Edward Ellis, Equity Lawyer, Imprisoned Without Cause, Denied Appeals in “Inversion of Justice System”: Whistleblower Pharmacist Neelu Berry Chaudhari and London CPA Lee Cant Alert World to his Work for Humanity

Report | Ramola D | July 7th, 2023

In Process July 20 2023

In a powerful conversation revealing the circumstances of the unlawful arrest of Mr. Edward Ellis, Equity Lawyer, on May 3rd from the Royal Courts of Justice in clear harassment of this singular whistleblower who has spent two decades investigating the endless scenarios of crime and corruption in the British judicial system, uncovering over 200 current cases of injustice and harm meted out to families, elders, pensioners, mothers, fathers, and children in numerous corrupt ways, whistleblower pharmacist Neelu Berry Chaudhari and former London CPA Lee Cant describe the continued situation of harm in which Edward is being held, and call for true justice for him and the people of England.

Denied appeals, denied the ability to reach his friends and supporters on the outside for months, Edward has reported the inadequacy of the kidney dialysis treatment which was eventually offered to him, after much phone-calling, emailing, and continued knocking on the doors of the prison at HM Pentonville–an unsafe prison, overcrowded and found to be in a situation of neglect twice by the Care Quality Commission, Neelu reports–when he was finally given this treatment but at a location some miles distant from Pentonville, driven to Chelmsford and back under police escort each time, with needed dialysis time taken up by the unnecessary transport–when he could have been provided this health care service on the premises of the prison itself.


“…the online booking doesn’t work for Pentonville and I suspect it’s because it has been deemed as unfit for purpose it’s had two Care Quality commission assessments that it failed and it hasn’t made any Improvement since the last one”–Neelu Berry, Newsbreak 161, Ramola D Reports, July 2, 2023


Private Ownership of Prisons: Failure to Provide Healthcare

What has been especially concerning, both Neelu Berry and Lee Cant report, is that both have made hundreds of phonecalls and emails and not been able to secure the requisite ease of access to Edward, who has been made a prisoner, arrested without cause, while being present in a courtroom to support the case of another citizen. Recent phone-calls Neelu Berry made to the prison reveal clearly that the switchboard operators for the prison have engaged in continued prevarication, obfuscation, and refusal to help, or provide information and wheel-spinning suggestions with great earnestness while essentially gatekeeping and delaying access, health, and support for “the prisoner.”

Image credit: Neelu Berry Chaudhari

What has also been revealed, both through diligence in investigation and persistent enquiry, evidenced in this spectacular phone call (referenced in Newsbreak 161) Neelu made on June 29, in conversation with a Victoria at a Switchboard found to be a remotely-operated Switchboard for all prisons in England and Wales, is that neither HM Pentonville nor the rest of His Majesty’s Prisons are run by His Majesty’s Government but a corporation headquartered in France, Sopra Steria (which may or may not be related to the corporation SERCO found to own half of US and UK Gov and Prisons thereof).

Phone call to Pentonville found to be run by Sopra Steria, Neelu Berry Chaudhari, June 29, 2023

As a consequence, there appears to be less interest in either Justice per se or in providing ease of access to those incarcerated or in providing non-discriminatory healthcare to all housed there.

Training in COINTELPRO for Sopra Steria Prison Switchboard Operators (or Community Behavioral-Health Harassment)

There does appear to be a high degree of interest however–as also clear from other follow-up calls such as this and this which Neelu Berry made (and familiar to many of us today)–in training telephone operators to engage in facetious repetition, feigned inability to hear, harassive requests for repeats of questions and names, invasive interrogation regarding relationship, and Catch-22 suggestions for actions to take with other sections of prison administration when all of prison administration clearly is not being responsive to communications or to attempts to make contact from the outside–all evocative of classic COINTELPRO, much in action today in the US too, as so-called government bodies, in actuality run by private, mercenary corporations close ranks and stonewall the questing public in face of rampant injustice, crime, and corruption.

[Neelu has previously exposed this private ownership of prisons also in a podcast at this channel (now at Odysee) honoring the voices of whistleblowers inclusive of journalist Julian Assange.]

We must not forget either the entire phenomenon of “Community Behavioral Healthcare” aka Harassment in name of same, which seems to have swept the entire Western world lately (more coverage on that soon) and which needs to be addressed and terminated publicly the world over.

How Do We Make Governments and Their Frontmen Contractors Respond to the People?

In the building atmosphere however of intimidation and uber-surveillance the whole of the Western world has experienced since 9/11 especially, it is remarkable actually to learn of some kind of response (after several calls) available even over the phone from people fronting Government.

What is pointed to here perhaps is the importance of persistence, as Neelu Berry Chaudhari, a whistleblower exposing pharmaceutical crime and the grievous, pedosadistically abusive murder of her baby niece, as described early in Newsbreak 161 and in earlier conversations at Ramola D Reports, models for us in these communications via telephone with prison administrative staff as she draws insistent attention to crimes against children, families, and the elderly in the UK.

When the Barrister is Kidnapped from the Court, When Judges and Attorney-Generals Commit Crime Against Humanity

Obviously what is at stake here is much more than merely making contact with or ensuring healthcare for a retired barrister unlawfully kidnapped from Court for no crime, but bringing public awareness to the immensity of all crimes committed by the sadly deformed mechanisms of the State, which Neelu frankly refers to as State Terrorism, as she calls people to investigate the international anti-terrorism laws for possible use in addressing corrupt judgments meted out by elitist corrupt judges with paid-off solicitors and law enforcement parties.

These, she details, comprise entrenched actions of harm which have created underworld build-up of corrupt industry in almost every field of human engagement. In this she echoes Edward’s own findings of injustice and his humanitarian objective of shining a light and bringing justice back to Government.

And I want to make this very important point…in England the Criminal Justice System does not exist, and it’s been hijacked by the Civil Justice System so there are no solicitors who will privately prosecute an individual’s case against the government, there are only false prosecutions by the State against individuals who happen to be whistleblowers, and this is the Inversion of the Justice System that is treasonous from top down, and that’s the problem in England, is that it is not compliant with International Law.

–Neelu Berry Chaudhari

The supreme irony of arresting and supposedly convicting and actually imprisoning a barrister–a volunteer assisting cases free of charge, as Neelu notes–the actual Equity Lawyer engaged in bringing to world attention numerous crimes reported by Corruption Claimants he has helped (of impersonation, home break-in, theft of homes, foreclosure on homes, kidnapping of children from their own good homes and families, loss of property, loss of livelihood, harassment of the elderly, bank fraud, mental health fraud, “behavioral-health” harassment in community, corruption in office, abuse of power, homicide, and much more) is underlined by the fact there is no comprehensible reason for his arrest, and the earlier “judgment” meted out to him carries elements of what one might conclude is perjury, as remarked on by other supporters earlier, and by this writer, and by former London CPA and human rights campaigner Lee Cant:

“Edward hasn’t really committed any crime, he hasn’t done anything wrong, there’s nothing! All he, all he is doing is objecting against the artificial fake restraint orders imposed on him by the High Court. The judges and Judge Kerr wrote out the verdict on the 8th of March this year which was full of false statements, the whole verdict is complete nonsense, there’s no evidence against Edward, there’s no supporting documentation that Edward has done anything wrong, it’s purely accusations. What that verdict states clearly is that people like Sood, Sham Sood, were recruited by Edward as a campaign, as a movement, almost like a cult that Edward was manipulating, using, to further his causes which is complete nonsense–
Sham Sood has come out and made public statements that he was never ever recruited by Edward.”

–Lee Cant

Transcript excerpts from Newsbreak 161 on the subject of Edward Ellis’s fraudulent arrest and imprisonment and the background of his work/In Process

[Starting from the top of our conversation and the sad story of Baby Sunaina’s untoward hospital death, Neelu Berry’s pharmaceutical whistleblowing, Lee Cant’s experience of neglect in his neighborhood and the unlawful treatment meted out to whistleblowers and human rights campaigners in the UK]

Neelu Berry Chaudhuri, Baby Sunaina

Neelu Berry: So my nightmare started in 2000 with my baby niece– I was dying of cancer, I was on chemotherapy, I was like a 70-year old woman with my hair had fallen out–and I witnessed my baby niece’s neglect as in denial of oxygen, I didn’t know at the time she was being overdosed, all I knew was the oxygen was being denied, she went purple, her blood oxygen was 37.5 normally it’s 98 percent, and my sister called the doctor out, he refused, they dismantled the oxygen machine, baby died, we then found semen on her bib and in her mouth, my sister told me that she, we found out that that’s what had happened to the baby, she’d been gang raped in the hospital, and we collected 12,000 signatures for a new investigation into the death–the coroner covered it up–Dr Elizabeth Stern. And the police covered it up, and the police–she was isolated under a family court emergency protection order with an arrest warrant, and against me if I was to try to intervene with her care or whatever gang rape–

Ramola D: We should mention you’re a pharmacist, Neelu, and you spoke out about some of the chemicals, some of the the drugs involved, right-

Neelu Berry: I, I didn’t know that at the time but when after she died, I went through the medical file, I did reports, expert reports, and I proved 60 doctors, nurses, and pharmacists were guilty of her manslaughter, of her murder, because Ranitidine was not licensed for use in children under two years of age–she was given an adult dose. The weight for her, the dose for her weight was supposed to be three milligrams three times a day–she was given 150 milligram twice a day–which is why she, her heart packed up, and she went purple, and then she was injected in the neck here with potassium chloride, which is the last lethal injection in death row. In the postmortem photograph you can see the needle in the neck and Dr. Thomas Rager was with her and Chris McMenamin, the nurse was with her– Kathy Allenford was the award manager at Clover Ward at King George Hospital Barking Havering and Rudbridge Trust–and the police, Ilford Police, Metropolitan Police were involved in the criminal cover-up. Then the body disappeared in 2007. Up till 2007 I was working as a Locum in Birmingham in 2007, and I was filling up my petrol and as I looked over I saw the name of the funeral directors that had stolen her body, and luckily for me it said call this number–it’s a Sunday and the guy said wait here I’m coming–so he got the body and we got the body to India within a couple of weeks.

This was when the London borough of Redbridge threatened that they were going to dispose of the body under the Diseases Act so then we went to the High Court in Delhi to ask for a, a new investigation, they referred it to the 18th Law Commission of India which did the Report 206 which said all suspicious deaths of Indians will be investigated in India abroad if they died abroad, so I’ve got now five murders of my five members of my family that have been murdered in England so I, I’ve had many attempts on my life in many many attempts, so has Lee, and because we campaigned to stop the children being abused in England, and that really gets you murdered–if, if you try to stop–and you get Mental Health Fraud, you get kidnapped, and Edward has been campaigning with the baby murder case as the top case in the UK–he was sent by the Royal Commission to look for me because of the quality of the documents submitted by Dr. Akena Adoko who was the president of the Law Society, Uganda Law Society, and my dad who was a judge in Jalandhar in India, they were both the same age, so they couldn’t understand how much treason they witnessed in the courts with the coroner, the police, the, you know, they wouldn’t allow Dr. Adoko to come to the inquest, they wouldn’t let me come as at the inquest and, and you know we appealed that decision of the coroner and it–she just went ahead and it was actually September 11th that the Twin Towers coming down that that stopped the, you know us being in the front page news as nuisance family, that won’t have what we’re told, won’t accept what we’re told. So even professionals are murdered in England especially whistleblower pharmacists, you know are is going to–they want to continue this poverty and slavery system so my sister was also–

Ramola D: This has been happening for a very long time is what you’re saying, this has been the situation as many of us unfortunately are familiar with, and there’s been a sort of laissez-faire attitude toward whistleblowers being retaliated against, activists being retaliated against, activists being murdered, this is wrong, and this is part of what we are attempting to correct by speaking out very strongly on the subject–please continue the story, Neelu, I just wanted to point out that this is wrong. Whistleblowers should not be retaliated against, people standing up against crime and corruption should not be retaliated against.

Neelu Berry: Especially that I was backed by two judges, two honorable judges who are now murdered, both of them are murdered, and I can tell you how they were both murdered in the NHS by the NHS–

Ramola D: And your sister also– —

Neelu Berry: was murdered as well and my mother and the baby. So I’ve come to the conclusion that everyone who comes to England is going to end up with a –you know–because people die in ambulances, they die in hospitals, very few people actually die at home and then there are lots of staged events that–kidnaps, that people disappear, they end up in mental health secure units, we’ve had so many kidnaps in the Royal Courts of Justice, this, Edward’s kidnap is just one of the attempts on his life, I mean he was manhandled out of Court 37, I don’t know if you were there, Lee he was literally lifted off his chair–

Lee Cant: Yeah

Neelu Berry: and carried out and then you were also there that day when the security did not let him come into his own committal, I think it was like February 2019, and I, I went into the courtroom, you and some others, Belinda was there, they, you’d been told to get out of the public Gallery area, and you were outside and I came, and I said you know I when I was by security Edward was with me, Edward was stopped by security and I grabbed my bag and I went in front of Edward, and they said to me, do you know him, and I said no, I don’t know him because I knew they stopped him, and they were going to stop me, so I had to say and then he said Oh Neelu! so anyway I went into the courtroom and I thought Lee and Belinda were outside I said wait what’s up, I went in, I said is this the hearing for Edward Ellis and the judge has got his head down judge what was his name Lee I can’t remember Turner, was it Turner

Lee Cant: it was Turner yeah

Neelu Berry: — and then I said it again I said is this the hearing for Edward Ellis who still had us down there right and then I said third time is this the hearing for Edward Ellis and he just went to Mr Eardley sideways– I think we’d better let him in–I think we’d better let him in

Ramola D: So they were trying to hold him back at his own hearing–

Neelu Berry: And they were going to arrest him for not turning up!

Lee Cant

Ramola D: Ya. Boy–I know there’s just huge stories here, I mean there’s just so much to unravel I know with each of your cases. We’ve talked a little bit about your case Neelu before so before we move on to talk further about Edward–Lee did you wish to introduce yourself a little bit and give us a little bit about your background as well…?

Lee Cant: Well that’s a very big question to answer–

Neelu Berry: Shall I summarize Lee?

Lee Cant: I think we should spend our time focusing on Edward because it’s so big–

Neelu Berry: Let me summarize–Lee is an Accountant who’s been fighting corruption in Hackney Council, against the Hackney Council, they’ve been charging him Service Charges without providing any Services; he’s been, you know suffering from mold–they’re meant to renovate the mold, and they’re meant to keep him safe, he’s fallen down many times in potholes and been run over by Vehicles on Pavements and he–

Lee Cant: Noise–loud banging even at 3 am in the morning

Neelu Berry: Neighbors, noisy neighbors manufacturing plans with neighbors and he has been kidnapped, you’ve been kidnapped many times–people banging out your doors

Lee Cant: By PC Martin–This is a document prepared by Edward, and you can see PC Martin who–It was an early morning raid by three policemen who threatened to smash my door down early in the morning–

Neelu Berry: I think basically your case is part of the Mass Remedy Process and the Coronation Oath Enforcement Authority case against the Councils but because we’ve had the bank case against the Lloyd’s banking group by (former Thames Valley Police and Crimes Commissioner) Anthony Stansfield, and the FCA fine of 80 million dropped to 45 million, that we can dissolve all councils–for fraudulent trading, by money laundering–your case proves that all the councils are money laundering the council tax, and the surface charges, and so they, we can seize–cease their trading and seize their assets, and and get the compensation that you deserve for all the pain and suffering and all the noise and stress and trauma.

I mean these people think that we’re just going to drop dead, all of us, if they just carry on with their Tortures of us, State Terrorism against us—

UK Parliament Notified of Massive Insolvency Fraud Indicative of Malfeasance by Judges, Barristers, Banks, Courts, Law Firms Using Fraudulent Court Documents, Fabricated Debt, Repeated Violations of Statutory Law and Human Rights | October 6, 2021

News Panel 23: Whistleblowing on Financial Crimes: Lloyd’s of London & High Level Fraud | September 18, 2021

News Panel 19: Audit the Bank of England, Injunct Govts, Halt the Genocidal mRNA Vaccines, Initiate Walk Away Pgms in Police, Set Up Military Tribunals/New Juries in Common Law: End the Criminal Attacks on Humanity by Crown Parasites | April 4, 2021

Edward’s Arrest, Background

Neelu Berry: So Edward basically got kidnapped this time because of the case of Sham Sood, and the Sham Sood case is that his banker son worked at Lloyd’s Banking Group and that’s–the Father was made homeless in November or December, and the Father, the court decided against the Son actually but they still came and took the house, so the three properties owned by the dad have been stolen by the banker son, the systems analyst for Lloyd’s, and so that, that again, after the jail sentences of the Lloyd’s Banking Group in 2017, makes it a contempt of the Criminal Appeals court because the criminal appeals court had that case in 2020, 28th of February 2020, and so the Lloyd’s banking group is continuing, they stole my late sister’s house on the 19th of October 2022, six weeks before Sham’s and on the 17th of March 2023.

So they’re in contempt of …you know the Crime International Cooperation Act which is a terrorism law, the bank is in contempt, and because Lloyd’s banking group is a central bank, that means that the government, because the government owns the central bank, that the government is also fit for dissolution, dissolving, that’s where the point at where we’re at, aren’t we Lee. We’ve proved the councils are trading illegally, fraudulently, causing terrorism to the people that they’re meant to serve, the banks are doing it, 200 billion every year laundered abroad, and the prisons are full of political prisoners like Edward Ellis, we have, in England a terrorist State–yeah go ahead Lee.

Falsified Case Against Edward Ellis

Lee Cant: Edward hasn’t really committed any crime, he hasn’t done anything wrong, he–there’s nothing! All he, all he is doing is objecting against the artificial fake restraint orders imposed on him by the High Court. The judges and Judge Kerr wrote out the verdict on the 8th of March this year which was full of false statements, the whole verdict is complete nonsense, there’s no evidence against Edward, there’s no supporting documentation that Edward has done anything wrong, it’s purely accusations. What that verdict states clearly is that people like Sood, Sham Sood (were) recruited by Edward as a campaign, as a movement, almost like a cult that Edward was manipulating, using, to further his causes which is complete nonsense–Sham Sood has come out and made public statements that he was never ever recruited by Edward.

Ramola D: Yes and, I think–. Yes, and I looked at some of that, you know the Judgement, all of these false claims and false accusations which are essentially seeking to completely invalidate the entire Mass Corruption Remedy Process that Edward’s been engaged in, right, by simply denying that there are so many corruption victims, that these cases are all false, and kind of casting, miscasting is probably the correct word, miscasting the entire endeavor to bring these cases forward before the public eye, and before the monarchy, the Equity Monarchy Trust of course that, you know, is behind what this whole Equity law thing is about, Equity governance is all about, and they’re trying to invalidate the whole process and deny that these cases actually exist, these people actually exist, and that they’ve actually suffered wrongdoing, they’ve suffered injustice, that the whole thing is actually authentic, and that’s kind of incredible that they would write that and publish it and–Much needs to be made of that, that’s the kind of thing that needs to be reported publicly you know in print journalism in particular, in the UK.

Neelu Berry: Can I take your point a bit further, Lee, it’s not just that, you know, they’ve falsified a case against Edward, it’s that the Civil Courts have hijacked the criminal courts, because you can’t go to jail from the Royal Courts of Justice if you plead Not Guilty, you’re entitled to a jury trial–and there are no jury trials in the Civil Courts, if you’re being accused of contempt of court because you’ve breached a restraining order, but there’s a big but in that–

Edward was a registered Solicitor with the Law Society, the Law Society told Edward he could stay on the roll if he promised not to do anti-corruption cases. Edward said he was not willing to stop doing anti-corruption cases, and that’s why he was removed. Which proves that all solicitors that are on the roll are criminals, or that they would be willing to commit crimes to stay on the Register–this is how horrific the Regulatory bodies have become now. And the same parallels with the Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain now called a general Pharmaceutical Council, they struck me off rather than the 60 assassins that routinely murdered babies! So they only have assassin pharmacists on their rolls who are willing to kill babies on order or remain silent if they’ve witnessed the crimes of gang rape of a baby in the hospital, and the same with the financial regulator, the Financial Conduct Authority, they have got their money, the 45 million pound fine from the bank–Lloyd’s banking group–but the victim families, 900 of them with 5 to 15 victims in each case as Trevor Mealham says, they are still without their compensation from 2017. Whereas the bank has paid the FCA the fine–how can the FCA collect its fine without ensuring that the victims have got the compensation? And how could the bank have stolen my late sister’s house and made Sham Sood homeless last year, end of last year when the banks were sent to jail for exactly that–fraudulent trading by money laundering and human trafficking–

[See also earlier coverage on these matters here and at Ramola D Reports video channels.)

Related Crime and Corruption: The COVID Debacle

Lee Cant: That’s right, that parallels–just quickly–with the Martin Sexton case where he got a Crime Reference Number against the Cabinet, you know, for COVID deaths and murders, and there’s a whole long history behind that case, and he had two, he had lawyers, two lawyers, a barrister working with him to help put the bundles together and now the Solicitors Society and the SRA, the Regulation Authority are now doing the same to those who are helping Martin Sexton, they’re about to strike them off and punish them for helping bring charges against the government and government corruption–so–

Ramola D: Instead of investigating the actual story right, instead of investigating the actual scenario — I followed that a little bit and I’d certainly published, republished I guess Martin’s video that was on Telegram quite a bit, it was going around

Neelu Berry: it’s Mark, it’s Mark–I think it’s Mark–

Ramola D: Right Mark Sexton, yes (retired Police Constable, Birmingham) Mark Sexton, a couple years ago. So, it’s shocking to me as well to find that physicians who’ve actually spoken out, people from the inside who’ve spoken out about the vaccines, they are the ones who are continuing to be held under scrutiny when in fact it’s the vaccines themselves that should be properly looked at again.

Public Awakening to Nefarious World Agenda: UK Defenders of Children Expose Pharma-Protecting Police, Act to Close Vaccination Center in Bristol to Prevent Further Child Deaths & Injury | October 11, 2022

Former Police Officer Mark Sexton Reports London Metropolitan Police in “Special Measures” After Police Inaction Post Apprising Them of Grave Pandemic Crimes by Members of Parliament and Media | July 4, 2022

[External Links: Update on Criminal Case ​From Mark Sexton, January 18, 2022 | Patricia Harrity, The Exposé

Mark Sexton’s Criminal Case Gets “Fact Checked” by Those With A Conflict of Interest, January 22, 2022 | Patricia Harrity, The Exposé]

And I see all of that as coming back in the news now, this is the kind of thing that I was covering along with many others–with doctors, with natural health physicians, with other journalists a year ago, two years ago, and it’s astonishing that it’s taken so much time yet, and people in the government both in the UK and the US still haven’t quite gotten the actual truth of what’s happened over here, you know, because the whole thing needs to have been pulled down a long time ago, and hopefully it is, I think it’s slowly coming into the (“News”) now, and, what Mark Sexton did was absolutely incredible, amazing, he stood up on his own, and you know he got lawyers around him, he got physicians to help, the kind of work that he did is kind of like the work that you guys have been doing, and along with Edward, on all of these corruption cases which are literally crime and perjury and Injustice cases right, and showing the perjury being committed by solicitors, by regulatory authorities, by judges and, and people in fact who are making pots of money doing it, right, thousands of dollars, sorry pounds you’re in England–British pounds and Euros in Europe as well so —

Newsbreak 109: Dr. Ariyana Love Shatters the Myths Around the COVID Psy Op | March 13, 2021

Newsbreak 133: Team of Scientists Confirm Presence of Toxins Graphene, Aluminium, Cadmium Selenide, Stainless Steel, LNP-GO Capsids, Parasites, Other Toxins Variously in 4 COVID Vaccines: Pfizer, Moderna, AstraZeneca, Johnson & Johnson | August 28, 2021

Newswatch Live 2 with Dr. John Reizer: No Virus for COVID Has Been Isolated, Mass Hypnosis via Media/Govt Psy Op Fixated on False PCR Test is Underway–Intent? To Push Dangerous RNA/DNA-Altering Vaccines, Boosters on All | June 21, 2021

BREAKING: Mass Corruption Remedy Process in UK at Breakthrough Moment, Citizen Input Needed | Mr. Edward Ellis Informs the Privy Council President, Mr. Jacob Rees Mogg (Newsbreak 47) | December 10, 2019

–let’s talk about Edward, Edward was wrongfully once again falsely arrested from civil court right, tell us a little bit about the court system because here in the U.S we have a slightly different court system I think, so what is the difference between the high courts, the civil court, the Royal court, where was he arrested and why was he taken to Pentonville prison…What is the significance of this particular prison? Neelu, you’ve done some research over there, you’ve found out something about the history of the prison — is this, is this like a Maximum Security Prison, why has Edward been left there for a whole year, why has he been sentenced for a whole year, what kind of impact does this have on his health, his age, and the fact that indeed he has needed kidney dialysis and you and several others stood up and spoke for him and tried to get him that, is he getting the treatment, how is he doing, what’s going on, are you in touch with him, etc.

Neelu Berry: So the judges refused to believe Edward was a patient for kidney dialysis when they sent him– got him kidnapped–and we made the arrangements that night by making phone calls, so his dialysis was due the next day and he got it, but over the next few weeks, he said he was missing out on 25 percent dialysis time because of the two police officer requirement there–he was waiting around in the van for four hours before they both got together in the van, then it’s a four-hour on the dialysis machine and then it’s a four hour return so 12-hour round trip just for four hours of dialysis, and then I looked up the research that they had got dialysis facilities in a prison in North Nottingham, and that it went well and I asked them if they would do that for him, and this, they, you know I did the PHIL calls, and recently I’ve done it, done it the second time around because he’s not had any visitors, and we’re frustrated by the procedures.

[Earlier coverage: Egregious Sectioning and Kidnap Attempts on Equity Lawyer Edward Ellis As the Completing Mass Corruption Remedy Process Exposes Pervasive Crime & Corruption in UK Courts, Police Departments, and Hospitals | June 28, 2019]

The online booking doesn’t work for Pentonville, and I suspect it’s because it has been deemed as unfit for purpose, it’s had two Care Quality commission assessments that it failed, and it hasn’t made any Improvement since the last one. There were plans to change it to developments, residential housing and I think that it’s been bought out for more money to carry on kidnapping political prisoners through the back door and killing them–I think that’s what’s happened here to be honest.

Because the phone call I made to Sopra Steria, I mean, to, well to Pentonville Prison turned out to be Sopra Steria, a company based in France– on Dun and Bradstreet they have 500 branches all over England and Europe and in India, so it’s a data collection center which means it’s able to hijack the Public Services of England, is pretending to be the Home Office, it’s pretending to be the prison service, but it’s just a call center and the woman was so rude to me when I said to her, you know, she asked me if I was calling from an embassy and if, what relationship I was to Edward, and I said you are asking me to breach my privacy data, you tell me your surname, and I will talk to you–she said, I’m not willing to give you the name and that’s the end of the call, and then subsequently I had two positive calls from the Safer Custody and the PHILL, so I think that was how I got the brick wall removed of the Sopra Steria with Edward, and hopefully that they’re going to provide him with proper Dialysis in the prison without having to waste 12 hours of his time.

Ramola D: When did you make these calls, Neelu, because, were you able to actually make a change over there, because initially you’ve sent us three calls I think and the first one was pretty spectacular that’s the one you’re talking about right, you spoke to her and she was– but you persisted she was really not interested in continuing the conversation, you persisted, and she didn’t give you her last name but she kind of said she’d look into it–is that what happened…?

Neelu Berry: I think that– I didn’t want her to do anything because once I found out she was Sopra Steria, all I know is that she’s hijacked the Home Office, she’s not a public service, she’s impersonating Pentonville Prison, she’s impersonating all the prisons in England, she’s impersonating the Home Office public service and therefore the government is unfit for purpose because they’ve allowed these hijackers to provide these call centers to hijack the, you know, if I’m speaking to her and they’ve hijacked Edward’s privacy data, now I’ve just called her on my mobile number, and they have now put me on a ransom for the Privacy data of my life, my voice.

Ramola D: So let’s break this down a little bit–so basically you’re saying that now that you’ve discovered–and I think a lot of people have been discovering–that the prison services in our countries are not being run by the government per se but are sort of being farmed out to third-party contractors they’re being owned by private corporations and in this case in the UK you’re saying that the prison system that the, that particular prison Pentonville Prison plus the other–the general prison system is owned by a French company, it’s situated in France, is this something huge –I mean it sounds kind of major so basically what you’re saying is, prison Services should be run by the court system, should be run by the government, but it’s not it’s being run by a French company so therefore there are huge issues of breach of privacy data over here, and also Healthcare right, Healthcare is not being provided then by the government by the His Majesty’s prison system in your case but it’s being hijacked– and Healthcare is not really being provided to the prisoners because of this private ownership scenario, perhaps Lee can address that as well because you are a former CPA aren’t you Lee with a background in how private corporations are set up and how they work and stuff.

Lee Cant: Yeah, Sopra Steria is a publicly listed company on the stock exchange and their Shares are currently trading at about 182 euros and can, can you see clearly …So I’ll read, I’ll read to you instead what it says, so the CEO of this is Cyril Milage there’s 48, 700 employees the HQ is in Paris, and it was founded in 1968. And it’s an I.T company information technology company and this is all this information is found even on Wikipedia and also there’s a page which says seven convictions for the future of banking which is quite odd that’s very odd page… oh yeah there it is L7 convictions for the future of banking, and that’s about sopra steria which is a very strange, that’s a very strange thing to say, and can you see can you see on the right hand side here it talks about the share price, and the number of employees 48, 700–

Ramola D:…okay well I’m looking at it and it says 50 000 employees, 5.1 billion euros of Revenue in 2022 top five European Digital Services companies, I mean it doesn’t say anything about prison services does it, I mean shouldn’t it say what it does…aha Industries Aerospace Defense and Security Energy and Utilities Financial Services Insurance and Social Government Retail Telecommunication Media and Entertainment Transport—boy, it’s running governments–

Lee Cant: …so I would suggest we move on to the next point about Edward, the fact that Neelu has done an incredible job of spending hundreds of hours telephoning and emailing the prisoner, the care system, the CQC system which Edward falls under, and the governor. And likewise, I’ve done the same I’ve sent emails to the governor but he never replies, he just gets his secretary to send a brief note saying we are doing our best care for Edward, but anyone can say that, they could be lying and not telling the truth, anyone can make that statement, there’s no evidence.

And Edward has written a letter to another supporter and in that letter, Edward says that there have been problems arriving late at Broomfield Hospital to receive dialysis, exactly what Neelu says, so he’s only getting two and a half hours instead of four hours of dialysis because they’re arriving late.

Then, then the governor is not allowing Edward to use the library in the prison, he’s not being allowed access to print off appeal forms for the High Court and the Supreme Court so he hasn’t been able to appeal against his sentence–he’s not, he’s not receiving any adequate care because of his dialysis condition and we also lodged appeals on his behalf but the Supreme Court and the high court rejected those appeals that were lodged on the grounds that they must be lodged by Edward. And in our documents we said we are doing it on behalf of Edward, that Edward wanted us to appeal on his behalf and they completely rejected it– So how, how can Edward appeal if the governor of the prison is not letting him fill in any appeal forms?

Neelu Berry: You know whatever we try to do their intention is to kill Edward because the lengths they’ve gone to deny him–he’s only got four percent kidney working since 2019. Three times a week dialysis, four hours each session for a 70 year old man does not give him much life unless he has a kidney transplant; he asked for the kidney transplant list but he was removed (from it) by a corrupt doctor who was bought out so everybody, all the judges and doctors are bribed to do these crimes against the whistleblowers– it’s a standard operating procedure in England’s Public Services, they’re all hijacked by the banks.

Because the banks will finance any amount of money to kill whistleblowers like myself and Edward and Lee and that’s the extent that they’ve gone to–they’ve stolen my house, they’ve stolen my late sister’s house whilst it’s still going through probate, and Edward is the executor on the will. Edward was dragged out from the Romford County court and Edward was denied his executorship and the fact that he was ‘You cannot touch my late sister’s house whilst it’s going through a probate’ and things like that– the procedure is that, when Edward appealed inside that hearing, 3rd of May, this year, to Lord Justice Coulson and Lord Justice Lewison that, I am appealing your, you know, sentencing of me, and he had an eight-week window given to him on the 3rd of March, and they could not have sent him to prison until he had his appeal, and that was not an appeal, because his appeal was to the Supreme Court, if he didn’t win at that hearing, then he still had a right of appeal to the Supreme Court, which he said ‘I’m appealing you cannot send…’–and the private security basically kidnapped him from the front to the back of the courtroom and the same security guards–a 50 year old four foot ten inch with short dark hair and six foot 40 year old Ross with dark hair, they were there on the 8th of March, they were there, they were just waiting, waiting to grab him, like you know …the police, the G4S prison van was parked in the East block car park the whole day each day, each time Edward had a hearing, so these are all pre-determination signs is that they want to kill Edward, they will go to any length to kill him, they will have staged this hearing in a civil court–

Neelu Berry:…Royal Courts of justice is a Civil Court, it’s not a Magistrate’s Court, it’s not a Crown Court, so you cannot be sentenced to prison unless you’re in a Crown Court. Now this case against Edward has been brought by the Attorney General; the Attorney General’s role is as an advisor to the government, the Attorney General cannot bring a case against a whistleblower, you know a volunteer who is assisting cases free of charge, you have to remember it’s free of charge, Edward is not profiting from this, Edward is doing this honorably, because remember the Law Society says only criminals can be on their roll– Edward says I’m not a criminal so leave, you know, let me do my, my humanitarian work, get the corruption away from good people, and they want this slavery-poverty system, they want to remove the whistleblowers, so it’s not a democracy, it’s a dictatorship, it’s a terrorist state, and so you can’t say that you’re running a Justice System when it’s not running properly; it’s running in Reverse: you’ve got criminals in top jobs in all public services who are immune to prosecution, they do not go to jail if– the more crimes they commit, the higher up they go on the ladder–and with Edward and myself we provide free, you know, whatever we can do 24-7 telephone service, you know, we help each other when we’re in trouble, and we’re like a family, and it’s like you know, further down the road, if Lee’s in trouble I will come and help him he knows that right Lee?

More about the Mass Corruption Remedy Process

Lee Cant: All of the 200 corruption claimants who have been processed by the High Court in a very prejudicial manner–all of those people contacted Edward. Never, never has Edward gone out to recruit people, that’s never happened, it’s always been an introduction, like Neelu for instance, you know spoke to me about her cases, and I mentioned Edward Ellis to her and then Neelu contacted directly Edward, so it’s all being done–but Eardsley and the judges they’ve fabricated false witness against Edward by stating that Edward has gone out to recruit people, and that is wholly and totally untrue, he has never ever recruited anybody. In fact he’s rejected people. A lot of people have come to Edward asking for help and he’s refused to offer them help because he’s been too busy or their case hasn’t been of sufficient high quality or standard or had enough evidence, you know, to prove what they’re saying is true and correct.

So what we would do is we would go to Edward, relate all the facts and give our bundles to Edward he would read through it and then from what we’ve given to Edward, he would then write something, usually about one page about our case and then we would sign it and then lodge it with our bundles into the court. And you’ve got judges like Judge Luba who sees Edward’s name on a document like this that I attached to my bundle, and it’s got the People versus Top Judges, and the Judge said, Oh, you’re not allowed to use certain words because that’s a breach of a restraint order on Edward Ellis–you’re not allowed to use the word “citizen” because it breaches the restraint order, and you’re not allowed to use the word “top judges” even though they are the top judges within the high court system and there’s a whole long list of these banned words.

And that’s all that Edward has ever done, that’s the crime, that’s the totality of the accusation, that’s why he’s gone to prison because he’s simply written these documents and lodged them into the court–and they put him in prison for 12 months for that, it’s absolutely insane! I’ve never ever, no one would believe– they’d call me a liar– you couldn’t believe or Justify simply by writing–And he never charged any money for writing these documents he’s never gained any benefit from it, it’s been total aggravation, it’s been annoying for him because a lot of the corruption claimants– they’re all so broken down, they’re all destroyed as human beings, they’ve been put under so much distress and psychological pressure that they can hardly–some of them can’t even speak properly, you’ve got a victim like Kansei who’s not even English, he can hardly speak English, and Eardsley and the judges accused Edward of recruiting him, and he was introduced to Edward by another, another person and you know he was never, Edward never even, you know, it’s impossible–Kansei came out and denied it completely. He was never recruited as part of a campaign and there’s a long list of about six or seven; I think even my name was put on that list where I’m supposed to be recruited by Edward and I even first met Edward in about 2014 and he was walking up and down the pavement outside the high court and a person came up to me and said, well, talk to Edward he’s got some very good advice or ideas about how to present your case so I went up to Edward and I spoke about my cases and he said oh I’m not really interested in your case it’s not it’s you know–send me an email anyway I’ll have a brief look at it–and then he walked away from me and I he didn’t even, he forgot to give me his email address so I had to chase after him, you know, to get his email address, he wasn’t even-

Neelu Berry: Lee, I think it was 2016 because I met him in 2016, So I tried to introduce you to him–but he was actually sent to look for the baby murder case in 2004–12 years it took him to find me but I think it’s because the quality of the paperwork submitted by my family for the baby murder case was an International Quality, because the two judges obviously from abroad, and I want to make this very important point is that in England the criminal justice system does not exist and it’s been hijacked by the Civil Justice System so there are no solicitors who will privately prosecute an individual’s case against the government, there are only false prosecutions by the State against individuals who happen to be whistleblowers and this is the inversion of the justice system that is treasonous from top down and that’s the problem in England is that it is not compliant with international law. The Crime International Cooperation Act 2003 was used by America to invade countries to steal lands and assets of millionaires and honorable people whistleblowers, who knew what America was doing to their finances abroad and it’s all connected with the banks, the fraudulent trading by the Banks. So now all we’re saying is we will use that same law against our governments who are now terrorizing their whistleblowers, the same law applies, and that will dissolve the government it will dissolve the banks and it will stop the terrorism under international law, overnight, it but we just need to learn the language of– a criminal language, you know–of the crimes of treason, it’s State terrorism, it is fraudulent trading, money laundering, human trafficking, slavery and poverty system based on debts which is illegal–since the 17th of August 2015 totally illegal, since even 1963–or it all has to be reversed, all compensation will be paid, there is unlimited amount of money to pay compensation there’s one quintillion dollars for all of that settlement.

Lee Cant: There would be more than one million victims who have been suffering quietly as a result of the judicial system here in England, they’ve all been….they’ve delivered perverted verdicts, all their cases have been manipulated, there’s been false witness statements inserted into their bundles you know, all sorts of crimes have been committed against millions of people who have been processed by the High Court magistrates, Crown Court, even the Old Bailey.

(See also earlier coverage in previous podcasts with Neelu Berry, Anthony Badaloo, Andrew Devine and on the Saturday News Panels.)

UK Mothers Across Socio-Economic Lines Reveal the Crimes, Corruption, and Fraud Rampant in UK Family Courts and Bankruptcy Courts Which Unlawfully Asset-Strip and Defraud Women & Kidnap, Foster, Traffick, and Disappear Their Children and Babies | November 4, 2020

UK Parliament Notified of Massive Insolvency Fraud Indicative of Malfeasance by Judges, Barristers, Banks, Courts, Law Firms Using Fraudulent Court Documents, Fabricated Debt, Repeated Violations of Statutory Law and Human Rights | October 6, 2020

News Panel 19: Audit the Bank of England, Injunct Govts, Halt the Genocidal mRNA Vaccines, Initiate Walk Away Pgms in Police, Set Up Military Tribunals/New Juries in Common Law: End the Criminal Attacks on Humanity by Crown Parasites | April 4, 2021

News Panel 23: Whistleblowing on Financial Crimes: Lloyd’s of London & High Level Fraud | September 18, 2021

News Panel 17: Women’s Power in Humanity Rising : You Have to Stand Up to Stop the Tyranny and Crime | Use the Power of the Spoken and Written Word | February 14, 2021

Ways Forward for Julian Assange, Protection for Whistleblowers

And look at the Julian Assange case look how shocking, disgraceful, you know, there is that case proves that we’re in a state of Interregnum here in England and that there isn’t a proper law system operating, it’s completely defunct, void. And that’s well documented, you know, all the crimes that the judges have done are well documented and proven in the Assange case–lots of people have publicly come out and written articles and spoken clearly to explain the Injustice of that case, and it’s reached such a high level it went beyond the judicial system right up to government, to government level so it’s no longer, it can no longer– it was so mangled, mashed up and destroyed, shredded to bits that all that were remained of it is a government, three governments involved in negotiation as to the next stage.

Neelu Berry: What they did in that case Lee was if you remember when we went outside the Old Bailey, they had said that they were sitting–the Westminster Magistrate’s Court was sitting at the Old Bailey–Can you imagine a Westminster Magistrate’s Court hijacking the Old Bailey? Now after the Magistrate’s Court you go to the Crown Court and after the Crown Court you go to the Old Bailey.

Lee Cant: Correct.

Neelu Berry: Julian Assange was kidnapped from an embassy. You cannot, you cannot kidnap somebody who is taking asylum in an embassy unless you are a terrorist state–that is an act of terrorism. You see, if you didn’t stop Julian Assange being a subject of terrorism, the rest of us are easy peasy. They’re using us to prove that they can do this and the international platform will tolerate it, and this is how they are exhibiting their power over the world, is they need to continue to demonstrate their power over the best of the best that are in England.

Lee Cant: They’re just boasting. They’re boasting. It’s a power ego, ego-crazed insane ego boast that “we can do anything we want, no law no country can restrain what we want, we will do whatever we want to do, we can break any law, anywhere…anytime–”

(**Audio Hacking all through section below)

Lee Cant: It’s true what you are saying Neelu–and we, we went to the Australian Embassy here in London… but we issued liens that bankrupted the Australian government because we proved fraud and we proved crime cover-up by the Australian government.

Neelu Berry: We are talking about a terrorist state that is power boasting to the world in England what it can do to its whistleblowers. We have got hundreds of whistleblowers that– (there) have been–attempts on their life; it is all attempted murder. If you take a whistleblower, call it a democracy you are a terrorist, you know….

(Returning from Audio Hacking**)

Ramola D:.. I wanted to congratulate you both for laying out the situation so very clearly about the criminal justice system in particular having failed and the fact that the government apparently is coming after people, but people have no recourse, and when the government does things that are wrong, there is no recourse in the court system–because you have all tried the court system.

And Julian Assange’s case certainly and Edward Ellis’s case appear to be along the same lines, they’re both whistleblowers, of crime and corruption in the world and they’ve both been thrown into prisons, and we find that these prison systems both in the UK and the US are owned by somebody else, not the government–you know initially we thought it was Serco and now we find it’s Sopra Steria maybe it’s the same company– but they seem to be an I.T consulting company, and yet they are doing all sorts of things right–so it seems there are a lot of vast Global multinational corporations that are making pots of money but that are completely permitting crime and breakdowns in the judicial system to just go unnoticed–because they are propping up a prison industry really, and they don’t care about the life and death or the suffering of the real people. Which is what governments should do, and, you know, we all hope Will do, so that brings me to one of the questions I wanted to ask you both: When the judicial system fails in the UK what is the next recourse, is it possible to appeal to the government directly, can you speak to people in your cabinet in Parliament, can you, how do you reach them–?

Lee Cant: We’ve done that already, we’ve gone to our MPs. The highest court of appeal is the Supreme Court and they normally reject every appeal, they reject just about everything because they can only decide on questions of law–that is their remit, and they won’t even consider new evidence, they won’t even allow an appeal on any reasonable grounds or any–they seem to be in Cloud Cuckoo Land and they just make up their own rules again, they can make any decision anytime anywhere. The Supreme Court are a law unto themselves and they don’t–you know, have they cut out their law degree off a back of a Kellogg’s CornFlakes packet, is it just made of, you know cardboard, without any substance–?

Neelu Berry: If I can just answer the question Lee, I think that that law that Ramola’s just put up on the screen, the Crime International Cooperation Act is the way that we can dissolve the UK government, dissolve the bank, we can seize their assets, and this is Mutual, you know any country can come to our rescue, so Lee you’ve got a history in Australia I have five members myself, my family from India–I’m asking all the countries of the world to apply this law to save our whistleblowers who are in prisons and just to protect us, we’re entitled to Protection and Safety and Security as whistleblowers in a democracy–nobody can harm us, nobody should be able to harm us.

Lee Cant: And they do attack us, they do–

Neelu Berry: …They’re not a democracy then, don’t call yourself a democracy if you’re a terrorist state–

Lee Cant: The corruption claimants, they’ve all got unheard appeals waiting to be–for the court to set a date to be heard, I mean. I’ve got several unheard Appeals in Buckingham case, and Sullivan case, and Hackney case, and they’ve never been heard–these appeals have never been heard. And Neelu paid 180 pounds for an appeal against the arrest warrant and possession orders, and they’ve never been heard in the High Court nor have they been heard in the, in the Romford court, so we’re all sitting here not getting any justice–

Ramola D: That’s absolutely shocking–

Neelu Berry: Lee, we’re not expecting Justice because we’ve come to the conclusion of State Terrorism now– because the last words actually Edward said whilst he was being kidnapped in the courtroom, Court Nine on the 3rd of May, was to the judges, saying, I’ve not had my appeal, I had eight weeks to appeal, you cannot do this, and this is Terrorism, this will be International Terrorism laws that will apply, and that’s the law, that we’ve gone through today– that applies to all cases against local governments, central government, public services, denial of honorable services to us which is treason, and it ceases their trading and seizes their assets and that’s–everyone can say that now.

Ramola D: That’s interesting it’s come to that point–international terrorism laws, international human rights laws – you know International ways of dealing with this because the local courts and governments have failed so thoroughly, very sad situation…

Let’s just, you know, look to our audience to step forward and become whistleblowers themselves, everybody’s got to become a whistleblower in this time rather than sitting back and not speaking–we’ve all got to be speaking at this point in time in order to bring corruption and crime forward and end Injustice in our worlds…today in all of the many different ways each of us can do so we are definitely going to be continuing this coverage as we proceed and I hope to provide some print journalism as well as we proceed so we can put the information out before the public eye and generally inform the world because it appears the Guardian and the Independent and Telegraph and so on are simply not doing their jobs I don’t know why–they have you know I think they do get paychecks–

Neelu Berry: The banks are bribing them into silence. I think they buy the stories–the banks will buy out their stories and when my sister and I went to Indian media we had a three-hour documentary about the baby–they promised us it will go out to the world but in the end they only went out in India and then we had some further interviews which they did not put out so basically the British Embassy in New Delhi was buying out our stories–

Ramola D: They’re literally buying out the stories–

Neelu Berry: That’s what they do. They literally bought out the story.

Lee Cant: Do you have a copy of the recordings Neelu?

Neelu Berry: They wouldn’t give them to us, they just put them out and then we can’t get them, so they’ve been bought out after that, after the show–

–Excerpt from Transcript: Neelu Berry Chaudhari & Lee Cant, Newsbreak 161, Ramola D Reports, July 2, 2023

Neelu Berry’s petition to help liberate Edward Ellis from prison is here. Neelu Berry’s letter to the King and Prime Minister Rishi Sunak (a nephew of hers) as mentioned on Newsbreak 161, discussing the crimes she has spoken about and addressing her concerns is here.

Great change, one always hopes, is just around the corner for all, yet nothing usually moves or changes unless whistleblowers speak and keep speaking, people support them, and governments begin to see themselves as people again. Edward Ellis obviously shouldn’t be in prison at all, the judicial system in both the UK and US needs to be changed, and international crime agreements and anti-terrorism laws–previously used by the NSA, FBI, DHS, CIA, MI5 et al to escape scrutiny themselves and indict the innocent instead should indeed be used to effect positive change for all.

Newsbreak 161 needs wider viewing and coverage, please share widely.

Related

Newsbreak 161 | July 2, 2023 | Edward Ellis, Equity Lawyer, Wrongfully Held in Prison Shines a Light on 100s of Cases in the UK | Please Sign the Petition For His Immediate Release.

Neuro-AI Convergence, NBIC, And a “New Global Order” Embodying Asymmetry in Ethics

Note & Op-Ed | Ramola D | 28 June 2023

Updated July 5 2023 | Updating July 6 2023

From the startling opener noting that neuroscientists simply don’t know “how mind occurs in the brain” to much of this surprising conversation focused on Nano-Bio-Info-Cogno convergence (covered earlier here), this June 15, 2023 radio podcast discussion at the US Army “Mad Scientist” Convergence Podcast featuring Dr. James Giordano and Dr. James Canton, offers up quite some food for concern for all:

449. One Brain Chip, Please! Neuro-AI with two of the Maddest Scientists

https://madsciblog.tradoc.army.mil/449-one-brain-chip-please-neuro-ai-with-two-of-the-maddest-scientists/

Dr. James Giordano is the Chief of Neuroethics and a Professor of Neurology and Biochemistry at Georgetown University, primarily a “neuroscientist by trade, by profession,” as he avers on this podcast, curiously now also introducing himself as an adjunct professor of Psychiatry at the Uniformed Services University of Health Sciences in Bethesda, which suggests that this military neuroscientist is scrambling to corral the dubious fields of Psychiatry, “Behavioral Health,” and Mental Health into Weaponized Neuroscience, or perhaps just gain the credentials to preside over both–to unravel why, we must listen to this podcast.

Dr. James Canton is the author of several books aiming at techno-futures, a former Apple exec, with affiliations ranging from the National Science Foundation to the National Science and Technology Council, Stanford, Wharton, the U.S. Army and Naval War Colleges, the Joint Special Operations University, the Singularity University at NASA, who, curiously, appears to have functioned as a management consultant and advisor not merely to the US Government–White House, Departments of State, Defense–but also Health and Human Services–on various subjects including especially on nanotechnology. His stated focus is on “Emerging Technologies” though (a subject for greater exploration soon given coverage at this site earlier), and “threats and opportunities” thereof, on which he says he’s advised four White Houses, while also working in the space of AI in the private sector, holding positions as CEO of 5 private companies; a special focus today, he notes is the NBIC from NSF covered allusively later in this podcast (excerpts from the 2002 NSF Convergence report below).

While both of these military/managing men–one presented (on the “Mad Sci blog”) as a “hard science” expert, the other as a “soft science” visionary–present a complex view of an intended future within the framework of national security and defense, the actual content of their references in terms of takeover of the human mind, brain, body, agency must be questioned: Is it really possible that demolishing human–in this case American–individuality, independence, autonomy, uniqueness, creativity, intelligence can contribute to keeping our country safe from our “adversaries” or “competitors”? (One would think “National Security” inheres in platforming and promoting American brilliance, not seeking to disappear it.)

Neuro-AI Convergence

Neuro-AI seeks the convergence of Neuroscience with Artificial Intelligence, which is discussed here as necessary for advancement in the sciences and military. Ways of bringing these sciences together, we’re told include nano-bio-info-cogno, which seems to be pretty much everything Mil-Intel Mad Science has dreamed up including nanotechnology, synthetic biology, powerful database systems, cognitive processing underlying the creation of AI, and a seeking to bring the worlds of Cogno: Artificial Intelligence, Neuroscience, the BRAIN Initiative, Robotics, Bio: The study of Life, Biology, Medicine, Genetics, putatively also “Behavioral Health” and Psychiatry, Info: Supercomputing, Big Data, Telecom, Nano: Nanobiosensors, Nanobioelectronics, Nanomedicine et al together under one management umbrella, all of it wanting sadly to head Humanity and Life in the direction of full-on brain implantation and Borg’ing into a cerebral Internet, body, brain, and behavior to be continually manipulated. (Covered often earlier at this site including with former US Navy Mark Trump on this podcast.)

Report #147: Mark Trump & Barbara Hartwell, Podcast 1: Alerting All to the Techno-Abyss

This kind of merging of man with machine is insistently posited as the future of both warfare and society, with much predicated on its intended successes in numerous fields of endeavor.

Dr. Giordano talks about implications for Public Health and Safety, BioMedicine, Performance Optimization and “making people better,” mentioning National Security, military and Intelligence goals in securing “multi-domain” security (Air, Space, Cyber, et al) while also alluding to Global Biosecurity and a Global Bio Economy. The US he concedes has a modest lead in the field over its adversaries and competitors, but more needs to be done, Dr. Canton also notes, to connect and link the fields of AI and Neuroscience. “We’ve invented this technology, we haven’t converged and linked it.”

“Performance Optimization” enters the conversation, with Dr. Giordano hastening to surface (in presumptive Orwellian wise) how “making people better” via the Brain Sciences could contribute to the good–the problem there of course is the eternal one of fox guarding the henhouse which he surely knows by now is The primary problem with his dual-stance neuromilitaryscience/neuroethics discourse: Where are the voices of the writers, the journalists, the scholars, the ethical biologists and physicists, the true healers, the working professionals and citizenry alluded to here as the “people”, the mothers, the fathers, the children in this debate?

Weaponized Neurotechnology to Affect Behavior

Addressing the notion of Convergence, Dr. Giordano states his particular focus is “the intersection of the Brain Sciences and those technologies that are going to be vital for not only Public Health and Bio Medicine but also for key aspects of lifestyle, which would then include things like Performance Optimization, but of course what you can do in terms of rendering Good, making people better, there’s a flip side to that coin, you can also make people Worse, and of course, what’s good for me may not be good for you–which then brings us to the whole stage of how the Brain Sciences are being leveraged multi-nationally for a variety of nationalistic Goods–economically, biomedically, technologically, socially, of course militarily, and on the Intelligence front.” (We mustn’t miss the fact he’s actually given it all away quite successfully here, acknowledging that the Neuroweaponry /Nanoweaponry /Microweaponry (brain sciences and other tech) Collective is quite possibly likely to Destroy brains while it’s busy aiming apparently to modify behavior for the “Good,” much as MK ULTRA in “Behavioral Health” functions.) (Or, in other words, Neuroweaponry IS MK ULTRA, and MK ULTRA IS Neuroweaponry: Top Secret (until it’s not).)

Brain sciences he goes on to say must include the social sciences, humanities, or “soft sciences” while Dr. Canton calls for the NeuroAI, NeuroSci and NeuroCog communities to talk to each other, all of which requires further research for further reportage, but the rising implication here of using neuroscience and other technologies–putatively nanotechnology, imaging, scanning, facial recognition AI, remote sensing technologies, gene-editing technologies, EMF technologies utilizing wifi, telecom, telemetry to affect lifestyle, daily life, and effect a paternalistic hold on people’s “performance” at work or play–being referred to here and being along the same spectrum as the DEW Bio-Behavioral Research contracts inflicting physical damage on people reported often here earlier, is unmistakable. Are military energy technologies slated for dual-use now being intended or used (in hard-to-believe tech-transfer of historic CIA MK ULTRA neuro control tech) for “behavioral health” purposes?

And it turns out, indeed they are, as many modern technologies, “emerging” or “innovative”, being introduced into doctors’ offices and psychiatry treatments suggest: Military Brain Technologies Revealed: Therapy or Weaponry? (Please also see the documents and notice of military contracts in Public Disclosure of Anti-Personnel DEWS and Neuroweapons… and US and NATO Weapons-Testing for more.)

Brain Control rather quickly becomes Mind Control here, with much nebulous allusion to the psycho and the social sciences, conjuring up visions of such awkward, human-erasive inventions as sentient simulation, metaverses and virtual reality, immersive AI and brain cloning, voice cloning and RHIC-EDOM (radio hypnosis and dissolving memory), synthetic telepathy and so on, a combination of disclosed, being-experimented-with, and reported-by-non-consensual-Neuro-experimentation-victims tech:

“Understanding the Brain Sciences as they exist today–and I’ve had the opportunity to be a neuroscientist for about 40 years now– is that the capabilities of the brain sciences and the technologies it both uses and evolves are highly dependent on the interaction with other sciences, not just the physical sciences, natural and life sciences which I think are axiomatic to the brain sciences–the Brain is a biological organ—but understanding the functions of the brain are psycho-social, and therefore the social sciences, in identifying what those investigative targets are going to be for the brain sciences—

In other words, what are we looking at? What cognitions, emotions, and behaviors are going to be vital to understand the structural, functional mechanisms, correlations but then also, how are we going to affect those things, how are we actually going to intervene in the Brain in these ways or in some way that is capable of modifying, modulating (which is a fancy way of saying Manipulating) those things that we colloquially refer to as Mind – but soon as you get there then you’re also dealing with not just the social sciences inclusive of Law but the Humanities – What is ethically correct to do and not correct to do, and of course with what philosophy, based upon what type of epistemology, what do we know and how do we know itShouldn’t we go forward with these things even though we don’t know what the manifest effects are going to be?

That said, the Brain Sciences are axiomatic to what we now consider to be Advanced Integrative Scientific Convergence – in other words you can’t do effective brain science without Convergence and desiloing other sciences both natural and physical sciences as well as social sciences and more broadly the humanities—what are sometimes called soft sciences. So brain sciences Are convergent, it’s that Convergent that enables and force-multiplies the brain sciences to be used in the Social Science Public and obviously National Security Military and Intelligence milieu.”

–Dr. James Giordano, Episode 79/449, Mad Science Convergence Podcast: One Brain Chip, Please! Neuro-AI with two of the Maddest Scientists

Remote-Access Neuro Takeover of “the Human System, the Biological Organism”

With Dr. Canton delineating five key domains within the Neuro-AI Convergence (militarily) envisioned comprising Chips and Hardware, Software, Cloud Platforms and Satellites, Systems like Tele-Robotics, Decision Support Systems, Decision Analysis, and Wearables meaning BCI-AI (brain computer interfaces and supercomputer AI), Dr. Giordano ruminates on challenges ahead regarding “how these five…are going to be yoked to the human system, the biological organism” and suggests looking to “other species as proxies, biomimetic systems, hierarchical systems”.

Neuro Cognitive science, he says, cannot be done “without actuating Big Data and Machine Learning” (the latter referring silently to artificial neural networks) — which is ominous in itself, given the military’s disclosures on Neuro Cognitive Weapons in recent times: Is it possible that human brains and human intelligence, in this dystopian view, are being prepped for downgrading, degrading, occluding and harm through techno Artificial Intelligence overlays?

The domain of wearables he notes includes implantables, injectables, nano levels of chemicals, with migration to key areas (an echo of intelligent targeting bioweapons there), real-time remote sensing (via nanobiosensors presumably) “real time reading from the living brain and writing into the living brain,” all of which he now confirms is part of a “global bio economy” with “peer competitors” and its own train of implications for National Security, Military, and Intelligence.

Listen again (past Cyberhacking) and we hear the whole of it, he Does go into that whole messy concept of nano NSA Neurosurveillance, reading brains in real time, and writing into them too, meaning with gaps and spaces and wiping out of memory so Neuro Cog, as Biodefense names it, or Neurology Live, takes on its real Black Ops Cloak of nanobiosensor nets :

…so yah, Wearables, are Certainly a Domain, but Wearables in what way? Things that are donnable and doffable? Or things that are Intrinsics—in the scale of properties that Dr. Canton mentioned, working down at that low Nano Level Scale whether we’re talking about nano level concentrations of chemicals and/or nanoscale engineering devices–are highly implantable, inhalable, swallowable, injectables, migrated into key areas where My work intersects, in the Brain, and then form literally Vast Arrays of Sensors and Transmitters that allow Real Time Remote Sensing and Engagement of the Brain—in other words, Real Time Reading from the Living Brain and Writing Into the Living Brain.

–Dr. James Giordano, Episode 79/449, Mad Science Convergence Podcast: One Brain Chip, Please! Neuro-AI with two of the Maddest Scientists
Converging Technologies for Improving Human Performance NANOTECHNOLOGY, BIOTECHNOLOGY, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND COGNITIVE SCIENCE | NSF/DOC-sponsored report | June 2002

This is information from the military-intelligence world which every person on the planet needs to be aware of and needs to track, question and speak out about. But there is more, and that relates to the “Human Performance Optimization” mentioned earlier. Dr. Canton, asserting that AI and Neuro AI systems are going to supersede human intelligence in decision-making and data analysis soon enough (a point of contention with many I would imagine given that we don’t have NeuroAI playing chess with either yet), suggests a seeming need to enforce in the average human being this belief-in-the-unproven-yet-intended (forcing humans to roll over and cave to NeuroAI takeover?) via human augmentation with brain technology: “You either enhance the human to understand that–Rapid Decisionmaking, Rapid Deployment, Rapid Analysis–and we can Do that, there are lots of ways that are non-invasive–Neuralink and other companies are playing with ways to Do that–but that same technology could be hacked and used against us–so there are much broader much bigger social ethical issues here, I am confident we can navigate this properly…”

The implication being also that top “adversary” countries like Russia and China are engaged in the same “race” to the fore, requiring constant vigilance and padding of budgets, an old story from the military on every score, while Ethics of course remains an exclusive stronghold of the West, much waffling about ancient cultures, traditional cultures and so on gilding the conversation on China–with some surface attention paid to the obvious history we are familiar with of Communism in those parts. “That’s not to advocate an authoritarian US,” assures Dr. Giordano, as he meanders through thickets of a “whole of Government approach” needing to “conjoin whole of nation approaches” then fixes his sights on “bipartisan Unity” being essential to ensure the US remains competitive with a “definite strategic plan” and unchanging posture given that our adversaries had gotten ahead by way of a “triple helix” of conjoined sectors–Government, research, commercial.

Neuroethics Contemplates “Revising Certain Ethical Principles (for) a New Global Order”: (“A More Dialectical Approach to Ethical Realities”)

Ethics remains, if only in cosmetic cover, a topic for discussion, with “asymmetry in ethics” of course skewed only in favor of the US, still seen in this rose-colored light as Leader in Virtue (of whatever dubious means): “We provide a Global Security,” explains Dr. Canton, as he looks to a “War for the Future” while longing for a “Future that is not a War but is a negotiation, is a collaboration, is an understanding…” yet grumbles about our need for an “Innovation Detente to not go hot” given that China is racing ahead supposedly cramming into 20 years our 200 of sci-tech: “Our thesis is NeuroAI convergence is important…We need to move up our game. We invented ChatGpt, We invented Mapping the Human Genome… You don’t stop innovating, you raise the bar…” (This is either before or after he mentioned Sam Altman and Einstein in the same breath–on the other hand, is he talking about the Military inventing these things or the frontmen for same…?)

Either way, there’s that tiny question of Disclosure which now seems to be pouring out of the Mad Science Podcast as also from a ton of documents and videos from various branches of Military and US Gov–which suggests really, given the sweep of Global ventures mentioned, historically speaking, the Worldwide Internet itself may have heralded our plunge into what Dr. Giordano calls a “New Global Order” for which Ethics itself must be twisted out of itself to fit. Pondering this spiky notion of traditional Ethics to “keep our honor clean” Dr. Giordano offers the alternative (more pleasing no doubt to those apologists for AI, being perhaps less endowed in the human department themselves) to simply fudge it, phrasing this offer in genteel puzzlement: “Do we stoop to conquer and do we compromise what may be longstanding Western ethics or do we engage a more dialectical approach to ethical realities where we Revise certain Ethical Principles or perhaps Renew some others aNew so as to create a New Global Order that may be far more Co-operatively Competitive and does so in a way that honors if you will Certain Moral Precepts not only those of our own but that of others, and does so in a more Metered Way–but that Speaks to the Future?”

“Where we are right now is that the United States and its international allies maintains a very modest lead in Key Areas across the NBIC framework – nano bio informational cogno and Cogno here conjoining Neuro obviously – and doing so reciprocally both in terms of Cognitive-Based-Systems that are AI-based-systems, using neuromorphic design and then utilizing AI Machine Learning Systems to facilitate what we know about Organic Brains and the Organisms in Which They Live

But what I foresee is over the next 5 to 10 years that will be a fairly short-lived advantage—for 3 reasons, Number 1, because the actual technological capabilities are being infused by the triple helices of at least our major, at least Trans-Pacific peer competitor, And, the Overwhelming and Ubiquitous if you will Juggernaut of their economy, not only nationally but internationally, Number 2 is that, the Nature of What Can Be Done, in China, is in some ways Flexible. Dealing with this on an international level, trying to get some level of organizational and industrial co-operation, in other words if we’re looking for economic co-operative models that also recognize competition, our Chinese Peer Competitors are very savvy in recognizing that a key aspect of Much of Western philosophy is acknowledgment of Competing Viewpoints—and an Openness, or at least Readiness to engage that as axiomatic to the philosophy itself—and their viewpoint here is there are wonderful aspects of Western philosophy that are wholly intrinsic with their value systems but ..

We must now appreciate that we are dealing with a very old culture, equivalently as old as the cultures of the West, and that culture for a number of years, hundreds of years, has been essentially isolated, the last 100 years have been viewed as the Century of Humiliation, and only moving into the current period, notably over a Sentinel year, since 1949, has that culture been Allowed to gain some Global Stature and Status, in many ways playing Catch’up! But it’s no longer a question of playing Catch-up. Now those values, and those values and desires of that culture are becoming paramount based upon the economic capability of that culture on a number of different global scales and markets.

Therefore the Posture is, it’s sort of an aspect of a Golden Rule if you will, yeah, Those with all the Gold Rule, and our Trans-Pacific peer competitor is coming to the table and very realistically saying, Got a lot of gold! There’s a lot of things we can do.

And we’re not closing our doors, we’re Opening our doors, we’re inviting, and soliciting, and attracting Individuals to be Collaborative, but the thorny part of that collaboration is that there are also Intellectual Property laws, that are not only in China, but that have now been leveraged Globally, that while being attractive to international co-operation around much of the IP to Chinese national property, which then creates tremendous leverageable capability and hegemony on the global stage at least legally and economically. So what we’re seeing is, that although we’re very keen to talk about if you will maintaining our fight for Right and Freedom, and those Freedoms how they can then be Realized through Technological and Scientific Readiness, we also have to maintain at least some attitude toward what it means to keep our honor clean. Do we stoop to conquer and do we compromise what may be longstanding Western ethics or do we engage a more dialectical approach to ethical realities where we Revise certain Ethical Principles or perhaps Renew some others aNew so as to create a New Global Order that may be far more Co-operatively Competitive and does so in a way that honors if you will Certain Moral Precepts not only of our own but that of others, and does so in a more Metered Way–but that Speaks to the Future?

–Dr. James Giordano, Episode 79/449, Mad Science Convergence Podcast: One Brain Chip, Please! Neuro-AI with two of the Maddest Scientists

The Brave New World of “Non-Sovereign Rogues (and Non-Rogues)”: Multi-Domain Engagement with Innovative Warfare (Bio-Hacking Tech) to Roll out Neuro-Communism & Communism-With-Consent (Teamwork Neuro AI)

The New Word of “Co-optition” introduced earlier by Dr. Giordano notwithstanding, Dr. Canton provides in a whispery, blustery way the right way to go about wearing the thin skin of Ethics AI (one presumes) to foil China–still flailing about building (unnamed) new technologies likely to flay the US supposedly–while professing Collaboration with the rest of the DEW/Neurotech/Cyber/AI-building contingent of crowns worldwide in order to run full-on Engagement (replete with lasers masers RNM drones NeuroAI et al) on the People of the world–the next World War presumably which is already here, as some of us know–with particular (dosimetric) attention to brains, bones, veins, nerves, eyes, hearts, organs, genes, cell nucleii and so on, along with the obvious NBIC covers noted above to bring about that dream confection they’re all baking away with Double Speak, the Brave New World for Rogues (and Non-Rogues):

I take a bit of a more, let’s say, Pragmatic View on all this but I agree with everything Dr. G has said, we’re involved in a War for the Future, China too, because of the Background, and the History, and the Context, that’s the Background of Obviousness…..If wiser heads would prevail, you’ll end up with a leadership in China that recognizes hey! Wait a minute! There’s a Fundamental Economic Basis, for if you attempt to kill off your biggest customer, maybe that might have an impact on our economy—so let’s just step back for a moment. The Global Economy is a collaborative, interlinked co-dependent System. (It wasn’t at any other time up till very recently.) 80, 90% of their entire Income is derived from Us walking into Targets and buying stuff. This is the bottomline, right, the bottomline.

Now why is this important? The Demographic Debacle of the One-Child Policy is going to leave within a decade China at a deficit, of not being able to Replace their Replacement, which is critical to any kind of hegemonic desires that you have to go ahead and operate your own country from an economic point of view, but that they’re trying to do in 20 years what we did in maybe 200 years. So the economic underpinnings of all this—that really is a Core foundational reality.

Now the Chinese are betting, and to a certain extent the US and EU—and these are the 3 Major Forces on the Planet if you will—they’re trying to figure out a new kind of—and they should have an Innovation Detente to Not Go Hot—so at the end of the day, I like where Dr. G is going in terms of a “Cooler Heads Will Prevail with a Collaborative Basis”—but at the End of the Day before that happens, this War for the Future is going to get tried out – and I think it’s going to be surprising—so we should, you know, Hope for the Best but Prepare For Engagement—Space, Oceans, Multi Domains, Cyber, and that’s where again, coming back to our Thesis—Our Thesis is that ‘Neuro-AI Convergence is Critically Important’–are we moving fast enough in this? No we’re not! Are we behind on this? Yes we are.

A big part of us doing this podcast is to say, Look, we are Insiders in the Game, but we need to move up our game. We need to not sit back and say, Ok We invented ChatGpT, we invented, you know, Mapping the Human Genome, this is great…we are, our biggest weakness is our biggest strength. You don’t stop innovating, you raise the bar. We need to get back and think through the next Opportunities for Neuro AI so that we can provide a Peaceful Secure Global Security which has been the role of the United States and will continue to be that role–while we continue engagement with China and many other adversaries, you know, in the what I call The Dark Network of Non Sovereign Rogues, and Non-Rogues–we need to use these technologies to provide a more secure – It’s going to be a tough ride! over the next decade, having new frontiers.

Now what’s the Drag on those? Well we have some Moral Issues. I mean they’re not discussing in their 5 year plan—you want to know what China’s going to do, they’re publishing it every 5 years right? The Chinese—and many of our Peer Adversaries are not just publishing it but they don’t have the same Value System as we have. And having been part of the many briefs and developments on you know, ‘You always have to have a human in the KillZone’, you know, ‘at the end of the day for Kinetic AI’, you know, we’re going to have to develop a let’s say, a kind of New Appreciative Way of ‘What are the conditions of Engagement so we can deter and make it let’s say a Future that is Not a War but is a Negotiation, is a Collaboration, is an Understanding’-can only be, only be successful if you have the right stuff, to be able to stand things down.

So that’s just my, my Sense about this, this is an imperative to Step on the Gas. Should we do something about it? Yes we should. So I’m hoping a listener here will reach out to us and say Yeah, I’m in a position to do something about it, and I want to talk to you guys.

–Dr. James Canton, Episode 79/449, Mad Science Convergence Podcast: One Brain Chip, Please! Neuro-AI with two of the Maddest Scientists

Russia’s “Fully Autonomous Robots” Versus Humans in the Decision Making: Reversing Ethics with Machine-Intelligent Humans?

“Complete autonomy” we learn is not going to be turned over, in Robots (or Artificial Intelligence?) despite human engagement being acknowledged as requisite.  “Ethical Posture” becomes a goal, which seems to require Tailoring a few disparate pieces together: Light Wars and Brain Hacking, brain cloning and “human enhancement” technology, Neuralink and Neuro AI to replace human thinking, machine intelligence to replace human brains–“Human Robots” examined briefly here earlier.

So here’s the Scenario—you know as Futurists we like to write Scenarios and I’ve done a number of them for Mad Sci about Defense and Intel – Secenario No 1 is that we’ve already adopted, for certainly the Defense Department and Defense Posture if you will that a human has to be in the Kill Chain, right—You’re not going to turn over Complete Autonomy. Well, we already know, from an adversarial point of view, Russia, has already deployed Robots – let’s say Defensive Robots that are fully autonomous. Now I don’t think their Science is as good as ours, but you know, they’re Russian! Science, theyr’e pretty damn good! So we’re going to have a Scenario where we adopt an Ethical Posture that says, Human Beings have to be in the decisionmaking before an autonomous system–regardless of how powerful–has access to either a weapons system or IS a weapons system –that goes away when we lose the East Coast, Ok?–that Goes Away—

Now that’s One Scenario. Now the Other Scenario says, we have a Bifurcated or Trifurcated Set of Conditions, that what happens is, we have Human Engagement based on these conditionsand then Autonomy is part of the mix, in the event there needs to be—and I’m not talking about MAD (Mutually Assured Destruction)–I am saying that these are various levels of Tools that are gonna impact the Battalion Level, the Soldier Level, the Battalion Level…and Citizenry, because you have to now look at Ghost Wars and the Whole New World of Space and Cyber and everything in between—That’s where we should be playing and modeling Scenarios Now—Because you can tailor the Action Engagement and Rules of Engagement Now—Because we have So many Light Wars that are going on Now–now if you look at those, and the implications for Brain Hacking or—we’ve talked a lot about the Text Stack we’ve talked a little bit about the Scenarios, but Autonomy and Ethics—we have to have a Failsafe, to be able to deploy what we need, what we need–

Here’s the reality that nobody really wants to hear, is that AI Systems today, and Tomorrow’s Neuro AI Systems—and I do mean very shortly—will be able to make decisions and analyze data faster than humans—Done! – You either enhance the human to understand that—Rapid Decisionmaking Rapid Deployment, Rapid Analysis—we can Do that!—and there are lots of ways that are non-invasive–Neuralink and other companies are playing with ways to Do that–but that same technology can be hacked and used against us–so there are much broader bigger social ethical Impact Issues here, but I am confident we can navigate these properly…but if we don’t invent if we don’t keep moving forward, with safeguards, but also proper safeguards, that are adjustable and adaptable –in other words we may need an AI to govern AIs—ok Got it!

Now how many policy makers in Government and in our Congress understand that and have created a Taxonomy for that? None! So—I’m advising most of them, Microsoft…all most of them I advise most of these in the private scene – We need the Private and the Public sector to come together—we’ll get there—but this Threat Matrix of Potential is Going to Be More Exasperated and our Ability to be able to have an Ethical, let’s say Label and Constraints, are going to be tested and there’s things like you know our Survival—as a Nation and as a Species–will be on the Line, and I’m not the first to say that!

–Dr. James Canton, Episode 79/449, Mad Science Convergence Podcast: One Brain Chip, Please! Neuro-AI with two of the Maddest Scientists

 

“Find the Convergence”: Neuro Cog, BCIs, Human Brains, and NanoBIC

You know, just bringing together people from varied areas just to Find the Convergence, that seems to me to be something Mad Sci could do—there’s so much, and Jim knows this of Neuro Cog space, of people actually doing applied work and looking into the brain and understanding the processes and all—in other words if you look at Neuralink, what Elon Musk is doing, right, BCI Development right, very interesting—it’s probably the only venture, being as bold, and they got FDA approval to do this, this

(Reuters: Elon Musk’s Neuralink wins FDA approval for human study of brain implants: In other words, the Whitewash Phenom of Military-Intel Rushing to Cover Up Probably Over 50 Years of Using Humans Nonconsensually For Deadly Brain Experiments Rolled In With MK ULTRA & Disappearing All Pre-”FDA-Approved” Human Torture Experiments Sheathed by CIA-NSA-Media As “Targeted Individuals”)

So part of the pathway is and we learned this at NSF…and if you’re doing stuff and you had this follow up to NBIC Convergence which had to do with Enhancing Human Performance –those were the key technologies—if you start to think differently about Convergence—and you have these 3 or 4 poles you can put together, what does it look like, you can create new systems.

So we haven’t done that one—so if you put in a room, simply put Neuroscientists, and you curate them well—they’re Open and all that (huh?)–and Jim blesses them (Occult Blessing Ritual for Neuroscientists by Jim Prior to Release from FishPond and Just After Curation Which Involves Opening Them Up Like Fish?)-and then you’ve got AI Folks who are spending 2-3 million dollars a day (chortle chortle) and have Commitments of Billions of Dollars—and you say, let’s find that Interaction and Collaboration, that would be best for these kinds of Missions—How do we deal with Autonomy? (Whose really? Certainly not the Robots’!) How do we deal with Faster Decisionmaking (Through Neurodamage and Brain Takeover?) What does a Neuro AI system look like? (Like a Brain Star in its own ANN Lane…?) How could we do Better Prediction?

If you could do Bad Guy Hunting faster and then predict better – in other words – if you create a couple Vectors of Scenarios and say, OK, This is what we’re thinking about, might make a difference, and you bring people together, you might also bring together funding sources that Should Be Alerted, that this is a Cabal, a Conspiracy, a GOOD Conspiracy, (eyeroll) (Look into copyrighting/and assigning ownership over your own brains, everyone (to YourSelf)) That’s how you Make Change.”

–Dr. James Canton, Episode 79/449, Mad Science Convergence Podcast: One Brain Chip, Please! Neuro-AI with two of the Maddest Scientists

“How Can We Leverage Government Labs (and) Technologies Which Nobody Knows about”? 

I’ll just throw in one more practical, ‘What to Do,’ and all that. So when I was at SOCOM, and that’s actually ONE of the ways I met Jim—I was Tasked with seeing what Private Sector has going on –you know, what’s happening with Venture Capital and Startups, and Mature Companies and all that—how can we leverage Government Labs, Technologies Which Nobody Knows About

So there is (deep throated chortle) a Fertile Landscape of Opportunities (full bellied laugh) there’s Money, there’s Innovation, what we need to do is have Better Bulk-Ons, and revisit how to Collaborate more –and that’s why Jim and I you know are Mad Scientists (attempted-irascible-giggle) (What Is a Mad Scientist – a kind of Anything Goes, don’t blow our (Obvious) Cover Now…?)

And we represent that kind of—We need better Real World Collaboration—and There’s Not That Much! And it could make a big difference in terms of our Survival—and, our Our Way of Life. [reaching for help and finding it in that tried (and false) trope from past US Presidents (and the obviously propped-up Writers who virtuously cite them)] 

–Dr. James Canton, Episode 79/449, Mad Science Convergence Podcast: One Brain Chip, Please! Neuro-AI with two of the Maddest Scientists

Now both these speakers calling for a future subjugation of the human brain and human intelligence as we know it seem to have a touching faith in (Invasive asserted as Non-Invasive) Science and Technology leading the way to a better tomorrow filled with power for the wealthy and the warmongering–“fertile landscape of opportunities”–“some of these AI companies make 2-3 million dollars a day with a commitment of a billion dollars” “there’s money, there’s innovation” (but we do need “better world collaboration…for our survival and way of life”)–yet the corralling of humans into Human Performance Optimization through nano-bio-info-cogno, the use of AI to downgrade human intelligence, the casual recourse to brain chips and vibrational energy technologies to affect brains can hardly be considered “innovations” and forward-moving sci-tech to marvel at and make one’s own: as nations, as nationals, as citizens, as Americans, as humans with intelligence and soul who value our own and our children’s unique and perfect lives and brains, we need to do way, way more. We each need to stand up and question every part of what is going on in these spaces, we need to know that basic, extant Ethics and Human Rights by our side make it rather simple really to just say No. And Keep saying No.

RELATED

Red Alert! Graphene Oxide Found in Pfizer/AstraZeneca Vaccines–Used in Biosensors and Neural Interfaces–Could Be the Secret Link to Nano-Bio-Info-Cogno (NBIC) Human-Machine Convergence for AI Singularity & Full Spectrum Brain/Bio Control Intended by Anti-Human Transhumanists, Globalists, Governments

“Global Health Security” Versus AI-Run Digital Health: Does the WHO, European Commission’s Partnership Respect Human Rights or Aim for Cerebral Internet Cyborgism?

The Future of Intelligence or The Rise of Human Rights? | Artificial Intelligence, Neural Networks, Deep Learning Vs Preserving The Sanctity of Human Brains And Lives

Military Brain Technologies Revealed: Therapy or Weaponry?

Drop Copyright, Ban Artificial Intelligence: Question Where Neural Networks Come From First

Mr. Edward Ellis, Equity Lawyer Leading Mass Corruption Remedy Process in UK Unlawfully Custodially Sentenced: Dr. Julia Spivack Writes Back

Report | Ramola D | June 22, 2023

In a series of letters addressing the unlawful imprisonment and withholding of needed medical treatment which Mr. Edward Ellis has endured at Pentonville Prison since early May, 2023, Dr. Julia Spivack, a Natural Medicine Physician qualified and experienced in Osteopathy, Homeopathy and Ayurvedic Medicine, has recently been addressing various Government Ministers and High Court Justices in the UK, writing directly to His Majesty the King Charles III, as well as King’s Bench judge Mr. Justice Kerr, Rishi Sunak the British Prime MInister, Suella Braverman the Home Secretary, the Prison Governor Ian Blakeman, and others, in powerful support of those innocent citizens seeking remedy from lifelong harm inflicted by the UK judicial system.

Thankfully, His Majesty’s Court and Tribunal Service has begun to write back, heralding an obvious change on the horizon for one and all–even if such has to involve appeal to a higher court.

Ironic then is the fact that Mr. Edward Ellis, working on behalf of His Majesty King Charles and the Rule of Law, has been denied access to appeal forms and use of the prison library in order to fashion an appeal to the Supreme Court, which, as Dr. Spivack remarks in her email note back to the HMCTS “Customer Investigations Officer,” puts the Court and Justice Kerr “in contempt of his own remit” essentially “invalidat(ing) any jurisdiction he may claim to have in respect of Mr. Ellis or indeed anyone else.”

“What makes this fraudulent imprisonment particularly egregious,” Dr. Spivack relays, “is the fact that Mr. Ellis suffers from Chronic End Stage Renal Failure and is dependent upon renal dialysis as well as additional measures of medical support which are not being adequately provided. Those who know Mr. Ellis and the background to his fraudulent imprisonment are of the opinion that this is a secret Death Penalty. The death penalty is illegal in the United Kingdom.” (More on this can be found in Dr. Spivack’s letter to the Prison Governor Ian Blakeman, Justice Kerr, PM Rishi Sunak dated 9 June, letter 2 posted below.) “All of these restrictions,” Dr. Spivack notes to this writer, “are clear violation of his rights as a prisoner in the UK.”

Dr. Spivack’s email dated June 19, 2023 (Email PDF below) seeks Mr. Edward Ellis’s release, requiring termination of the unlawful custodial sentence conferred by an apparently recalcitrant judicial body unclear as to the core import of the Equity Monarchy Trusts–which Mr. Edward Ellis and Neelu Berry Chaudhari (also a whistleblower on pharmaceutical and hospital corruption and crime, incidentally also an aunt to Rishi Sunak) have previously discussed at Reports and Newsbreaks at this writer’s channels, first discussed here earlier.

The Equity Monarch Trusts, as Edward has often explained on podcasts, offers an ethical court of remedy affiliated with the reigning monarch, essentially a justice restoration mechanism which fell into dormancy for 45 years. Dr. Spivack notes it was revived and serviced by the late Queen Elizabeth II who taught it to her son Charles.

A Custodial Sentence, also known as imprisonment, is acknowledged by the UK’s Sentencing Council to be “the most severe sentence available to the courts,” “reserved for the most serious offences and…imposed when the offence committed is ‘so serious that neither a fine alone nor a community sentence can be justified for the offence'”. This as we all know in Edward Ellis’s case in particular is patently absurd. As Dr. Spivack notes in her email of June 19 to the Litigation Team, Courts and Tribunals, HMCTS, Mr. Ellis has committed no crime.

In fact, as we know from all correspondence he has provided from inside the prison, in addition to his nearly two decades of toil on the Mass Corruption Remedy Process exposing the failures of the UK court system, Mr. Ellis has been working hard on behalf of others also falsely imprisoned while being denied proper life-saving medical treatment needed for his chronic end-stage kidney problem. Imprisonment itself he has shown is the problem.

In brilliant insight calling attention to Justice Kerr’s contempt of his own remit and invalidation of his “contempt” judgment, Dr. Spivack reminds the HMCTS litigation team that dismissal of victims of corruption today is akin to historic elimination practices in both recent times in the UK against osteopaths and against Jews in Nazi Germany, and promises a new day for justice in International Criminal Court.

–Excerpt, Email from Dr. Julia Spivack to Customer Investigation Team, HMCTS), June 19, 2023

Email Correspondence, Litigation Team, HMCTS and Dr.Spivack:

Fraudulent Conviction, Malicious Neglect, Gross Human Rights Abuses

It is not clear in fact why Mr. Ellis has been arrested and detained in Pentonville Prison, which occurred on the 3 May 2023 at the Royal Courts of Justice, Dr. Spivack reports.

Arrests appear to have been frivolous and on false grounds. An earlier “offence” in fact for which Mr. Ellis had been arrested, Dr. Spivack notes in a letter to Home Secretary Suella Braverman on 26 May, 2023 (letter 1 posted below), comprised accidental contact with a court staff-member while at an appeals hearing on 17 March for another osteopath, whereupon Mr. Ellis was arrested for “Assault by Beating” yet another fabricated crime leveled at a whistleblower and true advocate for the people.

That letter details Dr. Julia Spivack’s significant rebuttal to the false judgment against Mr. Ellis, noting the fraudulence of the conviction, malicious neglect of his medical condition, and gross human rights abuses he has been subjected to in prison.

Of particular interest is the fact that the false judgment leveled against Mr. Ellis has sought to dismiss the Mass Corruption Remedy Process under the aegis of the Equity Monarchy Trusts as an “apparently internally consistent belief system in corruption” which has attracted recruits and adherents (phrasing which relates to historical ideas pulled directly from “behavioral health”-fixated paradigms in psychology, DSM psychiatry, used punitively against people in unlawful CIA MK ULTRA programs, and, shockingly, being recycled today into AI-run human resource management) when in fact most of us know, objectively speaking, corruption in the judicial system (or any other aspect of government) is a fact.

Dr. Spivack’s rebuttal to this profound misrepresentation using her own corruption case to support the authenticity of victim-reportage Mr. Ellis has collected is powerful and exemplary, and must be read in full by all: while personal, it rebuts presumption and deploys thoughtfulness in countering false claims by so-called authority figures who often try to discredit victim-reportage through crafted appeal to misdirective contrivance in fiction, not fact.

Letter from Dr. Spivack to Home Secretary Suella Braverman, 26 May 2023


Earlier Coverage

As many know, Mr. Edward Ellis has been working, now for over 19 years, it seems, to bring forward the numerous cases of harm that highly productive and civic-minded citizens, activists, whistleblowers in the UK have reported, many suffering egregious loss of job, career, profession, health or tragic confiscation of their homes, children, property, all experiencing censorship, judicial injustice, or whistleblower retaliation of some kind–including, often, Mental Health Frauds involving false and forced psychiatric evaluations or false imprisonment to discredit their witness. Mr. Ellis has earlier stated that this persecution of whistleblowers especially calls attention to the state of dictatorship in the UK, whose entrenchment can be traced to the falling into disuse of the Equity Monarchy Trusts which he has now revived.

Some earlier coverage here:

Mr. Edward Ellis, Equity Lawyer, Reports the Launch of a Mass Corruption Remedy Process in the United Kingdom and Calls for Principled Independents and Empowered Citizens to Step Forward

Transcript of Newsbreak 47: Mass Corruption Remedy Process in UK at Breakthrough Moment, with Edward Ellis and Neelu Berry

Newsbreak 74: Whistleblower Update with Edward Ellis and Neelu Berry Chaudhari | Corruption Proven

BREAKING: Mass Corruption Remedy Process in UK at Breakthrough Moment, Citizen Input Needed | Mr. Edward Ellis Informs the Privy Council President, Mr. Jacob Rees Mogg

Common law or equity governance, Mr. Ellis has taught us all, offers a route for citizens to recognize the power of their natural rights and human rights, express grievances not merely in courts but through private process of correspondence and communication, persisting in thus publicizing such notice of harm in order to prove abuse of powers and unfitness of those elected or appointed who have engaged in harm and judicial misconduct, and thus paving the way to positive change and redressal of all grievance. Citizen leaders could help in collecting cases and evidence in order to speak thus for all harmed–what Edward Ellis has indeed done, along with others who have assisted in the Mass Corruption Remedy Process, such as Dr. Julia Spivack, Neelu Berry Chaudhari, Anthony Badaloo, Andrew Devine, some of whose work has been covered at my channels.


Dr. Julia Spivack Details Crimes Against Humanity and Seeks Redress for All

Dr. Spivack’s letter of 9 June, 2023 (letter 2 posted below) to the Prison Governor Ian Blakeman, Prime Minister Rishi Sunak, and Justice Kerr of the High Court, King’s Bench, further details her own case and that of others’, advocating for Mr. Ellis’s release and seeking compensation for damages to all.

Notably, Dr. Spivack mentions her own work in collecting cases of misfeasance in statutory healthcare regulators and subsequent whistleblower retaliation corruption she endured, which included the kind of false mental health labeling fraud which has been visited on numerous activists, journalists, whistleblowers, and victims to discredit their reportage, a subject previously covered and of evolving interest at this site. This letter is the one responded to by Her Majesty’s Court and Tribunal Service Litigation Team (Email Correspondence in PDF above).

Letter from Dr. Spivack to Prison Governor, Justice Kerr, PM Rishi Sunak, June 9, 2023

Letters to the King

Of particular note are Dr. Spivack’s earlier letters to the King which draw attention to Mr. Ellis’s work for the Equity Monarchy Trusts, managed, she notes, through the Royal Commission, reminding the King of his coronation oaths to the people according to the statutes of God and Natural Justice. Her letter of 5 May written just before the day of the Coronation of King Charles on 6 May is below.

This story will be updated as information comes in. Letters and notes from Mr. Edward Ellis can be found on the Equity Governance site and will be posted here as time permits.

It must be remembered that the work Mr. Ellis and Dr. Spivack and numerous writers, citizen journalists, private investigators working to support the Mass Corruption Remedy Process in the UK are doing is extraordinarily noble, and seeks to redress historic wrongs across all classes of people, in all professions, all walks of life. Sometimes it takes the candor and persistence of writers and public speakers to remind those in power where their true value lies, and one can only hope these direct communications succeed in moving this entire Corruption Remedy Process in the UK forward sooner, rather than later.

Many thanks to Dr. Julia Spivack for her correspondence and provision of emails and letters for wider circulation.


RELATED

The Edward Ellis Files

Equity Governance UK/Introduction to Common Law and Equity Governance (External site)

Constitution of the UK, More on Equity Law, Other UK Historic Acts/Peacekeepers (External site)

Mr. Edward Ellis, Equity Lawyer, Reports the Launch of a Mass Corruption Remedy Process in the United Kingdom and Calls for Principled Independents and Empowered Citizens to Step Forward

Transcript of Newsbreak 47: Mass Corruption Remedy Process in UK at Breakthrough Moment, with Edward Ellis and Neelu Berry

Newsbreak 74: Whistleblower Update with Edward Ellis and Neelu Berry Chaudhari | Corruption Proven

BREAKING: Mass Corruption Remedy Process in UK at Breakthrough Moment, Citizen Input Needed | Mr. Edward Ellis Informs the Privy Council President, Mr. Jacob Rees Mogg

Redbridge Council Cites “Personal Care” Exemption in Refusing to Explain Aggressive & Fraudulent Sectioning Attempts on Mr. Edward Ellis, Equity Lawyer

Egregious Sectioning and Kidnap Attempts on Equity Lawyer Edward Ellis As the Completing Mass Corruption Remedy Process Exposes Pervasive Crime & Corruption in UK Courts, Police Departments, and Hospitals

Ramola D Reports/NewsBreak 30: Wave of Mental Health Frauds in UK, New Zealand | Queen’s Hospital Fraudulently Reports Edward Ellis as Absconded Dialysis Patient


See, also: Writing Back to Dr. Julia Spivack Post Addled Slander | June 29, 2023


Drop Copyright, Ban Artificial Intelligence: Question Where Neural Networks Come From First

Note and Op-ed | Ramola D | June 12, 2023

A few hearings lately on Artificial Intelligence and Intellectual Property held by House Judiciary subcommittees have started to point to some of the essential problems with US Copyright and Copyright law, IP law, case law, precedents in law, definitions of the terms “copyright” “patents” “intellectual property” et al, while seemingly all rushing to approve AI as a new technology for the future supposedly to establish technological supremacy and maintain a “global technological leadership” edge over countries like China.

Copyright, Neural Networks, Brains

Artificial Intelligence and Intellectual Property: Part I — Interoperability of AI and Copyright Law | House Judiciary Subcommittee on Courts, Intellectual Property, and the Internet hearing on Wednesday, May 17, 2023 at 10:00 a.m. ET

None are actually pausing to examine comprehensively the shadowy subject of “inputs to train AI models” which Senator Hank Johnson draws attention to in his opening speech at this hearing (AI and IP: Part 1 – Interoperability of AI and Copyright Law, House Judiciary Subcommittee on Courts, Intellectual Property, and the Internet, May 17, 2023) yet relates purely to “copyrighted works” (itself obviously a subject for much debate and discussion if you take the route of Hollywood’s lawyers or just a subject to reject outright, as any writer, artist, or musician can do anytime, in this new age of Copyright thieving via AI: simply withdraw copyright, retain copyright, return copyright to yourself, and refuse to hand it over in licenses or permissions to be misused and exploited by tech mavens who will never fully acknowledge, credit, or compensate you). What are these inputs? Are they purely copyrighted works? Or do they include neural networks–biological neural networks–at whatever stage of construction of AI models? And what are AI models exactly–simulation models seeking to replicate brain networks in the act of cognitive processing? And whose brains exactly are being studied, heterodyned, cloned, harvested for this purpose? Can brains be copyrighted?

Listening to some of these lawyers speak we begin to get a sense of what the argument is being framed as, but we do not exactly hear much resounding dissent and questioning of the limitations of the term “copyright” itself.

The question of outputs–work generated using these supposedly trainable AI models–being copyrightable or not pales in significance beside the enormity of this primary questioning, which every one of us should be engaging in, worldwide, if we want to preserve–for ourselves and our children and all future generations–the sanctity and autonomy of our brains, our biological neural networks, our rights to our own thinking, perceiving, sensing, cogitating, ruminating, writing, speaking, moving, singing, and all else of our own supremely singular and unique human capabilities at any time.

We must keep in mind that behind the entire phenomenon of Artificial Neural Networks lies the study of biological neural networks, and the examination of brains in the process of cognitive processing.

Questions of Safety, Regulation, Control

While Sam Altman, CEO of OpenAI, mentions large neural networks in his testimony at this other hearing around the same time (Oversight of AI: Rules for Artificial Intelligence, House Judiciary Subcommittee on Privacy, Technology, and the Law, May 16, 2023), he fails to mention that Artificial Neural Networks are built on biological neural networks, that they have to do with the translation of human brain processing mechanisms and methodologies into software applications via the quantitative sciences which inform simulation modeling, that this translation is essentially brain theft–especially when arrived at non-consensually, and that all Artificial Intelligence so built is vastly inferior to human intelligence which it seeks but fails to emulate.

The dangers and risks of AI which he points to and which are more expansively addressed here, in one of his referenced papers, suggest that, well beyond what is overtly expressed at these hearings, generative AI seeks to become a tool for oligarchic repression of the populace on the one hand through governing access to superior–yet ill-gotten–tools for base cognitive processing (the neural networks of experts), and on the other, degrading human brains through destroying human creative and critical thinking, enforcing new kinds of cognitive processing which seem solipsistic and limiting and essentially enacting information warfare or “unconventional warfare” on all, which military-deception/Psy Ops practices could tell us a great deal about.

All of these are subjects to be more closely looked at. Most especially, the questions of “regulating” (what precisely?), enforcing (what precisely?) and protecting from harm (what precisely?) need addressing.

Much could be simplified if only these “witnesses” at government hearings could state a little more clearly that what they are selling as futuristic AI and seek to have passed on freely to enslave impressionable young minds is nothing but a form of Cliff’s Notes and content-generation software (built on unethical research) for which they now seek personally-profitable content management.

A cursory look at the “observed safety challenges” of GPT-4 listed and elaborated on here at this referenced article which seems to inform Sam Altman’s testimony quite a bit suggests alarming intent to replace whole bodies of critical enquiry, online language analysis, law enforcement concerns, psychology concerns, journalism concerns, law concerns with in-house “red-teaming” while establishing new and arbitrary norms (whose precisely?) for all thinking, speaking, expression, communication and apparently replacing surveillance-censorship online and in brains with private-party-censorship. The use of language such as “enforce” is doubly problematic when no-one is quite sure what exactly needs to be enforced and why–how is this not a major issue behind the whole construct of Artificial Intelligence, how has the study of AI even got this far as to warrant usage of such a word? Yet regulation implies enforcement, and these hearings on AI seem to want to rush through to regulation sans discussion. This conversation with Jack Kornfeld and Soren Gordhamer has Sam Altman bring up “enforcing” again here: “I think we just need to do the same thing here, we need to come together, decide what we want, decide we’re going to enforce it and accept the fact the future is going to be very different and probably like wonderfully better.”

Clearly, pushback in Congress needs to continue.

Neural Network Mapping, Unethical Human and Animal Research, and Human Rights

One of the primary questions to ask however is where neural networks in AI come from, and whether they include the neural network maps which many of those unlawfully targeted have whistleblown about, including French software engineer Frederic Laroche at my channel, who speaks of witnessing French and American brain researchers display and refer to neural maps at his Hewlett-Packard workplace: essentially, are those unlawfully targeted and wrongfully watchlisted being used in secret experiments to map their brains and neural circuits, information from which is then supplied to private-party tech companies intent on making a private profit and rolling out software applications for their own self-aggrandizement off essentially the political persecution and abuse of the innocent? Does the study of neural networks in animals, especially primates, as well fall in this same continuum of abuse of humans? These are human rights questions of devastating importance, since all who report being so targeted and abused essentially report torture, bio-hacking, neuro-hacking, and a complete abrogation of their basic human rights; animals, we all know, have indeed been tortured in multiple ways for military and public-domain neuroscience.

AI and Emerging Technologies: To Be Questioned, Not Expanded and Protected

Meanwhile, Rama G. Elluru, a thinktank patent attorney with apparent over-Government connections, and rather patently sheathed inside the National Security state (she testifies she’s worked as staff for the National Security Commission on Artificial Intelligence (now playing defunct with reports coyly archived at a “cybercemetery” online), lays out a plan for Congress to follow at this recent hearing (Artificial Intelligence and Intellectual Property — Part I: Patents, Innovation, and Competition, Subcommittee on Intellectual Property, June 7, 2023), seeking reform of IP policies to “establish new IP policies and regimes to incentivize, expand, and protect AI and emerging technologies.”

Artificial Intelligence and Intellectual Property – Part I: Patents, Innovation, and Competition |

“Emerging technologies” a nebulous enough term to permit a host of concealments, but one surfacing more these days in seeming attempts to legitimize all including under “emerging technology foreign policy” as covered here earlier, and desperately in need of human rights oversight: US Department of State Sets Up a New Office for Critical and Emerging Technology Diplomacy and Foreign Policy: Human Rights Oversight Urgently Needed/January 5, 2023.

Too much is happening too fast while in actuality the entire edifice of Artificial Intelligence needs to be questioned, not taken for granted. We don’t need to look to AI to “transform our societies, economies, and security” as US Secretary of State Antony Blinken stated in January, using the trope of foreign partnership that time (versus the current one of global tech competition and leadership) to rustle in public consent without disclosure, very thinly referring to emerging technologies then as “including biotechnology, advanced computing, artificial intelligence, and quantum information technologies.”

We need to ask what AI really is, what it has been built on, and what it uses as base: Inevitably, these questions will run into the large ethical questions behind the incredible abuses of animals and humans underpinning all neuroscience research, military and public-domain, which are not being asked, but which have certainly been addressed continuously at this writer’s desk and broadcast channels.

The new subcommittee hearing slated for tomorrow, June 13, 2022, one can only hope, will address this matter openly: Artificial Intelligence and Human Rights. (Curious however that this subcommittee is focused on Human Rights and the Law, while the others are focused on IP and copyright: Will they speak to each other?)

Artificial Intelligence Built on Unlawful Exploitation of Brains and Brain Outputs Needs Banning Outright

The world needs to be apprised of the great harms behind AI research. AI should be banned, not lauded, glorified, or legitimized. Ask first where those neural networks came from, ask what ChatGPT is actually based on, ask what the brain research projects in which “Targeted Individuals” have been buried are really all about, ask what DARPA, DOJ, NIJ and others have been doing for the last two decades in their brain research projects supposedly to help the “mentally-ill” and make society “safe” from falsely-labeled terrorists and falsely-labeled “psychiatric patients.”

Ask how Informed Consent has been jettisoned for absolute carnage, as both academics and agencies have permitted the public to be openly harmed: No Waivers of Informed Consent, PERIOD: The Public Reports Ongoing Non-Consensual Experimentation and Demands the Common Rule Protect Citizens, Not Covert Activities/17 July, 2016.

There is a great danger to all of humanity–and especially all our children, all our generations to come–in the arbitrary use of AI to replace human intelligence and human brain processes with artificial neural networks or machine learning through nifty software apps or neurological enhancements and thence hand over rights to one’s own creativity in any field, art, music, science, whatever, to the tech gurus who now assure us such appropriation is well within the scope of extant copyright and IP law, as described for instance by UCLA Professor of Law and Electrical Engineering John Villasensor in this testimony addressing concepts of “conception.”

Returning all “Copyright” Ownership, Conception, and Origin Rights to Oneself As Artists, Writers, Scientists, Human Beings with Brains and Biological Neural Networks Belonging Only to Ourselves

So if you are a writer, artist or scientist of any kind, or human being who believes your brain and neural networks, published works, or body of knowledge, experience, and expertise are being attacked, exploited, used and abused by unethical AI researchers–as many report–then it’s time to go beyond these lax notions of protection available in Copyright Law and IP Law and start acting in your own power as living men and women, as Americans on the land–not subject to statutory law but keeping to God-given rights in natural law, common law, international law, stating, declaring, and returning all power over your own self to yourself, as I have done here–a statement I hope to keep updating as I too begin to understand more clearly what exactly needs to be said out loud to stop the interminable exploitation of our creative and living human selves: Statement of Ownership as Statement of Fact Exceeding and Superseding all Copyright Notices | June 11, 2023

“Global Health Security” Versus AI-Run Digital Health: Does the WHO, European Commission’s Partnership Respect Human Rights or Aim for Cerebral Internet Cyborgism?

Note and Op-Ed | Ramola D | 6th June, 2023

While the WHO and European Commission’s sad little partnership to run a “global health security” digital health initiative predicated entirely on certification to promote COVID-19 fallacies and lies is utterly transparent in its intent–no-one can travel (“global mobility”) or work except by kowtowing to the absurdity of nasal swabs, interminable COVID tests, painfully useless face-masks, and harmful untested experimental “vaccines” to quell viruses which have not been proved to exist–what’s really at stake is what’s not being said.

We must remember all corporations, even global and worldwide, are only private corporations and each of us must exercise personal discernment and continue to make private health choices as we read this information–while also working quietly within our own families, neighborhoods, cities, counties, to inform our local officials and help save each of their as well as our own children from the incredibly invasive implications of such ventures as this.

Yesterday’s news:

https://www.who.int/news/item/05-06-2023-the-european-commission-and-who-launch-landmark-digital-health-initiative-to-strengthen-global-health-security

Digital Health, AI, Innovative Tech, Synthetic Biology

“Digital Health” has become a catch-all word here for way too much — many scientists, investigative analysts, whistleblowers, and podcasters have in recent times been taking apart the very serious implications for all humanity in permitting the use of the highly deleterious nanotechnologies, neurotechnologies, surveillance and monitoring “emerging technologies,” “innovative technologies” and historic sweep of human and animal studies in brain functioning, neurology, cognitive processing, language modeling which inform Artificial Intelligence (AI) and make “digital health” “telemedicine” and other forms of remote-access health monitoring happen, subjects often explored here.

While Artificial Intelligence and the concept of IP theft examined briefly here continue to be discussed in the US Congress, some of the harms and the call for a moratorium on its development were recently aired at this earlier May 2023 hearing (to be further reported on by this writer):

https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/committee-activity/hearings/oversight-of-ai-rules-for-artificial-intelligence

The intersection of nanotechnology, neurotechnology, and synthetic biology has been examined in recent times by such scientists and researchers as Dr. Ana Maria Mihalcea, Dr. Robert Young, Celeste Solum.

Hydrogel and Graphene Oxide Used For Neuron Stimulation ( AKA Mind Control) Via Injection Or Inhalation | Dr. Ana Maria Mihalcea

Newsbreak 133: Team of Scientists Confirm Presence of Toxins Graphene, Aluminium, Cadmium Selenide, Stainless Steel, LNP-GO Capsids, Parasites, Other Toxins Variously in 4 COVID Vaccines: Pfizer, Moderna, AstraZeneca, Johnson & Johnson

Synthetic Biology webinar with Celeste Solum

Virology Fraud versus Natural Health

The fallacies of virology versus the intuitive healing and natural health approaches to living in tune with Nature, our human bodies and our planet as well as the ways in which AI, 5G, nanotech and neurotech converge have been often discussed at my channel including with Dr. Tom Cowan, Dr. Andy Kaufman, Dr. Robert Young, Dr. John Reizer, Dr. Amandha Vollmer, Dr. Zara Anne Bourgeois, Dr. Beverly Rubik.

Report 284 | Dr. Tom Cowan Exposes Virus/Infection Fallacies, & Describes True Health & Healing

REPORT 283: DR. JOHN REIZER ON PANDEMIC-THEORY, PLANNED DISEASE, MEDICAL FALLACIES, TRUE HEALTH

Report 279: Panel on Terrain: Hidden Science: Greater Cause of Disease Not Germs but Terrain with Dr. Andy Kaufman and Dr. Robert Young

REPORT 276: DR. BEVERLY RUBIK ON WIRELESS AND 5G HARMS TO BIOFIELDS, BLOOD, LIFE/COVID-5G CONNECTION

NEWSBREAK 128 | DR. ANDY KAUFMAN AND DR. AMANDHA VOLLMER EXPOSE COVID TEST FRAUD, BRAIN/AI/5G AGENDA

Report #162: Zara Anne Bourgeois, Homeopath:Vaccine Risks/Harms, Natural Remedies, Immunity, Healing

The Great Need to Continuously Research, Monitor, and Challenge Invasive Science and Technology Research and Development

The great harms of turning our health over to large private corporations which have been working for decades to develop technologies harmful, surveillant, and pigeonholing of humans must be questioned, challenged, and stopped before they can take hold in our world. Where AI, 5G, impacting biofields and blood, nerves, cells, brains, and nervous systems has been headed, often under covers such as dual-use technologies which emphasize health while practicing harm in secret, needs to be widely known and continuously researched and questioned as pioneer scientists and researchers, activists and journalists Elana Freeland, Clifford Carnicom, Frances Leader, Dr. Salinas Flores have shown us.

REPORT 268 | ELANA FREELAND: THE AGE OF TRANSHUMANISM CALLS FORTH TRUE HUMAN CONSCIOUSNESS

PANEL 1 – CARNICOM DISCLOSURE PROJECT UPDATE 2021, TMT & RDR | DR. MADEJ, DR. MIKOVITS, DR. YOUNG

Worldwide Reveal of New, Destructive SynBio ”Cross-Domain Bacteria” Linked to Chem Trails, Morgellons, Now in Everyone’s Bodies “Transforming the Human Species”: The Carnicom Institute Disclosure Project Overview

REPORT 271: FRANCES LEADER: GREAT VIRUS/EMF DECEPTION, PHARAONIC FUTURE VS HUMAN ENERGY SYSTEMS, CHI

“Disruptive Technologies”, 4IR, Cerebral Internet

Closer focus on the “Cerebral Internet” exposed in films and books was highlighted here early with Dr. David Salinas Flores’s work, which has also converged with others’ exposing the nanotechnology underpinnings behind “disruptive technologies” and the much-touted but sadly lacking-in-EQ “Fourth Industrial Revolution” or 4IR (subjects further to be explored here).

Professor David Salinas Flores, MD | The Secret of “Person of Interest”: The Cerebral Internet

Dr. David Salinas Flores | The Fourth Industrial Revolution: The First Robotization of Africans

New FOIA Request Reveals Entire Pandemic Based on Scientific Fraud: CDC Concedes Inability to Locate Purified Isolate of SARS-COV-2/COVID-19 Virus or Delta Variant by Koch’s Postulates, Says Viruses can be Isolated “Only by Growth in Cell Culture”

CONFIRMED: COVID-19 Plandemic a Known, Live “Training and Simulation Exercise” under WHO, Treasonously Agreed to by 196 Countries

Scientific Fraud Must be Detected Early and Dismantled Early to Avert and End Cerebral Internet Cyborgism

The great harms of scientific fraud perpetrated by the COVID deception could have been stopped months and years ago if only the reportage of those meticulously working against tremendous odds to uncover the truth had been heeded. It is never too late however to do the right thing, to acknowledge all reporters of this endless trainwreck which “public health”/allopathic or medical managed healthcare systems has become, and move forward in more inclusive ways to bring healing, personal health freedom, and absolute neuro privacy and bodily autonomy to our world, free of the harms dreamed up by greedy private corporations and their elitist CEOs keen to tear down our hard-won rights and freedoms on the land in every part of the world.

Make 2022 the Year to Wise Up and Stand Up: Reject Vaccine Mandates, Reject the Public Health Paradigm, Reject Germ-Creation in the Pandemics-Forever-Plan, Reject Nanobiosensors, Reject the Internet of Bio Nano Things, Reject the “Common Good,” Reject Media/Pharma/Govt Lies-for-Profit, Reject Digital Currencies, Reject Vaxx Passports & Biometric IDs, Reject COVID, Reclaim Your Sovereignty

Cerebral Internet Cyborgism must be averted and ended altogether as an end-goal for science and technology research and development worldwide by each of us having the courage to stand up and speak up, sharing our knowledge and our thoughts, our dreams, our words for a better world ahead for us all, especially our children.

Healing Our Human Bodies and the World with Water

Note & Links | Ramola D | June 3, 2023

Water heals and restores us, water soothes and invigorates. Water is powerful yet gentle as it seeps and flows over rock into earth, water insistently restores our cells from the inside out when we need it to.

The healing power of water is a huge subject, which has come into focus recently with awareness rising of the health of our people and planet in peril. Several doctors and naturopaths I have interviewed over the last few years have shared their expertise with healing remedies including water on my reports and newsbreaks, highlighting the importance of the simple–water, exercise, sunshine, clay, nutrition, vitamins, minerals in healing and detoxing the human body from numerous pollutants, in diseases like cancer, brain diseases, vaccine damage.

The power of Water and Alkalinity in Healing Tissue and Cell, Blood and Brain

The pH of water and restoring the alkalinity of our tissues and cells with healthful living has been especially highlighted by the well-known scientist, nutritionist, naturopath Dr. Robert Young, author of several books including the groundbreaking The Ph Miracle: Balance Your Diet, Reclaim Your Health (by Dr. Young and Shelley Redford Young) in several interviews including this one:

Newsbreak 136 | Life-Saving Information: Dr. Young Discusses Vaccine Damage and Powerful Detox Protocols

Dr. Young has listed some of the numerous other interviews and panels he has done here, including one with Dr. Ariyana Love, nutritionist and naturopath, covering various Solutions to Pollution where he speaks about the importance of the pH of water bathing our tissues and combating the harms of radiation damage to human bodies.

Water as Sentient, Listening, Aware, Expressive, Communicative, Therapeutic

The ways in which water responds to human thought and emotion and speaks to us in its own language of geometry and more has been explored by Dr. Masaru Emotu and those who have studied and sought to replicate and extend his work.

Michiko Hayashi, Director of the Emoto Peace Project, describes Dr. Emoto’s work and talks about how water has extraordinary receptive power to expressed intention and feeling, and how water responds powerfully to emotion, in ways that can be scientifically observed.

WAVES OF LIGHT-EPISODE 1: MICHIKO HAYASHI, EMOTO PEACE PROJECT, ON THE POWER OF WATER

Veda Austin, author of The Secret Intelligence of Water studies the language of water, seeking to document the language of water, sharing her findings and extraordinary photographs of crystal formations in frozen water called hydroglyphs here:

WAVES OF LIGHT-EPISODE 4: VEDA AUSTIN ON THE CONSCIOUSNESS OF WATER, THE POWER OF INTENTION

For more Consciousness posts, please see the links and posts under Consciousness here.

For more on restoring your health with water and other natural solutions, please see the podcasts at the Ramola D Reports video channels and many of the articles and posts here.

These subjects and more to be covered here soon, please stay tuned.

Military Brain Technologies Revealed: Therapy or Weaponry?

Note & Op-ed | Ramola D | May 29, 2023

Posted today at the Bulletin of Atomic Scientists is an interview with an alarming title with a science journalist and writer, Sally Adee, editor at New Scientist and author of We Are Electric Inside the 200-Year Hunt for Our Body’s Bioelectric Code, and What the Future Holds, reviewing her experience with tDCS, Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation, a military brain technology from DARPA revealing uses both putatively therapeutic and other. Also reviewed are a few other technologies including brain decoding or mind reading using something called the Utah Array, and xeno bots, which seem to be living beings from stem cells, therefore these latter not technologies but beings used in bioelectricity or tDCS research–rather immense subjects to further explore.

Most puzzling though is the tone and allusive way in which this major information is presented, as if presuming consent for some very dark technologies (some of which most people unlawfully targeted have been reporting for years now as profoundly invasive and abusive), some yet to be fully exposed–including, seemingly, some such as synthetic telepathy, brain stimulation to amplify learning which seems to be using neural network mapping, and other such: Q&A: How DARPA hacked a science writer’s brain and turned her into a sharpshooter | Sara Goudarzi | May 29, 2023

Like much that is being published these days and apparently over the years in certain forums, both in print and in podcasts, there is a lot of just such seemingly artfully artless presenting of neurotechnology information ongoing, it seems, when the issues, unspoken and unremarked, are huge, with massive implications for all human neuro, cognitive, individual and collective freedom.

“Hacking Brains”: Is Language Being Opened Up Now in Mainstream Space to Gain Consent by Stealth?

Most fundamentally, this article is not about a science writer turned into a sharpshooter, but about a well-published one who in 2007 voluntarily submitted to Trans Cranial Direct Current Stimulation for a story. It is about her seeking a “flow state” through what appears to be either a video game or Virtual Reality or a metaverse scenario, never exactly presented as such. Showing up for her “simulation” (or perhaps just Stimulation) in a traumatized, sleep-deprived jetlagged state, she is then subjected to a series of training exercises for “first-person shooter games” rushing through her repeat exercises with progressive success, not noticing how time flies–essentially getting to some modicum of a flow state at some speed: is this supersoldier training, is this Artificial Intelligence simulations playing out, is this Supercomputing AI and over stimulation of neurons via Syn Tel–TAMI (Thought Amplification and MIND Interface), MIND, SATAN on steroids, is this brain heterodyning or similar? Read (the whole interview/Q and A amalgam) closely and some clues emerge. Yes to all above it seems especially if you understand what trauma-based mind control is all about, what neural circuit mapping in cognitive processing is all about and how this relates to the kind of basic IP theft which brain/EEG heterodyning, cloning or harvesting essentially is. There are connections here to the harvesting of flow states from experts in every field–which actually implies neuro experimentation, generative AI and nested learning algorithms which, if you keep digging into deep learning, machine learning history will bring up links to experimentation on primates from Delgado to Neuralink, on people needing prosthetic limbs, on those held hostage in mental asylums, prisons, nursing homes–vulnerable populations needing protection from all yet inexplicably used historically in non-consensual medical research projects.

There are clues here as well to neuro influence technology, synthetic telepathy, neuro cognitive weaponry, inner voice takeover, narrative disruption protocols, frequency codes for negative thoughts and emotions being piped in, and connections with brain-on-a-chip tech, digital twinning/cloning, BCI (brain computer interface) networks and neurostimulators–a whole history of questionable research leading to these moments of revelation of unethical technology transfer or once-weaponry repurposed as beneficial tech, which numerous military and intelligence and private corporations inclusive of DARPA have been studying for years.

“They kept putting me through these training exercises and I kept failing and being really overwhelmed. Everything was happening all at once—the fake people were running at me, and I didn’t know what order to dispatch them in. It was incredibly frustrating, and I had this entire script of self-recrimination running through my head the entire time. It was just vicious. Then I started just having really negative thoughts. I was thinking this is all garbage, my whole job is garbage—just catastrophizing.

Then the tech came in and switched the current on, and it was like somebody had put noise cancelling headphones on me. I couldn’t hear any of that [negative thoughts] anymore. I did the training again and thought this is completely fine; I know exactly what I’m doing; what’s all the fuss? I was actually really enjoying it. After three minutes, the tech came in (normally, the runs were taking about 20 minutes to get through), and I had dispatched all the bad guys and was waiting the next wave, and said, “it’s done.” I was really surprised—actually, really annoyed—because I was thinking so now, I get it right for the first time and you stop it early. I said, “but I’ve only been here for a couple of minutes.” She said “no,” and I looked at the clock and was shocked to find that 20 minutes had passed. The researcher [in charge] said it was a common response that time starts to fly quite quickly.”

https://thebulletin.org/2023/05/qa-how-darpa-hacked-a-science-writers-brain-and-turned-her-into-a-sharpshooter/

Interestingly it seems it is actually sharpshooting training in the simulation she participated in, and not mass-shooter transformation as some may say the title implies, while the entire article seems to be written in a somewhat obfuscating way, the harms of even “noise cancelling headphone” sensations achieved by electrical current on a human brain lost.

“Zapping Brains into the Zone”

An article by Adee in 2012 helps further elaborate her experience only thinly presented today and the “flow state” she pursued–one well known to artists, dancers, writers, musicians, tennis players, sportsmen and sportswomen of every kind, but again, in itself another area of questionable brain research, which has been reported earlier by psychologist Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi: https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg21328501-600-zap-your-brain-into-the-zone-fast-track-to-pure-focus/

Human Rights and Lack of Neuro Privacy

Ultimately this is all about much more than what is only very slightly pointed to here–this is about grave and profound harm, issued inhumanely, with reverberating repercussions for Americans, the American military, and indeed the entire world. This isn’t written about though, here. The language in the title, while previously surfaced in mainstream space in the slightest of ways, is still startling enough to draw attention, to mislead, and to premise consent, which no-one with an ethical bone in their body would ever give if they ever knew what “neuro hacking” and “bio hacking” actually means — subjects covered incessantly by whistleblower scientists and journalists here, including at the two recent DEW/Neurotech conferences in 2021 and 2022 as well as numerous panels and podcasts here and at other sites online.

In this space what is powerfully reassuring is that there are indeed highly ethical servicemen and women in the US and other militaries worldwide who have come forward to address the human rights issues involved here, to whom we in this country indeed owe much gratitude on this Memorial Day 2023.

Bioelectronics

Significantly however, this article by an associate editor Sara Gordazi at the Bulletin points to several neurotechnologies and areas of bioelectronics which have now come to be variously applied it appears in fields of amplifying learning, in assisting with sports training, in stroke recovery, in relearning tasks when injured (subjects sometimes covered at my podcasts and articles), but 21st-and-20th-century public disclosure of which from military sources like DARPA needs further to be catalogued and highlighted for public awareness.

This linked article from 2017 in a neurophysiology journal reveals the use of tDCS in studies, not fully described, for numerous neurological conditions or named yet questionable conditions like Parkinson’s, dementia, Alzheimer’s: Evidence-based guidelines on the therapeutic use of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS).

As with other neurotechnologies described by whistleblowers and DOD scientists in lectures and journals over the past few years and presented today as therapeutic under various “emerging technologies” and community research headings, it is never clear how ethically these were developed and how ethically they are being used.

Those who have been unlawfully targeted today and for several decades now, in the US and worldwide, have long been subjected to numerous exotic technologies without consent and have long sought attention to be drawn to their absolutely incomprehensible plight, while we see at the very same time numerous technologies being introduced in our midst, in hospitals, in research settings, in criminal justice settings as therapeutic, or interventional, or deterrent, or emerging, or innovative. These must be questioned from a human rights point of view.

Especially disturbing is the tone of presumed or premised consent underlying examination, however slight, of any and all neurotechnology, both here and in much coverage online today which every intelligent observer must rise up to question. When did neurotechnology become a thing? How many of us are willing to submit to brain monitoring and brain surveillance and brain research on our own thinking processes and thoughts? These are subjects we need to keep researching and writing and speaking about–as well as directly addressing with those building them.

Also questionable is the presented narrative of tDCS being used as a therapy not merely to treat depression but to beat back “inner voices” or negative thoughts, an old one much in line with the historic linking of inner voices or “hearing voices” to so-called schizophrenia or schizoid disorders–instead of recognizing the disclosures today of synthetic telepathy, V2K, projected sounds, ultrasound invasion of the brain and other human-effect electromagnetic, bioelectronic, and neuro hacking technologies known today to specialized audiences.

Much to explore and address further, at a later date.

The Future of Intelligence or The Rise of Human Rights? | Artificial Intelligence, Neural Networks, Deep Learning Vs Preserving The Sanctity of Human Brains And Lives

Note & Op-ed | Ramola D | May 16, 2023

While many of us have been reporting the great harms to humanity and ourselves from so-called emerging or innovative technologies including neurotechnologies, nanotechnology, and directed energy technologies, as covered for instance at last October’s DEW/Neurotech conference posted here, conversations at EM Tech Digital 2023, a recent mainstream conference hosted by MIT Technology Review points to the continued upholding of Artificial Intelligence–a technological, machine-intelligence overlay apparently intending to override human agency and brains–as a supposed stable fixture in our future.

The Future of Intelligence/Em Tech Digital

Clearly not enough thought, time, space, or public consideration has been given to the place of humanity in this vast and nebulous scenario where most people do not understand the basic subject matter here. Perhaps because the creation and development of AI and Machine Learning seems to be quite intricate, encompassing various fields such as cognitive neuroscience, computational linguistics, and software programming, behind which seem to lie more buried fields such as nanobioelectronics and optical imaging.

IBM’s program manager Eda Kavlakoglu has a blog post offering insights into some of these terms using a Russian nesting doll concept to explain the connections between them: Machine Learning, Deep Learning, Neural Networks, and Artificial Intelligence.

Some associated subjects have been covered in the journalism at this site, some profoundly human-rights-violative, especially in surveillance and mil/Intel coverage, COVID vaccine coverage, and nanotechnology posts.

Is it possible that Artificial Intelligence development and brain or natural language processing research could involve human rights violations?

Dr. David Salinas Flores, whose highlighting of the illegitimate use of nanotechnology in the exploitation of humans has been featured here before has drawn attention to such futuristic scenarios as brain internets, cerebral internets, brains on a chip and so on, subjects I too have raised in some interviews and panels, especially those with TradCatKnight Radio’s Eric Gajewski, posted at his site and my video platforms. Ethical problems in the study of human brains including IP theft are noted here–Dr. David Salinas Flores | The Fourth Industrial Revolution: The First Robotization of Africans–and here: Professor David Salinas Flores, MD |The Nanomafia: Nanotechnology’s Global Network of Organized Crime.

IP theft (Intellectual Property theft) in itself has long been discussed in the form of EEG heterodyning and EEG cloning by American scientist Dr. Robert Duncan in The Matrix Deciphered, numbers of Russian, European, Indian scientists and journalists, military and intelligence whistleblowers, and others in podcasts and articles here and at my video platforms (the ones left standing that is, past Youtube’s 2021 takedown of my Reports channel there.) This is, shockingly enough, brainwave harvesting, mixing, and/or replacing–forms of read-write remote access to the human brain achieved through a variety of intricate neurotechnology, nanotechnology, and computational means some of which neuroscientists in the military space have recently taken to disclosing publicly, as partially reported here:

Public Disclosure By Military/Intelligence Whistleblowers on Neuro Weapons and Neuro Technologies In Use Today

Microwave Weapons, Psychotronic Weapons, Human Control Weapons: From Nazi Times to Russia’s Cheka to the Present “Havana Syndrome”: A Century of Victims

Neuro ethics in itself is a contested space, and many know it. Neuro rights, first established at the government level in Chile, as well as AI via what has been termed non-invasive BCI (brain computer interfaces) at the nano and micro levels, were discussed by Dr. Rafael Yuste, Director of Neurotechnologies at Columbia University, head of the US Brain Initiative Project, on Report #197 at my channel Ramola D Reports in 2020. Neuroethics and neuro rights were also discussed in various other interviews, panels, articles, and podcasts here, some listed below.

Report #197: Prof. Rafael Yuste, Director, Neurotech, Columbia Univ. On Neurotech, Ai & Neuro Rights

Lack of Consent in Neuro Ethics and Brain Research: A Primary Problem, Long Exposed

Ramola D Reports | Report #152: Kristen Conklin, Electrical Engineer, HR Activist on Neuroweaponry, Neuroethics, Human Rights, Transhumanism

Report #122: Shad Budge Discusses Global NeuroEthics Conference 2019 and Neuro Rights

Questions remain therefore at every level from the standpoint of human rights.

This virtual Em Tech Digital 2023 conversation with former Google computer scientist and cognitive psychologist, Geoffrey Hinton, titled The Future of Intelligence, while striving to address some of the problems associated with AI doesn’t quite address the invasive and human rights issues surrounding neuro privacy, neuro rights, and brain and body autonomy which must inevitably arise in any kind of Artificial Intelligence development seeking to replace or augment human cognitive or communication processes.

Part of what’s being hidden behind public surfacings of Artificial Intelligence powers therefore are the disclosures made by DEW/neurotech-assaulted or “targeted individual” whistleblowers, which include the psychological terror games played by Synthetic Telepathy operators, Neuro Linguistic Programming echo-stalkers, neural network mappers and others in eliciting people’s individual cognitive processes via decision-tree choices which make up our separate human brains and personalities.

These are large and very troubling subjects for ethicists, neuro ethicists, human rights advocates, animal rights advocates, psychologists, psychiatrists, and everyone else to discuss openly together, along with those reporting harm in non-consensual brain or AI research–the only way, as often discussed here, to transparency and human harmony going forward.


Related

Brain Entrainment, Mind Hiving, Neuro Surveillance: In Groups, At Work, Already? | Questions re. Brain Autonomy at Davos

US Department of State Sets Up a New Office for Critical and Emerging Technology Diplomacy and Foreign Policy: Human Rights Oversight Urgently Needed

Seth Farber, Ph.D: The Psychiatric Metanarrative, Targeted Individuals, and the Deep State: A Response to The New York Times

A New World Where Every Thought Counts: Transcending Nano Quantum Chaos with Heart

World Press Freedom Day, 2023: Boston Activists call for Julian Assange’s freedom

Note | Ramola D | May 3, 2023

In welcome recognition of the importance of press freedom and needed protection for journalists worldwide at a time when journalists continue to be unlawfully targeted and detained, Assange Defense Committee reports that today’s 30th anniversary of World Press Freedom Day is being marked in Boston with a phone bank to call for Assange’s freedom as well as protection for all journalists and those who speak truth to power.

May 3 at 12 pm EDT: All who care about press freedoms and the importance of preserving our human rights and civil liberties can call in to Massachusetts senators and the Department of Justice or send an email to express their minds:

Image: Assange Defense Boston

“World Press Freedom Day was created by the UN to act as both a reminder and a reflection on the freedoms of the press and of speech that we all hold dear. With the continued prosecution of Assange and the recent imprisonment of WSJ reporter Evan Gershkovich, these freedoms are under attack daily.”

Assange Defense Committee

Evan Gershkovich is the Wall Street Journal reporter recently detained in Russia on supposed “espionage” charges while he was reporting on the ground on repercussions of Russia’s war with Ukraine, and examining the effects of information warfare on locals in the border regions there.

“This action comes amidst renewed pressure from national and world leaders, as well as major publications, calling for Attorney General Merrick Garland to drop the charges against Assange.”

–Assange Defense

Assange Defense Committee, a coalition of well-known advocates and activists inclusive of writers, philosophers, whistleblowers Noam Chomsky, Alice Walker, Daniel Ellsberg, John Kiriakou, Thomas Drake and many others advocating for Julian Assange is organizing events across the USA to try to stop his extradition to the US.

Decline in Press Freedom and the Ability to Practice Journalism Meanwhile

What’s faintly reassuring is that the current White House Administration has started to (if only selectively) echo the extant awareness of all practicing journalists and intelligent readers on the subject of press freedoms. At the White House Correspondents Dinner on April 29, President Joe Biden called for Evan Gershkovich’s immediate release “along with every other journalist held hostage or wrongfully detained abroad.”

Biden: “Journalism is not a crime”/Politico, 4/30/2023

The troubled state of journalism today around the world and the targeted attacks on journalists in many countries including the USA has been noted this week by many observers worldwide, as also in this Washington Post editorial and this Republic World article. Unlawful retaliation on journalists, activists, government and agency whistleblowers has often been covered at this site, and one can only hope the entire world wakes soon to the need to honor and celebrate journalists rather than incarcerate or marginalize or disappear them.

In the words of Noam Chomsky, “Julian Assange shouldn’t be the subject of a grand jury hearing, he should be given a medal. He’s contributing to democracy.”


From 8/15/2022: Livestream of Julian Assange’s Don’t Extradite Assange Campaign | Week 1 of the Assange Case…

Follow Julian Assange’s case:

Assange Defense Committee: News and Coverage

Reporters Without Borders: News

Speak Up for Assange:

International Journalists’ Statement in Defense of Julian Assange,

List of International Journalists here; Ramola D: #1308

Lack of Consent in Neuro Ethics and Brain Research: A Primary Problem, Long Exposed

Report | Ramola D | April 6, 2023

Lately there seem to be have been all sorts of surfacing of the need for Neuro Ethics and Neuro Rights, including in mainstream coverage of Duke University law and philosophy professor Nita Farahany’s new book “Battle for Your Brain” and a new interview with her and Antonio Regalado, senior biomedicine editor at MIT Technology Review by Greater Boston News’ Sue O’Connell.

“Brain implants could treat serious conditions. The technology is closer than you think“/Greater Boston News, April 5, 2023 (Screenshot)–MIT and Duke just grazing past addressing true neuro ethics in relation to “targeted individuals” reporting non-consensual brain experimentation

One of the more startling admissions made here by researchers and elite-academe media obviously long aware of the unethical and covert use of people in brain experiments and non-lethal weapon testing operations–long reported here at this site–is that Consent of those ab/used in experimental brain research is still in question (or that the question of Lack of Consent is making some researchers squirm now).

“…(Regarding) the technology that we’re talking about for implanted electrodes used by people who are suffering from neurodegenerative disorders or who’ve lost their ability to communicate–the primary ethical issues are around safety and efficacy and ensuring the autonomy of the individuals on whom these are being researched are able to provide full consent — there are complex questions with deep brain stimulation about continuity of self, and what that means for a person with depression…”

–Dr. Nita Farahany, JD, MA, PhD
Excerpt, GBH News Interview with Nita Farahany, Duke University, and Antonio Regalado, MIT Tech Review

False psychiatric labels to wrongfully label people mentally ill–or depressed, or paranoid, or bipolar, or schizophrenic–have as we know long been used to inhumanely and unethically experiment on those also wrongfully labeled “targeted individuals” (who start out being wrongfully watchlisted by the Security Surveillance apparatus often as “terrorists” or “non-investigative subjects” as the ACLU has exposed or “troublemakers” by local community mavens who moonlight as FBI informants keen to disappear school moms with a voice)–a serious issue which needs to be publicly addressed by everyone in Medicine, Psychiatry, and Psychology, as indeed everyone in the world aware of identical abuse conducted under MK ULTRA or Soviet/Communist regimes. (Covered previously here and here, for instance.)

Neurotechnologies and EMF technologies being known in military and intelligence circles to invoke the symptoms of mental illnesses (like depression), neurodegenerative disorders, or DSM-labeled “disorders” has been publicly surfaced by numerous whistleblowers, scientists, and researchers over the years, including recently Dr. James Giordano, Dr. Charles Morgan, and Debra D. Schnelle at a Biodefense conference, and reported here earlier:

Public Disclosure By Military/Intelligence Whistleblowers on Neuro Weapons and Neuro Technologies In Use Today

Non-consensual brain experimentation as also non-consensual energy-weapon-experimentation/testing/operation is a subject therefore which cannot be discussed openly without discussing wrongful mental-illness attribution.

False-Claim of Mental Illness in the Microwave, Millimeter Wave, Other “Non Lethal” Weapons Testing on Citizens in USA & Worldwide

In the Name of National Security? Secret, Classified Human Subject Experimentation and Research in 2015: Where is the Public Outrage?

Everyday Brain Sensors and Everyday Brain Hijacking via Bluetooth, Nanotech, Smart Tech: Neuralink to Meta to Microsoft to Everyone else

Of equal concern currently to pretty much everyone in the world is the casual mention of “everyday brain sensors” and the vulnerability of the human brain to non-consensual nano and micro implants, “brainjacking” (covert brain hacking), the “commodification of data”–your brain data, that is, AKA your most private thoughts, fleeting or entrenched, your prejudices and passions, desires and dreads, in addition to your language skills, your Math skills, your ability to think logically, compute clearly, summarize, connect, disengage, associate, cognize, remember, recognize, compose, write, read, dance, sing, speak, express yourself verbally or vocally, do art, fix cars, etc–and how indeed (with the right nanotech humming along inside your neurons maybe) you can be Bluetoothed just as easily as your iPhone or Thinkpad, Epsilon’d, dumbed-down, or disappeared.

Think of what this could do to y/our children’s brains–and perhaps has been for a while: Brain Entrainment, Mind Hiving, Neuro Surveillance: In Groups, At Work, Already? | Questions re. Brain Autonomy at Davos

Tech companies, we are told, are now flourishing and predating on human brains, coming up with different “consumer-facing” tech which really seeks to normalize brain-computer-interfaces or microchips as sensors to be secreted into earbuds and headphones and other such–while also normalizing other forms of invasive brain surveillance, already in operation in police/criminal justice as crowd control tech and limited-effect tech.

Suggesting, with Antonio Relegado, that Neuralink and Elon Musk have brought “attention to the field,” Nita Farahany says that “brain computer interface companies whether it’s implanted neurotechnology companies or the huge number of players that have started to introduce everyday brain sensors it’s really stimulated all of the major tech companies, all of the brain computer interface companies to rapidly start to think about consumer-facing technologies which is why you have Meta investing in a watch that is supposed to serve as a neural interface to augmented reality and you have Snap buying a major neurotech company called Next Minds in order to integrate into its products and you have Microsoft and Apple all looking at developing neural interface for everyone. I think it’s the big untapped Market in so many ways –right–people are used to quantifying every other aspect of their bodies and of their health but we even know virtually nothing about our own brains so I think the ‘Musk effect’ has led to a huge amount of funding and a race to be the first to develop a broad scale kind of killer app for everyone”: Is this a matter-of-fact surveying of an already too-advanced foray into brain invasion for all humanity or a seeking to normalize such as perfectly okay?

Neuro Rights or Human Rights? Brains to Regulate or Brains to Keep Private?

Neuro rights, neuro privacy, cognitive liberty: these are terms which have been conceived and surfaced for quite some time now, but who is laying claim to these concepts, why are “terms of service” being mentioned and should this be a legal issue, a moral issue, an ethical issue, or a concerted cause for alarm and massive human rights alert for all alive today on all these counts?

(“Terms of service” is a phrase used by Nita Farahany in a Guardian interview. “There are profound risks from both the commodification of the data but also what it means to have your brain activity monitored by others and what that does to freedom of thought. The technology is at an inflection point: use is ascending steeply but it is not yet mainstream. We have a moment, before the terms of service are set by others, where we can have a voice in how it is used and deployed in society.”)

Non-Consenting “Subjects” of Classified or Hidden Military/Intelligence Technologies Have Long Exposed Neurotechnology & DEW Abuse

Mind reading, replacement of your inner voice, soul-jacking–essentially transforming your personality via MK ULTRA style “crime prevention” neuro surveillance seeking to provoke or hypnotize people into crime-creation–mind-control via remote EMF tech, overwhelming synthetic telepathy, and the tracking and transforming of your mental activity or neurological state have long been reported by those covertly targeted with military and Intelligence neurotechnologies, disclosed by DOD/CIA/Navy/Army whistleblowers and scientists, and increasingly exposed now as being rolled out, including in schools and crowd control situations as post-COVID reports from China and Europe and the US and Australia demonstrate.

A significant public exposure of unlawful targeting of Americans and abuse in non-consensual brain and energy bio-effects/bio-behavioral research occurred in 2011 and 2012 with the Presidential Bioethical Commission hearings, as also with the SACHRP comments during the Common Rule revision in 2015/16 when Intelligence and Criminal Justice agencies were apparently given a free pass to experiment on civilians without any of the human rights protections the Common Rule (already watered-down version of the Nuremberg Code) offered.

This was covered here earlier:

Washington’s Blog: The American Public Informs President Obama’s Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues About Ongoing Non-Consensual Human Experimentation in the USA Today | 3/13/2016

No Waivers of Informed Consent, PERIOD: The Public Reports Ongoing Non-Consensual Experimentation and Demands the Common Rule Protect Citizens, Not Covert Activities | 7/16/2016

Neuroethics as a means to address such rampant abuses has long been discussed on my panels and podcasts, including in such memorable interviews as with neuro rights activist Shad Budge, Columbia Neuroscience professor Dr. Rafael Yuste who brought Neuro Rights to Chile, the Invasive Neurotech, True Neuro Ethics panels, and the recent Neurotech/DEW Tech online conferences I hosted in 2021 and 2022.

It should be noted also that everyone I have interviewed or worked with over the years in relation to their exposure or/and disclosure of these neurotechnology and DEW abuses has contributed vastly to the exposing of these crimes against humanity and brought forward the entire public discourse on neuro ethics, bio ethics, and neuro rights, which all academics, private parties and media now tentatively touching these subjects need to consult. (As indeed they need to consult also the vast body of literature from numerous researchers and writers who have addressed these matters, including Cheryl Welsh, Paul Baird, Dr. Nick Begich, Dr. Rauni Kilde, Gloria Naylor, Mark Rich, Dr. John Hall, Mary Gregory, and others.)

The fact remains that these disclosures from the field cannot be overlooked in any intellectual reportage or review of technology use in this area, and a serious overhauling of the entire fields of surveillance, psychiatry, brain research–whether in public, private, or academic sectors–is long overdue.

Consent cannot be presumed for the great numbers of unwitting, involuntary, non-consenting people who have come forward in many ways to report the great harms on their persons inflicted by remote neurotechnologies and energy technologies–implicating military, intelligence, corporate, and academic research, classified or not–even by so-called neuroethicists fraudulently held up by corporate media and academe. Nita Farahany, interestingly, was a member of President Obama’s Bioethical Commission headed by Amy Gutmann in 2011 and 2012 which heard the testimonials of numerous Americans exposing these crimes (as also, curiously, was Christine Grady, wife of Anthony Fauci).

The entire industry of neural interfaces, augmented reality, prosthetics, BCI-tech, nanotech, optical imaging tech and so on needs to come under much closer scrutiny than it has currently, always in light of the vast public disclosure of crimes against humanity in such research made by many many reporters of these crimes, often dismissed, wrongfully, as a cadre of mentally ill “targeted individuals.”

Inevitably also, the abuses of animals, particularly primates, in neurotechnology and BCI (brain computer interface) research, as exposed last year in the case of the Neuralink-funded use of baby monkeys at UC Davis–reported here and questioned further by the Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine–must be further scrutinized in light of harms to humanity implicit in all such research.

A sampling of panels below:

Report #122: Shad Budge Discusses Global NeuroEthics Conference 2019 and Neuro Rights/March 16, 2019
REPORT #197: PROF. RAFAEL YUSTE, DIRECTOR, NEUROTECH, COLUMBIA UNIV. ON NEUROTECH, AI & NEURO RIGHTS | Oct 10, 2020
REPORT 239 | INVASIVE NEUROTECH, TRUE NEUROETHICS-PANEL 2 | DR. ROBERT DUNCAN, MIL/INTEL NEURO EXPMTS | March 14, 2021

“Existential Threat Against Humanity” says Dr. Robert Duncan: Worldwide DEW/Neurotech Targeting & Non-Consensual AI/Cybernetics/Brain Experimentation Conference Bears Witness to Profound Mil/Intel/DOJ/Univ/Private Sector Crimes | October 22, 2022

Worldwide DEW/Neurotech Targeting & Non-Consensual AI/Cybernetics/Brain Experimentation Conference | Oct 22, 2022

RELATED:

Public Disclosure of Anti-Personnel DEWs and Neuroweapons (Non-Lethal/Limited Effect Wpns, EMF Spectrum Wpns) Being Used, Covertly but Definitively, Illegitimately, and Inhumanely, by US, UK, All Govts Worldwide on People

Affidavits, Letters of Validation and Support, & Legislation Efforts Attesting to Ongoing Non-Consensual Experimentation & DEW Use on Civilians