Ramola D/The Everyday Concerned Citizen/Posted 9/8/2016
Rohinie Bisesar/Facebook
Next Monday, September 12, marks the date for an upcoming court appearance scheduled for Rohinie Bisesar, the strikingly beautiful and accomplished financial services analyst and York University MBA with no previous criminal record charged with first-degree murder in the sudden stabbing death of a young woman.
Rosemary Junor/Facebook
Rosemary Junor (28) was the vibrant, newly-married woman stabbed on December 11, 2015 in the underground PATH shopping mall complex in Toronto, who sadly succumbed to her injuries a week later.
Communications Breakthrough as Defense Attorney Confirms Letter from Activists Received by Rohinie Bisesar
Brain Computer Interface/Image:www.phys-edu.blogfa.com
While Rohinie Bisesar is considered by mind-control activists in Canada to be a possible victim of neuro-experimentation, the new frontier of absolute human control being covertly explored by military/Intelligence agencies (as per the accounts of victims, scientists, and whistleblowers), for a long while it was not clear to activists whether her defense attorney, David Connally, had indeed conveyed to Ms. Bisesar that there are others in Canada familiar with the symptoms of neuro-experimentation, sympathetic of her situation, and interested in helping her.
Joshua Byer, a dedicated mind-control activist in Toronto, reports that earlier efforts to reach the attorney through his office had generally been fruitless (since he had not responded to emails or calls), although he seemed “far more receptive” when accosted at court on Rohinie’s most recent appearance on August 8, and “promised to talk to Rohinie about us.”
This writer is pleased to report that David Connally confirmed today that a letter of information and support, provided by Galina Kurdina, an activist with the Canadian Organization for Victims of Psychotronic Weapons, was indeed conveyed to Rohinie. “I can confirm that Ms. Bisesar has received the letter you referenced.” Mr. Connally, who said he did not wish to comment on her case, said he had been caught up “in an ongoing trial matter that concluded today,” a reason possibly for his inability to respond earlier to queries on this case.
Additionally, in response to concerns that Rohinie Bisesar be kept abreast of coverage on her case in the media, including coverage here on the mind control activists seeking to reach her, by this and other interested journalists–as an issue of basic human rights, especially given her own interest in how she is being portrayed in media as per her words to other Toronto reporters–David Connally noted that he hopes to keep her informed.
“I can also confirm that I will update her on the coverage of her matter in the media.”
“I am Innocent of This Crime,” Rohinie Bisesar Tells Court August 8
Joshua Byer, who has attended at previous court appearances and earlier tried to contact Rohinie Bisesar at Vanier Jail and through her attorneys (both her previous attorney Calvin Barry and current attorney David Connally), states that he was present at her most recent court appearance on August 8, which was reported in the Toronto Sun and other Toronto newspapers.
On that day, Ms. Bisesar once more sought to address the court and inform the world that she was innocent. From a report by Daniel McKenzie at the Toronto Sun, and published widely including at SaultThisWeek.com:
“Bisesar, 40, interrupted proceedings, requesting permission to address the court.
Bisesar said that something had happened to her, beyond her control, which instigated the stabbing.
She claimed she would never commit such an offence and that she considers it “terrorism” and “an international crime” — a situation that needed to be addressed immediately.
“I am innocent of this crime … I’m not sure what’s going on … or who is responsible,” she said.”
Joshua Byer conveys his observations of Ms. Bisesar at court:
“When we saw Rohinie, she had her shoulders rounded in a fashion I have found they have forced me into in the past. She spoke of a skin condition that went away as soon as she was transported to the hospital, which is in line with what they do to other people and myself personally. She mentioned a common law partner that was supposedly experiencing the same thing.
She (also) mentioned wanting a transfer from the Vanier Center and expressed some interest in meeting with people who can help her.”
The physical, neuro-muscular disruptions of posture mentioned above, as also involuntary, externally-induced movements of arms and legs, have been reported by other victims of covert neuro-experimentation in testimonials, affidavits, and at public forums such as the 2011 Presidential Bioethics Committee Meetings in Washington DC and New York, and at various of the Secretary’s Advisory Committee Human Research Protections Meetings in Maryland from 2011 to 2016.
Many have also reported similar rashes—possibly a form of radiation dermatitis—induced externally and temporally on their skin by covertly-used directed-energy weapons. Prisoner accounts of remote and covert electronic harassment with directed-energy weapons or, in prison parlance, conducted-energy devices or RF (Radio Frequency) offender-monitoring systems, are not new, although they are still being censored. Guantanamo prisoner Khalid Shaikh Mohammed recently spoke out about being electronically harassed and abused with radiation weapons while a captive in jail, in a testimonial where the video feed and transcript covering his description of how the prison was equipped for “vibrations” on his body was redacted (with a “security classification button”).
International Human Rights Coalition Against Neuro-Experimentation Reaches Out to Defense Lawyer
Also of note is the fact that Suja Vijayan, Director of the World Coalition Against Covert Harassment, World-CACH, “an organization working for justice for the technologically marginalised, harassed, & criminalized,” wrote to David Connally in July, seeking to inform him about covert experiments being run by various unknown agencies in the areas of neuro-control and behavior modification.
“I hope you are open to widen your perspective about the technical feasibility of her claims, though her narrative can be sketchy, as she seemed new to research on behaviour modification technologies (per her & her friends’ accounts in the media).
What she seemingly doesn’t realize is how common this implant steering has become and how difficult it has become to trace the criminals (who) misuse NEUROWEAPONRY via hijacking the ICT (Information and Communication Technology) equipment all around us.
This is also not known to non-specialists on the tech which would include lawyers & psychiatric evaluators within the judicial system. I don’t mean to cast aspersions but only to present you the big picture where judiciary has to catch up A LOT with hi-tech crimes like these – which can be proven only via body scans & signal tracing equipment available to a few PIs (Private Investigators) and with help from Toxicologists.”
“Implantable Medical Devices: Hacking Humans”
Ms. Vijayan who is based in India also made mention of hacking into heart implants or pacemakers, which has been publicly demonstrated, as this 2012 article, titled “Yes, you can hack into a pacemaker (and other medical devices too)” in Forbes by Tarun Wadhwa reports:
“The equipment needed to hack a transmitter used to cost tens of thousands of dollars; last year a researcher hacked his insulin pump using an Arduino module that cost less than $20. Barnaby Jack, a security researcher at McAfee, in April demonstrated a system that could scan for and compromise insulin pumps that communicate wirelessly. With a push of a button on his laptop, he could have any pump within 300 feet dump its entire contents, without even needing to know the device identification numbers. At a different conference, Jack showed how he’d reverse-engineered a pacemaker and could deliver an 830-volt shock to a person’s device from 50 feet away – which he likened to an ‘anonymous assassination.'”
As a rather significant aside to this article, and possibly demonstrative of a guarded-to-death secrecy surrounding undercover experiments (hidden under security classifications) involving the bio-hacking of humans and implantable electronic devices , it must be reported that Barnaby Jack, the security researcher mentioned above, is no longer with us. A July 2013 article at RT.com titled “Hacker dies days before he was to reveal how to remotely kill pacemaker patients” notes:
“Jack’s death came one week to the day before he was scheduled to detail one of his most recent exploits in a Black Hat talk called “Implantable Medical Devices: Hacking Humans.”
“I was intrigued by the fact that these critical life devices communicate wirelessly. I decided to look at pacemakers and ICDs (implantable cardioverter defibrillators) to see if they communicated securely and if it would be possible for an attacker to remotely control these devices,” Jack told Vice last month.
…After around six months of research, Jack said he developed a way to hack one of those devices remotely and send it a high-voltage shock from upwards of 50 feet away.
“If the devices can be accessed remotely, there’s always a potential for abuse,” he told Vice tech reporter William Alexander.”
Is it possible this potential for abuse is currently being exploited, even as frantic attempts are being made today by propaganda-producing corporate media—such as The New York Times and The Daily Beast–to dismiss the reports of neuro-experimentees as “paranoid and delusional”?
Classified, Kept-Secret Neuro-Experimentation: Mainstream Media Cover-Up & Whistleblowing
Many observers and analysts think so, including Cheryl Welsh, founder of MindJustice, whose cornerstone 2013 paper Misled and Betrayed: How US cover stories are keeping a Cold War weapon and illegal human testing secret discusses a six-decades long program (from the ’50s) by US Military/Intel in neuro-experimentation that is being kept covert, at detriment to the thousands of non-consensual neuro-experimentees speaking out today who are still essentially being ignored by a largely unaware and mis-informed society. Referred to as “Targeted Individuals” and falsely labelled delusional, it appears that propaganda pieces in mainstream media seek to condition readers into viewing all reporting neuro-experimentees (of undisclosed classified experimentation) as schizophrenic, unreliable, and dismissable.
On this count, David Voigts, the former US Navy officer who is walking across America to bring attention to victims of non-consensual neuro-experimentation, the issue he is whistleblowing about, said in a recent interview to Joyce Riley on the Power Hour that “these people need our help” and deserve open public awareness of their plight.
Keen to speak about “a human-machine-interface weapons system” he has learned about during his work and studies in Special Warfare and Electronic Warfare, that is being non-consensually tested on random members of society, he says that the mass shooters we see, such as Aaron Alexis, the Navy Yard shooter, Myron May, the FSU shooter, and others, are all evidence of this secretive weapons system in action. Rohinie Bisesar, he considers, is another victim of this weapons system, responsible for the takeover of her brain and body, in perfect “Manchurian-candidate” fashion in the execution of this remote-controlled crime—exactly as she claims, herself, in every court appearance.
Cyber-Crime and Electronic Harassment
In her July letter to David Connally, Suja Vijayan made mention of laws in some states of the United States which ban Electronic Harassment (such as Michigan and Massachusetts) and others which prohibit hacking into pacemakers in India, and suggested to this Canadian criminal defense attorney that an honest defense of Rohinie Bisesar could indeed be made, as a victim of externally-induced neuro-crime “steered” by the real criminal, the neuro-experimenter.
“Hacking into heart implants (pace-makers) is categorised under CYBERCRIMES in India. Use of Psychotronic weapons & neuro-modification/bodily harm via EMF weaponry is banned in the USA. I can help you with local laws in Canada and also help raise funds via our group in Toronto if need be.
“This could also be, very well, a precedent where actual culprits who ‘steer people’ to make them commit acts of crime or modify their behaviour are punished, instead of the victims themselves.
A lawyer who does not know or take into consideration this angle in a case like Rohinie’s would work against her instead of for her. A lenient punishment via pleading insanity is not really required here, where a clear investigation into what affected her at PATH & is affecting her even now (this tech enables a 24*7 internal & external remote bodily surveillance and remote neural & motor control/modification including sensory-data read-write, like forced speech and forced movement) and who was interested in the death of the other victim (deceased) is the immediate need of the hour. This would ensure punishment to the real criminals and release of the ‘controlled’ Rohinie who did an uncharacterisitic & artificial act.”
By this analysis, World-CACH points out that there are indeed two victims here, both being targeted covertly by an external third-party.
Suja Vijayan reports that she recently followed up on her letter with an email asking Mr. Connally if he would prefer if World-CACH “approached him officially (via a court petition or a legal notice) so that he is ENABLED to act on our concerns” in order to communicate with activists and with Rohinie Bisesar on the subject of covert neuro-experimentation.
Will Canadians & The World Wake Up to Covert Neuro-Experimentation and Bio-Robotizing of Humans Ongoing Today?
Stepping out of the realms of speculation, fantasy, and science-fiction today, covert neuro-experimentation has “come of age” and is being discussed widely today–if only in many closed circles–by writers, scientists, whistleblowers, and those non-consensually experiencing its effects.
Given Rohinie Bisesar’s impassioned avowals of her innocence and her pleas for help and understanding of the peculiar brain takeover she has experienced—as reported also in several earlier articles here , here, and here–in appearance after appearance in court, it is to be hoped that Canadians of conscience and integrity will step forward to acknowledge these pleas, and act to publicly assist her.
Not just Canada but all of humanity is at a crossroads today in the consideration of the particular case of Rohinie Bisesar. The spotlight on her case offers an opportunity for all of humanity and neuroscientists and whistleblowers in particular to step forward and speak out about the absolute plausibility of her claims that her brain and body have been bio-hacked by a remote Brain Computer Interface (BCI) system, and that she has been thus invasively assaulted, manipulated, exploited, and used by an external third-party in the creation of this crime–which has therefore created two victims, not one.
One may well ask: Is humanity going to keep on ignoring the absolute reality of Bio-Hacking and Neuro-Experimentation in our midst, or are 21st-century citizens going to wake up and put an end to it?
Neuroscientists and concerned citizens are encouraged to speak out. Activists continuing their dedicated efforts in Toronto to reach Rohinie Bisesar with information would also appreciate their active participation and help. In particular, Joshua Byer asks that large numbers of concerned citizens show up at her next court appearance, on September 12, in efforts to once more reach Rohinie Bisesar and her lawyer, in person, with evidence of their support.
David Connally’s law-firm may be reached online at FromsteinLaw.com. Media worldwide is encouraged to follow and report, in truth, and with integrity, on this paradigm-breaking case.
***
RELATED:
***
Ramola D is a writer and independent journalist with a background in science, management, and literature researching issues in science, technology, and ethics relevant to our times, including issues related to Intelligence, Surveillance, Security, and Defense. She runs the solutions journalism site at The Everyday Concerned Citizen, and edits the online literary quarterly, Delphi Quarterly. Her literary journalism, fiction, and poetry have been published widely, more on this at her website. Please connect with her on Twitter at @EccEveryday, via email at ecc@nym.hush.com, or on Facebook.
This article may be freely re-published online in full or part with attribution and linkback. Please share widely.
Ms. Kurdina and Mr. Byer had sought to relay a message of support and confirmation to Ms. Bisesar, who has said openly in court that she did not need a psychiatric assessment but a body scan, and that she believed she had been the subject of “experiments which had gone wrong.” She has also stated that she felt “something foreign had been put in (her) mind,” and had tried earlier to research nanotechnology and Artificial Intelligence.
Among the effects of remote accessing of human brains she described are: “Manipulation of human behavior: forced speech, involuntary body movements, induced actions, transmission of specific commands into the subconscious, compulsory execution of these commands. Reading thoughts remotely, retrieving memories, implanting personalities. Debilitation of mental acuity.”
