Tag Archives: brain implants

Ben Colodzin, Ph. D: Encountering Clients Claiming Externally Controlled “Implants” Are Affecting Their Health: An Advisory for Healthcare Professionals

Dr. Ben Colodzin, Health Educator and Therapist with a Ph.D in Psychology and 30 years of experience in teaching useful self-help methods to those who have experienced trauma of various kinds, has offered this advisory for purposes of public education, which could be used both to inform healthcare professionals, and also to support those reporting victims of covert implantation crime in our societies today. 

microchip-implant-brain-mapping

Click to enlarge image/linked to source

Given that non-consensual implants are increasingly being reported by civilians worldwide, and microchips and nanotechnology are both subjects of high concern in this current age of abusive surveillance and non-consensual military/intelligence experimentation–explored here earlier–this primer may be invaluable in the ongoing effort to inform and educate doctors, psychiatrists, and psychologists about the reality on the ground today regarding implants, covert weapons systems, and sophisticated remote neurotechnologies. While ER physicians, psychiatrists, and psychologists have previously rushed to label all victims reporting covert targeting or non-consensual implants “delusional,” Dr. Colodzin cautions that such misdiagnoses, “the common lot of almost everyone who has become an experimental test subject for these technologies” can be extremely harmful. “We are in a whole new diagnostic ball game.”

With much gratitude to Dr. Colodzin for his thoughtful and detailed advice for healthcare practitioners on this very vital subject.

Please find the pdf of this advisory here; all those who are “targeted individuals” in particular, who are reporting these crimes today, may find this document useful, to hand to physicians and psychologists and psychiatrists. 

–Ramola D/Posted 11/11/2017

***

ENCOUNTERING CLIENTS CLAIMING EXTERNALLY CONTROLLED “IMPLANTS” ARE AFFECTING THEIR HEALTH: An advisory for healthcare professionals

Ben Colodzin Ph.D.

June 2014

Over the last several years I have consulted with individuals from 5 U.S. states and 4 sovereign nations who have claimed to be “implanted” without their consent with some type of technology that affects their physical, mental, and emotional functioning.

I am a therapist and educator in California. Earlier in my career, like most of my colleagues, I had dismissed claims of these types of harassment as an impossibility, and likely a sign of mental illness. One of the first credible accounts that opened my mind was a paper written by the former Chief Medical Officer of Finland, Rauni-Leena Luukanen-Kilde, M. D., titled MICROCHIP IMPLANTS, MIND CONTROL, AND CYBERNETICS, December 2000. Once I became at least somewhat better informed about the very real possible uses of state of the art remote sensing and influencing technologies, I realized that my earlier reflex to simply assume that people who reported such phenomena were “crazy” was based more upon my ignorance than upon scientific fact.

In the 1980’s I worked with many Vietnam veterans with Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) . At that time, PTSD was a newly recognized mental disorder, newly included in the most recent Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 3rd edition. I met many veterans who qualified for the PTSD diagnosis, and many of them had histories of being mis-diagnosed with a wide variety of other mental disorders. Within the established health care bureaucracies, there was a lot of resistance to supplementing their diagnostic evaluative procedures in whatever ways might help them notice if a possible PTSD diagnosis had been overlooked, or if mis-diagnosis had occurred. As people with PTSD increasingly came forward and told their stories, and as our culture increasingly began to listen to them, collectively we got better at noticing when PTSD was present. But before PTSD was officially recognized—and for quite a time after—there was a tremendous amount of mis-diagnosis, and many people were harmed by the failure of health care providers to adequately recognize what was happening for these individuals.

Now in 2014 I see a very similar problem occurring for individuals with advanced implanted technologies non-consensually placed in their bodies. Whereas once we could only speculate if this was real or fiction, we now have toxicological tests that can confirm the presence of advanced nano materials (extremely small manufactured items that can self-assemble into operational machines) in the body, as well as highly sensitive scanning equipment that can detect frequency signals emanating from and directed to a person’s body. This means we can actually now use validated tests to discern if a physical system capable of externally altering a person’s functioning is actually present and operating.

Although practically no one yet seems to know about these mostly military-type technologies or their fantastic-sounding abilities, and are unaware of the possibility to test for their presence, nonetheless the sound scientific basis of the testing procedures does exist, and increasingly there are individuals whose tests are showing they are indeed imbedded with advanced nano materials, and they are indeed emitting signals and/or resonating with external signals in ways that are just not natural for a human body. This is a reality in the present that should not be ignored. However, without the knowledge that externally controlled machines within the body can massively affect physical and mental functioning, diagnosticians of all health-related disciplines continue to NOT look for the presence of such possible causative factors. This is the established norm today.

How could these technologies possibly be in widespread use without being widely detected? Dr. Luukanen-Kilde, from the perspective of a Chief Medical Officer of a sovereign nation, offered this view in December 2000:

One reason this technology has remained a state secret is the widespread prestige of the psychiatric DIAGNOSTIC STATISTICAL MANUAL IV, produced by the U.S. American Psychiatric Association (APA) and printed in 18 languages. Psychiatrists working for U.S. intelligence agencies no doubt participated in writing and revising this manual. This psychiatric “bible” covers up the secret development of MC (mind control) technologies by labeling some of their effects as symptoms of paranoid schizophrenia.

Victims of mind control experimentation are thus routinely diagnosed, knee-jerk fashion, as mentally ill by doctors who learned the DSM “symptom” list in medical school. Physicians have not been schooled that patients may be telling the truth when they report being targeted against their will or being used as guinea pigs for electronic, chemical and bacteriological forms of psychological warfare. [END QUOTE]

However, as in the earlier example I mentioned about PTSD, eventually enough evidence can accrue that previously disregarded information reaches a critical mass, and the possibility that something previously undetected is playing a role begins to gain support. That is the point we seem to be at now, regarding scientific evidence that there truly are “targeted individuals” being externally influenced in ways we who are not privy to classified information previously thought impossible.

Now it can be proven that advanced nano machines do exist inside some human bodies, and it can be proven that the knowledge and technical infrastructure exists to transmit signals remotely that powerfully affect the brain and other human functions in selected or “targeted” individuals. The capability is now being developed to track these external controlling frequency signals back to their sources. With this development we are entering an era where accountability for this totally unregulated human experimentation and manipulation may become possible for these previously invisible activities. In this situation and with these technologies now poised to proliferate, the ethical health provider needs to be informed about this sad state of affairs.

I make this declaration to witness to health care professionals around the world: if you have clients who claim they are being targeted or “chipped” and present the symptoms that are commonly associated with this phenomena (see references below), do not automatically assume they are delusional. They may be, but they may not as well. Or, they may have delusions that are not indicative of organic psychosis, but instead of artificially induced, virtual reality-based, externally transmitted delusions. For which there is no diagnostic category in current psychiatric thinking. With the application of these technologies increasing as their sophistication grows, we are in a whole new diagnostic ball game.

And if such clients come to you with Raman spectroscopy tests confirming the presence of advanced nano materials in their body fluids, and sophisticated scanning tests showing unusual frequency emissions emanating from their bodies or other results that are not in the normal range for human beings, it may be time to re-think the possible, to get more informed about the state of the art of brain-altering weapons systems, and to listen to what these people who are calling themselves “targeted individuals” have to say.

Misdiagnosis is the common lot of almost everyone who has become an experimental test subject for these technologies. The lack of recognition of what is actually happening for them causes perhaps as much harm as the aggressive technological attacks they are subjected to. For all health practitioners who find the injunction to DO NO HARM a worthy standard, be prepared to investigate the possibility that “targeted individuals’” claims of being externally programmed may be real, prior to reaching other diagnostic conclusions.

Ben Colodzin Ph.D.

June 21 2014

REFERENCES

  1. MICROCHIP IMPLANTS, MIND CONTROL, AND CYBERNETICS Luukanen-Kilde, Rauni-Leena, M.D., former Chief Medical Officer, Finland. Available at: educate-yourself.org/mc/implantsmcandcybernetics06dec00.shtml
  2. International Center Against Abuse of Covert Technologies: European organization with website with multiple “targeted individual” accounts and links to further information. Available at: www.icaact.org
  3. Mindjustice.org Human rights organization dedicated to protection of mental integrity and freedom from new techbnologies and weapons which target the mind and nervous system. Symptom list for targeted individuals available at: mindjustice.org/symptoms.htm
  4. Advances in Computers: Volume 71 NANOTECHNOLOGY Zelkowitz, M.V. (Ed.), Dept. of Computer Science, Institute for Advanced Computer Studies, College Park Maryland, Copyright 2007, Academic Press/Elsevier Inc.
  5. Nanotechnology vs. Environmental Technology Staninger, Dr. Hildegarde, presented at Annual Conference 10/11, National Regustry of Environmental Professionals, available at: 1cellonelightcom/pdfNanovsEnvironmentalTech100411.pdf
  6. MATADOR’ WITH A RADIO STOP WIRED BULL. MODIFIED BEHAVIOR IN ANIMALS THE SUBJECT OF BRAIN STUDY. Osmundsen, J., New York Times, 17 May 1965.
  7. Freedom from Covert Harassment: U.S. organization advocating for rights of targeted individuals, website with information links and self-report questionnaire for possibly “targeted individuals” at: www.freedomfchs.com
  8. Secretly Forced Brain Implants. 4 part San Francisco Examiner investigative report by Deborah Dupre, 2010, regarding one “targeted individual” who won landmark lawsuit to cease his nonconsensual targeting through implanted devices.
  9. SECRET DARPA MIND CONTROL PROJECT REVEALED; LEAKED DOCUMENT (Whistleblower reveals military mind control project at major university) July 29, 2013 available at: www.activistpost.com/2013/07/secret-darpa-mind-control-project.html
  10. NANO AIR VEHICLES A TECHNOLOGY FORECAST Davis, W.A., Major, U.S. Air Force, April 2007, Blue Horizons Paper, Center for Strategy and Technology, Air War College. Available at: http://static2.docstoccdn.com/docs/4899449/NANO-AIR-VEHICLES-A-TECHNOLOGY-FORECAST-William-A-Davis

Source: Dr. Ben Colodzin

Victim of Neuro-Experimentation Rohinie Bisesar Reports Abuse in Canadian Jail System

by Ramola D/Posted 2/13/2017

(Breaking News Update from Mr. Byer based on today’s court proceedings, 2/13/2017, included at end of article.)

Rohinie Bisesar, the striking and talented 41-year-old Canadian woman accused of fatally stabbing a 28-year-old health worker, Rosemary Junor in December of 2015, appeared in a Toronto court on February 8, 2017, was found fit for trial, and was assigned a court trial date a whole year from now, in January of 2018.

rohinie-bisesar3Her appearance, however, reported with the utmost neutrality and complete lack of investigative journalism by the Canadian press, gave rise to much concern among Mind Control activists who were present.

Facial Rashes and Bruises

To start with, her face was marked with a rash, which some activists note could possibly be a kind of “radiation dermatitis” a known side-effect of radiation, which cancer-sufferers often manifest after radiation therapy, also which prisoners in other detention centers have reported, and which electro-sensitive patients often report, in response to directed electromagnetic radiation.

This is also a reaction reported by many who allege continuous assault by electromagnetic weapons: pulsed electromagnetic radiation from “non-lethal weapons” and other directed-energy weapons, designed to degrade human health, does indeed give rise to radiation dermatitis.

Bisesar entered the courtroom in handcuffs and appeared to have a rash on her face. Throughout the proceedings, Bisesar spoke in a raspy voice and told the judge that she was dehydrated.” – CBC News

It should be noted here that dehydration is also a symptom of microwave radiation over-exposure; many today who are reporting covert assault with microwave and directed-energy weapons report dehydration and extreme thirst.

Also of concern are reports from a January 9 court appearance that Rohinie Bisesar’s face was marked with “four bruises.”

When she arrived in court on Monday, Bisesar appeared to have four large healing abrasions covering both sides of her face. It’s not yet clear how she suffered the injuries.” – City News

rohinidrawing-city-news-marianne-boucher

Image: City News/Drawing: Marianne Boruch

Allegations of Being Drugged and Raped

Judge John McMahon, to his credit, appears to have asked immediately about Ms. Bisesar’s health.

“The judge immediately asked Rohinie about the medical condition she had complained about before. He was referring to a rash that was on Rohinie’s face. Rohinie responded by claiming that she was unable to speak properly. She was having difficulty speaking….Rohinie eventually informed the judge that she had been taken to Oakville hospital, where she was drugged, raped, and not allowed to wash. Once she got to the hospital, her rash disappeared.” – Joshua Byer

Raped? Drugged and raped? Surely these claims, of basic human rights violation and extreme physical abuse at the hands of the Canadian jail and court system require both reportage and investigation? Yet news reports by the selectively-reporting journalists typing up their brief accounts of court events appear to have fully missed these claims.

Mr. Byer specifically confirms that Ms. Bisesar used the word “rape” in court. At Oakville Hospital, where Rohinie had been sent for a mental health assessment, Mr. Byer reports that Rohinie had stated as much:

“She was drugged unconscious and then found some of her pubic hair missing at Oakville hospital. That is my understanding of the rape claim…Rohinie used the word ‘rape’.”

David Connally Fired as Defense Attorney

In a series of communications with the judge, punctuated by sobs and urgent pleas, interspersed with clear statements, Rohinie Bisesar stated she wished to fire her current attorney, David Connally, the second assigned to her defense, after attorney Calvin Barry had been fired earlier.

Mr. Byer reports that the judge asserted this might be possible while attempting simultaneously to persuade her not to take this action. Regardless, Ms. Bisesar persisted, and the judge was obliged to release Mr. Connally from his duties as Ms. Bisesar’s defence lawyer.

“Rohinie wrote a two page letter to the judge. The judge told Rohinie that she was not supposed to do that. No secret communication is allowed between the defendant and the judge. The judge is going to give a copy of the letter to both the defense attorney and the prosecutor. In the letter, Rohinie stated once again that she was not satisfied with her current lawyer, David Connally. The judge offered to remove Connaly as Rohinie’s counsel and attempted to pressure her into refusing. This didn’t work, Rohinie took the judge up on his offer. The judge officially had Connaly removed as her counsel.

The judge then suggested that this would delay the case by 3 weeks, in order to get her new lawyer up to speed. The judge claimed that he would assist Rohinie in getting a new lawyer, asked for her to give him the name of a potential new lawyer. Rohinie refused to say the name to the court, but eventually agreed to write it on a piece of paper and have it given to the judge.” – Joshua Byer

Defendants on other cases note here that letters to judges in court are not always considered unwelcome; one notes that a letter to the judge in a Juvenile Court hearing was indeed read out boastfully by the judge, to make all parties aware of the contents.

This person (identity being protected) notes that the fact that Ms. Bisesar took the step of addressing the judge in a letter seeking a change of attorney speaks perhaps to the fact that she was hard-put to know who else to appeal to. It also appears commendable that she was expressing her mind and her reservations about public disclosure with perfect clarity and intent.

Reports of Mistreatment and Abuse at Vanier Center for Women

Mr. Byer further reports that Rohinie Bisesar complained that about 300 pages of notes were stolen from her at the jail, Vanier Center for Women, where she is being housed, about being denied visitors, about her mail being stolen, about not being allowed to receive mail from Legal Aid, making it difficult to find a new lawyer, and about not being permitted to use the phone.

“David Connally’s office had requested that the jail not allow her to use the phone…The judge said that he was informed the reason for this was ‘she kept trying to call the prime minister and chief prosecutor’. The judge eventually assured the court that Rohinie would be allowed to contact lawyers over the phone.”

The judge also promised to call the jail and investigate the theft of her notes.

Again, these reports of abuse of basic civil and human rights appear to have merited bare to no mention in Canadian news reports. The irony that Ms. Bisesar’s own defense attorney would act to willfully prevent her from using the telephone was not remarked on in news coverage.

Mr. Byer in fact reports that on previous visits to the jail, activists were told no letters could be handed to Ms. Bisesar. Galina Kurdina, who frequently attempted to get letters across, was obliged to memorize messages and relay them verbally on her visit.

How can this arbitrary suppression of mail be considered lawful? Even prisoners, while subject to having their letters scanned, have basic rights and liberties, according to the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms in the Canadian Constitution. That should include being able to receive mail from the outside world, from concerned citizens and human rights activists, from journalists and well-wishers, from family and friends.

As a target of criminal or Intelligence-run MK ULTRA-like non-consensual neuro-experimentation, is Ms. Bisesar being singled out by the Crown for discriminatory treatment and suppression of basic civil rights?

Reports of Non-Consensual Neuro-Experimentation, Neuro-Implantation, and Remote Manipulation of Body and Brain

At core of Ms. Bisesar’s complaints is her repeated assertion that she is a victim of non-consensual neuro-experimentation, and that she has been implanted with a device which has the capability of taking over her brain and body, and manipulating both her personality and her bodily movements. Maintaining her innocence last May, she said she was controlled:

“Bisesar has repeatedly denied she has mental health problems, maintaining instead that a device has been implanted in her that controls her words and actions. That is why she is innocent of the murder, she has said.”The Star

Once more in court this past week, she made these assertions:

“Bisesar repeatedly said she was “a good person” and not responsible for Junor’s death.

“There’s something interacting with me,” said Bisesar, who grew emotional in court at times. “I am a victim myself, I didn’t ask for this but someone is doing it to me.”Simcoe.com

Mr. Byer, himself a reporting victim of non-consensual neuro-experimentation, notes that an implanted device can affect one’s tone and volume, as Ms. Bisesar’s voice appeared affected, making it hard for her to communicate.

He also suggests that the rash which disappeared on her arrival at the hospital could also have been caused by the implanted device, a scenario not unfamiliar to other reporting non-consensual neuro-experimentees.

“Through the implanted device, the CIA affected her voice, created false emotions and caused her to say things. The result allowed reporters to ignore all of the evidence of manipulation and instead focus on the appearance of showmanship/acting.”

Whether it is the US Central Intelligence Agency or Canadian Military Intelligence, operating through the Intelligence Branch or the Communications Security Branch of the Department of National Defence and Canadian Forces, or the Royal Canadian Mounted Police, or some other Intelligence wing of the Canadian military and security and Intelligence establishment, or a private criminal element involved in covert neuro-experimentation on former financial analyst Rohinie Bisesar, as also on other reporting victims in Canada, it is perhaps these Intelligence bodies who should be subpoena’d or prosecuted and questioned on their current Black Operations of non-consensual neuro-experimentation.

“Can we get control of an individual to the point where he will do our bidding against his will and even against fundamental laws of nature, such as self-preservation?” US government memo on PROJECT ARTICHOKE, 1952

“The key to creating an effective spy or assassin rests in splitting a man’s personality, or creating multipersonality, with the aid of hypnotism…. This is not science fiction. …I have done it.” George Estabrooks, Canadian-American MK ULTRA psychologist.

The possibility that Rohinie Bisesar is indeed a MK ULTRA victim of secretive and malicious covert neuro-experimentation by shadowy Intelligence and military special operations groups, who are judged, worldwide, by discerning researchers, to be engaging in such programs, was considered extensively in previous articles here:

Ramola D/Washington’s Blog: Rohinie Bisesar: Psychiatric Illness, or Long-Term Covert Neuro-Experimentation and a “Manchurian Candidate”?

Ramola D/Washington’s Blog: Activists Inform Canadian Journalists of Ongoing Neuro-Experimentation & Mind Control Projects While Irregularities in Rohinie Bisesar’s Court Case Mount

Anti-Mind-Control Activists Prevented From Contacting Possible Mind-Control Neuro-Experimentee Rohinie Bisesar by Toronto Jail, Lawyer, Media

21st-Century Bio-Hacking and Bio-Robotizing in the Case of Rohinie Bisesar: Breakthrough as Defense Attorney Confirms Her Receipt of Letter from Human Rights Activists

While Ms. Bisesar was found “fit to stand trial” after a mental assessment in April 2016, meaning found to be mentally competent to understand the charges against her and the nature of the court proceedings, the judge informed Ms. Bisesar that the Crown—essentially the State in Canada—would seek a fresh psychiatric assessment to determine whether she could be adjudged Not Criminally Responsible. Ms. Bisesar rejected this suggestion.

“I do not want a psychiatric assessment. That’s a great way to cover up what’s happening,” Bisesar said. “It’s not a psychiatric disorder.”

Justice John McMahon, who is presiding over the case, explained that the Crown is entitled to ask for an assessment in relation to whether Bisesar was not criminally responsible for the offence she’s charged with.

A person can be found not criminally responsible if they were suffering from a mental disorder at the time of the offence that made it impossible for them to understand the nature and quality of what they did or impossible for them to understand that what they were doing was wrong.

McMahon explained that Bisesar would not have to raise the issue of being not criminally responsible at trial but if a jury found her not guilty, then the Crown could potentially bring up the NCR issue at that stage.”Simcoe.com

Other Canadians are Reporting Covert Non-Consensual Neuro-Experimentation, which Corporate Media Suppresses

Thousands of Canadians today are reporting covert experimentation and assault on their bodies and brains, just as thousands worldwide are reporting such programs.

Information on these reports may be found widely online, and covers experimentation with Brain Computer Interfaces, Brain to Brain Communication, EEG Cloning and Heterodyning, Synthetic Telepathy, Radio Hypnosis and Electronic Dissolution of Memory, Artificial Neural Networks, Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, other kinds of neurotechnology, and other extensions of MK ULTRA behavior modification programs using electromagnetic radiation and microchip implants.

“New neurological technology, however, has a refined efficiency. The individual is defenseless against direct manipulation of the brain because he is deprived of his most intimate mechanisms of biological reactivity.” – Jose M. Delgado, Physical Control of the Mind/Toward a Psycho-Civilized Society, 1969

These top secret experiments were successful in creating Manchurian Candidates or super spies programmed to carry out assassination, terrorist acts, sexual favors, and more without conscious knowledge of what they were doing…. The existence of these programs was denied for decades, and certainly any recent documents would be classified secret under the rubric of “national security.” A trusted CIA informant I know assures me that these programs are ongoing.” – Fred Burks, I Want To Know, CIA Mind Control Experiments/ Declassified Documents Reveal Sex Abuse, More

“In 1967 a writer named Lincoln Lawrence published a book … [Were We Controlled? presented] a sophisticated technique known as RHIC–EDOM … Radio Hypnotic Intra-Cerebral Control–Electronic Dissolution of Memory….

“Under RHIC, a ‘sleeper’ can be used years later with no realization that the ‘sleeper’ is even being controlled! He can be made to perform acts that he will have no memory of ever having carried out. In a manipulated kind of kamikaze operation where the life of the ‘sleeper’ is dispensable, RHIC processing makes him particularly valuable because if he is detected and caught before he performs the act specified . . . nothing he says will implicate the group or government which processed and controlled him.”– Walter Bowart, Operation Mind Control/Mind Control and Ritual Abuse Information Service

“Following public outrage, the CIA announced it had ceased its mind manipulation programmes. Victor Marchetti, a CIA veteran of 14 years who turned ‘whistle-blower’, exposed this to be untrue.

In 1977, Marchetti said the CIA claims to have ceased were a cover story. Under scrutiny, the agency were quick to downplay the success of MK-ULTRA – claiming no real advances were achieved. Miles Copeland, another long-serving CIA officer disputed this. Speaking to a reporter, Copeland revealed that ‘the congressional subcommittee which went into this sort of thing only got the barest glimpse’. Another source within the intelligence community says that after 1963, CIA efforts increasingly focused on psychoelectronics. Narcohypnosis had been drained dry.” –Richard G. Gall, Mind Control and MK ULTRA

Current-day reports on invasive MK ULTRA-style neuro-experimentation can increasingly be found on specialized human rights advocacy sites focused on uncovering current reality–given that corporate media outlets, certainly in the USA and, according to whistleblower journalist Udo Ulfkotte, all over the Western world, including Canada, have been controlled for decades by the CIA, and are now apparently silenced or magically enchanted by mantras of “National Security”.

Media indeed seem to have failed and betrayed us with their repeated publication of official Government propaganda and lies permitted by unConstitutional practices of Military Deception and Psychological Warfare, particularly in this subject area of neuro-experimentation.

As a result, except for the most awakened and sophisticated readers today, many believe that such technological accomplishments in the area of Neuroscience as the remote introduction of voices into one’s head, clandestine neuro-implantation, including of programmable read-write Brain Computer Interfaces which can delete memories and insert directives and memories, remote manipulation of motor cortexes, sensory cortexes, bodily movements, and senses, reading minds, and seeing through another’s eyes or hearing through another’s ears, still float in a nebulous world of futuristic “science fiction.”

Experience of Canadian and US Neuro-Experimentees Very Similar to Rohinie Bisesar’s

Supporting Ms. Bisesar’s claims of covert implantation and mental and bodily steering through remote manipulation of a device inside her as well as of her brain, Mrs. Galina Kurdina, prominent mind control activist with the Organization of Victims of Psychotronic Weapons in Toronto, who recently wrote an informative letter to media, states that her own experience quite closely resembles Ms. Bisesar’s.

She also states that she was scanned by toxicologist Dr. Hildegarde Staninger and has learned she has nanomaterials in her body which are used as chips to send signals to her body. As a programmer herself, she offers insight into the programmable aspects of these chips:

“It seems to me that the implants in bodies of victims are actually microcomputers that have all necessary programs, can gain full body and mind control over human subjects, exchange information with computers of perpetrators and need minimum of stimulation and interference with their work. I feel that my brain and body are scanned 24/7. I feel like pressure on different parts of my body. Besides it, I am always dizzy, weak, sometimes it seems to me that I am going to faint. It is impossible to resist this influence, since electrical signals of mind control equipment that affect me are much more powerful than electrical signals of my body.

I experienced loud and very loud voices in my head at the beginning of the experiments upon me: first several months of 2006. Voices exchanged information with me, for example, they could remind me, where I left my belongings, since criminals constantly deleted my memory at that time. After that, I experienced mostly induced thoughts, not voices.

The influence upon me was so powerful (it was full and precise mind and body control) that it was impossible to resist it. Yes, my body was taken over completely: thoughts, emotions, feelings, sensations, desires, speech, movements, actions and so on were not mine. When they took full control over my body, they manipulated me, as if I was a radio toy, a bio robot.” – Galina Kurdina

Mrs. Kurdina’s long and traumatic experience, detailed with specificity, can be found in her video accounts and in a diary she has kept. Especially interesting are notes from her diary which directly indict the Royal Canadian Mounted Police, who she says, are involved in the experimentation projects on her brain:

“They talk to me like over cell phone….Male voice in January 2006, which introduced himself as a Jew Grigoriy Shultser, offered me to work for RCMP as a guinea pig for the first time….They have asked me several times since January, 2006 whether I wanted to work for RCMP as a “guinea pig”. I refused every time…They offer me a job as a software programmer within their experiment, under control of their computer, actually, job of a guinea pig….Perpetrators offered me to work as a guinea pig for RCMP for 25,000 CAD per year several times in January and March, 2006, but I refused.

(They) say to me that there is nothing awful that I am manipulated like a computer device. I want them to be manipulated as bio robots if they do not see anything bad in it. They have offered me to leave Canada for any other country many times recently. They do not want to be responsible for their crimes, they want to get rid of the victims of their experiments and witnesses of their crimes….

They have offered me to become a guinea pig in their experiments with psyche since January 2006. They wanted to research schizophrenia; they offered to develop schizophrenia, bring me in catatonia and spend a month in this state.” – Galina Kurdina’s Diary

Manan Paul, another Canadian reporting non-consensual experimentation describes his experience as very similar to Rohinie Bisesar’s and Galina Kurdina’s:

“I was once scanned and found out that there is radiation from my head, so I could be implanted.

I think I am being controlled through the brain for sure with or without implantation.

I get induced thoughts all the time I am not sleeping, along with voices. My whole body is controlled, even internal functions such as respiration and digestion. I am in a hypnotic state all the time. Memory is retrieved at will by the handlers and I don’t have access to my memory. These are only some of the symptoms.

It is impossible to resist the manipulation of mind and body I found. I don’t think resisting is possible. I have tried a lot of things including yoga and meditation.

I have experienced the whole body being taken over. I have not read this book (Project Soulcatcher by Dr. Robert Duncan) but read the previous one (The Matrix Deciphered) and a lot of things described there match what I experience.” – Manan Paul

Joshua Byer, who experiences external mind control, does not report external takeover of his body but suggests the work of an implant:

“I know because of what has been done to me that I have a brain implant that was implanted non-consensually. I have had an X-ray, MRI, and CT scan none of which appeared to show any implants. The implant interacts directly with my brain by shocking, it is therefore either on or in my brain.

I believe with certainty that the body control aspect of the device is done through the brain. The device shocks a certain area of the brain causing the body to react.

My brain is being read/scanned and manipulated continuously for long periods of time. Given the extreme lengths that I experience this, it can at times prove difficult to know if I am currently being monitored. I suspect if they did not perform any manipulation I would have to assume I was not being monitored although it could likely be the case.” – Joshua Byer

Tyrone Dew, well-known American mind control activist and author of Satellite Terrorism: The Illuminati Got Me!, who reports being a victim of non-consensual neuro-experimentation, astonishingly since early childhood, does not believe he has an implant, but describes a process similar to the EEG cloning and heterodyning described by whistleblower Dr. Robert Duncan in his book Project Soulcatcher. He also describes trauma-based mind-control, in line with information emergent from MK ULTRA files:

“No brain implant, I had MRIs as a kid when I played football. It’s the stimulation of my neural network and electromagnetic energy taking the shape of my body, overriding my bio electricity and controlling my body sort of like how people believe the spirit does. Physical sensations? It depends, sometimes it hurts! Mostly it feels like my brain waves are being overpowered.

Yes (I have experienced V2K or Voice to Skull—synthetic telepathy) mostly racist, threatening comments.

I’ve tried (resisting) and was successful but they inflict extreme pain! Sometimes it feels like energy is in the form of an invisible human moving throughout my body. At first I was able to resist a few minutes until they applied extreme pain. Nowadays after years of pain being inflicted and still not being able to completely resist, it’s become easier for them to control me.

When I experienced forced speech, first I could resist as I felt my brainwaves changing but they inflicted an extreme stinging pain in my brain and it began feeling like the energy in the shape of an invisible person was forcing me to speak. Nowadays I can’t resist!” – Tyrone Dew

Another American non-consensual experimentee (identity being protected) reports similar experiences of being the victim of EEG cloning, where another person’s brainwaves are transmitted into her brain via a presumed Brain Computer Link and overrides hers, forcing her body into foreign movements:

“…another electronic technique for making people say and do things that they normally would not say or do. Though I have experienced it myself, David Voigts is the expert on this technology. It has to do with a type of remote neural monitoring where they use a brain link to overlap two separate minds into one, where the perpetrator can override the victim and insert foreign speech and actions. The neighbor next door did it to me when I had company.

Two well- respected professionals (who were also being targeted) were visiting me for the first time. As I started answering their questions and telling them my TI story, I started using exaggerated facial and hand gestures, which made me look and sound like a clown, basically so I would look ridiculous and lose credibility. I felt like I was a puppet on a string. By the time I realized that I was not the one doing this, my new friends were exchanging looks and giggling with each other. I tried to explain afterward, but first impressions tend to last a long time.

My neighbor (name withheld) was doing this to me. Because our brains were linked in two-way communication, I had a telepathic vision (in my mind’s eye) of him standing in his apartment wearing a head-set and making exaggerated expressions and hand motions in order to mock me as I spoke. My expressions and hand gestures were not as extreme as his, but it did feel like I was being remote-controlled to mimic him. Now, I wonder how often this has occurred without my knowledge of it.” – American non-consensual neuro-experimentee

Breakthrough Communication from Rohinie Bisesar to Activists Pleads for Help

Back in September of last year, after one of five letters Mrs. Galina Kurdina tried to get through to Ms. Bisesar finally went through, Ms. Bisesar penned a note to Galina Kurdina, which was posted then on Facebook, and is reproduced now below, with permission from the Canadian group:

rohinie-letter1

Subsequent to this call for help, Mrs. Kurdina and another activist visited Ms. Bisesar in prison, and the group had this to report:

“Like many of us, Rohinie feels that people are seeing through her eyes and hearing through her ears. She claims that her limbs are being moved by someone else (through the use of the implanted device). She does not feel her lawyer is doing anything for her and wants us to find a new one. She has promised to mail Galina names of family and acquaintances so that we can better help her. We know that she is being allowed visits from her brother. We have promised to try and contact lawyers so that she can start freely making phone calls and receiving all her mail. Hopefully, we can also resolve why getting in to see her has been a months’ long ordeal.” – Joshua Byer

In subsequent visits, World-CACH (Coalition Against Covert Harassment) Director Suja Vijayan reports, Canadian activists were able to pass on further information to Ms. Bisesar, including information on a professional medical scanner and a list of lawyers, and asked her to contact her family for the cost of a scan, which she agreed to do.

Much as she reports repeatedly herself, and as evident from the lucidity of her letter above, it seems to become increasingly clear that Rohinie Bisesar is not a victim of mental illness but instead of technologically-aided neuro-experimentation as a non-consensual victim, as the case also with the five reported cases herein.

Crown’s Negligence in Ignoring Neuro-Experimentation and Insistence on Psychiatric Assessments

The Crown’s insistence therefore on demanding fresh psychiatric assessments and refusing to endorse the need for physical and radiological scans, as is expected from the judge’s statements on her impending next court appearance on Monday, February 13, is an issue of negligence that perhaps Ms. Bisesar’s new defense lawyer will address.

The ongoing tragedy here is that Ms. Bisesar’s claims of neuro-experimentation are not being taken seriously by the court system, nor by corporate Canadian media – in protection, it appears, of the military and Intelligence services running clandestine neuro-experimentation projects on the Canadian populace.

Is the Crown also ignoring Ms. Bisesar’s reports of drugging and sexual abuse, as well as theft of writings, and suppression of mail and phone calls, made in court last week?

It is to be hoped here too that her claims will be taken seriously, and that prisoner rights and women’s rights activists in Canada will step forward to advocate on Ms. Bisesar’s behalf.

“Imprisonment of course limits liberty and places certain restrictions on freedom of association, expression and assembly, but it does not mean total deprivation or absolute forfeiture of rights. Prisoners maintain the right to be treated with legality, dignity and respect. They have the right to safety and security of the person, the right to be treated humanely and be free from torture, degrading or inhuman punishment. It is important that our correctional authorities be held to account to ensure rights and liberties are minimally impaired. Correctional practices, like the democracies behind them, require transparency and accountability.” – Notes for an Address, Howard Sapers, Correctional Investigator of Canada, Respecting Rights in Canadian Prisons: An Ombudsman’s Perspective

As noted earlier, mind control activists from around the world suggest that this could be a paradigm-breaking case, where for the first time the true criminals—possibly the military and Intelligence scientists irresponsibly running these experiments on innocent victims—are held to book, rather than the non-consenting victim of such invasive and pernicious neuro-technologies.

Once more, concerned citizens and neuroscientists with conscience are asked to step forward to offer help and expertise in the further development of Ms. Bisesar’s defense, and indeed in the defense of all humanity from the current and unhappily ongoing scenario of non-consensual neuro-experimentation, worldwide.

Update Based on Court Proceedings Today–2/13/2017–from Mr. Byer:

Mr. Byer, who attended court proceedings this morning in Toronto, reports excellent news, that the judge re-stated Ms. Bisesar’s claims of being implanted with a device and suggested a scanning of her brain. While Ms. Bisesar took issue briefly with the judge’s wording, she apparently agreed with the judge that the implanted device was affecting her emotions.

Ms. Bisesar now has a new lawyer, and was cautioned by the judge against continually changing lawyers. Ms. Bisesar mentioned that she has a positive impression of this lawyer, and wished to return in a week with the new lawyer. It was noted that Legal Aid may not approve of the new lawyer. Mr. Connally, the recently fired attorney, stated that he wished to no longer continue with the case, which was confirmed by the judge. The date of March 1st was set for the next appearance with the new lawyer.

In addition to the brain scan ordered by the judge, a new mental health assessment was also suggested by the judge as ordered by the court. The Crown however, who had been expected to order a mental health assessment, did not go through with this expected request, and did not wish to meet in the immediate future.

A Mr. Leroy was appointed by the judge to present results of the scans and mental health assessment. A representative from Vanier Center for Women is expected to be present at Ms. Bisesar’s next court appearance.

Much gratitude to Mr. Byer for this news update.

RELATED:

Hacking the Human Brain: The Next Domain of Warfare. Wired, 2012

Remote Behavioral Influence Technology Evidence by John J. McMurtrey, M. S., 2003

Air Force Wants Neuroweapons to Overwhelm Enemy Minds, Wired, 2010

Brain Implant Victims, Psychic Dictatorship in the USA, by Alex Constantine, 1995

Implantable “Neural Dust” Enables Precise Wireless Recording of Nerve Activity, DARPA, 2016

Dr. Rauni-Leena Luukanen-Kilde, MD, Former Chief Medical Officer of Finland: Microchip Implants, Mind Control, and Cybernetics

“Today’s super technology, connecting our brain functions via microchips (or even without them, according to the latest technology) to computers via satellites in the U.S. or Israel, poses the gravest threat to humanity.”

This invaluable article published in the year 2000 (and re-published widely on the Web at that time, but very relevant today in 2015) on the subject of clandestine government Cybernetics, Neuropsychology, Microchip implants, and Mind Control experiments covers briefly the history of cybernetics and brain implants, current nature of implants, experimentation on unconsenting humans with these neurotechnologies, governmental research, intent, and participation in these areas, further invasive developing technologies such as ESB, Electronic Stimulation of the Brain, and the great danger of these technologies to humanity.

rauni kildeThis article was written by the late Dr. Rauni-Leena Luukanen-Kilde, an outspoken advocate for freedom from such invasive technologies (whose interviews and talks can be found widely on Youtube), and found originally posted at ConspiracyArchive.com, one of the early information sites on the Web; it is reprinted here in full by kind permission of the owner, Terry Melanson

This article was originally published in the 36th-year edition of the Finnish-language journal SPEKULA (3rd Quarter, 1999). SPEKULA (circulation 6500) is a publication of Northern Finland medical students and doctors of Oulu University OLK (Oulun Laaketieteellinen Kilta). It is mailed to all medical students of Finland and all Northern Finland medical doctors.

(Highlights in red below are mine.)

*************

Microchip Implants, Mind Control, and Cybernetics

– by Rauni-Leena Luukanen-Kilde, MD Former Chief Medical Officer of Finland December 6, 2000

brain

Click image for a 2014 Daily Mail article on liquid implants

In 1948 Norbert Weiner published a book, Cybernetics, defined as a neurological communication and control theory already in use in small circles at that time. Yoneji Masuda, “Father of the Information Society,” stated his concern in 1980 that our liberty is threatened Orwellian-style by cybernetic technology totally unknown to most people. This technology links the brains of people via implanted microchips to satellites controlled by ground-based supercomputers.

The first brain implants were surgically inserted in 1974 in the state of Ohio, USA and also in Stockholm, Sweden. Brain electrodes were inserted into the skulls of babies in 1946 without the knowledge of their parents. In the 1950s and 60s, electrical implants were inserted into the brains of animals and humans, especially in the U.S., during research into behavior modification, and brain and body functioning. Mind control (MC) methods were used in attempts to change human behavior and attitudes. Influencing brain functions became an important goal of military and intelligence services.

Thirty years ago brain implants showed up in X-rays the size of one centimeter. Subsequent implants shrunk to the size of a grain of rice. They were made of silicon, later still of gallium arsenide. Today they are small enough to be inserted into the neck or back, and also intravenously in different parts of the body during surgical operations, with or without the consent of the subject. It is now almost impossible to detect or remove them.

It is technically possible for every newborn to be injected with a microchip, which could then function to identify the person for the rest of his or her life. Such plans are secretly being discussed in the U.S. without any public airing of the privacy issues involved. In Sweden, Prime Minister Olof Palme gave permission in 1973 to implant prisoners, and Data Inspection’s ex-Director General Jan Freese revealed that nursing-home patients were implanted in the mid-1980s. The technology is revealed in the 1972:47 Swedish state report, Statens Officiella Utradninger (SOU).

Implanted human beings can be followed anywhere. Their brain functions can be remotely monitored by supercomputers and even altered through the changing of frequencies. Guinea pigs in secret experiments have included prisoners, soldiers, mental patients, handicapped children, deaf and blind people, homosexuals, single women, the elderly, school children, and any group of people considered “marginal” by the elite experimenters. The published experiences of prisoners in Utah State Prison, for example, are shocking to the conscience.

Today’s microchips operate by means of low-frequency radio waves that target them. With the help of satellites, the implanted person can be tracked anywhere on the globe. Such a technique was among a number tested in the Iraq war, according to Dr. Carl Sanders, who invented the intelligence-manned interface (IMI) biotic, which is injected into people. (Earlier during the Vietnam War, soldiers were injected with the Rambo chip, designed to increase adrenaline flow into the bloodstream.) The 20-billion-bit/second supercomputers at the U.S. National Security Agency (NSA) could now “see and hear” what soldiers experience in the battlefield with a remote monitoring system (RMS).

When a 5-micromillimeter microchip (the diameter of a strand of hair is 50 micromillimeters) is placed into optical nerve of the eye, it draws neuroimpulses from the brain that embody the experiences, smells, sights, and voice of the implanted person. Once transferred and stored in a computer, these neuroimpulses can be projected back to the person’s brain via the microchip to be reexperienced. Using a RMS, a land-based computer operator can send electromagnetic messages (encoded as signals) to the nervous system, affecting the target’s performance. With RMS, healthy persons can be induced to see hallucinations and to hear voices in their heads.

Every thought, reaction, hearing, and visual observation causes a certain neurological potential, spikes, and patterns in the brain and its electromagnetic fields, which can now be decoded into thoughts, pictures, and voices. Electromagnetic stimulation can therefore change a person’s brainwaves and affect muscular activity, causing painful muscular cramps experienced as torture.

The NSA’s electronic surveillance system can simultaneously follow and handle millions of people. Each of us has a unique bioelectrical resonance frequency in the brain, just as we have unique fingerprints. With electromagnetic frequency (EMF) brain stimulation, fully coded, pulsating electromagnetic signals can be sent to the brain, causing the desired voice and visual effects to be experienced by the target. This is a form of electronic warfare. U.S. astronauts were implanted before they were sent into space so their thoughts could be followed and all their emotions could be registered 24 hours a day.

The Washington Post reported in May 1995 that Prince William of Great Britain was implanted at the age of 12. Thus, if he were ever kidnapped, a radio wave with a specific frequency could be targeted to his microchip. The chip’s signal would be routed through a satellite to the computer screen of police headquarters, where the Prince’s movements could be followed. He could actually be located anywhere on the globe.

The mass media has not reported that an implanted person’s privacy vanishes for the rest of his or her life. She can be manipulated in many ways. Using different frequencies, the secret controller of this equipment can even change a person’s emotional life. She can be made aggressive or lethargic. Sexuality can be artificially influenced. Thought signals and subconscious thinking can be read, dreams affected and even induced, all without the knowledge or consent of the implanted person.

A perfect cyber-soldier can thus be created. This secret technology has been used by military forces in certain NATO countries since the 1980s without civilian and academic populations having heard anything about it. Thus, little information about such invasive mind-control systems is available in professional and academic journals.

The NSA’s Signals Intelligence group can remotely monitor information from human brains by decoding the evoked potentials (3.50 HZ, 5 milliwatt) emitted by the brain. Prisoner experimentees in both Gothenburg, Sweden and Vienna, Austria have been found to have evident brain lesions. Diminished blood circulation and lack of oxygen in the right temporal frontal lobes result where brain implants are usually operative. A Finnish experimentee experienced brain atrophy and intermittent attacks of unconsciousness due to lack of oxygen.

Mind control techniques can be used for political purposes. The goal of mind controllers today is to induce the targeted persons or groups to act against his or her own convictions and best interests. Zombified individuals can even be programmed to murder and remember nothing of their crime afterward. Alarming examples of this phenomenon can be found in the U.S.

This “silent war” is being conducted against unknowing civilians and soldiers by military and intelligence agencies. Since 1980, electronic stimulation of the brain (ESB) has been secretly used to control people targeted without their knowledge or consent. All international human rights agreements forbid non consensual manipulation of human beings — even in prisons, not to speak of civilian populations.

Under an initiative of U.S. Senator John Glenn, discussions commenced in January 1997 about the dangers of radiating civilian populations. Targeting people’s brain functions with electromagnetic fields and beams (from helicopters and airplanes, satellites, from parked vans, neighboring houses, telephone poles, electrical appliances, mobile phones, TV, radio, etc.) is part of the radiation problem that should be addressed in democratically elected government bodies.

In addition to electronic MC, chemical methods have also been developed. Mind-altering drugs and different smelling gasses affecting brain function negatively can be injected into air ducts or water pipes. Bacteria and viruses have also been tested this way in several countries.

Today’s super technology, connecting our brain functions via microchips (or even without them, according to the latest technology) to computers via satellites in the U.S. or Israel, poses the gravest threat to humanity. The latest supercomputers are powerful enough to monitor the whole world’s population. What will happen when people are tempted by false premises to allow microchips into their bodies? One lure will be a microchip identity card. Compulsory legislation has even been secretly proposed in the U.S. to criminalize removal of an ID implant.

Are we ready for the robotization of mankind and the total elimination of privacy, including freedom of thought? How many of us would want to cede our entire life, including our most secret thoughts, to Big Brother? Yet the technology exists to create a totalitarian New World Order. Covert neurological communication systems are in place to counteract independent thinking and to control social and political activity on behalf of self-serving private and military interests.

When our brain functions are already connected to supercomputers by means of radio implants and microchips, it will be too late for protest. This threat can be defeated only by educating the public, using available literature on biotelemetry and information exchanged at international congresses.

One reason this technology has remained a state secret is the widespread prestige of the psychiatric Diagnostic Statistical Manual IV produced by the U.S. American Psychiatric Association (APA) and printed in 18 languages. Psychiatrists working for U.S. intelligence agencies no doubt participated in writing and revising this manual. This psychiatric “bible” covers up the secret development of MC technologies by labeling some of their effects as symptoms of paranoid schizophrenia.

Victims of mind control experimentation are thus routinely diagnosed, knee-jerk fashion, as mentally ill by doctors who learned the DSM “symptom” list in medical school. Physicians have not been schooled that patients may be telling the truth when they report being targeted against their will or being used as guinea pigs for electronic, chemical and bacteriological forms of psychological warfare.

Time is running out for changing the direction of military medicine, and ensuring the future of human freedom.

******************

Terry Melanson (owner of ConspiracyArchive.com, where Dr.Kilde’s article above is posted) also states: There’s quite a bit of suppressed history on the subject of microchip implants. The state of the technology is light years ahead of what the general public assumes. There’s the story about the Sky-Eye chips too that I brought up in a interview here:
http://www.conspiracyarchive.com/Commentary/Melanson_Interview.htm

Related:

Ex-IBM Employee Reveals TV Abandoned Analog Band to Make Room for RFID Chips

Understanding RFID Chips–An Introduction to New Technologies by Ex-IBM Executive Patrick Redmond

Tim Rifat: Deadly Microwave Weapons Being Used Covertly as Dissident/Mass Behavior Control Weapons in UK and US