Daily Archives: April 20, 2016

Judge Anna von Reitz–Step By Step–Emancipation

Re-posted, with many thanks, from Paulstramer.net. Please visit there or annavonreitz.com for more. Judge Anna’s posts appearing here are being collected here.

This is a more recent post from Judge Anna offering advice on how exactly to claim one’s name and estate on the jurisdiction of the land. There are 5 steps discussed in detail below:Claim your name(s), record them with the Land Recorder’s Office, and at the same time, declare your political status and emancipation.” (Fifth is Claim of Life Estate, also below.)


Thursday, April 7, 2016

Step by Step — Emancipation

by Anna Von Reitz

People have been asking me— how do I correct this mess? Let’s look at what should have happened when you were born and what didn’t. Your name should have been recorded on the land jurisdiction of the state you were born in, NOT “registered” as a “vessel” NAME in the foreign international jurisdiction of the sea. Your Trade Name should have been recorded in the County Land Recorder’s Office instead and you should have been listed as a State National belonging to— for example, the wisconsin state or the massachusetts commonwealth.

That is what SHOULD have happened, if the United States of America, Inc. run by the Federal Reserve and the Secretary of the Treasury had been doing their jobs and if their named Successors to contract and Bankruptcy Trustees had been doing their jobs.

As it is, they self-interestedly were NOT doing their jobs. So now you have to take things in your own hands and make it perfectly clear to them and to their creditors and to the entire world exactly who and what you are, by going back and doing what should have been done from the outset:

Claim your name(s), record them with the Land Recorder’s Office, and at the same time, declare your political status and emancipation.

First Step:

Declaration of Political Status

To all whom it may concern, i, a living woman known as anna riezinger of big lake, alaska, of sound mind and body, a Caucasian of age, not indigent, not penniless, a landlord having been born on the portion of the North American Continent claimed by the united States of America and under their political dominion and more particularly on the land area recognized to be under the political dominion of the wisconsin state, and having been born politically free and politically independent, i claim to have been born one of the progeny of the People of the United States as they styled and established themselves in the Preamble of The Constitution for the united States of America and am one of the free, sovereign, and independent people of the United States as defined in The Definitive Treaty of Paris, 1783, and am a beneficiary —not of any Public Charitable Trust— but of The United States Trust; i do freely and under penalty of perjury under the Common Law declare that i have never, ever, willingly, knowingly, and intentionally—having first been fully informed of the negative consequences—voluntarily subjected myself or my property to the authority of the British Crown nor any other artificial political or religious or commercial incorporation and i see no convincing evidence that i ever engaged in any process of naturalization as mandated by United States Statute-at-Large stipulated in the public record at SEVENTH CONGRESS, Session 1, Chapter 28, Sections 1-4, April 14, 1802, which would serve to make me or anyone in my family any form of United States Citizen however styled.

As a beneficiary of The United States Trust merely administered by The United States of America i am entitled and enabled to take against any codicil of the Will established by other beneficiaries and i here declare that i have taken against both the Constitution of the United States of America charter and its various By-Law Amendments made since 1868 and the New Deal announced by Franklin Delano Roosevelt in 1933.

If there should be any evidence to the contrary, let it here be established that any such evidence would only be in existence due to fraud and non-disclosure and adhesion and other improper, unlawful, and illegal contracting practices forbidden by the Common Law, the Law of Admiralty, and the United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods, and all those United Nations Declarations and Treaties that the United States of America, Incorporated, has agreed to —resulting in press-ganging, inland piracy, unlawful conversion, and secretive change of political status resulting in theft from me, the Holder in Due of my paramount identity, and Breach of Trust owed to me. These criminal acts of non-disclosure and self-interested omission resulting in falsified evidence are not consensual, not to my advantage, and not of my intentional making. By many Maxims of Law all such evidences, claims, and contracts are void ab initio and those advancing such claims would be admitted criminals.

Any such documents that might be ascribed to me are lawfully authorized under the universal Law of Necessity as the fruit of the fraudulent practices and claims set forth in the paragraph above and such documents, if there be any, do not establish any valid contract or agreement rendering me subject to any foreign power nor serve to make me a debtor, voluntary conscript, or chattel acting as surety for any artificial en legis entity.

Be it also known that i am a peaceful and non-combatant woman and not an enemy of any state or people and i freely release and discharge all judges and justices from any obligation to impose statutory military law per Section 17 of the Trading With the Enemy Act as Amended by the Banking Emergency Act of 1934 in any case whatsoever brought before them and bearing my name in any style; and, i hereby record that i do not consent to any statutory military court proceedings related to me or my person(s) in the past, do not consent to any statutory military court proceedings related to me or my person(s) in the present, and do not consent to any statutory military court proceedings related to me or my person(s) in the future: i do not consent once, i do not consent twice, i do not consent three times, but i do accept the oaths of all judges and justices to support and defend The Constitution, i do accept their obligation to operate in amity and friendship in perpetuity with respect to me and my person(s) and vessels in commerce guaranteed by The Definitive Treaty of Peace 1783, The Treaty of Westminster 1794, and their obligation to perform with good faith under the Bar Association Treaty of 1947.

My principle of law is the American Common Law and my court is a court of record on the land of the united States of America and cannot be construed as the Common Law of Admiralty; i claim the Saving to Suitors Clause of the Northwest Ordinance in all matters and issues pertaining to me and my property.

My money is the United States Silver Dollar. All funds deposited, transferred, or disbursed from accounts associated with me or operated under my name are to be denominated as lawful money and all accounts may only be exercised as fiduciary operating accounts and not interpreted otherwise.

To the extent that others may have criminally misrepresented and mischaracterized me for the purpose of press-ganging me and plundering and pillaging my estate in my artificially contrived absence and caused there to be confusion and false claims regarding my identity, nature, activities and political status i here affirm that i have returned home with a clear conscience and uninterrupted loyalty to my country and there can be no truthful or competent evidence otherwise. As one of those protected by Section 1 of the 14th Amendment of the corporate charter known as the Constitution of the United States of America and Section 9 of the Trading With the Enemy Act Appendix, i accept the oath of the Alien Property Custodian and the United States Treasurer to uphold the Constitution of the United States of America (Inc.) and their obligation to release and return my property free and clear of any damage resulting from their seizure of it, free of all debt, tithes, fees, encumbrances, liens, attachments, secondary titles and deeds held under color of law, involuntary and non-consensual capitulation of my name, forced use of private script in place of lawful money, appointments of usufructs and other impositions, confiscations, and false presumptions made against me and my private property.

It has never been my knowing and free and voluntary Will express or implied to provide any incorporated entity with the benefit of my body or estate — nor was it my free and willing and knowing act to ever subject my son eric belcher of big lake, alaska, to any such presumption. i never deserted my son from the moment of conception nor have i knowingly allowed him to be interpreted as an abandoned vessel subject to maritime salvage by any incorporated entity nor have i voluntarily appointed any such incorporated entity as his Trustee or usufruct at any time.

It has never been my knowing and free and voluntary Will express or implied to grant my power of attorney to any incorporated entity.

As the lawful copyright Holder in Due Course of the Trade Names Anna Riezinger and Anna Maria Riezinger and Anna M. Riezinger and as the creator and Holder of the copyrighted pen names Anna von Reitz and Anna M. Riezinger-von Reitz and all derivatives thereof, all autographs, signatures, trademarks, symbols, numbers and seals including all derivatives of any such symbolic representations of me, i consider use of these symbols by anyone pretending to act in my behalf without my explicit and knowing consent obtained under conditions of full disclosure a criminal trespass, infringement, and act of identity theft.

All such exercise of my imprimaturs without my free and knowing consent results in contracts violated by fraud and force. Should any evidences otherwise exist they can only exist as evidence of self-interested crime against me and my nature and estate and as evidence of similar intentional self-interested crime against my progeny as well.

i am set free to exercise my dominion over the jurisdictions of air, land, and sea and no one may otherwise address me or offer any contrary presumption from the beginning to this day and forever afterward: i was, i am, i will be a living heir to the covenant of faith and the covenant of love and i am a true woman of God.

As i am the only one having true and first-hand knowledge of my nature, my Will, my intentions, my knowledge at any given time, my actions, their meaning or anything else about me— every word that drops from my lips concerning me is a Matter of Fact and all else is hearsay.

In support of the above declarations made in truth and with good faith and standing this _______day of April 2016: ____________________________________________non-negotiable autograph and seal by anna riezinger for Anna Riezinger all rights reserved.

Notice to Principals is Notice to Agents. Notice to Agents is Notice to Principals. Witness in no way transfers the Issuer of this Declaration from his original jurisdiction on the land and creates no change in the origin of this Declaration.

Witness and Acknowledgement

In the Matanuska-Susitna County of the Alaska State:
Today, the ______day of April in the calendar year 2016 appeared before me, a commissioned Notary, the woman known to me as Anna Riezinger and she did autograph and seal this Declaration of Political Status as shown; _____________________________________Notary; my commission expires on:________________ and my seal is set hereon.


***** i accept the Witness and Acknowledgement of the Notary as an act of good faith service and friendship: _________________________________________non-negotiable autograph and seal by anna riezinger for Anna Riezinger, all rights reserved.*****

Second Step:

Grant and Deed of Trust

i, the living woman, anna of the Lawful House Riezinger, hereby declare that i am the Holder in Due Course of the Trade Names Anna Riezinger and Anna Maria Riezinger and Anna M. Riezinger which were bequeathed to me as gifts by my biological parents the day i was born on June 6th of the calendar year 1956.
i retain the copyright and control of these Trade Names and all associated derivative names, signs, seals, numbers and symbols however styled which in any way claim to represent me or which seem to represent me or my property interests. No use of them in association with me or my private property is allowed absent my explicit and knowing consent obtained under conditions of full disclosure.
i am also the Holder in Due Course of the seal and the trademark clearly imprinted and described below which i retain for my private and exclusive use without exception and these do provide additional proof upon my Will or any public acts that they are executed by me and with my approval

Thumbprint, right hand, seal

Trademark : red, white, and blue bars lower left to upper in red ink. right, three white Hawthorn blossoms in the blue bar.

I also created and retain copyright of the following pen names: Anna von Reitz and Anna M. Riezinger-von Reitz as of October 1, 1981.
These marks and symbols and Trade Names and pen names are property belonging to me as of June 6, 1956 or the date of their creation and i fully grant and deed them together with any derivatives thereof to myself for my own use without exception.
In support of the above declarations made in truth and with good faith and standing this _______day of April 2016: ____________________________________________non-negotiable autograph and seal by anna riezinger for Anna Riezinger all rights reserved.

Notice to Principals is Notice to Agents. Notice to Agents is Notice to Principals. Witness in international jurisdiction in no way transfers the Issuer of this Grant and Deed of Trust from her original jurisdiction on the land and creates no change in the origin of this Grant and Deed of Trust.

Witness and Acknowledgement

In the Matanuska County of the Alaska State:
Today, the ______day of March in the calendar year 2016 appeared before me, a commissioned Notary, the woman known to me as Anna Riezinger and she did autograph and seal this Grant and Deed of Trust as shown; _____________________________________Notary; my commission expires on:________________ and my seal is set hereon.


***** i accept the Witness and Acknowledgement of the Notary as an act of good faith service and friendship: _________________________________________non-negotiable autograph and seal by anna riezinger for Anna Riezinger all rights reserved.*****

Step 3:

Record of Name(s) Affidavit

In this case the name anna also called anna riezinger and anna maria riezinger refers to a living woman born the sixth of June in the calendar year 1956, a native to wisconsin and second daughter of lavera and emmett of the Lawful House Riezinger, biological heir and beneficiary of her parents, her land, her house, her names, all trademarks and symbols and accounts and earthly estate in sum total:
Anna Maria refers to a living woman born on the land of the county referred to as the magisterial judicial district of Clark County, a beneficiary of the Divine Estate, and the United States Trust, superior to and set apart from all commercial rules and entities.
Anna Maria Riezinger is a Trade Name belonging to the non-combatant living woman bequeathed to her on June 6, 1956 by her biological parents, mistakenly registered as a commercial vessel enfranchised by the State of Wisconsin which was itself a franchise of the bankrupt United States of America, Incorporated, that same year. This Trade Name should have been recorded as an unincorporated business operating on the land jurisdiction of the organic states instead of being registered as a foreign situs trust operating in the foreign jurisdiction of the sea—- a mistake and disservice for which the living beneficiary seeks full correction and remedy.
ANNA MARIA RIEZINGER – a non-combatant commercial vessel structured as a Foreign Grantor Trust rightly belonging to the living beneficiary who is the same woman native to wisconsin but mistakenly created as a franchise of the UNITED STATES which acquired all franchises and property of the bankrupt United States of America, Incorporated, and which then acted as a usufruct to establish new franchises benefiting itself – a circumstance for which the living beneficiary seeks full correction and cure as required by Article IV of the still potent Cestui Que Vie Act of 1666: “should the dead Man should he be found alive” all property held in his name must be returned to him free and clear of debts, liens, and other encumbrances established by presumed secondary beneficiaries. The establishment of this ESTATE trust is again a mistake and disservice for which the living beneficiary seeks full correction and cure.

ANNA M. RIEZINGER is a public transmitting utility which has been created by USA, INC. acting as a usufruct of yet another merely presumed secondary beneficiary of the living woman and her estate, a mistake and disservice for which she claims full correction and remedy.
Anna von Reitz and Anna M. Riezinger-von Reitz are both pen names created by the living woman called anna maria riezinger on or about October 1, 1981, to which she retains all lawful claim and copyright for her use from that day forward.

i, anna, the lawful Holder in Due Course and Entitlement Holder of all property bequeathed to me including my given names and names created by me, being of age and sound mind and body, not indigent, not penniless, not incompetent, and not at fault for the mismanagement and bad faith of those entrusted to care for my property, request immediate correction of the records and reconveyance of all property held or formerly held in my name(s) plus settlement of my accounts reflecting the fact that i am not a decedent, not unknown, and not a pauper.

i, anna, a true woman of God, have never knowingly, willingly, or voluntarily sought any benefit from nor accepted any office or role as an administrator or co-trustee or co-beneficiary of the Public Charitable Trust (PCT) established for the benefit of displaced plantation slaves in the wake of the American Civil War, say that I am not a slave nor former slave, not an indentured servant of any kind, not under any kind or condition of color, not a corporation, not an artificial person, not a taxpayer, not a United States citizen of any style or stripe, not now and not ever considering such citizenship a benefit, and not subject to the limitations of any civil rights conferred upon me, not seeking welfare, not employed by any franchise of any governmental services corporation, not seeking any corporate privilege, not stateless and not in need of any political asylum, not a member of any political party, religion, or cult, not an enemy toward any people or state.

As i, anna, a true woman of God, am the only one having any first-hand knowledge of my Will, my knowledge, my intentions, or my nature, every word that falls from my lips and every act that proceeds from my hand is a Matter of Fact and all else is hearsay.
So said and so done this ______day of April in the calendar year 2016: by anna riezinger for Anna Riezinger:_______________________________________________all rights reserved.

Step 4:

Notice of Emancipation

In accordance with the Emancipation Proclamation issued by Executive Order of President Abraham Lincoln On January 1, 1863 and the still-standing order of Abraham Lincoln acting as Commander-in-Chief of the United States Army and Navy, all Federal Officers and Government Officials in every capacity and at every level are given Notice of the following:
1. “That on the first day of January, in the year of our Lord one thousand eight hundred and sixty-three, all persons held as slaves within any State or designated part of a State, the people whereof shall then be in rebellion against the United States, shall be then, thenceforward, and forever free; and the Executive Government of the United States, including the military and naval authority thereof, will recognize and maintain the freedom of such persons, and will do no act or acts to repress such persons, or any of them, in any efforts they may make for their actual freedom.” — President and Commander-in-Chief, Abraham Lincoln (boldface added).
2. That numerous persons named after states and people have been press-ganged, kidnapped, and enslaved for the profit of private, mostly foreign-owned corporations and that those persons have been deliberately manipulated by those responsible so as to bring false claims against the actual states of the union and the actual people of the United States;
3. That all these persons are considered slaves and treated as criminals by definition under the 14th Amendment to the Constitution of the United States of America and that they do or have in the past included a foreign situs trust called Anna Maria Riezinger, a Cestui Que Vie ESTATE trust called ANNA MARIA RIEZINGER, and a public transmitting utility called ANNA M. RIEZINGER;
4. That all these similarly named corporate franchises have been created and operated without the knowing consent and agreement of the free-born living woman anna maria riezinger who was never told about this abuse of her given name this infringement upon her copyright and this disrespect of her position as Holder in Due Course and Entitlement Holder of her earthly estate and who is not at fault for the mismanagement of these corporate franchises;
5. That the living woman anna maria riezinger is not deceived and is owed her freedom and her estate free and clear of all false presumptions, claims, debts, deliberate confusions and acts of personage against her and against her private property including her inherited Trade Names: Anna Riezinger, Anna Maria Riezinger, and Anna M. Riezinger;
6. That the living woman anna maria riezinger relies upon the Emancipation Proclamation to secure the willing and ready assistance she requires of all federal officials and officers at every level including federal state and territory officials to honor and assist in emancipating –that is—liquidating all of the en legis slaves on paper that have been named after her and used as a means to control and defraud her of her natural estate.

Step 5:

Claim of Life Estate

This shows that the life estate of anna maria riezinger dba Anna Maria Riezinger is due and owing to the lawful heir and:
–that the beneficiary stands on the land jurisdiction of the United States;
–that the beneficiary is of age;
–that the beneficiary is not an infant nor a decedent nor a corporation;
–that the beneficiary grants her names and estates to herself:
__________________ anna
Prepared by: anna maria riezinger
for: Anna Maria Riezinger
c/o Post Office Box 520994
Big Lake, Alaska RR 99652

[ With a great, big, fat adult footprint autographed: footprint of anna maria riezinger born on six June year of our Lord nineteen hundred fifty-six in neillsville, wisconsin, taken April second of two thousand sixteen in big lake, alaska]

anna maria riezinger, all rights reserved.

Seal the bottom right hand corner of all these documents with your thumbprint and file them with the nearest land recorder’s office and request to pay the nine dollar 1802 tax to reconvey your estate. Get at least three certified copies.

Record these documents along with the Authenticated Long Form Certificate of Live Birth that the State Secretary of State and US Secretary of State have signed as being authentic, and the other documents which Kurt Kallenbach has developed for these purposes.

Taken together these actions provide ironclad documentation that you are you and that you have claimed your estate.

Send a Certified Copy to the United States Treasurer Rosa Gumataotao Rios and a copy of the copy to the Secretary of the Treasury requesting correction of their records and release of your estate.

And if they don’t promptly do so, invoke the office of the United States Marshals acting as Federal Marshals to arrest them for violation of their international fiduciary trust obligations.


Source: Paulstramer.net

Judge Anna von Reitz: Top 12 Steps to Reclaim Your Estate – Birthright Citizenship vs Corporate Slave Citizenship

Re-posted from Morning Liberty, April 2015. (I was looking for posts from Judge Anna on actual steps to take; she has recently published a few posts on this subject. Will post here as I find them.)  For more information, please visit annavonreitz.com. Also see posts being collected here.


Top 12 Steps to Reclaim Your Estate – Birthright Citizenship vs Corporate Slave Citizenship

Anna Von Reitz
Tue, Apr 14, 2015
Subject; Top 12 Steps to Rightful Entitlement Holder of Your Estate

I am not an activist. I am a Judge of the Alaska State Superior Court, and
the Alaska State is one of Several States guaranteed the land jurisdiciton
of Alaska by Statehood Compact. That means that what I did here in Alaska
directly impacts what applies to every other State on the land of the
Continental United States including Washington State.

If no properly convened Washington State Court (not State of Washington
which is a “State of State” — a Federal State– operating in the
international jurisdiction of the sea) overturns my findings and Public
Order, you will find that I already addressed the criminality of the North
American Power Alliance and their subsidiaries. See attached Public Order
and Notice to Law Enforcement (including Judges).

If you would like to get to the heart of this matter and put an end to such
encroachment upon the land jurisdiciton of your state and its citizenry,
there are some (relatively) simple steps to be taken.

1. Everyone must choose their proper citizenship. Do you want your
birthright citizenship on the land of the Washington (or other) State on
the land jurisdiction of the Continental United States guaranteed to the
United Colonies and carrying with it all your guarantees to the Bill of
Rights, etc., or do you want to adopt “corporate citizenship” as a
franchise owned and operated by other corporate entities and operate as a
debt slave in international jurisdiction of the sea for the benefit of the

2. All those who wish to retain their birthright — gather together and
begin operating your County and State on the Land, known as Washington
State, not “State of Washington”. Notify the Registrars operating in the
Counties where you were born with a sworn affidavit that you are above the
age of 21 and are the rightful Entitlement Holder of [YOUR NAME IN ALL
CAPITAL LETTERS] ESTATE. To prove this you will need at least two
competent witnesses who know you and know your family and who can identify
you in a photo included as part of the Witness Affidavit and verify your
current address and at least the town address of where you were born.
TYpically this will be an older friend or family member—- “I am the
natural person John William Wiley, a family friend and physican of the
McClusky Family of Duluth, Minnesota, for the past thirty-nine years. I was
the attending physician when….” or “I am John Bruce Richards, older
Counsin of Lilian Diane Cooper. I was 19 when Lilian-Diane was born and
have a complete recollection of her parents, birth in Peoria, Illinois, and
her life ever since. I can competently identify the woman in the photo
shown below as Lilian Diane Cooper, now married to Joshua Rayburn Clarke,
of Piedmont Park, California.”

Your current address will have to be corrected— you are zip code exempt,
write out the whole state name, and if you have a Post Office Box change it
to a General Post Office Box (Whatever number) via a change of address

You will also need a long form Birth Certificate that has been
Authenticated by the Secretary of State of the Birth State for use in a
non-Hague Convention Country like Indonesia or Taiwan. In most States you
can just order the BC from Vital Statistics and for an extra fee request
that it be sent to the Secretary of State for the Authentication and then
all sent to you without going back and forth. Once you get the
authenticated BC you never let it out of your hands again.

You make copies of the BC and the Authentication and write “For
Administrative Use Only” in red on the face of these copies and then on the
back you write (also in red) “I certify as Document Holder that this is a
true and correct copy of the Birth Certificate and Authentication on
file..” — Signed Upper and Lower Case, all rights reserved, and sealed on
the Signature with your thumbprint, also in red.

Copies of the self-certified Authenticated BC, the Witness Affidavits
signed before a public notary under a statement to the effect “Witness by
Notary does not change Jurisdiction from the Land” written above the Notary
block, and your own Affidavit should be entered on the public record of the
probate court in the county of your birth. Request certified copies of the
public record created.

3. Once this process is completed and your claim is received, posted on the
public record of the probate court, and you have your certified copy of the
action, you are the recognized Executor of your own ESTATE trust. You
really always were the lawful Entitlement Holder— the rats just
“misunderstood on purpose” in order to defraud you and control your assets.

4. Now you are the Executor of the ESTATE and they have to do exactly what
you tell them to do and they cannot interfere whatsoever. They can no
longer harass you or presume upon you or make false claims against you. No
judge can act as an Executor de Son Tort with regard to your assets.

5. You, meanwhile, have fully realized that there are three versions of
“United States” in play. There’s the Continental United States (land) for
example, Ohio State, and there’s the Federal United States (sea) for
example, the State of Ohio, and the Corporate United State, also known as
the Municipal United States, which also operates in the international
jurisdiction of the sea, for example, the STATE OF OHIO. The actual nation
is the State which holds land jurisdiction, All the others are
corporations— “inchoate States” that exist on paper only— and which as
Federal “States” have *no authority on the land except* that which directly
pertains to their own Federal Citizens (federal civilian and military
employees, African-Americans, those born in DC, Guam, etc., welfare
recipients, and poltiical asylum seekers) or actual federal property—
docks, customs houses, arsenals, etc. that have been officially granted to
the federal union.

6. Standing as the Lawful Entitlement Holder and as an American State
Citizen on the land jurisdiction of the Continental United States, you are
empowered to serve as a juror of the Continental United States so long as
you are not a member of the Bar Association and have attained the age of
21. If you meet the other requirements (age, education, etc.,) that were
established for public offices of the land-based State prior to 1860 or
meet those requirements adopted by the local citizens of the County now,
you may operate as a Judge, Sheriff, Grand Juror, Coroner, or in any office
of the State on the land or the County or the Township, so long as you are
not a member of the Bar Association.

7. Be aware that the Titles of Nobility Amendment ratified prior to the
Civil War and incorporated into the actual equity contract known as The
Constitution for the united States of America is still in effect and it
still prohibits Bar Association Members from holding any public office of
the Continental United States. All these “courts” you see and all these
“judges” operating them are operating in a purely private capacity — as
corporate administrative tribunals and as military tribunals. The proof of
this is plain to see— all “State Statutes” they use are privately
copyrighted and so, are not public documents. The flags in their
courtrooms are all “Executive Flags” of the Commander in Chief—- they are
operating in “Special Admiralty”— and falsely presuming that you are an
“Enemy Combatant” or “POW” ,etc., instead of recognizing that you are a
civilian. Once you put this nonsense to rest by reclaiming your ESTATE
from the probate court, they face court-martial and death penalty criminal
charges if they continue to take such actions against you.

8. As the Lawful Citizenry of the Continental United States you each have
more civil authority in your little finger than the entire “federal
government”. You hold plenary jurisdiction over the land and its assets.
Any attempt to boss you around while you are standing on State land or on
your own property is a breach of jurisdiction. Any crime committed on
federal property is of course another matter. If you engage in actual
international commerce the federales have something to say about it, but
most Americans are only engaged in peaceful trade among other organic
states of the union. The federal union may only promote and regulate trade
among the States *so as to encourage and expedite such trade. *They are *not
allowed to restrict *our internal trade.

9. Start reading The Constitution for the united States of America —- the
actual Constitution not the corporate fake called the Constitution of the
United States of America. The real Constitution is very brief — ten
Articles, three Amendments, including the Titles of Nobility of Amendment
which the later corporates fakes do not include. This document is the only
treaty and equity contract tying us to the British-controlled Federal
United States. *The United Colonies still hold the complete and plenary
jurisdiction and extends it to every “State” formed, whether on the land or
the sea (corporate). *

*10. Bear in mind that the land jurisdiction includes all actual material
associated with the land— soil, plants, minerals, people, buildings,
animals— all land assets and you have plenary jurisdiction on the land of
the nation States. The Federal United States has plenary jurisdiction on
“the High Seas and Inland Waterways” and otherwise has only the right to
speak to its own Federal Citizens who are “residing” on the land. You
don’t “reside” on the land— you “inhabit” the land. The problem has been
that they have been “offering” to contract— actually racketeering and
press-ganging on the land jurisdiction and forcing American State Citizens
to contract with them under conditions of non-disclosure and semantic
deceit, allowing them to falsely claim that we are corporate franchisees or
even corporate franchises of their foreign federation and its various
corporations. *

*11. Now you begin to see where your power lies and how you must exercise
it. We have been swamped with pirates and armed marauders who are our
employees operated under diabolical misappropriation by governmental
services corporations that are in turn owned and operated by international
banking cartels. *

*Here’s an example— the FEDERAL RESERVE newly organized as a franchise of
the UNITED NATIONS, INC. is fronting its own franchise doing business as
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, INC. This entity has created hundreds of
millions of “public utilities” operated under the given names of living
Americans — you can recognize these new corporate franchise dopplegangers
because they all use names in this form: JOHN Q. PUBLIC.*

*So, are you a public utility owned and operated by a franchise subsidiary
of the FEDERAL RESERVE banking cartel operated by the UNITED NATIONS,
INC.? *

*No? *

*Time to stand up and shove this baloney. *

*12. The effort is underway to put an end to this criminal fraud scheme
and seize back the assets of the Continental United States that have been
stolen and plundered by the Federal United States corporations and
misdirected employees. You can help by donating time, money, and skills to
educate others and to document and prosecute claims. Also time to
repudiate the Odious “National Debt” and reclaim the credit and assets
which have been purloined by various “State of” franchises via fiduciary
trust fraud and fraudulent convertible debt.*

Judge Anna von Reitz: A One-Page Reduction of the Situation

Re-posted, with thanks, from Paulstramer.net. From April 14.


Thursday, April 14, 2016

A One Page Reduction of the Situation


I have spent so many days explaining and explaining and trying to drum this into people’s conscious awareness so now, I have reduced it down to simple graphic form and a single page.

by Anna Von Reitz

These private corporate tribunals are only “giving an appearance of justice” —- which the courts boldly state in their own published rules—- and you can believe them or not, based on your own experience.

Governmental Services Corporation Dates of Operation Operational Code

United States of America, Inc. 1868 – 1999 Federal Code Titles 1-50

(under bankruptcy administration) 1933 – 1999

UNITED STATES, INC. 1944 – 2015 Title 50

THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 2009 – United Nations Law

USA INC. 1944 – Puerto Rican Law

Your political status determines your “law” and your “persona” so long as that corporation exists and you are “enfranchised” by it. .

United States of America Person —- “John Mark Doe” a foreign situs trust—– subject to Federal Code

UNITED STATES PERSON ——- “JOHN MARK DOE” a Roman Civil trust —— subject to Title 50

THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA/USA —— “JOHN M. DOE” a public transmitting utility– subject to United Nations Law and/or Puerto Rican law.

Obviously, nobody is enfranchised by the United States of America, Inc. anymore and the old Federal Code is out the window. Obviously, too, since the UNITED STATES is insolvent and under liquidation since 2015, Title 50 is gone, too, and anyone operating as “JOHN MARK DOE” is fair game for international creditors.

What remains on the board is THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, INC. and USA, INC. —- and people can choose to be “enfranchised” by both of these entities and be subject to both UN law and Puerto Rican law—- or they can wake the hell up and reclaim their birthright status and live as free men under the United States Statutes-at-Large and not be “enfranchised” at all.

You have a CHOICE. You can live as a free man or as a corporate franchise operator.
What’s it going to be?

You can live under the Law of the Land — the Ten Commandments, the lawful Constitution, the United States Statutes-at-Large or not. What’s it going to be?

You can live under the Law of the Sea — either as workers employed by the United Nations Corporation or as chattel collateral standing good for the debts of an already bankrupt Puerto Rican Electric Company.

Your call.

What’s it going to be?

Source: Paulstramer.net

Ramola D/Intellihub News–(Updated) Psychologists Urged to Examine Complicity in Supporting Abusive Systems of Torture in U.S. Criminal Justice System and Covert Government Programs

Updated 4/22/2016: Many thanks to Intellihub News for publishing this article covering issues of ethicality among psychologists, as noted by psychologists, and concern about abusive systems of torture and abuse in various US venues such as jails and detention centers as well as in widespread covert programs using directed-energy weapons (DEWs), re-posted here below:

Psychologists urged to examine complicity in supporting abusive systems of torture in U.S. criminal justice system and covert government programs


Originally published on Intellihub News on April 18, 2016.

Psychologists Urged to Examine Complicity In Supporting Abusive Systems of Torture in US Criminal Justice System and Covert Government Programs

by Ramola D

Psychologists for Social Responsibility (PsySR), the group which led the call to end the involvement of American psychologists in the CIA Torture program at Guantanamo, and took the American Psychological Association (APA) to task last summer for their “highly permissive” ethics through which the APA had colluded with the Department of Defense “to preserve unethical detention and interrogation practices”, is calling now for psychologists to look closer at Cruel, Inhumane, and Degrading Treatment (CIDT), torture, and abuse ongoing currently within the US Criminal Justice system and undertaken “with the consent and acquiescence of public officials.”

In a statement issued last week, titled PsySR Statement on Torture, Cruel, Inhuman, and Degrading Treatment and Racial Injustice in the United States, they highlighted the important role psychologists and other health professionals within the criminal justice system play in exposing and addressing abuse, injustice, and human rights violations.

Professionals need to look seriously at our ethical obligation to beneficence and nonmaleficence. We need to recognize when we are rightly and actively resisting abuse and when we are instead complicit in maintaining abusive systems.

Communities of color, they note, mentioning the Black Lives Matter movement, are a focus of particular concern, as they call for psychologists to pay close attention to incidences of torture and abuse they might come across, such as electric shock treatment, prolonged solitary confinement (“a psychologically destructive practice that the United Nations Special Rapporteur on Torture has called on all nations to abolish”) and “police beatings and racially discriminatory killings, sexual assault, medical neglect, and abuses within prisons, jails, and detention centers.”

Recognizing grassroots organizations such as We Charge Genocide of Chicago and Anti Police-Terror Project of Oakland, they urge psychologists to continue to build coalitions and alliances and advocate for systemic change. Psychologists must actively resist participation in abusive practices of torture and report all forms of abuse, they advise.

Particular circumstances they cite include “forced segregation, mass incarceration, private for-profit prisons, solitary confinement, the school-to-prison pipeline, and other correlates of inhuman and degrading treatment.”

Psychologists Must Choose Whether to Oppose HR Violations or Act as Bystanders

Pyschologists must seek accountability of abusive institutions and protection for whistleblowers, they urge, to increase awareness of cultural climates that permit abuse, and to take definitive action such as press for alternatives to incarceration, write articles on witnessed abuse, and work collaboratively to end practices such as solitary confinement and mass incarceration.

Under international law, the United States is obligated to stop and prevent torture and CIDT. Social scientists and health professionals, bound by their professional ethics and values, also bear a serious responsibility to face and stop these abuses. Many of us work within institutions where CIDT and torture occur, and thus we have a choice whether to oppose these human rights violations or, as bystanders, to perpetuate them. Too often, our participation in these settings supports existing structures of racial injustice, already so widespread they can appear commonplace and “normal.””

The whole statement can be found here.

Many Forms of Torture and Abuse Rampant in US, Including Covert Harassment

This call to action addressed to psychologists comes at a time when Chicago grieves the new loss of a young teenager, Pierre Loury, to impetuous police shooting, when recent probes into Homan, the Chicago black site reveals a culture of violent abuse, with 7000 “disappeared” over the last decade, and when awareness mounts of a new kind of covert operation of torture in the USA, through the use of electronic and directed-energy weapons in secretive and repressive programs of surveillance, harassment, and abuse on watchlisted and targeted individuals who are neither guilty of nor charged with crime, but appear to be either assaulted for their activism or/and are being rolled into classified, non-consensual programs of Military/Intelligence experimentation as random subjects.

In a letter sent to the Psychologists for Social Responsibility (and shared with this writer), one targeted individual, a former reporter and blogger who wrote in support of Wikileaks, and who in 1998 sued a political supporter of the President, points to documentation of such abuses by many who have been “extra-judicially targeted for stalking and ‘touchless torture’ with covertly used directed-energy weapons, electromagnetic fields, microwaves, and manipulated electric wires.”

Stating that she has Bio-MEMs (Biomedical Micro Electro Mechanical devices) covertly implanted in her by doctors affiliated with Northwestern Memorial Hospital in Chicago, she emphasizes that “the medical field is deeply complicit in this abuse,” that professionals in hospital settings help by implanting individuals with Bio-MEMs, RFIDs (Radio Frequency Identifying Devices), and other inserts which aid in the electronic harassment of individuals.

To this date, targeted individuals have no public health group advocating on their behalf. Conversely, many psychologists and psychiatrists are witting or unwitting accomplices in these hidden abuses by ignoring or dismissing the complaints of individuals being shot at, microwaved, or radiated with the military’s new ‘neuroweapons.’

I urge you to speak out in defense of these victims of horrific abuses by the U.S. government agencies including the CIA, the FBI, the DOJ and the DHS. The ACLU has abdicated its responsibilities to defend the afflicted. Targeted individuals need you to stand up for their rights.”

Carole Smith, a psychoanalyst and researcher, pointed out in a 2003 article titled On the Need for New Criteria of Diagnosis of Psychosis in the Light of Mind Invasive Technology in the Journal of Psycho-Social Studiesthat new technologies to silently attack humans’ brains and bodies have been developed:

We have failed to comprehend that the result of the technology that originated in the years of the arms race between the Soviet Union and the West, has resulted in using satellite technology not only for surveillance and communication systems but also to lock on to human beings, manipulating brain frequencies by directing laser beams, neural-particle beams, electro-magnetic radiation, sonar waves, radiofrequency radiation (RFR), soliton waves, torsion fields and by use of these or other energy fields which form the areas of study for astro-physics. Since the operations are characterised by secrecy, it seems inevitable that the methods that we do know about, that is, the exploitation of the ionosphere, our natural shield, are already outdated as we begin to grasp the implications of their use.”

Acknowledging that people are being experimented on in extremely abusive ways, she spelled out the complicity of psychiatrists and psychologists in aiding military/Intelligence experimenters:

The only witnesses who are speaking about this terrible technology with its appalling implications for the future, are the victims themselves, and those who are given the task of diagnosing mental illness are attempting to silence them by classifying their evidence and accounts as the symptoms of schizophrenia, while the dispensers of psychic mutilation and programmed pain continue with their work, aided and unopposed.”

These atrocious human rights abuses appear to be in place as both covert government harassment masquerading as “electronic surveillance” and military/Intelligence experimentation.

Confirmation from a NSA Whistleblower

In recent conversations with various reporters and writers, new NSA whistleblower Karen Stewart has come forward to confirm these accounts of covert abuse being reported by thousands of Americans, and others, worldwide:

I had originally thought, based on my experience (2006-2009), that only NSA Security used this harassment technique on NSA whistleblowers, journalists, or anti-NSA activists, which was bad enough by itself. But then I met a whistleblower from the Department of Justice who knew NSA was involved in her being targeted for slander and stalking harassment as well, so I realized how broadly the Federal government was using criminal harassment with NSA more than happy to help with its ever increasing network of compromised or gullible law enforcement officials and ready-to-roll civilian stalking groups. In the last year, the DOJ whistleblower has reported to me that she is now also being targeted for electronic harassment.”

Dubious Ethics of Dependency on Military and Intelligence Agencies for Funding

In July 2015, in a press release addressing an investigation of the APA’s actions in the matter of psychologists assisting the CIA in torture, PsySR urged psychologists to work toward “changes to ethical and other policies so as to meet standards appropriate for a profession of scientists, health professionals, and educators rather than the priorities of the Department of Defense or CIA,” and noted:

Psychologists have a duty to recognize and examine how decades of dependency on the military and intelligence agencies for employment, funding, and stature have influenced our entire profession, in ways that have never been adequately examined.”

As psychologists begin to speak openly of issues of ethicality in extant tortures and abuses within the US Criminal Justice system, it is to be hoped that they will address as openly and as urgently the issues of covert targeting, implantation, electronic harassment, and brain/behavior control experimentation being experienced today by thousands of Americans, and others, worldwide, in which also it seems health professionals, psychologists, and psychiatrists are complicit.

Ramola D is a writer with a background in science and literature researching issues in science, technology, and ethics relevant to our times, including issues related to Intelligence, Surveillance, Security, and Defense. She runs a solutions journalism site at everydayconcerned.net, and edits the online literary quarterly, Delphi Quarterly. Her literary journalism, fiction, and poetry have been published widely. You can follow her online at @EccEveryday, or at The Everyday Concerned Citizen on Facebook.