Tag Archives: Mind Hacking

Ramola D/Washington’s Blog: Rohinie Bisesar: Psychiatric Illness, or Long-Term Covert Neuro-Experimentation and a “Manchurian Candidate”?

Originally published at Washington’s Blog, May 3, 2016. Thanks to Washington’s Blog for their continuing commitment to the truth on all fronts. 

The subject this story highlights is of profound concern at this site, particularly since awareness of its existence is being actively suppressed in mainstream corporate media.

In relation to this article, please see this excerpt from this recent report at the National Post:

“Bisesar said she is innocent, and needs a “body scan,” not a psychiatric assessment.

“I want to exercise my right to speak,” Bisesar said. “My lawyer is not representing me as I wish.”

Re-posting of this article in full with link-back and attribution is welcomed. –Ramola D

***

Rohinie Bisesar: Psychiatric Illness, or Long-Term Covert Neuro-Experimentation and a “Manchurian Candidate”?

(With information reported in the Toronto Sun, National Post, Toronto Life, City News, and other media.)

Toronto Police Service

Rohinie Bisesar’s “Wanted” Image/Toronto Police Service

Toronto Police

Rosemary Junor/Toronto Police image

Many things fail to add up in the case of Rohinie Bisesar, the 40-year-old financial services professional with a highly accomplished resume who was recently charged with first-degree murder in Toronto in the tragic stabbing death of a young woman unknown to her, 28-year-old newly married Rosemary Junor, who, her family notes, “was just starting out on her life.” Rohinie Bisesar has been ordered to undergo a mental health exam in advance of an impending court date of May 4.

We must question however whether mental health is the primary issue here, or if a darker scenario is at play.

Described by former colleagues and classmates as “extremely gentle,” “brilliant,” and “calm,” she was also reported by some who encountered her closer to the time period of the fatal stabbing incident on Dec 11, 2015, as odd, according to reports. During this time she apparently exhibited what some called paranoia when she reported to friends on different occasions that her purse had been ransacked and her computer hacked into, and sought briefly at one time to obtain spy cameras to record suspected tampering by work colleagues of files and property at work, according to a former boyfriend.

Delving into her background, as one reporter in Toronto Life has done, and many others reported, a rather desolate picture emerges of a highly educated professional who experienced continuous periods of unemployment and homelessness, yet who displayed remarkable resilience in continuing diligently, even seemingly obsessively, on a job search. With an MBA from highly-regarded York University, accolades from mentors and colleagues at York, where she interned and worked part-time during her studies, and financial analysis experience in respected consulting firms, she nonetheless faced inexplicable rejection in her job search on a continuous basis. Estranged somewhat from what sounds like an authoritarian family–hard-working immigrants from Guyana who ran a clothing store in Toronto–she relied on friends and colleagues for occasional handouts, a couch to sleep on, and other support.

She was well-known in certain circles. Dressed professionally, she was known to spend her days at a downtown Starbucks with her laptop, as a mostly non-paying customer, drinking hot water with cinnamon, and handing out her card to customers. She used a local gym’s change room to shower and work for hours until she was asked to stop. She has spent nights on subway trains and in the city’s underground shopping system–to prevent which, various friends and acquaintances have loaned her a place to sleep. A friend and professor from York University whom she reached out to often took her out to meals to “prevent her from starving.”

After a break-up with her boyfriend in 2014 when she returned briefly to her parents’ home, there was an incident of pushing her mother and damaging a door where her mother called the police. She was involuntarily hospitalized and forced to undergo a psychiatric evaluation–she was diagnosed with schizophrenia–and take an anti-psychotic drug, Olanzapine, which she found later to cause unshakeable drowsiness and mental fog, and stopped. During this time, she told her ex she had been hearing voices in her head since 2012, including the voice of “an old, white male Bay Street executive”. He felt he understood then all of the signs of “mania, paranoia, grandiose ambition” he had been seeing in her–through the lens of mental illness, it is implied. Notable here is a recollection from him of her asking him in spring of 2012 whether nanotechnology could control a person’s thoughts.

In an email sent from her email account to the National Post, after the violent stabbing incident of Rosemary Junor at a drugstore in the underground PATH shopping system, was a query on whether the recipient knew of professionals in nanotechnology, satellites, Artificial Intelligence, in the Military or Government. She said something had been happening to her, and this was not her normal self and she wanted to know “who and why this is happening.” She said she was “sorry for the incidence,” but that she had “felt the need to be extreme, to see if it would work.” She would normally not do such a thing, she said. In a different email she told a friend who emailed her after the attack that she was a good person, “the most good,” and that “I need to speak to the top professionals in artificial intelligence, military and government. I need to get to the bottom of something that has been quite disruptive.”

Unlikely aspects of her engaging in sudden criminal aggression against another include the fact that she has no criminal record. After a visit at the jail where she is being held, her attorney, Calvin Barry, said she was “meek and quiet” and upset, he also noted she was like a “deer in the headlights,’ and a tiny person–four foot eleven, and weighing 85 lbs.

Friend and colleague/CityNews:“The behaviour that is alleged is extremely, extremely out of character for Rohinie. (I’m) absolutely shocked. This is someone who is very gentle, very calm, very measured. She speaks almost with a whisper. Physically she is like 5’1 in heels, probably 85 lbs. soaking wet. This is someone very gentle, just makes this whole thing all the more surprising.”

Countering this image in court on Feb 3, she is reported to have spoken up in what has been characterized by media reports as “a rant about terrorism,” and to claim repeatedly that she had become the subject of covert tests by some unknown group which had affected her personality and behavior. She mentioned suspicions of being microchipped, and spoke over the judge, saying she was not mentally ill, as some suggested, but that she needed a medical scan and a chip removed. She said parts of her being had been manipulated by this chip: “It can move small aspects of me, and large aspects of me. It can see what I see, hear what I hear. It can put words in my mouth.”

Toronto Sun: I have no mental health problems,” Bisesar, 41, told the court. “I am innocent of this crime. Someone put something foreign in my mind.”

These words have been repeatedly reported in the press as “bizarre” and evidence of mental illness. The word “bizarre” in fact has been used so often to color her claims that the question of Cognitive Containment, a military mind-hacking term described in Dr. Robert Duncan’s Project Soulcatcher, denoting the deliberate containment of ideas within pre-set contexts to limit the dissemination of awareness across populations, comes to mind. Predictably, all television channels reporting the in-court events that day, latched on to that word and echoed it non-stop.

In court, her lawyer Calvin Barry spoke over her head, raising the specter of mental illness, and noting the need for a psychiatric assessment. In Canada, the finding of Not Criminally Responsible, while still a rare finding in court cases of homicide, can be administered in cases of mental incompetence.

Covert Micro-Chipping and Mind Hacking

But there is another reason to investigate this case further, which could indeed also prove grounds for mitigation: that of covert neuro-experimentation, covert microchipping, and mind hacking by military/intelligence programs, a possibility which concerned citizens and activists from World CACH (World Coalition Against Covert Harassment) and US CACH (US Coalition Against Covert Harassment) have come forward to present as a possibility which must be explored further.

Rohinie Bisesar’s claims in fact are not unusual today, they say, and are echoed by thousands who have experienced symptoms similar to hers.

Citing recorded, scientifically-conducted scans of radio-frequency-emitting implants found in the brains of others reporting symptoms of external neural control of their brains, and pointing to reports of these scanning sessions conducted by the International Center Against Covert Technologies (ICAACT), they direct attention to a vast body of literature available online currently and in books and other media, detailing an ongoing worldwide occurrence of covert neuro-experimentation and covert micro-chipping, with many cases of reporting individuals surgically removing covertly-implanted microchips from their bodies.

Richard Cain is one of these individuals, who underwent surgery to remove implants he says were covertly placed in him and his children’s bodies by doctors at a hospital in California, whom he sued. James Wahlbert has also reported the removal of covert implants. Dave Larson, initial volunteer in a medical study with the CIA, sued the CIA for further non-consensual covert implantation and experimentation with external stimulation and manipulation of his brain and body with these implants; his report includes pictures of the tiny Micro Electronic Mechanical devices removed from his body tissues. (Their reports can all be found online.)

RFID Chip Technical Info

Image from Nationalreport.net

The Radio Frequency Identifying Tag (RFID) microchip industry today is a 10-billion dollar industry and growing. Ex-IBM Executive Patrick Redmond has stated that microchips are being used in retail, in agriculture, in health services, and newly in biometric surveillance, variously for tracking consumer items, cattle, and people. They range in size and form today from the visible RFID tracking chip now being used on credit cards, the tracking Verichip, twice the size of a grain of rice, to films, powders, disappearing inks. One class of microchip, the neurostimulator implant, is being tested, developed, and used in patients for various reasons, such as to administer controlled doses of medication internally. Microchips in their most basic form carry a transponder in them, a mechanism for receiving radio frequencies, and for emitting radio frequencies. Some are inert or passive unless stimulated by an external signal; some are active in continuously emitting a signal. The radio waves emitted and received can vary in length, based on frequency; some microchips developed by Siemens and other companies are known to be trackable from space (from over 75 miles or 400,000 feet away).

Those reporting covert microchipping–as evident from many reports online, particularly at sites collecting accounts from individuals who identify themselves as non-consensual experimentees, such as ICAACT, Freedom From Covert Harassment, Surveillance Issues, ICOMW.org, and others–inevitably offer symptoms of feeling an external activation at precise points on their bodies, of feeling external electromagnetic signals invoking sudden internal sensations of heat, pain, or shock, sometimes localized pain at certain organ sites. Localized effects are not inconsistent with the intended outcomes recorded in the use of implants in the medical field. (However, here they are being reported as torture devices, the opposite of medically-healing or pain-relieving.)

Individuals often correlate these incidents of external activation to the close presence of people pointing cell phones at them. Many also note the experience of signals on their bodies directed at them from a cell antenna or cell tower–a phenomenon recently corroborated by senior ex-DARPA scientist Paul Batcho, who disclosed that a certain range of frequencies had been appropriated for exclusive use by the military, and was now being used to send specific frequencies to assault “targeted individuals” who have been made the unfortunate subjects of these illegitimate military/intelligence covert experiments and operations.

Covert Neuro-Experimentation

In fact, reports of non-consensual neuro-experimentation abound, with many reporting sensations of feeling repeatedly remotely accessed around various regions of their head, experiencing constant ringing or tinnitus in ears, sharp localized pains to certain regions of their brains, sudden onset and surcease of strong emotions, as if externally induced, sudden onset of untoward thoughts, as if externally induced, strange dreams, as if externally-induced, the electronic play of voices inside their heads, often issuing directives in repetitious fashion, and “cloned” sensations of smell, hearing, touch, taste, and sight, meaning experiencing strong sensations of smell and touch or auditory or visual images, when no physical correlate for these sensations exists, as if specific parts of their brain, stimulated, had produced these sensations and images.

In other accounts, individuals report the experience of suddenly having no control over their voluntary bodily functions, such as in moving their arms or legs, in speaking, or in controlling urination/excretion, and feeling accessed biologically remotely in directive ways. Authors Tana Winkler (My Remote Neural Monitoring Experience) and Tyrone Dew (The Illuminati Got Me! Directed Energy Weapon Terrorism) have both recounted experiences of this robotizing nature in their books. People have also reported externally-arising sensations of sexual stimulation and assault, and experiences of electromuscular shock on different parts of their bodies.

In the more public world of mainstream television, we have all witnessed anchors around the world, including Judge Judy, suddenly lose control of their speaking faculties and issue forth disjointed streams of incomprehensible gibberish.

Remote Access of Human Brain: Patents, Whistleblowers, Current Neuroscience, and DARPA Research Contracts

What all of this points to is the remote access of human brains and the remote biological manipulation of human bodies.

Are these entirely covert programs of experimentation by our military and Intelligence agencies? Or do patents exist in the public domain for some of these purported technologies?

It turns out they do. Patents and military contracts exist, among others, for the remote access, harvesting, and manipulation of human brain waves, for altering brain states, for deep brain stimulation, for transcranial magnetic stimulation, for brain entrainment, for the electromagnetic disruption of neural networks and processes.

Whistleblowing scientists have come forward to reveal their part in developing some of these technologies. Dr. Richard Alan Miller has recounted working for the US Navy and developing Synthetic Telepathy, also known as Voice to Skull or Voice of God or Microwave Hearing technology, where voice signals are modulated onto microwaves and transmitted into the back of a person’s head, inducing within his or her brain the clear auditory sensation of externally-produced voices, in a phenomenon of hearing voices inside one’s head which psychiatrists may unknowingly or knowingly mis-diagnose as a symptom of schizophrenia.

Image

Voice to Skull Hypnosis – Synthetic Telepathy

Dr. Robert Duncan has come forward to describe DOD/CIA projects in cybernetic mind-control, weaponized neuropsychology, and bio-communication controls, which include the integrated use of Artificial Intelligence, biophysics, and behavioral science in the creation of remote-control Electronic Brain Links, cerebral cortex cloning, Mind Hiving, Neural Linguistic Programming. and more. Dr. Barrie Trower has spoken extensively of microwave radiation weaponry that has been developed by the UK Navy, for whom he has worked.

soulcatcherDr. Duncan, who along with others in his Mind Hacking Strategy group interviewed both Intelligence agency whistleblowers and 650 volunteers who reported experiencing external control of their brains and bodies, writes extensively of mind-hacking experimentation projects being run by the DOD/CIA in Project Soulcatcher: the prime objective seems to be absolute control of the human mind, and absolute control of populations, even as other, Globalist and eugenicist objectives also play out. Microchips may not be needed for remote mind hacking. “In a direct mind-hack, spoofing is done with synthetic telepathy, a bio-communications technology. Sounds and voices can be forced into a target’s perception.” He discusses various techniques shared with his research group by whistleblowers, including brain entrainment of frequencies, recurring hypnotic states induced in an individual’s brain by radio control–Radio Hypnotic Inter-Cerebral Control/Electronic Dissolution of Memory–RHIC/EDOM, hypnotically entrained “forced speech,” and programming “to perform certain actions or maintain certain attitudes by radio signal.”

Current Neuroscience: Inside and Outside the Military

This is, we are told, by a President sinking most of his budget in Defense, and $50 million of a $100 million investment in the BRAIN (Brain Research Through Advancing Innovative Neurotechnologies) Initiative in DARPA, the Decade of the Brain.

Mainstream Neuroscience has also made astonishing, if not terrifying advances. Neuroscientists outside the military/Intelligence world, from academia and clinical practice, have started to speak openly about the remote accessing of people’s brains, of Neural Imaging wherein everything a person sees, whether physically or electronically, off a screen, can be picked up remotely (as EMF/low frequency radio waves) and reproduced/re-translated into image format via the intermediate use of a computer program functioning as an Electronic Brain Link. Similarly, technologies exist to pick up and record thoughts, ideas, memories–all issuing forth as extremely low frequency (and long wavelength) radiation, in the range of 0.5 to 30 Hertz–even the “voice in your head/your inner voice” can be read now, as pre-vocalized thought. Applications in Neurocrime and Predictive Policing–reading your mind to find out if you are a likely criminal or plotting a criminal act–very much in Minority Report style–are currently being studied, discussed at conferences, and discoursed about in Neuroscience programs. This Youtube playlist  collects many related videos, including the Davos 2016 videos, on current-day neuroethics and neuroscience.

Ongoing and recent DARPA contracts seem to be probing the myriad ways that military neuroscientists, neuropsychologists, behavioral scientists, cyberneticists, transhumanists, and Artificial Intelligence programmers can use to disrupt, alter, modify, transform, transhumanize (with nanotechnology introduced into neural networks), retard, and deform the human brain. These are not exaggerations. This is weaponized neuroscience, and the intent is Control of the Human Mind. While Universities make weak attempts to discuss neuroethics, the military has no such qualms and rushes in where academics might otherwise fear to tread. (Many Universities are currently receiving Defense funding and working on projects for the military, including in Neuroscience.) Projects include the disruption of normal narrative processes of sequential thinking, brain-computer interfaces via implants to control thoughts and feelings, and others.

These are DARPA’s public-domain contracts. The DoD has a dark(er) side: the Black Budget, Covert Ops. What manner of experiments, of operations, of intentions exist here, do you think? It is theorized by some that the Black Budget is vast and capacious, runs up to trillions of dollars, and because it is classified, is able to run all sorts of dubious experimental operations on humanity, with zero accountability. These would be Covert Operations–including covert microchipping and covert neuro-experimentation–of the kind that thousands worldwide are reporting today, including in Canada and the USA.

So Should the Criminal Justice System Rely Today Solely on Psychiatry–or Start Including Neuroscience?

Given these current realities of Neuro-Experimentation on vast numbers of people, where should we place psychiatry today in the courtroom? To this day, psychiatrists often function as experts, swooping in to mark a person psychiatrically ill or mentally competent, as the case may be. They are seen as ultimate authorities in determining mental soundness, mental fitness. On their word, whole futures revolve. In a murder trial, this might well mean the difference between life and death for someone facing conviction.

But someone reporting hearing voices in their head today, or suspecting the presence of a microchip somewhere on their bodies, or feeling they have been directed or steered toward an action foreign to their very character and core, as Rohinie Bisesar contends, can perhaps no longer be arbitrarily and unequivocally seen as mentally ill. All her claims: of feeling her senses have been taken over, of experiencing forced speech, and of having aspects of herself removed, of hearing voices in her head, and particular voices at that, are described as cerebral cortex cloning and synthetic telepathy experimentation projects in DOD/CIA-derived information in Project Soulcatcher.

So we must conclude there could very well be a Neuroscience Experimentation component here, that cannot be ignored until it is fully investigated.

Long History of Covert Experimentation, MK ULTRA, and Manchurian Candidates

One more factor of note must be considered. The US has a long history of covert experimentation on non-consenting citizens, and so does Canada. Canada was in fact part of the CIA’s MK ULTRA experiments; some of the most egregious radiation experiments were conducted on children at Canada’s McGill University.

One discovered motive in trauma-based mind control experiments under MK ULTRA was the CIA’s interest in creating sleeper assassins or Manchurian candidates–people who would be steered toward committing assassinations for the state, even if their base personality would prevent such actions. They could literally be split multiply into multiple personalities–some aspects of them lifted and removed, some aspects moved in, some small, some large, as Rohinie Bisesar put it–so their new, altered self could engage in actions of violence abhorrent to their own, earlier self.

In the case of Rohinie Bisesar, two young women have abruptly lost their lives and futures. Rosemary Junor was tragically stabbed to death (although she survived the incident, she died in hospital a few days later). Rohinie Bisesar allegedly did the stabbing, and quite possibly faces life in prison.

Although Miriam Carey–who was shot by the Secret Service at the Capitol after a chase succeeding her crashing a barrier near the White House with her car (with her 1-year-old child in the backseat)–and Aaron Alexis, the Navy Yard shooter, who shot several, and Myron May, the Florida State University shooter and ex-District Attorney, who shot many (with both killed by police), were all three deemed mentally ill and schizophrenic for having reported hearing voices in their heads, signs exist to suggest that all three were non-consensual subjects of covert neuro-experimentation instead. Aaron Alexis had in fact complained of ELF radiation attacks and had inscribed on his rifle the words “My ELF Weapon.” Myron May had also complained of hearing voices through walls, and being covertly assaulted with directed-energy weapons. Miriam Carey had said Barack Obama had spoken to her inside her head; among other patents noted above, the technology exists to accurately “clone” anyone’s voice.

In a Time of Mass Deception, Mass Shootings, and False Flags

Mass shootings in our midst these days often seem to point to manufactured false flag events, with the objective being gun control–perhaps Aaron Alexis and Myron May and Miriam Carey (attempted sleeper assassin?) fall into this category. What might be the objective though, in a case like Rohinie Bisesar’s? In the US, the government has given itself permission to engage in Psy Ops on the populace, and to engage in the dissemination of government propaganda, by Executive Order. The US has also signed and is implementing Global Policing agreements, where UN policing initiatives are superseding local ones. Is this the case also in Canada?

In Rohinie Bisesar, we have a highly-educated, accomplished, and personable woman from the upper middle-class with a known personality of calm, focus, and gentleness, and no criminal record, supposedly sliding in adulthood into sudden mental illness, loss of control over her life, unexplained unemployment, and finally, violent “extremism” as she abruptly destroys her own life and career in a fit of unprovoked aggression in a drugstore, stabbing to eventual death a complete stranger, with a kitchen knife. Hearing voices, displaying paranoia, unable to find or keep employment, she is hustled off to psychiatrists, named schizophrenic, and prescribed neuroleptics to further retard her mental functioning. The narrative we are left with is that sudden onset of schizophrenia, “violent extremism,” and uncontrolled aggression can emanate from the most unlikely of sources, and can erupt at any unexpected time, even from among the ranks of the highly-educated, the highly-accomplished, the seemingly calm, gentle, and personable, and from any genre of citizenry, including the educated, hard-working Guyanese immigrant of South Asian descent.

One must ask therefore–if this is instead, as seems plausible, a case of covert neuro-experimentation, where Rohinie Bisesar has been a long-term unwitting victim of targeting by shadowy military/Intelligence experimenters, subjecting her to synthetic telepathy (voices in the head), organized stalking (at work, with her job search), electronic harassment (covert microchipping/Radio-frequency Hypnotic Inter-Cerebral Cloning), as she suspected, although she attributed this to possible nanotechnology (which might indeed play a role, since nanotechnology is currently raining down on us via chem trail/aerosol)–if the underlying agenda here is:

1) To further enshrine the Psychiatrist as the ultimate authority in society, and Psychiatry as the ultimate tool to determine fitness for living in society, with the drug industry at its core, eager to remove thinking minds from society, with forced psychiatric evaluations and mental-fog-inducing neuroleptics;

2) To attempt to justify the current covert targeting of thousands, if not millions, with electronic/scalar/sonic neuroweaponry, covert microchipping, and organized stalking (Psy Ops/CO-INTELPRO) in which whole communities are recruited, as necessary Behavior Modification aspects of the already-being-rolled-out methodologies of Predictive Policing/Neuro Policing (neurochipping/mind-reading via harvesting of EMFs/continuous biometric and physical surveillance), and Community Policing (where neighbors are encouraged to surveil, track, watch, and report neighbors), of those arbitrarily and eugenically deemed dangerous or expendable by the State;

3) To rationalize the extreme drive toward full-spectrum surveillance in the US and Canada and worldwide: surely we All need to be continuously monitored, chipped, tracked, and surveilled because, however educated or personable or non-criminal we are, any one of us could go off our rockers at any time in our lives, and launch hacking or stabbing or shooting incidents on our fellow-humans; “Countering Violent Extremism” with Predictive Policing and Community Policing could be on the menu to being rationalized in this way.

4) To valorize Policing, policing budgets, and innovative policing methods which are already beginning to include increasingly invasive forms of biometric surveillance–fingerprints, irises, gait, skull-shapes, face-structure, DNA–and bump those up via Neuroscience to brainprints (one’s signature set of EMFs emanating from our individual brains), heartprints, and so on.

All these are signals of totalitarianism, and unless we as a society begin to openly and fully acknowledge and address the very real monsters in our midst of covert neuro-experimentation, covert micro-chipping, and covert assault with electronic/scalar/sonic neuroweaponry which thousands are reporting today–even as massive State-sponsored attempts to suppress public awareness of these atrocities rise, with a silenced/complicit corporate media and active publishing of disinformation online, as in Wikipedia and Rational Wiki–we condemn ourselves to continued manipulation, deception, and control en masse.

Not “Bizarre” as in “Insane”: It’s Neuro-Experimentation

Instead of mis-characterizing reports of remote mind control and neuro-chipping as “bizarre,” reporters with integrity could start investigating, researching, and reporting on Neuroscience experimentation, patents and contracts for remote read/write projects on brains, Neurocrime, and Predictive Policing.  Attorneys and judges in the court system could get informed on the very real potential, via Deep Brain Stimulation, pulsed microwave induction, and radio-frequency cortex cloning of external neural influence of human thoughts, behavior, and actions. Psychiatrists and psychologists could get informed too, on Synthetic Telepathy, Deep Brain Stimulation, neurostimulator implants, HAARP’s abilities to effect mind-control via ELF (Extremely Low Frequency radiation), remote influencing of brains, and related subjects.

All of society could wake up and demand that the sociopathic and eugenicist Neuro-experimentation and electronic harassment programs being run by the DOD/CIA and other Intel/Security agencies—the CIA/FBI/NSA/DIA/”shadow government” complex—under various covers of “national security” worldwide, as reported by whistleblowers, are stopped immediately, and the top Government perpetrators held accountable.

Perhaps Rohinie Bisesar’s case is a wake-up call to all of us. This is no longer Kansas. It’s 2016, institutional ethics is on the wane, and stealth warfare is on the rise. Our brains are being studied, researched, remotely stimulated and influenced, remotely read, and remotely “written” or altered.

If we don’t individually wake up now and collectively work to change our current reality, it is entirely possible we and our children–as independently thinking and acting humans, as sovereigns entitled to the sanctity and privacy of our thoughts— won’t have much of a future left, very soon.

***

Dr. Nick Begich/Vinny Eastwood Show/Military Experimentation, Mind Control, Domain of the Mind: Technological Grid Prevents People From Thinking

This is just such a stellar interview by the engaging Vinny Eastwood of The Vinny Eastwood Show of investigative science and technology researcher and reporter Dr. Nick Begich (whose website is EarthPulse Press) that I wanted to make a separate post of it, just to call attention to a couple very important things he focuses on. Of course it’s always enlightening to listen to Nick Begich, and to read his books, which are meticulously researched and footnoted; his books are vital in any researching of HAARP, chem trails, weather modification, mind control technologies, but I am increasingly impressed by researchers and alternative media interviewers today who are unafraid–unlike the ER-coverNYT, Washington Post, Intercept, Globe, CNN, and other MSM parties–to speak openly, candidly, and freely of the covert military experimentation projects that are currently underway–and have been for decades apparently–all over the world using “technetronic” or EMF/scalar/sonic weapons, as well as HAARP and weather modification technologies which are not merely modifying the weather but assisting in mass mind control (via HAARP and ELFs–a post on this from Dr. Nick Begich and Jeanne Manning here).

Humans in small and large numbers–Targeted Individuals and Mass Populations (which pretty much covers both you and me)–are being experimented on with these new weapons (issues covered here under Human Rights and many posts) because we are looking currently at highly techno-militarized governments seeking to increase their techno-military activities as they develop scarier and scarier weapons–in classified military and intelligence projects, and in secrecy–when technology of this kind, which allows humans to remotely manipulate and control other humans, as Dr. Begich notes, should really be open to public discussion. The military and government intent seems to be to pre-empt and shut down any hint of human protest through individual and mass mind control –and these weapons are being used currently in this way, on activists and others: Targeted Individuals. And unless and until humans rise up, get informed en masse,  about these horrific brain and body control technologies, and protest, this will not stop.

Corporate media of course helps keep the masses ignorant about these issues and in a perpetual state of panic over various contrived and enacted events–a state of consciousness which disallows people from exercising calm judgment, reason, and thinking for themselves, notes Dr. Begich. Government today, Dr. Begich stresses, is merely continuing what it’s been doing for decades–as we know now, half a million Americans have been experimented on without consent over the past 4 decades, as per Clinton’s confession (linked here earlier)–and no-one prosecuted or jailed the criminals who engaged in this research. Governments today are supremely focused on Mind Control and information control–and in the US today have exempted themselves from requiring Informed Consent by classifying their research in the name of National Security, and disassociating Informed Consent from Classified Research (in my view, an absolutely shameful, immoral, and corrupt circumstance which will be spotlighted here soon, and which should be vocally challenged and ended). We are seeing today “an increase in secrecy which serves to make Government opaque and the people transparent”–when it should really be the other way, he points out.

We have entered a time period  when what’s of prime importance, notes Dr. Begich, is the Domain of the Mind (and mass media will never cover this apparently, they’ve done a good job so far of kowtowing to “authority” and not touching it, except if at all, in derision, using the term “conspiracy theory” to dismiss/deny/avoid having to cover). Mind control weapons which include remote transmission technologies such as Synthetic Telepathy–remotely modulating sound or voices into people’s heads, using microwave radiation--have been developed, and are being tested and used; these can be used to influence politicians and people in government, just as much as the ordinary man or woman on the street, something he has shared with the EU Commission in 1998.

One interesting bit of information I don’t recall learning about earlier is a Navy document he uncovered in 2006, he says, which  lists protocols for human subject research. (In looking it up actually I do recall seeing it earlier; it’s similar to lists of exemptions for different government agencies in the CFR, but I will re-evaluate as I continue to collect documentation on this site.)

From the vantage point of 20 years of research in the field, Dr. Begich suggests that it’s vital for everyone to take a stand–to do some research, understand what’s going on, and then find your own way to make a difference. We are facing brain and mind control technologies today that are completely destructive of human will, autonomy, sovereignty, privacy--and it’s up to each of us to make a stand.

If this is a subject new to you, a good place to start that research would be his books and the many videos of his talks and interviews on Youtube.  Mass Media is failing us shamefully, and if some of us don’t know yet that Mind Control and Brain Control research and non-consensual human experimentation involving Remote Manipulation technologies is well underway, all over the world, it’s because MSM and the CIA/Military Cyberwarfare Disinfo Brigade, along with government-funded psychiatrists, has done a number on us, trying to get most people to believe that people being abused today by nonconsensual experimentation on their bodies and brains and reporting that abuse are variously paranoid, unstable, deranged, unreliable, schizoid, and so forth, an age-old and unimaginative ploy intended to keep secrets secret and covert projects covert that increasingly more of us are beginning to see beyond.

Exploring The FBI’s “Consensual Monitoring” and the CIA’s “Concealed Monitoring”: One-Party Consent to Electronic Recordings and Non-Consensual Two-Way Radio Implant Communications?

Perhaps we can start by agreeing there is no such thing as Consensual Surveillance, for if there were, we would all be ticking boxes on Census-like forms offered to us by benevolent government entities keen to surveill us with our consent, saying Yes! You can surveill me, adding, defensively, as many of the unthinking among us do, After all, I have nothing to hide.

The FBI States It Engages in Consensual Monitoring

Still, the FBI is on record now as stating that it engages in Consensual Monitoring, in the case of the aerial surveillance of Baltimore in May during the protests succeeding Freddy Gray’s death in police custody, as documents obtained by ACLU reveal. This October 30, 2015 ACLU report has the story, and the FBI Evidence and Memo Logs referencing “Consensual Monitoring” in pdf form can be found linked at the end of that article.  These evidence logs, which are redacted in places, seem to be logging in Aerial Surveillance Videos, but in a few cases, log in “Other Electronic Surveillance” which is still item-described as “Aerial Surveillance,” and in one case, additionally, as “Consensual Monitoring–Non-Telephonic.”

What is Consensual Monitoring?

fbiBaltimore-1What can Consensual Monitoring possibly be? Is the FBI defining a form of monitoring and surveillance it engages in as Consensual, in hopes of “keeping it legal”? One clue they offer is that it’s “Other Electronic.” It’s not Aerial Video. It’s not Aerial Photography. Can it be Aerial Cyber Surveillance? (Why would they need to do that from the air, when it would be far more effective from the ground?) It’s Non-Telephonic. So it’s not Stingray, Dirtbox, cell-phone-tower-mimicking scooping-up of cellphone voice and text data. It’s Electronic, and it’s Consensual–so they say–and it’s not Video, Audio, Telephonic, Cyber-related.

From the ACLU article:

“FBI evidence logs reveal that at least half of the flights conducted video surveillance, and that the FBI retained copies of those videos in its files. Other flights conducted some type of “electronic surveillance,” but specific descriptions are redacted. This suggests that those flights were perhaps using more sensitive or powerful recording gear than just video cameras, though what kind we don’t know.

What we do know is that one of the aircraft, a Cessna propeller plane registered to an FBI front company, NG Research, had specialized surveillance camera equipment on board. FAA documentation shows that the FBI installed a Paravion Technology infrared camera mount and a FLIR Talon multi-sensor camera system on the exterior of the plane. The FLIR system includes a “thermal imager,” an optical camera, and a “laser illuminator” for recording at night. We did not receive documentation about the second plane observed circling over Baltimore, so we don’t know if it was carrying different gear.”

Regular FBI Surveillance Flights Over Cities and Rural Areas

A June 2015 article by the Associated Press revealed the fact of regular surveillance flights over cities by FBI planes, although again the nature of the surveillance was not clarified:

“Scores of low-flying planes circling American cities are part of a civilian air force operated by the FBI and obscured behind fictitious companies, The Associated Press has learned.

The AP traced at least 50 aircraft back to the FBI, and identified more than 100 flights in 11 states over a 30-day period since late April, orbiting both major cities and rural areas. At least 115 planes, including 90 Cessna aircraft, were mentioned in a federal budget document from 2009.

For decades, the planes have provided support to FBI surveillance operations on the ground. But now the aircraft are equipped with high-tech cameras, and in rare circumstances, technology capable of tracking thousands of cellphones, raising questions about how these surveillance flights affect Americans’ privacy.

“It’s important that federal law enforcement personnel have the tools they need to find and catch criminals,” said Charles Grassley, chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee. “But whenever an operation may also monitor the activities of Americans who are not the intended target, we must make darn sure that safeguards are in place to protect the civil liberties of innocent Americans.

The FBI says the planes are not equipped or used for bulk collection activities or mass surveillance. The surveillance equipment is used for ongoing investigations, the FBI says, generally without a judge’s approval.”

Also:

“One of the planes, photographed in flight last week (May/June 2015) by the AP in northern Virginia, bristled with unusual antennas under its fuselage and a camera on its left side.”

fbiplane

The AP video report that accompanies a Blaze article on this same AP report identifies the spherical white protrusion with cable on the fuselage as a ball camera to provide sweeping panoramic views, but the other equipment is not identified.

“Evolving technology can record higher-quality video from long distances, even at night, and can capture certain identifying information from cellphones using a device known as a “cell-site simulator” — or Stingray, to use one of the product’s brand names. These can trick pinpointed cellphones into revealing identification numbers of subscribers, including those not suspected of a crime.

Officials say cellphone surveillance is rare, although the AP found in recent weeks FBI flights orbiting large, enclosed buildings for extended periods where aerial photography would be less effective than electronic signals collection. Those included above Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport and the Mall of America in Bloomington, Minnesota.”

Currently Available Aerial Surveillance Technologies

On the subject of technology currently being used in Aerial Surveillance by Law Enforcement, and by Military PISR operations (Persistent Intelligence, Surveillance, Reconnaissance), see this slide show presentation from the company Persistent Surveillance Systems, linked in pdf and posted Jan 2014 at PublicIntelligence.net, which includes suggested policy statements on Persistent Surveillance for Law Enforcement, among other things.

The image below of the Surveillance Systems market size  is from this pdf. Also posted at Public Intelligence is the US Joint Command Handbook for Persistent Surveillance.

PSS

The Washington Post ran an article on this subject in Feb 2014. Also see the video produced by the Center of Investigative Reporting and PBS demonstrating this system.

Essentially, what they say is that Wide Area Persistent Surveillance camera systems that are carried on planes offer panoramic views of large areas such as whole towns and cities, several miles (up to 25 miles in reports) in diameter, and the way they are used is to generate real-time video by having the planes circle interminably over defined areas, for about six hours at a time, combining the data obtained thereby with that from networked ground cameras, traffic cameras, gas station cameras, etc., to create a detailed picture in real-time of what anyone is doing, outside, on foot or in cars/vehicles. CIR and KQED’s video on surveillance below introduces this system and also touches on biometric intelligence, and other forms of surveillance.

State of Surveillance: Police, Privacy, and Technology

ACLU also discusses this issue, and elsewhere covers wide area surveillance (ARGUS-IS) from drones as it raises privacy concerns.

Persistent Surveillance Systems on Military Electronic Warfare Planes

Merely as reference, consider too the kind of wide-spectrum surveillance and data collection in process currently with Military Persistent Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance programs, which use continuously-generated data from planes, ground stations, and satellites, as illustrated in this Raytheon UK overview image, from a Dec 2014 AIN Online article (Raytheon UK Develops New ISR Solutions). Note especially SATCOM–how satellites are being used to network data from the ground, from aircraft, from mobile forces, and from “tactical” ground stations.

raytheonUKoverview

Electronic Warfare aircraft, whose collection of ELINT, COMINT, SIGINT–Electronic Intelligence, Communications Intelligence, Signals Intelligence–is achieved through sophisticated radar systems, electronic jamming systems, and radio antennas, use various networked tools to engage in Persistent Aerial Surveillance.

The image below of an Electronic Warfare plane is from GlobalSecurity.org; while this aircraft looks obviously military and loaded with “pods” and antennae, Military news reports (and Defence company news and press releases) over the past couple years have pursued the creation of increasingly “intuitive” portable and streamlined EW collections/jamming packages that can be mounted more easily on smaller craft, including drones, as well be used in ground vehicles, fixed installations, and in backpacks for “foot soldiers” to carry. (See The Future of Army Electronic Warfare, Sep 2013.)

So, looking again at the FBI surveillance plane imaged above, one might just wonder if it’s possible this high-tech FBI surveillance aircraft is merely a smaller, streamlined version of the plane below, carrying compact Electronic Warfare collection/jamming systems for Persistent Intelligence, Surveillance, Reconnaissance.

electronicwarfareaircraft

Electronic Warfare Includes “Signals Intelligence” Collection

Not to be forgotten is the fact that Electronic Warfare, which has been covered previously in this post here, includes electronic surveillance and remote electronic signals collection–by which is meant a variety of electronic signals, as this Army Concept Capability on Electronic Warfare for the Future Modular Force 2015-2024 document details, including remotely-culled information from computers and electronic communications. Electronic Attack, one of the three Army-Doctrine aspects of Electronic Warfare, seeks to use electromagnetic energy to attack personnel, as well as equipment, and Electronic Warfare Support  seeks out sources of intentionally and unintentionally radiated electromagnetic energy for threat recognition and targeting, as this overview image from the Army Concept Capability document illustrates.

ewow

Widely-posted –although less-well-known–information from the ’90s on NSA Signals Intelligence reveals that SIGINT also includes information on human bioelectric fields and EMF thoughtwave forms (unintentionally radiated energy), as noted by John St.Clair Akwei in his lawsuit against the NSA (See especially the Section, NSA Signals Intelligence uses EMF Brain Stimulation for Remote Neural Monitoring (RNM) and Electronic Brain Link (EBL)).

Returning to Consensual Monitoring

It turns out the FBI has Department of Justice-specified Procedures for Consensual Monitoring.

See this Sep 2005 report: Chapter Six: Procedures for Lawful, Warrantless Monitoring of Verbal Communications (Consensual Monitoring)/FBI’s Compliance with the Attorney General’s Investigative Guidelines (Redacted) Special Report.

Opening information from this report:

“Consensual monitoring is the interception by an electronic device of any wire, oral, or electronic communication where one of the parties to the communication has given prior consent to the monitoring or recording. A warrant is not required to conduct consensual monitoring, and the party providing consent may be a government agent. See 18 U.S.C. § 2511, (2) (c) – (e) (2002).

The Attorney General Guidelines governing consensual monitoring cover only non-telephonic consensual monitoring.319 The types of monitorings addressed by these Guidelines include the use of body recorders and transmitting devices. To supplement the Guidelines, the FBI imposes detailed administrative and management controls on the use of both non-telephonic and telephonic consensual monitoring. MIOG II § 10-10.”

Further, the report goes on to specify that DOJ permission to monitor is required only in the case of “sensitive individuals” such as members of Congress, Governors, and other public officials, and duration of monitoring be permitted in those cases for only up to 90 days at a time. For all other parties–such as you and me–no permission is required other than a sign off from a Special Agent at the local FBI office, and duration of monitoring may be marked by said Special Agent as “for the duration of the investigation,” may be conducted by anyone, including possibly Government agents, and doesn’t need a warrant or DOJ approval.

Records are required to be maintained in all cases of consensual monitoring; the record to FOIA-request is: Form FD-759, captioned “Notification of SAC/ASAC Authority Granted for Use of Telephonic and/or Nontelephonic Consensual Monitoring Equipment in Criminal Matters Only.”

Is Consensual Monitoring Accomplished via 1), Recordings Unilaterally Consented-to by Hundreds of Thousands of Recipients of National Security Letters, & 2), Covertly Implanted RFID transponders?

Given this information, while it appears as if this kind of monitoring is being legitimately engaged in by the FBI purely in matters of criminal investigations, because there is much information online about abusive surveillance–fraudulent and wasteful investigations on non-terrorists and non-spies mis-characterized post-Patriot-Act as terrorists and spies–being conducted by DHS/FBI, including from ex-FBI insiders and whistleblowers (such as Mike Germain), and because thousands of individuals today in the US report covert assaults with Remote Neural Monitoring technologies involving Directed-Energy Weapons and Covert RFID implants, two other possibilities come to mind:

Consensual Monitoring One: The consensual monitoring being spoken of here is via recorders, such as apps on cell phones, or videorecorders/audiorecorders on cell phones, which belong to people who are “co-operating in an investigation” by the FBI, and who are being gagged from speaking about this to the individual under investigation by way of National Security Letters, hundreds of thousands of which, possibly now more than a million, have been handed out every year (See the Electronic Frontier Foundation‘s Module on NSLs);

and Consensual Monitoring Two; The “body recorders and transmitting devices” spoken of are biomems, RFID chips, MicroElectroMechanical devices, neurostimulators, and the like, covertly implanted in individuals, which do indeed function as “body recorders” and radio transmitter/receivers. Of course, this is scarcely Consensual communications, even if it is a two-way radio communication, since the implants themselves are non-consensual, but is an attempt being made here to pass off RFID transmissions as “Consensual Monitoring”?

The CIA’s Concealed Monitoring

This brings us to the CIA, and a June ACLU article by Staff Attorney Ashley Gorski, New Docs Raise Questions About CIA Spying Here At Home which revealed the recent FOIA-requested (by ACLU & Yale Law School’s Media Freedom and Information Access Clinic) release of several documents–eg., the CIA’s own internal regulations on spying in both foreign and domestic areas, titled AR 2-2, a CIA/FBI Memo of Understanding regarding foreign and domestic intelligence collection, and others, related to the CIA’s collection programs under Executive Order 12333.

It must be noted, these documents are continuously redacted, with blanks in place of particular Intelligence collection information marked “National Security Act.”

These documented regulations apparently govern the domestic activities of the CIA, in its human subject research programs, its domestic intelligence collection programs, its foreign intelligence collected-domestically programs, its domestic monitoring programs, and its co-ordination with the FBI in domestic electronic surveillance and monitoring.

This ACLU article, and all the documents it points to, in particular the document AR 2-2, which clearly notes that the CIA engages in human subject research and experimentation programs–an issue of profound concern at this site, deserve close reading and analysis, and will be examined further here, in a succeeding post (when redactions will be filled in, speculatively).  

What’s of particular note here to this analysis, from this ACLU article/finding is: The CIA works closely with the FBI on domestic intelligence collection and can ask the FBI to collect intelligence anytime on anyone it likes. Any recording consented to by one party is not considered electronic surveillance, it is possibly considered Concealed Monitoring, a term that Army Intelligence and the CIA are familiar with(this seems to be the same kind of surveillance the FBI discusses as Consensual Monitoring, where one party unilaterally consents to a recording involving two parties or more). The CIA gives itself permission to install “monitoring devices” whenever no warrant is required for law enforcement–a loophole created by other loopholes–but does not specify what these devices are. (RFID Implants/Bio-MEMs maybe?)

The ACLU article notes:

“In addition, Annex B explains that the CIA may “use a monitoring device within the United States under circumstances in which a warrant would not be required for law enforcement purposes if the CIA General Counsel concurs.”

But what qualifies as a “monitoring device”? And how exactly does monitoring differ from “electronic surveillance,” which the CIA is prohibited from doing domestically? We don’t know. In the newly released documents, the definition of “monitoring” (as distinct from “electronic surveillance”) is redacted.​”

Redacted Signals Intelligence Collection Information, Persistent Intelligence, Surveillance, Reconnaissance, One-Party Consent Labelled Consensual Monitoring, Warrantless FBI Monitoring with Transmitting Devices, Warrantless CIA Monitoring Devices Used Domestically, Redacted Definitions of Monitoring

Security and Intelligence analysts need to start connecting the dots here and planning strategies to force this information out into the open in order to seek accountability and exposure. All Americans deserve to know that our Intelligence agencies–in particular the FBI and CIA–are 1) actively collecting particular electronic signals information the nature of which is being kept redacted and classified–but which thousands of Americans experiencing covert-assault and covert-access with radar and Remote Neural Monitoring technologies, as well as researchers studying Mind-Hacking patents and technologies can identify as Human Bio-Resonance EMFs and Brain EMFs; 2) getting away with close monitoring and surveillance of Americans, domestically, and secretively, using National Security Letters as leverage to obtain one-party consent that is then labelled “consensual monitoring”; 3) self-permitting and installing covert non-consensual implants of radio transmitting/receiving devices in the bodies of Americans so as to engage in Remote Monitoring which is then rolled into “concealed monitoring.”

Further posts here will specifically examine CIA involvement in ongoing classified human subject research and experimentation programs, and the nature of the transmitting devices/monitoring devices–radio frequency implants– being self-authorized for CIA/FBI use in undisclosed Remote Monitoring programs.

For an inside look at one extraordinary instance of the documented CIA use of biomedical implants in Intelligence collection as a surveillance method, see David Larson’s 2009 testimony, lawsuit against the CIA, and report with photographs.

 

 

 

CIA Can Neither Confirm Nor Deny Informed Consent in Mind Hacking Research and Human Experimentation in the USA

cia-blackNew page reporting the response of CIA personnel to a long-delayed appeal of an original Freedom of Information Act request (by this writer) asking for information on Informed Consent in any ongoing directed-energy neuroweapon research and human experimentation in the USA:

FOIA Request Report: CIA Unable to Confirm Informed Consent in Any Open Human Subject Programs and Research Using Directed-Energy Neuroweapons in the USA