Tag Archives: Ursula von der Leyen

Feature Report | Ramola D | February 21-27, 2022

In explosive news from a news conference held at Strasbourg last week, European MEPs or Members of the European Parliament have demanded that Ursula von der Leyen, President of the EU Commission since 2019 and a Klaus Schwab Great Reset Cyborging-of-Humanity promoter, be asked to resign on conflict of interest after notice of emails with Pfizer heads she won’t reveal was published by a German journalist and her contracts with Pfizer and Moderna were exposed, heavily redacted, showing evidence of back-room deals with these powerful and unethical COVID vaccine corporations.

Outspoken members of Parliament hugely concerned about the loss of freedoms in numerous European countries along with violations of basic human rights point also to her husband’s involvement in biotechnology and state that her conflicts of interest here in promoting experimental Pfizer and Moderna vaccines in private contracts she is unwilling to reveal–while her subsequent mandating of dangerous experimental vaccines, outlawing powerful medical countermeasures and preventatives such as Ivermectin–affecting millions of lives of the European public, require that she step down immediately.

The Pfizer, Moderna and other vaccines in Europe have been found to be unsafe by thousands of physicians and scientists, having now led to over 40,000 deaths as reported by Eudra Vigilance, and many more, yet unreported, according to many analysts examining the adverse event reports from international databases.

False and Misleading Narratives from Governments Push Mass Vaccination by Mandate while (Experimental, Poison-Filled) COVID Vaccines Are Statistically Seen to Cause Deaths: Holding The Line Journalists Address the Facts

40,000 Deaths from COVID Shots in European Database as Insurance Claims Skyrocket/Vaccine Impact News

The conference, which will be presented in transcript here in full, is outstanding and should be spread worldwide because it presents independent, freedom-loving, humanitarian European leaders unafraid to openly tackle the issues of corruption and venality in private deals with hugely powerful pharmaceutical corporations which have been previously exposed for strong-arming governments around the world with astonishing no-liability and pledge-of-territory clauses.

The MEPs who spoke at the conference, from Lithuania, Croatia, France, Romania, and Germany were:

MEP Stasys JAKELIŪNAS (Greens, LT), MEP Ivan Vilibor SINČIĆ (NI, HR), MEP Virginie JORON (ID, FR), MEP Cristian TERHES (ECR, RO), and MEP Cristine ANDERSON (ID, DE)

VIDEO OF THE CONFERENCE:

MEP Stasys Jakeliunas from Lithuania: “Not science, not good governance, but execution of a Vaccine Business Plan”

In his opening statement, the MEP from Lithuania, Stasys Jakeliunas spelled out the many reasons why Ursula von der Leyen should be removed, saying up-front she was clearly “part of a gigantic COVID-19 scientific fraud and propaganda campaign that cost and continues to cause massive violations of human rights freedom and is a threat to the democracy in Europe. Because of her actions and major conflicts of interest she should resign from her position as the president of the commission.”

Stating that the EU Commission President was essentially promoting the “COVID-19 vaccine business” with secretive contracts in the name of “global public good,” and lying about vaccination being the only way to end the pandemic while censoring thousands of doctors saying otherwise, Mr. Jakeliunas enumerated the reasons why she should be removed from her position.

It is significant here that Ursula von der Leyen worked in Angela Merkel’s cabinet earlier as Defense Minister, and is a Procurement Pro apparently used to hiding her tracks, with her phone being wiped of data after one deal where she was accused of handing contracts out without proper protocols or assessment.

PRIVATE PROCUREMENT DEALS BETWEEN URSULA AND ALBERT INVESTIGATED BY EU OMBUDSMAN EMILY O’REILLY (TO NO AVAIL)

“As we all know it’s in the media the President was involved in private communication with the CEO of Pfizer before signing the purchase agreement with this private company but refused to disclose the content of this communication–this is a clear violation of principles of transparency and good public administration.

Second, according to the disclosed segments of the agreement with Pfizer–and not all parts are disclosed which is another violation of the same principles–the European Commission has to coordinate external communication with this private commercial entity and to promote COVID-19 vaccines as the global public good, this is not science, this is not good governance, this is an execution of Vaccine Business Plan and the President of the European Commission acts as the chief Sales Representative of this business.

Three, as a result of this commitment Ms. von der Leyen has been actively advocating vaccination as the only way to end the pandemic, this is a lie. There have been efficient and not expensive medical treatment protocols from the start of the pandemic. Now thousands of doctors around the world are testifying this but the President of the Commission has been ignoring this all along.

Fourth, Pfizer after signing the contract with the Commission on May 20, 2021 claimed in their press release that the pandemic is likely to last for several more years and we all will have to be vaccinated number of times. How can they know that and why the President of the European Commission has to subscribe to this notion?

Number five, the Commission has been co-operating with social networks on so-called fact-checking in other words censorship of scientific and public debates about COVID-19. This collaboration was announced as early as 10th of May–uh-June 2020 and is one of the main driving elements of COVID-19 propaganda.

Six, according to the official declaration of interest of president von der Leyen, her husband Heiko von der Leyen is the Medical Director of a biopharmaceutical company, is also an advisor to another company, a consulting firm for German and European healthcare market. Since Ms. von der Leyen is actively involved in active promotion of COVID-19 vaccination business, this is another major conflict of interest.

Because of all this she has to resign from her position as the President of the European Commission and I call on the leadership of all political groups and leadership of the European Parliament to support this request and to finally create an Investigative Committee of COVID-19 pandemic.

People of the European Union need answers from this Parliament on how and why this pandemic started, how it was managed, and how to prevent it from happening again, thank you.”

–MEP Stasys Jakeliunas from Lithuania

MEP Ivan Sincic from Croatia:

“Digital COVID Certificate useless tool of Pandemic Marketing, and License to Spread and Infect”;

“Pandemic of Corruption in Europe needs investigation and accountablity”

“Thank you very much Mr. Terhesh thank you very much, dear colleagues, dear guests.

I would like to say a few words about mandates especially digital COVID certificate mandates and of course vaccine mandates, especially in the light of an idea that comes from the European institutions about prolonging for one year–that means to 2023–the digital COVID certificate.

I will say loud and clear we are strongly against that digital COVID certificate–it has been proven completely useless. Not just useless, it was proven to be backfiring, to be contra-effective–it gives people a false sense of security. It has become a tool of pandemic marketing, forcing people. Now governments are openly admitting it–that it it was a tool to put pressure on the people to take the vaccines.

The DGC itself is undemocratic, it is blackmailing citizens of Europe for their fundamental rights, for their human rights, for their constitutional rights. In some countries unless you have a DGC you cannot access your job, you cannot access your supermarket or store, you cannot access public building,s etc. etc. It is as I said not just useless, it is backfiring, and it is basically a license to spread and infect.

There is a James Bond movie from the 1980s saying License to Kill and what we have here is an analogy we have a License to Spread and in fact if you’re vaccinated you’re considered safe even though Science has proved to us not just now and in the last months but before the DGC was even implemented–for example in European Parliament in November there was major scientific evidence in the Lancet and others saying that vaccinated people also can spread the disease almost at the same level as the unvaccinated, and this is just one of the evidences but European institutions continue to ignore this.

They continue to ignore these facts–luckily some governments especially recently have decided to abolish all measures and mandates, and they have set a path to a normal life or to old normal.”

–MEP Ivan Sincic from Croatia

“And with all this unconstitutional and democratic and unscientific behavior, the Agents of Pandemic Marketing such as President of the Commission von der Leyen and we have very suspicious information about that even in the mainstream media now, they continue to promote this madness and they now want to extend Digital COVID Certificate for another year – and we strongly advocate against this.

When it comes to vaccine mandates I must say that some European leaders such as Mr. Macron from France and Mr. Draghi from Italy and we have some statements from Austria as well–and these three countries are probably the worst countries when it comes to mandates in Europe–have demonized part of their people that decided that one way of treatment is not best for them, that they want another kind of treatment.”

–MEP Ivan Sincic from Croatia

“They demonized, they ostracized part of their people that simply want to exercise their human rights–their rights to be informed, rights to informed consent and rights to choose their own therapy.

We condemn this and we simply cannot believe that something like this is happening in Europe in the 21st century.

Basically why would anyone like Austrian Government want to force their population to take an experimental medical product?

And the last year has shown to us very low effective, very low quality medical products with plenty of side effects more than all the other products combined in 30 years with zero long-term safety– why would any government in the world or in Europe want to do that, to experiment on its own people not knowing what will happen in two years five years ten years?

–Ivan Sincic, MEP from Croatia

“It’s a total disaster and we strongly protest against this and we are also very happy to be proven right that what we were claiming and we were claiming what the science showed us what the practice showed us in the last few months that we are on a right path and we are very happy to see that all around the world many governments are lifting their mandates and that the people are rising to fight for their rights, for their freedoms, that people who are tired of not just health crisis but economic crisis, democratic deficit, and everything else I have mentioned.

What we have here clearly is a pandemic of corruption and we are determined to get to the bottom of this and we want European institutions starting from Ombudsman to many others to make full investigations and what we need in Europe is accountability. Thank you.”

–MEP Ivan Sincic from Croatia

MEP Virginie Joron from France: “We need transparency but Madame van der Leyen makes decisions without a scientific foundation”

Speaking in French, MEP Virginie Joron remarked on the haste with which European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen was rushing to put in place vaccination obligations for EU member states and extend the COVID Certificate plan until 2023, while over a million adverse effects due to the vaccine had been reported in European vaccine injury databases, with children getting strokes, myocarditis, pericarditis from a vaccine for a disease unlikely to cause them harm.

“Thank you all for being here because while we are comfortably seated here in Strasbourg, our compatriots from the whole of France are in the cold in Brussels denouncing the draconian measures against liberty put in place by those who are in the hands of the lobbies.

–MEP Virginie Jaron from France

“As my colleagues have said, we need transparency–But Madame van der Leyen prefers to respond by rapidly putting in place the vaccination obligations for member states, getting the commission to make decisions without sanitary or scientific foundation to extend the European Covid certificate until June 2023.

Recall here that this date corresponds to the end of the Clinical Phase 3 of the vaccines. Yes, We are in the middle of the clinical studies.

Today, more than one million cases of adverse effects have been listed by the Parliament L’agence Medical D’European. A million without counting those who have not sent reports in because there is a lot of reluctance to report these by doctors.

From these reports, we see that children have strokes, Children have myocarditis, Children have pericarditis, Children have autoimmune diseases because of the anti-covid vaccine for a disease which does not concern them.

I am going to present a resolution for compensation of the victims of the Covid vaccines. I will thank you in advance, and to the fake news decoders for doing their job well–Not like last time. This resolution has already been tabled in 7 September, swept away with the back of the hand not even debated— and that is a Scandal.

One day all those people who lobby the government in technocrat media will have to answer for their actions. Meanwhile I will simply answer to Clement Beaune that the only shame and egoism we see here is in the one who wants to annoy the people—and that’s Macron, for whom the people feel nothing. Thank you.”

–MEP Virginie Jaron from France

MEP Cristian Terhes from Romania: “Is this the kind of Europe we want where an unelected Commission President negotiates with a private company to affect all our basic rights — with no transparency?”

“This is the contract with Moderna–is this transparency?”

Romanian MEP Cristian Terhes raised the issue of Ursula von der Leyen refusing to disclose the texts of her private communications with the CEO of Pfizer, and displayed copies of the redacted Moderna and Pfizer contracts, asking Is this Transparency? He also revealed that the European People’s Party–really a special interests party, he quipped–was responsible for amendments to draft wording from the European Parliament recommending that no non-disclosure clause be included in Pharma contracts, and that the Commission should release the contracts in full, non-redacted, for everyone to see.

“I would like to take this opportunity, I will be speaking today about transparency, the importance of transparency in the European Union. I will prove, why transparency, it’s so important especially when we talk about rule of law.

Before I start my argument I would like to take this opportunity to thank a journalist from Germany who did not stop, who did not cave, and who was not afraid to seek the truth. When this journalist whose name I don’t know and that’s not important saw the news out there in the month of April of 2021 the result that Ursula von der Leyen signed a contract with Pfizer for 1.8 billion–not million, billion with B–new doses of Pfizer vaccines, the guy requested from the European Commission based on the regulation the EU law that gives you guys access as journalists to documents held by the Commission, so this journalist requested all the communications between the European Commission and between Ursula von der Leyen and the head the CEO of Pfizer company, the answer that this journalist received from the European Commission was that they cannot give him the personal messages or the direct messages between Ursula von der Leyen and the Head, the CEO of Pfizer.

The journalist did not stop there, he filed a complaint with the Ombudsman’s office. In the month of September or last year it was publicly announced by the Ombudsman’s office that they are starting an investigation.”

–MEP Cristian Terhes, Romania

“I’m not here to criticize the media but I have to tell you guys the Brussels media was only one outlet who reported the story. We as MEPs we found out two weeks afterwards about this investigation, we started promoting that and that’s how the mainstream media started talking about that investigation.

A few weeks ago, the Ombudsman released the conclusions of that investigation and the Ombudsman’s office said and I quote “There was maladministration when the European Commission and implicitly the head of European Commission Ursula von der Leyen refused to release, to disclose this personal communications between her and the Pfizer CEOs–so my question to all of you not only of you journalists but people who are watching us and who will be watching us: Is this the kind of Europe that we want where the President, an unelected by the people President of the European Commission is negotiating – “negotiating!”–personally with the head of a private company, that will affect our basic fundamental rights as all of my colleagues already said?

We should– not only that we are entitled by law and by the treaty of the European Union to have access to these documents–but it should have been her the first one disclosing this information to us as MEPs and to you as journalists and to everybody living in the European Union, because we are all affected by these decisions and that did not happen.

–MEP Cristian Terhes from Roumania

“So I have to take this opportunity to thank Emily O’ Reilly the European Ombudsman for not caving, for not stopping, and for actually doing her job. She was pressured, she was threatened–I know the kind of back door deals were here in the Parliament to stop mentioning in all these reports about her activity, “do not say anything about the contracts”–back door deals–but she did not stop, she did what she was supposed to be doing and that’s how we found out that that was mal administration.

But this is not enough! You remember a few months ago in a similar press conference I showed you the contracts the way they were released to the public and to US media after the Pharma companies accepted to be released this way–and I will show you some of the pages. This is the contract with Moderna. Pfizer is even worse–at least here you can see the page number. In the contract with Pfizer that was released to the public you can’t even see the page number – so I’m asking all of you is this transparency?

–Cristian Terhes, MEP from Romania

“In the Pfizer contract you can’t even see the page number–is this transparency?”

“Do you as journalists or you as people feel safe when the head of the European Commission is negotiating personally with the CEO of a private company – public company whatever you know they have stocks – but it’s still a company, it’s not a government it’s not a state.

We became objects of these people–they strip away our rights because they have commercial agreements–this is unacceptable.

So yesterday we had to vote in the plenary and you can check the records on what is called the activities of the European Ombudsman’s annual report for 2020, and I have to congratulate my colleagues from all the groups, who included in this report, in the draft report, I would say before it was put to vote, an article where the Parliament, the European Parliament is demanding, it’s asking, it’s urging the European Commission to release not only all the contracts that were released as I showed you – this is the great transparency in the European Union – the Parliament said in its draft report that all the contracts with these pharmaceutical companies be released, and going forward, the European Commission should not accept a clause in this contract that they will not be able to release the full contract, the full version of these contracts. We were all happy with that article but we were shocked yesterday morning when we saw an amendment from the EPP group, the European People’s Party group–that’s not People’s Party anymore the European Special Interest group–“

—-Cristian Terhes, MEP from Romania

“So I will read and I quote some of the things that were mentioned in this article because it’s important especially for you as journalists to have access to correct information in order for you to properly inform the audience and what they try to do. The first thing mentioned in this report is the following and I quote: “It is in the interest of the European citizens to have clarity and transparency on the advanced purchase agreements and purchase agreements concerning COVID-19 vaccines and that this must prevail over the request of the manufacturing to introduce non-disclosure clauses.” The amendment proposed by EPP was to remove this language, so my question is why don’t they want to have people access to these contracts?

Second thing, the European Parliament it’s encouraging the Ombudsman to continue her inquiries and to ask the Commission to publish non-redacted versions of such advanced purchase agreements and purchase agreements. This text was proposed by EPP to be removed from the report why and I’m urging you guys as journalists: ask the leadership of EPP group why they don’t want the European citizens and you as journalists to see the contract, the content of these contracts.

The article also says that emphasizes that any lack of transparency in the framework of COVID- 19 pandemic is at odds with citizens’ rise to information and fuels these informations and distrust. Which is true we don’t know what’s in this contract some people contacted me unofficially who said, man you should not be aware everything is okay, I said, I don’t know.

But just the fact that even us as MEPs we are not able to see the full version of these contracts, this is a problem in itself — even this text they wanted to be removed and there was another mention where the European Commission was urged to publish, fully publish all these contracts also this text was proposed to be removed but see people have the power.”

—-Cristian Terhes, MEP from Romania

Over Five Hundred MEPs (72%) Vote for Full Disclosure–Unredacted–of Secret Pfizer and Moderna Contracts with EU Commission President Ursula von der Leyen

“We mentioned before that we are elected by the people for the people – so we had a vote yesterday from all the political groups except EPP who took into consideration the fundamental rights of the European citizens and this is how they voted, here’s the result of the vote: 187 MEPs, the vast majority from epp voted in favor of this amendment to not allow the EU citizens and the journalists to have access to a full contract; on the other side 506 MEPs voted that these contracts be published, that the European Commission should publish them immediately, and they should not accept any such clauses going forward. I’ve done a calculation – 27 percent of the MEPs who voted yesterday voted against transparency and 72 percent of the MEPs voted in favor of transparency.”

—-Cristian Terhes, MEP from Romania

“These were all across political groups except EPP – from the left to the right. Because we are here for the people so I would like to take this opportunity to thank again to this journalist from Germany who did not stop and kept pressuring to find out what is going on between these messages that were privately exchanged between the head of the European Commission and the CEO of Pfizer.

I would also like to thank my colleagues from all political groups who all fought for the same thing, we all want this contract to be published and I think it’s time as all my colleagues said the European Union right now it’s in a deep crisis, it’s in a crisis of leadership and it is in the crisis of accountability.

We already have two investigations here that are proving that Ursula von der Leyen is clearly not fit for this office – she committed Mal-administration on the way she handled that request from the journalist, and 72 percent of the MEP just voted yesterday that all of these contracts be published.

So I join my colleagues and I publicly demand the immediate resignation of Ursula von der Leyen and allow this Union to actually be led by a person who truly believes in the European values in transparency and respect for fundamental rights. thank you.

—-Cristian Terhes, MEP from Romania

Clear Conflict of Interest On Several Counts: Ursula Von der Leyen’s Husband Advises Two Pharma Companies Linked to Pfizer & Portal to Europe’s Medical Market Plus She’s Part of a Pharma Sales Team

In the question and answer session that followed the presentations above, a journalist from Europe Diplomatic Anna Vanessa raised the question of Ursula von der Leyen’s being intrinsically locked in conflict of interest with her husband working in Pharma.

Heiko von der Leyen, Board Member on Orgenesis, advises not one but two biotech companies, confirmed Lithuanian MEP Stacys Jakeluinas, while Ursula herself has served as a sales rep. participating in a commercial event promoting vaccines.

The rabbit hole is actually deeper, and Adrian Onciu, a Romanian journalist has been chronicling the red flags (link to article below). Turns out that Heiko von der Leyen was suddenly boosted to stardom in December 2020, as vaccine talk heated up, and Vanguard–which owns both Pfizer and Orgenesis, Blackrock and 90% of US Media including the New York Times–recruited him to be frontman in a contrived dealmaking which had him being paid 1.5 million dollars to fly out of Hanover and set up shop as Orgenesis Board Member in New York, two doors down from Pfizer, while Ursula von der Leyen his wife would soon open negotiations with Pfizer, eventually handing Bourla plum contracts for 1.8 billion doses of an untested non-vaccine unleashing gene-modification on its victims. Those text messages she won’t share included him too.

Vanguard, Onciu reminds us, is run by the billionaires of the world and the bloodline royal families — which points really to a plutocracy of profiteers and pirates running the entire Pfizer/Vaccine farce which has Europeans enslaved to a lethal vaccine promoted by front player Ursula von der Leyen.

MEP Stacys Jakeluinas informs the Press that Heiko von der Leyen “is employed or advising not one, but two companies–one of them has a relationship through the personnel with Pfizer, then the common shareholders, some of them are in the company which works and are also shareholders of Pfizer. The other company is the entrance into the European healthcare that means medical market for me, it’s a clear conflict of interest.

She cannot perform her duties free of this conflict of interest and in addition you know her participation now in some commercial event continuing to promote vaccination so performing as a sales representative of this vaccination business plan is of course a disaster I think.

So at least she doesn’t promote now the mandatory vaccination she mentioned in December first that we should start discussion on mandatory vaccination in the European Union– I hope it’s not happening and I hope she will listen to what we say here and appreciate we will address of course the European institutions about this conflict of interest but just to inform the public, to inform you that our position is that she’s on a deep massive conflict of interest not one but several.”

This article is a must-read and offers further insight: Crimes against #EU-Manity – the von der Leyen Connection…| The mysterious assignment of Ursula von der Leyen’s spouse, Dr Heiko von der Leyen as a medical director in Orgenesis, a gene therapy company./Ehden Bieber, posting Adrian Onciu’s Facebook post/Dec 9, 2021

“Everything Here Done on Back Room Deals and Compromises”: European Union Particularly Corrupt?

Stating that Laura Kudzukivishi the Romanian head of the European People’s Party who earlier investigated petty bribery of officials should lead this investigation, Cristian Terhes also pitched in on the subject of Conflict of Interest, emphasizing that he was not focusing on prosecution or law enforcement but pointing out “the appearance of a conflict of interest–the fact that Ursula von der Leyen is negotiating personally on behalf of the European Union when her husband is already involved in the business, that’s a problem in itself, and in any democracy around the world, if something like that would have happened, she would have been investigated by the national parliament. I don’t think that will happen here, because everything here is done as I said based on backdoor deals and compromises.“

Rallies and Protests Around the World to Call Out Government Overreach and Police Abuse

MEP Cristine Anderson in addressing the question on conflict of interest displayed by Ursula von der Leyen called attention to the rise of worldwide movements for freedom from Government tyranny–both in Europe and elsewhere, and commended especially the Canadian truckers’ protests:

“What we have seen since November is absolutely incredible – people are voicing their opinion on government overreach, they are taking to the street protesting these illegal COVID mandates and they are challenging their governments in ever increasing numbers.

In Germany, thousands and thousands of people take strolls every Monday night in hundreds of cities all across the country to express to the German government that they will not tolerate being stripped of their civil rights. In Australia, Italy, France, Austria, New Zealand and Belgium, in pretty much every western country of the world, people are rising to defend freedom, democracy, and the rule of law and they’re doing so despite democratic governments’ desperate attempt to shut these protests down by forbidding them, intimidating protesters with brute police force and water cannons, criminalizing government’s critics even going so far as to arresting them.

And out of all of these movements it is the Canadian truckers that stand out and shine brightest because it was the Canadian truckers, their boldness their courage their determination to stand up to their governments and it was they who inspired so many others all over the world to finally come together and be determined to put a stop to governments tearing down the very foundation of our democracies.”

Cristian Terhes seconded that, reminding viewers of the values of basic human rights revered by Europeans and stating unequivocally that Justin Trudeau in Canada had behaved like a tyrant and despot, exactly like Ceaucescu in Romania and the leaders of barbarism at the Inquisition:

“The strength of the Western world is not the army, it’s not the economy — we see countries right now, emerging countries that have stronger economies than any economy in the EU–what made us strong over the history and I’m talking about the Western world were the values, the respect for basic fundamental rights, the understanding that the government is there to serve you as citizen, as a person, not for you to serve the government.

And what the Prime Minister of Canada, the way he’s behaving right now, he’s exactly like a tyrant like a dictator, he’s like Ceausescu in Romania, if even you doubt, if you raise doubts about the vaccines, you’re out-casted, what’s the difference between what he does and what happened under the Inquisition?”

PEDOPHILE IN POWER, NEEDING REMOVAL FROM OFFICE: JUSTIN TRUDEAU SIGNED A $2.25 MILLION NDA TO SILENCE A VERY YOUNG SCHOOLCHILD ON SEXUAL RELATIONS HE HAD WITH HER WHILE A SCHOOLTEACHER AT WEST GRAY: WHY IS THIS NOT FRONT-PAGE NEWS? People in Canada call for his removal from office. (Buffalo chronicle article linked below)

Martin Armstrong: “Trudeau backs down after Major Banks scream about Massive Withdrawals”| https://www.extremelyamerican.com/post/martin-armstrong-trudeau-backs-down-after-major-banks-scream-about-massive-withdrawals

Trudeau revokes EA after banks began to crash in Canada while pontificating about Careful Consideration; the EA he had unleashed sought to remove basic human rights and freedoms:

Mr. Terhes also made a very relevant point about Science, and firmly denounced the Governmental suppression of criticism of the vaccines.

“On one side they say, well we should not believe in God but on the other side they say believe in Science — we don’t have to. Science is not about belief. Science is about measurements, conclusions, hypothesis and arguments. We got to a point right now where even if you say something, if you raise any doubt, you are already considered you know as whatever – they label you in very different ways, this is not okay.“

–Cristian Terhes, MEP, Romania

Mr. Terhes, whose powerful speeches at this conference and others have reverberated across the Internet lately, concluded by admonishing Governments that they weren’t elected to become slavemasters:

“I hope this movement for freedom and for rights is spreading all around the world because at the end of the day we have to make sure that all these elected officials they understand that they were elected in those offices to work for the people, not to behave like masters of slaves.”

And that might be the most apt concluding note for this report since it appears from all that has been unearthed by the Ursula von der Leyen private-text-message-with-Pfizer and private-contracts-redacted-for-everyone-else fiasco, that Vanguard, the grasping Royals, and puffed-up Bloodlines–known to practice Satanism, Luciferianism, black magic, occultism, witchcraft, and, as per much public disclosure including from the banker Ronald Barnard, child sacrifice, pedosadism, and ritual child abuse–have unleashed a bloodbath of diabolical proportions on Europe and the world with their deadly, digitizing and poison-laden COVID vaccines, killing athletes, young men, young women, mothers, babies, fathers, grandfathers in prime shape indiscriminately in vast eugenicist maneuvers while profiting mightily off the carnage. They’re not slavemasters, we’re not slaves, and they need to know this.

Please share widely.