(Tallahassee, FL) In the summer of 2017, the Florida legislature in Tallahassee passed a strengthening of its famous “Stand Your Ground” self-defense law, specifically to thwart “over-zealous district attorneys from prosecuting people who were attacked on their own property and forced to defend themselves.” And Florida Governor Scott signed this strengthened version into law soon thereafter.
Yet, how is it that the apparently extremely ambitious Assistant District Attorney, Lorena Vollrath-Bueno not only totally ignored the right of Florida citizens to defend themselves from attackers trespassing on their own property with obvious ill intent, but she has even taken this to an outrageous extreme.
Vollrath-Bueno actually chose to bring charges against a woman in her 60’s, who was attacked by a man half her age and twice her size, who not only was intentionally trespassing, but had gone to the trouble of hiding his car down the victim’s driveway, ringing the doorbell, then retreating to hide until the intended victim came out into the driveway from the side door. At that point, Christopher Hines Dean, ambushed Karen Melton Stewart, cursing and swinging at her, as corroborated by a witness at the door, Patricia Melton, Stewart’s mother.
Blows were exchanged after Dean threw the first punch, then Dean left and both called Leon County Sheriff’s Department (LCSD) to report the incident and injuries.
Dean, in his 30’s, has no known occupation, and a history of substance abuse and battery.
Stewart is a retired National Security Analyst who held a Top Secret clearance for almost 30 years and received awards for her series of six month Top Secret intelligence reports supporting Operation Iraqi Freedom, which was estimated by her own managers as having saved over 2,000 lives.
And Stewart had been reporting Dean for months as trespassing to harass her and her elderly parents, with whom she stayed part-time to help them out after she had retired, and was waiting for her husband in Maryland to do so also. Stewart had even reported having seen him run from their dogs and jump the fence late one night, which resulted in Dean being treated for a fractured leg.
She had even written a letter to his widowed mother asking her to get control over her son before she would be forced to defend herself against him, after Stewart’s brothers’ attempts to reason with the widowed mother resulted in bizarrely inappropriate flirtation from her.
In regard to Stewart and her family’s efforts to get legal protection from months of harassment by Dean and others affiliated with him, the LCSD was largely unresponsive, though one lackadaisical attempt at help was further thwarted by detective Paul Salvo’s refusal to put up cameras facing the correct direction to catch Dean or any other intruders. Then they were taken down in short time when they of course showed nothing by design. And one wonders if Dean was not given a friendly warning, considering the LCSD’s demonstrable unabashed bias.
Just two weeks before the attack, Dean’s sister, an employee of the LCSD, had visited Stewart unannounced to taunt her that they were a Sheriff’s Department family (their mother had worked there 24 years) and that as family, the LCSD would never lift a finger against her brother so he or anyone in their family could do as they pleased to Stewart and her family. The two exchanged words and the sister left.
On the day of the attack, October 18, 2016, two deputies were dispatched to get the stories of both parties, a male deputy to 2036 Wildridge Dr. to get Dean’s story, which varied wildly from Stewart’s and the witness’ story, and a female deputy to speak to Stewart and the witness. Until a supervisor arrived, the female deputy confirmed that they were sent out to arrest Dean of course as the pre-meditated aggressor. When an older supervisor appeared, he dismissed Stewart’s story and the witness’ account and told the female deputy,
“We are not going to arrest Renee’s son. We are going to say that Dean just came over for a nice, friendly visit and Stewart just attacked him for nothing.”
“We are going to say Stewart has mental issues (with no proof and indeed abundant proof to the contrary).”
“We are going to charge Stewart with assault with a deadly weapon (flashlight) and arrest her.”
At that point the female deputy seemed to become quite embarrassed, looked at Stewart who while a few feet away, had heard the supervisor’s ad hoc fabrication of the lie and the false premise upon which to arrest her, the real victim. The female deputy then just looked hang-dog at her feet, as if unable to fathom the turn of events.
Stewart was arrested, taken to Tallahassee Memorial Hospital to get a completely split lip sewed up, then she was transported to the Tallahassee jail, stayed overnight where the jail made sure to wash her bloodied shirt to mitigate evidence of the horrific injury given her by Dean, then was bonded out and returned for 24 hours to her parent’s home.
Before she could even secure a lawyer, detective Salvo appeared and demanded to arrest her for yet another unknown (nonexistent) crime. In jail she was told that detective Salvo had (fooled) a judge into thinking that a “trail camera” put up on her parents’ property in a tree to catch the prowler (Dean) coming over the Melton’s chain link fence and damaging it nightly to trespass and harass, was actually Stewart “cyberstalking” Dean and/or his mother, Renee Stockton, with whom the jobless Dean lived, or more accurately said, lived off of.
Of course, Salvo had to know that a trail camera generally, and this model specifically, could not possibly be used to cyberstalk since it had no ability to connect to a computer or the internet, it merely took 1-3 photos of motion events near it that were stored on a memory chip inside it.
The camera chip was removed and examined and the photos showed the Melton’s damaged fence and nothing more, likely triggered by branches swaying in the wind or a bird flying by, though several yards away the fence was being newly damaged out of camera view.
Salvo knowingly perjured himself.
Yet, the charges still stand against Stewart. Deputies were asked to take finger prints on the fence by a Melton family member, which they purposely botched by taking them in the wrong location as pointed out to them, but ignored.
Not only did Vollrath-Bueno spit in the face of the Stand Your Ground law but she also showed a depraved disregard for crime victims in Florida, as well as spitting in the face of women’s rights, a woman’s right to defend herself against a male attacker, and elder rights, by insisting that a 60 year old woman, at the whim of authorities, contrary to Florida law, cannot defend herself against a much younger attacker on her own property, even one who had a recent and clear history of harassing her and a criminal record indicating she was not his only victim by far.
Unreasonably aggressive assistant district attorneys are usually politically motivated to use a body count to attain a lucrative judgeship, lucrative not only in higher salary, but lucrative in the ability to take out loans and magically have them marked repaid after a decision was rendered that pleased the real loan source (1).
If ADA Vollrath-Bueno can “do favors” for a less than honest Sheriff’s Department doling out outrageous and obvious perversions of justice at whim, then what kind of judge would Vollrath-Bueno make?
Perhaps one like Angela Dempsey (2), also assigned the Stewart case, who has been sanctioned by the Florida Supreme court for blatantly false ads in her previous run for that office?
In a December 2017 update, Lorena Vollrath-Bueno is being sued by a lawyer in North Florida, for accepting known perjurious testimony from a dishonest Florida Law Enforcement member in order to bring false charges against him, for obvious unethical purposes. Just like she did with Stewart.
Perhaps this unexpected scrutiny is why Vollrath-Bueno turned the Florida v. Stewart case over to Assistant District Attorney Brittany Fox, who, rather than actually investigating the feeble case based entirely on premeditated perjury by the LCSD, cut out all facts provided by Stewart and the witness, and made a lazy, face-saving but still outrageously unjust offer for the State of Florida to Stewart’s attorneys, Annabelle Dias and Alex Morris, for a “deferment” of charges, offering to drop the outrageous “assault with a deadly weapon (flashlight)” that perverted self defense into a felony contrary to not only the supposed enlightened perspective of the Stand Your Ground law, but the recently strengthened Florida Stand Your Ground law, and demanded that Stewart be on a type of probation for daring to defend herself, for two years during which, she was
a) not allowed back to Leon County Florida to visit her elderly parents (who are presently 87 and 89) unless the Florida judge “allows” it, essentially guaranteeing she will never see her parents alive again,
b) could not carry a weapon (do they mean a flashlight or an actual, real “weapon” since the Florida court system and law enforcement cannot tell the difference?),
c) cannot leave the new state in which she resides without “permission”,
d) cannot mention Renee Stockton in “Social Media” because Stewart’s attempts to get her to control her son had resulted in Stockton having to ask her doctor to “increase her usual (?) meds”;
e) cannot contact any Florida State, Leon County, or Tallahassee City official unless they contact her first… a blatantly unconstitutional abridgment of her First Amendment Right to free speech, because none wanted to hear what was going on in their scofflaw, compromised state. (This includes Bill Montford, the legislative representative from her district who should care about the Stand Your Ground law purposeful misapplication, but apparently does not; the Leon County Counsel members; Florida Governor Scott; Attorney General Pam Bondi, to whom she wrote five times in the time period between early 2015 and late 2016, trying in vain to explain and show evidence and expert testimony of the fact that NSA/DHS/FBI/Fusion Center/Infragard and opportunistic thugs like Dean, were engaged in an unconstitutional, ID Theft and life insurance murder-for-profit scam utilizing a fraudulent Terrorist Watch List against the American people to enrich themselves, to include many more victims than herself, within the State of Florida and in fact, nationwide, but who, meaning Bondi, could only muster the response “I am not law enforcement” to Stewart’s warnings and seasoned analysis and assessments of what she was experiencing; the thoroughly compromised good old boys’ club, the LCSD; the lethargic Tallahassee Police Department, one detective from which told her he did not believe anyone from Tallahassee would be smart enough to ever have worked for the NSA; the Tallahassee City “Ethics Officer” Julie Meadows-Keefe, who told her she knew “all about her” (from the Fusion Center, i.e. vicious slander known to be utilized nationwide to justify mercenary and lucrative covert-because-they-are-illegal harassment campaigns); and the Tallahassee/Leon County Fire Department, none of whom cared about criminal abuses by NSA/DHS/FBI/Fusion Center/Infragard personnel; nor cared that multiple people had already reported harassment by Tallahassee area Infragard thugs or related mercenary stalkers and harassers with criminal records.
Others reporting vicious, contractual, paid, organized harassment (-such as Chris Dean allegedly participated in), in and around Tallahassee, to the amazingly unresponsive Florida officials who were and are, habitually unable to connect the dots, were John Mallory, ex-Naval intelligence,Mark Albright, an army veteran, and Myron May, a lawyer attempting to wrest a friend’s child away from a Tallahassee pedophile ring operating through Florida State Child Protective Services, which many believe got him targeted through the FBI Fusion Center/Infragard harassment protocol secretly put in place shortly after 9/11 to go after those who threatened criminal activity within government.
After two years of pleading for help with 24/7 stalking and electronic harassment, Myron lashed out in February 2014 and was enthusiastically shot (24 times) by the same Florida police who had utterly refused him equal protection under the law.
As for Mallory and Albright, the last time Stewart spoke to either man, was in 2016, they both expressed serious fear for their lives from the Florida stalker network, and though she had been in constant touch, each man vanished within a similar time period and she concludes they met the same fate intended for her, death at the hands of essentially, a secret death cult run by the Deep State and its State, County, and local sycophant networks of mercenary profiteers who, while they were publicly professing ignorance and incredulity at the notion of mercenary stalking networks in Florida, knew all about them.
But Stewart’s lawyers, Anabelle Dias and Alex Morris, had no desire to demand all the ludicrous charges be dropped because they assessed the judgement of Tallahassee residents and officials to be far too limited in intellect and sophistication to understand that Stewart was the victim of horrific, unthinkable and lengthy abuse due to the gross incompetence of Tallahassee/Leon County “authorities” and that Dean was indeed the depraved stalker, harasser, attacker, and would-be murderer Stewart described him to be…for months.
However, Florida is a State that long ago gained notoriety to those in-the-know, as an out-of-control playground for fascistic stalkers, as portrayed in depth in David Lawson’s “CauseStalking” study, published many years ago, in which he made clear that these mercenary networks were a long established industry in Florida.
It is just possible that those officials feigning disbelief anew with each victim, might just have been more concerned with protecting Florida’s tourist industry and retirement haven reputation… where older women apparently had better noteven think of defending themselves against violent, unemployabledrug addicts, at least not those with nepotism a factor within locallaw enforcement entities.
And officials and gang stalkers alike showed no respect whatsoever that Stewart had not only served her country long and well, as had her father, who had had a long career in the Air Force and was a wounded Vietnam War veteran before retiring to Tallahassee and working for the State of Florida government another couple decades, and who had been on the very first Florida State University football team, and her mother, a 1950’s Ohio transplant, had actually won a contest to name the FSU band – the Marching Chiefs, so both were rather iconic in Tallahassee history. But, none of that made a difference in a town fueled by utter depravity with an exceedingly thin veneer of “Southern charm”… [banjos playing in the background.]
Nice to know what North Florida really thinks of its military and intelligence community war heroes and patriots.
–RAE (Report, Analysis, Op-Ed) | Ramola D | Posted September 10, 2019
On the 21st of April, 2019, the Chicago Sun-Times, owned by a group of neither intellectuals nor literati but businessmen and politicians in Chicago, ran a story by columnist and editorial-team member Neil Steinberg, who was once arrested for getting drunk and beating his wife, and spent a month in an alcohol-rehab facility, as his profile in Wikipedia—in itself a forum famous for its selective truths and rampant propaganda (much like Steinberg’s article here)—so ardently details.
The title of this masterpiece by a little-known journalist now marked in Wikipedia as a drunken wife-beater is “Are you being tracked? Burned by lasers? Maybe you are a ‘Targeted Individual‘
Not solicitous, not concerned, not critically enquiring nor journalistically curious, but skeptical, mocking, stopping just short of sticking a question-mark at the end of that pithy projection of disbelief, and offering a label in quotes, “Targeted Individual,” priming the reader to care just as less as the writer about all of it.
A label, indeed, used as an indictment and straitjacket, a closed door and condemnation, as labels usually are.
And a not-so-subtle invite to the reader to dismiss the entire subject as illusory.
No Longer in Kansas, Neil, Time to Read Orwell
Which is more than confirmed in
Steinberg’s opening as he launches into a cascade of scenarios, all
presented as improbable, unimaginable—a skepticism which might be
convincing if we lived in Dorothy’s Kansas, but reeks of
Fusion-Center-driven propaganda instead since we actually reside in
post 9/11, post-Orwell, All-Horrors-Plausible America:
“Strangers are following you. Teams of them, coordinating their surveillance. Recording you. Attacking you with sonic devices. Maybe burning you with lasers. Maybe implanting grain-sized trackers inside your body. You can feel the hard bumps under your skin.
You are alarmed, naturally, and turn for help to those you trust: your family and friends. Maybe law enforcement. Only they don’t believe you. They might even act like you’re the problem. Like you’re crazy.
Welcome to the world of Targeted Individuals, a loose confederation of those, in their words, subject to the “growing crimes of organized stalking, surveillance, abuse and electronic harassment.””
This last, in tandem with the bland caption below the photo of a group of people with signs noting Covert Experiments, Torture, Microwave Weapons, and Failures of Law Enforcement, now labelled as “People who claim they are being put under organized surveillance and harassed by shady forces” continues the priming: you, the reader, are enjoined to react only with skepticism to the possibility of surveillance crimes, illicit experiments, torture, microwave weapons, and harassment being reported.
Because of course, with the callous promiscuities of the Patriot Act, the excesses of the NDAA’s Indefinite Detentions, the twisted revisions of the Common Rule favoring carte blanche secret experiments for Intelligence agencies & the Justice department in conjunction with Executive Order 12333, the cannibalizing military complacencies of 5241.1R which permit surveillees to be experimented on and character-assassinated, the hundreds of bio-behavioral field-tests with millimeter/microwave weapons currently ongoing, the numerous categories of citizen the FBI has declared it must and will surveil and investigate, the nauseous militarizing of police and hand-over of multiple powers to fusion centers, the sinister 1994 Memorandum of Understanding between the DOD and DOJ permitting the testing of “advanced technologies” on Americans, the many revelations by whistleblowers from the CIA, NSA, FBI, DHS of perfidy in-house inclusive of DEW attacks on whistleblowers, the hundreds of thousands of National Security Letters rubberstamped every year by the corrupt FISA court, the unauthorized spying of innocents up and down the coasts & heartland of the US, including the outright targeting and surveillance of an elected President by men in high office, the Stasi crossover into community policing nationwide, no organized surveillance and harassment by shady forces could possibly be happening, oh no…Neil Steinberg (the rehabilitated alcoholic) says so.
The Mental Illness, Paranoia, and Delusion Fraud: The DOD/CIA Psy Op of Labeling Victims and Equating that Label with Paranoia and Delusion
One part of this troubled scenario—where purported journalists can write hit-pieces on whole groups of people and get away with it, thanks also to precedent set by such stalwarts as The New York Times (“The United States of Paranoia”) and Wired (“Mind Games: The Tortured Lives of “Targeted Individuals””), proving they’re really full-on propagandists, paid to deceive—is the inherent difficulty in the label “Targeted Individual.”
A military term quite factual in its meaning yet offering a pigeonholing label now historically misused and abused by reporters who claim people “self-identify” as TIs (short-form for Targeted Individual) and do nothing to investigate their claims/reports but spend reams of column-inches mocking, ridiculing, and calling them “delusional,” this term now occupies a conflicted signifying space, at once literal and associative, which no doubt has been the intention all along, to tie the term to notions of paranoia and delusion.
Stage set, therefore, for a propaganda artist like Mr. Steinberg to engage in some hard-core Media POPPCon—Psy Op Propaganda Piece Conning—which he does, with aplomb. Reading the rest of his article follows the formula for propaganda success over at POPPConville (a MockOp subdivision of Langley): Cast TIs as delusional, interview someone who helps establish TIs are delusional, cast this someone as delusional, call on a psychologist to state the lot are delusional, bring up “mass delusions” and “Internet” syndromes, close-case on anything TIs claim, now that you’ve worked so hard to damage their credibility by naming them delusional.
What is lost in this merry-go-round of formula madness is that “Targeted Individuals” are reporting victims of extremely grave human rights violations under cover of Fusion Center Surveillance, involving the non-consensual use of silent electromagnetic weapons, sonic weapons, scalar weapons, neuroweapons, bioweapons such as microchip implants—all bio-hacking, neuro-hacking “advanced technologies” and “non-lethal weapons” that both DOD and DOJ have publicly established they are testing—treasonously and unethically—on Americans, in addition to harassive COINTELPRO, extrajudicial surveillance, and worldwide “community policing” Psy Ops also known colloquially as Gang Stalking—as this writer has been reporting for several years now, and as many other writers and whistleblowers, such as Paul Baird, Barbara Hartwell, Karen Melton-Stewart, Dr. Rauni Kilde, Mark Rich, Cheryl Welsh, Soleil Mavis, John Finch, Dr. John Hall, Dr. Eric Karlstrom, Harlan Girard, Dr. Corkin Cherubini, Mary Gregory, Renee Pittman Mitchell, Rosanne Schneider, Mojmir Babacek, and others, have also been reporting for years.
It is no exaggeration to say Targeted Individuals have been extrajudicially targeted for extreme persecution and illicit and unethical Mil/Intel experimentation—by corrupt criminals in power seeking to ruthlessly silence people of integrity, including activists and whistleblowers—and my own numerous interviews over the years, my own 6-year experience of being extrajudicially targeted, and my research and published investigative journalism, in addition to that of others (named above) confirms this.
Free’s Statement to Neil Steinberg Regarding Targeted Individuals
Being Mentally Ill
In this particular case, it has been extraordinarily concerning to myself and other journalists and human rights activists to note that Ella Free who runs talk shows on Talkshoe for TIs and has tried to establish herself as a radio and talk show persona under her banner “Freedom For Targeted Individuals,” purporting to be deeply concerned about TIs and seeking to offer human rights “support” is quoted as herself calling TIs mentally ill.
Calling spokeswoman, “Ella Free,” started with a surprise.
“A good portion of people who claim to be Targeted Individuals are actually mentally ill,” she said. Straight to the elephant in the room. “So many of them, people have the same story: it’s interesting that a person isolated is having a very similar scenario.”
She meant “interesting” as in “persuasive” — these people are describing the same thing, therefore it must have basis in reality. That logic doesn’t hold up.
Giving Ella the benefit of the doubt, despite being incensed—as an investigative science and technology journalist who has been researching and reporting on this subject for 5 years–at this false statement (more on this below) I contacted Ella fairly immediately on Twitter, DM (text on Twitter), and email to find out what she had said to Neil Steinberg and if indeed she had said what he claimed, that many TIs are mentally ill.
Free: “It Was A Strategy Behind It”
In the course of the convoluted text/email conversations that followed, it became clear that Ella Free had 1) indeed said to Steinberg that a “portion” of Tis were mentally ill, and 2) sought to explain to him simultaneously—with her apparently non-existent communications skills—that TIs “came across that way’ because “it’s hard to discern the symptoms”/”the symptoms seem the same.” Her texts sought to explain to me that she’d had a “strategy” behind this statement of hers, a strategy which had apparently backfired.
Does agreeing with a propaganda-publishing misleading reporter working for mainstream media constitute a strategy?
Ella also stated that she did not keep on top of all that has been published in recent times in terms of disclosure or analysis, which means she has missed Dr. James Giordiano’s recent rather stunning disclosures of military neuroexperimentation on “selected targeted individuals” and Debra Schnelle’s astonishing reveal of “neuro cognitive weapons” inducive of high-speed-Alzheimer’s the US Navy was seeking to build countermeasures for, and Dr. Hoffman’s and Dr. Golumb’s and Dr. Giardiano’s affirmations of neuroweaponry and radiation weaponry being used on the diplomats from China and Cuba reported to have been hit with sonic weapons originally–among other interesting revelations.
What DARPA, MIT, and Dr. Giordiano in
particular have been publishing recently is nothing short of
mind-blowing—especially in terms of public acknowledgment of the
kinds of neurotechnologies only Tis had previously been talking
about, even though patents for many of these have been long in the
Stressing how busy she is “supporting”
those who are targeted, she stated she had no time to read.
What then is she doing acting as a spokesperson for those targeted?
Post the publication of Report #144 with CIA whistleblower Barbara Hartwell, Ella Free left a torrent of comments on Twitter, including one disavowing any claim from her of being a journalist, and one suggesting that talking about the technology being used on targets was provenly pointless, in response to a tweet from me pointing out that Targeted Justice Board members Dr. Katherine Horton and Richard Lighthouse were both putting out Disinfo regarding the technology, and that Midge Mathis was blindly supporting them, despite, most especially, Dr. Katherine Horton’s well-reported and widely-known petty, juvenile, but profoundly injurious and sinister smear attacks, sabotage-activities, calls to violence, and echo-stalking/mirroring displays-in-plain-sight of her Intel Neuro-Linguistic-Programming efforts, the latter aimed directly at me, earlier described in The Consequences of Infiltration,Swiss Cheese and Bayonets, and The End of Techno Crime Fighters Forum: The Real Backstory.
Contextualizing Ella Free’s tweet (below) regarding ignoring the technology, are some of my previous tweets regarding Disinfo, clarifying my stance re. what I see as an influx of Disinfo being poured into the TI activism space by highly questionable personalities in Targeted Justice and Freedom for Targeted Individuals and supported and endorsed by others such as Frank Allen of Targeted Massachusetts (@FranktheArcher), and a couple tweets in response to Lulie’s (@B91827364) questioning of that stance. (Lulie apparently has removed her Twitter account, hence the blanks below.) Ella’s tweet, focus of this scrutiny, is in the last tweet pictured below.
Then there’s the assurances from Ella Free, post-article, that she’d had most enriching conversations with #MockOp minion Neil Steinberg and he was going to issue a follow-up article filled with truth and facts (Dream On, really), while stating to her it was not his intention to “sadden” anyone. In contrast, consider the actual pithless remonstrances she apparently made on email, post-article, which her pal Neil brushes off like he might a flea, oh, a mentally-challenged flea at that. Both below.
Media Tactic from Neil Steinberg: Find a Lone “Spokesperson” to
Cast as Delusional
Tellingly, and most intriguingly, Ella
revealed that Neil Steinberg had told her he wanted to talk to her
alone for his article.
Remember the POPPCon formula for
success in Mindwash Media, over yon at POPPConville (wealthy suburb
of Langley)? Cast TIs as delusional, interview someone who helps
establish TIs are delusional, cast this someone as delusional…
I spoke with Free and listened to her interviews on Internet shows, about how a bad online relationship expanded into obsessiveness — whether hers or someone else’s I’ll leave unaddressed. Maybe everyone at the beach was videotaping her.
“I knew right off this guy had hired these people to do this to me,” she said.
Maybe the stabbing pain in her leg was being induced.
I knew it was artificial,” she said. “I thought it was a laser, maybe going off the wi-fi.”
I do not mean to
suggest that I see Ella in the same light as any of the other named
witnesses above, each of whom has a solid history of highly credible
research, testimonial, and reportage behind them.
The difference is, Ella – whose words, as she stated to me, could certainly have been taken out of context in order to cast her as delusional, as evident in the semantic sleight-of-hand above – openly confesses she has no idea about the technologies being used, makes no effort to determine what they might be, discourages others from doing so (as recently on Twitter), and suggests it is schizophrenic to read and learn widely from articles and videos, exercise critical thinking, and get informed!
Insider-Outsider MockOp Media Psy Op: Factors of Note
I will also note here that Ella’s story of being obsessively stalked by a single deranged acquaintance appears to many of us, extrajudicially targeted, who are being multiply-monitored, surveilled, COINTELPRO’d, high-tech-weapon-hit and harassed by whole groups of Fusion Center-run minions (including local police, ambulance, and EMS personnel, often flashing Masonic symbols) in highly organized fashion indicative of Mil/Intel operations, is highly anomalous and in no way typical of the general TI experience. But comes across really as nothing but a fairy-tale, token concoction to gain her entrance into the highly-fragmented and severely-infiltrated, data-collector-strewn, targeted “community.”
In fact, as many readers may know, one important reason I am writing this article is to illustrate why Ella Free is clearly not a trustworthy spokesperson for those targeted and reporting victims of fusion-center trafficking into black ops military/intelligence/academic neuro/behavioral/medical experimentation, who are being disappeared with the label “Targeted Individuals” now freely being synonymized by Mainstream Media, as Steinberg does, with Paranoid and Delusional—as part of the gigantic False-Reality-Construct being run by Operation Mockingbird’s media minions, as noted in this recent expose of CBS 60 Minutes’ Targeted America, a well-scripted-and-played Tell-a-Lie-Vision production playing the Cuba/China Mysterious Weapons Charade.
When she is not informed, not well-read, not aware, what is she doing running an organization termed “Freedom for Targeted Individuals” and handing out flyers which strategized-tunnel-vision reporters like Neil Steinberg can latch on to?
Also of note is the fact that it is the Targeted Justice group here, along with Ella Free and Matthew Aaron’s group, Freedom for Targeted Individuals, offering a public face for mainstream Chicago media to notice while using her flyers: is this their joint intent–through on-street-activism, while also pushing Disinfo and Misdirection in efforts to limit the public disclosure, as covered here earlier?
And why, most of all, did Neil Steinberg interview only Ella for his little froth-piece with a purpose, to denigrate Tis as mentally ill? What does that really signify about his own interests in covering the issues of targeting and being targeted? Not to mention the interests of the Chicago Sun-Times in projecting those reporting the persecutory depredations of Surveillance Abuse and wrongful watchlisting—which has permitted Mil/Intel/Univ exploitation and human trafficking–as mentally ill?
How does this not
establish the Chicago Sun-Times as complicit, in this clear
Also: As Barbara Hartwell asks in her meticulous examination of Ella’s own words and actions here, who is supporting the many billboards she has now placed in many cities and seeks to place in many more? Those who are targeted and being destroyed are generally flat-broke, near-homeless, kept unemployed or low-income-employed by severe blacklisting, wrongfully psych-committed or wrongfully incarcerated; clearly her benefactors are well-monied: what is their purpose? Given especially, the Victim Message of those weeping blue-eyed billboards, which completely bypass the Governmental/Fusion Center/Military/Intelligence/Academic/Medical Research nature of these illicit targeting and persecution programs, and highlight contract-stalking instead, suggesting private stalking, not taxpayer-paid-for, pervasive, government-run, military-funded, Defense-granted programs.
To me, as to many others (who have reported to me the lopsided focus and selective highlighting of witness on the interminably long (3-4 hours) conference calls that she runs), the conclusion that Ella Free is a carefully-strategized, deliberately-planted misdirector “activist” running an insider Psy Op to match the carefully-strategized, deliberately-planted misdirector “journalist” outsider Psy Op, which Steinberg embodies, is inescapable.
And how this might fit into a historic alt-media construct run by CIA fraudsters keen to keep us all swimming in Fake News and False Realities, is well-described by CIA Whistleblower Barbara Hartwell in her observation of long-time alt-media persona Ken Adaichi, who stepped forward in 2017 to squash and obscure the witness of real truth-telling writers and journalists, including myself, by avidly tunnel-vision-spotlighting the Talkshoe antics of Ella Free.
My own previous comments on Ella Free’s Hollywood connections and background-supported ability to persuade the most extraordinary guests onto her calls, including such as former NSA Technical Director Bill Binney–who has to date ignored my several requests and invites to come do an interview on my video channel Ramola D Reports–can be found at The Consequences of Infiltration, and other articles and comments I have posted online.
for Organized Persecution With High-Tech Weapons: Of Course the
Government is Involved
On the subject of who is targeting and assaulting TIs, what also surfaced from my emails with Ella Free was that she had sent Steinberg a list of statements about people targeted which her FFTI partner Dr. Matthew Aaron had compiled. Much of this is highly questionable. Both have made statements that government agencies are not involved, when much evidence to the contrary exists. Pretty much everyone knows that large-scale organized social ostracizing, blacklisting, character-assassination, and harassment which includes ground and aerial stalking (involving small planes, drones, and helicopters), non-stop monitoring, neighborhood hostility, and obvious COINTELPRO on the roadways cannot be accomplished without Fusion Center and local government complicity and oversight.
While private individuals and companies may be involved in targeting and covert persecution of people, their participation is both concealed and made possible by Fusion Center (government agency) contracting. NSA whistleblower Bill Binney has expressly spoken of public-private partnerships in mass surveillance and counterterrorism activities which has ensured that thousands of private contractors are being supported and directed by the government.
Further, in a multiplicity of programs connecting Defense funds to University researchers (DURIP and MURI programs, for instance, as well as the Minerva Research Initiative and new Defense Education Institution and Civilian University Research (DECUR) Partnership) and to research institutions which are increasingly doing away with Informed Consent, citing lies and equivocations like Minimal Risk, Broad Consent, and Benefit to Participant, government monies are being funneled into unethical experimentation involving top Universities, hospitals, research institutions—as Dr. Millicent Black’s experience indicates, and others’ – matters of interest to this writer, to be further investigated and fully reported soon.
So yes—in contradiction to what Ella Free and Dr. Matthew Aaron suggest–these are unethical, inhumane government-run-and-contracted programs. Local governments/police/sheriffs/FBI are clearly fully aware, public and private sector both have been drawn into participating. Please see the plethora of reports at this site and in interviews at Youtube.com/Ramola D Reports that offer much disclosure on this subject.
Danger of Projecting Cover-Stories that Reporting Victims of Serious
Government Crime are Mentally Ill
Suffice to note in this essay that two
extremely grave crimes are committed by those journalists and the
psychologists/psychiatrists/sociologists they quote who engage in
such absolute deception:
The primary Failure-to-Report-Crime of covering up the base Government crime of wrongful Surveillance watchlisting, and from there, wrongful human trafficking into exploitative and persecutory and terminal (profoundly unethical) medical experimentation programs—and thereby misleading the public while protecting Serious Government Crime.
The also primary Abuse-of-Publishing-Powers-Crime of publishing injurious untruths which have extremely deleterious ramifications for reporting #GovtCrime victims within their families, work environments, and communities. Reputations are ruined, characters are smeared, careers are halted. Families and communities believe the published lie, disbelieve and shun the being-abused #GovtCrime victim. Blacklisting, social ostracism, social isolation, and utter ruination of the #GovtCrime victim’s life follow. Families themselves report the #GovtCrime victim as Mentally Ill to Community Services, police, and hospitals, and ruthlessly and cluelessly force their already-persecuted family-member into psychiatric drugging and incarceration—as reported in numerous cases. Medical treatment is compromised; many targets report that doctors IGNORE their actual physical problems and call for psychiatrists. Doctors, in fact, misled by Media Lies, believe the lie and completely dismiss the reports of #GovtCrime victims of radiation assault and implant assault as delusional.
This Question of Targeted
Individuals Suffering Mental Illness
The instant-labeling of Targeted
Individuals as delusional, precisely the intent and enacted intention
of the perpetraitors assaulting and exploiting them, as described
earlier, is nothing to endorse and project by any genuine human
rights activist seeking to represent, support, or protect them.
But regarding the notion that mental illness can exist among any sector or group of the population, including TIs, here is my base understanding: Yes, from what has been reported to me, and what I have learned, there are some who before they were targeted were being treated for milder issues such as anxiety, or stress, or depression, and continue to take pills for these—but not full-blown schizophrenia or paranoia; there are some who have developed PTSD or stress or anxiety after being targeted—for good reason, given the 24/7 COINTELPRO and neuro/DEW trauma they endure, and that is still not schizophrenia or paranoia; and most vitally, there are some, in fact quite a few crisis actors and infiltrators in the such-as-it-is TI community who write and speak disjointedly, leave weird comments on websites and under videos including mine, espouse bizarre theories and report a-credible occurrences: these are not the genuine targets but the genuine Intel plants deliberately playing mentally-ill in order to help outsiders like Steinberg label TIs as mentally-ill–and apparently feed Ella Free’s unsupported and unscientific notions of 5% of TIs being mentally ill as well.
And then, crowning coup for misleading, abusive, authoritarian Psychiatry: there are some, force-drugged, force-committed, force-false-diagnosed as schizoid, delusional, schizophrenic and on Disability—who are fully mentally-sound, sane and well, but victimized, exploited, persecuted, as described earlier.
Additionally, it is entirely possible–going by the historic Government record of rampant experimentation crime–that people locked away in psychiatric institutions or homes with false diagnoses of serious psychoses and schizophrenia are also being non-consensually experimented on by unethical Military/Intel/Academic researchers, just as prisoners in the nation’s numerous private prisons, including Guantanamo–as testified to by many imprisoned there, no doubt also are.
THE MISO/PSY OP CONSTRUCTED PERCEPTION OF MENTAL ILLNESS: Not to be forgotten is the fact that the entire MISO/Psy Op (Military Information Support Operations/Psychological Operations) of the “Gangstalking” COINTELPRO/MK ULTRA Trauma that targets are subjected to 24/7 in homes, neighborhoods, communities seems to be aimed at eliciting the self-incriminating projected symptoms of mental illness–heightened reaction to constant harassment and provocation, while slyly aimed also at provoking reports of stalking and gaslighting to be easily DSM-dismissed by DSM-indoctrinated psychiatrists as “paranoia” thereby creating the bugaboo “diagnosis” to dog and discredit reporting victims as paranoid and delusional.
Given that mental illness is the precise tool of oppression being used against targets and used to conceal these crimes publicly, it is the one most important aspect to be careful about when speaking to MSM reporters—which Ella Free, self-confessed “leader” (a term she has used to describe herself on her podcasts and conference calls) acting like she is to be considered a primary Voice for TIs, flubbed.
Psychology Professor David
La Porte: Paranoid Individuals Enflamed & Organized by the
Internet into “Probably a Delusion”
Then there’s the issue of the Authority Figure. Predictably, as in Mike McPhate’s Psy Op slam-piece in The New York Times, Steinberg cites a psychologist to give credence to this convolution of a “mass delusion” which, the psychologist explains, is fed by the finding-each-other phenomenon the Internet offers:
“People who are paranoid start to latch onto the same kind of delusion,” said David LaPorte, a professor of psychology at Indiana University of Pennsylvania.
“This is not uncommon. When airplanes first started, people started having delusions they were being followed by airplanes. The computer has been a huge issue that leaked into paranoid delusions. Every technological advance becomes fodder for paranoid individuals.”
“They’re well organized because of the Internet,” LaPorte said. “That’s part of the problem. It deepens and entrenches what is probably a delusion.”
Note the “probably” in the previous sentence. Sometimes the improbable does happen. Stalking is real, though usually by individuals, not shady networks.
“No one’s really actually talked to these individuals in a clinical way to establish whether they are nuts,” LaPorte said. “Anybody who has worked in this field for a long period of time, you hear stories of fantastic delusions only to find out it was true. What they’re talking about could be true, but it’s probably not.”
“To establish whether they are nuts,” note. Not, “To find out if what they are saying is true” but to establish whether they are nuts.
I wrote to Professor La Porte, given that his university affiliation was published and email posted online. My intent was to inform and educate him, and assure him he was wrong about his delusion theories in relation to government and military crime victims.
Subject: Re: Your recent comments in Neil Steinberg’s Chicago Sun Times article on “Targeted Individuals” versus the facts
This is the letter, sent to Professor La Porte on April 26, 2019:
From: Ramola D<email@example.com>
Friday, April 26, 2019 1:59 AM
Dear Professor La Porte,
I am an investigative science and technology journalist who has been covering the subjects of current-day science and technology, surveillance, Defense, ethics, and consciousness for the past 5 years, with an educational background in Physics, Business Management, and Writing and a 20-year career in teaching College English, Creative Writing, and Literature, as well as in management consulting and technical communications, and ongoing practice as a fiction-writer, poet, playwright, memoirist, essayist, literary editor, publisher, and journalist, in addition to broadcasts and articles at my media sites and channels, Ramola D Reports and The Everyday Concerned Citizen.
I am writing to you because I have covered the subject of “Targeted Individuals” for five years, and engaged in investigative research with the US military and Intelligence agencies on the subject.
In the course of my investigative reportage, I have studied military and Intelligence documents, spoken with and reported the testimonial of US Government whistleblowers and scientists, including from the NSA, CIA, FBI, Department of Defense, US Air Force, US Navy, NASA, and US Army, as well as former French and Belgian Intelligence; I have researched and reported the work, words, and testimonial of scientists from the CIA, US Navy and UK Navy, as well as widely researched and reported on the work of scientists and militaries worldwide, particularly in the areas of electromagnetic weaponry or DEWs, neurotechnology, EMF/neuroweapons testing, wireless telemetry, and surveillance technology. I have investigated and reported on human subject protections and non-consensual neuro-experimentation among other modern science and technology issues, interviewed a wide variety of professionals including science and technology journalists, authors, academics, neurologists, psychologists, psychiatrists, electronic engineers, scientists, writers, other journalists, and published the testimonials of many people worldwide reporting non-consensual military/Intelligence neuro-experimentation with Radio Frequency and Sonic technologies today. From my perusal of military and Intelligence documents, listening to and reading audio/video/print testimonial of whistleblower scientists and Intelligence analysts, researching the history of weaponized Neuroscience, and speaking personally with whistleblowers, and multiple reporting victims, I can attest to the reality of ongoing Neuro-technology testing and training as well as non-consensual neuro-experimentation with electronic warfare weaponry, Brain Computer Interfaces, and RFID tracking micro/nanotech on civilian populations in the US, Europe, and worldwide.
“Targeted Individuals” are the Crime Victims of the Military Intelligence Industrial Complex. The wrongful watchlisting of innocents and the human trafficking of them into military/USAF/Marine Corps Anti-Personnel Non-Lethal Weapons Tests and Neuro Surveillance Beta Testing by the National Institute of Justice/FBI/CIA as well as military and NIH/NSF medical experiments have together unleashed a new era of horrific violence in our midst with Spectrum (EMF/sonic/scalar) weapons being used on people; these people are literally the targets of new emerging military technologies which use Radar, Scalar, and Sonic tech as well as covert RFID/nanotech implants on their bodies to non-consensually test out a variety of concepts from cybernetics, AI, robotics, neurotechnology, behavioral psychology, criminal justice and other sciences.
Your statement here therefore that “They’re well organized because of the Internet. That’s part of the problem. It deepens and entrenches what is probably a delusion.” is untrue.
“Targeted Individuals” are not delusional, nor does the Internet create their condition, the US Military and the US Department of Justice and the US Department of Homeland Security does. They are also victims of Torture, which is illegal by US and International Law, and those who seek to conceal these War Crimes being investigated and reported today by journalists and whistleblowers may well find themselves called to testify soon at new Nuremberg trials for their crimes: today, reporters like Neil Steinberg and others who work for corporate Propaganda Media as well as psychologists, sociologists, and psychiatrists who confirm their biases and propaganda, wittingly or unwittingly, by calling Mil/Intel Crime Victim targets mentally ill without investigating the matter will be culpable.
(Please note, it is people like Steinberg and psychologists who don’t read, don’t investigate the state of the world today re. Surveillance, except in mainstream media channels/fora which suppress the truth of what the Government is doing and conceal the War Crimes the Government is committing who are displaying Confirmatory Bias.)
These matters are discussed in numerous articles at my website, including this one by Dr. Seth Farber, a psychologist:
In addition, I recommend that you watch the many video podcasts I have posted at my Youtube channel RamolaDReports, which include interviews with many “Targeted Individuals”–in truth, Crime Victims of the MIIC.
Finally, please consult the two Investigative Reporter Statements for Todd Giffen and Frederic Laroche at my site for details of whistleblowing and declassified documents attesting to the reality of these War Crimes.
As a journalist publishing the truth of current-day reality, I will be compelled to address the several false and ignorant statements you have made in this article, in print. However, I urge that you inform yourself with deep exploration of this very vital subject, issue a retraction of your amazingly off-base and false statements, and wisely choose not to make the same mistakes in the future.
I also enclose a Ten Step Checklist for Doctors and Psychologists and Psychiatrists I am developing to help bring much-needed medical services for TIs. A primer on human rights is also being developed and I will be glad to send you a copy soon when it is completed.
Best wishes for your Continued Education, Ramola D
thank you for taking the time to write to me and also thanks for send me the links. As is often the case with interviews only a portion of what I said is ever published. I was quoted correctly when I indicated that I’ve heard wild stories from people in the past that on first blush appear to be delusions only to find out that they are completely true. And there is little doubt that in the past the government has done things to citizens without their permission or knowledge. That said, it is still an open question if paranoia is a possible explanation. I try to keep an open mind about such things and it is my intention to do further research on this by interviewing as many TIs as are willing to talk with me. I need to obtain permission from my university’s Institutional Review Board before I do so and hopefully that will occur this summer. I will definitely be looking at the information you sent me once the semester ends.
David J. LaPorte, Ph.D.
Professor of Psychology
Indiana University of Pennsylvania
1020 Oakland Ave. 220 Uhler Indiana, PA 15705-1068 firstname.lastname@example.org 724-357-4524
I then wrote back to Professor David LaPorte, copying my letter to Dr. Seth Farber, also a psychologist and insightful scholar and author whose well-known article on the subject of the Psychiatric Metanarrative regarding Targeted Individuals, the Deep State, and shoddy New York Times coverage is noted above.
From: Ramola D<email@example.com>
Sunday, April 28, 2019 3:57 PM
Dear Professor La Porte,
Thank you for your note in response and noted, that only a portion of what you said was published, and that you acknowledge previous stories of delusions you have heard turning out to be true.
I am glad to know you will be further investigating this matter.
However, given the subject matter, and given, as you acknowledge, the nature and history of non-consensual military and medical experimentation, it is my informed opinion that investigating the claims of truly “Targeted Individuals” is not the purview of Psychology alone, but also Journalism, Radiology, Toxicology, Forensic Science, Medical Physics, Neuroscience, and Radio Frequency and Electrical Engineering.
In fact, I would suggest that no psychologist is equipped to undertake a study of Reporting Victims of Military Weapon Use on their own. The material evidence provided by physical scanning for RFID implants via MRIs, X-Rays, Faraday RFID Detection, SCADA scanning for nanotechnology wave guides, and bodily and residence scanning for receiving and emitting radio frequencies, in conjunction with documented photographic and/or videographic evidence of high, pulsed EMFs such as is obtainable with an electrosmog detector or EMF detector app, spectrum analyzer, or other detecting and recording equipment; evidence of burns, blisters, lesions, and scars on body; hair, skin, and nail analysis, blood plasma analysis, as well as recorded footage of repeated Community Oriented Policing or Neighborhood Watch cell-phone-pointers/recorders or COINTELPRO swarming, or repeated drone and helicopter stalking will more readily furnish absolute evidence of EMF/Neuro DEW Targeting & Organized Stalking.
I have personally examined and reported on the scientific scanning reports from private investigators and industrial toxicologists attesting to the reception and/or emission of radio frequencies on different parts of the body (indicating presence of RF implants or RFID nano-clusters) as well as examined MRIs and X-rays and read the radiologists’ reports provided for several TIs, and reported in print on some of these cases. These articles will offer further information:
Your statement therefore, here, about paranoia cannot be tested without physical, medical, radiological analysis alongside. Excluding the Surveillance and Military Experimentation/Weapons Test and completely physical Weapon-Use context when examining the claims of TIs can only lead to false, illogical, and incomplete conclusions: “That said, it is still an open question if paranoia is a possible explanation. I try to keep an open mind about such things and it is my intention to do further research on this by interviewing as many TIs as are willing to talk with me.”
Reporters like Neil Steinberg who work for corporate media adhering to CIA Operation Mockingbird principles of Deception and Propaganda in the interests of Psychological Warfare and Information Warfare on the American citizenry are doing Americans a great disservice by starting, framing, and concluding that MIIC Victims are mental patients needing help from psychiatry–when they completely ignore the exacerbated Surveillance and Military Weapons Testing context (both public-domain knowledge) we are all living within, in contemporary America, and in fact, ridicule and mock it, as if it doesn’t exist. In this, they give away their obvious base allegiances to the Surveillance Abuse State — and their lack of intelligence as journalists.
Had Mr. Steinberg wished to really conduct a meaningful investigation, he would have spoken to a group of TIs and especially examined their physical evidence, as I have. He also would not have spoken to just one “spokesperson” for TIs–Ella Free–nor told her he did not wish to speak to anyone else (as she reports).
I would suggest that in your University-supported research project, you especially speak with those TIs who can and have furnished evidence of the physicality of this atrocious anti-personnel weapon targeting and nonstop torture, some of whom I have interviewed.
Dr. Seth Farber, whom I copy here, has suggested that I offer personally to be interviewed by you, since I too am reporting Military Weapon use on my person, and have collected much video/photo evidence of such; however, I am still collecting medical and radiological evidence of non-consensual RFID implants even as I continue to publish my own experience in articles and affidavits, and recommend, if you are interested, research of my story online, as published & broadcast in Washington’s Blog and The World Beyond Belief/Pineconeutopia, for more information. There are many others with solid radiological and toxicological evidence.
Ignoring the extensive information on ongoing military and Intelligence technology tests, experiments, and war crimes I had provided, including my suggestion that Radiologists, among other technology professionals would be needed to test out the claims of Targeted Individuals, and ignoring the insights and information in Dr. Seth Farber’s meticulously thought-out and referenced article, Professor David La Porte wrote back, working desperately to swing the focus back to Mental Illness:
Monday, April 29, 2019 9:24 AM
From: David LaPorte <firstname.lastname@example.org>
To: Ramola D <email@example.com>
As a psychologist I cannot, as you point out, investigate the various science and technology aspects of this issue since I have no training in those areas. I’ll leave that to others. You have to understand that to many people the claims of TIs sound “crazy” and that stain will remain until the issue of mental illness is formally addressed. That is my goal: to address the mental state of TIs, since that has not been done to date. Thanks for your offer of an interview and once I have received IBR permission I will certainly take you up on that offer.
David J. LaPorte, Ph.D.
Professor of Psychology
Indiana University of Pennsylvania
1020 Oakland Ave.
220 Uhler Indiana, PA 15705-1068
Considering that I hadn’t offered and wasn’t offering to interview with a psychologist who could not apparently assimilate the information I was providing, I felt obliged to write back to Professor LaPorte and inform him as much. I also forwarded this correspondence (on which Dr. Seth Farber had been copied) to Dr. Eric Karlstrom, Professer Emeritus of Physical Geography from California State University, and NSA whistleblower Karen Stewart, for their information, and Dr. Seth Farber wrote back a detailed letter analyzing and addressing Professor LaPorte’s stance. This email he addressed to this small group, although his letter itself was addressed to me. In addition I understand he wrote to Professor LaPorte separately. Professor LaPorte also wrote back again to me, informing me he was a trained skeptic and intended to hold his blighted pattern. I responded briefly, skeptical myself. All 3 emails are below, with Dr. Farber’s offering the clarifying final word.
From: Ramola D <firstname.lastname@example.org> Sent: Thursday, May 2, 2019 10:19 PM To: David LaPorte Subject: Re: Your recent comments in Neil Steinberg’s Chicago Sun Times article on “Targeted Individuals” versus the facts Dear Professor La Porte,
Thanks for your note and apologies for my late response. However, I felt I should clarify I wasn’t offering to interview with you, particularly since you fixate on mental illness in the face of the blatant Surveillance/Military Context as well as solid scientific evidence I was striving to call your attention to. Dr. Seth Farber wrote you the most apt response and I will not repeat myself. Suffice to say your efforts to address “the mental state of TIs” are an insult to the earnest efforts of (perfectly sane and mentally well) reporting victims of Military/Intelligence/Industry crime, and your determined ignoring of absolute fact AND evidence regarding the use of Anti-Personnel DEWs in testing and operation by DOD/DOJ suggests nothing less than pre-planned agenda, well in support of Mainstream Media Propaganda. I have published extensively on this subject; the information is out there for all sufficiently intelligent to avail of it.
Dear Ramola,I certainly understand your position and respect your wishes. I take issue with the intimation that I have a pre-planned agenda here. As a scientist I am skeptical by nature and training. So my agenda is to seek answers not to promote one position over another.
David J. LaPorte, Ph.D.
Professor of Psychology
Indiana University of Pennsylvania
I did write back to Professor LaPorte, although by this point I was tired of this being-ignored attempt to educate and inform him.
From: Ramola D <email@example.com> Sent: Friday, May 3, 2019 10:14 AM To: David LaPorte Dear Professor La Porte,
This is hardly an issue of promoting positions but unearthing facts, which I certainly do not believe can be accomplished by a psychologist alone in a void of factual and physical scientific context, and a stated pre-determined focus, which is precisely what invokes the possibility of pre-planned agenda.
I continue to investigate and publish on the subject myself, as noted earlier, as do others, and will look forward to more real scientists, including psychologists capable of assimilating physical evidence stepping forward to support the hard-core physical reality of non-consensual RFID, WBAN, BioMEM, Nanotech & BCI implants, RF transmissions, and acoustic and radiation weapon use on people, which is the reality “Targeted Individuals” AKA Military/Intelligence Weapons-Testing Crime Victims report.
Finally, the brilliant Dr. Seth Farber’s incisive, scholarly, and considered response, referred to in my final emails to Professor LaPorte:
Monday, April 29, 2019 9:08 PM, Dr. Seth Farber wrote:
These conventional psychologists are all the same…He writes, “You have to understand that to many people the claims of TIs sound “crazy” and that stain will remain until the issue of mental illness is formally addressed.”
This is a non-sequitur. It tells me that LaPorte has no intention of removing the stain– a stain reified by mental health professionals.
If a person–say a self-described TI– hears punitive voices that have no referent in the external world then by psychiatric standards and by common sense she is “mentally ill.” (I don’t accept the disease paradigm–so I would use a different formulation to describe her emotional crisis) If she says the CIA creates the voices in her head through advanced cyber technology to harass her, then (by psychiatric standards) she is a “paranoid schizophrenic.”
But if the CIA is in fact using directed energy weapons and experimenting on her brain then obviously her assertions are veridical and she is not paranoid–even by psychiatric standards.
LaPorte’s idea that he can determine whether someone is ‘mentally ill” without determining whether the putative technology –of which they claim to be victims– exists or not makes no sense. He does not need training to determine the latter—he only needs to be willing to look at the evidence.
He did not answer my letter because I pointed out the pseudo-scientific nature of “psychodiagnosis” which bases its finding of “psychosis” not upon scientific knowledge, but upon ‘”common sense” about what is possible. Psychiatry/Psychology substitutes psychiatrists’ consensus about what is delusional for a view of reality that actually corresponds to the “real world” as confirmed by empirical investigation. For example the veracity of TIs’ claims about group stalking could easily be confirmed or vitiated by hiring a private detective to investigate their claims. THat is an easy way to assess whether a TI is delusional.
But as psychologist Bruce Levine says they do not want to know the truth.
The validity of a view of reality is established by the generation of predictions that are subjected to testing and confirmed—not by taking a straw poll among psychiatrists and psychologists! Had scientists taken LaPorte’s approach in 20th century, quantum (physics) never would have been discovered.
I pointed out in my letter to LaPorte that once Hemingway’s friend/biographer read the FBI files on Hemingway 25 years later, he changed his assessment of Ernest. This may be the reason LaPorte wants to address the issue of “mental illness” without even glancing to see if there is an elephant in the room. He’s a phony. If he admitted there was an elephant in the room, how could he declare that people pointing to the elephant were all mentally ill, all delusional??
What if there was a tiger in the room? If a person’s sympathetic nervous system is aroused for no reason, he probably had a panic attack. If in addition he sees things that are not there, he is “psychotic” by psychiatric standards. But if there is a tiger in the room he would be “mentally ill” if his sympathetic nervous system were not aroused! LaPorte intends to look at signs of arousal without examining the environment.
The fact that Dr LaPorte thinks he can assess one’s mental health in abstraction from social context shows that like his cohorts he is involved in stigmatizing persons–any deviation from the status quo is deemed pathological, including any dissident (“extreme”) political views.
Psychiatry is an effort to discredit people by declaring them “psychotic.” In the case of TIs this requires ignoring the elephants and the tigers in the room. Then after the frightened person, the TI, is declared psychotic his claims about the deep state can be dismissed and the mental health profession can continue to serve–wittingly or unwittingly– the social control objectives of the deep state.
Sincerely, Seth Farber, PhD
As Dr. Farber so aptly pointed out, the stance that David LaPorte, Ph.D takes is to ignore the actual physical context and fixate on his primary and unsubstantiated obsession that reporting victims of high-tech Government crime must be mentally ill, that being the premise and lens to regard #TargetedIndividuals through. If that’s not a pre-planned agenda, I’d like to know what is.
Neil Steinberg’s glib recourse to LaPorte’s unexplainable premise advertises itself therefore doubly as government-protecting propaganda, and part of a sustained, determined, Information Warfare and Psychological Warfare operation being conducted against Americans–and by extension and in replication, citizens worldwide–by #MengeleMen in the US Department of Defense and CIA, operating through their larger umbrella of academics, journalists, brain-experimenters, weapons-testers, medical researchers, Intel analysts, insider activists and outsider reporters to conceal their incredibly appalling roster of extremely unethical #WarCrimes and Crimes Against Humanity via illicit targeting, surveillance, and injurious, intrusive, human-rights-violative non-consensual experimentation. Many people are involved in this criminal Psy Op, many agencies, many government, military and Intelligence divisions. Those losing out here are the innocent people of integrity, wrongfully targeted and trafficked.
The only way forward is to continuously expose all of it.
Her fiction, poetry, and writer-interviews have been widely published. Subscribe to her video-channel at Youtube.com/RamolaDReports for ongoing science and tech, investigative, and human rights journalism. Stay tuned for the revival of her literary review Delphi Quarterly and author website ramolad.com, the launching of a literary press, and a new book of short fiction whose publication has been mysteriously delayed. If you are a whistleblower, activist, journalist or other wrongfully targeted who wishes to publicize via podcast interview or have information to share for an article, please write to her with your story at firstname.lastname@example.org.If you appreciate her voice and work, please support her no-holds-barred, truth-seeking, and clear-speaking journalism via Patreon.com/RamolaD or via the Paypal Donate link here.
Letters of inquiry and concern sent earlier to Redbridge Council Press Office and to the Care Quality Commisssion overseeing NHS Trust Hospitals at Brighton, Sussex, and Essex regarding the recent multiple and aggressive sectioning attempts on Mr. Edward Ellis, Equity Lawyer were replied to on July 30, with a terse refusal to address by Redbridge Council. Citing the 2000 Freedom of Information Act, the Adult Care, Public Health and Well-being Team stated, “We are unable to provide a response as this relates to a matter of personal care and treatment that falls outside of the FOI process.”
Considering that the letter requesting information had raised a number of concerning issues about Mr. Ellis’s being pursued by the Mental Health workers at Redbridge Council on multiple occasions, including with police officers carrying tasers as they entered the home they broke into on 26 June and on another occasion as reported here earlier, and also considering that earlier coverage had established quite definitively that Mr. Ellis was hardly mentally ill and had become instead the victim of fraudulent sectioning attempts by Redbridge Council on the basis of faulty information from NHS Trust doctors, particularly the questionable Dr. Lever, head nephrologist at Queen’s Hospital, this is hardly an adequate response to a concerned public.
Among the questions raised by this reporter in her request for information from the press office were the following:
Why was this action taken on 26 June 2019 to break down Mr. Ellis’s door in intention of “search and capture” of Mr. Ellis?
Why was Police Officer EO 4333 holding a taser in his hand behind his back just as he entered the home?
Are you aware of the extreme dangers of tasers–which have caused numerous deaths and cardiac arrests, and which harm people in relation to the level of their physical health? (Please see my Community Care…article linked above, which links to many articles reporting these dangers.)
Are you aware Mr. Edward Ellis is a kidney patient, who has moreover been the recipient of a fistula surgically placed in him by Sussex University hospital with no follow-up for dialysis over 7 months, who is himself working on acquiring the best treatment for his kidney issues?
Are you aware that Redbridge Council has essentially approved the use of a taser on a 66-year-old kidney patient–if this police officer acted in a pre-approved manner, that is? If he did not, are you aware that this is a serious matter of concern and that Law Enforcement in the whole of the UK needs to be made aware of the extreme dangers of taser use on unwell people, who are for obvious reasons, in a vulnerable physical state–and that Law Enforcement should not therefore be permitted to use or threaten use of tasers on people known to be medical patients?
Failure to answer such basic questions is inexplicable, given their intent to elucidate why the Council would embark on such pernicious actions against a senior citizen and NHS patient who is also a whistleblower and equity lawyer of high international repute, working to end corruption crimes against upstanding citizens, who is known and loved by millions, if not billions.
Questions of Concern Regarding Taser Use and Wrongful Sectioning Attempts Shockingly Left Unanswered
Questions of concern regarding taser use when left unanswered by an “Adult Care, Public Health, and Well-Being” team surely suggest a blithe and unsettling lack of concern on this subject by this team. More than shocking given that the very presence of police officers accompanying a mental health team taking the extreme step of breaking down a resident’s door with force, citing the Mental Health Act, has obviously been decreed by the council.
On a later occasion also recorded by human rights activist and reporter Neelu Berry, it is clear the police officer who sought to enter and search her home is prominently carrying a taser.
On the occasion of the dramatic and thickly-peopled break-in on 26 June where not one mental health nurse or social worker but several bustled in on the officers’ heels to look under beds and peer into closets with intent to capture a hardworking equity lawyer, it is further clear the officer with the taser had full intent to use it, or keep it handy for swift use, as he whipped it out from under his vest and carried it behind his back as he entered.
26 June 2019, Nurse Smiles as Officer Holds Taser Behind Back/Covered Here
If this is not a betrayal of the public trust, what is? How is a Mental Health team engaging in adult care, public health or well-being by delivering 50,000 volt shocks using a deadly conducted energy device which shoots prongs into people’s bodies, designed to paralyze and incapacitate, and known cause of several deaths by cardiac arrest in the past?
And how is the Adult Care, Public Health, and Well-being Team at Redbridge Council justified in maintaining a cool silence over this matter? Does the Council wish to imply that they intend to continue in this practice and believe it is perfectly alright to knock out and quite possibly kill senior citizens in this fashion? It is quite clearly not a matter of public health, public safety, or personal well-being but its opposite when a police officer is permitted to brandish and deploy a deadly energy device on a member of the public, under the aegis of “Mental Health Care.”
It becomes painfully obvious rather that such an extreme police action in accompaniment with a team intent on a psychiatric arrest is intending primarily to subjugate and subdue a non-mentally-ill citizen, for purposes of political silencing, in flagrant violation of all protected freedoms of speech and expression in a democracy.
Neelu Berry notes that the Redbridge Council should respond to the taser held by the police officer and the Mental Health nurse smiling, also the fact that there was no incident that invoked the Mental Health Act. “The fact that the taser being used before the Mental Health Team Assessment was proof of an assassination of character or intellectual property. All the above actions of the team were contrary to Section 4 of the Criminal Law act 1967 which mandates wide publicity for crimes being committed, especially by corrupt state officers against Whistle.blowers who are protected Witnesses.”
Questions of Concern on Evidence of Fraud and Medical Malpractice by Queen’s Hospital Nephrologist Left Unanswered
The primary matter of medical malpractice evinced by wrongful attribution as mentally-ill of perfectly sane and mentally-well professionals like Mr. Ellis, covered at length earlier, was also left unanswered:
5) Are you aware that, as Ms. Berry spells out below, there does not appear to be any cause whatsoever for a Mental Health sectioning to have been indicated by any hospital or doctor in recent contact with Mr. Ellis: “The Mental Health Team of 8 had no reason to believe Mr Ellis had Mental Health issues because Dr Lever confirmed there was no evidence of it during a consultation.” Please note that this matter of Dr. Lever stating clearly it was not in his remit to make mental health evaluations while oxymoronically and peculiarly asking Mr. Ellis to submit to his recommendation that someone else should make a mental health evaluation–for no reason whatsoever–was discussed in my article Egregious Sectioning….linked above. Dr. Lever’s attitude and actions suggest that he is unreasonably and suspiciously persecuting a whistleblower reporting high-level corruption including hospital corruption.
The claiming of a personal data exemption to withhold information on the sectioning attempts on Mr. Ellis–a matter of vast public concern, and not in any way purely private, given its implications for all members of the UK and world public–also reads as an unnecessarily lax and expedient refusal to discuss the matter further, a commentary on the evasion of transparency and public accountability by the London Borough of Redbridge.
Questions of Concern on General Practice and Protocol also Left Unanswered
Questions regarding general practice and protocol in the matter of the Council pursuing a mentally sound citizen under false-labeling as mentally ill were equally left unanswered, with a “personal data” exemption being claimed, when the questions themselves indicate an interest in general procedure.
7) Why were there so many staff workers of whatever kind attendant, who are they, what is their professional qualification, and why were they all storming the bastion of Mr. Ellis’s home that morning?
8) What had these staff workers been told to warrant their all being there, en masse, as if they all needed to be there?
9) What is your understanding (I am asking Redbridge Council and the Care Quality Commission Health Service Regulating Body here) of the rationale behind getting a warrant under the Mental Health Act to section a completely sane and sound citizen, who in no way has engaged in harm to self or society and has never been in danger of same–and has given no-one, no doctor, no nurse, no medical professional, no neighbor, no friend, no interviewer any evidence whatsoever of such imputed harm?
The Council’s blanket response:
“The information is exempt from disclosure under Section 40(2) of the Freedom of Information Act (FoIA). The information is personal data as defined by the Data Protection Act 1998 (DPA). As it is information about someone else I’m unable to give this to you; release of this information would constitute a breach of Principle 1 of the DPA. Principle 1 states that personal data shall be processed (used) fairly and lawfully and, in particular, shall not be used unless at least one of the conditions in Schedule 2 of the DPA is met; in this case none of those conditions have been met. This response therefore acts as a refusal notice under section 17 of the FoIA.”
This matter continues therefore to be of great concern, and while the Council suggested Mr. Ellis could protest his treatment–“If Mr Ellis wishes to complain about his treatment he can do so by contacting the NELFT complaints team at email@example.com“–this writer intends to submit an appeal for internal review, as suggested by the Information Request and Compliance team at the Council, as per their letter.
It is also regrettably clear from this cover-all response that the officials at the Council penning it have sought to screen themselves from scrutiny and public accountability on a matter of grave concern to all citizens in a democracy; every citizen is at risk if a democratically-elected government can sink into syndicated corruption, protect people in authoritative positions who engage in medical malpractice, and unleash over-arching actions of harm on citizens in the name of psychiatric well-being.
Anyone and everyone could be subjected to a Mental Health Arrest-With-Taser on any doctor’s fraudulent, false-labeling recommendation then, it seems–and no need for the Council Mental Health teams to explain these actions: a situation which calls for immediate reform in both the Freedom of Information Act and the Mental Health Act.
Concerned citizens should be doubly alarmed and might wish to subject each member of this Council to closer scrutiny of platform and agenda for integrity and true interest in public health and safety.
American Journalist Covering this British Government Debacle Retaliated Against with Anti-Personnel Weapons in India
It should also be reported that directly after completing a draft of this article and sending it in to the London Borough of Redbridge and their Press Office for review and comment as per their request, this reporter was hit immediately with intense anti-personnel “non-lethal” weapons AKA Stealth Assault Anti-Humane Weapons, inclusive of resounding ELFs from a local construction mixer and precision-hit Microwave Weapons from nearby cell towers or satellites, as well as intense scalar weapon-hits on private parts–all sounded on external shields, inducing projectile vomiting, migraines, and burning for over 48 hours. (The program of stealth assault involving electronic-warfare weaponry now installed in the US and UK to stifle freedom of speech and expression is worldwide, from all reporting victim accounts, and has been installed in India in exactly the same format.)
Clearly, the reason this story–as also many others of international import–is not being covered by mainstream media outlets in the UK or elsewhere is because such coverage is being stifled and repressed, by brutal attack of the journalists attempting coverage.
This information is being reported in the interests of informing the world public and UK public that Freedom of the Press in the UK is quite literally dead, despite fake attempts by the UK Government with the recent Global Conference on Media Freedom touting interest in media freedom–which perhaps translates more accurately to propaganda freedom for government use.
This information regarding anti-personnel assault on this writer was also provided earlier today to the Redbridge Council with a second request for comment, which elicited the following anonymized and opaque reply from the Press Office, London Borough of Redbridge:
“A council spokesperson said: “The council has responded to your FOI request and we have nothing further to add.”
Clearly, the London Borough of Redbridge believes it is possible to maintain an impenetrable silence on all matters related to their fraudulent Mental Health Act invocations on sane and mentally sound citizens and get away with it. This should be deeply concerning to all sane and mentally sound UK residents, and this writer advises that all in UK concerned by this matter make their feelings about Redbridge Council’s actions known publicly to them in writing.
This writer also requests that all readers take note of what is being reported here, about anti-personnel anti-humane weapon retaliation against journalists with gravitas.
British, American, and all Western governments seem to think they can maintain a semblance of “democracy” while assaulting all questioners, writers, journalists, activists, and whistle-blowers in stealth, with electronic-warfare weapons–and not be held accountable for it. As many know from reading my reports and watching my interviews, I believe these weapons, whose thrust I have been on the receiving-end of for almost six years now, are profoundly inhumane and should be banned.
I am making a special report today on the situation regarding Omni or Phillip Douglas Walker. I have been in touch with Omni/Phillip for about two years I think, and was introduced to him, if I recollect correctly, by actor, filmmaker and activist Ahmad Enani, with whom I ran a few podcasts last year under the header Real Talk True Media. Ahmad is also reporting aspects of non-consensual neuro-experimentation which defy imagination and sound absolutely extraordinary to the regular reader of Science news put out by such mainstream and CIA-controlled publications as the New York Times and the Washington Post, and will, I hope, publish his own testimonial and story with me in a print interview and podcast soon.
I have listened to the testimonial of many others who are not keen to publish their names yet or who shrink from publicity.
I recently wrote about my exposure to and understanding of ongoing covert neurotechnology operations on world populations, with whistleblower and documented military evidence of DEW bio-effects on humans in my Investigative Reporter Statement for Frederic Laroche, a human rights activist in France who is reporting criminal entrapment today in relation to his own activism reporting current-day neurotech crimes.
Make no mistake, the military and Intelligence powers who are running these unethical covert sacrifice-torture operations on humans today appear to see their experimentation as precious, legitimate, and justified under the covers of “National Security” they are using as blanket cover worldwide, or are perfectly aware they are committing crimes–these neurotechnology/AI/Robotics experiments involve Trauma-Based Mind Control and nonstop physical, brain, and psychological trauma being meted out to their victims, AKA Non-Consensual Human Test Subjects, and every single victim of these Mil/Intel/Mercenary crimes reports Torture, Extreme Bodily Invasion & Privacy Invasion, Trauma, Social Isolation, and Psychological/Spiritual Attack--and are acting to cover up their crimes of Torturing Humans by seeking to frame and suppress all activists and victims via Incarceration/Criminal Entrapment or Incarceration/in Psychiatry or both. Every activist working in this area in particular reports one or both of these, and is familiar with these sorts of entrapment and psych-commit attempts being run on them.
Phillip Walker/Omni has also reported psych-commit attempts: this is the way in which the black ops agencies running these ghastly programs of major neurotech torture seek to control the public image and public profile of their victims. As long as the average Joe thinks someone is “schizophrenic” or “paranoid delusional” or “having hallucinations,” they are easily convinced that person needs to be medicated or force-medicated as the case may be and, most importantly, must needs be dismissed each time they mention anything related to the neuro-experimentation they are being subjected to non-consensually. This is standard military and Intelligence practice; I will dig up some references and post them shortly; I have personally read about “destruction of reputation” as being a necessary factor and SOP in non-consensual experimentation in a military manual addressing military research.
My previous print interviews with Omni can be found here:
Because I have been in touch with him on Skype for so long (we text frequently), I can attest to the fact that Phillip is careful with the truth and reports what he experiences in the most truthful way possible; he is quick to correct misunderstandings or misperceptions and has in the past always sought to clarify what he is reporting such that I can understand exactly what he means and transmit what he means, rather than putting an overlay of meaning or personal interpretation over his reports that might misrepresent his reportage.
Phillip has recently been reporting attempts to “neuro-frame” him. He, like others, has spoken extensively about bio-robotizing and neuro-invasion technologies taking over his bodily and brain functions; currently he is reporting 100% bodily control and total takeover. This kind of total takeover, via EEG cloning and BCI technology (Brain Computer Interface) has been reported by many others; please visit the videos at Ramola D Reports and the print interviews listed here at Ramola D/Reports to see reports here; also see Dr. Robert Duncan’s book Project Soulcatcher.
This is obviously an extreme situation–and what it basically means for all of humanity is: we need to step forward and take some immediate action to stop these barbaric experiments on those reporting them. We need to pay attention to the cries of people in our midst reporting such extreme and invasive takeover. For what can there possibly be in our future if we do not? Are we prepared as a species to permit a small group of insane neuroscientists and AI scientists and supercomputing scientists/no doubt working at the behest of Luciferian bankers with world-control aims and agendas totally take over our human bodies and brains, one by one?
Phillip Douglas Walker is currently in desperate need of media coverage, rescue, and restoration to his own authentic intrinsic human self.Please watch the podcast report below, share as widely as you can with everyone you know, and please call out for help to the very same military neuroscientists who are wreaking this unconscionable torture on him. I thank you all very much for whatever act of attention, media coverage, information dissemination, and restorative action you take, on Phillip’s behalf.
CLASSIFICATION TO CONCEAL CRIME: These experiments are most probably falsely being named or hidden under classification covers as “important for national security,”; I strongly disagree, and will be publishing further my own views regarding these massively unethical and criminal Torture operations on human beings flying undercover of classification soon. Suffice to say for now Neuro/Bio/DEWs should be banned.
Phillip has over the last few days relayed to me on Skype exactly what he means when he reports that he is in dire straits currently. I have included screen footage of our Skype text conversations with his own testimonial in this video report, Report #98, made last week, and I will link to his very important testimonial and Affidavit below:
Re-posted from Barbara Hartwell‘s website, BarbaraHartwellVsCIA, with permission. Many thanks to Barbara Hartwell for her unflinching and piercing insight, intellect, candor, forthrightness, and integrity in the face of extraordinarily malicious, slanderous, and juvenile behavior from Katherine Horton directed against herself, myself, and others recently, online and in videos, in a flurry of written and spoken insanely over-the-top attacks which appear to be actively and desperately seeking to establish a false and defamatory narrative about us, and apparently succeeding among at least one coterie of her less-thoughtful supporters and followers, if harassive emails and Youtube comments are anything to go by. My own responses to Katherine’s latest salvo (she doesn’t seem able to stop) in her dedicated Lie-Slander-Smear-Attack Defamation campaign against me, along with my work-in-progress discussing the insidiousness of infiltration, counterintelligence, entrainment and domination as expressed by agent provocateurs, saboteurs, and activism disruptors–where she occupies a starring role–will be posted shortly.
I first learned of the existence of Katherine Horton and her website when I was invited by Ramola D/Dharmaraj as a guest on her podcast, Ramola D Reports, to do a series of interviews. Horton was a member of the Techno Crime Fighters Forum, a weekly podcast which presented information on various issues related to the targeting of individuals via directed energy weaponry and other means.
In August of this year (2018) the forum ended, a result of the decision of the other members, including Ramola. I am not personally acquainted with any of the former members, including Horton, with the exception of Ramola. I will not include their names here, out of respect for their privacy. I speak strictly for myself and my purpose is to address Katherine Horton’s defamation against me, in connection with her defamation against Ramola.
I should make it clear that I am not, nor have ever been involved, in any organizations or groups which address issues or conduct activism for what they call “targeted individuals”, nor am I in any way connected to what is called the “TI community”.
I am an independent investigator, intelligence analyst, journalist and government whistleblower. I do not join groups. As clearly stated in notices on this website, my reports are for INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY. The readers may make of the material on this website what they will.
As brief background, I have been a political Target of retaliatory counterintelligence operations for a quarter century and have published reports on the Internet exposing numerous perpetrators by name, since 1995, as well as on radio and video podcasts.
This report specifically addresses the defamation of Barbara Hartwell by one Katherine Horton, on her website and on video podcasts, which has recently come to my attention. My purpose is to refute the false accusations with facts, of which Horton is clearly in short supply.
I had viewed a number of the podcasts of TCFF and made my own independent observations and analysis, on which I published a report on August 16, 2018.
I did watch a number of the podcasts of Techno Crime Fighters’ Forum. And I did observe the behavior of Katherine Horton, on more than one occasion, as openly advocating violence against specifically named persons, such as Gina Haspel. A “bullet in the brain” was one such statement. The dropping of F-bombs accompanied these rantings.
Shortly thereafter, I published another report naming Horton, after some defamatory comments against me by one of many anonymous cowards and morons, a supporter of Horton, appeared on a You Tube podcast on Ramola’s channel.
Fact: I do not know Katherine Horton. Anything I have said, in writing, or on video with Ramola, was based on my independent observations and analysis of a very PUBLIC issue, that being the words and actions of Horton, in calling for unlawful violence, even murder, of public figures, while ranting, dropping F-bombs.
My analysis of this behavior included what I deemed a sort of “theatrical production”. A woman hunkering down in what she described as a “bunker”, crawling under a desk, surrounded by tin foil walls, while advocating “bullets in brains”.
No, I see no “dignity”, nor “integrity” in this behavior. What I do see is that those associated with Horton will be tarred with the same brush of lawlessness, thus not in any way helping their cause, or serving the cause of justice.
Next item: Katherine Horton defames Barbara Hartwell by listing my name in a section of her website, titled:
BLOOD ON THEIR HANDS (BLACK LIST) The criminals and people who chose to do nothing when victims begged for their help.
Horton names Barbara Hartwell in her defamatory article which makes many false accusations against Ramola D:
“Barbara Hartwell, CIA, wades in” (link to my report on TCFF, given above)
Note the sinister and incendiary title: “BLOOD ON THEIR HANDS” So, Horton accuses Barbara Hartwell of being CIA, apparently parroting the longstanding party-line of controlled opposition. Nothing new here. And lists me and Ramola as two of the “criminals and people who chose to do nothing when victims begged for their help.”
This is one of the most stupid statements I have seen, especially regarding Ramola, who has done more to help many people suffering from persecution than most anyone I have ever known, not only as a journalist reporting on their cases, but with material support as well. As for me, Horton has access to no information whatsoever about anything I have done – or not done. It is simply a malicious, sensationalist fabrication, in an attempt to discredit me.
Then, the most recent slander in a video podcast, titled:
Dos & Don’ts – Holocaust Working Group 2 (Stop 007)
I did not watch the entire video, which was over 4 hours long. I don’t have that kind of time to waste, listening to the malicious nonsense and filth spewed by this woman. I was told of the video by Ramola, who gave me the time markers of Horton’s defamatory comments. I took notes and will address Horton’s defamation, which I will show to be FACT-FREE, nothing but name-calling, erroneous assumptions, wild speculation, fabrication. As usual, she drops the F-bombs liberally. Horton’s comments are in quotes.
Horton begins with this statement:
“The CIA’s Barbara Hartwell wades in. She is a bitch. I’ve never met the bitch. This woman is off her rocker. Personally I think she is a f—ing fraud, I think she is a CIA plant.”
How very original…nothing that has not been promoted in a massive defamation campaign for two decades by my enemies in the intelligence community and their minions, lackeys and stooges. And for which none of them has been able to produce any evidence, ever. Addressing BH:
“I laughed my ass off. You are against the crown corporation, my dear. Why the f— do you have a snake, logo of the Vatican/CIA. Why the f— do you show yourself with gangstalking sunglasses, which indicate you don’t want people to see your face that well?”
FACT: I have never named any “crown corporation” in my written reports, nor in any other venue. As will become clear, Horton is putting words in my mouth, and making false statements about things I never said.
FACT: The flag displayed on my website is the Gadsden flag: The Gadsden flag is a historical American flag with a yellow field depicting a rattlesnake coiled and ready to strike. Positioned below the rattlesnake are the words “DONT TREAD ON ME.” The flag is named after American general and politician Christopher Gadsden, who designed it in 1775 during the American Revolution.
As used by me, it has absolutely nothing to do with the Vatican or CIA. Horton is clearly ignorant of the true symbolism and of American history.
As for the so-called “gangstalking sunglasses”, just another stupid, erroneous assumption. I wear sunglasses year round, due to extreme light-sensitivity of my eyes. If I wanted to hide my face, I would have no photo at all.
And don’t call me “my dear”, you foul-mouthed creature, you loathsome servant of the devil.
Again, she brings up the snake, and the Vatican with another false statement:
“You claim you’re suing the crown corporation?”
FACT: No, I have never made any such “claim”, about suing the “crown corporation”. Again, she is putting words in my mouth, which I never spoke, and citing claims I never made.
“Are you off your rocker? And then you are wading in ten days after this woman makes an announcement that she’s trying to look in to the financial, a leading financial expert on the space-based economy and black budget. F— don’t tread on me. She deserves the Nobel prize.”
FACT: I do not know the person she mentions (Catherine Austin-Fitts). There is no connection between anything I have ever said about Horton (or on any other topic) and this third party. Horton is commingling issues which are in no way related and which have nothing to do with me.
“Ten days later this woman who claims to be suing the crown corporation who has never met me adds shit to the situation. Really? Is that the most f—ing productive thing you can do if you’re claiming to be against the CIA? Two days later Ramola publishes Hartwell’s musings about free speech and if you should swear and advocate violence. Knowing that the whole f—ing thing wasn’t about advocating violence to start with.”
FACT: Once again, the false statement about a “claim”. Never have I made such a claim of any such lawsuit. Which again, has nothing to do with anything published by Ramola. And no, I do not advocate promoting lawless violence and murder against anyone, as does Katherine Horton. In my considered professional opinion she is a liability to anyone associated with her. An opinion I am free to state. I do not presume to tell anyone what they “should” be doing, nor have I ever tried to police anyone’s free speech. And I “know” no such thing. From my observations, promoting violence was a major issue, as clearly stated by Ramola and others.
“Before Barbara Hartwell pulled this thing, I already had issues with her. Issues are, go to my website. All of you need to learn discernment. Do you believe Barbara Hartwell? Do you believe me? I don’t care as long as you start thinking about it.”
What nonsense. Now, Horton presumptuously takes on the persona of a school teacher, an instructor of all others. Considering the fact that I am not involved in her “community” of followers, it is not my concern whether or not any of them believe anything I say, nor have I ever sought their opinions.
Next, typically, Horton brings up former FBI chief Ted Gunderson, a known former colleague, and later, adversary of Barbara Hartwell. And, as I will make very clear by stating the actual FACTS, Horton knows nothing about Gunderson, just as she knows nothing about Barbara Hartwell.
She cites the “high profile affidavit” of Ted Gunderson, published on her website and a number of others.
“Ted Gunderson, who was murdered in 2011. In fact he was murdered in such a way, his personal physician said he saw Gunderson being murdered over a period of 8 years, where he was poisoned with arsenic.”
Now, Horton parrots the “murder” plot, which has been all over the Internet since 2011. I have not seen any evidence from any trustworthy source, such that I would believe that Gunderson was murdered. He was nearly 83 years old at the time of his death, and was being treated for cancer. But I have certainly seen all kinds of conspiracy theories promoted by some very UNtrustworthy sources, the same minions and stooges of Gunderson who have carried out his dirty work of stalking, threatening, libeling/slandering Targets of Gunderson’s COINTELPRO. Including Barbara Hartwell. What a coincidence.
And then, Horton makes this statement:
“The man who was in line to become director of the FBI was poisoned by the FBI.”
Horton does not know what the hell she is talking about. But for those interested, here are some FACTS.
Ted Gunderson retired from the FBI in 1979. Before his retirement, he was considered as a possible candidate for Director, but the position went to William Webster. Gunderson retired from the FBI nearly FORTY YEARS AGO. At the time of the supposed “poisoning”, even if it began in 2003, 8 years before 2011, when he died, he was certainly NOT “in line” to be Director of the FBI. This is a FACT anyone can easily check from the public record and Gunderson’s FBI file.
Then, she further states:
“Ted Gunderson blew the whistle on pedophiles, pedophilia, satanic pedophile rings, satanic ritual sacrifice, the mass theft of children by none other than the FBI. Special Agent in Charge, in line to be the next director of the FBI. Then the FBI poisoned him. Why would someone who is in line to be Director of the FBI shoot his entire career prospects? He knows how COINTELPRO works. FBI cointel annihilates entire social circles.”
FACT: By the time Gunderson began publicly discussing any of these issues, he was already OUT of the FBI. Again, he was NOT “in line” to be Director. As far as COINTELPRO, Gunderson was Hoover’s right hand man, the COINTELPRO Kingpin. Of course he knows how it works. He continued as a perpetrator of counterintelligence operations for decades after he retired. Gunderson was no whistleblower. He in fact ran containment operations to neutralize genuine whistleblowers, former military and intelligence professionals.
Horton rambles on, showing her profound ignorance. Again, she continues to repeat the falsehood that Gunderson was “in line” to be director of the FBI.
“Why would somebody who is in line to be head of the FBI do all this to get himself killed, if he weren’t genuinely shocked? If Gunderson was just a crook, like Hartwell likes to say, you could be a crook for free. If he hadn’t done that he would have been the next director of the FBI.”
FACT: I first met Ted Gunderson in 1997, when he was planted on me. I got to know him very well. I worked with him for three years before I broke off my association with him, for cause. I have done my own thorough investigations of Gunderson’s criminal activities, which I have exposed, on this website and in other venues, since 2000.
Katherine Horton is a pretentious poseur, who makes claims which cannot be verified, just shooting off her mouth about issues of which she knows nothing, which only exposes her ignorance. She did not know Gunderson, nor has she presented any facts. She has only parroted the Gunderson COINTELPRO party-line promoted by his minions and stooges.
It’s all been said hundreds of times, by hundreds of belligerent ignoramuses, of which she is only one of the latest.
“How exactly does the evidence stack up with what Barbara Hartwell is saying, because in my reading it doesn’t stack up. Not the f— at all. Harebrained shit that I don’t know what. This is just the facts.”
Facts? What facts are those? Horton does a great job of managing to be FACT-FREE, while claiming to know things for which she can provide no evidence.
Then she comes out with this, about how she knows the “facts”:
“Female intution otherwise known as deductive reasoning…inductive reasoning…whatever.”
FACT: “Female intuition” is a vague concept which is not based on logic and which cannot be proven, and has nothing to do with deductive reasoning.
Deductive reasoning is a logical process in which a conclusion is based on the concordance of multiple premises that are generally assumed to be true.
And more than that I won’t bother to say, except that maybe Horton could benefit from taking a course in logic, which it appears plays no role in her thinking processes.
“What that tells me about Barbara Hartwell when I hear her voice and just close my eyes it just sounds like f—ing lies to me personally. My personal assessment of this is I don’t believe her f—ing fake cough. I don’t believe a single word this woman says.”
Well, bully for you, Katherine Horton. Your “female intuition” must be in overdrive. What kind of person would ridicule someone’s medical condition calling it a “fake”? Your little gaggle of followers, I’m sure, will hang on every word you say, despite the fact that you can furnish not a scintilla of evidence, for the simple reason that none exists.
Horton then adds this:
“I never mentioned Barbara Hartwell once. I respect her right to put her view out there. I applaud Ramola for bringing it to the fore, this way I could decide if Barbara Hartwell is a fraud. It reassured me to put Ted Gunderson’s work out there. I’m all for collection of data, I’m in favor of having Barbara Hartwell on so we can all decide.”
Apparently, Horton, in her arrogance, believes that Barbara Hartwell is on trial and will be convicted in the court of public opinion, as she expresses her fraudulent and insincere sentiments regarding Ramola.
“Her facts are bullshit. The fact she’s talking sounds like one hundred percent lying and fakeness.”
So, she talks about “facts”, while presenting not one verifiable fact in her tirade of invective against Barbara Hartwell.
“Just happens to have cartel signalling that meets you when you go to her website. Somebody who fights the CIA having been in CIA, knowing their internal coded language, you would not put the image of a snake with the tagline Don’t tread on Me. So nothing makes any f—ing sense.”
Cartel signalling! Coded language! And snakes! And she actually thinks she knows what someone would put on a website, and why. No, I’m sure it makes no f–ing sense to Katherine Horton. With every word she speaks she reveals her profound ignorance, along with her malice.
“This is evidence that people should take whatever she says with a pinch of salt or pepper.”
What evidence? Katherine Horton has provided no evidence whatsoever, only easily refutable defamatory falsehoods.
In summary, I can only say that from my observations, Katherine Horton is running a theatrical production for the purpose of propagandizing those persons foolish enough to follow along on the road to the death and destruction she advocates. And she solicits money for her “cause”, as advertised, putting “bullets in brains”.
If she is in fact some sort of operative (as some have suggested), those who have hired her have made a poor choice indeed, and must be desperate for cheap labor. She behaves like a rank amateur, even in her theatrics, and especially in showing her ignorance of real counterintelligence operations and those who run them.
Katherine Horton: FACT-FREE and evidently proud of it. By her fruits shall you know her.
Barbara Hartwell, November 23, 2018
PS: DON’T TREAD ON ME
From The Every Day Concerned Citizen
Joint Public Cease and Desist Notice to Dr. Katherine Horton
In light of Dr. Katherine Horton‘s recent inflammatory, defamatory, and libelous online publication
Global Non Lethal Weapons Testing Mental Illness Program | Public Notice
Fusion Center Treason | Flyer for Public Education
Newest Reports/PodcastsRamola D | Info-Talks: A New Series | #DisclosureOnTargeting
Info-Talk 2 | 8/30/2019: White House Notified of FISA Abuse, Patriot Act & DOD/CIA CrimesInfo-Talk 1 | 3/22/2019: Millions in US Targeted With RF/Scalar/Sonic Weapons, Nano, Neuro, Chem, Bio WeaponsGlobal Gestapo: A Series with Dr. Eric Karlstrom
Global Gestapo 12/Gloria Naylor and Stephen O'Keefe-The CounterIntelligence Zionist Superstate
Newsbreak Breaking News Updates
Newsbreak 44: Todd Giffen, Still Incarcerated, Gets New Counsel & Seeks New Competency Hearing
Newsbreak 43: Frederic Laroche, HR Activist, Non-Consensual Mil/Intel Neurotech Expmtee
Newsbreak 42: David Noakes with Neelu Berry--Update on MHRA/OCLAESP Persecution
Newsbreak 41: Expire Section 215, Patriot Act, Abolish Unconstitutional Terrorist Watchlist
Newsbreak 40: Chris Burton with NSA Whistleblower Karen Stewart on a recent Civil Commitment Hearing
Newsbreak 39: Karen Rex, Silicon Valley Security Whistleblower on NatSec Violations
Independent Investigative Journalism
Reader-supported human rights, public interest, & Sci Tech journalism. Funds currently sustain tech support for ongoing reportage and EMF shielding/monetary support for the wrongfully targeted.
Free Keene’s web site/A peace-liberty-voluntarism project pursuing and promoting peaceful living in Free Keene, New Hampshire
Free State Project
Free State Project’s website/A Liberty in our Lifetime project in New Hampshire, pursuing liberty, community, and peaceful living
New Earth Project
New Earth Project website/Open platform to unite humanity and create initiatives to support the emergence of absolute freedom and sovereign creative expression for all
Public Intelligence Blog
Blog for Earth Intelligence Network, Phi Beta Iota the Public Intelligence Blog/Promotes hybrid transparent governance, collective intelligence, true cost economics, and whole systems understanding