Tag Archives: Holding the Line

Rusere Shoniwa, Holding the Line | BBC Hosts Big Pharma’s African Marketing Campaign

Re-post from Holding the Line | Ramola D | Jan 14, 2022

By Rusere Shoniwa | Dec 27, 2021

Dr Ayoade Alakija on BBC World News at the end of November

If Big Pharma were to run a modestly honest advertisement to recruit dealers for pushing Covid ‘vaccines’ in Africa, it might read something like this:

‘International drug cartel requires Western educated Black face to front our public campaign to push experimental and unnecessary Covid vaccines on the impoverished African continent. This is a tough market, highly suspicious of the product and not without good reason. Smile and dial merchants need not apply as you must bypass the consumer to target the decision-maker. Successful applicants must display the ability to rail melodramatically at the ‘racist vaccine-hoarding’ injustices perpetrated by the West against Africa, appealing to the woke sensibilities of those in positions of power within key Western institutions. African leaders will then be expected to do as they’re told.’

BBC stages agitprop for Big Pharma

I must confess that I reverse-engineered that ad after watching the successful applicant going through the motions like a performing seal on a BBC World News slot set aside for just such agitprop. Following the latest Covid variant hype, the Co-Chair of the African Union’s Vaccine Delivery Alliance, Dr Ayoade Alakija, announced on the UK’s flagship propaganda organ:

‘What is going on right now [the emergence of the Omicron Variant] is inevitable. It’s a result of the world’s failure to vaccinate in an equitable, urgent and speedy manner. It is a result of hoarding by high-income countries of the world and quite frankly it is unacceptable. These travel bans are based in politics and not science. It is wrong.’

Abandoning any pretence at journalism, the BBC presenter plays the role of therapist by responding: “I hear your anger about the immediate reaction and the lack of action beforehand.’

The stage direction becomes even more obvious and cringeworthy as the BBC presenter then pauses, providing a cue for the good doctor to glance at her script and resume the televised amateur dramatics:

‘So this is hopefully a dress rehearsal because until everyone is vaccinated no-one is safe…Why are the Africans unvaccinated? It’s an outrage because we knew we were going to get here. We knew this is where the hoarding, the lack of IP waivers, the lack of cooperation on sharing tech and sharing know-how, we knew this was the cross-roads it was going to bring us to. To a more dangerous variant.’

The only valid question she raises concerns the swift travel bans placed on Southern African countries: ‘Why are we locking away Africa when this virus is already on three continents? Nobody is locking away Belgium, nobody is locking away Israel.’ 

This is an emotional ploy to gain the trust of the small handful of privileged Africans watching this drivel. She is saying to them: ‘I am right-on, woke, one of you.’ She quickly jumps back on board the Covid cult train with a policy ‘nudge’ that must have African leaders reaching for their sick bags.

‘Something needs to be done to everywhere. My recommendation is have a coordinated global shut down of travel, for the next month if you want, but don’t single out Africa.’

And then back to the greedy, vaccine-hoarding West:

‘The Botswana government ordered 500,000 doses of vaccines at $29 per dose, much higher than the rest of the world paid. They did not get those vaccines because other people jumped ahead in the queue. Moderna supplied to other countries…and so now we have a variant.’

Rule #1 of BBC ‘journalism’ – avoid the most obvious question

Not a single grain of this guerrilla marketing campaign was challenged by the BBC journalist. The obvious starting point for a presenter with half an ounce of journalistic integrity would be to explore whether the ‘vaccines’ are working and whether they would indeed have prevented a variant. After all, the fact that they do not halt transmission and infection is no longer controversial.

After the The Daily Sceptic blew the lid off the vaccine efficacy lie, The Spectator confirmed that ‘in every age group over 30 in the UK, the rates of Covid infection per 100,000 are now higher among the vaxxed than the unvaxxed’. Even the UK Prime Minister has been forced to admit that the vaccine ‘doesn’t protect you against catching the disease, and it doesn’t protect you against passing it on‘. The BBC itself doesn’t pretend to be ignorant of the uselessness of the vaccine in preventing transmission and infection but, in a homage to Orwellian satire, it managed to use vaccine inefficacy to argue for more vaccination.  

African leaders will be wondering why Portugal, one of the world’s most vaccinated places, which has pretty much run out of people to vaccinate, has recently announced it will reimpose restrictions to stop a surge in cases. Emphasising that the definition of madness – repeatedly doing what has been shown not to work – is no longer a barrier to health policy in the West, Portugal announced that it will ‘continue to bet on vaccination to control the pandemic’ by rolling out booster shots.

African leaders may ponder why Gibraltar, whose entire eligible population is vaccinated, has cancelled official Christmas events amid a surge in Covid-19 cases. Gibraltar has achieved the mathematical impossibility of a 118% vaccination rate owing to counting doses given to Spaniards who cross the border to work or visit the territory every day. Its health minister in November announced a ‘drastic increase in the numbers of people testing positive for Covid-19 in recent days’.

Here is a report on 10 countries where data shows the vaccines have failed miserably.

It would have been entertaining to see the Vaccine Delivery Alliance spin doctor weave all of this into her sales pitch for Africa.

Omicron fear porn demonstrates collapse of the vaccine narrative

No sales pitch involving an illness would be complete without recourse to fear-based marketing tactics. Enter the Omicron narrative. Despite her claim that we now have ‘a more dangerous variant’, there was no evidence that this variant would make any difference to disease severity at the time she was invited by the BBC to make her vaccine sales pitch for Africa. (Nor is there proof that vaccination prevents variants from arising in the first place.) Since then, the evidence emerging is that Omicron is less severe than previous variants and more contagious – the ideal combination for hastening herd immunity with minimal population health impact.

Are there any grounds for believing that the ‘vaccines’ will be any less useless at stopping this variant than they have been with all the preceding variants? Reuters reported on 2nd  December that all 14 passengers returning to the Netherlands on two flights from South Africa who tested positive for the Omicron variant were vaccinated. It also reported ‘that most of the 62 people who tested positive for COVID-19 [irrespective of variant] … had been vaccinated, lending weight to a call for pre-flight testing regardless of vaccination status.’ 

Reports of the worthlessness of the vaccine are too numerous to catalogue. The one above serves the dual purpose of illustrating the collapse of the vaccine narrative and the stupidity of using the variant narrative as an argument for more vaccination. The only thing more depressing than seeing the stale and mould-ridden variant dish being reheated and served up yet again is watching people capable of reading and writing hungrily devouring it.

In short, the vaccine narrative is not merely in freefall; it is a fetid corpse being given mouth-to-mouth resuscitation by a political leadership and its media allies whose threshold for self-abasement is boundless. Telling medium-sized lies and half-truths with a straight face has always been the minimum qualification for political office, but Covid has raised the bar to a new height – the ability to swim in a pool of one’s own metaphorical vomit without flinching.

Never, never mention vaccine safety

The ‘discussion’ might have turned to safety to tease out how much personal risk Africans will be expected to bear in submitting to a vaccine that doesn’t perform the primary function of a vaccine. The word ‘safety’, however, was not permitted to impinge in any way on the protestations of the injustice of depriving Africans of the wondrous medical treatments emanating from the hallowed laboratories of Western science. 

The reticence about safety is understandable from a marketing perspective since, by any objective measure, these ‘vaccines’ are the most dangerous mass medications rolled out in modern history. At 25 November the vaccine safety reporting systems in the US, EU and UK reported deaths following vaccination of 18,853; 31,014; and 1,784 respectively. The total number of adverse reports logged across these systems respectively is 894,145; 386,517 (encompassing 1,271,009 individual events); and 1,181,121 (encompassing 2,859,586 events). 

The UK’s own responsible health authority estimates the reported rate of adverse events to be 2-10% of the actual occurrence. The rate of underreporting is estimated to be similar in the US. I do not have estimates of underreporting for the EU systems but there is no reason to assume that underreporting is not a phenomenon there. Thus, the true level of injury is a significant multiple of the reported figures.

Alex Berenson, a former New York Times investigative journalist, has made a name for himself reporting the truth about Covid. He made the following sobering observation about relative risk of Covid and injury from vaccination for young college age adults:

‘The risk of severe disease or death from Covid to healthy college-age adults is too low to measure accurately. The data from Europe suggests that a healthy 18 year-old has a risk of death lower than 1 in 1 million. 

‘The risk of dangerous heart inflammation [following Covid vaccination] is NOT too low to measure. A new study from Hong Kong found that 1 out of 2,300 12-17 year-old boys who received both Pfizer doses suffered acute myocarditis or pericarditis. Most of the risk came after the second dose. The risk is very similar in college-age men.’

 It has also come to light that Pfizer clinical trial data shows that more vaccine trial recipients died than did the placebo recipients. Berenson points out that ‘all-cause mortality is arguably the MOST important measure for any drug or vaccine – especially one meant to be given prophylactically to large numbers of healthy people, as vaccines are.’

Meanwhile the US FDA is resisting attempts to get it to release important documents associated with the approval of the Pfizer vaccine, claiming that it could take 75 years to comply with the request. If the FDA gets its way, some 451,000 pages regarding the clinical trials for this vaccine will be off limits to the millions of people being coerced into taking it. Aside from the gall it takes to hide information about a treatment from the patients being forced to take it, how can there be any claims to ‘following The Science™’ when science relies on data and the data is being deliberately hidden? 

And who will Africans turn to in the event of serious injury from a treatment to prevent an illness that the vast majority have coped very well with for two years? Perhaps Dr Alakija should have been quizzed about how Africans might react to the drug manufacturer’s lack of confidence in the safety of their own products in light of their refusal to distribute it to countries who refuse to provide blanket immunity from liability for injury.

How much of the safety information provided here (which is a tip-of-the-iceberg summary) was explored, even in the vaguest terms, in the BBC World ‘News’ report? Not a single word of it was mentioned. Nothing. Neither of the two stooges saw fit to broach the prospect that many young Africans whose risk of dying from Covid is so small that it is hard to measure, may die following vaccination. Recall the vaccine risk to young males highlighted by Alex Berenson and then link it to Africa’s average age of 20.  

The callousness of this omission is standard operating procedure in Western liberal discourse, a key function of which is to drape a ‘humanitarian’ cloak over policies that enrich corporate interests in the West while harming and exploiting the poor. The only consolation available to Africans is that this time around, the expendability of life in the ostensible cause of furthering scientific progress has been equally applied to their Western counterparts. The game really has changed in that sense. That is obviously not something to be celebrated but it is an important clue to the meaning of Covid as a global change phenomenon, more of which later.

Propaganda 101 – bury credible dissenting narratives

Unveiling the farce of the BBC plug for Africa’s vaccination allows us to consider a game in which we imagine what other doctors might say if the BBC were to air credible dissenting voices – a practice that was once regarded as the bread and butter of journalism, but which would now be a radical act of rebellion. It’s not a difficult game to play. In fact, no imagination is required because the actual statements of credible dissenting medical doctors are available on other independent media news channels. Here’s what some doctors are saying on a new Austrian TV channel:

Dr Maria Hubmer-Mogg: ‘The Covid-19 vaccine still has only emergency authorisation, because there has been no officially recognised treatment. It is an experimental medication. Children very rarely get seriously ill with Covid-19, yet vaccination can involve high but unspecifiable risks. Politicians, by coercing us to take a vaccine like this, are behaving like criminals. Covid-19 infections are – especially at the outset – very easy to treat. But in spite of a high level of effectiveness, the available treatments are not globally sanctioned. Why?’ 

Dr Christian Fiala: ‘The Covid-19 vaccine is useless and dangerous. The public has been manipulated and conditioned through scaremongering, and the measures taken are – sadly – completely haphazard. People have steered clear of rational argument when discussing the “pandemic”. This new-fangled mRNA “vaccine” makes the human immune system attack its own body. So, the corona “vaccine” is effectively programmed self-destruction.’

Dr Heiko Schöning: ‘The corona panic is a stage-managed production. It’s a confidence trick. It is now urgent that we understand we are now in the grip of a worldwide Mafioso-style criminal enterprise. We can see we are dealing here with organised crime. So what do we do? We don’t play along any longer. Here and now we have to draw the red line.’

Had Dr Schöning just finished watching the two stooges on BBC World News when he described ‘the corona panic’ as ‘a stage-managed production’? Whether the Austrian doctors are right or wrong is irrelevant to the journalistic duty to present credible dissenting voices to the public. The failure to do so goes a long way to meeting the criteria for propaganda. The question in relation to Dr Alakija’s BBC guerrilla marketing campaign is: do enough Africans know that there are alternative credible narratives to challenge the mainstream BBC vaccine narrative and how would they respond if these competing narratives were presented? 

The meaning of Covid for Africa – a manufactured crisis is a crisis no less

Does Africa, or anywhere else for that matter, need mass vaccination? Almost two years into this global nightmare, with evidence showing that up to 80% of South Africans (how similar for other African nations?) may have already been exposed to the virusless than 6% of Africa vaccinated, and a death toll a fraction of that in the ageing populations of the West (Africa’s Covid deaths are 3% of the global total), it is clear that Africa has already learnt to live with the virus. 

Had Africans succeeded in applying the same level of rigorous lockdown stupidity that was achieved in the West, it would not have made the slightest difference as real science is conclusively demonstrating not just the futility of lockdowns but their positive destructiveness. Despite looser lockdowns (perhaps partly because of this) Africa fared much better than the illiberal West in health outcomes. No doubt there are other variables at play, but cheap effective early treatments in some parts of Africa were used to good effect and should continue to be the focus of attention. Africa and the entire planet would get far more bang for their buck from policies addressing human health holistically rather than with expensive experimental ‘vaccines’ which will continue for as long as human beings are prepared to, or more likely forced to, surrender their bodies to Big Pharma and authoritarian governments. 

It must be patently obvious to African leaders that the Covid crisis is a manufactured one, but that does not make it any less of a crisis. On the contrary, it signals a far deeper crisis in the West than might have been the case had there been sincere and rational attempts to deal with a genuinely apocalyptic health threat. Covid containment policies are not about protection of health and nor are they the result of incompetence as many naïve commentators so desperately want to believe. 

The West’s ruling elite has completely lost confidence (if it ever did have confidence) in the values of democracy and freedom that it tried to impose on the rest of the world through a combination of brute military force and economic terrorism. Notwithstanding that these uncivilised means of delivery signified an absence of faith in the product, the result of the loss of confidence in these values is that Western liberal democracy is being dismantled at breakneck speed under the cover of Covid containment policies. 

The criminality, coercion, censorship, propaganda and blatant negligence all signal the logical conclusion to a brutal colonial mindset – the attempted colonisation of the entire globe to serve the interests of a global elite which has successfully captured Western governments and supranational organisations.

We are not experiencing mere change à la 1968. We are witnessing the collapse of a global empire with a mafia style global elite hijacking that collapse to defend its continued survival in the aftermath. The psychopaths whose aim is to introduce a technocratic global system of human control understand only too well that shutting off travel for economies that rely on tourism is a far bigger killer of economies, and therefore lives, than this virus has ever been. The message being sent by the sadistic controllers to Africa’s leaders is a simple one: get serious about imposing vaccines and the technocratic population control measures for which vaccines are the delivery system…or else. This is an audacious global project and, to state the obvious, global tyranny won’t work unless it’s global

Africa is at an epochal crossroads courtesy of Covid policies manufactured in the West and being exported wholesale to Africa. At a superficial level, absolutely everything about the West’s containment policies for Covid can be characterised as voodoo garbage. African leaders understand this. In relation to the punitive global reaction to Omicron, the South African president called out the unscientific basis for the travel bans. And yet still he flirts with lighting a match underneath the seething resentment of forced vaccines by threatening mandated vaccination. 

At a deeper level, Covid containment policies represent a desperate authoritarian response to permanent decline. This cannot end well for the West and if the West is a sinking ship, then Africa must not blindly tether itself to this Titanic disaster. Addressing Ethiopia’s political leadership on Pan Africanism, Professor P L Lumumba recently warned that Africa will be recolonised in the next 25 years. Sadly, his warning lacks the requisite degree of urgency since the timeframe is out by 25 years. It is happening right now.

His failure to appreciate this is rooted in a failure to comprehend the meaning of Covid. It is a totalitarian coup by global capital using captured Western governments to implement technocratic systems of biomedical and financial control. If Africa is serious about avoiding recolonisation, it must get serious about resisting Covid diktats from Western governments and international agencies.

You can read more of Rusere’s work at https://plagueonbothhouses.com 


Many thanks to Rusere Shoniwa for permission to repost this article. May Africa wake and lead the way forward in rejecting and halting the toxic COVID-vaccines which are causing millions worldwide to die and suffer disability. Please share widely!

RELATED:

Holding the Line, Journalists Against Covid Censorship | Journalists call for Christmas truce to stop division turning into war

Holding the Line Press Release | Ramola D | Dec 26, 2021

Journalists united against Covid censorship in the UK, USA, and elsewhere, including this writer, call for a Christmas truce between the vaccinated and unvaccinated factions and urge a revisiting of awareness of basic freedoms for all people of speech, discourse, and medical choice. Christmas Press Release re-posted below, please share widely. Holding The Line posts important news on censorship versus freedom at their website.

From Sainbury’s Christmas Truce commercial marking the 100th anniversary of this WWI phenomenon/Christmas Day 1914 when Germans, French and British marked a truce along the Western Front
1914 Christmas Truce/Image: Public Domain

Society has become polarised around the issue of Covid vaccines and it is worrying to imagine where this schism could be pushing normally right thinking people.

There are two camps drawing battle lines in the digital world, those who are injected and demand everyone else be injected, and those who want to remain uninjected for now or permanently while keeping their freedoms.

In the non-digital world there is another group, which outnumbers both the other two groups put together, that simply wants the vaccinated and unvaccinated to be able to coexist in peace.

Let’s move back to the first group for a moment, though, as it seeks to influence the largest of the three groups. This group is small in number but sometimes has the platforms to shout loudest.

Without naming names, as HTL understands that hostility against journalists and commentators is rising in parallel with hostility against the unvaccinated, here are some headlines from this month.

The unvaccinated have become a lethal liability we can ill-afford

Make the unnjabbed face their own lockdown so we can live our lives

It’s time to punish Britain’s five million vaccine refuseniks: They put us all at risk of more restrictions. So why shouldn’t we curb some of their freedoms?

There have been several precursors to the robust views above that have also been topped by equally strong headlines in national newspapers this year, including: “No job. No entry. No NHS access; It is only a matter of time before we turn on the unvaccinated.”

The language is stark and unambiguous, and appears to be written by people who believe the unvaccinated are a huge problem for society, a problem great enough to warrant the loss of freedoms and punishment.

The power of these headlines should not be underestimated, indeed many readers only ever read the headlines of a story and perhaps the first two or three paragraphs if the author is lucky.

So how will those headlines make the third group feel, the one that wants to live in peace with their unvaccinated/vaccinated brothers and sisters?

If they are unvaccinated they are possibly going to be feeling anxious and this could lead to fear and even anger against the vaccinated. Perhaps they will be led into thinking many injected people share the opinions expressed in those headlines.

If they are vaccinated they are also possibly going to be feeling anxious and this could lead to fear and even anger against the unvaccinated. Perhaps they will be led into thinking the uninjected could be disrupting everyone’s lives or, worse still, causing the death of others.

And so we now have a split in this third group, many of whom will join with either of the other two groups, depending on their vaccine status.

Is the language used in those headlines something we should be worried about? Are polarised splits in opinion a fact of life, something we just have to deal with? Or is there a way we can encourage respectful debate and perhaps even move aside the debate altogether and allow for peaceful coexistence between opposing groups?

Perhaps a Christmas truce is needed. Even if it is temporary, let us for today try and live with each other, injected and uninjected, accepting and respecting other points of view.

If we can then perhaps hold on to that feeling of mutual respect, it can lead to understanding, and from there to coexistence in peace.

We emailed four major UK newspapers for a right of reply to this article but none responded within the specified time frame of three working days.

Happy holidays to one and all from the team at HTL.

Date: December 25, 2021


RELATED:

Newsbreak 137: Active Censorship by New York Times & Washington Post of Scientific Research on Vitamin C Benefits Exposed by Holding the Line Journalists Against COVID Censorship

Newsbreak 137: Active Censorship by New York Times & Washington Post of Scientific Research on Vitamin C Benefits Exposed by Holding the Line Journalists Against COVID Censorship

Report & Video Links | Ramola D | November 3, 2021

Roger Guttridge, UK Journalist from Holding the Line, a group of UK and other international journalists resisting COVID censorship by the mainstream press has recently exposed the astonishing refusal by the New York Times and the Washington Post to permit articles or advertisements espousing the efficacy of Vitamin C and other micronutrients in the treatment of the cluster of flu symptoms which has come to be called COVID (but around which much controversy persists, especially since no virus-isolate for the putative SARS-COV-2 virus associated with it has been proved to exist).

In a press release published on October 19, Holding the Line revealed that the Washington Post returned $40,000 dollars to the Dr. Rath Foundation after first accepting their deposit, saying the Legal Department required that the FDA approve all medical treatments mentioned in their paper–a specious excuse, given that no product was being sold or advertised, it was information on research proving the efficacy of Vitamin C and other micronutrients that the Dr. Rath Foundation was seeking to publicize, for the benefit of the reading public.

Image, Screenshot, Press Release/Holding the Line, Oct 19, 2021; Please read the full press release here

Paul Anthony Taylor, Executive Director of the Dr. Rath Foundation, a not-for-profit foundation focused on scientific research, which sells no products, further explained in Newsbreak 137 at Ramola D Reports, published yesterday (video links below), that efforts to pursue informational advertising–succeeding the refusal to publish op-eds or articles–in several major newspapers which included the New York Times and the Washington Post proved unsuccessful after blanket refusal by the Legal Departments at these newspapers to permit publication of anything promoting alternative treatments for COVID. The New York Times Legal Department indicated that the material was “sensitive” and could not be approved–after earlier agreements to publish.

Newsbreak 137 (video links below)

Only False Narratives & Mass Press Censorship Promote the Notion that “No Treatment Exists for COVID”

This is of course much along the lines of the ongoing mass Press censorship of all alternative treatments for COVID, as highlighted by Roger Guttridge in Newsbreak 137: Ivermectin, Hydrochloroquinone, Vitamin C, Vitamin D, zinc, have all been downplayed, disappeared, or downright ridiculed in the mainstream press as effective treatments, while the push to administer the highly controversial and toxic COVID-19 vaccines, which now thousands of doctors and scientists are seeking a halt to, is continued at a manic and frenetic pace by all legacy/corporate media.

What is especially significant about this story is that research on the efficacy of alternative treatments is being actively suppressed; obviously this leads to a dearth of information in mainstream media on these subjects, helping to promulgate the false narrative that “no treatment” exists for (the questionable) COVID, a narrative which numerous physicians and scientists such as those at America’s Frontline Doctors, Dr. Vladimir Zelenko, and others have strongly contested.

This research can be found at the Dr. Rath website, and is linked here:

Soumya Swaminathan, WHO is Being Sued by the Indian Bar Association for Promoting False Narratives on Ivermectin

The efforts being made by powerful international organizations like WHO, billionaires like Bill Gates, and media like the New York Times and the Washington Post to suppress vital lifesaving information and promulgate false narratives can be prosecuted, as Roger Guttridge highlights in Newsbreak 137, with the current lawsuit being brought by the Indian Bar Association to sue Soumya Swaminathan, Chief Scientist at the World Health Organization for falsely publishing (in a tweet, later deleted) that Ivermectin, by implication, was neither safe nor effective, and WHO advised against its use–which led to the Indian State of Tamil Nadu withdrawing Ivermectin as treatment protocol, and subsequent deaths. This has been covered at The Desert Review and COVID Call to Humanity by Justus Hope here, with the IBA’s Legal Notice posted here.

This tweet by Soumya Swaminathan was posted one day after the Government of Goa announced the use of Ivermectin, caused state governments to pull Ivermectin usage, and was deleted after the Indian Bar Association sent WHO a legal notice.

From Rockefeller Medicine Men to Blackrock and Vanguard: Medicine and Media Long Hijacked, Run by the Same Money Managers

Both Paul Taylor and Roger Guttridge point to the over 100-year hijacking of the medical/healthcare industry by the Rockefeller/Carnegie clans which have led to the rise of the profit-centric pharmaceutical industry–which is currently fixating on vaccines, pandemics, and totalitarian tyranny with the help of flaccid governments and grasping bankers pursuing Bio-Digital enslavement for the masses and perfect power for themselves.

Methods used to suppress natural healthcare began, we learn, with that long-ago Rockefeller suppression of homeopathy, naturopathy and other treatments and the rise of surgery, medical interventions, and patentable drugs and vaccines replacing plant remedies and clay treatments; Paul Taylor has examined this subject in previous interviews at Ramola D Reports and recommends the book Rockefeller Medicine Men: Medicine and Capitalism in America: Report 238 | Paul Anthony Taylor, Dr. Rath Health Foundation: The Corporatization of Public Health

Michael McKibben of Americans for Innovation and Douglas Gabriel of American Intelligence Media have also addressed this subject of planned hijacking of healthcare and journalism by American and British elites building a profiteering enterprise from the time of Cecil Rhodes and the 1909 Imperial Press Conference, in a rather eye-opening podcast at Ramola D Reports recently: Report 261| Michael McKibben and Douglas Gabriel on The Long British Empire & Bankers’ Hold Over America and the World–& How to End it

Mainstream corporate media of course has close ties with the pharmaceutical industry, a subject increasingly revealed online (as in Dr. Mercola’s June article here: The Same Shady People Own Big Pharma and the Media), just as all the tech platforms holding up social media and information flow online such as Google, examined here earlier, also do.

Dangers of Vaccines & Dangers of the COVID Vaccine Whited-Out by Google (as well as Facebook, Youtube, Twitter, Instagram) in Service to the False Narrative that Vaccines are Safe: It’s a Pfizer-DARPA Narrative, Finally

The profound tragedy of COVID vaccine deaths-and-disability which could be averted continues today because vital lifesaving information such as this information on the efficacy of Vitamin C and other micronutrients in addressing upper respiratory infections is being suppressed.

Crooked Journalism and Censored Physicians

Media today in the service of government, or “authority,” as Roger Guttridge explains, and false narratives propping up the profits of Big Pharma is not objective, science-based media, finally, and is doing the world a great disservice by censoring the free flow of scientific research and by engaging in what can only be called crooked journalism.

The level of deceit awash in mainstream media today–“fact-checking” a part of this deceit–is nothing short of breathtaking and should be condemned by scientists and journalists alike.

Indeed, 12,700 scientists have signed the Rome Declaration of September 2021 currently, as of October 22, one of its resolutions calling for the unrestricted flow of scientific research and restraint from controls on providing treatment to patients imposed by public health agencies, governments, and hospitals–each in their turn propped up by the pronouncements of deceiving corporate media.

Holding the Line, Journalists Against COVID Censorship is to be commended for its steadfast attention to exposing the misleading tide of true misinformation emanating from mainstream media.

Many thanks to Paul Anthony Taylor and Roger Guttridge for speaking openly on this subject.

Previous podcasts with Paul Anthony Taylor and Holding the Line can be found here:

Report 238 | Paul Anthony Taylor, Dr. Rath Health Foundation: The Corporatization of Public Health

Report 181: Paul Anthony Taylor, Dr. Rath Foundation: “WHO is Compromised by Big Pharma”/Odysee

Newsbreak 129 | Tony Gosling, Holding the Line | UK Journalists Question the Official Narrative/Bitchute

WATCH NEWSBREAK 137 AT SCREENCAST OR HERE:

WATCH NEWSBREAK 137 AT BITCHUTE: Newsbreak 137 | Roger Guttridge, Holding the Line Exposes Press Censorship of Natural COVID Cures

WATCH NEWSBREAK 137 AT BRIGHTEON: Newsbreak 137 | Roger Guttridge, Holding the Line Exposes Press Censorship by the New York Times, Washington Post of Natural COVID Treatments from a Natural Health Foundation

WATCH NEWSBREAK 137 AT ODYSEE: Newsbreak 137 | Roger Guttridge, Holding the Line Exposes Press Censorship by the New York Times, Washington Post of Natural COVID Treatments from Natural Health Foundation