Category Archives: covert implants

Neuro Crime (Pre Crime) and Neuro Warfare (Brain Modification) Are Being Studied and C/overtly Tested — ChurchCommittee 2.0 Production: The Neuro Revolution

Riveting video introduction to advances in neuroscience research in the areas of neurocrime and neurowarfare, by the ChurchCommittee Production company, profiling two recent books on the subject, Neuro Revolution by Zack Lynch with Byron Laursen and Undue Risk, Secret State Experiments on Humans by Jonathan D. Moreno, and discussing developments in academic and black-budget covert neuroscience research which seek application in such 21st-century fields as lie/truth detection, brain fingerprinting, neuro-stimulation, and neuro-modification.

This is research on emerging technologies which we’d do well as concerned citizens to follow more closely because the implications for society are immense. Especially significant to note is that a lot of this research has to do with remotely-harvested electromagnetic brain waves, while other aspects cover microchip and neurochip-related neuro-interventions (transmission, reception, stimulation, modification).

For one, the on-record research that’s been uncovered and is budgeted openly is now neuroRevolutionZackLynchbeing used in the development of neurotechnologies such as lie-detection and brain-mapping/fingerprinting being marketed and tested by the law enforcement/security industry. This includes the interestingly-named Project Hostile Intent technology which reads brainwaves at airports, a fact seemingly glossed over in early disclosures and news reports of this technology, as this 2007 UK article would seem to suggest.

Brain wave reading is also being carried out by satellites, hovering many hundreds of kilometres away; “research into computer-analysis of brainwaves detected by satellites without the subject’s knowledge” was/is a DARPA project underseen by neuroscientist Dr. Amy Kruse, Tech Consultant to DARPA’s director, currently underway, which seeks to detect terrorist intent/behavior as recorded in brain EMFs. Remote reading of human minds is no longer science fiction, as many psychologists and psychiatrists confronting and dismissing accounts of c/overt assault by today’s covert subjects of human experimentation in neuroscience by unethical neuroscientists (“Targeted Individuals“) have been led to believe; if satellites can pick up brain waves and labs can decipher thought and word patterns via EMF wave analysis, I think we can safely conclude human minds are being read remotely today. DARPA’s stated intent is to monitor the moods and mental states of soldiers in the field, to assist commanders in allocating human resources to the next gory task of battlefield mayhem should one soldier’s mental or emotional states go into overdrive or confusion mode and prevent him from acting in concert to complete whatever “combat-“related task he’s been directed to do.

(This DARPA/NRO (satellite) (NRO is the National Reconnaissance Office, responsibleUndue Risk for satellites) remote reading of minds might be part of the NSA’s Signals Intelligence project, which is explored here in this 2011 article speculating on Russ Tice’s intended/never completed revelations to Congress regarding illegal Special Access Programs from his work on electronic intelligence gathering for the NSA/DIA : Is the NSA Conducting Electronic Warfare on Americans?)

Then there’s off-the-record research uncovered by Moreno which suggests that the $68 billion budget set aside by the DoD for scientific research and possibly $6 billion Black Ops research budget is being used to rope in the vast academic network of Universities to engage in research with private Defense corporations–such as Lockheed Martin and Honeywell–that’s being intentionally aimed at not merely reading the human mind, but in developing weaponry targeted to alter the human mind–via such niceties as Neurochip implants, pulsed ultrasound helmets, Electronic Brain Link technologies, microwave radiation weapons, and Extremely Low Frequency radiation weapons. This joint network of private and academic entities is also engaged in the affairs of a new alphabet initiative, the NIA or Neurotechnology for Intelligence Analysts–an initiative aimed at enhancing human imaging capabilities with advanced assistive neurotechnology techniques (which appear to include human-brain-computer interfaces as well as neuroimplants and optical implants), a little  on which can be found here.

Black Ops research, of course, is not publicly divulged. DARPA’s openly-published research, though, and the open doings of neuroscientists should be enough cause for concern. For those paying attention, think about it: Google wants to blanket us with wifi from space; the Federal govt recently issued gag orders to NOAA and the National Weather Service and the US Department of Commerce regarding, it seems, talking about the weather/geoengineering/chem trails/agency plans, chem trails are raining heavy-metal nanotechnology down on us, while smart meters, cell phones, cell towers and other EMF sources bathe us in constant radiation, satellites, we’re being told here, are picking up brain waves, quantum supercomputing is no longer a secret, and thousands of people worldwide are reporting c/overt assaults with DEWs and EMF/scalar/sonic neuroweapons. Among the technologies being reported by insiders and whistleblowers such as Dr. Robert Duncan and Dr. Richard Alan Miller are hiving-mind technologies, EEG cloning, EEG heterodyning, synthetic telepathy, and electronic brain links–all technologies aimed at reading human minds, connecting human minds, influencing human minds, invading human minds, and altering human minds. Should we be worried, d’you think?

Many thanks to ChurchCommittee TwoPointO, to whose channel on Youtube you can subscribe, and let’s hope a lot more journalists and filmmakers will cover this subject–shall keep reporting here.

 

 

 

 

Dr. Nick Begich/Vinny Eastwood Show/Military Experimentation, Mind Control, Domain of the Mind: Technological Grid Prevents People From Thinking

This is just such a stellar interview by the engaging Vinny Eastwood of The Vinny Eastwood Show of investigative science and technology researcher and reporter Dr. Nick Begich (whose website is EarthPulse Press) that I wanted to make a separate post of it, just to call attention to a couple very important things he focuses on. Of course it’s always enlightening to listen to Nick Begich, and to read his books, which are meticulously researched and footnoted; his books are vital in any researching of HAARP, chem trails, weather modification, mind control technologies, but I am increasingly impressed by researchers and alternative media interviewers today who are unafraid–unlike the ER-coverNYT, Washington Post, Intercept, Globe, CNN, and other MSM parties–to speak openly, candidly, and freely of the covert military experimentation projects that are currently underway–and have been for decades apparently–all over the world using “technetronic” or EMF/scalar/sonic weapons, as well as HAARP and weather modification technologies which are not merely modifying the weather but assisting in mass mind control (via HAARP and ELFs–a post on this from Dr. Nick Begich and Jeanne Manning here).

Humans in small and large numbers–Targeted Individuals and Mass Populations (which pretty much covers both you and me)–are being experimented on with these new weapons (issues covered here under Human Rights and many posts) because we are looking currently at highly techno-militarized governments seeking to increase their techno-military activities as they develop scarier and scarier weapons–in classified military and intelligence projects, and in secrecy–when technology of this kind, which allows humans to remotely manipulate and control other humans, as Dr. Begich notes, should really be open to public discussion. The military and government intent seems to be to pre-empt and shut down any hint of human protest through individual and mass mind control –and these weapons are being used currently in this way, on activists and others: Targeted Individuals. And unless and until humans rise up, get informed en masse,  about these horrific brain and body control technologies, and protest, this will not stop.

Corporate media of course helps keep the masses ignorant about these issues and in a perpetual state of panic over various contrived and enacted events–a state of consciousness which disallows people from exercising calm judgment, reason, and thinking for themselves, notes Dr. Begich. Government today, Dr. Begich stresses, is merely continuing what it’s been doing for decades–as we know now, half a million Americans have been experimented on without consent over the past 4 decades, as per Clinton’s confession (linked here earlier)–and no-one prosecuted or jailed the criminals who engaged in this research. Governments today are supremely focused on Mind Control and information control–and in the US today have exempted themselves from requiring Informed Consent by classifying their research in the name of National Security, and disassociating Informed Consent from Classified Research (in my view, an absolutely shameful, immoral, and corrupt circumstance which will be spotlighted here soon, and which should be vocally challenged and ended). We are seeing today “an increase in secrecy which serves to make Government opaque and the people transparent”–when it should really be the other way, he points out.

We have entered a time period  when what’s of prime importance, notes Dr. Begich, is the Domain of the Mind (and mass media will never cover this apparently, they’ve done a good job so far of kowtowing to “authority” and not touching it, except if at all, in derision, using the term “conspiracy theory” to dismiss/deny/avoid having to cover). Mind control weapons which include remote transmission technologies such as Synthetic Telepathy–remotely modulating sound or voices into people’s heads, using microwave radiation--have been developed, and are being tested and used; these can be used to influence politicians and people in government, just as much as the ordinary man or woman on the street, something he has shared with the EU Commission in 1998.

One interesting bit of information I don’t recall learning about earlier is a Navy document he uncovered in 2006, he says, which  lists protocols for human subject research. (In looking it up actually I do recall seeing it earlier; it’s similar to lists of exemptions for different government agencies in the CFR, but I will re-evaluate as I continue to collect documentation on this site.)

From the vantage point of 20 years of research in the field, Dr. Begich suggests that it’s vital for everyone to take a stand–to do some research, understand what’s going on, and then find your own way to make a difference. We are facing brain and mind control technologies today that are completely destructive of human will, autonomy, sovereignty, privacy--and it’s up to each of us to make a stand.

If this is a subject new to you, a good place to start that research would be his books and the many videos of his talks and interviews on Youtube.  Mass Media is failing us shamefully, and if some of us don’t know yet that Mind Control and Brain Control research and non-consensual human experimentation involving Remote Manipulation technologies is well underway, all over the world, it’s because MSM and the CIA/Military Cyberwarfare Disinfo Brigade, along with government-funded psychiatrists, has done a number on us, trying to get most people to believe that people being abused today by nonconsensual experimentation on their bodies and brains and reporting that abuse are variously paranoid, unstable, deranged, unreliable, schizoid, and so forth, an age-old and unimaginative ploy intended to keep secrets secret and covert projects covert that increasingly more of us are beginning to see beyond.

Covert Harassment Conference, Berlin, Oct 2015: Videos Uploaded

Please visit the Covert Harassment Conference, Berlin, Oct 2015 website for uploads of videos and information on all the speakers–a varied mix of investigative reporters, science and technology journalists, scientists, academics, alt. media broadcasters, engineers, and ex-Intel experts–at this conference. This may have been up for a while, I am just noticing it and watching the videos myself, starting with Dr. Nick Begich‘s first talk–which he opens with describing HAARP, its use as an ionospheric heater, its applications in earth-penetrating tomography, its generation of ELF waves (Extremely Low Frequency)–which are waves that can affect human minds at the low frequencies in which the human brain itself operates, and its use in Global Brain Entrainment (which Magnus Olsson, Director of EUCHACH, also speaks about here.) (I will make further posts on these videos in time.)

Many thanks to Peter Mooring of STOPEG for this excellent website and all information, including the videos, posted on it. The website also offers a compendium of information on the many subjects informing Covert Harassment and promises to be a central site on the Web for this purpose.

Covert Harassment Conference on Facebook

Covert Harassment Conference is on Facebook.

Note to journalists, writers, and human rights advocates worldwide: Please visit and listen to these talks to get caught up on the nature and extent of the Global Covert Assault technologies currently being used covertly on all of humanity, worldwide. These technologies now affect All of us on the planet--thanks to nanotechnology in aerosols being sprayed on all of us, thanks to ELF entrainments from HAARP and otherwise, thanks to cloud computing, AI, and various other technologies.

For anyone who isn’t aware of who was behind this excellent annual conference, this is from the website:

The Covert Harassment Conference 2015 is organized by:

Speakers

I am so pleased and grateful to all the organizers and speakers of this conference for setting up and posting this international forum to disseminate information openly on how electromagnetic/scalar/sonic technologies are currently being operated and tested c/overtly on “Targeted Individuals” as well as globally on populations worldwide.  Hopefully this heralds a new era of absolute disclosure when the world wakes up to what exactly is going on today under the rubric of Global Governance (see this post on Mass Control Technologies), and more and more people from all walks of life can step forward to act to stop these atrocities and challenge the use of Electronic Warfare and Artificial Intelligence by our joint governments on humanity–without our consent--as they wake up to the truth.

The Who and Why of Global Covert Assault is being considered here in a new series of ongoing posts, which seeks to collect and archive information from all over the Net, both older and newer articles & videos considering these questions. Please check back for periodic updates. (Please look under Featured Posts and Pages on the sidebar for this page link, I will post it there shortly.)

Further Information on RFID Chips, Nanochips, Neurochips, Chipped Vaccines/Excerpt from Research by Fritz Springmeier and Cisco Wheeler

In the interests of documenting and collecting historical and current information on the development, use, and covert implantation of microchips in humans, please see this list at the valuable archiving site whale.to. The last article linked is dated June 2014, and posted links point to articles down the 2000s tracing the growing development of microchips, their decreasing size, their use by Intelligence agencies, and their planned use as nanoparticles in vaccines.

deeperinsightsIncluded is this highly informative chapter on Electronics and Electricity from the book Deeper Insights into the Illuminati by Fritz Springmeier and Cisco Wheeler, with detailed and sourced  information on Electromagnetic Weapons, Implants, ELFs (Extremely Low Frequency waves) and Direct Remote Brain Monitoring and Manipulation, among other related subjects.

Excerpt on the subject of implants:

B4. Body suits 

Victims of mind-control who receive implants often are given a body suit of implants. The location of these implant sites used on the human body have been mapped 10.00 out on the following charts. The mapped sites on these charts are verified by a. an insider, who learned from the inside what is going on, EM (H) & b. this author’s experience in working with a sizable number of implant victims. Implants can be placed anywhere, but there are certain key sites that tend to be used. The location used also depends upon the type of implant. Implants over the body create the ability to trigger moods, pain, and other phenomena. Implants for auditory sounds are in the ear. Nasal implants are used for mind-control. Tracking implants are also placed into people.

Section C. Specific Implants

Cl. Audio implants (a. public. b. secret)
C2. Body manipulation implants
C3. Visual holographic implants
C4. Memex/Brain Link implants
C5. Torture/Nerve & Muscle Stimulation Implants
C6. Tracking & I.D. Implants.

C1. AUDIO IMPLANTS

BACKGROUND INFORMATION

The concepts used in audio implants had been discovered in the first half of the 20th century, but the refinement of technology to take advantage of what had been discovered waited until the second half of the century.

The development of audio implants ran on two tracks, one was the public medical research and the other was the secret Illuminati/Intelligence Agencies’ research.

Audio implants began to be publicly placed into people in the 1960s. The Illuminati was experimenting on some victims at this stage, and the military in the Vietnam war used auditory implant devices to aid communicating to their men who were sent into tunnels and who were placed into forest situations where audible noise would compromise their locations to the enemy. The Illuminati/Intelligence/& Military consortium was keeping the experimentation secret.

It appears from looking at the worldwide research on audio implants that the Illuminati realized that the field was so ambiguous, and open to so many different approaches, that rather than straightjacket the research community by a specific strategy, they encouraged a wide variety of approaches in the research.

Consequently, research by one group would overlap or duplicate research by another. Much to their credit, a few researchers rejected offers to get involved because they saw the sinister ramifications.

By the 1970s, the intelligence agencies were willing to start using hundreds of people to experiment operationally with the implants. People in every state of the U.S. were selected as victims.

Many of these implant victims had programmed multiple personalities already. The controllers were very heavy handed with the people they implanted, and they used the full force of the Illuminati/Intelligence agencies power to keep these people under their control at all times.

These innocent victims have had their lives totally destroyed. Some tried to fight back, spending thousands of dollars to get out from underneath the incessant audio messages that the implants sent, but the system was too big and too powerful to fight.

Police, congressmen, psychologists and many other people turned their backs on these victims. Some victims who initially fought back gave up resisting, some committed suicide, and some continued to fight.

Meanwhile, on the public track during the 1970s & 1980s, medical researchers kept putting more and more audio implants into deaf and hard-to-hear persons. Hundreds of people in the U.S. and many hundreds in other nations such as the U.K., Germany, Austria, Israel, Australia, France and other countries began to receive the cochlear implants.

Australia was so proud of their audio implant research/development they issued a postage stamp showing an implant device (“bionic ear”) developed in Australia.

The question begs asking, if thousands of people have publicly received audio implants, isn’t obvious that the secret societies and secret intelligence agencies have done at least as much if not far more?”

From later on in the chapter:

“A more recent NY Times article (2/2/97, p. E6) discusses how Xerox Corporation has created sensors the thickness of peach fuzz. These are called MEMS (micro-electomechanical systems). The article states, “MEMS are all about doing more with less, about being lean, mean, and next to invisible.”

The article is lean on facts. It does give a hint of the incredible power these little gadgets have when the writer launches into his propaganda tirade at the end of the article, “Paradoxically the fear that accompanies the fantasy of nanotechnology is not that the culture will be as stratified and fragmented as Victorian England, but that the new culture will be one that is unrecognizable to everyone alive today.” That is true, this nano technology is taking us to the place that society will not be recognizable.

The age of the future is planned to be the age of robots–humans if they are to survive are to be robotic slaves for the illuminated elite. However, this is not paranoid fear as the NY Times writer implies, but it is the unfortunate reality humanity faces.

Some people apparently are already experiencing it. One victim of mind-control, whose father is Military Intelligence and whose family is part of the Illuminati, claims that he has been subjected to tiny robots called nanobots.

These nanobots have been featured on TV, where they have been billed as an asset for surgeons. Reportedly, these tiny robots can work off of 10-100 kilohertz of beamed power. They have coil-shaped antennas, 2 little six-pointed “wings” to attach and move themselves with.

These tiny boron-carbon nanobots have all kinds of purposes. One use is for multitudes of these Nanobots to be placed into a single victim’s head, where they are programmed to migrate to certain programmed positions where they can suppress the optical signals to the brain and replace these signals with their own holographic images that can be externally transmitted to the nanobots or preprogrammed in. They are trying or have succeeded, depending upon who is talking about nanobots, in making self-replicating assemblers. In other words, they have built miniature robots that build other robots. “

Please continue reading at this linked page from the Implants page on Whale.to.

I should add though that while I continue to post these articles and information here regarding the dismal dystopian future still being worked on by various psychopathic and criminal groups and agencies mistakenly termed the “elite” and “intelligent/ce,” I believe fully, along with many thousands of others, it is the posting, sharing, and comprehending of this incredible attempted power-grab which will ensure that this dystopia is thwarted and will not come to pass. What you do not know about you can scarcely resist. Open public knowledge of what has for many years and decades been kept secret and covert, and which certain “intelligence” agencies are frantically striving to continue to keep covert by manically discrediting those who write or report its existence is supremely powerful. Our collective consciousness can change the world. For those who are currently being covertly assaulted too, and their families, this may be particularly interesting information.

Dr. Steven Greer: How the Secret Government Works — UFO Secrecy, Unacknowledged Special Access Projects, Scalar Technologies, Disinfo Tactics

This video of Dr. Steven Greer‘s recent workshop talk in Washington, DC offering disclosure on many issues surrounding the national security state and its connection to the tremendous secrecy built up around UFOs, ETs, and space-age technologies deriving from ET contact still being-kept-secret has been passed around on the Web for some time and can be viewed on Youtube.

Update and Correction, September 2016: The letter presented in Dr. Greer’s video and covered below as from the Strategic Studies Institute was apparently wrongfully attributed as such, and is in actuality, as per her own correction, a letter penned by Julianne McKinney, Director of the Electronic Surveillance Project.

I understand Ms. McKinney has now corrected Dr. Greer on the matter of authorship and intent of this letter. In a March 23, 2016 letter to him, notification of which was provided to me, she wrote:

 “I had intended this letter as a sardonic slap-in-the-face, drawn in part from my former role as Director of the Electronic Surveillance Project, affiliated with the Association of National Security Alumni.

In that capacity, I had had extensive contact with former satanic cult members and with so-called UFO “abductees,” as well as first-hand experience with the deceptive practices employed by the U.S. Government, especially in the intelligence and UFO-abduction fields. I employed the knowledge gained from those experiences in my letter to Metz and Kievit.” Julianne McKinney, March 23, 2016

While it appears from the correspondence exchanged between both and reported to me that accusations of CIA affiliation and lack of integrity were aired, I personally seek to stay somewhat neutral on this subject and post here only the most relevant information (in my view). I am sure Ms. McKinney or Dr. Greer would be able to publicly post further on this fracas on their own, should they wish, to clear up any doubts on their views or affiliations. If both parties would like to contact me, however, with specific intent to add more to this report, I will be glad to report further.

Dr. Greer’s March 24, 2016 response, as reported by Julianne McKinney, contained the following:

I very much apologize for the confusion on this matter. All I was ever given were the 2 pages I showed and was told it was FROM the Institute , not to it. I did not know about you at all!

I will certainly make this clear in the future.

However I am curious how you know – however sardonically you may have presented it- about the para-governmental involvement in hoaxing many UFO and Abduction events. That part of what you wrote is no exaggeration as I have multiple independent military and government sources who have specifically explained to me this ” stagecraft”- and some who have been directly been involved in those ops.

Like you, I am actually very skeptical of much of what is out there attributed to “aliens”. Many cases are attempts to hide advanced human electro-magnetogravitic aircraft that are highly classified.

There is also an enormous amount of psyops disinformation designed to, frankly, scare people and create fear and hatred of ETs- for future propaganda conditioning purposes to be announced.

Again, I apologize for the confusion as all I had has part of your letter (can you send me all of it? ) and it conformed with other evidence and sources who have confirmed to us the hoaxing of many UFO/ Abduction events ( as well as the so-called animal mutilation phenomena) .

There is also a very substantial op dealing with electronic, psychotronic and radionics warfare technology.

Any info you have on these matter(s) is appreciated. Dr. Steven Greer, March 24, 2016

The Julianne McKinney 1995 letter at core of this controversy was apparently long-posted online in full at MindNet Journal, but, by Julianne McKinney’s recent report to me, “no longer exists. This, after being left intact for ten years, but following my having brought this to your attention..”

Ms. McKinney also noted: “As it happens, I made a copy of that letter and am attaching it below, should you require continued access.”

Since Ms. McKinney has provided a copy of that letter to me, I will post it on this site, with a link below, for continued access by anyone interested. Should anyone find this problematic, please contact me.

I note further below which part of this post is part of my original Dec 15, 2015 post, when I did not have this information about Julianne McKinney’s letter. Thanks!

–Ramola D

All this below is my original post on this video, from Dec 15, 2015.

I waited to post it here because I wanted to view it myself, which has taken some time–it’s long, I could only watch it in snatches–and of course, I watched it primarily with an eye to further understanding how our highly-secretive Intelligence agencies–which are running extremely damaging Covert Ops on the American public today (see this post on “Targeted Individuals”)–are functioning, and why they think they’re inviolate and invincible.

They’re not of course, no-one is, they just don’t seem to know it. Exposure of their deeds and misdeeds, past and present, is today exploding all over the place, and we owe huge debts of gratitude to those like Dr. Steven Greer, who have spent years of their lives researching these heavily classified subjects, who have persisted in their questioning, and who have come forward with extraordinary courage and integrity to present their findings to the public, minus media fanfare, and often in the face of government opposition and intimidation.

There is quite some incredible disclosure in this video (more information on this in the Description section below the video at Youtube), and it’s highly recommended, on all counts. I’ll note below though what I found interesting in relation to the development and use of electromagnetic and scalar and RFID technologies that are implicated in today’s Covert Ops of Brain, Body, and Mind Control experimentation on Americans–and which seem to be part of the globalist push for same via similar Covert Assaults on populations worldwide. (An issue that our media should be covering in detail, but isn’t, because of course they’re either run by the CIA or gagged by the NSA or misled by PsyOps Disinfo from both–more below.)

Extreme Secrecy & the Deep State

Dr. Greer traces in the  opening parts of his talk (5:00 minutes on) how the Deep State as we know it today, with its penchant for black ops and unaccountability, started with the UFO issue in the late ’40s, during the time of the development of the atomic bomb, and the Roswell incident, and the extreme secrecy that came to be built around the UFO issue succeeding this time period. This segment is interesting not merely by way of the story behind Roswell–that the spacecraft was actually shot down–but by reason of the technology used: scalar, longitudinal electromagnetic technology, used in a kind of beam weapon, developed way back in the ’40s. (Around 13:00 minutes on.)

Scalar Technologies

In other words, Tesla’s scalar technology or the understanding of scalar waves by the military/Intelligence/industrial complex, which today is thought to be used in Remote Neural Monitoring weapons whose tracking beams appear to defy shielding of all kinds, was developed way back then, and was used in the ’40s. Scalar waves are superluminal (several times faster than light), and this information is classified (!) — it’s still not taught in schools. (Note that scientists do speak about it today though, including, notably, the late Konstantin Meyl.)

Projects Off the Books

Unacknowledged Special Access Projects and their off-the-books aspects, compartmentalized secrecy maneuvers, concealment from elected government, and atmosphere of threat and intimidation is talked about around 50:00 minutes on. Illegal, unconstitutional, criminal, dangerous, is how Dr. Greer describes these–and who can argue with that.

Scientists Forced to Lie/Or Paid to Lie

How scientists at Harvard and elsewhere have been strong-armed to maintain silence over UFOs and ETs, or have been on the payroll of Intelligence agencies such as the CIA to propel falsehoods and lies on this subject for years, including Carl Sagan, of Cosmos fame, is talked about around 1 hr:58 minutes on.

Technology Interfacing with Thought

Also fascinating is the discussion of electronics picking up directed intended thought, or brain-electronic interfaces, incorporated into ET navigation systems, covered around the 2:00 hour mark. As many of us know today, the Electronic Brain Link technologies developed by DIA and CIA and DARPA neuroscientists interested in “hiving minds” and controlling the brains and thoughts of individuals (part of Mind Hacking projects referred to by Dr. Robert Duncan in this post) are some of the technologies being covertly tested today on nonconsenting Targeted Individuals, freely supplied to unethical military/Intel experimenters as EMF weapon fodder by an unscrupulous security state (the way it’s currently working, first they target you, then they think you’re free game and can be experimented on)–and by a government that is no longer representative of the people, but rather, of criminally-active transnational corporations desperate to control the people. (We are currently inside the fascist New World Order, even if not everyone knows it yet–the question is, how do we get out of it.)

Extremely Micro RFID Chips and the CIA

Around 2 hrs: 47 mins is mention of Dr. Greer’s conversation with Air Force computer specialist William Pawelec, now an interview available on Youtube ( which warrants its own post another day) on the subject of CIA involvement in the manufacture of RFID chips in the ’70s and ’80s manufactured by Siemens in the billions–miniature, edible chips, some with Neurophone capabilities, permitting radio-control of thought and behavior. Dr. Greer notes that EG &G, a chip implant manufacturer near Area 51, makes chips that have been found implanted in victims of abductions — proving that these abductions were part of the PsyOps Psychological Warfare set up and run by the Deep State, to muddy the waters and deflect attention from report or anticipation of any positive UFO or ET experiences–but also proving that RFID chip implants have been planned for a long time, have been experimented with, developed, and fine-tuned covertly for years–in particular, by the CIA. RFID chip information is being followed on this site.

Open Admission of Directed-Energy Weapon Use on Americans/Abductions of Citizens/Psychiatrist Complicity/Controlled and Compliant Media

In reference to the Update and Correction, September 2016 information at head of this post, the letter presented by Dr. Greer at his webinar as emanating FROM the Strategic Studies Institute, US Army War College, was covered in this section of my original Dec 15, 2015 post. As Julianne McKinney has informed me, this is her letter TO the SSI, and here below is the start of the letter, taken from MindNet Journal in August 2016, when it was still online. The link to the full letter, now being  stored on this site, can be found just below this excerpt.

"Homemaker's Recipe" for a Successful Revolution in Military 
Affairs

By Julianne McKinney

January 1995

----------------------------------------------------------------

            Association of National Security Alumni
                Electronic Surveillance Project
                        P.O. Box 13625
                 Silver Spring, MD 20911-3625
                       (301) 608-0143
 
January 8, 1995

Steven Metz, Ph.D.  
LTC James Kievit  
Strategic Studies Institute
U.S. Army War College  
Carlisle Barracks, PA 17013-5050

Dear Dr. Metz and LTC Kievit:

I read your _Revolution in Military Affairs and Conflict Short of
War_  with great interest. Noting that you encourage discussion
and debate on this subject (and presuming that the average U.S.
citizen is not to be excluded from these discussions and
debates), I would like to comment on  this paper.

First, I noticed a rather curious omission in your paper, namely,
the impact of a "revolutionized" military upon the rights of U.S.
citizens as they might be inferred to exist under Article IX of
the United States Constitution. True, you have expressed some
concern about potential "ethics" violations resulting from
unconstrained evolutionary or revolutionary processes; however,
I see no reference anywhere in your paper to the military's
primary responsibility in upholding, protecting and defending
the U.S. Constitution.

Absent any such reference, your use of the term, "ethics,"
becomes relativistic, in my opinion--more suited, perhaps, to
discourses by followers of Nietsche. This is not a criticism,
incidentally. If you are unprepared to discuss an RMA in the
context of its impact on the U.S. Constitution, then I will spare
you the hassle, since what I am about to propose is similarly
bereft of any such considerations.

Full Letter at MindNet Journal/link no longer working

Full Letter posted here, as supplied by Julianne McKinney/September 2016

Please note, the discovery of this full letter by Julianne McKinney necessarily affects the nature of the information presented below, earlier, when further knowledge of this letter was not available. I am leaving this latter part of the post as is, just for the record, but to fully understand the scenario regarding this letter, please read the Update and Correction, September 2016 note added to the head of this post. Thanks!

*****

This part of the post offers the original text about this letter from the Dec 15, 2015 post:

The most explosive information though from this talk, from the point of view of Disclosure of Directed-Energy Weapons being used today as means of Surveillance and as Assault on Americans and other populations, comes from a document (around 2 hrs: 50 minutes in video) from the Strategic Studies Institute, dated 1995. Please note there’s huge disclosure here too about other horrific CIA/NSA practices, plans, and intentions–Satanic cults, MK ULTRA trauma-based mind-control, false-flag alien invasion scenarios, complete with “stage craft,” planned abductions of citizens.Note the “Recipe” format, and the “ingredients,” which include imported mercenaries and a controlled and compliant media.

With regards to how Targeted Individuals are being assaulted today, note the verbiage re. Official Denials, Psychiatrists and Psychologists, and Government-Funded Brain research.

Text below thanks to Paul Getson from Real Hidden History on Facebook:

Strategic Studies Institute 
January 8, 1995 
Page 3 of 11 Pages
Ingredients (continued);
Imported East Bloc Mercenaries and Military Equipment
Imported Foreign National Scientists
A Controlled and Compliant Media
Decentralized U.S. Government Control
An Induced Crime Wave

Instructions:

1. Raise one or two generations of children under the auspices of government-approved satanic cults, such as COL (USA ret.) Michael Aquino’s Temple of Set. Violent sexual, physical and psychological abuse of these children over a period of 15 years will produce generations of dissociative automatons who will comply with instructions in obedient, unquestioning fashion. Their required adherence to cult tenets precludes any consideration of laws governing U.S. society, generally. Cult-programmed “graduates,” among other things, will be expected to participate in contrived UFO abduction scenarios.

2. Create a global UFO cult, which will involve the abduction of citizens so as to foster an illusion that this earth is facing an extraterrestrial invasion. UFO abductees-of-preference will have an expertise in computer technologies, since that expertise will be required in future technocratic R.M.A. scenarios. Use of experimental drugs, holographic projection capabilities, directed-energy technologies, induced auditory input, experimental aircraft, and special effects costuming and stagecraft, among other things, will be used to persuade abductees of the reality of their circumstances. Official denials regarding these events will employ reverse psychology, to ensure that all such denials are taken as official confirmation of an imminent and/or ongoing extraterrestrial invasion. UFO abductees will be persuaded to worship their anticipated extraterrestrial “conquerors” in cult-enforced religious fashion. UFO cult networks will be controlled by U.S. Intelligence to limit infiltration and ensure that dissidents do not disrupt UFO Cult long-term agendas. Dissociative satanic cult graduates will handle all such executions; i.e., when not actively lending logistical and theatrical support to UFO abduction operations.

3. Directed-energy surveillance and weapons technologies of all types will be used for purposes of spreading fear and confusion in the population at large (under deniable circumstances); for eliminating persons deemed “adversarial” to U.S. national security interests; and for spotting, assessing and manipulating potential recruits to R.M.A. causes.

4. Neurocybernetics and other psychotechnologies will be used to sow confusion and hypochondria in the population at large. The symptoms and effects produced by these and other directed-energy technologies will parallel the effects produced by various microbes, viruses and chemical imbalances, thus compelling a large segment of society to seek medical intervention, which in turn, will be a basis for their being used for medical experimentation under “voluntary” circumstances. Psychiatrists and psychologists will play an important role in these experiments, particularly where denying the efficacy of neurocybernetics/psychotechnologies is concerned. Citizens complaining of “hearing voices” will be used as a basis for (generously) government-funded, schizophrenic-related brain research, since comprehension and control of the human brain is critical.

The Strategic Studies Institute is located inside the US Army War College. This is one part of a much longer document. Perhaps Dr. Greer will post the whole document on his site sometime.

More on Dr. Greer’s solutions and action items in a separate post–they can be found at the end of the video.

Dr. Harold Mandel: Ongoing Human Rights Abuse with Intentional False Diagnoses of Mental Illness, Electronic Warfare, Blacklists, Psychiatric Drugs, & More from US Govt/Police/Psychiatrists

Re-posted, with thanks, from Dr. Harold Mandel’s website. In the face of widespread Mainstream Media neglect of ongoing covert human experimentation with EMR/acoustic/scalar directed-energy weapons, remote neural monitoring technologies, and others, by DoD/DoJ/Academic/Intel Agency factions, where nonconsensual experimentees are being “disappeared” by wrongful psychiatric diagnoses from colluding psychiatrists, all issues of profound concern at this site, it is vital to note and publish the growing awareness and acknowledgment of this 21st-century atrocity in our midst by educated and aware professionals, including physicians.

From his website: Dr. Harold Mandel is a general physician and online medical reporter with special interests in natural health care and human rights of patients. He is also a member of the Citizens Commission on Human Rights (CCHR). The CCHR is a nonprofit mental health watchdog which has helped to enact more than 150 laws protecting individuals from abusive or coercive practices. The CCHR has long fought to restore basic inalienable human rights to the field of  mental health.

****

Tuesday Dec. 8, 2015

Dr Harold Mandel

                         

Breaking Mental Health Care Human Rights Abuse Terror Alert

 Psychopathic Monsters Rule Over The Minds Of The USA: The US feds, cops, psychiatrists & their personal judges are “psychopathic monsters” who have been sadistically torturing human rights activists, poor people and even children 24/7 with intentional false diagnoses of mental illness, electronic warfare, their poisonous arsenal of psychiatric drugs, beatings, false arrests in their prison death chambers, blacklists, and incarcerations in their mental hospital concentration camps. All along the ignorant barbarians responsible for all of this insist they are the only truly civilized people on the planet!

 This alert is simply an opinion and is not based on any scientific studies keeping in mind there are no biological markers for the diagnoses of the psychiatrists which are therefore also not based on scientific studies!

Source: Dr.HaroldMandel.com

******************

Please visit Dr. Mandel’s site to view his informative articles on the flaws, failures, and horrors of modern-day psychiatry, as well as information he provides on natural and humane approaches to mental health.

Related:

Paranoid Schizophrenia, Tool of the Red Terror, Makes a Comeback in Authoritarian USA & Other Western “Democracies”
 

Exploring The FBI’s “Consensual Monitoring” and the CIA’s “Concealed Monitoring”: One-Party Consent to Electronic Recordings and Non-Consensual Two-Way Radio Implant Communications?

Perhaps we can start by agreeing there is no such thing as Consensual Surveillance, for if there were, we would all be ticking boxes on Census-like forms offered to us by benevolent government entities keen to surveill us with our consent, saying Yes! You can surveill me, adding, defensively, as many of the unthinking among us do, After all, I have nothing to hide.

The FBI States It Engages in Consensual Monitoring

Still, the FBI is on record now as stating that it engages in Consensual Monitoring, in the case of the aerial surveillance of Baltimore in May during the protests succeeding Freddy Gray’s death in police custody, as documents obtained by ACLU reveal. This October 30, 2015 ACLU report has the story, and the FBI Evidence and Memo Logs referencing “Consensual Monitoring” in pdf form can be found linked at the end of that article.  These evidence logs, which are redacted in places, seem to be logging in Aerial Surveillance Videos, but in a few cases, log in “Other Electronic Surveillance” which is still item-described as “Aerial Surveillance,” and in one case, additionally, as “Consensual Monitoring–Non-Telephonic.”

What is Consensual Monitoring?

fbiBaltimore-1What can Consensual Monitoring possibly be? Is the FBI defining a form of monitoring and surveillance it engages in as Consensual, in hopes of “keeping it legal”? One clue they offer is that it’s “Other Electronic.” It’s not Aerial Video. It’s not Aerial Photography. Can it be Aerial Cyber Surveillance? (Why would they need to do that from the air, when it would be far more effective from the ground?) It’s Non-Telephonic. So it’s not Stingray, Dirtbox, cell-phone-tower-mimicking scooping-up of cellphone voice and text data. It’s Electronic, and it’s Consensual–so they say–and it’s not Video, Audio, Telephonic, Cyber-related.

From the ACLU article:

“FBI evidence logs reveal that at least half of the flights conducted video surveillance, and that the FBI retained copies of those videos in its files. Other flights conducted some type of “electronic surveillance,” but specific descriptions are redacted. This suggests that those flights were perhaps using more sensitive or powerful recording gear than just video cameras, though what kind we don’t know.

What we do know is that one of the aircraft, a Cessna propeller plane registered to an FBI front company, NG Research, had specialized surveillance camera equipment on board. FAA documentation shows that the FBI installed a Paravion Technology infrared camera mount and a FLIR Talon multi-sensor camera system on the exterior of the plane. The FLIR system includes a “thermal imager,” an optical camera, and a “laser illuminator” for recording at night. We did not receive documentation about the second plane observed circling over Baltimore, so we don’t know if it was carrying different gear.”

Regular FBI Surveillance Flights Over Cities and Rural Areas

A June 2015 article by the Associated Press revealed the fact of regular surveillance flights over cities by FBI planes, although again the nature of the surveillance was not clarified:

“Scores of low-flying planes circling American cities are part of a civilian air force operated by the FBI and obscured behind fictitious companies, The Associated Press has learned.

The AP traced at least 50 aircraft back to the FBI, and identified more than 100 flights in 11 states over a 30-day period since late April, orbiting both major cities and rural areas. At least 115 planes, including 90 Cessna aircraft, were mentioned in a federal budget document from 2009.

For decades, the planes have provided support to FBI surveillance operations on the ground. But now the aircraft are equipped with high-tech cameras, and in rare circumstances, technology capable of tracking thousands of cellphones, raising questions about how these surveillance flights affect Americans’ privacy.

“It’s important that federal law enforcement personnel have the tools they need to find and catch criminals,” said Charles Grassley, chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee. “But whenever an operation may also monitor the activities of Americans who are not the intended target, we must make darn sure that safeguards are in place to protect the civil liberties of innocent Americans.

The FBI says the planes are not equipped or used for bulk collection activities or mass surveillance. The surveillance equipment is used for ongoing investigations, the FBI says, generally without a judge’s approval.”

Also:

“One of the planes, photographed in flight last week (May/June 2015) by the AP in northern Virginia, bristled with unusual antennas under its fuselage and a camera on its left side.”

fbiplane

The AP video report that accompanies a Blaze article on this same AP report identifies the spherical white protrusion with cable on the fuselage as a ball camera to provide sweeping panoramic views, but the other equipment is not identified.

“Evolving technology can record higher-quality video from long distances, even at night, and can capture certain identifying information from cellphones using a device known as a “cell-site simulator” — or Stingray, to use one of the product’s brand names. These can trick pinpointed cellphones into revealing identification numbers of subscribers, including those not suspected of a crime.

Officials say cellphone surveillance is rare, although the AP found in recent weeks FBI flights orbiting large, enclosed buildings for extended periods where aerial photography would be less effective than electronic signals collection. Those included above Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport and the Mall of America in Bloomington, Minnesota.”

Currently Available Aerial Surveillance Technologies

On the subject of technology currently being used in Aerial Surveillance by Law Enforcement, and by Military PISR operations (Persistent Intelligence, Surveillance, Reconnaissance), see this slide show presentation from the company Persistent Surveillance Systems, linked in pdf and posted Jan 2014 at PublicIntelligence.net, which includes suggested policy statements on Persistent Surveillance for Law Enforcement, among other things.

The image below of the Surveillance Systems market size  is from this pdf. Also posted at Public Intelligence is the US Joint Command Handbook for Persistent Surveillance.

PSS

The Washington Post ran an article on this subject in Feb 2014. Also see the video produced by the Center of Investigative Reporting and PBS demonstrating this system.

Essentially, what they say is that Wide Area Persistent Surveillance camera systems that are carried on planes offer panoramic views of large areas such as whole towns and cities, several miles (up to 25 miles in reports) in diameter, and the way they are used is to generate real-time video by having the planes circle interminably over defined areas, for about six hours at a time, combining the data obtained thereby with that from networked ground cameras, traffic cameras, gas station cameras, etc., to create a detailed picture in real-time of what anyone is doing, outside, on foot or in cars/vehicles. CIR and KQED’s video on surveillance below introduces this system and also touches on biometric intelligence, and other forms of surveillance.

State of Surveillance: Police, Privacy, and Technology

ACLU also discusses this issue, and elsewhere covers wide area surveillance (ARGUS-IS) from drones as it raises privacy concerns.

Persistent Surveillance Systems on Military Electronic Warfare Planes

Merely as reference, consider too the kind of wide-spectrum surveillance and data collection in process currently with Military Persistent Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance programs, which use continuously-generated data from planes, ground stations, and satellites, as illustrated in this Raytheon UK overview image, from a Dec 2014 AIN Online article (Raytheon UK Develops New ISR Solutions). Note especially SATCOM–how satellites are being used to network data from the ground, from aircraft, from mobile forces, and from “tactical” ground stations.

raytheonUKoverview

Electronic Warfare aircraft, whose collection of ELINT, COMINT, SIGINT–Electronic Intelligence, Communications Intelligence, Signals Intelligence–is achieved through sophisticated radar systems, electronic jamming systems, and radio antennas, use various networked tools to engage in Persistent Aerial Surveillance.

The image below of an Electronic Warfare plane is from GlobalSecurity.org; while this aircraft looks obviously military and loaded with “pods” and antennae, Military news reports (and Defence company news and press releases) over the past couple years have pursued the creation of increasingly “intuitive” portable and streamlined EW collections/jamming packages that can be mounted more easily on smaller craft, including drones, as well be used in ground vehicles, fixed installations, and in backpacks for “foot soldiers” to carry. (See The Future of Army Electronic Warfare, Sep 2013.)

So, looking again at the FBI surveillance plane imaged above, one might just wonder if it’s possible this high-tech FBI surveillance aircraft is merely a smaller, streamlined version of the plane below, carrying compact Electronic Warfare collection/jamming systems for Persistent Intelligence, Surveillance, Reconnaissance.

electronicwarfareaircraft

Electronic Warfare Includes “Signals Intelligence” Collection

Not to be forgotten is the fact that Electronic Warfare, which has been covered previously in this post here, includes electronic surveillance and remote electronic signals collection–by which is meant a variety of electronic signals, as this Army Concept Capability on Electronic Warfare for the Future Modular Force 2015-2024 document details, including remotely-culled information from computers and electronic communications. Electronic Attack, one of the three Army-Doctrine aspects of Electronic Warfare, seeks to use electromagnetic energy to attack personnel, as well as equipment, and Electronic Warfare Support  seeks out sources of intentionally and unintentionally radiated electromagnetic energy for threat recognition and targeting, as this overview image from the Army Concept Capability document illustrates.

ewow

Widely-posted –although less-well-known–information from the ’90s on NSA Signals Intelligence reveals that SIGINT also includes information on human bioelectric fields and EMF thoughtwave forms (unintentionally radiated energy), as noted by John St.Clair Akwei in his lawsuit against the NSA (See especially the Section, NSA Signals Intelligence uses EMF Brain Stimulation for Remote Neural Monitoring (RNM) and Electronic Brain Link (EBL)).

Returning to Consensual Monitoring

It turns out the FBI has Department of Justice-specified Procedures for Consensual Monitoring.

See this Sep 2005 report: Chapter Six: Procedures for Lawful, Warrantless Monitoring of Verbal Communications (Consensual Monitoring)/FBI’s Compliance with the Attorney General’s Investigative Guidelines (Redacted) Special Report.

Opening information from this report:

“Consensual monitoring is the interception by an electronic device of any wire, oral, or electronic communication where one of the parties to the communication has given prior consent to the monitoring or recording. A warrant is not required to conduct consensual monitoring, and the party providing consent may be a government agent. See 18 U.S.C. § 2511, (2) (c) – (e) (2002).

The Attorney General Guidelines governing consensual monitoring cover only non-telephonic consensual monitoring.319 The types of monitorings addressed by these Guidelines include the use of body recorders and transmitting devices. To supplement the Guidelines, the FBI imposes detailed administrative and management controls on the use of both non-telephonic and telephonic consensual monitoring. MIOG II § 10-10.”

Further, the report goes on to specify that DOJ permission to monitor is required only in the case of “sensitive individuals” such as members of Congress, Governors, and other public officials, and duration of monitoring be permitted in those cases for only up to 90 days at a time. For all other parties–such as you and me–no permission is required other than a sign off from a Special Agent at the local FBI office, and duration of monitoring may be marked by said Special Agent as “for the duration of the investigation,” may be conducted by anyone, including possibly Government agents, and doesn’t need a warrant or DOJ approval.

Records are required to be maintained in all cases of consensual monitoring; the record to FOIA-request is: Form FD-759, captioned “Notification of SAC/ASAC Authority Granted for Use of Telephonic and/or Nontelephonic Consensual Monitoring Equipment in Criminal Matters Only.”

Is Consensual Monitoring Accomplished via 1), Recordings Unilaterally Consented-to by Hundreds of Thousands of Recipients of National Security Letters, & 2), Covertly Implanted RFID transponders?

Given this information, while it appears as if this kind of monitoring is being legitimately engaged in by the FBI purely in matters of criminal investigations, because there is much information online about abusive surveillance–fraudulent and wasteful investigations on non-terrorists and non-spies mis-characterized post-Patriot-Act as terrorists and spies–being conducted by DHS/FBI, including from ex-FBI insiders and whistleblowers (such as Mike Germain), and because thousands of individuals today in the US report covert assaults with Remote Neural Monitoring technologies involving Directed-Energy Weapons and Covert RFID implants, two other possibilities come to mind:

Consensual Monitoring One: The consensual monitoring being spoken of here is via recorders, such as apps on cell phones, or videorecorders/audiorecorders on cell phones, which belong to people who are “co-operating in an investigation” by the FBI, and who are being gagged from speaking about this to the individual under investigation by way of National Security Letters, hundreds of thousands of which, possibly now more than a million, have been handed out every year (See the Electronic Frontier Foundation‘s Module on NSLs);

and Consensual Monitoring Two; The “body recorders and transmitting devices” spoken of are biomems, RFID chips, MicroElectroMechanical devices, neurostimulators, and the like, covertly implanted in individuals, which do indeed function as “body recorders” and radio transmitter/receivers. Of course, this is scarcely Consensual communications, even if it is a two-way radio communication, since the implants themselves are non-consensual, but is an attempt being made here to pass off RFID transmissions as “Consensual Monitoring”?

The CIA’s Concealed Monitoring

This brings us to the CIA, and a June ACLU article by Staff Attorney Ashley Gorski, New Docs Raise Questions About CIA Spying Here At Home which revealed the recent FOIA-requested (by ACLU & Yale Law School’s Media Freedom and Information Access Clinic) release of several documents–eg., the CIA’s own internal regulations on spying in both foreign and domestic areas, titled AR 2-2, a CIA/FBI Memo of Understanding regarding foreign and domestic intelligence collection, and others, related to the CIA’s collection programs under Executive Order 12333.

It must be noted, these documents are continuously redacted, with blanks in place of particular Intelligence collection information marked “National Security Act.”

These documented regulations apparently govern the domestic activities of the CIA, in its human subject research programs, its domestic intelligence collection programs, its foreign intelligence collected-domestically programs, its domestic monitoring programs, and its co-ordination with the FBI in domestic electronic surveillance and monitoring.

This ACLU article, and all the documents it points to, in particular the document AR 2-2, which clearly notes that the CIA engages in human subject research and experimentation programs–an issue of profound concern at this site, deserve close reading and analysis, and will be examined further here, in a succeeding post (when redactions will be filled in, speculatively).  

What’s of particular note here to this analysis, from this ACLU article/finding is: The CIA works closely with the FBI on domestic intelligence collection and can ask the FBI to collect intelligence anytime on anyone it likes. Any recording consented to by one party is not considered electronic surveillance, it is possibly considered Concealed Monitoring, a term that Army Intelligence and the CIA are familiar with(this seems to be the same kind of surveillance the FBI discusses as Consensual Monitoring, where one party unilaterally consents to a recording involving two parties or more). The CIA gives itself permission to install “monitoring devices” whenever no warrant is required for law enforcement–a loophole created by other loopholes–but does not specify what these devices are. (RFID Implants/Bio-MEMs maybe?)

The ACLU article notes:

“In addition, Annex B explains that the CIA may “use a monitoring device within the United States under circumstances in which a warrant would not be required for law enforcement purposes if the CIA General Counsel concurs.”

But what qualifies as a “monitoring device”? And how exactly does monitoring differ from “electronic surveillance,” which the CIA is prohibited from doing domestically? We don’t know. In the newly released documents, the definition of “monitoring” (as distinct from “electronic surveillance”) is redacted.​”

Redacted Signals Intelligence Collection Information, Persistent Intelligence, Surveillance, Reconnaissance, One-Party Consent Labelled Consensual Monitoring, Warrantless FBI Monitoring with Transmitting Devices, Warrantless CIA Monitoring Devices Used Domestically, Redacted Definitions of Monitoring

Security and Intelligence analysts need to start connecting the dots here and planning strategies to force this information out into the open in order to seek accountability and exposure. All Americans deserve to know that our Intelligence agencies–in particular the FBI and CIA–are 1) actively collecting particular electronic signals information the nature of which is being kept redacted and classified–but which thousands of Americans experiencing covert-assault and covert-access with radar and Remote Neural Monitoring technologies, as well as researchers studying Mind-Hacking patents and technologies can identify as Human Bio-Resonance EMFs and Brain EMFs; 2) getting away with close monitoring and surveillance of Americans, domestically, and secretively, using National Security Letters as leverage to obtain one-party consent that is then labelled “consensual monitoring”; 3) self-permitting and installing covert non-consensual implants of radio transmitting/receiving devices in the bodies of Americans so as to engage in Remote Monitoring which is then rolled into “concealed monitoring.”

Further posts here will specifically examine CIA involvement in ongoing classified human subject research and experimentation programs, and the nature of the transmitting devices/monitoring devices–radio frequency implants– being self-authorized for CIA/FBI use in undisclosed Remote Monitoring programs.

For an inside look at one extraordinary instance of the documented CIA use of biomedical implants in Intelligence collection as a surveillance method, see David Larson’s 2009 testimony, lawsuit against the CIA, and report with photographs.

 

 

 

Understanding RFID Chips–An Introduction to New Technologies by Ex-IBM Executive Patrick Redmond

(Article by Patrick Redmond re-posted with thanks from the Michael Journal.)

Continuing my exploration of RFID chips–begun in the article recently posted here on covert implantation of RFID Chips–to openly examine what the state of the art is for this technology, what areas of industry are using it, and how in particular RFIDs are being used in the medical world currently, both overtly and covertly, and to further explore how RFID chips are being implanted covertly in individuals globally for nonconsensual electromagnetic experimentation, harassment, and torture, here is this really informative article from the Michael Journal, transcribing an April 13, 2008 talk given by Patrick Redmond, ex-IBM executive, on the 2008 status of RFID chips.

WorldUnderWatch, a blog covering Surveillance issues, also reports on this article–I will post their report next–and notes that this talk was given to “the Catholic patriot group known as the Pilgrims of Saint Michael, which also is known for advocating social credit, a dramatic monetary reform plan to end the practice of national governments bringing money into existence by borrowing it, with interest, from private central banks. The group’s publication The Michael Journal advocates having national governments create their own money interest-free. It also covers the RFID issue.”

Today in the US–2015–RFID chips are in our clothing, our shoes, our toiletries and cosmetics, our passports, our driver IDs, and our credit cards. I recently received an “updated” credit card in the mail with a chip (unfortunately in my case hardly the most of my worries given my current ongoing experience as a covertly-implanted “Targeted Individual.”) See this article by Scott Granneman in 2003 which is already dated because it predicts tags on retail products–those tags are here today–the article is titled RFID Chips Are Here and it is nevertheless very informative.

But the most disturbing thing to explore of course–especially for the general public new to these subjects–is whether these RFID chips are being covertly implanted in humans, how they’re doing it, and how credible the accounts of witnesses are, reporting covert implants on their bodies. 

This 2008 article by Patrick Redmond especially throws light on how tiny these chips are-some of them are just like ink or powder, how easily they can get into human bodies, either consensually or nonconsensually, which companies are making them, how they are being linked–via computer networks and satellites–into a global surveillance system, and what dramatic potential they offer for hacking and abuse. Please read, take in, absorb at your leisure, please research further, and please pass on the word. Every one of us needs to know the truth about RFID chips today–we need to banish the disinformation gimmicks out there which strive to charge all reports of RFID implants as “conspiracy theory.”

(“Targeted Individuals” in particular who report being covertly implanted and experience the presence of these mostly-passive but also-active RFID chips in their bodies–especially vivid during transmission when they are scanned by RFID-scanners/readers, whether from just a few inches away in grocery stores by covert grocery store Mil/Intel operatives, or from 100’s of meters away from ground-based vehicles or helicopters, 1000’s of meters away from Electronic Warfare planes circling their neighborhoods, or 22,300 miles away from stationary satellites in geosynchronous orbit around the earth (radio waves are long waves, up to 3 km in length; and patents for these chips mention “repeater devices”)–and who are fighting today for their voices to be heard by an easily misled public (reporting RFID implants to medical personnel today continues to invoke misdiagnoses of “schizoid disorders” by uninformed, colluding, or conned psychiatrists) can be seen to be completely credible in their accounts, given the information in this article.)

Posting the article as is. Please visit Michael’s Journal for more. (All emphases/highlighting in red below is mine.)

An introduction to New Technologies (Part I)

by Patrick Redmond

Patrick Redmond graduated with a Doctorate in History from the University of London, England in 1972. He taught at the University of the West Indies in Trinidad, then at  Adhadu Bello University in Kano, Nigeria before joining IBM.  He worked in IBM for 31 years before retiring. During his career at IBM he held a variety of jobs. These included; from 1992 until 2007 working at the IBM Toronto lab in technical, then in sales support. He has written two books and numerous articles. Here is a presentation he gave in Toronto on April 13, 2008.

* * *

I want to thank Yvon for inviting me here to talk about new technologies. What I’m going to do is give you an introduction to three technologies that are becoming more and more important. The first is RFID chips, the second genetic engineering, and the third synthetic biology. This will give you an understanding of what is happening and where science is going.

We will start with RFID chips:

So what are they? They are Radio Frequency Identification Devices. An RFID is a microchip with an attached antenna. The microchip contains stored information which can be transmitted to a reader and then to a computer.

RFID’s can be passive, semi-passive or active. Active RFID’s have an internal power source such as a battery. This allows the tag to send signals back to the reader, so if I have a RFID on me and it has a battery, I can just send a signal to a reader wherever it is. They can receive and store data, and be read at a further distance than the passive RFID’s. The batteries can only last a short while. But the current batteries in the RFID’s can last for over a hundred years, because of their self-generating power. Ultrawideband (UWB) allows the small battery operated RFID tag to be sensed over fairly wide areas. For instance, GE Aircraft Engines in Ohio has installed five readers in the factory and it covers over 30,000 square feet so they can track everything within that area with only the five readers. That gives you an idea of the distance that can be covered by an RFID tag that might be on you or on equipment.

An RFID held by a pair of tweezers

The readers can transmit over telephone or by internet to computers and they use satellites as well. For example, Digital Angel has signed contracts with satellite providers to transmit their data for military personnel location beacons (PLBs). These beacons use the COSPAS-SARSAT satellite system. This system has some 400,000 digital beacons around the world and it’s rising to some 900,000. By the year 2009 they plan to have a GL stationary satellite system that will enable them to find the location and details of any beacon. You may sometimes see these at night; the GO stationary systems can track any beacon. Skiers sometimes use them so that they can be identified, and sailors as well, if they become lost at sea they will be able to be tracked. Anything that has an RFID tag can be tracked by a reader or a computer.

An example of such transmission is a chip sold by Zarlink. This chip is implanted in a person; it tracks problems and if one is detected, it alerts the doctor who uses a two way RF link to interrogate and adjust the implanted device. Semi-passive RFIDs have an internal power source that let them monitor environmental conditions, such as temperature and shock, but they still require RF energy from the reader to respond.

Passive RFID’s do not have a power source but use a signal sent by the scanner to power the microchip circuit to transmit back their stored information. Passive RFID’s are getting very small. Hitachi a few years ago produced a chip (called the mu chip) that was the size of a pencil point; if you take a pencil and put it on a piece of paper you get a little dot. That’s how small they’re getting. In 2007 Hitachi came out with a chip that was even smaller, they call it RFID powder. They are just like the talcum powder you would put on a baby.

Somark Innovations in Jan 10, 2007 announced an invisible RFID ink. This can be applied to cattle, prime cuts of meat, military personnel and it can be read through hair.

I brought along a couple of the larger size chips, and this particular chip I got from Gillette fusion blades. I bought one of the blades and you can see that on one side what looks like a bar code and if you open it up you can see parts of a RFID chip on the back. This one here is from the Gap. One of my daughters went to the Gap; they put the tag directly on the clothing and the instructions just say to remove before washing and wearing. If you put it up to the light you will see the RFID chip inside it. These chips are quite small and can be put on the back of labels. They would not be noticeable in badges or ID cards; they could even be put in the eye of a person, they are that small.

In order for chips to be useful, they have to have a unique product number and because of this, MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) started developing some standards. It’s called the AutoID Center. They then passed it on to the AutoID Group within the Uniform Clothes Council. It will assign codes and publish specifications, so if you have a company, government agency, or church you can contact these people and they will give you a set of numbers.

So let’s say there are three or five people in this room wearing the same white hat and each one of them has a chip on it with a different number. We could differentiate everything even if you’re all wearing the same clothes, it doesn’t really matter because everything has a unique number. MIT has the architecture of participation called EPC Global so if you go on Google and type in EPC Global and you will come up with the website they will give you instructions on how to apply and get chips. So if you want to chip yourself, your family, relatives, company or anything like that; you can do it.

It works with people who want to use this technology. One of many companies who sell the chip is called, Technic Imitations. If you have a company and you go to one of their presentations, they will give you books like this that tell you what the chips look like, how they work, the types that are sold, and what the readers look like. They will help you install chips in your company. It’s a very big business and it’s spreading very quickly.

When you use active or passive chips, active chips have advantages when you want to track items or people over longer distances. Soldiers can have active chips so they can be tracked via satellite wherever they might be in the battlefield. You can get one for your car, so you can be tracked if you are on the 407 or something.

Passive ones suffice if you are only interested in tracking over shorter distances. For example, in a sea container coming in from China, every box and every item within the box can have a chip on it. A reader can track all the items as a box passes through it. In a warehouse it is used to ensure the right shipments go to the right places. A man carrying a skid on a forklift can have the goods inside the box verified without even opening it.

They are using the chips to track inventory in order to be able to monitor what items are going where, if the right items are in the truck, etc. The passive chips are being put on devices to ensure they are valid.

There’s a lot of counterfeit drugs being produced and sold over the internet. Viagra is one of the most commonly counterfeited ones although there are many others. To ensure that people get the correct drugs they sometimes put chips on the containers so when you’re buying them you know that you are buying the correct drug.

Chipping farm animals is now required by the government

RFID’s are a great economic help to a company because they reduce theft and loss. They also streamline inventory, reduce turnaround time and handling. They’ve allowed companies to adjust production in response to inventory levels and to respond on demand. That’s why companies are interested, because of these big economic benefits and efficiency.

When you go to Wal-Mart, Best Buy, the U.S. Military and many other agencies around the world, you will see that they are all implementing RFID chips on items and increasingly on people.

The recent growth of the RFID industry has been staggering: From 1955 to 2005, cumulative sales of radio tags totaled 2.4 billion; in 2007 alone, 2.24 billion tags were sold worldwide and analysts project that by 2017 cumulative sales will top 1 trillion–generating more than $25 billion in annual revenues for the industry.

We’re starting to see chips being implemented in credit cards, debit cards and passports, driver’s licenses, health cards, and many other things. Increasingly they are being used to monitor people as well as items. RFID tags embedded into clothes and personal belongings allow people to be tracked and monitored in shopping malls, libraries, museums, sports arenas, elevators, and restrooms. American Express has them on their blue cards. They are announcing plans to place people-tracking readers in stores to track customers movements and observe their behavior. If you bought something with your credit or debit card, they will know what items you bought and if the items were chipped, they will know what you were buying. In this way they will be able to track you.

In 2006, IBM received a patent approval for an invention called, “Identification and tracking of persons using RFID-tagged items.” One stated purpose was to collect information about people that could be “used to monitor the movement of the person through the store or other areas.”

When somebody enters a store a reader “scans all identifiable RFID tags carried on the person,” and correlates the tag information with sales records to determine the individual’s “exact identity.” A device known as a “person tracking unit” which then assigns a tracking number to the shopper “to monitor the movement of the person through the store.”

If I had three readers in this room, I could scan everybody in one second and I would know right away who’s here; so it would scan that quickly. The computers are getting quite sophisticated and capable of doing large numbers of scans at any given time. One company recently announced a computer that reads data transactions at 200 million/second, an incredible number.

Here’s an example of how they are being used in companies; a few oil companies have given their employees smart cards so that they know where they are at any time of the day. This ensures that people do not go where they are not authorized to go. They will see how many times an individual might go to the washroom or outside to have a cigarette; things like that. It allows continuous tracking of people, and so more and more companies are thinking it’s a novel idea.

In early 2007, the American government complained to the Canadian government that they were tracking American contractors who were visiting Canada by placing loonies ($2.00 Canadian coins) with tiny RFID transmitters in their pockets. And a CIS officer when confronted with this said: “Ah, give us a break! You might want to know where the individual was going, what meetings he’s attending, who he’s talking with and everything like that.” So if they wanted they could track people with chipped loonies.

The University of Washington students, faculty and staff are being tracked as they move around the site so the details of where they’ve been, what they’re doing and with whom, will be stored in their database. One of the professors at the University was asked, “Will you check on this student?” so he checked on him and said, “Oh, he’s on the fourth floor just standing outside room 452 and now he’s moving into the classroom.”

In London you can buy a monthly pass to the transit cars that have an RFID on it and if you link the bus pass to a person’s name you can track where this person is on the bus and subway system throughout London, England. Last year the police were getting four requests a month and now they are getting close to 100.

Just last week the London police announced that they were putting RFID chips on all of the 31,000 police in London. Now this may be on their ID card, they did not say if they were going to put them directly on their body, but they were getting chipped; it was published in the Daily Mail. Some of the police were complaining that they “are going to know where we are at any time, we won’t be able to go into a coffee shop and get a donut.” All 31,000 police in London now have RFID’s so if they ever need to stop or control people they can direct 1,000 troops immediately to the scene.

In Southern China they’re implementing RFID readers in the city of Shenzhen to track the movement of citizens; all citizens have an ID card with a chip so they can identify who is in what part of the city at any point in time.

RFID readers in a library

The chips and National ID cards that they are trying to bring in now contain not only a number, but also a person’s work history, education, religion, ethnicity, police record and reproductive history. The United States has been trying to implement the National ID card for a few years now and there are strikes going on in different states as they try to resist this National ID that will identify everyone in the country.

Canada is adding a Real ID to the license plates and we don’t hear anything about it, its being done a lot more secretly than it is in the States where there is a lot of public debate. The increase of the use of RFID chips is going to require a increased rate of the UBF spectrum, as a result in the United States they’re going to stop using the UBF spectrum of the VHF frequency in 2009 and everything is going to go digital. You may have seen that on television in the United States.

Canada is going to do the same thing, they’ll say it still works, and instead of the antenna on your roof you’ll use a black box. The reason they’re doing this is that the UBF and VHF analog frequency are being used for the chips, so they don’t want to overload the chips with television signals, because the chips signals will now be receiving those frequencies.

A friend of mine from Quebec says his cows have a chip embedded under the skin. All farm animals have to be chipped and he says he’s no longer allowed to kill as many cows as he wants. He was given a limit of two cows that he could kill and use only for the farm. All the others had to be sold to particular companies who could control those cows and get food from them. So he could only kill two and the others he had to sell to a supermarket chain.

People are being chipped now. There’s a trend that they’re promoting in the media in terms of chipping people; they’re saying why not chip children for safety, so we can protect them, especially if they’re in the hospital then nobody could steal the newborn babies. Why don’t we chip the sick, then if someone has a heart attack and falls on the floor, we can read the signal in the chip and send someone to help them. We should chip the military so we would be able to know where the soldiers are and if they’re alive. After we could chip people on welfare so we could make sure they’re not cheating the government. Then we can chip all the criminals so that we could control them, and we’ll chip workers because a lot of them goof off at work. Then we’ll chip all the pensioners because they’re just taking money from us; and after that we’ll chip everyone else.

Some 800 hospitals in the United States are now chipping their patients. You can turn it down, but it’s available. Four hospitals in Puerto Rico have put them in the arms of the Alzheimer’s patients, and it only costs about $200 per person.

The Baja Beach Club in Barcelona gets patrons chipped. A BBC reporter went the club and got himself chipped. He said it was like getting a needle in your arm; they just rubbed it with some antiseptic and put a chip in. Because it was fairly small, he said it didn’t hurt too much and he had it inside him so whenever he ordered he would just move his arm and pay for it. The reader on the bar would read the signal and since he had his bank account information on the chip on his arm it would deduct the money from his bank account.

Nigel Gilbert of the Royal Academy of Engineering said that by 2011 you should be able to go on Google and find out where someone is at any time from chips on clothing, in cars, cell phones, and inside many people themselves.

Chips are becoming more and more sophisticated. Nature Magazine reported recently that a drug containing microchips has been developed that will release drugs at the right time and amount. They can put a chip in you and release drugs so you don’t have to take a pill every day. This particular one that they’re selling lasts for over 140 days, you just have to get chipped three times a year with this drug and it releases it every day automatically. We will probably start hearing more about things like this in the near future.

In 2006, LifeScience.com said that European researchers have developed neuro-chips, they’ve coupled together living brain cells in silicone circuits and done a lot of experimentation on rats and snails. An electrical signal from a neuron is recorded in the chips transistors, while the chip’s capitulators stimulate the neurons. They can create neuro-stimulators and use them to alleviate pain and lessen the debilitating effects of Parkinson’s disease.

The mu chip is only .05 ml in length

There are gastric stimulators that can treat obesity, they would make you feel hungry so you wouldn’t want to eat anymore, it would just be necessary to put a chip in your brain that would connect and send signals. In another study, neuro-chip implants were developed and are being used on violent prisoners. They were implanted with the microchip (but they didn’t know they were implanted), and when the implant was set at 160 megahertz’s all the subjects became lethargic and slept about 22 hours a day. The implants ended all aggression in violent prisoners. Another interesting application is a silicone chip implant that mimics the hippocampus, the area of the brain known for creating memories. If successful, the artificial brain prosthesis could replace its biological counterpart, enabling people who suffer from memory disorders to regain the ability to store new memories. It’s being developed by Professor Berger at the Center for Neural Engineering at the University of Southern California.

They’re working on rats and monkeys, so if applied to humans what this could do is restore your short-term memory which people lose as they get older, or it could replace your existing short-term memory with artificial short-term memory.

Applied Digital Solutions has a Verichip that is compatible with human tissue and can be used on implantable pacemakers or put defibrillators in artificial joints. It can be injected using a syringe and used as a sort of bar code in security applications. That’s seen as one of the easy ways to implement chips in people through injections. They could very easily inject it via a flu shot or a vaccine.

Verichip is working on a glucose microchip that would determine glucose levels. You wouldn’t have to draw blood to monitor glucose level. All you need is to have the doctor read your chip and your information and tell what your blood levels have been for the past month or two.

IBM has demonstrated a tiny device that measures heart rate and is able to sense when a person wearing it is in distress, after which it will call a cell phone for immediate help. The distress signal is sent wirelessly via Bluetooth.

Zarlink has developed the first swallowable camera capsule which uses Zarlink’s RF transmitter to relay real-time images from the gastrointestinal tract. Our MICS (Medical Implant Communication Services) platform is designed with in-body communication systems that will improve patient care, lower healthcare costs, and support new monitoring, diagnostic and therapeutic applications.

Currently the chip uses 100 hair-thin electrodes that sense the electro-magnetic signature of neurons firing in specific areas of the brain in, for example, the area that controls arm movement. The activity is translated into electrically charged signals and are then sent and decoded using a program, which can move either a robotic arm or a computer cursor. According to the Cyberkinetics’ website, three patients have been implanted with the BrainGate system. The company has confirmed that one patient (Matt Nagle) has a spinal cord injury, while another has advanced ALS.

This shows that human thoughts can be converted into radio waves and used by paralyzed people to create movement.

Matt Nagle sends the thoughts to a computer to decipher. He can turn his TV on or off, change channels, and alter the volume. (BBC 2005) He can also move his arms and pick up things.

In addition to real-time analysis of neuron patterns to relay movement, the Braingate array is also capable of recording electrical data for later analysis. A potential use of this feature would be for a neurologist to study seizure patterns in a patient with epilepsy.

Braingate is currently recruiting patients with a range of neuromuscular and neurodegenerative diseases, so if you want a computer chip in your brain you can just go on the website and volunteer.

What are the problems about these new technologies? Let me just give you a brief explanation. Chips are going to end privacy. There’s a website called Spychips.com operated by Katherine Albrecht; they research the use of RFID’s by different companies. They have been warning people about them because chips that have economic or health data could get that data stolen.

The New York Times in October of 2006 said that any card that doesn’t require swiping (in other words that doesn’t have a chip in it), is vulnerable to un-authorized charges and put people at risk for identity theft. You can buy scanners in electronics stores for $60 or more that can read the information on the chip.

They are finding that once implanted in people, chips can be damaging to our health. For example, the body of a rodent who was tested started rejecting some chips and started a development of cancer. Also there is a danger of viruses; you are all familiar with software viruses on your computers, imagine if you got a virus in your chip that deletes your information in your chip.

If chips can disseminate medicine then they can disseminate other things too; anything put inside a microchip can be activated by a signal. And finally, with this technology, subliminal mind control becomes possible. I went on to Google and did a search on mind control; you might find it interesting to check that yourself. I read one on patents; there are patents that exist for mind control. This is what one states: non-aural carriers, in the very low or very high audio frequency range or in the adjacent ultrasonic frequency spectrum, are amplitude or frequency modulated with the desired intelligence and propagated acoustically or vibrationally, for inducement into the brain. This is patent number 5,159,703 1992.

Another explains a device that can be placed in the auditory cortex of the brain. This device allows the following process: someone speaks into a microphone, the microphone then has the sounds coded into microwaves which are sent to the receiver in the brain and the receiver device will transform the microwaves back so that the person’s mind hears the original sounds. In other words, a person with this device in their head will hear whatever the programmers send via microwave signals. (Phillip L. Stoklin took out patent number 4,858,612 on this.)

What do things like this mean to people of faith? You know from the Apocalypse, which is the last book of the Bible, that microchips are unacceptable to God.

Chapter 13, Verses 16-17: “And he (the beast) shall make all, both little and great, rich and poor, freeman and bondmen, to have a character in their right hand, or on their foreheads. And that no man might buy or sell, but he that hath the character, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name.”

Chapter 16, Verse 2: “The first angel poured out his vial upon the earth, and there fell a sore and grievous wound upon men who had the character of the beast; and upon them that adored the image thereof.”

Chapter 20, Verse 4: “And I saw seats; and they sat upon them; and judgment was given unto them; and the souls of them that were beheaded for the testimony of Jesus, and for the word of God, and who had not adored the beast nor his image, nor received his character on their foreheads, or in their hands; and they lived and reigned with Christ a thousand years.”

If people have chips they will be tracked wherever they are. And there is a reasonable expectation that their bodies will be controlled and manipulated, as this technology is increasingly refined. Their minds will also be manipulated, they can certainly be made or induced to follow whatever people want them to follow. It’s quite conceivable that they could be made to denounce God also.

Patrick Redmond