Tag Archives: Redbridge Council

Redbridge Council Cites “Personal Care” Exemption in Refusing to Explain Aggressive & Fraudulent Sectioning Attempts on Mr. Edward Ellis, Equity Lawyer

–Ramola D/Posted August 3, 2o19

Letters  of inquiry and concern sent earlier to Redbridge Council Press Office and to the Care Quality Commisssion overseeing NHS Trust Hospitals at Brighton, Sussex, and Essex regarding the recent multiple and aggressive sectioning attempts on Mr. Edward Ellis, Equity Lawyer were replied to on July 30, with a terse refusal to address by Redbridge Council. Citing the 2000 Freedom of Information Act, the Adult Care, Public Health and Well-being Team stated, “We are unable to provide a response as this relates to a matter of personal care and treatment that falls outside of the FOI process.”

Considering that the letter requesting information had raised a number of concerning issues about Mr. Ellis’s being pursued by the Mental Health workers at Redbridge Council on multiple occasions, including with police officers carrying tasers as they entered the home they broke into on 26 June and on another occasion as reported here earlier, and also considering that earlier coverage had established quite definitively that Mr. Ellis was hardly mentally ill and had become instead the victim of fraudulent sectioning attempts by Redbridge Council on the basis of faulty information from NHS Trust doctors, particularly the questionable Dr. Lever, head nephrologist at Queen’s Hospital, this is hardly an adequate response to a concerned public.

Among the questions raised by this reporter in her request for information from the press office were the following:

Why was this action taken on 26 June 2019 to break down Mr. Ellis’s door in intention of “search and capture” of Mr. Ellis?

Why was Police Officer EO 4333 holding a taser in his hand behind his back just as he entered the home?

Are you aware of the extreme dangers of tasers–which have caused numerous deaths and cardiac arrests, and which harm people in relation to the level of their physical health? (Please see my Community Care…article linked above, which links to many articles reporting these dangers.)

Are you aware Mr. Edward Ellis is a kidney patient, who has moreover been the recipient of a fistula surgically placed in him by Sussex University hospital with no follow-up for dialysis over 7 months, who is himself working on acquiring the best treatment for his kidney issues?

Are you aware that Redbridge Council has essentially approved the use of a taser on a 66-year-old kidney patient–if this police officer acted in a pre-approved manner, that is? If he did not, are you aware that this is a serious matter of concern and that Law Enforcement in the whole of the UK needs to be made aware of the extreme dangers of taser use on unwell people, who are for obvious reasons, in a vulnerable physical state–and that Law Enforcement should not therefore be permitted to use or threaten use of tasers on people known to be medical patients?

Failure to answer such basic questions is inexplicable, given their intent to elucidate why the Council would embark on such pernicious actions against a senior citizen and NHS patient who is also a whistleblower and equity lawyer of high international repute, working to end corruption crimes against upstanding citizens, who is known and loved by millions, if not billions. 

Questions of Concern Regarding Taser Use and Wrongful Sectioning Attempts Shockingly Left Unanswered

Questions of concern regarding taser use when left unanswered by an “Adult Care, Public Health, and Well-Being” team surely suggest a blithe and unsettling lack of concern on this subject by this team. More than shocking given that the very presence of police officers accompanying a mental health team taking the extreme step of breaking down a resident’s door with force, citing the Mental Health Act, has obviously been decreed by the council.

Given that the Council sent that team, with police escort, to Mr. Ellis’s home, it follows that the Council is responsible both for the wrongful citation of the Mental Health Act (in absence of any evidence of mental illness, as discussed earlier here in Egregious Sectioning and Kidnap Attempts on Equity Lawyer Edward Ellis As the Completing Mass Corruption Remedy Process Exposes Pervasive Crime & Corruption in UK Courts, Police Departments, and Hospitals) and for attempts by police officers to knock people out with tasers, perhaps occasioning their sudden death by cardiac arrest, as doctors and lawyers have attested is an ever-present danger with 50,000-volt-shock-delivering tasers, discussed earlier here: Community Care or Deranged “Mental Health Team”? UK Police Carry Taser Into Home Break-In to Attack Whistleblower Patient with Kidney Failure

6 July, 2019 Visit of Officer with Taser/Covered Here

On a later occasion also recorded by human rights activist and reporter Neelu Berry, it is clear the police officer who sought to enter and search her home is prominently carrying a taser.  

On the occasion of the dramatic and thickly-peopled break-in on 26 June where not one mental health nurse or social worker but several bustled in on the officers’ heels to look under beds and peer into closets with intent to capture a hardworking equity lawyer, it is further clear the officer with the taser had full intent to use it, or keep it handy for swift use, as he whipped it out from under his vest and carried it behind his back as he entered.

26 June 2019, Nurse Smiles as Officer Holds Taser Behind Back/Covered Here

If this is not a betrayal of the public trust, what is? How is a Mental Health team engaging in adult care, public health or well-being by delivering 50,000 volt shocks using a deadly conducted energy device which shoots prongs into people’s bodies, designed to paralyze and incapacitate, and known cause of several deaths by cardiac arrest in the past?

And how is the Adult Care, Public Health, and Well-being Team at Redbridge Council justified in maintaining a cool silence over this matter? Does the Council wish to imply that they intend to continue in this practice and believe it is perfectly alright to knock out and quite possibly kill senior citizens in this fashion? It is quite clearly not a matter of public health, public safety, or personal well-being but its opposite when a police officer is permitted to brandish and deploy a deadly energy device on a member of the public, under the aegis of “Mental Health Care.”

It becomes painfully obvious rather that such an extreme police action in accompaniment with a team intent on a psychiatric arrest is intending primarily to subjugate and subdue a non-mentally-ill citizen, for purposes of political silencing, in flagrant violation of all protected freedoms of speech and expression in a democracy.

Neelu Berry notes that the Redbridge Council should respond to the taser held by the police officer and the Mental Health nurse smiling, also the fact that there was no incident that invoked the Mental Health Act. “The fact that the taser being used before the Mental Health Team Assessment was proof of an assassination of character or intellectual property. All the above actions of the team were contrary to Section 4 of the Criminal Law act 1967 which mandates wide publicity for crimes being committed, especially by corrupt state officers against Whistle.blowers who are protected Witnesses.”

Questions of Concern on Evidence of Fraud and Medical Malpractice by Queen’s Hospital Nephrologist Left Unanswered

The primary matter of medical malpractice evinced by wrongful attribution as mentally-ill of perfectly sane and mentally-well professionals like Mr. Ellis, covered at length earlier, was also left unanswered:

5) Are you aware that, as Ms. Berry spells out below, there does not appear to be any cause whatsoever for a Mental Health sectioning to have been indicated by any hospital or doctor in recent contact with Mr. Ellis: “The Mental Health Team of 8 had no reason to believe Mr Ellis had Mental Health issues because Dr Lever confirmed there was no evidence of it during a consultation.” Please note that this matter of Dr. Lever stating clearly it was not in his remit to make mental health evaluations while oxymoronically and peculiarly asking Mr. Ellis to submit to his recommendation that someone else should make a mental health evaluation–for no reason whatsoever–was discussed in my article Egregious Sectioning….linked above. Dr. Lever’s attitude and actions suggest that he is unreasonably and suspiciously persecuting a whistleblower reporting high-level corruption including hospital corruption.

The claiming of a personal data exemption to withhold information on the sectioning attempts on Mr. Ellis–a matter of vast public concern, and not in any way purely private, given its implications for all members of the UK and world public–also reads as an unnecessarily lax and expedient refusal to discuss the matter further, a commentary on the evasion of transparency and public accountability by the London Borough of Redbridge.

Questions of Concern on General Practice and Protocol also Left Unanswered

Questions regarding general practice and protocol in the matter of the Council pursuing a mentally sound citizen under false-labeling as mentally ill were equally left unanswered, with a “personal data” exemption being claimed, when the questions themselves indicate an interest in general procedure.

7) Why were there so many staff workers of whatever kind attendant, who are they, what is their professional qualification, and why were they all storming the bastion of Mr. Ellis’s home that morning?

8) What had these staff workers been told to warrant their all being there, en masse, as if they all needed to be there?

9) What is your understanding (I am asking Redbridge Council and the Care Quality Commission Health Service Regulating Body here) of the rationale behind getting a warrant under the Mental Health Act to section a completely sane and sound citizen, who in no way has engaged in harm to self or society and has never been in danger of same–and has given no-one, no doctor, no nurse, no medical professional, no neighbor, no friend, no interviewer any evidence whatsoever of such imputed harm?

The Council’s blanket response:

“The information is exempt from disclosure under Section 40(2) of the Freedom of Information Act (FoIA). The information is personal data as defined by the Data Protection Act 1998 (DPA). As it is information about someone else I’m unable to give this to you; release of this information would constitute a breach of Principle 1 of the DPA. Principle 1 states that personal data shall be processed (used) fairly and lawfully and, in particular, shall not be used unless at least one of the conditions in Schedule 2 of the DPA is met; in this case none of those conditions have been met. This response therefore acts as a refusal notice under section 17 of the FoIA.”

This matter continues therefore to be of great concern, and while the Council suggested Mr. Ellis could protest his treatment–“If Mr Ellis wishes to complain about his treatment he can do so by contacting the NELFT complaints team at nelftcomplaints@nhs.net“–this writer intends to submit an appeal for internal review, as suggested by the Information Request and Compliance team at the Council, as per their letter. 

It is also regrettably clear from this cover-all response that the officials at the Council penning it have sought to screen themselves from scrutiny and public accountability on a matter of grave concern to all citizens in a democracy; every citizen is at risk if a democratically-elected government can sink into syndicated corruption, protect people in authoritative positions who engage in medical malpractice, and unleash over-arching actions of harm on citizens in the name of psychiatric well-being.

Anyone and everyone could be subjected to a Mental Health Arrest-With-Taser on any doctor’s fraudulent, false-labeling recommendation then, it seems–and no need for the Council Mental Health teams to explain these actions: a situation which calls for immediate reform in both the Freedom of Information Act and the Mental Health Act.

Concerned citizens should be doubly alarmed and might wish to subject each member of this Council to closer scrutiny of platform and agenda for integrity and true interest in public health and safety. 

American Journalist Covering this British Government Debacle Retaliated Against with Anti-Personnel Weapons in India

It should also be reported that directly after completing a draft of this article and sending it in to the London Borough of Redbridge and their Press Office for review and comment as per their request, this reporter was hit immediately with intense anti-personnel “non-lethal” weapons AKA Stealth Assault Anti-Humane Weapons, inclusive of resounding ELFs from a local construction mixer and precision-hit Microwave Weapons from nearby cell towers or satellites, as well as intense scalar weapon-hits on private parts–all sounded on external shields, inducing projectile vomiting, migraines, and burning for over 48 hours. (The program of stealth assault involving electronic-warfare weaponry now installed in the US and UK to stifle freedom of speech and expression is worldwide, from all reporting victim accounts, and has been installed in India in exactly the same format.)

Clearly, the reason this story–as also many others of international import–is not being covered by mainstream media outlets in the UK or elsewhere is because such coverage is being stifled and repressed, by brutal attack of the journalists attempting coverage.

This information is being reported in the interests of informing the world public and UK public that Freedom of the Press in the UK is quite literally dead, despite fake attempts by the UK Government with the recent Global Conference on Media Freedom touting interest in media freedom–which perhaps translates more accurately to propaganda freedom for government use.

This information regarding anti-personnel assault on this writer was also provided earlier today to the Redbridge Council with a second request for comment, which elicited the following anonymized and opaque reply from the Press Office, London Borough of Redbridge:

“A council spokesperson said: “The council has responded to your FOI request and we have nothing further to add.”

Clearly, the London Borough of Redbridge believes it is possible to maintain an impenetrable silence on all matters related to their fraudulent Mental Health Act invocations on sane and mentally sound citizens and get away with it. This should be deeply concerning to all sane and mentally sound UK residents, and this writer advises that all in UK concerned by this matter make their feelings about Redbridge Council’s actions known publicly to them in writing.

This writer also requests that all readers take note of what is being reported here, about anti-personnel anti-humane weapon retaliation against journalists with gravitas.

British, American, and all Western governments seem to think they can maintain a semblance of “democracy” while assaulting all questioners, writers, journalists, activists, and whistle-blowers in stealth, with electronic-warfare weapons–and not be held accountable for it. As many know from reading my reports and watching my interviews, I believe these weapons, whose thrust I have been on the receiving-end of for almost six years now, are profoundly inhumane and should be banned.

My most recent correspondence with Redbridge Council reporting Anti-Personnel Stealth Weapon retaliation and their response to my request for comment: Response from Redbridge Council Press Office & Report of Anti-Personnel Assault on Journalist

The Redbridge Council Response letter is here: Response (information exempt)

My Letter of Concern to Redbridge Council and other members of the UK Government is here: Letter of Concern_Request to Stop All Wrongful Mental Health Sectioning Attempts on Mr. Edward Ellis, Equity Lawyer – Ramola D

My Request for Information to the Press Offices at Redbridge Council and the Care Quality Commission, along with Neelu Berry’s letter to the Care Quality Commission is here: Request for Information on Wrongful Sectioning Attempts on Mr. Edward Ellis, Equity Lawyer, 26 June 2019

Related:

Egregious Sectioning and Kidnap Attempts on Equity Lawyer Edward Ellis As the Completing Mass Corruption Remedy Process Exposes Pervasive Crime & Corruption in UK Courts, Police Departments, and Hospitals

Community Care or Deranged “Mental Health Team”? UK Police Carry Taser Into Home Break-In to Attack Whistleblower Patient with Kidney Failure

Ramola D Reports/NewsBreak 30: Wave of Mental Health Frauds in UK, New Zealand | Queen’s Hospital Fraudulently Reports Edward Ellis as Absconded Dialysis Patient

Mr. Edward Ellis, Equity Lawyer, Reports the Launch of a Mass Corruption Remedy Process in the United Kingdom and Calls for Principled Independents and Empowered Citizens to Step Forward

Ramola D Reports/NewsBreak 30: Wave of Mental Health Frauds in UK, New Zealand | Queen’s Hospital Fraudulently Reports Edward Ellis as Absconded Dialysis Patient

–Ramola D/Posted 7 July 2019

In a brief livestreamed conversation at Ramola D Reports yesterday afternoon, children’s rights activist, pharmacist, and whistleblower Neelu Berry described how the spate of whistleblower retaliation which has been regularly meted out to anti-corruption and anti-child-trafficking whistleblowers in the UK has amped up at high steam in the last couple weeks as several prominent activists and whistleblowers, even those with large public followings, such as John Paterson, Edward Ellis, John Wanoa, and Lee Cant have suddenly been literally state-kidnapped and subjected to fraudulent Mental Health sectioning arrests.

Astonishingly, despite public uproar, true-media coverage and enquiries made by this reporter and others to Redbridge Council, the Care Quality Commission and the Brighton and Sussex University Hospital Trusts and the Queen’s Hospital Trust, Edward Ellis, whose previous wrongful sectioning attempts have been reported here earlier, continues to be pursued by Ilford Police and Redbridge Council Mental Health workers as recent visits they have made, past the 26 June 10-person sectioning attempt, demonstrate.

Queen’s Hospital Nephrologist Dr. Lever Has Apparently Put Out False Information on Edward Ellis as a Kidney Dialysis Patient Gone Missing, Who Needs Mental Health Sectioning For His Own Good

Yesterday morning, 6 July, Neelu Berry reports that a new attempt was made in an uninvited visit and entry-under-duress of Neelu’s home where Edward Ellis had previously been taking sanctuary, in a thirteenth attempt to section him.

The policeman who threatened to “Break Entry” (to prevent which Neelu opened the door) stated that Queen’s Hospital had reported that Edward, characterized as a kidney dialysis patient gone missing, was being sought for as a “missing person” by police, which this policeman can be heard mentioning on the video recording of his invasion of Mrs. Berry’s late sister’s home.

This is worthy of close scrutiny because from the audio recording of Queen’s Hospital Dr. Lever’s conversation with Mr. Ellis on the 19th of June (contained in the Egregious Sectioning…article), it is quite clear that it is Dr. Lever’s uncalled-for and inappropriate suggestions to get Edward to submit to a psychiatric assessment, and his attempt to get “somebody else” to support these suggestions, with his secretive standby Mental Health team asking openly if they should “section” Edward at his command–all aggressive threats to his civil liberties and rights (since Mental Health labeling most definitely strips one of rights) and in no way connected to his kidney health–which caused Edward to abruptly leave the hospital premises, not any interest in “absconding” from “kidney dialysis treatment.”

Neelu had openly stated during that conversation interest in a second opinion on the issue of Edward’s kidney health, diagnosis, and treatment. There was some considerable doubt, Neelu has reported, about Dr. Lever’s readings and projections of the level of health this patient displayed, given his pronounced physical fitness and daily exercise regimen–had tests been switched, were the creatinine numbers really his?–which is what had prompted Ms. Berry and Mr. Ellis to mention interest in a second opinion.

Daily Harassment by Mental Health Workers and Police on Lying Notifications from Queen’s Hospital 

However it appears that Queen’s Hospital has issued a blatant lie to local Redbridge Council and Ilford Police, characterizing Edward as a kidney dialysis patient who had absconded or gone missing, projecting thereby doubt in his mental health, churning up fears about his physical health, and permitting police and Mental Health workers to swoop in to try to “find him” — all as a matter of “doing public good.”

Several attempts have been made to visit and enter the home, as security-camera footage reveals, with both police officers and Redbridge Council Mental Health workers going so far as to bend or kneel down to peer through mailslots in the door, walk around into the side and back gardens and peer through windows, hanging around the premises for tens of minutes, and peering into the parked SUV methodically through front and back windows.

Continued Police Harassment and Invasive Trespass In Face of Informative Media Coverage of Fraudulent Mental Health Sectioning Attempt at Queen’s Hospital Suggests Complicity

Neelu Berry informed the police officer trespassing into her home the police needed to stop the daily harassment, trespass, and search for Edward, since he was not a mentally ill person requiring police to search for him. The police officer responded that he “did not know anything” about a mental health fraud or sectioning attempt and repeated he was looking for Edward because he was “missing.”

Perhaps police officers do not actually read the news–reported here openly–and missed the fact that a certain nefarious Queen’s Hospital nephrologist who had been caught in the act of impersonating a psychiatrist–and demanding that a patient waiting for kidney dialysis treatment needed to be admitted in hospital immediately in sudden high urgency and needed a mental health exam immediately with equal urgency (a determination he was in no way qualified to make)–had been told in no uncertain terms his services were not needed, and therefore had been discharged of any responsibilities of care for this patient.

Perhaps their thoughtless compliance with this nefarious nephrologist stemmed from blind allegiance to a NHS Trust hospital. But their actions of blind compliance, inability to first investigate the matter through news reports, and determined pursuit of Mr. Ellis as a putatively mentally ill person mindlessly running from his own needed medical treatment through harassive forced entries, daily trespass and daily harassment of the other residents can still not be excused.

More likely is the possibility that Redbridge and Ilford Police are deliberately choosing to recognize and act only on Queen’s Hospital medical staff-person Dr. Lever’s wrongful notifications while choosing to ignore media coverage here and elsewhere online on the truth behind the fraudulent Mental Health Sectioning attempt by Dr. Lever at Queen’s Hospital on 19 June, in an act of obvious complicity with this highly questionable doctor’s interest in shutting down Mr. Ellis’s Corruption Remedy Process which also indicts NHS hospital crime.

Doubly egregious is the fact that this officer entered the premises with a visibly displayed taser–whose dangers were discussed here earlier–in clear intent to stun and mow down this older patient: how is Redbridge Council permitting such a travesty? How is use of a taser on a kidney dialysis patient permissible? Tasers can cause cardiac arrest and death, particularly on the health-compromised, as discussed widely online by investigative journalists, lawyers, and doctors.

Visibly Displayed Taser on Police Officer Entering Home for Invasive Search on Threat of Forced Entry, 6 July 2019

Constable Casey, 6 July 2019, at Door Prior to Entry-Invited-Under-Duress

The many recent attempts to section Edward Ellis, whose anti-corruption work is clearly under attack by locals in Redbridge, as questionable police constables work with questionable NHS Trust doctors to pursue him, have been recorded below on private CCTV security cameras, and published online:

27 June 2019:

28 June 2019:

5 July 2019:

6 July 2019:

How the Public Can Assist with the Corruption Clean-Up Process in the UK

Neelu closes out Newsbreak 30 with some encouraging information and advice for those willing to help . The matters which Edward has brought forward—the many corruption claims of child theft, home theft, farm theft etc.—can now be rectified by members of Parliament and Councils, Neelu Berry notes, as the new Prime Minister waits in the wings to take office, in a way which cleans out the corruption and resets Government to start anew.

Any MP, she notes, can step forward to offer Edward Ellis, who now can be considered the caretaker Prime Minister, his needed health treatments—kidney dialysis—through their own NHS Trust hospitals, any MP can step forward to return stolen children to their own loving parents in other boroughs from where they have been stolen.

From Neelu Berry: The number is 0207 219 3000 to call Houses of Parliament, to speak to MPs to provide Asylum to whistleblowers being terrorised by their local Government services, to speak to Health, Home & Justice Ministers, to demand Witness Protection, release all whistleblowers, jailed and sectioned.

John Paterson/UK Sectioned, John Wanoa/New Zealand Sectioned, Lee Cant/UK Attacked, Neelu Berry/UK Harassed, Home Stolen

Neelu Berry also reports on the sectioning arrest on July 1 of John Paterson, who had been wrongly prosecuted for attending the court hearings of Sabine McNeill and David Noakes, fined 19,500 pounds, which he sought to appeal at the Royal Court House on July 1, at which time he was kidnapped by the Mental Health workers.

Across the world in New Zealand, John Wanoa who has claims in ancestry to King William I and has been active as an anti-corruption Equity Lawyer in New Zealand was also arrested and subjected to Mental Health Sectioning Fraud on a health visit to a local hospital; Neelu Berry has tried to find out more:

Lee Cant, a CPA who is also active in anti-corruption matters and has exposed money laundering and extortionate service charges in Hackney Council, and discussed the global gold remedy process via Swiss Indo along with Neelu Berry at Ramola D Reports/Report #87 last year (video linked below), has also been physically attacked by a former client and is currently recovering.

Especially disturbing is the fact that Neelu Berry’s refuge home at her late sister’s is now being daily trespassed on by police and mental health workers.

Neelu Berry, activist extraordinaire for whistleblowers, who has sought to have Julian Assange released as well, reports that she herself fears that further attacks and attempts to section her as well as a whistleblower may be on the cards, and asks for public protection through speaking out and speaking for her and all of these whistleblowers being attacked, to local Council, MPs, and Ministers. Viewers and readers who have been following the Mass Corruption Remedy process for some time may recall that Neelu Berry’s home was unlawfully stolen by the State as reported here earlier.

Stay tuned for more coverage on these matters. Public participation in these matters is encouraged.

Expressing concern and care for these whistle-blowers’ lives and asking for their immediate release from Mental Health captivity frauds will help establish public concern about these matters to the “authorities” who are engaging in whistle-blower retaliation thinly disguised as fraudulent “healthcare.” Obviously, none of these towering intellectuals and anti-corruption activists and equity lawyers is mentally ill.

In fact it is nothing but public concern and true-media coverage such as this which will eventually make the difference between maintaining a corrupt status quo protected by criminals and changing the system from the inside-out so ethical, accountable people begin to occupy positions of power, as Edward Ellis’s entire Mass Corruption Remedy Process seeks to establish.

RELATED

Egregious Sectioning and Kidnap Attempts on Equity Lawyer Edward Ellis As the Completing Mass Corruption Remedy Process Exposes Pervasive Crime & Corruption in UK Courts, Police Departments, and Hospitals

Community Care or Deranged “Mental Health Team”? UK Police Carry Taser Into Home Break-In to Attack Whistleblower Patient with Kidney Failure