Tag Archives: anti-personnel weapons

Scott Workman, Friends of the Original Constitution announces $500 TRILLION Lawsuit against the FEDERAL GOVT and over 140 MONOPOLISTS

Report | Ramola D | August 9, 2021

Friends of the Original Constitution has announced a $500 Trillion lawsuit against the Federal Government corporation, which they invite all Americans to participate in as a plaintiff and as a signee of the Declaration of Restoration of July 6, 2021 they have posted. In a pointed and candid video announcement, they detail the criminality issuing forth from the Federal Government and indicate both who will be sued in addition (all pharmaceutical companies, CDC, WHO, Bill Gates as well), and what all plaintiffs will be awarded after the lawsuit is won and damages paid (debt jubilee and many financial rewards).

Scott Workman, Screenshot

This video (posted below) posted on several channels a couple days ago after Youtube removed it in a few hours of posting–now reinstated at Youtube–has been making waves worldwide, for good reason; its resolute determination to rid the world of the illegal and criminal Federal corporation at head of all other corporations running assault and battery operations on us of a hundred different kinds, including currently the COVID Vaccine Tyranny, is powerfully persuasive and music to all our ears.

Speaking in the video is Scott Workman, author The Map of Thieves and Trojan Virus, and the group is Friends of the Original Constitution. Intended is the restoration of the original Constitution and Republic.

The group says your signature on their Declaration of Restoration authorizes it.

Excerpt: “The history of the present so-called FEDERAL GOVERNMENT is a history of repeated secrecy, injuries, usurpations, corruption, theft, malpractice, and despotism, all having in direct object the establishment of self-service, money and power, over and above service to these States and to the people; its rightful masters.

To prove this, let these Facts be submitted to a candid world:

They conspired to form a “Legal Fiction” or “FEDERAL” Corporation called THE UNITED STATES to secretly “go around” the Constitutional Government that We the People ordained by the hands of our Founding Fathers.

They conspired to form a “Legal Fiction” or “FEDERAL” corporation called the CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA to secretly “go around” the original Constitution for the United States of America.

They created this “Legal Fiction” or “secret jurisdiction” to subjugate us, override our Rights and Liberties and to fulfill their nefarious objectives of monopoly, greed, tyranny, monarchy and control.

They are allowing the secret, subtle and gradual dismantling of our Constitutional Republic and the installation of a monarchy (or oligarchy).

They are participating in Collusion, Conspiracy, Fraud, False Pretense, Racketeering and other secret and nefarious activities with the objective and end goals of money, power and total control.”

Full Declaration of Restoration, July 6, 2021 here.

Their mission statement spells out the founder’s awakening to the reality of a crime-syndicate running the Federal Government:

Excerpt: “The Problem: Our Government is not the Constitutional Government that the Founding Fathers established.

Our government is in fact a fraudulent FOREIGN CORPORATION which was established (starting in 1871) by evil and conspiring men who supplanted our Constitutional Government with this CORPORATION. This FOREIGN CORPORATION is masquerading as our government. You can simply detect that it is not a Constitutional Government by reading the original Constitution which grants ZERO authority to issue mandates, rescind freedom and Liberty, for any reason, except by legitimate due process of Constitutional law (only if a crime is suspected and only by oath and affirmation).

This Band of Thieves’ (who effectively own this FOREIGN CORPORATION) ultimate goal is to overthrow the freedom of all lands, nations and countries. This Band of Thieves, which I call in my writings the “Monopolists” are psychopathic genocidal wannabe dictators that love money and power more than people. They, like many dictators throughout history, (including Adolph Hitler) will do anything to obtain absolute power; even if it means that millions of people die as a result.  

Wars are generally armed conflicts, with armies engaging in battles to conquer and gain control of nations by force. Today’s world war is much more sophisticated, without the initial need for armies. The war they’re waging on us today, in this country and many more, is a psyop (psychological operations) war; their most effective weapon is “Information Control.”  They use fear, divisiveness and endless false narratives to control us. They have control of the main stream media and big tech and both are engaged in disinformation, censorship and controlling the narratives that you and I see, read and hear every day.

Prime example: This so-called “pandemic” A.K.A COVID-19 narrative. They’re using a simple virus; the “Coronavirus” (common cold/flu virus) and have hyped it up and into a “pandemic.” Just look at what they were (and are) able to accomplish with their campaigns of fear about the “COVID-19 virus.” People are submitting to mandates, lock-downs, shut-downs, mask mandates, vaccines and vaccine passports; all because they fear what used to be called “the common cold/flu Coronavirus.”

Further Excerpt, from Scott Workman’s mission statement:

Why has nothing changed for the better? Why has no movement gotten anywhere with a solution to fix this huge gargantuan problem?

 Because up until now, we’ve been playing in their ballpark, by their rules: That’s the problem! Their ballpark = their rules! That’s why nothing has changed and why no movement has gotten anywhere; until now! Because when you play by their rules – You are not standing in a constitutional ballpark or jurisdiction. What Friends of the Original Constitution has done is expose their fraudulent ballpark and revoked their authority and jurisdiction. We’ve declared that we are restoring the original ballpark – where We the People are its rightful authority! They must now play in our ballpark; by our rules! They are now under our authority and our jurisdiction. We the People can do whatever we agree to do at the Constitutional Convention & Court and your signature (as a US Citizen) on the Declaration of Restoration – authorizes it!

What is the general outline of the plan to fix this huge problem?

  1. You can read the full plan which is contained in the Books: Map of Thieves and The Trojan Virus and the Complaint/Lawsuit. All are available on this website. This plan is 8 years in the making.
  2. I’ve written a Declaration of Restoration to be signed by millions of US Citizens, which is our authorization to call for and hold a Constitutional Convention & Court where we will restore our Constitutional Government. It authorizes the interim Constitutional Government and it authorizes the prosecution of all the defendants in our lawsuit.
  3. We have exposed the FEDERAL GOVERNMENT as a fraudulent government. They are in fact a FOREIGN CORPORATION that is masquerading as our government. We have revoked all of our signatures on any contracts with them, thus removing their jurisdiction over us. Friends of the Original Constitution is the interim Constitutional Government authorized by We the People’s signatures of the Declaration of Restoration
  4. We are going to incentivize scientists throughout the world, with billions of dollars, to develop a reversing agent for the COVID-19 vaccine.
  5. We are going to restore Liberty, our Constitution and our Constitutional Government.
  6. We are going to remove all leadership from the fraudulent FEDERAL CORPORATION masquerading as our government.

FULL MISSION STATEMENT HERE.

Who they are suing:

Friends of the Original Constitution®,
a trademarked organization,
and
We the People of the Constitutional Republic of the United States of America  

Plaintiffs,  
v.

The FEDERAL CORPORATIONS A.K.A.
THE UNITED STATES and
THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
et al.:
(Left and Right Columns below)
Complaint
Judges: First Delegate Scott Workman and the Delegates at the Constitutional Convention and Court  
President, Vice President, Cabinet Members, Secretary of State, Members of Congress, Judges, ALL Leadership of all Agencies, Departments and Bureaucracies, Military Industrial Complex, The Pentagon, American Bar Association, All Lobbyists, All Political Action Committees (PACs), Quasi-Governmental Agencies, Cecil Rhodes Foundation for World Government, The Ford Foundation, The Carnegie Endowment, The Guggenheim Foundation, United  Nations (UN), Council on Foreign Relations, (CFR) The Trilateral Commission, The Bilderberg Group, The New World Order, The One World Government, Round Table Group, A.C.L.U., NATO, CBS, ABC, NBC, CNN, MSNBC, FOX, Google/YouTube, Facebook/Instagram, Twitter, American Medical Association (AMA), Pharmaceutical Research & Manufacturers of America (PhRMA), American Hospital Association (AHA), Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association (BCBSA), American Chemistry Council (ACC), American Pharmacists Association (APha), Johnson & Johnson, Pfizer, Merck & Co, Abbott Laboratories, Amgen Inc., Eli Lilly and Company, AbbieVie Inc., Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene Corporation, Shire PLC, Zoetis Inc, Vertex Pharmaceuticals Inc., Baxter International Inc., Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc, Alexion Pharmaceuticals Inc, McKesson Corporation, INCYTE Corporation, AmerisourceBergen Corporation, Biomarin Pharmaceutical Inc, Cardinal Health Inc., GlaxoSmithKline, Sanofi, Novavax, Emergent BioSolutions, CSL, Inovio Pharmaceuticals, AstraZeneca, BASF, Bayer-Monsanto, Dow-Dupont, Syngenta, Huntsman Chemical, Boeing, Celanese, Mitsui, Northrop Grumman, Parker-Hannifin,

  Defendants.
Honeywell International, Southern Company, DTE Energy, AES Corp., ArcelorMittal, LyondellBasell, Nestle, U.S. Public Health Service and Human Services (HHS), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), Food and Drug Administration (FDA), National Institutes (27) of Health (NIH), Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (ONC), Rockefeller Empire & All Assets owned or Controlled (AAC), American Cancer Society (ACS), National Cancer Institute (NCI), World Health Organization (WHO), Bill Gates & AAC, Charlie Munger & AAC, Warren Buffett & AAC, The Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI), The Tides Foundation, Mark Zuckerberg & AAC, Bill & Hillary Clinton & AAC, George Soros & AAC, Anthony S. Fauci, M.D. & AAC, Deborah L. Birx, M.D. & AAC, Federal Reserve Bank, International Monetary Fund (IMF), American Bankers Association, JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America, Citigroup, Wells Fargo, Goldman Sachs, ChexSystems, US Oil & Gas Association, American Petroleum Institute (API), Western States Petroleum Association (WSPA), Southern Company (Gas & Utilities), Koch Industries, Exxon Mobil Corporation, BP America (British Petroleum), Chevron Corporation, ConocoPhillips Co., Shell Oil, Occidental Petroleum Corporation, Valero Industries, EOG Resources, Phillips 66, Pioneer Natural Resources, Marathon Petroleum, Anadarko Petroleum, Verizon Communications Inc, Vodafone, A T & T, China Mobile Limited, General Communications Inc,  

Defendants.
 

A note at their website today says they are seeing an unprecedented response. You can join as a plaintiff in the lawsuit and sign their Declaration of Restoration by registering with them. You can also gain great rewards later they say by donating currently to their cause. Whistleblowers are also encouraged to get in touch with information.

Many of Us Are Fully Aware America Has Fallen Far into Profound Atrocity

Geral Sosbee, FBI Whistleblower has previously alerted the world to the murderous criminality of the fallen US Government Corporation:

Geral Sosbee, FBI Whistleblower: Murderous Corruption of FBI and Federal Magistrate Judges, Sample Secret FMJ Court-Order Requiring Inhumane Community Persecution of Innocent Targets

FBI Whistleblower, American Hero Geral Sosbee Reports Continued FBI/CIA/Military Human Rights Violations: Egregious Assault and Persecution with Anti-Personnel DEWs, ELF Neuroweaponry

And Memos to Trump posted by this writer and reporter in 2017 and 2019–and signed by hundreds of Americans and people worldwide–detail the depravity of assault and battery using sophisticated Stealth EMF and Neuroweaponry being visited on innocent Americans and people worldwide all through the delinquent brutality of the Secret-Society-and-Rogue-Military-Intelligence-Complex using DHS, Fusion Centers, FISA courts, NSLs, and classification to conceal crime, atrocity, and huge profit, under cover of “National Security” “War on Terror” “Surveillance” “Investigation” and other gargantuan lies:

Once Again, A Memo to President Trump: Massive Surveillance State Abuses | Treason on the Ground, in the USA: Public-Private Partners in Targeted Killing of Americans

Memorandum to President Donald J. Trump on Domestic US Torture Programs Running Under Cover of Surveillance

Facts regarding weapon-use on Americans and citizens in every country by abject criminals in Law Enforcement (LE, FBI, DHS) and Homeland Security, Military, and Intelligence–and a cohort of private partners in telecom, local governments, utilities, public works, delivery companies like UPS, FEDEX, USPS, AMAZON, and many other private companies–using stealth microwave/infra-red/radar/milliwave/acoustic weaponry being hidden in homes, antenna systems, portable devices, drones, helicopters, planes as “crowd-control technology” and “peace-enforcement technology,” who are hiding behind classifications and compartmentalizations while running brutal and sadistic 24/7 Torture Programs on people can be found here:

Public Disclosure of Anti-Personnel DEWs and Neuroweapons (Non-Lethal/Limited Effect Wpns, EMF Spectrum Wpns) Being Used, Covertly but Definitively, Illegitimately, and Inhumanely, by US, UK, All Govts Worldwide on People

Redbridge Council Cites “Personal Care” Exemption in Refusing to Explain Aggressive & Fraudulent Sectioning Attempts on Mr. Edward Ellis, Equity Lawyer

–Ramola D/Posted August 3, 2o19

Letters  of inquiry and concern sent earlier to Redbridge Council Press Office and to the Care Quality Commisssion overseeing NHS Trust Hospitals at Brighton, Sussex, and Essex regarding the recent multiple and aggressive sectioning attempts on Mr. Edward Ellis, Equity Lawyer were replied to on July 30, with a terse refusal to address by Redbridge Council. Citing the 2000 Freedom of Information Act, the Adult Care, Public Health and Well-being Team stated, “We are unable to provide a response as this relates to a matter of personal care and treatment that falls outside of the FOI process.”

Considering that the letter requesting information had raised a number of concerning issues about Mr. Ellis’s being pursued by the Mental Health workers at Redbridge Council on multiple occasions, including with police officers carrying tasers as they entered the home they broke into on 26 June and on another occasion as reported here earlier, and also considering that earlier coverage had established quite definitively that Mr. Ellis was hardly mentally ill and had become instead the victim of fraudulent sectioning attempts by Redbridge Council on the basis of faulty information from NHS Trust doctors, particularly the questionable Dr. Lever, head nephrologist at Queen’s Hospital, this is hardly an adequate response to a concerned public.

Among the questions raised by this reporter in her request for information from the press office were the following:

Why was this action taken on 26 June 2019 to break down Mr. Ellis’s door in intention of “search and capture” of Mr. Ellis?

Why was Police Officer EO 4333 holding a taser in his hand behind his back just as he entered the home?

Are you aware of the extreme dangers of tasers–which have caused numerous deaths and cardiac arrests, and which harm people in relation to the level of their physical health? (Please see my Community Care…article linked above, which links to many articles reporting these dangers.)

Are you aware Mr. Edward Ellis is a kidney patient, who has moreover been the recipient of a fistula surgically placed in him by Sussex University hospital with no follow-up for dialysis over 7 months, who is himself working on acquiring the best treatment for his kidney issues?

Are you aware that Redbridge Council has essentially approved the use of a taser on a 66-year-old kidney patient–if this police officer acted in a pre-approved manner, that is? If he did not, are you aware that this is a serious matter of concern and that Law Enforcement in the whole of the UK needs to be made aware of the extreme dangers of taser use on unwell people, who are for obvious reasons, in a vulnerable physical state–and that Law Enforcement should not therefore be permitted to use or threaten use of tasers on people known to be medical patients?

Failure to answer such basic questions is inexplicable, given their intent to elucidate why the Council would embark on such pernicious actions against a senior citizen and NHS patient who is also a whistleblower and equity lawyer of high international repute, working to end corruption crimes against upstanding citizens, who is known and loved by millions, if not billions. 

Questions of Concern Regarding Taser Use and Wrongful Sectioning Attempts Shockingly Left Unanswered

Questions of concern regarding taser use when left unanswered by an “Adult Care, Public Health, and Well-Being” team surely suggest a blithe and unsettling lack of concern on this subject by this team. More than shocking given that the very presence of police officers accompanying a mental health team taking the extreme step of breaking down a resident’s door with force, citing the Mental Health Act, has obviously been decreed by the council.

Given that the Council sent that team, with police escort, to Mr. Ellis’s home, it follows that the Council is responsible both for the wrongful citation of the Mental Health Act (in absence of any evidence of mental illness, as discussed earlier here in Egregious Sectioning and Kidnap Attempts on Equity Lawyer Edward Ellis As the Completing Mass Corruption Remedy Process Exposes Pervasive Crime & Corruption in UK Courts, Police Departments, and Hospitals) and for attempts by police officers to knock people out with tasers, perhaps occasioning their sudden death by cardiac arrest, as doctors and lawyers have attested is an ever-present danger with 50,000-volt-shock-delivering tasers, discussed earlier here: Community Care or Deranged “Mental Health Team”? UK Police Carry Taser Into Home Break-In to Attack Whistleblower Patient with Kidney Failure

6 July, 2019 Visit of Officer with Taser/Covered Here

On a later occasion also recorded by human rights activist and reporter Neelu Berry, it is clear the police officer who sought to enter and search her home is prominently carrying a taser.  

On the occasion of the dramatic and thickly-peopled break-in on 26 June where not one mental health nurse or social worker but several bustled in on the officers’ heels to look under beds and peer into closets with intent to capture a hardworking equity lawyer, it is further clear the officer with the taser had full intent to use it, or keep it handy for swift use, as he whipped it out from under his vest and carried it behind his back as he entered.

26 June 2019, Nurse Smiles as Officer Holds Taser Behind Back/Covered Here

If this is not a betrayal of the public trust, what is? How is a Mental Health team engaging in adult care, public health or well-being by delivering 50,000 volt shocks using a deadly conducted energy device which shoots prongs into people’s bodies, designed to paralyze and incapacitate, and known cause of several deaths by cardiac arrest in the past?

And how is the Adult Care, Public Health, and Well-being Team at Redbridge Council justified in maintaining a cool silence over this matter? Does the Council wish to imply that they intend to continue in this practice and believe it is perfectly alright to knock out and quite possibly kill senior citizens in this fashion? It is quite clearly not a matter of public health, public safety, or personal well-being but its opposite when a police officer is permitted to brandish and deploy a deadly energy device on a member of the public, under the aegis of “Mental Health Care.”

It becomes painfully obvious rather that such an extreme police action in accompaniment with a team intent on a psychiatric arrest is intending primarily to subjugate and subdue a non-mentally-ill citizen, for purposes of political silencing, in flagrant violation of all protected freedoms of speech and expression in a democracy.

Neelu Berry notes that the Redbridge Council should respond to the taser held by the police officer and the Mental Health nurse smiling, also the fact that there was no incident that invoked the Mental Health Act. “The fact that the taser being used before the Mental Health Team Assessment was proof of an assassination of character or intellectual property. All the above actions of the team were contrary to Section 4 of the Criminal Law act 1967 which mandates wide publicity for crimes being committed, especially by corrupt state officers against Whistle.blowers who are protected Witnesses.”

Questions of Concern on Evidence of Fraud and Medical Malpractice by Queen’s Hospital Nephrologist Left Unanswered

The primary matter of medical malpractice evinced by wrongful attribution as mentally-ill of perfectly sane and mentally-well professionals like Mr. Ellis, covered at length earlier, was also left unanswered:

5) Are you aware that, as Ms. Berry spells out below, there does not appear to be any cause whatsoever for a Mental Health sectioning to have been indicated by any hospital or doctor in recent contact with Mr. Ellis: “The Mental Health Team of 8 had no reason to believe Mr Ellis had Mental Health issues because Dr Lever confirmed there was no evidence of it during a consultation.” Please note that this matter of Dr. Lever stating clearly it was not in his remit to make mental health evaluations while oxymoronically and peculiarly asking Mr. Ellis to submit to his recommendation that someone else should make a mental health evaluation–for no reason whatsoever–was discussed in my article Egregious Sectioning….linked above. Dr. Lever’s attitude and actions suggest that he is unreasonably and suspiciously persecuting a whistleblower reporting high-level corruption including hospital corruption.

The claiming of a personal data exemption to withhold information on the sectioning attempts on Mr. Ellis–a matter of vast public concern, and not in any way purely private, given its implications for all members of the UK and world public–also reads as an unnecessarily lax and expedient refusal to discuss the matter further, a commentary on the evasion of transparency and public accountability by the London Borough of Redbridge.

Questions of Concern on General Practice and Protocol also Left Unanswered

Questions regarding general practice and protocol in the matter of the Council pursuing a mentally sound citizen under false-labeling as mentally ill were equally left unanswered, with a “personal data” exemption being claimed, when the questions themselves indicate an interest in general procedure.

7) Why were there so many staff workers of whatever kind attendant, who are they, what is their professional qualification, and why were they all storming the bastion of Mr. Ellis’s home that morning?

8) What had these staff workers been told to warrant their all being there, en masse, as if they all needed to be there?

9) What is your understanding (I am asking Redbridge Council and the Care Quality Commission Health Service Regulating Body here) of the rationale behind getting a warrant under the Mental Health Act to section a completely sane and sound citizen, who in no way has engaged in harm to self or society and has never been in danger of same–and has given no-one, no doctor, no nurse, no medical professional, no neighbor, no friend, no interviewer any evidence whatsoever of such imputed harm?

The Council’s blanket response:

“The information is exempt from disclosure under Section 40(2) of the Freedom of Information Act (FoIA). The information is personal data as defined by the Data Protection Act 1998 (DPA). As it is information about someone else I’m unable to give this to you; release of this information would constitute a breach of Principle 1 of the DPA. Principle 1 states that personal data shall be processed (used) fairly and lawfully and, in particular, shall not be used unless at least one of the conditions in Schedule 2 of the DPA is met; in this case none of those conditions have been met. This response therefore acts as a refusal notice under section 17 of the FoIA.”

This matter continues therefore to be of great concern, and while the Council suggested Mr. Ellis could protest his treatment–“If Mr Ellis wishes to complain about his treatment he can do so by contacting the NELFT complaints team at nelftcomplaints@nhs.net“–this writer intends to submit an appeal for internal review, as suggested by the Information Request and Compliance team at the Council, as per their letter. 

It is also regrettably clear from this cover-all response that the officials at the Council penning it have sought to screen themselves from scrutiny and public accountability on a matter of grave concern to all citizens in a democracy; every citizen is at risk if a democratically-elected government can sink into syndicated corruption, protect people in authoritative positions who engage in medical malpractice, and unleash over-arching actions of harm on citizens in the name of psychiatric well-being.

Anyone and everyone could be subjected to a Mental Health Arrest-With-Taser on any doctor’s fraudulent, false-labeling recommendation then, it seems–and no need for the Council Mental Health teams to explain these actions: a situation which calls for immediate reform in both the Freedom of Information Act and the Mental Health Act.

Concerned citizens should be doubly alarmed and might wish to subject each member of this Council to closer scrutiny of platform and agenda for integrity and true interest in public health and safety. 

American Journalist Covering this British Government Debacle Retaliated Against with Anti-Personnel Weapons in India

It should also be reported that directly after completing a draft of this article and sending it in to the London Borough of Redbridge and their Press Office for review and comment as per their request, this reporter was hit immediately with intense anti-personnel “non-lethal” weapons AKA Stealth Assault Anti-Humane Weapons, inclusive of resounding ELFs from a local construction mixer and precision-hit Microwave Weapons from nearby cell towers or satellites, as well as intense scalar weapon-hits on private parts–all sounded on external shields, inducing projectile vomiting, migraines, and burning for over 48 hours. (The program of stealth assault involving electronic-warfare weaponry now installed in the US and UK to stifle freedom of speech and expression is worldwide, from all reporting victim accounts, and has been installed in India in exactly the same format.)

Clearly, the reason this story–as also many others of international import–is not being covered by mainstream media outlets in the UK or elsewhere is because such coverage is being stifled and repressed, by brutal attack of the journalists attempting coverage.

This information is being reported in the interests of informing the world public and UK public that Freedom of the Press in the UK is quite literally dead, despite fake attempts by the UK Government with the recent Global Conference on Media Freedom touting interest in media freedom–which perhaps translates more accurately to propaganda freedom for government use.

This information regarding anti-personnel assault on this writer was also provided earlier today to the Redbridge Council with a second request for comment, which elicited the following anonymized and opaque reply from the Press Office, London Borough of Redbridge:

“A council spokesperson said: “The council has responded to your FOI request and we have nothing further to add.”

Clearly, the London Borough of Redbridge believes it is possible to maintain an impenetrable silence on all matters related to their fraudulent Mental Health Act invocations on sane and mentally sound citizens and get away with it. This should be deeply concerning to all sane and mentally sound UK residents, and this writer advises that all in UK concerned by this matter make their feelings about Redbridge Council’s actions known publicly to them in writing.

This writer also requests that all readers take note of what is being reported here, about anti-personnel anti-humane weapon retaliation against journalists with gravitas.

British, American, and all Western governments seem to think they can maintain a semblance of “democracy” while assaulting all questioners, writers, journalists, activists, and whistle-blowers in stealth, with electronic-warfare weapons–and not be held accountable for it. As many know from reading my reports and watching my interviews, I believe these weapons, whose thrust I have been on the receiving-end of for almost six years now, are profoundly inhumane and should be banned.

My most recent correspondence with Redbridge Council reporting Anti-Personnel Stealth Weapon retaliation and their response to my request for comment: Response from Redbridge Council Press Office & Report of Anti-Personnel Assault on Journalist

The Redbridge Council Response letter is here: Response (information exempt)

My Letter of Concern to Redbridge Council and other members of the UK Government is here: Letter of Concern_Request to Stop All Wrongful Mental Health Sectioning Attempts on Mr. Edward Ellis, Equity Lawyer – Ramola D

My Request for Information to the Press Offices at Redbridge Council and the Care Quality Commission, along with Neelu Berry’s letter to the Care Quality Commission is here: Request for Information on Wrongful Sectioning Attempts on Mr. Edward Ellis, Equity Lawyer, 26 June 2019

Related:

Egregious Sectioning and Kidnap Attempts on Equity Lawyer Edward Ellis As the Completing Mass Corruption Remedy Process Exposes Pervasive Crime & Corruption in UK Courts, Police Departments, and Hospitals

Community Care or Deranged “Mental Health Team”? UK Police Carry Taser Into Home Break-In to Attack Whistleblower Patient with Kidney Failure

Ramola D Reports/NewsBreak 30: Wave of Mental Health Frauds in UK, New Zealand | Queen’s Hospital Fraudulently Reports Edward Ellis as Absconded Dialysis Patient

Mr. Edward Ellis, Equity Lawyer, Reports the Launch of a Mass Corruption Remedy Process in the United Kingdom and Calls for Principled Independents and Empowered Citizens to Step Forward

Letter to the German Ministry of the Interior/Cover-Up & Secrecy After Electromagnetic Terrorism Warnings to the German Public Published Earlier, in Ministry’s 2001 Threat Report

Ramola D/Posted 8/31/2017

EM Environment-1In contribution to the massive global cover-up of atrocities being committed on world populations today with electromagnetic weapons and neuroweapons in secretive, illegal, and repressive civilian-military operations, the German Ministry of the Interior blandly informed human rights activists in Germany recently they would not be receiving an official response to their latest letter of concern.

The letter in question, penned by two human rights advocates known to this reporter, was sent in to the German Minister of the Interior, Dr. Thomas de Maiziere, almost a year ago, and explicitly questioned the lapse in coverage–between the Ministry’s Second Threat Report published in 2001 and the Fourth Threat Report published in 2011–of “electromagnetic terrorism” conducted on civilian populations using these weapon systems.

The 2001 Second Threat Report of the promisingly-named Ministerial Commission for the Protection of the Civilian Population (Vierter Gefahrenbericht der Schutzkommission beim Bundesministerium des Innern), the letter’s authors pointed out, explicitly warned of the threat to public safety and the “increased use in the future” of this weapons system in actions of “electromagnetic terrorism.”

However, the 2011 Fourth Threat Report of the Commission failed to recall the continued threat posed by these anti-personnel microwave weapons being used to terrorize populations, and focused instead on nuclear EMP or Electromagnetic Pulse weapons and their threat to electronic and computer systems.

What may have occurred in the ten years between the reports to permit such an obvious shift in focus? Perhaps an extended and increasingly secretive use of microwave weapons by militaries and local law enforcement in criminal actions of domestic repression of world populations—which many are reporting today?

Indeed, the 2001 Second Threat Report stated clearly that high-powered microwave weapons were already in use by militaries, and seemed to suggest that threats to public safety accrued mainly from the possibility of such weapons being developed and used illegally by civilians, in sabotage or blackmail operations.

In contrast to NEMP [nuclear electromagnetic impulse]-weapons, HPM [High-Power-Microwave]-weapons can be built relatively easily and without complex costs by civilians from commercial available components and used for sabotage purposes and blackmail. One already speaks in this context of electromagnetic terrorism which can lead to “a threat to public safety.” In the military sector, the utilizability of similar weapons is already achieved.”

(Second Threat Report, p. 39, quoted after Prof. Dr. med. Karl Hecht:
http://www.puls-schlag.org/download/hechtgrenzwertekiint20090109.pdf (p. 56 ff.)).

The ease with which everyday microwave ovens can be converted into weapons, and deadly laser and microwave weapons can be scrambled together even by tech-minded teenagers and used on anyone, including next-door neighbors, was recently demonstrated avidly by Dr. Katherine Horton, former CERN high-energy physicist, in a Techno Crime Fighters Forum panel (Episode 18) online, where she analyzed and provided expert commentary on such amateur weapon-creation recorded on videos by over-eager yet under-educated teens and posted blatantly online at Youtube.

Proving thereby, that the threat of electromagnetic terrorism by random citizens or private groups—in addition to militaries–is most definitely already here, not just in Germany, but in every country where such electromagnetic components are available.

Further, the authors note, citizens have been coming forward both in Germany as well as elsewhere including the United States of America, to attest to the criminal use of electromagnetic radiation weaponry on their person—and its effects, inclusive of sleep-deprivation, bodily pain and damage, torture, and neural manipulation. Many have recorded radiation levels with meters, many have complained to police and local authorities. Yet no official investigations have been undertaken.

This, despite a resolution published by the European Parliament in 1999—B4-0551/95–warning of the results of the abuse of non-lethal weapons, and demanding a ban of weapons aiming at “the manipulation of the human nervous system” and stating that “the maintaining of secrecy in military research is to be counteracted and the right to openness and democratic examination is to be strengthened” (European Parliament’s resolution B4-0551/95, paragraph 21).

Interestingly, the misleading term “non-lethal weapons,” the authors note, citing informative papers by researcher David G. Guyatt and a doctoral dissertation titled “Non-Lethal Weapons in International Law” by attorney Dr. Hans Wolfram Kessler, emerged in first mention from secret documents of the CIA in the early Sixties.

The bio-effects of such weapons have been known for some time, according to both experts. The capacity of these “anti-personnel” bio-weapons and neuro-transmitters to effect both mind and emotion control of populations, as well as rapid disease-onset or death by inducing deadly medical conditions such as heart attack or stroke is also known.

In such a situation, they say, using state secrecy to keep these “innovative non-lethal weapons” hidden when they clearly offer an innovative means for serious crime–extreme domestic repression/control as well as lethal erasure of humans–runs counter to democratic ideals and should be challenged with steps taken to end such criminal use of microwave weapons on citizens.

121 reporting victims of assault with these weapons provided their signatures and information within the letter, which closed with an appeal to the Minister to investigate and address the crimes of electromagnetic terrorism being perpetrated on them, and an assurance that the Ministry of the Interior would be informed–and reminded of his responsibility to protect the civilian population from these crimes–each time one on the list of innocent victims died from their injuries.

The authors have also conveyed to this reporter that several who signed the letter have been experiencing repercussions by way of increased electromagnetic weapon assault for publicly signing and attesting to the testimonial of the letter, much in the style of the retaliatory assaults experienced by this writer succeeding the writing, signature-collecting, and open publication of the historic Memorandum to President Trump on Domestic US Torture Programs Running Under Cover of Surveillance—which, like this letter being evaded by the German government, remains unanswered by the Trump White House.

However, as both this writer and the letter’s authors are aware, such retaliation is to be reported publicly, and not permitted to function as deterrent to public exposure of these crimes, as apparently the perpetrators intend. The letter in full is posted below, names and signatures of victims are being withheld for their protection.

Many thanks to the German activists who sent this letter on for perusal and open publication.

****

Thomas de Maizierea

German Minister of the Interior, Thomas de Maiziere

German Ministry of the Interior (BMI)
Minister Dr. Thomas de Maizière
Alt-Moabit 101 D
D – 10559 Berlin

18/10/16

Electromagnetic Terrorism in the Federal Republic of Germany/Suspicion of Murder with Electromagnetic Frequency Weapons

Mr. Minister,

The topic of this letter is the illegal use of so-called “non- lethal weapons”[1] against the civilian population of the Federal Republic of Germany.

Again and again, the concerned citizens have addressed the Ministry of the Interior directed by you – in vain until now. They didn’t receive any answer although the use of this weapons system is described in the Second Threat Report (Zweiter Gefahrenbericht) published by the Ministry of the Interior in 2001, explicitly warning from an “increased use” in the future as well as from a “threat to public safety” due to “electromagnetic terrorism”.[2]

Ten years later, in the Fourth Threat Report of the Ministerial Commission for the Protection of the Civilian Population (Vierter Gefahrenbericht der Schutzkommission beim Bundesministerium des Innern) dating from 30/05/2011, there is no longer any mention of a “threat to public safety” due to “electromagnetic terrorism”. The Threat Report solely refers to “dangers due to the (nuclear) electromagnetic impulse (EMP)”, which can disrupt or destroy electronically supported machines and systems (p. 31). A similar effect on modern electronics is attributed to high-power microwaves (ibid). This presentation – clearly shortened compared with the Second Threat Report of October 2001 – is incomplete and does not mention that specific beam weapons as microwave weapons, electromagnetic frequency weapons and laser weapons were designed to be applied and are in fact applied as anti-personnel weapons, as is demonstrated – inter alia – by the following article:

David G. Guyatt: Some Aspects of Anti-Personnel Electromagnetic Weapons. A synopsis prepared for the International Committee of the Red Cross Symposium, The Medical Profession and the Effects of Weapons, presenting a medical and humanitarian perspective on the use of EMP weapons.

Hans Wolfram Kessler’s doctoral thesis “Nichtletale Waffen im Kriegsvölkerrecht” (Non-Lethal Weapons in International Law) proves that the beam weapons named above can be used as bioweapons, inter alia with the function of bioregulators influencing vital functions such as heartbeat, breathing, body temperature, moods and immune reactions.[3] Rapid forms of death such as heart attack or sudden stroke as well as deadly diseases such as cancer can be triggered on this basis – the great ‘advantage’ or rather the great danger consisting in the lacking detectability of an external influence, so that lethal applications of the beam weapons named above can be kept hidden behind allegedly natural causes of death.

Great potential is attributed to the military use of neurotransmitters by which almost every kind of human emotions can be produced artificially. Especially controversial are bioregulators which can potentially manipulate the mental state of the whole ‘hostile’ population.[4] The use of such anti-personnel bioweapons unequivocally violates current international law.[5] The national use of ‘non lethal weapons’, however, gives reason to grave concern, too: ‘Innovative‚ non lethal weapons’ open the doors to completely new methods of control, repression and torture.[6]

As evidenced by innumerable testimonies of so-called targeted individuals, the national use of ‘non lethal weapons’ is already reality.[7] The targeted persons are exposed to complete monitoring as well as continuous (24/7) electromagnetic terror and suffer from sleep deprivation, neurophysiological manipulations, sexual abuse, pains and serious health damage. Numerous concerned persons have addressed to local police stations or responsible law officers and have filed a complaint. Not a single case is known to us in which the authorities would have initiated investigations; the radiation exposures proved by the concerned civilians – among them exposures or gamma, laser and radar rays – were ignored. As soon as 1999, the European Parliament’s resolution B4-0551/95 warned from the results of the abuse of ‘non lethal weapons’, demanding a ban of any kind of weapon aiming at the manipulation of the human nervous system and stating “that the maintaining of secrecy in military research is to be counteracted and the right to openness and democratic examination is to be strengthened” (European Parliament’s resolution B4-0551/95, paragraph 21). The designation ‘non lethal weapons’ first emerged in the sixties in secret documents of the CIA.[8] Since then, the concealment of these weapons has been lifted to some degree, but essentially maintained.

Informations about non-nuclear EMP-weapons (electromagnetic-impulse-weapons) are largely inaccessible and are normally treated with the utmost secrecy’, as the jurist Hans Wolfram
Kessler writes in his doctoral thesis.[9] According to this policy of secrecy, civilians witnessing the illegal use of ‘non lethal weapons’ are in many cases placed under suspicion of psychosis or psychiatrized by force or subjected under legal supervision.

The 121 innocent citizens of the Federal Republic of Germany listed in the annex were or are victims of the illegal use of ‘non lethal weapons’.

Those still living are exposed to an acute danger.

It is suspected that those who are already dead were killed or driven to suicide with beam weapons. The list is by no means complete; only a small fraction of the relevant targeted individuals is known to us namely.

Mr. Minister, we call on you to see personally to the clarification of this outrageous “electromagnetic terrorism” (Second Threat Report) and to the identification of the perpetrators with firm determination. There may be no protection of secrecy for such serious crimes! Moreover, we expect concrete steps to be taken against the described manifestation of organized crime.

Each time one of the still living persons of the attached list will die according to our fear, we will inform you thereon, appealing to your responsibility.

Yours respectfully,

in the name of the targeted individuals of the attached list,

[…]

[Attached to the letter were the personal data of 121 targeted individuals.]

——————————————————————————–

[1] Cf. Hans Wolfram Kessler: Nichtletale Waffen im Kriegsvölkerrecht.
Berlin 2013, p. 22: It is very controversial to refer to weapons as
‘non lethal’. The designation has been criticized as euphemism and as
oxymoron.

[2] “In contrast to NEMP [nuclear electromagnetic impulse]-weapons,
HPM [High-Power-Microwave]-weapons can be built relatively easily and
without complex costs by civilians from commercial available
components and used for sabotage purposes and blackmail. One already
speaks in this context of electromagnetic terrorism which can lead to
a “threat to public safety”. In the military sector, the utilizability
of similar weapons is already achieved“ (Second Threat Report, p. 39,
quoted after Prof. Dr. med. Karl Hecht:

http://www.puls-schlag.org/download/hechtgrenzwertekiint20090109.pdf
(p. 56 ff.)).

[3] Cf. Kessler, p. 69.

[4] Cf. ibid.

[5] Cf. ibid, p. 86.

[6] Cf. ibid, p. 190.

[7] Cf.

http://washingtonsblog.com/2016/03/american-public-informs-president-obamas-commission-study-bioethical-issues-ongoing-non-consensual-human-experimentation-usa-today-html

Mojmir Babacek: Psychotronic and Electromagnetic Weapons: Remote
Control of the Human Nervous System (Global Research 31.01.13 /
16.03.14)

Helmut Höge: Elektromagnetische Wellen. Ein Leben mit Gehirnwäsche
(taz 08.11.15)

https://de.scribd.com/doc/61126419/Strahlenterror-Deutsche-Betroffene-1-Strahlenfolter

[8] Hans Wolfram Kessler: Nichtletale Waffen im Kriegsvölkerrecht.
Berlin 2013, S. 21.

[9] Cf. Kessler, p. 116.

Source of Letter: Authors, and German activists

Related

Activist Helmut Michael Informs Central German Broadcasting (MDR) of Microwave Weapon Use on Civilians