Category Archives: RFID Chips

February 8, 2016, International Day Against Mind Control/In Honor of Dr. Rauni Luukanen-Kilde

https://i1.wp.com/www.mind-control-news.de/images/grafiken/500/8-feb-2016-international-day-against-mc-h500.jpgRe-posted, on request, from Mind Control in Deutschland und Europa, who are seeking to disseminate information on a call-in television program in Poland tomorrow, on Feb 8, to raise public awareness of Mind Control (EMF radiation/scalar/sonic) weaponry being used extra-judicially and covertly on citizens in Europe and worldwide, and discuss issues related to Mind Control Harassment, on the occasion of the newly-instituted International Day Against Mind Control, created to honor the anniversary of Dr. Rauni Luukanen-Kilde’s passing. As many know, Dr. Kilde, who was Chief Medical Officer of Finland, was a vocal opponent of Governmental and military mind control programs using Covert Electromagnetic weapons that she learned about in the course of her professional life, researched, authored books on, and took every opportunity to speak widely about. The TV program mentioned below is a joint venture of Swedish WHITE TV and Polish NTV, and will include Skype call-ins, more information below.

Dr. Kilde’s December, 2000 essay, posted here earlier, titled Microchip Implants, Mind Control, and Cybernetics traces the history of brain implants, the abuse of neurotechnologies in non-consensual brain experimentation projects being conducted worldwide today by governments and militaries, and warns against the very real and imminent dangers of human robotization implicit in these trends. You can explore her several informative and insightful talks and interviews on Youtube. Dr. Kilde, whose death is attributed to covert assault by Directed-Energy EMF weapons, which she had reported earlier, also spoke and wrote widely on subjects of spirituality, consciousness, and evolution, and was known and loved for her positive outlook, vitality of spirit, and outspokenness.  

***

World Day against Mind Control on February 8th, 2016

Contributed by redaktion on Feb 06, 2016 – 01:20 PM              Pageviews: 156

Picture 0 for World Day against Mind Control on February 8th, 2016

First international day in memory of Rauni Kilde and for TIs worldwide called for Monday, Februay 8th 2016. Polish NTV will send 3 hours special program. National Groups to send victims’ reports.

Minden/Poland/Stockholm.

The following message was published by Tomek Bieniek from Poland.

Dear All,

As you recall, in Berlin I proposed on behalf of the Polish delegation and the originator, the NTV editor, Mr Zagórski, to proclaim the date of death of Dr. Rauni Luukanen-Kilde, International Day Against Mind Control. You have liked the idea and 8th of February is coming soon, so it’s time to put it into life and pay back the moral debt to her, who made so much for the TI’s movement.

Establish World Day for e-harassment victims

On this occasion STOPZET association together with the internet televisions: Swedish – WHITE TV and Polish – NTV propose to all the TIs’ of the world and their allies to take part in the common medial event.

Our aim is to proclaim the International Day Against Mind Control, to pay tribute to Dr. Kilde and to broadcast most widely via Internet the information about necessity of immediate prohibition of inventing, testing, producing and using the newest generation weapons that can remotely control human behavior.

On this occasion we plan to put online 2 following petitions to sign for you:

1) To the Polish Parliament about the prohibition of testing those weapons on the Polish citizens and about setting up the special parliamentarian committee to research the issue of secret EU and NATO experiments that were undertaken on us in this matter.

2) To EP (the letter edited by Mojmir Babacek that you know from Berlin)

International guests on Polish NTV

We plan at least 3 hours long program block. Our guests in studio will be Mojmir Babacek and Dr. Henning Witte that you know from Berlin, but we also count on the presence of the other TI friends on Skype or by video.

The first hour will be devoted to Dr. Kilde’s memory and the necessity of lobbying for the prohibition of weapons remotely influencing human beings’ nervous system. The second hour will be filled up with the statements of the victims of secret harassing from Poland and from all over the world.

Then we start the debate with the participation of Polish politicians and journalists. We would like to invite also you to take part in this event. .. watch NTV Poland on Monday

National Groups: Please contribute

grafik: international dayWe ask the representatives of national groups for a short video recording (2-3 min) about the situation of TIs in a relevant country. If there are a few associations in a country, we ask each of them to introduce itself, give the number of members, estimated number of victims of mind control, if it is known, as well as briefly mentioned the most important issues and initiatives. Please send us the recorded video till 5 february into the following address wdr@otn.com.pl by WE TRANSFER.

The point is to make other Internet users aware of global scale of the problem and the fact that it may happen to themselves at any time as well. In addition, we would like the decision-makers and persecutors realize that their victims start organising themselves and demanding the compensation.

You need not expose your personal details or the face if you don’t want. However a tongue of the transmission i.e. English is a crucial element, because the entire meeting and all video materials are live broadcast online, repeated in the evening program. Later it will be put on YT on the special Playlist. In the case your English was a barrier, please record yourself in your mother tongue and provide the recording with English subtitles.

Marathon of revealing silent violence

We also want to invite the politicians and journalists, who feel displeasure of the violence applied towards us and would like to hurry with help. They will be invited into the studio in person as well as virtually (via Skype). If you know such people in your countries, ask them to support our event with the brief presentation on video. Best in English, and if it is impossible, then with translation in subtitles into English. A few words will literally be enough in a style like this: My name is, I am representing …, I am supporting etc.

Please, do it as soon as possible, as we will still have to put Polish subtitles and assemble that for Polish viewers in the end. In order to make the work easier for editors, we ask you to mark every recording with a category in English:

TI – for groups and associations of Tis, JOURNALIST, POLITICIAN or DIFFERENT.
We are waiting for your recordings till 4 February and this deadline is intransigent.

At last, we will open a special page for private persons or organizations, which would like to express their support for the movement of TIs. An e-mail address, a full name or a name will be enough for an organization. You will get relevant links and materials soon and we ask- let us do it together.

It is only a small pace and marathon is in front of us, but it is necessary to start one day. Jointly and definitely. See you in NTV!

for NTV – Janusz zagórski
for STOPZET – Ewa Pawela
for WHITE TV – Henning Witte

Source, with thanks: Mind Control in Deutschland und Europa

What Does “Exemptions to Informed Consent” Mean, In Light of “Consent of the Governed”?

New page in Human Rights pointing out that “Exemptions to Informed Consent” permitted extensively today in classified Human Subject Experimentation/Research projects to US Military and Intelligence agencies and contractors via increasing loopholes in the Code of Federal Regulations, as noted also recently in the Electronic Frontier Foundation‘s article, Human Research Loopholes: Alive and Well, cannot possibly have the “Consent of the Governed“:

“Exemptions to Informed Consent” in Classified Research and Non-Consensual Covert/Clandestine Human Subject Experimentation in the USA Today Versus “Consent of the Governed”

Further Information on RFID Chips, Nanochips, Neurochips, Chipped Vaccines/Excerpt from Research by Fritz Springmeier and Cisco Wheeler

In the interests of documenting and collecting historical and current information on the development, use, and covert implantation of microchips in humans, please see this list at the valuable archiving site whale.to. The last article linked is dated June 2014, and posted links point to articles down the 2000s tracing the growing development of microchips, their decreasing size, their use by Intelligence agencies, and their planned use as nanoparticles in vaccines.

deeperinsightsIncluded is this highly informative chapter on Electronics and Electricity from the book Deeper Insights into the Illuminati by Fritz Springmeier and Cisco Wheeler, with detailed and sourced  information on Electromagnetic Weapons, Implants, ELFs (Extremely Low Frequency waves) and Direct Remote Brain Monitoring and Manipulation, among other related subjects.

Excerpt on the subject of implants:

B4. Body suits 

Victims of mind-control who receive implants often are given a body suit of implants. The location of these implant sites used on the human body have been mapped 10.00 out on the following charts. The mapped sites on these charts are verified by a. an insider, who learned from the inside what is going on, EM (H) & b. this author’s experience in working with a sizable number of implant victims. Implants can be placed anywhere, but there are certain key sites that tend to be used. The location used also depends upon the type of implant. Implants over the body create the ability to trigger moods, pain, and other phenomena. Implants for auditory sounds are in the ear. Nasal implants are used for mind-control. Tracking implants are also placed into people.

Section C. Specific Implants

Cl. Audio implants (a. public. b. secret)
C2. Body manipulation implants
C3. Visual holographic implants
C4. Memex/Brain Link implants
C5. Torture/Nerve & Muscle Stimulation Implants
C6. Tracking & I.D. Implants.

C1. AUDIO IMPLANTS

BACKGROUND INFORMATION

The concepts used in audio implants had been discovered in the first half of the 20th century, but the refinement of technology to take advantage of what had been discovered waited until the second half of the century.

The development of audio implants ran on two tracks, one was the public medical research and the other was the secret Illuminati/Intelligence Agencies’ research.

Audio implants began to be publicly placed into people in the 1960s. The Illuminati was experimenting on some victims at this stage, and the military in the Vietnam war used auditory implant devices to aid communicating to their men who were sent into tunnels and who were placed into forest situations where audible noise would compromise their locations to the enemy. The Illuminati/Intelligence/& Military consortium was keeping the experimentation secret.

It appears from looking at the worldwide research on audio implants that the Illuminati realized that the field was so ambiguous, and open to so many different approaches, that rather than straightjacket the research community by a specific strategy, they encouraged a wide variety of approaches in the research.

Consequently, research by one group would overlap or duplicate research by another. Much to their credit, a few researchers rejected offers to get involved because they saw the sinister ramifications.

By the 1970s, the intelligence agencies were willing to start using hundreds of people to experiment operationally with the implants. People in every state of the U.S. were selected as victims.

Many of these implant victims had programmed multiple personalities already. The controllers were very heavy handed with the people they implanted, and they used the full force of the Illuminati/Intelligence agencies power to keep these people under their control at all times.

These innocent victims have had their lives totally destroyed. Some tried to fight back, spending thousands of dollars to get out from underneath the incessant audio messages that the implants sent, but the system was too big and too powerful to fight.

Police, congressmen, psychologists and many other people turned their backs on these victims. Some victims who initially fought back gave up resisting, some committed suicide, and some continued to fight.

Meanwhile, on the public track during the 1970s & 1980s, medical researchers kept putting more and more audio implants into deaf and hard-to-hear persons. Hundreds of people in the U.S. and many hundreds in other nations such as the U.K., Germany, Austria, Israel, Australia, France and other countries began to receive the cochlear implants.

Australia was so proud of their audio implant research/development they issued a postage stamp showing an implant device (“bionic ear”) developed in Australia.

The question begs asking, if thousands of people have publicly received audio implants, isn’t obvious that the secret societies and secret intelligence agencies have done at least as much if not far more?”

From later on in the chapter:

“A more recent NY Times article (2/2/97, p. E6) discusses how Xerox Corporation has created sensors the thickness of peach fuzz. These are called MEMS (micro-electomechanical systems). The article states, “MEMS are all about doing more with less, about being lean, mean, and next to invisible.”

The article is lean on facts. It does give a hint of the incredible power these little gadgets have when the writer launches into his propaganda tirade at the end of the article, “Paradoxically the fear that accompanies the fantasy of nanotechnology is not that the culture will be as stratified and fragmented as Victorian England, but that the new culture will be one that is unrecognizable to everyone alive today.” That is true, this nano technology is taking us to the place that society will not be recognizable.

The age of the future is planned to be the age of robots–humans if they are to survive are to be robotic slaves for the illuminated elite. However, this is not paranoid fear as the NY Times writer implies, but it is the unfortunate reality humanity faces.

Some people apparently are already experiencing it. One victim of mind-control, whose father is Military Intelligence and whose family is part of the Illuminati, claims that he has been subjected to tiny robots called nanobots.

These nanobots have been featured on TV, where they have been billed as an asset for surgeons. Reportedly, these tiny robots can work off of 10-100 kilohertz of beamed power. They have coil-shaped antennas, 2 little six-pointed “wings” to attach and move themselves with.

These tiny boron-carbon nanobots have all kinds of purposes. One use is for multitudes of these Nanobots to be placed into a single victim’s head, where they are programmed to migrate to certain programmed positions where they can suppress the optical signals to the brain and replace these signals with their own holographic images that can be externally transmitted to the nanobots or preprogrammed in. They are trying or have succeeded, depending upon who is talking about nanobots, in making self-replicating assemblers. In other words, they have built miniature robots that build other robots. “

Please continue reading at this linked page from the Implants page on Whale.to.

I should add though that while I continue to post these articles and information here regarding the dismal dystopian future still being worked on by various psychopathic and criminal groups and agencies mistakenly termed the “elite” and “intelligent/ce,” I believe fully, along with many thousands of others, it is the posting, sharing, and comprehending of this incredible attempted power-grab which will ensure that this dystopia is thwarted and will not come to pass. What you do not know about you can scarcely resist. Open public knowledge of what has for many years and decades been kept secret and covert, and which certain “intelligence” agencies are frantically striving to continue to keep covert by manically discrediting those who write or report its existence is supremely powerful. Our collective consciousness can change the world. For those who are currently being covertly assaulted too, and their families, this may be particularly interesting information.

William Pawelec: Billions of Microchips Made by Siemens in 1984, Trackable from Space

This video interview of the late William Pawelec by Dr. Steven Greer, referred to in his recent talk on the Secret Government, explored here, has been highlighted in an article this past week (excerpted below) by Dr.Michael Salla of Exopolitics.org, Siemens Implicated in Tracking Forced Labor and Slaves in Space, which explores whistleblower testimony regarding forced labor in space, but also explores Siemens’ role in early manufacture and developing of RFID chip technologies.

(This Disclosure video interview is also linked at The Commonsense Show site, where I recently viewed it; Bill Pawelec, reportedly, was a long-time personal friend of Dave Hodges.)

Many thanks to Dr. Michael Salla, whose article is excerpted below, please visit Exopolitics.org for the full article.

The tiny Siemens chips made in 1984 that he refers to (see below) could be detected and read from a distance of 120 km away, he said. This translates to about 400,000 feet or 75 miles, well above the altitude most commercial jets fly at (30-40,000 feet) or even fighter aircraft (50,000 feet or above), well above the stratosphere and into the thermosphere.

Consider: Low-flying aircraft studding our skies these days, circling our neighborhoods in long low sweeps at night and by day–particularly those neighborhoods hosting activists, citizens, and veterans being c/overtly assaulted in classified Mind Hacking human experimentation projects--flying anywhere from 500 to 3000 feet, or even commercial aircraft flying by steadily in a diverted stream anywhere from 1,000 to 10,000 feet, often reported by those being assaulted as part of aerial stalking scenarios,  would not have any trouble communicating with such long-distance chips.

Of course, other tracking and surveillance technologies are reportedly being used from these airborne platforms too, including Radar, and Remote Neural Monitoring. Remarkable though that microchips of such sophistication have been in existence for more than thirty years now– and important information to have, to show proof that microchips that can be read from thousands of feet or many tens of miles away have indeed been developed, fine-tuned, and exist.

Excerpt:

“Prior to 2001, Pawelec decided to reveal what he knew about deep black projects that he believed were hiding advanced technologies from the U.S. public. He gave an interview to Dr. Steven Greer with the strict instruction that it would only be published after his death. He died on May 22, 2007 and the video was published posthumously on December 14, 2010.

Among his many revelations is information concerning the development of the first electronic RFID tracking chips that were developed as early as 1979 according to Pawelec. He explained the history of their development, and the role his Denver-based company played in setting up meetings with government agencies, which were interested in using the chips for security purposes.

In his video interview with Greer, Pawelec said:

At the time in the security industry, a lot of us had a lot of concerns about tracking and locating people that had been kidnapped. Particularly what was going on in Europe at the time where we were having NATO officers, even the Prime Minister of Italy, kidnapped … These people were drained [of information] or they were brutalized or both… One of the goals of the industry was to develop technology that would allow us to track these people or locate them quickly.

He said that the tracking chips, which were very small and shaped like a pill, had multiple functions:

chip

Image from Wikipedia

Now this particular pill shaped device, very minute, had a lot of flexibility in its capabilities. It was basically almost a transponder. You could send a frequency to it and it would respond back with its unique number which could not be changed once the chip was made. Yet there were a lot of capabilities that could be added to this chip such as monitoring temperature, blood pressure, pulse, and even wave forms out of the brain.

Pawelec said that soon after demonstrating an even more sophisticated lithium niobate chip in 1984, which could be tracked from a distance of 120 kilometers in space, he discovered a small Silicon Valley company had been set up to manufacture billions of them. He learned that “after they had made billions and billions of these little chips” the factory was shut down a year later, and all information about the chips disappeared.

Pawelec said that the small company responsible for making the billions of tiny chips “was a division of a rather major European electronics firm that had the plant. Siemens.”

Pawelec went on to describe how his colleague, Bob, the former head of security for the U.S. State Department, was assassinated in Nairobi because he was getting too close to learning about the people that had acquired control over the tracking chips and had built billions of them for an unknown purpose.

According to Pawelec, the people behind Bob’s assassination had infiltrated the U.S. military industrial complex at its highest level, and could intimidate and silence anyone.

Pawelec’s testimony suggests that the Siemen’s corporation had acquired the rights and control over the tracking chip technology, built billions of them in less than a year using a U.S. subsidiary, and then arranged for the local manufacturing plant to close with all information about the tracking chips now gone.

Importantly, the Siemen’s corporation was associated with a powerful force embedded within the U.S. military industrial complex, which was intent on hiding the true purpose of the chips. This hidden force possessed the power to remove anyone who got too close to learning the truth, even the head of security at a U.S. Embassy.

It is worth repeating that the main function of the tiny chips, according to Pawelec, was to track people, and even monitor their key physiological processes over large distances. This leads to the question, why would the Siemen’s corporation need billions of chips to monitor people over large distances?”

Please continue reading at Exopolitics.org.

Related:

In 2015, Covert Non-Consensual RFID/MEMS (Microchip) Implants Are a Reality Everyone Should Know About

Exploring The FBI’s “Consensual Monitoring” and the CIA’s “Concealed Monitoring”: One-Party Consent to Electronic Recordings and Non-Consensual Two-Way Radio Implant Communications?

Perhaps we can start by agreeing there is no such thing as Consensual Surveillance, for if there were, we would all be ticking boxes on Census-like forms offered to us by benevolent government entities keen to surveill us with our consent, saying Yes! You can surveill me, adding, defensively, as many of the unthinking among us do, After all, I have nothing to hide.

The FBI States It Engages in Consensual Monitoring

Still, the FBI is on record now as stating that it engages in Consensual Monitoring, in the case of the aerial surveillance of Baltimore in May during the protests succeeding Freddy Gray’s death in police custody, as documents obtained by ACLU reveal. This October 30, 2015 ACLU report has the story, and the FBI Evidence and Memo Logs referencing “Consensual Monitoring” in pdf form can be found linked at the end of that article.  These evidence logs, which are redacted in places, seem to be logging in Aerial Surveillance Videos, but in a few cases, log in “Other Electronic Surveillance” which is still item-described as “Aerial Surveillance,” and in one case, additionally, as “Consensual Monitoring–Non-Telephonic.”

What is Consensual Monitoring?

fbiBaltimore-1What can Consensual Monitoring possibly be? Is the FBI defining a form of monitoring and surveillance it engages in as Consensual, in hopes of “keeping it legal”? One clue they offer is that it’s “Other Electronic.” It’s not Aerial Video. It’s not Aerial Photography. Can it be Aerial Cyber Surveillance? (Why would they need to do that from the air, when it would be far more effective from the ground?) It’s Non-Telephonic. So it’s not Stingray, Dirtbox, cell-phone-tower-mimicking scooping-up of cellphone voice and text data. It’s Electronic, and it’s Consensual–so they say–and it’s not Video, Audio, Telephonic, Cyber-related.

From the ACLU article:

“FBI evidence logs reveal that at least half of the flights conducted video surveillance, and that the FBI retained copies of those videos in its files. Other flights conducted some type of “electronic surveillance,” but specific descriptions are redacted. This suggests that those flights were perhaps using more sensitive or powerful recording gear than just video cameras, though what kind we don’t know.

What we do know is that one of the aircraft, a Cessna propeller plane registered to an FBI front company, NG Research, had specialized surveillance camera equipment on board. FAA documentation shows that the FBI installed a Paravion Technology infrared camera mount and a FLIR Talon multi-sensor camera system on the exterior of the plane. The FLIR system includes a “thermal imager,” an optical camera, and a “laser illuminator” for recording at night. We did not receive documentation about the second plane observed circling over Baltimore, so we don’t know if it was carrying different gear.”

Regular FBI Surveillance Flights Over Cities and Rural Areas

A June 2015 article by the Associated Press revealed the fact of regular surveillance flights over cities by FBI planes, although again the nature of the surveillance was not clarified:

“Scores of low-flying planes circling American cities are part of a civilian air force operated by the FBI and obscured behind fictitious companies, The Associated Press has learned.

The AP traced at least 50 aircraft back to the FBI, and identified more than 100 flights in 11 states over a 30-day period since late April, orbiting both major cities and rural areas. At least 115 planes, including 90 Cessna aircraft, were mentioned in a federal budget document from 2009.

For decades, the planes have provided support to FBI surveillance operations on the ground. But now the aircraft are equipped with high-tech cameras, and in rare circumstances, technology capable of tracking thousands of cellphones, raising questions about how these surveillance flights affect Americans’ privacy.

“It’s important that federal law enforcement personnel have the tools they need to find and catch criminals,” said Charles Grassley, chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee. “But whenever an operation may also monitor the activities of Americans who are not the intended target, we must make darn sure that safeguards are in place to protect the civil liberties of innocent Americans.

The FBI says the planes are not equipped or used for bulk collection activities or mass surveillance. The surveillance equipment is used for ongoing investigations, the FBI says, generally without a judge’s approval.”

Also:

“One of the planes, photographed in flight last week (May/June 2015) by the AP in northern Virginia, bristled with unusual antennas under its fuselage and a camera on its left side.”

fbiplane

The AP video report that accompanies a Blaze article on this same AP report identifies the spherical white protrusion with cable on the fuselage as a ball camera to provide sweeping panoramic views, but the other equipment is not identified.

“Evolving technology can record higher-quality video from long distances, even at night, and can capture certain identifying information from cellphones using a device known as a “cell-site simulator” — or Stingray, to use one of the product’s brand names. These can trick pinpointed cellphones into revealing identification numbers of subscribers, including those not suspected of a crime.

Officials say cellphone surveillance is rare, although the AP found in recent weeks FBI flights orbiting large, enclosed buildings for extended periods where aerial photography would be less effective than electronic signals collection. Those included above Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport and the Mall of America in Bloomington, Minnesota.”

Currently Available Aerial Surveillance Technologies

On the subject of technology currently being used in Aerial Surveillance by Law Enforcement, and by Military PISR operations (Persistent Intelligence, Surveillance, Reconnaissance), see this slide show presentation from the company Persistent Surveillance Systems, linked in pdf and posted Jan 2014 at PublicIntelligence.net, which includes suggested policy statements on Persistent Surveillance for Law Enforcement, among other things.

The image below of the Surveillance Systems market size  is from this pdf. Also posted at Public Intelligence is the US Joint Command Handbook for Persistent Surveillance.

PSS

The Washington Post ran an article on this subject in Feb 2014. Also see the video produced by the Center of Investigative Reporting and PBS demonstrating this system.

Essentially, what they say is that Wide Area Persistent Surveillance camera systems that are carried on planes offer panoramic views of large areas such as whole towns and cities, several miles (up to 25 miles in reports) in diameter, and the way they are used is to generate real-time video by having the planes circle interminably over defined areas, for about six hours at a time, combining the data obtained thereby with that from networked ground cameras, traffic cameras, gas station cameras, etc., to create a detailed picture in real-time of what anyone is doing, outside, on foot or in cars/vehicles. CIR and KQED’s video on surveillance below introduces this system and also touches on biometric intelligence, and other forms of surveillance.

State of Surveillance: Police, Privacy, and Technology

ACLU also discusses this issue, and elsewhere covers wide area surveillance (ARGUS-IS) from drones as it raises privacy concerns.

Persistent Surveillance Systems on Military Electronic Warfare Planes

Merely as reference, consider too the kind of wide-spectrum surveillance and data collection in process currently with Military Persistent Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance programs, which use continuously-generated data from planes, ground stations, and satellites, as illustrated in this Raytheon UK overview image, from a Dec 2014 AIN Online article (Raytheon UK Develops New ISR Solutions). Note especially SATCOM–how satellites are being used to network data from the ground, from aircraft, from mobile forces, and from “tactical” ground stations.

raytheonUKoverview

Electronic Warfare aircraft, whose collection of ELINT, COMINT, SIGINT–Electronic Intelligence, Communications Intelligence, Signals Intelligence–is achieved through sophisticated radar systems, electronic jamming systems, and radio antennas, use various networked tools to engage in Persistent Aerial Surveillance.

The image below of an Electronic Warfare plane is from GlobalSecurity.org; while this aircraft looks obviously military and loaded with “pods” and antennae, Military news reports (and Defence company news and press releases) over the past couple years have pursued the creation of increasingly “intuitive” portable and streamlined EW collections/jamming packages that can be mounted more easily on smaller craft, including drones, as well be used in ground vehicles, fixed installations, and in backpacks for “foot soldiers” to carry. (See The Future of Army Electronic Warfare, Sep 2013.)

So, looking again at the FBI surveillance plane imaged above, one might just wonder if it’s possible this high-tech FBI surveillance aircraft is merely a smaller, streamlined version of the plane below, carrying compact Electronic Warfare collection/jamming systems for Persistent Intelligence, Surveillance, Reconnaissance.

electronicwarfareaircraft

Electronic Warfare Includes “Signals Intelligence” Collection

Not to be forgotten is the fact that Electronic Warfare, which has been covered previously in this post here, includes electronic surveillance and remote electronic signals collection–by which is meant a variety of electronic signals, as this Army Concept Capability on Electronic Warfare for the Future Modular Force 2015-2024 document details, including remotely-culled information from computers and electronic communications. Electronic Attack, one of the three Army-Doctrine aspects of Electronic Warfare, seeks to use electromagnetic energy to attack personnel, as well as equipment, and Electronic Warfare Support  seeks out sources of intentionally and unintentionally radiated electromagnetic energy for threat recognition and targeting, as this overview image from the Army Concept Capability document illustrates.

ewow

Widely-posted –although less-well-known–information from the ’90s on NSA Signals Intelligence reveals that SIGINT also includes information on human bioelectric fields and EMF thoughtwave forms (unintentionally radiated energy), as noted by John St.Clair Akwei in his lawsuit against the NSA (See especially the Section, NSA Signals Intelligence uses EMF Brain Stimulation for Remote Neural Monitoring (RNM) and Electronic Brain Link (EBL)).

Returning to Consensual Monitoring

It turns out the FBI has Department of Justice-specified Procedures for Consensual Monitoring.

See this Sep 2005 report: Chapter Six: Procedures for Lawful, Warrantless Monitoring of Verbal Communications (Consensual Monitoring)/FBI’s Compliance with the Attorney General’s Investigative Guidelines (Redacted) Special Report.

Opening information from this report:

“Consensual monitoring is the interception by an electronic device of any wire, oral, or electronic communication where one of the parties to the communication has given prior consent to the monitoring or recording. A warrant is not required to conduct consensual monitoring, and the party providing consent may be a government agent. See 18 U.S.C. § 2511, (2) (c) – (e) (2002).

The Attorney General Guidelines governing consensual monitoring cover only non-telephonic consensual monitoring.319 The types of monitorings addressed by these Guidelines include the use of body recorders and transmitting devices. To supplement the Guidelines, the FBI imposes detailed administrative and management controls on the use of both non-telephonic and telephonic consensual monitoring. MIOG II § 10-10.”

Further, the report goes on to specify that DOJ permission to monitor is required only in the case of “sensitive individuals” such as members of Congress, Governors, and other public officials, and duration of monitoring be permitted in those cases for only up to 90 days at a time. For all other parties–such as you and me–no permission is required other than a sign off from a Special Agent at the local FBI office, and duration of monitoring may be marked by said Special Agent as “for the duration of the investigation,” may be conducted by anyone, including possibly Government agents, and doesn’t need a warrant or DOJ approval.

Records are required to be maintained in all cases of consensual monitoring; the record to FOIA-request is: Form FD-759, captioned “Notification of SAC/ASAC Authority Granted for Use of Telephonic and/or Nontelephonic Consensual Monitoring Equipment in Criminal Matters Only.”

Is Consensual Monitoring Accomplished via 1), Recordings Unilaterally Consented-to by Hundreds of Thousands of Recipients of National Security Letters, & 2), Covertly Implanted RFID transponders?

Given this information, while it appears as if this kind of monitoring is being legitimately engaged in by the FBI purely in matters of criminal investigations, because there is much information online about abusive surveillance–fraudulent and wasteful investigations on non-terrorists and non-spies mis-characterized post-Patriot-Act as terrorists and spies–being conducted by DHS/FBI, including from ex-FBI insiders and whistleblowers (such as Mike Germain), and because thousands of individuals today in the US report covert assaults with Remote Neural Monitoring technologies involving Directed-Energy Weapons and Covert RFID implants, two other possibilities come to mind:

Consensual Monitoring One: The consensual monitoring being spoken of here is via recorders, such as apps on cell phones, or videorecorders/audiorecorders on cell phones, which belong to people who are “co-operating in an investigation” by the FBI, and who are being gagged from speaking about this to the individual under investigation by way of National Security Letters, hundreds of thousands of which, possibly now more than a million, have been handed out every year (See the Electronic Frontier Foundation‘s Module on NSLs);

and Consensual Monitoring Two; The “body recorders and transmitting devices” spoken of are biomems, RFID chips, MicroElectroMechanical devices, neurostimulators, and the like, covertly implanted in individuals, which do indeed function as “body recorders” and radio transmitter/receivers. Of course, this is scarcely Consensual communications, even if it is a two-way radio communication, since the implants themselves are non-consensual, but is an attempt being made here to pass off RFID transmissions as “Consensual Monitoring”?

The CIA’s Concealed Monitoring

This brings us to the CIA, and a June ACLU article by Staff Attorney Ashley Gorski, New Docs Raise Questions About CIA Spying Here At Home which revealed the recent FOIA-requested (by ACLU & Yale Law School’s Media Freedom and Information Access Clinic) release of several documents–eg., the CIA’s own internal regulations on spying in both foreign and domestic areas, titled AR 2-2, a CIA/FBI Memo of Understanding regarding foreign and domestic intelligence collection, and others, related to the CIA’s collection programs under Executive Order 12333.

It must be noted, these documents are continuously redacted, with blanks in place of particular Intelligence collection information marked “National Security Act.”

These documented regulations apparently govern the domestic activities of the CIA, in its human subject research programs, its domestic intelligence collection programs, its foreign intelligence collected-domestically programs, its domestic monitoring programs, and its co-ordination with the FBI in domestic electronic surveillance and monitoring.

This ACLU article, and all the documents it points to, in particular the document AR 2-2, which clearly notes that the CIA engages in human subject research and experimentation programs–an issue of profound concern at this site, deserve close reading and analysis, and will be examined further here, in a succeeding post (when redactions will be filled in, speculatively).  

What’s of particular note here to this analysis, from this ACLU article/finding is: The CIA works closely with the FBI on domestic intelligence collection and can ask the FBI to collect intelligence anytime on anyone it likes. Any recording consented to by one party is not considered electronic surveillance, it is possibly considered Concealed Monitoring, a term that Army Intelligence and the CIA are familiar with(this seems to be the same kind of surveillance the FBI discusses as Consensual Monitoring, where one party unilaterally consents to a recording involving two parties or more). The CIA gives itself permission to install “monitoring devices” whenever no warrant is required for law enforcement–a loophole created by other loopholes–but does not specify what these devices are. (RFID Implants/Bio-MEMs maybe?)

The ACLU article notes:

“In addition, Annex B explains that the CIA may “use a monitoring device within the United States under circumstances in which a warrant would not be required for law enforcement purposes if the CIA General Counsel concurs.”

But what qualifies as a “monitoring device”? And how exactly does monitoring differ from “electronic surveillance,” which the CIA is prohibited from doing domestically? We don’t know. In the newly released documents, the definition of “monitoring” (as distinct from “electronic surveillance”) is redacted.​”

Redacted Signals Intelligence Collection Information, Persistent Intelligence, Surveillance, Reconnaissance, One-Party Consent Labelled Consensual Monitoring, Warrantless FBI Monitoring with Transmitting Devices, Warrantless CIA Monitoring Devices Used Domestically, Redacted Definitions of Monitoring

Security and Intelligence analysts need to start connecting the dots here and planning strategies to force this information out into the open in order to seek accountability and exposure. All Americans deserve to know that our Intelligence agencies–in particular the FBI and CIA–are 1) actively collecting particular electronic signals information the nature of which is being kept redacted and classified–but which thousands of Americans experiencing covert-assault and covert-access with radar and Remote Neural Monitoring technologies, as well as researchers studying Mind-Hacking patents and technologies can identify as Human Bio-Resonance EMFs and Brain EMFs; 2) getting away with close monitoring and surveillance of Americans, domestically, and secretively, using National Security Letters as leverage to obtain one-party consent that is then labelled “consensual monitoring”; 3) self-permitting and installing covert non-consensual implants of radio transmitting/receiving devices in the bodies of Americans so as to engage in Remote Monitoring which is then rolled into “concealed monitoring.”

Further posts here will specifically examine CIA involvement in ongoing classified human subject research and experimentation programs, and the nature of the transmitting devices/monitoring devices–radio frequency implants– being self-authorized for CIA/FBI use in undisclosed Remote Monitoring programs.

For an inside look at one extraordinary instance of the documented CIA use of biomedical implants in Intelligence collection as a surveillance method, see David Larson’s 2009 testimony, lawsuit against the CIA, and report with photographs.

 

 

 

Roxy Lopez/The Truth Denied: How to Remove an RFID Implant

Please visit The Truth Denied‘s site for this extensive Nov 11, 2014 post reporting on RFID implant technology, varied views on removing these implants, and links to relevant documentation from various sources, including a very compelling report from David Larson detailing nonconsensual implantation, in 1997, of microstimulators used in neural prosthesis research by NIH-funded researchers–he was able to remove various of these microchips, match them up to extant patents, and track down the inventors and their unethical research; his document includes photos and patent information. 

Excerpt:

RFID technology could lead to political repression as governments could use implants to track and target human rights activists, labor activists, civil dissidents, and political opponents; criminals and domestic abusers could use them to stalk and harass their victims; slaveholders could use them to prevent captives from escaping; and child abusers could use them to locate and abduct children. So what do we do about this?

Apparently, the removal of an RFID Implant is complicated  whether you are a pet or a human. First you have to find a practitioner who can detect the chip. This is usually not so easy to do as some of the chips do not show up on X-rays, ultrasound machines, or scanners. Once you have successfully determined that you do have an implant ,you better hope the chip stays in once location, they tend to move.  Secondly, you must find a surgeon who is willing to remove the chip, or find a technician who can erase the chip and stop it from transmitting data. The following is sure to help those of you who may have strong implications of chip implantation. This article is to aid you in your search for either chip detection and or chip removal.

James Walbert, who has testified at the Presidential Bioethics Commission, and who is well-known for having pursued his covert-implantation/electronic stalking and abuse case in court and obtained a restraining order on the technology used and against the local abusers, is mentioned in this post. Posted  also is a radio conversation with Jesse Beltran of ICAACT, James Walbert, and Lars Drudgaard, which also features Dr. Barrie Trower’s information. (James Walbert reports during this conversation that five doctors he has visited refuse to remove his implants, because they are afraid of the government and don’t wish to get involved.)

Please visit The Truth Denied for the whole informative article and radio talk and click on links there for David Larson’s report, and other documents.

Exposing Covert Implantation with RFID Chips, MEMs, Microchips

This is a serious subject, one that this site continues to excavate and publish. It is Not acceptable that people are being implanted covertly today, all over the world; it is Not acceptable that “Classified Research” (which does not bother with Informed Consent) is being conducted in the USA and elsewhere on people (this includes pregnant women and children); and it is Not acceptable that such research can go on in our midst using “color of law” by way of bogus Statutes and Executive Orders which, in blatant violation of the US Constitution, the Nuremberg Code, the Geneva Convention, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, and every basic code of common human decency, completely ignores human rights, ethics, birthright, and sovereignty in its intrusions, invasions, and mutilations of the human body. 

None of this can be excused in the name of “National Security,” and none of us should be sitting back letting this happen to a single person in our midst.

New page collecting all articles posted on this site on this subject posted here, please stay tuned for more:

In 2015, Covert Non-Consensual RFID/MEMS (Microchip) Implants Are a Reality Everyone Should Know About