiatry, Neuroscience, the Intelligence agencies, the Security agencies, Law Enforcement, Information Technology, the DOD, the DOJ, who are either in the know, or actively and passively supporting, through their work and through their silence, really want?
Let’s be very clear, for all those in Law Enforcement, for all those employed at the Department of Justice and the Department of Defense, for all those in Intelligence and Security agencies and in every branch of Government who have integrity, uprightness, conscience, morality, ethics, and humanity at their core: this entire Targeting program is a program of Extreme Abuse. By means of this program―and all the pernicious Military and Intelligence weapons-testing and experimentation it allows―every single person who is involved is complicit and a participant in nothing less than the State-sanctioned and secret use of violence, torture, and all too often, murder of innocent civilians and veterans. This is indeed violence, indeed torture. It is also cruelty, malice, and victimization. It is absolutely not just “Surveillance” nor is it keeping the nation secure. It is both select human exploitation and mass repression of the kind that people endured under the Nazis and KGB, under Hitler and Stalin.
It is absolutely time for anyone and everyone of conscience to step forward, en masse, for mass whistleblowing, for conscience-driven hacking. We need―as global humanity–to shut down these satellites, these cell towers, these GWEN towers, the whole Smart Grid of Electronic Warfare that is currently inexorably turned on us, the whole panopticon of Surveillance under which it hides, we need to tear down the mammoth secrecy shielding and protecting these deadly programs of exploitation.
Either we all continue to consent silently to give ourselves and our children over to the endless secrecy and power of classification which endlessly permits the most heinous abuse, or we collectively find the steel and the spine to challenge and revoke that power today. If we let things slide today and do nothing, be assured, it’s our children who are being set up now to be further covertly controlled, electronically brain-stimulated, remotely radiation- and neuro-assaulted, bio-robotized, brain-linked, mind-hived, trans-humanized: for them, as also those thousands worldwide being exploited today as lab rats, and all 7 billion of us being targeted one way or the other, tomorrow is going to be too late.
Criminals in High Places: Delineate the Crime and Expose the Criminals
“Why call it something that it isn’t? The testing ended in the ’80s. This is an illegal subjugation program. The criminal elements running this program are doing it out of their greedy self interest. Whether it’s to intimidate and silence someone, discredit someone, sexual abuse, extortion, enslavement, sadistic torture that would make Nero blush, forced criminal labor, etc…Long term it’s social engineering and population control to preserve the power and interests of the criminal elite at the helm….This war being waged by elements in the deep state to illegally enslave the general populace for their greedy self interest is no experiment, even though I’m sure they’re still developing new devices. …Calling it an experiment…downplays it in the public’s mind and almost gives it a ringing of justification. It’s not, it’s a coup, a junta, treason, and a crime against humanity.
Look at all totalitarian regimes, which is the road America is on, who did they target, from Stalin to Pol Pot? The crème of the crop, the intellectuals, the well regarded military officers, the principled, the Christians, the self-made, and those that posed the greatest threat to the tyrants’ ability to carry out whatever agenda they saw fit or those most capable of steering the loyalty of the people away from the tyrant.”
“The US House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence should be looking into the relevant crimes as should the US House Oversight and Government Reform Subcommittee on national security and foreign affairs. Any approaches to these bodies through MPs, should note that the Departments of Defence, Energy, Homeland Security, Treasury, State, etc., as well as the CIA, NSA, DIA, NRO, ODNI, Office of Homeland Security and (since ’96 when this escalated) the NGIA (National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency) are all involved or complicit in the crimes in question. The systematic covert oppression, discreditation, experimentation and more in relation to caring, honest citizens branded as dissidents by criminals in high places is one of the greatest hidden crimes of the last 50 years. It is a ‘silent holocaust’.”
Well, it appears that they’re at it again as thousands around the world complain of painful electronic assaults which are affecting their bodies and minds …. Of course, the attempts to discredit these reports are well funded, … I guess that Defense contractors don’t want to give up their huge multi-million dollar contracts …. the pain and horror inflicted upon the victims doesn’t seem to matter … it’s a matter of National Security they’ll say … collateral damage they’ll say …. yeah right, but never any mention of one dime for the victims who are often tortured for years at a time with these war toys … it’s as if they’re not even human beings, just lab rats, nothing more … another chapter from “The Death of Compassion” movement which we seem to be going through as money becomes King …
Millions are being made by weapons manufacturers and the victims of these assaults are bankrupted, ignored, destroyed and discredited … there’s absolutely no excuse for this, but then everyone connected with National Defense is brainwashed into an attitude of the ends justifying the means, and hey, it aint their families being destroyed … but you know, once this technology becomes widespread, it very well could be …
…The following has now been confirmed by direct evidence presented to our courts:
Innocent citizens are being used against their will in painful experimentation.
Innocent citizens are being drugged and implanted with modern technology without their knowledge or consent.
Remote influencing technologies are causing pain and chaos to innocent lives.”
“The most heinous of all realizations: I am a HUMAN TEST SUBJECT. Just writing those words still shakes me to the core. I guess I have known for more than a year, but only in the last few months have I seen enough to know with 100 percent certainty. The most shocking thing of all, the Government I served, vowed to give my life for as a member of the US Armed Forces runs the Test Laboratory, and I am their LAB RAT.
I guess what is even more appalling, if there could be such a thing is more appalling than knowledge of your own participation in human experimentation, is that just as in every laboratory experiment, once the researchers extract as much as they can from the Lab Animal, they always end their test subject’s life through euthanasia.
Thousands of Innocent Americans share my plight. Thousands try to call this to the attention of a country of citizens who “Just refuse to believe” our government could do that to us. The most tragic thing about all of this is, if this were a prosecutor looking for likely suspects, there could only be one. American history is littered with thousands of known victims of these unthinkable crimes against humanity, Tuskegee syphilis experiments, MK-Ultra LSD trials, CIA released a whooping cough virus on Tampa Bay, DoD injecting soldiers with micrograms of plutonium for Project Oak Ridge, testing the effects of Agent Orange on the skin of US Soldiers, and on and on. Still we continue to tell our truth to (deaf) ears. I, like the thousands of other victims do not deserve this. We suffer as these butchers work tirelessly to try to convince the world that somehow we do deserve it. I say, ‘How could anyone deserve this?'”
–Kenneth Peartree, Senior Master Sergeant, US Air Force, Retired
“…The Defense Intelligence Agency just released a report, saying the military needs to spend more on neuroscience―up to and including “making the enemy obey our commands”. The problem is the line between who the enemy really is has become blurred and technology is now turned on (us) and operated by those practicing unscrupulous, unethical tactics and strategies due to little public knowledge, and, as I write in ‘You are Not my “Big Brother!”, the covert, subliminal, manipulative capabilities of numerous technologies and numerous delivery systems. In other words, “All hell has broken loose” as the ethics and moral issues surrounding the technology and inevitable abuses and victimizations, outside of any laws of protection, continue to escalate unchecked and unmonitored.”
–Renee Pittman Mitchell,BigBrotherWatchingUs.com,Author, Remote Brain Targeting (2012), You Are Not My “Big Brother!”, Covert Technological Murder, and other books
“This program of persecution is not carried out by the government you learned about in your history books. Currently, supra-governmental think tanks, which are interlocked with Wall Street and the tax-exempt foundations, control America and other NATO nations.
These groups are composed of multinational corporations, royalty, international banks, and people of tremendous wealth. This interlock has been called the Invisible Government. It is a satanic/psychopathic organization.
They control the mass media, which is their primary distribution center for lies and propaganda. Politics, industry, academia, and finance are also under their control. The President is their puppet.
They create policy by circumventing Congress and the voting public, which is filtered down into federal, state, and local governments. It is enacted without public knowledge or approval. Influenced by convincing propaganda, there are people who carry out their policy with the best of intentions. In all likelihood, the Hidden Evil is their creation.”
–Mark Rich,NewWorldWar.org,Author, The Hidden Evil (2008), New World War, and other books
“On Feb. 7, 1950, James Paul Warburg, “testified” to the American Senate: “We shall have World Government,whether or not we like it. The only question is whether world government will be achieved by conquest or consent.”… His uncle, Paul Warburg, was co-founder of the Federal Reserve. The Warburg family is Illuminati (a powerful German Jewish secret society).
Also, Fletcher Prouty makes clear in his 1973 book, The Secret Team: The CIA and Its Allies in Control of the United States and the World, that achieving a “One World” order was a primary, albeit secret, political/military objective of American leaders in the immediate post-WWII period.
In this context, we can view the chemtrail spraying of toxins, EMF radiation, vaccines, GMOs, biological weapons (viruses), ELF transmissions via HAARP, etc., as parts of a blanket (United Nations) depopulation program, whereas gang stalking/DEW is a weapons system designed to target and neutralize (kill) individuals who are perceived as threats to the system.
This is obviously today’s covert equivalent of a typical despotic government’s “first strike” to target and eliminate the intelligencia/teachers/social workers/political activists, as was, for example, the CIA’s Phoenix Program in Vietnam. With these potential leaders removed, totalitarian governments can more easily manipulate the masses. To better understand how the NSA/DHS/CIA/FBI organized stalking program is merely the modern extension of the CIA’s MKULTRA, the FBI’s COINTELPRO, and the CIA’s Phoenix programs, see Marshall Thomas’ “Monarch: The New Phoenix Program.”
The main point here is that these are top secret, U.S.-government-sponsored, Black and Wet Operations. Most Congressmen, Senators, political representatives, and citizens evidently do not even know about them. MKULTRA, COINTELPRO, and the Phoenix Program, of course, were also top secret Black and Wet Ops in the 1950’s – 1970s. No one was supposed to know about these programs either, but they have long since been thoroughly exposed.
Today’s organized stalking operations are so heinous and unAmerican that education and exposure is probably our best defense against them. When a critical mass of American and world citizens learn about these programs, I believe they will stop and heads will roll. It is up to us, as TIs, then, to make sure that these programs are exposed soon and the right heads roll. It is now our job to name the guilty, the top planners and sponsors of these programs, as best as we can. This won’t be that hard. We already know the names of many of the CIA “spychiatrists” involved in Project MKULTRA and we also know the names of the individuals who developed the patents for the critical psychotronic weapons.
I feel our imperative, then, is to expose the guilty. And re-expose and re-expose and re-expose. First, we must delineate the crime and then we must expose the criminals.”
Next Monday, September 12, marks the date for an upcoming court appearance scheduled for Rohinie Bisesar, the strikingly beautiful and accomplished financial services analyst and York University MBA with no previous criminal record charged with first-degree murder in the sudden stabbing death of a young woman.
Rosemary Junor (28) was the vibrant, newly-married woman stabbed on December 11, 2015 in the underground PATH shopping mall complex in Toronto, who sadly succumbed to her injuries a week later.
Communications Breakthrough as Defense Attorney Confirms Letter from Activists Received by Rohinie Bisesar
While Rohinie Bisesar is considered by mind-control activists in Canada to be a possible victim of neuro-experimentation, the new frontier of absolute human control being covertly explored by military/Intelligence agencies (as per the accounts of victims, scientists, and whistleblowers), for a long while it was not clear to activists whether her defense attorney, David Connally, had indeed conveyed to Ms. Bisesar that there are others in Canada familiar with the symptoms of neuro-experimentation, sympathetic of her situation, and interested in helping her.
Joshua Byer, a dedicated mind-control activist in Toronto, reports that earlier efforts to reach the attorney through his office had generally been fruitless (since he had not responded to emails or calls), although he seemed “far more receptive” when accosted at court on Rohinie’s most recent appearance on August 8, and “promised to talk to Rohinie about us.”
This writer is pleased to report that David Connally confirmed today that a letter of information and support, provided by Galina Kurdina, an activist with the Canadian Organization for Victims of Psychotronic Weapons, was indeed conveyed to Rohinie. “I can confirm that Ms. Bisesar has received the letter you referenced.” Mr. Connally, who said he did not wish to comment on her case, said he had been caught up “in an ongoing trial matter that concluded today,” a reason possibly for his inability to respond earlier to queries on this case.
Additionally, in response to concerns that Rohinie Bisesar be kept abreast of coverage on her case in the media, including coverage here on the mind control activists seeking to reach her, by this and other interested journalists–as an issue of basic human rights, especially given her own interest in how she is being portrayed in media as per her words to other Toronto reporters–David Connally noted that he hopes to keep her informed.
“I can also confirm that I will update her on the coverage of her matter in the media.”
“I am Innocent of This Crime,” Rohinie Bisesar Tells Court August 8
Joshua Byer, who has attended at previous court appearances and earlier tried to contact Rohinie Bisesar at Vanier Jail and through her attorneys (both her previous attorney Calvin Barry and current attorney David Connally), states that he was present at her most recent court appearance on August 8, which was reported in the Toronto Sun and other Toronto newspapers.
On that day, Ms. Bisesar once more sought to address the court and inform the world that she was innocent. From a report by Daniel McKenzie at the Toronto Sun, and published widely including at SaultThisWeek.com:
“Bisesar, 40, interrupted proceedings, requesting permission to address the court.
Bisesar said that something had happened to her, beyond her control, which instigated the stabbing.
She claimed she would never commit such an offence and that she considers it “terrorism” and “an international crime” — a situation that needed to be addressed immediately.
“I am innocent of this crime … I’m not sure what’s going on … or who is responsible,” she said.”
Joshua Byer conveys his observations of Ms. Bisesar at court:
“When we saw Rohinie, she had her shoulders rounded in a fashion I have found they have forced me into in the past. She spoke of a skin condition that went away as soon as she was transported to the hospital, which is in line with what they do to other people and myself personally. She mentioned a common law partner that was supposedly experiencing the same thing.
She (also) mentioned wanting a transfer from the Vanier Center and expressed some interest in meeting with people who can help her.”
Many have also reported similar rashes—possibly a form of radiation dermatitis—induced externally and temporally on their skin by covertly-used directed-energy weapons. Prisoner accounts of remote and covert electronic harassment with directed-energy weapons or, in prison parlance, conducted-energy devices or RF (Radio Frequency) offender-monitoring systems, are not new, although they are still being censored. Guantanamo prisoner Khalid Shaikh Mohammed recently spoke out about being electronically harassed and abused with radiation weapons while a captive in jail, in a testimonial where the video feed and transcript covering his description of how the prison was equipped for “vibrations” on his body was redacted (with a “security classification button”).
International Human Rights Coalition Against Neuro-Experimentation Reaches Out to Defense Lawyer
Also of note is the fact that Suja Vijayan, Director of the World Coalition Against Covert Harassment, World-CACH, “an organization working for justice for the technologically marginalised, harassed, & criminalized,” wrote to David Connally in July, seeking to inform him about covert experiments being run by various unknown agencies in the areas of neuro-control and behavior modification.
“I hope you are open to widen your perspective about the technical feasibility of her claims, though her narrative can be sketchy, as she seemed new to research on behaviour modification technologies (per her & her friends’ accounts in the media).
What she seemingly doesn’t realize is how common this implant steering has become and how difficult it has become to trace the criminals (who) misuse NEUROWEAPONRY via hijacking the ICT (Information and Communication Technology) equipment all around us.
This is also not known to non-specialists on the tech which would include lawyers & psychiatric evaluators within the judicial system. I don’t mean to cast aspersions but only to present you the big picture where judiciary has to catch up A LOT with hi-tech crimes like these – which can be proven only via body scans & signal tracing equipment available to a few PIs (Private Investigators) and with help from Toxicologists.”
“The equipment needed to hack a transmitter used to cost tens of thousands of dollars; last year a researcher hacked his insulin pumpusing an Arduino module that cost less than $20. Barnaby Jack, a security researcher at McAfee, in April demonstrated a system that could scan for and compromise insulin pumps that communicate wirelessly. With a push of a button on his laptop, he could have any pump within 300 feet dump its entire contents, without even needing to know the device identification numbers. At a different conference, Jack showed how he’d reverse-engineered a pacemaker and could deliver an 830-volt shock to a person’s device from 50 feet away – which he likened to an ‘anonymous assassination.'”
As a rather significant aside to this article, and possibly demonstrative of a guarded-to-death secrecy surrounding undercover experiments (hidden under security classifications) involving the bio-hacking of humans and implantable electronic devices , it must be reported that Barnaby Jack, the security researcher mentioned above, is no longer with us. A July 2013 article at RT.com titled “Hacker dies days before he was to reveal how to remotely kill pacemaker patients” notes:
“Jack’s death came one week to the day before he was scheduled to detail one of his most recent exploits in a Black Hat talk called “Implantable Medical Devices: Hacking Humans.”
“I was intrigued by the fact that these critical life devices communicate wirelessly. I decided to look at pacemakers and ICDs (implantable cardioverter defibrillators) to see if they communicated securely and if it would be possible for an attacker to remotely control these devices,” Jack told Vice last month.
…After around six months of research, Jack said he developed a way to hack one of those devices remotely and send it a high-voltage shock from upwards of 50 feet away.
“If the devices can be accessed remotely, there’s always a potential for abuse,” he told Vice tech reporter William Alexander.”
Is it possible this potential for abuse is currently being exploited, even as frantic attempts are being made today by propaganda-producing corporate media—such as The New York Times and The Daily Beast–to dismiss the reports of neuro-experimentees as “paranoid and delusional”?
Classified, Kept-Secret Neuro-Experimentation: Mainstream Media Cover-Up & Whistleblowing
Many observers and analysts think so, including Cheryl Welsh, founder of MindJustice, whose cornerstone 2013 paper Misled and Betrayed: How US cover stories are keeping a Cold War weapon and illegal human testing secret discusses a six-decades long program (from the ’50s) by US Military/Intel in neuro-experimentation that is being kept covert, at detriment to the thousands of non-consensual neuro-experimentees speaking out today who are still essentially being ignored by a largely unaware and mis-informed society. Referred to as “Targeted Individuals” and falsely labelled delusional, it appears that propaganda pieces in mainstream media seek to condition readers into viewing all reporting neuro-experimentees (of undisclosed classified experimentation) as schizophrenic, unreliable, and dismissable.
On this count, David Voigts, the former US Navy officer who is walking across America to bring attention to victims of non-consensual neuro-experimentation, the issue he is whistleblowing about, said in a recent interview to Joyce Riley on the Power Hour that “these people need our help” and deserve open public awareness of their plight.
Keen to speak about “a human-machine-interface weapons system” he has learned about during his work and studies in Special Warfare and Electronic Warfare, that is being non-consensually tested on random members of society, he says that the mass shooters we see, such as Aaron Alexis, the Navy Yard shooter, Myron May, the FSU shooter, and others, are all evidence of this secretive weapons system in action. Rohinie Bisesar, he considers, is another victim of this weapons system, responsible for the takeover of her brain and body, in perfect “Manchurian-candidate” fashion in the execution of this remote-controlled crime—exactly as she claims, herself, in every court appearance.
Cyber-Crime and Electronic Harassment
In her July letter to David Connally, Suja Vijayan made mention of laws in some states of the United States which ban Electronic Harassment (such as Michigan and Massachusetts) and others which prohibit hacking into pacemakers in India, and suggested to this Canadian criminal defense attorney that an honest defense of Rohinie Bisesar could indeed be made, as a victim of externally-induced neuro-crime “steered” by the real criminal, the neuro-experimenter.
“Hacking into heart implants (pace-makers) is categorised under CYBERCRIMES in India. Use of Psychotronic weapons & neuro-modification/bodily harm via EMF weaponry is banned in the USA. I can help you with local laws in Canada and also help raise funds via our group in Toronto if need be.
“This could also be, very well, a precedent where actual culprits who ‘steer people’ to make them commit acts of crime or modify their behaviour are punished, instead of the victims themselves.
A lawyer who does not know or take into consideration this angle in a case like Rohinie’s would work against her instead of for her. A lenient punishment via pleading insanity is not really required here, where a clear investigation into what affected her at PATH & is affecting her even now (this tech enables a 24*7 internal & external remote bodily surveillance and remote neural & motor control/modification including sensory-data read-write, like forced speech and forced movement) and who was interested in the death of the other victim (deceased) is the immediate need of the hour. This would ensure punishment to the real criminals and release of the ‘controlled’ Rohinie who did an uncharacterisitic & artificial act.”
By this analysis, World-CACH points out that there are indeed two victims here, both being targeted covertly by an external third-party.
Suja Vijayan reports that she recently followed up on her letter with an email asking Mr. Connally if he would prefer if World-CACH “approached him officially (via a court petition or a legal notice) so that he is ENABLED to act on our concerns” in order to communicate with activists and with Rohinie Bisesar on the subject of covert neuro-experimentation.
Will Canadians & The World Wake Up to Covert Neuro-Experimentation and Bio-Robotizing of Humans Ongoing Today?
Stepping out of the realms of speculation, fantasy, and science-fiction today, covert neuro-experimentation has “come of age” and is being discussed widely today–if only in many closed circles–by writers, scientists, whistleblowers, and those non-consensually experiencing its effects.
Given Rohinie Bisesar’s impassioned avowals of her innocence and her pleas for help and understanding of the peculiar brain takeover she has experienced—as reported also in several earlier articles here , here, and here–in appearance after appearance in court, it is to be hoped that Canadians of conscience and integrity will step forward to acknowledge these pleas, and act to publicly assist her.
Not just Canada but all of humanity is at a crossroads today in the consideration of the particular case of Rohinie Bisesar. The spotlight on her case offers an opportunity for all of humanity and neuroscientists and whistleblowers in particular to step forward and speak out about the absolute plausibility of her claims that her brain and body have been bio-hacked by a remote Brain Computer Interface (BCI) system, and that she has been thus invasively assaulted, manipulated, exploited, and used by an external third-party in the creation of this crime–which has therefore created two victims, not one.
One may well ask: Is humanity going to keep on ignoring the absolute reality of Bio-Hacking and Neuro-Experimentation in our midst, or are 21st-century citizens going to wake up and put an end to it?
Neuroscientists and concerned citizens are encouraged to speak out. Activists continuing their dedicated efforts in Toronto to reach Rohinie Bisesar with information would also appreciate their active participation and help. In particular, Joshua Byer asks that large numbers of concerned citizens show up at her next court appearance, on September 12, in efforts to once more reach Rohinie Bisesar and her lawyer, in person, with evidence of their support.
David Connally’s law-firm may be reached online at FromsteinLaw.com. Media worldwide is encouraged to follow and report, in truth, and with integrity, on this paradigm-breaking case.
Ramola D is a writer and independent journalist with a background in science, management, and literature researching issues in science, technology, and ethics relevant to our times, including issues related to Intelligence, Surveillance, Security, and Defense. She runs the solutions journalism site at The Everyday Concerned Citizen, and edits the online literary quarterly, Delphi Quarterly. Her literary journalism, fiction, and poetry have been published widely, more on this at her website. Please connect with her on Twitter at @EccEveryday, via email at email@example.com, or on Facebook.
This article may be freely re-published online in full or part with attribution and linkback. Please share widely.
Everything this nation once stood for is being turned on its head.
Free speech, religious expression, privacy, due process, bodily integrity, the sanctity of human life, the sovereignty of the family, individuality, the right to self-defense, protection against police abuses, representative government, private property, human rights—the very ideals that once made this nation great—have become casualties of a politically correct, misguided, materialistic, amoral, militaristic culture.
Indeed, I’m having a hard time reconciling the America I know and love with the America being depicted in the daily news headlines, where corruption, cronyism and abuse have taken precedence over the rights of the citizenry and the rule of law.
Why should we Americans have to put up with the government listening in on our phone calls, spying on our emails, subjecting us to roadside strip searches, and generally holding our freedoms hostage in exchange for some phantom promises of security?
Exclusive Reportage on Counter-Terrorism “Manufactured-Target” Targeting & Gross Human Rights Violations in Amoral Human Experimentation Crimes by Intelligence Agencies, Law (Lie) Enforcement, & US/NATO Military Divisions: Off-the-Charts Torture & Abuse of “Targeted Individuals”
GLOBAL BRAIN ENSLAVEMENT, DNA BIORESONANCE, & EXOTIC MILITARY TECH: TARUN RAVI REPORTS | REPORT 296 | At Bitchute | At Brighteon | At Odysee | At Rumble | Posted Oct 4, 2022
CARNICOM DISCLOSURE UPDATE 2022 – PANEL 2 | BIOTECH TRANSFORMATION VS RESILIENCE IN DIVINE CREATION | At all channels | Posted Sep 28, 2022 Report 295 | Michelle Ford/California Assembly on Restoring Your Status as American on Land & Soil | At Bitchute | Brighteon | Odysee | Rumble| Posted Sep 25, 2022
Free Keene’s web site/A peace-liberty-voluntarism project pursuing and promoting peaceful living in Free Keene, New Hampshire
Free State Project
Free State Project’s website/A Liberty in our Lifetime project in New Hampshire, pursuing liberty, community, and peaceful living
New Earth Project
New Earth Project website/Open platform to unite humanity and create initiatives to support the emergence of absolute freedom and sovereign creative expression for all
Public Intelligence Blog
Blog for Earth Intelligence Network, Phi Beta Iota the Public Intelligence Blog/Promotes hybrid transparent governance, collective intelligence, true cost economics, and whole systems understanding