Tag Archives: Law of the Land

Judge Anna von Reitz: A One-Page Reduction of the Situation

Re-posted, with thanks, from Paulstramer.net. From April 14.

***

Thursday, April 14, 2016

A One Page Reduction of the Situation

WAKE UP! WAKE UP!

I have spent so many days explaining and explaining and trying to drum this into people’s conscious awareness so now, I have reduced it down to simple graphic form and a single page.

by Anna Von Reitz

These private corporate tribunals are only “giving an appearance of justice” —- which the courts boldly state in their own published rules—- and you can believe them or not, based on your own experience.

Governmental Services Corporation Dates of Operation Operational Code

United States of America, Inc. 1868 – 1999 Federal Code Titles 1-50

(under bankruptcy administration) 1933 – 1999

UNITED STATES, INC. 1944 – 2015 Title 50

THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 2009 – United Nations Law

USA INC. 1944 – Puerto Rican Law

Your political status determines your “law” and your “persona” so long as that corporation exists and you are “enfranchised” by it. .

United States of America Person —- “John Mark Doe” a foreign situs trust—– subject to Federal Code

UNITED STATES PERSON ——- “JOHN MARK DOE” a Roman Civil trust —— subject to Title 50

THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA/USA —— “JOHN M. DOE” a public transmitting utility– subject to United Nations Law and/or Puerto Rican law.

Obviously, nobody is enfranchised by the United States of America, Inc. anymore and the old Federal Code is out the window. Obviously, too, since the UNITED STATES is insolvent and under liquidation since 2015, Title 50 is gone, too, and anyone operating as “JOHN MARK DOE” is fair game for international creditors.

What remains on the board is THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, INC. and USA, INC. —- and people can choose to be “enfranchised” by both of these entities and be subject to both UN law and Puerto Rican law—- or they can wake the hell up and reclaim their birthright status and live as free men under the United States Statutes-at-Large and not be “enfranchised” at all.

You have a CHOICE. You can live as a free man or as a corporate franchise operator.
What’s it going to be?

You can live under the Law of the Land — the Ten Commandments, the lawful Constitution, the United States Statutes-at-Large or not. What’s it going to be?

You can live under the Law of the Sea — either as workers employed by the United Nations Corporation or as chattel collateral standing good for the debts of an already bankrupt Puerto Rican Electric Company.

Your call.

What’s it going to be?

Source: Paulstramer.net

Judge Anna Maria Riezinger: Crucial Information For All County Sheriffs, Police Departments, Officers, Federal Agents–Specifics On Law Enforcement Versus Peacekeeping

Re-posted, with thanks, from this January 9 post at Paulstramer.net. Please visit there on an ongoing basis for the latest updated and archived articles from Judge Anna, and also visit Judge Anna’s site for pdfs.

***

Judge Anna explains here the difference between Sheriffs on the land (where all law is the law of the land or Common Law) who are elected by people associating freely as landowners in their counties, publicly bonded, and with an oath of public office, engaged in the business of Peacekeeping, and in enforcing organic law including the Constitution, versus Sheriffs working as Law-Enforcement officers of Federal States or Federal Counties which are incorporated entities and franchises of US, Inc., which latter are essentially working in a private capacity for a private corporation, much like private security officers at Malls.

She notes that such Sheriffs are really operating in the jurisdiction of the Sea, and should not continue to call themselves Sheriffs as this could be seen as a condition of constructive fraud, for which they could be held accountable, since there are no Sheriffs on the Sea.

Also of note here is mention of the arbitrary 1976 Congressional vacating of State Offices and State Laws to the trusteeship of the United Nations, which further ensures that Sheriffs and other law-enforcement officers–for such Federal agencies as “the FBI, FEMA, DHS, BATF, IRS, and the host of other quasi-law enforcement “agencies” out there” are not working in a governmental capacity, but rather in a private capacity, for private interests, including banks, and have no governmental or other authority over the people of the United States.

Concerned, patriotic Sheriffs –and any American –interested in securing the present and future of the United States of America as a free and peaceful and sovereign nation not ruled by international banking interests or the United Nations/Agenda 21/Agenda 2030 global government crowd may be interested in taking the free online Common Law and Constitutional course being offered by the National Liberty Alliance. As posted just recently on Starship Earth, 1000 Sheriffs have currently signed up with Sheriff Mack and the CSPOA–Constitutional Sheriffs and Peace Officers Association–so far.

***

Specifics for Sheriffs and Federal Agents Regarding the Difference Between “Law Enforcement” and “Peacekeeping” – by Judge Anna Maria Riezinger

This information is crucial and needs to get into the hands of all 3100 County Sheriffs and all Police Departments and all Officers and Federal Agents Nationwide. Please help by broadcasting, reading, making videos, printing pamphlets, hand-delivering, and talking to all those you know.

The Articles of Confederation, The Declaration of Independence, and The Constitution are Organic Law of the Land. The Law of the Land is all Common Law. It functions on the land jurisdiction of the United States and is attached to it.

A Common Law Court functions only within the geographically defined boundaries it serves. All the offices associated with a Common Law jurisdiction or a Common Law Court including the Office of Sheriff are by definition Public Offices. They are administered under the Organic Law and the Public Law of the United States known as the United States Statutes at Large.

All Public Offices serve the government “of the people, for the people, and by the people”. All Public Offices are created and maintained by unincorporated body politics—- free associations of landowners and other members of the “free sovereign and independent people of the United States”.

As you can see from reading Amendment VII, all conflicts arising between people and affecting private property of value in excess of $20 are owed service by a Common Law Court.

The Sheriff on the land is responsible for the enforcement of the Organic Law of our nation, including The Constitution, and the Public Law. He is the highest peacekeeping officer in America within the boundaries of his County. He has sweeping powers to deputize men and commandeer equipment, facilities, and supplies to secure the peace and guarantee the enforcement of the Organic Law. A Sheriff on the land is elected by the people acting in free association as landowners in their counties. He has a Public Bond and he has an Oath of Public Office.

But, when you incorporate anything, you remove it from the jurisdiction of the land and from the Law of the Land.

Thus, when our Counties and States incorporated as franchises of the Federal “United States, Inc.”—either out of stupidity or treasonous intent, they became franchises in the same sense as we have franchises of Dairy Queen. They no longer function as our organic counties or states. They function as private corporate entities no different than Burger King or Walmart. They have no authority as government, and are merely “governmental services corporations”.

All the offices that were public offices associated with them immediately also devolve to merely private status. Thus the “Sheriff” working for such a “Federal County” or “Federal State” is no longer a Public Official. He is a private security officer working for a private corporation, no different than a mall cop working for Walmart. The fact that he may or may not be working on a contract requiring him to provide “law enforcement services” in a particular county in no way imbues him or his office with any governmental authority or immunity.

His job is to ride herd on corporations in general and employees of federal corporations especially. These corporations set up as franchises of the parent federal corporation are all required to abide by the in-house rules of the “United States, Inc.” or whatever federal corporation is acting as Queen Bee at the time. Theirs is a government “of the corporation, by the corporation, and for the corporation”.

His job does not involve enforcement of the Organic or Public Laws. His job is merely “code, statute, and regulation enforcement” that is meant to apply solely to corporations and corporate entities— trusts, transmitting utilities, and so on. He does not have a Public Bond, does not have an Oath of Public Office, he’s in the same status as a Mall Cop and has no lawful right to deputize anyone or commandeer anything. He is in private rather than public capacity and should not continue to call himself a “Sheriff” because there are no Sheriffs operating within the international jurisdiction of the sea and continuing to call himself a “Sheriff” sets up a condition of constructive fraud for which he can be held accountable.

The same applies to the FBI, FEMA, DHS, BATF, IRS, and the host of other quasi-law enforcement “agencies” out there. They continue to act as if they had something to do with the lawful government of the United States and as if they had some authority over the people of the United States, when in fact they do not and never have had. The rule is that if you can’t do something acting in your private capacity, you can’t do it, period, not at all. If you can’t bust down your neighbor’s door and face-slam his teenage daughter and ransack their house looking for imaginary “contraband” as Joe Average, you can’t do it as a Mall Cop, either.

The only people who have that kind of authority are “Peacekeeping Officers” working for the unincorporated government of the land, and they are required to abide by the Organic Laws and Public Laws and to operate under Common Law when they do it.

In 1976 the rats in “Congress” operating as the Board of Directors of the “United States, Inc.”—- a doing business name of the International Monetary Fund— declared with no lawful authority at all, that all our state offices and state laws were “vacated” and released to the trusteeship of the United Nations. See the International Organizations Immunity Act and the Foreign Sovereign Immunity Act. Of course, nobody bothered to tell us.

This had the affect of further removing all Federal County and Federal State and Federal Agency personnel from any valid Public Office. Even though these “agencies” have continued to use the names of our public government offices and units, such as the “Bureau of Land Management” and “U.S. Small Business Administration” and “Sheriff of Macon County”—- these are merely trademarked names, like brand names under new management, and have no meaning in terms of their actual authority or function.

The FBI Agents out in Oregon are acting under Color of Law and pretending to be under the administration of our lawful government, when in reality they are just hired commercial mercenaries acting at the behest of unknown private interests— mostly banks— and, as a result, they are engaged in armed racketeering on American Soil, against the American people, who are in fact paying their salaries via a criminally mismanaged “governmental services contract”.

So it is really very simple for anyone to determine exactly who these people are and what their status is. Are they working for an incorporated entity or not? If yes, they are working in a private capacity and have no lawful public function at all.

Virtually all the Sheriffs in this country have been converted in this surreptitious way from being “peacekeeping officers” to being “law enforcement officers” — leaving nobody in charge of enforcing the Organic Laws and Public Laws of this nation, except the People themselves, even though the People have continued to loyally pay through the nose for “Sheriffs” and “Deputies” and other such “services” aplenty.

Now, given this as a background—- all you “Sheriffs” and “Deputies” and “FBI Agents” and others involved in this travesty— have to ask yourselves two questions:

1. Am I working for a corporation?
2. Am I therefore working in private or public capacity?

If you work all day enforcing “codes, statutes, and regulations” you are a Mall Cop working for some version or franchise of the current “federal corporation” as a private “law enforcement officer” operating under international law. Any presentation or pretense otherwise is constructive fraud. You have no public office, no public bond, no capacity to exert any governmental authority on anybody.

If you work all day long enforcing the Organic Law and Public Law you are a Peacekeeping Officer acting with all the authority of the actual government owed to the land jurisdiction of the people of the United States behind you.

All corporations and all employees of all corporations are obligated to obey the Organic and Public Laws of this nation and if you do not, you are acting as an “Outlaw” on the land or a “Pirate” on the sea—–that is, as criminals.

You are also perpetuating war crimes against unarmed non-combatants when you trespass upon private property and pretend to have any jurisdiction over it. The people of this country have the absolute right to defend their lives and their property with armed force, and even more so, when the threat and trespass is being offered by their own misdirected employees who are required to provide them with Good Faith Service.

Everyone on both sides of this circumstance needs to wake up.

All those presently acting as “corporate Sheriffs” and “FBI Agents” and “DHS Agents” and so on need to recognize the very, very thin ice they are skating on and be very circumspect in their actions.

At the same time, they need to be asking themselves— hey, wait a minute! I am not a “citizen” of District of Columbia nor an employee of the bankrupt District of Columbia Municipal Corporation, and even less am I aware of being a UN Corporation employee! What is going on here~! What am I doing? There’s no parachute for me. I have been recognized as merely a private corporate Mall Cop, trespassing on private property, which is against the Public Law!

And those militia men are right. They are here to enforce the Organic and Public Law of this nation.

In most cases, the “corporate Sheriffs” love this country and want to serve their communities, they are just clueless about the insane web that has been cast around them and the way that their authority and office has been altered via the mechanisms of incorporation.

There is nothing stopping any of these men from reclaiming their own political status as “one of the free sovereign and independent people of the United States” and occupying the actual vacated Public Office of Sheriff. There is then nothing stopping them from deputizing as many men as they deem necessary to arrest the criminals responsible for misdirecting and misinforming them and causing all this harm to this country and the people they are bound to serve.

PS—- Yes, this DOES mean that every improper “federal action” from Ruby Ridge to Waco to the Bundy Ranch has been absolutely, totally against the Organic and Public Law of the United States and those who participated in and carried out these actions under Color of Law are international criminals guilty of multiple capital crimes and/or trespass offenses.

Janet Reno and G.W. and Bill Clinton and all the other Party Hearties responsible for these and other crimes against the American People need to be rounded up and turned over international courts of record for trial as war criminals guilty of capital “crimes of aggression” against the peaceful non-combatant people of the United States.

When we finally unravel the story of what went on with the Twin Towers attack, there will be plenty more to add to the docket.
—————————————
See this article and over 100 others on Anna’s website here:www.annavonreitz.com

***

Re-posted, with thanks, from Paulstramer.net. Please visit there on an ongoing basis for the latest updated and archived articles from Judge Anna, and also visit Judge Anna’s site for pdfs.

For articles by Judge Anna being re-posted here with brief commentary on an ongoing basis, in efforts to distribute the researched information and advice she is putting out, as well as as to publicize all ongoing efforts to restore the USA to peace and freedom, please check in at this page: The Ongoing Fight to Restore the USA: Collecting Judge Anna von Reitz’s posts.

On this subject, you can also check in at The Truth About US Govt. posts, an ongoing series which posts essays and articles from Judge Anna as well as other historians, investigative researchers, legal experts, and journalists on this subject, as well as my own notes as I follow along.

Please share this widely with all Sheriffs, Law-Enforcement personnel, and Federal agencies and agents, as well as other concerned and patriotic Americans, thanks.

Judge Anna Maria Riezinger Offers Some Clarity on Common Law, the Suppression of the lawful Common Law Court System, and the Current, Continued Use of Foreign Admiralty/Federal Martial Common Law Courts

Re-posted, with many thanks, from this linked page at Paulstramer.net. Please visit there on an ongoing basis for the latest updated and archived articles from Judge Anna, and also visit Judge Anna’s site for pdfs.

For articles by Judge Anna being re-posted here with brief commentary on an ongoing basis, in efforts to distribute the researched information and advice she is putting out, as well as as to publicize all ongoing efforts to restore the USA to peace and freedom, please check in at this page: The Ongoing Fight to Restore the USA: Collecting Judge Anna von Reitz’s posts. On this subject, you can also check in at The Truth About US Govt. posts, an ongoing series which posts essays and articles from Judge Anna as well as other historians, investigative researchers, legal experts, and journalists on this subject, as well as my own notes as I follow along.

***

Judge Anna responds to critics publishing critiques in The Oregonian with a simple explication of Common Law, and details how it is still the one and only Law of the Land. She also explains what our current court system is based on, and why it does not relate to the jurisdiction of the Land. (All highlights below mine.)

***

To Betsy Hammond of the Oregonian RE “self appointed judge” showing up.
on January 12, 2016 at 4:48 PM, updated January 12, 2016 at 5:55 PM

In reference to your recent story in The Oregonian in which you said:

“In late November, Anna Maria Riezinger, an Alaska woman who claims to be Judge Anna von Rietz under the same inaccurate reading of the Constitution that Doucette uses, ruled that the members of Congress, the president and the U.S. treasury secretary all committed crimes and directed U.S. marshals and FBI agents to arrest them.

Last week, Riezinger issued a statement about the Harney occupation. In it, she wrote that “The Hammonds and the Bundy Family are Priority Creditors of all the (government agencies) which are now or which have operated in this country in the past. …They and their countrymen are owed the patent to all land within the geographically defined boundaries of their respective states, free and clear of liens, encumbrances, or other presumptions.”

Hundreds of people who have used similar sovereign citizen arguments to justify failing to pay federal income taxes, getting drivers licenses or other government requirements have never prevailed in any court.”
— Betsy Hammond

________________
Ms. Hammond,

In the first place, I never actually said any such thing. I explained the law and its implications for the members of the law enforcement community. You should read before you gossip and mindlessly repeat sensationalist headlines.

If I am not legitimately exactly what I say I am— a Judge operating the Common Law jurisdiction of the Alaska State Superior Court — how is it that I have functioned in that Public Office for three years now, and have not been arrested for “impersonating” a Judge? Certainly, you have heard of me all the way to Oregon. My role is not exactly a secret, is it?

How is it that I haven’t paid a penny in federal income tax in twenty years? That’s another good question for you to ask.

Could it be that “federal officials” are in fact nothing but private corporate officers with no Public Office at all, and that they are wildly out of compliance with the only commercial contract allowing their presence on our soil?

I published their Dun and Bradstreet Numbers in our sworn, autographed, sealed and published affidavit of probable cause, “You Know Something Is Wrong When…..An American Affidavit of Probable Cause” which is available on Amazon.com. I can also produce their Registered Agents, EIN Numbers, and lots of additional evidence to prove that what you think of as “your government” is in fact not your government.

Your government has been incorporated and via that simple mechanism has been usurped into the foreign and international jurisdiction of the sea and placed under the Law of the Sea, not the Law of the Land which you, as an American, are owed.

Except for people like me, the Organic Law of this country— The Declaration of Independence, The Articles of Confederation, The Constitution for the united States of America, and the United States Statutes at Large are not being enforced. And now you know the reason.

If your interest in providing a “balanced” reporting of the facts is not aroused, it should be.

It is true that a great many well-meaning patriots have gone to jail when they tried to enforce their guarantees owed to them under the Law of the Land in courts that are functioning under the Law of the Sea. So what?

Those patriots were not wrong in their basic assumptions, they were simply duped, misinformed, as you are Ms.Hammond, about the nature of institutions merely “standing for” our lawful government which is supposed to be “of the people, by the people, and for the people” and not of the corporation, by the corporation and for the corporation.

Please bother to open up a copy of any United States Constitution you can find and look at Amendment VII. There you will find that all issues of value in excess of $20 (around $500 translated to current values) must be tried at Common Law.

So like most Americans you probably assume that the courts you are familiar with are operating under the Common Law you are owed, right?

Wrong. They are operating under a form of martial common law euphemistically called “Special Admiralty”. It’s the only form of common law that the corporate federal government and its incorporated franchises operating the Federal States and Federal Counties possess.

Back in 1938 in a U.S. Supreme Court Case known as Thompkins v. Erie Railroad, the Justices admitted that there is no such thing as federal “General Common Law”, so in order to keep their incorporated Court System going, they had to fall back on a provision made at the end of the Civil War allowing military commanders to establish military common law tribunals in the Southern States for the purposes of punishing and subduing “rebels”.

This situation was addressed again by the U.S. Supreme Court in Milligan Ex Parte (1866) which still stands and it was decided that there was no excuse for the use of martial common law in areas where the local Common Law Courts were operating.

So via the process of incorporation the rats responsible made sure that the continental Common Law Courts got no support, no access to the public funding they are owed. The corporate managers simply arranged to undermine the lawful Common Law Court System so that the only “common law courts” left were the federal martial common law courts which could be used to further usurp our lawful jurisdiction.

And that is what they have done.

Foreign Admiralty courts have run rampant upon the land jurisdiction of this country and have inflicted terrible damage upon the American people and their private property assets as a result. And people like you, Ms. Hammond, have supported them in their unlawful and unprincipled acts against your neighbors and have laughed at the poor “deluded” patriots over cocktails, never realizing that this same process of racketeering and usurpation can be applied against you and your family and your friends and your neighbors, too.

The history of Nazi Germany is most instructive. It became fashionable to be a Nazi. All those common people who weren’t Nazis were looked down upon, made the brunt of jokes, gossiped about. Just like the patriots are being treated now.

At the end of the day when the truth was fully out, it turned out that the Nazis were madmen and criminals and that far from being educated or elite, they were nothing but a crime syndicate with a lot of wanna be “elitist” sycophants following like dumb cattle in their footsteps, wearing their gang colors, and parroting everything these swine said while doing every evil imaginable.

Welcome to who you really are, Ms. Hammond— one of those dumbly following along and parroting the fashionable story line without a thought in your head of your own, without an eye for the cognitive dissonance created by living as a slave while endlessly prattling about “liberty”.

I suggest you look up the word “liberty” in a dictionary, Ms. Hammond. It’s what British sailors get on shore leave. It has nothing to do with freedom.

If you want to preserve what is left of your freedom, you had better double-down on actual hardcore research of the facts instead of merely repeating what is fashionable.

Sincerely,
Judge Anna Maria Riezinger

—————————————
See this article and over 100 others on Anna’s website here:www.annavonreitz.com

Source: PaulStramer.net