Tag Archives: common law

Judge Anna von Reitz: Vital Information on the Current US Court System for Thomas Deegan, Ammon Bundy, and Everyone Else Facing Prosecution; Informing the Court with a Declaration of Political Status, and a Release and Discharge for the Judge

Re-posted from Maine Republic Alert, with thanks. Please visit there for updated news and information on the restoration of the US, among other vital news and information.

***

Judge Anna offers a quick run-through here to explain the current court system, the history behind its change-over from 1933, the hidden histories of names, birth-certificates, and citizenship within the system of fraud that we have all taken to be our reality, and how those facing prosecution may gain legal remedy within this situation. Please scroll down for her instructions on how to declare political status and release judges fromany obligation to impose military common law in his court created by the Constitution”.

I don’t know whether people who are currently incarcerated and facing prosecution on wrongful charges have access to the Internet, but I do hope their relatives are paying attention to the nationwide movement to restore Common Law and the Constitution to the US, and can forward this information to them. (I don’t claim to offer any legal or law-related advice myself, I am merely following her work with interest as I too seek to gain knowledge on Common Law means to gain legal remedy from injustice, so please do explore her work further on your own.) Judge Anna’s posts are being collected here on an ongoing basis; you can see more at her website: http://www.annavonreitz.com. You can also find out more in the Truth About US Govt. posts here.  Colors and highlights below are mine/just for emphasis & ease of reading.

***

The Down and Dirty for Thomas Deegan, Ammon Bundy, and Everyone Else Facing Prosecution by the Vermin Pretending to Serve and Defend America

—by Judge Anna

1. The Federal District Court today is a hybrid that was never intended to be.

2. Every Federal District Judge takes his oath to uphold the Constitution —– 5 USC 3331. (Bear in mind that you cannot use CFR, USC, or any other of their private statutes in their courts, with the single exception of the United States Statutes at Large, which are public. The most you can do is remind them of their oath and accept it.)

3. March 9, 1933 martial law was imposed by Proclamation 2040 on both the federal and state government franchises organized as the United States of America, Inc. and its “states” doing business as the “State of California”, etc. The “Trading With the Enemy Act” of October 6, 1917 (50 USC App. 5(b) was amended by the “Emergency Banking Relief Act” of March 9, 1933 (12USC95a) —-2040 continued Emergency Proclamation 2039.

4. On April 25, 1938, the US Supreme Court demolished federal general common law civilian due process and the military common law jurisdiction was imposed.

5. In September 1938, new Federal Rules of Civil Procedure were introduced “as authorized by Section 17 of the Trading With the Enemy Act”. Four years later, in 1942, new Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure followed.

6. After that, there has been no distrinction between suits at law and suits in equity— they are constitutionally created courts, but sitting in a foreign, statutory, emergency war powers military jurisdiction. Civilian “U.S. citizens” are now treated as “enemy combatants” subject to military due process of law— i.e., international martial common law.

7. From July 28, 1868 to March 9, 1933, all Americans in the organic states were Private American National Citizens without any implied or express contract with the Federal corporations or the Federal “State” franchises. They were protected by Section 1 of the corporate Constitution’s 14th Amendment.

8. FDR’s Proclamation 2039 made all U.S. citizens “enemies” and their property was deemed “enemy property”— which was seized via exercise of titles held under color of law by the Alien Property Custodian, now the Secretary of the Treasury;

9. On March 9, 1933, Congress approved — after the fact — Roosevelt’s actions back to March 4, 1933, the day of his inauguration— and approved both his Proclamation 2039 and 2040;

10. Every Private American National Citizen was “deemed” to be Registered as a “U.S. citizen” — a foreign situs trust named after them and deemed a citizen under federal “diversity of citizenship”—- via a Certificate of Live Birth. The foreign situs trust created by this “registration” rather than “recording” yielded an artificial “person” which was operated under a name in Upper and Lower Case identical to the given name people were used to using and this “person” was deemed “registered property” of the bankrupt federal corporation. The living Americans were also “deemed” voluntary sureties and voluntary trustees for the resulting corporate persona: James Albert Doe. After 7 years of this, when clueless Americans didn’t come forward and object and reclaim their status by Expatriation, it was “presumed” that the owner/trustee was “lost at sea” and a second constructive trust was created—-a Cestui Que Vie Trust operated as: JAMES ALBERT DOE, for example.

11. This reduced the status of the Private American National Citizen to that of a “U.S. citizen”—- a corporation created under federal corporation auspices as a franchise.

12. This PERSON named after you is by definition an “enemy combatant” subject to international military jurisdiction.

13. AS a result of all this GARBAGE and FRAUD, every court procedure both civil and criminal, involves two jurisdictional trusts—- one express and inactive and constitutional, one implied and active and unconstitutional.

14. The express trust is the Constitution for the United States of America. Under this trust, the plaintiff is the trustee and the defendant is the beneficiary (presumed innocent).

15. Thanks to the rupture caused by FDR, the government has foisted its responsibility to be trustee off on the victims of this fraud— the people.

16. The implied trust is the court case itself, conducted within the military jurisdiction of the “civilian” court.

17. This implied trust arises from the “hybrid” nature of the Defendant— a man presumed to be acting as a thing– a corporation and “enemy combatant”—-which results in the Defendant being “deemed” an “enemy combatant” and “presumed guilty”.

18. In a criminal prosecution in a federal court (and all courts are federal— either district or Federal “state” courts— all operated by the United States District Court) the plaintiff comes in the name of the sovereign government—-NOT the sovereign people. The indictment enabling the government to prosecute the victim is a True Bill— see the legal definition of a True Bill and a Bill of Attainder— and then see the Fourth Amendment to the Constitution.

19. The plaintiff is now the beneficiary and the defendant is now the trustee— this has been accomplished via two contracts—- the first one for the Private American National Citizen and the other for the government.

20. The first implied contract binding the Private American National Citizen is the registered “Certificate of Live Birth” coupled with the seized of all property associated with that NAME;

21. The second contract that replaced our lawful civilian government with martial law was express by the Emergency Banking Relief Act (EBRA) and its amendment to the Trading with the Enemy Act.

HERE IS AN IMPORTANT TAKE HOME MESSAGE. The “government” is a corporation bringing “charges” against a “vessel in commerce” via means of a Bill of Attainder presented as a True Bill. They are doing this by pretending that Thomas Deegan,the man, is the “same as” THOMAS DEEGAN, the corporate “PERSON” they created as a franchise to benefit themselves.

Now, what to do about it?

PLEASE NOTE: the Judge is between a Rock and a Hard Place. He has taken his oath to the Constitution on one hand, and yet is obligated to uphold the statutes of the United States on the other.

***The Article III Judge must be RELEASED and DISCHARGED from any obligation to impose military common law in his court created by the Constitution.***

You, as the living man and true sovereign, can release the Judge from this “conflict of duty” and end the nightmare.

23. Set up a one page Declaration of Political Status and Release and Discharge for Judge _______________ . Place a one dollar United States Postage Stamp in the top right hand corner of the page as consideration for the new contract you are creating.

For example: I, Thomas of the Lawful House of Deegan, release and discharge Judge ___________ from his emergency war powers jurisdictional duties created by Section 17 of the “Trading With the Enemy Act” and clearly inform the court that I, a Private American National Citizen who has harmed nobody and nothing do not consent to statutory military jurisdiction of any kind. I did not willingly or knowingly consent to statutory military jurisdiction prior to being unlawfully detained and I do not consent to statutory military jurisdiction now. I do not consent to statutory military jurisdiction now nor at any foreseable time in the future.

I do, however, accept the Oath of Judge_______________________and his trust obligation to uphold and defend the Constitution of the United States under the Law of the Land affirmed “So help me God” and I do accept the “perpetual friendship” and “amity” of all members of the Bar Associations owed to Americans by the Treaty of Westminster 1794 and their honest conduct owed by The Bar Association Treaty of 1947.

I repeat that I am a non-combatant and not an “enemy” and I do not consent to any statutory military jurisdiction being exercised against me by this court since my unlawful detainment, I do not consent to any statutory military jurisdiction being exercised with respect to me in the present, and do not consent to any future statutory military jurisdiction being offered against me.

I revoke all and any consent actual or implied to act as or be considered a voluntary surety, trustee, volunteer, a corporate officer of any kind, a tax payer, commercial driver, corporate franchise operator, warrant officer, licensee, beneficiary of the public charitable trust or any other individual or employee subject to the British Crown or the British King in any capacity whatsoever.

I clearly attest and declare that I am an American born on the land of the ___________state and am one of the free, sovereign, and independent people of the United States as defined by The Definitive Treaty of Peace, Paris, 1783. I have never considered any other political status actual or implied to be a benefit.

Autographed by__(handprinted first name only)____Thomas (thumbprint seal).

24. Next, repudiate the presumptions, accept the Indictment, and return it to the government acting as plaintiff. On the face of a copy of the Indictment write: “Accepted for Value by Grantee, Returned for Value by Grantor-Settlor, On Special Deposit Without Recourse, IT IS ORDERED: Discharge All Obligations/Presentments/Bonds/Fees/Taxes/Tithes to Extinguish the Debt and Settle the Account of THOMAS DEEGAN: Date____________________, Signature_________________________________(Upper and Lower Case) Authorized Representative, all rights reserved.

This turns the tables back on the government agents and makes them the trustees. And the grantor-beneficiary of the Constitution trust has just ordered the trustees to pay the charges and release the penal bonds.

This entire “schtick” depends on (1) identity theft; (2) corruption of the courts; (3) ignorance coupled with non-disclosure to mischaracterize innocent people and their natural political status. No matter what they say or accuse you of, they are there to protect the interests of the British Crown and to extract money out of Americans and the lawful American government. It is your duty to fully inform the court and hold it accountable.

Now here are some other facts you can use to “fully inform” the court(s).

According to 16 American Jurisprudence, 2nd Edition, Sections 71 and 82—- no “emergency” justifies a violation of any Constitutional provision.

Despite this fact, as admitted in Senate Report 93-549 (1973): “A majority of people in the United States have lived all their lives (mischaracterized as British Subjects thanks to registration via Certificates of Birth) under emergency rule. For 40 years, freedoms and governmental procedures guaranteed by the Constitution have in varying degrees been abridged by laws brought into force by statutes of national emergency.”

Any idea that a statutory entity, a corporation, can “declare war” is by its nature fantastical and logically unsound, for the divide between the living and the dead is absolute and precludes such a notion. The corporate charter would be irrevocably violated and the perpetrators exposed as a mere band of criminals.

“Emergency does not create power. Emergency does not increase granted power or remove or diminish restrictions imposed upon power granted or reserved. The Constitution was adopted in a period of grave emergency. Its grants of the power to the Federal Government and its limitation of the power of the States were determined in the light of emergency and they are not altered by emergency.” — Home Building and Loan Association v. Blaisdell 290 US 426 (1934).

“The Constitution of the United States is a LAW for rulers and people equally in war and in peace, and covers with the shield of its protection ALL classes of men, at ALL times, and under ALL circumstances. No doctrine, involving more pernicious consequences, was ever invented by the wit of man than that any of its provisions can be suspended during any of the great exigencies of government. Such a doctrine leads directly to anarchy or to despotism.” Statement of Opinion, United States Supreme Court, Annals 1866, in response to a new class of proposed infringing Reconstruction legislation that was similarly promoted on the basis of “national emergency”.

Powers and property interests that the corporate officers of the United States of America, Incorporated or the UNITED STATES, Inc. did not possess prior to the 1933 bankruptcy “emergency” did not magically accrue to them as the result of any emergency economic or otherwise.

All that really happened is that two international banking cartels colluded among themselves to initiate a “war” for profit, a war that pitted foreign situs trusts named after innocent Americans against Roman Inferior TRUSTS also named after the same innocent Americans.

“Calling it an apple does not make it an apple.”— Benjamin Franklin, 1772.

Naming a Roman Inferior Trust “JOHN MICHAEL DOE” or a foreign situs trust “John Michael Doe” does NOT make either of these en legis “persons” equivalent to or the “same as” the living man whose given name has been seized upon and whose identity has been stolen. All it does is create an environment rich in confusions and semantic deceits that have been used to cheat, harass, entrap, enslave, defraud, and steal from the peaceful people of this land who are the employers, benefactors, and creditors who are owed “good faith service” from both the offending international banking cartels and both their sponsored governmental services corporations.

The Private American National Citizens are at peace, not parties to any “war” among fictional incorporated entities, not bound to act as sureties for the debts of governmental services corporations merely under contract to provide them nineteen essential enumerated services. To the extent that competing foreign banking cartels have created “emergencies” and advanced these outrageous claims against the employers and benefactors of the governmental services corporations they have each sponsored, they deserve to be recognized as crime syndicates engaged in identity theft and credit fraud, insurance fraud, securities fraud, press-ganging, entrapment, racketeering, armed extortion under color of law, personage, barratry, enslavement, embezzlement, conspiracy, unlawful conversion, and other crimes against humanity.

There are no “emergency powers” granted to Congress. There is no basis for the Trading With the Enemy Act ever being applied against us nor against any “vessel” in commerce named after us. There is no excuse for pretending that all the Americans magically “volunteered” to be considered British Subjects, either.

On April 14, 1802, the actual United States in Congress Assembled passed United States Statute-at-Large 2, 153, Chapter 28, Subsection 1. The actual government of, for, and by the people clearly defined the necessary process for any American to ever become a United States Citizen—that is, a British Subject merely residing on the land of the United States— a process requiring multiple notices and conscious acts by consenting adults confirmed by public officials and on the public record over a period of two years — not an undisclosed “implied” contract foisted off under conditions of deceit upon babies in their cradles and women recovering from childbirth.

This is the thanks we get from the British Monarch for loyally supporting Britain and British interests in two World Wars.

Source: Maine Republic Alert

Judge Anna von Reitz: Note About the National Liberty Alliance

Re-posted, with thanks, from Judge Anna von Reitz‘s Facebook page/February 15.

***

Judge Anna addresses issues she has had with the National Liberty Alliance--many of us may have wondered why they were not working together. Apparently they had been, at one time. Her note below is quite illuminating–a lot of information here on the American Common Law Court System, and what it needs to become fully functional. “...(T)he Common Law Grand Jury is only about one-fourth of the Common Law Court System we are owed, and without the Common Law Judges (properly called Common Law Justices) and Trial Juries and Clerks and other members of the Common Law Courts including the Sheriffs operating the land jurisdiction of this country, the Common Law Grand Juries have no enforcement capability. They can hand down their findings, and the “District Attorney” can ignore them, so that the entire effort goes astray and has no teeth.”

***

About me and the NLA: I TRIED to work with NLA early on. I also in good faith delivered a wet-ink signed and thumb-printed and sealed copy of our affidavit of probable cause to John Daresh, but nothing was done about our affidavit—which has been published as “You Know Something Is Wrong When….An American Affidavit of Probable Cause” available on Amazon.com.

When I attempted to contact NLA regarding their silence and inaction with regard to the grave accusations of criminality our affidavit raised, they hung up on me. A couple weeks later, Mr. Gary Jolly, contacted me and said something inane like, “we know who you are and we don’t trust you”— as if this was an excuse for failure to address capital crime?

I also rubbed them the wrong way when I revealed that the Common Law Grand Jury is only about one-fourth of the Common Law Court System we are owed, and without the Common Law Judges (properly called Common Law Justices) and Trial Juries and Clerks and other members of the Common Law Courts including the Sheriffs operating the land jurisdiction of this country, the Common Law Grand Juries have no enforcement capability. They can hand down their findings, and the “District Attorney” can ignore them, so that the entire effort goes astray and has no teeth.

Therefore I pointed out the need to elect people to fill the other, additional vacated Public Offices we are owed and to re-established the American Common Law Court System that is supposed to be in place and acting in support of the Common Law Grand Juries. Mr. Daresh and Mr. Jolly would hear none of it.

Three years have gone by with the Citizens Common Law Grand Juries being set up and spinning their wheels, accomplishing nothing much for all their work and good will. Meanwhile, those who waved good-bye to NLA and proceeded to set up their counties on the land and elect and fill the vacated Public Offices have made great strides. They are actively setting up and restoring County-level government and educating people all over this country, while NLA continues to accomplish…….what?

As a result of all this, I have grave concerns about NLA’s leadership. Some months ago, I heard that John Daresh is actually a Bar Attorney from New York named John Vidurek. So I asked him, up front, in good faith— just wanting to know the truth of the matter. He refused to answer me, but he did answer Rodger Dowdell in Florida, that yes, this is so. His given name was John Vidurek and yes, he is from New York and yes, he is a Bar Attorney.

To me, a Bar Card is a strong indicator that Mr. Daresh may not be operating in good faith.

A second indicator is that he has adopted a nom de guerre that has nothing whatsoever to do with his real name.

Third, why quote me out of context in a major Writ of Mandamus and not even bother to contact me, yet leave it seeming that I was involved? That doesn’t add up, either.

Fourth, why harbor vaguely stated and semi-threatening “suspicions” such as Gary Jolly expressed toward me? Honest men ask honest questions. They don’t hide behind vague insinuations.

A fifth concern about NLA leadership is the lack of progress by the CLGJ organizations in the states where NLA is in control of the CLGJ’s compared to what is going on in other states where people have struck off and done it without NLA’s “help and direction”. These spin off groups are miles ahead in addressing the real problems we are facing.

A sixth concern in NLA’s failure to admit and educate people regarding the fact that the CLGJ’s are just a part— about one quarter– of the Common Law Court System that we are owed and which we need up and fully functioning to give the CLGJ’s both teeth and administrative support. How can you run a wagon train with one-wheeled carts?

A seventh concern is NLA’s complete lack of response to a signed, sealed, witnessed affidavit of probable cause that has been exhaustively researched and demonstrated. We brought forward damning evidence of immense, systemic, institutionalized fraud— fraud against the Republic, fraud against the probate and bankruptcy courts, fraud against American States and American people—- and NLA puts the blinkers on and pretends it never heard a word?

So we are supposed to ignore capital level crimes, including war crimes, being committed by foreign banks and their storefront organizations run as “governmental services corporations” because……? Why?

If it is NOT the job of the CLGJ’s to investigate crimes against Americans, just exactly what does Mr. Daresh propose that their job is? To stand around issuing pointless documents filled with ignorance and outrage so that his buddies down at the local Bar Association can have a good laugh?

Daresh is a Bar Attorney. He knows better than to send a Writ of Mandamus to an Admiralty Court. He was playing everyone for laughs. He was saying, “Oh, look at this, boys! These people are SO clueless, SO dumb, that they are going to put their time and energy into doing this! Hahahahahah! — And for EXTRA fun, I am going to sign Anna’s name to it and take her work out of context, so everyone can laugh at her, too! Hahahahahahah!”

I believe that many, many of the people in NLA are wonderful, patriotic, well-intentioned, and determined. I believe that the vast majority are trying in good faith to make a badly needed difference and to fill in a very necessary Public Office—- but I also believe that they are being purposefully limited and misguided by leaders who have their own contrary agenda, which is simply to keep the horse in the barn and not let the CLGJ’s function as they could and ought to, and also prevent people from addressing the need to restore the ENTIRE American Common Law Court System which is owed and needed to make the work of the Common Law Grand Juries count.

The way things are run under Daresh, you might as well be riding unicycles. It’s entertaining, but without the other “wheels” of the American Common Law Courts in place—- the Justices, the Clerks, the Recorders, the Bailiffs, the Sheriffs operating on the land jurisdiction, and the Trial Juries—-you are stuck, chasing around in circles without enforcement, wasting your time. Apparently, that kind of window dressing role is what Mr. Daresh wants. Just “be there” appearing to do something and creating an illusion of remedy, while in fact providing no real alternative to the Admiralty Court and Administrative Court System at all.

If the CLGJ’s were operating as they should, as part of the American Common Law Court System, they would hand down orders to a Sheriff operating on the jurisdiction of the land of this country, and the Sheriff would bring the orders to a Common Law Justice who would issue the warrants for arrest and to Public Prosecutors who would prepare the discovery subpoenas and complaints, and this would all wind up in front of a Jury of Twelve Honest Peers who would review the facts and hand down a decision for the Justice to read in open court on the record and execute. That is how it is supposed to work.

As it is, the CLGJ’s are misguided to function as laughingstocks for the Bar Members and spend their days making pleas to District Attorneys who ignore the CLGJ’s just like they ignore everyone else, and writing Writs in Law addressed to Admiralty Courts that can’t even hear a Land Writ.

Sigh. So, there is my assessment of the current status of the CLGJ’s and their role under the limitations imposed by John Daresh and NLA—- and right where they are is where they are likely to stay, in my opinion, until or unless people wake up a second time and realize that they are spinning their wheels at a moment in history when they ought to be making desperately needed progress.

NLA could be instrumental in restoring the entire American Common Law Court System, in reviving and restoring the land-based government we are owed—- but that isn’t where the NLA leadership has gone and that doesn’t appear to be where they are going.

Source: Facebook/Anna von Reitz

What Does “Exemptions to Informed Consent” Mean, In Light of “Consent of the Governed”?

New page in Human Rights pointing out that “Exemptions to Informed Consent” permitted extensively today in classified Human Subject Experimentation/Research projects to US Military and Intelligence agencies and contractors via increasing loopholes in the Code of Federal Regulations, as noted also recently in the Electronic Frontier Foundation‘s article, Human Research Loopholes: Alive and Well, cannot possibly have the “Consent of the Governed“:

“Exemptions to Informed Consent” in Classified Research and Non-Consensual Covert/Clandestine Human Subject Experimentation in the USA Today Versus “Consent of the Governed”

Judge Anna Maria Riezinger: Crucial Information For All County Sheriffs, Police Departments, Officers, Federal Agents–Specifics On Law Enforcement Versus Peacekeeping

Re-posted, with thanks, from this January 9 post at Paulstramer.net. Please visit there on an ongoing basis for the latest updated and archived articles from Judge Anna, and also visit Judge Anna’s site for pdfs.

***

Judge Anna explains here the difference between Sheriffs on the land (where all law is the law of the land or Common Law) who are elected by people associating freely as landowners in their counties, publicly bonded, and with an oath of public office, engaged in the business of Peacekeeping, and in enforcing organic law including the Constitution, versus Sheriffs working as Law-Enforcement officers of Federal States or Federal Counties which are incorporated entities and franchises of US, Inc., which latter are essentially working in a private capacity for a private corporation, much like private security officers at Malls.

She notes that such Sheriffs are really operating in the jurisdiction of the Sea, and should not continue to call themselves Sheriffs as this could be seen as a condition of constructive fraud, for which they could be held accountable, since there are no Sheriffs on the Sea.

Also of note here is mention of the arbitrary 1976 Congressional vacating of State Offices and State Laws to the trusteeship of the United Nations, which further ensures that Sheriffs and other law-enforcement officers–for such Federal agencies as “the FBI, FEMA, DHS, BATF, IRS, and the host of other quasi-law enforcement “agencies” out there” are not working in a governmental capacity, but rather in a private capacity, for private interests, including banks, and have no governmental or other authority over the people of the United States.

Concerned, patriotic Sheriffs –and any American –interested in securing the present and future of the United States of America as a free and peaceful and sovereign nation not ruled by international banking interests or the United Nations/Agenda 21/Agenda 2030 global government crowd may be interested in taking the free online Common Law and Constitutional course being offered by the National Liberty Alliance. As posted just recently on Starship Earth, 1000 Sheriffs have currently signed up with Sheriff Mack and the CSPOA–Constitutional Sheriffs and Peace Officers Association–so far.

***

Specifics for Sheriffs and Federal Agents Regarding the Difference Between “Law Enforcement” and “Peacekeeping” – by Judge Anna Maria Riezinger

This information is crucial and needs to get into the hands of all 3100 County Sheriffs and all Police Departments and all Officers and Federal Agents Nationwide. Please help by broadcasting, reading, making videos, printing pamphlets, hand-delivering, and talking to all those you know.

The Articles of Confederation, The Declaration of Independence, and The Constitution are Organic Law of the Land. The Law of the Land is all Common Law. It functions on the land jurisdiction of the United States and is attached to it.

A Common Law Court functions only within the geographically defined boundaries it serves. All the offices associated with a Common Law jurisdiction or a Common Law Court including the Office of Sheriff are by definition Public Offices. They are administered under the Organic Law and the Public Law of the United States known as the United States Statutes at Large.

All Public Offices serve the government “of the people, for the people, and by the people”. All Public Offices are created and maintained by unincorporated body politics—- free associations of landowners and other members of the “free sovereign and independent people of the United States”.

As you can see from reading Amendment VII, all conflicts arising between people and affecting private property of value in excess of $20 are owed service by a Common Law Court.

The Sheriff on the land is responsible for the enforcement of the Organic Law of our nation, including The Constitution, and the Public Law. He is the highest peacekeeping officer in America within the boundaries of his County. He has sweeping powers to deputize men and commandeer equipment, facilities, and supplies to secure the peace and guarantee the enforcement of the Organic Law. A Sheriff on the land is elected by the people acting in free association as landowners in their counties. He has a Public Bond and he has an Oath of Public Office.

But, when you incorporate anything, you remove it from the jurisdiction of the land and from the Law of the Land.

Thus, when our Counties and States incorporated as franchises of the Federal “United States, Inc.”—either out of stupidity or treasonous intent, they became franchises in the same sense as we have franchises of Dairy Queen. They no longer function as our organic counties or states. They function as private corporate entities no different than Burger King or Walmart. They have no authority as government, and are merely “governmental services corporations”.

All the offices that were public offices associated with them immediately also devolve to merely private status. Thus the “Sheriff” working for such a “Federal County” or “Federal State” is no longer a Public Official. He is a private security officer working for a private corporation, no different than a mall cop working for Walmart. The fact that he may or may not be working on a contract requiring him to provide “law enforcement services” in a particular county in no way imbues him or his office with any governmental authority or immunity.

His job is to ride herd on corporations in general and employees of federal corporations especially. These corporations set up as franchises of the parent federal corporation are all required to abide by the in-house rules of the “United States, Inc.” or whatever federal corporation is acting as Queen Bee at the time. Theirs is a government “of the corporation, by the corporation, and for the corporation”.

His job does not involve enforcement of the Organic or Public Laws. His job is merely “code, statute, and regulation enforcement” that is meant to apply solely to corporations and corporate entities— trusts, transmitting utilities, and so on. He does not have a Public Bond, does not have an Oath of Public Office, he’s in the same status as a Mall Cop and has no lawful right to deputize anyone or commandeer anything. He is in private rather than public capacity and should not continue to call himself a “Sheriff” because there are no Sheriffs operating within the international jurisdiction of the sea and continuing to call himself a “Sheriff” sets up a condition of constructive fraud for which he can be held accountable.

The same applies to the FBI, FEMA, DHS, BATF, IRS, and the host of other quasi-law enforcement “agencies” out there. They continue to act as if they had something to do with the lawful government of the United States and as if they had some authority over the people of the United States, when in fact they do not and never have had. The rule is that if you can’t do something acting in your private capacity, you can’t do it, period, not at all. If you can’t bust down your neighbor’s door and face-slam his teenage daughter and ransack their house looking for imaginary “contraband” as Joe Average, you can’t do it as a Mall Cop, either.

The only people who have that kind of authority are “Peacekeeping Officers” working for the unincorporated government of the land, and they are required to abide by the Organic Laws and Public Laws and to operate under Common Law when they do it.

In 1976 the rats in “Congress” operating as the Board of Directors of the “United States, Inc.”—- a doing business name of the International Monetary Fund— declared with no lawful authority at all, that all our state offices and state laws were “vacated” and released to the trusteeship of the United Nations. See the International Organizations Immunity Act and the Foreign Sovereign Immunity Act. Of course, nobody bothered to tell us.

This had the affect of further removing all Federal County and Federal State and Federal Agency personnel from any valid Public Office. Even though these “agencies” have continued to use the names of our public government offices and units, such as the “Bureau of Land Management” and “U.S. Small Business Administration” and “Sheriff of Macon County”—- these are merely trademarked names, like brand names under new management, and have no meaning in terms of their actual authority or function.

The FBI Agents out in Oregon are acting under Color of Law and pretending to be under the administration of our lawful government, when in reality they are just hired commercial mercenaries acting at the behest of unknown private interests— mostly banks— and, as a result, they are engaged in armed racketeering on American Soil, against the American people, who are in fact paying their salaries via a criminally mismanaged “governmental services contract”.

So it is really very simple for anyone to determine exactly who these people are and what their status is. Are they working for an incorporated entity or not? If yes, they are working in a private capacity and have no lawful public function at all.

Virtually all the Sheriffs in this country have been converted in this surreptitious way from being “peacekeeping officers” to being “law enforcement officers” — leaving nobody in charge of enforcing the Organic Laws and Public Laws of this nation, except the People themselves, even though the People have continued to loyally pay through the nose for “Sheriffs” and “Deputies” and other such “services” aplenty.

Now, given this as a background—- all you “Sheriffs” and “Deputies” and “FBI Agents” and others involved in this travesty— have to ask yourselves two questions:

1. Am I working for a corporation?
2. Am I therefore working in private or public capacity?

If you work all day enforcing “codes, statutes, and regulations” you are a Mall Cop working for some version or franchise of the current “federal corporation” as a private “law enforcement officer” operating under international law. Any presentation or pretense otherwise is constructive fraud. You have no public office, no public bond, no capacity to exert any governmental authority on anybody.

If you work all day long enforcing the Organic Law and Public Law you are a Peacekeeping Officer acting with all the authority of the actual government owed to the land jurisdiction of the people of the United States behind you.

All corporations and all employees of all corporations are obligated to obey the Organic and Public Laws of this nation and if you do not, you are acting as an “Outlaw” on the land or a “Pirate” on the sea—–that is, as criminals.

You are also perpetuating war crimes against unarmed non-combatants when you trespass upon private property and pretend to have any jurisdiction over it. The people of this country have the absolute right to defend their lives and their property with armed force, and even more so, when the threat and trespass is being offered by their own misdirected employees who are required to provide them with Good Faith Service.

Everyone on both sides of this circumstance needs to wake up.

All those presently acting as “corporate Sheriffs” and “FBI Agents” and “DHS Agents” and so on need to recognize the very, very thin ice they are skating on and be very circumspect in their actions.

At the same time, they need to be asking themselves— hey, wait a minute! I am not a “citizen” of District of Columbia nor an employee of the bankrupt District of Columbia Municipal Corporation, and even less am I aware of being a UN Corporation employee! What is going on here~! What am I doing? There’s no parachute for me. I have been recognized as merely a private corporate Mall Cop, trespassing on private property, which is against the Public Law!

And those militia men are right. They are here to enforce the Organic and Public Law of this nation.

In most cases, the “corporate Sheriffs” love this country and want to serve their communities, they are just clueless about the insane web that has been cast around them and the way that their authority and office has been altered via the mechanisms of incorporation.

There is nothing stopping any of these men from reclaiming their own political status as “one of the free sovereign and independent people of the United States” and occupying the actual vacated Public Office of Sheriff. There is then nothing stopping them from deputizing as many men as they deem necessary to arrest the criminals responsible for misdirecting and misinforming them and causing all this harm to this country and the people they are bound to serve.

PS—- Yes, this DOES mean that every improper “federal action” from Ruby Ridge to Waco to the Bundy Ranch has been absolutely, totally against the Organic and Public Law of the United States and those who participated in and carried out these actions under Color of Law are international criminals guilty of multiple capital crimes and/or trespass offenses.

Janet Reno and G.W. and Bill Clinton and all the other Party Hearties responsible for these and other crimes against the American People need to be rounded up and turned over international courts of record for trial as war criminals guilty of capital “crimes of aggression” against the peaceful non-combatant people of the United States.

When we finally unravel the story of what went on with the Twin Towers attack, there will be plenty more to add to the docket.
—————————————
See this article and over 100 others on Anna’s website here:www.annavonreitz.com

***

Re-posted, with thanks, from Paulstramer.net. Please visit there on an ongoing basis for the latest updated and archived articles from Judge Anna, and also visit Judge Anna’s site for pdfs.

For articles by Judge Anna being re-posted here with brief commentary on an ongoing basis, in efforts to distribute the researched information and advice she is putting out, as well as as to publicize all ongoing efforts to restore the USA to peace and freedom, please check in at this page: The Ongoing Fight to Restore the USA: Collecting Judge Anna von Reitz’s posts.

On this subject, you can also check in at The Truth About US Govt. posts, an ongoing series which posts essays and articles from Judge Anna as well as other historians, investigative researchers, legal experts, and journalists on this subject, as well as my own notes as I follow along.

Please share this widely with all Sheriffs, Law-Enforcement personnel, and Federal agencies and agents, as well as other concerned and patriotic Americans, thanks.

Judge Anna Maria Riezinger Offers Some Clarity on Common Law, the Suppression of the lawful Common Law Court System, and the Current, Continued Use of Foreign Admiralty/Federal Martial Common Law Courts

Re-posted, with many thanks, from this linked page at Paulstramer.net. Please visit there on an ongoing basis for the latest updated and archived articles from Judge Anna, and also visit Judge Anna’s site for pdfs.

For articles by Judge Anna being re-posted here with brief commentary on an ongoing basis, in efforts to distribute the researched information and advice she is putting out, as well as as to publicize all ongoing efforts to restore the USA to peace and freedom, please check in at this page: The Ongoing Fight to Restore the USA: Collecting Judge Anna von Reitz’s posts. On this subject, you can also check in at The Truth About US Govt. posts, an ongoing series which posts essays and articles from Judge Anna as well as other historians, investigative researchers, legal experts, and journalists on this subject, as well as my own notes as I follow along.

***

Judge Anna responds to critics publishing critiques in The Oregonian with a simple explication of Common Law, and details how it is still the one and only Law of the Land. She also explains what our current court system is based on, and why it does not relate to the jurisdiction of the Land. (All highlights below mine.)

***

To Betsy Hammond of the Oregonian RE “self appointed judge” showing up.
on January 12, 2016 at 4:48 PM, updated January 12, 2016 at 5:55 PM

In reference to your recent story in The Oregonian in which you said:

“In late November, Anna Maria Riezinger, an Alaska woman who claims to be Judge Anna von Rietz under the same inaccurate reading of the Constitution that Doucette uses, ruled that the members of Congress, the president and the U.S. treasury secretary all committed crimes and directed U.S. marshals and FBI agents to arrest them.

Last week, Riezinger issued a statement about the Harney occupation. In it, she wrote that “The Hammonds and the Bundy Family are Priority Creditors of all the (government agencies) which are now or which have operated in this country in the past. …They and their countrymen are owed the patent to all land within the geographically defined boundaries of their respective states, free and clear of liens, encumbrances, or other presumptions.”

Hundreds of people who have used similar sovereign citizen arguments to justify failing to pay federal income taxes, getting drivers licenses or other government requirements have never prevailed in any court.”
— Betsy Hammond

________________
Ms. Hammond,

In the first place, I never actually said any such thing. I explained the law and its implications for the members of the law enforcement community. You should read before you gossip and mindlessly repeat sensationalist headlines.

If I am not legitimately exactly what I say I am— a Judge operating the Common Law jurisdiction of the Alaska State Superior Court — how is it that I have functioned in that Public Office for three years now, and have not been arrested for “impersonating” a Judge? Certainly, you have heard of me all the way to Oregon. My role is not exactly a secret, is it?

How is it that I haven’t paid a penny in federal income tax in twenty years? That’s another good question for you to ask.

Could it be that “federal officials” are in fact nothing but private corporate officers with no Public Office at all, and that they are wildly out of compliance with the only commercial contract allowing their presence on our soil?

I published their Dun and Bradstreet Numbers in our sworn, autographed, sealed and published affidavit of probable cause, “You Know Something Is Wrong When…..An American Affidavit of Probable Cause” which is available on Amazon.com. I can also produce their Registered Agents, EIN Numbers, and lots of additional evidence to prove that what you think of as “your government” is in fact not your government.

Your government has been incorporated and via that simple mechanism has been usurped into the foreign and international jurisdiction of the sea and placed under the Law of the Sea, not the Law of the Land which you, as an American, are owed.

Except for people like me, the Organic Law of this country— The Declaration of Independence, The Articles of Confederation, The Constitution for the united States of America, and the United States Statutes at Large are not being enforced. And now you know the reason.

If your interest in providing a “balanced” reporting of the facts is not aroused, it should be.

It is true that a great many well-meaning patriots have gone to jail when they tried to enforce their guarantees owed to them under the Law of the Land in courts that are functioning under the Law of the Sea. So what?

Those patriots were not wrong in their basic assumptions, they were simply duped, misinformed, as you are Ms.Hammond, about the nature of institutions merely “standing for” our lawful government which is supposed to be “of the people, by the people, and for the people” and not of the corporation, by the corporation and for the corporation.

Please bother to open up a copy of any United States Constitution you can find and look at Amendment VII. There you will find that all issues of value in excess of $20 (around $500 translated to current values) must be tried at Common Law.

So like most Americans you probably assume that the courts you are familiar with are operating under the Common Law you are owed, right?

Wrong. They are operating under a form of martial common law euphemistically called “Special Admiralty”. It’s the only form of common law that the corporate federal government and its incorporated franchises operating the Federal States and Federal Counties possess.

Back in 1938 in a U.S. Supreme Court Case known as Thompkins v. Erie Railroad, the Justices admitted that there is no such thing as federal “General Common Law”, so in order to keep their incorporated Court System going, they had to fall back on a provision made at the end of the Civil War allowing military commanders to establish military common law tribunals in the Southern States for the purposes of punishing and subduing “rebels”.

This situation was addressed again by the U.S. Supreme Court in Milligan Ex Parte (1866) which still stands and it was decided that there was no excuse for the use of martial common law in areas where the local Common Law Courts were operating.

So via the process of incorporation the rats responsible made sure that the continental Common Law Courts got no support, no access to the public funding they are owed. The corporate managers simply arranged to undermine the lawful Common Law Court System so that the only “common law courts” left were the federal martial common law courts which could be used to further usurp our lawful jurisdiction.

And that is what they have done.

Foreign Admiralty courts have run rampant upon the land jurisdiction of this country and have inflicted terrible damage upon the American people and their private property assets as a result. And people like you, Ms. Hammond, have supported them in their unlawful and unprincipled acts against your neighbors and have laughed at the poor “deluded” patriots over cocktails, never realizing that this same process of racketeering and usurpation can be applied against you and your family and your friends and your neighbors, too.

The history of Nazi Germany is most instructive. It became fashionable to be a Nazi. All those common people who weren’t Nazis were looked down upon, made the brunt of jokes, gossiped about. Just like the patriots are being treated now.

At the end of the day when the truth was fully out, it turned out that the Nazis were madmen and criminals and that far from being educated or elite, they were nothing but a crime syndicate with a lot of wanna be “elitist” sycophants following like dumb cattle in their footsteps, wearing their gang colors, and parroting everything these swine said while doing every evil imaginable.

Welcome to who you really are, Ms. Hammond— one of those dumbly following along and parroting the fashionable story line without a thought in your head of your own, without an eye for the cognitive dissonance created by living as a slave while endlessly prattling about “liberty”.

I suggest you look up the word “liberty” in a dictionary, Ms. Hammond. It’s what British sailors get on shore leave. It has nothing to do with freedom.

If you want to preserve what is left of your freedom, you had better double-down on actual hardcore research of the facts instead of merely repeating what is fashionable.

Sincerely,
Judge Anna Maria Riezinger

—————————————
See this article and over 100 others on Anna’s website here:www.annavonreitz.com

Source: PaulStramer.net

The Ongoing Fight to Restore the USA: Collecting Judge Anna von Reitz’s posts

Posted Here March 14, 2016: Judge Anna von Reitz: Vital Information on the Current US Court System for Thomas Deegan, Ammon Bundy, and Everyone Else Facing Prosecution; Informing the Court with a Declaration of Political Status, and a Release and Discharge for the Judge

Posted Here Feb 20, 2016: Judge Anna von Reitz: We Are Determined There Will NOT Be a Third World War, We Want the Criminals Recognized as Criminals

Posted Here Feb 16, 2016: (Feb 15) Note About the National Liberty Alliance

Posted Here Feb 16, 2016: (Feb 15) Letter of Support to Sheriff Glenn Palmer, Grant County, Oregon

Posted Here Feb 15, 2016: Judge Anna von Reitz/Feb 10 Update: Where the Hammer Has to Hit First and Hardest…Local Counties That Have Incorporated & “Sheriffs” Who Have Failed to Enforce the Organic & Public Law

Posted Here Feb 15, 2016: Judge Anna von Reitz/ (Feb 11) Address to Pope Francis: The Need to Dismantle the Machine

Posted Here Feb 6, 2016: Judge Anna von Reitz: Clarification–What We Have Done/Answers for Tom–And the Rest of the World, Too

Feb 3, 2016: Judge Anna von Reitz Vs Karen Hudes: The Banks Running the Govt. Services Corporations, including the Federal Reserve…IMF…World Bank and IBRD, Have Operated as Criminal Syndicates And Must Be Liquidated

Jan 30, 2016: Judge Anna von Reitz/Anti-Corruption Society: Americans Free At Last (The Ties Have Been Permanently Broken)

Jan 29, 2016: Judge Anna von Reitz: Information and Instruction Regarding FBI in Burns, Oregon

Posted Here Jan 31, 2016: Judge Anna von Reitz: (Jan 21) Letter to General Dunford, American Armed Forces and Board of Governors & Directors, World Bank/IBRD/IMF Re. Final Notice of Commercial Obligation Lien

Jan 28, 2016: Judge Anna von Reitz: Essential Knowledge for Every American to Know

Jan 27, 2016: Judge Anna von Reitz: An American Amritsar

Jan 26, 2016: Judge Anna von Reitz: Extra-Judicial Notice Issued to the Justices of THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

Jan 23, 2016: Judge Anna von Reitz: Notice to Pope Francis, the UN Security Council, Congress, and The World— Round Seven: Karen Hudes/World Bank/IBRD/IMF: There Is No “Interregnum”

Jan 22, 2016: Open Letter to Pope Francis and All Members of the Christian Clergy from Judge Anna – 22 January 2016

Posted here Jan 18, 2016: Judge Anna Maria Riezinger: Crucial Information For All County Sheriffs, Police Departments, Officers, Federal Agents–Specifics On Law Enforcement Versus Peacekeeping

Posted here Jan 17, 2016: Judge Anna von Reitz: Why Unrest of Any Kind Defeats Both Versions of America

Posted here Jan 9, 2016: Judge Anna von Reitz: Great Britain, Fiduciary Trust Fraud, The Federal United States, The British Crown, All Countries Once Under the British Empire

January 7, 2016: Doreen Agostino/Our Greater Destiny/Judge Anna von Reitz: The Hunters Are About To Become The Hunted

Posted here Dec 23, 2015: Information of Interest Also to Targeted Individuals from Judge Anna re. Steps for Everyone to Take Today: Help Us Make Peace & Real Freedom in the World

Posted here Dec 21, 2015: Judge Anna von Reitz: There Are Two Systems of Law in This Country

Posted here Dec 2, 2015: Judge Anna von Reitz: The Jurisdiction of the Land

Posted here Jan 17, 2016: Judge Anna Maria Riezinger Offers Some Clarity on Common Law, the Suppression of the lawful Common Law Court System, and the Current, Continued Use of Foreign Admiralty/Federal Martial Common Law Courts

Posted here Dec 20, 2015: Judge Anna von Reitz: Solving the Problem of Individual Freedom and Sovereignty

Posted here Dec 21, 2015: Dec 14, 2015 Letter to John Kerry and Ban Ki-Moon from Anna Von Reitz

Dec 19, 2015: Second Letter to Sheriff Ward from Judge Anna

Posted here Nov 24, 2015: Judge Anna von Reitz: An Open Letter to Sheriff Ward of Harney County Oregon- and to All County Sheriffs in America

Original note with post: Just a note to say I hope to collect more of Judge Anna‘s posts here and will update this post regularly with links, collected above.  As many know I have been trying to re-post some of her many valuable  articles. Not merely is she currently re-posting in article format much of what is contained in her American Affidavit, in efforts to educate us all on what has transpired historically in the US, she is also keeping us updated on her ongoing efforts to directly address those in power, to restore Common Law or the law of the land to the land of the continental united States of America, and retrieve coffers of gold (:-) for the American people.

(Odd as this may sound to those unfamiliar with this subject, gold from 1933 has become the center of some rather interesting debate. There is an ongoing conversation with Karen Hudes, ex-World Bank counsel, on the subject of the Global Debt Facility and the “world’s gold” and in reference to the recent commercial lien placed by Judge Anna and others on the American Bar Association, International Bar Association, and the Department of Justice, which has been recorded in various places, including Judge Anna’s site and PaulStramer.net. It’s hard to keep up! but I’ll aim to post on that shortly.)

I’m especially keen to post Judge Anna’s work here because there is no doubt about it, she is offering insight into a different system of law (the jurisdiction of the land–common law, natural law, organic law) which could very well be the absolute cornerstone to completely turning things around in the USA and elsewhere–and breaking out of the surveillance/police state modality with its rampant injustice, covert programs, military deception, and excessive controls and surveillance we’re caught up in today.

For those of us who are being unlawfully and illegitimately targeted, harassed, and assaulted MK-ULTRA-style in our homes with EMF radiation/scalar/sonic weapons hiding in our neighborhoods and communities under misnomers, euphemisms, and outright deceptions as “FISA-court-ordered electronic surveillance,” “concealed monitoring,” “consensual monitoring,” “threat assessment surveillance,” “radiation surveillance,” “non-lethal surveillance,” “non-invasive surveillance,” possibly also “Community-Based Participatory Research,” and many other Intel-concocted covers and lies, and enduring continuous radiation weapon assaults in continuous and unlawful invasions of privacy, intrusions into our homes, our bodies, and our brains, not to mention character assassination and employment sabotage in our communities–all under completely known and sanctioned yet undisclosed programs of collusion between agencies and the Department of “Justice”–and many many others suffering injustice today in the US, this is welcome news.

Is it possible that, despite the state of lawlessness we are seeing around us today–things may actually begin to change? I follow the work of those working to restore Common Law with much hope.  Please start following her brilliant work if you haven’t already, and please do share her work widely.  We are so fortunate to have her voice, her brilliance, her activism, on behalf of all of us who are fighting without cease for a free and peaceful world.

Judge Anna von Reitz: There Are Two Systems of Law in This Country

Re-posted, with thanks, and in the interest of spreading the word, from Paulstramer.net. Please check in there for updated articles and posts on “what is really going on behind the scenes in the patriot movement in America, including solutions from Oathkeepers, Anna Von Reitz, Constitutional Sheriffs, Richard Mack, and many more people who are leading the charge to restore America to freedom and peace.”

This post below by Judge Anna is in response to a recent Snopes article calling into question the recent commercial lien placed by her and a group of people challenging government crimes and calling for arrests, as well as her stated status as a judge. Here Judge Anna discusses the Court system of Common Law versus the Federal Court system, and the historic nature of American citizenship as twofold–free independent people and inhabitants–in a context where language determines status. 

The lien document in pdf format can be found here, and is educative both in itself and in its modeling of/and information on an affidavit, which is a notarized document and a prime statement or declaration of facts in any situation of injustice, which, if I’m reading it right, is the first step and a means of obtaining legal remedy for injustice or crime under Common Law.

This may therefore be of interest to those unable to gain remedy through the Federal court system, and who are striving to explore Common Law as a means to obtain justice.

Friday, December 18, 2015

A Reply to “Snopes” and All Others from Anna Von Reitz

Yes, an Alaskan state judge HAS called upon the US Marshals and the rest of the “law enforcement agencies” to do their real job, and I am in a position to confirm it, as I am that judge. Your ignorance is no excuse in this matter.

There are two systems of law in this country, and it is long past time for you all to learn the facts.

When The Constitution was adopted there was already a Common Law Court System in this country that had been established for over 200 years. The Constitution created an additional “federal” court system for the needs of the “federal government”—- that court system is obligated to function in two venues only: administrative (Article I) and maritime/admiralty (Article III).

As you can see for yourself if you ever wake up and bother to look, the Seventh Amendment very clearly stipulates that ALL matters involving living people and their property assets in excess of $20 are to be decided under Common Law and as you can also readily find out Erie Railroad v. Thompkins (1938) there is no such thing as Federal Common Law.

Since all the “States of States” incorporated and adopted the Uniform Commercial Code circa 1965, they have operated as “federal States of States” as defined in the UCC Definitions Section. All these things calling themselves “States” — except for one—are actually corporate franchises of the parent corporations located in Delaware or Washington, DC, respectively, and are private, for-profit organizations no different from General Electric or Macy’s and having NO public office, authority, oath, or bond at all. They are merely “governmental services corporations” in the business of doing what? Providing governmental services to you as a consumer.

All these “courts” you see calling themselves various fictitious names like the “SUPREME COURT FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA” are operated by members of the American Bar Association— all declared to be foreign agents of the British Crown employed as bill collectors. They are all corporations imposing their services upon you. Both the American Bar Association and the Internal Revenue Service are bill collection agencies employed by Northern Trust, Inc. and both have functioned as foreign crime syndicates on our shores for longer than anyone living can remember.

If “Snopes” were worth a hoot in Hell as a fact checking organization, they would have already discovered all of this and a LOT more, so my advice is to stop taking what a couple liberal Californians have to say about reality as Gospel and start using your own eyes, ears, and minds to check your own facts. Get off your lazy rumps and read the founding documents of this country for yourselves.

Go check out the Definitive Treaty of Peace known as the Treaty of Paris 1783. There you will find that two kinds of people exist in this country—– the “free sovereign and independent people of the United States” (that’s us) and the “inhabitants”—– subjects of the British Crown allowed to “reside” here (the members of the Bar and various other “public servants”) who are obligated under Article IV, Section 3, Clause 2 to provide us with “essential governmental services”.

AFTER you have read the facts for yourselves, check out our sworn and published affidavit of probable cause: “You Know Something Is Wrong When…..An American Affidavit of Probable Cause” which is available on Amazon.

Am I a judge? You’d better believe I am. I am among a handful of actual Common Law Judges in America and where I operate my court—on the land—-no admiralty court has any right to stand (See Milligan Ex Parte, 1866).

I am operating the actual Public Common Law Court required by Amendment VII as part of the American Common Law Continental Court System that predates all “federal” and “territorial” courts by 200 years. I am NOT a member of the Bar Association, and for your information, no actual judge having jurisdiction over the land can be a member of the Bar Association. All members of the Bar owe allegiance to a foreign government and are here by treaty (See Bar Association Treaty of 1947) and are precluded from holding ANY public office by The Constitution. Read it and weep.

And wake up. NOW.   http://www.annavonreitz.com

See this article and over 100 others on Anna’s website here:  www.annavonreitz.com
Also see the post Judge Anna von Reitz: The Jurisdiction of the Land on this subject.