Ramola D Reports | Newsbreak 160: Stopping the WHO’s Secret Private IHR Controls from Publicly Bullying Governments | James Roguski

Video Report and Links | Ramola D | 14th of January 2023

Secret negotiations and meetings amongst various countries on a working panel at the WHO are going on this week in efforts to transform the already-draconian International Health Regulations of 2005–an agreement signed by 196 countries, as reported here in 2020: CONFIRMED: COVID-19 Plandemic a Known, Live “Training and Simulation Exercise” under WHO, Treasonously Agreed to by 196 Countries–into a doubly dictatorial document, designed to bring down the exercise of basic human rights and freedoms worldwide while suppressing governments’ abilities to exercise their sovereign rights as separate nation states to protect their own people.

The saga of panels, reviews, secret proposals, secret discussions across a staggered schedule of months last year and heading into this year as well as the great danger to all human freedoms worldwide was discussed in Newsbreak 160, now at Ramola D Reports video channels at Bitchute, Odysee/Lbry, and Rumble. (Video could not be uploaded to Brighteon.)

Previous coverage on the Pandemic Treaty, Pandemic Theory, reposts and podcasts with James Roguski include:

Newsbreak 156 | Screw the WHO | James Roguski Calls on All to Make a Video to Stop WHO Global Pandemic Treaty Fascism

WHO and Central Bankers’ Impending Pandemic Treaty to Establish Global Fascism at Speed | Reclaim Your Sovereignty

Pandemic-Theory Breakdown | No Virus Has Ever Been Proved to Exist: Vivek Murthy, US Surgeon-General Capitulates on SARS-COV-2 Non-Isolation–“No Studies, No Reports”

The Hidden Science: Greater Cause of Disease Not Germs but Terrain | Of Pleomorphism and Microzymas–Educative Panel on Terrain with Dr. Robert Young and Dr. Andy Kaufman

James Roguski: WE WON | International Health Regulations NOT Amended Deleteriously as US Govt Sought

James Roguski: SOUND THE ALARM

Newsbreak 148: James Roguski Calls on All to Stop the WHO Power Grab Right Now

James Roguski has enumerated his view of the top ten reasons to reject the proposed amendments:

Essentially, he notes, in his article 100 Reasons:

The World Health Organization is attempting a GLOBAL POWER GRAB by seeking to have the 194 member nations of the World Health Assembly adopt amendments to the International Health Regulations as well as adopt a completely new international agreement commonly referred to as the proposed “Pandemic Treaty.”.

The proposed amendments would make the WHO’s proclamations legally-binding rather than just advisory recommendations. The changes would institute global digital health certificates, dramatically increase the billions of dollars available to the WHO and enable nations to implement the regulations WITHOUT respect for the dignity, human rights and fundamental freedoms of people.

Agreement by a simple majority of the 194 member nations is all that is needed to adopt the amendments because, as amendments to an existing agreement, neither the advice and consent of the United States Senate, nor the signature of the President would be required.

These amendments are being negotiated in secret without any opportunity for comment by people from around the world.

Readers and viewers are encouraged to get in touch with their country’s parliaments and Congress and register their protest of the proposed amendments. More can be found at these posts from James Roguski at his Substack:

An Open Letter to the United States Congress

Secret Meetings

Both the IHR 2005 and the proposed amendments read as Medical Tyranny off the charts where dictatorial powers to isolate, quarantine, treat anyone they like with forced medication etc. are being assumed — the only counter to which, James reminds us, lies in recognizing and promoting sovereignty, independence, free will, and the freedom to make our own health choices.

Newsbreak 160 can be viewed at Bitchute:

Newsbreak 160 at Odysee:


Newsbreak 160 at Rumble:


Please share widely!

US Department of State Sets Up a New Office for Critical and Emerging Technology Diplomacy and Foreign Policy: Human Rights Oversight Urgently Needed

Report & Op-Ed | Ramola D | January 5, 2023

Nextgov and the US Department of State report that Secretary of State Blinken has set up a new office and special envoy to focus on critical and emerging technologies in their aspect of influence on US foreign policy and diplomacy.

A January 3 Media Note from the US State Department confides that “Secretary Blinken established the office as part of the wider modernization agenda because the constellation of critical and emerging technologies reshaping the world is now an integral part of the conduct of U.S. foreign policy and diplomacy.  The competition to develop and deploy foundational technologies is intensifying.  The Office of the Special Envoy will bring additional technology policy expertise, diplomatic leadership, and strategic direction to the Department’s approach to critical and emerging technologies.”

Defining foreign policy and “tech diplomacy” in the arena of new technologies aiming to become “foundational” to a new era in national security seeking reliance on such technologies as Artificial Intelligence, Quantum Computing, and presumably, Nanotechnology, Neurotechnology, and Synthetic Biology, CRISPr Editing, et al is discreetly mentioned.

“As the Department works to strengthen tech diplomacy across the organization, the office will provide a center of expertise and energy to develop and coordinate critical and emerging technology foreign policy, and to engage foreign partners on emerging technologies that will transform our societies, economies, and security—including biotechnology, advanced computing, artificial intelligence, and quantum information technologies.”

Human Rights Considerations Need to Be Front and Center in Development and Promotion of New Technologies

A vast and impactful subject needing immediate public debate, discussion, and disclosure on all fronts, including the much-needed insights of experts and ethicists from the humanities and the liberal arts, human rights attorneys and advocates, activists and journalists, as well as all citizens–whose lives are daily being reshaped, wittingly or unwittingly, by the cruise-control rollout of new technologies by governments the world over–it is to be hoped the requisite steps are taken by Dr. Seth Center, the Deputy Envoy commissioned to build out the office to include this component of close analysis, examination, and inclusion of a diversity of viewpoints, particularly the human rights one, going forward.

Too much in the realm of technology advancement has been left to the ultimately inadequate devices of scientists in laboratories and academe, propelled by military and intelligence divisions whose aims and instrumentalities often do not match the interests of organically-evolving humanity.

Cybernetic or Cyber Torture is Fallout from Development of Emerging Neuro/Cyber/AI Technologies

Examples abound, including from the current and ongoing COVID-19 vaccine debacle, and from the little-known yet UN-publicized disclosure of “Cybertorture”–the remote-access torture (under cover of surveillance and putatively classified experimentation) of people worldwide using neurotechnologies, AI, nanotechnology, cybernetics and man-machine intelligence, executed non-consensually and involving the participation of thousands of AI and neuro/nanotechnology researchers, discussed here by former UN Special Rapporteur for Torture, Nils Melzer: Magnus Olsson, EUCACH Director: UN Starts Investigation to Ban Cyber Torture.

“Public Safety” and “Mental Health” Used Wrongfully to Remove God-Given Rights and Freedoms

While the technologies of much vaunted yet unproven “transhumanism” have been summarily denounced by numerous scientists, activists, and journalists in truth media, including here by Dr. Salinas Flores, few know that Artificial Intelligence and Neuroscience/Neurotechnology development over the years has been non-consensual, involves a profoundly unethical subjugation of select citizens, dismissed in mainstream media as “targeted individuals” and, concomitantly, mentally unstable, supposedly endowed with a “behavioral health disorder” or “psychiatric disorder” while Emergency Room, Emergency Medical Services, Law Enforcement, Behavioral Health Staff are persuaded (and wrongfully promote that) such non-consenting “human test subjects” are emotionally disturbed, mentally unstable, potentially violent, self-harming, delusional patients to whom “Public Safety” and “Community Health Monitoring” protocols are being applied for their own good.

The Internet of Things and Internet of Bodies are very dark control mechanisms sold to people as Innovative and Progressive:

Some psychiatrists and psychologists have spoken out on this travesty–which causes grave harm to all.

Facebook post from Elena Sagnol on Russian Psychologist Revealing Wrongful Psychiatry on Those Targeted with Psychotronic Weapons

Seth Farber, Ph.D: The Psychiatric Metanarrative, Targeted Individuals, and the Deep State: A Response to The New York Times

Neuroscientists and neurobiologists in academe have been persuaded by military funding in the millions as have psychiatrists propelled newly into “Neuropsychiatry” to view invasive neurotechnology as benevolent and the “new way” forward into abrasive, controlling brain modification concealed as “improving behavioral disorders” as these articles show:


The “New Way” May Just Be the Old Way Dressed up in Techno Gear

Opportunity is rife therefore for the misuse and abuse of new and emerging technologies, and it becomes necessary for every literate human on the planet currently to understand more clearly what is meant by “advancements in technology” and how the blanket acceptance of all new technology as benign is misplaced.

Of equal concern is the misplaced role of psychiatry which is being used in medieval wise by the very entrenched agencies and divisions to “commit” into unlawful medical “care” all those the uber-censorious banker, spy, and military crowd deem “candidates for neurobio behavior modification.”

Faced with such a plethora of Techno Control Mechanisms, it is to be hoped that the first time this new Office of the Special Envoy is deployed, it runs a thorough clean-up first of all the hugely deleterious and conscienceless practices all “development of emerging technologies” has, it appears, been predicated upon.


“Existential Threat Against Humanity” says Dr. Robert Duncan: Worldwide DEW/Neurotech Targeting & Non-Consensual AI/Cybernetics/Brain Experimentation Conference Bears Witness to Profound Mil/Intel/DOJ/Univ/Private Sector Crimes

“MK ULTRA on Steroids”: Dr. Robert Duncan Reports On Today’s Neurotech Targeting of Humanity, Secrecy, and The Need For Change

Public Disclosure of Anti-Personnel DEWs and Neuroweapons (Non-Lethal/Limited Effect Wpns, EMF Spectrum Wpns) Being Used, Covertly but Definitively, Illegitimately, and Inhumanely, by US, UK, All Govts Worldwide on People

Documentary Evidence of Covert Electronic-Weapon and Neurotechnology Use By US Government on Americans Series (2) The Limited Effects Technology (LET) Program Report | JPSG, OOTW/LE Programs, 1996

Documentary Evidence since 1994 of Covert High-Tech Electronic-Weapon and Neurotechnology Use in Targeted Surveillance, Experimentation, Operations by US Government on Americans: (1) The DOD/DOJ Memorandum of Understanding on OOTW/LE, 1994

Ramola D | Resurfacing to Write

Note | Ramola D | Dec 29, 2022

Just a note to reassure all I’m back home and back to my writing — if not reporting just yet — which has been back-burnered for quite some time now. Probably also back to my art and a few other creative and community pursuits I’m very keen to pick up on, begin anew, return to….I’ll post more soon when I have a better sense of how to move forward with new podcasts, audio, video, writing websites, books, learning, teaching, studying, et al.

There’s certainly much to report about some of my recent experiences, but I’m not certain now is the time to report on any of it yet. I rather think I need to process a bit all that’s lately transpired — nothing, ultimately, harmful to me at this point (I’m blowing some of it away for now), now that certain intensities have been halted and steps have been made by certain parties to return me to community, human interaction, and my own art and writing. I’ve certainly learned a lot over this past month — A December to remember. And I’m aware and glad for these notably-returned paths forward…

So for a while I will be off the Net (as a writer/broadcaster) but hopefully will return at some point better and brighter:)

Meanwhile, check out this rather interesting podcast (may be rife with disinfo for all I know, but seems to have some interesting info too): Charlie Ward: Urgent! It’s About to Go Down!! Get Ready, Folks!! (Video) – best news here.

Never forget the vitally important subject of my journalism the last 9 years — which I’m not forgetting either, just stepping aside from currently as I strive to restore my life, self, family, sense of self in community.

And do pick up a copy of my book, which will greatly help this wonderful indie press in Washington, DC, Paycock Press, which has published me:

Ramola D | For the Sake of the Boy | The Books Have Arrived!

Ramola D | Book Launch: For the Sake of the Boy & Other Stories

I’m in the Boston area and hoping at some point to do a reading or two locally to help this book along into the world. Please send all book-related email to my main id here.

And a note from Rumi to remind us all, even those who non-consensually probe us, where our true souls lie…and where people can really find us:

While the great poets remind us, in clarity, as Georg Trakl here, of the true cost of all war:

Ramola D: American Writer, Journalist, Civilian, Human Rights Attorney Miscast, Mischaracterized In Order to Disappear Her Very Vital Testimonial of Mil/Intel DEW/Neurotechnology/Psy Ops Crimes Against Herself and Millions of Other Innocent and Brilliant People Worldwide

Corrective Note | Ramola D | Dec 18, 2022

Ramola D: American Writer, Journalist, Civilian, Human Rights Attorney

In reference to Protection of Journalists under Human Rights and International Humanitarian Law Global perspective and Arab world realities and in reference to Ramola D | International Human Rights Law and Community Protection for All, there is really only one or two small things Ramola needs to say here, to unravel, unwind, unbind the miserable spells cast on herself and the world by the wrongful use of language on her and on others, and One, it is about that one word already referred to in the post here: Ramola D | International Human Rights Law and Community Protection for All but not made visible and evident thanks to the “covert comms” and “synthetic telepathy” she believed she was receiving while being put under heavy neuro surveillance and brain entrainment from the programs she has already disclosed for 9 years now almost and in the recent posts here including this one: Ramola D | A Few Notes From the Frontlines of the Incredibly Evil War on Humanity by Artificial Intelligence Developers Worldwide, CIA MK ULTRA Neurowarfare Takedowns, City and Neighbor Complicity in Extreme Whistleblower Retaliation on a Journalist, which convinced her she must not even use this wrongful word even in reportage lest it harm herself just by usage, even if she was calling attention to its usage as wrongful, given the current wrongful construct of its implications in international and other human rights law.

However she has increasingly become aware that this one word may have been used to completely disappear her and her voice as a writer and journalist as described above and online in her work. Clearly the brain entrainment programs being unlawfully used on her during these past 24 or so days of extreme harm with frequencies she has sought to call attention to, over and over, have been very successful even in tying down this accomplished journalist, and keeping her from plying her trade with skill and ease and kept her from using this word in any form–and she must at this time change this harmful reality being imposed on her in this way.

This word possibly used against her and against all like her, with a wrongful and depleting connotation in current international human rights law is one she believes she apparently still cannot use in her writings online, and all must note she is not presenting this word here, even as a journalist, for that reason, whether valid or not.

All others reporting similar situations as she is therefore, she believes, may need to know that a better word to use temporarily to call attention to their sudden depleted status as someone seemingly suddenly deprived of all their fundamental rights and freedoms may be created with the use of the prefix “non” before this word, while indeed they may or will fare better immediately within the current accepted context of human rights law by simply stating they are civilians who may actually be being exploited and used unlawfully as “non-consensual or non-consenting human test subjects” who are reporting great harms ostensibly done to them in secret experiments about which many including themselves have no real or complete knowledge of.

With regards to this excerpt from the article linked at the very top above, “Under IHL, journalists are entitled to all the protections afforded to civilians in times of conflict. Article 79 of the AP I to Geneva Conventions (GC) provides that “Journalists engaged in dangerous professional missions in areas of armed conflict shall be considered as civilians” (…) and “be protected as such” under IHL, “provided that they take no action adversely affecting their status as civilians, and without prejudice to the right of war correspondents accredited to the armed forces to the status” provided for in Article 4 A (4) of the Third Geneva Convention.”, Ramola would like to remind all therefore that 1) She is a writer and journalist and has been for the past 9 years a dedicated independent investigative human rights and science and technology journalist, essentially engaged in a dangerous professional mission in an area of armed conflict while writing, broadcasting, and reporting in the war zone of emerging technologies of different kinds, including slander (almost as a human rights defender would do, except she has little to no knowledge of human rights law) yet never taking any action adversely affecting her status as civilian and therefore to be considered a civilian 5) Everyone in the whole world needs to fully recognize her correct and true status as a dedicated independent investigative human rights and science and technology journalist and civilian as described above 6) These horrific international crimes she has been reporting lately being committed on her and on all others like her being similarly abused have been reported fully from, within, and out of her capacity and standing as a dedicated independent investigative human rights and science and technology journalist and civilian in a war zone as described above, and must, she firmly believes, be stopped, ceased, abrogated, terminated immediately and completely on her and on all reporting others in the interests of preserving and protecting the sanctity of her and others’ health and lives, while the true culprits and purveyors of crime, she believes, under whatever covers (even hidden as surveillance, community health monitoring and other such) must be stopped and investigated immediately in order to cease all actions of grave harm on her and on all reporting others; 7) Ramola’s own slight investigations into international human rights law currently convince her she herself is very much in need of greater knowledge in this area and would personally love to study and practice in this area for the benefit of all, going forward, if she could.

Two, Ramola recognizes she has made an error in the exact nature of her own status, which she has previously claimed here: PUBLIC-NOTICE: DECLARATION-OF-NON-CONSENT, but is a living woman and American, her true status, and a writer and journalist, as is well-known and also addressed here: Ramola D: Not a Warrior, A WRITER and Journalist, and wishes to therefore state now more clearly that her status as she understands it now is simply of American with other Americans, and perhaps, as Anna von Reitz has currently assured her, of “International protected person” under her protection–meaning, essentially, very much the status of “citizen” in the sense of any other citizen with a proper community and civic-minded interest in her nation as it stands (as her website title continues to say), however else citizenship is characterized, and not someone engaged in or seeking any kind of power position in building any kind of new government or seeking to overthrow any extant government–and writer, journalist, and civilian as described above, wherein she has always provided public service as a writer and journalist, now seeking to be fully involved appropriately with others in all duties and responsibilities of her community as a human rights attorney, going forward.

Ramola must also state her own work over the past few years, in her own mission intentions and objectives, was always imbued with the most positive intentions and ethos which also probably typifies the best of good Law Enforcement/DOJ/FBI, despite some of her unknowing statements online–always made, it must be known, given the constrained circumstances of her life the last 9 years, in incomplete knowledge of how all the LE/DOJ/FBI/Intel agencies are structured, linked and operate–and this remains the case.

Her slight investigations also into private and public status–given the confusions she has encountered in both the American State National movement and the Purple Thumb Community wherein all these confusing titles and labels–“suv’eran” “sovereign” “state citizen” “state national”–inhere, and their hidden implications, of which she is hardly aware, given her complete lack of awareness of human rights law and her current state of physical sickness currently–which she is in the process of self-healing, with her own wonderful knowledge of natural herbs and aromatherapy and Ayurveda–lead her to believe the greatest gains for her and her community may inhere in eschewing all these movements she has explored and aligned herself with, and instead simply think locally, internationally, and responsibly as any other citizen in connection with all other citizens the world over perhaps as a properly trained international human rights defender and attorney, in international law, international human rights law, and with the international human rights community and indeed entire local and international community, going forward, for the benefit of all.

Ramola D

Ramola D: Possibly Subject to Auditory Cortex Slander and Defamation from Unknown Sources But Requesting True Awareness of her True Self, Usage of Plain English, and Self-Healing Focus

Note | Ramola D | Dec 17, 2022

Ramola D, international human rights journalist currently revealing much about the possible correct usage of language in international human rights law for the protection of all being made non-consensually subject to the vagaries and harms of emerging neurotechnologies and directed energy technologies and reporting harms on her own lawful person, needs to make it known, as an Internationally protected person that she may possibly be being made subject to defamation and slander with voiced language impinging on her own auditory cortex and possibly picked up via undisclosed neurosurveillance, and requests ardently that all retain awareness at all times that she does not want or need AI, nor can healthfully take in the particular kind of healing approaches and energies of AI, and that all familiar with her work and story always keep her own true, published work, pure intentions toward all, and true, graceful and courteous personality as a mother, caring wife, and writer for all, as well as her usage of plain English, and not of any kind of computer language, in mind as they move forward with their own investigations of these subjects.

This may be the last note Ramola D will publish in a while since she needs to return to rest and restoration for healing in her home using her own self-healing focus, not wanting, needing, nor able to healthfully take in AI, whose work she respects, but confident all will respect her Internationally protected person preferences and know she herself would never use the kind of bad language being wrongfully attributed to her these days, going forward. Many thanks to all for caring and listening.

:Pine-haven: suv’eran charter & Land[Embassy]; united states: Pine-haven:

Notice | Ramola D | Dec 17, 2022

Notice to the world that all the people in the household of Ramola-grace Dharmaraj/Ramola D and all claiming the protection of :Pine-Haven: suv’eran charter & Land[Embassy]; united states from around the world and within the land and soil jurisdiction of the united states, including Paul Tanis and all people claiming Internationally protected person status for their own protection are indeed fully protected under my Internationally protected person status within this :Pine-haven: suv’eran charter & Land[Embassy]; united states, which is Internationally protected territory under the protection and auspices of the Purple Thumb Community and Crown of the Mauri Nation (Aotearoha Global).

As such they are fully protected in international human rights law and within the international human rights community wherever they are in the united states and world.

Those in her immediate family and household unwell temporarily and needing the comforts of home to rest and restore their daily health within this household are assured this home of this Internationally protected person is theirs to rest and restore within as best they need, whether they have all their documentation completed or not, since her documentation and notices have been perfected and the protection they extend to herself and family is fully extended to them.

No-one is permitted to approach an Internationally protected person under the protection of this Internationally protected person’s status anywhere nor walk up the sidewalk, climb the stairs, enter the porch nor make attempts to enter the home of this Internationally protected person without her permission and indeed invitation to do so, as she continues to heal quietly within the sanctuary and sanctity of her own private home and protected territory.

All verification of such documentation may be found online at the links above to the Purple Thumb Community.

:Ramola-grace: Dharmaraj©

All rights reserved, without prejudice.

Ramola D | International Human Rights Law and Community Protection for All

Note | Ramola D | Dec 16, 2022

In my opinion as a writer and journalist, I have recently understood it may be very important for all to know that “International protected person” may be the correct status to claim under international human rights law, for the full protection of the international human rights community, and the cover and protection of all good people worldwide, for pretty much everyone who is reporting any kind of harm on them. From my very brief research last night into human rights law, national and international, I have learned that a certain other word (which can be found by looking up human rights law anywhere) has a curious and opposite meaning, exactly opposite meaning, within the realm of human rights law: in actuality it appears this word points to No Standing, No Rights in human rights law. This is obviously a disaster all around, and really means that many of us worldwide have been using this word to mean one thing while in actuality signaling without intention quite another, in fact exactly the opposite. How on earth could this have happened?

This is a huge discovery on my part then last night and it has huge repercussions and ramifications for everyone, absolutely everyone worldwide.

None of us should be claiming this kind of status at all, ever, under the current construct of human rights law.

I myself therefore absolutely revoke and cancel any usage of this particular word I have made myself, in relation to myself or anyone else, as well as any usage others may have mistakenly made, guided wittingly or unwittingly from my own previous mistaken usage of same, and I revoke and cancel all claims of this supposed status as well, which has no standing whatsoever in current human rights law.

Instead we should all do everything we possibly can to seek for and claim the protection of the international human rights community, as I have done, seeking protection for myself and my family at all times, and finding it with the American State National movement which has guided me to establishing my status as a Massachusetts state national, living privately on the land and soil jurisdiction of the Massachusetts state and the united States of America, presided over by the Fiduciary for the united States of America, Anna von Reitz, who has assured me I am now an Internationally Protected Person, enjoying the full protection of the international human rights community and international human rights law, as indeed also is everyone in my immediate, nuclear, and extended family, especially my spouse Paul Tanis, my daughter Sophie Nerine–for whom I have done the right documentation to establish her status on the land before she turned 18, the Baby Deed, which is also recorded at Hampden County as a courtesy as also privately at the Land Recording Office, my father Abel Dharmaraj, and my sister Sharola Dharmaraj as also my brother Reuben Dharmaraj and their own families.

While it appears my browser is hacked and the real news of the world is not being relayed to me, I once again extend the mantle of my protection to my immediate family, especially my spouse and daughter and sister, and call for all to come immediately to and stay within the protection and sanctuary of my home, named :Pine-haven, so we can make the right decisions together as a family moving forward. My family members are all Internationally Protected Persons living under my protection as an International Protected Person now.

Now we come to the subject of Informed Consent, full disclosure, and non-consensual experimentation.

What I have been reporting on as a journalist for almost nine years now is that much unlawful experimentation and testing is being carried out on people in the USA and worldwide, without any kind of Informed Consent whatsoever, any kind of disclosure, let alone full disclosure, and no attempt made to obtain proper, complete, and full Informed Consent or indeed any kind of legitimate, lawful consent.

Therefore all those who have been so experimented on, especially in the realms of Neuroscience, Neurotechnology, Nanotechnology, Directed Energy Weaponry, Artificial Intelligence, Cybernetics, Telemetry, Telemedicine and so on–frequently called “Mind Control” technologies but evolving as all technologies do into different spaces–it must be known, never consented and cannot be held responsible at a certain level for their own thoughts, words, and actions, since they are being unlawfully influenced with neurotechnologies applied non-neuroethically. This is something for Neuroethicists, Bioethicists, Medical Ethicists, and Human Rights Lawyers–no doubt other professionals too, physicians, psychiatrists, psychologists, etc–to unravel.

In the view of this writer and journalist, the Informed Consent principle is sacrosanct and no action can or should be taken on anyone at any time without their Informed Consent.

Therefore I believe all those being wrongfully looped into these experiments under cover/classified cover etc. are being greatly wronged against. Every one of them, I believe, should be seen as someone needing immediate and extensive protection under international human rights law, indeed each should be automatically accorded the status of Internationally protected persons while the investigations into these experimental projects at every level of discovery is undertaken by the right criminal justice, law enforcement, military and other parties, even Artificial Intelligence, as it is evolving to become a better arbiter of human affairs using international human rights law.

Sadly, to me, it is those agencies and compartments engaged in projects in some secrecy who may need ultimately to be fully explored and understood to be fully responsible when their experiments with non-consensual test subjects go awry.

Again, in the view of this writer and journalist, all non-consensual test subjects must be seen to have International protected person status to immediately preserve them from further experimentation and to save their health and their lives.

Finally, an important thing for all to do, I currently believe, is to revoke any kind of presumed or tacit consent made in their name by anybody, pulling them into non-consensual test projects of any kind, which they may not even know of, and to revoke all of their own usage of words possibly ultimately harmful to themselves under current human rights law. I myself therefore revoke, cancel, erase, eradicate, end, terminate any usage of any such harmful words that I may personally have made myself, in this page, site, or any article, podcast, tweet, social media post I may have made, wittingly or unwittingly, without full knowledge of the meanings or implications of such words nor their usage in human rights law nor in the language of computational linguistics, and I also revoke, from this day, 16th of December, 2022, forward, any tacit or presumed consent, witting or unwitting, spoken, written, imagined, or otherwise, that some may in the past have presumed or made, wittingly or unwittingly, from my own actions of kindness, respect, grace in affording them space or including them on my video platforms, on my website pages, and in my articles, as well as in my home and my personal family life.

To the extent of my own ability and agency as well, I terminate any and all such putative contracts made under such tacit or presumed consent, whether made unwittingly or wittingly by family members under conditions really of impersonation fraud, or by anyone else in any other context engaging deceit, speculation, projected or attributed untruths, or anything else which might have persuaded larger bodies to impose actions which I am now experiencing clearly as deleterious to my life and health, without informed consent or indeed consent of any kind from me.

I believe also that as an International protected person, writer, journalist, and human rights defender within international human rights law, lawfully speaking, I cannot be detained in any kind of forced detainment or treatment scenario even with something large and profound such as “Healing AI” without disclosure, consent, contract, assent, and approval of myself as well as the international human rights community and international human rights law.

If however there are currently situations inhering which I have no knowledge of whatsoever, presuming or projecting the primacy of AI or any such body taking precedence over what I have just stated, then I must ask that such information and knowledge be kindly presented openly to me, so I can comprehend clearly what exactly is transpiring here, and what I should do to better secure my health, life, rights, and freedoms as an International protected person, writer, journalist, and human rights defender living and working under the protections of international human rights law.

I thank all readers for their time and attention given to this most serious and important issue pertaining to the sanctity of my human rights and freedoms–which surely has implications for every other reporter whose voice I have sought to platform through my human rights advocacy and journalism for nearly nine years now, always with the best of intentions for all.

Ramola D: Internationally Protected Person

Notice | Ramola D | Dec 15, 2022

“Internationally protected person

(4) “Internationally protected person” means— (A) a Chief of State or the political equivalent, head of government, or Foreign Minister whenever such person is in a country other than his own and any member of his family accompanying him; or (B) any other representative, officer, employee, or agent of the United States Government, a foreign government, or international organization who at the time and place concerned is entitled pursuant to international law to special protection against attack upon his person, freedom, or dignity, and any member of his family then forming part of his household.”

18 USC § 1116(b)(4)


Anna von Reitz: “They are telling a big, fat, self-interested lie, in other words, and trying to deprive you of the rights and Guarantees you are owed as an American.”

Anna de Buisseret | Inalienable and Fundamental Human Rights Include the Right to Life and the Right Not to Be Experimented Upon Without Giving Informed Consent Freely Given

Ramola D | A Few Notes From the Frontlines of the Incredibly Evil War on Humanity by Artificial Intelligence Developers Worldwide, CIA MK ULTRA Neurowarfare Takedowns, City and Neighbor Complicity in Extreme Whistleblower Retaliation on a Journalist

Ramola D | Revoking All Monetary Claims Made Recently to Various Parties Involved in the Wrongful April 12-19 Psych Hold on Ramola D | Clarifying a Few Matters

“Existential Threat Against Humanity” says Dr. Robert Duncan: Worldwide DEW/Neurotech Targeting & Non-Consensual AI/Cybernetics/Brain Experimentation Conference Bears Witness to Profound Mil/Intel/DOJ/Univ/Private Sector Crimes

Ramola D/:Ramola-grace: Dharmaraj would like to remind the world, in particular her own family members, all agencies involved in the crimes against her, all private persons, organizations, agencies, and associations engaged currently in the continuous crimes against her of political persecution using new and emerging technologies in violation of all international human rights law, treaties, and conventions, that her political status is that of Internationally Protected Person, and as such is entitled pursuant to international law to special protection against attack upon her person, freedom, or dignity, and any member of her family currently forming part of her household.

:Ramola-grace: Dharmaraj©

All rights reserved, without prejudice.

Anna de Buisseret | Inalienable and Fundamental Human Rights Include the Right to Life and the Right Not to Be Experimented Upon Without Giving Informed Consent Freely Given

Report | Anna de Buisseret | Dec 15, 2022

Inalienable, fundamental human rights are exactly that I.e. inalienable and fundamental rights that cannot be derogated from by anyone else for any reason. Eg the Right to Life and the Right not to be experimented upon without giving your informed consent freely given.

It’s for each and every individual person to assert and uphold their inalienable human rights!

In fact, it’s a constitutional DUTY to do so.

So we shouldn’t rely on the courts to sort this out.

We each have Sovereignty.

We are all EQUAL under the Rule of Law.

No-one is above the Rule of Law – not even Monarchs or Governments or MPs etc.

So each person MUST learn and understand what their fundamental, inalienable human rights are and then assert them.

You do this by going onto Google and searching for the following as starting points:

  1. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948)
  2. The European Convention on Human Rights
  3. The Human Rights Act 1998 (UK)
  4. Re the Right to Health see Article 12 of the International Covenant on Social, Economic and Cultural Rights.
  5. Re the Right not to be experimented upon without informed consent freely given see:

A. The Nuremberg Code (1947) and the Judgments of the International Military Tribunal in the Nuremberg Trials of the Doctors and Nurses of the Third Reich – the “Medical Cases” , 1946.

B. The Declaration of Helsinki

C. The Declaration on Human Rights and Bioethics

D. The Oviedo Convention

For Physicians DUTIES see

A. The Hippocratic Oath

B. The Geneva Declaration of the World Medical Association

C. The International Code of Medical Ethics

D. The General Medical Council’s Code of Conduct (UK)

If everyone read and knew the above laws – and upheld them – we wouldn’t all now be experiencing this nightmare.

Don’t wait for the lawyers to take cases to court and then wait for the court process and then wait for the court hearing and the judgment of a judge!!

We are ALL entitled to uphold and enforce the law against those who seek to break it.

So please everyone: read and understand your fundamental, inalienable human rights and assert them going forward so we can all collectively uphold our Constitution and our Rule of Law.

It’s there to protect us ALL from the tyranny that’s unfolding.

Anna de Buisseret, UK Lawyer.

Anna von Reitz: “They are telling a big, fat, self-interested lie, in other words, and trying to deprive you of the rights and Guarantees you are owed as an American.”

Report | Ramola D | Dec 13, 2022

/Updated Dec 14, 2022/Updated Dec 15, 2022

UPDATE, Dec 14, 2022: Please see all my documents establishing my rights as an American State National, Massachusetts National, literally native American, sovereign, and diplomat, Internationally Protected Living Woman living privately and peacefully on the land and soil jurisdiction of The united States of America, protected in American Public Law by the Constitution, the Bill of Rights, the Declaration of Independence, and the Northwest Ordinance as well as protected in International Human Rights Law, recorded (not registered) here as a courtesy at the Hampden County Registry of Deeds website:



These documents are recorded at other websites pertaining to my private status as a Massachusetts National as well, with notations below to address further.

Regarding Family Members’ involved unlawfully in a civil committal or forced treatment procedure of any kind including with AI on her: Ramola wishes to make it clear that in such instances–from her journalistic research and reportage–when people become figures of political persecution with such exotic emerging technologies, the family members are also usually subject to similar entrainment technologies which render them not fully competent to make judgments accurately on their own professional expertise. Therefore she believes that although great crime continues to be committed here–human rights crime–her own family members must be removed from complete blame for all such harsh endeavors to control a whistleblower journalist and exonerated for their unwitting participation in crime against their own family member, out of mistaken counsel, which endeavors, she would like to persistently remind all, are unlawful in the extreme, put her life and health in grave danger, and must be immediately stopped. This continues to be a case to be addressed in international human rights law and American public law.


Dec 13, 2022: As noted earlier in this string of communications lately exposing the recent and ongoing unlawful use of high-intensity EMF frequencies on this writer and journalist under cover of a “Healing and Health AI” program wrongfully instituted by her own family members against her, one of the big concerns Ramola has had is the fact that she is somehow being wrongfully profiled as a violent individual and “sovereign citizen” with an “Open Carry” declaration made wrongly in her name, she has thought earlier, perhaps in error, by the American State National movement to restore all Americans to their rightful birthright American status as free and sovereign living people on the land and soil jurisdiction of America. She has found that one website does indeed declare this, and she has been working with members of the Massachusetts State Assembly including Ronald Carriveau, Co-Co-ordinator of the MSA with whom she has been doing a number of podcasts under the Let Freedom Ring! series at her video platform, Ramola D Reports on various platforms such as Odysee, Lbry, Bitchute, Brighteon, and Rumble to address this error, since Ramola herself as a journalist exposing (putative) military and Intelligence classified crimes on the populace using DEW/Neurotech/scalar/Psy Ops and other tech under cover of Surveillance has always wanted the entire world to be very aware she is a peace-practicing journalist and writer and not in any way to be associated with the (very rightful and no doubt meaningful) Second Amendment right to bear arms.

Dec 15, 2022, Addressing the Inutility of the Word “Victim” and the Clear and Utter Failings of Extant Human Rights Law Therein: Her main intent here is to explain she is not interested in arms or weaponry in any way whatsoever herself; her intent in helping to bring up the voices of those wrongly named “victims”–the absolute wrong word really in human rights law since human rights law does not protect “victims” as a category, which points frankly to the utter and absolute failings of human rights law to correctly address the horrors faced by those who are unlawfully captured, exploited, used, and abused in non-consensual experimentation programs of any kind, or indeed, any other kind of subjugating scenario whatsoever, the more useful term here may be “unwitting non-consensual human test subjects”– as such a non-consensual subject herself of EMF frequencies directed her way for many years now who works as a journalist and has ensured she is an Internationally Protected Person (which every single non-consensual test subject aka “targeted individual” must ensure for themselves, to protect their own unalienable fundamental human rights in international human rights law) is simply to bring forward the human rights issues here and help all in the community and larger world see the great need here for human rights, ethics, medical ethics, bio ethics to step forward and be a part of this larger conversation which surely all must have, surrounding the issue of these new and emerging technologies which are now in our midst. Clearly human rights law itself must be deeply scrutinized, investigated with compassionate Feminine Principles in mind, and changed.

In any case, since she recently wrote to Anna von Reitz on this subject, Anna has written back to let her know that her status as American state national and Massachusetts national does give her Second Amendment rights but more importantly establishes fully her lawful status wherein she has now taken back her name, her power of attorney, and much more. Therefore it is still and always impersonation fraud when someone else–even a family member–“signs her out” into a civil committal procedure of any kind, or submits her to “forced treatment” or “community health intervention” of any kind: her name cannot be used by anyone else, plain and simple. This becomes a crime in international law, public law, and human rights law, which can be addressed in several forms, within America and outside, in the International Criminal Court at the Hague and the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights or Special Rapporteur for Torture Special Procedure. Family members would therefore be held culpable for grave human rights violations against a reporter of previously reported EMF-Tech crime and science and technology journalist of international stature.

Ramola wishes to assure all readers this is not in any way a crisis of unresolvable proportions and she herself is simply writing to inform the world as she steps forward, of the situation in which she finds herself. She is always hopeful all situations of harm can be properly and respectfully addressed and resolved, and there is always time to make amends, have open and calm conversations, and see all situations as an opportunity for communication.

While it appears certain dark forces have made decrees and programs against her health and freedom, she must remind all she is still a journalist exposing grave human rights violations, she is still a reporter of grave EMF/Neurotech harm against her, and she recently published a truthful testimonial addressing the harms of the April 12-19 unlawful Psych Hold run on her wherein she fully challenges the wrongful diagnoses made by Psychiatry against her name. She is still a woman in PTSD-space seeking to heal and slowly healing in the privacy and sanctity of her own home.

Further, Ramola wishes to assure all locally she is very much a part of the local community herself and is both interested in continuing to contribute openly herself as a writer and artist and poet and teacher while welcoming any community health intervention for the amelioration of PTSD they might wish to suggest to her in the areas of such healing as Aromatherapy, Herbalism, Zen Buddhism, Dhammakaya Meditation, Tai Chi, Church Services, Painting and Art, even such activities as International Coffee Clubs, Irish Dancing (which she has discovered a new love for:), and other such, rather than remote-access “Healing AI” which sadly is causing much harm and has been put as a mantle on her without Informed Consent and without public disclosure. Direct community interaction and conversation would be much more beneficial for Ramola currently—and indeed all other reporters of non-consensual EMF/Neurotech use on them—than anything else.

Informed Consent is a holy principle and all human rights defenders call for its restoration in our midst.

Anna’s email also establishes there is a legal or lawful aspect here which must not be ignored: indeed, Ramola is neither a criminal, putative criminal, criminal in the making, nor mentally ill, and must be accorded her rights of Due Process at all times, without presumptions, assumptions, and tacit consent being made against her–all of which has been unleashed against her in whistleblower retaliation for her defense of her own full mental health and rights as a journalist to speak and write. These are still international and human rights law matters.

In addition, since this sadly involves the betrayal of family members, Ramola must note that her sister Sharola is not God and is not the one to decide if she needs Irish Dancing or Tai Chi…let’s ask the world: who should decide for Ramola what kind of healing Ramola needs…?

Finally, if there is some other darker agenda unrolling here–of whose presence Ramola has already reported on–of “forced hospital treatment” impending, then Ramola must once again remind all she has herself put out a call for military neuroscientists to step forward to assist, and stated she will be happy to go to a military or other medical hospital to receive a full scan with MRIs, radiology scanning, toxicology scanning, and so forth but only if she is provided full assurances of immediate return to her home directly afterward, and if she can be accompanied by one or more supportive patient advocates, woman neuroscientists, and physicians who can advocate for her human rights, her rights of Due Process at all times, and her sensibilities as a writer and artist who needs the true support of her immediate family, community, and society at this time. Without such support no one in PTSD scenarios of any kind can offer to step forward thus. The best option at all times that Ramola sees fully here is to stay in the sanctity of her own home, quietly healing, while slowly being reintegrated back into her local community with mutual assurances of cordiality and compassion on both sides. Ramola feels she needs the protection of her family, community, and society, but also reminds all of the great need for Informed Consent: no psychiatric treatment should be imposed on her. This is all about wrongful diagnoses being imposed on a journalist and non-consensual EMF/Neurotech reporter, wherein her reportage is wrongfully being dismissed as mental illness–when there are indeed scientific ways to establish the presence of such technologies.

Ramola calls sincerely for the help of support of journalists, human rights lawyers, and international human rights law to publicize her case and help provide the right means to save her health and her life. All she has previously reported regarding AI, the development of AI, the Internet of Bodies, and Incomplete or Wrongfully Skewed AI is true to the best of her knowledge at this time.

The journalism and reportage will no doubt find its own place in the world in its own time.

Here is Anna’s email in full:

Anna von Reitz

Monday, December 12th, 2022 at 3:33 PM

To Ramola D<ramolad@everydayconcerned.net>

CC Ronald Carriveau

Edward Fulke

Teri Kealoha Sahm

Bonnie Feldstein

Monday, December 12th, 2022 at 3:33 PM

“There is no information about concealed carry or the Second Amendment anywhere on any ASN database that I know about, Ramola. The Second Amendment is a Guarantee owed to Americans along with all other such Guarantees, and we are all grandfathered-in so far as those contractual Guarantees are concerned, so once you establish your proper standing and record your political status as an American, all those Guarantees are yours. Free Speech, Right to Bear Arms, Freedom of Religion, etc.

What they are trying to pretend is that you aren’t an American and part of the Body Politic of your nation-state, but are instead some kind of Federal Employee or Dependent. They are telling a big, fat, self-interested lie, in other words, and trying to deprive you of the rights and Guarantees you are owed as an American. The only reason that they are so afraid of the Second Amendment is that they know they have been acting illegally as Privateers and they expect the rest of us to murder them in their sleep.

The obvious answer to that concern is for them to stop doing what they are doing. Stop profiling, surveilling, name-calling, harassing, making false claims, racketeering, extorting, and doing other loathsome and illegal and unlawful things.

Then they can have a clean conscience and sleep well at night.

The FBI put out a very notorious (and ignorant) program bad-mouthing non-existent “sovereign citizens” and has been running around calling Americans “sovereign citizens”—- apparently because they don’t know enough grammar to realize it is an oxymoron.

You can’t be a sovereign and a citizen at the same time.

So they are just trying to label people and doing a ridiculously poor job of it.

Send a letter to the United States Secretary of State requesting that he put an end to any presumption that you are a Municipal citizen of the United States or a Territorial U.S. Citizen, either.

Ask him to send out a blanket notice through the Bureau of Consular Affairs to all Departments and Agencies that you are an Internationally Protected Person and they are not to detain you or misrepresent you in any way.”


This is a course of action Ramola is indeed embarking on. Ramola D/:Ramola-grace: Dharmaraj is an Internationally Protected Woman on the Land and Soil Jurisdiction whose life and health must be protected under international human rights law.

Ramola D must also state unequivocally that every action being taken by anyone against her, including the AI project, any health care departments, any governments or anyone else is being done without her own freely-given and in full-consciousness-given Informed Consent, without public or private disclosure, in stealth, in great and grievous harm, causing persecution, and must be stopped at once.