In an expansive and revealing conversation last Wednesday, NSA whistleblower and retired Senior Intelligence Analyst Kirk Wiebe spoke at length about the need for everyday Americans to rise up and start speaking out and taking action at a grassroots local-government level to curb the corruption and moral decay evident and endemic at highest levels today in agencies and the Administration of the US Government.
Going back in time to June 1975 when he himself joined the National Security Agency, then led by an officer he names as one of the most distinguished NSA officers he had known, Vice-Admiral Bobby Inman, Kirk Wiebe offers an insight into the concerns of that time period when the Church Committee was uncovering evidence of domestic NSA spying–in addition to unravelling the now-known yet still-fully-concealed horrors of the MK ULTRA experiments run by the CIA and 80 complicit Universities (given that thousands of pages of reports were shredded then on order of CIA Director Richard Helms).
“If you look up the Church Committee, you will find that it was in 1975 and a little before that, that NSA was caught spying on Americans. The current spying is not the first time this has happened. People in control of governments often go astray and misuse their power. And we started doing that in the late ’60s, early ’70s with a couple of programs designed to spy on anti-Vietnam-War personnel, members of the Senate, including Senator Frank Church himself and Martin Luther King, many others in society.”
Kirk Wiebe, Report 251/Ramola D Reports
In this regard, Christopher Pyle, a ‘1970s whistleblower, now a professor of Constitutional Law, author of Military Surveillance of Civilian Politics and Getting Away with Torture, who revealed NSA surveillance of anti-war figures and civil rights activists to the Church Committee, asked, in 2013:
“If the NSA was targeting people like Sen. Frank Church, who were in a position to oversee the NSA — is that happening now? That is, are people like intelligence committee chairs Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.), Rep. Mike Rogers (R-Mich.) and other congressional leaders — who are supposed to be providing oversight themselves — compromised in some way by the NSA?”
NSA Spying — Church Committee Whistleblower: “Are Senators Compromised?”/Institute for Public Accuracy, Sep 26, 2013
Senate & House Intelligence Committees were Formed by Congress in the ’70s Primarily to Curb NSA Spying
The issue of current-day oversight of the Intelligence agencies who like to spy on one and all is curious because there appears to be none.
Especially notable is Kirk’s emphasis on the fact that the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence (SSCI) and House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence (HPSCI) were formed directly as a result of those deliberations on oversight and monitoring, primarily to rein in the domestic spying activities of Intelligence under cover of Surveillance.
Now, he says, these powerful military and law enforcement agencies are trying to turn back time and go back to before those committees and oversight mechanisms were formed.
“They have simply turned the clock back to prior to the Intelligence reforms that led to the formation of two Intelligence committees. People do not understand the reason there is a Senate Select Subcommittee on Intelligence and a House Permanent Subcommittee on Intelligence–SSCI and HPSCI–is because of actions ordered by Congress to stop the unauthorized spying on American citizens. That’s why those committees exist. A lot of people assume that they exist just to look at legislation affecting Intelligence and so forth–No, they were established to stop the unlawful surveillance of people.“
Kirk Wiebe, Report 251/Ramola D Reports
“We are in danger of losing our Constitutional Republic”
Attention to American rights and freedoms by oath-taking to defend the Constitution was taken seriously back then. The atmosphere, Kirk suggests, was different, at least in some circles.
Kirk relays that Vice-Admiral Bobby Inman who headed the NSA when he joined and helped the Church Committee establish rules for NSA surveillance and set the tone for integrity at the NSA then was a “law-abiding officer who enforced allegiance not to the President, not to the Chief of the Intelligence Community, the CIA then, but to the Constitution of the United States–this is critical.”
” When you join the Military or go to work for the Government, used to be we all signed oaths, to defend the Constitution of the United States, not to defend a Democrat or Republican administration, not to defend a sitting President, that has nothing to do with it, it has everything to do with loyalty to the principles stated in that sacred document known as the United States Constitution.”
“Now as we all know these days people just think that document was created by old white Europeans who really were these fuddy duddy white guys who didn’t know anything and they want us to throw it out and start anew with socialism or fascism–and that’s what I see happening before us now.”
“When you see the Government tell phone companies to intercept people’s text messages to look for those who don’t want to take an experimental vaccine, that’s a red flag.”
Awareness of the dangers of government misuse of powers and concern for the rights of individuals and the preservation of American freedoms when NSA and the White House asked them to include billing data in their analyses of surveilled data is what led to the whistleblowing on mass surveillance that he and other NSA officials, Bill Binney, Ed Loomis, and Diane Roark accomplished, he says, even as they failed in-house to get the NSA administration to adopt their selective-surveillance tool Thin Thread.
“We have a government that, not just in 1975, that cheated, not just in 2001 when we (myself and Bill Binney and Ed Loomis and Diane Roark) blew the whistle on illegal unconstitutional surveillance of the people, we have a government that is progressively seizing ever more power, and we are in danger of losing our Constitutional Republic and tipping the scales toward a dictatorship better known as Governmental control, and you can pick your title, you can call it Fascism, you can call it Socialism, you can call it Communism, I don’t care, the result is the same: the power moves from the people to the Government and if we are going to be a free society, it is absolutely critical people understand these things that are happening in Government in terms of their own personal future, liberty, and well-being–and that is at the heart of it.”
Classification to Conceal Crime is Criminal But Has Been Long Practiced by the Agencies and Military
The rise of mass surveillance and spying on all US citizens by agencies now working together has at this point escaped all measure of oversight. Collecting all communications under PRISM and handing over this data to the CIA and FBI is still being kept secret, Kirk suggests. “They’ve kept this under wraps for many years and they don’t want it out, the matter has never been in front of a judge.”
“Something of this magnitude has to involve the White House, members of Congress and of course the agencies themselves.”
Agencies which should be accountable to Congress and the President–the Commander-in-Chief of the military and Chief Classification Officer of the US Govt–are no longer overseen, monitored, audited, or held accountable.
Going by the book, there is indeed legislated provision against classification to conceal crime but in actuality, says Kirk, that is how the covert operation faction has gotten away with it, it’s been done “repeatedly, frequently, and often, to keep the truth from the American people.” “Because they are in power and they can do it.”
Section 1.7 of Executive Order 13526 (which protects classification in the interests of national security) addresses criminal classification:
Sec. 1.7. (Executive Order 13526) Classification Prohibitions and Limitations. (a) In no case shall information be classified, continue to be maintained as classified, or fail to be declassified in order to:
(1) conceal violations of law, inefficiency, or administrative error;
(2) prevent embarrassment to a person, organization, or agency;
(3) restrain competition; or
(4) prevent or delay the release of information that does not require protection in the interest of the national security.
“War on Terror” used as Pretext to Spy on Everyone (NSA) & Name Anyone a Suspect (FBI)
Since 9/11, with the Patriot Act and other means, mass surveillance has increased on the pretext of terrorists sneaking over the border and harboring terror plans in US communities–an excuse to surveill everyone and concoct spurious markers to tag “persons of interest” such as the wrong conception of religion, interest in human rights, animal rights, the environment, the Constitution, anything whatsoever–as indeed the FBI has done (published in their manuals and alerts).
Simultaneously, the Government has shown that it has little interest in actually resolving the matter of possible foreign insertion of terrorists into our midst by not addressing simple Immigration issues such as maintaining solid records of immigrants and visa-holders, Kirk notes, relaying the account of his and Bill Binney’s work at Boeing for the US Govt in analyzing the tracking of visa-holders and reporting on this matter, wherein they offered advice and recommendations which were simply not implemented by the government. “Political interest and businesses wanting to have the benefit of the workers–cheap good smart labor from many countries–there’s always money involved somewhere” kept that from happening.
Mass spying and collection permits selective and arbitrary targeting.
“NSA has strayed from its original purpose, which was to support military operations, to a broad spectrum of subject matter running the gamut, from science to economics to you-name-it, NSA’s got a hand in it,” collecting information in multiple databases, which they have and hold permanently to delve into and use even if they say they “don’t look at it all.”
“Who says? How do you know they are not looking at it?”
Abusive Surveillance, Spying, Persecution of Targets under “Covered Research” by NSA, FBI, DHS, CIA, DOD
Which leads to the targeting of innocents and trafficking them into unethical and inhumane black operations, which FBI Whistleblower Geral Sosbee tells us is indeed being done, by handing over “suspects” to “covered research.”
Oversight of the agencies by Intelligence committees to ensure they are not acting illegally is “virtually nonexistent.”
Persecution in Surveillance
The failure of ethics, morality and oversight at all levels of Intelligence and military has now led to a situation where people in the US, UK, and countries worldwide are reporting extreme persecution, covert harassment, sadism, and life-takedown run by organized factions from fusion centers–an agglomeration of Intelligence agencies, law enforcement, Sheriffs, EMS, military, sharing information, surveilling nonstop, provoking nonstop (using COINTELPRO methods) and creating falsified records and false profiles of people they wish to target and terminate: activists, journalists, whistleblowers, community leaders, as well as everyday people of integrity from various professions or in retirement.
Persecution in Non-Consensual Human Experimentation and Military Weapons-Testing
Lack of oversight coupled with profound moral decay might account as well for the noxious human experimentation ongoing by covert operations of Intelligence and the military where people report being non-consensually implanted, bio-hacked, neuro-hacked, and clandestinely attacked, while weapons-testing projects are advertised, unlawfully using Americans as target practice–as for instance unleashed by the 1994 DOJ-DOD Memorandum of Understanding publishing the joint military/law enforcement development and testing of so-called “non-lethal weapons” of Electronic Warfare and Limited-Effect Weapons in programs run by DARPA (Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency) and the NIJ (National Institute of Justice).
Addressing this question of abusive targeting where thousands of Americans and citizens worldwide are reporting being surveilled, stalked, monitored, and harassed to the point of extreme persecution with electromagnetic weapons and neurotechnology by government-run programs and projects, and the ACLU reports it may be millions now being so targeted and falsely labeled “Known and Suspected Terrorists,” “violent extremists,” and “domestic extremists,” as reported in their 2016 report “Trapped in a Black Box: Growing Terrorism Watchlisting in Everyday Policing,” Kirk points to the rise and spread of corruption in all agencies of US Government.
Self-serving interest arising from public-private partnerships and utilizing the infamous “revolving-door” principle between Government and private-sector in the Defense industry as well as every other industry including pharmaceutical and biomedical research has also led to the wide commercialization of Mass Surveillance and select targeting.
“There is No Real Oversight–If Congress Wanted Real Oversight, They Would Establish a Tech Team”
The Intelligence sub-committees in Congress are clearly not doing their jobs, and Kirk outlines a simple method whereby they could easily set up a technical team with access to the NSA TCP/IP networks, with ability to roam on the networks, examine data retrieval actions and check for possible publication/report creation (or not), linkages to client sites, money trails et al based on that data, to pinpoint any source of questionable and non-transparent actions and thereby track down only those particular nodes, sites, or sources requiring surveillance.
However, what the NSA, Pentagon, and other departments are now doing (and have been doing for 20 years since 9/11 if not before) he notes, is full-spectrum surveillance and full-communications collection, all of which poses immense danger to our constitutional Republic, he says, in its complete trampling of citizen rights and privacy.
Politically speaking, “these agencies, the FBI don’t want real oversight.” In this context, it is valuable to note what FBI Whistleblower has stated of the FBI versus the DOJ, which latter is supposed to have oversight of the FBI. In reality, Geral Sosbee says, it is more likely the other way around–powerful agencies like the FBI, CIA, and NSA seem to be running the show.
People Need to Be Speaking Out at School Boards, City Council Meetings
Kirk Wiebe says it is possibly past time for marches and rallies but indeed these are still needed, as also are needed other means of public and private speaking and activism to persuade government officials back onto the straight and narrow, such as speaking out at School Board meetings, city council meetings and reaching out to Senate Intelligence Committees.
The threat to American freedoms has arrived at every door, he says, and everyone needs to be standing up to change this situation around. It is not important to be perfect in one’s presentations, he notes, but to be authentic to purpose and true of heart. “Pureness of heart is recognized by all.” In such ways, change can begin.
This is the case also for schools wishing to teach racist ideology via Critical Race Theory (CRT) or thrust sex education on kindergartners at a time when the National Education Association has vowed it will force CRT onto curricula in all 50 states: parents need to wake up and take a stance and start getting active at School Board meetings and to principals. Stopping racism, chaos, and subjugation of rights begins with each one of us. “CRT is racism.”
Scientists, RF Engineers, Physicians Need to Come Forward to Assist Targets with Scanning and Establishing Evidence
And what of those targets, the truly victimized and extremely persecuted, who report their lives have been utterly destroyed by surveillance and secret experimentation programs?
Scientists, radiologists, medical professionals do need to come forward to assist here, he agrees, people need to be scanned professionally and instruments such as frequency spectrum analyzers and Faraday detection need to be wielded by engineers and scientists who can accurately identify the nature and direction of frequencies people are reporting. Perhaps targets can group to fund the lease of such analyzers and hire professionals, he suggests.
Something people need to do also is self-advocate more powerfully by using scientific method and language to report the kinds of radiation assaults they are reporting, he says, since there are enough forces out there (in media, psychology, psychiatry, law enforcement) arrayed to discredit reporting targets as mentally unstable when they report being hit by pulses from satellites or planes, for instance.
There are most definitely targets, he says, but not all of them are credible, and recourse to science in reportage can go a long way.
Best Way Forward is Still Approaching Congress and the Intelligence and Oversight Committees
In a later email with this writer, Kirk Wiebe recommends that approaching Congress is still the best way forward to gain public acknowledgment and redressal of all surveillance and targeting crimes, “especially the Intel Committees and the Government Oversight Committees” and recommends that those targeted move their efforts in these directions, going forward.
Report 251 | NSA Whistleblower Kirk Wiebe Encourages Americans to Stand Up to Return Ethics and Morality to Government
Kirk Wiebe’s profoundly important interview with repercussions for Governmental change for the better can be viewed at Ramola D Reports channels at Bitchute, Brighteon, Odysee.
Please share widely, and feel free to re-post and mirror at your channels and websites.
Report by Ville Hellberg | Posted by Ramola D | 31.05.2021
Note: This is a major report from a European policy analyst exposing the horrors of counter-terrorism and mass surveillance torture programs being run worldwide since 9/11 by US, Five-Eyes, Fifteen-Eyes, EU member nations under agreement with US intelligence and security agencies, self-labeled as surveillance and counter-terrorism, self-permissive of bio-hacking and neuro-hacking, using invasive anti-personnel Electronic Warfare neuroweaponry, self-permissive of “No-Touch Torture” and remote-access physical and neurological abuse, shrouded in secrecy and propaganda, deeply invasive of human privacy, and unleashing Stasi, Nazi, Mengele-style programs of atrocity, torture, physical, and psychological abuse in concentric circles of control on millions of innocent civilians, wrongfully labeled “suspects” and “terrorists” for purposes of competitive development worldwide of supercomputing AI, cybernetics, robotics, neuroprosthetics, Brain Nets, Mind Hives, Cerebral Internets, and brain-degrading Neuroweaponry all at the cost of massive human suffering and human lives, revealing a complete breakdown of ethics and consideration for human rights among governments, militaries, security, and Intelligence agencies, seen through the eyes of European policy analysis and human rights convictions examining US Foreign Policy just as much as state of the art Surveillance Technology and Neurotechnology.
While these programs of political persecution and hidden torture are the same ones American human rights campaigners and others worldwide have been discussing widely in articles and books (see Targeting is Real), this report is groundbreaking and unique in its close examination of the US “War on Terror” declared by George Bush in 2001, which has influenced US Foreign Policy and coerced European submission to a worldwide fixation on counter-terrorism and mass surveillance inducive of clampdowns and removals of civil rights and liberties, and destroyed the concepts, principles, and protections of democracy worldwide, including European concepts of human dignity and rights completely at odds with American imperialism. “Europeans do not wish to bring the War on Terror to European soil,” writes Ville Hellberg from Finland.
What few people know–thanks to mainstream media propaganda and long-term occlusion of human rights reportage with deprecating, discrediting cover, intended to obfuscate, of “Targeted Individuals” who have been reporting extreme torture and abuse now for over three decades–is that American counter-terrorism and surveillance programs and laws have gone well beyond the revelations of Edward Snowden and permitted egregious torture, abuse, and removal of rights on American soil, as reported by this writer and others to President Trump in 2017 and 2019:
What Ville Hellberg brings to this disclosure is keen insight into the structure of global security agreements, the excessive role played by US “War on Terror” foreign policy demands, the rise of new technologies permitting extreme invasion of human, bio and neuro privacy, the false legalizing of “sources and methods” of interrogation and investigation granted to Intelligence and Security agencies, and the crying need to address and end the silent suffering of thousands of innocent citizens, wrongfully targeted, blacklisted, ostracized, tortured, maimed, disfigured, continually abused, destroyed, and yes, also murdered–in a complete breakdown of recognition of human rights–worldwide. Many thanks to Ville Hellberg for this powerful and deeply thoughtful analysis and report, which is surely going to pave the path to positive change, going forward.
RENDITION FLIGHTS, ANYONE? INTER- AND CROSS-GOVERNMENTAL TORTURE PROGRAMS MANIFESTED UNDER THE NEW SURVEILLANCE AND COUNTER-TERRORISM LAWS WITHHOLD LEGAL PROTECTION, HUMAN RIGHTS, AND CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS FROM CIVILIANS, THEIR TARGETS
Ville Hellberg | May 31, 2021
WE ARE WITNESSING GLOBAL ELECTRONIC WARFARE BY SUPERPOWERS WHERE INDIVIDUALS, POPULATIONS, AND INFRASTRUCTURE ARE TARGETED. DUE TO THE WAR CIRCUMSTANCE, GOVERNMENTS HAVE PERMITTED THEMSELVES TO DIVERT FROM LAWS AND DEMOCRATIC PRINCIPLES.
”Torture is a horrific topic and most minds will turn away from it because it can’t be comprehended that humans can be motivated, or computer programs can be run to do this to other sentient beings. Just when we believed we were becoming more civilized as a culture, the technology for torture has advanced more than a hundred fold in recent decades.” – Robert Duncan, ‘Neuropsychological and electronic “no-touch torture”. The spectrum of “interrogation” and torture techniques used by the US and its allies’. 
Electronic Warfare (EW) anti-personnel applications such as DEW (directed energy weapons) and AW (acoustic weapons), as well as their distant cousins neuropsychological electronic (neurotech) applications RNM (remote neural monitoring)/RMI (remote mental imaging) /EEG (electroencephalogram), and the product of these, V2K (microwave hearing), among other techniques, are being directed to civilians globally. With the exception of capital-intensive neurotech applications or other mass operations, the tech can be operated by private sector agencies and corporates, whilst the operations are in general run by military and law enforcement agencies from multifunctional radar and antenna platforms globally. Even though the applications are used in connection with psychological operations, they have the fatal capacity and produce pain, suffering and psychological trauma, even fatalities in their targets; civilians. Thus, the utilisation supports the definition of torture. Under governments’ execution, the operations are run by the military whose clientele the national security, law enforcement, intelligence societies are. Whether the implementation and targeting of this technology on civilians constitute a war crime should be evaluated. The technology ’consumes’ the human body, especially the neurological system, as directed to its targets for over inhumanly prolonged periods. Other scientists say the neurotech mass surveillance AI applications should be considered as a WMD. It is imperative indeed to acknowledge that the vast increase in numbers of targeted civilians indicates a widespread attack on human rights.
Due to its stealth nature, the technology has attracted military budgets globally. Other governments have developed sophisticated global operations and are well advanced in the utilisation of this technology. However, due to the low cost of operations most governments have utilised their own version of the technology. This also involves increased non-consented human testing and yet another armament. Human testing on dissidents, activists and whistleblowers, even their descendants, seems common. Whilst the effects of resonance spectrum frequencies on the human body and nervous system were discovered to their full potential by the midst of the 1970s , it still needed an agenda and strategy for implementation. The new millennium has brought us “the War on Terror” in which counter-terrorism and mass surveillance laws introduced legal instruments to allow the use of “mass surveillance neurotechnology” under which the resonance technologies are operated. The use of anti-terrorism as an agenda is an unconstitutional plan of the Western coalition that has significantly strengthened sovereign national power at the expense of human rights and democratic systems through surveillance laws.
The new dynamics of global geopolitics have also impacted the global power balance and foreign and security policies. We may have to accept that there are several superpowers capable of globally utilising this technology against the citizens of other countries. International laws should regulate the imperialistic execution of these technologies by regime and purpose e.g. automatized targeting, target selection, technology and intergovernmental co-operation should be regulated and watched carefully. There are some parallel operations and agendas that further increase the number of targeted people and populations. When the operations are global it is likely the resonances are directed through OTHRs (over-the-horizon-radar) and satellites which in turn facilitates the discovery of the source radar. For the sake of clarity, it is sensible to acknowledge that cellular phones have a key role in locating targets and delivering biometrics. The MSM is full of cover articles when one government is caught using the technology and blaming the others. Recently, we have seen evidence of purposely leaked material in MSM regarding global Electronic Warfare, in attacks where resonance technologies have been used, such as the attacks to White House officials  and Cuban embassy staff  by assumed DEW microwave technologies. These operations have been leaked not only to inform the public and other governments of the ongoing global Electronic Warfare but also to blame the other governments. It is reasonable however, to recognise that these attacks really are lightweight samples of the use of the WMDs. People should be suspicious in view of the recent bushfires also. In other words, it is the infrastructure, populations and individuals that are being targeted in this global war and not discussed in the MSM. We are indeed viewing the evidence of a global war.
The technology is poorly understood by lawmakers, practioners and politicians it is presented by military and law enforcement lobbyist and therefore, become approved and utilised globally. Human rights activists are in search of political co-operation whereas the political or administrative powers will not touch the topic. There is a significant number of similarities in details of this “play” to the events of WWII where the messengers of the Holocaust had not been taken seriously either.
Brain invasive neurotechnology applications (RNM/RMI/EEG) are claimed to have been used in mass surveillance operations. The applications are commonly called “cybernetics” although finding common global terminology for the EW applications seems problematic. We suggest the use of military terminology since the technology is based on military design. Each technology presented in this paper should be defined as Electronic Warfare anti-personnel applications, including the mass surveillance neurotechnology applications.
The mass surveillance operations target civilians and their neural systems. The operation is automated and run by supercomputers through multifunctional radar or antenna systems which means robotic elements are involved. In the investigations of the neural systems of the targeted civilians, the cortex is being stimulated by a spectrum of electromagnetic pulses for years in order to clone the entire neural system. The methodology is called synthetic telepathy since it may investigate and implant thoughts and mind patterns into the targeted brains. The term “mind control” implies the domination of the conscious nervous system. The process is not painless, hence the term “no-touch torture”. A group of brains can be linked together as “brain network” which in turn assists supercomputers to develop a competitive advantage in the field of AI. In “neuropsychological electronic torture” painful stimulants help to cause a reaction in the targets’ cortex that is measured and biometrics collected. Synthetic telepathy refers to reading and replacing one’s thoughts with “synthetic thoughts” or even by another mind replacement. The recent development where mobile devices, phones, can be used to collect and introduce these emissions i.e., ICT and 5G networks are in use. Scientists have developed systems to take nanotech to the brains which then receive the resonances. It has been presented that the mass delivery of this nanotech would occur through public vaccinations. The nanotech operates using the body energy (piezoenergetics) or by energy delivered resonances. Thus, the resonances deliver both the energy and the informantion in form of commands. The delivery of these resonances can be arranged from any platform, even by mobile device emissions. The mass surveillance utilises satellites and OTHRs. This allows continued mass observations of the feelings, senses, thoughts, and actions of the target. The fact is that individual’s free will and degree of autonomy are hugely affected.
As a result of the recent breakthrough of technological development different forms of applications are being utilized in many areas in the society, such as police, customs office, border control, prosecutor, judicial system, and intelligence community but also in the private sector. The technology remains unregulated and lacks sufficient measures of supervision, monitoring, and control due to the covert nature of the operations. In Europe, the situation is being recognized  by lawmakers to a certain extent. Whilst the EU has been speculated to push through a reform  on the laws of AI mass surveillance to ban the use of AI for mass surveillance (from the private sector alone) and some other uses this has not been ratified. There has been a good progress made to impose further regulation on automated weapons systems  and interrogation methodologies . In addition, the consistency of surveillance laws is being evaluated in the EU by the ECHR . It seems lawmakers do not understand the technology since they only have the military introduction to it. In the absence of ethical aspects, international laws, regulation, and compassion, solidarity the torture-like execution continues to be conducted, hence the phenomenon of targeted individuals.
Too little is spoken in public about white-collar law enforcement and intelligence community operations’ military tactics that produce pain, suffering, and psychological problems to civilians. Resonance technologies are at the core of the Western intelligence community and law enforcement operations today, executed by the military among others. Yet it is unclear which government agencies and how many countries are abusing neurotech methodologies. The military technologies have been introduced to politicians under anti-terrorism agenda by a Western intelligence coup as surveillance methodologies with a major detail left ignored, that the technology causes significant pain, suffering, physical and psychological trauma, even fatalities. The technologies are also being widely misused in operations lacking supervision in an unregulated industry in the absence of ethical aspects.
Such tactics as DEW (directed energy weaponry; laser, maser, high power microwave and radio frequencies as well as particle beams), AW (acoustic weaponry), RNM (remote neural monitoring), reverse EEG (electroencephalogram), and V2K (microwave hearing) to mention a few are somewhat creatively executed from multifunction radars and a series of antennas and directed to their living targets from a diversity of platforms with satellite assistance. Despite the fact that these are military tactics, and a crucial part of Electronic Warfare anti-personnel operations, they are being directed towards civilians to cause pain and suffering when misused and therefore, must be considered as torture. Should that not constitute a war crime? In addition to a law (Finland: Rikoslaki luku 11 pykälä 9a) that defines torture as a crime, most of these nations have signed on the UN Convention on Torture.
”Anyone can be put into these programs. Justice and rule of law does not exist at the highest levels of government. Treaties are worthless because the #1 agreement in the rules of war, a ban against torture, is not obeyed. This creates a more brutal and barbaric society lead by example.”  This is the explanation of the “War on Terror”. It seems the police, prosecutor, in particular, border control, customs, judicial system, intelligence community and military operations are all in favor of this type of implementation, the citizens themselves being bypassed. Probably, the entire clientele favours this technology which allows direct participation in the activation of the targeted suspects’ sensors. This is the end of privacy as we know it, the film ‘Minority Report’ in steroids.
Coercive Measures and the Use of “No-Touch Torture”
In Finland, military intelligence confirmed on 06.05.2021  that some of their coercive measures are similar to the ones used in the local law enforcement. More interestingly, the article confirms that the district court (of Helsinki) regulates the use of coercive measures which in turn may be interpreted that the judicial system in Finland allows the use of military tactics that are sometimes referred to as “no-touch torture” (torture caused without visible connection to the targeted) to be used to target the Finnish citizens. In view of the fact that law treats any torture or intentionally caused pain as a crime (Rikoslaki Ch 11 §9a among the UN Convention against Torture) in Finland, the arrangement is somewhat disputable. Another trick to hold back the argument on war crime?
In Finland, the chiefs of military and law enforcement select the technologies used under coercive measures and self-supervise the utilisation of these. It is indeed wishful thinking that the lawmakers, law practitioners and politicians approving the use of the technologies would also understand them. Some targets have been targeted for decades even though the permitted period is supposed to be 6 months each time before renewal. The renewal process would not stand any closer evaluation. The law enforcement officers manufacture the evidence to present the suspect in a negative frame. There is no alternative explanation on why the same targets are under the execution for decades unless, they are the targets of military exercise. The former ptotocol is called target manufacturing. It surely seems the technologies have become a punitive instrument for the political and administrative cultures.
One acknowledged problem seems to be the new surveillance law that allows the use of resonance technologies together with counter-terrorism laws which in turn allows the removal of civil rights. Finnish Defence Forces (FDF) are investing in cyberwar in the future  and confirms that AI is involved in order to handle significant amounts of data. The terminology appear to cause problems with interpretation since the term “cyberwar” has been used in the media to cover resonance methodologies also. Bear in mind the ICT sector is a part of the mass surveillance structure and 5G infra based on resonance technologies. Since 10bn Euros is being invested in the new fighter jet fleet which in turn supports cybertechnologies by multifunctional radar systems it is clear the technology is in use. Kivinen, the Chief of Defence, states that in developing a cyber defence programme the Finnish Defence Forces co-operate with other members of the EU cyber defence projects . It was brought to the knowledge of Finnish Prime Minister Antti Rinne in 2019 that what mistakenly is called cyber weaponry instead of anti-personnel EW technologies were being used to target civilians and even children. Rinne publicly aimed a reminder to the Chief of Defence who in turn publicly mentioned the technology related to an international war exercise . As it has been brought to the discussion earlier the EU seems to have security policies that conflict with human rights and indeed, with the EU policies for human rights. Since the EU does not possess an organised military compartment or co-ordination for the common defence the EU member nations practice with who they will. Human rights are left under the observation of the military in this war exercise, a light operation if any.
Since the views of targets have not been heard in preparation of the surveillance and counter-terrorism laws in the EU, the understanding of the technology is based on military reviews. This is an excellent reason why targeted should be heard by lawmakers, law practitioners, and politicians instead of copying military methodologies from other societies supported by massive lobbying. If not legal risks, at least political and reputational risks will acknowledged by the Governments of the EU [17, 20, 26]. The use of these weapons should be regulated more aggressively and indeed, take into account that the same targeted civilians, shockingly, remain the targets of international war exercises for years, as long as their physiology can withstand for the attacks of the energy weapons.
The Intelligence Ombudsman in Finland supervises the legality of civil and military intelligence and the realisation of basic and human rights in intelligence activities (The Act on the Oversight of Intelligence Gathering entered into force in February 2019) states the website of the Intelligence Ombudsman. The Ombudsman has produced recently (05.05.2021) a second opinion on the operations of military intelligence and intelligent services in Finland according to which he approves the operations. The Intelligence Ombudsman is aware of the use of the technologies brought to discussion in this report in Finland. He has been presented with 26 accounts of personal reports of targeted civilians on Finnish soil. These technologies have been used on the targeted well before the surveillance law came into force. An independent external review is suggested on the surveillance laws in the EU as there is no consistency among them. Similarly, the coercive measures used and the principles on what basis they are being used on civilians in the EU [20, 23, 26] should be put under review.
The Rights of the Targeted
”Governments may mistake their citizens as enemies in the same way that an immune system may lose its ability to distinguish between the body’s own cells and pathogens. ” 
The above is a very polite articulation of the fact that human targets are required to develop military technologies. The targets are approved through a judicial system that operates law approved by politicians and lawmakers. By practice, we know that most of the targeted individuals are manufactured targets and presented in a frame that has very little to do with reality in order to allow the use of counter-terrorism and mass surveillance laws.
“If an intelligence law is not well-conceived and rational, it could easily become a formidable weapon of repression. An intelligence law should not only protect citizens against terrorism, but also against the State… There is a total absence of control in this law.” M Trevidic 
The EU security strategy has been impacted by the Western agenda for anti-terrorism and allows such resonance technologies to be utilised under the law enforcement and intelligence operations of its member countries against the earlier knowledge of the topic (art. 30 Resolution on the Environment, Security and Foreign Policy from January 28, 1999, Nr.A4-005/99) to civilians. No human rights, no rights of the accused nor legal protection is respected in the process to which civilians are exposed. Constitutional rights are removed by these counter-terrorism acts. The counter-terrorism laws and mass surveillance laws both are used against democracy and human rights. The suspects do not have rights nor legal protection against coercive measures. In fact, the suspects have been stripped of their rights during the implementation of this protocol. The accused supposedly have rights (ignored), the rights of the accused, however, only a very few ever are being accused. The unconditional nature of implementation indicates it is not about seeking the truth under district court approval but the aim is to degrade the individual. It takes time for civilian targets to recognise their life is over as they used to know it. Dramatically enough no instance informs targets of their amended status in society. Even members of families with small children are placed under the torture scheme in which situation everyone is affected physically and psychologically (an acknowledgement based on empirical observation).
“As Lord Hoffmann noted in a concurring opinion in A Secretary of State for the Home Department, ”The real threat . . . comes not from terrorism but from [practices] such as these.”” referring to the impact of counter-terroristic measures in the society.
”Why torture? The CIA claims it works. The assumption is that it works to gain actionable intelligence. Torture is often used for revenge, punishment, interrogation, and behavior modification. In other terms torture is used to remove the continuity of thought to confuse the target to reveal information, erase brain patterns such as values and beliefs, or to break down the human spirit to make them submit and obey their handlers.” 
– Robert Duncan – “Neuropsychological and electronic “no-touch torture”. The spectrum of “interrogation” and torture techniques used by the US and its allies”
Neuropsychological and electronic “no-touch torture” [7, 9] is used as the spectrum of “interrogation” and torture techniques by the US and its allies says Robert Duncan, a former CIA analyst and engineer, who has been developing such methodologies as a CIA, DoD engineer. Robert has an opinion the neurotech mass surveillance technology is indeed a WMD.
”The intelligence agents can also use low level microwaves to cause mental and physical confusion that leads to illness. Beaming microwaves at victims makes them fatigued, damages their immune system, causes neurological damage that affects their thinking and ability to carry out tasks, induces premature aging, cancer, and cataracts. ” T Rifat. 
The mass surveillance neurotechnological weaponry causes a spectrum of effects depending on the computer program, the technology chosen, and the team running the execution. It may be sensible to make a note that we are indeed talking about piezoelectric mechanisms  (NB. Figure 15. Piezoelectric energy harvesting from the human body) within the human body (biochemical balance within the body e.g. various proteins electrically reacting towards each other). Antioxidants alleviate the potential risks of EMF exposures . The following effects are reported among others : Synthetic telepathy (reading and broadcasting of thoughts), microwave hearing, forced visions some synched with body motion, forced memory blanking, controlled dreams, forced waking visions, artificial tinnitus, wildly racing heart at rest, forced muscle quaking, the sensation of tapping, intense general pain or hot-needles-pushed-deep-into-flesh sensations, sensations of electrical shocks, burning sensations, intense pain in a larger area of body e.g. face or chest (technical capability to amend the spread of the beam as well as the spectrum), special attention to the genital area; itching, forced orgasms, intense pain, forced thoughts and feelings and sleep deprivation (sleep being constantly disturbed with the above).
In Finland, a survey of a population of nearly 100 victims of Electronic Warfare anti-personnel applications was taken in 2020-21. The research involved questionnaires and interviews and produced very consistent information on the symptoms and observations of the victims. Reported health damages and symptoms appeared to be far more serious than what was expected. There also seems to be an apparent division of symptoms and observations by different executions of DEW and neuropsychological resonances. The findings of this research will be published in another context; however, it can be noted here that the following psychological disorders or physical symptoms were reported among others: Memory lapse, PTSD, long-term stress, panic attack, state of fear, severe depression, suicidal thoughts, paranoia, schizophrenia, anxiety, lack of concentration, ADHD, sleep deprivation, desire for sex /food etc, cardiac arrhythmia, headache, hearing voices, sensation of disturbance in cognitive processes, orgasms, erections, sensation of pressure in brains, pain in eyes, chest pain, difficulty to breathe, stomack pain, digestive problems, temporary paralysis, pain in genitals, twitches, sudden increase in blood pressure, brain fog, neurological symptoms, strokes, tinnitus, sensations of burns, temporary feelings of blood clots and numbness anywhere in the body, cosmetic injuries such as burnt skin and physical and psychological exhaustion among other. The targets reported that their head, heart or genital area was attacked the most. In addition, some Electronic Warfare anti-animal attacks have been conducted to their pets and anti-material attacks were reported in which mobile devices or computers were either used remotely or entirely damaged their hard discs. In connection to preparing this documentation many methods were conducted to potentially prevent the submission of this material. Many targeted people have reportedly been targets of an attempted murder also. The dilemma here is that potential injury cannot be connected to the resonance technologies. Another argument being used by the supporters of the neuropsychological technologies is that whenever there is pain, no injury has necessarily taken place. The definition of torture is based on the concept of experiencing pain. Therefore, whether the pain is physically caused or ‘only’ the idea of pain being delivered to the brains, the pain is still being experienced.
The long-term effects are not well published expept for long-term sleep deprivation which is a major catalyst to changes in the human body causing, for instance, high blood sugar and other signs of exceptions leading to long-term diseases. The radiation may impose a threat on internal organs, especially the liver and heart. An exposure to radiation in the long-term is very likely to cause heart diseases such as cardiac muscle inflammation which in turn may cause the failure of the heart muscle. Exhaustion seems to be one of the common symptoms that also was shown in the results of the Finnish research.
If anyone was to argue that the aforementioned symptoms were based on civil applications, such as the 5G or electricity grid, they are not entirely wrong. The ICT (information communications technology) infrastructure is being utilised within these operations; together with electricity, radar, and satellite technologies they create a strong electromagnetic field that enables the surveillance and introduction of “brainwaves” and what not. It is however, the effect of the radar that amplifies within the strong electromagnetic field and causes the symptoms by signals delivered via satellites and ICT network. Due to the nature of the scientific research, the findings are kept secret and the health concerns remain unpublished to cover the economic model within the industry. The business model is a cash cow and supports also related industries and business models. The symptoms reported in the Finnish research are consistent, the experiences are similar and indicate a clear correlation of the presence of strong electromagnetic fields. Such an electromagnetic field requires radar or antenna series for targeting. Also the observations on the use of OTHR (over-the-horizon-radar) and satellite delivery correlate with the symptoms. The impacts of long-lasting combined microwave exposure on the human body may not have been adequately investigated and approved by the medical scientific society. It seems it is the currently targeted population which produces this critical empirical knowledge since the biometrics are available for reading at all times. The Military/ Intelligence/ Private sector execution seems more interested in the development of their projects, in the development of AI and in spying on civilian targets as well as the profits produced, than in the health and wellbeing of the targeted people. The cortex is being stimulated by overlapping applications and new “products” are constantly being developed. By now the audience should acknowledge that the radar technology eanbles 360-degree imaging of the target.
”Neurological research found the brain to have specific frequencies for each voluntary movement called preparatory sets. By firing at your chest with a microwave beam containing the ELF signals given off by the heart, this organ can be put into a chaotic state, the so-called heart attack.” – T. Rifat 
The aforementioned effects reconcile well with the methods of interrogation and behavior modification illustrated by R Duncan in his report on torture  where Duncan introduces 18 tactics of torture that can be implemented via physical or “no-touch torture”. ”Coercing and torturing people to suicide is very common. Both tactics in physical or no-touch torture involves plausible deniability.”
The Target Selection
The problem is persistent since there is a vastly growing number of operations that aim to benefit neuro-invasive technologies. There are private AI developers in the sector and many of them are known for entirely another type of consumer products. As a result of long-running operations their resources have developed a pattern of excellence and now are looking to gain a technological advantage in neuroscience and supercomputing. Some corporations or countries may own satellites which in turn allow a significant access to the field of research. These companies consider their employees as a resource by clauses in their contract of employment that allow the use of “brain data” in form of any inventions made by the employees.
A significant amount of States are utilizing the technology and having a “brainrace” causing perhaps overlapping execution on international individuals since there are also a number of individual government agencies whose operations may be run from their independent facilities. This explains the vast increase in the headcount of targeted individuals. The law enforcement body involving the prosecution and judicial system is becoming dependent on the technology which is likely used during trials and pre-trial examinations already.
The resonance methodologies have their roots in military technologies. Recently, the security sector and law enforcement agencies have owned the technology and the defense industry has developed new applications . Also, international white-collar organizations such as the NSA under the national Foreign Ministries’ military wing, the DSA, execute the operations . The technology is operated by the military using multifunctional radar signal intelligence for law enforcement and intelligence community (DSA) white-collar agencies acting as their ”clientele”. NSA officers can globally flag any individual and set them up under the execution without hearing the person. The justice systems and law enforcement agencies are used actively to get hold of the citizen to manufacture them a target . The targeted are not informed of their amended status as a suspect which in turn prevents the target to kick-start legal action. Supervising instances are claiming to use legal protection and reminder of remedies the society may offer. It is difficult to get a message across that no tricks are left, no authority takes responsibility. Taking the matter into the court which has just approved the use of the methodologies sounds illogical. Usually, terrorism, national threat, or serious crime are being used as the excuse to approve the use of the technologies under the coercive measures . In doing so, it seems the EU acting as an ally also is unaware it backs the implementation of the anti-democratic measure that ignores citizens’ human rights, the international rights of the accused, and leaves the targets without legal protection and due process. No questions being asked from the individual themselves.
Since the manufacturing of the targets seems relatively careless and no oversight committee or set of regulations or auditable institution is monitoring how targets are being selected, the protocol may be used for an extension of personal and political, even economical interests. Picking and setting up random targets, no legal groundings necessary. Certainly, dissidents, activists, or whistleblowers are not there by accident. Random people, people who have been in the wrong place at the wrong time are selected to reach the critical mass, the amount of targets to allow for technological breakthrough. The execution does not seem to have a deadline. Anyone could become the future’s target; the extrajudicial implementation does not recognize social statuses, unless social scoring is involved. The targeted people will experience their life being demolished in all areas, holistically, and therefore, their profile is on the downhill. The execution of such a program requires inter-and cross-governmental implementation, hence the “international torture program”. The targeting is inhumane, unjust, unreasoned, and unaccountable .
It may well be that the private sector acts as the developer of the product and runs the experiment whereas the governments are backing the research and delivering the resources, the brains in the execution of neurological mass surveillance.
The Human Rights Issues
”Obviously, silencing dissidents, oppositions of political parties, and whistleblowers are included in the lists of applications. The most disturbing of the trends in torture is testing and improving it. No-touch torture is much more complex than physical torture. Testing design flaws and weaknesses of the signal intelligence is one reason why it is necessary to test on innocent targets.” 
The usage of resonance technologies is observed to be at times politically orientated, or not adequately justified, and is always questionable, strongly subjugating human rights or constitutional rights let alone moral aspects. This is because i) the technology produces a spectrum of pain in the target (and injuries of which some fatal), ii) sleep deprivation in long term preventing full participation in society, iii) the technology is being directed towards civilians (against the Geneva Convention), iv) the technology is being utilized without the permission or consent of the targeted person (against the Nuremberg Treaty), v) the operations lean on self-supervision and monitoring to the extent the human rights aspects are not being considered appropriately (no measures on corruption), vi) the technology is being directed to people inhumanly while asleep and vii) towards bystanders (especially children while also asleep disturbing their sleep and causing them pain), viii) the technology is being directed to homes of the targeted citizens (against constitutional rights for privacy, domestic peace, etc), ix) the period the technologies are being implemented to targets is matter-of-factly inhuman, reportedly from less than a decade up to 30 years (in which time most of the targets are forced outside of their societies and health, social structure, career, and families have all been destroyed), x) the technology may cause fatal injuries that are impossible to trace back to the usage of this technology and xi) torture, definition, of which the use of this methodology fulfills, hardly is an argumentative solution. Finally, xii) targets do not possess constitutional rights, nor legal protection from the practitioner or executor of this torture on them since it is with significant likelihood the local or other government. In addition, xiii) law enforcement and healthcare have been instructed to deny the matter. Local regulators, political power, legislators, and courts approving the use are not understanding and aware of these aspects due to the fact that the military traditionally has been the only institution with this knowledge. Yet this technology has lobbied its way into our societies. The substantial list of shortcomings above leads us to conclude the technologies have not been adequately investigated. The lawmakers, practioners, politicians have only listened to the military and law enforcement arguments as the marketer of these technologies .
Under the anti-terrorism agenda, the constitution and human rights can be occluded, it seems, by the declaration of War on Terror which yet allows derogation of the civil rights on a temporary basis only . When a civilian is targeted by goverment and presented as a terrorist they can be exposed, it seems, to methods of interrogation (e.g. coercive measures neurotech mass surveillance). This derogation should be however a temporary measure. How is it explained that some individuals have been targeted for a decade and more? Indeed, the neurotech mass surveillance is a “no-touch torture” protocol that causes long periods of serious pain, suffering, and even fatalities. By now we should agree that the execution is conducted as a counter-terrorism measure.
“The European Convention on Human Rights requires that a member state availing itself of the derogation clause inform the Secretary-General of the Council of Europe of the measures the state has taken and the reasons for them.” 
“Although the idea of temporality is not expressed in the derogation provisions of the ICCPR or the European Human Rights Convention, it has been understood to have been implied by the notion of emergency. According to the U.N. Human Rights Committee, article four of the ICCPR requires that “measures derogating from the provisions of the Covenant . . . be of an exceptional and temporary nature.“ and ““Derogations from human rights obligations are permitted in order to deal with emergencies. They are intended to be temporary.’” Thus, the suspension of ordinary processes must end when the emergency that required the suspension ceases to exist.“ The targeted under counter-terrorism law could argue that the temporary state has been maintained for purpose since no evidence of terrorism has been found for those accused. In a case where implementation has taken 10 years, the government should be prosecuted for inefficiency in dealing with the matter and thus, violating human rights. This is hardly a temporary measure in the aspect of human life.
Currently, there are no specific laws protecting humans or animals, neither any medical support for them, during cybernetic torture. “The situation is created by the fact that scientists do not leave any information about the illegal mind reading technologies.” How should “we protect people that by utilitarian grounds, without informed consent, are used for brain studies with brain-computer-interfaces in Cyber Psychological Systems, illegal stealing of brain data” ?
In view of the above intellectual rights are important but the human rights violations probably the core of concern. It seems governments have agreed with a single-minded informal agreement that they have the right to remove legal protections from the citizens. They have interpreted that in certain circumstances (that have been artificially created by themselves) they have the right to degrade the human rights, constitutional rights and strip the citizens of legal protection. The torture and inhumane, unjust, unreasoned, and unaccountable targeting  may lead to significant compensation requests from the victims for the use of WMD mass surveillance protocols once they become organized. The UN should support this idea. The periods under execution seem to be unlimited which demonstrates the enslaving nature of the implementation.
There is simply no privacy at all when the privacy of thoughts, feelings, senses, and life overall is demolished. The targets’ households are trespassed physically and technologically, and subjected to domestic disturbance from outside by the resonances (some evidence on this will be published in connection with the field examination). No government is capable of replacing what has been taken away from these people. The terror in their life has been unspeakable. What about the immaterial rights such as the stolen brain data?
“Article 1 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2000) states that “Human dignity is inviolable. It must be respected and protected”.”
The Psychic Driving/System Programming
States have used the same tactics for centuries to put away activists and dissidents who do not buy into the explanations of the power elite and publicly challenge the administration. The targeted people are many times activists, whistleblowers, or dissidents in addition to random people. During the execution of the “no-touch torture program ”, targeted individuals are being treated as mentally ill by the government. The police and healthcare, who are the emergency services, the first point of contacts, have been programmed to handle these patients with a certain presumption. The programming, or inadequate education/ omission of the education, is a part of the design of the torture program . States have a national manual of diseases where identical symptoms the targeted experience have been added indicating alleged neurosis / mental illnesses that correlate with medication designed to worsen the condition of the targeted and strengthening the impact of the resonance. Doctors do find themselves in a helpless position with neurotechnology victims since the illnesses could be induced into the patient . Linking specific medicines with microbiological structured molecules a desired impact can be delivered on the purposed area of the brain. Also, nanotechnologies can be used to deliver nanotechnological engineering into the brains . These are used in combination with EMF resonances to activate certain viruses, bacteria, even cells, synapses to deliver their function. Dr. J. Giordano also specifies neurotoxins that can be used to gain a certain effect. This technology can force the human brain to think certain thoughts, feel certain emotions, and can theoretically override motor control functions. This knowledge must have been obtained by investigating human bio-effects and experiences.
”By specialising on the pulse frequency you could induce psychiatric ilnesses to the point where a psychatrist could not tell if it is a genuine psychiatric illness or an induced psychiatric illness.” – Barry Trower – Microwave Warfare.
”The body is an electromagnetic chemical reaction. Yes, chemicals like drugs can help the body and be used as countermeasures to electromagnetically induced problems. Drugs can be used to affect the body’s electrical-chemical processes.” – R. Duncan, How to Tame a Demon – A Short Practical Guide to Organized Imtimidation Stalking, Electronic Torture, and Mind Control
Many States maintain laws under which the patients can be forced to receive medication and mental help when deemed necessary (by labels of neurosis, imminent threat of violence, self-harm, etc). Due to the inter-and cross-governmental nature of the implementation, the treatment is being coordinated from a co-ordinative structure above the staff treating the patient. The entire process can be evaluated by the supervisory co-ordinative team and depending on the content that the patient discloses as well as his/her behavior the team makes the decision on the most practical plan for him/her. Medication can be used to assist neurotechnological implementation. In some societies, implantable devices are injected into the targeted civilians to assist the chemical balance or observation of the biometrics. These military developed devices are not painless either whilst nowadays merely replaced by nanotechnological materials that may be only inconveniencing to digestion.
The biological and socio-psychological aspects of the targeted’s lives are heavily influenced. Many are pushed outside of their societies and the social networks that are crucial for well-being. A target that intends to disclose the program may experience imminent measures of discrediting or a form of punitive measures that strips social status from the target. Informal reporting and social scoring by the administration is impacted immediately which also derogates the rights of the targeted. They become outlawed. The accused have rights, the rights of the accused but the suspects do not have any. The term “suspect” refers to the removal of civil rights and being made a target. They are profiled internationally and presented as a terrorist, serious criminal, or national threat. The torture that has many faces and sides may go on for decades, in which time the target has lost his social status, fellows, health, financial sustainability, earning model, and credibility.
When the target intends to approach separate parts of the administration to deliver information on potential consipiracy and illegal government activity it is imperative the target has a well argumented, well-written and comprehensible statement to deliver intended content since their profile will be attacked severely by those in the administration who lobby on behalf of the implementation of mass surveillance. Measures will also be taken to prevent any electronic submissions or hard copies delivery to authorities. The informal nature of the execution and coercive measures ensure that the targeted cannot defend themselves against implementation that does not officially exist.
Indeed, an annulment is a common practice. It has become visible and reported that some implementations of systematic programming of discrimination are directed towards the same bloodline or family over the generations. Genetic information hardly provides us a decent explanation for this type of execution.
There are governments with a significant number of totalitarian attributes that have disguised themselves as a democracy. It goes without saying the social sector of administration supports the governmental agenda and is in a position to set up any individual with a variety of methods. Similarly, the judicial system that not only regulates the use of coercive measures but also operates a governmental agenda as the steering mechanism in relation to these individuals. A target cannot possibly receive objective and equal treatment in court. The judicial system reflects the will of the Government.
The method by which the CIA and intelligence community control masses and MSM is to publish fiction that involves similar elements that are involved in the news they want to deny or shut down. They create stories and mix them with the original report (in this case my analysis) and because the topic is complicated the masses are unable to separate the two, only a marginal audience understands what is going on.
There are countless tactics to discredit individual revelations made in media. A common tactic is to descredit the author/content of a revelation that is harmful to government. Another trick is to confuse the original message to an imaginary content that has similar elements. Perhaps involving aliens or conspiracy models that ridicule or make fun of the actual revelation.
Controlling the public is a game of capturing the opinion of masses by using MSM (main stream media). Governments are participating in the information war (between governments) and propaganda (inside the nation) either by direct or indirect ownership of the media. “Regulation, legislation, physical attacks, and threats against journalists or media owners are effective methods used to capture the media. But funding is arguably the most effective method of all. By financing media and journalists willing to toe the government line and by not funding independent, critical media, authorities manage to suppress large parts of the media sector.” [10, 36]”
Resonance methodologies are at the core of Electronic Warfare (EW) operations. DEW, AW, RNM/RMI/EEG, and V2K are tactics being used on targets under anti-personnel execution. DEW and AW are purposed to cause physical injuries whereas the neurotechnological applications used under AI mass surveillance programs such as NRM/RMI/EEG cause psychological effects and pain. RNM Remote Neural Monitoring is used along with the EEG for cloning the neurostructures of the target. A heterodyne is a signal frequency that is generated by combining or mixing two other frequencies using a signal processing technique called heterodyning. Heterodyning is utilised to shift one frequency range into another, new frequency range, and is also involved in the processes of modulation and demodulation. Heterodyning and technology based on TMS (Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation) can be used for the synthetic telepathy. Neurotechnological implementation can be fatal in multiple ways it can drive the targeted to suicidal thoughts but it also has physical health effects that may weaken the body and immune system of the targeted in the long term fatally. V2K can also be produced in a multiple ways but one of the most sophisticated ones is as an AI computer software, developed to learn, which can communicate with the target in real-time and read their memory, thoughts and is able to manipulate targets psychologically and emotionally . The V2K can be used for behavior modification when the technology is based on a psychiatric medical technology called Neurofeedback – EEG Biofeedback. The software acts as an alternative roadmap for the brain (an AI software accesses brain waves emitted by the brain ie ELF waves) by harvesting brainwaves when the brain reacts negatively and the cloning this type of brain wave (ELF waves). V2K technology can be used to clone or mime different medical pathologies, including psychiatric ones. This is why many targets are diagnosed with Schizophrenia or other mental illness. When the use of mobile device emissions is introduced to affect a targeted brain we are in uncontrolable territory.
The operational implementation does not differ. The resonances are delivered from multifunctional radars (active electronically scanned array [AESA]) or antennas on any platform, also by using satellite targeting. Similar radar antennas are used in fighter jets. Networks similar to GWEN (Ground Wave Emergency Network) can be used to create EMPs. In DEW implementation the effect is based on transmitted high amplified energy pulses that cause pain or injuries, even fatalities. Physical obstacles may be overcome by maser technology. In the neurotechnological implementation, the impact is based on heterodyne which combines by intermodulation (two alternating signals, eg radio signals) to produce two or more signals having frequencies corresponding to the sum and the difference of the original frequencies that cause pain or the wanted effect in the target. Depending on the purpose there are custom-designed handheld platforms to be used inside buildings also. An electromagnetic field is created around the target to read the target’s biometrics and run them in a computer simulation in real-time that aims to clone and link the targeted brains. The computer program executes a chosen torture method for interrogation and behavior modification and to the targeted, the execution naturally appears entirely ruthless and cruel. This means the entire process is being automated [7, 9]. Also entire thought patterns, feelings, and images can be induced to the target . The concern in view of the future is whether the transmitting technology will be integrated with our handheld ICT technology and its infrastructure. The handheld mobile devices may already emit resonances below 100Hz that are closely linked to our biology.
DEW (directed energy weapons) can be broadly defined as systems that produce “a beam of concentrated electromagnetic energy or atomic or subatomic particles” which is used as a direct means to incapacitate, injure or kill people, or to incapacitate, degrade, damage or destroy objects . Execution by microwaves, lasers, masers and particles.
AW (acoustic weapons) Acoustic weapons aim to use the propagation of sound – a variation in pressure that travels through a fluid medium (such as air) to affect a target. Most of the acoustic weapons that have been speculated upon are based on either ultrasound (above 20 kilohertz, kHz),
low frequencies (below 100 hertz, Hz) or infrasound (below 20 Hz) deployed at high levels. The human range of hearing is commonly given as between 20 Hz and 20 kHz. In reality, the upper hearing-threshold frequency decreases significantly with age, whereas sounds with lower frequencies can be heard and otherwise perceived if the level is high enough.
We should not forget the ionosphere radar or over the horizon radar (“OTHR”) of which the most famous is the HAARP (The High-Frequency Active Auroral Research Program) which is capable of producing a very high amount of energy in beams and wanted resonance to exact locations at any time. Other nations have revealed their concern with regard to this. HAARP is located in Gakona, Alaska, and was developed by DARPA (Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency). Another OTHR is EISCAT in Longyearbyen, Norway which was originally designed by France, Germany, and the three Nordic countries (Norway, Sweden, and Finland). The Targets in Finland have seen evidence of weather modification as well as traces in the clouds as a marker of the use of OTHR and satellite co-ordination beaming. In view of the European Parliament Resolution on the Environment, Security and Foreign Policy from January 28, 1999, Nr.A4-005/99 art 30 states “Calls in particular for an international convention for a global ban on all research and development, whether military or civilian, which seeks to apply knowledge of the chemical, electrical, sound vibration or other functioning of the human brain to the development of weapons which might enable any form of manipulation of human beings, including a ban on any actual or possible deployment of such systems.” Is it a coincidence that the commonly operated facility has been set into a country that locates in Europe but is not a member of the EU?
When delivering resonances that imitate body functions a satellite becomes a very operative assistance and used seamlessly with the execution of OTHR. Especially for these radar systems, living human targets are a necessity to develop the operating systems, their accuracy, amount of energy directed, and before anything the psychological impact on the individual. A spontaneous EKG can potentially discover the operation whereas a planned scrutiny for healthcheck results in a pause in the execution of the beaming.
The entire multilayer strategy of implementation involves remote execution with satellites and OTHR, local operation by field operatives with a gangstalking element from ordinary local people hired from social media, as well as the utilisation of the ICT infrastructure via mobile devices and the mobile antenna infrastructure. The latter is controlled by software applications that are run within the network. A huge step forward in synthetic telepathy has been the introduction of nanotechnology which has greatly assisted the transportation of AI technology to human brains but also facilitated the access to brains from AI frameworks [34, 35].
“You’re either with us or against us in the fight against terror.”
– George W Bush on 6.11.2001
It is breathtaking how few politicians have understood the larger picture. The anti-terrorism movement by states is an agenda that allows the rights of citizens to be removed for the greater “good of the State” and therefore, a very unconstitutional movement. The strategy, however, was at first implemented by the Western coalition ’Five-Eyes’ to hijack the foreign and security policies of targeted nations, including the allies in the EU. The Western coalition finger-pointed allies saying there is a terroristic activity spotted within the population of the EU countries defining who is a terrorist and what is a terroristic act. Something the European leaders should quickly accomplish is figure out whether they have been treated as allies or subservients by Western Five Eyes coalition manufacturing targets and addressing to the EU member nations that they have citizens with terroristic tendencies (naturally artificial and false accusations) which in turn may be used to force the foreign and security policy of the EU member nations to remove reputational risk and potential risk of conflict. We quote a journalist from RT Neil Clark’s article on 25 Feb, 2021: ”The ‘War on Terror’ was based on a fundamental deceit. It was a deep state/neocon con trick. Not only was it a war that could never be won, it was never meant to be won. It was meant to be permanent.” Indeed, the idea of the anti-terrorism agenda is the declaration of war on those who beg to differ by opinion. There should be only one interpretation of the world events and no exception to the “Western” one is tolerated. The bully-tempered narrow-mindedness quite often leads to a point where sensible analysis is not conducted. There is no need to disagree to juxtapose.
The agenda is an imperialistic tool to force governments to operate similar foreign policies and line up with the West. To make the EU a participant in the War on Terror and bring the conflict onto the European soil. Originally terrorism has been an inconvenience of those nations practicing imperialistic and clumsy foreign policies intervening in the internal politics of other nations. Now, the EU is taking moral responsibility for this against better understanding.
We do not need conflict in the EU and our younger generations should be psychologically free of this type of liability.
There are several pillars to this operation. Strategies are linked to the technological advantage of the Western technology. Signing up as a user a nation agrees with certain conditions and integrates the operations. This happens for the sake of maintenance alone. For instance, for fighter jet fleets, which carry multifunctional radars, their maintenance and updating require a common technological strategy. States which purchase fighter jet fleets will be committed to one strategy due to the maintenance and development of the system. It is a deep integration of defense strategies.
Terrorism, serious crime, a national threat is used as the rationale to justify the manufacturing of the targets to European allies. Must say the manufacturing of the consent has been a bit careless not to forget the implementation. The Western military-intelligence complex coup has won the intelligence communities over by their advanced technology. An average American taxpayer supports the military industry to the extent that equals the cost of free healthcare. By creating suspects in each nation the Western coalition has been enabled to a) force the State to take care of the terrorism and b) offer the Government technology to be used in connection with this which in turn means more dollars for the military complex. Manufacturing targets is a trillion-dollar plan since their resources can be linked to develop AI. “The more brains you have collected in your pool the better AI you will be able to develop”.
Terrorism is indeed a very gloomy and poisonous projection to deliver to our next generation which has already been psychologically affected by the speech of terrorism constantly present in the MSM. We may not be able to estimate the damage caused but we could do something to stop building horrible scenarios. It is indeed recommended that this bellicose agenda is abandoned since the rest of the world, especially our new generation, do not wish to live under such a narrow-minded scenario. A return to international democracy is recommended.
What will the Governments do next to defend their position? It is apparent that so far some of the terroristic attacks in Western societies have been provoked if not financially and operationally supported by Western intelligence itself. We would not expect to see this level of governmental radicalism anymore. The strategy of governments will be to temporarily rate higher the threat of terrorism so that any criticism would not question their undertakings. The Western governments will put the curriculum vitae of their funded researchers (eg Magnus Ranstorp) against those who have been forced to independently investigate the field. This is to the benefit of the researchers since they strengthen their position and ego in supporting the idea of War on Terror. They market the war on behalf of terrorism. It is better to have war to cover the agenda than admit the imperialistic effort to control global population. This is a fight between David and Goliath and the Goliath owns the MSM (mainstream media). Also. the MSM is turned selectively towards other areas of interest.
War on Terror? Not exactly. The methodologies used to harness innocent individuals for something so evil as WMD targeting them are a crime against humanity. We must re-think the role of Western surveillance within society not alone the supervision and monitoring aspects. The execution appears as Robert Duncan (CIA officer and engineer) illustrates: ’It was a clever tactic used by the Germans in WWII to take people away slowly so no revolt occurred. As one CIA agent says, “The Nazis didn’t lose the war they just had to move.” It is not about the Jews now. It is something much more complex and evil’. One should hope the Covid-19 pandemic is not an agenda to enhance governmental control over individuals . Oh no, it is not. There is a chance that it is indeed a part of the very same operation to deliver access to brains of the population.
A senior officer J. Karsikas responsible for digitalisation in the Finnish Defence Forces states that considering super powers it is unlikely they would commit themselves in any regulation and ratify any international agreements in the development of AI . This is due to the fact that AI technologies may constitute the next strategic advantage.
What is the most disappointing aspect of the Electronic Warfare between superpowers, in which populations and individuals are constantly targeted by military technologies is that for these living targets who have become the instruments of global war, no government seems to have a social sector strategy? No civil defence strategy. Societies have created multimillion Euro plans to cover the infrastructure, but the civilian targets are left to die, not being overly dramatic. A meritocratic society is programmed to think there is something seriously wrong with these individuals which leads to isolation of the targeted individuals. That is as intimidating as is the implementation of WMDs. The lack of will to improve the lives and circumstances of the victims speaks thousands of words.
“Wanton killing of innocent civilians is terrorism, not a war against terrorism.” – Noam Chomsky
Electronic Warfare (EW) anti-personnel resonance-based applications that cause pain, suffering, even fatalities are being directed to civilians globally by means of energy- and psychological effects. The governments responsible for the implementation, under which the execution is operated, are utilizing at diversity of military platforms to conduct these operations based on the resonance spectrum. The “Torture Program” is based on the idea of using pain and suffering as a stimulant, an instrument of interrogation to cause a reaction in the targets. The operation is to intentionally cause pain and suffering in its targets for a prolonged period of time. Scientists are in opinion the technological implementation should be reviewed as a weapon of mass destruction. It is a technical legal aspect of international laws of human rights whether the operation should be viewed as a war crime. Execution of a technology that causes pain and suffering, even fatalities, in innocent civilians and bystanders, even children, is now left to supercomputers to run? We are seeing the evidencing of a phenomenon that reminds me in detail of the human experiments during the WWII conducted by Nazis. Even the public demonstrates similar ignorance and prejudice. It seems this psychological cycle repeats itself in human history when a part of the society comes to think of itself as “too invincible”. A result of meritocracy. It is imperative to acknowledge the vast increase in numbers of targeted civilians indicates a widespread attack on human rights.
The resonance spectrum-based technology that now abuses human targets had been developed to its full potential in the midst of the 1970s. The knowledge was kept tight in the military instead of considering civil applications. The War on Terror offered a suitable basis for an imperialistic global agenda and strategy of implementation. The mass surveillance neurotechnology is operated under the agenda of the Western coalition to force new order among states. Anti-terrorism as an agenda is an unconstitutional plan of the Western coalition not only to strengthen sovereign state power at the expense of human rights and democratic systems through surveillance and counter-terrorism laws but also to hijack the foreign and security policies of other nations. War naturally speeds military spending. And speaking of an entirely new niche of technologies the War on Terror is a blessing to the defense industries. The concept of war has been creatively introduced to legally eclipse human rights and democratic decision-making. The erosion of the Constitution is significant.
As for private citizens in terms of pain and suffering caused also their rights have been removed under the counter-terrorism and mass surveillance acts. Suspects do not have the rights of the accused since they will never be accused instead, they have been stripped of their civil rights complete families affected at once. Measures that were purposed as an exceptional and temporary tool to deal with emergencies are now used on an unlimited basis under surveillance laws. It is clear the aforementioned laws are abused to target innocent people. A significant majority of the targeted are not brought to courts of justice and officially accused due to the fact that they are not guilty. These people and their human rights are degraded once abandoned under technology-driven human experiments that remove entirely their privacy and domestic peace. The fact is that individuals’ free will and degree of autonomy are hugely affected. It is the question of a plan with multilayer agenda. It seems that the counter-terrorism and mass surveillance laws are used to manufacture candidates for the human experiment. The selection protocol is inhumane, unjust, unreasoned, and unaccountable. What a convenient tool for governments to root out and yet benefit from the physical existence of political opponents, whistleblowers, activists, or dissidents. At the same time, a significant element of opponents to the political power is being created.
The execution was based on the idea that the targeted would not organize themselves and see through the plan. Now the life cycle of this agenda is different. It is indeed imperative to increase public awareness on the ongoing torture to impact on the life cycle. No totalitarian method can tolerate public awareness as European history points out.
The War on Terror has been successfully used as an extension of the imperialistic foreign policy of foreign nations to destabilize the peace in Europe and the seed of war has been implanted in the soil of the EU. We European citizens do not approve of the War or Terror on European soil. Citizens do find it difficult to believe that European leaders who were supposed to look after the civil rights and peace in Europe are taking a role in such an imperialistic agenda. We expect the EU to be built upon the idea of democracy that guarantees equal rights to everyone. It has been a result of ignorance, shortsightedness, and poor judgment that this sort of plan has gone past our due diligence processes impacting greatly on the future beliefs of young generations who are at the core of well being of any nation.
Making Torture legal is a very questionable agenda. We suggest an urgent review of surveillance laws as well as counter-terrorism laws. The laws have now been used as a punitive measure allowing unequal and inhumane treatment and abuse of civilians by the governments and an underpinning of sovereign state power. The laws have become a formidable weapon of repression. An intelligence law should not only protect citizens against terrorism but also against the State. The modern holocaust has revealed significant weaknesses in our societies. Lawmakers, law practitioners, and politicians, even human rights activists poorly understand the technologies being approved for use on citizens for a prolonged period of time. The role and the strategies of intelligence function in societies European wide should be revisited and some consistency introduced. Military and intelligence functions in eroded society are meant to represent a marginal mechanism, but not the role of the decision-maker. It seems there is a psychological cycle in the collective consciousness of humanity, the need to repeat the pattern of pain and suffering. Perhaps the revised agenda could take a sustainable look to raise the standards of performance we all need to evidence and take part in for the mental growth of the human society. We would choose “trust” among people instead of synthetic telepathy that indeed demonstrates the opposite.
The new generation is experiencing the world as a threatful place today. Continuous airtime on news of terrorism by MSM creates psychological expectations that will last decades. The citizen’s belief in the future is constantly heavily impacted. There are so many areas in society that require improvement that the civilization hardly has time to handle them if crises similar to the War on Terror are intentionally created. I think there might be confusion on where the civilization is going from here. It seems politicians are lost on their way. It is known that beliefs in the future is directly correlated with the well-being and prosperity of national economies. Should the beliefs be a little more positive than they are? One should think the War on Terror hardly is an agenda for a nation looking for well-being to follow. Europeans do not wish to bring the War on Terror to European soil. Therefore, the message for the politicians goes accordingly in terms of foreign and security policies.
The EU should develop its independent defense, especially in terms of technologies, to reduce its dependence on NATO and the Western military-intelligence complex. Therefore the military spending and exercises internally should be coordinated. The EU should seriously review its relation to Western allies, to determine whether the role of European allies is viewed as subservient. The abuse of intelligence operations and aggression in foreign politics that do not respect sovereign EU member nation decision-making as well as the dynamics of ongoing confrontation among powers have taken so many years.
It is apparent the EU has chosen a homeland security strategy that confronts its human rights agenda. Mass surveillance and counter-terrorism laws should be reviewed from the European perspective alone and not as an ally to someone with an imperialistic agenda. The security strategy and following surveillance laws are a result of a poor understanding of Electronic Warfare and its technologies. It would be to the benefit of European democracy to drop the ignorance and bring to the table the representatives of the targeted so that all aspects are indeed understood.
SOME SUGGESTED ELEMENTS FOR A PLAN TO MAKE PROGRESS:
What should be done to prevent the abuse of innocent victims:
1. Increasing awareness of the public of the cybernetic abuse and means of Electronic Warfare being tested on civilians is at the core of tackling the crime against humanity.
2. Breaking the ignorance. It is imperative that the viewpoint and experiences of the targeted must not be ignored or bypassed since understanding the perspective of victims allows for democratic decision making. The victims should be permitted to offer consultation and expertise, the perspective of the targeted to law- and decision-makers for the creation of appropriate EU legislation to protect civil citizens from covert cybernetic crimes and other Electronic Warfare applications.
3. Organisation of the resources. In order to defend the civil rights of the targeted and support the targeted, a global organization should be created which would set up a representation globally for human rights and could enhance “best practices for the establishment of clear ethical boundaries to strictly regulate the use of cyber systems enabling the manipulation and control of human beings” .
To be clear, a), no torture should be tolerated, and both torture and “no-touch torture” protocols should NOT be allowed as an interrogation tactic even though “neuro-surveillance” for purposes of safeguarding national security may be intended; b), Surveillance permission- granting process should be adequately and closely monitored. Mass surveillance of innocent citizens should not be allowed; c) The intel gathered in any possible surveillance method should not be misused and only used in the form it has been approved by court. We may need to allow surveillance but no method of neuro-surveillance or bio-surveillance should use targeted pain or pain at all as a catalyst. Also, the surveillance, of whatever kind, should be limited to a 6-month period with renewal permissions significantly tightened to say only 15% of the applications for renewals, firmly overseen, and with detailed, documented reports delineating reasons for applied renewals, which can be audited, overseen, and withdrawn at any time; d) Human rights auditors from outside Intelligence and Security agencies need to be involved in the continuous monitoring and auditing process, to prevent abuse and torture of targets, as we have now; e) No covered experimentation using pain and torture techniques as “sources and methods” of gathering information, as for instance, the US intelligence community , and other intelligence agencies and militaries are currently doing, under classified cover, to prevent scrutiny of their torture for neural network mapping and neuro behavior modification. What should be allowed instead are strict protocols, regulation, and monitoring of the intelligence community in place as well as surveillance laws that are consistent globally, and the intelligence community held responsible for potential misconduct.
Global consistence in surveillance laws, country-specific regulations, supervision, and monitoring as well as civil channels for reporting potential misconduct is a good start. What is the problem in the US as K Shipp and W Binney [10, 11] indicate, is that the intelligence community may not observe the law, i.e., there is a constitutional conflict since secrecy and classification are currently being used to classify and conceal extreme crime against humanity and actual torture and assassination of human beings.
The message to the governments is to support democracy and avoid planting foreign agendas against democracy to the European audiences. The concern relates to the younger generation which have been entirely forgotten with the anti-terrorism . There is no excuse for bullying civilians and taxpayers since it seems that the EU has increasingly plans for common taxation. No threat exists on this planet that justifies harming and torturing civilians.No collective rationale would speak for the torture without the consent and permission for the implementation. What has been done to civilians on the watch of governments is unforgivable.It is apparent that the administrations involved, have had a need to identify from a worst-case scenario, even though they could afford to see democracy and citizens as a positive reserve and potential, not as a threat.
The targeted individuals are put through a spectrum of social, medical, legal, financial and professional discrimination in their societies. Since the victims or their relatives do not receive the redress, reparation, and rehabilitation they are entitled to under international law (A/73/207) there are some important measures the UN could take to reduce that ’accountability gap’ and to improve the position of the targeted civilians. Perhaps one of the most important measures is to implement pressure on the local governments by holding them responsible to 1) investigate the reported torture and other cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment or punishment by the law enforcement. Currently, the police systematically ignores the reports of these crimes and in an unprofessional manner suggest mental health problems for those reporting their findings to the police. Also, healthcare should be put responsible to 2) guarantee access to healthcare to receive the redress, reparation, and rehabilitation of victims. 3) Compensations on the targeted civilians should be paid to ensure they are able to return to normal life. The first step, however, would be to request the governments to recognise the issue of targeted individuals. The governments should be requested to prepare a statement in view of this matter. These people should be made to once more become socially accepted and full members of the societies. There should be a program available for the rehabilitation of these individuals where consultation and support would be available for each of them. When a government fails to implement basic standards of living for these individuals, they should be submitted a candidate for the Universal Periodic Review protocol (UPR) for the following decade to follow up their progress. The UPR mechanism should be started by each government to reach a common view and statement on the recognition of the issue. The status of each government should be reported annually and compared to the quality of issues and the number of reports received from targeted individuals. Reputational risk should be made obvious to steer some of the governments. Where no progress had been visible the governments could be made legally responsible for the violation of civil rights in the Court of Human Rights globally and the targets should be entitled to compensations. Indeed, a creation of political, legal, financial, and reputational risks to balance the enthusiasm to participate in the aggressive military resonance programs would be advisable.
(1) TARGETING PEOPLE – ARTICLE36.ORG – Key issues in the regulation of autonomous weapons systems, Convention on Conventional Weapons (CCW) Geneva, November 2019
(2) ACOUSTIC WEAPONS – ARTICLE36.ORG – Discussion paper for the Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons (CCW) Geneva, November 2018
(3) DIRECTED ENERGY WEAPONS – ARTICLE36.ORG – Discussion paper for the Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons (CCW) Geneva, November 2017
(4) TARGETED USE OF DEW MILITARY TECHNOLOGY APPLICATIONS (THAT CAUSE FATAL OR SERIOUS INJURIES AS WELL AS SERIOUS PAIN AND SUFFERING FOR INHUMANLY EXTENSIVE PERIODS OF TIME) TO CIVILIANS IN FINLAND – OHCHR SUBMISSION 08.2020 – V. Hellberg
(5) INTERNATIONAL TORTURE PROGRAM MANIFESTED UNDER ANTI-TERRORISM LAWS WITHHOLDS LEGAL PROTECTION AND CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS FROM ITS
TARGETS? – TECHNOLOGY TESTED ON CIVILIANS 09.2020 – V. Hellberg
(6) Barry Trower – Microwave Warfare
(7) Robert Duncan – Neuropsychological and electronic “no-touch torture”. The spectrum of ‘interrogation” and torture techniques used by the US and its allies
(8) The Verge – The EU is considering a ban on AI for mass surveillance and social credit scores
(35) An Implantable Wireless Network of Distributed Microscale Sensors for Neural Applications: Jihun Lee; Ethan Mok; Jiannan Huang; Lingxiao Cui; Ah-Hyoung Lee; Vincent Leung; Patrick Mercier; Steven Shellhammer; Lawrence Larson; Peter Asbeck; Ramesh Rao; Yoon-Kyu – 2019 9th International IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering (NER)
(36) Control the money, control the media: How government uses funding to keep media in line – Marius Dragomir, Center for Media, Data and Society (CMDS), School of Public Policy, Central European University
CORRESPONDENCE TO THE EU COMMISSION
The UN Convention against torture was signed by nations, many of them only partially, on 10.12.1984. Since that time the world has changed significantly in terms of torture. What the EU intends to do with common legislation on torture? A very timely matter.
What the EU Commission intends to do by the fact that the EU strategy for homeland security is in conflict with its policies for human rights?
The coercive measures of law enforcement of western countries are based on resonance methodologies such as electronic warfare anti-personnel technologies DEW, AW, RNM, EEG, V2K, etc. The usage of this technology at times politically orientated, or the usage is not adequately justified, and is questionable, strongly mitigating human rights or constitutional rights let alone moral aspects. This is because i) the technology produces a spectrum of pain in the target (and injuries of which some fatal), ii) sleep deprivation in long term preventing full participation to the society, iii) the technology is being directed towards civilians (Genova Convention), iv) the technology is being utilized without the permit or consent of the targeted person (Nurnberg Treaty), v) the operations lean on self-supervision and monitoring to the extent the human rights aspects are not being considered appropriately (no measures on corruption), vi) the technology is being directed to people inhumanly while asleep and vii) towards bystanders (especially children while also asleep disturbing their sleep and causing them pain), viii) the technology is being directed to homes of the targeted citizens (constitutional rights for privacy, domestic peace, etc), ix) the period the technologies are being implemented to targets is matter-of-factly inhuman, reportedly from decade up to 30 years (in which time most of the targets are forced outside of their societies and health, social structure, career, and families have been destroyed), x) the technology may cause fatal injuries that are impossible to trace back to the usage of this technology and xi) torture, which by definition the use of this methodology fulfills, hardly is an argumentable solution. Finally, xii) targets do not possess constitutional rights, nor legal protection from practitioner since it is with the significant likelihood the local or other government. In addition, xiii) law enforcement and healthcare have been instructed to deny the matter. Local regulators, political power, legislators, and courts approving the use are not aware of these aspects due to the fact that the military traditionally has been the only instance with this knowledge. The intelligence community has gained an imbalanced position with this tech and now abuses it in each member country. Also, justice system is becoming addicted to this tech. W Binney quite correctly points out concern about democracy, human rights, constitution, and legal protection of our citizens in the following: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xF_VYNtDgN8&t=441s
What the EU intends to do in view of human rights in Europe?
Most of the member nations do not have legislation on torture, they rely on the UN convention from 1984. For instance, in the case of Finland, this convention is only partially recognized (article 21 paragraph 1 and 22 paragraph 1).
The security strategy strongly relies on technologies of which use conflicts with human rights and the EU policy for HR. These have a significant impact on 1) democracies, 2) corrosion on constitutional rights and 3) confidence in the future which in turn defines the development of wellbeing in any nation. The security strategy supports electronic warfare (EW) anti-personnel resonance methodologies. These are being proposed as a surveillance tech by the intelligence community and defense forces who do not reveal these technologies have the capacity to cause pain, suffering, and fatalities (Resolution on the Environment, Security and Foreign Policy from January 28, 1999, Nr.A4-005/99) and the capacity is in heavy use and not supervised, controlled properly. The national supervision and control mechanisms are not sufficient. The massive and growing audience of TI (targeted individuals) is a remarkable sign of this issue.
The technology is being supported by the western agenda for anti-terrorism and benefits the defense industry. Why would the EU cast this type of future for itself? There is an interesting phenomenon ongoing in western societies. The intelligence community has been allowed to step up and guide societies. A function that has been purposed to a marginal mechanism within the society now manufactures the consent.
The resonance technology provides the intelligence community and defense function a role during the time of peace that conflicts with the idea of democracy. These instances appear to paint pictures of horror to advance their agenda under national security, threats and crisis constantly to argue stronger participation within the society. A good example of this is the agenda of anti-terrorism that defines the form of society today. We lay an artificial threat to our younger generation. The confidence for the future of the new generation is being tested with the current threats created by geopolitical agendas and the birth rate has sunken significantly in many societies. Why would a society inflict upon itself such a curse?
Does the EU understand that by buying the idea of the threat of terrorism it accepts the idea of the ‘war on terror’ and casts it to Europe? We must remember that terrorism has been defined by the ’west’ and the recent issue may be seen as a result of heavy-handed foreign policy, poor diplomacy of nations from past decades that refer to themselves as the empire. By accepting the idea of the war on terrorism we accept the war is in Europe. As citizens of the EU we are looking for a less gloomy picture for the future and rather would identify from positive models of the future. The human mind operates from the level it identifies. We should do better than this.
How does the EU intend to do to control surveillance activities in the EU?
There is a lack of consistency in surveillance laws among the EU nations. When a surveillance law of a member nation prevents e.g. use of RNM/RMI (remote neuromonitoring/remote mind imaging) towards its citizen the intelligence community turns to the nation where the use of the technologies is allowed. The intelligence community serves each other thus the rights of a citizen or legal protection does not hold anymore. The ruling is awaited that prevents where forbidden technology in one country is being used from another to target civilians. The EU would benefit from resonance-free zones. Social media: Reading an individual’s social media communication private of nature the intelligence community from Finland may turn to Swedish intelligence who is a member of ’nine eyes’ and has access to XkeyScore.
The US intelligence services have become desirable among the European intelligence community due to the technological advantage but also by US anti-constitutional approach their strategy to enhance the sovereign rights by the cost of civilians. A part of the imperialistic agenda is to create security concerns that overrule any rights of citizens and also underpin the position of intelligence communities in democracy. The US has won the European intelligence community on their side by integrating the individual intelligence services by technology that also defines the strategy for the user. In the anti-terrorism agenda, the US hijacks security and foreign policies by defining who is a terrorist and what is a terroristic act. Since a nation identifies from the frame it is given why provide the EU with a gloomy pic? Mass surveillance laws to consider seriously the aspect from resonance technologies, AI, robotics, neuroscience (https://lbry.tv/@RamolaDReports:8/Invasive-Neurotech-True-Neuroethics—Panel-2:e). Fighter jet fleets use EMP to target citizens without their permit or concent torturing civilians with multifunctional radars and manipulating their biometrics.
In Finland, the constitution was amended to provide intelligence service power and tools to operate. The community is asking for more eg allowing trespassing. An analysis was completed from the perspective of resonance technologies why this should not be allowed. Civilians are targeted by military tech to their homes, bystanders, even babies, and children intentionally produced pain, suffering, and even fatal injuries. The big picture indicates absolutely no reason other than the paranoia and profile rise effort by the intelligence service why such powerful tools should be allowed. No legal protection for targets to rely on, constitutional rights, or human rights not respected. The international rights of the accused are being orbited by presenting the target as a suspect. The targets are manufactured to test the ultimate control over an individual. Trust is gone. Testing periods are inhumane.
How are the EU law enforcement agencies regulated, monitored? How does the EU inland security strategy recognize the fact that resonance-based mass surveillance systems (RNM, EEG, RMI) are being targeted to civilians? How common is the knowledge that these cause pain, suffering, psychological trauma even fatal injuries in their targets, bystanders, civilians, even babies, and children? Is it known the execution is careless? How are the individuals chosen for these ’torture programs’? What principles are being met to prevent politically-minded targeting? How does the EU recognize the rights of suspects since there are no rights similar to the rights of the accused? How are the periods of targeting regulated? A large number of govt agencies, also from foreign communities, have access to these programs. Torturing is illegal by law in most EU nations and against human rights, constitutional rights. No legal protection for citizens exists against this crime against humanity. Operations are run by the national military agencies thus, can be defined as a war crime. How the EU intends to root out the problem of torture by state agencies and private sector partners foreign intelligence community? A good memory of the operation ’rendition flights’, that had no legal ground, of which distant cousin this operation is. What the EU intends to do to improve the approach of national law enforcement and healthcare systems to the targets of resonance technologies (government-directed mass surveillance protocol that cause pain and psychological trauma) that clearly degrade their rights? How is the legal protection of these citizens improved? Are these people still degraded and treated as mentally ill in front of police or healthcare? What an uncivilized, backward, and inhumane approach. How is the idea of democracy with this implementation?
Having made myself familiar with the SOCTA 2021 report among other reports it seems the Europol does not make a note of such a problem at all albeit the headcount of targeted civilians is piling up. Pretending such a problem does not exist? The global market reports as well as the manufacturers’ technological guides, scientific articles, etc confirm electronic warfare anti-personnel technology is based on military multifunctional radars and signal tech soon to be operated from ICT framework and indeed, operated by the military. An issue of a war crime? Are we really doing this? Pretending that there is no problem and allowing the extrajudicial purge similar to the holocaust ongo at the EU watch? Even though human rights, the constitutional rights are severely and violently attacked there is no word on the phenomenon of targeted civilians? Individuals, someones’ children, are targeted without consequence, perhaps overlapping. Targets do not have rights, no legal protection. Since the technology in question is operated as an extension of political decision-making as a punitive instrument. We will never know who is going to be the next target. No status will bring a shield in the future.
Is that due to fact that it is the law enforcement and intelligence community in the EU who are targeting civilians with military equipment electromagnetic pulses that cause pain, suffering, and fatal injuries as well as psychological trauma? We have a serious concern since the EU’s strategy for homeland security conflicts with the strategy for human rights.
As Finnish citizens, we experience it difficult to reach information from officials in Finland on our rights and therefore we approach the Commission for this matter.
In 1995 Joseph Biden introduced a bill called the Omnibus Counterterrorism Act of 1995. It previewed the 2001 Patriot Act by 1) allowing secret evidence to be used in prosecutions, 2) expanding the Foreign Intelligence Act and wiretap laws, 3) creating a new federal crime of ’terrorism’ that could be invoked based on political beliefs, permitting the US military to the used in civilian law enforcement, and allowing permanent detection of non-US citizens without judicial review.
The Center for National Security Studies commented the bill would erode ’constitutional and statutory due process protections’ and would ’authorise the Justice Dept to pick and choose crimes to investigate and prosecute based on political beliefs and associations’.
We share the concerns addressed and would urge to review the rights of the accused and suspects of serious crime or terrorism in Finland. It seems the rights of the accused have been degraded and the legal protection of suspects has been eroded similar to their constitutional rights. Coercive measures such as neurotech applications (RNM/RMI) cause pain, suffering, likely fatalities are being misused and directed to homes of investigated for long periods of time.
Who overviews the methodologies of coercive measures? Who supervises the technology is being used correctly? How is the ethical aspect present when technology is being chosen? There is no adequate control.
To what extent it is permitted in the EU (Finland) to benefit materials in a prosecution that a) has been obtained by coercive measures b) that is classified (the accused has no chance to verify the material nor defend themselves against it)?
To what extent are neurotech applications being used in courts? To what extent the technology steers the decision-making of judges? It seems the accused has the role of the bystander in their trial.
The permission-granting process is not controlled properly. To what extent the evidence to open a secret investigation is being verified and examined by the district court of Helsinki? How political or personal interests of investigation are prevented? Coercive measures are used to manufacture state will. The state interest as an investigator is to make the suspect appear guilty or question their integrity, crecitability, and the suspect does not have the position to defend themselves in the process. To convict a terrorist suspect of a felony of any kind reduces the impact of miscalculation or political ambition by the state. There is evidence of implantable devices injected into the bodies of citizens without their permit producing agony and pain. The current correct practice of investigation is not so much to seek the truth that it is to degrade an individual.
JUDICAL SYSTEM AND DEMOCRACY IN FINLAND
The rights of the accused are not self-evident today. In practice, the burden of proof is often shifted to the accused. The accused is granted a chance to make himself heard albeit this rule is being broadly violated. A significant moral dilemma exists also in the access of the accused to counsel. Whilst compensated in quality it is allowed at a good rate in the national courts. Whereas trial above the national judicial system, at the time when legal process often becomes the case of state integrity, no assistance is granted anymore. This remarkably reduces the number of processes reaching the ECtHR and limits the possibility of discovery of potential malpractice of the national judicial system. White collars should follow ethical practices which highlight fairness and equality. The relation of the police and prosecutor seems to put the values to the test(pre-trial). Instead of justice, the national court appears to deliver the ’will of the State in relation to the accused’.
The counter-terrorism laws are used against democracy. Suspects do not have rights nor legal protection against coercive measures. The accused have rights, the rights of the accused. Very few are ever being accused.
Coercive measures are being abused with the assistance of the court and target suspects for an inhumanly long period of time with investigation methodologies that cause pain, suffering, and even fatalities to the targets or family members, even babies. During this time the suspect does not have proper legal protection, even constitutional rights are removed by the execution.
Neuropsychological and remote electronic ’no-touch torture’ applications used under coercive measures compromise heavily human rights and are thought of as WMD by its engineers. Since there is no adequate fair inspection in place suspects are abused during investigations likely for wrong reasons. Counter-measures are being used to manufacture trials directed against the suspect by State or individuals advised to do so. This tactic guarantees further investigation permitted. The accused should never be found guilty on the basis of evidence that has not been brought to light and examined by the accused. The evidence is not presented to the accused to ward coercive measures.
There have been several serious incidents that indicate deep structured corruption of critical infrastructure of Govt institutions under the monitoring of the Parliament. Inadequate supervision has become a significant problem. The role of the political power as the inspector raises many questions of which the least important is not ’whether Finland should have its Constitutional court?’. Although ’professional judges must have a higher university degree in law’ it does not prevent corruption especially since the judicial system is ’independent’. A mature member of society understands, by human nature this is impossible. The judicial system does not seem to convince the citizens anymore.
What mechanisms the EU has to evaluate the level of democracy in member nations? Democracies to be re-evaluated.
How does the EU regulate, overview or monitor the preparation of counter-terrorism and surveillance laws by member states? How is the consistency of the laws being monitored between the nations? How do civil rights and legal protection survive in these circumstances?
By observation, globally ‘the war on terror’ seems to underpin the sovereign power at the expense of civil rights. We have a constant dilemma on how the ‘act of terror’ is being defined and how it has been communicated to the citizen. Similarly, we do have a problem by definition with what may trigger the need for surveillance over an individual. A matter of interpretation is not good enough? In practice, some crimes or anti-social behavior now turn into an ‘act of terror’ by definition or interpretation? Citizens may not even understand their commitment to an act of terror or being a part of a society of which status is turned to be suspected of terroristic activity by the administration. Grey lines everywhere. It seems politicians have created an extrajudicial tool to ensure sovereign access to ultimate power over the citizen. Why the ultimate control?
How are the surveillance technologies and methods overviewed? How are the periods of surveillance regulated by law and human rights? There has been a vast increase of reports coercive measures are indeed producing pain, suffering, and even fatal injuries. The suspects are receiving rough treatment over prolonged periods of time but never accused.
“Although the idea of temporality is not expressed in the derogation provisions of the ICCPR or the European Human Rights Convention, it has been understood to have been implied by the notion of emergency. According to the U.N. Human Rights Committee, article four of the ICCPR requires that “measures derogating from the provisions of the Covenant . . . be of an exceptional and temporary nature”” – “Informal” Suspencion of Normal Processes: The “WAR ON TERROR” as an Autoimmunity Crisis by A. ADDIS, Boston University Law Review.
How is this informality being monitored? How is it supervised no coercive measure or interrogation method consist of an element of torture, cause pain or suffering in the targeted? By observation, most of the suspects will never be accused. Is it possible that being a target of coercive measures is a worse option than imprisonment? How are the rights and legal protection of suspects ensured? We have still countries where even the rights of the accused materialize poorly.
Every question addressed here points to a system error. The ultimate cost is borne by the citizen. We have totalitarian states disguised as democracies. It is the culture of execution and power balance, the relationship between the citizen and the administration. We must measure these things to correct them.
The supervision of the Finnish police relies on internal self-supervision. Recently, there have been a number of court cases questioning the integrity of the entire National Bureau of Investigation. How does the sole internal monitoring compare among the European peer group? By observation of the public reports, news, and personal experience there is a need for a European authority for investigation of police practices to improve and support the moral standards. An external unit, in particular.
The police would not investigate reports of electronic warfare attacks targeting citizens. This has been addressed to the National Police Commissioner Seppo Kolehmainen. No response has been received. Whether this is rather a matter of national security, the activity may continue uninterrupted and the targeted civilians suffer pain, psychological illnesses, even fatalities. On many occasions, the police have reportedly annulled and questioned the mental health of citizens who have requested an investigation on their constant concern. There are reports some individuals have been taken to mental institutions or mental evaluation by force while others proposed to visit their therapist or doctor suggesting an issue with mental health. Kolehmainen has been addressed. No response has been received. Police do not possess the capability to assess the mental health of an individual. What sort of guidance has been given to police in view of this vastly growing issue?How the citizen reporting DEW and resonance attacks should be minded according to police, whether the practice is indeed consistent with this?
The emergency services in Finland are operated by Emergency Response Centres managed by the Ministry of the Interior in cooperation with the Ministry of Social Affairs and Health ie the police and healthcare functions. We would like to understand what sort of guidance there is given to the police and healthcare in terms of individuals who suffer the symptoms of electromagnetic attacks?
The permission granting process for police’s coercive measures by the District Court of Helsinki, in particular, requires monitoring. Since the judges do not know the individuals whose surveillance is on the table the decisions are made on an application basis. How is this process monitored externally? How many times an extension on an existing permission can be granted? How is it controlled the coercive measures are not being used for business, political or personal interests? How is the resilience of individual police officers and the judges, in particular, is being monitored in terms of corruption?
The Finnish police maintain formal and informal databases of citizens, involving profiles of them. This information is not available to the citizen by data access request. Is informal reporting used in cross-governmental communication?
Reports exist the NBI maintains a form of co-operation with the equivalent of Russia. Is this co-operation is indeed approved and formal?
When did it become okay for the US Government to condone and permit Torture of the citizenry?
When did it become okay to put people on Kill Lists and Torture-Until-Death lists–that FOIA requests will not divulge?
When did it become okay to use Predator drones to shoot-to-kill Americans–with Radio Frequency Weapons–inside America?
When did it become okay to surround people with satellites and send High-Powered Microwave Weapon pulse shots into people’s heads, chests, faces — because they are engaging in truth-telling activities potentially harmful to the careers of corrupt local government or other personnel?
When did it become okay to randomly label people terrorists and stick them on lists, then sell them to US Air Force and US Navy and other Dept. of Defense Field Weapons Testing contracts so they could be pounded with heat bombs from subdural Nanotech and Pulsed Energy Projectiles directed at them any ole time of day or night?
(Among other horrors, that is: such as being burned and blistered with microwave weapons, milliwave weapons, lasers, masers, RF signals sent to covertly-implanted RFIDs, MEMs, NEMs, WBANs.)
When did it become okay to burn people alive in their beds, wake them up continuously at night with specific Radio Frequencies sent to their brains at night–to keep them from REM sleep–which is essentially SLEEP DEPRIVATION, a classic component of Torture as we all understand it?
When did it become okay to needle people remotely from a distance with flicks of military tracking radar–on all parts of their bodies, including their private parts?
When did it become okay to do remote EEGs on people’s heads, send remote electroshocks and remote electro-vibrations to their spines or other body parts?
When did it become okay to send Voice to Skull and the constant, abusive chatterboxing and abuse from HIVE-MINDED MORONS into someone’s skull–to keep them from living their lives in peace?
When did it become okay to test out a whole bunch of nasty, invasive, amoral, unethical, barbaric Brain Assaultive Technology on people–calling it Surveillance, calling it Monitoring, calling it Prevention of whatever latest flavor of “Threat” or “Terrorism” the Covert Ops agencies are concocting as Cover for their evil technology-creation–which no scientist with even one ethical bone in their bodies would permit the creation of?
The fact is, Surveillance Targeting today has opened the door to clear-cut Torture. People are being tortured. This is not something to sit back and look askance at. This is a HUMAN RIGHTS CRISIS, and every single human being on this planet should be waking up and paying attention and asking what we each can do to stop this monstrous outrage NOW.
Please join Dr. Millicent Black and myself today live on my YouTube channel at 12 noon EST as we open our Study Sessions on Targeting as Torture. We are aware Targeting is only the FIRST STEP; what happens after people are randomly listed is a PLETHORA OF ABUSIVE ASSAULT which includes trafficking into covered projects of medical experimentation, social engineering experimentation, DOD/CIA weapons-testing, Torture Club programs–all of them ILLEGAL from the get-go.
The Legal Departments at the US Air Force, Navy, Marine Corps, CIA/NSA, and Defense contractors like Lockheed Martin and General Dynamics may kid themselves they are engaging in Legal Endeavor, but the listing of absolutely innocent people as terrorists and criminals is ILLEGAL—that is the FIRST STEP, and they are engaging in ILLEGAL ASSAULT on these people from the get-go. Torture is also absolutely and unequivocally ILLEGAL.
Let me spell it out: The US Government–in all its Intelligence and Security agencies, Fusion Centers–and State, City, County Governments, and Military/Air Force/Navy Divisions running RF/Electronic/Neuro/DEW weapons tests on people inside the USA and worldwide–is engaging in both extremely ILLEGAL activity, as well as activity which is EXTREMELY VIOLATIVE AND ABUSIVE OF HUMAN RIGHTS. All this, under the cover of “SURVEILLANCE.”
Dr. Millicent Black is a whistleblower on the insidious, stealthy, and extremely pernicious use of Brain Computer Interfaces in Domestic Violence and Torture–this was a focus of her dissertation as she completed her doctorate in Christian Education, a subject we talked about in her Interviews with Changemakers interview:
What Dr. Black is reporting today in her own case–as she whistleblows on how Brains and Bodies are being hacked today, and how local Government is sitting back and letting it happen, to say the least–is nothing less than Torture: please read her story here:
I will continue to publish here and report continuously on the Surveillance-Cover Torture Activities being run today worldwide by the US and Global Gestapo using secretive Weapons-Testing and Non-Consensual Experimentation contracts, as more and more people’s stories surface. To understand the entire horrific landscape further, please join us in our live video Study Sessions.
The intention of all this open discussion and exposure–in tandem with the efforts of all others in this country and worldwide–is most definitely the shutting down of these nefarious experimentation and weapons-testing programs–which are stripping all basic human and civil rights from human beings–and the absolute banning of these terrible and barbarically inhumane weapons (Anti-Personnel EMF/Neuro/DEWs).
–Ramola D/Nov 6, 2018
And here is Episode 1:
Dr. Millicent Black and Ramola D discuss the similarities between Surveillance Targeting and plain old Classic Torture as we open this new podcast series which intends to study extant Reports on Torture from human rights groups, histories of non-consensual experimentation and torture inflicted on civilians and soldiers by the US Department of Defense as well as the CIA, and the current US and International Laws, Treaties, and Conventions against torture. We will also discuss Informed Consent and waivers, loopholes, and weaselly ways in which the DOD and other Fed agencies have succeeded in distorting the Common Rule to their purposes, so as to permit experimentation without consent on Americans.
In this episode, we discussed the US Code definition of Torture, and briefly discussed the Clinton Apology to Tuskegee victims more than 50 years after the fact, the Presidential Bioethical Commission findings re. the Guatemalan victims of US experiments, and the selfsame failed Bioethical Commission hearings wherein hundreds of MIC victims aka “targeted individuals” stepped forward to report non-consensual experimentation on their bodies and brains and were cruelly and callously dismissed by Amy Gutmann’s whitewash committee as needing to refer their claims to the Justice Department. (Which, when victims report energy weapon assault, also cruelly dismisses them as delusional and paranoid and needing neuroleptics, an entrenched Catch 22 strategy designed to silence victims, shut down society, and keep on victimizing MIC victims. This is the sorry state of affairs in the US today.)
The US-Europe Joint Investigation Team is pleased and proud to stand right by key member, key American whistleblower, and former NSA Intelligence Analyst Karen Melton-Stewart‘s side in this critically important and profoundly thought-out, acute, and well-referenced address she has penned to American Law Enforcement, in particular personnel from Police Departments and Sheriffs’ offices. Karen Stewart offers this address as a flyer, much in line with the other brilliant flyers she has been pumping out on a regular basis, some of which can be found here, at Flyers for Public Education, and encourages all to print out and spread this address far and wide, most especially to all police in America.
In all takeovers of nations, no doubt the police contingent is colonized early. Many of us know, simply looking at the state of affairs in the USA today, and in particular at how the police are behaving, in both inner cities and outer suburbs, in predominantly white neighborhoods and predominantly black or diversely-populated neighborhoods, that absolutely inexplicable and execrable behaviors have been unleashed on communities by Law Enforcement under complacent cover of the “need for increased scrutiny” self-permitted to the bulldozing, biometric behemoth of the Surveillance State, always touting terrorism and National Security as rationale.
What is less known to most however, by way of controlled mainstream media publishing deception, lies, and propaganda, and alternative media standing apart in reluctance to touch, is the fact that worse has been going on for nearly two decades now, ever since 9/11. Terrorist watchlists have been grossly inflated, communities have been silenced with lies, and EMF/neuroweapons or DEWs (Directed Energy Weapons) have been rolled out en masse all across the USA, bringing carcinogenic physical Radiation Surveillance, terminal non-consensual neuro-experimentation, and terminal weapons-testing, replete with “Bio Behavioral Research,” courtesy covert Civilian-Military Operations and Military/Intelligence hubris to neighborhoods. In all cases, no terrorists are being surveilled and monitored and attacked with stealth radiation weapons, but outstanding, moral, community-minded Americans, journalists, whistleblowers, and activists who exhibit leadership qualities, speak out about corruption, or simply speak their minds.
In this address, Karen brings the question down into succinctly American terms: Do American police not recognize what they are doing to the USA? Do they not realize they are flouting the protections of American law, in addition to basic human understandings of human rights and civil liberties? With righteous indignation she notes:
“The early 21st Century will be regarded as the Dark Ages of SHAMEFUL law enforcement BETRAYAL, when it ALLOWED hundreds of thousands of innocent people to be tortured and murderedunder their noses. Now, ARE you an OATH KEEPER and PATRIOT who supports the PRINCIPLES UPON WHICH our country was FOUNDED? Or are you a thug for the New World Order, which invaded, infiltrated, and usurped the US government in order to commit genocide – with your passive and active help? Are you the watchmen who fell asleep on the wall and allowed the USA to be destroyed fromwithin?”
I finally took the plunge and set up a Patreon page to allow for my incremental move to subscriber-funded journalism and podcasts.
Please visit my page at Patreon to learn more about what I am doing and hope to to be doing as I continue my work here in True Media sci/tech/surveillance/defense/consciousness print journalism and broadcasting: https://www.patreon.com/RamolaD
All of my plans for new podcast series are included there.
I want to assure you all I am notexactly moving to a subscriber-only model by any means.
My human rights advocacy and investigative/truth-telling/op-ed journalism and publishing/re-posting of others’ work will continue openly and freely for all, both here at this website, The Everyday Concerned Citizen--which will continue, at my page on Medium, on a new site for Ramola D Reports I hope to set up shortly, at my Youtube channel Ramola D Reports, and at any new channels I set up elsewhere shortly, such as at Vimeo, Bitchute, Twitch, D-Tube.
I am particularly keen to keep writing, podcasting, and publishing freely on behalf of all those “Targeted Individuals”–men and women of intelligence and integrity worldwide who have been and are being cruelly and inhumanely targeted and irradiated by corrupt and rogue militaries, Intelligence agencies, and government departments with deadly Surveillance Abuse, Electromagnetic/Sonic Assault, and Neurotech Assault in Non-Consensual and Black Ops Neuro-Experimentation programs, while Mainstream Media lies and denies, Law Enforcement maintains cultic Secret Society silence, and Psychiatry horrifically victimizes, persecutes, and re-victimizes. These are Crimes Against Humanity which I am committed to help expose and force the termination of.
But I am indeed seeking to establish myself as an independent True Media journalist who is moving to a subscriber-as-well model, and seeking as well to engage more directly with a community of subscribers and supporters, as I follow the path of other ethical news and views reporters into subscriber-funded and supported journalism, such as Sibel Edmonds/Newsbud or James Corbett/The Corbett Report.
If you find the work I do here on an ongoing basis of meaning, significance, and value and would like to support this endeavor as I continue, please sign on as a subscriber at Patreon. As you know, True Media of integrity, ethicality, and candor need people-support to survive. You can support this endeavor at any level you like, whether it’s $3 a month (Bluefinch) or $100 a month (Arctic Tern), with special perks at each level.
I have to say I sat around wondering what exactly to provide as Patreon perks, and finally decided to have some fun with it: I’m glad to offer a couple exclusive podcasts each month to supporters on a patrons-only basis, and quite excited about being able to throw my creative writing and teaching skills into the mix with offerings of e-satire and poetry/fiction readings on podcast. $15 a month (Red-Throated Loon;) will bring you a monthly e-book in Modern Satire and $100 a month (Arctic Tern) will bring you a special monthly Lit Inspire podcast with a curated set of inspiring and nurturing writings from fiction-writers, poets, memoirists, essayists–including my own work and the work of my writer-friends!–read by yours truly.
My aim ultimately, as in my creativity workshops, is to bring Literature, Art, and Science together, along with Ethics, Humanity, and Consciousness, and with your help, hopefully, we’ll get there together.
I want to thank all the many wonderful people out there who have been sending me donations, big and small, through the Donate button here from Paypal, and helped support and validate my work so far. This Donate button will continue to be here for one-time donations, but to support my work on more of a recurrent, ongoing basis, Patreon helps.
So do feel free to sign up anytime! Help co-create ethical sci/tech media and create ethical intellectual community by supporting Ramola D Reports on Patreon.
From their website, Restore The Fourth“is a nonpartisan 501(c)(4) nonprofit corporation, dedicated to restoring the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution and ending unconstitutional mass government surveillance.
In the wake of the Snowden revelations of June 2013, and initially on Reddit, groups began meeting across the United States, under the banner of “Restore The Fourth”. Under our first National Chair (Anna Wilmesher, summer 2013), we coordinated protests for July 4 and for Orwell Day. Under our second National Chair (Ben Doernberg, fall 2013), we helped organize the nationwide Stopwatching.us protests, culminating in a rally of thousands in Washington DC. Under Alex Marthews (2014-), our focus has shifted more towards legislative advocacy and public education, particularly around sunsetting the legal authorities underlying mass government surveillance.“
Please visit their website for more information, and read their newsletters here. Reproduced here is part of their 11/22/2017 newsletter which landed in my inbox earlier today–with some rather interesting news and action items. You can join them–“If you’d like to join, or help start a chapter of Restore The Fourth, please get in touch!”
Appropriately, our main call this week is to protect immigrants from the kind of digital “extreme vetting” that none of us could well sustain. A new, Senate version of the USA Liberty Act was released; we filed two amicus briefs at the Supreme Court; and the Pentagon leaked evidence of its mass internet surveillance through an unsecured upload to Amazon’s cloud.
Action 1: Call on IBM to not bid on “extreme vetting” software contract
ICE is stepping up automated “extreme vetting” of immigrants, and companies like IBM are interested in powering it. As conceived of by this administration, “extreme vetting” would include requiring visa applicants to provide consular officers with extensive information about their online presence, such as their social media handles. An automatic screening system will continuously analyze a multitude of databases, including those containing social media information, to evaluate such subjective characteristics as whether a traveler is likely to “becom[e] a positively contributing member of society.” If you’re not comfortable with IBM, or other large companies, bidding to become the gatekeepers of who is “likely to become a positively contributing member of society”, sign this petition: https://actionnetwork.org/petitions/dont-build-trumps-deportation-machine. And remember: Just as is happening with facial recognition software at airports, what gets applied to foreign nationals today will be applied to US nationals tomorrow. Happy Thanksgiving!
Action 2: This week’s specific asks on 702 surveillance
This week’s asks are as follows, and luckily work for Representatives and for Senators. – Cosponsor the USA RIGHTS Act (H.R. 4124 / S. 1997) – Oppose the FISA Amendments Reauthorization Act (S. 2012) – Oppose the inclusion of any 702 reauthorization provisions in an end-of-year omnibus spending bill
For Senators in particular, please also ask them to cosponsor and work to strengthen the Senate version of the USA Liberty Act (no bill number yet, introduced by Sen. Leahy and Sen. Lee).
It may be surprising to take a relatively favorable stance towards the Senate version of USA Liberty. RT4-Boston has a longer legislative analysis up at https://warrantless.org/2017/11/section-702-thanksgiving-week/ that goes into our thinking in more detail, and specifies what to recommend about Senate USA Liberty.
Our activists’ check-in calls happen on the Fourth of every month (next one December 4, 9pm Eastern; call in to (650) 285-1763 [no code]).
It’s been a busy week for us, what with tax filings and amicus brief filings. You can find our new briefs here: Collins v. Virginia,Byrd v. United States; congratulations to Mahesha, Vivek and the students at Harvard’s Cyberlaw Clinic for their assistance. Also, check out our new “Privacy Patriots” podcast episode: http://www.privacypatriots.org/2017/11/episode-8-tracy-rosenberg/. We’re still looking for new board members (email email@example.com if interested; minority or female candidates especially welcome), and we’ll be starting our winter fundraiser next week. If you think we’re doing good work, please give generously!
NSA Whistle-blower Karen Melton Stewart has stepped forward on behalf of all illegally targeted Americans currently being stalked, surveilled, and brutally and inhumanely assaulted today ( in many cases, to death) and experimented on with deadly electromagnetic weapons and neuro-weapons by a mercenary conglomerate of corporations and individuals via public-private partnerships with Federal and State and local government agencies which include Homeland Security, Intelligence agencies, Law Enforcement, Sheriff’s offices, and the Military/Air Force, to make this necessary and critical demand to the Federal Government.
It is now public knowledge in educated circles in America and Europe, Australia and New Zealand, South Asia, the Middle East and the Far East that only outstanding people of integrity, conscience, morality and community spirit are being targeted for sale into these lucrative experimental contracts, not terrorists, not criminals, not spies — although lies are freely being told in communities about the Patriot Act routing out the extremists and subversives, both mischaracterizing and defaming “targets.”
As always, it is vital to note that this situation is not covered in the national press because mainstream/much alternative media bows to Military/Intel directives and shamelessly lies in print about reporting victims of these Military and Intel programs being delusional, or simply ignores American victims’ reports, and US human rights agencies such as the ACLU and Amnesty International, apparently equally hypnotized, also turn a blind eye.
In anticipation of the upcoming 9/11 anniversary, all Americans suspecting watchlisting, who experience covert persecution such as stalking or surveillance or electromagnetic assault are encouraged to sign this petition, now posted at iPetitions.com. Citizens from other countries experiencing similar attacks are also encouraged to sign. Full text of the petition, with its informative focus on how innocent American citizens are being unlawfully targeted and trafficked, citing laws, statutes, and oaths of office which are being trampled on, is posted below. With much gratitude to Karen Stewart for this milestone declaration and petition, clarifying for the world the barbaric, human-rights-abusive reality of the American and global surveillance state today.
Official Request To Be Taken Off the Unconstitutional, Non-Consensual, Human Targeting & Kill List
Marbury v. Madison (1803)
According to the Supreme Court decision, Marbury v. Madison, which has never been challenged much less overturned, any law that is passed in the United States, or any of its territories, which is contrary to the Constitution is void. This would apply to rules, regulations and directives too.
Photograph by Karen Melton Stewart. Taken in the summer of 2016 in Tallahassee, Florida.
This photo shows the distortion resulting from an iPhone photo mechanism attempting to take a photo while in the very strong and harmful electromagnetic field of an illegal, Directed Energy Weapon (DEW) emanating from the trunk of the car, Florida tag [HON EEE], as it illegally targets the intended victim, the photographer, with a mobile DEW which is classified under 18 US code as a weapon of mass destruction (WMD) and a weapon of Domestic Terrorism.
Sept 11, 2017
I am writing to you to demand that my name be taken off of whatever “enemies list” (Terrorist Watch List, fake Terrorist Watch List, Enemies List, Kill List, Human Non-Consensual Experimentation List or contract, UN Agenda 21 Kill List, etc.) or whatever other list you have fraudulently and criminally concocted as a cover for the mass, invasive non-consensual, covert weapons testing, neurobiological weapons testing, secret illegal implantation of medical chips and other invasive devices, nano technology contamination, morgellons contamination, radiological poisoning, food and contact poisonings, gassings, etc., which you are knowingly subjecting literally thousands of innocent, noncombatant Americans to, based on no criminal criteria whatsoever, but a wink and a nod from a crony involved in this shameful, depraved, America-originated, Silent Holocaust of a human trafficking and asset-stripping criminal scheme, perpetrated by a crime syndicate heavily infiltrated within elements of the government like DHS (really registered as a private for profit entity), CIA, NSA, FBI, ICE/Border Patrol, etc., to include the private enterprises of Fusion Centers, their illegal hybrid army of mercenary, traitorous, civilian proxy brown shirt thugs, and the bribed, clueless, or intimidated State and local authorities, law enforcement and criminal elements within the community, to include private criminal, predatory “security companies”.
We, your victims, are quite aware that whatever “laws” and “directives” that you have illegally passed (no doubt secretly to avoid judicial scrutiny as well as public scrutiny and outcry) to attempt to justify this fraudulent, criminal war on innocent people, are indeed unconstitutional and illegal. You have purposely perverted and misinterpreted law to try to justify the seditious trampling of the 4th Amendment, 6th Amendment, 8th Amendment, and 14th Amendment, while creating an elaborate matrix of maniacal misinformation, misogyny, and murderous malice for personal profit. Your criminal actions and utter refusal to afford citizens their inviolate Constitutional, Civil and Human rights based on contemptibly feeble legal sleight of hand, are also indefensible in light of the cornerstone founding principles of the United States, exemplified below, on pages 3 – 5.
The Supremacy Clause of the United States Constitution (Article VI, Clause 2) establishes that the Constitution, federal laws made pursuant to it, and treaties made under its authority, constitute the supreme law of the land.  It provides that state courts are bound by the supreme law; in case of conflict between federal and state law the federal law must be applied. Even state constitutions are subordinate to federal law.  In essence, it is a conflict-of-laws rule specifying that certain national acts take priority over any state acts that conflict with national law. In this respect the Supremacy Clause follows the Article VIII of the Articles of Confederation, which provide that “every state shall abide by the determination by the United States Congress assembled, on all questions which by this confederation are assembled by them”.  A constitutional provision announcing the supremacy of federal law, the Supremacy Clause assumes the underlying priority of federal authority at least when the authority is expressed in the Constitution itself.  No matter what the states or the federal government might wish to do, they have to stay within the boundaries of the Constitution. This makes the Supremacy Clause the cornerstone of the whole American political structure.   However, note the supreme, all important caveat:
Marbury vs. Madison, 1803, Supreme Court Decision
Any law passed contrary to the Constitution is void.
“The Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in the Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the Supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the contrary not withstanding.”
Such as any law, rule, directive, etc. that goes contrary to the
4th Amendment – “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.”
6th Amendment – In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a public and speedy trial by an impartial jury of the sate and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law; and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusations; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for attaining a witness in his favor; and to have the assistance of counsel in his defense.”
8th Amendment – “Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel or unusual punishments inflicted.”
14th Amendment – “All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and the State wherein they reside. No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or the immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.”
18 US Code
CHAPTER 113B – TERRORISM § Section 241, – Conspiracy to deprive of Constitutional Rights § Section 242, – Conspiracy to deprive of Constitutional Rights under color of law; § Section 832, – Participation in use of weapons of mass destruction; § Section 2332a(c), – Use of weapons of mass destruction; § Section 2339a – Providing Terrorist Material Support
DEFINITION OF DESTRUCTIVE DEVICE § Section 921(c) – Any combination of parts designed or intended for use in converting any device into any destructive device described in subparagraph (A) or (B) and from which any destructive device may be readily assembled.
CHAPTER 73 § Section 1519 – The destruction, alteration or falsification of records in Federal investigations…
CHAPTER 75 § Section 1959 – Violent crimes in aid of racketeering activity § Section 2339A – Giving material support to Terrorists
CHAPTER 113C – TORTURE § Section 2340, – Forbidden use of torture under color of law; § Section 2441, – War Crimes;
CHAPTER 115 – TREASON, SEDITION, and SUBVERSIVE ACTIVITIES § Section 2381 – Treason; § Section 2383 – Rebellion or Insurrection; § Section 2384 – Seditious Conspiracy; § Section 2385 – Advocating Overthrow of US Government (sedition of Constitution); § Section 2389 – Recruitment for service against the US (sedition of Constitution); § Section 2390 – Enlistment to Serve Against the United States (sedition of Constitution);
CHAPTER 118 – WAR CRIMES § Section 2441 – War Crimes; § Section 2442 – Recruitment of child soldiers;
CHAPTER 119 – WIRE AND COMMUNICATIONS INTERCEPTION AND INTERCEPTION OF ORAL COMMUNICATIONS § Section 2511 – Interception and disclosure of… electronic communications prohibited; § Section 2512 – Manufacture, distribution, possession… electronic communication intercepting devices prohibited; § Section 2513 – Confiscation of… electronic interception devices; § Section 2521 – Injunction Against Illegal Interception;
CHAPTER 121c – STORED WIRE AND ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS…
CHAPTER 123 – PROHIBITION ON THE RELEASE AND USE OF CERTAIN PERSONAL INFORMATION FROM THE MOTOR VEHICLE DEPARTMENT RECORDS. (To use for identity theft & fraud)
United States Code, Title 42, Section 1983 – Conspiracy under color of law to deny equal protection under the law.
Other oaths of American authorities being blatantly ignored or perverted by the depraved complicity of military, judiciary, law enforcement in illegal human trafficking, slavery and eradication – both Federal and local:
Oaths of Office:
U.S. Military Oath of Service – “I Do Solemnly Swear (or Affirm) that I will Uphold the Constitution of the United States of America, Against All Enemies Foreign or Domestic, …Pledging My Life, My Fortune, and My Sacred Honor. So help Me God.”
Each justice or judge of the United States must take the following oath or affirmation before performing the duties of his office: “I, _______ ______ (name), do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will administer justice, without respect to persons, and do equal right to the poor and the rich, and that I will faithfully and equally discharge and perform all the duties incumbent upon me, as ______ , under the laws and the Constitution of the United States. So help me God.”
I [ name ] do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States, against all enemies, foreign or domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same, that I take this obligation freely without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office which I am about to enter. So help me God.”
This is but a sampling of the Constitution and legitimate Constitutional laws as well as oaths being broken now by DHS/CIA/NSA/FBI/FUSION CENTERS/INFRAGARD (as well as actual local law enforcement) and other unconstitutional militarized and mercenary Community Policing organizations (illegal secret standing armies) aka proxies being used as a buffer to criminal and conspiratorial harassment and murder ordered by criminals within the Federal government illegally using their positions to execute blatant human rights violations and war crimes for profit.
Under-the-Table tax money is being misappropriated/stolen to be used for enticing and rewarding civilians to commit crimes for the government for the purpose of targeting innocent Americans.
The targeting protocols are the subjection of those innocent Americans to: massive slander, fraudulent fear- and hate mongering of them to the gullible public, stalking, mobbing intimidation, encouragement of the public (i.e. “Community policing”) to provoke and bear false witness against, spy on/report/invade the private business of, record or repeat private conversations or information from illegally intercepted emails, phone calls, and US mail from engaging in mail theft and tampering by proxy criminals, and the overt crimes of package theft, break-ins, pet thefts, pet mutilations and pet murders, regular theft, vandalism, trespassing for criminal intent, cyberstalking, illegal placement of gps tracking devices on the victim’s car, the use of gasses, poisons, covert harmful/lethal electronic weaponry (meant for war) on them, the intimidation, bribery, or usurpation of medical treatment and procedures to illegally implant tracking devices, medical chips, and other non-consensual, medically unnecessary, experimental or oppressive and harmful devices and technology as a means to hijack and steal a victim’s life to serve a government or corporate master which pays to “own” a contract on that person.
This is because unconstitutional laws have been purposely and calculatedly misinterpreted to mean that anyone secretly put on the Watch List or similar such list, can be secretly stripped of his Constitutional, Human and Civil Rights and sold into slavery to one of many predatory entities participating in this new human trafficking, new human slavery enterprise based on a fraudulent or vastly overstated risk of “terrorism”, which is purposely being bloated by the insane number of foreigners being brought into this country with little to no vetting, for the purpose of diluting the population which is well aware of Constitutional Rights with a foreign population that has no such concerns or allegiances, is only here for largely parasitic or oppressive intent, and whose creeds are often in staunch apposition to such concepts, which was a general concern to the Founding Fathers as apparent in their precautionary warnings, and frankly unfair to those who do come wishing for assimilation.
We, the victims of the 21st Century Dark Ages of Techno-terrorism totalitarianism employed by Technocratic would-be slave masters, demand the immediate cessationof the human trafficking and slavery efforts against us by those whose charge it is to protect us, the right to defend ourselves in any way we see fitif laws and legal help are not immediately forthcoming, and we demand the arrest under terrorism laws and indefinite detainment of all involved as well as the immediate and complete asset-stripping of each and every entity and individual involved in our vilification, slander, torture, enslavement, false imprisonment, conspiracy to deprive of our constitutional rights, in the creation of our illnesses, injuries, murders or forced suicides. And the redistribution of those funds to each and every verifiable victim or survivor of these unparalleled crimes against humanity, based on length of suffering and damages – to be decided BY KNOWN and TRUSTED Leaders of the community with the help of legal experts with integrity.
We demand the death penalty for any/all engaged in our assaults who knew or should have known that they were conspiring to deprive us of our Constitutional rights and our very lives for their own monetary gain. We further demand that a Constitutional court show them the mercy they showed us, which wasnone whatsoever. Due to the heinous, egregious, and utterly depraved nature of this conspiracy to torture and murder for profit, we remind authorities of good conscience that rabid dogs cannot be rehabilitated and for the good of all, must be removed from interactions with healthy beings / healthy society and put down so as to not infect everyone and everything around them. The same with the army of psychopaths and their leadership responsible for this American-originated silent holocaust. This must be done in the shortest time possible for the survival of the nation and those not yet “infected”, and for the sake of the long-suffering victims.
Authored by Karen Melton Stewart, retired NSA Intelligence Analyst, and oath keeper.
I , ________________ ___________________, would also like to demand that my name and my person be taken off of such a list and out of such a program as Mrs. Stewart describes, and based on the same laws cited in her letter.
Sherri M. Guarnieri has a Fine Arts degree from the University of the Arts in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. She is an avid yogi of Bikram Yoga, travels, and is a dance choreographer. Sherri is a fund-raiser for the Walk to End Alzheimer’s. She has over twenty years of experience assisting an array of businesses with office management and accounting.
Part I: Advocacy for Alzheimer’s, Discovery of Maltreatment in Elder Care Facilities in Massachusetts and Connecticut, Whistleblowing and Public Reporting
Ramola D: Thank you so much Sherri, for coming forward and being willing to share your story of whistleblower retaliation, White House involvement, and abuse with microwave weapons. I understand you were a whistleblower about malpractice or negligence in healthcare at a facility taking care of seniors. Did you come to this subject as a healthcare worker or as the relative of a patient?
Sherri M Guarnieri: Thank you Ramola, for allowing this opportunity to discuss the importance of Alzheimer’s awareness as well as non-consensual human trafficking with microwave attacks on our nervous system under illegal microwave surveillance.
My grandmother started showing memory challenges while I was living in Washington, DC where I was working for a corporation as an Accounts Manager/Controller. After speaking with family, I offered to leave Washington, DC. My grandmother gave me so much in my life, I would do anything needed in return. I then left Washington, DC to assist in caring for my grandmother in Massachusetts and later in Connecticut.
I never considered myself as a whistleblower until her health-care in three long-term care facilities started to cause unexplained injury, antipsychotic drug-use errors, and procedures that were not approved by the appointed caregiver which was myself, as Health Care Proxy and Power of Attorney. I have no medical background, but when I have cause and concern over the health and well-being of a family member with a disability such as cognition problems, then I will do the research until I tip over from lack of sleep.
Ramola D: Where was she then and which part of Massachusetts and Connecticut were you in? Also, when exactly was this?
Sherri M Guarnieri: The period of time was from the end of 2005 to 2012. My grandmother’s care was in two facilities in Massachusetts and one in Connecticut, all with alarming concerns on care and medication handling. The two facilities in Great Barrington, Massachusetts were Fairview Commons end of 2005 to 2008 and Great Barrington Rehabilitation and Nursing–now known as Timberlyn East/Heights–a division of Kindred Healthcare 2009 to early 2011, and Geer Skilled Nursing Facility in Canaan, Connecticut 2011 to 2012.
The nursing facilities where my grandmother resided, I found the oversight with patient-to-caregiver ratio to be poor. Staff were learning on the job without taking a course in cognition disability care which is now Alzheimer’s care, or even a basic psychology course to understand a senior with a disability. I would like to note the use of the word “disability.” During my grandmother’s care, classifying Alzheimer’s as a true disability was not allowed or considered.
Ramola D: So are you saying that your grandmother was not recognized as having a disability then, by staff? Had she been diagnosed as having Alzheimer’s or cognition problems?
Sherri M Guarnieri: Yes. The years her Alzheimer’s progressed, it was considered as dementia. A senile senior with forgetfulness. Alzheimer’s was still building its footing. She was losing her short-term memory, which was causing stress. Example: my grandmother would open and read her mail and after a few minutes see her mail open. She would then proclaim someone opened her mail. You could see the stress and disbelief set in. My grandmother did see a neurologist who suggested Aricept, which was a bridge medication at the time for Alzheimer’s. However it had to be given in tandem, per her physician, with the antipsychotic Seroquel at 15 mcg. I would later find out that while in long-term care facilities, many residents in Massachusetts were advised to get on Seroquel by the physician or medical director. I would also find later on that Seroquel caused more stress in my grandmother’s cognition which led eventually to care injuries in those long-term care facilities where she stayed. At the time, I missed the key phrase from her physician, “Most of our patients are on Seroquel.” It did not give me alarm bells then because this was all new to me and I was trusting her physician of over 60 years.
Ramola D: Can you tell us exactly what you saw going on at these nursing facilities? Were they understaffed, did they delay in giving attention or care to residents? What were the most outstanding things you noticed about the quality of attention and care?
Sherri M Guarnieri: Facilities have a regimented timeline. Medication, breakfast, dressing/bathing, activity, lunch, activity/snack, bathroom checks, dinner and evening bedding/bathing. I found she was losing her choice and rights if she did not want to conform to the schedule, then attention was on to the next patient.
It’s a challenge with Alzheimer’s patients, their care needs more personalized attention. Example: bathing and dressing. My grandmother was a conservative Catholic, wherein you do not expose yourself to anyone. Dressing a senior with Alzheimer’s with two staff in the room handling dressing can cause heightened anxiety. I witnessed this example frequently. Staff having fun with each other chatting but the patient is being left out and dressed like a doll instead of a human being.
The loss of your personal privacy with toileting, bathing, and dressing is a huge loss of dignity. The last facility in Connecticut recognized my grandmother was mishandled so much they could sense trauma, and started using a sheet to dress her, so she felt protection.
The list of general problems–medication mistakes, medical staff not returning your call, terrible food, missed toileting, losing personal clothing and property–is standard in all long-term care facilities. The key these facilities miss is these seniors are people with dignity and past lives before becoming a resident there. They should not be at the mercy of facilities coming up with wrong diagnoses of unfounded conditions to treat and to collect money upon.
Ramola D: Let’s go into that in some detail. You have said you actually started to notice the presence of unexplained bruises on your grandmother. What were some of the circumstances under which you made those discoveries–was she cognizant of these bruises, did she share any information with you about them?
Massachusetts Facility Bruise/Click to Enlarge
Sherri M Guarnieri: My grandmother had no reference memory of her harm. It’s my understanding they gave her extra Seroquel from the back-room, which led to unfounded diagnosis, harm, and procedures not approved by me. I could see common-care bruises but the ones I found outside of common were the exact size and shape of opt-site bandages. The one in Massachusetts was a large rectangle near the wrist with dried blood on the floor. The second in Connecticut which was a butterfly bandage with point to point bruising. (Images left and below.)
After approaching nursing and care staff, I began to document her bruises and send information to the Department of Public Health. All pictures were shot upon discovering and sent to the Department of Public Health in real time. Massachusetts facilities representatives claimed, in an apparent lie, that they had no recollection (about these bruises) and the Connecticut facility said it was from a cotton bra. Any forensic expert would agree that these bruises were exact size and shape pressure points, not “a cotton bra” and a “I don’t know.” Facilities always have a reason to not be liable even though they are responsible for 24/7 care.
Bruise on Christine’s right arm after a while
Ramola D:When you saw the bruises on your grandmother–or later, now when you know so much about microwave weapons–do you think some of them could be due to DEWs? The rectangular-shaped one in particular–since it seems they can do that kind of thing with these weapons.
Sherri M Guarnieri: No Ramola, I don’t feel my grandmother’s bruises to be from Directed-Energy Weapons, only the hand of medical malpractice. The rectangular or butterfly shape was from bandages in that shape. However, having her hearing aids go missing and later returned with intention you never know if they were altered in any way or targeted with Synthetic Telepathy. Anything or anyone close to me was an alternative target. It’s a process of gross meta data, how much can they find to destroy and deface your life, body etc.
Connecticut Facility Bruise/Click to Enlarge
Ramola D: You mentioned she was being given 15 mcg of Seroquel, an antipsychotic drug, along with Aricept. Did you have questions about her diagnosis and prescriptions? And how did you find out they were giving her extra Seroquel?
Sherri M Guarnieri: All of her medications were prescriptions outside of the questions on undisclosed additions in these facilities. We went to obtain second opinions, but I soon found out that when a patient is in long-term care and not at home, facility care staff do not want to change over the medical director’s decision. To my observation, the use of antipsychotic medication seemed to be farmed in facilities. Massachusetts facilities pushing Seroquel and the Connecticut facility pushing Zyprexa Xydis like it was a drug trial and not personalized care.
I found that the antipsychotic medication made my grandmother more combative, which made care worse and caused more continued harm. One care staff member was caught verbally abusing my grandmother because she did not want to be touched by the staff-member. She was removed from my grandmother’s care after I complained.
Did I make inquiry, yes. Medical replies from her physician came a week after inquiry, and communication from medical care staff became snarky and poorly documented. The honesty and my trust level in these care facilities was falling rapidly.
I found the variance in Seroquel by making an Excel sheet. I charted the order date, to the distribution, to the day of the month. When I noticed an overlap of 25 mcg (microgram)to 50 mcg I asked the nurse on staff what she had in the cart. The nurse reviewed her cart and two sheets of different mcg Seroquel pills were there. She then wanted to check a backroom “lock box” and found two more sheets of Seroquel pills at 50mcg. A sheet of pills equals a thirty day supply. I requested review by her physician and the nursing director to ensure going back to 25mcg and to dispose of the unused pill sheets. The disposal of extra medication came into question due to pile up in the lock box. This was the first clue that proved that several times before my grandmother had been receiving more medication than approved and prescribed.
Long-term care facilities appear to enjoy the beat-down (in response to the attentiveness of a patient’s guardian). Meaning, the less we the guardians question their treatment of patients, our loved ones, the happier they are. Conversely, the more a guardian inquires about, the less they feel they have to cooperate. It’s an industry standard. After my grandmother’s brutal harm, her assigned doctor, Dr. Potler screamed, with his finger in my face, “I’m so sick of you!” Is that any way to act after a brutal harm incident?
Ramola D: Wait, you actually asked your grandmother’s doctor about a certain injury you noticed on your grandmother, and he insulted you? Did you have photographs, did this doctor see the injury? What was his assessment of this injury, why would he dismiss your concerns?
Sherri M Guarnieri: Yes, Dr. Potler, the Medical Director and my grandmother’s physician was in my face, in the hallway with staff witnessing. He reviewed the injury and seemingly did not care about if I had a photograph or not. He could not find out from staff how the injury happened.
He then said, “You know how difficult your grandmother is.” I was horrified and asked him if this was safe, the injury was too specific, too large, and not a single person knew.
Did he dismiss my concerns because he already knew he could cover the illegal procedure he was apparently engaged in? If not, what other explanation was there? Was his outburst the result of being exposed perhaps for the first time, as knowingly giving less than proper care to his patients?
On leaving, from another wing, a nurse who had witnessed his decidedly less than professional and inappropriately aggressive response said she would keep an eye on my grandmother. This nurse was not a daily person to interact with my grandmother’s care.
Ramola D: By this time, judging from what you had personally seen and witnessed, from the reaction of care staff, from this odd reaction by the physician in charge of your grandmother’s health, what were you starting to conclude? What was your assessment? Did you feel a cover-up of sorts was ongoing, what did you suspect?
Sherri M Guarnieri: In assessing the continuing unprofessional care given to my grandmother, the repeated inappropriate hostility with which my concerns were met, it led me to conclude that the doctor may well have been deliberately overseeing the mishandling of drugs at his facilities, perhaps for criminal medical experimentation, in which case, he would be making loads of money. In which case, my grandmother’s safety would be the last thing on his mind.
My assessment: my grandmother was not safe in this facility. My grandmother’s medical care was from Dr. Potler, the Massachusetts facility Medical Director, and Dr. Dennis Kobylarz as her primary physician out of Canaan, Connecticut. I thought two physicians would help but it seemed to make the cover deeper.
I suspected that my grandmother, who lived until 101, was some one’s test case, and I was being completely disregarded even though I had all documents to support my concern under the law in Massachusetts and Connecticut. Red flags, sad moments, and very few apologies because apologies mean acknowledging being liable which they did not want. This is the struggle. 24/7 care should mean just that, that you the facility bears witness on agreeing to safety and security compliance of the patients, our loved ones. The law should hold to this fact.
My grandmother’s care was being human-trafficked just as I am today with illegal implantation which Massachusetts has placed in my body.
Ramola D: Yes, we must talk about illegal implantation that you experienced—let’s do that shortly, in Part 2. At this time, what kind of inquiry and advocacy were you doing generally—how did you report these lapses and aberrations in care?
Sherri M Guarnieri: When the unfounded diagnosis, injuries, and medication use became in question, I started alerting care staff, nurses, Directors of Nursing, medical doctors, facility administrators, an Ombudsman with the Department of Public Health, with photographs, requesting follow-through, with letters, emails and conversation. I also had an incident noted with the local Police Department, Quality Improvement Organization (QIO) of Medicaid/Medicare, Massachusetts/Connecticut Departments of Public Health, Council on Long-Term Care and Aging, Alzheimer’s Association, local Representatives, Senators, and The White House.
I was issuing information in real-time as incidents occurred, via email, with supporting documents and photographs.
Ramola D: That is an impressive list of groups and individuals to have informed. What was the reaction from these groups, what kind of advice or assistance did they provide? And how did the facilities and care staff there themselves respond?
Sherri M Guarnieri: I received pamphlets that had no supporting information and promises of assistance from executives in conversations that had zero follow-through, most with no replies, and the Massachusetts Department of Public Health investigator stating in his document unable to determine harm.
I started using the hotline from the Alzheimer’s Association support; it helped in discussion but made no relief to the current status of observed brutal harm.
Massachusetts Facility Elbow Split
We had several care meetings with these facilities but never an apology. Actually, after one brutal harm incident in a care meeting, it was agreed my grandmother was to be a two-assist patient. After that meeting, a week went by and she was on the floor with an elbow split to the cartilage. After that injury, I demanded release to Connecticut and she was moved to Connecticut in my vehicle.
Massachusetts facilities were a true disappointment in protecting her safety, security, and dignity. I would find out later why after I became illegally surveiled. Massachusetts authorities were involved in a larger-than-life type of medical corruption.
Ramola D: Let’s return to that important matter of retaliation shortly, in Part 2. During this time, you were working full-time as your grandmother’s caregiver?
Sherri M Guarnieri: Yes, I was doing my best in the beginning with providing home care, working part-time and supporting my grandmother full-time. During skilled 24/7 skilled nursing care, I was working full-time with interruptions daily which made challenges to hold a position. However during this abuse, life still continued for me. Imagine, amidst this tragedy, was the largest economic downturn in US history beside The Great Depression. I was living in a rural community in Massachusetts after coming from two major cities, San Francisco and Washington DC. It was a challenge to even hold a paying position due to the area, and the continued need to leave my job to attend to alarming calls about my grandmother’s care as the full-time caregiver appointee.
I was a very present family member to my grandmother–five times a week as well as any time for any special concern in-between. A person offering this kind of close attention can be seen in the long-term care facility business as a “problem” person instead of being seen as a supporter with compliments.
Ramola D: So, although you were initially a stranger to the healthcare industry, you began to understand slowly the nature of the political climate you were dealing with, generally.
Sherri M Guarnieri: I could never imagine the care of seniors having a political climate but the more I was involved and experienced, yes, it has one in a major way. Care facilities stated they were Alzheimer’s care facilities — by law, now you have to be qualified to make that statement in a marketing claim.
Another facility made statements to the effect that they carried Tri-State Insurance which means you can cross a family member into another state to keep the same coverage. This was also an incorrect and therefore illegal claim made by a long-term care facility, since that was not the case at all, my grandmother actually lost her medical insurance upon being admitted to that Connecticut facility and was forced to reapply.
Each facility supports a different type of drug outside of Alzheimer’s care, regarding which my finding of today is the commercialization and experimentation of drugs inside a care facility. Facilities sent my grandmother to care or treatment unsupported by her present condition.
An example of this was under Hospice care in my home when they wanted my grandmother to see a nutritionist–why would she, while living in my home intending to pass naturally need a nutritionist? I found myself working around the “farming of healthcare” and standing for her religious rights, dignity, and humanity just as she did for me when I was little.
Ramola D: What kind of headway were you able to make with the Massachusetts Department of Public Health, whom you reported abuses to?
Sherri M Guarnieri: The headway was few and far between. Under the website, Member of the Family, which is a website assessing and publishing reports on nursing homes, during my grandmother’s time, all three facilities were notated as ”much below average with potential of harm.”
Fairview Commons was reviewed by Quality Improvement Organization, Centers for Medicaid and Medicare per my request on my grandmother’s medical records as “did not meet quality of care standards.”
And during a meeting with my lawyer Raymond Jacoub present, a representative of Kindred Healthcare-Great Barrington Rehabilitation of Nursing made a prepared statement in which it was claimed, “After review, we have found Christine L. Guarnieri is not the only resident with medication handling concerns. We are aware of the issue and are working to correct this situation.” A Department of Public Health review found the nursing supervisor “guilty of mishandling personnel effects,” which were my grandmother’s hearing aids.
But major harm to my grandmother’s body that I had documented and reported was listed as “unfounded.” The Massachusetts Department of Public Health investigator made a personal phone call to me stating “unfounded” does not drop the observation on concern, but for me it felt like a major loss when so many injuries had been reported.
The Geer Skilled Nursing in Canaan, Connecticut review from the Department of Public Health stated that care was in the scope of normal. But the Ombudsman noted that Geer Skilled Nursing can no longer state they accept Tri-State health insurance. Meaning claiming that a person from either Connecticut, Massachusetts, or New York would be covered in their building. Sadly, I had moved my grandmother at 100 from Massachusetts to Connecticut thinking she could keep her health insurance, be safe, but the moment she entered the building, after telling me it would be fine, she lost her health insurance. Can you imagine at 100 having to reapply for State health insurance? It was outrageous!
One last notation on Geer Skilled Nursing: an employee went missing on a three-week leave of absence when the notes of observed illegal doping in pre-dinner juice on the wing came up in my reporting. After she returned to work, I watched a Unit Manager from another area of the facility come to her cart and test her juice on more than one occasion.
Can I change the climate of healthcare alone, no. I was keeping notes and speaking out, documenting and sharing information to create awareness. I still feel more a failure today then a success. Thankfully, the Alzheimer’s Association has made leaps and bounds over my grandmother’s time of care. Alzheimer’s patients are being reviewed by Centers of Medicare and Medicaid. We have a firm law issued by Medicare in which no long-term healthcare facility can state they are an Alzheimer’s Care Unit unless certified by Medicare. The Alzheimer’s Association is now being recognized with Federal Funding for research. This disease will outreach more people than cancer, so support is needed each year.
Ramola D: That’s great, and we’ll post your Walk to End Alzheimer’s link below.
Let’s focus on the White House a little — I understand President Obama’s White House came to play a part here. What kind of information did you send in and how—was this through the White House website?
Sherri M Guarnieri: My notations to The White House while living in Massachusetts were in two letters sent FedEx: one during the height of injury noting 32+ exhibits, and the second after my grandmother’s passing (this letter imaged in full below), noting the found facts again and asking President Obama to please Do More, Be More and Hope for More for Alzheimer’s patients Each and Every Day.
Second Letter to President Obama, Page 1
Second Letter to President Obama, Page 2
Second Letter to President Obama, Page 3
(Sherri is walking this year with others to raise funds for Alzheimer’s research and care; to support her walk, please visit her donation page.)
Part 2: Whistleblower Retaliation: Stalking, Illegal Surveillance, Covert Implantation; Obama, Deval, Barletta, Freeh Connection; US Secret Service Visit; Synthetic Telepathy, & Non-Consensual Military/USAF Weapons Operation
Ramola D:I understand you started to experience some very odd responses from the care facilities, after you started questioning the level of care and reporting abuses your grandmother was suffering. What exactly did you experience?
Sherri M Guarnieri: Staff from these facilities started following us to church, to lunch outings, and calling me at all hours of the day and night, even on days when I was not present. This formulation was a level of stalking.
Once, I had a nurse on staff call me at 2 am stating my grandmother had facial drooping which they diagnosed as a mild heart attack, which I learned later was an unfounded speculation after I spent 14 hours in Emergency Services. My grandmother while in the ER seemed to be on more Seroquel then prescribed. I believe this to be the reason of the false diagnosis. Or it gave the ability to gain access to my home while in the ER for so many hours. I had Care staff circling around my house when having lunch outside with my grandmother. I had a male nurse call me on my off day, asking why I was not coming in–which is a level of psychological harassment.
I later noted remarkably, that various levels of staff appeared to be outright lying to me in that they were claiming things contrary to facts I knew to be true–apparently because they were aware I was issuing complaints in real time. My feelings and reply was, if you can’t assure her safety or tell me how this major injury happened, then what are your services providing in quality, safety, and security?
This was a daily life in eight out of the ten years. This does not even cover the heartbreaking moments you have with watching and supporting your loved one with Alzheimer’s decline. In this climate I was unwilling to waver because at the true core, despite the illegal stalking and psychological harassment from these long-term care facilities, I loved and supported my grandmother, which is more powerful than any health-care machine treating her as a means of income instead of nurturing her humanity. I still can say with great supporting proof behind me, Shame on them.
Ramola D:I understand you started to experience even worse retaliation for your whistleblowing. How did this start, and what exactly did you notice happening—was it overt or covert at the start?
Sherri M Guarnieri: As I stated above, the nursing facilities made it overt. During my grandmother’s time in long-term care, when you are labeled as “a problem,” they start losing your loved one’s personal effects, hearing aids, glasses, jewelry, clothing, plants and family pictures. This is a level of cruelty.
I tested one of my grandmother’s plants — its ph level was off the charts, it seems a staff member dumped rubbing alcohol in it. In a scarier example, my grandmother refused an earlier approved appointment to review her pessary. This procedure was rescheduled and instead of telling me while I was in the building, they chose to do it after hours and after I left the building and not telling me of the changes, which is a violation of an element of the law as I was the designated Healthcare Proxy with Power of Attorney.
A nursing supervisor, administrator, or director is breaking the law by refusing to inform the Health-Care Proxy and Power of Attorney of any and all changes to health care. The harm increased, the care meetings increased, and her age was 100 when I moved her yet again. I was hoping for relief in the final care facility but that failed as well.
The covert stalking was during the time of complaints, and after my first letter to The White House, items became missing from my home and were later returned, items became missing from my garage, medical records were changed on the fly because I was asking for them regularly. I started being followed, my mail was being opened in the upper left-hand corner, my phone was not working properly, the air in my tires taken out to read low and my computer was hacked.
I was surveilled by undercovers watching me at my jobs, by an official at the library, and followed just shopping in a store. I’m glad I have a slight photographic memory, as I will never forget those faces of people stalking me.
On one occasion, my driver’s-side door was shot at with a BB gun on the main street of Great Barrington. The man looked like a Pittsfield Police Department cadet. There were three people in the car, two in the front seat and the shooter in the back seat sitting in the middle of the seat. I wish I could remember more but I was trying to get into traffic to follow when I was blocked by another car.
Ramola D:Was he driving a police car? Was your car damaged?
Sherri M Guarnieri: The car was white–a white four-door vehicle with a Massachusetts license plate–so hard to tell if it was an undercover police car without the license plate for proof. Yes, my car today still has the dent on my driver’s side door.
Ramola D: You have also mentioned neighborhood harassment.
Sherri M Guarnieri: I had a stalker squatting in the house next door from New York City. He started squatting in the house with a group of others after it was foreclosed. After a number of complaints by myself and another neighbor to the police department, which was of no help, we found he was indeed from New York City and using his father’s car and listed under his insurance. In the foreclosed home, they kept a room surrounded by plastic with a computer in it, there was a grill propane tank hooked to the outside of the house for heat, trash everywhere, old mail piling up outside, and when the house was finally sold, the new owner noted an extension cord running under the ground pointing towards my house. They may have been using my house for electricity while I was at work.
After repeated reports from my neighbors and myself of the grill propane tank, the police did not take action in my town. These New York City kids were not poor, they stayed up all hours of the night, ran donuts in the snow with their vehicles in the yard and onto my property, and even damaged my neighbor’s property by ski jumping on his lawn at 2 am. It was The Department of Public Safety and the lawyer of the foreclosed property who finally shut this squatting ring down.
I NEVER thought that being an advocate for Alzheimer’s and loving/caring for my grandmother to the end of life would bring such invasive harm and would make me a person enduring cyber- stalking, tactical illegal ground surveillance, property damage and much more as being a targeted individual. I find myself then and present-day enduring in a 24/7 tactical human trafficking illegal surveillance sponsored by our government. At that time I had no idea I had illegal implants in my body.
Ramola D: It is absolutely astonishing, the level of harassment suddenly leveled at you. When and how did this surveillance escalate into covert assault with microwave weapons? When did Synthetic Telepathy and microchip implantation enter the picture?
Sherri M Guarnieri: Since I have done more research, have reflected back, and understand this level of tactical assault, I started to notice microwave hits on my body while caring for my grandmother in my home on hospice care. These hits would make my body feel terribly painful. As the microwave level was so high in body shots and in my home, this would explain why my phone would not work due to jamming radio frequencies draining the battery in one hour while I was caring for my grandmother on hospice care. While home with my grandmother, I had to keep my phone plugged in at all times.
I was also getting random bloody noses which I never had before. I had a spinal C6/C7 problem which could have been part of the assault because it hit the same time I was reporting my grandmother’s harm in Massachusetts.
In Massachusetts and Connecticut, I was having my tires read low on air on a regular basis. Even at Canyon Ranch in Massachusetts where Security and cameras were present throughout the property, my tires read low on several occasions. One of the then Security Officers of Canyon Ranch was advanced later to a Chief of Police in a small neighboring town. I wonder to this day if it was related.
Synthetic Telepathy started in Massachusetts a year and a half after my grandmother’s death when a conversation with Joseph F. Barletta took place and he asked for a recent picture of me.
Ramola D: Was Joseph F. Barletta a personal friend?
Sherri M Guarnieri: I had met Joseph F. Barletta earlier in San Francisco, California at Trattoria Contadina where I worked as a restaurant manager for many years. He was a regular guest with his family and other guests. The joke from my boss was he was FBI but in my opinion he was CIA. Louis Freeh, former director of the FBI, came in for dinner on his recommendation. No director of the FBI has communication with other lower-ranking employees; in my opinion, Joseph F. Barletta had to be his peer in equal measure to come into the restaurant on a personal recommendation. Trattoria Contadina also hosted The Blue Angels (the US Navy airshow flight team) team every year during Fleet Week as well as a host of Hollywood actors. We had one sweep by a security team one year to see if Al Gore could dine. Al Gore did not dine because we had no second door for departure.
Joseph F. Barletta was an acquaintance in kind through work. I kept in touch with him after I moved back to Massachusetts, I had several contact phone numbers for him. He was an attorney, and helped me on occasion with legal questions or matters as they presented. I thought I could trust him and rely on the truth from him, but I am thinking now maybe he was aware all along that I was an implanted person and his interaction was based on CIA review.
Ramola D: And you met Barletta again, in Massachusetts, after your grandmother died?
Sherri M Guarnieri: I think he was at Windy Hill Farm that Columbus Day weekend–however, it had been 14-15 years since I last saw him in person. After my departure from Windy Hill Farm, while working for Invite in Massachusetts, I thought I saw him again dining with a few male friends at an outdoor patio inside the complex where Invite was located. It was the sound of his tone and language which seemed familiar but I could not be sure. Before my assault with synthetic telepathy hit, before I even knew I was implanted, I had a chance near-encounter with Deval, Barletta, and Obama at Windy Hill Farm in Massachusetts. (Ed Note: Deval Patrick was the Governor of Massachusetts during 2007 to 2015.)
I had taken a seasonal job at Windy Hill Farm during the time I was trying to sell my house. Life was challenging but I thought being in nature would be a fun and yogic thing to do during a poor economy. Oddly, Dennis Mareb, the owner, nicknamed me “Security.” I asked him repeatedly why, he never had an answer, he just laughed. You see, I believed it was the staff at Windy Hill Farm who had first-hand knowledge that I was to be presented or awarded with something on behalf of my advocacy for Alzheimer’s. The attendees in the orchard that Columbus Day weekend were supposed to be Deval, Obama, Joseph F. Barletta, and others. I was aware that something was going on. Large black SUVs came and went that morning, staff usually in farm clothes were dressed up, staff had cameras in hand and even the Hilton sisters were there, picking apples in the orchard.
As the morning progressed, Deval’s security team arrived, two huge twin men arrived and stood near the location I was working, and the statement heard on the floor at work was: “Obama’s ETA (Estimated Time of Arrival) 40 minutes out as he is at the boy’s school in Hudson, NY.” People started to get close and all of a sudden the security team left and people looked disappointed. All this was supposed to be a surprise to me. However, I just went about my job and observed people scramble. A man approached me in a cashiering line from Washington, DC and said, “I drove all this way just to turn around and go home, Sherri.” A man I did not know. The man said my name and I was not wearing a name tag.
Ramola D: I understand there was one other outstanding connection with former President Obama after you moved to New Mexico, at a new spot that you were working at — can you describe that further?
Sherri M Guarnieri: Yes, while working for Outside Magazine an interview with former President Obama was under development during his August 2015 outdoor adventure with Bear Grylls. When former President Obama’s story was published, I was no longer with the company but they kept my name on the tear sheet. It was during my employment with Outside Magazine that my thumb drive went missing for a few hours out of my purse. Later, I overheard a conversation brewing:
“The information on the drive, did it have our business information on it? No? OK.”
“I guess I hit a little hard last night that upset her, hahaha.”
I was disgusted after this. No business is allowed to illegal search-and-seizure without a warrant. I have never been served a warrant.
Ramola D:Yes, it is most unsettling to hear from so many about neighbors’ or collegial/employer participation in implant-activation and “electronic surveillance” which is essentially remote access of a human body and participation in Torture, which is not just amoral, it is illegal and downright criminal.
The question also rises, is it pure coincidence that you worked at a few places where you encountered famous politicians and public figures — such as Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama and Louis Freeh, or did some of this appear to be more than coincidence? Some targets have reported being stalked by public figures.
Sherri M Guarnieri: Yes, as I noted before an unusual group of people started to be around areas which I worked–
Hillary Clinton, Canyon Ranch, Lenox, Massachusetts Former President Obama, Outside Magazine Louis Freeh, Trattoria Contadina General Michael Hayden, a library in Massachusetts where I was
You see, a level of people started to come around and I was just living and supporting my family.
Recently, a British man came by during employment and before looking me in the face to say hello, looked directly into my left ear and then looked at me and said hi. One of my larger implants resides in my left ear. (Image below.)
It’s odd, as an illegally implanted woman, I have to take all coincidences and encounters as something to review because someone with immeasurable power has implanted my body and is allowing criminal access. A path I never chose for myself.
So to this day I have no idea how I got these implants, what the plan was for me besides my normal life. It sits in my heart the unknown, and now to be abused by my implants–I refuse to go silent on Crimes Against Humanity for my grandmother and my current life.
Ramola D: When and how did you realize you were implanted?
Left Ear Implants, Click to Enlarge
Sherrie M. Guarnieri: My ear implants and other areas of implants were found after doing research and reviewing an older set of MRIs from my first spinal injury in 2009 in Massachusetts. After leaving Massachusetts and living in New Mexico, the assault became very microwave frequency-driven to my ears, which assaulted other areas of my body, the same way that Chinese acupuncture works via the ears and head, through energy meridians. I even have a coating on my teeth which enhances electrical connection. The sexual assault was daily and for hours and days on end.
MRI, Back View, showing reflectives/implants at ears and back
MRI Side View, Reflective/Implant at Ear
Ramola D: That is absolutely horrifying, and truly criminal. To return to Barletta and the whole experience of your first assault with Synthetic Telepathy which you report as extremely traumatic–when was it that Barletta asked for your picture, what happened directly afterward?
Sherri M Guarnieri: I thought speaking with Joseph F. Barletta was in-kind (a mutual, collegial friendship), so I sent a picture via text to his phone number. After that conversation, I was harshly attacked with Synthetic Telepathy which found me unconscious in the doorway of my home naked. I went to the emergency room, had an overnight stay, and did a number of tests during the stay and after, all tested negative. One test which was most notable and the reason they kept me overnight showed my white cell count was way out of balance which I now know to be due to radiation from the attack.
The Synthetic Telepathy was stating:
“You are under arrest, I’m going to shoot you in the head on the street and place you naked in a body bag. Obama, Deval, and Martha Coakley will watch, and they approve of your execution, put your ass on the door frame, put your hands behind your back, I can see you in my cross hairs, don’t breathe, don’t blink, don’t move–I will shoot you if you stand.”
(Ed Note: Martha Coakley was the Attorney-General of Massachusetts 2007 – 2015, same time period as Deval Patrick being Governor.)
Several other kinds of lurid sexual verbiage was included in the assault. During the assault they used the recorded voices of Obama, Martha Coakley, members of my family, older friends, Joseph F. Barletta, and members’ of the surrounding police departments whom I knew and had had interaction with, to heighten the assault. At the time of the assault, I did not know I had an illegal ear implant.
I know now, that this type of assault is SERE training used by the military. I have also found evidence of older grants which the Army was given to advance Synthetic Telepathy long before my assault. I was researching how this was connected to my body because my body, my mind, and my life would never think of these types of abuses or harm.
Ramola D: So you wrote to the White House reporting this Synthetic Telepathy assault and usage of microwave weapons. You mentioned you received a visit from the US Secret Service shortly afterward. Can you describe this further?
Sherri M Guarnieri: It was later, after I moved away from Massachusetts, now living in New Mexico, that I posted my Synthetic Telepathy assault to the White House website asking the US Government to stop sexually violating me, and would our President be OK with this type of disgusting Synthetic Telepathy happening to him. I gave my accounts of experiencing V2K/Synthetic Telepathy on more than one occasion and reported the same language as noted above in my first assault.
The Secret Service visit came a year after me living in New Mexico. They came making accusations and misleading my neighbors and employer with on-the-spot interviews. My neighbors rejected their false accusations.
The Secret Service asked my neighbor if I was carrying a gun in a case to and from my home. My neighbor replied, “Do you mean her yoga mat?” Then the Secret Service asked if I was seen carrying a lot of bags to and from my home. My neighbor replied again, “Do you mean her recycled grocery bags?” Then they came to see me at work and made me feel like I was in poor health which was also false. A job, friends, primary care physician, and yoga five times a week–far from the truth, Secret Service!
The Secret Service man could also not provide the full email which was the spark of their review in my office in front of me, as my email was about Human Trafficking Lives with microwave-frequency Directed-Energy Weapons. Before Secret Service agent Mr. White left my office, he made me sign over my HIPPA rights which means they could review my medical record over thirty days or for as long as needed.
After those accusations and Mr. White from the Secret Service proclaiming to my face that Microwave-Frequency Directed Energy Weapons did not exist and I needed medical help, I found on the Internet a Joint Chiefs of Staff document under Obama which addresses Microwave Frequency Directed-Energy Weapons.
I then found the Non-Lethal Military Division overview on Microwave-Frequency Directed-Energy Weapons in coordination with other countries. Even more, a document from the Air Force from 1999 proclaimed quality work at Kirkland Air Force base in New Mexico with development of Microwave Frequency Directed-Energy Weapons. And my most recent find, a document declassified in 2006, which states the Army was testing microwave hits on “willing participants.” The same use as on my body which can be supported by several other documents and reports I have in my possession.
If you want to turn a blind eye to the safety and dignity in care of Alzheimer’s patients, then illegally implant my body in Massachusetts to abuse and illegally shrivel my life for bringing compassion to the front, then don’t think I won’t dig my feet in the earth to prove you an inhuman person.
Sherri M Guarnieri: No, no one cared. I was being forcefully burned on my rectal, vagina, abdominal area with abusive frequency hitting my ears. I was leaving screaming messages to Joseph F Barletta, Secret Service, and emailing the FBI and The White House to stop sexually violating me.Stop burning my rectal and vaginal area in the car, at work, in yoga or sleeping. No one cared at all.
So when a high ranking department gives zero response to a person, then they are participating in the assault and not protecting our Constitutional Rights as Americans. And when high ranking departments then try to sabotage your life so you do not disclose your evidence, then this means millions of dollars are at play.
Think about the effort. I believe I was implanted as a child, so quite a lot of the Medical and state authorities within Massachusetts would appear to be involved. Those who are abusing me clearly during my first Synthetic Telepathy assault knew my background in full. I can be followed where ever I go and this implant in my ear also records any conversation I was ever in IN MY LIFE TIME. That is huge money at play in medical, military, universities, national science labs and Department of Defense.
Ramola D:When did you start attempting to obtain documentation and proof of what you were experiencing, and how did you go about this? What did you find?
Sherri M Guarnieri: After Secret Service came to see me and tried to note me as needing medical attention, I started doing more research because the false accusation was cruel.
I started looking for information online about Synthetic Telepathy, targeted individuals, microwave frequency directed-energy weapons, military grants, patents, etc. I took my medical records and reviewed them again. My MRI was so telling on the level of reflectives in question inside my ears, eye, neck, head, cheek bone and rib cage. Then a foot x-ray showed a reflective in my toe and even my teeth had an odd coating which shows like a false tooth. I started with reviewing back to childhood and remembered problems related to ear infections from birth to three. Even unexplained vaginal burning in my youth before the age of nine–I think it can be all tied to the illegal ear implants.
In 2015, I reached out to contact Karen Melton-Stewart then to Dr. Katherine Horton then you and Millicent Black. I now have a community of people all experiencing the same things and determined to expose criminal human trafficking. People who understand the mission of discovery and understanding. I’m now in hopes that headway can be made with our speaking out and the additional involvement with Bill Binney and Kirk Weibe. This needs to stop, human trafficking is criminal and these are Crimes Against Humanity.
Ramola D: How have physicians and radiologists responded to your MRIs? Have you visited doctors for medical assistance after realizing you were being assaulted through your implants? What was their reaction?
Sherri M Guarnieri: I sent certified letters to my treating neurologists and radiologists. The only response was from the radiologist, noting these reflectives “are not a harm to your current health.” I’m looking for the best doctor to remove my ear implants but this is a hard task because I can see my left ear is connected with other areas of the body. My fear is my body could alter for the worse if some of these embedded implants are removed.
Ramola D: You have lived in California and Washington DC before Massachusetts and New Mexico. Did you experience stalking there? Are you still experiencing stalking, surveillance, and assault with microwave weapons in New Mexico?
Sherri M Guarnieri: My memories of California, I was followed once on a boat ride. In Washington DC, my computer was hacked; it was later hacked again when I moved to Massachusetts to take care of my grandmother. I was doing yoga so one of the things they do regularly now is hit my bowels with microwaves to evacuate the bowel to humiliate me. This happened often to disrupt my yoga class.
100,000 Microwatts per sq meter, recorded at Sherri’s home. Click to Enlarge.
I still get ground-level stalking in New Mexico. A pregnant woman with a state badge once followed me to a restaurant. Employees of Los Alamos National Labs would stand by me in yoga class and smile as if they knew I was being hit with microwaves to destroy my class. People from law enforcement took my class near me and military personnel. My tires here have been sabotaged, a front fog light removed from my car, crystals in my home ground with a grinder and since my home was a new build from the ground up, who knows what more could have been sabotaged.
I should not be living as a non-consensual human subject but as a free woman, free from sexual assault, harm, and abuse from microwave-frequency Directed-Energy Weapons hitting my ears and other areas of my body.
I get hit with microwave frequencies every day. From 2016 to 2017, I’ve documented major harm that I have endured by being hit by this weapon. I think at this point, I may be a high-level target for sexual assault, torture, and being slow-killed as I give you this interview.
Ramola D: My hope truly is that exposure of your case will bring relief and remission — that publishing this evidence of extralegal radiation and bio-assault here in the USA and notifying the American public of these abuses will provoke action from the medical and human rights community, create opportunity for change.
I notice you call this torture—what would you count as the most egregious assaults?
Right eye burned in sleep; white dot/implant on eyelid was activated, invoked pain, broke capillaries
Sherri M Guarnieri: No doubt on this is torture. The greatest harm: ear infections as a child, vaginal burning as a child, damaging my C6/C7 & L3, burning the top of my head with 100,000 need units here in microwave, burning my right eye lid (image at right), forcing my body to defecate unnaturally, high frequency abuse to my ears and the constant sexual assault to my vaginal, rectal, abdomen and breasts.
Ramola D:I understand you have researched the question of who is involved in this endless vendetta. You live close to an Air Force base, do you think they are involved?
Sherri M Guarnieri: These are military grade weapons. If they are dropped in the hands of criminals who know how they can be developed in harming human lives then crime is at an all- time high. In research, I have found that the FCC and Departments of the Air Force oversee control in radio communications. The FCC with regulating our rights inside the US and the Air Force with protection.
So if a 100,000 radio frequency of microwatt to square meter of microwave energy is hitting my home and body, it can be traced under current communications technology.
Who is involved, it’s in depth. If I am an MKULTRA baby then the complexity is vast. If The White House put me on a Kill List for being an advocate, then I ask them to reread the Constitution and understand that my use of swearing language in my letter to them comes from long-term abuse with microwave frequency direct energy weapons. Since sexual assault is the most common abuse hitting my body, then don’t think you won’t get a swear word or the use of the word “slave.”
This is coming to the surface and first to require answers from is our government. Don’t think twice when “We the People” start exercising our Rights.
Ramola D: Have you taken any recent actions to report this crime, and received any kind of response from anyone, local or Federal?
Right ear burned in sleep; implant activation here assaulted Sherri’s spine/lumbar area.
Sherri M Guarnieri: I’ll keep emailing and photographing in real time as harm occurs. I’ll stand next to any other person with the same implantation as mine in right to support. Making a choice to alter or harm a human body without consent or calculated intent is a CRIME; weather as an Alzheimer’s patient or as a living person on Planet Earth. This is a global network of crime which needs to stop.
No one can or has replied because this is a new exposed underbelly of government development. No one wants the government bothering them and if they choose me without my consent then watch out I will find the answers I need. I have two illegal ear implants which have caused more problems then I thought humanly possible.
Sherri’s cat being microwaved, readings show over 30,000 Microwatts per Square Meter.
We should be living and experiencing with our natural bodies without chem trail dumping, without frequency assault, without microwave hits and without non-consensual implantation. No single person should choose this type of pursuit in life, someone has chosen it and is wielding it upon me and abusing the secrecy privilege 24/7. That does not make me mentally ill, it’s actually them, because common people do not choose sexual assault, burned bodies, or criminal implantation. These people are even harming my cat.
Ramola D: What would be your advice for anyone around the country and the world who has been targeted in similar ways?
Sherri M Guarnieri: Review your medical records, do not live in silence against microwave-frequency rape, harm, and abuse, stand against even the highest levels of government with the important questions in the US or around the globe. Counter in your state, make it be known this is a collective pursuit and something we did not choose for ourselves.
Remember our Civil, Human, and Constitutional Rights, no man or group has the right to aim overt or covert action against another unless they choose to be a criminal.
Om Shanti Om, leave me in peace because your harm on me will reflect on to you and it will be your Samsara and not mine. I will return with another life and find you the criminal time and time again.
Many thanks to Sherri M. Guarnieri for this important interview in the advancement of total exposure of the extralegal and barbaric covert operations of whistleblower retaliation and Torture using radiation/neuro/bio weapons being conducted on thousands under cover of “Surveillance” by governments, military, police, and Intelligence agencies worldwide.
Many thanks also to NSA Whistleblower and Joint Investigation Team Intelligence Analyst Karen Stewart for her careful review and advice on the final draft of this interview.
Is France, like the United States of America, like Switzerland, like Belgium, like Germany, like Poland, like Canada, like Australia, like New Zealand, and numerous other countries of Europe, North America, Asia, and other continents, now practicing totalitarian State repression KGB and Cheka-style with the use of political psychiatry?
It would appear so, if Frederic Laroche‘s experience is anything to go by. A talented and experienced software engineer with a background in teaching high school science, Frederic Laroche has worked for several years as a human rights activist on the behalf of French residents who have in recent years fallen prey to the same kinds of programs running wild in all the no-longer-democratic or now-only-superficially democratic countries mentioned above—organized stalking, covert assault with directed-energy weapons or DEWs (also called psychotronic, electronic, non-lethal, or microwave weapons), and non-consensual enrollment in neuro-experimentation programs—trademark evidence of covert extrajudicial surveillance and experimentation by globally-operative Intelligence agencies working hand in glove with national Security agencies, military units, and local police and governments.
These are manifestations of the global surveillance state run apparently by Bilderberger central bankers & technocrats, secret-society cultists, Freemasons, Satanists, Paperclip Nazis, Zionists, operatives from the Vatican/City of London/Washington, DC as a global shadow operation ensconced inside the governments of countries, which the Mainstream Media mouthpieces for the CIA and MI5/MI6 and Mossad in the US and UK and Europe have proved openly now they will not dare to report.
But will indeed bolster and conceal apparently with distortions, lies, omissions, and elisions in reportage; the New York Times, for instance, distinguished itself with such faulty and flagrantly deceptive reportage in recent times, as also did the oddly Satanically-named outfit, The Daily Beast, both seeking to discredit the reporting victims and witnesses of 21st-Century covert assault with EMF Spectrum/Neuro-weapons and organized stalking—a group inclusive of highly-educated and accomplished researchers, whistleblowers, and activists.
Such media deception relies on the offices of that old State tool, Psychiatry, and perhaps we should not marvel at the fact that one government propaganda tool relies on the concealing bulwark of another—indeed, one historically used to support Terror operations run by governments and Secret Services such as the Cheka (Secret Police) in the Soviet Union and the Stasi in East Germany.
We should, however, hold both Psychiatry and Mainstream Media accountable for the crimes of mass deception and duplicity—and for the wilful destruction of large numbers of individual lives. If psychiatrists are merely ignorant, not complicit—as some suggest—it is time they educated themselves then, on the realities of modern electromagnetic weaponry and modern Stasi and Cheka-style Intel-agency-run stalking, persecution, surveillance, and experimentation being practiced by the global surveillance (Mafia) state.
Railroaded by French Intelligence and State Psychiatry
In April 2017, Frederic Laroche sent informative letters to French government members covering the realities of extrajudicial targeting with EMF/Neuro -weapons in France. He enclosed supportive information from Dr. Katherine Horton, ex-CERN physicist and founder of the Joint Investigation Team, an international team of experts exploring the wrongful use of DEWs and military neurotech on civilians worldwide. Shortly after, in May 2017, he was wrongfully detained by local police in Grenoble, France on the basis of a trumped-up charge of assault of a pedestrian with his automobile, after what appears to have been an entrapment operation run on him on May 2, 2017 by actors working for the French Intelligence services. He was then remanded by order of the town Mayor, judge, and Prefet (the Police Commissioner) to a local psychiatric institution where he was forcibly dosed with very high quantities of an anti-psychotic, which caused him to experience intensive back, spine, and neck paralysis, inability to breathe, and near-comatose blankness of mind. Because he demanded that this drug be stopped, the dosage was reduced; the attending physician informed him “We cannot give you nothing.” His continued stay at this facility was curtailed only on the assessment of the attending psychiatrist, who has “let him go” on the condition that he return every month until September for a mega-dose of another anti-psychotic, intended to sustain his physiology for the period of a whole month at a time. This drug, he reports, muddies his concentration and focus, blanks his initiative, degrades his cognitive processes, dampens his mood, and renders him inactive. The reason for this drug? To quell his “delusions,” according to the either-ignorant or -complicit psychiatrist, who wishes, apparently, to convince Frederic that electromagnetic weapons and French Intelligence chicanery do not exist—an unfortunate delusion she perhaps is trapped in, that is, if she is not overtly colluding with French Intelligence herself.
To hear the full story highlighting the drugs prescribed and the entire entrapment operation, and to understand how Psychiatry is being used here as a tool for political repression, please listen and share widely.
Neuro-Mapped and Neuro-Experimented on at Hewlett-Packard: From DEW Assaults to Assassination Attempts
In Part 2 of his narrative (linked below), Frederic details the history of his targeting and surveillance, starting at his parents’ home in suburban Grenoble in 1998 when he noticed he was being followed, and then being hit with strange abdominal and other pains which seemed to coincide consistently with the at-home presence of a neighbor. Putting his scientific background, logical thinking and sleuthing skills to good use, he embarked on a process of careful observation and inquiry which revealed to him the nature of the stalking, surveillance, and eventual neuro-experimentation he realized he was being subjected to as he worked in different jobs in Grenoble and across France, being hit with DEWs everywhere he went.
In an open work-floor space at Hewlett-Packard, he learned (from various sources, including a manager, in addition to his own eyewitness and personal encounters) that the strange group of newcomers in the adjoining rows who seemed intent on his every word, phrase, emotion, and action comprised French and American Intelligence agents engaged in neuro-mapping, and that their primary subject was himself. On Bastille Day one year, watching the city fireworks, he overheard one of his stalkers say to another “He will leave with this memory of the fireworks.” Later that night, he suffered an electromagnetic beam attack to his brain, which felt, he said, like brain-death; forced to wake out of medicated slumber, he learned that moving his head and body helped him to escape the beam, in what he records now as a distinct assassination attempt.
In an unexpectedly dramatic conversation which follows his subsequent departure to Istanbul, Turkey, and a tragically repeated experience there of stalking and DEW assault at a camp ground, culminating in a despairing attempt to take his own life–as a logical response, he says, to the endless, unstoppable stalking and DEW/Neuro assaults he was being subjected to all over France and even across borders–Frederic details how he was actually stopped in this attempt and assisted back to recovery by his very stalkers, to whom, apparently, his life and continued availability for DEW assault and neuro-experimentation meant something.
This extraordinary story is detailed in full in Part 2 of Frederic’s story, video-linked below. Also watch the moving short film made of these early experiences in April 2015.
Please stay tuned for Part 3, which will follow Frederic to India as he tried once more to escape the deathly DEW assaults and nonstop stalking and surveillance unleashed on him, and Part 4, as he returned to France and engaged in public education and human rights activism in attempts to alert the world of the ongoing specter of global surveillance, neuro-experimentation, and mass mind control currently unleashed to varying degrees on all of us.
As readers may be aware, these experiences of directed-energy weapons and neurotechnology assault are not isolated to France or a single French civilian but being reported worldwide by citizens in almost every country of the world, and are being documented and reported on an ongoing basis at this news/media site and blog, as also by many other activists worldwide.A joint Memorandum to Trump sent earlier this year detailed how domestic programs of torture are being run in the United States and globally under cover of “Surveillance.” An international call to G20 leaders from Poland’s Stopzet and several international human rights groups just a few weeks ago sought a ban on psychotronic weapons.
In the face today of neurohacking, transhumanizing, and electromagnetic takeover, it is no doubt the eleventh hour, and the situation facing us as a species and a planet is dire. But perhaps we can each step forward in the uniqueness of our own light and power and take definitive steps to make a difference.
In a powerful and hard-hitting Real Talk True Media conversation on a wide range of issues related to the current rise of the global surveillance state, budget monies which disappear into a black hole, and organized crime at the heart of the global financial system, Oxford-trained former CERN Particle Physicist and Systems Analyst Dr. Katherine Horton traces how trillions of dollars stolen from the public purse–as recorded by former Assistant Housing Secretary and President of Solari, Catherine Austin Fitts–as well as thousands of missing children today point to the existence of a parallel “spying civilization” which employs institutionalized secrecy to hide venal crime.
The end-result, she says, is a society out of kilter, which does not honor the innate power of human beings as creativity and change generators, but, in seeking absolute control, enters a spiral of inevitable systems failure.
At heart of this bifurcated society is the funneling of vast public monies via the Security and Intelligence Agencies into the creation of a vast class of citizens–often uneducated, blue-collar, young, indigent, unemployed–being trained in cities and countries worldwide to criminally target, stalk, harass, and assault with microwave weapons those brilliant professionals increasingly identified by the Intelligence agencies as exceptionally bright, aware, creative, intelligent, and likely to effect positive change in their communities.
These targets are then blacklisted, defamed, and slandered by Intel agents in local communities and clandestinely enrolled in highly lucrative (for the Black Ops military-industrial-academic-intelligence complex) contracts for Military/Medical/Intelligence weapons-testing, implant-and-sensor testing, and neuro-experimentation operations worldwide.
“For every target, there are thousands of hidden targets and also for every target, there are thousands of children, being stowed somewhere, who have even less rights than us–who are literally being shredded in the most inhumane, psychopathic fashion.”
An essential problem, she identifies, are top-down managerial views of human activity and human beings as resources rather than non-linear creativity generators who can turn systems failures around and use their creativity and individuality to change our reality in ways that would benefit communities, societies, countries, and the world.
Stay tuned (you can subscribe to Real Talk True Media here) for the resumption of this riveting conversation in Part 2 later this week, where Dr. Horton will further examine how Switzerland lies at the heart of the problem and expand on solutions for meaningful global change we can collectively commit to.
In avid demonstration of the extraordinary defamation and slander tactics employed by today’s new criminal/crimIntel class, fully supported by the mushrooming State mechanisms of police-state repression involving Intelligence agencies, local police, and masses of citizens–including neighbors–being trained to act as Stasi troublemakers, stalkers, and discreditors, Dr. Horton reports today that she was recently verbally attacked and threatened by her neighbors in Zurich, Switzerland, in an extraordinary fit of what appears to be contrived street theatre.
Luckily for all of us, she recorded this conversation (linked below), conducted in German, which ensued when she returned to her flat after a walk, and spliced it together with an English translation and a series of pertinent questions addressed to the world.
With many thanks to Dr. Katherine Horton for her candid conversation on crime and financial systems, and for her video above illustrating what the highly-educated and exceptionally brilliant targets today of Intelligence agency criminality around the world are being subjected to within their own neighborhoods in desperate replays of 1930s and ’40s Nazi crime.
The question of note today really is: Are people of conscience worldwide going to wake up and do something about all of this — or simply let the conglomerate of corrupt and criminal and well-padded Mil/Intel mechanisms worldwide roll over and flatten all of us?
Protect Yourself from Vaccine Mandates | Carry Dr. Rima’s Advance Vaccine Directive Card
New Media Site in Process
Exclusive Reportage on Counter-Terrorism “Manufactured-Target” Targeting & Gross Human Rights Violations in Amoral Human Experimentation Crimes by Intelligence Agencies, Law (Lie) Enforcement, & US/NATO Military Divisions: Off-the-Charts Torture & Abuse of “Targeted Individuals”
Free Keene’s web site/A peace-liberty-voluntarism project pursuing and promoting peaceful living in Free Keene, New Hampshire
Free State Project
Free State Project’s website/A Liberty in our Lifetime project in New Hampshire, pursuing liberty, community, and peaceful living
New Earth Project
New Earth Project website/Open platform to unite humanity and create initiatives to support the emergence of absolute freedom and sovereign creative expression for all
Public Intelligence Blog
Blog for Earth Intelligence Network, Phi Beta Iota the Public Intelligence Blog/Promotes hybrid transparent governance, collective intelligence, true cost economics, and whole systems understanding