Re-posted with thanks to CIA Whistleblower Barbara Hartwell for her friendship, support and candor in speaking out.
I posted her article in a brief thread on Twitter yesterday (link below) with some thoughts & much gratitude. To clarify, as Barbara notes, I was pleasantly surprised and appreciative but did not ask Barbara to write in my support. It is a pure testament to Barbara Hartwell’s integrity and sense of rightmindedness and justice that she would write in support of a friend and sister journalist working for Truth and Justice as she is, and there really is no-one else in the world like her, uncompromising in her integrity and clear-seeing of Dark and Light, rock-solid reliable in her alignment with Light. I am honored therefore and grateful beyond words for her freely-given friendship and her incisive, history-making writing.
#NEWReport Thanks v. much to CIA Whistleblower Barbara Hartwell for writing and posting this report in my defense.
“Good name in man and woman, dear my lord,
Is the immediate jewel of their souls:
Who steals my purse steals trash;
’tis something, nothing;
’twas mine, ’tis his, and has been slave to thousands;
But he that filches from me my good name
Robs me of that which not enriches him,
And makes me poor indeed.”
― William Shakespeare,Othello
Katherine Horton has been running a massive smear campaign against a former colleague, Ramola D, for at least the past 18 months. I do not know Katherine Horton, but I have witnessed the damages to Ramola’s reputation, as a journalist, and as a person, as her character has been vilely assassinated and her professional work trashed.
To add insult to injury, Katherine Horton has enlisted many others among her gaggle of sycophants (her followers on social media, supporters of her website and audience of her You Tube channel) to engage in mob tactics against Ramola, to attack her, to defame her good name, to publish outrageous lies against her and her family.
Additionally, Horton has targeted others for her lies and calumny, including Barbara Hartwell.
EXCERPT from previous report:
Horton then began a smear campaign against Barbara Hartwell, promoting outrageous falsehoods for which she had no evidence whatsoever. Horton has claimed from the beginning that I am a CIA agent. Having no facts at her disposal, she simply parroted the mantra of long-running counterintelligence ops against me: Barbara Hartwell is a CIA disinfo agent.
I wrote several reports in which I refuted her false claims, and further exposed her as a malicious liar and promoter of violence and murder, using HER OWN PUBLISHED WORDS as evidence.
In my considered professional opinion, as an intelligence analyst and former profiler for the US government, based on my observations of her words and actions, from March 2018 until the present time, Katherine Horton is a despicable fraud whose prolific criminal conduct makes her a danger to anyone associated with her.
What is of great concern to me is that so few people will stand up and tell the unvarnished truth about Katherine Horton, though the writing is on the wall, clear as crystal for those with eyes to see.
Nor will they stand up publicly in defense of Ramola. What I have witnessed (aside from those rabid Horton supporters openly participating in the witch hunt) are the fence-sitters, the compromisers, who refuse to take a firm stand, to name names of those engaged in unscrupulous actions, some of which are criminal in nature.
No, apparently they would rather sit silently on the sidelines, waiting to see which way the wind blows, rather than stand up and be counted in defense of Ramola against her enemies, those who clearly wish to destroy her.
For the record, I stand with Ramola, not just because she is my friend; not just because she has supported me and my work (for which I know she has taken tremendous heat). I stand with her because I see her value as one of very few people I have known who DOES stand up against evil, against oppression, against tyranny, without compromising her principles, without concern for the approval of others, whatever the consequences to herself.
Ramola did not ask me to write this, though I dare say she may not be surprised that I did. As her friend and colleague, I know the terrible price she has paid for telling the truth and for standing up for what she knows to be right, even if she has to stand alone. That is the stuff of which heroes are made and I cannot be silent in the face of these vile attacks on her name, her character and her work on behalf of those many decent, law-abiding persons, worldwide, being targeted for harassment, torture, terror, wrongful incarceration and life-destroying crimes.
Katherine Horton, a former Techno Crime Fighters Forum and JIT colleague who appears to have deteriorated currently into Ms. Potty Mouth with a PhD in Invective and an obsession with attacking me and ICATOR Founder and President Melanie Vritschan—as well as anyone else who challenges her bedtime stories–has lately been adding to her platter of slander, smears, attack, libel and defamation against myself with runaway tweets, new additions to her nasty and quite obviously libelous page with my name on her website,and a video where she circles round and repeats herself ad infinitum, while blasting out curse-words and epithets along with distortions of truth and pithy, tabloid-style fictions.
CIA Whistleblower Barbara Hartwell marks this latest theatrical feat accurately in her response to Katherine’s verbal attacks on her: Fact-Free Theatrical Productions Starring Katherine Horton. For interestingly enough, in this video—which Melanie responded to and which I partially responded to in Report #99— Katherine’s attacks have not been limited to me alone. Barbara Hartwell, Melanie Vritschan, and Thomas McFarlan have also been maligned—in what appear to be a combination of abusive pre-emptive and retaliatory attacks seeking to refute the truth and integrity of their witness while painting herself drama-queen-style as tragically wronged, victimized, and immaculate.
I refer most especially to the page on her website titled “Ramola Dharmaraj,” (a name I am no longer known by) and to her “Blood on their hands” page (the title of which she has currently changed, 2 days ago, it appears, to “Attacks & Refusals of Assistance,” which lists a photograph of me, and to the continuous series of libelous and attacking tweets she has put out on Twitter, claiming, melodramatically, falsely, slanderously, and libelously she is being stalked and harassed by me and the victim of a “near 4-month-long campaign of defamation” supposedly run by me against her. Which does make it seem like there’s no conscience, morality, integrity, truth-bone or spine evinced here whatsoever because she seems to show no compunction in making these ridiculous and repeated claims of victimhood at my hands.
12/15: I note further she has now made further additions to that page, including struggling to counter my Standing Notice on her which I was compelled to post on 12/13 directly after visiting her page on 12/13—in order to complete this effort to accurately counter her libel there—and discovering a new section filled with JTRIG storyline lingo titled “Ramola’s Sabotage of European Projects”; she has also posted further epics referencing Frederic and Melanie slanderously, and spent some time creating graphics with photos and screenshots, posing me suggestively at center of her constructed-intrigue in Interpol-style while accusing me once more of various crimes—which this article addresses, further down. All this proves and vindicates my reasons for publishing that Standing Notice: Katherine Horton is establishing online her extreme on-and-on fixation, obsession, and cyberstalking of me online, exactly what I point to in my Standing Notice.
12/16: Let’s update that: Katherine has now added even newer sections to this page, post a new podcast Melanie and I have made, Report #103, addressing the earlier 12/15 additions and the slanderous and frankly malicious sections slamming Frederic and Melanie. Obviously we’re not going to be able to keep up in this nonstop hamster wheel of delinquence Katherine is riding, but I’ll address her attack-dog “Ramola’s Sabotage of Dr. Horton’s Projects” further below.
It is a fact that Counterintelligence CIA checklists and manuals advise their operatives to “Blame, attack and abuse” in order to deflect attention and bury the true abuser, themselves.
When this ridiculous page of hers first came to my attention—because someone brought it to my attention, as indeed is the way all her nasty attack-tweets and attack-videos came to my attention, since Katherine Horton has blocked me from her Twitter page—something she did the very day we published our Video-Note marking the end of Techno—and I have not been following her activities (I am way too busy; and most people who read my articles and watch my podcasts or call and discuss future or present plans and strategies for HR activism or podcasts with me know exactly what I mean), I was more than appalled. To start with, my signature author photograph graced her site (she has removed that now), with text claiming an attack campaign on her by me below it. My immediate response to this page was fired off in a series of tweets where I added screenshots over a couple nights, and I will try to embed this below. Additionally, I published a Public Notice to Katherine, immediately protesting this public online attempt at rather patently malice-filled defamation and slander.
My 13 Nov and 14 Nov Tweets on the subject of Katherine Horton’s 12 Nov 2018 Posting of her defaming “Timeline”: Unrolled Thread Here
Post Katherine Horton's SECOND Slam & Smear Assault on Yours Truly, as expressed on her site @stop007org as well as on Melanie Vritschan & Thomas McFarlan & Cassandra–where she has MISAPPROPRIATED the use of my Author Pic, among other crimes, I'm grateful for smarter friends. 1/ pic.twitter.com/9oI5h5QwXT
This Public Notice to Katherine resulted in my author photo being removed from her site as I requested, but no other response, such as removing the page or removing my name from it. Further, she replaced my photo with a screenshot from a previous video Techno podcast, a rather unflattering one I should add, but a likeness nevertheless of me, the posting of it at all seeming to be a vindictive and malicious move to sully my public image and reputation–something she appears hell-bent on doing.
A second Joint Public Cease and Desist Noticewas issued, signed by a few of us being maligned, and long-time activist Paul Baird. To no response. As of date this libelous page of hers is still up—and continues to be added to, which does seem to point to a targeted and strategic Lies, Libel, Smear, and Discredit campaign being run by Katherine on me, and readers are welcome to figure out why.
I will address the elements on this page as seems appropriate in each case; there is much here that has already been covered earlier. Distract, Delay and Disrupt is also in the CIA Counterintelligence Manual for suckers. Publishing malicious lies and libel about someone is also a way of tying them up in prolonged, time-consuming efforts to defend themselves and ponder litigation for character defamation. Plus, no doubt among a certain group it has its intended effect of defaming one’s character or image online—as I now know, in observing the unhinged comments on Twitter and Youtube (in chat and comments) and on my own media site on WordPress, as well as in private emails to me calling me names, exactly as Katherine has done, including: gangstalker, human trafficker, sell-out, terrorist c*nt, pedo, and more, as well as waxing prolific and preachy and uninformed not to mention outlandishly inane about my “needing to be pulled off Dr. Horton”–and, never mind overt racism from the cyber-trolls now, because I am “not from the US” and “do not represent a modern American Human Rights Woman/Advocate.” As for who is doing this: check Erika Meyer, Deborah Ann Weber, Marijke Eken, “Rita” the Racist, and Ellen Powell. There are others. Some screenshots below. (Note: Youtube, or Cyberhacking Protecting Youtube is currently preventing the viewing & screenshotting of all chat comments on recent livestreams where many including myself witnessed slanderous posts against me, including from Erika Meyer and Rita.)
Please let that sink in. An investigative reporter, publishing and broadcasting journalist, writer, poet, educator, and human rights activist working since 2013–when she was personally hit, for no discernible reason, with extreme Surveillance Abuse, 24/7 assaults with anti-personnel EMF Neuro DEWs (Directed Energy Weapons), covert implantation, community ostracizing and character assassination, business sabotage, relationship sabotage, and life-destruction COINTELPRO, like thousands in the USA and worldwide, but working ever since she was hit to expose the massive and treasonous crimes of Surveillance Abuse by US Intelligence agencies, US Military and Medical/Academic groups, and US fusion centers and their proxies and partners worldwide—which include COINTELPRO “gangstalking,” human trafficking into non-consensual and Torture-marked medical and military experimentation projects, and social and community terrorism disguised as “Community Policing” is being attacked openly and name-called by a small group of potty-mouthed predators, led and egged on by the intrepid bayonet-wielding Katherine Horton whose name-calling of me on her latest Rant and Deflect/Smear and Slam video, deceptively titled “Dos and Don’ts, Working Group 2” includes the pithy reference to me–among other choice epithets–as “the bitch in Boston.”
Katherine Horton’s Second Slam-and-Smear Video Filled with False Narratives, Defamation Attacks, “Bitch,” “Dumbass,” and Other “Respectable Professional” References
Katherine Horton’s Defamation Campaign Page with the header “Ramola’s Defamation Campaign”
Let’s start with that curious title, “Ramola’s Defamation Campaign,” which I had not heard about until Katherine published that remarkable header.
Had I known or heard about this “campaign” before–a word resonant with “public”–so would have everyone else. For in case anyone is in any doubt about what exactly I do currently–my work is public, please take a good look at my media/blog website, my videos, my articles on Steemit and Medium, my deliberate and intentional flash-journalism on Twitter, as well as the body of my published journalistic work online, which has been re-published and posted by various other sites and blogs including The Sleuth Journal, Washington’s Blog, Intellihub News, International Reporter, and others, as well as the videos published at my Youtube channel Ramola D Reports. To spell it out in this context: I publish, I broadcast, I publicize matters I believe to be of public interest. A “campaign” I run would be publicized. No-one would be in any doubt of my running a campaign on any subject, because, pardon the conceit but I do think I express myself pretty succinctly, as perhaps most anyone capable of reading Plain English can tell.
I do not run defamation campaigns.
That’s what the scurrilous and corrupt FBI does, and the Massachusetts Fusion Center does, and the US Army does, and the entire US DOD does, when they want to character-assassinate a person of integrity and conscience who dared to stand up to anyone in public or call local officials out for corruption and criminality, whom they have human-trafficked into a covert DOD/CIA MK Ultra or Remote Neural Monitoring non-consensual neuro-experimentation project, DEBR—Directed Energy Bio Behavioral Research–or Neuro/DEW weapons testing project for the US Airforce or Airforce Research Lab–of the kind running today in Boston and the South Shore as exposed in my Letter to the School Board, Quincy Public Schools–or any other kind of nasty, barbaric, amoral, inhumane, and venal, SRA-style, Torture-based government-funded project of the kind they are daring to run and are most definitely running today on hundreds or thousands or millions of us, including myself. Targeted defamation campaigns have long been running on me, since 2013, in my neighborhood, in my own community, in my own city, in my state—and Katherine’s currently is adding to these.
In reading through all her published notes on this page, and reviewing her video rants online, it appears Katherine is accusing me, essentially, of expressing my opinion privately, of “defaming” her to Melanie Vritschan, over a period of 3-4 months between the end of July to November. She appears to have not understood the concept of Freedom of Speech and Freedom of Opinion, nor of Private Speech versus Public Speech.
It should not be a surprise to anyone—after her First Slam and Smear video on me titled “The End of Techno Crime Fighters Forum“—that I have acquired an abysmally low opinion of Katherine Horton, fueled both by the very many problems she created on the show we once ran together along with others, problems aired and described in detail on my video-response and written statement titled The Real Backstory, fueled by her own remarkably audacious and repellent behavior in echo-stalking/mirroring, and apparently attempted-NLP’ing me as I have previously described, and fueled by her own reprehensible and untruthful re-framing of the Techno break-up on her Slam-and-Smear video, where she settled in to name me (rather than herself) as prime destroyer of Techno, aided by an imaginary “DEW attack from Intel” she conjured out of thin air and has glued herself to now with her own special brand of Fact-Less Zurich Superglue.
It is no secret to many that I have continued to be in touch with Melanie Vritschan and freely expressed my opinions on Katherine Horton to her, well past Techno’s break-up, that I have kept her updated on the work I was doing, including letting her know about an article I was working on to address infiltration among HR activism groups and further delineate Katherine Horton’s conscious echo stalking/mirroring of me in detail, and cautioning her about continuing to work with a woman who had involuntarily revealed herself to me, primarily, and without doubt, through these deliberate actions of echo-stalking/mirroring, as a double agent and Intel infiltrator seeking to “neuro/behavior-modify,” and to all of us on the Techno team as a wild card and loose cannon who has made several irresponsible calls to violence on our shows, has published dubious tweets with images of various Intel agency heads in crosshairs, dominated our shows, not heeded our counsel, refused to meet and discuss these matters, and then refused to acknowledge that she had made any calls to violence whatsoever, while deflecting focus in her later false-narrative-contrivances from that primary issue to confabulated focus on her own gratuitous swearing, cursing and profanity.
(By “double-agent” by the way, what I mean in this context is someone who is playing or installed as Victim/”Targeted Individual” on Demand, going to the lengths of establishing cover for that status, to the lengths of voluntary implantation (which we learn many Intel agents submit to, as per UK Navy/MI5 scientist Barrie Trower’s disclosures on the use of microchips by Intelligence agencies from the ’60s and ’70s onward), and directed-energy hits on demand, and cyber-hacking on demand, and using a cover of Victim/TI Advocate while also operating among HR/TI activists as an agent of a covered agency in CounterIntel or (NSA/DOD) HUMINT field collection of data, psychological personality profiling, interrogation, misdirection and sabotage, disruption, dilution, behavior modification, AI/hive-minding echo-creation, vortex-creation, chaos-creation, and so on.)
I should also add that in that time period, Melanie Vritschan herself frequently spoke to me about Katherine Horton even as she marked her disagreement with me about her, and suggested we keep from discussing her or discussing her as being a possible double-agent; the fact is, Melanie was continuing to work with Katherine and was running scanning sessions and fundraisers with her and frequently mentioned Katherine herself, as she sent me notes about her progress, as well as described further her travails with her own court case and with her continuing efforts to regain custody of her daughter, who was taken from her at Erasme Hospital a year ago after Katherine spoke to a midwife and initiated the series of events whereby her newborn was taken away from her. As anyone can imagine, this is a source of recurring trauma to Melanie, and Melanie has incessantly returned to speaking about Katherine with me and reliving the events of that fateful night at Erasme last October when Katherine talked too much and unleashed Psychiatric Mayhem in that hospital, to extremely painful and traumatic consequence for Melanie and her newborn.
I will also add here that through these conversations it became increasingly clear to me that many details about that night and later at Erasme Hospital as reported to me by Katherine Horton and published by me in my press releases and articles last year were either not quite accurate, inaccurate, outright lies, distortions of truth or fabrications. There were discrepancies in reportage between what Katherine reported to everyone on a podcast she was on at the time (Alfred Webre’s podcast), and to me, and to Melanie, and in her witness statement, and what the midwife reported to Melanie. There were discrepancies in Katherine’s own testimonial of when exactly she informed the midwife of the implant-residue still lodged in Melanie’s neck; these can be seen in Alfred’s podcasts, Techno podcasts around that time, and in her current statements. Did Katherine mention the implant-residue in the throat to the midwife after she accompanied the baby and midwife to a different room when the baby was taken for a Vitamin K injection after the birth, and in response to the midwife’s questioning, as she said on Alfred Webre’s podcast, or did she say this to the midwife while in the operating-room and before the birth, and primarily because it was a medically concerning condition, as she now claims often on her videos? My growing uneasiness as I learned of these discrepancies led me to the publication of my Disclaimer on Katherine Horton’s reportage, intention to publish which I had earlier informed Melanie about, and which simply records my personal disassociating from the disputed reportage Katherine Horton had fed to me, which I reported, in trust of her word at the time, which trust had been completely shattered after her public slander of me and misrepresentations of fact, distortions of truth, and confabulations of opinion presented as fact on her Slam-and-Smear video, The End of Techno Crime Fighters Forum, and after these conversations with Melanie with re-explorations and re-visitings of what exactly had happened last year at Erasme, and what exactly was said by Katherine Horton to the midwife and when.
As an independent investigative journalist unsupported by a news machine like the CIA-run Washington Post or the CIA-run New York Times or any other CIA or Soros-funded group, I focus on publishing truth-centered human-rights and human-advocacy journalism; when I find the truth of what I have myself published in question, it is my moral duty and clear obligation to correct such an error publicly, which is what I was doing. That Disclaimer was not a “libelous notice” as Katherine claims, it was me setting the record straight and personally disassociating from her disputed reportage.
It should be noted that for a long time Melanie has held a different opinion of Katherine Horton than I have, that I was fully aware of. Melanie has stated to me that she believed Katherine Horton to be naive and immature, and not a double-agent—as has been and is now my firm opinion, an opinion I currently have every right if not moral obligation to publish–as I frequently emphasized in our conversations on Skype. My own understanding of Melanie’s then-opinion of Katherine—which I understand has now changed—is that Melanie is a generous and warm-hearted and open-minded person, who was continually interested in giving Katherine Horton the benefit of the doubt regarding what had happened at Erasme Hospital, as well as in relation to various other problems she had with Katherine on previous scanning projects she has related to me, on finishing projects or on responding adequately to requests for information (such as a shortened Witness Statement) to help in her court case against Erasme Hospital and other court hearings for child custody. I did not fully understand Melanie’s attitudes and ideas concerning Katherine Horton and told her so. The only way I could explain it to myself was that Melanie’s compassion and empathy as she stated to me for a woman in the middle of a divorce took precedence over the many warning signs and dangerous red flags raised by Katherine’s past actions and behaviors against Melanie herself, her HR organization, her newborn child, and her whole family.
In any case, it is no secret that I continued to express my opinion to Melanie—to the point of irritation I think, with Melanie, and I will repeat, Melanie also continued—to equal points of irritation with me–to express both opinion and ongoing narration of shared projects with Katherine Horton.
We are all entitled to our own opinions. This is a fact Katherine Horton appears to show no awareness of. We are also entitled to sharing our opinions with anyone we please at any time. Further, despite the NSA telling you otherwise, we are entitled to private conversations, private opinion-sharing, private speech, and private communications.
There is a rather obvious difference between Private Conversations and Public Conversations.
Katherine Horton too was having private conversations with Melanie at the same time I was. I heard about these conversations on an ongoing basis from Melanie just as Katherine heard about my conversations from Melanie. At no point did I publicize what I heard like a junior high-schooler, claiming or attacking Katherine Horton openly and publicly for “defamation campaigns” based on things she had said to Melanie, that I had heard about, because I was perfectly aware they were private conversations.
It appears that Katherine has either no awareness of the difference between private and public or that she deliberately embarked on a public campaign of attack anyway, in purposeful, targeted intent to slander and revile, by claiming that private conversations I had with Melanie—which she did not participate in and so cannot characterize in any way–amounted to a “4-month long defamation campaign” against her. It is hardly a campaign to express a private opinion in private to anyone. What Katherine has sought to do here, fraudulently, and it appears, deliberately, is distort and inflate her necessarily-flawed understanding of my private conversations with Melanie, then make a hoopla online shrieking that I’m the one running a campaign against her. I understand that as of date of writing this section (12/13), she is now characterizing this as a “covert defamation campaign” in her tweets– another masterstroke it seems to me, of classic counterintelligence. Blame and Attack, Distort and Discredit. Name it Public, Covert, Overt, any kite you can fly.
Why would she do this? Why would she create a public drama of such proportion slandering me publicly if all she is is a genuine “Victim of the Secret Services” and “Advocate for Victims” as she claims to be? Shouldn’t her focus be on helping other victims and addressing the secret services—rather than taking the time to find photos and take screenshots of me, write elaborate timelines, and report private conversations as somehow defaming of her publicly? This to me is one more indication of Katherine Horton not really being what she claims to be, a supposed Intelligence agency victim seeking to help others similarly targeted address such injustice, but a planted counterintelligence agent running controlled opposition shenanigans in our midst and wasting the time of genuine HR activists. In addition, she got on Twitter and engaged in further elaboration with various people, claiming to have been “attacked” by me, “stalked” by me, tired of the “conniving” by me, and “needing to be left alone” by me. In addition to being egregious and outrageous and defamatory, all of this comes as news to me.
I recall however this is exactly what she did after Techno broke up, when she went on-camera and announced to the world my awareness of her echo-stalking and mirroring which I had mentioned to her in my very last email to her during the exchange of emails that last week of July 2018, in that moment transforming information from a private email to a public matter. Subsequently, I addressed this matter publicly—because she had initiated this public airing, compelling a rebuttal publicly—and I am further addressing it in my article on infiltration, where I describe her echo-stalking in greater detail. Frankly, at the time, I would not have bothered talking publicly about her echo-stalking and mirroring and clear indications to me thereby of her being a double agent except in private to a few other activists, as I did do at the time via email, and spoke publicly of this only when she aired it herself in that Slam and Smear video which she named “The End of Techno Crime Fighters Forum.”
Additionally, when Techno broke up, many may recall we strove, in the final Video-Note which Millicent, Karen, and I aired, to stay neutral regarding reasons for Techno’s ending, seeking to end on neutral terms and not express publicly our dismay at Katherine’s repeated stonewalling in emails that week on key issues; we mentioned our discomfort with a primary issue, her random calls to violence on various Techno broadcasts, only when she showed up in the chat room and suggested she had been excluded from an episode of Techno—which it was not; I explained much more in The Real Backstory only after she issued her smear attacks on me in her video, compelling a rebuttal and response.
I make this point for a reason: Katherine Horton is engaged it appears in deviously constructing false narratives through making private matters—emails, texts, second-hand heard-about conversations/hearsay—selectively public and distorting them selectively for her own purposes of private gain, projecting false attitudes of “transparency,” innocence, and artlessness while indulging in specious and brazen public attacks which are openly defamatory against significant HR activists and journalists such as myself, Barbara Hartwell, and Melanie Vritschan, for deliberate purposes of assault to our public image and reputation, while attempting to garner public sympathy for herself for alleged “victimizing” by us.
Responses I wish to make to Katherine Horton’s wrongful and fraudulent statements, inventions, and claims on this POPPCon Timeline page of hers:
One Primary Observation About This “Timeline”: In keeping with the flatulent “Constructed-Narrative” in evidence throughout this libelous page Katherine Horton has constructed, there is no mention or emphasis in this timeline of Katherine’s initiating acts and attacks of slander, with her First Slam-and-Smear video attacks, her malicious false-allegation tweets in extended conversations online to various parties on Twitter, her Second Slam-and-Smear video rants, and her egregious publication of her “Blood on their Hands” page and “Ramola Dharmaraj” page, filled with malicious slander and false-narrative. There is therefore No Context provided here for the Public Cease and Desist Notices I have published online—which she has summarily ignored, and which she dares to characterize as libel, and No Context for the rebuttal videos, statements, observations, tweets I have made in The Real Backstory, Reports #99, #103, other podcasts, and on Twitter. Not a single one of my public responses has been made except in response and rebuttal to her public attacks online—but you would not know it, perusing her deranged “Timeline.”
01 August 2018: Dr. Horton meets Catherine Austin Fitts in Zurich.
Katherine Horton’s constructed-narrative of DEW hits engineered by “Intel” on myself and others to initiate the break-up of Techno the last week of July 2018 has been addressed earlier by me in The Real Backstory, and is being trotted out here again as if it has any meaning whatsoever except to her—and those she has succeeded in hypnotizing. I had no idea Catherine Austin Fitts was meeting with Katherine Horton in Zurich, nor did either inform me of this meeting. The first I heard of it was on Katherine’s Slam and Smear video titled “The End of Techno…” where she informed all that she had not told any of the members of Techno/JIT—for whatever inexplicable reason—she was going to have this meeting with Ms. Austin-Fitts. I am aware of Catherine Austin-Fitts’ work online and have corresponded with her a few times, perfectly cordially, including sending her links to articles online, mine and others’, and that is the extent of our interaction. Fact-Free Zurich Superglue seems to be in effect still for Katherine Horton, attempting once again to connect me to this meeting in Zurich I had no connection to whatsoever.
“02 August 2018:Ramola excludes Dr. Horton from the Techno Forumand terminates the show started by Dr. Paul Marko and Mindy Urken. Dr. Horton is completely unaware of these plans and is waiting to join the call when she sees the show go live without her. She has to express her amazement in the Live Chat.”
This has been previously addressed in The Real Backstory, a published account approved by the other three members of the former JIT and Techno Forum team prior to publication. History does not change just because Katherine Horton wishes to use my name over and over with nefarious intent. Also see my response further down to her “Ramola’s sabotage of Dr. Horton’s projects” where I post NSA Whistleblower Karen Melton-Stewart’s recent note on this subject.
Excerpt/The End of Techno Crime Fighters Forum: The Real Backstory, Written Statement
02 August 2018: Ramola calls Melanie Vritschan in Brussels and tells her to stop working with Dr. Horton. This is reported by Melanie to Dr. Horton during a phone call in the evening, which Dr. Horton receives half way up a Swiss mountain where she had to flee after DEW attacks on her exploded after the break-up of Techno.
Utter tosh. Melanie and I had been in contact and I called to let her know what had transpired, since she had not been privy to the acrimonious email exchange Millicent, Karen, and I had been on with Katherine. The rest is drama. Saying I “told Melanie to stop working with Dr. Horton” is a confabulation straight out of Katherine’s Fairy Storybook for Delinquents. Suggesting Techno’s breakup was responsible for DEW attacks on her is an interesting idea and probably another fairy story, particularly since I recall the intense COINTELPRO I was subjected to that last week while writing emails back to her and later while writing The Real Backstory as well: I was certainly given the Covert Comms message that “Intel” didn’t want Techno to break up in the least. Why? I have speculated on this before, and I rather think it has something to do with CounterIntel set-ups, FISA set-ups, global FBI, a reason-on-paper for surveillance, and a woman in our midst—whom I most definitely suspect is CounterIntel–shouting about blowing people’s brains out every now and then—conveniently enough for FBI Parallel Construction mavens and bullshit artists at the NSA and DHS and CIA and DIA seeking to name human rights activists “violent extremists” so they can then “legally” turn them over as “enemy combatants” into their dirty, classified, neuro-monitoring and neuro-surveillance and neuro-cannibalistic programs which they hide pretty well these days no doubt under “Sources and Methods of Gathering Intelligence.”
12/19: Merely as an aside, note Katherine Horton’s use of the term “bullshit artists” in this tweet, woven into her own characteristic lingo, which she puts out even before my article is finished and posted. Surveillance-feedback echo-stalk, anyone? And no, in her particular case, given my past experience with her, I do not subscribe to the theory, here, of the Neural Influence Psy-Op or the Orchestrated Synchronicity Psy-Op, both of which “Intel” is frantically working on these days, especially among activist groups. See Aside No. 2 at end of this article.
3 August-3 September 2018: Various listings linking to Thomas McFarlan’s and Barbara Hartwell’s writings and videos.
Here Katherine Horton is suggesting that Thomas McFarlan’s and Barbara Hartwell’s responses to Techno’s ending were evidence of my running an imagined “campaign” against her. What Katherine appears to be missing here is that many people watching this drama play out could see for themselves—with their own eyes and ears, in the privacy of their own homes, no help from me whatsoever—that she had spent hours baselessly attacking me on her video The End of Techno Crime Fighters Forum, while distorting the truth of what had occurred on Techno, misdirecting her viewers, misleading and misrepresenting and outright confabulating (DEW attacks and neurotech takeovers of myself, no less) —and refusing to acknowledge her own words, recorded on several Techno podcasts, making random and irresponsible calls to violence: one of the primary reasons Techno had closed. CIA Whistleblower Barbara Hartwell whom I have interviewed several times on my podcasts, and activist and journalist Thomas McFarlan stepped forward to record their own independent analyses and subsequent defamatory smears by Katherine Horton, without my asking either to, in unsolicited support of all three of us who had together broken from Katherine.
By linking here to further notes and sections named #LibelRamola, Katherine Horton is merely establishing her studied attack of my name in a denigratory and defamatory way.
This section, for instance, which she links to, (screenshot in the graphic above) completely ignores the context—of her own, initiating slander and defamation of me in her End of Techno video which I responded to in The Real Backstory–which prompted Thomas McFarlan’s analysis and careful documenting of a few of her many calls to violence on previous podcasts. This notion she raises of “right to reply” here is absurd given the point being made is the furnishing of evidence from her own mouth. I would remind Katherine Horton of the true context here: that she made that Slam and Smear video—The End of Techno—First; there was no “right of reply” accorded me there, while she blasted her way through Fact-Free Fictions about DEW attacks, neurotech attacks, and other confabulated creations, while sidestepping her own culpability in not being able to acknowledge calls to violence she herself had made, ignoring the very many problems of attrition in structure, focus, content, and tone the rest of us on Techno had experienced and acknowledged, as spelled out in The End of Techno Crime Fighters Forum: The Real Backstory, and detouring misleadingly into a focus on swearing on Techno, which also she misleadingly characterized as an issue of Freedom of Speech.
The fact that she then throws in digs about “proper journalism” being thrown out in favor of a fictional “takedown operation” suggests she has no clue what proper journalism is all about: accuracy of reportage, testimonial, opinion, and analyses in connection with sources, all completely missing from her free-fall smears of me in her End of Techno Slam and Smear video.
As for “no shred of evidence” for the echo-stalking or mimicking/mirroring I experienced from Katherine, unlike her, I do not record private Skype calls or take screenshots in devious fashion, but tend to stay open to people for a very long time—as I did with her, despite unsettling signals from her, because we were still working together and I am not quick to denigrate and conclude anything about anyone without repetition of the original signal, deep consideration, discussion with others, and thoughtful contemplation—all of which occurred in this case. I am discussing this very critical subject of the echo-stalking of me Katherine Horton most definitely engaged in during private Skype conversations of my gestures, bodily movements, words, phrases, colors, and actions—and apparently still engages in, on her podcasts, website, and tweets, as anyone schooled in analyzing verbal communications can tell—further in my impending supplementing article, The Consequences of Infiltration. Suffice for now to say that it is precisely this kind of mockery and echo-stalking that many thousands of people today who are being targeted by New Phoenix/ Gladio/ COINTELPRO/ Cybernetic Hive-Minding programs are reporting today all over the world, as part of gangstalking. Suffice also to say that these experiences with her have established definitively for mewhat I noted also when posting Thomas McFarlan’s work, that Katherine Horton is a sophisticated impostor, an infiltrator, an Intel (or/and DOD HUMINT) plant, an agent provocateur, and a saboteur. Not so sophisticated perhaps anymore—given the bludgeoning attacks she has currently mounted on me and many others online. Let me reiterate: this is my conclusion, based on my experiences with her, and my analyses of these as well as of her actions involving others in our midst. Her current actions in libeling me online ad infinitum in massive CounterIntel GCHQ JTRIG-style Discredit/Deceive ops on a writer and journalist who has been, since 2013—well before she crossed my path or anyone else’s in the Surveillance Abuse/Non-Consensual Mil/Intel Experimentation Exposing World–exposing the criminal targeting, surveillance, and deadly and unethical neuro/ nano/ scalar/ EMR/ bio experimentation crimes of the US, UK, Canadian, other American, European, Australian, New Zealand and other governments, militaries, and Intelligence agencies on their own populations merely add to and vindicate this conclusion.
Addendum, 12/19: The suddenly extreme, openly malicious, madly frantic and vindictive COINTELPRO I have been subjected to as well in currently-lawless Quincy and Milton, Massachusetts, while writing this article—with extremely hazardous driving, uber-brighting and uber-dazzling, sudden influx of huge pickups/trucks/SUVs, police cars, ambulances, fire engines, jaywalkers, extreme heart-hits and seat-hits by which I mean private-part hits while sitting (with remote precision RF/sonic weapons deployed from drones and ground-platforms) in my home, at Milton Public Library, everywhere while driving in Quincy and Milton, extreme facial-hits and head-hits with similar microwave pulse and nanoweapons so my face is visibly swollen on recent podcasts (#101, #99, Newsbreak 12, Global Gestapo 8, many more), exacerbated electronic attacks on my computer and cell phone (now so utterly drained of battery the cell will not charge), cyber-hacking of all recent podcasts–and sudden increase in hostile verbal attacks from other so-called TI activists who will not address Katherine Horton’s discrediting, defaming, and demeaning behavior publicly, but will start shooting out preachy and misguided emails to me to “not respond” also adds to and vindicates this conclusion.
Indeed, on this subject, I will make special note of the fact that not one of the many known TI activists, of their own volition, has spoken out publicly against Katherine Horton’s outrageous slander and libel of my work and name, but several have sought instead, quite repressively, to stifle my efforts to rebut her slander publicly and repudiated my requests to proffer public support in these efforts, while ignoring her slander of me, and some inviting her onto their talkshows and conference calls: this tells me once again the TI “community” is highly infiltrated, even at top levels, and clearly taking sides, permitting and validating her public mayhem. Further, while working on this article I have received frantic emails from various people as well as cybertroll comments online suggesting, among other things, that Katherine Horton is a “Monarch Program victim” and that I should therefore “let it go.” This extravagant protectiveness of Katherine Horton while permitting her, by their actions of omission, commission, and tacit and overt support, to slander and defame me and my work publicly also adds to and vindicates my conclusion.
Speaking of extravagant protectiveness, I will also mention the extravagant protection that Katherine Horton appears to enjoy in Intelligence agency circles, who, I understand protect their “assets”: in my own analysis, it is not possible for anyone who publishes such incendiary tweets as those with graphics of crosshairs on the foreheads of Intel agency heads and voiced exhortations to knock them or “corrupt judges and police” off—always mentioning military tribunals now of course, an add-on she has ensured after the attention called to loose-cannon calls to violence on Techno podcasts—to remain unquestioned on Twitter, Youtube, and other social media without protection—when people have been arrested and jailed for emails, Facebook posts and tweets, and each of these CIA/DHS/NSA-guided media is running censorship operations on free speech worldwide. This too adds to and vindicates my conclusion.
Furthermore, the fact that Youtube—or cyber-hacking of Youtube—will not currently let me replay the live chat on my recent livestreams (with Frederic Laroche and with Dr. Eric Karlstrom and two Newsbreaks, 11 and 12) so that I can once more examine and extract the extremely slanderous comments left there by such (equally questionable) parties as Erika Meyer and “Rita” –some of which I previously screenshotted and so have, while highlighting only hostile comments from various cyber-trolls under my rebuttal videos with Melanie, Reports #99 and #103, also adds to and vindicates this conclusion.
Those who are protected online by criminally-acting military and Intelligence agencies—which are also protecting the secrecy and evil of their crimes of targeting, surveillance, and non-consensual experimentation on people of integrity and conscience such as myself, with electromagnetic and sonic weaponry—are permitted to build a public profile online with the networked public support of planted alt-media mavens, also run no doubt by the sneaky CIA whose Operation Mockingbird clutch on alt-media journalism is just as tight as on mainstream media POPPCon operations. This was evident recently in Katherine Horton’s sudden flurry of public appearances—in parallel with her running a massive Defamation Campaign on me, complete with sleazy-screenshots of my face and rabid Constructed Narratives in print and in video-rants—on Project Camelot, Kerry Cassidy’s show, Richie Allen’s show, Victurus Libertas, Catherine Austin-Fitts’ show, and Frank Allen’s show; most of these podcasters were either made aware or expressed awareness of Katherine Horton’s Defamation Campaign on me but propped her up regardless. Richie Allen, notably, was the talk show host responsible for Katherine Horton’s debut in the “TI Community” a couple years ago–a debut which I now question and will write more about in The Consequences of Infiltration. Kerry Cassidy of Project Camelot disdained to interview me a year ago, after Katherine Horton’s earlier appearance there, and after requested email information sent to her by me, but shortly afterward invited Ella Free and Matthew Aaron onto her show instead; please note, this registers as a distinct choice Kerry Cassidy has made in choosing to overlook the considerable body of work I have published as an investigative and opinioned journalist and writer exposing targeting, surveillance, and military/Intelligence crimes, while supporting and platforming Ella Free instead, who also appeared among TIs suddenly, runs long Talkshoe calls for those targeted and, apparently supported by a CIA/Hollywood Rolodex and protected herself by way of non-probing, non-investigative, and non-threatening play-journalism, interviews some high-profile guests willing to go on her show but notably afraid to come on mine. Ella Free has also been selectively supported and platformed by Ken Adachi of EducateYourself.org and Jason Goodman of “Crowdsourcing the Truth”–both of whose platforms are seriously questionable, in my view, with Ken Adachi being fully exposed by CIA whistleblower Barbara Hartwell–although they most certainly seek larger validation and Cover by championing legitimate whistleblowers and activists as well. I will also add here that Alfred Webre of NewsInsideOut, who had been maintaining cordial relations with me (and with Melanie Vritschan) abruptly fell out with me after Techno Crime Fighters Forum closed, choosing to ignore the truth-telling in The Real Backstory and call me “ego-invested” and, as per her self-exculpating theory, “DEW-hit,” while he named Katherine Horton a “Genius” and “Crystal Child” with “Six-Strand-Activated DNA” whose public cussin’ and swearin’ he found oddly charming and understandable. All of this selective supporting and network-creating and building new media profiles for the future is most telling to those of us examining the alt-media landscape with discernment, and also adds to and vindicates my conclusion.
3-19 September 2018: Various listings alleging sabotage of her scanning efforts with Melanie
This section was dealt with closely in Ramola D Reports/Report #99 with Melanie, and I advise all to listen to that video for the truth, plus see the opening discussion here addressing the header “Ramola’s Defamation Campaign.”
Katherine makes mention in these sections of Paul Baird and Cassandra and something about my publishing testimonials from them; this sounds like garbled information distorted in hearsay. I had informed Melanie that others had noted Katherine’s echo-stalking of their own words and testimonialsof their own experiences in her appropiating tweets and statements on podcasts, including Cassandra, and might publish reports themselves. Paul Baird was not mentioned in this context.
Despite Katherine Horton’s Fairy Story for CounterIntel Kooks launching takedown operations on me online, Melanie has confirmed on video—see Report #99—that I was certainly not harassing her or running smear campaigns on Katherine; I expressed my opinions with her, and we together excavated once more what had occurred a year earlier at Erasme Hospital, and the truth of our conversations is recorded there in Report #99 as well as under the header discussion above under “Katherine Horton’s Defamation Campaign Page with the header “Ramola’s Defamation Campaign” here.
14 October-12 November: Various listings referencing Frederic, Melanie, and culminating in the date of her publication of this original Timeline page—which has now been padded and added to, like the CounterIntel Smear Missive it is
Once again, Report #99 where I addressed some of this reveals the truth of interactions with Frederic and Melanie. Stories about Frederic she has listed here, and elaborated further in her section slamming Frederic and named, maliciously, “Frederic’s Lying” are addressed fully in Report #103 with Melanie, released 12/15/2018, where I have summarized my interactions with Frederic and read out portions of his recent emails sent to a group of activists including myself, on 12/15 and earlier, right after his court hearing on 11/29 when he–entirely on his own—dropped Katherine Horton as an “expert witness” and ceased all collaboration with her.
I will summarize briefly:
1) Frederic confirms in these emails that he did feel that Katherine sabotaged his 13 June 2018 hearing by promising to be present and then withdrawing that promise—while at the same time he had fired his lawyer 3 days before the hearing and therefore the date of the hearing was dropped, letting Katherine off the hook.
These are Frederic’s words/Email 12/15/2018: “It is true that my court case on the 13th June 2018 was shifted because I had fired my lawyer 3 days before the hearing and not because Katherine Horton did not show up in Grenoble (but it (is) also true that she unexpectedly did not show up in Grenoble)….her lack of report and her absence could have been a sabotage of my case, but luckily for her, I had fired my lawyer in time so that the hearing was shifted, disengaging her responsibility in case I would have been judged without any help coming from her, and I did not fire my lawyer under her suggestion but from my own thinking and decision, because I had good reasons to be thinking he was playing a double game with me and the judge and the prosecutor thanks to a testimony from René Forney who is the first political prisoner in France and he is from Grenoble too and he had this same lawyer for his own defense in the past and he told me that it is he who demolished his defense.”
2. Frederic contacted me in October to inform me that Katherine, who had offered to help with his court case and write an updated statement for him, was not in touch with him and he feared a second sabotage and dropping by her and asked for my help in asking Melanie and her scientist friends at ICATOR for help in writing a statement in support of him. I passed on this information and request to Melanie; she, of her own volition, with no suggestion from me, questioned Katherine about the 13 June incident, and Katherine then confronted Frederic—while still intimating to him she would help him and be present at his court hearing on 11/29. Aware of Katherine’s hostility toward me, Frederic’s words at this time to both Katherine and myself appear to have been intended to placate and maintain communications on both sides—but Katherine has chosen to make a huge brouhaha out of all this, and has published emails from him without his permission, and now mounted a section charging him publicly with lying, scarcely the actions of a genuine human rights advocate helping anyone with their still-active court case.
3. The affidavit Katherine wrote for Frederic is seriously problematic and filled with inaccuracies, irrelevancies, and statements actually damaging to Frederic’s defense, in my view and his—and others’; please listen to my brief analysis of her affidavit on Report #103 for elaboration on this. These are not idle observations. (I also recommend comparing her posted “Expert Witness” statement with my posted Investigative Reporter statement which includes irrefutable references to government whistleblowing, reported testimonial, and declassified military documentation on non-consensual covert neuro-experimentation ongoing, yourself, if anyone wishes to comprehend the distinctions between this statement written by a supposed particle physicist and systems analyst from CERN with degrees from Oxford and an investigative reporter and science/technology journalist and educator with degrees from George Mason University and the University of Madras, India.)
4) Seriously dismayed, I understand, by Katherine’s untrue statements in this last-minute affidavit she provided, which he himself discerned—just as I too discerned on a first reading of her seriously problematic statement, despite her presence at his hearing (which, incidentally, he reports he, not the court had requested, as “expert witness”), and also by Katherine’s incredibly slanderous and downright nasty words against myself, Melanie, and Barbara Hartwell in her unhinged Second Slam and Smear video of 22 November, 2018, titled Holocaust Working Group Dos and Donts, and by the informative Rebuttal-Video-To-Her-Slam-and-Smear-Video, Report # 99, which Melanie and I published on 2 December, 2018, and by her threatening tone to him in emails on Dec 4, 2018, demanding he instantly comply with her requests for an immediate video-chat or she would “pull out of your court case and make a public statement about it,” and fearing impending slander from her, Frederic dropped Katherine Horton from his case immediately, on Dec 4, 2018—while she also sent him emails that day claiming to be withdrawing from his case–and informed me and Melanie and others by text and email of this eventuality.
In a later email to a group of TI activists the same day on 4 Dec, 2018, Frederic states:
“I fully support the views of Melanie Vritschan and Ramola D now, my eyes see clearly the damages that Katherine Horton was doing to my court case.
So I have to clear the things about what she mentioned in her affidavit given at my court case on the 29/11/2018 in Grenoble, France:
No I was totally in control of myself when the fake car accident occurred and I was NOT under the remote control of my implants that made me the urge to flee the spot of the incident: I was not fleeing, because this case was simply not a case of hitand run, but what she said made it appear as such, which is damaging my defense.
Therefore I am now publicly with Melanie and Ramola and with you all against this professional dangerous defamatory woman.”
On the subject of my Disclaimer as a truth-seeking journalist on Katherine’s disputed reportage regarding Erasme Hospital psychiatrists’ unlawful medical kidnap/theft of Melanie’s newborn last year succeeding Katherine’s extended conversations with a midwife the night the child was born—which stands on its own and speaks for itself, as I have noted in Report # 99, where Melanie once more addresses all matters of what transpired at Erasme–which she re-publishes here and later elaborately responds to in red in a separate section, I have nothing more to add. The statements in red Katherine Horton has left on this section have been addressed fully by Melanie in Report #99. The questions I have raised in this disclaimer remain. The references made there to Katherine Horton’s unreliability of reportage in this matter (and generally) relate to her own slanderous confabulations in her earlier video The End of Techno Crime Fighters Forum, and to the questions accruing from the discrepancies in reportage noted in the Disclaimer.
12 November 2018—12/16/2018 (the present day), where all my Clarifying Responses and Pointed Rebuttals to Katherine’s Libelous Website Publication Attacks on me–with her Bloodlist Page and Timeline page of 12 November 2018, various Twitter Publication attacks and libelous smears Post-12-November, and Video Publication Attacks of 22 November of me, Melanie, and Barbara–are listed, CounterIntel & JTRIG-style, as “new libel,” “campaigning obsession,” “smears,” “targeted campaign,” “pathological lying,” and, the kicker, “psychological terrorism.”
With official entrance of one and all into the Twilight Zone of CounterIntel Online Covert Action Character Assassination and Nonstop Psycho Terrorism, as spelled out charmingly in the GCHQ JTRIG manual reported by The Intercept a few years ago, the CIA Guide to Clandestine Operations, the US Army CounterIntelligence Handbook and various other tomes intended for use by the covert operatives who swarm the Internet and strive to take down accomplished writers, journalists, and activists racing ahead in the effort to expose unethical and barbaric crimes against humanity by the feckless Military Intelligence Industrial Complex pursuing Full Spectrum Dominance, Transhumanism, Artificial Intelligence, Cybernetics, an Internet of Humans, Manchurian Bio-Robotizing, EEG Cloning Neuro-Hacking, Nanoweapon Dehumanizing and otherwise complete dominion over all of humanity on Planet Earth, it is perhaps to be expected that a takedown attack on my journalism – which perhaps is seriously rocking the MIIC boat, just as Melanie’s human rights advocacy no doubt is – would seek to entrench, dig its clammy feet into the slimy swamp it is rooted in, and go on and on forever.
That certainly is what is happening here, with Katherine’s obsessive reframing of every genuine response and rebuttal, as well as justified comment on her inane slander attacks, as “evidence” of her constructed-narrative of a “defamation campaign” and “new libel” by me around every corner.
The coup of course is to attack someone and then say they are attacking you: this is straight from Machiavellian manuals no doubt that the Mossad and CIA and GCHQ and other agencies trained in the arts of deception and deceit read inside out and practice without cease as they infiltrate, betray, mislead, and deceive.
So I won’t be responding pixel by pixel to every one of her confabulated claims, since I don’t plan to be spending my life chasing her clacking of Swiss bayonets or churning of hole-filled cruel-to-cows Swiss cheese either.
If my every move online to depose her claims and expose her deceptions and counter her attacks is to be obsessively noticed and highlighted and tediously reframed and attacked by her in her desperate efforts to establish her GCHQ JTRIG standing or whatever other standing she might covertly enjoy, then she is welcome to stand on her head and pursue my writing or speaking online, word after word, making a spectacle of herself in the process. I will personally be ignoring the lunacy. I can only direct readers to my Standing Notice Regarding Dr. Katherine Horton’s JTRIG Slander Campaign Against Ramola D: I have more important matters to deal with than keeping an eye on her nonstop slander.
However there are three final matters I will briefly address in this writing.
One, the newest section Katherine has added, literally last night (12/16 at time of writing this section), pulling together a whole bundle of untruths into a constructed narrative to rival the Warren Commission narratives or the planes-causing-towers-to-vaporize narratives: Ramola’s Sabotage of Dr. Horton’s Projects
THE TRUTH: Note from NSA Whistleblower Karen Stewart, 11/17/2018:
Ramola, If you go to your Youtube/video explanation regarding the end of TCFF, you will see that I engaged several critics openly and publicly in the comments section, countering straw men arguments regarding cursing or just silly, uninformed, ignorant or insanely prejudiced opinions, like “Katherine was just experiencing American prejudice against anyone not like them”…. which made no sense at all considering TCFF was on the American side, a white American, a black American, and a naturalized citizen of Indian origin. Hardly homogenous. Some of the exchanges got quite heated, frankly.I said in no uncertain terms that the break up of TCFF was 100% due to Katherine’s refusal to acknowledge and stop the calls to extrajudicial violence AND the fact that she refused to admit she was doing it, after being counseled by all three of us separately and respectfully to stop for the sake of TCFF as well as the reputation of all TI’s. Certainly I opened myself up to be criticized for showing some fire in my responses. I also gave such an explanation on my Face Book feed. In my efforts to quell a public feud I privately encouraged Katherine to just dropit, and go her own way, hoping to lessen the damage done to all of us in the public eye of the TI community in North America as well as Europe. People saw us as a life line and stronglyresented that we had not solved the issues fortheirsakes.
I have no problem lauding you, Ramola, as a brilliant investigative journalist, an indefatigable warrior for truth and integrity, a woman who has suffered and sacrificed for thousands of people she has not even met and likely never will meet most of them, and whose work will go down in history as a magnificent chronicling of the 21st Century Techno-Terrorism Dark Ages, as where other accounts would be comparatively scant and incoherent in comparison.
I have no problem similarly saying Melanie against all odds, has created a ground- breaking human rights organization actually accomplishing something, in an area of human rights issues exceedingly dangerous to address or even speak of in this Orwellian nightmare world, and quite obviously at great personal expense, and unimaginable suffering to herself. And that going to ground maligning either of you, or anyone else, is unfair, irresponsible, and an unnecessarily destructive effort to us all when we are all fighting for our lives and credibility, and the future of mankind, which is now endangered more than ever before.”
I think it’s time for me to make a definitive statement here.
Ramola D: Statement on Katherine Horton
While it is not clear to me exactly why Katherine Horton has taken to running a malice and nastiness-filled non-stop slander, libel, and defamation campaign on me ever since Techno Crime Fighters Forum ended—as established by her videos and tweets as described above, starting with her Slam-and-Smear video “The End of Techno Crime Fighters Forum,” numerous tweets, her second video “Dos and Donts, Working Group 2,” her Ramola Dharmaraj page on her website and her Blood on Their Hands listing page, projecting untruths through these media, and creating a brazen false-construct of my running a “4-month-long/2.5 month-long malicious campaign” against her, and my being the one engaging in “malicious defamation” of her, my own personal reading of this entire operation is that it is a targeted counterintel operation related to my journalism, activism, and voice as well as my public disclosure of the grounds for my private speculations regarding her being a double-agent counterintel or HUMINT operative—which, it should be emphatically made clear, was necessarily made public subsequent to her own outing of these grounds: her echo-stalking, mirroring, and neuro-linguistic programming actions (also discussed briefly above) conducted in private Skype conversations with me–which was reported by me publicly only after she herself made reference to these actions of hers publicly in her first defaming video slandering me publicly with various false allegations, confabulations, unfounded speculations, and untruths, “The End of Techno Crime Fighters Forum.”
I did not imagine those actions by her; my analytical observation of them noted them definitively on several different occasions as deliberate, purposeful, and conscious –as opposed to being an unconscious play of “mind-control,” a pet theory with some about everything under the sun, or “orchestrated synchronicity,” which I am well-aware is a tool of social deceit and manipulation in current use by the Psy Op Brigade–and my second article The Consequences of Infiltration, to be released soon, will closely address and enumerate these actions—documented at the time privately and with other then-members of the JIT and related activists–very specifically
Possibly also it is a retaliation against former members of Techno Crime Fighters Forum and JIT for having broken away from her—actions we each took for very good reason, already published.
My understanding is no doubt incomplete—given that we live in a world governed by secrecy, clandestine operations, covert operations, lies, and deception–and these are merely my opinions and speculations, based on my analysis of my experience with her, which I think I, like everyone else on the planet and online, am perfectly entitled to air as my opinions and speculations; it is really quite inexplicable to me why she is obsessively pursuing the discrediting and defaming of my name, image, reputation, and work online.
I want to state definitively—knowing that the clear record of my work online (The Real Backstory statement and video, my repostings of others’ articles, my tweets, my statements on other podcasts, my Cease and Desist notices to her) to rebut her slander, held against the timeline and content of her instigating defaming videos andtweets proves this completely—that every single public statement of opinion, observation, and analysis I have made in podcasts, tweets, Facebook posts, and articles on Katherine Horton, including this one, have been made in timing, content, and intent to counter and negate her slanderous statements, false allegations, false accusations, and false narrative-constructs against me that she first posted, in clear attacks on my name, work, image, and reputation online. In other words: I am not the one running slander campaigns here. Katherine Horton mounted a targeted defamation campaign against me with everything she said in her very first video slamming me, and followed that up with continued smears, despite my addressing her allegations in The Real Backstory statement and video. It has currently got to the point of being utterly ridiculous, an entrenching of a false-construct she is peddling to the world in apparent seeking to do lasting damage to my name and work, in addition to maligning my character and inciting and instigating others to see my character as deficient and questionable.
I can only speculate therefore—I believe with complete justification, in light of all I have spelled out here—that I have currently become the intentional target of a massive and malicious CounterIntel takedown operation attacking my name, image, reputation, and work online in investigative journalism and human rights activism exposing US Military, Private Sector, Fusion Center, and Intelligence Agency Crimes Against Humanity, and that Katherine Horton, from the very beginning of her acquaintance with me, has been and is a part of it.
I state herewith that all I have published in this statement and article is the truth. I reserve all rights to continue to write, speak, and publish the truth in this matter—as in all other matters related to my human rights activism and investigative reportage–as I have experienced it, as I understand it, and as I believe necessary.
All those wishing to know the truth behind these slanderous and really ridiculous confabulations and allegations and any new ones she concocts, which I cannot any further keep track of (as of 12/16 she was already active and attacking once more on Twitter) are advised to watch Reports #99 and #103, and email me privately at any time should they encounter further falsehood and defamation from Katherine Horton directed at me for which they wish clarification. I will not myself be further tracking her on-and-on slander and libel and ridiculous, mischaracterizing responses to my rebuttals of her slander and libel as “slander and libel.”
After the publication of The Consequences of Infiltration, which I think necessary to publish, for my own vindication and for purposes of informing all, in complement to this article, I will be ignoring Katherine Horton.
Katherine Horton’s Egregious Slander, Malicious Defamation, and Just Plain Nastiness to CIA Whistlebower Barbara Hartwell
I would like to make a few remarks in relation to Katherine Horton’s ranting and abuse directed at Barbara Hartwell in her Dos and Donts Video, which Barbara herself has addressed thoroughly in her publication, FACT-FREE THEATRICAL PRODUCTIONS Starring Katherine Horton, which I have re-published at my site.
It is disturbing to watch and listen to Katherine Horton on this video, where she spews invective with intensity, and on this segment where she attacks Barbara Hartwell openly, characterizing her words as “lying” “fakeness” and other such, offering her unfounded opinions and speculations with contortions and distortions of facts—including about late Special-Agent-In-Charge Ted Gunderson—which she apparently knows nothing of, as Barbara Hartwell, who knew the much-mythologized right-hand man of Edgar Hoover and COINTELPRO kingpin Ted Gunderson personally, learned (and has published) of his involvement in treasonous Stinger missile deals with Osama bin Laden, Satanism, and pedophilia,understood the “containment operations” and controlled opposition/limited hangout operations she reports he was running, and was “befriended and betrayed” by him through extensive character-assassination operations, meticulously points out.
Here is a sampling of whatKatherine Horton says in that video about Barbara Hartwell:
“The CIA’s Barbara Hartwell wades in. She is a bitch. I’ve never met the bitch. This woman is off her rocker. Personally I think she is a f—ing fraud, I think she is a CIA plant.”
“I laughed my ass off. You are against the crown corporation, my dear. Why the f— do you have a snake, logo of the Vatican/CIA. Why the f— do you show yourself with gangstalking sunglasses, which indicate you don’t want people to see your face that well?”
“Are you off your rocker? And then you are wading in ten days after this woman (she means Catherine Austin-Fitts) makes an announcement that she’s trying to look in to the financial, a leading financial expert on the space-based economy and black budget. F— don’t tread on me. She deserves the Nobel prize.”
“Her facts are bullshit. The fact she’s talking sounds like one hundred percent lying and fakeness.”
“What that tells me about Barbara Hartwell when I hear her voice and just close my eyes it just sounds like f—ing lies to me personally. My personal assessment of this is I don’t believe her f—ing fake cough. I don’t believe a single word this woman says.”
This is abuse, plain and simple. In addition to all else: slander, malice, defamation, nastiness, and ignorance. Barbara Hartwell has reported extreme persecution by the amoral and venal CIA/FBI complex which practices life-destruction COINTELPRO on outstanding ex-CIA and ex-FBI whistleblowers with integrity, spine, and conscience such as herself and Geral Sosbee; her reports are on her website and included in several podcasts she has done with me—done, I will emphasize, at great personal cost, given the debilitating medical condition she has with her throat, breathing, and voice, which anyone listening to her can easily discern, and which she herself has spoken of openly on my podcasts.
Taunting, mocking, ridiculing someone with a disability is what Katherine Horton has accomplished here. In addition, she has gone all out to try to dismiss, deprecate, and marginalize Barbara Hartwell’s voice and work—in keeping with the long abusive history of such CIA/FBI-run persecution Barbara has endured online in systematic character sabotage operations over decades—effectively running COINTELPRO operations herself of repression, abuse, and persecution on Barbara Hartwell.
These attacks on Barbara Hartwell, who has previously published her own unvarnished analyses and opinions of Katherine Horton on the Techno Forum, and which appear to be an added attack on me, given my interviews with Barbara and support and interest in her work (although of course that entire video rant filled with repeated false-narratives and rife with epithets runs an attack on me), begs the question: Why would a “victim-advocate” and supposed reporting victim of Intelligence agency/military crime and “criminal investigator” as Katherine Horton terms herself seek to destroy one of the few CIA whistleblowers we have, speaking openly and publishing for years about Intelligence agency/military crime and the use of DEWs on citizens, whistleblowers, activists, and journalists alike?
I will add that my interviews with Barbara Hartwell as well as my firm friendship with her over this past year have established for me very clearly the power and importance of her voice, as she openly and fearlessly speaks about criminal activities engaged in by the CIA, FBI and other covered agencies, their retaliative and example-making persecution of whistleblowers, controlled-opposition activities they run in alt-media, New World Order/New Age repressions and deceptions run by the Globalists, various characters and personalities planted in alt-media by CIA Mockingbird mavens contorting journalism into trivia, and much more. Barbara’s authoritative handling of these subjects, based on her experience and analyses as a journalist and trained CIA Intelligence Analyst along with her family’s CIA background lends power to her voice—which is why, it seems clear to me, her voice has been attacked by the black ops CIA who attack anyone who clearly reveals their crimes.
Katherine Horton’s reprehensible and ignorant attacks on CIA whistleblower Barbara Hartwell therefore should be probed for motive and seen in context. FBI whistleblower, Vietnam veteran and once professor, attorney, and judge Geral Sosbee, who understands the importance of Barbara Hartwell’s voice, has written clearly on this subject, as noted in an article covering Ted Gunderson and Ken Adachi that Barbara has just published recently on her website: Pinocchio Adachi and The Ghost of Ted Gunderson
Thanks to Cassandra for Standing Up to Cyber-Bullying
Finally, I want to acknowledge and thank Cassandra’s deeply thoughtful, considered, and analytical responses in support of my right to respond to slander and stand up to cyber-bullying in her tweets back to Katherine Horton a few days ago, whose tone, language, and attack-mode in her tweets to Cassandra speaks for itself.
As Cassandra has noted to me, the reaction Katherine Horton has displayed here suggests her stance is that no-one should challenge her constructed-narratives, no-one should use their own critical thinking and perception, no-one should exercise independent discernment: do so and you risk being named an agent by her, or “operative” engaging in “slander,” in itself a tip-off once more of putative agenthood, given that counterintel tomes invite their undercover operatives to fly pre-emptive cover and run around calling anyone and everyone an agent first–which Katherine Horton certainly does.
I also commend Cassandra for her courage and fearlessness in speaking out, and in speaking her truth on Twitter, because the repressive bulldog behavior in Katherine Horton’s words, tone, and verbal attitude of challenge projecting intimidation and threat in tweets probably puts off and silences many.
The need for this written statement of course arises from the fact that Katherine (Dr. Katherine Horton)–with whom Karen (NSA whistleblower Karen Melton-Stewart), Millicent (Dr. Millicent Black) and I have worked for over a year on the weekly Techno Crime FightersForum podcast set up by Dr. Paul Marko and Mindy Urken and on JIT, the Joint Investigation Team set up by Katherine –has recently made a massively defamatory video pretty much slamming me to death and putting out an incredible amount of misframing, misdirection, lies, deceit, and slander about how and why Techno has closed, and what really occurred in the last week prior to its close.
Issues Over the Past Year & the Primary Issue
The real backstory—which Katherine has not touched, being too involved in image damage control apparently while regrettably focusing on projecting a false sense of innocence and being-wronged-ness–is that numerous frustrating issues had been brewing in the background for quite some time, issues in particular related to Katherine but also issues related to how increasingly unfocused and unplanned Techno had become, how much time it took up on Thursdays, how delayed it often was, as well as how dominated it often was by Katherine on-air, often extended toward the end by her sharing screens and expounding interminably when it was time to wrap up.
Language of Violence Quite Separate from Talk of Death Penalty
One of the larger issues concerning all 3 of us—all through the past year–was her use of a highly unsettling language of violence that had for a long time put us and many reporting viewers—including prominent government whistleblowers and TI (“Targeted Individual”) activists–on edge: the habit she had fallen into of calling for bullets through brains, or putting people in crosshairs, or suggesting people take shotguns into places of work (the NSA, to be precise) and blow brains off, or calling for the military to take people out, people in fact that were named, often titular heads of Intel – these references to violence and occasional calls to violence, however theoretical, or rhetorical, all offered variously in jest, indignation, or to mere dramatic effect.
This, I should clarify, and underline, was quite separate and different from the death penalty she advocated and Karen supported, as a just and legal means of dealing with Deep State Intel and military crooks who are currently openly torturing millions in their own homes with “Surveillance” or Military electromagnetic and acoustic weapons, and calling reporting victims delusional and schizoid when they report it—supported by the Propaganda & Deceit Brigade of Mainstream Media, as well as the Deceit & Authoritarianism of Collusive Psychiatry. While Millicent and I do not support the death penalty and have said so, Karen and Katherine do support the death penalty and have said so. No-one was censored for a difference in opinion; we have each freely aired our views on this subject, and none of us stopped the other from airing her views.
To reiterate, this was not about the death penalty; this was talk of violence quite separate from that. Regular viewers will understand what I refer to here; others only have to go back and check our Techno videos or her own videos made at her channel which echo the same theme.
Furthermore, there were occasions when the death penalty or the emphasis on administrative address of crime was brandished by her as an add-on or tag -on to a blasé rendition of Off-with – their-heads! which was all very humorous no doubt at first but hardly convincing as an innate appeal to legal redress alone, and increasingly distressing as yet another incident of talk we found discomfiting.
Reasons for Our Discomfort with Talk of Violence
Fascist, Corrupt, Over-Reaching, Exploitative Fusion Centers & Bogus Laws: The reason for our discomfort with such talk should partially be obvious: in the ridiculous atmosphere of totalitarianism we are currently living in, all over the world, but markedly and indisputably in the USA and in Europe, where we live, people making mention of violence are glibly seen to be putative terrorists or violent extremists by the very over-reaching and exploitative Intel and fusion centers who are in fact engaging in violence themselves upon the citizenry with Stealth weapons, which makes them Plausibly Deniable, and yes, they’re denying it, and continuing to commit massive crimes against humanity, we know that; that has been the subject of my investigative journalism for four years now. The Global War on Terror is in our American and European and Australian neighborhoods, and it practises Deception with a capital D. The programs of Countering Violent Extremism and Community Policing and Infragard are all trawling the streets and Net, eager to snag anyone and everyone for pretty much anything, and stick a label of Under Investigation on their backs so they can run around defaming innocent people as pedophiles, drug traffickers, and prostitutes as well as “Violent Extremists” or “Terrorists” in their neighborhoods, sell them into fiscally-rewarding incredibly treasonous and immoral DOD/USAF/Navy contracts engaging in barbaric, inhumane, terminal, Death-Dealing neuro and bio-behavioral experimentation with lethal military weapons criminally named “non-lethal,” and rationalize and deny every aspect of what they do by keeping it secret.
Parallel Construction Corruption & Framing by Deep State Criminals: As well:The FBI we know engages in Parallel Construction; as FBI whistleblower Geral Sosbee has explained, much corruption is achieved via corrupt FMJs—federal magistrate judges—and FISA court judges, with hundreds of thousands of National Security Letters being issued on innocent Americans who make the unfortunate mistake of whistleblowing about corruption, speaking out about anything meaningful, engaging in human rights or animal rights or eco activism, or acting with integrity in any sphere, in this Gladio/Phoenix/Op Chaos/Cointelpro atmosphere where Crime, Corruption, and Criminality are well-ensconced in both the highest and lowest echelons of our multi-national corporatist governments, federally and locally, currently, and constitute the New Yardstick to Live By, in this ZioNaziSatanic New World Dysorder rolled out on the globe.
Energetic Aspect to Talk of Death and Violence: That (above-addressed reality) isthe backdrop to our public conversations on the Techno Crime Fighter Forums; that is the deception we most definitely sought to challenge and expose. That awareness of deceiving Surveillance all around us however, with awareness of Fusion Center intent to hone in on talk of violence among human rights activists, was not our only objection to talk of violence; Millicent and I in particular objected to the negative word-energy and image-energy of death and violence, which had come to invade the show: in conjunction with the random references to violence, death of some kind appeared to intrude on every show, whether in one of Katherine’s analyses of cartel signalling or one of her narrations of family members’ or others’ deaths and funerals.
There is an energetic aspect to the Universe that conventional science ignores but which the new understandings of quantum physics and Consciousness science explores; the notion of the morphogenetic field or unifield field in which we all live and variously thrive or barely survive yet inevitably affect and influence with our words, intentions, and actions (and which the 0.1% Controller faction work night and day to keep in their control, by pumping hate, fear, anger, and discord through war, apartheid, occupation, terrorism, false flags, mass shootings, fake protest movements, created migrants, destruction of families, propaganda, targeting, weapons-testing, torture, child abuse, ritual sacrifice, etc.) is one some of us are aware of, that backgrounds our disinterest in constant focus on death and violence.
I must clarify, I am speaking about repeated focus on death, not necessary and essential reference. I am not at all saying or implying that we had strictures in place or needed them, excessively, to censor any of us on Techno from speaking about death in itself; unfortunately, these dark and barbaric programs of non-consensual human neuro-experimentation and GOG’s NEW GESTAPO assault of citizens with “dual-use” “non-lethal” “anti-personnel” technologies that we are reporting, investigating, and demanding human rights attention for from the larger public do result in the Fusion Center/Military-created death of targets, whether via directed-energy-weapon attack, inducing of terminal disease such as sudden cancer, stroke, blood clots, or via driving people through extremely abusive DEW and V2K/Neuro-Invasion attacks to suicide.
Programming Aspect to Talk or Images of Death & Violence: Death in itself assubject therefore was not the issue, but the repeated focus on death and violence; Millicent has discussed with me the (unintended-by-us but pulled off by Katherine) effect of this repeated focus and theme functioning also as a sort of programming of the younger viewing audience especially, to acclimate them to images of death and violence, much in the style of what Hollywood does.
We Are Human Rights Activists Reporting State-Sponsored & State-Run Violence: Another underlying objection to talk of extra-judicial violence we three shared was: As human rights advocates speaking out against and openly reporting to the wider, MSM-misled public the violence being done to us, as wrongful targets of Surveillance by an utterly-out-of-control and despotic, Globalist Deep State–I repeat, the violence of Stealth Weapon usage on human beings is most definitely State-Sponsored and State-Run Violence, Assault, Battery, Torture, and Terrorism, in all legal definitions of those terms, despite the atrocity of the cover of Dual-Use/Non-Lethal/Anti-Personnel/Electronic Surveillance Technologies they are hiding under— we do not think it is in any way right to project an interest in violence–especially since we do not have such an interest, at all.
Violence Cannot Address State Surveillance Violence & Military Experimentation Violence: Defending oneself legally and legitimately against wrongful violence is no doubt another aspect to socially acceptable and Constitutionally-protected responses to violence; that is another story and not one we have covered in depth on our show. As socially-minded women warriors for truth and justice exposing targeting and surveillance and military crimes, we are not and never have been a group advocating violence to address the violence of Surveillance Abuse, the violence of State- Sponsored Terrorism, and the violence of Non-Consensual Neuro-Experimentation; Millicent especially has taken care to spell this out on our shows. As public speakers engaged in truth-telling and public exposure, we are believers in Martin Luther King’s brilliant understanding of the only possible response to violence to end violence: Returning violence for violence multiplies violence, adding deeper darkness to a night already devoid of stars. Darkness cannot drive out darkness: Only light can do that.
Attempting to Address the Primary Issue of Talk of Violence
For all these reasons we had tried to bring up in particular this issue of talk of violence and images of death and violence with Katherine on more than one occasion over the past year, and had sought video meetings with her to discuss these openly, several times after broadcasts when these had occurred. Interestingly, Katherine’s availability always plummeted when these issues were mentioned; she simply vanished at will, staying off Skype, refusing to answer emails and refusing to respond to our concerns; this actually happened several times. She would also avoid showing up a little early for the show when we could do a pre-show check-in and discussion, but often signed in just as the show was about to start or after it had started. Occasionally she tangentially issued excuses about being excessively attacked, at just these times. As a result, our very real concerns with her on this primary issue was shelved, week after week.
Indeed, this was her customary response to open address of any kind of issue. As an example, there was the recent incident of a tweet she had posted, I think to World Bank whistleblower Karen Hudes, stating she was the leader of a team of investigators, and referring to us as her team, whom she “led,” which I wrote at length to her about; contrary to public projections, none of us on the Joint Investigation team had ever agreed to call her Dear Leader, nor had we ever considered ourselves her private team; each of us, I believe, is a powerful human rights activist in our own right, engaging in high -caliber research, reportage, public address, and human rights reportage, we each have our separate identities as Intelligence analysts, pastors, founders of international human rights groups, and writers, and our working together has always been a matter of free will and friendly collaboration. Katherine ignored my and Millicent’s emails and requests for a meeting on this issue for two months, engaged in the same avoidance and delayed-arrival-on-show strategy described above, and eventually made remarks to me in a private Skype conversation about how she had not intended to project leadership exactly, etc., which did not seem convincing, but which I let go of, in the interests of friendship and collegiateship, especially since it was months after the fact.
This strategy was in evidence right up to the last week preceding the close of Techno Crime Fighters Forum, when Katherine once again made remarks about people like Gina Haspel and James Giordiano needing to be “taken out,” which I actively countered live on the show and which many people commented to me about later as being wrongful and problematic, and about making Katherine a liability on the show, to the show, and to our individual professional profile as human rights activists, as well as to myself as a journalist.
In our last historic email exchange, Millicent wrote: “Talk of us doing ANY violence or promoting violence by anyone other than law enforcement and then only when warranted, should never be said of us. If they can go back to any Techno episodes and prove it was done, or at least that’s the way it sounded, we in America can be charged with conspiracy to commit acts of terrorism OR inciting to riot. Not to mention that State law says I have a duty as a mental health professional and a pastor to report such talk. Because of that, I cannot be part of any televised media where such talk is even jokingly suggested. We might be held accountable for the actions of others. It IS NOT alright to make such statements then say, O I WAS JOKING. A jury would not care.”
It must be noted that we have over the past year tried to both verbally address and sent emails to Katherine repeatedly to convey the advisability of curtailing references to violence, whether made in jest or in dramatic emphasis, in addition to respectfully requesting that she curtail or cut back on the swearing (discussed further below), but she has repeatedly argued on and on about the swearing and refused to stop either the swearing or the references to extra-judicial or non-judicial violence—which, via avoidance, she mostly refused to acknowledge.
Secondary Issue of Swearing & Profanity & Attempt to Address
Millicent in particular has conveyed to us the comments of many viewers, over this past year (comments we also heard independently on our own social media and contact lists) regarding Katherine’s free and forceful use of swearing on the show, which has been a source of distress to her, as a Christian pastor who is also reporting and experiencing ongoing V2K abuse which includes abusive cursing and swearing daily, and which she repeatedly cautioned Katherine against.
This was an issue of some concern to us also by reason of the professionalism factor; I don’t think I need to explain that a general rule of thumb in any kind of professional circle, including the arena of media and public address, where we have been playing, is to curtail any excessive swearing, and not exactly go around dropping the F bomb a zillion times.
I personally am not averse to swearing nor is any other American I know, but Katherine pulled a fabrication about the “prudery” of Americans out of thin air and inevitably cast our discontent with the nonstop cussin’ n’ swearin’ as prudish American behavior—while Europeans, apparently, she was trying to have her world audience believe, were a supremely savvy lot given to the healthy release of expletives night and day. And appearing perfectly polished and powerful besides, to the extent that all their public forums are sizzling with this sort of stuff, and no-one bats an eyelid.
Group & Community Concerns Disrespected
The fact of the matter is, the conveyance of group and community concerns to Katherine made not a dent in her succeeding comportment on the show; she brushed us off like fleas and marched right on ahead, not paying any attention to the information we were trying to have her look at: to wit, that there was a serious amount of community and therefore also group concern about the cursing and violent-talk both, and that we would appreciate a cutting back here.
This essentially was a disrespecting and dismissal of the group; whatever anyone watching us may think of these issues, whatever anybody’s opinions may be of these issues, this was a group concern to our little group, and connected to a larger community concern, and it was not recognized by Katherine as especially important or necessary to address.
I do not mean to suggest, by the way, that everyone in the world watching us had these same concerns; there is no doubt flash and glamor to dropping the F bomb publicly to a certain, especially young and male crowd (Katherine has mentioned view count increasing with greater incidence of swearing), and all those hundreds of thousands of spineless men and women out there—especially inside the Intelligence agencies, pulling a fat paycheck while watching the ZioNazis run Terror Programs of Silent Targeting and Assault with Anti-Personnel Neuroweapons on innocent and accomplished citizens, under their very noses, worldwide –who will not themselves stand up and oppose this Nasty Global Terrorism but don’t mind cheering on a young woman posture and grandstand about blowing people’s brains out no doubt think this makes for great visual copy and “expresses their own anger” and is going to save us all shortly, just by virtue of its effrontery and audacity. I am aware this faction exists, and that they will worship at the feet of anyone who seems to speak boldly for them, while not bothering to stand up and speak boldly for themselves, and while censuring and protesting and seeking to shape the rest of us who do.
This was merely an issue of a substantively-backed group request, which was not respected, and became the source of extended frustration over this past year, along with a host of other issues related to show focus, planning, duration, and domination. This too is a fact to be kept in mind: there were several ongoing and underlying issues.
Request for Curtailment Is Not Censorship of Style, Personality, Dynamism, Voice
Contrary to what Katherine suggested on her Slam and Smear video, none of us ever at any time sought to censor her style of delivery, her voice, her personality, her dynamism, or her mode of expression. All we asked and requested repeatedly was a cutback or curtailment of the swearing and a termination of all talk that involved or could be construed as an extra-judicial call to violence. We appreciated her energy and voice and her particular way of putting things.On many of our shows, when it was mostly myself and her “working the floor,” we worked together rather synergistically, I thought, able to speak publicly and candidly about all the various aspects of this Targeting, Surveillance, Weapons-Testing, and Experimentation Crime we and millions are reporting―not compromising either of our very distinctive personalities, nor clashing, nor curtailing, nor censoring, nor self-censoring.
This was absolutely not about censorship of anyone’s style, it was about trying to work amicably together as a group and honor and respect each of our individual thoughts and concerns.
There was However an Issue of Domination
Viewers have noticed this, all of us on the set felt it, and we tried to address this a few times. Katherine and I most especially have stood out, I am aware, for being the ones quick to interrupt with a question or comment or interjectory analysis, I know I do this too. We have ended up acquiring and holding the floor a little more I have thought was fair, and have tried to openly address this; we did not wish to drown out Karen’s or Millicent’s very important voices. Katherine and I recently vowed to be more inclusive in terms of time-sharing so Millicent and Karen could share their thoughts more equitably―and made an attempt to honor this consciously.
However I don’t think I have to really point out that Katherine often dominated the show and especially embarked on long projects of analysis with shared screens and cartel-signal-analyzing when it was time to close, a repeating issue; she often also gave longer lectures.
Domination of time was coupled with attitudes of dominance and establishing of authority; many viewers have remarked on this, for literally the entire year and a half that Techno has run. Being on the inside, and being mature, well-adjusted people, we worked with this situation always cordially and amicably, but this, coupled with Katherine’s avoidance strategies in dealing with issues, and disinterest in heeding our or the larger community’s opinions, led to ongoing impasse.
In one of her email responses, Millicent wrote: “I’m for bi-weekly or monthly. It’s always better and less stressful for me to be able to be prepared for the show. I do have more to say than I’m allowed to say.”
Issues of domination never work well in groups; they inevitably ask to be addressed, they brew discontent, they never stay subterranean, they always surface―again, I don’t think I need to elaborate on this; it is basic understanding from any psychology of groups―particularly collegiate, peer-to-peer, non-pyramid groups. (This subject is revisited below.)
More Concerning: A Very Serious Issue Behind the Scenes
There is also a very concerning issue I have not addressed publicly before―but which Katherine herself has now made public―after my mention of it to her in my final email to her– which I will discuss further down in this statement.
Suffice to note here that a week ago, just prior to Katherine issuing her defamatory video onme, I had emailed a small group of prominent activists sharing these private concerns―whichwere not new, which I had indeed aired earlier with Melanie Vritschan and Millicent and Karen a few months ago. They have to do with extremely disturbing non-verbal cues and signaling I had been receiving over months from Katherine on our private Skype-calls, which I describe as echo-stalking: the exact mirroring of habitual hand-gestures (such as the particular way of moving hair out of my eyes or smoothing hair behind my ears), exact body movements, exact physical actions on calls, habitual words and phrases I used, colors I wore, colors of coffee mugs.
I also wish to mention that my observation distinctly also was that she was engaging in these actions in a studiedly surreptitious way but consciously, and self-consciously, not without awareness, in fact, in echo of her own analyses of Cheshire Cat glee, with a look of complacency and glee on her face; I am aware from research that Neural Influence Technologies and nasty Surveillance-arranged-fake-synchronicities are indeed being used by the supercilious DOD/CIA Project Minerva Social Engineers to manipulate people and groups with all manner of Psy Ops and Meme Creation, that unconscious echoing is being manufactured. But this did not look like unconscious echoing to me, it looked like conscious and deliberate and purposive echoing.
Such echoing is commonly seen from the COINTELPRO Gangstalker Brigade and the Psy Op Warriors to gaslight, psy op, harass, mock, and disrespect targets―almost every TI is aware of this bizarre Stasi phenomenon. I also noticed she appeared to be screen-reading while talking with me, and recording me while I spoke informally with her―Melanie has reported a similar sense of witnessing the screen-reading, which she says in her case Katherine explained as reading emails that flashed across her screen; in my case, it appeared rather as if she were reading continuous text, and she once laughed inappropriately during our conversation, then attributed this rather lamely, I thought, to some image conjured up in her mind, which did not make sense at the time. Melanie also noted that Katherine had once told her she records everything. (I certainly had not given her my permission for her to record my private conversations with her, and trusted her so implicitly back then I would not have even imagined she would do thatwithout asking.)
To see all this from Katherine was a rather major and extreme shock, and I could barely believe my eyes when it first began happening, or rather when I first began to notice it, around the time–shortly after the incident at Erasme Hospital, I think–when Melanie’s baby was wrongfully removed from her by hospital staff after Katherine spoke to a midwife. I did not speak of it until a few months later when this echoing kept recurring, intending to observe further privately first. I spoke of it finally to Melanie first, Millicent second, then Karen. In all cases, I let them know I had started to wonder about Katherine’s authenticity as a targeted victim and activist, but that I would continue to keep tabs on this and observe further, before I came to any conclusions. I also related other odd anomalous cues I had received from her, such as for instance a sense I had had when I first met her of being deliberately interrogated―as opposed to simply being conversed with, on our earliest Skype conversations when we were getting to know one another as activists working in the same space. I wondered if I was being personality-profiled―as the DOD/CIA is indeed currently engaged in doing, on various projects, targeting “influencers” and prominent activists for this invasive and presumptuous attack on human sovereignty.
I would like to stress here therefore that other prominent activists have been aware of this major concern of mine for months―that I was increasingly being given cues that Katherine was indeed echo-stalking me, personality-profiling me, recording me, and working on-screen with a team while I believed she and I were having private conversations, which really means Katherine is not who she says she is, purely an Intelligence agency victim and activist, but an Intelligence agency or military infiltrator, working at the highest levels of TI activism, with subterranean intent to disrupt, misdirect, and derail the movement. Or/and collect data for feeding into negative AI systems of control of all humanity being planned and put in place by negative factions in the DOD/CIA.
Please be aware of my excessive caution prior to publicizing this information: I strove to stay vigilant and continue working with her while I continued observing her over months, in order to determine whether she was indeed doing this or whether I was extrapolating and projecting and becoming over-vigilant to a point of paranoia and imagining things. These echos continued. Further, through private conversations currently, I have learned I am not the only one noticing these activities; other targeted activists have relayed to me that they have observed her use of echo-words, phrases, and experiences from their own targeted-experience expressed verbally on videos or in her Twitter feed. In my own case, I have noticed she has left some evidence in words, phrases, images shared on Twitter and on Techno and on emails.
The day after I wrote privately to a small group of prominent activists describing my concerns―shared months ago with others―Katherine sat down and did her Defamation Video, also mentioning and denying this echo-stalking. That day, she also blocked me on Twitter.
I will return to this issue shortly, further down in this epic.
This Didn’t Just Blow Up That Last Week of July
Quite separate from the subterranean signaling and its implications, which I had not sought to publicize for months, was all that was happening in full public view―and all that I was fully making and keeping public, including the shared email thread that last week of July on which none of us four on the Techno team was excluded.
Katherine has fabricated and presented on her video an elaborate story of how all of the issues on Techno just blew up that last week of July, after our last episode, Episode 71 was live-streamed on July 26, 2018, and stated several times that it was I who blew up Techno, making a “unilateral decision” to end Techno.
This is so false it is ludicrous. It is blatantly misleading and an outright and deceitful lie to state that this blew up just that last week, when the major public issues eroding Techno had been brewing for months and months, and had simply not been addressed, and even when addressed, led to us going around in circles since Katherine simply had different interests regarding swearing, and refused to acknowledge there was an issue with her talk of non-judicial violence.
What was really occurring, in my assessment, is a slow ongoing subterranean erosion of Techno. I was not the only one to feel it, Millicent did too, and several times tried to drop out―she had many separate issues with Katherine not being responsive to her, including one very large issue, that of impulsively revealing her primary persecutor/perpetrator’s name on air, in open contravention of her request for privacy on that score (more on this below). We separately had ideas to energize Techno, including having regular guests, but these were not carried out. The focus from Katherine seemed to be long-drawn-out affidavit collection template creation which became increasingly expanded―supposedly to include victims of every crime on the planet including child abuse, SRA, and more; eventually she appeared to respond to our suggestions to streamline and focus and worked on a multiple-choice-style template, but which in itself went on for 100 pages―I found all of this difficult, but she did not include us in this project except to review and offer suggestions if we had any, and started to refer to it as her “baby.” (More about a real baby later.) We seemed to have fallen into a rut and it also appeared we were being pulled in a direction through tactics of domination that none of us felt comfortable with.
And no, as to that other lie and false accusation: I made no “unilateral” decisions here, and took no drastic action, of the kind she is stating I have; everything that has happened over that last week is recorded in email and can be verified. Nor did I “singlehandedly blow up Techno” as she has confabulated on her Smear & Slander video, this is not merely a false representation of events, it is an absurd and deceitful lie.
What Did Happen That Last Week of July
What did happen two weeks ago is that, after weeks of private consideration given the nature of the issues and impasse we were facing on Techno, and my own interest in other projects and campaigns, I sent around an email to the group explaining that I was becoming too overloaded with work as well as needed to start other projects and so needed to withdraw from a weekly play of Techno, but that an alternative I could envision was running the show once every 2-3 weeks or once a month. Karen responded that monthly would work for her since her time was being taken up by other pressing issues as well; Millicent said she was open to either biweekly or monthly. However Katherine, completely ignoring my suggestion that we move away from the weekly show, offered immediately to host the show at her channel weekly, and stated that weekly shows were very necessary because much was happening; she also said she would run the show weekly and the three of us could join as we wished.
Although it seemed odd that all of us were now being seen as optional participants on a show that she insisted (unilaterally, I might add) must continue to run weekly, given that with Katherine we were sitting on an unaddressed pile of issues particularly the most important one centered on her casual talk of non-judicial violence, I responded to clarify I was not relinquishing the hosting of the show, I was hoping we could talk about moving away from the weekly show format. I also encouraged her to run her own show weekly if she wished―with a different name―at her own channel.
The ensuing back and forthing of emails had Katherine insisting on a weekly show and explaining in different ways why this was important and me explaining that we had a whole pile of unaddressed issues here and were reluctant to entrust the hosting to her in our absence, particularly given the outstanding issue of the violent-talk; I was not the only one to feel this situation was unwelcome; Karen and Millicent provided their opinion, similar to mine, as well. None of us wanted Techno to be moved to her channel, to be hosted weekly, when certain basic issues were not addressed; we had and have no wish to be associated with wild-card talk of non-judicial violence of any kind, and we could not trust her to refrain from such talk in our possible absence.
Katherine informed me she was outraged at this attitude and found my emails patronizing, then I spelled out what I was outraged by, which she responded to, and so on. This became an unraveling of the issues, except, I should point out, Katherine on her own began to list the issues as she saw them, putting Swearing―which I had not mentioned―at the top of the list and presenting her usual ideas about that. She flatly denied she had ever made any kind of other reference to violence in any of our videos against anyone other than those made referring to the death penalty. She also expressed her outrage at me for daring to say we could not entrust the hosting to her, insulted me roundly, accused me of a power grab, said this was not the Ramola D Show, and so forth. To which I responded it was not the Katherine Horton show either, re-iterating that we were most definitely a group show but we had some problems to deal with here as a group. So on it went.
I did also clarify that the issue for me was not really where the show was hosted, that is, at whose channel, but noted―with no special emphasis–that I believed (and Karen and Millicent concurred) that keeping it at mine had a certain value since I was running a media platform, as a journalist, a circumstance which could give the show a journalistic seal which I believed is of value. (A statement she has twisted on her Smear Video, I will address this further later.) I reminded her the real issues were weekly versus anything else and needing to address the primary problem of irresponsible talk of doing violence to others―which she continued, inexplicably, to deny.
I will spare readers here by not going into a blow by blow account of these acrimonious and heated emails, but they exist and have been perused and can be verified by other prominent activists and whistle-blowers we are in close contact with; Karen and Millicent were a part of the thread. Publishing these emails in full (apart from quoting) would require everyone’s consent; I have no qualms about publishing mine, but there are three other people here and I am not currently asking.
Suffice to say that each return email I received from Katherine succeeded in misframing anything I said. The increasingly recalcitrant and combative tone of her emails was exemplified in her imperious demand to the three of us to go through and find the parts in the videos where she had made statements espousing random violence, to “produce the evidence,” she said.
This has to be one of the more ridiculous things Katherine has said since we three are not the only ones to have flinched at her statements when she made them, to have noticed them, or to have been appalled by them. We certainly did not have the time to start coursing through videos, but we have not misremembered this at all.
(Since then, Thomas McFarlan has looked through the videos and identified a few time-markers where such statements were made:
This was essentially a situation of impasse, as always, with Katherine, and she continued to espouse military violence (firing squads for Haspel and Giordiano) in her emails after my last email to her before Thursday explaining my own base understanding―guided by Martin Luther King―on the uselessness of violence at any time to end violence. In between she ran a lecture on free speech and defended her right to say anything she pleased, suggesting we were censoring her and bullying her, ignoring that we were striving to speak rather of show etiquette and joint agreement on focus, tone, and approach.
An additional stated source of contention to her was that of my “being present on every show” and therefore apparently engaging in a power grab; I reminded her that it was not that I was present but that I had hosted and run every show as a matter of commitment, despite many time constraints, after Paul and Mindy bowed out of hosting, and that she herself had enjoyed the convenience of my hosting it, so that she could pop in as she could, between her many travels.
In any case, I’m not covering it all. Suffice it to say that at some point we all realized Techno was royally dead and could not be resuscitated. Karen and Katherine exchanged emails examining the corpse. I stopped emailing. I spoke privately on a video meeting later that evening with both Karen and Millicent, with Karen only briefly since she had an interview. The next morning right up to one hour before the allotted time for Techno we continued to receive emails from Katherine questioning the value of public exposure of these crimes and stating that people like Ceasescu and Hitler had only been stopped with a bullet in the head. (“Do you really believe that multi trillion dollar projects are going to be pulled because there are web articles and a few YouTube videos on the crimes? If the military ever thought so then they would fire tweets, but they don’t. They fire bullets and rockets. And they never failed to get the job done.” “By the way, Nicolae Ceasescu was an agent of the banking cartel, just like Gina Haspel. He had non-stop public exposure during his reign and it did diddly squat. Hitler had public exposure, so had Stalin. It was all worth jack. The only thing that ever did the job were executions. That’s why the Mafia uses them, because they are the only thing that works on psychopaths.”)
(In my previous email I had reiterated my views about the importance of public exposure versus the lunacy of violence: “Bullets through brains are not the answer, in my view, and public exposure is indeed the answer. It is not courage that puts bullets through brains: destruction is EASY, this is why thugs do it. Killing and assaulting people–which is what the CIA/FBI/NSA is doing to us, with stealth weapons–are the actions of cowards and criminals. Perhaps you need your own show where you talk about bullets through brains incessantly– the whole POINT of having a show like Techno was and is and has been public exposure. So if we disagree there, so be it. That is a FUNDAMENTAL difference in point of view.
“It is not our “holier-than-thou” attitude or swearing, either, which will stop the psychopaths. But continuous public exposure, the vanguard of a firm resistance, and the power of words, intention, and information to inform larger and larger masses of public who do indeed need to take firm action to stop the psychopaths (I mean round them up, prosecute and jail them). And change the laws.”)
By this point we had gotten the impression that Katherine did not care about the group opinions or interests or ideas, had disrespected and abandoned the group, and didn’t care what we thought, felt, or requested. Throughout this contentious exchange she had continued to re frame our concerns as American prudery and indoctrination (“You are the most brainwashed nation on earth”) and questioned our very real remonstrances as attacks on her free speech, idle accusations without evidence, and bullying and ganging up on her (“You don’t come along and start telling people that they have to change or can’t say things because they clash with your views or the image you want to project. If you want to enforce homogeneity don’t pick a free speech platform.”)
It is unimaginable for Katherine to say that she did not know Techno had ended: Karen and she had discussed this. Our group emails had simply petered out into an absolute impasse and there was nothing more to say. It is completely off-base for her to issue public notificationsthat I took a decision on my own to end Techno. I sent out a meeting invite to Karen and Millicent (corrected 10/26/2019: not Katherine, as I had had it earlier) before the hour―primarily to honor the time slot of Techno and to discuss whether we should announce that Techno had ended on our own, the three of us, or try to make that announcement with Katherine. It would be an understatement to say that we were not all feeling devastated by what had just transpired, over the space of the last few days. We could not envision Katherine coming on with us and not continuing the acrimony on air and continuing to deny what she had spent several emails to deny, hence the decision to not send her a meeting invite. This had certainly ended badly, and I personally―being the one she primarily directed her ire against, and the one repeatedly verbally battered, framed, and abused―was neither interested in working with her any further in any way, shape, or form nor in having her on set myself. But I would like to point out that the decision to not invite her was a threefold one, not mine alone. It was a group decision to strive to honor the accomplishments of Techno and end with gratitude and grace, as much as we could, chalking the end up to ideological differences, which was certainly true.
Please also note that none of us saw this as an “episode” or “the last show.” This was only a a joint video note from the three of us―who had already been disrespected and abandoned as agroup by Katherine— to honor the regular time slot and mark the end of Techno for viewers (so they would not wonder what had happened that day to the show). The actual last episode ofTechno, which we did not know at the time, was Episode 71, on July 26, 2018. Techno had begun as TI Forum at Pineconeutopia with Dr. Paul Marko and Mindy Urken on March 17, 2017.
Lies and Slander Aimed at Discrediting the Work & Words of a Journalist
While it is most certainly tedious and annoying to have to address the many accusations and confabulations Katherine has published on her video, I am taking the time to do so because she has engaged in massive defamation of my work as a journalist―which I have been engaged in long before she came onto the public scene―and I think it is very important to address the false allegations, for the sake of the authenticity of the disclosure on Surveillance and Military Crimes Against Humanity that I and others―including the NSA, CIA, and FBI whistleblowers as well as scientists and engineers and reporting victims and activists who have been gracious and extending enough to have done interviews with me–are engaged in here.
Ego Clashes, Power Grabs, Singlehandedly Blowing up Techno, Taking Drastic Action Without Discussion, Unilateral Decisions to Exclude: The recurring theme in Katherine’s video is her accusation that I “singlehandedly blew up Techno””by blowing up on email on her suggestion of weekly hosting at her channel–and took drastic action to break up our group. The emails were indeed pretty heated, from my end too, yet never as aggressive and rude and combative as hers and do not exactly portray a blow-up from my end. People who have now read the emails note that it was she who blew up in a reactive way to my emails, and also note the abusive nature of her communications to Millicent and me in particular.
This is from a note Karen left on Facebook to similar accusations―currently flying fast and furious from the planted and paid cyber-trolls on Youtube and Facebook seeking to add to Katherine’s attempt to destroy my public name and reputation as a writer and journalist ―that I am a “plant” or “perp”:
“Dr. H. had started stepping over the line calling for violence against the perps OUTSIDE the law. We tried to gently reign her back but she was in denial. We have now found the examples of it to point ppl to. Ramola is no perp, she is more mature and responsible than many people and her brilliant journalistic work will go down in history. No one has done more for the TI community. Dr. H. would have been similar but for this incident. Sometimes ego is not worth it, we just have to suck it up, take responsibility and say “I’m sorry”. The decision was discussed as to whether to include her in the last TCFF sign off, very reluctantly we realized it would just be an on air fight. No one is happy how this went into the toilet.”
Karen also left a message on her Facebook page to explain things from her perspective, and recently published this note on Youtube:
“Actively Malicious”: Supposedly, not content with power grabs and takeovers, in Katherine’s confabulation of how Techno came to an end, I then embarked on a campaign of active malice by speaking “behind her back” with Melanie and Mindy about what had transpired. The absurdity of this is astounding.
Melanie and I have kept in touch with each other from several months ago; I have been intimately involved in covering her story in relation to the “Medical Kidnap” and abduction of her baby last October by Erasme Hospital in Belgium. As a leading activist in Europe, she has kept me informed on all things ICATOR, of which I have become a member; we have become friends and share information on our personal lives on our many Skype calls and texts. I informed her about what has happened, certainly, expressing my own views and private assessment of Katherine in the process―I rather think this is natural, to share information with a friend after an upsetting incident has occurred.
For Katherine to then say I was sabotaging European scanning projects and her work with Melanie etc. is slightly mind-bending; I personally would not work further with Katherine and said so on our joint Video Note on August 1, and said so to Melanie as well, about my own HR activism interests going forward―with full disclosure, having shared all my misgivings about Katherine many months earlier―but Melanie is her own person and runs her own HR organization in Brussels and makes her own decisions. While I reserve the right to publicize my own experience and offer my own counsel to anyone about anything based on my own experience, that is neither active malice nor sabotage, it is the free expression of opinion, a basic and natural human right.
Similarly with Mindy, co-founder of Techno with Dr. Paul Marko, with whom I have kept in touch via email and Skype, and whom I have appreciated speaking and discussing matters with, again, a very important friend with core connections to Techno who knew all of us, and who could understand what was happening here with compassion and sincerity. Interestingly, our Skype conversations that last week were continuously cyber-hacked and interfered with in real time, in much the same ways that Techno’s broadcasts on Google Hangouts were continuously cyber-hacked, particularly when Millicent or Karen or I were speaking (I don’t believe Katherine was ever cyber-hacked, incidentally, the way we 3 were while we were on Google Hangouts); someone in the deranged Intel world of cyber-hacking clearly did not wish for me and Mindy to be in contact and speak freely. Regardless, we were able to visit; she conveyed her sympathies and best wishes to all on new ventures, as I relayed on our Video Note of August 1. These too were conversations of friendship and kind support, nothing more.
“An Intel-Set-Up Break-Up; Not Recognizable as My Colleague; Not Really Ramola; Ramola was Neurotech’d to Bits and Fully Taken Over”: It’s lucky I have a good sense of humor, because my first response to hearing this massive platter of slander on Katherine’s video (after my eyebrows descended from the ceiling) is to fall over laughing.
It’s no laughing matter, certainly, in a certain light, given the fact and the actuality of powerful stealth neuroweapons which include mass brain-affecting ELF transmissions via HAARP and GWEN towers and cell towers as well as plain old-fashioned Black Ops technology from theBlack Ops Brigade over at Langley and Pentagon City (or Dulce and Montauk) where the real Men in Black stamp Top Secret on the Portable Manpads, all of which no-one knows too much about, except through dozens of public-domain patents, whistleblower and scientist testimony, and the reported experience of hundreds of victims of Neuro/DEW experimentation, who report especially the effects of Neurotech on their immediate families, remote-influenced to disbelieve victims, or manipulated into sudden outbursts of rage, fear, or other extreme emotions (See the patents on manipulation of the nervous system, brain andbehavior: http://www.usa-anti-communist.com/ard/US_PatentedMindControl.php); the entire Manchurian Candidate phenomenon, the mass shooters, the inflated numbers of suicides, the rise in depression can all be understood better from the vantage-point of this Remote Neural Influence Neuro Technology.
It is very true that we are living in the Age of Covert Neural Influence or Mind Control, and the 0.1% who have been working on Neuro and Behavior Modification from Tavistock times are still hard at it and seeking to manipulate us all at the neuro-level; I know, I have been researching and writing and speaking about these matters for four years. Weaponized Neuroscience (invasively and nonconsensually modifying the brain) is now entering the public-domain, as James Giordiano’s lecture at Lawrence Livermore Laboratories in August 2017, From Bench to Battlefield openly reveals. His other earlier lecture in 2013 on Predictive Neuroscience, Facts, Fears, and Fictions, detailing the use of neuro-imaging technologies in neuro-surveillance and “predictive policing,” offers a glimpse into another aspect of weaponized neuroscience: Law Enforcement interest in invasively peering into brains, pigeonholing brains, and Delgado/Cameron-style modifying brains under self-righteous pretensions of attending to Violent Extremism, and Potential for Crime. Neuro-influence technology is indeed being used on humans today―by the Covert Intel Suppression-of-Reality crowd who insistently imagine―being Omniscient no doubt–they can control Everyone sneakily through Silent Brain Entrance and keep these invasive horrors secret forever.
But it is remarkably insidious to suggest that there were no real issues here on the Techno team, and that one member of the team who returned group attention to the key extant issues with Techno on an email thread cannot be taken seriously because she was “taken over,” and suddenly neurotech’d to oblivion and turned into an Intel-handled monster who was absolutely unrecognizable as her previously sane colleague. It is salutary to note as well that when Katherine says this, she also points to and seeks to underline my “victim” status as a clear token of disempowerment, repeating that I am a victim, who is “chipped” (and that her donation of a RFID bug detector has indeed established this), and therefore not to be blamed, since I (by virtue of being chipped, apparently) was essentially mentally disabled and had no private defences, and was so profoundly “taken over.” I believe she forgives me as well, in this masterpiece of sleight of hand where she gets rid of the opposition in short order by crying Mind Control! Not to Blame! Wasn’t her really! Lost her marbles! Taken over!
Which in itself is a huge mockery and exaggeration of the very real fact of people in society today, in 2018, in this new Delgado-to-Obama Millenium of the Brain, indeed being subjected to Remote Neural Influence Technologies.
But it is also a very specific public and defamatory attack on my integrity as a person, my cognitive and analytical skills, my discernment and thinking processes, my sovereignty as a thinking and feeling human being who just happens to be working publicly in this space as a journalist.
Katherine has detailed an elaborate drama of just having posted her affidavit template online and just having met and spent eight hours speaking with former Assistant Secretary of Housing and financial whiz Catherine Austin Fitts as the causative backdrop to a confabulation of Intel swooping in to destroy Techno and her team by the lightning-swift mental take -out of a certain sadly chipped and victimized team member whom she at some point in her video strives to bury further by saying “claims to be a journalist.”
Not merely is this incredibly reprehensible and a clear way of evading responsibility for her own problematic actions and words brought under scrutiny, it is an Attack-the-Messenger act of targeting which fails to acknowledge the steely core of my character and persistent caliber of my work as a highly self-motivated and spiritually-empowered writer and journalist, who has not flinched from revealing a wide variety of incredibly evil Crimes Against Humanity which continue to be committed by Deep State criminals on millions of us.
I would like to point out as well that the appeal to “being neurotech’d” is an appeal to disavow of responsibility, to attribute the actions of someone to other-than-self, an invitation to consider this someone void of personal will, motivation, energy, awareness, intent, or ability, an invitation indeed to consider this person incapable of resistance. Contrary to this projection, I don’t in any way disavow responsibility for anything in the emails I sent to Katherine and the rest of the team that week, I stand by every word I wrote and stance I took, I have not changed my mind or point of view— which has been built up over months of interaction, not dropped into my head overnight by a fictitious Intel-handler―and I consider myself in full control of my own mental prowess―evidenced, I would like to point out to naysayers (who love to say “You too have this tech on you!/We’re all being mind-controlled!”) by the fact that I have been working rather productively for four years in this space as a writer, interviewer, reseacher, reporter, and journalist, work which requires, at a minimum, focus, attention, and intellect. And steady persistence despite all odds!
Unlike Katherine, I will not let her off the hook here and return in kind (by suggesting she was obviously neurotech’d to bits and taken over when she was making that Smear video), I will submit instead, from everything I have learned so far, that it appears to me rather that Katherine is a highly sophisticated paid infiltrator and agent provocateur, whose attempted takedown of my intellect and reputation and dismissal of my journalism with those words was intentional.
All this hoopla and character-assassination succeeding my suggestion to move Techno from weekly to not-weekly does raise the spectre of Intel actually being quite interested in continuing Techno on a weekly basis with her calling for beheadings at the helm, and one has to wonder why exactly that would be.
Melanie’s Baby: “I Was Neurotech’d to Bits, I Couldn’t Stop Myself”: Of course, this was not the first time we have heard from Katherine the line about being neurotech’d to bits, she famously used this about herself in connection with the utter disaster of Melanie’s newborn being removed from her care less than twenty-four hours after the birth in October 2017, shortly after Katherine spoke to a midwife and, in full volition, without being asked, offered up the information, out of medical concern, she said, that a portion of a foreign object– which she had scientifically analyzed―was still residually retained in Melanie’s throat, and might obstruct her breathing, information that Melanie had hoped and intended to keep confidential. (The story of this foreign object was covered in a podcast and article at Alfred Webre’s NewsInsideout.com, where a patent for a rather deadly and clearly inhumane military bioweapon, a self-assembling nanotechnology DARPA/Motorola strangulator implant is also published, information provided for consideration by researcher and investigator Dr. Stanninger.)
Katherine also reported at the time that since the midwife responded with apparent surprise and ignorance to this confidence, she then proceeded to provide extensive information on the many different kinds of implants that Intel agencies clandestinely plant in people’s bodies today, including cochlear and other implants which she said could put voices in people’s heads, and offered up other information about her work doing scanning of reporting victims with an RF detector and finding implants, and her work as a lead investigator on a criminal investigation team and much more.
The midwife responded by informing the gynecologist of this conversation, and the information contained in it, out of medical concern, she said; shortly after, Erasme psychiatrists swooped in and removed the baby, subjected Melanie to a train of indignities and abuses which included dragging her in the middle of the night to another hospital for a secondary mental evaluation and locking her in a Psychiatric ward for a week, and more. (This was covered extensively and can be researched further from JIT press releases and articles at my site, everydayconcerned.net.)
As this story of extreme injustice played out―culminating in the baby being removed to a children’s home where Melanie is currently permitted only half-hour visits per week –we on the Techno team supported both Katherine and Melanie with great compassion and sensitivity given the absolute horror of what had happened. We did ask Katherine what had really happened, and her answer regarding any queries as to how or why she would inundate an unschooled-in-Black-Ops-implantation-affairs midwife with so much sudden information about implants et al always was: “I was neurotech’d to bits to keep on talking, I couldn’t stop myself.”
This disavowal of responsibility has always sat thinly with me, and does raise many questions, given what most people targeted extrajudicially by the power-grabbing Surveillance State know, regarding the use of the Mental Health excuse to cover up all report of implantation or assault with Neuro/DEWS, and regarding the incredible ignorance (or collusiveness) especially of doctors, psychiatrists, and hospital staff in relation to covert implants, Intel agency abuse, DEWs and military neuro-experimentation.
Melanie’s Baby: “I got her off the psych drugs myself by shouting and demanding they listen.” During the time that this saga unfolded, I was in rather close touch with Katherine, often Skyping with her when she called from Brussels, and podcasting with her once on Alfred’s show and later on Techno, as she continued to report and I continued to write up JIT press releases detailing the story as it developed. I also called later and spoke to staff at the hospital and to Melanie when she was in the Psychiatry Ward. Throughout, I was, like everyone else on the team, extremely affected and upset by the situation and tried to do everything I could do to help.
The part of the story that Katherine has not revealed as she has striven to establish that she has helped rather than hurt this situation is that when she found out Melanie had been dosed with anti-psychotics, she conveyed this information to me, very much along the lines of fatalistically, “And now they have started to give her psych drugs!” reporting that Melanie was appearing drugged and disaffected as a result. As soon as I heard this, I said instantly she needed to make a very strong protest immediately, involve Melanie’s father as well, and that they both needed to make a stand and demand that the drugs be stopped; I informed her that by US law people cannot be involuntarily or forcibly put on psychiatric drugs without Informed Consent unless there was a mental diagnosis. I did not know the European law on this subject but proceeded to research this subject and sent her links. I also advised her that as she was now effectively Melanie’s patient advocate that she needed to make a very strong stand and not take No for an answer, she should mention US law and demand Melanie be taken off the drugs immediately.
Katherine reports that she did indeed make a fuss, to such impressive effect that Melanie was indeed taken off the drugs by the nurse. This is commendable, but to suggest these actions of hers should somehow establish–as she has suggested in this video―proof that she cannot therefore be an infiltrator and saboteur who just may have played a star role in destroying Melanie’s and her baby’s life, is not clear to me, especially given my own part in this, which she never mentions.
“Journalistic Seal”: I have addressed this earlier, but wanted to mention that the way Katherine has presented this notion in her video is once again an issue of misframing. Our primary issue with the idea of her hosting Techno at her channel in our absence was the issue of unaddressed and unresolved talk of non- judicial violence; she reframed this to say the primary issue was a stubborn attachment I had to hosting the show at my channel, and suggested that I had become recalcitrant about this, presenting the “journalistic seal” story immediately as my rationale for this attachment.
This is patently untrue. When Katherine first offered to host at her channel, I clarified immediately that I was not making an issue of the hosting, but seeking to address the periodicity of the show. In ensuing discussion I noted―quite tangentially, and not as a primary point of any kind–that since I was building my channel as a media platform, I believed there was a value to hosting at my channel, since it offered a seal of media enterprise, and would benefit from my seal on the show as a journalist and writer. I had to clarify later that this did not mean personal branding as she instantly accused me of, but rather placement within amedia space.
I also want to note, for historic purposes, that when Paul stopped hosting the show at his channel, he and Katherine both encouraged me to host the show at my channel, primarily to build the channel, which I had only recently started. Katherine did indeed host the show at her channel on days I was too cyber-hacked to do so, and not once did I suggest, even on this email exchange, that the show necessarily needed to be hosted at my channel for posterity. The issue was always, through and through, that of hosting on her channel while unresolved issues of talk-of-extra-legal-violence lay between us.
“I Threw Her Out of JIT”: On her video, Katherine states with apparent relish that inresponse to this mythical and nonexistent, “unilateral”and “singlehanded” decision and “drastic action” of mine to blow up Techno as well as exclude her from our video note livestream on August 2, she threw me out of JIT.
The fact of the matter is, the steady onslaught of rude and combative emails that entire week had been abrasive enough that I was compelled to conclude I could no longer work with her and said so on-air on our Video note livestream.
On August 2, after the livestream, Katherine sent us an email, addressing me in this: “I was shocked to hear that you cannot work with me anymore. That is ok though. Then let’s not work together on the Joint Investigation Team either because that would be too tough on you, I’m sure.”
I responded: “I don’t see how you could imagine you could send me such incredibly disrespectful and combative emails and then think I could continue working with you. You are correct about the JIT, I am withdrawing from it — I cannot work with people who are not supportive or respectful of my work.”
And that’s the story of that.
The Start of Techno, Who Introduced Who, Who Started Techno: On her videoKatherine addressed my expressed uncertainty in memory as to the sequence of who met who and how Techno started by stating rather definitively that she remembered, she had met Dr. Paul Marko and introduced me to him, after which he interviewed me, suggesting a primary role that she had played in both my interview and my being on Techno.
This is not true. Dr. Eric Karlstrom was the one who introduced me by email to Dr. Paul Marko, who interviewed me shortly after. I had sent off the Memo to Trump around that time, a letter I had put together with Katherine and Karen, and had been retaliated against rather extremely, with severe DEW attacks which left me ill for quite a few weeks―our first interview date was postponed and I kept the second date, despite still being somewhat ill.
Katherine, who had done podcasts and her pyramid/psychopath videos earlier, and whom I had met after her interview with Richie Allen, through other TI activists, had started the JIT around that time, which Karen, Millicent, and I had joined and when Dr. Marko and Mindy broached the idea of a conference-call-style podcast we were all pleased to be on it. As Mindy shared with me recently, the whole idea for a weekly show had come from her (Mindy’s) conceptualizing. The name itself came out of brainstorming lists from Karen, and was originally called TI Forum.
Abandoning Crime Victims by Not Doing a Weekly Show: One comment or aspersionrather that Katherine made was that I had somehow abandoned targeting crime victims by dropping Techno weekly or even wanting to, and that I had especially abandoned Millicent and opened her to further ravages by the deranged USAF veteran who continues to cyber-stalk and BCI-chip/satellite assault her by not offering her a weekly space of support and solidarity.
Considering that I continue to do podcast and print interviews with those targeted as well as whistleblowers and scientists, in addition to other articles probing issues of Surveillance and Military experimentation, I am not sure how this could be levelled at me. And in regards to Millicent, with whom I keep in touch on the phone regularly, it was not I but Katherine who revealed Barrett Wolf’s real name (this was his alias in the article I wrote on Millicent’s case) without her permission, causing her much grief and intensified attacks on her knees in aftermath. (I do not at all mean to suggest that criminals perpetrating these crimes should not be called out and named; but rather that it was not I here who was not cognizant and protective of the special situation and special request of Millicent.)
Free Speech: I resist utterly the notion that Katherine has put out in her video that my and our desire to curtail talk of violcnce on the show or cut back on swearing was in any way an attack on her free speech. It was rather, as I have said earlier, a matter of collective etiquette and joint agreement on focus, tone, and approach. I would think any group doing anything together would have discussions on such aspects. None of us has ever censored the other in matters of content; we have indeed indulged our right to free speech extensively, in a time-period when hundreds of millions are keeping their minds closed and their mouths shut―especially about Surveillance Abuse and Military Crime–including well-paid CIA media.
Echo-Stalking, Mirroring, & Neuro Linguistic Programming: I have learned after intensive discussion with many and in particular ex-CIA Whistleblower Barbara Hartwell who reports she was trained in these and other programming techniques as a trained hypnotherapist while in the CIA, that the echo-stalking I describe is termed mirroring and could relate to Neuro Linguistic Programming, a cultic manipulation of people using modeling techniques to induce behavior change and map behavior, and used in Scientology, Tony Robbins’ movement and other Human Potential Movements, as well as connected to CIA Behavior Modification programs. I am of course personally interested in finding out more, after this experience, and will research further.
I have worked with Katherine for a long time despite all of the many underlying issues including my increasing observation of her mirroring actions and words. I have loved her as a friend and cared for her as a sister target of Intelligence and Military weaponized crime. I have admired her powerful voice as a speaker, her clarity and her incisiveness in analysis, and have continued to work with her within our group and partnership structures for the sake of the very important fight I thought we were in together. For all the reasons I have spelled out here and more, I personally no longer trust her and question what she is doing. Much has not been said in this too-long statement of the Real Backstory behind the break-up of Techno. Perhaps I will say it all another time.
For now, to all those who will still choose to see this entire break-up as a Divide and Conquer game played on us by Intel, I will only say that things that don’t work sometimes do come to natural and necessary ends. Like many of us, I happen to be both level-headed, analytical, and intuitive; I am not misremembering the many occasions and incidences of echo-stalking I was treated to from Katherine; it raises the ultimate red flag for me. Unlike many in the spiky world of TI activism, I do not seek to unite or work with infiltrators or disruptors who derail, disrupt, delay, and slowly, inch by inch, in a steady downward spiral of destruction, dissolve activism movements. There are many of these in our midst, and I, like other well-known TI activists have pinpointed a few and distanced myself from them.
I will shortly write an op-ed on The Consequences of Infiltration to explain why I think infiltration among the targeted Untouchables of today’s Global Occupation is particularly reprehensible. This will probably go hand in hand with another op-ed addressing how targets being tortured in broad daylight have been fully disappeared by highly-credentialled, well-known if not glamorously famous journalists, physicians, and law-enforcers telling lies: Targets: Modern Lepers whom Mainstream Media Mocks.
I am presenting this information comprehensively so others can draw their own conclusions just as I have drawn my own.
Cyber-Hacking While Writing This
As well as Cyber-Eating, Cyber-Trolling, Planes, Drones, Helicopters, Crashing Trucks, Power Mowers, Power Trimmers, Heart & Private Part Hitters, ELFs, Infrasound, Microwaves
On 8/11, after steadily working on this statement for days, I woke to find the latest version wiped from my laptop and corrupted on my flash drive. Interestingly, not all copies and versions had been wiped, so I was able to procure an earlier version and rewrite the three pages I had lost—also no doubt a trick of the Neural Mapping Brigade who are constantly eating e-mails and paragraphs and compelling repeat writings of the same material while they no doubt sit in back rooms and engage in neurolinguistic analysis like maniacs—or get their AI supercomputers to do the same. In addition, the file seemed to be corrupted each time in smaller ways, with Japanese and other typographic characters introduced at places.
The attention this room, house, and street (Pine Street in Quincy, Massachusetts) has received the last few days as I worked on this, with nonstop single-engine plane, helicopter, and crashing trucks and zooming cars has been astounding. Once it sounded like a fighter jet was taking off in my backyard. Numbers of people dressed in red and crossing my path on a walk. Extreme attacks on my person with heart-hits and private-part hits, nonstop. I relay this information to convey I am experiencing a definite sense that the (Mafia) Intel Behemoth here which is assaulting people unlawfully under cover of Surveillance apparently did not want me to write this. Again, we have to ask ourselves why that would be.
Something many of us know who have awakened to the reality of the Global Occupation is that the black-magic and negative-energy Controllers who consider themselves supreme like to play both sides, and like to establish layer upon layer of limited hangouts and controlled opposition. Two covert communications placed in my path recently, as the email exchange between us seemed to heat up the Uninvited Readers of Private Emails Brigade, for your rumination: On the back of a van: OUR Revolution; and in front of me as I drove, a Pest-Control van with the tag line: The Future of Pest Control is Here.
In closing, I prefer to believe that the 9-million pound Supreme Gorilla we’re all facing down here is not going to win, that our combined and continuing efforts will indeed pay off and the entire world will indeed awaken by way of simple truth-telling and continued exposing to conscience, action, and positive energetic change. Techno has ended but the authentic activists among us will stay the course and make that change happen. Stay tuned.
Exclusive Reportage on Counter-Terrorism “Manufactured-Target” Targeting & Gross Human Rights Violations in Amoral Human Experimentation Crimes by Intelligence Agencies, Law (Lie) Enforcement, & US/NATO Military Divisions: Off-the-Charts Torture & Abuse of “Targeted Individuals”
GLOBAL BRAIN ENSLAVEMENT, DNA BIORESONANCE, & EXOTIC MILITARY TECH: TARUN RAVI REPORTS | REPORT 296 | At Bitchute | At Brighteon | At Odysee | At Rumble | Posted Oct 4, 2022
CARNICOM DISCLOSURE UPDATE 2022 – PANEL 2 | BIOTECH TRANSFORMATION VS RESILIENCE IN DIVINE CREATION | At all channels | Posted Sep 28, 2022 Report 295 | Michelle Ford/California Assembly on Restoring Your Status as American on Land & Soil | At Bitchute | Brighteon | Odysee | Rumble| Posted Sep 25, 2022
Free Keene’s web site/A peace-liberty-voluntarism project pursuing and promoting peaceful living in Free Keene, New Hampshire
Free State Project
Free State Project’s website/A Liberty in our Lifetime project in New Hampshire, pursuing liberty, community, and peaceful living
New Earth Project
New Earth Project website/Open platform to unite humanity and create initiatives to support the emergence of absolute freedom and sovereign creative expression for all
Public Intelligence Blog
Blog for Earth Intelligence Network, Phi Beta Iota the Public Intelligence Blog/Promotes hybrid transparent governance, collective intelligence, true cost economics, and whole systems understanding