Lately there seem to be have been all sorts of surfacing of the need for Neuro Ethics and Neuro Rights, including in mainstream coverage of Duke University law and philosophy professor Nita Farahany’s new book “Battle for Your Brain” and a new interview with her and Antonio Regalado, senior biomedicine editor at MIT Technology Review by Greater Boston News’ Sue O’Connell.
One of the more startling admissions made here by researchers and elite-academe media obviously long aware of the unethical and covert use of people in brain experiments and non-lethal weapon testing operations–long reported here at this site–is that Consent of those ab/used in experimental brain research is still in question (or that the question of Lack of Consent is making some researchers squirm now).
“…(Regarding) the technology that we’re talking about for implanted electrodes used by people who are suffering from neurodegenerative disorders or who’ve lost their ability to communicate–the primary ethical issues are around safety and efficacy and ensuring the autonomy of the individuals on whom these are being researched are able to provide full consent — there are complex questions with deep brain stimulation about continuity of self, and what that means for a person with depression…”
–Dr. Nita Farahany, JD, MA, PhD
False psychiatric labels to wrongfully label people mentally ill–or depressed, or paranoid, or bipolar, or schizophrenic–have as we know long been used to inhumanely and unethically experiment on those also wrongfully labeled “targeted individuals” (who start out being wrongfully watchlisted by the Security Surveillance apparatus often as “terrorists” or “non-investigative subjects” as the ACLU has exposed or “troublemakers” by local community mavens who moonlight as FBI informants keen to disappear school moms with a voice)–a serious issue which needs to be publicly addressed by everyone in Medicine, Psychiatry, and Psychology, as indeed everyone in the world aware of identical abuse conducted under MK ULTRA or Soviet/Communist regimes. (Covered previously here and here, for instance.)
Neurotechnologies and EMF technologies being known in military and intelligence circles to invoke the symptoms of mental illnesses (like depression), neurodegenerative disorders, or DSM-labeled “disorders” has been publicly surfaced by numerous whistleblowers, scientists, and researchers over the years, including recently Dr. James Giordano, Dr. Charles Morgan, and Debra D. Schnelle at a Biodefense conference, and reported here earlier:
Non-consensual brain experimentation as also non-consensual energy-weapon-experimentation/testing/operation is a subject therefore which cannot be discussed openly without discussing wrongful mental-illness attribution.
Everyday Brain Sensors and Everyday Brain Hijacking via Bluetooth, Nanotech, Smart Tech: Neuralink to Meta to Microsoft to Everyone else
Of equal concern currently to pretty much everyone in the world is the casual mention of “everyday brain sensors” and the vulnerability of the human brain to non-consensual nano and micro implants, “brainjacking” (covert brain hacking), the “commodification of data”–your brain data, that is, AKA your most private thoughts, fleeting or entrenched, your prejudices and passions, desires and dreads, in addition to your language skills, your Math skills, your ability to think logically, compute clearly, summarize, connect, disengage, associate, cognize, remember, recognize, compose, write, read, dance, sing, speak, express yourself verbally or vocally, do art, fix cars, etc–and how indeed (with the right nanotech humming along inside your neurons maybe) you can be Bluetoothed just as easily as your iPhone or Thinkpad, Epsilon’d, dumbed-down, or disappeared.
Tech companies, we are told, are now flourishing and predating on human brains, coming up with different “consumer-facing” tech which really seeks to normalize brain-computer-interfaces or microchips as sensors to be secreted into earbuds and headphones and other such–while also normalizing other forms of invasive brain surveillance, already in operation in police/criminal justice as crowd control tech and limited-effect tech.
Suggesting, with Antonio Relegado, that Neuralink and Elon Musk have brought “attention to the field,” Nita Farahany says that “brain computer interface companies whether it’s implanted neurotechnology companies or the huge number of players that have started to introduce everyday brain sensors it’s really stimulated all of the major tech companies, all of the brain computer interface companies to rapidly start to think about consumer-facing technologies which is why you have Meta investing in a watch that is supposed to serve as a neural interface to augmented reality and you have Snap buying a major neurotech company called Next Minds in order to integrate into its products and you have Microsoft and Apple all looking at developing neural interface for everyone. I think it’s the big untapped Market in so many ways –right–people are used to quantifying every other aspect of their bodies and of their health but we even know virtually nothing about our own brains so I think the ‘Musk effect’ has led to a huge amount of funding and a race to be the first to develop a broad scale kind of killer app for everyone”: Is this a matter-of-fact surveying of an already too-advanced foray into brain invasion for all humanity or a seeking to normalize such as perfectly okay?
Neuro Rights or Human Rights? Brains to Regulate or Brains to Keep Private?
Neuro rights, neuro privacy, cognitive liberty: these are terms which have been conceived and surfaced for quite some time now, but who is laying claim to these concepts, why are “terms of service” being mentioned and should this be a legal issue, a moral issue, an ethical issue, or a concerted cause for alarm and massive human rights alert for all alive today on all these counts?
(“Terms of service” is a phrase used by Nita Farahany in a Guardian interview. “There are profound risks from both the commodification of the data but also what it means to have your brain activity monitored by others and what that does to freedom of thought. The technology is at an inflection point: use is ascending steeply but it is not yet mainstream. We have a moment, before the terms of service are set by others, where we can have a voice in how it is used and deployed in society.”)
Non-Consenting “Subjects” of Classified or Hidden Military/Intelligence Technologies Have Long Exposed Neurotechnology & DEW Abuse
Mind reading, replacement of your inner voice, soul-jacking–essentially transforming your personality via MK ULTRA style “crime prevention” neuro surveillance seeking to provoke or hypnotize people into crime-creation–mind-control via remote EMF tech, overwhelming synthetic telepathy, and the tracking and transforming of your mental activity or neurological state have long been reported by those covertly targeted with military and Intelligence neurotechnologies, disclosed by DOD/CIA/Navy/Army whistleblowers and scientists, and increasingly exposed now as being rolled out, including in schools and crowd control situations as post-COVID reports from China and Europe and the US and Australia demonstrate.
A significant public exposure of unlawful targeting of Americans and abuse in non-consensual brain and energy bio-effects/bio-behavioral research occurred in 2011 and 2012 with the Presidential Bioethical Commission hearings, as also with the SACHRP comments during the Common Rule revision in 2015/16 when Intelligence and Criminal Justice agencies were apparently given a free pass to experiment on civilians without any of the human rights protections the Common Rule (already watered-down version of the Nuremberg Code) offered.
Neuroethics as a means to address such rampant abuses has long been discussed on my panels and podcasts, including in such memorable interviews as with neuro rights activist Shad Budge, Columbia Neuroscience professor Dr. Rafael Yuste who brought Neuro Rights to Chile, the Invasive Neurotech, True Neuro Ethics panels, and the recent Neurotech/DEW Tech online conferences I hosted in 2021 and 2022.
It should be noted also that everyone I have interviewed or worked with over the years in relation to their exposure or/and disclosure of these neurotechnology and DEW abuses has contributed vastly to the exposing of these crimes against humanity and brought forward the entire public discourse on neuro ethics, bio ethics, and neuro rights, which all academics, private parties and media now tentatively touching these subjects need to consult. (As indeed they need to consult also the vast body of literature from numerous researchers and writers who have addressed these matters, including Cheryl Welsh, Paul Baird, Dr. Nick Begich, Dr. Rauni Kilde, Gloria Naylor, Mark Rich, Dr. John Hall, Mary Gregory, and others.)
The fact remains that these disclosures from the field cannot be overlooked in any intellectual reportage or review of technology use in this area, and a serious overhauling of the entire fields of surveillance, psychiatry, brain research–whether in public, private, or academic sectors–is long overdue.
Consent cannot be presumed for the great numbers of unwitting, involuntary, non-consenting people who have come forward in many ways to report the great harms on their persons inflicted by remote neurotechnologies and energy technologies–implicating military, intelligence, corporate, and academic research, classified or not–even by so-called neuroethicists fraudulently held up by corporate media and academe. Nita Farahany, interestingly, was a member of President Obama’s Bioethical Commission headed by Amy Gutmann in 2011 and 2012 which heard the testimonials of numerous Americans exposing these crimes (as also, curiously, was Christine Grady, wife of Anthony Fauci).
The entire industry of neural interfaces, augmented reality, prosthetics, BCI-tech, nanotech, optical imaging tech and so on needs to come under much closer scrutiny than it has currently, always in light of the vast public disclosure of crimes against humanity in such research made by many many reporters of these crimes, often dismissed, wrongfully, as a cadre of mentally ill “targeted individuals.”
Inevitably also, the abuses of animals, particularly primates, in neurotechnology and BCI (brain computer interface) research, as exposed last year in the case of the Neuralink-funded use of baby monkeys at UC Davis–reported here and questioned further by the Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine–must be further scrutinized in light of harms to humanity implicit in all such research.
Nextgov and the US Department of State report that Secretary of State Blinken has set up a new office and special envoy to focus on critical and emerging technologies in their aspect of influence on US foreign policy and diplomacy.
A January 3 Media Note from the US State Department confides that “Secretary Blinken established the office as part of the wider modernization agenda because the constellation of critical and emerging technologies reshaping the world is now an integral part of the conduct of U.S. foreign policy and diplomacy. The competition to develop and deploy foundational technologies is intensifying. The Office of the Special Envoy will bring additional technology policy expertise, diplomatic leadership, and strategic direction to the Department’s approach to critical and emerging technologies.”
Defining foreign policy and “tech diplomacy” in the arena of new technologies aiming to become “foundational” to a new era in national security seeking reliance on such technologies as Artificial Intelligence, Quantum Computing, and presumably, Nanotechnology, Neurotechnology, and Synthetic Biology, CRISPr Editing, et al is discreetly mentioned.
“As the Department works to strengthen tech diplomacy across the organization, the office will provide a center of expertise and energy to develop and coordinate critical and emerging technology foreign policy, and to engage foreign partners on emerging technologies that will transform our societies, economies, and security—including biotechnology, advanced computing, artificial intelligence, and quantum information technologies.”
Human Rights Considerations Need to Be Front and Center in Development and Promotion of New Technologies
A vast and impactful subject needing immediate public debate, discussion, and disclosure on all fronts, including the much-needed insights of experts and ethicists from the humanities and the liberal arts, human rights attorneys and advocates, activists and journalists, as well as all citizens–whose lives are daily being reshaped, wittingly or unwittingly, by the cruise-control rollout of new technologies by governments the world over–it is to be hoped the requisite steps are taken by Dr. Seth Center, the Deputy Envoy commissioned to build out the office to include this component of close analysis, examination, and inclusion of a diversity of viewpoints, particularly the human rights one, going forward.
Too much in the realm of technology advancement has been left to the ultimately inadequate devices of scientists in laboratories and academe, propelled by military and intelligence divisions whose aims and instrumentalities often do not match the interests of organically-evolving humanity.
Cybernetic or Cyber Torture is Fallout from Development of Emerging Neuro/Cyber/AI Technologies
“Public Safety” and “Mental Health” Used Wrongfully to Remove God-Given Rights and Freedoms
While the technologies of much vaunted yet unproven “transhumanism” have been summarily denounced by numerous scientists, activists, and journalists in truth media, including here by Dr. Salinas Flores, few know that Artificial Intelligence and Neuroscience/Neurotechnology development over the years has been non-consensual, involves a profoundly unethical subjugation of select citizens, dismissed in mainstream media as “targeted individuals” and, concomitantly, mentally unstable, supposedly endowed with a “behavioral health disorder” or “psychiatric disorder” while Emergency Room, Emergency Medical Services, Law Enforcement, Behavioral Health Staff are persuaded (and wrongfully promote that) such non-consenting “human test subjects” are emotionally disturbed, mentally unstable, potentially violent, self-harming, delusional patients to whom “Public Safety” and “Community Health Monitoring” protocols are being applied for their own good.
The Internet of Things and Internet of Bodies are very dark control mechanisms sold to people as Innovative and Progressive:
Some psychiatrists and psychologists have spoken out on this travesty–which causes grave harm to all.
Neuroscientists and neurobiologists in academe have been persuaded by military funding in the millions as have psychiatrists propelled newly into “Neuropsychiatry” to view invasive neurotechnology as benevolent and the “new way” forward into abrasive, controlling brain modification concealed as “improving behavioral disorders” as these articles show:
The “New Way” May Just Be the Old Way Dressed up in Techno Gear
Opportunity is rife therefore for the misuse and abuse of new and emerging technologies, and it becomes necessary for every literate human on the planet currently to understand more clearly what is meant by “advancements in technology” and how the blanket acceptance of all new technology as benign is misplaced.
Of equal concern is the misplaced role of psychiatry which is being used in medieval wise by the very entrenched agencies and divisions to “commit” into unlawful medical “care” all those the uber-censorious banker, spy, and military crowd deem “candidates for neurobio behavior modification.”
Faced with such a plethora of Techno Control Mechanisms, it is to be hoped that the first time this new Office of the Special Envoy is deployed, it runs a thorough clean-up first of all the hugely deleterious and conscienceless practices all “development of emerging technologies” has, it appears, been predicated upon.
(4) “Internationally protected person” means— (A) a Chief of State or the political equivalent, head of government, or Foreign Minister whenever such person is in a country other than his own and any member of his family accompanying him; or (B) any other representative, officer, employee, or agent of the United States Government, a foreign government, or international organization who at the time and place concerned is entitled pursuant to international law to special protection against attack upon his person, freedom, or dignity, and any member of his family then forming part of his household.”
Ramola D/:Ramola-grace: Dharmaraj would like to remind the world, in particular her own family members, all agencies involved in the crimes against her, all private persons, organizations, agencies, and associations engaged currently in the continuous crimes against her of political persecution using new and emerging technologies in violation of all international human rights law, treaties, and conventions, that her political status is that of Internationally Protected Person, and as such is entitled pursuant to international law to special protection against attack upon her person, freedom, or dignity, and any member of her family currently forming part of her household.
Inalienable, fundamental human rights are exactly that I.e. inalienable and fundamental rights that cannot be derogated from by anyone else for any reason. Eg the Right to Life and the Right not to be experimented upon without giving your informed consent freely given.
It’s for each and every individual person to assert and uphold their inalienable human rights!
In fact, it’s a constitutional DUTY to do so.
So we shouldn’t rely on the courts to sort this out.
We each have Sovereignty.
We are all EQUAL under the Rule of Law.
No-one is above the Rule of Law – not even Monarchs or Governments or MPs etc.
So each person MUST learn and understand what their fundamental, inalienable human rights are and then assert them.
You do this by going onto Google and searching for the following as starting points:
The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948)
The European Convention on Human Rights
The Human Rights Act 1998 (UK)
Re the Right to Health see Article 12 of the International Covenant on Social, Economic and Cultural Rights.
Re the Right not to be experimented upon without informed consent freely given see:
A. The Nuremberg Code (1947) and the Judgments of the International Military Tribunal in the Nuremberg Trials of the Doctors and Nurses of the Third Reich – the “Medical Cases” , 1946.
B. The Declaration of Helsinki
C. The Declaration on Human Rights and Bioethics
D. The Oviedo Convention
For Physicians DUTIES see
A. The Hippocratic Oath
B. The Geneva Declaration of the World Medical Association
C. The International Code of Medical Ethics
D. The General Medical Council’s Code of Conduct (UK)
If everyone read and knew the above laws – and upheld them – we wouldn’t all now be experiencing this nightmare.
Don’t wait for the lawyers to take cases to court and then wait for the court process and then wait for the court hearing and the judgment of a judge!!
We are ALL entitled to uphold and enforce the law against those who seek to break it.
So please everyone: read and understand your fundamental, inalienable human rights and assert them going forward so we can all collectively uphold our Constitution and our Rule of Law.
It’s there to protect us ALL from the tyranny that’s unfolding.
Repost of PDF with Note and Links | Ramola D | Dec 26, 2021
Re-posting a document posted online by Mik Anderson, the scientific researcher at Corona2Inspect, who has been comparing the data found in extant scientific literature with the images and video of vibrating quantum dots, carbon nanotubes, flouroscent nanoribbons, capsids, and other findings in the vaccines by different researchers, particularly by Dr. Pablo Campra, and finding evidence of nano-robotics: self-assembling nano-routers, nano-sensors, plasmonic antennas, and nano-circuits related to the possible building of nano-networks in the human body to overlay and displace human neural networks, permitting remote-access neurostimulation, neuromodulation, and neurocontrol: the grotesque dream of the Transhumanists seeking to hybridize humans via bioengineering, nano-robotics, and synthetic biology into digitized beings linkable in an Internet of Bio Nano Things and Internet of Things, for eventual linkage to a AI-run Global Brain Net and Internet of Bodies.
La Quinta Columna has been addressing these discoveries in various videos lately, including this one on Dec 22, 2021: La Quinta Columna: The Origin of COVID-19 and the Final Objective concluding that graphene in vaccines (both COVID vaccines and in previously-administered flu, meningitis, and other vaccines) giving rise to self-assembling nano-networks, and the thrombi induced by this foreign invasion leads to the symptoms wrongfully being attributed to COVID, a hypothesis they have earlier discussed.
The replacement of human neural networks with nanotechnology using nano energy harvesters called nano rectennas is discussed in Mik Anderson‘s latest article:
INTRACORPORAL NANONETWORK: A Brief Summary/Mik Anderson
This summarizing document by Mik Anderson is very helpful in explaining the many different aspects of nano-networks and how the transhumanizing and nano-robotizing objectives are being achieved, without humanity’s consent, and like Celeste Solum’s articles, offer a heads-up and warning intelligence to all that we need to get informed, stay informed, and begin speaking openly against such rampant biological takeover by megalomaniacs:
Please support this ongoing work of independent investigative research and journalism via Patreon or via Paypal.
Given how extensively I am shadowbanned and deplatformed on social media–more than most, since I expose Manufactured-Target “Counter Terrorism” which persecutes whistleblowers, activists, journalists, natural leaders with 24/7 Microwave/Acoustic/ELF/RFID Weapon Assault–I ask everyone to share this information widely on your social media platforms (please download/upload my videos on your channels; re-post my articles, reports, posts, reposts at your websites, with linkback) so all those being deceived by mainstream media may learn the truth and save their children from the harms and planned digital enslavement intended by the non-vaccines, aerosols (chem trails), radiation, and other means of humanity-takeover being used against us.
On the eve of the anniversary of the massacre at Tiananmen Square, on June 4, 1989, in Beijing, China, when 100s or 1000s of Chinese students seeking democracy were victimized by a massive military attack crushing basic human rights and freedoms (estimates of deaths range from 800 to 4000 and have been officially downplayed (as 241) and suppressed), it seems fitting to post further notice of the worldwide “TI Program” which many who are being unlawfully targeted under cover of surveillance and counter-terrorism laws in the “democratic-in-name-only” West and worldwide today attest is being levied against them–while all in their neighborhoods, social circles, and employment circles can also attest exists, since these very self-deceiving “upright citizens” (corralled by the local fusion-center Gestapo) willingly participate in actions of social ostracism, character assassination, and facilitation of electronic assault-and-battery masquerading as “surveillance” and “community monitoring” against them.
“TI” has come to be short form for “Targeted Individual,” a term in itself conflicted and questionable, since it has come to be used pejoratively as a label and pigeonholing device, while the associations with it of mental-illness–studiously cultivated by propaganda-pushing and openly deceitful mainstream media (such as VICE News in this film it terms “empathetic of mentally ill TIs”), complicit psychiatrists, and the whole syndicate of funded criminals in “Law Enforcement,” “Homeland Security,” and “Bureaus of Investigation” who work with local corporate informants and corrupt public officials in local and state government to target innocents, as reported here in the US and here earlier to President Trump in 2017 and in 2019, across a range: activists, journalists, whistleblowers, artists, writers, poets, civic-minded community leaders, anyone who speaks out to a “connected” School Board official or city councilor or crosses the path of local Freemasons and Secret Society occultists or non-illumined “Illuminati” whether these be Mayors, School Board Presidents, or Governors, and label them “suspects,” “terrorists,” “violent extremists”–are intentional, deliberate, and succeed in deceiving many.
The “TI Program” has also come to be recognized worldwide–and the extreme forms of persecution and COINTELPRO previously reported only by Intelligence agency whistleblowers and activists who made the mistake of acting with integrity on the job and have been hounded for it forever are now being reported in selfsame guise by hundreds of thousands of once-free Americans, British, Europeans, Asians, Australians. Some analysts and observers say however there is no one program under which people are being targeted and persecuted, who distinguish political persecution as separate. Indeed it appears there are many, but those who are not necessarily political targets–never having been activists or whistleblowers–but who report the same kind of abusive physical torture and social ostracism protocols seem to concur that the methodologies of public and covert harassment they experience are very similar.
Whistleblowers from Defense, the CIA, Intelligence & Security agencies, information from FOIA requests, declassified documents have now confirmed what many report, that unacknowledged neuro-experimentation and non-lethal weapons testing is underway, both via US DOD and NATO diclosures, that “crowd-control technologies” using spectrum (EMF) weapons and acoustic (neuro) weapons are being tested and operated, that AI and supercomputing along with controlling synthetic biology and nanotechnology, cybernetics and robotics is being tested and developed competitively by companies and countries, as reported in this recent report:
It becomes clear therefore that the vagaries of “counter-terrorism” and “countering violent extremism” and “surveillance” have been used abusively by Intelligence agencies and DHS to acquire or manufacture targets for use in covered research, weapons-testing, and experimentation projects, as new technologies of BCI-AI, V2K, millimeter wave weapons and microwave pulse weapons have (without public debate or consideration for ethics and human rights) emerged from military research into use on the streets by Justice & Law Enforcement, as described in depth recently by Finnish policy analyst Ville Helleberg in his report to the OHCR:
Those told their friend, colleague, or neighbor is “under investigation” are recruited to participate in the Neuro Linguistic Programming and other Psychological Warfare protocols, under threat of high fines or jail time–as FBI whistleblower Geral Sosbee has revealed is common practice when false warrants and court orders are issued in secret by corrupt Federal Magistrate Judges or FISA court judges seeking to bury targets alive. Those targeted are stripped of all human and civil rights, pursued, persecuted, and subjected to high-tech torture in their homes, on their couches, in their beds at night–in ways that obliterate the Nuremberg Code, the Geneva conventions, all human rights laws, and tear common shame and decency to bits.
Secrecy needs to be ripped wide open, and classified research involving human subjects–and permitting such extreme atrocity–needs to be stopped, as CIA and DOD whistleblower Dr. Robert Duncan has stated:
Amy Rayboun, a “TI” investigator, researcher, advocate, and human rights activist who works to offer support and insight to those targeted whom she encounters, offers this information on the “TI Program” for all who may have no idea such cruelty and such atrocity can exist today, and for all “true-TIs” in support and acknowledgment of their infinite suffering. Many have been killed, this should also be known, through various means: attrition and health breakdown through constant frequency weapon attack or pushed-suicide through radio-hypnosis and frequency weapon attack or provoked police-shootings: these are nothing but Satanic programs of torture, abuse, life takeover, and human guinea-pigging, they are egregious in every way, and they should be stopped.
Many thanks to Amy Rayboun for this summary and confirmation of the gross violations of human and civil rights that those targeted are being subjected to. The physical abuse and torture being reported by those targeted establishes definitively that the use of classification to conceal the atrocities being wrought on targets is a criminal use of such classification.
May all reading be awakened to and act on the urgency of the need to bring these programs to an immediate end.
And on this 32nd anniversary of the Tiananmen massacre, may the world and China break free of the clutches of Communism & totalitarianism and return to sanity and freedom.
THE PROGRAM ALL TRUE TIs ARE BLACKLISTED IN TO….SILENT WAR TACTICS, TECHNIQUES, BOMBARDMENTS, AND INDUCTIONS DESCRIBED IN THE PROGRAM (PART 1) AND (PART 2)….
THE PROGRAM (PART 1)…
– done to destroy one’s personal and professional life
– half-truths, rumors, and lies are strategically spread into their lives
– may be the basis for a bogus investigation
– rumors circulated are shocking and repulsive. rumors are one is a pedophile, prostitute, terrorist, racist, anti-government, mentally ill, drug addict, drug dealer, or a threat
– those spreading the lies are acquaintances and/or family members who were recruited, lied to, intimidated, and blackmailed into becoming informants
– law enforcement has used tactics to destroy people that they either wanted to recruit as informants or those they knew they could not recruit and wanted to destroy
– done for the purpose of constant harassment with planned destructiveness and destroying relationships. done simultaneously with the goal of breaking someone down
– rumors spread to neighbors, friends, family, employers, etc. spent to separate/induce isolation for a TI from their friends and families.
– labeling one a pedophile is damaging and produce optimum leverage for gaining community support
– harassed by neighbors and vigilante groups to the point where they are driven out of communities, forced out of work, and driven out of multiple states
SENSITIVITY PROGRAMS (USED FOR BEHAVIOR MODIFICATION)
– borderline-subliminal attacks designed to induce phobias
– uses anchors and triggers
– goal is to condition people with damaging emotions linked to triggers such as objects, colors, movements, and sounds
– TIs are covertly injured openly in public AND may happen with or without the TI’s conscious awareness
– purpose is to get TI to “respond emotionally to a particular trigger.” negative emotions are then built into the protocol
– sound, movement, or object becomes the trigger that will invoke the emotion
– process of creating anchors has also been called Emotional Transference
– patterns of behavior can be installed AND then reactivated whenever a similar situation is encountered or created. perps intentionally install anchors to return the TI to specific emotional states. first, the perp will create the desired emotional state in the TI
– deliberate infliction of emotional pain is an act of violence
– TIs world wide have witnessed this being done with sounds, gestures, cell phones, laptops, pens, cars, watches, clothing, symbols, colors, and other items. perps will reinforce these anchors and triggers with an occasional “blitz attack”
– TIs stalked by multiple people who carry that object, wear that color, or utter that phrase. brings to the surface all the emotional pain a TI suffered during that particular experience
– stockholm syndrome, pavlovian conditioning program, etc…
SPACE INVASION (CROWDING)
– includes blocking, cut-offs, and swarming
– TIs may be encircled by people wearing colors or holding objects that has been used to sensitized them. prolonged crowding can have an extremely negative effect on your mental/emotional health
– deliberate space invasion is designed to look like normal cut-offs and collisions. it can happen with vehicles, on foot, or a combination
– intended to startle people and make them tense. used in blind areas such as corners, hallways, restrooms, or intersections where TIs have people or cars cutting them off OR almost hitting them in a calculated manner
– happens in stores, buildings and on the street, with people and vehicles
– can be induced crowding
– perps adjust their timing so that they meet the TI at the exact point where there is the least amount of space for all parties to pass which maximizing the invasion of the TI’s space
– purpose is to get the TI’s attention and make them uncomfortable
– happens in stores while making purchases, restaurants, businesses, where targets have people frequently cutting them off, invading their space, using sensitivity programs, or other harassment tactics
– TIs experience a steady stream of noise consisting of different types of noise disturbances around their residence. includes but not limited to door slamming, yelling, car alarms, horns, tires screeching, loud music, engines revving, and frequent construction projects from heavy machinery and tools
– other types of disturbances include frequent noise from lawn mowers, snow blowers, vehicles with loud exhaust systems, and ambulance sirens, etc…
– noise will be synchronized with some type of activity
– made as TI leaves to appear to serve as a form of communication to alert perps in the area to begin pursuit
– used as a weapon to inflict pain
– produces adverse physiological AND psychological health effects, i.e., high blood pressure, a rise in cholesterol, damage to the circulatory, cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, and musculoskeletal systems
HARASSMENT SKITS (STREET THEATRE)
– used during group stalking and contains verbal and non-verbal harassment, threats, insults, intimidation, and violence, conveyed overtly, or covertly using themes, symbolism, or other medium
– harassment can be relayed with metaphors, verbal remarks, and symbolism using clothing or other items
– perps stomp their feet, clear their throat, or cough to indicate that they are part of the program. perps speaking on their cell phone and loudly accent the insult as they walk by and stare at the TI. blatant, hostile, or smirking stares, overtly insults as TI walks by are all common
– TIs are harassed, insulted, and threatened with symbolism using articles of clothing, newspapers, and other items. symbolism used with articles of clothing, especially during a wave attack where a TI is “blitzed” by a crowd of perps who smile, laugh, stare at them, and cut them off as TI passes.
PATTERNS FOR COVERT ATTACKS
– they attack covertly
– conceal their harassment by using existing events that occur naturally
– usually cover for the harassment
– conceal much of the harassment using a basic, simple formula
the basic, simple formula is…
– frequency: how often an event occurs AND the number of acts within a single event.
– duration: length of a single event AND the non-stop nature of the harassment in general.
– intensity: amplification of acts such as sound, sight, crowding, etc. within an event.
– noise disturbances emanate from areas surrounding one’s residence.
– happens simultaneously, strung together, AND one right after the other.
– disturbances may be synchronized with one’s activity, such as one’s arrival or departure.
– disturbances may be a part of a NOISE CAMPAIGN consisting of an alteration of other types of noise.
– frequency and duration formula is also used in MOBBING.
– noise disturbances can be overused for an individual tactic when the tactics are combined and used in a round-the-clock fashion resulting in amplification of their overall potency.
BASIC PROTOCOL/TACTICS (purpose: TIs personality traits can be cataloged AND designed to make someone to appear that they are suffering from a mental disorder)…
– surveillance of targets
– monitoring of their private lives
– entry into their homes (break-ins)
– “singled out” for preliminary stages of harassment
– gang stalking (overt surveillance) ensues
– harassment gradually increases to extreme conditions
– can be attacked with microwave weapons (DEWs)
– neuro-linguistic Programming (NLP) (a type of mind-control)
– can have street theatre or staged events
– can have planned harassment skits aka BLOCKING or SWARMING
– includes informants who surround TIs (targets) for the purpose of conversations intended to be overheard that contains information about the TIs personal life
– may be emotionally drained
– unable to properly identify or explain what is happening to them
– psychological warfare tactics are intended to drive people crazy
MENTAL HEALTH SYSTEM
– US has used doctors to help abuse and discredit people
– collaboration between doctors and the military when experiments were carried out in prisons, hospitals, and universities on unwitting people in North America
– psychiatrist and psychologists provide cover for THE PROGRAM
– in Russia, enemies of the dictatorship would be thrown into mental institutions and drugged beyond recovery
– APA’s refusal to acknowledge the impact of terrorization upon the human psyche
– DSM (Diagnostic Statistical Manual) is a cover for THE PROGRAM
– paranoia and schizophrenia for anyone who ‘complains’ of THE PROGRAM
– NSA DOMINT (Domestic Intelligence) has the ability to covertly assassinate US citizens by running covert psychological control operations to cause TIs to be diagnosed with ill mental health
– THE PROGRAM itself is designed to mimic mental illness
– mental health professionals participate in THE PROGRAM, wittingly or unwittingly label targets as mentally ill; allowing THE PROGRAM to continue to operate covertly
– once a person is singled out, dwellings surrounding the TI will be sublet and used as bases of operation and training
– unusual patterns of occupancy, lots of people coming and going into these “bases”
– vehicles and license plates used by the “occupants” of the bases may change periodically
– the people who move into these bases have been linked to the DOJ, CIA, and other federal agencies, universities, and government defense contractors
– information obtained by surveillance is used for no ethical reason
– other than to establish a harassment protocol that follows that TI (targeted individual) for the rest of his or her life
– uses very sophisticated equipment that can locate TIs through walls. the equipment is used in combination with Directed Energy Weapons (DEWs) and other “non-lethals.”
– miniature microphones and cameras may be planted in one’s residence or through-the-wall infrared devices may be used to monitor one’s movement. for example, Life Assessment Detector System (LADS) have a range of about 135 feet and can detect heartbeat and respiration.
SOLDIER (SURVEILLANCE TECHNOLOGY)
– radar flashlight that has a standoff distance of 30 feet and detects motion behind a wall at 30 feet
– display images in 3D format. can detect respiration, and can see through, wood, brick, plasterboard, glass, and concrete
– used on TIs worldwide and is much more advanced (not available to the public)
THE PROGRAM (PART 2)…
SETUPS AND CONFRONTATIONS
– frame TIs for crimes and/or to participate in staged events that foster character assassination
– provoke TIs into confrontations
– will get into setup and staged confrontations with homeless TIs who are well-dressed and very clean to create big public scenes
– confrontations can aid with recruitment
– photos or video footage taken of an enraged TI after they have been antagonized (setup) assists with smear campaigns AND when leveraging support of the community, facilitates the removal of the TI
– multiple complaints filed independently which entail the same report may expedite removal of the TI
– setups and staged confrontations are done to get TIs into the penal or mental health system
– local police participate in stalking and framing TIs for crimes
– Cointelpro has routine setups and fabrication of evidence that is used to destroy a person’s character OR have them imprisoned
– FBI framed innocent people (TIs) for crimes by having informants commit perjury. some of the informants were murderers (20+ murder informants used by FBI). to protect them (FBI), federal law enforcement worked diligently to prevent homicide cases from being resolved
– DOJ personnel are liars, perverts, frame-up artists, and assassins AND the elite used the FBI to orchestrate the cover-up
STORES AND RESTAURANTS
– staff work in tandem with informants to harass TIs
– staff appears to be friendly as they stick their elbows in a TI’s face, repeatedly kick their chair, crowd them while taking an order, crowd while delivering food, intentionally mess-up orders, and appear clumsy or incompetent by accidentally dropping food or silverware on TIs
– CROWDING, blocking, cut-offs, and swarming while TI goes to restroom and dining table; staff (informants) repeats information about the TIs personal life via cell phone
– sensitization by staff perps wearing a specific color to harass TIs
– harass TIs to invoke a sense of helplessness in the TI so he/she will not be believed if he/she told someone about the harassment
– store clerks work with informants in their store to crowd, block, and cut TIs off
– store clerks participate in noise campaigns by banging merchandise on shelves, throwing boxes on the floor as TIs passes by, slams doors, slams items on counters, and other types of loud commotion
– noise campaigns and street theatre are intended to create a hostile environment to persuade TI to leave AND let the TI know they are being watched (surveillance)
– products from vendors over the phone or online; the TI frequently encounters representatives who does not return calls AND appears vague or incompetent. TIs receive poor service that is recurrently consistent
FRIENDS AND FAMILY
– may be recruited to break TI down
– may participate in harassment skits intended to make the TI look incompetent, inconsistent, hypocritical, mock, and demoralize TI
– ‘new friends’ pose as confidants who abruptly end ‘friendships’ under deliberate, degrading, and humiliating circumstances to purposely heighten emotional trauma in the TI in order to provoke an uncontrolled response and induce heightened isolation
– family forced to carry out some of the harassment tactics. at home, family may frequently slam doors, cabinets, draws, and other types of noises. in addition, family may crowd and/or block TI
– family members are forced by their handlers to guide the TI through participating in street theatre. family will interact with other informants to harass the TI. skits are intended to make the TI feel foolish, incompetent, or inconsistent
THEFTS AND BREAK-INS
– no sign of forced entry
– occur when TI is sleeping or elsewhere
– occur despite home security system in place
– leave evidence of their visits by relocating objects or committing petty/not-so-petty acts of vandalism
– informants commit small-scale damage which includes but is not limited to the following: ripping TI’s clothing, pouring out milk, coffee, and other items
– informants will steal items and bring back at a later date. they will relocate items by placing them in slightly different spots. the purpose is to gaslight TI. (gaslighting tactics)
– vandalism of property, theft of items, and relocation of items is used for the purpose of driving the TI insane (psychological warfare)
– TIs reporting small vandalism to law enforcement will appeared to have gone insane
– surreptitious break-ins, thefts, and sabotage were a staple part of old Cointelpro
SABOTAGE, VANDALISM, AND STAGED EVENTS
– electronic equipment frequently fails, i.e., electrical systems in their cars, brand new appliances, TVs, radios, PCs, and other electronic equipment suddenly dies OR acts strangely…frequent, ongoing computer trouble/problems is common which does not follow any logical pattern
– electronics sudden malfunction/failing can be attributed to the E-bomb (electronic mail bomb)
– minor vandalism is for the purpose of informing the TI that he/she is under surveillance
– large-scale property damage is done to homes/vehicles. large-scale property damage is but not limited to the following: slashed tires, broken/smashed windows, tampering with break lines, draining oil out of cars, tampering with electronic components and batteries, cutting break lines, breaks failing suddenly, clutches failing, and the destruction of electrical equipment
– pets die suddenly of mysterious illness
– vandalism and pets being tortured is in retaliation for a TI taking action to expose informants and their crimes
– deliberately attempted collisions by drivers aka informants who speed away quickly (staged event)
– intentionally being run off the road has caused fatal car accidents and TI’s vehicles being totaled, leaving TI deceased or with a non-operable vehicle
– multiple independent vehicles are used to facilitate an accident (staged event). the main purpose is for the accident to appear as though it was caused by the TI (framing the TI for the accident happening)
– informants recipe for murder OR framing the TI for any “accidental” deaths that would have occurred if a staged event is successful for vehicular homicide
– TIs experience more tailgating and cut-offs
– vehicles pull out past stops signs as TI approaches intersection (done to startle TI)
– rotation of vehicles that surround TI on highway AND rotation of people tailgating TIs
– when rotation/tailgating of TI is done in a recurrent manner by multiple vehicles; it can antagonize the TI’s behavior and may serve to encourage the TI to accelerate his/her speed. as a direct result of accelerating, the TI could get pulled over (very effective if one is not aware he/she is targeted)
– vehicles marked with an identifying feature or color is used as a sensitization tactic to trigger negative emotions which have been anchored to that ‘feature’ (features may include but not limited to: a uniform; a shade of red, have their lights on even during daytime, etc…). purpose is used as a method to unite the group of informants and promote informants’ group cohesiveness on highway
– common vehicles/aircraft used to stalk TIs include but are not limited to: city/state vehicles, off-duty metro buses, school buses, local restaurant delivery vehicles, city/construction vehicles, fire trucks, ambulances, police cars, postal/UPS vehicles, taxis, 18 wheelers, helicopters, and small planes
– vehicles belong to organizations selected for recruitment into the ‘citizen informant programs’
– convoys of vehicles all spaced the same distance and traveling at the same speed will stalk the TI
– vehicular brighting is an attack
– brighting tactics are maximized when a vehicle has one headlight grossly misaligned and the misalignment produces a hi-beaming effect
– frequency and duration play an important role in brighting
– lights are shined into a TI’s windows
– the most common ‘non-lethal weapons’ are bright lights (brighting)
– the intent is to reduce risks of injury by temporarily ‘hindering’ the eyesight of the TI
– job opportunities are destroyed
– TIs who are employed are MOBBED
– progressive financial depletion induced by TIs loss of employment AND compounded by the extra expenses from the harassment
– termination of employment involved prefatory harassment by employer and co-workers aka MOBBING AND will coincide with other overt forms of harassment
– blacklisting originally used as a foreign-policy tool
– slander plays a critical role in blacklisting
– law enforcement sends ‘watch lists’ to corporations which contain the names of individuals who are NOT under official investigation or wanted. agencies/corporations target and harass TIs by deliberately destroying his/her careers on a massive scale
– applicants denied work because their names appeared on the watch list of applicants that the corporation reviewed
– TI is treated like a leper, only getting the worst jobs
– if one is uncooperative with the state, then one will live in poverty (economic warfare)
– not permitted to enter into universities
– MOBBING continues on to interviews for the purpose of further traumatizing the TI AND designed to humiliate the TI
– interviewers can commit harassment to the TI with little fear of being caught/consequences
– harassment is masked in layers of accommodation to help strengthen the illusion that ‘the TI is not working because the TI chooses not to’
– TIs experience tampering or lost mail because the mail is intercepted
– the purpose is to get as much information as possible that it will aid in the harassment and intimidation of the TI
– one main objective for communication interference is to disrupt the communication systems of the TI
– TIs receive lots of harassing telephone calls. the phone itself is utilized as a tool for harassment
– search engine results are filtered (blocked) and replaced with information pertaining to a TI’s personal life. websites that a TI visits are spoofed to contain information that is intended to let the TI know he/she is being stalked in/on the internet
– online version of public stalking
– purpose of tactic is used for inductions of a sense of hopelessness and isolation
– TIs receive “unsolicited” email that parallels a current event in his/her life
– TIs receive covert insults and threats
– TIs receive harassment via threads posted on message boards
– the topics of these message board threads are about events unfolding in the TI’s personal life that may contain covert directed threats/insults to TI
– TI’s email is blocked/filtered AND web activity monitored
– the harassment of some TIs is broadcasted around the country via closed circuit TV
– in the workplace, harassment is done by surveillance systems
– surveillance films of TIs gang stalked in the office is for the purpose of facilitating perp group cohesiveness and in identifying TIs
– presently, surveillance film serves as a major source of entertainment for the informants participating in harassment as more overt degenerates are known to record the TIs actions so they can “re-live” the experience
– covert workplace surveillance is big business….$$$$
– surveillance system equipment is installed after hours which includes miniature cameras hidden inside but not limited to the following locations: thermostats, light switches, on walls and in ceilings, changing areas, locker rooms, break rooms, and bathrooms
NON-LETHAL WEAPONS (NLW)
– weapons exist and are being used on the civilian population
– NLWs are the following: Directed Energy Weapons (DEW), Psychotronic Weapons, Less-lethal Weapons, and Electromagnetic Weapons
– most TIs are hit with these weapons
– located in bases of operation which surround TIs
– NLWs may be satellite or tower-based
– TIs receive DEW attacks while traveling via airplanes or vehicles
– briefcase-sized portable weapons are used to attack TIs
– some of these non-lethal weapons (NLW) are Through-The-Wall (TTW) weapons
– presently used on a massive scale against citizens of North America and other NATO nations
– outsourced to the FBI to put NLWs in all the police departments in the US
– NLWs are deliberately misused on a global scale as a traceless form of slow kill/torture
– types of unclassified DEWs cause nausea, fatigue, headaches, liquefy bowels, and a variety of other symptoms
– TIs are disoriented by low-frequency acoustic beams that provokes vomiting and diarrhea
– some NLWs are used on both land and space based
– NWLs uses are the following but not limited to: the use of the electrical grid throughout the country, the use of microwave towers, and devices affixed to poles that are connected to power lines.
– NLWs systems are used by neighbors surrounding the TI who is singled out as the target
– NLWs have been used on the civilian population for decades
Report by Ville Hellberg | Posted by Ramola D | 31.05.2021
Note: This is a major report from a European policy analyst exposing the horrors of counter-terrorism and mass surveillance torture programs being run worldwide since 9/11 by US, Five-Eyes, Fifteen-Eyes, EU member nations under agreement with US intelligence and security agencies, self-labeled as surveillance and counter-terrorism, self-permissive of bio-hacking and neuro-hacking, using invasive anti-personnel Electronic Warfare neuroweaponry, self-permissive of “No-Touch Torture” and remote-access physical and neurological abuse, shrouded in secrecy and propaganda, deeply invasive of human privacy, and unleashing Stasi, Nazi, Mengele-style programs of atrocity, torture, physical, and psychological abuse in concentric circles of control on millions of innocent civilians, wrongfully labeled “suspects” and “terrorists” for purposes of competitive development worldwide of supercomputing AI, cybernetics, robotics, neuroprosthetics, Brain Nets, Mind Hives, Cerebral Internets, and brain-degrading Neuroweaponry all at the cost of massive human suffering and human lives, revealing a complete breakdown of ethics and consideration for human rights among governments, militaries, security, and Intelligence agencies, seen through the eyes of European policy analysis and human rights convictions examining US Foreign Policy just as much as state of the art Surveillance Technology and Neurotechnology.
While these programs of political persecution and hidden torture are the same ones American human rights campaigners and others worldwide have been discussing widely in articles and books (see Targeting is Real), this report is groundbreaking and unique in its close examination of the US “War on Terror” declared by George Bush in 2001, which has influenced US Foreign Policy and coerced European submission to a worldwide fixation on counter-terrorism and mass surveillance inducive of clampdowns and removals of civil rights and liberties, and destroyed the concepts, principles, and protections of democracy worldwide, including European concepts of human dignity and rights completely at odds with American imperialism. “Europeans do not wish to bring the War on Terror to European soil,” writes Ville Hellberg from Finland.
What few people know–thanks to mainstream media propaganda and long-term occlusion of human rights reportage with deprecating, discrediting cover, intended to obfuscate, of “Targeted Individuals” who have been reporting extreme torture and abuse now for over three decades–is that American counter-terrorism and surveillance programs and laws have gone well beyond the revelations of Edward Snowden and permitted egregious torture, abuse, and removal of rights on American soil, as reported by this writer and others to President Trump in 2017 and 2019:
What Ville Hellberg brings to this disclosure is keen insight into the structure of global security agreements, the excessive role played by US “War on Terror” foreign policy demands, the rise of new technologies permitting extreme invasion of human, bio and neuro privacy, the false legalizing of “sources and methods” of interrogation and investigation granted to Intelligence and Security agencies, and the crying need to address and end the silent suffering of thousands of innocent citizens, wrongfully targeted, blacklisted, ostracized, tortured, maimed, disfigured, continually abused, destroyed, and yes, also murdered–in a complete breakdown of recognition of human rights–worldwide. Many thanks to Ville Hellberg for this powerful and deeply thoughtful analysis and report, which is surely going to pave the path to positive change, going forward.
RENDITION FLIGHTS, ANYONE? INTER- AND CROSS-GOVERNMENTAL TORTURE PROGRAMS MANIFESTED UNDER THE NEW SURVEILLANCE AND COUNTER-TERRORISM LAWS WITHHOLD LEGAL PROTECTION, HUMAN RIGHTS, AND CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS FROM CIVILIANS, THEIR TARGETS
Ville Hellberg | May 31, 2021
WE ARE WITNESSING GLOBAL ELECTRONIC WARFARE BY SUPERPOWERS WHERE INDIVIDUALS, POPULATIONS, AND INFRASTRUCTURE ARE TARGETED. DUE TO THE WAR CIRCUMSTANCE, GOVERNMENTS HAVE PERMITTED THEMSELVES TO DIVERT FROM LAWS AND DEMOCRATIC PRINCIPLES.
”Torture is a horrific topic and most minds will turn away from it because it can’t be comprehended that humans can be motivated, or computer programs can be run to do this to other sentient beings. Just when we believed we were becoming more civilized as a culture, the technology for torture has advanced more than a hundred fold in recent decades.” – Robert Duncan, ‘Neuropsychological and electronic “no-touch torture”. The spectrum of “interrogation” and torture techniques used by the US and its allies’. 
Electronic Warfare (EW) anti-personnel applications such as DEW (directed energy weapons) and AW (acoustic weapons), as well as their distant cousins neuropsychological electronic (neurotech) applications RNM (remote neural monitoring)/RMI (remote mental imaging) /EEG (electroencephalogram), and the product of these, V2K (microwave hearing), among other techniques, are being directed to civilians globally. With the exception of capital-intensive neurotech applications or other mass operations, the tech can be operated by private sector agencies and corporates, whilst the operations are in general run by military and law enforcement agencies from multifunctional radar and antenna platforms globally. Even though the applications are used in connection with psychological operations, they have the fatal capacity and produce pain, suffering and psychological trauma, even fatalities in their targets; civilians. Thus, the utilisation supports the definition of torture. Under governments’ execution, the operations are run by the military whose clientele the national security, law enforcement, intelligence societies are. Whether the implementation and targeting of this technology on civilians constitute a war crime should be evaluated. The technology ’consumes’ the human body, especially the neurological system, as directed to its targets for over inhumanly prolonged periods. Other scientists say the neurotech mass surveillance AI applications should be considered as a WMD. It is imperative indeed to acknowledge that the vast increase in numbers of targeted civilians indicates a widespread attack on human rights.
Due to its stealth nature, the technology has attracted military budgets globally. Other governments have developed sophisticated global operations and are well advanced in the utilisation of this technology. However, due to the low cost of operations most governments have utilised their own version of the technology. This also involves increased non-consented human testing and yet another armament. Human testing on dissidents, activists and whistleblowers, even their descendants, seems common. Whilst the effects of resonance spectrum frequencies on the human body and nervous system were discovered to their full potential by the midst of the 1970s , it still needed an agenda and strategy for implementation. The new millennium has brought us “the War on Terror” in which counter-terrorism and mass surveillance laws introduced legal instruments to allow the use of “mass surveillance neurotechnology” under which the resonance technologies are operated. The use of anti-terrorism as an agenda is an unconstitutional plan of the Western coalition that has significantly strengthened sovereign national power at the expense of human rights and democratic systems through surveillance laws.
The new dynamics of global geopolitics have also impacted the global power balance and foreign and security policies. We may have to accept that there are several superpowers capable of globally utilising this technology against the citizens of other countries. International laws should regulate the imperialistic execution of these technologies by regime and purpose e.g. automatized targeting, target selection, technology and intergovernmental co-operation should be regulated and watched carefully. There are some parallel operations and agendas that further increase the number of targeted people and populations. When the operations are global it is likely the resonances are directed through OTHRs (over-the-horizon-radar) and satellites which in turn facilitates the discovery of the source radar. For the sake of clarity, it is sensible to acknowledge that cellular phones have a key role in locating targets and delivering biometrics. The MSM is full of cover articles when one government is caught using the technology and blaming the others. Recently, we have seen evidence of purposely leaked material in MSM regarding global Electronic Warfare, in attacks where resonance technologies have been used, such as the attacks to White House officials  and Cuban embassy staff  by assumed DEW microwave technologies. These operations have been leaked not only to inform the public and other governments of the ongoing global Electronic Warfare but also to blame the other governments. It is reasonable however, to recognise that these attacks really are lightweight samples of the use of the WMDs. People should be suspicious in view of the recent bushfires also. In other words, it is the infrastructure, populations and individuals that are being targeted in this global war and not discussed in the MSM. We are indeed viewing the evidence of a global war.
The technology is poorly understood by lawmakers, practioners and politicians it is presented by military and law enforcement lobbyist and therefore, become approved and utilised globally. Human rights activists are in search of political co-operation whereas the political or administrative powers will not touch the topic. There is a significant number of similarities in details of this “play” to the events of WWII where the messengers of the Holocaust had not been taken seriously either.
Brain invasive neurotechnology applications (RNM/RMI/EEG) are claimed to have been used in mass surveillance operations. The applications are commonly called “cybernetics” although finding common global terminology for the EW applications seems problematic. We suggest the use of military terminology since the technology is based on military design. Each technology presented in this paper should be defined as Electronic Warfare anti-personnel applications, including the mass surveillance neurotechnology applications.
The mass surveillance operations target civilians and their neural systems. The operation is automated and run by supercomputers through multifunctional radar or antenna systems which means robotic elements are involved. In the investigations of the neural systems of the targeted civilians, the cortex is being stimulated by a spectrum of electromagnetic pulses for years in order to clone the entire neural system. The methodology is called synthetic telepathy since it may investigate and implant thoughts and mind patterns into the targeted brains. The term “mind control” implies the domination of the conscious nervous system. The process is not painless, hence the term “no-touch torture”. A group of brains can be linked together as “brain network” which in turn assists supercomputers to develop a competitive advantage in the field of AI. In “neuropsychological electronic torture” painful stimulants help to cause a reaction in the targets’ cortex that is measured and biometrics collected. Synthetic telepathy refers to reading and replacing one’s thoughts with “synthetic thoughts” or even by another mind replacement. The recent development where mobile devices, phones, can be used to collect and introduce these emissions i.e., ICT and 5G networks are in use. Scientists have developed systems to take nanotech to the brains which then receive the resonances. It has been presented that the mass delivery of this nanotech would occur through public vaccinations. The nanotech operates using the body energy (piezoenergetics) or by energy delivered resonances. Thus, the resonances deliver both the energy and the informantion in form of commands. The delivery of these resonances can be arranged from any platform, even by mobile device emissions. The mass surveillance utilises satellites and OTHRs. This allows continued mass observations of the feelings, senses, thoughts, and actions of the target. The fact is that individual’s free will and degree of autonomy are hugely affected.
As a result of the recent breakthrough of technological development different forms of applications are being utilized in many areas in the society, such as police, customs office, border control, prosecutor, judicial system, and intelligence community but also in the private sector. The technology remains unregulated and lacks sufficient measures of supervision, monitoring, and control due to the covert nature of the operations. In Europe, the situation is being recognized  by lawmakers to a certain extent. Whilst the EU has been speculated to push through a reform  on the laws of AI mass surveillance to ban the use of AI for mass surveillance (from the private sector alone) and some other uses this has not been ratified. There has been a good progress made to impose further regulation on automated weapons systems  and interrogation methodologies . In addition, the consistency of surveillance laws is being evaluated in the EU by the ECHR . It seems lawmakers do not understand the technology since they only have the military introduction to it. In the absence of ethical aspects, international laws, regulation, and compassion, solidarity the torture-like execution continues to be conducted, hence the phenomenon of targeted individuals.
Too little is spoken in public about white-collar law enforcement and intelligence community operations’ military tactics that produce pain, suffering, and psychological problems to civilians. Resonance technologies are at the core of the Western intelligence community and law enforcement operations today, executed by the military among others. Yet it is unclear which government agencies and how many countries are abusing neurotech methodologies. The military technologies have been introduced to politicians under anti-terrorism agenda by a Western intelligence coup as surveillance methodologies with a major detail left ignored, that the technology causes significant pain, suffering, physical and psychological trauma, even fatalities. The technologies are also being widely misused in operations lacking supervision in an unregulated industry in the absence of ethical aspects.
Such tactics as DEW (directed energy weaponry; laser, maser, high power microwave and radio frequencies as well as particle beams), AW (acoustic weaponry), RNM (remote neural monitoring), reverse EEG (electroencephalogram), and V2K (microwave hearing) to mention a few are somewhat creatively executed from multifunction radars and a series of antennas and directed to their living targets from a diversity of platforms with satellite assistance. Despite the fact that these are military tactics, and a crucial part of Electronic Warfare anti-personnel operations, they are being directed towards civilians to cause pain and suffering when misused and therefore, must be considered as torture. Should that not constitute a war crime? In addition to a law (Finland: Rikoslaki luku 11 pykälä 9a) that defines torture as a crime, most of these nations have signed on the UN Convention on Torture.
”Anyone can be put into these programs. Justice and rule of law does not exist at the highest levels of government. Treaties are worthless because the #1 agreement in the rules of war, a ban against torture, is not obeyed. This creates a more brutal and barbaric society lead by example.”  This is the explanation of the “War on Terror”. It seems the police, prosecutor, in particular, border control, customs, judicial system, intelligence community and military operations are all in favor of this type of implementation, the citizens themselves being bypassed. Probably, the entire clientele favours this technology which allows direct participation in the activation of the targeted suspects’ sensors. This is the end of privacy as we know it, the film ‘Minority Report’ in steroids.
Coercive Measures and the Use of “No-Touch Torture”
In Finland, military intelligence confirmed on 06.05.2021  that some of their coercive measures are similar to the ones used in the local law enforcement. More interestingly, the article confirms that the district court (of Helsinki) regulates the use of coercive measures which in turn may be interpreted that the judicial system in Finland allows the use of military tactics that are sometimes referred to as “no-touch torture” (torture caused without visible connection to the targeted) to be used to target the Finnish citizens. In view of the fact that law treats any torture or intentionally caused pain as a crime (Rikoslaki Ch 11 §9a among the UN Convention against Torture) in Finland, the arrangement is somewhat disputable. Another trick to hold back the argument on war crime?
In Finland, the chiefs of military and law enforcement select the technologies used under coercive measures and self-supervise the utilisation of these. It is indeed wishful thinking that the lawmakers, law practitioners and politicians approving the use of the technologies would also understand them. Some targets have been targeted for decades even though the permitted period is supposed to be 6 months each time before renewal. The renewal process would not stand any closer evaluation. The law enforcement officers manufacture the evidence to present the suspect in a negative frame. There is no alternative explanation on why the same targets are under the execution for decades unless, they are the targets of military exercise. The former ptotocol is called target manufacturing. It surely seems the technologies have become a punitive instrument for the political and administrative cultures.
One acknowledged problem seems to be the new surveillance law that allows the use of resonance technologies together with counter-terrorism laws which in turn allows the removal of civil rights. Finnish Defence Forces (FDF) are investing in cyberwar in the future  and confirms that AI is involved in order to handle significant amounts of data. The terminology appear to cause problems with interpretation since the term “cyberwar” has been used in the media to cover resonance methodologies also. Bear in mind the ICT sector is a part of the mass surveillance structure and 5G infra based on resonance technologies. Since 10bn Euros is being invested in the new fighter jet fleet which in turn supports cybertechnologies by multifunctional radar systems it is clear the technology is in use. Kivinen, the Chief of Defence, states that in developing a cyber defence programme the Finnish Defence Forces co-operate with other members of the EU cyber defence projects . It was brought to the knowledge of Finnish Prime Minister Antti Rinne in 2019 that what mistakenly is called cyber weaponry instead of anti-personnel EW technologies were being used to target civilians and even children. Rinne publicly aimed a reminder to the Chief of Defence who in turn publicly mentioned the technology related to an international war exercise . As it has been brought to the discussion earlier the EU seems to have security policies that conflict with human rights and indeed, with the EU policies for human rights. Since the EU does not possess an organised military compartment or co-ordination for the common defence the EU member nations practice with who they will. Human rights are left under the observation of the military in this war exercise, a light operation if any.
Since the views of targets have not been heard in preparation of the surveillance and counter-terrorism laws in the EU, the understanding of the technology is based on military reviews. This is an excellent reason why targeted should be heard by lawmakers, law practitioners, and politicians instead of copying military methodologies from other societies supported by massive lobbying. If not legal risks, at least political and reputational risks will acknowledged by the Governments of the EU [17, 20, 26]. The use of these weapons should be regulated more aggressively and indeed, take into account that the same targeted civilians, shockingly, remain the targets of international war exercises for years, as long as their physiology can withstand for the attacks of the energy weapons.
The Intelligence Ombudsman in Finland supervises the legality of civil and military intelligence and the realisation of basic and human rights in intelligence activities (The Act on the Oversight of Intelligence Gathering entered into force in February 2019) states the website of the Intelligence Ombudsman. The Ombudsman has produced recently (05.05.2021) a second opinion on the operations of military intelligence and intelligent services in Finland according to which he approves the operations. The Intelligence Ombudsman is aware of the use of the technologies brought to discussion in this report in Finland. He has been presented with 26 accounts of personal reports of targeted civilians on Finnish soil. These technologies have been used on the targeted well before the surveillance law came into force. An independent external review is suggested on the surveillance laws in the EU as there is no consistency among them. Similarly, the coercive measures used and the principles on what basis they are being used on civilians in the EU [20, 23, 26] should be put under review.
The Rights of the Targeted
”Governments may mistake their citizens as enemies in the same way that an immune system may lose its ability to distinguish between the body’s own cells and pathogens. ” 
The above is a very polite articulation of the fact that human targets are required to develop military technologies. The targets are approved through a judicial system that operates law approved by politicians and lawmakers. By practice, we know that most of the targeted individuals are manufactured targets and presented in a frame that has very little to do with reality in order to allow the use of counter-terrorism and mass surveillance laws.
“If an intelligence law is not well-conceived and rational, it could easily become a formidable weapon of repression. An intelligence law should not only protect citizens against terrorism, but also against the State… There is a total absence of control in this law.” M Trevidic 
The EU security strategy has been impacted by the Western agenda for anti-terrorism and allows such resonance technologies to be utilised under the law enforcement and intelligence operations of its member countries against the earlier knowledge of the topic (art. 30 Resolution on the Environment, Security and Foreign Policy from January 28, 1999, Nr.A4-005/99) to civilians. No human rights, no rights of the accused nor legal protection is respected in the process to which civilians are exposed. Constitutional rights are removed by these counter-terrorism acts. The counter-terrorism laws and mass surveillance laws both are used against democracy and human rights. The suspects do not have rights nor legal protection against coercive measures. In fact, the suspects have been stripped of their rights during the implementation of this protocol. The accused supposedly have rights (ignored), the rights of the accused, however, only a very few ever are being accused. The unconditional nature of implementation indicates it is not about seeking the truth under district court approval but the aim is to degrade the individual. It takes time for civilian targets to recognise their life is over as they used to know it. Dramatically enough no instance informs targets of their amended status in society. Even members of families with small children are placed under the torture scheme in which situation everyone is affected physically and psychologically (an acknowledgement based on empirical observation).
“As Lord Hoffmann noted in a concurring opinion in A Secretary of State for the Home Department, ”The real threat . . . comes not from terrorism but from [practices] such as these.”” referring to the impact of counter-terroristic measures in the society.
”Why torture? The CIA claims it works. The assumption is that it works to gain actionable intelligence. Torture is often used for revenge, punishment, interrogation, and behavior modification. In other terms torture is used to remove the continuity of thought to confuse the target to reveal information, erase brain patterns such as values and beliefs, or to break down the human spirit to make them submit and obey their handlers.” 
– Robert Duncan – “Neuropsychological and electronic “no-touch torture”. The spectrum of “interrogation” and torture techniques used by the US and its allies”
Neuropsychological and electronic “no-touch torture” [7, 9] is used as the spectrum of “interrogation” and torture techniques by the US and its allies says Robert Duncan, a former CIA analyst and engineer, who has been developing such methodologies as a CIA, DoD engineer. Robert has an opinion the neurotech mass surveillance technology is indeed a WMD.
”The intelligence agents can also use low level microwaves to cause mental and physical confusion that leads to illness. Beaming microwaves at victims makes them fatigued, damages their immune system, causes neurological damage that affects their thinking and ability to carry out tasks, induces premature aging, cancer, and cataracts. ” T Rifat. 
The mass surveillance neurotechnological weaponry causes a spectrum of effects depending on the computer program, the technology chosen, and the team running the execution. It may be sensible to make a note that we are indeed talking about piezoelectric mechanisms  (NB. Figure 15. Piezoelectric energy harvesting from the human body) within the human body (biochemical balance within the body e.g. various proteins electrically reacting towards each other). Antioxidants alleviate the potential risks of EMF exposures . The following effects are reported among others : Synthetic telepathy (reading and broadcasting of thoughts), microwave hearing, forced visions some synched with body motion, forced memory blanking, controlled dreams, forced waking visions, artificial tinnitus, wildly racing heart at rest, forced muscle quaking, the sensation of tapping, intense general pain or hot-needles-pushed-deep-into-flesh sensations, sensations of electrical shocks, burning sensations, intense pain in a larger area of body e.g. face or chest (technical capability to amend the spread of the beam as well as the spectrum), special attention to the genital area; itching, forced orgasms, intense pain, forced thoughts and feelings and sleep deprivation (sleep being constantly disturbed with the above).
In Finland, a survey of a population of nearly 100 victims of Electronic Warfare anti-personnel applications was taken in 2020-21. The research involved questionnaires and interviews and produced very consistent information on the symptoms and observations of the victims. Reported health damages and symptoms appeared to be far more serious than what was expected. There also seems to be an apparent division of symptoms and observations by different executions of DEW and neuropsychological resonances. The findings of this research will be published in another context; however, it can be noted here that the following psychological disorders or physical symptoms were reported among others: Memory lapse, PTSD, long-term stress, panic attack, state of fear, severe depression, suicidal thoughts, paranoia, schizophrenia, anxiety, lack of concentration, ADHD, sleep deprivation, desire for sex /food etc, cardiac arrhythmia, headache, hearing voices, sensation of disturbance in cognitive processes, orgasms, erections, sensation of pressure in brains, pain in eyes, chest pain, difficulty to breathe, stomack pain, digestive problems, temporary paralysis, pain in genitals, twitches, sudden increase in blood pressure, brain fog, neurological symptoms, strokes, tinnitus, sensations of burns, temporary feelings of blood clots and numbness anywhere in the body, cosmetic injuries such as burnt skin and physical and psychological exhaustion among other. The targets reported that their head, heart or genital area was attacked the most. In addition, some Electronic Warfare anti-animal attacks have been conducted to their pets and anti-material attacks were reported in which mobile devices or computers were either used remotely or entirely damaged their hard discs. In connection to preparing this documentation many methods were conducted to potentially prevent the submission of this material. Many targeted people have reportedly been targets of an attempted murder also. The dilemma here is that potential injury cannot be connected to the resonance technologies. Another argument being used by the supporters of the neuropsychological technologies is that whenever there is pain, no injury has necessarily taken place. The definition of torture is based on the concept of experiencing pain. Therefore, whether the pain is physically caused or ‘only’ the idea of pain being delivered to the brains, the pain is still being experienced.
The long-term effects are not well published expept for long-term sleep deprivation which is a major catalyst to changes in the human body causing, for instance, high blood sugar and other signs of exceptions leading to long-term diseases. The radiation may impose a threat on internal organs, especially the liver and heart. An exposure to radiation in the long-term is very likely to cause heart diseases such as cardiac muscle inflammation which in turn may cause the failure of the heart muscle. Exhaustion seems to be one of the common symptoms that also was shown in the results of the Finnish research.
If anyone was to argue that the aforementioned symptoms were based on civil applications, such as the 5G or electricity grid, they are not entirely wrong. The ICT (information communications technology) infrastructure is being utilised within these operations; together with electricity, radar, and satellite technologies they create a strong electromagnetic field that enables the surveillance and introduction of “brainwaves” and what not. It is however, the effect of the radar that amplifies within the strong electromagnetic field and causes the symptoms by signals delivered via satellites and ICT network. Due to the nature of the scientific research, the findings are kept secret and the health concerns remain unpublished to cover the economic model within the industry. The business model is a cash cow and supports also related industries and business models. The symptoms reported in the Finnish research are consistent, the experiences are similar and indicate a clear correlation of the presence of strong electromagnetic fields. Such an electromagnetic field requires radar or antenna series for targeting. Also the observations on the use of OTHR (over-the-horizon-radar) and satellite delivery correlate with the symptoms. The impacts of long-lasting combined microwave exposure on the human body may not have been adequately investigated and approved by the medical scientific society. It seems it is the currently targeted population which produces this critical empirical knowledge since the biometrics are available for reading at all times. The Military/ Intelligence/ Private sector execution seems more interested in the development of their projects, in the development of AI and in spying on civilian targets as well as the profits produced, than in the health and wellbeing of the targeted people. The cortex is being stimulated by overlapping applications and new “products” are constantly being developed. By now the audience should acknowledge that the radar technology eanbles 360-degree imaging of the target.
”Neurological research found the brain to have specific frequencies for each voluntary movement called preparatory sets. By firing at your chest with a microwave beam containing the ELF signals given off by the heart, this organ can be put into a chaotic state, the so-called heart attack.” – T. Rifat 
The aforementioned effects reconcile well with the methods of interrogation and behavior modification illustrated by R Duncan in his report on torture  where Duncan introduces 18 tactics of torture that can be implemented via physical or “no-touch torture”. ”Coercing and torturing people to suicide is very common. Both tactics in physical or no-touch torture involves plausible deniability.”
The Target Selection
The problem is persistent since there is a vastly growing number of operations that aim to benefit neuro-invasive technologies. There are private AI developers in the sector and many of them are known for entirely another type of consumer products. As a result of long-running operations their resources have developed a pattern of excellence and now are looking to gain a technological advantage in neuroscience and supercomputing. Some corporations or countries may own satellites which in turn allow a significant access to the field of research. These companies consider their employees as a resource by clauses in their contract of employment that allow the use of “brain data” in form of any inventions made by the employees.
A significant amount of States are utilizing the technology and having a “brainrace” causing perhaps overlapping execution on international individuals since there are also a number of individual government agencies whose operations may be run from their independent facilities. This explains the vast increase in the headcount of targeted individuals. The law enforcement body involving the prosecution and judicial system is becoming dependent on the technology which is likely used during trials and pre-trial examinations already.
The resonance methodologies have their roots in military technologies. Recently, the security sector and law enforcement agencies have owned the technology and the defense industry has developed new applications . Also, international white-collar organizations such as the NSA under the national Foreign Ministries’ military wing, the DSA, execute the operations . The technology is operated by the military using multifunctional radar signal intelligence for law enforcement and intelligence community (DSA) white-collar agencies acting as their ”clientele”. NSA officers can globally flag any individual and set them up under the execution without hearing the person. The justice systems and law enforcement agencies are used actively to get hold of the citizen to manufacture them a target . The targeted are not informed of their amended status as a suspect which in turn prevents the target to kick-start legal action. Supervising instances are claiming to use legal protection and reminder of remedies the society may offer. It is difficult to get a message across that no tricks are left, no authority takes responsibility. Taking the matter into the court which has just approved the use of the methodologies sounds illogical. Usually, terrorism, national threat, or serious crime are being used as the excuse to approve the use of the technologies under the coercive measures . In doing so, it seems the EU acting as an ally also is unaware it backs the implementation of the anti-democratic measure that ignores citizens’ human rights, the international rights of the accused, and leaves the targets without legal protection and due process. No questions being asked from the individual themselves.
Since the manufacturing of the targets seems relatively careless and no oversight committee or set of regulations or auditable institution is monitoring how targets are being selected, the protocol may be used for an extension of personal and political, even economical interests. Picking and setting up random targets, no legal groundings necessary. Certainly, dissidents, activists, or whistleblowers are not there by accident. Random people, people who have been in the wrong place at the wrong time are selected to reach the critical mass, the amount of targets to allow for technological breakthrough. The execution does not seem to have a deadline. Anyone could become the future’s target; the extrajudicial implementation does not recognize social statuses, unless social scoring is involved. The targeted people will experience their life being demolished in all areas, holistically, and therefore, their profile is on the downhill. The execution of such a program requires inter-and cross-governmental implementation, hence the “international torture program”. The targeting is inhumane, unjust, unreasoned, and unaccountable .
It may well be that the private sector acts as the developer of the product and runs the experiment whereas the governments are backing the research and delivering the resources, the brains in the execution of neurological mass surveillance.
The Human Rights Issues
”Obviously, silencing dissidents, oppositions of political parties, and whistleblowers are included in the lists of applications. The most disturbing of the trends in torture is testing and improving it. No-touch torture is much more complex than physical torture. Testing design flaws and weaknesses of the signal intelligence is one reason why it is necessary to test on innocent targets.” 
The usage of resonance technologies is observed to be at times politically orientated, or not adequately justified, and is always questionable, strongly subjugating human rights or constitutional rights let alone moral aspects. This is because i) the technology produces a spectrum of pain in the target (and injuries of which some fatal), ii) sleep deprivation in long term preventing full participation in society, iii) the technology is being directed towards civilians (against the Geneva Convention), iv) the technology is being utilized without the permission or consent of the targeted person (against the Nuremberg Treaty), v) the operations lean on self-supervision and monitoring to the extent the human rights aspects are not being considered appropriately (no measures on corruption), vi) the technology is being directed to people inhumanly while asleep and vii) towards bystanders (especially children while also asleep disturbing their sleep and causing them pain), viii) the technology is being directed to homes of the targeted citizens (against constitutional rights for privacy, domestic peace, etc), ix) the period the technologies are being implemented to targets is matter-of-factly inhuman, reportedly from less than a decade up to 30 years (in which time most of the targets are forced outside of their societies and health, social structure, career, and families have all been destroyed), x) the technology may cause fatal injuries that are impossible to trace back to the usage of this technology and xi) torture, definition, of which the use of this methodology fulfills, hardly is an argumentative solution. Finally, xii) targets do not possess constitutional rights, nor legal protection from the practitioner or executor of this torture on them since it is with significant likelihood the local or other government. In addition, xiii) law enforcement and healthcare have been instructed to deny the matter. Local regulators, political power, legislators, and courts approving the use are not understanding and aware of these aspects due to the fact that the military traditionally has been the only institution with this knowledge. Yet this technology has lobbied its way into our societies. The substantial list of shortcomings above leads us to conclude the technologies have not been adequately investigated. The lawmakers, practioners, politicians have only listened to the military and law enforcement arguments as the marketer of these technologies .
Under the anti-terrorism agenda, the constitution and human rights can be occluded, it seems, by the declaration of War on Terror which yet allows derogation of the civil rights on a temporary basis only . When a civilian is targeted by goverment and presented as a terrorist they can be exposed, it seems, to methods of interrogation (e.g. coercive measures neurotech mass surveillance). This derogation should be however a temporary measure. How is it explained that some individuals have been targeted for a decade and more? Indeed, the neurotech mass surveillance is a “no-touch torture” protocol that causes long periods of serious pain, suffering, and even fatalities. By now we should agree that the execution is conducted as a counter-terrorism measure.
“The European Convention on Human Rights requires that a member state availing itself of the derogation clause inform the Secretary-General of the Council of Europe of the measures the state has taken and the reasons for them.” 
“Although the idea of temporality is not expressed in the derogation provisions of the ICCPR or the European Human Rights Convention, it has been understood to have been implied by the notion of emergency. According to the U.N. Human Rights Committee, article four of the ICCPR requires that “measures derogating from the provisions of the Covenant . . . be of an exceptional and temporary nature.“ and ““Derogations from human rights obligations are permitted in order to deal with emergencies. They are intended to be temporary.’” Thus, the suspension of ordinary processes must end when the emergency that required the suspension ceases to exist.“ The targeted under counter-terrorism law could argue that the temporary state has been maintained for purpose since no evidence of terrorism has been found for those accused. In a case where implementation has taken 10 years, the government should be prosecuted for inefficiency in dealing with the matter and thus, violating human rights. This is hardly a temporary measure in the aspect of human life.
Currently, there are no specific laws protecting humans or animals, neither any medical support for them, during cybernetic torture. “The situation is created by the fact that scientists do not leave any information about the illegal mind reading technologies.” How should “we protect people that by utilitarian grounds, without informed consent, are used for brain studies with brain-computer-interfaces in Cyber Psychological Systems, illegal stealing of brain data” ?
In view of the above intellectual rights are important but the human rights violations probably the core of concern. It seems governments have agreed with a single-minded informal agreement that they have the right to remove legal protections from the citizens. They have interpreted that in certain circumstances (that have been artificially created by themselves) they have the right to degrade the human rights, constitutional rights and strip the citizens of legal protection. The torture and inhumane, unjust, unreasoned, and unaccountable targeting  may lead to significant compensation requests from the victims for the use of WMD mass surveillance protocols once they become organized. The UN should support this idea. The periods under execution seem to be unlimited which demonstrates the enslaving nature of the implementation.
There is simply no privacy at all when the privacy of thoughts, feelings, senses, and life overall is demolished. The targets’ households are trespassed physically and technologically, and subjected to domestic disturbance from outside by the resonances (some evidence on this will be published in connection with the field examination). No government is capable of replacing what has been taken away from these people. The terror in their life has been unspeakable. What about the immaterial rights such as the stolen brain data?
“Article 1 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2000) states that “Human dignity is inviolable. It must be respected and protected”.”
The Psychic Driving/System Programming
States have used the same tactics for centuries to put away activists and dissidents who do not buy into the explanations of the power elite and publicly challenge the administration. The targeted people are many times activists, whistleblowers, or dissidents in addition to random people. During the execution of the “no-touch torture program ”, targeted individuals are being treated as mentally ill by the government. The police and healthcare, who are the emergency services, the first point of contacts, have been programmed to handle these patients with a certain presumption. The programming, or inadequate education/ omission of the education, is a part of the design of the torture program . States have a national manual of diseases where identical symptoms the targeted experience have been added indicating alleged neurosis / mental illnesses that correlate with medication designed to worsen the condition of the targeted and strengthening the impact of the resonance. Doctors do find themselves in a helpless position with neurotechnology victims since the illnesses could be induced into the patient . Linking specific medicines with microbiological structured molecules a desired impact can be delivered on the purposed area of the brain. Also, nanotechnologies can be used to deliver nanotechnological engineering into the brains . These are used in combination with EMF resonances to activate certain viruses, bacteria, even cells, synapses to deliver their function. Dr. J. Giordano also specifies neurotoxins that can be used to gain a certain effect. This technology can force the human brain to think certain thoughts, feel certain emotions, and can theoretically override motor control functions. This knowledge must have been obtained by investigating human bio-effects and experiences.
”By specialising on the pulse frequency you could induce psychiatric ilnesses to the point where a psychatrist could not tell if it is a genuine psychiatric illness or an induced psychiatric illness.” – Barry Trower – Microwave Warfare.
”The body is an electromagnetic chemical reaction. Yes, chemicals like drugs can help the body and be used as countermeasures to electromagnetically induced problems. Drugs can be used to affect the body’s electrical-chemical processes.” – R. Duncan, How to Tame a Demon – A Short Practical Guide to Organized Imtimidation Stalking, Electronic Torture, and Mind Control
Many States maintain laws under which the patients can be forced to receive medication and mental help when deemed necessary (by labels of neurosis, imminent threat of violence, self-harm, etc). Due to the inter-and cross-governmental nature of the implementation, the treatment is being coordinated from a co-ordinative structure above the staff treating the patient. The entire process can be evaluated by the supervisory co-ordinative team and depending on the content that the patient discloses as well as his/her behavior the team makes the decision on the most practical plan for him/her. Medication can be used to assist neurotechnological implementation. In some societies, implantable devices are injected into the targeted civilians to assist the chemical balance or observation of the biometrics. These military developed devices are not painless either whilst nowadays merely replaced by nanotechnological materials that may be only inconveniencing to digestion.
The biological and socio-psychological aspects of the targeted’s lives are heavily influenced. Many are pushed outside of their societies and the social networks that are crucial for well-being. A target that intends to disclose the program may experience imminent measures of discrediting or a form of punitive measures that strips social status from the target. Informal reporting and social scoring by the administration is impacted immediately which also derogates the rights of the targeted. They become outlawed. The accused have rights, the rights of the accused but the suspects do not have any. The term “suspect” refers to the removal of civil rights and being made a target. They are profiled internationally and presented as a terrorist, serious criminal, or national threat. The torture that has many faces and sides may go on for decades, in which time the target has lost his social status, fellows, health, financial sustainability, earning model, and credibility.
When the target intends to approach separate parts of the administration to deliver information on potential consipiracy and illegal government activity it is imperative the target has a well argumented, well-written and comprehensible statement to deliver intended content since their profile will be attacked severely by those in the administration who lobby on behalf of the implementation of mass surveillance. Measures will also be taken to prevent any electronic submissions or hard copies delivery to authorities. The informal nature of the execution and coercive measures ensure that the targeted cannot defend themselves against implementation that does not officially exist.
Indeed, an annulment is a common practice. It has become visible and reported that some implementations of systematic programming of discrimination are directed towards the same bloodline or family over the generations. Genetic information hardly provides us a decent explanation for this type of execution.
There are governments with a significant number of totalitarian attributes that have disguised themselves as a democracy. It goes without saying the social sector of administration supports the governmental agenda and is in a position to set up any individual with a variety of methods. Similarly, the judicial system that not only regulates the use of coercive measures but also operates a governmental agenda as the steering mechanism in relation to these individuals. A target cannot possibly receive objective and equal treatment in court. The judicial system reflects the will of the Government.
The method by which the CIA and intelligence community control masses and MSM is to publish fiction that involves similar elements that are involved in the news they want to deny or shut down. They create stories and mix them with the original report (in this case my analysis) and because the topic is complicated the masses are unable to separate the two, only a marginal audience understands what is going on.
There are countless tactics to discredit individual revelations made in media. A common tactic is to descredit the author/content of a revelation that is harmful to government. Another trick is to confuse the original message to an imaginary content that has similar elements. Perhaps involving aliens or conspiracy models that ridicule or make fun of the actual revelation.
Controlling the public is a game of capturing the opinion of masses by using MSM (main stream media). Governments are participating in the information war (between governments) and propaganda (inside the nation) either by direct or indirect ownership of the media. “Regulation, legislation, physical attacks, and threats against journalists or media owners are effective methods used to capture the media. But funding is arguably the most effective method of all. By financing media and journalists willing to toe the government line and by not funding independent, critical media, authorities manage to suppress large parts of the media sector.” [10, 36]”
Resonance methodologies are at the core of Electronic Warfare (EW) operations. DEW, AW, RNM/RMI/EEG, and V2K are tactics being used on targets under anti-personnel execution. DEW and AW are purposed to cause physical injuries whereas the neurotechnological applications used under AI mass surveillance programs such as NRM/RMI/EEG cause psychological effects and pain. RNM Remote Neural Monitoring is used along with the EEG for cloning the neurostructures of the target. A heterodyne is a signal frequency that is generated by combining or mixing two other frequencies using a signal processing technique called heterodyning. Heterodyning is utilised to shift one frequency range into another, new frequency range, and is also involved in the processes of modulation and demodulation. Heterodyning and technology based on TMS (Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation) can be used for the synthetic telepathy. Neurotechnological implementation can be fatal in multiple ways it can drive the targeted to suicidal thoughts but it also has physical health effects that may weaken the body and immune system of the targeted in the long term fatally. V2K can also be produced in a multiple ways but one of the most sophisticated ones is as an AI computer software, developed to learn, which can communicate with the target in real-time and read their memory, thoughts and is able to manipulate targets psychologically and emotionally . The V2K can be used for behavior modification when the technology is based on a psychiatric medical technology called Neurofeedback – EEG Biofeedback. The software acts as an alternative roadmap for the brain (an AI software accesses brain waves emitted by the brain ie ELF waves) by harvesting brainwaves when the brain reacts negatively and the cloning this type of brain wave (ELF waves). V2K technology can be used to clone or mime different medical pathologies, including psychiatric ones. This is why many targets are diagnosed with Schizophrenia or other mental illness. When the use of mobile device emissions is introduced to affect a targeted brain we are in uncontrolable territory.
The operational implementation does not differ. The resonances are delivered from multifunctional radars (active electronically scanned array [AESA]) or antennas on any platform, also by using satellite targeting. Similar radar antennas are used in fighter jets. Networks similar to GWEN (Ground Wave Emergency Network) can be used to create EMPs. In DEW implementation the effect is based on transmitted high amplified energy pulses that cause pain or injuries, even fatalities. Physical obstacles may be overcome by maser technology. In the neurotechnological implementation, the impact is based on heterodyne which combines by intermodulation (two alternating signals, eg radio signals) to produce two or more signals having frequencies corresponding to the sum and the difference of the original frequencies that cause pain or the wanted effect in the target. Depending on the purpose there are custom-designed handheld platforms to be used inside buildings also. An electromagnetic field is created around the target to read the target’s biometrics and run them in a computer simulation in real-time that aims to clone and link the targeted brains. The computer program executes a chosen torture method for interrogation and behavior modification and to the targeted, the execution naturally appears entirely ruthless and cruel. This means the entire process is being automated [7, 9]. Also entire thought patterns, feelings, and images can be induced to the target . The concern in view of the future is whether the transmitting technology will be integrated with our handheld ICT technology and its infrastructure. The handheld mobile devices may already emit resonances below 100Hz that are closely linked to our biology.
DEW (directed energy weapons) can be broadly defined as systems that produce “a beam of concentrated electromagnetic energy or atomic or subatomic particles” which is used as a direct means to incapacitate, injure or kill people, or to incapacitate, degrade, damage or destroy objects . Execution by microwaves, lasers, masers and particles.
AW (acoustic weapons) Acoustic weapons aim to use the propagation of sound – a variation in pressure that travels through a fluid medium (such as air) to affect a target. Most of the acoustic weapons that have been speculated upon are based on either ultrasound (above 20 kilohertz, kHz),
low frequencies (below 100 hertz, Hz) or infrasound (below 20 Hz) deployed at high levels. The human range of hearing is commonly given as between 20 Hz and 20 kHz. In reality, the upper hearing-threshold frequency decreases significantly with age, whereas sounds with lower frequencies can be heard and otherwise perceived if the level is high enough.
We should not forget the ionosphere radar or over the horizon radar (“OTHR”) of which the most famous is the HAARP (The High-Frequency Active Auroral Research Program) which is capable of producing a very high amount of energy in beams and wanted resonance to exact locations at any time. Other nations have revealed their concern with regard to this. HAARP is located in Gakona, Alaska, and was developed by DARPA (Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency). Another OTHR is EISCAT in Longyearbyen, Norway which was originally designed by France, Germany, and the three Nordic countries (Norway, Sweden, and Finland). The Targets in Finland have seen evidence of weather modification as well as traces in the clouds as a marker of the use of OTHR and satellite co-ordination beaming. In view of the European Parliament Resolution on the Environment, Security and Foreign Policy from January 28, 1999, Nr.A4-005/99 art 30 states “Calls in particular for an international convention for a global ban on all research and development, whether military or civilian, which seeks to apply knowledge of the chemical, electrical, sound vibration or other functioning of the human brain to the development of weapons which might enable any form of manipulation of human beings, including a ban on any actual or possible deployment of such systems.” Is it a coincidence that the commonly operated facility has been set into a country that locates in Europe but is not a member of the EU?
When delivering resonances that imitate body functions a satellite becomes a very operative assistance and used seamlessly with the execution of OTHR. Especially for these radar systems, living human targets are a necessity to develop the operating systems, their accuracy, amount of energy directed, and before anything the psychological impact on the individual. A spontaneous EKG can potentially discover the operation whereas a planned scrutiny for healthcheck results in a pause in the execution of the beaming.
The entire multilayer strategy of implementation involves remote execution with satellites and OTHR, local operation by field operatives with a gangstalking element from ordinary local people hired from social media, as well as the utilisation of the ICT infrastructure via mobile devices and the mobile antenna infrastructure. The latter is controlled by software applications that are run within the network. A huge step forward in synthetic telepathy has been the introduction of nanotechnology which has greatly assisted the transportation of AI technology to human brains but also facilitated the access to brains from AI frameworks [34, 35].
“You’re either with us or against us in the fight against terror.”
– George W Bush on 6.11.2001
It is breathtaking how few politicians have understood the larger picture. The anti-terrorism movement by states is an agenda that allows the rights of citizens to be removed for the greater “good of the State” and therefore, a very unconstitutional movement. The strategy, however, was at first implemented by the Western coalition ’Five-Eyes’ to hijack the foreign and security policies of targeted nations, including the allies in the EU. The Western coalition finger-pointed allies saying there is a terroristic activity spotted within the population of the EU countries defining who is a terrorist and what is a terroristic act. Something the European leaders should quickly accomplish is figure out whether they have been treated as allies or subservients by Western Five Eyes coalition manufacturing targets and addressing to the EU member nations that they have citizens with terroristic tendencies (naturally artificial and false accusations) which in turn may be used to force the foreign and security policy of the EU member nations to remove reputational risk and potential risk of conflict. We quote a journalist from RT Neil Clark’s article on 25 Feb, 2021: ”The ‘War on Terror’ was based on a fundamental deceit. It was a deep state/neocon con trick. Not only was it a war that could never be won, it was never meant to be won. It was meant to be permanent.” Indeed, the idea of the anti-terrorism agenda is the declaration of war on those who beg to differ by opinion. There should be only one interpretation of the world events and no exception to the “Western” one is tolerated. The bully-tempered narrow-mindedness quite often leads to a point where sensible analysis is not conducted. There is no need to disagree to juxtapose.
The agenda is an imperialistic tool to force governments to operate similar foreign policies and line up with the West. To make the EU a participant in the War on Terror and bring the conflict onto the European soil. Originally terrorism has been an inconvenience of those nations practicing imperialistic and clumsy foreign policies intervening in the internal politics of other nations. Now, the EU is taking moral responsibility for this against better understanding.
We do not need conflict in the EU and our younger generations should be psychologically free of this type of liability.
There are several pillars to this operation. Strategies are linked to the technological advantage of the Western technology. Signing up as a user a nation agrees with certain conditions and integrates the operations. This happens for the sake of maintenance alone. For instance, for fighter jet fleets, which carry multifunctional radars, their maintenance and updating require a common technological strategy. States which purchase fighter jet fleets will be committed to one strategy due to the maintenance and development of the system. It is a deep integration of defense strategies.
Terrorism, serious crime, a national threat is used as the rationale to justify the manufacturing of the targets to European allies. Must say the manufacturing of the consent has been a bit careless not to forget the implementation. The Western military-intelligence complex coup has won the intelligence communities over by their advanced technology. An average American taxpayer supports the military industry to the extent that equals the cost of free healthcare. By creating suspects in each nation the Western coalition has been enabled to a) force the State to take care of the terrorism and b) offer the Government technology to be used in connection with this which in turn means more dollars for the military complex. Manufacturing targets is a trillion-dollar plan since their resources can be linked to develop AI. “The more brains you have collected in your pool the better AI you will be able to develop”.
Terrorism is indeed a very gloomy and poisonous projection to deliver to our next generation which has already been psychologically affected by the speech of terrorism constantly present in the MSM. We may not be able to estimate the damage caused but we could do something to stop building horrible scenarios. It is indeed recommended that this bellicose agenda is abandoned since the rest of the world, especially our new generation, do not wish to live under such a narrow-minded scenario. A return to international democracy is recommended.
What will the Governments do next to defend their position? It is apparent that so far some of the terroristic attacks in Western societies have been provoked if not financially and operationally supported by Western intelligence itself. We would not expect to see this level of governmental radicalism anymore. The strategy of governments will be to temporarily rate higher the threat of terrorism so that any criticism would not question their undertakings. The Western governments will put the curriculum vitae of their funded researchers (eg Magnus Ranstorp) against those who have been forced to independently investigate the field. This is to the benefit of the researchers since they strengthen their position and ego in supporting the idea of War on Terror. They market the war on behalf of terrorism. It is better to have war to cover the agenda than admit the imperialistic effort to control global population. This is a fight between David and Goliath and the Goliath owns the MSM (mainstream media). Also. the MSM is turned selectively towards other areas of interest.
War on Terror? Not exactly. The methodologies used to harness innocent individuals for something so evil as WMD targeting them are a crime against humanity. We must re-think the role of Western surveillance within society not alone the supervision and monitoring aspects. The execution appears as Robert Duncan (CIA officer and engineer) illustrates: ’It was a clever tactic used by the Germans in WWII to take people away slowly so no revolt occurred. As one CIA agent says, “The Nazis didn’t lose the war they just had to move.” It is not about the Jews now. It is something much more complex and evil’. One should hope the Covid-19 pandemic is not an agenda to enhance governmental control over individuals . Oh no, it is not. There is a chance that it is indeed a part of the very same operation to deliver access to brains of the population.
A senior officer J. Karsikas responsible for digitalisation in the Finnish Defence Forces states that considering super powers it is unlikely they would commit themselves in any regulation and ratify any international agreements in the development of AI . This is due to the fact that AI technologies may constitute the next strategic advantage.
What is the most disappointing aspect of the Electronic Warfare between superpowers, in which populations and individuals are constantly targeted by military technologies is that for these living targets who have become the instruments of global war, no government seems to have a social sector strategy? No civil defence strategy. Societies have created multimillion Euro plans to cover the infrastructure, but the civilian targets are left to die, not being overly dramatic. A meritocratic society is programmed to think there is something seriously wrong with these individuals which leads to isolation of the targeted individuals. That is as intimidating as is the implementation of WMDs. The lack of will to improve the lives and circumstances of the victims speaks thousands of words.
“Wanton killing of innocent civilians is terrorism, not a war against terrorism.” – Noam Chomsky
Electronic Warfare (EW) anti-personnel resonance-based applications that cause pain, suffering, even fatalities are being directed to civilians globally by means of energy- and psychological effects. The governments responsible for the implementation, under which the execution is operated, are utilizing at diversity of military platforms to conduct these operations based on the resonance spectrum. The “Torture Program” is based on the idea of using pain and suffering as a stimulant, an instrument of interrogation to cause a reaction in the targets. The operation is to intentionally cause pain and suffering in its targets for a prolonged period of time. Scientists are in opinion the technological implementation should be reviewed as a weapon of mass destruction. It is a technical legal aspect of international laws of human rights whether the operation should be viewed as a war crime. Execution of a technology that causes pain and suffering, even fatalities, in innocent civilians and bystanders, even children, is now left to supercomputers to run? We are seeing the evidencing of a phenomenon that reminds me in detail of the human experiments during the WWII conducted by Nazis. Even the public demonstrates similar ignorance and prejudice. It seems this psychological cycle repeats itself in human history when a part of the society comes to think of itself as “too invincible”. A result of meritocracy. It is imperative to acknowledge the vast increase in numbers of targeted civilians indicates a widespread attack on human rights.
The resonance spectrum-based technology that now abuses human targets had been developed to its full potential in the midst of the 1970s. The knowledge was kept tight in the military instead of considering civil applications. The War on Terror offered a suitable basis for an imperialistic global agenda and strategy of implementation. The mass surveillance neurotechnology is operated under the agenda of the Western coalition to force new order among states. Anti-terrorism as an agenda is an unconstitutional plan of the Western coalition not only to strengthen sovereign state power at the expense of human rights and democratic systems through surveillance and counter-terrorism laws but also to hijack the foreign and security policies of other nations. War naturally speeds military spending. And speaking of an entirely new niche of technologies the War on Terror is a blessing to the defense industries. The concept of war has been creatively introduced to legally eclipse human rights and democratic decision-making. The erosion of the Constitution is significant.
As for private citizens in terms of pain and suffering caused also their rights have been removed under the counter-terrorism and mass surveillance acts. Suspects do not have the rights of the accused since they will never be accused instead, they have been stripped of their civil rights complete families affected at once. Measures that were purposed as an exceptional and temporary tool to deal with emergencies are now used on an unlimited basis under surveillance laws. It is clear the aforementioned laws are abused to target innocent people. A significant majority of the targeted are not brought to courts of justice and officially accused due to the fact that they are not guilty. These people and their human rights are degraded once abandoned under technology-driven human experiments that remove entirely their privacy and domestic peace. The fact is that individuals’ free will and degree of autonomy are hugely affected. It is the question of a plan with multilayer agenda. It seems that the counter-terrorism and mass surveillance laws are used to manufacture candidates for the human experiment. The selection protocol is inhumane, unjust, unreasoned, and unaccountable. What a convenient tool for governments to root out and yet benefit from the physical existence of political opponents, whistleblowers, activists, or dissidents. At the same time, a significant element of opponents to the political power is being created.
The execution was based on the idea that the targeted would not organize themselves and see through the plan. Now the life cycle of this agenda is different. It is indeed imperative to increase public awareness on the ongoing torture to impact on the life cycle. No totalitarian method can tolerate public awareness as European history points out.
The War on Terror has been successfully used as an extension of the imperialistic foreign policy of foreign nations to destabilize the peace in Europe and the seed of war has been implanted in the soil of the EU. We European citizens do not approve of the War or Terror on European soil. Citizens do find it difficult to believe that European leaders who were supposed to look after the civil rights and peace in Europe are taking a role in such an imperialistic agenda. We expect the EU to be built upon the idea of democracy that guarantees equal rights to everyone. It has been a result of ignorance, shortsightedness, and poor judgment that this sort of plan has gone past our due diligence processes impacting greatly on the future beliefs of young generations who are at the core of well being of any nation.
Making Torture legal is a very questionable agenda. We suggest an urgent review of surveillance laws as well as counter-terrorism laws. The laws have now been used as a punitive measure allowing unequal and inhumane treatment and abuse of civilians by the governments and an underpinning of sovereign state power. The laws have become a formidable weapon of repression. An intelligence law should not only protect citizens against terrorism but also against the State. The modern holocaust has revealed significant weaknesses in our societies. Lawmakers, law practitioners, and politicians, even human rights activists poorly understand the technologies being approved for use on citizens for a prolonged period of time. The role and the strategies of intelligence function in societies European wide should be revisited and some consistency introduced. Military and intelligence functions in eroded society are meant to represent a marginal mechanism, but not the role of the decision-maker. It seems there is a psychological cycle in the collective consciousness of humanity, the need to repeat the pattern of pain and suffering. Perhaps the revised agenda could take a sustainable look to raise the standards of performance we all need to evidence and take part in for the mental growth of the human society. We would choose “trust” among people instead of synthetic telepathy that indeed demonstrates the opposite.
The new generation is experiencing the world as a threatful place today. Continuous airtime on news of terrorism by MSM creates psychological expectations that will last decades. The citizen’s belief in the future is constantly heavily impacted. There are so many areas in society that require improvement that the civilization hardly has time to handle them if crises similar to the War on Terror are intentionally created. I think there might be confusion on where the civilization is going from here. It seems politicians are lost on their way. It is known that beliefs in the future is directly correlated with the well-being and prosperity of national economies. Should the beliefs be a little more positive than they are? One should think the War on Terror hardly is an agenda for a nation looking for well-being to follow. Europeans do not wish to bring the War on Terror to European soil. Therefore, the message for the politicians goes accordingly in terms of foreign and security policies.
The EU should develop its independent defense, especially in terms of technologies, to reduce its dependence on NATO and the Western military-intelligence complex. Therefore the military spending and exercises internally should be coordinated. The EU should seriously review its relation to Western allies, to determine whether the role of European allies is viewed as subservient. The abuse of intelligence operations and aggression in foreign politics that do not respect sovereign EU member nation decision-making as well as the dynamics of ongoing confrontation among powers have taken so many years.
It is apparent the EU has chosen a homeland security strategy that confronts its human rights agenda. Mass surveillance and counter-terrorism laws should be reviewed from the European perspective alone and not as an ally to someone with an imperialistic agenda. The security strategy and following surveillance laws are a result of a poor understanding of Electronic Warfare and its technologies. It would be to the benefit of European democracy to drop the ignorance and bring to the table the representatives of the targeted so that all aspects are indeed understood.
SOME SUGGESTED ELEMENTS FOR A PLAN TO MAKE PROGRESS:
What should be done to prevent the abuse of innocent victims:
1. Increasing awareness of the public of the cybernetic abuse and means of Electronic Warfare being tested on civilians is at the core of tackling the crime against humanity.
2. Breaking the ignorance. It is imperative that the viewpoint and experiences of the targeted must not be ignored or bypassed since understanding the perspective of victims allows for democratic decision making. The victims should be permitted to offer consultation and expertise, the perspective of the targeted to law- and decision-makers for the creation of appropriate EU legislation to protect civil citizens from covert cybernetic crimes and other Electronic Warfare applications.
3. Organisation of the resources. In order to defend the civil rights of the targeted and support the targeted, a global organization should be created which would set up a representation globally for human rights and could enhance “best practices for the establishment of clear ethical boundaries to strictly regulate the use of cyber systems enabling the manipulation and control of human beings” .
To be clear, a), no torture should be tolerated, and both torture and “no-touch torture” protocols should NOT be allowed as an interrogation tactic even though “neuro-surveillance” for purposes of safeguarding national security may be intended; b), Surveillance permission- granting process should be adequately and closely monitored. Mass surveillance of innocent citizens should not be allowed; c) The intel gathered in any possible surveillance method should not be misused and only used in the form it has been approved by court. We may need to allow surveillance but no method of neuro-surveillance or bio-surveillance should use targeted pain or pain at all as a catalyst. Also, the surveillance, of whatever kind, should be limited to a 6-month period with renewal permissions significantly tightened to say only 15% of the applications for renewals, firmly overseen, and with detailed, documented reports delineating reasons for applied renewals, which can be audited, overseen, and withdrawn at any time; d) Human rights auditors from outside Intelligence and Security agencies need to be involved in the continuous monitoring and auditing process, to prevent abuse and torture of targets, as we have now; e) No covered experimentation using pain and torture techniques as “sources and methods” of gathering information, as for instance, the US intelligence community , and other intelligence agencies and militaries are currently doing, under classified cover, to prevent scrutiny of their torture for neural network mapping and neuro behavior modification. What should be allowed instead are strict protocols, regulation, and monitoring of the intelligence community in place as well as surveillance laws that are consistent globally, and the intelligence community held responsible for potential misconduct.
Global consistence in surveillance laws, country-specific regulations, supervision, and monitoring as well as civil channels for reporting potential misconduct is a good start. What is the problem in the US as K Shipp and W Binney [10, 11] indicate, is that the intelligence community may not observe the law, i.e., there is a constitutional conflict since secrecy and classification are currently being used to classify and conceal extreme crime against humanity and actual torture and assassination of human beings.
The message to the governments is to support democracy and avoid planting foreign agendas against democracy to the European audiences. The concern relates to the younger generation which have been entirely forgotten with the anti-terrorism . There is no excuse for bullying civilians and taxpayers since it seems that the EU has increasingly plans for common taxation. No threat exists on this planet that justifies harming and torturing civilians.No collective rationale would speak for the torture without the consent and permission for the implementation. What has been done to civilians on the watch of governments is unforgivable.It is apparent that the administrations involved, have had a need to identify from a worst-case scenario, even though they could afford to see democracy and citizens as a positive reserve and potential, not as a threat.
The targeted individuals are put through a spectrum of social, medical, legal, financial and professional discrimination in their societies. Since the victims or their relatives do not receive the redress, reparation, and rehabilitation they are entitled to under international law (A/73/207) there are some important measures the UN could take to reduce that ’accountability gap’ and to improve the position of the targeted civilians. Perhaps one of the most important measures is to implement pressure on the local governments by holding them responsible to 1) investigate the reported torture and other cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment or punishment by the law enforcement. Currently, the police systematically ignores the reports of these crimes and in an unprofessional manner suggest mental health problems for those reporting their findings to the police. Also, healthcare should be put responsible to 2) guarantee access to healthcare to receive the redress, reparation, and rehabilitation of victims. 3) Compensations on the targeted civilians should be paid to ensure they are able to return to normal life. The first step, however, would be to request the governments to recognise the issue of targeted individuals. The governments should be requested to prepare a statement in view of this matter. These people should be made to once more become socially accepted and full members of the societies. There should be a program available for the rehabilitation of these individuals where consultation and support would be available for each of them. When a government fails to implement basic standards of living for these individuals, they should be submitted a candidate for the Universal Periodic Review protocol (UPR) for the following decade to follow up their progress. The UPR mechanism should be started by each government to reach a common view and statement on the recognition of the issue. The status of each government should be reported annually and compared to the quality of issues and the number of reports received from targeted individuals. Reputational risk should be made obvious to steer some of the governments. Where no progress had been visible the governments could be made legally responsible for the violation of civil rights in the Court of Human Rights globally and the targets should be entitled to compensations. Indeed, a creation of political, legal, financial, and reputational risks to balance the enthusiasm to participate in the aggressive military resonance programs would be advisable.
(1) TARGETING PEOPLE – ARTICLE36.ORG – Key issues in the regulation of autonomous weapons systems, Convention on Conventional Weapons (CCW) Geneva, November 2019
(2) ACOUSTIC WEAPONS – ARTICLE36.ORG – Discussion paper for the Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons (CCW) Geneva, November 2018
(3) DIRECTED ENERGY WEAPONS – ARTICLE36.ORG – Discussion paper for the Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons (CCW) Geneva, November 2017
(4) TARGETED USE OF DEW MILITARY TECHNOLOGY APPLICATIONS (THAT CAUSE FATAL OR SERIOUS INJURIES AS WELL AS SERIOUS PAIN AND SUFFERING FOR INHUMANLY EXTENSIVE PERIODS OF TIME) TO CIVILIANS IN FINLAND – OHCHR SUBMISSION 08.2020 – V. Hellberg
(5) INTERNATIONAL TORTURE PROGRAM MANIFESTED UNDER ANTI-TERRORISM LAWS WITHHOLDS LEGAL PROTECTION AND CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS FROM ITS
TARGETS? – TECHNOLOGY TESTED ON CIVILIANS 09.2020 – V. Hellberg
(6) Barry Trower – Microwave Warfare
(7) Robert Duncan – Neuropsychological and electronic “no-touch torture”. The spectrum of ‘interrogation” and torture techniques used by the US and its allies
(8) The Verge – The EU is considering a ban on AI for mass surveillance and social credit scores
(35) An Implantable Wireless Network of Distributed Microscale Sensors for Neural Applications: Jihun Lee; Ethan Mok; Jiannan Huang; Lingxiao Cui; Ah-Hyoung Lee; Vincent Leung; Patrick Mercier; Steven Shellhammer; Lawrence Larson; Peter Asbeck; Ramesh Rao; Yoon-Kyu – 2019 9th International IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering (NER)
(36) Control the money, control the media: How government uses funding to keep media in line – Marius Dragomir, Center for Media, Data and Society (CMDS), School of Public Policy, Central European University
CORRESPONDENCE TO THE EU COMMISSION
The UN Convention against torture was signed by nations, many of them only partially, on 10.12.1984. Since that time the world has changed significantly in terms of torture. What the EU intends to do with common legislation on torture? A very timely matter.
What the EU Commission intends to do by the fact that the EU strategy for homeland security is in conflict with its policies for human rights?
The coercive measures of law enforcement of western countries are based on resonance methodologies such as electronic warfare anti-personnel technologies DEW, AW, RNM, EEG, V2K, etc. The usage of this technology at times politically orientated, or the usage is not adequately justified, and is questionable, strongly mitigating human rights or constitutional rights let alone moral aspects. This is because i) the technology produces a spectrum of pain in the target (and injuries of which some fatal), ii) sleep deprivation in long term preventing full participation to the society, iii) the technology is being directed towards civilians (Genova Convention), iv) the technology is being utilized without the permit or consent of the targeted person (Nurnberg Treaty), v) the operations lean on self-supervision and monitoring to the extent the human rights aspects are not being considered appropriately (no measures on corruption), vi) the technology is being directed to people inhumanly while asleep and vii) towards bystanders (especially children while also asleep disturbing their sleep and causing them pain), viii) the technology is being directed to homes of the targeted citizens (constitutional rights for privacy, domestic peace, etc), ix) the period the technologies are being implemented to targets is matter-of-factly inhuman, reportedly from decade up to 30 years (in which time most of the targets are forced outside of their societies and health, social structure, career, and families have been destroyed), x) the technology may cause fatal injuries that are impossible to trace back to the usage of this technology and xi) torture, which by definition the use of this methodology fulfills, hardly is an argumentable solution. Finally, xii) targets do not possess constitutional rights, nor legal protection from practitioner since it is with the significant likelihood the local or other government. In addition, xiii) law enforcement and healthcare have been instructed to deny the matter. Local regulators, political power, legislators, and courts approving the use are not aware of these aspects due to the fact that the military traditionally has been the only instance with this knowledge. The intelligence community has gained an imbalanced position with this tech and now abuses it in each member country. Also, justice system is becoming addicted to this tech. W Binney quite correctly points out concern about democracy, human rights, constitution, and legal protection of our citizens in the following: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xF_VYNtDgN8&t=441s
What the EU intends to do in view of human rights in Europe?
Most of the member nations do not have legislation on torture, they rely on the UN convention from 1984. For instance, in the case of Finland, this convention is only partially recognized (article 21 paragraph 1 and 22 paragraph 1).
The security strategy strongly relies on technologies of which use conflicts with human rights and the EU policy for HR. These have a significant impact on 1) democracies, 2) corrosion on constitutional rights and 3) confidence in the future which in turn defines the development of wellbeing in any nation. The security strategy supports electronic warfare (EW) anti-personnel resonance methodologies. These are being proposed as a surveillance tech by the intelligence community and defense forces who do not reveal these technologies have the capacity to cause pain, suffering, and fatalities (Resolution on the Environment, Security and Foreign Policy from January 28, 1999, Nr.A4-005/99) and the capacity is in heavy use and not supervised, controlled properly. The national supervision and control mechanisms are not sufficient. The massive and growing audience of TI (targeted individuals) is a remarkable sign of this issue.
The technology is being supported by the western agenda for anti-terrorism and benefits the defense industry. Why would the EU cast this type of future for itself? There is an interesting phenomenon ongoing in western societies. The intelligence community has been allowed to step up and guide societies. A function that has been purposed to a marginal mechanism within the society now manufactures the consent.
The resonance technology provides the intelligence community and defense function a role during the time of peace that conflicts with the idea of democracy. These instances appear to paint pictures of horror to advance their agenda under national security, threats and crisis constantly to argue stronger participation within the society. A good example of this is the agenda of anti-terrorism that defines the form of society today. We lay an artificial threat to our younger generation. The confidence for the future of the new generation is being tested with the current threats created by geopolitical agendas and the birth rate has sunken significantly in many societies. Why would a society inflict upon itself such a curse?
Does the EU understand that by buying the idea of the threat of terrorism it accepts the idea of the ‘war on terror’ and casts it to Europe? We must remember that terrorism has been defined by the ’west’ and the recent issue may be seen as a result of heavy-handed foreign policy, poor diplomacy of nations from past decades that refer to themselves as the empire. By accepting the idea of the war on terrorism we accept the war is in Europe. As citizens of the EU we are looking for a less gloomy picture for the future and rather would identify from positive models of the future. The human mind operates from the level it identifies. We should do better than this.
How does the EU intend to do to control surveillance activities in the EU?
There is a lack of consistency in surveillance laws among the EU nations. When a surveillance law of a member nation prevents e.g. use of RNM/RMI (remote neuromonitoring/remote mind imaging) towards its citizen the intelligence community turns to the nation where the use of the technologies is allowed. The intelligence community serves each other thus the rights of a citizen or legal protection does not hold anymore. The ruling is awaited that prevents where forbidden technology in one country is being used from another to target civilians. The EU would benefit from resonance-free zones. Social media: Reading an individual’s social media communication private of nature the intelligence community from Finland may turn to Swedish intelligence who is a member of ’nine eyes’ and has access to XkeyScore.
The US intelligence services have become desirable among the European intelligence community due to the technological advantage but also by US anti-constitutional approach their strategy to enhance the sovereign rights by the cost of civilians. A part of the imperialistic agenda is to create security concerns that overrule any rights of citizens and also underpin the position of intelligence communities in democracy. The US has won the European intelligence community on their side by integrating the individual intelligence services by technology that also defines the strategy for the user. In the anti-terrorism agenda, the US hijacks security and foreign policies by defining who is a terrorist and what is a terroristic act. Since a nation identifies from the frame it is given why provide the EU with a gloomy pic? Mass surveillance laws to consider seriously the aspect from resonance technologies, AI, robotics, neuroscience (https://lbry.tv/@RamolaDReports:8/Invasive-Neurotech-True-Neuroethics—Panel-2:e). Fighter jet fleets use EMP to target citizens without their permit or concent torturing civilians with multifunctional radars and manipulating their biometrics.
In Finland, the constitution was amended to provide intelligence service power and tools to operate. The community is asking for more eg allowing trespassing. An analysis was completed from the perspective of resonance technologies why this should not be allowed. Civilians are targeted by military tech to their homes, bystanders, even babies, and children intentionally produced pain, suffering, and even fatal injuries. The big picture indicates absolutely no reason other than the paranoia and profile rise effort by the intelligence service why such powerful tools should be allowed. No legal protection for targets to rely on, constitutional rights, or human rights not respected. The international rights of the accused are being orbited by presenting the target as a suspect. The targets are manufactured to test the ultimate control over an individual. Trust is gone. Testing periods are inhumane.
How are the EU law enforcement agencies regulated, monitored? How does the EU inland security strategy recognize the fact that resonance-based mass surveillance systems (RNM, EEG, RMI) are being targeted to civilians? How common is the knowledge that these cause pain, suffering, psychological trauma even fatal injuries in their targets, bystanders, civilians, even babies, and children? Is it known the execution is careless? How are the individuals chosen for these ’torture programs’? What principles are being met to prevent politically-minded targeting? How does the EU recognize the rights of suspects since there are no rights similar to the rights of the accused? How are the periods of targeting regulated? A large number of govt agencies, also from foreign communities, have access to these programs. Torturing is illegal by law in most EU nations and against human rights, constitutional rights. No legal protection for citizens exists against this crime against humanity. Operations are run by the national military agencies thus, can be defined as a war crime. How the EU intends to root out the problem of torture by state agencies and private sector partners foreign intelligence community? A good memory of the operation ’rendition flights’, that had no legal ground, of which distant cousin this operation is. What the EU intends to do to improve the approach of national law enforcement and healthcare systems to the targets of resonance technologies (government-directed mass surveillance protocol that cause pain and psychological trauma) that clearly degrade their rights? How is the legal protection of these citizens improved? Are these people still degraded and treated as mentally ill in front of police or healthcare? What an uncivilized, backward, and inhumane approach. How is the idea of democracy with this implementation?
Having made myself familiar with the SOCTA 2021 report among other reports it seems the Europol does not make a note of such a problem at all albeit the headcount of targeted civilians is piling up. Pretending such a problem does not exist? The global market reports as well as the manufacturers’ technological guides, scientific articles, etc confirm electronic warfare anti-personnel technology is based on military multifunctional radars and signal tech soon to be operated from ICT framework and indeed, operated by the military. An issue of a war crime? Are we really doing this? Pretending that there is no problem and allowing the extrajudicial purge similar to the holocaust ongo at the EU watch? Even though human rights, the constitutional rights are severely and violently attacked there is no word on the phenomenon of targeted civilians? Individuals, someones’ children, are targeted without consequence, perhaps overlapping. Targets do not have rights, no legal protection. Since the technology in question is operated as an extension of political decision-making as a punitive instrument. We will never know who is going to be the next target. No status will bring a shield in the future.
Is that due to fact that it is the law enforcement and intelligence community in the EU who are targeting civilians with military equipment electromagnetic pulses that cause pain, suffering, and fatal injuries as well as psychological trauma? We have a serious concern since the EU’s strategy for homeland security conflicts with the strategy for human rights.
As Finnish citizens, we experience it difficult to reach information from officials in Finland on our rights and therefore we approach the Commission for this matter.
In 1995 Joseph Biden introduced a bill called the Omnibus Counterterrorism Act of 1995. It previewed the 2001 Patriot Act by 1) allowing secret evidence to be used in prosecutions, 2) expanding the Foreign Intelligence Act and wiretap laws, 3) creating a new federal crime of ’terrorism’ that could be invoked based on political beliefs, permitting the US military to the used in civilian law enforcement, and allowing permanent detection of non-US citizens without judicial review.
The Center for National Security Studies commented the bill would erode ’constitutional and statutory due process protections’ and would ’authorise the Justice Dept to pick and choose crimes to investigate and prosecute based on political beliefs and associations’.
We share the concerns addressed and would urge to review the rights of the accused and suspects of serious crime or terrorism in Finland. It seems the rights of the accused have been degraded and the legal protection of suspects has been eroded similar to their constitutional rights. Coercive measures such as neurotech applications (RNM/RMI) cause pain, suffering, likely fatalities are being misused and directed to homes of investigated for long periods of time.
Who overviews the methodologies of coercive measures? Who supervises the technology is being used correctly? How is the ethical aspect present when technology is being chosen? There is no adequate control.
To what extent it is permitted in the EU (Finland) to benefit materials in a prosecution that a) has been obtained by coercive measures b) that is classified (the accused has no chance to verify the material nor defend themselves against it)?
To what extent are neurotech applications being used in courts? To what extent the technology steers the decision-making of judges? It seems the accused has the role of the bystander in their trial.
The permission-granting process is not controlled properly. To what extent the evidence to open a secret investigation is being verified and examined by the district court of Helsinki? How political or personal interests of investigation are prevented? Coercive measures are used to manufacture state will. The state interest as an investigator is to make the suspect appear guilty or question their integrity, crecitability, and the suspect does not have the position to defend themselves in the process. To convict a terrorist suspect of a felony of any kind reduces the impact of miscalculation or political ambition by the state. There is evidence of implantable devices injected into the bodies of citizens without their permit producing agony and pain. The current correct practice of investigation is not so much to seek the truth that it is to degrade an individual.
JUDICAL SYSTEM AND DEMOCRACY IN FINLAND
The rights of the accused are not self-evident today. In practice, the burden of proof is often shifted to the accused. The accused is granted a chance to make himself heard albeit this rule is being broadly violated. A significant moral dilemma exists also in the access of the accused to counsel. Whilst compensated in quality it is allowed at a good rate in the national courts. Whereas trial above the national judicial system, at the time when legal process often becomes the case of state integrity, no assistance is granted anymore. This remarkably reduces the number of processes reaching the ECtHR and limits the possibility of discovery of potential malpractice of the national judicial system. White collars should follow ethical practices which highlight fairness and equality. The relation of the police and prosecutor seems to put the values to the test(pre-trial). Instead of justice, the national court appears to deliver the ’will of the State in relation to the accused’.
The counter-terrorism laws are used against democracy. Suspects do not have rights nor legal protection against coercive measures. The accused have rights, the rights of the accused. Very few are ever being accused.
Coercive measures are being abused with the assistance of the court and target suspects for an inhumanly long period of time with investigation methodologies that cause pain, suffering, and even fatalities to the targets or family members, even babies. During this time the suspect does not have proper legal protection, even constitutional rights are removed by the execution.
Neuropsychological and remote electronic ’no-touch torture’ applications used under coercive measures compromise heavily human rights and are thought of as WMD by its engineers. Since there is no adequate fair inspection in place suspects are abused during investigations likely for wrong reasons. Counter-measures are being used to manufacture trials directed against the suspect by State or individuals advised to do so. This tactic guarantees further investigation permitted. The accused should never be found guilty on the basis of evidence that has not been brought to light and examined by the accused. The evidence is not presented to the accused to ward coercive measures.
There have been several serious incidents that indicate deep structured corruption of critical infrastructure of Govt institutions under the monitoring of the Parliament. Inadequate supervision has become a significant problem. The role of the political power as the inspector raises many questions of which the least important is not ’whether Finland should have its Constitutional court?’. Although ’professional judges must have a higher university degree in law’ it does not prevent corruption especially since the judicial system is ’independent’. A mature member of society understands, by human nature this is impossible. The judicial system does not seem to convince the citizens anymore.
What mechanisms the EU has to evaluate the level of democracy in member nations? Democracies to be re-evaluated.
How does the EU regulate, overview or monitor the preparation of counter-terrorism and surveillance laws by member states? How is the consistency of the laws being monitored between the nations? How do civil rights and legal protection survive in these circumstances?
By observation, globally ‘the war on terror’ seems to underpin the sovereign power at the expense of civil rights. We have a constant dilemma on how the ‘act of terror’ is being defined and how it has been communicated to the citizen. Similarly, we do have a problem by definition with what may trigger the need for surveillance over an individual. A matter of interpretation is not good enough? In practice, some crimes or anti-social behavior now turn into an ‘act of terror’ by definition or interpretation? Citizens may not even understand their commitment to an act of terror or being a part of a society of which status is turned to be suspected of terroristic activity by the administration. Grey lines everywhere. It seems politicians have created an extrajudicial tool to ensure sovereign access to ultimate power over the citizen. Why the ultimate control?
How are the surveillance technologies and methods overviewed? How are the periods of surveillance regulated by law and human rights? There has been a vast increase of reports coercive measures are indeed producing pain, suffering, and even fatal injuries. The suspects are receiving rough treatment over prolonged periods of time but never accused.
“Although the idea of temporality is not expressed in the derogation provisions of the ICCPR or the European Human Rights Convention, it has been understood to have been implied by the notion of emergency. According to the U.N. Human Rights Committee, article four of the ICCPR requires that “measures derogating from the provisions of the Covenant . . . be of an exceptional and temporary nature”” – “Informal” Suspencion of Normal Processes: The “WAR ON TERROR” as an Autoimmunity Crisis by A. ADDIS, Boston University Law Review.
How is this informality being monitored? How is it supervised no coercive measure or interrogation method consist of an element of torture, cause pain or suffering in the targeted? By observation, most of the suspects will never be accused. Is it possible that being a target of coercive measures is a worse option than imprisonment? How are the rights and legal protection of suspects ensured? We have still countries where even the rights of the accused materialize poorly.
Every question addressed here points to a system error. The ultimate cost is borne by the citizen. We have totalitarian states disguised as democracies. It is the culture of execution and power balance, the relationship between the citizen and the administration. We must measure these things to correct them.
The supervision of the Finnish police relies on internal self-supervision. Recently, there have been a number of court cases questioning the integrity of the entire National Bureau of Investigation. How does the sole internal monitoring compare among the European peer group? By observation of the public reports, news, and personal experience there is a need for a European authority for investigation of police practices to improve and support the moral standards. An external unit, in particular.
The police would not investigate reports of electronic warfare attacks targeting citizens. This has been addressed to the National Police Commissioner Seppo Kolehmainen. No response has been received. Whether this is rather a matter of national security, the activity may continue uninterrupted and the targeted civilians suffer pain, psychological illnesses, even fatalities. On many occasions, the police have reportedly annulled and questioned the mental health of citizens who have requested an investigation on their constant concern. There are reports some individuals have been taken to mental institutions or mental evaluation by force while others proposed to visit their therapist or doctor suggesting an issue with mental health. Kolehmainen has been addressed. No response has been received. Police do not possess the capability to assess the mental health of an individual. What sort of guidance has been given to police in view of this vastly growing issue?How the citizen reporting DEW and resonance attacks should be minded according to police, whether the practice is indeed consistent with this?
The emergency services in Finland are operated by Emergency Response Centres managed by the Ministry of the Interior in cooperation with the Ministry of Social Affairs and Health ie the police and healthcare functions. We would like to understand what sort of guidance there is given to the police and healthcare in terms of individuals who suffer the symptoms of electromagnetic attacks?
The permission granting process for police’s coercive measures by the District Court of Helsinki, in particular, requires monitoring. Since the judges do not know the individuals whose surveillance is on the table the decisions are made on an application basis. How is this process monitored externally? How many times an extension on an existing permission can be granted? How is it controlled the coercive measures are not being used for business, political or personal interests? How is the resilience of individual police officers and the judges, in particular, is being monitored in terms of corruption?
The Finnish police maintain formal and informal databases of citizens, involving profiles of them. This information is not available to the citizen by data access request. Is informal reporting used in cross-governmental communication?
Reports exist the NBI maintains a form of co-operation with the equivalent of Russia. Is this co-operation is indeed approved and formal?
While US military officers often make public statements (at press conferences and to Congress) about counter-personnel directed energy weapons being “in development,” it is less well-known that these weapons are actually being tested, fielded, and demonstrated in action, as the 1996 DARPA Limited Effects Technology Program Report reveals and the 1994 DOD-DOJ MOU confirms, nor that people all over USA (as worldwide) have been reporting non-consensual assault and experimentation with DEWs—bio-hacking Remote Access Human Control weapons–for over three decades now.
In the US, it is clearly a program of covert operations the military and FBI/CIA/DHS is striving to keep secret (See The Secret War by William Arkin in the Los Angeles Times, 2002)– hidden under “Surveillance” as this Memorandum to President Trump details and this second Memo conveys, but which needs to be publicly known and addressed given the horrific crimes against humanity being committed. The reports pouring in from around the country of radiation burns, remote electroshocks, electromagnetic rape, intrusive neurotechnology and vibrational frequency assault are so extreme that it has become clear that nothing less than unethical, inhumane Torture is being inflicted with these weapons.
This report is no different.
Last Friday, January 29, a single mother in California who also happens to be a state Safe at Home participant with DMV and Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) protections reports that a letter she sent the night before to Terry Emmert, Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering led to her being severely “spectrum-assaulted” the very next morning via predator drone or hovercraft for six hours from 5 AM to 11 AM. She says she continued to hear the drone or hovercraft above her until 1 PM before it finally left.
(Electromagnetic weapons are also referred to as Spectrum Weapons or Electronic Weapons in military documentation.)
In a complaint to a military hotline asking for a thorough investigation, she wrote:
She notes that “According to the 2020 NDAA, the Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering is the leader of the Directed Energy Group. The position used to be held by Acting Under Secretary of Defense Michael J.K. Kratsios. However, last night, the Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering was listed as Terry Emmert, and today the site appears to have been updated to include Dr. JihFen Lei. Mr. Emmert has a background in the NAVY, and Dr. Lei has a background working for NASA.” She notes her own Navy connections–her late father and grandfather both served in the US Navy; her grandfather also worked as a NASA-funded Aerospace Engineer for DOD with ties to the Pentagon.
Minus Informed Consent: Targeted for MK ULTRA, Eugenics Programs, Weapons Testing
Tragically, this Navy-family mother (name held for protection), far from being supported by the Navy, reports a lifetime of abuse, from before birth to age 18 in a family subjecting her to personality-splitting trauma, which she relates to CIA-DOD clandestine programs including eugenics programs. She reports that she “fought against them in self-defense for (her) entire life” and has been, after deprogramming (herself) and recovering repressed memories, reporting on drug and human traffickers employed in government positions who state kidnapped her daughter for four consecutive months with threats to “foster her out for prostitution”. After interviewing for a movie called Lawless America, she says she received a death threat for exposing crime and has been continuously targeted with military grade directed energy weapons inside her home from 2012 to the present.
She reports continuous attack on her body: “I now feel like my peripheral nerves are always burning on fire, and the burning sensation is especially concentrated in my feet. I suffer from daily pain and inflammation in my entire body with specific injuries to my eyes, brain, and other internal organs. Though my symptoms are directly caused by microwave injuries, my Medi-Cal doctors are treating me for Graves Disease, Graves Eye Disease, Bilateral Tinnitus and Polyneuropathy.”
Noting that her VAWA abuser, her non-biological grandfather, a prominent attorney and court commissioner, has a background in the FBI and CIA, she reports usage in MK ULTRA Project Artichoke, secret interrogation and weapons testing programs, conveyed to her as a “5-Level torture protocol involving drugs, hypnosis, rape/sodomy, electrocution, and extreme interrogation techniques.” She also reports she was once told by a Mexican Secret Service Intelligence Agent that she had 44 implants and 12 different weapons on her while residing in Albany, CA—this latter is reported by many “targeted individuals” all over US and worldwide: the multiplicity of weapons being used to target and subjugate them, as well as multiple non-consensual covertly-placed RFID implants.
Reporting neighborhood perpetrators who stalk, surveil and target her daily and nightly, she says they comprise a Special Operations Group (SOG) primarily made up of veteran military and intelligence agents (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special_Activities_Center). She notes that Commissioner Fagan has stated she is considered an “unpaid asset” being targeted for being perceived as a “dissident” and “whistleblower” of government corruption. She also reports a neighborhood Air Force contractor who irradiates her all day “and then cranks up the power at night while she is trying to sleep.” An extreme attack by overhead drone a few nights ago caused her to vomit and take midnight showers “to shield from the health-harming pulsed electromagnetic frequencies.” A former NASA funded Aerospace Engineer has told her she is being spectrum assaulted with rogue HUMINT collections via remote neural monitoring and satellite surveillance.
Such blatant assault in an American neighborhood has become possible only through character assassination, a Stasi ploy now being used widely by fusion center personnel such as local FBI, DHS, Infragard, and Neighborhood Watch traitors, all under the guise of “community monitoring.”
She has overheard Commissioner Fagan telling her landlord and neighbors that she is a “prostitute who is living a life of luxury” in her HUD Section 8 Housing, while she is struggling to survive in the midst of a gang of contracted terrorists exploiting her based on malicious libel and slander. She reports, as do many others who are unlawfully targeted thus that Commissioner Fagan also uses “tampered evidence such as falsified police reports, voice morphed audio recordings, photoshopped images, and deep fake videos to make (her) look .. guilty of all sorts of different crimes.”
The irony is that this man has in fact confessed to having her targeted by the DOD, something which escapes attention when she has previously sought the protection of law enforcement. She reports that she has been referred to as a ‘Pentagon Slave’ by rogue members of the Police, FBI, CIA, NSA, NASA, DOD & Pentagon.
Reminding the Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering of the Geneva conventions, informed consent requirements, and US Code prohibitions against torture, terrorism, stalking, treason, war crimes, and classification to conceal crime, she demands removal from all non-consensual programs.
“I do not consent and have never legally consented to be used for training and education purposes, non-consensual medical experimentation, surveillance abuse, military weapons testing, operational targeting, microchip/nanochip implantation, organ harvesting, child and human trafficking, or mind control slavery. If anyone has acquired my signature on a consent form, a release of information, and/or a non-disclosure agreement, it was through forgery and trickery, or it was signed under threat, duress and coercion while I was drugged, hypnotized, or subjected to some other form of mind control…It is my understanding that you do follow the Common Rule that “informed, knowledgeable, signed consent is necessary” and no valid consent has ever been sought or acquired.”
(Reporting American citizen)
A powerful letter which also points to the 2014 NSA acknowledgement of high power microwave weapons and the fraudulent use of National Security letters to facilitate the targeting and trafficking into military-CIA programs of human exploitation—with NO research protections (targets are literally being assaulted to death and slow-killed with these deadly weapons), this letter is a tragic commentary on the nature of the unlawful assault on civilians on American soil by Military-Intelligence personnel today.
It is telling that immediate military retaliation followed, in the same vein of barbaric remote assault with microwave pulse weapons. The implication of course being that for targets there is no way out: breaking the silence of remote-weapon assault is swiftly rebutted with further assault, through intimidation and military “show of force.”
This is an outrageous abrogation of human rights and a devastating reminder that Americans have been stripped of all basic human rights and civil rights by a high-tech, rogue military mechanism which has left ethics, conscience, morality, decency, civility, and virtue by the wayside in its thrust toward Full-Spectrum Dominance over all humanity. This writer joins this reporting mother in asking for a complete halt to these irresponsible and diabolical remote-access bio-hacking assaults on Americans by the US Military and Intelligence factions engaging in them, and a speedy termination of these atrocious crimes against humanity.
Others similarly targeted are encouraged to write and publish their own letters to the Under Secretary of Defense in Research and Engineering. An astute reader of symbols notes that the harp behind both officers is a sign of the SES—the Senior Executive Service “a corps of executives selected for their leadership qualifications, serving in key positions just below the top Presidential appointees as a link between them and the rest of the Federal (civil service) workforce” (Wikipedia). Surely such top personnel are better served by heeding the basic human rights and bodily freedoms protected by the Nuremberg Code and the Constitution for the United States of America.
This American mother’s letter in full, with identifying information redacted, is below.
RAE (Report, Analysis, Op-ed) | Ramola D | Sep 26, 2020
This past week, in court at Old Bailey in London, during the ongoing extradition-to-US hearings, world-renowned journalist and Wikileaks founder Julian Assange’s psychiatrist, Professor Michael Kopelman revealed on Sep 22 that Julian had reported hearing abusive persecutory voices in his head while also experiencing a nose-dive into depression, to the point of having suicidal feelings and reaching out to a suicide hotline, The Samaritans.
The voices which Julian reported while in solitary confinement said things to him such as “You are dust” “You are dead” “We’re coming to get you.” In addition Julian has reported other auditory hallucinations such as music.
Julian Assange has been in a maximum-security prison at Belmarsh since April 2019 (when he was evicted from the Ecuadorian Embassy after seven years there), where he’s been held in solitary for long periods of time and endured multiple indignities including being denied access to his lawyers at various times. Last year in September, his father, John Shipton visited him in prison and reported conditions were harsh, that Julian’s treatment was “sordid and hysterical,” that he was being held in solitary for up to 23 hours a day, and subjected to intensive (known) surveillance which included laser microphones and video cameras, even in toilets. Nils Melzer, UN Special Rapporteur for Torture,who visited Julian in May 2019 stated that Julian was being subjected to full-blown psychological torture inclusive of the slanderous mobbing, defamation, and denial of coverage accorded him by mainstream media.
Indeed, he stated that Julian Assange had been “systematically slandered to divert attention from the crimes he exposed,” and been so dehumanized by the negative coverage aimed at him by a propagandist press naming him a rapist, a hacker, a Russian spy that the world had failed to notice and decry the base violations of his essential human rights.
The UN Human Rights Office released a statement in November 2019 succeeding that visit by Mr. Melzer which revealed that the UK Government, exposed for governmental misconduct and serious war crimes by the Wikileaks videos and cables, was essentially retaliating, torturing, and persecuting the journalist who exposed them:
The Special Rapporteur and his medical team visited the imprisoned Wikileaks founder in May and reported that he showed “all the symptoms typical for prolonged exposure to psychological torture” and demanded immediate measures for the protection of his health and dignity.
“However, what we have seen from the UK Government is outright contempt for Mr. Assange’s rights and integrity,” Melzer said. “Despite the medical urgency of my appeal, and the seriousness of the alleged violations, the UK has not undertaken any measures of investigation, prevention and redress required under international law.”
Under the Convention against Torture, States must conduct a prompt and impartial investigation wherever there is reasonable ground to believe that an act of torture has been committed. “In a cursory response sent nearly five months after my visit, the UK Government flatly rejected my findings, without indicating any willingness to consider my recommendations, let alone to implement them, or even provide the additional information requested,” the UN expert said.
In May, Mrs. Assange retweeted a statement by Stella Moris, his partner and mother of two young sons, expressing a fear that he may die in jail.
Labour MP John McDonnell has made a statement on Double Down News about the brutality of the treatment of prisoners at Belmarsh and the need for Julian’s persecution by the UK and US governments to be widely publicized:
A recent tweet by Stella Moris detailed just how horrifically Julian Assange is still being treated, as he is brought to court for the hearings:
Dr. Sondra Crosby, who has visited Julian Assange at Belmarsh in October 2019 and January 2020 and at the Ecuadorian embassy earlier in October 2017, testified at the hearing and asserted that he is at “high risk of completing suicide if he were to be extradited” to the United States.
She said Assange suffers from osteoporosis. He would face severe risks to his physical health—in addition to his mental health—if detained or incarcerated in a U.S. facility, given the abysmal state of health care in jails and prisons.
According to Crosby, Assange has concealed the “full extent of his depression and suicide plans” when meeting with prison doctors and mental health specialists. He was worried if he revealed his plans or the “extent of his suicidal ideations” that he “may be put under more surveillance” or face further isolation.
….As detailed in her December 2019 report provided to the court, Assange seemed severely depressed to her. He talked like he was “essentially dead.” He was “tearful” and pleaded “for help.” He spoke about calling an anonymous suicide hotline known as the Samaritans.
By October 2019, “he met all of criteria for major depression,” Crosby testified. “It was profoundly impacting his functioning, and he had thoughts of suicide every day, many times in a day.”
Crosby assessed his physical health and was concerned about what she viewed as symptoms of cardiac disease or anxiety, as well as chronic respiratory infections. Early in the COVID-19 pandemic, Assange’s defense team raised the issue of chronic respiratory infections in an attempt to bail him out of jail. The judge rejected their request.
It is established beyond doubt therefore that Julian Assange has been subjected to an excess of physical as well as psychological torture, that his suffering is real, his feelings of depression observed and understood.
Julian’s auditory hallucinations and suicidal ideations as disclosed by Professor Michael Kopelman were remarked in court reports by Rebecca Vincent from Reporters without Borders, and acknowledged by Stella Moris:
Concern from journalists covering this trial–Shadowproof has published a list here–has centered on Julian’s mental health and psychological well-being, severely compromised by incarceration in a brutal maximum security person, often confined to solitary.
Many observing and following these events in court, however, who are aware that anti-personnel non-lethal weapons and neuroweapons disguised as crowd-control technologies, electronic surveillance, “peace enforcement” and “deterrence,” which are known also to be used covertly in prisons, are in use today worldwide, ask if this is really the whole story. Is it possible there is something else operative here, related to weaponized neuroscience? That the auditory “hallucinations” being reported by Julian, and the plummeting dive into depression he has manifested, replete with suicide ideation, are consequences of neuroweaponry attacks rather than mental health breakdowns brought on by torture?
There has been much disclosure over the years regarding such neuroweapons, which can put voices into heads, as well as modulate feelings, moods, and states of being. Thousands of people have come forward to testify to the reality of auditory signals piped in from the outside, which indeed, they report, include repetitiously abusive voices, pushing negative messages and encouraging self-harm and suicide. Despite the desperate, apostate efforts over the past couple decades by propagandizing and openly-lying DOD/CIA-affiliated press such as The New York Times, Washington Post, Wired, Atlantic, Daily Beast, and other such to suppress the existence of these technologies, variously known to many as military Voice to Skull, or Voice of God weapons, and comprising a number of sonic, optical, and electromagnetic technologies such as bone conductance, the Neurophone, Frey’s microwave hearing, laser light modulation, MRIs, among others, notice of these technologies from Defense and CIA whistleblowers, published patents, and current public-domain neuroscience has indisputably established their existence, use, and “fielding” or deployment.
Dr. Robert Duncan, a military and CIA whistleblower who has spoken at length about state of the art neurotechnology at conferences, workshops, Universities recently discoursed on a variety of neurotechnologies capable of putting voices in heads, creating AI hive-minds and brain nets, neurally influencing thoughts, emotions, and behaviors, and creating No-Touch torture in human brains on a presentation hosted by human rights advocate Deserie Foley, which she presented at Camp Disclosure 2020 along with her own experience of being attacked with some of these neurotechnologies. This is Dr. Robert Duncan’s portion of the presentation, below, offered to this writer by Dr. Duncan for the purposes of this article, for the education and enlightenment of all readers, while Deserie Foley’s full presentation can be found here. (Many thanks also to Deserie for prompting this presentation by Dr. Duncan.)
In a conversation with this writer in February, Dr. Duncan spoke both of how these neuroweapons have come to be developed and deployed, and how there is a great need for exposure and ethical regulation of these weapons, to prevent the kind of harm that now thousands of “Targeted Individuals” being attacked with such neuroweapons are complaining of today:
Other military neuroscientists including Dr. James Giordano of Georgetown University and DARPA have spoken of how all-invasive today’s neuroweapons are (two all-revealing video presentations linked below), while Dr. Richard Alan Miller has published earlier on synthetic telepathy and microwave hearing: Synthetic Telepathy and the Early Mind Wars, by Richard Alan Miller, 2001
The subjects of synthetic telepathy, voices in heads, sounds in heads, and mind-hives have been discussed by many whistleblowers in the community to this writer, please see the many interviews at Ramola D Reports and on this website, including ones with Omnisense/Phillip Walker, Dr. Millicent Black, and Paul Baird of Surveillance Issues. Many have also published testimonials at various websites online, and several have spoken out at conferences and commission meetings such as the President’s Commission for Bioethical Issues cover-up meetings chaired by career academic Amy Gutman in 2011. (Amy Gutman, like the rest of the crew on that panel and at subsequent Office of Human Research Protections panels is abysmally guilty of covering up notice of these non-consensual experimentation crimes and human rights atrocities by reporting victims.) It is at this point an open secret that these neuroweapons are being used unethically on people worldwide, as indeed the US diplomats in Cuba and China also recently experienced and reported, and as thousands in China, Poland, and elsewhere are now reporting openly.
Finally, many who have been targeted with these weapons and who have experienced the inside of the US prison system, such as Todd Giffen and Warren Weisman have reported to this writer that they have experienced being hit with both neurotechnology and microwave weaponry while in jail. Justice documents including some recently released on FOIA request indicate also that new sensors and tracking devices are being tested out and used in US prisons, suggesting that the kind of intrusive surveillance prisoners at high-security prisons are subjected to far exceeds the visible and known surveillance of microphones and video cameras–and could include millimeter-wave heartbeat and heart EMF sensors, MRI scanners, and neuro-imaging/scanning/stimulation technologies. Prison populations in the US have also historically been experimented on by military and Intelligence factions, and it is entirely plausible that prisoners in the UK also are being subjected today to neuro-experimentation without consent.
In a lecture given at a Bases conference a few years ago, Dr. Robert Duncan remarked that these neurotechnologies comprised Offensive Information Warfare neuroweaponry. They are indeed weapons of war and their purpose is destruction.
The psychologists, psychiatrists, physicians and others working to provide Julian Assange healthcare and advocacy today are advised therefore to seriously consider and examine this possibility–and not look facilely to psychiatry and psychoactive drugs for answers and remedies. Many hundreds of people neuro-targeted non-consensually by the unethical Military-Intelligence behemoth already languish in mental asylums, Psych wards, and misdiagnosed hellholes of “schizophrenia, paranoia, schizoid disorder” labels, lives taken down by psychiatric miscreancy, forced onto disability, disbelieved by families, made penniless, jobless, and homeless. They too are victims of war crimes by a ruthless military-industrial-Intelligence-academe complex gone mad with greed and control, using neurotechnology to destroy lives, shut down dissent, and manage populations.
Neuroscientists watching the Assange hearings probably understand very well, as Dr. Duncan does, that Julian Assange also may be such a war crime victim, that his mind may be being hacked by the very war criminals his journalism has exposed.
It is an indisputable breach of neuro privacy and extreme violation of human rights, bodily autonomy, and neuro sovereignty to have one’s brain so monitored, scanned, and interfered with, and while mental health teams may focus exclusively on conditions of incarceration leading to “psychosis” and suicide ideation, they must know that the neuroweapons now exist to destroy, degrade, influence, and harm people’s healthy, happy minds. Of course, neuroweaponry used on Julian’s brain, if that is the case, and microwave weaponry used on his body, if that is the case (giving rise to many illnesses, as described by Dr. Sondra Crosby, symptoms of all of which can be induced by anti-personnel directed energy weapons, as reported by victims and scientists) both make the case for his immediate removal from Belmarsh prison and return to his home and family: they will establish he is being tortured with neuroweaponry and DEWs, as many other targets of the ire of the ruthless and criminal Deep State and war industry today are. This is Remote Rendition and Remote-Access Torture from a distance, as the writer and human rights advocate Cassandra has pointed out, in her article on El-Masri’s statement calling out the CIA’s Extraordinary Rendition he experienced; victims of neurotechnology war crimes today are essentially victims of Remote Rendition and Remote-Access Bio-Hacking and Neuro-Hacking Torture.
People worldwide watching these events and reading about them stand silently and remotely in support of Julian Assange while everyday, outside the court, people congregate to support Julian and push for his release.
Recently, like many other human rights activists and wrongful targets reporting Crimes Against Humanity from fusion centers, military branches, and Intelligence agencies freely using anti-personnel microwave, milliwave, acoustic neuroweapons on the populace—for the past 20-30 years–as if it were their right to do so—in stealth mode, undisclosed publicly, yet well-documented in many ways, as covered here and here and here by me earlier—I was appalled to learn that NSA whistleblowers Bill Binney and Kirk Wiebe were planning an appearance on Katherine Horton’s channel, and later appalled to witness their gatekeeping performance by her side on her channel.
A few years ago, Bill and Kirk made a big splash on Ella Free’s Talkshoe conference-call, issuing a call for information along with Cait Ryan and Karla Smith, announcing a survey to collect victim experience information on EMF/Neurotech assault. This was covered by me here.
This survey eventually fell into a turbid silence as no news whatsoever was provided and months and years rolled by and nothing was done, reported, or published on the matter by all original named parties above—and no substantive responses offered to queries by many including myself.
Nevertheless, several activists including myself frequently kept Bill and Kirk informed, sending in evidence, visual or recorded, of high-tech assault, sending in accounts of Stasi behavior from neighbors—with few getting any acknowledgment, including myself. The most Bill has written back to me was two words, Thank You, when I offered to send in reports of information as I received them, plus send in declassified and public-domain military and Intelligence documents on the weaponry and bio-effects I knew of and thought would be useful to their investigation. This was at the time of their appearance on Ella’s call, when I too called in to speak with them and did.
Kirk Wiebe is on Twitter and I have frequently tagged him in tweets. My letters to Bill invariably included him in the recipient list.
Over the one and a half years of public witness that I was on Techno Crime Fighters Forum, I continued to write to Bill and Kirk, as a reporting journalist of crimes against humanity being reported by Americans, Europeans, and others worldwide, despite their peculiar refusal to respond to me. I also invited them to interview with me, in print or podcast, several times—all of these invitations were ignored—including very recently, after I heard and saw Bill Binney speak openly for the first time about people in the community reporting microwave weapons assault to Chris Hedges on RT, in April 2020.
Over the past 6 years, since I was first singled out by the corrupt and criminal FBI/DHS/CIA mechanism in Boston for special treatment with EMF weapons, having a little too much integrity to their liking apparently—reported earlier at Washington’s Blog and Dr. Marko’s Pine Cone Utopia—I have researched, investigated, documented, written, podcasted, and published extensively on the subject of targeting, surveillance overreach, FISA abuse, non-consensual experimentation, surveillance technology used by fusion centers, in addition to other, related subjects in science and technology, human rights, and ethics. My articles and interviews have striven to unearth the means by which such perfidy could have been rolled out on the American public, and world public, and have highlighted the testimonial of many including CIA whistleblower Barbara Hartwell, FBI whistleblower Geral Sosbee, NSA whistleblower Karen Melton-Stewart, writer Paul Baird, actor Steve Shellen, many others. Additionally, I have authored, co-authored, and sent off memoranda and letters to various politicians, academics, and Commission heads including President Trump, Senators Ed Markey and Elizabeth Warren, and SACHRP committee chairs and members. I mention this to underline the fact that my writing on these matters—which occurred in a void, when no other journalist was covering these issues—except Barbara Hartwell, whose work I regrettably only discovered later but am indeed most grateful for—was well-known to all engaging in testimonial reportage and activism on these matters, and also to many in alt-media who occasionally republished, or made mention of my work.
During and after the time Karen Stewart, Katherine Horton, Millicent Black, and I worked on Techno Crime Fighters Forum, significantly, it was only Katherine Horton who received responses from Bill Binney and Kirk Wiebe that I know of (perhaps Millicent did, I do not recall this currently); Karen Stewart has reported that she too was long ignored and not recognized, certainly never publicly recognized, by these two stalwarts from the very same NSA she too had been employed in.
After Techno Crime Fighters Forum closed, as everyone following this matter knows, Katherine Horton embarked on a profoundly vicious, malicious, and vindictive smear campaign on me—publishing outright lies and false-allegations, in clear attempt to sully my character and name, which I documented and rebutted in numerous articles, videos, and Twitter threads. Her extensive actions as an infiltrator in the midst of victims and activists, functioning as agent-provocateur, saboteur, NLP controller were covered by me extensively here and here. Katherine Horton was also running smear campaigns at the time on others, including CIA whistleblower Barbara Hartwell, and other human rights advocates Cassandra, Thomas McFarlan, and Melanie Vritschan. Despite several Cease and Desists to her, her malicious slander and libel on all of us continues to be maintained at her website, stop007.org. This is defamation and character assassination, for which she could be and still can be sued. CIA whistleblower Barbara Hartwell has also documented and rebutted Katherine Horton’s smears and false-allegations against her in numerous articles on her site. Writer and activist Thomas McFarlan has documented and published in video the clear evidence of Katherine Horton’s lies and agent-provocateur calls to violence on her own videos which she later denied—but continued, including in her tweets on Twitter. Writer and activist Cassandra has documented and published the facts regarding Katherine Horton’s smear campaigns in threads on Twitter. Founder and President of ICATOR Melanie Vritschan has documented and rebutted in video the numerous lies, smears, and false-allegations directed at her by Katherine Horton, whose hand in the wrongful medical kidnap removal of Ms. Vritschan’s newborn, and refusal to help get her back is well-documented, well-reported (by me) and well-known.
In fairly recent times—November and December 2019—Karen Melton-Stewart, whose case I have consistently covered for years as a journalist, abruptly turned on me after we worked on a Joint Statement to rebut Katherine’s continued smears and tedious lies indicting and scapegoating me as means to deflect attention from her (Katherine’s) own culpability; thereafter Karen Stewart began to publish—exactly like Katherine Horton—outright lies, insults, and false allegations against me, all of which was documented, responded to, and rebutted extensively by me here and here and here.
Karen Stewart’s inexplicable turnaround from decrying Katherine’s behavior to suddenly condoning, “forgiving,” and lauding it while libelously and baselessly calling me names and denigrating me publicly with malicious lies and insults was abrupt, extreme, and publicly noticeable—as Karen splashed her false allegations all over Facebook and Twitter. Karen Stewart also libeled and denigrated CIA whistleblower Barbara Hartwell, which was documented and rebutted by Barbara Hartwell in numerous articles at her site.
Since Karen Stewart’s public and supernasty attacks on me, several other activists came forward publicly and privately to me to report malicious attacks by Karen Stewart on them. Writers and activists who witnessed Karen Stewart’s wrongful attacks on me at Twitter and Facebook published their observations and reminded her of the facts—which she was twisting, distorting, and ignoring—in Twitter threads, linked here, in this Statement I was compelled to make on her extreme-lying and defamation campaign against me. Karen Stewart also can be sued for her malicious defamation and libel against me, which she continues to maintain at her Facebook and Twitter pages and at a page she names “Perps and Nutcases” on Facebook—daring to include me in this group, along with others who are equally outraged at this extreme act of character-assassination and libel against them with this kind of noxious labeling by a now proven liar.
A prime contention (as stated by herself) of Karen Stewart against me – after the Joint Statement was approved by all co-authors and published – centered around a court case Katherine Horton was supposedly then filing, mischaracterized by Karen Stewart as a group or class action for European targets. This case, as I understand was later reported by Katherine Horton, was apparently thrown out of court for lack of paperwork or photocopies.
It is apparently this same court-case that Bill Binney and Kirk Wiebe are now suddenly popping out of the woodwork to say they are supporting publicly.
What exactly is happening here?
Why would Bill and Kirk step forward to shore up the image of someone who has long been operative as an agent-provocateur, saboteur – literally sabotaging and ending various projects prematurely, as covered earlier here and here — and smear-artist – unless they are all part of the same Intelligence network seeking to play the same game of Limited Reveal, acknowledging perhaps the worst, or some of the most extreme Crimes Against Humanity being reported by targets, while protecting a large part of the numerous and immense roster of classified, compartmentalized military-academic neuro experimentation and weapons-testing programs that they are casually experimenting on, exploiting and using hundreds and thousands of targets to nefarious end?
Is it possible that two senior former officers from the National Security Agency (Agency that loves to snoop!) have not, as another activist puts it “analyzed & monitored Katherine Horton’s social profile, videos, websites, case record of sabotaged projects and working relationships, published lies, provocations, insults yet want to align themselves with her as opposed to other targets with evidence/testimony?”
Why did Karen Stewart suddenly turn on me – as if coached to do so, and, peculiarly at the very time that Katherine Horton, by her recent stating on video, was in the United States, seeking out NSA whistleblowers to support her public image and become “experts” in her court case – unless she too is a part of this Intelligence network engaging in Limited Reveal while just co-incidentally, no doubt, working to bury my name, work, and journalistic and scientific disclosure on targeting?
Notably, Katherine Horton, like Ella Free, and like Midge Mathis of the probably-CIA-set-up Targeted Justice, has never mentioned my journalism or technical coverage as significant; she has however, sought openly to act as a technical gatekeeper, with absolutely meaningless blather on the technology herself, often saying she had no clue about it, as she puts out disinformation about the technology and supports others doing the same, such as former NASA “Richard Lighthouse,” and actively gatekeeps to repress reportage and analysis from others including myself of the technologies which apparently the Intelligence agencies and local governments and fusion centers want hidden forever—as I have often covered earlier.
Clearly, Bill Binney and Kirk Wiebe – ex-NSA officials of high stature, who have high-level secret clearances, who signed NDAs, who are privy to classified information, who surely know a lot more of SIGINT – as revealed by John St. Clair Akwei in his lawsuit – than they’ve ever let on in public, although Bill has let slip once that nefarious “classified programs” had been unleashed on the public (Tommy Collins interview), and another time that “ambient signals” were known to be picked up by the NSA (such as brain waves?) (Abby Martin interview) – also have never mentioned my journalism or technical coverage as significant.
My undergraduate degree in Physics and science-based interest in the various covert technologies of political targeting have led to my continued research and reportage on the putative technologies in use, as reported in many articles, and most recently in the listing of extrajudicial targeting technologies here and in the reporting of the 1996 DARPA/NIJ Limited Effects Program Report here.
There are several Facebook groups I am a part of where I regularly witness and read the highly erudite and probing analyses of various science graduates, Ph Ds, scientists, and engineers worldwide on the nature of the neurotechnologies and radiation and sonic technologies being used on targets, and ways to record these.
It is curious therefore, to see Bill Binney, once Technical Director of the NSA, cryptologist par excellence, Math major and codebreaker, and Kirk Wiebe, retired senior intelligence analyst, suddenly line themselves up with supposed high-energy particle physicist Katherine Horton, and all three of them hold forth on the opacity and complexity of the technology that “even they” could not comprehend, and the difficulty of measuring or recording any impact of this technology on human bodies.
(Meanwhile, many engineers, scientists, analysts, accountants, audio technicians, musicians among targets are busy experimenting and recording the high EMF hits, the bio-effects, even the V2K and projected sound attacks.)
It is even more curious to hear Kirk Wiebe – who has never responded to emails (from me and others who have copied me in on emails to him) proffering information on these EMF and Neurotech/Nanotech and covert implantation assaults – say on this video that people should send their questions about the technology to him, a line of action Katherine Horton appears also to be pushing as she refers to Kirk as an expert. Relaying a commonly-known, children’s textbook understanding of audible sound frequencies as between 20 and 20,000 Hz, Kirk Wiebe in fact suggests he has been informed of this as if he had been “read-into” a highly classified matter!
I have seen no evidence – nor communication from Kirk Wiebe – to suggest he has any knowledge whatsoever of the kind of ELFs, EMFs, microwaves, milliwaves, carrier waves, acoustics, or neurotech targets are reporting that he is willing to speak openly about, and therefore no indication that he should be regarded as a technology expert in this matter.
In speaking of the emails sent to him on the TI survey, Bill Binney—who says he is not an expert on these technologies, and, significantly, never reported the results of this survey, dismisses emails from targets as from bots or fraudulent in their reportage—but how would he know to judge?
Katherine Horton, who worked hard on her video to get Bill Binney to say he witnessed her being hit, presents Reflectix/aluminium coated bubble-wrap as a means to record sub-audible pulse shots.
My own shield made of Reflectix over steel-core baking sheet, with a layer of sticky-back foam-craftpaper over the Reflectix more definitively and distinctly records sub-audible microwave pulses and shots (more than Reflectix alone, which I have long experimented with) – something I have spoken and written about for ages; in tandem with an EMF meter, it offers irrefutable proof and directionality of external EMF pulse-shot hits.
I did not hear this mentioned by the new TechnoGate trio, nor did I hear mentioned any of the other means of recording that many targets have spoken of, privately and publicly, in emails and social media, to me and to others.
This is of course only one recording method, and one putative tech being used on targets. There are indeed a whole range of technologies being used against targets today, and huge difficulties in attempting to record and expose many of them; the bio-effects-reports of targets were summarized here in this second memo to President Trump; the many DEW/neuro targeting-tech reports from targets were summarized here in this document. Many of these coincide with bio-effects disclosed in military documents, and weapons disclosed in military documents, and by whistleblowers.
There is no doubt neither Bill, Kirk, nor Katherine are technical experts here, nor should they be considered as such. Yet this is how they are presenting each other and themselves—while also suggesting the impossibility of learning more about these technologies or of recording them. This is fraudulent. It is also a clear push to contain classified projects as classified – which is doing a huge disservice to the victims of these technologies, who deserve every single one of these technologies to be declassified and openly acknowledged as in use against them, while restorative technologies, countermeasures and compensation also need to be openly meted out to them.
The very detailed discussion of the technologies DARPA and the DOJ have confessed to be using, as evidenced in the recently released-on-FOIA-request document, The Limited Effects Program Report, the many surveillance technologies and crowd-control technologies DHS and local law is using, the weaponized and portable millimeter wave and sonic tech the military is using as evident from their weapons manuals, the many radiation, sensor, and radar technologies the AFRL and USAF is testing, the neurotechnolgies which scientists Dr. Robert Duncan and Dr. James Giordiano expose, all of which I have reported on, is completely ignored by this crew which fixates on the difficulty of measuring, does not once mention the many invasive neurotechnologies targets report being hit with, and conveniently buries the reportage and patents that I and other writers online have published on these matters.
It is my opinion therefore that Bill and Kirk are either playing a NSA game or a NSA/CIA game to continue to keep most things opaque and secret and vague, right alongside with Katherine playing a JTRIG/GCHQ/MI5/MI6/Swiss Intel/CIA game to do the same—while it is entirely plausible Karen Stewart, with her touching faith in the “white hats” culled from unreliable and deceiving NSA/FBI/CIA (who have twice distinguished themselves with false Intel on me fed to her, as proved in Twitter threads linked here) has been roped in to participate in these limited-hangout operations—as is evident in the bizarre hatchet job she has wrongfully swung against my character in recent times. In other words, a high-tech military Intel op designed to deceive, placate, control-the-disclosure, keep most of the tech classified, secret, sacrosanct and still-in-use, while palliating and misdirecting the victims—not to mention data-collect in the process, and keep victims subjugated for years with these technologies while data-collecting.
Notably, Bill and Kirk mention a long period of years to collect information and bring cases to court – when they could call up RT or Info Wars or any of the big alt-media channels right now and speak openly—whistleblow!–about what targets are relaying to them!
My being publicly slandered, lied-about, insulted, and defamed by Katherine Horton from July 2018, and publicly slandered, lied-about, insulted, and defamed by Karen Stewart from November 2019 is, it seems to me, very much a part of this scenario: my published sci-tech journalism on targeting and targeting technologies is apparently intended to be buried by their smear ops. Why? Why do I need to be disappeared as a journalist by this crew—and also by the Targeted Justice/other targeted-organization crews, who have all engaged in supernasty smear ops on me online?
Because the singular investigative technology, testimonial, whistleblowing, documentary, and analytical reportage I have published over 6 years as a writer and journalist exposes the Intelligence agencies and military and local/federal governments quite irrefutably—and exposes the actual nature of the sinister and deadly technologies they are using against us.
Which, I should remind all, is also completely in line with the investigative journalism and historic disclosure of investigative journalists, writers, whistleblowers, and scientists Dr. Nick Begich, Mark Rich, Cheryl Welsh, Dr. Rauni Kilde, Renee Pittman Mitchell, Deborah Dupre, Mojimir Babacek, Gloria Naylor, Magnus Olsson, Richard Alan Miller, Mary Gregory, Dr. John Hall, Dave Case, and Dr. Robert Duncan, as well as international human rights organization founders and advocates Galina Kurdina and Melanie Vritschan (and many others with sites online) and many reporting victims whom I have interviewed and written about—all of whose voices and work I frequently refer to and showcase.
Karen Stewart teaming up with Katherine Horton to attack my name and character is most definitely an attempt to disappear my name and silence my work and voice in these matters; Bill Binney and Kirk Wiebe’s propping up Katherine Horton currently both discredits them completely and is a clear attempt to gatekeep (everyone/all reporting victims) on all target-talk, speculation, and reportage of the anti-personnel radiation, sonic, bioweapon, and neural weapons technologies being used. (Don’t look at or refer to anyone’s work such as Ramola’s recent published work—or anyone else’s historic, published work, eg., Welsh, Kilde, Begich, Rich, Duncan etc.–on the actual technology or disclosures from documentation analysis, look here at TechnoGate which tells you “even we” cannot make statements on the tech being used.)
This is especially pernicious in the current atmosphere of media-neglect, as a wrongfully targeted writer-colleague points out:
“Because the targeted community as a whole is ignored by mainstream media/public, there is no widespread public social commentary, critical analysis, checking over facts/details, other experts giving their analysis/expertise–which allows for gatekeepers to use any kind of professional credentials, made-up or otherwise, Whistleblower status, and public profile, to come along and control the narrative, isolate real targets, truth-tellers, and journalists, and make vulnerable targets feel they must follow certain groups/self-proclaimed leaders out of fear of being left behind, isolated, or publicly ignored/denigrated if they dare give a genuine point of view about targeting and the weaponry/technology used for remote access torture.
Public scrutiny is always necessary regardless if it is an authoritative government/independent body, non-profit, charity, or activist group, especially when crimes against humanity and insidious torture are being exposed; it makes those of us targeted vulnerable to set-ups, cover-ups, punitive psychiatry, and counterintelligence operations used to: control the narrative, minimize the full extent and horror of what has happened, limit disclosures, delay or even prevent justice and recompense for the millions of us targeted.”
Pointing up this fact: For the past 30 years, ALL mainstream media – DOD/CIA-run – has, criminally, published lies—open lies—as well as disinformation, mockery, ridicule, downplayings, denigration, deprecation, distortions, skewings of fact, omissions of fact, in their limited and concealing coverage of targeting crimes with high-tech weaponry reported by citizens and supported by whistleblower scientists: The New York Times, The Washington Post, Wired, The Daily Beast, CBS, Chicago Sun-Times currently come to mind. My commentary on a few of these publications—which also point up this media treason is here:
So yes, most savvy activists are aware the “TI” community is bristling with infiltrators and gatekeepers— some of whom I have written about and exposed – who lean on email lists, conference calls, newsletters to cuttingly interrogate and censor targets. Infiltrators and gatekeepers also seem to have either Phd credentials or Intelligence Agency history or both, or run media ops to play “Spokesperson”—this is clearly by snaky Intelligence Community design.
It is also my opinion that, given Katherine’s past record with her court cases, given State Secrets and Official Secrets acts—which usually stop such cases in courts very early, given that she has not taken her case to the UK Investigatory Tribunal for classified matters but a regular court in the UK, her court case is a fraudulent artifact, for show, merely for use in the live action role play she appears to be a part of. Others have expressed to me that her court case may be a way to set precedent and prevent others with clear evidence from getting a hearing in court.
I do think everyone who is targeted with stealth technology needs to write a detailed affidavit–and while people are interested in building cases to take the Intelligence agencies to court, and dreaming of class-actions, I myself have been learning about the fraudulence of the judicial system, the recalcitrance of the military and Intelligence agencies (to the point of murder) in maintaining classified covers and extreme deception, and am exploring other definitive ways of exposing and terminating these assaultive crimes against humanity – but I would not advise anyone to hand their affidavits over to a group of Techno Gatekeepers with Intelligence and military roots: whose technical credentials and output regarding targeting technologies is non-existent, who have disdained from communication with and interviewing with a science-and-tech truth-journalist publishing extensively on targeting, who are instead supporting libel-practicing charlatans, poseurs, saboteurs, who have rejected the data from numerous victims on a past survey, and yet who are now clearly engaged again in supporting data collection—for handover to whom in which covert agency, and for what purpose—of further tabulating effects of these deadly, inhumane tech?–one can only speculate on.
All of it bodes ill, and does not offer hope for the saving of lives of present-day targets or future generations (when classified military/Intelligence actions against citizens are kept concealed, the lives and health of those citizens—and everyone else’s by extension—are in grave danger). Currently it seems classified torture or stealth-mode torture – which is what this is, essentially – is being protected, camouflaged, concealed by these elaborate bogus-courtcase-support operations by two NSA whistleblowers whose word—based on their actions and inactions–I can no longer trust.
I also note that Katherine Horton apparently recently disappeared from public view on her channel where she had been running her own show after Techno Crime Fighters Forum closed, without a word to her viewers (causing much anxiety amongst them, to the point of people openly, online, asking me—subject of her attacks—what had happened to her!), yet surfaced in others’ videos recently publishing notice of her having “been declared legally incompetent,” and hiring a public relations firm to clean up and defend her public image – which she herself has successfully sullied. In these videos and documentation by others she has distinguished herself most notably for apparently claiming a peculiar “right to be forgotten,” presumably in an attempt to reframe herself and her public image in a new light succeeding the many ways in which her execrable lies and smear operations in addition to other infiltration actions have recently been exposed, including by the Joint Statement.
There is no clarity, no authenticity, no truth, no integrity, no disclosure—but much obfuscation–in this group; I would not trust them, nor rely on them to fully expose targeting or procure justice.
This is my opinion, I have been made aware others share it. I am publishing it to surface some of the disquietude others have mentioned to me, just as much as to express my thoughts on the matter—and to make this a matter for open public discussion. This seems to be a classic Limited Hangout or Controlled Opposition scenario.
Rely on yourself to fully expose targeting crimes and obtain redress, would be my advice. High-flying NSA whistleblowers who don’t answer emails or complete survey-projects or speak openly of these crimes on all media are not going to do it. Bill Binney and Kirk Wiebe have had ample opportunity to publish the truth about the reportage many who are targeted have meticulously presented to them over the past few years, as they have the stature and credentials as NSA whistleblowers to command mainstream media attention, but they have not done so. Mainstream media and the Intelligence agencies in any case are intimately tied to each other, we know now, through much investigative excavation including by Americans for Innovation and German journalist Udo Ulfkotte’s disclosures in recent times.
The limited reveal Bill Binney offered on the Chris Hedges show this April seems to be in line with that paradigm; if Chris Hedges himself were a real journalist, he would have (much earlier) spoken to and highlighted the testimonial of targets, the whistleblowing of military scientists, and acknowledged the historic work of journalism of Dr. Nick Begich, Mark Rich, Dr. Rauni Kilde, myself, others. In his long silence, he reveals himself to be merely one of a whole train of well-known journalists, including those who purport to cover surveillance matters and technologies, who has been schooled to ignore the real reports of targets and the real work of journalists (such as myself and others wrongfully consigned to the “fringes” and “conspiracy theory” margins such as Miles Johnston, Alfred Webre, Kerry Cassidy) of exposing the true horrors of surveillance targeting with bio weapons, neuro weapons, nano weapons, and Psy Ops weapons being used widely on world populations today by layers of US/Five Eyes/ NATO/UN government, military, and Intelligence barbarism.
If people hadn’t noticed, the noose of totalitarianism is striving currently with the COVID-19 Plandemic Scam to tighten around the necks of every human on the planet, and it is increasingly vital for every human on the planet to know exactly what kind of supremely evil technology is being used against us all, and against some of us in extreme measure—so these actions and technologies can be halted in their tracks.
There is no doubt whole governments, whole Intelligence agencies, whole departments of the military, “healthcare”–read traitorous medical institutions who contract callously with Military/Intelligence to use, abuse, traumatize and persecute targets with the New Technologies of Torture which comprise neuro/DEW targeting—academic, and weapons industries will be intimately exposed as CRIMINALS if the whole truth about these targeting crimes is exposed – and that I think is the reason so many limited-reveal and palliative operations have been set in place around targets, including this one, to which Bill and Kirk are lending their names and credentials, but not, sadly, their credibility, in aligning with proven smear artists and liars such as Katherine Horton and Karen Stewart (not an idle statement, please see all articles posted on these two, with screenshot evidence of their libel and lies against me).
None of the (military/academic/Intelligence/law enforcement/private) groups and individuals involved in these Crimes Against Humanity should be protected, in my view, nor the classified projects, nor the classified weaponry being used on targets. We do not need TechnoGatekeepers but an unstoppable stream of voices and testimonials from all who experience or know of these crimes; the old structures of criminal Intelligence, law enforcement, and military agencies practicing crime in secret with stealth tech need to be torn down.
Humanity needs openness, truth, transparency – not limited-reveals so classified crime can continue and Remote Access Human Weapons and Psy Ops persist. Industries, agencies, governments, and militaries creative of and dependent on the barbarically invasive, intrusive, persecutory remote-access, degradation, and control, today AI-driven, of human bodies and brains need to be torn down.
In the balance lies all human bodily integrity, neuro privacy, cognitive rights, neuro rights, DNA rights, basic human rights to breathe, live, and exist as individual and independent human beings—basic humanity, in other words, which is today being corralled for cyborging destruction and transhumanizing by Satanists in power who are striving to remake man in their own image, as brain-dead slaves and robots.
Limited-hangouts are not going to save humanity, and it is regrettable to see Bill Binney and Kirk Wiebe embody one. (Joining Edward Snowden, in fact, in this continuing saga of Deceiving the People: Put (20-70 years of) Bio-Hacking and Neuro-Hacking on ice, let’s all flail about raving about NSA email and phone intercepts instead until kingdom come.)
To me, the base fact that both these gentlemen blew me off so thoroughly, disdaining to acknowledge the surveillance-tech journalism along with the emails and several requests for interview, while choosing to appear on Katherine Horton’s channel instead to prop up her self-tarnished public image and her more-than-dubious UK court case, speaks volumes about the nervous, high-anxiety state the so-called “Intelligence Community” is clearly in, to be using these well-known NSA whistleblowers—now protecting DOD/NSA/CIA?–to limit the damage from full disclosure of these extreme Techno-Torture Crimes Against Humanity—which cannot be stopped, despite their efforts, is already here, in multiple ways, from a multitude of voices—not least from my own desktop–and will continue to starkly inform the world.
Galina Kurdina: Government agents, provocateurs and slanderers in TI Community. NSA agent Karen Melton Stewart.
Exclusive Reportage on Counter-Terrorism “Manufactured-Target” Targeting & Gross Human Rights Violations in Amoral Human Experimentation Crimes by Intelligence Agencies, Law (Lie) Enforcement, & US/NATO Military Divisions: Off-the-Charts Torture & Abuse of “Targeted Individuals”
GLOBAL BRAIN ENSLAVEMENT, DNA BIORESONANCE, & EXOTIC MILITARY TECH: TARUN RAVI REPORTS | REPORT 296 | At Bitchute | At Brighteon | At Odysee | At Rumble | Posted Oct 4, 2022
CARNICOM DISCLOSURE UPDATE 2022 – PANEL 2 | BIOTECH TRANSFORMATION VS RESILIENCE IN DIVINE CREATION | At all channels | Posted Sep 28, 2022 Report 295 | Michelle Ford/California Assembly on Restoring Your Status as American on Land & Soil | At Bitchute | Brighteon | Odysee | Rumble| Posted Sep 25, 2022
Free Keene’s web site/A peace-liberty-voluntarism project pursuing and promoting peaceful living in Free Keene, New Hampshire
Free State Project
Free State Project’s website/A Liberty in our Lifetime project in New Hampshire, pursuing liberty, community, and peaceful living
New Earth Project
New Earth Project website/Open platform to unite humanity and create initiatives to support the emergence of absolute freedom and sovereign creative expression for all
Public Intelligence Blog
Blog for Earth Intelligence Network, Phi Beta Iota the Public Intelligence Blog/Promotes hybrid transparent governance, collective intelligence, true cost economics, and whole systems understanding