Tag Archives: Global Governance

Alex Newman/The New American: UN Adopts “Education” Plan to Indoctrinate Children in Globalism

Re-posted from The New American, with many thanks to Alex Newman for this vital news and analysis, and to Blacklisted News for posting. Please visit there for more news and analysis on a regular basis on the UN’s Agenda 2030, which appears to be plowing ahead with its plan for collectivism and global communism under guise of global citizenship and sustainable development. Note in this discussion below, especially, issues of human rights, which are being re-defined by the UN as bestowed by governments, essentially, and changeable by “law”. If individual nations and individual thinkers, actors, and educators do not intervene, this Brave New World of centrally-controlled indoctrination seeking to stamp out national and individual will, sovereignty, creativity, and diversity will attempt to continue. 

The UN’s Global Depopulation agenda, as described by historian and activist Kevin Galalae in recent posts highlighting his ongoing hunger strike against this agenda at the Vatican, is related to this quest by the globalists for world domination via the UN. 

****

UN Adopts “Education” Plan to Indoctrinate Children in Globalism

Written by 

A United Nations summit in Korea this week adopted a global “action plan” demanding a planetary “education” regime to transform children around the world into social-justice warriors and sustainability-minded “global citizens.” Among other elements, that means the UN-directed global education must promote “integrated development” of the “whole person,” including the formation of their ethics, values, and spirituality, the final document declared. The global-citizenship programs, with definitions to be incorporated in curricula worldwide, should also indoctrinate children so that they understand their responsibilities to “protect the planet,” and promote what the UN and its member governments consider to be the “common good.”

The controversial action plan, approved by the UN’s propaganda department and a group of largely government-funded “non-governmental organizations” (NGOs) on June 1 in Gyeongju, Republic of Korea, is aimed at helping the UN impose its Agenda 2030 scheme to “transform the world.” In fact, the title of the summit gave away the agenda: “Education for Global Citizenship: Achieving the Sustainable Development Goals Together.” As The New American has documented extensively, the UN Agenda 2030 plan, also known as the “Sustainable Development Goals” (SDGs), was approved by governments and dictators last year as a road map toward global control (tyranny). From national and international wealth redistribution to government healthcare and legal abortion for all, the controversial Agenda 2030 vows repeatedly to leave “no-one behind.”

However, globalists and the UN know that to achieve their vision of global totalitarianism, the minds of the young must be captured via “education.” Agenda 2030 actually has an entire goal dedicated to UN-guided “education.” And so the latest summit in Korea, organized for NGOs by the UN Department of Public Information, or UN DPI, was aimed at defining what that “education” regime will look like — and how NGOs can help. “Education is a human right, essential to well-being and dignity, and is key to achieving Agenda 2030,” reads the action plan adopted this week. “Further, an ethos of global citizenship is required in order to fulfil [sic] this bold, people-centered, universal, and planet-sensitive development framework.”

In the “spirit of global citizenship,” the document declares that “our primary identity is that of human beings.” But the agenda is much broader than attacking nationalism and patriotism. The UN DPI and the Astro-Turf “NGOs” that surround it, styling themselves “Civil Society,” explained that what they call “education” must also be about more than what people normally think of as education — literacy, numeracy, and so on. In the UN’s view, according to the “Gyeongju Action Plan” adopted in Korea, “education must advance the cause of global citizenship.” That means a lot more than one might think, too.

Among other points, this education for global citizenship must promote “integrated development of the whole person emotionally, ethically, intellectually, physically, socially, and spiritually,” the action plan declares. (Emphasis added.) Of course, parents, families, communities, tribes, churches, and more have traditionally been responsible for much of that. When or under what authority government-run, UN-approved schools became responsible for children’s physical, ethical, spiritual, emotional, and social development was not made clear. The implications, though, should trouble anyone who values liberty, diversity, national sovereignty, and parental rights.

The “education” pushed by the UN must also be “imbued with an understanding of our roles, rights and responsibilities for the common good in service to humanity and the advancement of a culture of peace, non-violence, freedom, justice, and equality,” the action plan continued, using rhetoric about the “common good” that has been the rallying cry of countless tyrants. The globo-education must inculcate “a sense of care for the earth, reverence for the interdependent kinship of all life, and stewardship of all ecological systems for future generations.” It should also strengthen “the societal relationships among individuals, institutions, communities, states, humanity, and the planet.” And finally, it should nurture “a sense of solidarity and empathy in order to end poverty, protect the planet, ensure human rights, and foster prosperous and fulfilling lives for all.”

To those not well-versed in globalist-speak, that all might sound fine and dandy. However, when the UN’s agenda is examined more closely, the real agenda becomes more clear. Consider, as just one point among many, what the UN means when it speaks of “human rights.” In Article 29 of the UN’s “Universal Declaration of Human Rights,” the government signatories claim “rights” can be limited “by law” under the guise of everything from “public order” to “the general welfare.” In other words, you have no rights, only privileges. Separately, the same article claims that everyone has “duties to the community” and that “rights and freedoms” may “in no case be exercised contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations.” Compare that to the U.S. Constitution and the Declaration of Independence, which outline and protect God-given, inalienable rights.

Further down, the global action plan explains that the “education” agenda intends to shape every aspect of human life and civilization. “Education for global citizenship is an essential strategy to address global challenges as well as to promote gender equality, facilitate the eradication of poverty and hunger, build skills, eliminate corruption, and prevent violence, including violent extremism,” the document says. “It promotes truly sustainable production and consumption, mitigating climate change and its effects, protecting our waters and biodiversity, and preserving indigenous knowledge.”

If “tradition” and individual cultures get in the way of that agenda for UN-defined “human rights” and “global citizenship,” then “educational understandings” of those things will have to be “enhanced,” the action plan declares. The document also makes clear that this must be a worldwide effort, saying the global-citizenship scheming must be incorporated in school curricula worldwide and that “equitable quality education,” as defined by the UN, must be provided to “all people.” (Emphasis in original). The signatories vowed to work at the local level, too, to “incorporate education for global citizenship in educational systems.”

The signatories of the action plan, developed at the “66th United Nations Department of Public Information (DPI)/Non-Governmental Organization (NGO) Conference,” also committed to pushing global education that promotes a number of controversial concepts. “We commit to an education that teaches conflict resolution, a deep appreciation for diversity, ethical reasoning, gender equality, human rights and responsibilities, interdependence, multilingual and multicultural competence, social justice, sustainable development, and values,” it said. Those values, of course, are very unlikely to reflect the values of most parents around the world, whether they be Christian, Jewish, Muslim, Hindu, or any other major religious tradition. Instead, the values will be the values guiding the UN: globalism, pseudo-environmentalism, socialism, and more.

The UN Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization, or UNESCO, is at the center of the UN’s global “education” machinations. In addition to a partnership signed with Common Core-financier Bill Gates, UNESCO has been hard at work in its efforts to standardize and dumb-down education around the world. Among other schemes, it runs global programs on “Education for Sustainable Development,” “Educational for Global Citizenship,” and much more. It also has a “World Core Curriculum,” dedicated to and inspired by influential occultist Alice Bailey, that it hopes will guide schooling around the world in the years to come.

At a previous UN education summit, held last year in Korea, UNESCO boss Irina Bokova, a Bulgarian Communist Party operative who PR agents claim is among the “frontrunners” to lead the broader UN, also declared the UN’s intentions. “We have the collective duty to empower every child and youth with the right foundations — knowledge, values and skills — to shape the future as responsible global citizens, building on the successes of the past 15 years,” she said, adding that education would “transform lives” and contribute to “breakthroughs on all the proposed sustainable development goals.” In other words, the UN — not parents, families, or communities — believes that it has not just the right, but the “collective duty,” to shape your children’s values.

The latest conference on pushing Agenda 2030 through globalist indoctrination of children masquerading as “education” is a crucial follow-up to the adoption of the agenda itself. “Children and young women and men are critical agents of change and will find in the new Goals a platform to channel their infinite capacities for activism into the creation of a better world,” the official Agenda 2030 agreement explains.

The sort of activists that the UN hopes to make your children into is also explicitly defined in the agreement. “By 2030, ensure that all learners acquire the knowledge and skills needed to promote sustainable development, including, among others, through education for sustainable development and sustainable lifestyles, human rights, gender equality, promotion of a culture of peace and non-violence, global citizenship and appreciation of cultural diversity and of culture’s contribution to sustainable development,” the global plan for 2030 states. Considering what the UN means by “sustainable development” — population control, central planning, global governance, and more — the agenda for your children takes on an even more sinister tone.

“Sustainable” children for global citizenship in the new order will be accomplished via what the UN, the Obama administration, and others misleadingly refers to as “education.” In the UN document the word “education” alone is mentioned more than 20 times. And throughout the agreement, the UN openly advocates the use of schools to indoctrinate all of humanity into a new set of values, attitudes, and beliefs in preparation for the new “green” and “sustainable” world order. The UN’s education agenda also puts sex “education” front and center. “By 2030, ensure universal access to sexual and reproductive health-care services [abortion and contraception], including for family planning, information and education,” the document also explains.

For now, Americans, Europeans, and people around the world still have many options to protect their children from the global brainwashing campaign being pushed by the UN — home education, private schools, Christian schools, and more. However, the UN realizes that, too. And so, in recent years, under the phony guise of “human rights,” the UN has started agitating for government control and regulation of private and alternative forms of education in addition to its grip on “public” schools. The UN also continues to push international education agreements and schemes on everything from sex education and reading pedagogy to values and beliefs.

There is a good reason the UN is ridiculed by critics as the “dictators club.” Most of its member governments cannot be considered “free,” even under the most generous definition of the term. Allowing the UN to make and shape education policy is not just dangerous, then, it is crazy. Instead, education should be a job for families, communities, churches, charities, schools, and more — but primarily parents. The future of liberty literally depends on it.

Alex Newman, a foreign correspondent for The New American, is normally based in Europe. Follow him on Twitter @ALEXNEWMAN_JOU. He can be reached at anewman@thenewamerican.com

Related articles:

UN Agenda 2030: A Recipe for Global Socialism

UN: Gov’t Must Control Private Schools Because of “Human Rights”

Source: The New American

Global Policing, Global Governance, Unlimited AUMF, Setting the Stage for International Martial Law/One World Disorder/Global Domination…?

On a day when it seems, looking at Mainstream Media, it’s just “business as usual” in the downplaying way the Malheur Refuge/Harney County actions of aggression by the Federal Government are being reported, I’m just connecting a few dots here; the whole focus on Global Policing and Global Systems Surveillance and Intelligence is too close not to be remarked on; and while I’m not a fan of fear-mongering and fixating on martial law doom scenarios, it’s hard not to notice what is going on. Just in case you missed the recent Senate move to pass a revamped version of the AUMF giving the US President unlimited powers to start a war anytime, anywhere, minus Congressional input, here is more on this subject, from Senator Chris Murphy of Connecticut:

Many articles online about this, including this post at Activist Post by Joshua Krause/The Daily Sheeple:

Excerpt: Make no mistake, this doesn’t grant Obama the authority to strike ISIS. This gives him unlimited war powers in the broadest sense. ISIS has popped up all over the world. Countless insurgencies and terrorist groups have aligned themselves to the group. They encourage Muslims in every country to conduct terror attacks in their name, even if they’ve never met that person. ISIS isn’t just a group of zealots in Syria and Iraq; they are a banner which people can rally around, which means that ISIS can technically be anywhere.

In other words, this AUMF wouldn’t just give Obama permission strike ISIS anywhere in the world. It gives him the ability to deploy our military anywhere in the world, foreign or domestic, for an undetermined period of time, at the mere suggestion that ISIS is there. And it won’t be hard for them to prove ISIS is there, since anyone can wave their flag and carry out attacks in their name.

By now this should all sound very familiar to you. 9/11 invoked the same response from our government. They declared a War on Terrorism, which is nothing more than a tactic that anyone could use, thus allowing our government to take its war machine into any country on the planet.

But after the Bush administration fell out of favor with the American public, so too did the War on Terror. The war never stopped of course, but the term has lost its emotional charge, and isn’t used very often anymore. This bill aims to bring back the same sentiment with different words. It’s the War on Terror 2.0, which will henceforth be dubbed “The War on ISIS,” coming to a town near you. Full article here/Activist Post

Then there’s that Global Police Force we heard about earlier, to solve “Domestic Extremism” –codeword for American Dissent/American Freedom Movement/American Independent Thinking/American Activism?–launching “Strong Cities Networks” all across the United States, which Kris Anne Hall deconstructed for us, here, and Global Co-operation and Global Systems in Intelligence and Surveillance being set up–by Globalists/Internationalists/Central Bankers?–to address, surprise, once more Domestic Extremism/Homeland Security, which was publicly discussed last fall by certain international Intelligence Agency heads at George Washington University, reported here earlier.

It’s hard not to see where this is leading, or where the folks doing this would like it to lead.  Many steps are being taken in many different arenas, it seems, to tighten the noose around us and lead us inexorably to a One World Government based fully in totalitarian control, full-spectrum-dominance, all-systems control, weather control, human control, land control, neuro/thought control, mind control.

Today’s actions in Oregon underline the ruthlessness of the actors.

Judge Anna von Reitz has addressed these actions as well as the concept of martial law in a Notice to the Supreme Court, to be posted here separately–but you can see it online right now at Paulstramer.net or Scanned Retina.

Also, see her letter there on the issue of the commercial lien recently placed on various parties, including the International Bar Association, American Bar Association, and the Department of Justice. Many revealing bits of information there, including on the current insolvency of US Inc., the private government services corporation posing as Government, and offers by the World Bank and others to buy out this corporation…to be posted here shortly.

Excerpt here from the recent 1/26 State of the Nation article, with a personal disclaimer re. Pamela Geller’s words excerpted below: I don’t in any way condone or support equating Islam with terrorism or violent extremism; in my understanding, Islam is being propagandaistically used in this way, and has been, for years and decades, by the US Govt and CIA:  Obama Administration and UN Announce Global Police Force to Fight ‘Extremism’ In U.S.

by Pamela Geller
Breitbart.com

On Wednesday, Attorney General Loretta Lynch announced at the United Nations that her office would be working in several American cities to form what she called the Strong Cities Network (SCN), a law enforcement initiative that would encompass the globe.

This amounts to nothing less than the overriding of American laws, up to and including the United States Constitution, in favor of United Nations laws that would henceforth be implemented in the United States itself – without any consultation of Congress at all.

The United Nations is a sharia-compliant world body, and Obama, speaking there just days ago, insisted that “violent extremism” is not exclusive to Islam (which it is). Obama is redefining jihad terror to include everyone but the jihadists. So will the UN, driven largely by the sharia-enforcing Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) and the pro-Islamic post-American President Obama, use a “global police force” to crush counter-jihad forces?

After all, with Obama knowingly aiding al-Qaeda forces in Syria, how likely is it that he will use his “global police force” against actual Islamic jihadists? I suspect that instead, this global police force will be used to impose the blasphemy laws under the sharia (Islamic law), and to silence all criticism of Islam for the President who proclaimed that “the future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam.”

What is a global police force doing in our cities? This is exactly the abdication of American sovereignty that I warned about in my book, The Post-American Presidency: The Obama Administration’s War on America. The Obama Department of Justice made it clear that it was exactly that when it distributed a press release last week announcing the “Launch of Strong Cities Network to Strengthen Community Resilience Against Violent Extremism.” In that press release, the DoJ complained that “while many cities and local authorities are developing innovative responses to address this challenge, no systematic efforts are in place to share experiences, pool resources and build a community of cities to inspire local action on a global scale.”

So if the local and municipal effort to counter the euphemistic and disingenuous “violent extremism” is inadequate and hasn’t developed “systematic efforts are in place to share experiences, pool resources and build a community of cities to inspire local action on a global scale,” the feds – and the UN – have to step in. Thus the groundwork is being laid for federal and international interference down to the local level. Please continue reading at State of the Nation.

 

Covert Harassment Conference, Berlin, Oct 2015: Videos Uploaded

Please visit the Covert Harassment Conference, Berlin, Oct 2015 website for uploads of videos and information on all the speakers–a varied mix of investigative reporters, science and technology journalists, scientists, academics, alt. media broadcasters, engineers, and ex-Intel experts–at this conference. This may have been up for a while, I am just noticing it and watching the videos myself, starting with Dr. Nick Begich‘s first talk–which he opens with describing HAARP, its use as an ionospheric heater, its applications in earth-penetrating tomography, its generation of ELF waves (Extremely Low Frequency)–which are waves that can affect human minds at the low frequencies in which the human brain itself operates, and its use in Global Brain Entrainment (which Magnus Olsson, Director of EUCHACH, also speaks about here.) (I will make further posts on these videos in time.)

Many thanks to Peter Mooring of STOPEG for this excellent website and all information, including the videos, posted on it. The website also offers a compendium of information on the many subjects informing Covert Harassment and promises to be a central site on the Web for this purpose.

Covert Harassment Conference on Facebook

Covert Harassment Conference is on Facebook.

Note to journalists, writers, and human rights advocates worldwide: Please visit and listen to these talks to get caught up on the nature and extent of the Global Covert Assault technologies currently being used covertly on all of humanity, worldwide. These technologies now affect All of us on the planet--thanks to nanotechnology in aerosols being sprayed on all of us, thanks to ELF entrainments from HAARP and otherwise, thanks to cloud computing, AI, and various other technologies.

For anyone who isn’t aware of who was behind this excellent annual conference, this is from the website:

The Covert Harassment Conference 2015 is organized by:

Speakers

I am so pleased and grateful to all the organizers and speakers of this conference for setting up and posting this international forum to disseminate information openly on how electromagnetic/scalar/sonic technologies are currently being operated and tested c/overtly on “Targeted Individuals” as well as globally on populations worldwide.  Hopefully this heralds a new era of absolute disclosure when the world wakes up to what exactly is going on today under the rubric of Global Governance (see this post on Mass Control Technologies), and more and more people from all walks of life can step forward to act to stop these atrocities and challenge the use of Electronic Warfare and Artificial Intelligence by our joint governments on humanity–without our consent--as they wake up to the truth.

The Who and Why of Global Covert Assault is being considered here in a new series of ongoing posts, which seeks to collect and archive information from all over the Net, both older and newer articles & videos considering these questions. Please check back for periodic updates. (Please look under Featured Posts and Pages on the sidebar for this page link, I will post it there shortly.)

ETC Group & Heinrich Boll Foundation: Myth of Climate-Smart Agriculture at Paris, Dangers of Synthetic Biology to Developing Economies and Planetary EcoSystems, New Video Release

Thanks to Third World Network, for pointing to this information, and to the Guardian, for this report covering the excising of human rights language from the Paris Climate Summit conclusions, which impacts all nations but in particular affects the poorest and most disadvantaged communities in the world.

ETC Group, which, as noted on their website,  “works to address the socioeconomic and ecological issues surrounding new technologies that could have an impact on the world’s poorest and most vulnerable people” and the  Heinrich Boll Foundation have been sounding the alarm recently about how the synthetic biology industry–a new and growing multi-billion dollar biotech industry where new synthetic organisms can be manufactured by gene tampering and gene replacement to function as little factories–whether to output certain chemicals, or petroleum, or perfumes, or vanilla, or saffron, or anything else–is poised, not to save the world as they project, via “climate-smart agriculture” but to destroy existing eco-systems and economies, particularly in developing countries.

The animation video they have recently released is very clear-cut and informative and traces how this new biotech industry could easily become a runaway train that spells catastrophe for the planet. 10:43 minutes, well-worth watching. Written and narrated by Jim Thomas. Produced by Jocelyne Clark.

From their website:

“ETC Group and Heinrich Böll Foundation are releasing new language versions of a ten minute animated introduction to Synthetic Biology. Titled “What is Synthetic Biology ? : Engineering life and livelihoods” this short explainer cartoon, drawn by award-winning Canadian animator Marie-Josée Saint-Pierre and produced by documentary filmmaker Jocelyne Clarke was previously only available in English but is now available in French, Spanish, Portuguese and German. Additonally, a Haitian Creole version is available thanks to support from the 11th Hour Project. “

Here’s the English version, please visit their website for all other languages mentioned above:

ETC Group has also released two significant reports on Synthetic Biology in relation to the fossil-fuel industry and bio-engineering crops in agriculture, these pdfs can be found at their website, links below:

Extreme Biotech meets Extreme Energy -an ETC Group and Heinrich Böll Stiftung Report

Excerpt from press release: The extreme genetic engineering industry of Synthetic biology (Syn Bio) is shrugging off earlier pretensions that it would usher in a clean, green ‘post-petroleum’ economy. Now they are partnering with big oil, coal, gas and mining interests. As the extreme biotech industry and the extreme extraction industry move towards deeper collaboration, the safety risks and climate treats emanating from both will become ever more entangled. This report details this emerging fossil-biotech alliance.

Report Release: Outsmarting Nature? New Report Questions Risky Synthetic Biology Developments Promoted Under “Climate-Smart” Guise

 

 

 

ExcerptOutsmartingNature

Excerpt from the ETC Report, Outsmarting Nature?

From their website, where you can find immense amounts of information on subjects related to the impacts of climate policies, agriculture, biotechnology,

OutsmartingNature2

From the ETC Report, Outsmarting Nature?

and ecology on developing countries and economies, they note, with reference to the recently-concluded Climate Summit in Paris:

“Farmers’ movements and their allies have already made it absolutely clear that so-called climate-smart agriculture is the wrong fix for climate change. Applying synthetic biology to the challenges that agriculture faces is doubly wrongheaded,” explains Silvia Ribeiro, ETC Group’s Latin America Director, currently en route to the Paris climate negotiations. “To cool the climate what needs to be recognized and supported is agroecological and resilient small scale and peasant farming systems, not falling for false fixes from the Big Agribusiness corporations that brought us climate change in the first place.”

“In Paris civil society will be saying we need system change to fight climate change. What we certainly don’t need are risky techno-fixes,” said Lili Fuhr of Heinrich Böll Foundation. ”Agribusiness corporations would have us believe it is better to change fundamental natural processes such as photosynthesis than to move away from  industrial agriculture and its damaging impacts – that is not just insane, but fundamentally unsustainable and unjust.”

The press release from which the above is excerpted can be found here.

“Climate-Smart Agriculture” or CSA is apparently a “brand” being pushed by old industrial mavens striving to camouflage themselves as green, sustainable developers in the new Global Alliance for Climate-Smart Agriculture (GACSA), and appears to be a part of the global Agenda 21/Agenda 2030 brigade, covered here in other posts.

ON3

From the ETC Report, Outsmarting Nature?

These issues in particular with reference to impacts on developing countries, ecosystems, and economies will continue to be monitored here.

For updated news on these subjects, please check in regularly at ETC Group and at Third World Network.

To learn more about Synthetic Biology, which is apparently sweeping through the biotech world and has ensconced itself in Universities, also see this brief informative video from Grist (check Youtube for other videos): 4:23 minutes

 

Alex Newman/The New American: Paris Stunned As Scientists Debunk Climate Change Hysteria

Re-posted (in excerpt) from Sean Adl-Tabatabai’s post at Your News Wire, please visit for full story. Original article by writer and foreign correspondent Alex Newman at The New American.

While the absence of geo-engineering from talk of global warming at the Paris Summit is a whole big story in itself–not covered by mainstream media because they’re apparently paid not to talk about geo-engineering (as also so much else)–the other big story is about fudged data, evidence for global cooling, and global warming alarmism as strategy to push through global carbon taxes, global control, and global government. Are we tired of the word “global” yet…? I’m grateful to the scientists speaking out about these dark world-domination agendas and to the writers who are reporting them. Many thanks to Alex Newman and The New American as well as to Sean Adl-Tabatabai and Your News Wire, for this article; please visit there for the full story.

********************

Paris Stunned As Scientists Debunk Climate Change Hysteria

Posted on December 9, 2015 by

An international team of scientists have stunned attendees at the UN’s climate change conference in Paris recently by debunking claims that global warming is man-made.  

parisclimat

The scientists say that while the science refutes the UN’s claim that man-made carbon emissions are to blame for global warming, they claim that the UN is pressing ahead with its sinister ‘climate regime’ agenda, which includes: destroying industrial civilization, propping up kleptocrats with Western tax funds, and seizing control of the global economy under the guise of regulating the immensely beneficial “gas of life,” also known as carbon dioxide.

Thenewamerican.com reports:

Dubbed “Day of Examining the Data,” the conference featured numerous presentations, each one debunking multiple elements of theincreasingly discredited anthropogenic (man-made) global-warming theory (AGW). From explaining the myriad benefits of carbon dioxide to the environment and mankind to highlighting the ongoing 19-year pause in warming, no intellectually honest attendee could have left the summit still believing the “climate” hysteria pushed by various governments and international outfits. Indeed, practically every fear-mongering narrative pushed at the nearby UN climate summit was mercilessly debunked with facts, data, logic, and common sense. Later in the day, the film Climate Hustle brutally exposing the climate alarmism premiered at a nearby cinema in Paris, earning nothing but profuse praise from attendees.

Among the scientists speaking at the realist summit were Dr. Robert Carter, former chief of the School of Earth Sciences at James Cook University. “Global warming is not happening,” he explained, even noting that long-term cooling was predicted. Carter’s presentation was especially fascinating because it totally shredded the outlandish notion that CO2 — exhaled by humans and critical to life — is “carbon pollution” in need of regulation. In fact, he said, even at current atmospheric concentrations, the Earth and the plants it supports are “starving” for more CO2. And in the past, CO2 concentrations were some 10 to 15 times higher. “Attempting to stop climate change is an exercise in utter futility,” he added, noting in an interview with The New American that nobody would seriously consider trying to “stop” earthquakes or volcanic eruptions.

Also speaking at the summit was Dr. Willie Soon, an astrophysicist and geoscientist at the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics. The UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), he explained, “is totally anti-science, and is harming science.” Emphasizing the massive role played by the sun in the Earth’s incomprehensibly complex climate system, Soon narrowed in on one particular claim in the IPCC report on the issue that he said made a complete mockery of science. “The IPCC is pure gangster science,” he explained. Speaking to The New American after his presentation, Soon said the vicious attacks against his character and family by global-warming alarmists had only motivated him to work harder. Rather than launching personal attacks, he said, critics should instead focus on the data and his conclusions published in the peer-reviewed literature.

Another top scientist at the summit was University of Virginia Professor Emeritus Dr. Fred Singer, founder of the Science and Environmental Policy Project (SEPP) and the Nongovernmental International Panel on Climate Change. “There has been no statistically significant warming in 18 years,” he told the summit, showing a slide comparing observed temperatures with the various bogus predictions made by “climate models” relied upon by the UN, all of which predicted warming as CO2 increased. “The models don’t work. We should not use them to make policy.” He also noted that carbon dioxide — “the original plant food,” as he called it — is very valuable. “Plants are starving. They want more CO2,” Singer added.

Essentially, the internationally respected scientist continued, the climate has always changed due to natural forces — warming, cooling, and so on — from the beginning. And so, that means the obvious hypothesis that natural forces are still driving climate change, as they always have, must be shown to be false by proponents of the man-made climate change propaganda. In other words, the burden to show that the recent minor changes are attributable to mankind is on the alarmists who want to empower the UN, control CO2, and redistribute wealth. So far, though, the alarmists have failed, and they have a tough job ahead, Singer said.

“This is about money and power,” Singer told The New American in an interview, adding that governments had purchased the cooperation of many scientists on climate alarmism. “Science plays a small role, and mostly it’s being misused.” “It’s a matter of really trying to control things,” Singer said, noting that control of CO2 means control of economies and ultimately, people. What is being plotted right now at the nearby UN COP21 summit, he added, is a “direct subsidy to kleptocracies,” which are pocketing the climate loot and hiding it in their bank accounts. “It’s a matter of the poor in rich countries supporting the rich in the poor countries,” Singer concluded.

Please continue reading at Your News Wire.

Kris Anne Hall & A Young Intern: Remember the Opposite of Sovereign is Slave/You Were Born With the Right to Speak

sovereign

Sovereign of Elizabeth I (1583-1600)

“Sovereignty” is a word that’s being appropriated and demonized within the Security State, as Constitutional attorney, scholar, and public speaker Kris Anne Hall points out, and it is worth looking at what “Sovereign” really means.  A young intern with her organization, Elizabeth Manley, has written an intriguing letter which is posted on her website (linked below), and I highlight a small excerpt below from it, which calls on all of us to speak out against the abuses of our Government, when our Government is abusive–note, this is the voice of an 18-year-old. (Follows the note on Sovereignty.)  She calls on her own generation, but really she calls on all of us to “speak out against the evil, to stop letting our government define things for us.” Never has there been a more crucial moment in history for us to heed this insightful teenager’s advice–in the US, and in the world, as the 2015 Climate Summit approaches, we are standing on the brink of absolute totalitarianism, and this may well be the most defining moment for us All to speak out, to act, to avert this catastrophe for humanity.

Re-posted from Facebook and from Kris Anne Hall’s website (in excerpt), with thanks.

**********************************

krisannehallKris Anne Hall, Facebook, Nov 5, 2015

Today’s Point To Ponder:

It is interesting the way the application of the word “sovereign” is being altered. Changing the societal definition of words is a tool used by tyrants throughout history to enslave the people.

The federal government is attempting (quite successfully) to stigmatize the understanding of “sovereignty” when it comes to individuals and at the same time try to convince us that the federal government is itself “sovereign.”

Sovereign is defined as “autonomous, independent, self-governing; Supreme in power; possessing supreme dominion.” Are we to believe that these adjectives describe the federal government? Is the federal government autonomous, independent and self-governing? Is the federal government Supreme in power or possessing supreme dominion? Of course not! Let us be reminded:

“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal and endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights…that to secure these Rights, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just power from the consent of the governed…That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it…”

Now consider this:
“The Power not delegated to the United States by the Constitution…are reserved to the States respectively, or to the People.”

Power emanates from Rights. We did not delegate Rights to government we delegated power. Government has nothing that is not sourced from the people.

“What is true of every member of the society individually, is true of them all collectively, since the rights of the whole can be no more than the sum of the rights of individuals.” T. Jefferson

Government cannot exercise a power over you greater than YOU can exercise over your neighbor. Why? The source of all government power comes from the people and government cannot be greater than the individual source of its power.

“The supreme power is undoubtedly in the people, and it is a principle well established in my mind, that they reserve all powers not expressly delegated by them to those who govern; this is as true in forming a state as in forming a federal government.” Federal Farmer #16

The power of the People is one area where the Federalists and Anti-Federalists were in complete agreement. In Federalist #84, Hamilton is very clear that the fact that we have delegated power to the federal government does not in any way amount to a surrender of our Rights: “in strictness, the people surrender nothing, and as they retain every thing.” Hamilton even identifies The People as the ultimate source of control over the federal government, in Federalist #33:

“If the federal government should overpass the just bounds of its authority and make a tyrannical use of its powers, the people, whose creature it is, must appeal to the standard they have formed, and take such measures to redress the injury done to the Constitution as the exigency may suggest and prudence justify.”

Given these explanations, the only proper application of Sovereignty is to that of the People. We are in possession of sovereign power. We are the supreme political authority. We are the paramount control of the constitution and frame of government and its administration. We are the self-sufficient source of political power, from which all specific political powers are derived.

Government possesses NO autonomy and no power independent on its own. All government power is derived FROM the People, at the will of the People!

So then next time you hear someone vilifying the idea of Sovereignty, remember the opposite of Sovereign is Slave. Is that who we think we are? It is who the government wants us to be.

From Elizabeth Manley, Liberty First Intern:

I have big hopes for my peers.  We are the next generation of Americans! We cannot stand by and let our nation fall. Each person will answer to God for his/her decisions and actions to guard what God has blessed us with.

 “Please stand with me, let’s encourage each other on to bigger and better things! Let’s face the world as a strong generation and let’s not pass this evil on to our children.”

Mercy Otis Warren states: “We will stand today, or our children will fall tomorrow.”

You still have inalienable rights. You were born with the right to speak. What good does it do you if you never, ever use it?! Can we speak out against the evil, stop letting our government define things for us, and instead put government back in it’s rightful place?

– See more at: http://krisannehall.com/a-plea-from-the-future-of-liberty/#sthash.jiVT6krU.dpuf

 

RELATED:

Studying Sovereignty, Birthright, & the Anglo-American Empire of One World Government: Consent of the Governed

Kris Anne Hall: Liberty is Our Inherent Possession, Not Government Gift

Strong Cities, Smart Growth, Mega Regions: Agenda 21’s Frenzied Plan for Global Policing and Stacked Housing

CIA, Mossad, MI6, DGSE: Seemingly Pushing for a “Global Systems Approach” to “Homeland” Security

Shortly after the Paris attacks, it was learned more widely that the heads of various Intelligence agencies–the CIA, the DGSE, and former heads of the Mossad and MI6–had met a couple weeks earlier in Washington, DC.

Dahboo7 reported briefly on this:

The meeting took place on the campus of the George Washington University (where I taught Creative Writing for many years, and prior to that, various Composition and Writing courses in the English Department’s Writing Program) under the aegis of the George Washington Center for Cyber and Homeland Security (no doubt creative in its own way;), which describes itself on Youtube thus:

The Center for Cyber and Homeland Security (CCHS) at the George Washington University is a nonpartisan “think and do” tank whose mission is to carry out policy-relevant research and analysis on homeland security, counterterrorism, and cybersecurity issues. By convening domestic and international policymakers and practitioners at all levels of government, the private and non-profit sectors, and academia, CCHS develops innovative strategies to address and confront current and future threats.

The occasion for the meeting was ostensibly a panel conducted as part of a conference titled the (2nd Annual) Ethos and Profession of Intelligence Conference, which was co-hosted by the Central Intelligence Agency and the George Washington University, and was held on October 27, 2015.

The panel was titled, interestingly, “The Shared 21st Century International Mission,” and featured CIA Director John Brennan, former UK MI6 Chief John Sawers, Director of the French Directorate for External Security Bernard Bajolet, and former Israeli National Security Advisor Yaacov Amidror. The panel was moderated by David Ignatius, Columnist at the Washington Post.

The whole panel may be watched on Youtube (video below), and, given the power that Intel agencies currently have appropriated for themselves, and the level of self-congratulation aired here, is just a little disturbing to watch and listen to, but is posted here for a couple reasons. While it’s no secret that Intelligence agencies in the West–and Israel–probably work together anyway on all sorts of issues related to security and intelligence, counter-intelligence, and counter-terrorism, it’s interesting to note that there now appears to be an obvious, emerging bent now among Intelligence agencies to openly merge and combine their efforts and missions, much in keeping with other global initiatives, such as evinced in Global Policing and the current push toward One World/Global Governance.

To this end, I found two moments of note in this panel, one by former Israeli Advisor Yaacov Amidror sounding just un peu frantic about the crucial need for increased collection and sharing of information among Intel agencies in order to “win in the arena of digital/cyber warfare,” and the second featuring current CIA Head John Brennan holding forth on the changed terrain post 9/11, acknowledging the sophistication of current systems but noting the current-day complexity of pulling together vast collections of data and information from all sorts of sources, including, “something from Youtube, something collected clandestinely,” and the need for “pulling it all together and pulsing it, at the speed of light”–a need for a “System of Systems approach” to be established and evolved and improved, as data improves (a subject immediately picked up by the rest of the panel as an opportunity to praise the gargantuan collection of data by the NSA).

Actually, that led to something else that’s disturbing though–John Sawers talking about “threats to the homeland” (Does the UK also have a “Homeland”? How language creeps along!) and David Ignatius pointedly asking Mr. Amidror about Palestinian “lone wolf” terrorists. (Who praised Israeli Intel for their efforts in intercepting “95% of planned terrorism” and confining attacks to ones by the “lonely wolves.”) This excerpt is prefaced by the French DGSE Head Bernard Bajolet talking about international co-operation among Intel and his own efforts in tracking suspects who tended to travel between Europe and the Middle-East and can be viewed from 41 minutes in to about ten minutes down.

What’s notable is that there seemed to be a distinct attempt by all at this panel including the moderator to highlight this Global Systems approach, as well as to deliberately spotlight Domestic Intelligence, Domestic Terrorism or Extremism, and Lone Wolves–all focuses that we have seen before, and are still seeing today, resulting in increased and repressive, secretive, surveillance and counter-terrorism measures being unleashed on domestic populations, both in the US, the UK, and in other countries in Europe.

Panel at GW, 21st-Century Intelligence Sharing

In relation to the above, it is interesting to note the following excerpt on supercomputers crunching massive amounts of intelligence in an Artificial Intelligence scenario from an article on Remote Neural Monitoring–a secretive, probably-classified neurotechnology which directs electromagnetic/scalar energy remotely onto human brains, bodies, and nervous systems, which is nevertheless widely described today, reported worldwide by non-consensual experimentees, and discussed online, and which will be covered here more extensively shortly–posted at Deepthought.newsvine.com:

“‘Mr Computer’ is a general artificial intelligence with greater-than-human level reasoning capability.  Whilst not what many envision as being the technological singularity, it is certainly the leading practical implementation of this notion.  For the less romantic, ‘Mr Computer’ is a HCI solution to a vast decentralized data warehousing solution jointly operated by the CIA and NSA.  Its role in RNM is a CIA black op with stated objectives of controlling all aspects of human behavior, thus it is possible for individuals to know of this AI in a different capacity and not have access to RNM directly.

Outside of its role in RNM, ‘Mr Computer’ is a force multiplier that enables the US intelligence community to connect-the-dots in gathered intelligence from every available source.  This system is the ultimate destination of any data the US Federal government collects. Forget notions of hacking or attacking this system, not only can it literally vaporize you, but its also a better programmer, physicist and engineer than all humans combined.  It’s as secure as they come and its bugs are not of the conventional exploitable type.   I’m sure it finds modern notions of cyber-warfare and IT security ‘cute’ and ‘charming’, but ultimately not in the same league as it and certainly not a threat.” More can be found at Deep Thought.

In which vein, also see this informative 2013 article on Skynet and AI taking over NSA surveillance data: Skynet Rising: Google Acquires 512-Qubit Quantum Computer: NSA Surveillance to be Turned Over to AI Machines