Category Archives: CIA

Mary Louise/Prison Planet: Operation Mockingbird: CIA Media Manipulation

Re-posted, with thanks, linked here, from PrisonPlanet.com. Article from 2003, covering Operation Mockingbird and CIA media control by Mary Louise, PrisonPlanet.com.

Operation Mockingbird: CIA Media Manipulation

By Mary Louise

The CIA’s secret activities, covert missions, and connections of control are all done under the pretense and protection of national security with no accountability whatsoever, at least in their minds.  Considering the public is held accountable for everything we think, say, and do there is something seriously wrong with this picture.  The CIA is the President’s secret army, who have been and continue to be conveniently above the law with unlimited power and authority, to conduct a reign of terror around the globe.

The “old boy network” of socializing, talking shop, and tapping each other for favors outside the halls of government made it inevitable that the CIA and Corporate America would become allies, thus the systematic infiltration and takeover of the media.

Under the guise of ‘American’ objectives and lack of congressional oversight, the CIA accomplish their exploits by using every trick in the book (and they know quite a few) that they actually teach in the notorious “School of the Americas”, nicknamed the “School of Dictators” and “School of Assassins” by critics.  The Association for Responsible Dissent estimates that 6 million people had died by 1987 as a result of CIA covert operations, called an “American Holocaust” by former State Department official William Blum.  In 1948, the CIA recreated its covert action wing called the Office of Policy Coordination with Wall Street lawyer Frank Wisner as its first director.  Another early elitist who served as Director of the CIA from 1953 to 1961 was Allen Dulles, a senior partner at the Wall Street firm of Sullivan and Cromwell, which represented the Rockefeller empire and other trusts, corporations, and cartels.

Starting in the early days of the Cold War (late 40’s), the CIA began a secret project called Operation Mockingbird, with the intent of buying influence behind the scenes at major media outlets and putting reporters on the CIA payroll, which has proven to be a stunning ongoing success.  The CIA effort to recruit American news organizations and journalists to become spies and disseminators of propaganda, was headed up by Frank Wisner, Allen Dulles, Richard Helms, and Philip Graham (publisher of The Washington Post).  Wisner had taken Graham under his wing to direct the program code-named Operation Mockingbird and both have presumably committed suicide.

Media assets will eventually include ABC, NBC, CBS, Time, Newsweek, Associated Press, United Press International (UPI), Reuters, Hearst Newspapers, Scripps-Howard, Copley News Service, etc. and 400 journalists, who have secretly carried out assignments according to documents on file at CIA headquarters, from intelligence-gathering to serving as go-betweens.  The CIA had infiltrated the nation’s businesses, media, and universities with tens of thousands of on-call operatives by the 1950’s.  CIA Director Dulles had staffed the CIA almost exclusively with Ivy League graduates, especially from Yale with figures like George Herbert Walker Bush from the “Skull and Crossbones” Society.

Many Americans still insist or persist in believing that we have a free press, while getting most of their news from state-controlled television, under the misconception that reporters are meant to serve the public.  Reporters are paid employees and serve the media owners, who usually cower when challenged by advertisers or major government figures.  Robert Parry reported the first breaking stories about Iran-Contra for Associated Press that were largely ignored by the press and congress, then moving to Newsweek he witnessed a retraction of a true story for political reasons.  In ‘Fooling America: A Talk by Robert Parry’ he said, “The people who succeeded and did well were those who didn’t stand up, who didn’t write the big stories, who looked the other way when history was happening in front of them, and went along either consciously or just by cowardice with the deception of the American people.”

Major networks are primarily controlled by giant corporations that are obligated by law, to put the profits of their investors ahead of all other considerations which are often in conflict with the practice of responsible journalism.  There were around 50 corporations a couple of decades ago, which was considered monopolistic by many and yet today, these companies have become larger and fewer in number as the biggest ones absorb their rivals.  This concentration of ownership and power reduces the diversity of media voices, as news falls into the hands of large conglomerates with holdings in many industries that interferes in newsgathering, because of conflicts of interest.  Mockingbird was an immense financial undertaking with funds flowing from the CIA largely through the Congress for Cultural Freedom (CCF) founded by Tom Braden with Pat Buchanon of CNN’s Crossfire.

Media corporations share members of the board of directors with a variety of other large corporations including banks, investment companies, oil companies, health care, pharmaceutical, and technology companies.  Until the 1980’s, media systems were generally domestically owned, regulated, and national in scope.  However, pressure from the IMF, World Bank, and US government to deregulate and privatize, the media, communication, and new technology resulted in a global commercial media system dominated by a small number of super-powerful transnational media corporations (mostly US based), working to advance the cause of global markets and the CIA agenda.

The first tier of the nine giant firms that dominate the world are Time Warner/AOL, Disney/ABC, Bertelsmann, Viacom/CBS, Rupert Murdoch’s News Corporation/Fox, General Electric/NBC, Sony, Universal/Seagram, Tele-Communications, Inc. or TCI and AT&T.  This is just the head of the octopus which has its second and third tier tentacles working together in unison or feigned division.  This would include The Washington Post/Newsweek, The New York Times/Weekly Standard, Tribune Co., US News, Gannett/USA Today, Dow Jones/Wall Street Journal, Washington Times, Knight-Ridder, etcetera.  A good site to visit for more information is Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting, a public interest media watchdog group, at www.fair.org/index.html, www.fair.org/mediafiles/index.html and www.fair.org/extra/9711/gmg.html.  Media propaganda tactics include blackouts, misdirections, expert opinions to echo the Establishment line, smears, defining popular opinions, mass entertainment distractions, and Hobson’s Choice (the media presents the so-called conservative and liberal positions).

“Who Controls the Media?  The Subversion of the Free Press by the CIA, The Depraved Spies and Moguls of the CIA’s Operation Mockingbird”,  “The CIA: America’s Premier International Terrorist Organization”, and “Virtual Government: CIA Mind Control Operations in America” by Alex Constantine are an excellent source of information on this topic: www.alexconstantine.50megs.com/the_cia_and.html and www.alexconstantine.50megs.com.  David Guyatt has written books and many articles including one entitled “Subverting the Media” at www.deepblacklies.co.uk/subverting_the_media.htm.  Then there are two articles called “A Timeline of CIA Atrocities” and “The Origins of the Overclass” by Steve Kangas that are very informative although from a more liberal perspective.  Steve will not be writing anymore articles as he is no longer with us, having unfortunately met his untimely death that was ‘apparently’ from a self-inflicted gunshot wound.  If you read about him on his web page that is still available, you will see that he did not seem like a person who was suffering from deep depression.  In his memory, please take the time to read what he wrote at www.korpios.org/resurgent/CIAtimeline.html, www.korpios.org/resurgent/CIAtimeline.html, and www.korpios.org/resurgent/index.html.

CNN aired “Valley of Death” in June of 1998 and Time magazine (both owned by Time-Warner) ran a story about a secret mission called Operation Tailwind and the activities of SOG, Studies and Observations Group, a secret elite commando unit of the Army’s Special Forces that used lethal nerve gas (sarin), on a mission to Laos designed to kill American defectors.  Suddenly the network was awash in denials and the story was hushed up, as usual.  Acknowledged use of this gas coming at a time when the U.S. government was trying to get Saddam to comply with weapons inspections, was an embarrassment to say the least.  What hypocrisy!   Having actually used the weapons on our own troops, then complaining and accusing Saddam of potential use of stored similar weapons, of which some were manufactured in and supplied by the U.S.  The broadcast was prepared after exhaustive research and rooted in considerable supportive data.  To decide for yourself what the truth is read Floyd Abrams’ report on the CNN site at www.cnn.com/US/9807/02/tailwind.findings/index.html.

Journalists Carl Bernstein and Bob Woodward broke the stories on Watergate (late 70’s) in the Washington Post, having gained access to what the CIA was trying to keep from congress about its program of using journalists at home and abroad, in deliberate propaganda campaigns.  It was later revealed that Woodward was a Naval intelligence briefer to the White House and knew many insiders including General Alexander Haig.  A high-level source told Bernstein, “One journalist is worth twenty agents.”  CFR/Trilateralist Katharine Graham, in a 1988 speech given to senior CIA employees at Agency headquarters said, “We live in a dirty and dangerous world.  There are some things the general public does not need to know and shouldn’t.  I believe democracy flourishes when the government can take legitimate steps to keep its secrets and when the press can decide whether to print what it knows.”  Maybe that’s another reason why folks get the impression that a suspicious agenda lurks behind the headlines.  “25 Ways to Suppress Truth: Rules of Disinformation” and “8 Traits of the Disinformationalist” at www.proparanoid.com/truth.htm, sums it up very well.

Ralph McGehee was a CIA agent for 25 years, mainly in South-East Asia where he witnessed bombing and napalming of villages, which caused him to examine closely what the CIA was really all about.  He has written about Vietnam’s Phoenix Program www.vwip.org/articles/m/McGeheeRalph_VietnamsPhoenixProgram.htm and after a long battle with CIA censors, he published the book “Deadly Deceits” in 1983.  Ralph has been harassed by the CIA and FBI, involving bodily injury, and his CIABASE website was shut down on Spring of 2000.  He copied some reports that can be found at http://serendipity.magnet.ch/cia/ciabase_report_1.htm (and 2.htm), http://serendipity.magnet.ch/cia/death_squads.htm, and www.thirdworldtraveler.com/CIA/Deadly_Deceits.html.  He concluded that the CIA is not now nor has it ever been a central intelligence agency but rather the covert action arm of the President’s foreign policy advisors, of which disinformation is a large part of its responsibility and the American people are the primary target of its lies.

One of the primary reasons John F. Kennedy was assassinated had to do with the fact he dared to interfere in the framework of power.  Kennedy was intent on exercising his ELECTED powers and not allowing them to be usurped by power-crazed individuals in the intelligence community, threatening to “splinter the CIA in a thousand pieces and scatter it to the wind.”  There were four things that filled the CIA with rage and sealed his fate; JFK fired Allen Dulles, was in the process of founding a panel to investigate the CIA’s numerous crimes, put a damper on the breadth and scope of the CIA, and limited their ability to act under National Security Memoranda 55.

There is such an overwhelming amount of information pertaining to the CIA that it is impossible to cover it all in one book, much less an article.  Personally, I have come to the conclusion that the media is not only influenced by the CIA…..the media is the CIA.  Many Americans think of their supposedly free press as a watchdog on government, mainly because the press itself shamelessly promotes that myth.  One of the first tenets for the control of a population is to control all sources of information the population receives and mostly because of the pervasive CIA and Operation Mockingbird, the mainstream American Press is a controlled multi-national corporate/government megaphone.  They are up to their eyeballs in dirty deeds and there will never be an end to the corruption that prevails unless the CIA is abolished.  Otherwise, the CIA will just keep on using their tricks of propaganda, stuffed ballot boxes, purchased elections, extortion, blackmail, drug trafficking, sexual intrigue, kidnapping, beating, torture, intimidation, economic sabotage, false stories about opponents in the local media, infiltration and disruption of opposing political parties, demolition and evacuation procedures, death squads, and politically motivated assassinations.  The CIA is the epitome of organized crime run amuck!

Source: http://www.prisonplanet.com/analysis_louise_01_03_03_mockingbird.html

Popular Resistance: Operation Mockingbird, CIA Media Control Program

Reposted, with thanks, from Popular Resistance. Source: Operation Mockingbird, CIA Media Control Program

Basic history on CIA Control of Mainstream Media from a Popular Resistance 2013 article, re-posted below:

**********************

Video on the CIA funding and manipulation of the U.S. news media.  Operation Mockingbird was a secret Central Intelligence Agency campaign to influence domestic and foreign media beginning in the 1950s.

According to the Congress report published in 1976:

“The CIA currently maintains a network of several hundred foreign individuals around the world who provide intelligence for the CIA and at times attempt to influence opinion through the use of covert propaganda. These individuals provide the CIA with direct access to a large number of newspapers and periodicals, scores of press services and news agencies, radio and television stations, commercial book publishers, and other foreign media outlets.”

Senator Frank Church argued that misinforming the world cost American taxpayers an estimated $265 million a year.

In 1948, Frank Wisner was appointed director of the Office of Special Projects (OSP). Soon afterwards OSP was renamed the Office of Policy Coordination (OPC). This became the espionage and counter-intelligence branch of the Central Intelligence Agency. Wisner was told to create an organization that concentrated on “propaganda, economic warfare; preventive direct action, including sabotage, anti-sabotage, demolition and evacuation measures; subversion against hostile states, including assistance to underground resistance groups, and support of indigenous anti-Communist elements in threatened countries of the free world.”

Later that year Wisner established Mockingbird, a program to influence the domestic and foreign media. Wisner recruited Philip Graham from The Washington Post to run the project within the industry. According to Deborah Davis in Katharine the Great; “By the early 1950s, Wisner ‘owned’ respected members of The New York Times, Newsweek, CBS and other communications vehicles.”

In 1951, Allen W. Dulles persuaded Cord Meyer to join the CIA. However, there is evidence that he was recruited several years earlier and had been spying on the liberal organizations he had been a member of in the later 1940s. According to Deborah Davis, Meyer became Mockingbird’s “principal operative.”

In 1977, Rolling Stone alleged that one of the most important journalists under the control of Operation Mockingbird was Joseph Alsop, whose articles appeared in over 300 different newspapers. Other journalists alleged by Rolling Stone Magazine to have been willing to promote the views of the CIA included Stewart Alsop (New York Herald Tribune), Ben Bradlee (Newsweek), James Reston (New York Times), Charles Douglas Jackson (Time Magazine), Walter Pincus (Washington Post), William C. Baggs (The Miami News), Herb Gold (The Miami News) and Charles Bartlett (Chattanooga Times). According to Nina Burleigh (A Very Private Woman), these journalists sometimes wrote articles that were commissioned by Frank Wisner. The CIA also provided them with classified information to help them with their work.

After 1953, the network was overseen by Allen W. Dulles, director of the Central Intelligence Agency. By this time Operation Mockingbird had a major influence over 25 newspapers and wire agencies. These organizations were run by people with well-known right-wing views such as William Paley (CBS), Henry Luce (Time and Life Magazine), Arthur Hays Sulzberger (New York Times), Alfred Friendly (managing editor of the Washington Post), Jerry O’Leary (Washington Star), Hal Hendrix (Miami News), Barry Bingham, Sr., (Louisville Courier-Journal), James Copley (Copley News Services) and Joseph Harrison (Christian Science Monitor).

The Office of Policy Coordination (OPC) was funded by siphoning of funds intended for the Marshall Plan. Some of this money was used to bribe journalists and publishers. Frank Wisner was constantly looking for ways to help convince the public of the dangers of communism. In 1954, Wisner arranged for the funding of the Hollywood production of Animal Farm, the animated allegory based on the book written by George Orwell.

According to Alex Constantine (Mockingbird: The Subversion Of The Free Press By The CIA), in the 1950s, “some 3,000 salaried and contract CIA employees were eventually engaged in propaganda efforts”. Wisner was also able to restrict newspapers from reporting about certain events. For example, the CIA plots to overthrow the governments of Iran (See: Operation Ajax) and Guatemala (See: Operation PBSUCCESS).

Source: Operation Mockingbird, CIA Media Control Program

Exploring The FBI’s “Consensual Monitoring” and the CIA’s “Concealed Monitoring”: One-Party Consent to Electronic Recordings and Non-Consensual Two-Way Radio Implant Communications?

Perhaps we can start by agreeing there is no such thing as Consensual Surveillance, for if there were, we would all be ticking boxes on Census-like forms offered to us by benevolent government entities keen to surveill us with our consent, saying Yes! You can surveill me, adding, defensively, as many of the unthinking among us do, After all, I have nothing to hide.

The FBI States It Engages in Consensual Monitoring

Still, the FBI is on record now as stating that it engages in Consensual Monitoring, in the case of the aerial surveillance of Baltimore in May during the protests succeeding Freddy Gray’s death in police custody, as documents obtained by ACLU reveal. This October 30, 2015 ACLU report has the story, and the FBI Evidence and Memo Logs referencing “Consensual Monitoring” in pdf form can be found linked at the end of that article.  These evidence logs, which are redacted in places, seem to be logging in Aerial Surveillance Videos, but in a few cases, log in “Other Electronic Surveillance” which is still item-described as “Aerial Surveillance,” and in one case, additionally, as “Consensual Monitoring–Non-Telephonic.”

What is Consensual Monitoring?

fbiBaltimore-1What can Consensual Monitoring possibly be? Is the FBI defining a form of monitoring and surveillance it engages in as Consensual, in hopes of “keeping it legal”? One clue they offer is that it’s “Other Electronic.” It’s not Aerial Video. It’s not Aerial Photography. Can it be Aerial Cyber Surveillance? (Why would they need to do that from the air, when it would be far more effective from the ground?) It’s Non-Telephonic. So it’s not Stingray, Dirtbox, cell-phone-tower-mimicking scooping-up of cellphone voice and text data. It’s Electronic, and it’s Consensual–so they say–and it’s not Video, Audio, Telephonic, Cyber-related.

From the ACLU article:

“FBI evidence logs reveal that at least half of the flights conducted video surveillance, and that the FBI retained copies of those videos in its files. Other flights conducted some type of “electronic surveillance,” but specific descriptions are redacted. This suggests that those flights were perhaps using more sensitive or powerful recording gear than just video cameras, though what kind we don’t know.

What we do know is that one of the aircraft, a Cessna propeller plane registered to an FBI front company, NG Research, had specialized surveillance camera equipment on board. FAA documentation shows that the FBI installed a Paravion Technology infrared camera mount and a FLIR Talon multi-sensor camera system on the exterior of the plane. The FLIR system includes a “thermal imager,” an optical camera, and a “laser illuminator” for recording at night. We did not receive documentation about the second plane observed circling over Baltimore, so we don’t know if it was carrying different gear.”

Regular FBI Surveillance Flights Over Cities and Rural Areas

A June 2015 article by the Associated Press revealed the fact of regular surveillance flights over cities by FBI planes, although again the nature of the surveillance was not clarified:

“Scores of low-flying planes circling American cities are part of a civilian air force operated by the FBI and obscured behind fictitious companies, The Associated Press has learned.

The AP traced at least 50 aircraft back to the FBI, and identified more than 100 flights in 11 states over a 30-day period since late April, orbiting both major cities and rural areas. At least 115 planes, including 90 Cessna aircraft, were mentioned in a federal budget document from 2009.

For decades, the planes have provided support to FBI surveillance operations on the ground. But now the aircraft are equipped with high-tech cameras, and in rare circumstances, technology capable of tracking thousands of cellphones, raising questions about how these surveillance flights affect Americans’ privacy.

“It’s important that federal law enforcement personnel have the tools they need to find and catch criminals,” said Charles Grassley, chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee. “But whenever an operation may also monitor the activities of Americans who are not the intended target, we must make darn sure that safeguards are in place to protect the civil liberties of innocent Americans.

The FBI says the planes are not equipped or used for bulk collection activities or mass surveillance. The surveillance equipment is used for ongoing investigations, the FBI says, generally without a judge’s approval.”

Also:

“One of the planes, photographed in flight last week (May/June 2015) by the AP in northern Virginia, bristled with unusual antennas under its fuselage and a camera on its left side.”

fbiplane

The AP video report that accompanies a Blaze article on this same AP report identifies the spherical white protrusion with cable on the fuselage as a ball camera to provide sweeping panoramic views, but the other equipment is not identified.

“Evolving technology can record higher-quality video from long distances, even at night, and can capture certain identifying information from cellphones using a device known as a “cell-site simulator” — or Stingray, to use one of the product’s brand names. These can trick pinpointed cellphones into revealing identification numbers of subscribers, including those not suspected of a crime.

Officials say cellphone surveillance is rare, although the AP found in recent weeks FBI flights orbiting large, enclosed buildings for extended periods where aerial photography would be less effective than electronic signals collection. Those included above Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport and the Mall of America in Bloomington, Minnesota.”

Currently Available Aerial Surveillance Technologies

On the subject of technology currently being used in Aerial Surveillance by Law Enforcement, and by Military PISR operations (Persistent Intelligence, Surveillance, Reconnaissance), see this slide show presentation from the company Persistent Surveillance Systems, linked in pdf and posted Jan 2014 at PublicIntelligence.net, which includes suggested policy statements on Persistent Surveillance for Law Enforcement, among other things.

The image below of the Surveillance Systems market size  is from this pdf. Also posted at Public Intelligence is the US Joint Command Handbook for Persistent Surveillance.

PSS

The Washington Post ran an article on this subject in Feb 2014. Also see the video produced by the Center of Investigative Reporting and PBS demonstrating this system.

Essentially, what they say is that Wide Area Persistent Surveillance camera systems that are carried on planes offer panoramic views of large areas such as whole towns and cities, several miles (up to 25 miles in reports) in diameter, and the way they are used is to generate real-time video by having the planes circle interminably over defined areas, for about six hours at a time, combining the data obtained thereby with that from networked ground cameras, traffic cameras, gas station cameras, etc., to create a detailed picture in real-time of what anyone is doing, outside, on foot or in cars/vehicles. CIR and KQED’s video on surveillance below introduces this system and also touches on biometric intelligence, and other forms of surveillance.

State of Surveillance: Police, Privacy, and Technology

ACLU also discusses this issue, and elsewhere covers wide area surveillance (ARGUS-IS) from drones as it raises privacy concerns.

Persistent Surveillance Systems on Military Electronic Warfare Planes

Merely as reference, consider too the kind of wide-spectrum surveillance and data collection in process currently with Military Persistent Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance programs, which use continuously-generated data from planes, ground stations, and satellites, as illustrated in this Raytheon UK overview image, from a Dec 2014 AIN Online article (Raytheon UK Develops New ISR Solutions). Note especially SATCOM–how satellites are being used to network data from the ground, from aircraft, from mobile forces, and from “tactical” ground stations.

raytheonUKoverview

Electronic Warfare aircraft, whose collection of ELINT, COMINT, SIGINT–Electronic Intelligence, Communications Intelligence, Signals Intelligence–is achieved through sophisticated radar systems, electronic jamming systems, and radio antennas, use various networked tools to engage in Persistent Aerial Surveillance.

The image below of an Electronic Warfare plane is from GlobalSecurity.org; while this aircraft looks obviously military and loaded with “pods” and antennae, Military news reports (and Defence company news and press releases) over the past couple years have pursued the creation of increasingly “intuitive” portable and streamlined EW collections/jamming packages that can be mounted more easily on smaller craft, including drones, as well be used in ground vehicles, fixed installations, and in backpacks for “foot soldiers” to carry. (See The Future of Army Electronic Warfare, Sep 2013.)

So, looking again at the FBI surveillance plane imaged above, one might just wonder if it’s possible this high-tech FBI surveillance aircraft is merely a smaller, streamlined version of the plane below, carrying compact Electronic Warfare collection/jamming systems for Persistent Intelligence, Surveillance, Reconnaissance.

electronicwarfareaircraft

Electronic Warfare Includes “Signals Intelligence” Collection

Not to be forgotten is the fact that Electronic Warfare, which has been covered previously in this post here, includes electronic surveillance and remote electronic signals collection–by which is meant a variety of electronic signals, as this Army Concept Capability on Electronic Warfare for the Future Modular Force 2015-2024 document details, including remotely-culled information from computers and electronic communications. Electronic Attack, one of the three Army-Doctrine aspects of Electronic Warfare, seeks to use electromagnetic energy to attack personnel, as well as equipment, and Electronic Warfare Support  seeks out sources of intentionally and unintentionally radiated electromagnetic energy for threat recognition and targeting, as this overview image from the Army Concept Capability document illustrates.

ewow

Widely-posted –although less-well-known–information from the ’90s on NSA Signals Intelligence reveals that SIGINT also includes information on human bioelectric fields and EMF thoughtwave forms (unintentionally radiated energy), as noted by John St.Clair Akwei in his lawsuit against the NSA (See especially the Section, NSA Signals Intelligence uses EMF Brain Stimulation for Remote Neural Monitoring (RNM) and Electronic Brain Link (EBL)).

Returning to Consensual Monitoring

It turns out the FBI has Department of Justice-specified Procedures for Consensual Monitoring.

See this Sep 2005 report: Chapter Six: Procedures for Lawful, Warrantless Monitoring of Verbal Communications (Consensual Monitoring)/FBI’s Compliance with the Attorney General’s Investigative Guidelines (Redacted) Special Report.

Opening information from this report:

“Consensual monitoring is the interception by an electronic device of any wire, oral, or electronic communication where one of the parties to the communication has given prior consent to the monitoring or recording. A warrant is not required to conduct consensual monitoring, and the party providing consent may be a government agent. See 18 U.S.C. § 2511, (2) (c) – (e) (2002).

The Attorney General Guidelines governing consensual monitoring cover only non-telephonic consensual monitoring.319 The types of monitorings addressed by these Guidelines include the use of body recorders and transmitting devices. To supplement the Guidelines, the FBI imposes detailed administrative and management controls on the use of both non-telephonic and telephonic consensual monitoring. MIOG II § 10-10.”

Further, the report goes on to specify that DOJ permission to monitor is required only in the case of “sensitive individuals” such as members of Congress, Governors, and other public officials, and duration of monitoring be permitted in those cases for only up to 90 days at a time. For all other parties–such as you and me–no permission is required other than a sign off from a Special Agent at the local FBI office, and duration of monitoring may be marked by said Special Agent as “for the duration of the investigation,” may be conducted by anyone, including possibly Government agents, and doesn’t need a warrant or DOJ approval.

Records are required to be maintained in all cases of consensual monitoring; the record to FOIA-request is: Form FD-759, captioned “Notification of SAC/ASAC Authority Granted for Use of Telephonic and/or Nontelephonic Consensual Monitoring Equipment in Criminal Matters Only.”

Is Consensual Monitoring Accomplished via 1), Recordings Unilaterally Consented-to by Hundreds of Thousands of Recipients of National Security Letters, & 2), Covertly Implanted RFID transponders?

Given this information, while it appears as if this kind of monitoring is being legitimately engaged in by the FBI purely in matters of criminal investigations, because there is much information online about abusive surveillance–fraudulent and wasteful investigations on non-terrorists and non-spies mis-characterized post-Patriot-Act as terrorists and spies–being conducted by DHS/FBI, including from ex-FBI insiders and whistleblowers (such as Mike Germain), and because thousands of individuals today in the US report covert assaults with Remote Neural Monitoring technologies involving Directed-Energy Weapons and Covert RFID implants, two other possibilities come to mind:

Consensual Monitoring One: The consensual monitoring being spoken of here is via recorders, such as apps on cell phones, or videorecorders/audiorecorders on cell phones, which belong to people who are “co-operating in an investigation” by the FBI, and who are being gagged from speaking about this to the individual under investigation by way of National Security Letters, hundreds of thousands of which, possibly now more than a million, have been handed out every year (See the Electronic Frontier Foundation‘s Module on NSLs);

and Consensual Monitoring Two; The “body recorders and transmitting devices” spoken of are biomems, RFID chips, MicroElectroMechanical devices, neurostimulators, and the like, covertly implanted in individuals, which do indeed function as “body recorders” and radio transmitter/receivers. Of course, this is scarcely Consensual communications, even if it is a two-way radio communication, since the implants themselves are non-consensual, but is an attempt being made here to pass off RFID transmissions as “Consensual Monitoring”?

The CIA’s Concealed Monitoring

This brings us to the CIA, and a June ACLU article by Staff Attorney Ashley Gorski, New Docs Raise Questions About CIA Spying Here At Home which revealed the recent FOIA-requested (by ACLU & Yale Law School’s Media Freedom and Information Access Clinic) release of several documents–eg., the CIA’s own internal regulations on spying in both foreign and domestic areas, titled AR 2-2, a CIA/FBI Memo of Understanding regarding foreign and domestic intelligence collection, and others, related to the CIA’s collection programs under Executive Order 12333.

It must be noted, these documents are continuously redacted, with blanks in place of particular Intelligence collection information marked “National Security Act.”

These documented regulations apparently govern the domestic activities of the CIA, in its human subject research programs, its domestic intelligence collection programs, its foreign intelligence collected-domestically programs, its domestic monitoring programs, and its co-ordination with the FBI in domestic electronic surveillance and monitoring.

This ACLU article, and all the documents it points to, in particular the document AR 2-2, which clearly notes that the CIA engages in human subject research and experimentation programs–an issue of profound concern at this site, deserve close reading and analysis, and will be examined further here, in a succeeding post (when redactions will be filled in, speculatively).  

What’s of particular note here to this analysis, from this ACLU article/finding is: The CIA works closely with the FBI on domestic intelligence collection and can ask the FBI to collect intelligence anytime on anyone it likes. Any recording consented to by one party is not considered electronic surveillance, it is possibly considered Concealed Monitoring, a term that Army Intelligence and the CIA are familiar with(this seems to be the same kind of surveillance the FBI discusses as Consensual Monitoring, where one party unilaterally consents to a recording involving two parties or more). The CIA gives itself permission to install “monitoring devices” whenever no warrant is required for law enforcement–a loophole created by other loopholes–but does not specify what these devices are. (RFID Implants/Bio-MEMs maybe?)

The ACLU article notes:

“In addition, Annex B explains that the CIA may “use a monitoring device within the United States under circumstances in which a warrant would not be required for law enforcement purposes if the CIA General Counsel concurs.”

But what qualifies as a “monitoring device”? And how exactly does monitoring differ from “electronic surveillance,” which the CIA is prohibited from doing domestically? We don’t know. In the newly released documents, the definition of “monitoring” (as distinct from “electronic surveillance”) is redacted.​”

Redacted Signals Intelligence Collection Information, Persistent Intelligence, Surveillance, Reconnaissance, One-Party Consent Labelled Consensual Monitoring, Warrantless FBI Monitoring with Transmitting Devices, Warrantless CIA Monitoring Devices Used Domestically, Redacted Definitions of Monitoring

Security and Intelligence analysts need to start connecting the dots here and planning strategies to force this information out into the open in order to seek accountability and exposure. All Americans deserve to know that our Intelligence agencies–in particular the FBI and CIA–are 1) actively collecting particular electronic signals information the nature of which is being kept redacted and classified–but which thousands of Americans experiencing covert-assault and covert-access with radar and Remote Neural Monitoring technologies, as well as researchers studying Mind-Hacking patents and technologies can identify as Human Bio-Resonance EMFs and Brain EMFs; 2) getting away with close monitoring and surveillance of Americans, domestically, and secretively, using National Security Letters as leverage to obtain one-party consent that is then labelled “consensual monitoring”; 3) self-permitting and installing covert non-consensual implants of radio transmitting/receiving devices in the bodies of Americans so as to engage in Remote Monitoring which is then rolled into “concealed monitoring.”

Further posts here will specifically examine CIA involvement in ongoing classified human subject research and experimentation programs, and the nature of the transmitting devices/monitoring devices–radio frequency implants– being self-authorized for CIA/FBI use in undisclosed Remote Monitoring programs.

For an inside look at one extraordinary instance of the documented CIA use of biomedical implants in Intelligence collection as a surveillance method, see David Larson’s 2009 testimony, lawsuit against the CIA, and report with photographs.

 

 

 

CIA, Mossad, MI6, DGSE: Seemingly Pushing for a “Global Systems Approach” to “Homeland” Security

Shortly after the Paris attacks, it was learned more widely that the heads of various Intelligence agencies–the CIA, the DGSE, and former heads of the Mossad and MI6–had met a couple weeks earlier in Washington, DC.

Dahboo7 reported briefly on this:

The meeting took place on the campus of the George Washington University (where I taught Creative Writing for many years, and prior to that, various Composition and Writing courses in the English Department’s Writing Program) under the aegis of the George Washington Center for Cyber and Homeland Security (no doubt creative in its own way;), which describes itself on Youtube thus:

The Center for Cyber and Homeland Security (CCHS) at the George Washington University is a nonpartisan “think and do” tank whose mission is to carry out policy-relevant research and analysis on homeland security, counterterrorism, and cybersecurity issues. By convening domestic and international policymakers and practitioners at all levels of government, the private and non-profit sectors, and academia, CCHS develops innovative strategies to address and confront current and future threats.

The occasion for the meeting was ostensibly a panel conducted as part of a conference titled the (2nd Annual) Ethos and Profession of Intelligence Conference, which was co-hosted by the Central Intelligence Agency and the George Washington University, and was held on October 27, 2015.

The panel was titled, interestingly, “The Shared 21st Century International Mission,” and featured CIA Director John Brennan, former UK MI6 Chief John Sawers, Director of the French Directorate for External Security Bernard Bajolet, and former Israeli National Security Advisor Yaacov Amidror. The panel was moderated by David Ignatius, Columnist at the Washington Post.

The whole panel may be watched on Youtube (video below), and, given the power that Intel agencies currently have appropriated for themselves, and the level of self-congratulation aired here, is just a little disturbing to watch and listen to, but is posted here for a couple reasons. While it’s no secret that Intelligence agencies in the West–and Israel–probably work together anyway on all sorts of issues related to security and intelligence, counter-intelligence, and counter-terrorism, it’s interesting to note that there now appears to be an obvious, emerging bent now among Intelligence agencies to openly merge and combine their efforts and missions, much in keeping with other global initiatives, such as evinced in Global Policing and the current push toward One World/Global Governance.

To this end, I found two moments of note in this panel, one by former Israeli Advisor Yaacov Amidror sounding just un peu frantic about the crucial need for increased collection and sharing of information among Intel agencies in order to “win in the arena of digital/cyber warfare,” and the second featuring current CIA Head John Brennan holding forth on the changed terrain post 9/11, acknowledging the sophistication of current systems but noting the current-day complexity of pulling together vast collections of data and information from all sorts of sources, including, “something from Youtube, something collected clandestinely,” and the need for “pulling it all together and pulsing it, at the speed of light”–a need for a “System of Systems approach” to be established and evolved and improved, as data improves (a subject immediately picked up by the rest of the panel as an opportunity to praise the gargantuan collection of data by the NSA).

Actually, that led to something else that’s disturbing though–John Sawers talking about “threats to the homeland” (Does the UK also have a “Homeland”? How language creeps along!) and David Ignatius pointedly asking Mr. Amidror about Palestinian “lone wolf” terrorists. (Who praised Israeli Intel for their efforts in intercepting “95% of planned terrorism” and confining attacks to ones by the “lonely wolves.”) This excerpt is prefaced by the French DGSE Head Bernard Bajolet talking about international co-operation among Intel and his own efforts in tracking suspects who tended to travel between Europe and the Middle-East and can be viewed from 41 minutes in to about ten minutes down.

What’s notable is that there seemed to be a distinct attempt by all at this panel including the moderator to highlight this Global Systems approach, as well as to deliberately spotlight Domestic Intelligence, Domestic Terrorism or Extremism, and Lone Wolves–all focuses that we have seen before, and are still seeing today, resulting in increased and repressive, secretive, surveillance and counter-terrorism measures being unleashed on domestic populations, both in the US, the UK, and in other countries in Europe.

Panel at GW, 21st-Century Intelligence Sharing

In relation to the above, it is interesting to note the following excerpt on supercomputers crunching massive amounts of intelligence in an Artificial Intelligence scenario from an article on Remote Neural Monitoring–a secretive, probably-classified neurotechnology which directs electromagnetic/scalar energy remotely onto human brains, bodies, and nervous systems, which is nevertheless widely described today, reported worldwide by non-consensual experimentees, and discussed online, and which will be covered here more extensively shortly–posted at Deepthought.newsvine.com:

“‘Mr Computer’ is a general artificial intelligence with greater-than-human level reasoning capability.  Whilst not what many envision as being the technological singularity, it is certainly the leading practical implementation of this notion.  For the less romantic, ‘Mr Computer’ is a HCI solution to a vast decentralized data warehousing solution jointly operated by the CIA and NSA.  Its role in RNM is a CIA black op with stated objectives of controlling all aspects of human behavior, thus it is possible for individuals to know of this AI in a different capacity and not have access to RNM directly.

Outside of its role in RNM, ‘Mr Computer’ is a force multiplier that enables the US intelligence community to connect-the-dots in gathered intelligence from every available source.  This system is the ultimate destination of any data the US Federal government collects. Forget notions of hacking or attacking this system, not only can it literally vaporize you, but its also a better programmer, physicist and engineer than all humans combined.  It’s as secure as they come and its bugs are not of the conventional exploitable type.   I’m sure it finds modern notions of cyber-warfare and IT security ‘cute’ and ‘charming’, but ultimately not in the same league as it and certainly not a threat.” More can be found at Deep Thought.

In which vein, also see this informative 2013 article on Skynet and AI taking over NSA surveillance data: Skynet Rising: Google Acquires 512-Qubit Quantum Computer: NSA Surveillance to be Turned Over to AI Machines

 

Anonymous Message Sent Via An Open Letter to Donald Trump

Thanks to Jean Haines of Co-Creating Our Future on Planet Earth for this find, and to ConspiracyClub.co for posting this. Re-posting (not in endorsement of Donald Trump/or anyone else) to highlight the disclosure re. 9/11 as well as current insights into the “plot to destroy America” President John F. Kennedy warned so long ago about, including the TPP and the US arming of ISIS/ISIL/IS.

***************

An OPEN LETTER To Donald Trump

Dear Donald Trump,

Greetings from the 50 States and other Territories.  We acknowledge your unrivaled courage and honor your many initiatives to reveal the facts.  Thank you!  We extend our sincere gratitude to you and your family for being a source of truth and light in the political darkness of falsehood and deception.

First and foremost we are addressing you as the only open and honest presidential candidate throughout the current campaign season.  This nation has not seen any presidential aspirant so transparent and forthcoming as you have been.  Please know that were it not for your quite politically incorrect posture, this letter would not have been written.

Many Americans have been particularly impressed by your willingness in the past to challenge Barack Obama on his ‘missing’ birth certificate.  Only through your persistent efforts did the ‘president’ finally post a forged and fraudulent copy of his fake birth certificate on the official WhiteHouse.gov website.  In so doing he and his co-conspirators have committed a number of serious felonies.

As you well know, this criminal matter was professionally investigated by Phoenix Sheriff Joe Arpaio.  He and his officially appointed Cold Case Posse determined that the copy of Obama’s posted birth certificate was a categorical forgery and fabricated document.  This final and irrefutable conclusion was made by a number of highly experienced electronic document experts whose forensic investigation of this matter has not been contested by a single professional in the field.

Now, here we are almost one year away from President Obama completing his second term.  You know that we have a proven imposter in the White House.  As you have repeatedly pointed out, not only has he profoundly betrayed the American people, his actions in Syria smack of outright treason.  That’s right, most of us firmly believe that funding and arming ISIS is both unlawful and treasonous.  Especially when the ISIL terrorist network routinely executes Christians and wipes out Christian communities across the Middle East are Obama’s criminal actions all the more reprehensible and traitorous, deplorable and outrageous.

This brings us to the purpose of this open letter.  President Obama has demonstrated that he is simply incapable of leadership.  It has become painfully obvious to most that true presidential authority has not been invested in him; therefore, he is unable to execute the responsibilities of his high office.  His real masters will not permit him to do so. Consequently he is being methodically used to execute an agenda that is intent on destroying the United States of America.  This clandestine plot must be exposed before he leaves office.  Not after; rather, BEFORE HE LEAVES OFFICE.  This is imperative for a variety of reasons.

Why?  What is so critical that the next president cannot address and remedy.

Let’s be very real.  Those who selected Obama decades ago to be the President of the USA during this crucial period of the American Republic installed him to implement a very specific and covert agenda.  They are getting dangerously close to the completion of that agenda with the unlawful passing of the TPP (Trans-Pacific Partnership) and TTIP (Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership).  Negotiated with the utmost secrecy, both of these trade agreements, together with the TPA (Trade Promotion Authority), have greatly undermined U.S. sovereignty and betrayed the American people.

Surely you know where we are going with this.  The Republican side has only abetted Obama in the passing of these disastrous trade agreements.  Hence, the only way to show the U.S. citizenry that they have been terribly deceived and wronged by the President and the Congress is to use your campaign platform as the Republican frontrunner.  No matter who is elected president in 2016, they will essentially be powerless to revisit these scandalous trade agreements in 2017.

Which brings us to the real reason that we are writing this letter of support and encouragement.

You were recently quoted whereby you pointed out that the terrorist attacks of 9/11 occurred on the watch of George W. Bush.  As you well know, the Bush Administration not only covered up the U.S. Government conspiracy which perpetrated those false flag attacks, there are now volumes of evidence available which prove their direct complicity. There are those key members of the previous Clinton Administration who also appear to have helped lay the groundwork for that highly consequential false flag operation.

Let’s face it — it all comes down to 9/11.  Everyone knows that that day’s events have radically changed the destiny of this nation, as well as of the world-at-large.  Just look at Syria … at Iraq … at Afghanistan … at Pakistan … at Libya … at Yemen … at Egypt … at Palestine … at Lebanon … at Iran and at the Ukraine.  Look at most of Africa, where resource wars dominate the landscape. Each of these naked wars of aggression has been waged by a Noble Peace Prize winner. It has even been reported that the world has seen the first instance where one Nobel Peace Prize winner has bombed another prize winner!  And, that the US Military knew exactly what they were bombing in advance—the Kunduz Hospital in Afghanistan.

That’s exactly where we are at this late date in 2015.  An extremely sad state of affairs indeed.  All because of the 9/11 false flag attacks perpetrated by rogue elements within the U.S. government.  You know exactly who they are as their names and roles have been splattered all over the internet. Just like you knew Obama’s birth certificate was a complete and total fraud.

The key issue regarding 9/11 is that a worldwide War on Terror was fraudulently declared by Washington.  The world community of nations has subsequently felt the wrath and warmongering unleashed by the CIA, NSA, DIA and U.S. Armed Forces. Needless to say, it is the USA, along with its close collaborators throughout the Anglo-American Axis (AAA), which has been responsible for maintaining and promoting a regime of state-sponsored terrorism across the entire planet since 9/11.  In other words, the CIA created Al-Qaeda just like the MOSSAD created ISIS.

What’s the point?

Because the mainstream media (MSM) has also conspired to cover up the state’s crimes committed on September 11, 2001, the 9/11 Truth Movement  has had a difficult time raising the awareness that is necessary for the truth to break out into the open.  The further away we get from September of 2001 the more challenging it will be to present the legal case to the American people.  However, this upcoming election has presented a unique opportunity for you to disclose some of the most significant facts … necessary details … and inconvenient truths.

Donald, you’re a New Yorker at heart.  Is there a single fellow New Yorker who doesn’t seriously doubt the 9/11 Commission Report?!  Virtually every U.S. citizen, who still possesses critical thinking skills, knows that the official government 9/11 investigation was the biggest cover-up in U.S. history.  Even those who say they still believe the government’s utterly ridiculous conspiracy theory now have their nagging doubts and serious misgivings.

When every NYC firefighter and policeman knows that the Twin Towers could only have come down by way of an inside job, who in the Big Apple doesn’t know the real deal? Hence, you know that the greater New York metropolitan area would support your call to reopen the 9/11 investigation—NOW!  The rest of the country would then follow suit, as many are now livid with rage and beside themselves with frustration.  That countless career criminals within the U.S. Federal Government were allowed to get away with the 9/11 false flag attacks, and then use that false flag operation to terrorize the world community of nations, is simply too much for most to bear.  They’re pissed and getting more peeved by the day.  Certainly you and your team comprehend the sheer enormity and profundity of this unresolved tragedy.

Look it, the American people intuitively know that it all comes down to 9/11.  It is the great litmus test for every politician in the future.  You can either be the one who blows it wide open or consign yourself to being another untrustworthy politician.  If you fail to open the case of 9/11, you will fail to earn the respect of your biggest constituency.  Who among us does not know practically every detail of the 9/11 scam and betrayal after 14 years of research and investigation?

Our Best Recommendation:

Just like Ron Paul has used his presidential campaigns to educate the American people about the Federal Reserve, the IRS, the USA’s perpetual war economy, you can likewise enlighten the electorate about 9/11.  While Congressman Paul has functioned as a 21st century version of Thomas Paine, you might issue an indictment much like Thomas Jefferson did with the Declaration of Independence (DOC).  Most are unaware that the DOC is perhaps the most scathing indictment of its kind issued against the British Crown and King George III, in particular.

Whereas Ron Paul became an “internet pamphleteer”, you might shift your focus away from attacking your current competitors and direct your accusations toward the current monarch—the despotic King Obama.  His entire administration is every bit as tyrannical and oppressive as the English were in the 1770s.  They have also acted with a lawlessness and impunity never seen in U.S. history.  Quite frankly, many feel that the Obama regime must be prosecuted before they take the unprecedented initiative to repeal the 2nd Amendment.  As you are fully aware, that is their next goal.

You must know by now that if you proceed down this road of using your powerful (and God-given) platform for substantive revelation, the American people will stand behind you. The MSM will only tear you down more, but who cares.  They’re just as guilty for deliberately covering up the crimes of 9/11.  There are still those few patriots in the MSM who will use every method and device to disseminate your truth-telling, should you really go full-bore on 9/11 and other unspeakable truths.

Lastly, we would strongly suggest that you speak to your daughter Ivanka about the upcoming Year of the Fire Monkey.  She is fully aware that 2016 is not only the ChineseYear of the Fire Monkey, and that Pluto is still cruising through Capricorn.  The last time that these two events occurred in the same year was in 1776, and it only happens once every 245 years.  She will fill you in about how the powerful energies of the whole universe are now converging to assist those who stand in integrity by telling the truth.  And, by acting for the greatest good of all.

Look at President Vladimir Putin if you want to see truth in action.  The boys in D.C., especially the G-men at Langley, don’t know how to deal with his righteous governance and wise approach to international affairs.  Putin completely befuddles them by simply acting in the best interest of the world.  That — right there — is Putin’s secret.  If you resolve yourself to govern in the best interest of the global community the Universe will support you.  If you don’t follow this Golden Rule of good government, you will be heckled and hounded at every turn.  And you know it will be a heckuva lot more difficult sitting in the Oval Office than it is right now, as you’ll be in their crosshairs (both literally and figuratively) every moment of every day for four long years.

Therefore, the single best way to turn the tables on these duplicitous turncoats and homegrown terrorists is to go on the offensive … just like Putin did in Syria.  Look at the massive revelations that have emerged from Russia’s relentless bombing of The Three Stooges — ISIS, ISIL & the IS.  Yeah, everyone knows they’re the exact same entity funded and financed, armed and equipped by the good ole USA!  The point here is that by going ballistic on the whole DC-coordinated scam, Putin’s Russia has blown it all up.

Dear Donald, do you now get the strategy that is being highly suggested?  It is time to go ballistic.  You know the best defense is a “shock and awe” offense, just like Putin is doing in Syria.  Obama & Company is now essentially powerless in the Mideast and will be for the foreseeable future.  The whole Mideast geopolitical chessboard was completely rearranged in just a few days time by Putin et al.

With other Republican candidates now trying to take you down — HARD — like Rand Paul, the intensity will only ratchet up by the day.  Now, or very soon, is the time to turn the tables on them.  You’ve dealt with many sociopaths long enough throughout the Manhattan real estate market.  You know that you’re dealing with a group of hardened, criminally insane psychopaths that only understands one language.  Only by the grace of God were you gifted with such a career to learn their language.   It took the Kremlin many years to understand this, partly because of their vastly different language, but once Putin’s team got it, they’ve never looked back.

May God bless you and shower His grace upon your valiant efforts.

Very sincerely,

Anonymous, Citizens of the USA
October 17, 2015

Source

Ex-CIA and MI5 Agent and Whistleblower Carl Clark Reveals Covert Electromagnetic Torture of Civilians by Intel Agencies in US/UK/Europe/Asia with Directed Energy “Non-Lethal” Neuroweapons

(Text of interview re-posted with thanks from Stopeg.com and Rudy2’s Multilingual blog–links below.)ECC-cover of Torture, Asian and Global Perspectives

In my quest to post information of note relating to the ongoing and blatant global holocaust of covert persecution and assault of innocent and ethical civilians and veterans (“Targeted Individuals”) with ElectroMagnetic Radiation (EMR) Neuroweapons, Scalar Weapons, Sonic Weapons, Directed Energy Weapons, wrongfully-named “Non-Lethal” Weapons, and all other misnomers for what Tim Rifat rightfully calls “a fearsome array of mind control weapons” possessed and used today by unscrupulous governments, militaries, and Intel agencies, I am re-posting in excerpt this extraordinary 2010 whistleblower testimony interview with ex-agent Carl Clark of Norfolk, England, who worked with Secret Services in many countries in Europe, Asia, and the US, including the CIA, Mossad, MI5, and others.

raum and zeitIn this interview he reveals his experience and thoughts on the subject of covert electromagnetic torture of civilians, whether political dissidents or not, by American, British, European, and Israeli Intelligence agencies, surveillance and harassment activities in which he participated once as an employee, and which he experienced himself on his person after he left the Services.

This interview appeared in the German magazine Raum & Zeit, 4/2010, and is posted here in text form from Rudy2’s Multilingual blog; the pdf is linked from StopEg.com, with thanks to both; the translation from German to English is noted on the pdf as by Cyborg Nicholson on PeacePink. Also posted here now, 2-14-2024.

*****************

From the start of the interview:

Interview with Carl Clark, Norfolk, England.

Armin Gross: Matters related to the secret services are usually not disclosed. You want to bring them out in the open though. Who did you work for?

Carl Clark: I worked freelance from 1980 to 2003 for various secret services. I worked for the American Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) up to 1997. I then worked for the Israeli Secret Services, Mossad and for the Anti-Defamation League (ADL), a US organisation against discrimination and defamation of Jews.  I was also employed by MI 5, a subgroup of the British Secret Services.  I later moved to the Police Secret Services as well as to the secret services of an investigation laboratory.  I was deployed in European operations in Paris, Zurich, Berlin, Dusseldorf, Munich, Madrid, Lyon, Bilbao and Moscow.

Armin Gross: What were your main assignments?

Carl Clark: An important assignment was to infiltrate certain groups to obtain inside information about them. I would join certain groups, make friends with some of the members and then proceed to ruin their lives.

Armin Gross: What kind of groups were they?

Carl Clark: First and foremost criminal gangs and drug cartels.  I provided information about the National Front, Nazis or skinheads to Israeli Secret Services. What they were interested in were names, addresses, meeting places, projects and objectives. I tracked individual targets for the CIA.

****************************

From the section on Microwave Weapons onward:

MICROWAVE WEAPONS

Armin Gross: Did you also use such weapons?

Carl Clark: No. I was responsible for surveillance. Colleagues from special departments did this. However, I was at times on site when these weapons were deployed.

Armin Gross: Can you describe in more detail how the deployment of weapons took place?

Carl Clark: It’s a bit like what takes place in a science fiction movie. People can be tracked anywhere by radar, satellite, a base station and complimentary computer programs. For example, three radar devices would sometimes be positioned in the vicinity of the target.  The radar emits electromagnetic waves, some of which pick up the target and the result is then evaluated. My friends who work in the special department could then follow the target all day on their computers. This form of localising the target made it easy to deploy the weapons accurately. My colleagues could see exactly where to aim and also observe how the target reacted.

Armin Gross: What effect did the weapons have on the targets?

Carl Clark: They create heat, inner burns, pain, nausea, fear. Sometimes traces are left on the skin, but mostly not.  If the targets go to the doctor, they get told everything is OK. Take into account, this was the situation ten years ago. This technology has advanced considerably since then.

Armin Gross: What is the objective of such attacks?

Carl Clark: The aim is to intimidate certain people, for example people who make a lot of noise. I myself was under attack for three years after opting out. I’m virtually sure that weapons were used against me in 2003/2004 which provoked strong aggression. I almost killed somebody on two occasions, once a neighbour who was a pleasant elderly lady.

ATTEMPTS TO DRIVE PEOPLE TO INSANITY

Armin Gross: Do you think it’s possible to directly influence feelings by weaponising electromagnetic rays?

Carl Clark: Without doubt. We know that living organism is sensitive to electromagnetic radiation. Elementary life processes within cells function by biogenic electromagnetic oscillation. Frequencies from the exterior can damage or change these processes. There have already been far-reaching attempts at influencing body, mind and soul through frequencies within the framework of military research. It’s possible to provoke fear, aggression, nervousness or forgetfulness in this way. In combination with other interventions, a target can be driven insane. For example, radiofrequency can be manipulated so that the target hears his own name on the radio or his computer shows his name time and again. Voices are also specifically transmitted to a target commenting on his activities.  For example, I heard a voice in the morning after getting up which said “Get up and injure somebody”.

Armin Gross: People are actually being driven to psychic extremes then?

Carl Clark: Yes, the undoubted goal is to have select people end up in psychiatric institutions. If a target seeks help by going to the police or to the doctor, they don’t get taken seriously.  Some doctors and hospitals actually work together with the Secret Services. Diagnostic directives permit a patient who feels persecuted or hears voices to be classified as schizophrenic.

Armin Gross: Hospitals cooperate with the Secret Services?

Carl Clark:  Yes, certainly. Large companies too. That’s why one lives dangerously if one carries out investigations on large companies.  The American State protects large companies like MacDonald’s, Coca-Cola and certain pharmaceutical enterprises. These companies also have FBI agents at their disposal for matters related to industrial espionage. The Freemasons who are widespread within the CIA also play a major role.

ENORMOUS SURVEILLANCE NET

Armin Gross: Do you know in which countries individuals are under surveillance and are being assaulted by energy weapons?

Carl Clark: The USA, Germany, China, North Korea, Russia, France and England, normally without the official knowledge of the particular government. But unofficially, I believe that government personnel must be involved in some way or know something about the goings-on.

Armin Gross: Do you know how many people are under surveillance?

Carl Clark: There are about 5,000 in England under surveillance and about 15,000 overseeing the operation. Apart from the large Secret Service agencies, there are 300 or 400 minor Secret Service agencies which were formed by former policemen or former Secret Service agents. They have permission from the Home Office to spy, take photographs and procure information. Their employees are well paid.

Armin Gross:  Was it a problem for you to switch from one Secret Service agency to another?

Carl Clark: No. It was always a positive move from my new employer’s viewpoint as I could always provide information to him about my previous Secret Service agency. The large Secret Service agencies mistrust each other totally. I earned more money as a result.

OPTING OUT

Armin Gross: Why did you opt out?

Carl Clark: I saw that what I was doing was wrong. The last two targets that were allocated to me had done nothing. They were not political, quite normal, nice people, not criminal or economically dangerous. The only reason I could come up with for them having been selected as targets was their DNA or their blood.  There has recently been a lot of research done in this area. The DNA is associated with the finest details of our character. The Human Genomes Project between 1993 and 2004 analyzed all chemical base pairs which make up human DNA, also collecting the genetic data of people from isolated communities in danger of extinction (Human Genomes Diversity Project).  The results were then all compared and correlated. Our employers were always very keen on DNA analyses of the people under surveillance. It was always one of our most important tasks in the initial period of surveillance to organize DNA or blood analyses of these individuals.

*********************

Please visit Rudy2’s Multilingual Blog for the entire text of the interview, and also for translations in different languages, including French, Italian, and Spanish. Or visit Stopeg.com for the pdf of the translated interview.

The full interview can also be found here, many thanks to all who created this interview, translation, and PDF.–Ramola D, 2-14-2024.