Author Archives: Ramola D

Community Care or Deranged “Mental Health Team”? UK Police Carry Taser Into Home Break-In to Attack Whistleblower Patient with Kidney Failure

–Ramola D/Posted & Updated June 30, 2019

Concerning CCTV footage of the heavily manned Home Break-In under pretext of Mental Health Act provisions to “search and remove patient” meaning Edward Ellis on June 26—in one of several recent Mental Health Fraud sectioning attempts, reported here–reveals that one of the two police officers went in to the home carrying a Taser—in fact pulling it out of his vest just at the door as he entered–with apparent intent to use on a 66-year-old patient diagnosed with kidney failure.

That Edward Ellis is hardly subject for a Mental Health sectioning is a fact well-known to all in contact with him and familiar with his advocacy and anti-corruption work—while mysteriously unknown to his nephrologists apparently, who seem to have initiated these forcible-arrest attempts although their job is kidney-related and limited to diagnoses of a patient’s physical health, not mental.

Mental Health by Taser? The Terrorism of Mental Health Sectioning Revealed

Stills from the footage show a large gang of “Mental Health” workers, consulting and congenial as they congregate around someone else’s door and break into their home in an egregious invasion of privacy, and with intent to execute removal of the patient, their stated objective, with aggression, as witnessed by the Taser in Officer EO 4333‘s hand, held slyly behind his back as he entered.

The fact that one of these police officers—or as Neelu Berry puts it, impostor wearing the uniform of a police officer—carried a taser is shocking to the core: why would police require a taser to subdue someone like Edward, who moreover has been diagnosed with kidney failure?

Tasers are Powerful and Inhumane Electronic Control Devices: Essentially Neuroweapons Sending Electrical Pulses to Neurons Controlling Muscles

For those unaware, tasers are extremely powerful, dangerous, and in the view of many including this writer, completely inhumane high-tech electroshock devices wrongfully permitted for Law Enforcement use by reckless and irresponsible Criminal Justice officials, which have been known (in numerous cases) to cause cardiac arrest and death in addition to unconsciousness, when they propel at high velocity two electrodes into the victim’s body completing an electrical circuit and causing incapacitation or paralysis of the victim.

A taser can administer nearly 50,000 volts to the human body, and it is significant that their known effect on the recipient is completely predicated on his/her basic health condition at the time.The impact of a Taser shock depends a lot on the overall health of the person being shocked, what substances may be in his or her body at the time, and how long the shock lasts.”— Lauren Kirchner, The Very Real Dangers of Tasers

These articles discuss cardiac arrest, death, and UK Police use of Tasers despite all indications of their unviability for use on anyone in a humane and educated society:

How Dangerous is the Use of Tasers?/Guardian  

What Do Tasers Do To the Body?/Scienceline

The Very Real Dangers of Tasers/Pacific Standard 

Studies Show Tasers Have Harmful Effects on the Body and Mind/BigThink

Tasers May Be Deadly, Study Finds/Popular Science 

Tasers Can Stop the Heart and Kill/Medical News Today

Tasers have also been shown to affect the mind, affecting neurocognitive function and mental health (well-reported online including here: Taser’s 50,000 Volt Jolt Can Mess Up Your Brain/LiveScience) –so it literally makes no sense whatsoever that a Mental Health Team despatched by a Council or Hospital would involve, permit, condone, or endorse the firing of a deadly and potentially brain-damaging, mental-health-assaulting and cardiac-arrest-causing taser into the body of a kidney patient.

Does this Mental Health Team require education and guidance on critical thinking on Tasers–in addition to much else, as on applying their post-graduate training to evaluating the validity of Mental Health Interventions/Sectioning Terrorism on a more-than-mentally-sound whistleblower and kidney patient rather than blindly becoming the tools of oppressive higher-ups who seek to label people Mentally Ill to cover up their corruption and crimes? It would appear so.

Intimidation by Numbers, Intimidation by Taser, Intimidation by Mental Health Fraud

Both officers were also armed, and were accompanied by 9 other people, who lined up to enter the home one by one, after one of the men used a giant crowbar to prise the door open.

It appears this train of personnel lining up with their folders and handbags, laptop cases and cellphones to break into someone’s house and later stand around as if at a wake was perfectly aware they were engaging in seriously questionable behavior:Intervening as “Community Mental Health Care” to break into someone’s home who had no mental illness of any sort but was known to be a kidney patient is fraudulent in the extreme and one has to ask, who authorized this crowd to pursue, hunt down, and “remove” a patient needing care—physical care, not mental, that is—and why were there so many of them? Is this just “doing my job” for them?

In such outings and home-invasion programs, what exactly are they told about the person they seek to capture, using burly men and police uniforms with crowbars, guns, and tasers to do so? And why do they not question what they are told instead of meekly participating in a Crowd Intimidation and Police Intimidation action against a whistleblower?

Efforts to contact for comment the parties who executed this break-in attempt continue and will be reported as soon as contacted.

The seriousness of these wrongful attacks on the autonomy and character of a whistleblower however must be noted by all; the urgency of need to protect Edward Ellis from these potential attackers is high.

Requested Action by Concerned Citizens

Please add your voice immediately to speak to the administration at Queen’s Hospital and at the Brighton and Sussex University hospitals and ask why a whistleblower revealing multiple corruptions and injustice is being so inordinately persecuted; request that all arrest warrants and advisories they have given to detain Edward wrongfully on Mental Health concerns be nullified immediately; please write to your local newspaper and council and report this matter.

Please also ask your local Council and MPs why deadly neuroweapon tasers have been approved for use on British citizens, and why Officer 4333 was carrying a taser in his hand when he broke into a private citizen’s residence–indeed an older gentleman known to be suffering from kidney failure.

Neelu Berry advises that people can call 101 in the UK to ask for names of officers EA 4333 and EA 4142 Ilford Police and call House of Parliament on 0207 219 3000 which is the 24/7 number to complain to Health, Home, Local Govt & Justice Ministers. Reference: State Assassination Attempt caught on CCTV using Locksmiths, Mental Health Team and Fake Warrant as props 450 New North Road, IG6 3EB UK at 9.50am to 11.30am on 26 June 2019.

UPDATE: The Names of the Officers Have Been Identified from the warrant: EA 4333 is PC CABIE and EA 4142 is PC DAVISON

Please make a call or send an email; every call/email made serves as notice to safeguard human rights for all.

RELATED

1. Neelu Berry reminds all that these are Mental Health Fraud attempts and disappearance and assassination attempts:

“6th Assassination Attempt 10am on 26 June 2019 under pretence of Mental Health Fraud to discredit the work and cause slow kill from denying Dialysis with Fistula in place for 7 months

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8KztGlAoqQM

At 13.44 you will see the officer pull out a Tazer to use on Mr Edward Ellis whilst the nurse smiles – lucky he was out and the others including me, Neelu”

2. In concern for Edward’s well-being, Neelu Berry made a call to the Care Quality Commission to report this incident, but was unable to secure assurance that the complaint was recognized or being investigated; that audio recording is here:

Egregious Sectioning and Kidnap Attempts on Equity Lawyer Edward Ellis As the Completing Mass Corruption Remedy Process Exposes Pervasive Crime & Corruption in UK Courts, Police Departments, and Hospitals

Biomedical Researcher Lynda Thyer Traumatized by Extradition Threat, Narrowly Escapes Kidnap Attempt as Cancer Cure GcMAF is Demonized by MHRA and Pharmaceutical Establishment Protecting Chemo Drug Profits

UK Whistleblower Calls for Australian High Commission to Issue Witness Protection Order for Julian Assange and Reminds Jeremy Corbyn to Express Public Interest and Provide Witness Protection for Persecuted Whistleblowers Sabine McNeill, Melanie Shaw and Julian Assange

Ramola D Reports/Report #83: Neelu Berry on Beating Global Slavery with Mass Remedies

Mr. Edward Ellis, Equity Lawyer, Reports the Launch of a Mass Corruption Remedy Process in the United Kingdom and Calls for Principled Independents and Empowered Citizens to Step Forward

Updates on the Mass Remedy Process in UK

 

Egregious Sectioning and Kidnap Attempts on Equity Lawyer Edward Ellis As the Completing Mass Corruption Remedy Process Exposes Pervasive Crime & Corruption in UK Courts, Police Departments, and Hospitals

–Ramola D/Posted 6/28/2019/Corrections & Updates, 6/29/2019

In a series of extraordinary incidents last week as he strove to complete a final document detailing the corruption proofs derived over 20 years from cases of intellectual property theft and home theft to concealed murder operations and human organ theft in NHS hospitals, all protected by corrupt police protections accorded to people in positions of power including top judges, hospitals, doctors, and prime ministers, and exposing the unmistakable crime syndicate networked into UK courts, police departments, and hospitals, Equity Lawyer Edward Ellis became the target of sudden panicked attempts at medical kidnap and sectioning.

While Mental Health Fraud is now, shockingly enough, routinely being conducted against whistleblowers and activists by corrupt or corralled mental health professionals working with governments, both in the UK and it seems worldwide, it must be seen anew each time for what it really is: an extreme abuse of power, a Show of Force, purposive intimidation and attempt to silence important work, an illegal grab at one’s rights to autonomy, mental and physical, and, as resolute activist Neelu Berry notes, outright State Terrorism.

The work that Equity Lawyer Edward Ellis has been doing—and publishing notice of at various channels online lately (including Andy Devine’s channel and Ramola D Reports) as well as via email lists and filings to Parliament and all UK Ministers is nothing short of earth-shattering, and exposes crime, fraud, trickery, and entrenched corruption fraud at its roots, exposing and challenging the UK’s pervasive system of protection by crime-syndicate-police for all abuse-of-power crimes.

In Edward’s case, it appears the purpose of pursuing him for forced Mental Health Assessments has been twofold: both to stifle his voice and work exposing systemic UK corruption and cover up evidence of medical negligence crime committed against him by the very hospitals that have now run panicked mental health frauds—wrongful sectioning attempts–on him.

Preparation for Dialysis Which Never Happened

This goes back to December 2018 when Edward was told he had a deteriorating kidney condition and needed dialysis by doctors at Sussex University hospital administered through the Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust—incidentally, not long after Edward had exposed corrupt activities by Sussex police in drug-growing and firearms-stealing in the case of a wrongfully accused and imprisoned Sussex farmer whose land was stolen.

Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals/bsuh.nhs.uk

Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals/bsuh.nhs.uk

They then proceeded to instal a “fistula” on him, as first step in helping ready veins and arteries for dialysis. This tube is supposed to be left in for only a few days in between dialysis sessions, notes Neelu Berry. The problem was, they then left it in for seven months, saying they had put him on a dialysis list, which they apparently hadn’t because they never called him.

This tube which connects the artery and the vein is to connect to the dialysis machine so that the dirty blood in the vein is cleaned by the machine and put back into the artery as clean blood. By leaving the tube in place, the dirty blood is mixing with the clean blood, bypassing the lungs, kidneys and all cleaning organs. It is a slow execution. Edward is shrinking, losing weight, his food is going straight through him and he is having a bug and hayfever, unable to fight the infection. Immunity is zero. The heart becomes enlarged so the patient does feel more energetic than ever.

In efforts to combat the effects of the fistula and keep his immunity up, Edward had embarked on a rigorous exercise program which involved walking several miles and swimming as well.

Numerous Mental Health Fraud Attempts

Recent attempts to section Edward and fraudulently label him mentally ill when the Sussex hospital it seems had incurred liability on themselves by surgically inserting a fistula in him –which they neither utilized appropriately with immediate dialysis nor removed–began on 17 June 2019, when a Redbridge Council Mental Health team called and offered their services to him on the phone, which he declined.

Prior to this, in Dec 2018, it also appears that Dr. MacDiarmid-Gordon of Sussex University Hospital had engaged in what Edward characterizes as Blackmail Fraud, demanding that he submit to a psychiatric evaluation and apparently withholding kidney dialysis treatment until he did so—it is not clear why a mental health evaluation was suggested.

The regularity with which Mental Health Evaluations are used in hospitals to permit authoritarian takeover of patients’ rights was remarked in Edward’s Remedy process document: “The National Health Service Doctors repeatedly commit Torture and Blackmail using Treatment Denial Frauds to support Mental Examination Consent Demands. They are Technically Clever but Judgmentally Impoverished. Some are Power Obsessed.”

This fraudulent medical-tyranny attempt to discredit Edward was also referred to later by Dr. Lever of Queen’s Hospital who said Edward had been “labelled” “historically” as mentally ill by Dr. Gordon (discussed below). (Labeling is indeed right; this appears to be exactly what Authoritarian Psychiatry seeks, to label and dismiss whistleblowers as mentally ill to discredit their whistleblowing. It is ironic and interesting that Dr. Lever made recourse to precisely this truth-telling term.)

As he fought off his hayfever last week and completed the final document in the Mass Remedy process he had initiated, Edward Ellis was informed through his GP that Dr. Lever, the Clinical Lead Kidney Specialist at Queen’s Hospital in Romford, Essex was suddenly bumping his appointment up from the end of July to the 19th of June without notice.

Then, both on the 18th of June and 19th of June, a Mental Health team arrived unannounced at his residence, presumably to section him, meaning forcibly remove him to a mental health facility for evaluation, citing the Mental Health Act which permits this infamy. (Click links for CCTV footage on these visits.)

18 June 2019 Mental Health team unannounced uninvited visit

19 June 2019 Mental Health Team unannounced, uninvited visit

Neelu Berry notes beneath the videos that these attempts to section a whistleblower are intended to discredit him—which does ring true, given that Edward’s physical condition had suddenly been transmuted by a network of culpable doctors into a mental health issue, with no evidence whatsoever of any kind of sudden-onset mental illness!

It does beg the question how many hundreds of mental health “patients” locked away in Psych wards are really whistleblowers. Neelu Berry notes that these bogus sectioning attempts prove the “failure of the Care Quality Commission to maintain safety standards in its Health & Care services” and calls for “the immediate review and release of all patients admitted in Mental Health Institutions.”

Seamy Backstory: Child Trafficking, Organ Trafficking, and Kidnap for Rituals In NHS Hospitals

Darker, seamier sides to what lies behind dialysis diagnoses and urgent appointments must also be noted. This is where it becomes impossible not to see that assassination of patients, as Neelu Berry notes, particularly vulnerable ones like kidney dialysis or cancer patients is not an idle claim, that it can be accomplished very easily with DNRs (Do Not Resuscitate order) and Mental Health frauds run by criminal insider doctors working for the corrupt crime syndicate rooted in secret-society occultism and bizarre rituals. Is this really happening? Those who have experienced anomalous care at NHS hospitals suggest it is.

Edward’s Remedy Process document, which reports on an investigation of widespread corruption and crime remarks: “The Corruption Investigations had discovered how the Renegade Professional Groups function. They are Thug Gangs. Professional Qualifications + Post Appointments get Gang Membership but Professional Standards do not govern them. The Budget Managers do. Judges became dependent on Court Frauds and the Budget Managers who buy them.

Queen’s Hospital, Romford, Essex/Image: Romford Recorder

On the 19th of June when Edward had been told Dr. Lever would see him straight away if he attended the Ambulatory Care Unit and informed reception, he visited Queens Hospital with two friends. Apparently when he informed Reception he found there was no record of Dr. Lever making an appointment with him. (The peculiarity of Ambulatory Care Units set up in hospitals and the potential for their use in secretive isolation, disappearance, and assassination attempts is discussed by Neelu Berry in Ramola D Reports/Newsbreak 29.)

It must be noted that Dr. Nicholas Lever, oddly enough, was the very same clinician who issued a DNR or “Do Not Resuscitate” order when Neelu’s sister, Sadhana Chaudhari, suffering from breast cancer, was admitted in June 2018 to the very same Queen’s Hospital, bizarrely and inappropriately to a Kidney ward under Dr Lever, and “it was Edward’s documents to the CEO which had it reversed.”

At heart of the Mass Corruption Remedy process Mr. Ellis has been working on, Sadhana’s child, baby Sunaina features as one of the main Corruption Fraud Proof cases, since a whole slew of unconscionable crimes tragically attended her brief life and death; semen was found in her mouth at death, blisters on lip; organs had been removed; this was after doctors had wrested control of her care from the mother Sadhana with a Mental Health Fraud; prior to that Baby Sunaina, who had been wrongfully diagnosed with a genetic defect and doomed-life prognosis even before birth, and been operated on for a diaphragmatic hernia had been given an abnormally high dosage of a potent drug, Ranitidine; when the mother sought further care, the dosage was reduced but still high, an adult dosage, and administered in a protracted program of medical malpractice which Neelu Berry, her aunt, a pharmacist discerned immediately as malfeasant; what she was subjected to points to an entrenched and callous practice of human organ theft, with secrecy aiding in sexual abuse of child-patients, and possibly even darker, ritualistic abuse. The mother and aunt were also silenced with an unlawful restraining order in protection of these crimes (later nullified by common law grand juries).

(This entire situation was reported here earlier, in Newsbreak 8; Neelu Berry, Baby Protection Pharmacist, Made Homeless by UK Parliament and also in a recent ITNJ testimonial.)Neelu Berry notes in Newsbreak 29 that the occulted, secret-society breed of rich, protected criminals which runs hospitals and courts has many dark uses for death and dead bodies.

What was the rationale behind Dr. Lever’s hurried change of appointments to compel Edward to visit Queen’s Hospital on the 19th of June? Neelu suspects entrapment for sectioning and discrediting of a most powerful whistleblower, as well as quite possibly an intended assassination. This latter she bases also on the overnight-in-hospital experience of her “Black Dad” Dr. Akena Adoko who reported, shortly before he died, men stealing in to inject him in the arm twice at night in King’s College Hospital as well as transport him secretly somewhere at night where he said hundreds stood around looking at him; he died unexpectedly in the middle of the night after his niece had seen him improved earlier.

(For further details, please see Neelu Berry’s Report, linked below.)

Queen’s Hospital Nephrologist Dr. Lever Caught Impersonating a Psychiatrist, Having Mental Health Team on Standby

The entire incident at Queen’s Hospital where it is clear to all from the audio recording Neelu made (linked below), that a highly unsavory and deliberate attempt to fraudulently section Edward Ellis as mentally ill was being made despite no “delusion evidence” and despite the fact that nephrologists—or any other kind of specialist—have no business trying to suggest their patients are mentally ill really highlights what terrifying power doctors have been given in hospitals.

When Edward was ushered into a meeting with Dr. Lever, he was initially in the room on his own; raised voices and talk of “psychiatric assessment” prompted Neelu Berry to turn on her recorder and knock on the door to be let in. But what the recorder captured indicates quite clearly that Dr. Lever, a nephrologist, is demanding that Edward be admitted immediately and consent to a psychiatric assessment, while refusing to listen to his patient’s explanations regarding his  need to finish his important work before a hospital admission. (Remember too that Edward’s work exposes hospital crime and reports to Parliament.)

EXCERPT FROM AUDIO TRANSCRIPT/Recorded through door:

Dr Lever: I want you to be seen by, I think you should be seen by the psychiatric services here.

Mr Ellis: I refuse

Dr Lever: Yes but at the moment these processes are not absolutely not going to recognise….

Mr Ellis: They’ve screwed up

Dr Lever: I’m not going to argue with you. I’d rather, What I am saying is, all I want to do…

Mr Ellis: I am giving Notice to Parliament

Dr Lever: I’m not interested, I am saying

Mr Ellis: I’ll finish

Dr Lever: Please, I’m saying I’m not interested, I’m not interested, I am saying for you to have a mental health assessment

Mr Ellis: A decision is being made this week, I will finish the grounds this week

KNOCK KNOCK (Neelu enters at this point)

Rejecting utterly Edward’s information on the mass corruption remedy process, Dr.Lever initially focused on the kidney situation with Neelu but when reminded by her it was not in his remit to play psychiatrist, agreed, yet persisted in his stance about needing a mental health assessment. Correctly assessing the situation as dangerous, Neelu Berry informed Dr. Lever they would get a second opinion and tried to hurry Edward out of the office.

Dr. Lever pressed the alarm bell, saying loudly he wished to get “somebody else” into the office, code-word for Mental Health staff, Neelu surmised, and as they hurried out, gestured to another doctor to follow them, prompting staff to say, revealingly, “Do you want us to section him?” Suggesting “somebody else” was right there, waiting, and a whole crew as well, ready to forcibly section Dr. Lever’s interviewee at the drop of a hat.

All of which brings sharply into view the pre-arranged nature of this apparent hospital ambush, with a Mental Health Team waiting to exert Authoritarian Psychiatry on a fully-sane, mentally-sound patient.

EXCERPT FROM AUDIO TRANSCRIPT:

Neelu Berry: Edward I think we should just walk out of here, we don’t require your services

Dr. Lever: But you do require our services

Neelu Berry: We don’t

Edward Ellis: Neelu

Dr. Lever: I am the Clinical Lead of Kidney Services in this Hospital

Neelu Berry: But you are outside your remit with the Mental Health

Dr. Lever: No no no no, I know I am, I know I am, absolutely, and I agree with that I agree with that I completely agree with that in terms of the

Neelu Berry: It’s that conflict that you’ve abused and we are not interested in your services

Edward Ellis: No please allow me to conduct

Dr. Lever: Allow me to speak please

Dr. Lever: What I am saying is what I would like to do in order to deal with this and as you are quite right I am not a mental health specialist at all

Edward Ellis: And you’ve got no delusion evidence

Dr. Lever: No

Edward Ellis: In which case what are you doing requiring mental services with a delusion deficit?

Dr. Lever: Because of the fact that you’ve been labelled as having that historically so I would like to

Edward Ellis: Yes and that has been subject to a blackmail criminal investigation

Dr; Lever: All I was asking for was

Edward Ellis: No no no, you have taken crime proceeds and said that you want to use them for medical purposes. That’s what you’ve done

Dr. Lever: All I’m saying that I would welcome a further assessment by somebody

Edward Ellis: You are not having, you are enforcing a mental health fraud which itself was crime proceeds, that ends.

Dr. Lever: I’ve started a new assessment

Edward Ellis: That is not a new assessment

Dr. Lever: It’s the first time, I haven’t met you before

Edward Ellis: What you haven’t done is asked for any of the evidence to support my position

Dr. Lever: I am asking simply

Edward Ellis: No no It is how they run the frauds is they ignore the evidence of the citizen and just decide..

Dr. Lever: Right I’m going to get somebody else in here

Neelu Berry: No we are going

The entire transcript, which reads like something out of a Hollywood script for a KGB Crime novel is reproduced below this article, under RELATED, and the audio recording can be listened to here:

Neelu Berry’s Report on the multiple sectioning attempts, Dr. Lever’s impersonation of a psychiatrist as well as backstory on Sunaina Chaudhuri, Sadhana Chaudhuri, and Dr. Akena Adoko is here: 2019 06 19 Mental Health Fraud + Assassination Attempts on Equity Lawyer Mr Ellis Report by Neelu Berry

Neelu Berry discussed the entire experience June 22, 2019 in Newsbreak 29, where she also discussed the harassment she is herself, facing, as a whistleblower:

Arrest Warrants, Police Breaking Down Doors, Changing Locks, Nonstop Mental Health Fraud Attempts

The hospital attempts to section Edward continued after the escape from Queens Hospital on the 19th of June at 3 pm.

At 5 pm that day, June 19, the Mental Health team called on the phone in another attempt to force through a Mental Health Fraud kidnap attempt.

Shockingly, on June 26, 2019, the house at which Edward was staying, taking refuge, along with Neelu Berry–herself a whistleblower of hospital crimes who had gone through relentless Police raids in Aug 2017, Jan 2018 before her home was stolen by 22 men and women in July 2018–was broken into, Neelu reports, “by 10 thugs including 2 dressed as Police,” in an arrest and kidnap attempt under the Mental Health Act.  Neelu had felt unsafe and moved out days before this third Mental Health Sectioning Raid. Notices were left on the door, the locks changed, and a key left with a neighbor. Correction re. earlier reportage: Neelu reports a friend sent her pictures of the note on the door and what she describes is a fake unsealed warrant.

While some may find this hardly believable in a democracy, it appears that Authoritarian Psychiatry has taken over now as a tool of a corrupt State devolved into tyranny. Notices left suggest fraudulently and baselessly that the patient, Edward Ellis, is a “person believed to be suffering from mental disorder and….being unable to care for himself, is living alone” and authorizes police to remove him to a “place of safety” or make arrangements for his treatment or care.

Edward Ellis is Most Certainly Not Mentally Ill

How is this even legal, and how do hospitals and Councils get away with such transparent crime? Even on the count of physical health, Edward’s regimen of physical fitness casts into doubt the numbers and diagnoses produced by Romford Hospital which suggest a dialysis is needed immediately. If a dialysis is indeed indicated shouldn’t the Sussex hospital have provided it—instead of delaying for 7 months as the fiasco with the fistula demonstrates? Where does Mental Health enter this picture? And how does anyone—let alone a supposedly highly educated team of doctors and specialists from Sussex and Romford Hospitals—conclude that a person of Edward’s intellect, integrity, and firm anti-corruption and humanitarian resolve, as evidenced in all his public work and appearances, as also on my show in several interviews, is “suffering from mental disorder”?

Obviously, he is not. Nor does it appear to anyone watching his interviews that he is unable to care for himself nor a danger to self or society, which should, one would think, be the only criteria prompting a community mental healthcare visit in any reasonable society.

This insistent series of kidnap attempts does not seem to be however about Health Care, Concern, or Humanity, but its opposite—and a transparently retaliatory and panicky preventive attempt to stop the disclosure of crimes which Edward’s Mass Corruption Remedy Process threatens to unleash on the whole of the UK Protected-Crime-and-Corruption Fraud network.

Reminder of Liability, Demand for Remedy, Immunity Offer

Over the last couple days, Neelu Berry has served immunity offers and liability notices with a demand for remedy on Sussex and Romford Hospitals, suggesting pre-paid dialysis at a top facility in exchange for immunity, and a liability notice to both hospitals and Redbridge Council, reminding them of personal liability in any continued attempt to section Edward Ellis. The intent being to stem the fraudulent Mental Health sectioning attempts which essentially aim to stifle the voice of a whistleblower and take control of his personal affairs and healthcare decisions–thereby disappearing him.

A conversation with the assistant to the CEO at Brighton and Sussex that Neelu Berry had after these notices were sent suggests the hospital is taking the notices seriously and will return a response shortly. (Audio file recording of this phone call is linked below.)

Concerned citizens and those with influence are requested to speak on Edward’s behalf and join in the efforts to restrain Council members and NHS hospitals from persisting in these fraudulent and baseless attempts to section and discredit Edward Ellis, whose work as a trained equity lawyer protecting the rights of citizens is needed today more than ever, as the whole world engages currently in the revelation of hidden crimes and hopefully a changeover soon to a better reality.

Neelu Berry requests: Citizens who wish to take action to stop the State Terrorism against Whistleblowers can call 0207 219 3000 and demand their MP act by inviting Edward Ellis for an admission into an NHS Kidney Hospital outside of the 2 implicated NHS Trusts. 

Many thanks to Neelu Berry for her outstanding work as a human rights advocate and practitioner of equity law in this matter, and for her terrific reportage, recording, and broadcasting throughout the past week as she has kept viewers and readers closely informed, both on her own channel, via Facebook, and through conversations online at Andy Devine’s Facebook and Youtube channel, DeVine Bar, and Ramola D Reports.

RELATED

FULL AUDIO TRANSCRIPT/2019 06 19 Transcript of Queens Hospital, Romford Kidney Ambulatory Care Unit Mental Health Fraud in Equity Lawyer Edward William Ellis/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sZa7z-r7Yic,

19 June 2019 4pm: Queens Hospital, Romford Kidney Specialist Caught Impersonating a Psychiatrist in Kidnap Attempt of Mr. Ellis

Dr Lever:I want you to be seen by, I think you should be seen by the psychiatric services here.

Mr Ellis:I refuse

Dr Lever:Yes but at the moment these processes are not absolutely not going to recognise….

Mr Ellis:They’ve screwed up

Dr Lever:I’m not going to argue with you. I’d rather, What I am saying is, all I want to do…

Mr Ellis:I am giving Notice to Parliament

Dr Lever:I’m not interested, I am saying

Mr Ellis:I’ll finish

Dr Lever:Please, I’m saying I’m not interested, I’m not interested I am saying for you to have a mental health assessment

Mr Ellis:A decision is being made this week, I will finish the grounds this week

KNOCK KNOCK

Ms Berry:Sorry, Hi,

Mr Ellis:Hello Do Sit down

Dr Lever:Who are you

Ms Berry:I’m with Edward

Mr Ellis:This is Neelu Berry

Dr Lever:Oh Hello! Hi

Mr Ellis:She has consent to sit

Dr Lever:Hi I’m Dr Lever I am a kidney Consultant Hi So what I am saying is, what I am saying to Edward is that he has, so I have received correspondence from his GP, and I’ve also received correspondence fromDrDiarMaid-Gordon who was one of his consultants when he was seen at the Royal Sussex County in Brighton in March 2019. DrDiarMaid-Gordon,dr Bukhari and myself have concerns 1. About Edwards kidney failure OK Right Because Edward does have kidney failure in terms of his kidney function is less than 10% of what it should be. So Edward is at the level where we need to think about starting dialysis treatment

Ms Berry:Can you show me the tests that you’ve done

Dr Lever:So I’ve got all the tests over here. This is the creatinine level. The creatinine level today is 791

Ms Berry:And can I see that it is his blood test and not somebody else’s blood test

Dr Lever:This is his address Edward Ellis Ok Alright It’s been around that time.

Ms Berry:He’s just started a lot of activities with the swimming and walking

Mr Ellis:I just swam 36 lengths on Friday

Dr Lever:His Creatinine was 686 in March and now it’s 791. The normal level for someone like Edward would be less than 90

Ms Berry:Yeah but He is very fit for his age, he’s not a very good drinker, he’s been dehydrated because he doesn’t drink very well

Dr Lever:Right ok so this is going to be very helpful What I want to do is I would like to admit Edward to hospital today in order for us to review both the requirements and both how we logistically can start dialysis treatment

Ms Berry:What he would like is an independent second opinion

Dr Lever:So he has been seen by Dr MacDiarMaid-Gordon

Mr Ellis:Please let us cut to the chase on this

Dr Lever:mmm

Mr Ellis:I need to give priority to the next communications for the lord Bishops I will do that tonight.

Ms Berry:Right so he will come back tomorrow

Mr Ellis:What you need to know is there are many Doctors who are subject to Disclosure restraint frauds

Ms Berry:Edward I think we should just walk out of here, we don’t require your services

Dr Lever:But you do require our services

Ms Berry:We don’t

Mr Ellis:Neelu

Dr Lever:I am the clinical lead of kidney services in this Hospital

Ms Berry:But you are outside your remit with the mental health

Dr Lever:No no no no, I know I am, I know I am, absolutely, and I agree with that I agree with that I completely agree with that in terms of the

Ms Berry: It’s that conflict that you’ve abused and we are not interested in your services

Mr Ellis: No please allow me to conduct

Dr Lever: Allow me to speak please What I am saying is what I would like to do in order to deal with this and as you are quite right I am not a mental health specialist at all

Mr Ellis: And you’ve got no delusion evidence

Dr Lever: No

Mr Ellis: In which case what are you doing requiring mental services with a delusion deficit?

Dr Lever: Because of the fact that you’ve been labelled as having that historically so I would like to

Mr Ellis: Yes and that has been subject to a blackmail criminal investigation

Dr Lever: All I was asking for was

Mr Ellis: No no no, you have taken crime proceeds and said that you want to use them for medical purposes. That’s what you’ve done

Dr Lever: All I’m saying that I would welcome a further assessment by somebody

Mr Ellis: You are not having, you are enforcing a mental health fraud which itself was crime proceeds, that ends.

Dr Lever: I’ve started a new assessment

Mr Ellis: That is not a new assessment

Dr Lever: It’s the first time, I haven’t met you before

Mr Ellis: What you haven’t done is asked for any of the evidence to support my position

Dr Lever: I am asking simply

Mr Ellis: No no It is how they run the frauds is they ignore the evidence of the citizen and just decide..

Dr Lever: Right I’m going to get somebody else in here No we are going

Ms Berry: Edward let’s go

Mr Ellis: You cannot be trusted with the process. I have to write the next set of Communications to the lord Bishops tonight

Dr LEVER PRESSES AN ALARM BUTTON

Dr Lever: Can I have somebody else in here please

Mr Ellis: Let me have the written evidence on which you rely
Ms Berry: Edward Edward
Dr Lever: Come back and sit down again
Mr Ellis: No
Ms Berry: Let’s go
Mr Ellis: You are going down for this
Ms Berry: Edward stop it
Irish Doctor: Hi my name is Dr [Irish accent doctor 45 years old 6ft 2″]
Ms Berry:I told you they were going to do this to you, Edward, you’re not listening to me
Mr Ellis:Please allow me to conduct
Mr Ellis:I am fed up
Irish Doctor: Please stop its just me
Ms Berry:We don’t require your services
Mr Ellis:No I don’t care who you are
Irish Doctor: Just stop and talk to me
Ms Berry:You don’t know what you’re letting yourself in to
Irish Doctor: Just stop and talk to me
Ms Berry:No because you’re going to lose your job and I don’t want you to.
Irish Doctor: Stop You can walk with me
Irish Doctor: Just stop and talk to me
Mr Ellis:No
Ms Berry:Go back to Ireland it’s a lot safer, it’s a lot safer
Irish Doctor: If we could have a chat
Ms Berry:Come this way please Edward Edward
Ms Berry:Go back to Ireland
Irish Doctor:Stop and chat to me
Ms Berry:Go back to Ireland
Ms Berry:Let’s get on a bus, they’re going to try and catch you

END

LETTER SENT BY EMAIL by Neelu Berry to Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals CEO:24 Hour Remedy Demand + Immunity Offer – Personal Liability of all Officers of Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals

Phone-call by Neelu Berry on the subject of the Liability Notice Letter Sent By Email to the Brighton/Sussex CEO:

LETTER SENT BY EMAIL by Neelu Berry to Queens’ Hospital and Redbridge Council: 6th Mental Health Fraud Kill Attempt on Edward Ellis 26th June at 450 New North Road Hainault Essex IG6 3EB PERSONAL LIABILITY NOTICE_ TO REDBRIDGE COUNCIL + CQC OFFICERS

Edward Ellis’ Completion Document of June 24, 2019 in the Mass Corruption Remedy Process in the UK: 2019 06 24 Remedy Process + Judicial Office Unfitness Cases + Health Fraud Remedy Application Grounds of Equity Lawyer v State

Biomedical Researcher Lynda Thyer Traumatized by Extradition Threat, Narrowly Escapes Kidnap Attempt as Cancer Cure GcMAF is Demonized by MHRA and Pharmaceutical Establishment Protecting Chemo Drug Profits

–Ramola D/Posted 6/13/2019

British biomedical research scientist Lynda Thyer who has helped many hundreds of patients recover from late-stage cancer in her work with David Noakes at ImmunoBioTech using GcMAF, a naturally occuring protein in the human body and part of the immune system, and who, along with David Noakes, CEO, and nine others has been wrongfully hounded and persecuted in recent times by the MHRA (Medicines & Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency), Britain’s Health and Regulatory Agency, is recovering from cardiac complications brought on by the extreme trauma and anxiety associated with a baseless order of extradition in London and is currently in need of public witness protection for protection of life and safety, reports Neelu Berry, retired pharmacist, rights advocate and friend and supporter.

Issued an order by the Kent Police European Liaison Unit to appear at Heathrow June 11 to be extradited to France where a French judge was waiting to prosecute her, despite a note on Friday from her solicitor permitting an extension of 10 days, which however was not recognized by Kent Police who sent her railway tickets, Lynda Thyer made her way, Neelu Berry reports, to Heathrow Airport, early Tuesday 11 June 2019 morning for the Extradition Fraud, through sheer State Terrorism.

At Reading she collapsed on the train, an ambulance was called, and ECG found normal but she was advised she is unfit to fly for 5 days. She was arrested and released. She continued her journey to Heathrow where she was advised that French Police would meet her on Wednesday. Intending to sleep on a bench, friends she spoke to asked others in London to reach out to help her recover, where it was decided she would be more comfortable to rest for the 5 no-fly days.

Extrajudicial Kidnap and Feared Whistleblower Disappearance/Assassination Attempt with Redbridge Ambulance: Secret Surveillance and Profound Invasion of Privacy

This terrifying saga rooted in intimidation and threat from unlawful and out-of-control “authorities” does not end there. Accepting an offer to stay at a friend’s home, Lynda Thyer arrived at the undisclosed safehouse at 9:45 pm. Around 10:15 pm, very suspiciously, two ambulance crew-women with walkie talkies knocked repeatedly and violently at the front door for 20 minutes. An uncalled-for ambulance was parked outside for no reason for two hours until midnight, then drove off. An unmarked car with rear lights on was seen between 10.30 pm and 1 am across the road to the left of the Green, also parked for no reason for over two hours. Neelu Berry notes it is possibly of the Secret Service which has followed Lynda from the airport on a tag.

Uncalled-for ambulance in front of home, unknown car parked across–both for 2 hours at night, June 11, 2019.

CCTV Footage:

Why would an ambulance show up unasked at a private residence? Why would it park and stay for two hours outside that residence despite no communications from the residents?

Ms. Berry reports this matter, noting that the stress of impending extradition has been taking its toll on Lynda Thyer. “Last Saturday 8th June her heart stopped and she was resuscitated causing severe bruising… This was an Extra-Judicial Kidnap and Assassination attempt after Lynda had a resuscitation in Truro and an ECG at Reading Station when she collapsed on her way to Heathrow Airport.

Lynda Thyer: Recent Resuscitation, June 8, 2019

Neelu Berry states firmly that Lynda needs to recover before she is able to instruct her lawyers, and adds: “A call is being made to the public for Witness Protection.

This attempt by Kent Police to force an extradition by intimidation has also been carried out in direct contravention of the ruling on May 27, 2019 by the British Common Law Court with a 12-person jury held by John Smith which annulled the fraudulent extradition order from Judge Supperstone, and denounced the criminal coercion, malfeasance in public office, unlawful court orders, fraud, legal deception, and the “threat of unlawful detention to protect vested interests.” from Judge Supperstone.

This was also an act of malicious prosecution in supporting the claims of the French prosecutor, notes the ruling, targeting innocent people, acting for vested business interests and “maintaining the monopoly of judicial and pharmaceutical systems.”

Newsbreak 27: Lynda Thyer Extradition Moved, MHRA Corruption, GcMAF Cancer Cure Withheld

The whole matter of this wrongfully demanded extradition was discussed recently at Newsbreak 27 on Ramola D Reports as also earlier on a round-table podcast, and recent interviews with David Noakes, Lynda Thyer, and Neelu Berry where the highly questionable nature of the demand was made clear.

Breaching matters of jurisdiction, High Court Judge Supperstone has essentially ruled that Lynda Thyer should prepare for extradition to France based on a French judge and prosecutor seeking to prosecute her on wrongful charges at the behest of the marauding Big Pharma-run MHRA which has sought to destroy Immuno BioTech and all involved in healing cancer naturally with GcMAF. David Noakes points out that this is fraudulent and corrupt, given that GcMAF is a lifesaving remedy and has provenly saved thousands of lives.

“If put in the NHS, GcMAF will save 120,000 lives a year. That’s the thing they want to prevent, so to do that there, they came out with a 26-year jail sentence for me–they wanted me to serve 14 years in England and 12 in France and they then got the French lawyer–OCLAESP is the even more corrupt MHRA equivalent in France so their judge GODAUD came up with nine fraudulent completely false charges completely out of his own head and of course they have no evidence of this because it is fake.

So Judge Supperstone should have rejected the extradition for Lyn and me because the charges are fake, and then of course also the jurisdiction is England; we had twenty-seven staff in England and only one part-time member of staff in France, poor David Halsall has already spent five months in a French jail without charges so that’s what happened. So now they want to send Lynn, they can’t send me because I’m serving a sentence in England, they will send Lynn to France for a 12- year sentence so there are some odd things going on.”

Biased and Defamatory Mainstream Media Coverage Against GcMAF, David Noakes, Lynda Thyer, Immuno BioTech Team Ignores the Science & Facts

While mainstream media coverage as by the BBC of the court, MHRA, and police persecution of David Noakes, ImmunoBioTech, Lynda Thyer and others associated with the manufacture and distribution of GcMAF has been remarkably biased if not positively opaque on the true natural healing powers of GcMAF, its actual profile as a natural protein rather than a manufactured drug requiring MHRA licensing, and the accomplishments of ImmunoBioTech in assisting in the recovery of 9000 patients from 50 diseases with GcMAF, including 800 late-stage cancer patients from cancer, it appears to this reporter as also to others that these journalists are essentially propping up both the MHRA and a corrupt pharmaceutical industry protecting cancer drug profits: their denunciation of David Noakes as a quack peddling a “wonder drug” cure, and their mischaracterization of GcMAF as a “blood plasma product” in the face of tremendous evidence to the contrary speaks volumes.

Primarily one-sided and declarative of a blanket refusal to examine the scientific backing, as David Noakes points out, it is absolutely astonishing to note that both the BBC and the British courts who prosecuted David Noakes in November 2018, imprisoning him for six months after a misguided attorney-advised plea-bargain let them wrongfully label him “guilty of money-laundering and charges of selling an unlicensed product,” have completely failed to look at the vast scientific documentation on GcMAF, detailing its nature as a bodily-created protein, its curative immune-system profile, and its numerous benefits. Hundreds of scientists have supported GcMAF in research papers, studies, and conferences; numerous scientists and doctors in different disciplines including oncology have used GcMAF successfully to treat their patients.

Excerpts from a few summaries and papers detailing scientific study of GcMAF:

“GcMAF is the body’s way of curing cancer, a human protein all of us make, and a human right; it has no side effects. It is the best treatment known for tumour cancers, which is 90% of them, and 50 other diseases. People with disease can’t make it, and need external GcMAF to cure their diseases. It was discovered in 1990, and the MHRA has conspired to conceal it from the public since then.

300 scientists have written over 150 scientific research papers on GcMAF, and Immuno Biotech Ltd had supplied 11,000 people, with fabulous results before the MHRA closed them down.”– MHRACorrupt.st/gcmaf

“We had 4 scientists, the most senior being Professor Marco Ruggiero MD, 7 doctors, two ultrasound staff, 4 nurses, and admin staff, when the MHRA closed us down.

GcMAF successfully treats all tumour cancers, which is 90% of cancers

75% of terminal stage IV patients lives saved in our clinics.

The American National Library of Medicine, or Pubmed has 70 GcMAF papers peer reviewed for the second time.”– GcMAF, The Cancer Cure the World Has Waited For/gcmaf.se

“Dr. Yamamoto studied GcMAF in 16 patients with metastatic prostate cancer with excellent results.  Nagalase activity declined to normal, and there was no evidence of tumor recurrence over 7 years of observation.”– Cancer Immunotherapy from Dr. Yamamoto by Jeffrey Dach, Op Ed News

“Clinical trials using first-generation GcMAF in patients with metastatic breast cancer (7), prostate cancer (8), and metastatic colorectal cancer (9) have been conducted. Cancer did not recur over a four- to seven-year period in all those administered weekly doses of 100 mg of GcMAF for seven to 19 weeks.”– Clinical Experience of Integrative Cancer Immunotherapy with GcMAF, Toshio Inui, MD, of the Saisei Mirai Clinic in Kobe, Japan; Anticancer Research Vol. 33 no. 72917-2919

“Further, DBP-maf (Vitamin D Binding Protein), as well as being directly antiangiogenic activates macrophages which can then infiltrate solid tumors. This proposed amplification of the antiangiogenic effect of DBP-maf may explain the currently observed potency of this molecule as an anti-tumorigenic therapy.” —Vitamin D Binding Protein-Macrophage Activating Factor (DBP-maf) Inhibits Angiogenesis and Tumor Growth in Mice; Neoplasia.Vol. 5, No. 1, January 2003, pp. 32 –40

The Raids Over Licensing Issue: Does GcMAF Need to be Licensed, as a Natural Remedy?

Neelu Berry, a UK-trained pharmacist notes that GcMAF, contrary to MHRA implications, is not a licensable drug: it is neither synthetic nor manufactured chemically, as cancer chemotherapy drugs are, but a natural substance found in the body. When produced in the laboratory, Lynda Thyer notes, it is made with natural means such as fermentation and becomes a natural remedy supporting the body; as such, it would not be required to be subject to licensing or regulation of any kind.

https://youtu.be/_9n95-mEAEMNatural remedies do not require licenses,” affirms Neelu Berry. Prosecution by the MHRA has been based on the “unlicensed” nature of the product sold by GcMAF, a focus in much of the derogatory BBC and other mainstream media coverage.

“Before the mainstream media can justify participating in this criminal cover-up that’s going on,” says Neelu Berry, “there would have to be evidence of harm, people would have to be screaming out about things that went wrong, but there’s nobody.” David Noakes notes the MHRA actually did find one lone patient who said GcMAF did not work for her, but this patient confided to him that she did not approve what the MHRA was doing to him and his company, plus, it is profoundly significant that she did not in any way report “harm” from GcMAF.

But is it even likely that the MHRA would license GcMAF if they could or should? The MHRA has conducted highly invasive and aggressive raids on ImmunoBiotech facilities and offices in Cambridge, Guernsey, and Lausanne–14 raids with 100 officers, confiscating computers, flasks of GcMAF, one vial of Vitamin D binding protein (DBP) used in the creation of  Goleic, the product containing GcMAF which was made by Immuno Biotech, clamped down on the bank accounts of David Noakes and staff, terrorized scientists and staff in extended interrogation processes, and essentially destroyed the livelihood and lives of the professionals healing cancer patients at Immuno Biotech.

This article by Ben Porter, Corrupt Guernsey, covering the raids in Guernsey on Immuno BioTech offices as well as other raids details the trail of destruction caused by MHRA playing concerned regulator but in actuality swooping in to destroy the lives of caregivers.

Additionally, the seizure of GcMAF and the closing of laboratories and offices instigated and executed by MHRA in conjunction with local police has caused the deaths of a number of patients who had been recovering from cancer with GcMAF treatments after their supply was stopped. Details on these matters can be found here.

One-Sided Coverage With Information Solely From MHRA Ensures That MPs are Kept in the Dark

A former journalist himself who has worked for the BBC and editor of six newspapers, writing 30 articles a month at one time, David Noakes notes that a very basic tenet of journalism, of checking both sides for a story, is flouted in such abysmally biased coverage: “They get all their information from the MHRA. No-one ever comes to us, no-one cross-references–all the journalists are lousy. Even the BBC, Cancer Research UK, the Parliamentary Library–even Matt Hancock the Health Minister gets his information only from the MHRA.”

The media are assassins,” says Neelu Berry, cutting no corners. “They are responsible for the ongoing deaths of 200,000 people a year. The publishers have to be held accountable. And the entire behavior of the Health Ministry proves that the UK is a dictatorship, it’s not a democracy.”

Both David Noakes and Neelu Berry stress that the MHRA is already responsible for millions of deaths from cancer and other diseases which GcMAF could have treated and cured fully–by MHRA withholding this miracle cure for decades.  Autism is one of the diseases that has responded favorably to GcMAF. Dr. Jeff Bradstreet, well-known doctor and researcher, who was killed in the prime of his life, at the peak of his research and effective work with autism patients using GcMAF, David Noakes states, had healed 2000 autism patients. Outstanding autism results–complete cessation of symptoms–have been observed, David Noakes says, within one week of daily GcMAF administering.

“Dr Jeffrey Bradstreet has now treated over 2,000 autistic children with GcMAF and the results are well established. In 15% GcMAF makes no difference. 85% improve, if only a little, and of them 15% have their autism eradicated. In all 3,000 children have been treated with GcMAF with similar results.”–Autism

Neelu Berry states: “We’ve got different levels here. Because of the crimes that have already been committed by the MHRA, who are responsible for these two million murders since the 1980s (when it was called the Medicines Control Authority), the damage has already been done, the crimes have already been committed, the claims are already known about, so the question is: is the MHRA fit for purpose–No.”

Neelu Berry, describing liability

“What can the Health Minister do here–start with the natural remedy, then go to the synthetics. Here they have shut down the entire saving of 200,000 people a year–that is a massive crime the MHRA has committed. Not only did it deny the GcMAF, but it actually went out and shut it down–and caused all these crimes to be committed against these geniuses so that in itself proves the MHRA was acting as a gatekeeper to deny humanity the natural remedies that are given to us by God. They acted against God, that’s treason.”

“So you know there’s a lot of serious criminals running the MHRA and the Health Service–and that is the issue now, we don’t require these policies that deny natural remedies in the Health Service. The people want natural remedies and it’s common sense to have to start with the natural. Most diseases can be cured simply with natural remedies that have been excluded, that have been demonized by the MHRA, and that’s  where the MHRA have made themselves extinct, the Health Service is now extinct because of its addiction to profit, addiction to toxic synthetic drugs and its addiction to excluding the natural remedies.”

Excluding natural remedies and imposing synthetic drugs which offer unpleasant modalities of treatment essentially constitutes fraud. The nature of the revolving door between regulatory agency MHRA and Big Pharma, the fact that police and pharmaceutical company CEOs and not scientists and unbiased researchers sit on the Board of MHRA was covered in podcasts by David Noakes and Neelu Berry and also discussed here by journalist Iaian Davis.

An immense fraud has been pulled off, it appears by the pharmaceutical industry and the regulatory agencies on humanity, by denying access to simple natural cures of all kinds, not just GcMAF, but all the other natural remedies for cancer too, which exist in naturopathy, homeopathy, and various traditional systems of medicine.

Chemotherapy is a poison,” notes David Noakes, “You can lose your eye, liver, any organ–half the people who die of cancer don’t die of cancer, they die of the chemotherapy, and they die in horrific pain.”

The public can assist in the protection of Lynda Thyer and David Noakes and really the protection and furtherance of GcMAF as an acknowledged and readily available remedy for cancer by making calls and emails to MPs, providing them scientific information from PubMed (collected at the sites mentioned in the podcast, gcmaf.se, mhracorrupt.st, gsy.st). Also see the excellent articles by Ben Porter, Iain Davis, and Scott Tips, linked below, for further information. Coverage at this site will continue, and as Neelu Berry urges, all cancer and other patients healed with the use of GcMAF are especially urged to come forward to give their testimonials.

Related

GcMAF, Nagalase, Vaccines, Autism & Cancer Cures, & Holistic Doctors Being Killed: What is the Connection?

Looking Closer At The Sudden Deaths of Several Holistic Doctors & the GcMAF/Nagalase & Cancer/Autism & Vaccine Connections

Richard Presser: Dr Rima Laibow interviews David Noakes and exposes the Big Pharma fingerprints in the GcMAF/Nagalase health bombshell

GcMAF & Immune System Health/Nagalase in Vaccines/An Update

External Links

Common Law Court Order May 27, 2019 Annulling Judge Supperstone’s Extradition Order

Instead of a Medal They Gave Him Prison by Scott C. Tips

GcMAF – The Persecution of David Noakes and Lyn Thyer by Iaian Davis

Corrupt Guernsey by Ben Porter

For more information on GcMAF, please visit these sites:

https://mhracorrupt.st/gcmaf/

https://mhracorrupt.st/parliament-guilty

https://gcmaf.se/gcmaf-the-cancer-cure

Visit these pages to join the campaigns to get Big Pharma out of the MHRA and FDA, and sign up for the regular newsletter:

https://thenhf.co.uk/campaigns/get-big-pharma-out-of-the-mhra/

https://thenhf.co.uk/campaigns/get-bi…

https://thenhf.com/campaigns-library/…

Visit these pages for further evidence of healthcare provider persecution:

https://corruptswitzerland.se/

https://gsy.st/

Collusion, Conspiracy, and Sabotage Blatant in Todd Giffen’s Case by Federal District Court Judge Mustafa Kasubhai, US Attorneys, Defense Attorney Lisa Ludwig

–Ramola D/Posted 6/10/2019/Updated 6/11/2019

Following on the absurd finding of “mental incompetence” by Judge Mustafa Kasubhai in the case of Todd Giffen on May 23, 2019, reported here earlier, Dr. Seth Farber and this writer both wrote to his appointed defense attorney Lisa Ludwig, urging her to step forward to defend Todd adequately and file motions of appeal and reconsideration of his wrongfully-arrived at determination, and asking for her response. Which was not forthcoming, since Lisa Ludwig seems to have established a habit of refusal to acknowledge emails and phone calls, even from expert witness Dr. Seth Farber, whose testimonial at the court hearing she prevented from being aired and did not support.

Both letters are shared below, followed by excerpts from Todd’s own communications from Oregon’s Sheridan Jail on Corrlinks addressing the rather major factor of Lisa Ludwig’s lack of responsiveness and support in her supposed defense of Todd, much in line with the previous defense attorney Todd Bofferding’s words and actions against him, which got him fired for incompetence. Judge Mustafa prevented Todd from firing Lisa Ludwig, who  asked to be released from the case at the end of the court hearing and was asked to stay on, apparently in name only since she informed Todd Giffen she would not be filing appeals and motions for dismissal to assist him. Judge Kasubhai added to this betrayal by informing Todd he could not file any motions of appeal himself.

Currently however it appears that appeals filed earlier at the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals have come through, after a long delay. From Todd, on the matter of appeals and the Writ of Mandamus he has filed:

“Typically an interlocutory appeal only takes 4 months, meaning by March or April we would have had a decision on the Dec 5th and Nov 5th orders. Todd Bofferding, Lisa Ludwig, and Judge Mustafa are all involved…. Now my appeals are finally being heard by Judge McShane- but he should have heard them back in December or January when I filed my own pro se appeals because Todd Bofferding, illegally, wouldn’t do it. The case law states an attorney cannot refuse to file an appeal when ordered by the client. Lisa Ludwig got involved in this by trying to get Mustafa to agree she didn’t have to file my appeals May 23. They love to delay and stall people filing appeals big time.”

The Nov 5th and December 5th hearings he refers to were those held shortly after his arrest when the US attorneys suggested he be evaluated for mental competency; these hearings and the background of Todd’s case were covered here earlier. It is important to note throughout that while the FBI, on US Capitol Police intimations arrested Todd last November on charges of “interstate threats and communications” in emails sent last July and August to US Senators, the language in those emails while carrying graphic imagery do not extend threats of violence as mis-characterized by the FBI in their warrant, but promise retribution via a jury trial culminating in an imagined death penalty for their inaction (Senators Wyden and Defazio) in the face of repeated appeals for help while he was being abused as a vulnerable person and non-consensual experimentee with radiation weapons, DEWs, and mind invasion neuroweaponry. That Todd is not in any way violent nor likely to be has been repeatedly stressed by his long time psychologist, Dr. Seth Farber.

Todd notes that all the attorneys assigned to him have been failing him one by one, starting with Kimberly Seymour, then Todd Bofferding, now Lisa Ludwig:

“So I originally ordered Todd Bofferding and Kimberly Seymour to file my appeals back in Nov, and Dec 5th. Todd Bofferding refused a direct order to file my appeals. (The case of) Sandoval-Lopez says an attorney cannot do that, or if they do, client is allowed to file pro se late. So Judge Mustafa refused to let me file mine–that’s why I had to go do a Writ of Mandamus.”

“The court of appeals told me to file a Writ of Mandamus. When I told Mustafa about what the appeals court said and (brought up) the case law (in court), he tried to cover up his wrong by lying in court saying he had no idea he received appeals. But Kelly luckily recorded his clerks on the phone saying they received the notice of appeals, and they were sent to Mustafa for review. He filed them way late in April. But why the appeals were really late is: Todd Bofferding was supposed to do it within 14 days or so of the judge’s decision Dec 5th and he knew that.”

Regarding Lisa Ludwig’s refusal to file appeals, Todd points out these are illegal abuses and defense counsel is required to file appeals: “On the record May 23, both she and Judge Mustafa said “there will be no appeals.'” But the US Supreme Court ruled long ago defense counsel was banned from refusing to file appeals and had to consult with clients to ask if they wanted an appeal done, and in cases where an appeal is prudent, mandatorily had to do it even without consulting with client.”

Having learned through Kelly Wallace’s investigative reportage that Judge Michael McShane oversees Judge Mustafa, this writer sent on to Judge McShane the complaint sent originally to the Oregon Commission about the blatant violations of judicial process in the competency court hearing, also included below. Dr. Seth Farber sent a letter as well at the same time protesting the violations of judicial process  by Judge Kasubhai and attorney Lisa Ludwig at the May 23 hearing  to Judge McShane, also included below. Todd has sent on to Judge McShane objections to the magistrate’s findings as well asking that Dr. Cynthia Low’s questionable evaluation be struck from the record, that he be evaluated by psychologists of his own choosing, provided medical care for his infections, and be released from custody immediately.

Excerpt: “The government has already covered up my health, inflicted injuries, denied me medical care for over 6 months, and this will continue.

6. The Due Process liberty standard under O’Connor v Donaldson requiring something more than just mental illness, such as dangerousness for commitment should prevail to protect citizens from slaughter in psychiatric facilities.

As Judge McShane is handling the review of the Nov and December orders now, and I want all other orders reviewed by Mustafa, he should nix the in-custody competency evaluation, thus nixing Cynthia Low’s report, and make proper findings that an outpatient examination should be ordered, and I should be released from custody immediately.”

Letter from Dr. Seth Farber Sent By Email to Lisa Ludwig, Todd Giffen’s appointed attorney, after the May 23, 2019 Mental Competency Hearing

5/26/2019 at 2:40 AM

Seth Farber, PhD

NYC

Dear Ms. Ludwig,

It seems to me that your negligence in Todd Giffen’s case has been so egregious as to constitute malpractice.

I do not know whether the law states only forensic psychologists/psychiatrists can give opinion on defendants’ “competence.” (Rule 72 does not state that.) Jim Gottstein, Esq., a renowned lawyer in his own field (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Gottstein), did not think it did. Todd Giffen said it was an abuse of judicial discretion.

But the government attorney claimed that only forensic psychologists can assess competence and the judge did not permit either Ron Unger or myself to give an opinion as to Todd’s competence. If you knew this to be the case what was the point of our testimony?The only expert opinion that the Court heard was Dr. Low’s—and thus the judge had to base his ruling on her opinion.I had no idea I would not be permitted to say Todd was competent. It was your responsibility to find Todd a forensic psychologist who could give the judge another opinion. But you made no effort to do that. This is negligence.

If the judge was wrong and expert witnesses do not need certification in “forensics” to assess competence, why did you not object ? I checked with Todd–you did not object once..So Ms. Ludwig, either way you failed to represent Todd adequately. Either you should have gotten a forensic psychologist for Todd, or you should have repeatedly objected to the judge’s refusal to allow Mr Unger or me to opine on Todd’s competency.

Your own negligence was also evinced in the fact that I was given 10 minutes by you and Dr. Low spoke for over an hour.

It is ludicrous that a defendant who is a high-school dropout who knows the law better than many lawyers,who did not miss one word spoken in the Court, who submitted numerous motions to the Court and wrote his own habeus corpus petition, who probably has an IQ well over 135, is considered incompetent to understand the charges against him! This was an easy battle for you to win–had you cared, Ms. Ludwig. It seems like you don’t give a damn.

Clearly Dr. Low’s prejudice against the defendant, either for his “extreme” political views or his “mental disability,” prevented her from giving an objective assessment of Todd’s competence! And since you represented Mr. Ivers in 2018, you know a defendant can be “delusional” and competent.

Had you given me time I would have explained that to the Court. In NY that principle is codified in Rivers v. Katz.

Now you refuse to do anything more for Todd, even though the judge instructed you to comply with his requests. You should have filed on last Friday a motion for review by District Court judge and a motion for reconsideration. Please do it Monday. You should get Todd an expert witness who is allowed to testify on his competence.

Dr Peter Breggin is the only witness with forensic credentials who can explain to the Court why Dr. Low’s evaluation lacks scientific validity. This is necessary since she has misled and confused the Court,.

Please do your job or Todd’s supporters will be forced to take other legal measures.

Sincerely

Seth Farber, PhD

Letter from Ramola D Sent By Email to Lisa Ludwig, Todd Giffen’s appointed attorney, after the May 23, 2019 Mental Competency Hearing

Todd requires counsel to act on his behalf

From Ramola D <ramolad@hushmail.com>

To Lisa Ludwig <lisa@l2r2law.com>

Sent Saturday, May 25, 2019 at 12:52 PM

Dear Lisa Ludwig,

Like everyone else I am pretty horrified at the judge’s ruling that Todd Giffen is in his view mentally incompetent, and needs to be restored to competency.

Dr. Farber has reported that his evaluation and testimonial as to Todd’s competency and intellectual acumen was neither permitted nor accepted, his one remark regarding Todd being competent was objected to and struck off the record, with his defense counsel not objecting to this objection and strike-off.

It is also clear that Dr. Low’s faulty evaluation was the one that was let stand.

The situation points to malpractice on the part of many players, including the judge.

Todd’s counsel is required to speak and act on his behalf, to help him establish mental competency — which none of us can see as being in any doubt — in order to move forward to a jury trial where he can defend himself suitably.

I ask therefore that you kindly file motion for reconsideration of this judge’s wrongful decision immediately, so that it can be properly appealed. Anything less will comprise an abandonment of Todd’s defense, in my view.

In the past, when I have emailed you my Investigative Reporter’s Statement for Todd Giffen and my Declaration by Ramola D in Support of Mental Competence of Todd Giffen, you have neither acknowledged my emails nor affirmed that my statements and declaration were filed in the court and provided to the judge. You have also prevented me from testifying in court at this hearing, although your PI Maraed Walsh asked me to testify on Todd’s request and I agreed.

I request that you kindly acknowledge this email and let me know immediately your response to this urgent request to stand up for Todd, to truly act as his defense lawyer, to act for him and to appeal this reckless ruling by Judge Mustafa with its train of dire consequences impending.

I understand there is high urgency in terms of when this motion should be filed, and when immediate arrangements are made to ensure adequate evaluation, hopefully by Dr. Breggin, that can be used in court, so please let me know immediately your response.

Thanks very much.

Sincerely,

Ramola D

**********************************************************

Ramola D

Investigative Sci-Tech Journalist | Writer | Poet | Educator | Activist

Editor & Publisher, The Everyday Concerned Citizen

Reporter, Ramola D Reports on Youtube, Vimeo, Bitchute

Twitter: @EccEveryday

Facebook: Ramola Dharmaraj

Complaint (by Ramola D) about Federal District Court Judge Mustafa Kasubhai: Violations of Judicial Process in the May 23, 2019 Hearing and Faulty Ruling of Mental Incompetence of Todd Giffen

Date: June 3, 2019

Dear Judge McShane:

I submitted the following complaint to the Commission on Judicial Fitness and Disability last week but was advised it is not within their jurisdiction to attend to matters concerning federal district court judges, so on the advice of a friend who called in to your offices on Friday, suggesting you are the right person to send this to, I am sending this complaint to you, to apprise you of this matter, which is an urgent and extremely important matter regarding wrongful judgement in the case of Todd Giffen, whose case I have been reporting on as an investigative journalist since I learned of his arrest, some months ago—and requesting that you take immediate action to stop this wrongful judgment from going forward. Great harm may be done by the US District Court system, unwittingly, to Todd Giffen if this matter is not attended to immediately. I will send as well my Declaration in Support of Mental Competency of Todd Giffen and Investigative Reporter Statement for Todd Giffen, for your review.

Complaint sent to judicial.fitness@oregon.gov,

Thursday, May 30, 2019 at 3:27 PM

My name is Ramola D/Dharmaraj…witness to Todd Giffen, Case Number 6:18-mj-236-MK and this is about his court hearing on May 23, 2019 where Judge Mustafa Kasubhai of Eugene, Oregon in the Federal District Court declared him mentally incompetent after a prejudiced hearing.

This is the gist of my complaint:

Judge Kasubhai has violated basic judicial process in the case of Todd Giffen by prematurely naming him mentally incompetent after a highly prejudiced and one-sided court hearing on May 23, 2019:

1) by, in court, not permitting Dr. Seth Farber, Todd Giffen’s psychologist who has spoken often to Todd and evaluated him before, to present evidence or discussion and analysis on Todd Giffen’s mental competency;

2) by, in court, sustaining an objection from the prosecutors on Dr. Farber’s own voiced assessment of clear mental competency, and in fact striking from the record Dr. Farber’s comment implying that Todd is mentally competent;

3) by, in court, giving Dr. Farber, Todd’s expert witness only 10 minutes to speak while the court-assigned psychologist was given 90 minutes;

4) by, in court, not including the evidence sent to him in an Investigative Report and in a Declaration by Investigative Science and Technology Reporter and Journalist Ramola D/Dharmaraj who has covered the subject of non-consensual government experimentation with anti-personnel radiation weaponry and neuro-monitoring neurotechnology for several years, a matter acutely relevant to Todd’s case since he claims being subject to same, a matter quite plausible given the historic and whistleblowing evidence of these technologies currently being tested on Americans, as per declassified documents, the words of military and University scientists, patents, and other reports;

5) without, earlier, first giving him a proper chance to be evaluated by his own clinical psychologist for many years but assigning a random psychologist Dr. Cynthia Low to examine him, which she did over a scant two hours, making use of previous records to write a report that is faulty in its conclusions, based as it is on inadequate information;

6) by, in court, suddenly making it a requirement that the examining psychologist needs to be “forensic” — an unheard-of requirement, never before aired in any other court case; On this matter, the fully mentally competent Todd Giffen writes:

My attorney was not thorough or prepared for a competency hearing May 23, 2019. She did not hire a forensic psychologist or psychiatrist to do an evaluation, get a report, and have the forensic doctor testify, for my defense.

The attorney and Judge did not notify me, or my expert witnesses, that a forensic doctor was required to testify on competency.

The attorney was given a list of my expert witnesses. Dr. Peter Breggin is a forensic psychiatrist, who is willing to testify and evaluate me, if he gets paid for his time. He told the attorney he was not available on May 23rd, but another date would be ok.”

7) by failing to ensure that the defendant, who is too poor to afford his own counsel, and is a reporting victim of much past abuse at the hands of police, hospital staff at Oregon State Hospital, and covered agencies of the government, was provided competent counsel: Lisa Ludwig has established she is not competent counsel, has failed to call Todd’s witnesses over two months, failed to ensure proper psychological evaluation, failed to provide him medical help when he needed it, and failed to abide by the judge’s ruling May 1 to get Todd the medical help he needed and a letter for the Marshalls to ensure it, and failed to communicate either with Todd or his supporters in a timely way. (Further, in court on May 23, this lawyer, Lisa Ludwig has stated she will not file motions to appeal or reconsider the judge’s decision, showing she and the judge are working similarly against the best interests of this defendant, who is therefore being discriminated against intensely by the court.)

In a letter, Todd Giffen writes:

“My attorney neglected my legal rights, causing vulnerable persons’ abuse and prejudice to my rights.

Main Case Law: United States v Gillenwater, 717 F.3d 1070, 1080 – states that a defendant must speak up if his lawyer or judge is abusing him, otherwise he loses the right to call witnesses or testify.

Under “18 USC 4247(d).” Under 4247(d) it says, “you shall be represented by counsel (it is not optional), shall be afforded opportunity to testify, subpoena and call witnesses, cross examine, and present evidence by proffer or otherwise.”

Case Law United States v. Sandoval-Lopez 409 F.3d 1193. The case law states “a defense counsel cannot refuse to file an appeal, reconsideration, or objections to magistrates’ findings” at order of their client, and they must file these things when it seems prudent to do so even if the client does not order it be done. If the attorney refuses to do it or failed to, the defendant may file pro se, against the attorney’s will, and even file late because it was the attorney’s job to do it. It is always ineffective assistance of counsel for an attorney to refuse to appeal, or to fail to when it was prudent to.

I have a right to object the Judges’ decision and file an appeal and other motions for reconsideration. The attorney told the Judge, she is not willing to file my appeal or motions as her obligation.”

8) by then ordering that the defendant could not any further file his motions pro se, or send his motions for others to file, the judge has effectively tied him unlawfully to incompetent counsel, a fraudulent ruling based on judicious malpractice, wrongful actions to exclude important expert witness testimonial, and cut off all avenues for him to appeal any of this himself.

9) by earlier seeming to work with the incompetent counsel to ask for case law to deem an articulate defendant incompetent: Todd Giffen writes:

“March 20, 2019 the Judge stated at the hearing, and on transcript record, that I was intelligent and can communicate effectively.

May 1, 2019, the Judge said my thoughts were focused and I was communicating well, and that the attorney for the government better have a good reason to show on May 23, that I was incompetent. He told the government attorney that they need a case law on an articulate person who was found incompetent. Why would the judge try to help the government attorney on case law and tell them what they need, to find me incompetent?

I believe the case has been one sided, which is illegal. The Judge is being unlawful and violating my civil rights. The statements by the Judge, about my intelligence and in communicating, clearly shows that he knows I’m competent and fit to stand trial.”

As a consequence, Todd Giffen, perfectly mentally competent–which requires awareness of legal and court procedures, and cognizance and assistance in one’s own defense, which he has demonstrated daily at expert-level throughout his incarceration–has been wrongfully and fraudulently named mentally incompetent by the irresponsible words and actions of this judge, and is in danger of being wrongfully psychiatrically committed and force-drugged for 4 months, all of which are both fraudulent and great crimes against humanity.

The faulty rulings of this judge in violation of basic judicial process and in encroachment and discrimination of the defendant’s basic rights to an unprejudiced hearing should be condemned and rescinded and this judge removed from the Bench. A fair hearing should be set up in its place, with Dr. Farber, Todd’s chief witness, being permitted to fully speak his mind and share his knowledge on Todd’s Mental Competency to stand trial, which he stands ready to do, with a new Judge, one who does not exhibit incompetence and prejudice, and with, if needed, a forensic psychologist whom Todd GIffen approves, Dr. Peter Breggin, who has already indicated he will testify if given enough lead time for court, and with new counsel who can indeed be expected to act on the defendant’s behalf properly.

It is a crime against humanity to name a mentally competent person incompetent, and thereby remove his civil and human rights and force him into a mental institution and fill him up with deadly neurotoxic drugs. It is lack of discernment and judgment to permit incompetent counsel like Lisa Ludwig to act as defense in any case when her failings are glaring and she has been complained about before by the defendant. This judge should be removed and this ruling dissolved immediately.

Thank you for your attention and do not fail to approach me for further information. My contact information is below. I enclose the Declaration I submitted to the judge for this hearing, which supports the information Todd Giffen is reporting; kindly be aware that as an investigative journalist, what I am researching and reporting overrides the faulty speculations of Dr. Cynthia Low, the court psychologist, of non-consensual government neuro-experimentation (this being the right terminology, not “Govt mind control” as prosecuting attorneys labeled it) being factual truth as we have it currently, from military insider sources, cited in my Declaration, and that therefore people reporting it, including Todd Giffen, cannot be deemed “delusional” as she suggests when they do; these are people who should be helped and supported, and not victimized further with faulty mental health assessments and destructive judgements.

Sincerely,

Ramola D

****************************************************************************

Ramola D

Investigative Sci-Tech Journalist | Writer | Poet | Educator | Activist

Editor & Publisher, The Everyday Concerned Citizen

Ramola D Reports on Youtube, Vimeo, Bitchute

Twitter: @EccEveryday

Facebook: Ramola Dharmaraj

Letter from Dr. Seth Farber to Judge McShane on Todd Giffen’s Mental Competency Hearing with Judge Kasubhai

Seth Farber, Ph.D.
http://www.sethHfarber.com
June 2, 2019

To the Honorable Judge McShane,

I am writing to urge you to review REVIEW AND RECOMMENDATIONS,May 28, 2019 Re Todd Giffen, Case No.: 6:18-mj-00236-MK by Judge Kasubhai. I testified at Mr Giffen’s competency hearing. I was misled by Ms. Ludwig and told I’d be qualified as an expert witness.

I received my doctorate in psychology from the California Institute of Integral Studies in 1984. I have had 5 books published, and numerous articles and I am an editor of the scholarly journal, The Journal of Mind and Behavior. I have practiced psychotherapy for over 30 years.

I think the document, REVIEW AND RECOMMENDATIONS, May 28, 2019 Re Todd Giffen, Case No.: 6:18-mj-00236-MK by Judge Kasubhai, validates the claim I made in my letter (enclosed) to Mr Giffen’s lawyer, Lisa Ludwig: Todd Giffen was discouraged from procuring a mental health professional recognized as an expert by the Court to testify that he was competent.

In fact, Todd Giffen was deceived, wittingly or unwittingly, by his lawyer — and by Judge Kasubhai? He was told by Ms. Ludwig (as I was told) that the Court would recognize his psychotherapist (me) and Ron Unger, LCSW (a psychotherapist of Todd’s 4 years ago) as experts and would take our testimony into consideration.

The fact that Ron Unger and I were allowed to testify but not allowed to state an opinion as to Todd’s competency and the fact that neither of us was even mentioned in the Judge’s recommendations while Dr. Low’s report was taken as gospel means that Todd was denied his constitutional right to call expert witnesses.

Had he been told that my testimony and Mr. Unger’s testimony would be discounted by the Court (because we were not “forensic” psychologists), he would have demanded his right to be examined by an expert who would be recognized by the Court. But he was told and I was told the opposite by Ms. Ludwig who implied the judge had made the decision to recognize me as expert despite the Government’s objection.

I have testified over 40 times in Court in NY as a qualified expert witness. In most of those cases I spoke in opposition to a report by a Court-appointed psychologist recognized as an expert who concluded the respondent had “mental illness” that allegedly made him “incompetent” to be a parent. In none of those occasions were
the experts credentialled in “forensic psychology.”

It was and is my opinion after reading her report that Dr. Low was so biased against the defendant that she was unable to objectively assess his competency. I believe she was biased against Todd because of his “extremist” political views and because of his putative mental illness. The best way to determine whether Mr. Giffen understood the charges against him and the consequences would have been to ask him. This was never done. Nor was an effort made to assess his intellectual abilities.

Instead, Dr Low wrote page after page about his unstable childhood and his misdeeds as a troubled youth. This material is prejudicial and not probative. What does his troubled youth have to do with his competency now? Nor did Dr. Low even look at the motions Tod filed or his Habeus Corpus petition he wrote (without assistance) — that gives some idea of whether he has the capacity to understand the charges against him. These materials evince a person of far-above average intelligence who far surpasses the minimum requirement for competence. (This issue is independent of whether Mr Giffen is “delusional.” I have testified for several clients who were “delusional” and competent. As US vs. Ivers indicates, the Court recognizes they are not the same.)

Todd was examined only by Dr. Low. He was misled into believing that Mr.Unger and I would be permitted to present our opinions. Once he was told the Court would allow us to testify in Court, he assumed our testimony would have some weight, as did we. We are not even mentioned in the document written by Judge Kasubhai. We were all misled. Had Todd known our testimony was purely for show, he would have demanded the right to be examined by a “forensic psychologist” of his own choosing. I have no doubt that an unbiased psychologist would have found Todd competent.

Sincerely,
Seth Farber, Ph.D.

RELATED:

Todd Giffen: Scholar, Researcher, Activist, Whistleblower, Targeted Victim of Government and Police Crimes

Todd Giffen, Whistleblower on Non-Consensual Govt. Neuro-Experimentation Held on Charges of Interstate Threat & Stalking (After Messages Sent to Senators) Reports Serious Statutory Violations in Extended Jail Stay, Unsafe Jail Conditions, Attorney Failings, and Wrongful Mental Competency Evaluation

Unconventional Journalism in the Face of Unconventional Warfare: An Update on Todd Giffen | May 23, 2019

Petition by Kelly Wallace Seeking the Release of Todd Giffen with 293 signatories

Investigative Reporter Statement by Ramola D for Todd Giffen

Declaration by Ramola D in Support of Mental Competence of Todd Giffen

 

Professor David Salinas Flores, MD | The Secret of “Person of Interest”: The Cerebral Internet

–Posted 6/5/2019

Brilliant and necessary reading on the subject of the Cerebral Internet, the massive world secret Snowden and Assange have hidden from view for the larger world kept miasmically indoctrinated and brainfogged by the vast octopus reach of corporate-owned, Rothschild-run, propaganda-pushing mainstream media supporting World Fascism and Total Tyranny who deceptively push the focus on Mass Surveillance in a time period when Mass Neuro Surveillance is going on–as this reporter seeks often to cover, and as hundreds of thousands of non-consensual neuro-experimentation victims of unethical military and Intelligence persecution worldwide, wrongfully labeled “Targeted Individuals” and discredited as “Mentally Ill” by sinister and clear Mil/Intel design, testify avidly to.

Re-published with much thanks by invitation of the author, Dr. David Salinas Flores, MD, Professor of Medicine at the Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Peru, a shorter form of his longer paper published in April 2019 at The Journal of Medical Case Reports and Reviews.

Salinas, D. “THE SECRET OF“PERSON OF INTEREST’: THE CEREBRAL INTERNET”. Jmcrr, Vol. 2, no. 4, Apr. 2019, http://jmcrr.info/index.php/jmcrr/article/view/54.

Previous publications by this acutely incisive thinker and writer at this media site include:

Professor David Salinas Flores, MD: Transhumanism: The Big Fraud – Towards Digital Slavery

–Ramola D

THE SECRET OF “PERSON OF INTEREST’: THE CEREBRAL INTERNET

Person of Interest is an American science fiction television series that recreates the permanent surveillance of citizens daily life and attributes the obtaining of private information to a super artificial intelligence ( Fig 1); however, a scientific analysis reveals that actually the television series is recreating surveillance with Cerebral Internet of citizens with secret implantation of invasive neurotechnology such as brain nanobots in New Yorks citizens. (Fig 2).

Fig 2: The secret of “Person of Interest”: The Cerebral Internet | The large amount of information obtained by “The Machine” is a mystery (Left). The big information obtained about citizens can only be explained by the surveillance of citizens who have secretly installed brain nanobots. Cerebral Internet is the real method of mass surveillance in Person of Interest (Right).

Cerebral Internet is a means of communication developed in a person who has in his brain, implants, nanobots or microchips with which a tele-transmission of his/her daily life would be performed. This is sent via wifi to cell phones, computers, and televisions and even to other brains; thus, a televisualization of the victim’s daily life would be done with Cerebral Internet. In short, any person would see another person’s entire life, minute by minute, through a cell phone or computer. Scientific research about Cerebral Internet has only been reported in experiments with animals such as monkeys and rats. However scientists like Michio Kaku claim that prototypes already exist and that he has seen them in the laboratory. But the most serious fact is that recent investigations warn of forced and secret human experimentation with brain nanobots and microchips in the world, mainly in Latin American universities.

There are many pieces of evidence that suggest that its actual script is being based on illicit human experimentation with Cerebral Internet in the world, mainly in United States and Latin America. It is very likely that there are many real “Persons of interest,” beautiful women, millionaires, eminent scientists, prosecutors, judges among others. They are permanently monitored, not for their safety, but for the illicit enrichment of a mafia of prosecutors, policemen, and journalists. The world society shall know, be alert and report the crimes committed by this Hollywood’s mafia that aims to become a great organized crime network in the world.

Actually, the television series seeks to manufacture the consent to the use of the Cerebral Internet under the argument of security.

There are several evidences in the series that reveal that it recreates Cerebral Internet, among them:

— The soliloquies of the characters of the TV series;

A person with Cerebral Internet can be recognized for speaking alone, without having the appearance of being psychotic or having mobile hearing aids.

— The kind of information obtained is only explained with Cerebral Internet;

— The properties attributed to “the machine” are explained only with the Cerebral Internet;

The secret of this TV series is not only that it recreates citizens who are spied on with the Cerebral Internet, there are many evidences that indicate that the real script of this TV series is based on secret, illicit, and forced human experiments with Cerebral Internet in the world, mainly in Latin America and United States. There are many reasons that support this fact:

a) The Discovery of Hollywoods Nanomafias

Recent researches reveal evidences that the technological transnational companies, in illicit association with US Army and the corrupt governments, have created an organization that is developing in the world a secret, forced, and illicit neuroscientific human experimentation with invasive neurotechnology which may have even led scientists to win Medicine Nobel Prizes. The US Army has strong relations with Hollywood, this is the reason that explains the existence of a Mafia of Hollywood that produces films and TV series based on illicital human experimentation of US Army. Many science fiction writers are considered as “visionaries” or “prophets”; however the real script of many science fiction films used by Hollywood producers is based on secret experiments realized with nanotechnology by US Army, CIA, and American Universities at the cost of the health and honor of thousands of citizens in the world. This is the reason for the certainty with which Hollywoods stars and productors affirm: “Today’s science fiction will be the real science of tomorrow.”

Actually, recent researches alert that :

“The science fictions of today are illegal and forced experiments

that are currently being carried out in the world.”

b) The discovery of Mafia of Cerebral Internet in United States

There are many evidences that indicate the existence of a network of organized crime to develop the Cerebral Internet in the world. In USA, the Mafia of Cerebral Internet is organized by their own White House, its main operator being the former US president Barack Obama, strong suspicion of which is based in three facts:

Recent researches warn that the scientific megaprojects of the human brain organized and presented by Barack Obama such as BRAIN project and Human Connectome are developing with illicit human experiments using brain nanobots by nanomafias.

The relationships of Barack Obama with foundations. Foundations are considered human farms of nanotechnology. In 2014, Barack Obama founded “The Obama Foundation” in Chicago.

– Own declarations of Former US President Barack Obama. Obama in a recent public meeting made statements that suggest that American cities such as Chicago are gigantic human laboratories to develop Cerebral Internet and Hive Mind.

c. Many evidences indicate that New York is a city spied on with Cerebral Internet

Although “Person of Interest” is promoted as science fiction, it could be really recreating the reality of New York. New Yorkers would be real “Persons of Interest,” they could be being secretly and permanently monitored with the Cerebral Internet by the mafias of the American government. This suspicion is based in two facts:

-The discovery of Mafia of Cerebral Internet in EU that is organized by former President Barack Obama and Dave Eggers.

-The campaign of New York as Smart City.

Smart City is an urban area that uses different types of electronic data collection sensors to supply information which is used to manage assets and resources efficiently. The city of New York has been announced as the Best Smart City of 2016 as part of the World Smart City Awards. The development of Smart Cities has a main component: The creation of Smart Citizen, the Citizen with brain microchips. In fact, the Smart City campaign is another intellectual camouflage to develop the societies of citizens spied on with the Cerebral Internet. Promotion of Smart Citizen is associated to iconography of robotization, this fact reinforces this suspicion: Smart Citizen will be spied on with Cerebral Internet and subjected to a process of human robotization. (Fig 3)

Fig 3: New York: A city spied on with the Cerebral Internet -The secret script of “Person of interest” | Recent research warns the development of a Mafia of the Cerebral Internet in the United States, organized by former US President Barack Obama (Left). New York is considered smart city (Center); Smart City is prepromotion for citizens with brain nanobots. All these facts point out that New York is a city spied on with Cerebral Internet. New York’s citizens are “Persons of interest” in real life.

DISCUSSION

Person of Interest” is an evident promotion of Cerebral Internet, and there may be evidences that actually recreate the development of Cerebral Internet in New York, New Yorkers are “Persons of Interest” in real life.

Cerebral Internet is promoted by the Press as a benefit or natural evolution of Internet; however, it is a permanent violation of privacy, of communications secrets, and is considered the most powerful extortion weapon owned by the common crime and state terrorism.

Media is the main source of the messages and images that reach people, therefore is the main tool for manufacturing consent to Cerebral Internet. This is the reason that “Person of Interest” is one key piece of a gigantic program of the White House to manufacture the voluntary assent of society to Cerebral Internet.

The objective of the series is to convince the spectator to accept Cerebral Internet and coexist with the daily espionage by an elite of millionaires who have access to the private life of everyone, but who do not lose their own privacy; in other words, the TV series seeks to convince spectators to give their private life to the oligarchy that governs the world under the safety swindle, an oligarchy which evidently includes the Hollywood magnates. Thus, American government and transnational companies will have legal access to people’s private lives without legal claim.

The world plutocracy is very interested that citizens accept voluntarily the use of the Cerebral Internet. Popular culture plays a key role in the transmission of ideas, this is the reason why a TV series like “Person of Interest” is designed carefully to promote Cerebral Internet, along with its intellectual camouflages and the cliches related to it, among them:

a) Manufacture consent for mass surveillance under the argument of National Security.

The messages of the series are clear:

Mass surveillance is the medicine against terrorism,”

Your safety is the objective, the sacrifice is your private life,” “The end justifies the means.”

The title of the series has this objective, to justify the permanent surveillance of chosen “Persons of Interest” under the pretext of Security. According to the Cambridge dictionary:

“Person of Interest is a person who the police think

might have been involved in a crime, but who has not been arrested.”

In real life, “Person of Interest” is a chosen citizen by the Mafias of the Cerebral Internet who can benefit the Government Mafias, thus a Person of interest can be a Miss Universe, a millionaire, a lawyer, an eminent scientist, or an enemy to the interests of the Government Mafias such as honest judges. (Fig 4.)

Fig 4: Cerebral Internet’s main goal: The sex life of young women, not her security | The series promotes the message “Mass surveillance is for safety of citizens” (Left). In reality, the main objective of mass surveillance with Cerebral Internet is obtain the sex life of beautiful women, a millionaire secret business of TV press in the world.

b)”Person of Interest” promotes Digital Fascism

Digital Fascism is a government that will control citizens with invasive neurotechnology such as brain nanobots. Although scientists of the big transnationals promote brain nanobots as innocuous and as a benefit for society, they only inform that brain nanobots give connectivity, but do not inform that “connection will make us vulnerable”. Actually, nanobots can be a weapon against the citizen. Brain nanobots would make us lose our mind control: citizens would be controlled by others and thus they would lose their autonomy; turning us into human robots, they would lose their privacy due to being permanently spied on with the Cerebral Internet; they would lose their identity since their memory can be deleted with brain nanobots. Thus, if the citizens are spied-on, controlled mentally and do not have identity, they would become human slaves at the service of the transnational companies and economic powers.

In Digital Fascism there will be two social classes :

An elite of millionaires, who will not use nanobots and brain microchips, who will have access to video centers to spy, control and enslave the rest of society.

The rest of society, digital slaves, will use invasive neurotechnolgy and the Cerebral Internet, devices that will be mandatory to work in their companies.

Person of interest” subliminally promotes the Cerebral Internet because this is the main tool of Digital Fascism, it permits development of the different components of fascism such as mind control, erasing of memories, surveillance, torture or destruction of sexuality. “Person of interest” also directly promotes several other components of Digital Fascism, such as loss of privacy (permanent surveillance of citizens), homosexuality (the main female characters of the series are lesbians), mind control (the series recreates an avatar boy).

It is necessary to highlight that Nolan also produces Westworld, it is another series that promotes the same messages of “Person of interest”– the permanent surveillance, mind control, homosexuality and super artificial intelligence. Both series also promote and recreate the uses of the Cerebral Internet: “Person of interest” recreates espionage with the Cerebral Internet, Westworld recreates mind control with Cerebral Internet.The promotion of Westworld is that this series recreates humanoid robots (robots like humans), however the real state of artificial intelligence does not explain the humanoid robots of Westworld. Actually, Westworld recreates human robots (robotization of human beings).

The relationship between “Person of Interest” and Westworld is clear, in short:

Digital Citizens recreated in Person of Interest,

they will be the Human Robots of Westworld in the future.

The production of both series with digital fascist messages corroborates that Jonathan Nolan is the main key piece of a campaign of the American government for the promotion of Digital Fascism. (Fig 5.)

Fig 5: Digital Fascism’s promotion: From Person of Interest to Westworld -Jonathan Nolan’s job – Person of interest recreates smart citizens, citizens with brain chips (Left). Brain chips are the main tool of human robotization. Actually, Westworld recreates human robots, not humanoid robots. Westworld’s human robots are the future of Person of Interest’s smart citizens.

C.Person of Interest” promotes Friendly Fascism

Society has voluntarily given part of their private lives in emails, Facebooks, and telephone calls to the transnationals, former Google CEO says:

With your permission you give us more information about you, about your friends.”

Nowadays, with the advance of invasive neurotechnology such as brain microchips and Cerebral Internet, it is possible that the transnationals of technology such as Google or Facebook can get all the information of a citizen’s life such as routine life, memories, dreams, sexual life, among others. In addition to the transnationals succeeding in convincing citizens to give part of their private life, nowadays, the transnationals want to convince citizens to give all the information of their lives that can be obtained with the Cerebral Internet. It is necessary to remenber that knowledge is power, this large amount of private information gives immense power to transnationals of technology, these transnationals secretly co-govern the world together with the elected governments.

The transnationals have chosen a method to achieve this mega-objective: Friendly Fascism.

Classical fascism has been associated with violence, for example Hitlers fascism or Mussolini’s fascism. In Classic Fascism the main method is the violence; in Friendly Fascism the method is swindle, or misleading advertising.

So the Mafia of Neuromarketing develops the following strategies :

You must accept losing your privacy for your safety”

(The objective: Convince the citizen to accept surveillance of private life)

It is very important that you must control your emotions”

(The objective: Convince the citizen to accept mind control)

You must erase your bad memories”

(The objective: convince the citizen to accept erasing of memories)

You must use brain nanobots to become a cyborg or God”

(The objective: convince the citizen to accept use of brain nanobots)

In short, the main objective of Friendly Fascism is:

Citizens live happy being digital slaves, illicitly enriching an elite of millionaires that govern the world.

d) Mass Surveillance is administered by Superheros

The main actor, Jim Caviezel, played Christ, and in several chapters of “Person of Interest” assumes the role of “Guardian Angel” who advises people to avoid committing crimes, subliminally repeating the role of Christ; thus Caviezel goes from Christ to Angel of Safety. However, the message of the TV series: “Massive surveillance is managed by supervigilants,” contrasts with reality; recent research reveals that massive surveillance with Cerebral Internet is developed by journalistic Mafias that obtain the sexual life of University women to commercialize them, yet the most serious fact is that mass surveillance is handled by Mafias of policemen, prosecutors and judges, they use Cerebral Internet as a weapon of extortion.

e) Mass surveillance is carried out by Super Artificial Intelligence

The American establishment seeks to create in the unconscious of citizens the idea that the mass surveillance system is made by supercomputers and highly developed software. The US government wants to use the image of computers so that citizens accept mass surveillance: computers are considered honest, accurate and impartial.

The secret goal of this message “supercomputers perform mass surveillance of citizens” is that citizens believe that the future management of private information obtained with Cerebral Internet, (private life, sexual life, thoughts, dreams, memories), will be in charge of supercomputers, they will store this audovisual material and avoid leaks.

The secret message is:

“Supercomputers are the only ones that will have access

to our sexual life, nobody will see our privacy.”

The message of “Person of Interest”: “Massive surveillance is done by supercomputers and supersoftwares” is surprisingly repeated by the most promoted defender of privacy, Edward Snowden.

In 2012, in the chapter “No Good Deed,” the chosen “person of interest” was Henry Pecker, a NSA 33 year-old analyst who discovers that his agency is conducting a mass surveillance by a super artificial intelligence. Surprisingly, a year later, by a suspicious coincidence, Edward Joseph Snowden, a former Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) employee, reveals the existence in the world of a mass surveillance by NSA based on supersoftware such as PRISM. Thus, suspiciously, a year in advance, the television series predicted the Snowden case. Henry Pecker even had physical characteristics similar to Snowden. It is necessary to highlight that Snowden is promoted by the world press as the agent more informed about mass surveillance of the CIA, however he only has reported massive surveillance systems done by computers and supersoftware such as PRISM; incredibly despite the fact that he continually gives interviews about the state of mass surveillance, he has not reported massive surveillance with Cerebral Internet, despite the fact that there is much research that already alerts all to the illicit development of Cerebral Internet in Latin America.

It is evident that Snowden knows about the Cerebral Internet, but he hides it, he hides the main weapon of CIA for massive surveillance. Actually, Snowdens repetition of US government cliche, “Mass surveillance is done by computers” and the concealment of the Cerebral Internet are evidences that indicate:

Snowden continues being an agent of the CIA, a main CIAs agent.

The message of “Person of Interest” and Edward Snowden: “The main mass surveillance is developed by supercomputers,” seeks to hide the reality. Recent research warns that the main mass surveillance is carried out by a Mafia that develops the Cerebral Internet, main massive surveillance with Cerebral Internet is not developed by an Super Artificial Intelligence. The private information obtained with the personalized surveillance of the Cerebral Internet illicitly enriches a corrupt circle of journalists, prosecutors, judges, police and politicians. They spy, torture, extort and damage the health of citizens who secretly and without their consent have invasive neurotechnology such as brain nanobots. (Fig 6.)

Fig 6: Person of Interest: The pre-promotion of Snowden,
the false prophet of Cerebral Internet
In the TV series, Henry Pecker, a NSA worker, reveals massive surveillance with supercomputers and software (Left). Surprisingly, a year later, Edward Snowden, a NSA worker repeats the same message, mass surveillance is secretly developed with supercomputers and supersoftware.(Center). Snowden is promoted as hero (Right). However, Snowden hides the Cerebral Internet, the most powerful weapon of mass surveillance of the US government.

f. The Mass Surveillance system is our new God

g) Opponents to the Mass Surveillance system are criminals

Person of interest” repeats the cliche of American Establishment “Nothing to Hide.” In short, the dishonest are the people who do not want to lose privacy, if you claim (concern) about surveillance is because you are a criminal. Those who try to resist living their lives publicly and being constantly surrounded by social media are now suspects. It is a false dichotomy of choice: either we accept total surveillance or we are criminals worthy of suspicion. Nowadays, Hollywood produces a whole series of films and television series where the defense of privacy is presented as a crime such as recent films, The Circle and Anon. Actually, “Nothing to Hide” is another fraudulent message of plutocracy that governs the world. There are many elements of human behavior best served by secrecy including things like religión, sex, politics. “Nothing to hide” doctrine is nothing more than a form of social intimidation to expose those who do not conform.

h) Person of Interest promotes Precrime

Precrime is promoted in science fiction but also in criminology journals, it is already being implemented in precrime systems in US commissaries, but the promotion of this US precrime system is associated with promotion related to invasive neurotechnology, which reveals a clear intention to legalize the use of the Cerebral Internet as a pre-crime tool in reality. The reading of minds with the Cerebral Internet allows (them) to know which citizen could commit a crime. Predeliction-thoughts in “thought-crimes” can be used as an excuse to justify the use of the Cerebral Internet in citizens. Under the Pre-crime paradigm, Government Mafia could turn innocent citizens into criminals, Pre-crime would become “the crime of the honest citizen”– in that way any honest opponent could be punished only with his thoughts in a fascist government. However, the reality is different, the main objective of mass surveillance of the Mafia of the Cerebral Internet is not Precrime but the private life of citizens. The real “persons of interest” are citizens chosen by the Cerebral Internet’s mafias for their illicit enrichment such as millionaires.

The Mafia of the Cerebral Internet looks for crimes but only for extortion.

Cerebral Internet is the more powerful weapon of extortion.

In a global vision, gathering all their cliches, in short, the real message of the “Person of interest” is :

The Cerebral Internet will be administered by supercomputers, compile all the information of our lives and select what is relevant as a threat to security. We should not worry about the leak of our private life or secret data to the mafias because only computers will see our sex life, no human being will see our sexual life, we must trust them as we trust in the privacy of our email. The life of citizens is not the priority of surveillance, only surveillance of terrorists, however we will monitored by default by supercomputers. We must accept with confidence and tranquility Cerebral Internet as a new God. Snowden, the hero of privacy, who revealed the massive surveillance by computers to us, will recommend to us the best applications on our smartphone to control the Cerebral Internet. Person of Interest must be seen knowing this socio-political context and disinformation campaign of the World Press. (Fig 7)

Fig 7: Mafias of prosecutors in Latin America: Key partners of production of TV Science Fiction  | Jonathan Nolan (Left). Peru is the main place where there is illicit experimentation with brain nanobots for developing film and tv series of science fiction. Prosecutor of the Nation Pablo Sanchez Velarde (2015-2018) and Callao prosecutors (Right). No prosecutor in the world has denounced massive surveillance with Cerebral Internet.

CONCLUSIONS

Person of Interest is an American science fiction television series that recreates massive surveillance with Cerebral Internet of citizens, with secret implantation of invasive neurotechnology. Actually, the movie seeks to manufacture consent to the use of the Cerebral Internet under the argument of security. The series aims to recreate the secret reality of New York, a city spied on with the Cerebral Internet. It is very likely that there are many real “Persons of interest” in the world, millionaires, prosecutors, beautiful women, among others, who are permanently monitored, not for their safety, but for the illicit enrichment of a mafia of prosecutors, policemen, and journalists. World society shall know the crimes committed by this Hollywood’s Mafia that aims to become a great organized crime network in the world.

Mojmir Babacek: Open Letter To The Czech President, Government And Deputies Of The Czech Parliament And Senate | Need for Legislation to Protect the Human Brain and Central Nervous System from Remote Manipulation with Energy Weapons

–Posted 5/25/2019

Mojmir Babacek, founder of the International Movement for the Ban of the Manipulation of the Human Nervous System by Technical Means, author of numerous articles on the issue of mind manipulation, offers via email on May 24, 2019 this preface to an Open Letter recently published at numerous non-mainstream media outlets, and seeking wider exposure:

“Here in the Czech Republic we have started a campaign for legislation banning attacks by physical fields on human nervous system by an Open Letter to the Czech Government describing possible growth of occurrence of cancer diseases in the Czech republic due to increasing electromagnetic smog (global positioning systems, cell phone systems, Wifi etc. followed by 5G technology in a close future).

Czech statistics show that since 1985, until 2016, the occurrence of cancer tumors in the Czech republic grew by 140% and the growth of cancer disease causes presented by the World Health Organization (obesity, smoking, drinking alcohol, smog, etc.) can account only for a growth of cancer disease occurrence by some 10%. Cancer of the skin grew in the Czech Republic by 400% since 1992, and this is the time when the ozone hole in the atmosphere was disappearing. There should be no hole above the Czech Republic after 2020. So there is a good chance that it was the growing electromagnetic smog which caused the growth of cancer of the skin in the Czech Republic.

This article was not published in the major media, but at least some 35 independent or alternative media sites have published it. After the publication we were invited to the radio broadcasting of an Internet radio station, Infovojna (Infowars), in Slovakia to talk about mind control. Right now, as a next step of the campaign, we are starting publication of the Open Letter to the Czech Government asking it to enact legislation banning attacks by physical fields on the human nervous system. We hope to reach the same amount of publication of the Open Letter as with the previous one. The text of the letter is below.”

***

Open Letter To The Czech President, Government And Deputies Of The Czech Parliament And Senate

The USA and the European Union have invested since the beginning of the century billions of dollars and euros into brain research. As a result of this research, perfect maps of the brain were developed, including the areas of the brain that control the activity of different body organs or parts where higher brain activities, such as speech and thoughts, are taking place. The brain activities corresponding to different actions in those areas were also deciphered.

Thanks to the knowledge of specific locations of different centers in the brain and frequencies of the neuronal activity in them, teams of physicians are now capable of helping many people who were in the past, for different reasons, unable to participate in a normal life. There exist prostheses, which are controlled directly from the brain centers that normally control the movement of the limbs, https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=8082156, and enable people, who lost them, to use the prosthesis in a way similar to the way normal people use their limbs. Higher brain activities were produced as well. In 2006, scientists placed into the brain of a completely paralyzed man an implant which transferred the activity of his brain into different devices and enabled him to open his e-mail, control his TV set, and control his robotic arm. Other paralyzed people were able to search the Internet, play computer games and drive their electrical wheelchairs: https://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/18/magazine/the-cyborg-in-us-all.html?pagewanted=all .

Thanks to extensive brain research, computers were taught to understand the neuronal activity so much so that they are now capable of using the activity of our brain to reproduce our perceptions. Canadian scientists demonstrated an experiment, where the computer could interpret the electroencephalographical recordings from the brain to produce the painting of a face that the subject of experiment was perceiving:  http://www.foxnews.com/tech/2018/02/26/this-literally-reads-your-mind-to-re-create-images-faces-see.html.

In the opposite way the data, processed by the computer in the way that will make them intelligible for the nervous system, can be transmitted into the brain and produce there a new reality. When an implant is placed in the brain and connected to a camera, placed on spectacles, for people whose photoreceptors in their retina stopped working, the sight is at least partially restored. In this case the camera on the spectacles is transmitting into the implant light frequencies and the implant re-transmits them in frequencies which “understand” the neurons processing the visual perceptions: http://www.businessinsider.com/scientists-put-a-bionic-eye-to-the-test-and-it-helped-blind-people-see-again-2015-7.

In California, scientists have developed a device which can register brain waves and, using analysis, find among them consonants and vowels and in this way transform our thoughts to words. A paralyzed man could use this device to write without using a keyboard. Presently, the accuracy of the device reaches 90%. Scientists believe that within five years they will manage to develop a smartphone, to which their device could be connected https://www.researchsnipers.com/device-that-translates-your-thoughts-in-to-words-will-be-in-smartphones-soon/https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3497935/.

Just like in the case of visual perception, it is possible, when knowing the algorithms of brain processing of words, to generate algorithms of different words in the computer and transmit them into the brain in ultrasound frequencies and in this way produce in the human brain particular thoughts.

Everybody will easily fall victim to the proposal that, instead of typing or searching with the use of mouse, his computer or cell phone could react directly to his brain’s activity and take down his thoughts directly to the documents or carry out operations that has just occurred to him.

As a matter of fact Apple and Samsung companies have already developed prototypes of necessary electro-encephalographical equipment, which can be placed on top of a head and transmit electromagnetic waves produced by the brain into the prototypes of new smart phones. The smart phones would analyze those waves, find out what the intentions of their owners are, and carry them out. Apple and Samsung companies expect that the direct connection with brains will gradually replace computer keyboards, touch screens, mice and voice orders: https://lsspjournal.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s40504-017-0050-1. When the system is complete, it will be feasible for hackers, government agencies, and foreign government’s agencies to implant thoughts and emotions in people’s minds and “hearts“, when they will be connected to Internet or cell phone systems.

In 2013, scientists in the USA could infer from their brain activity the political views of people and distinguish Democrats from Republicans, and, in 2016, scientists used transcranial magnetic stimulation to make subjects of experiments more positive towards criticism to their country, than the participants whose brains were unaffected https://lsspjournal.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s40504-017-0050-1 .

Last year, the historian Juval Noah Harari was invited to deliver a speech at the World Economic Forum in Davos. The editor of the British Daily Financial Times stressed, when introducing him, that it is not usual to invite a historian to speak to most important world economists and politicians. Juval Noah Harari warned in his speech against the rise of new totality, based on the access to the human brain. He said: “Once we have algorithms that can understand you better than you understand yourself, they could predict my desires, manipulate my feelings and even make decisions on my behalf. And if we are not careful the outcome can be the rise of digital dictatorships. In the 21stcentury we may be enslaved under digital dictatorships”:  http://www.ynharari.com/wef2018. In a similar way the Stanford University researcher in Neurology and Dolby Labs’ chief scientist Poppy Crum warned at the conference in Las Vegas: “Your devices will know more about you than you will. I believe we need to think about how [this data] could be used”: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-5611645/Future-devices-let-companies-scan-body-detect-mood-health.html. 

In April 2017, the neuroethicist at the University of Basel Marcello Ienca, and Roberto Andorno, a human rights lawyer at the University of Zurich, writing in the journal Life Sciences, Society and Policy, published the article “Toward new human rights in the age of neuroscience and neurotechnology”:  https://lsspjournal.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s40504-017-0050-1, where they called for the creation of legislation which would protect the human right to freedom and other human rights from the abuse of technologies opening access to the human brain. In the article, they wrote that “the mind is a kind of last refuge of personal freedom and self-determination” and “at present, no specific legal or technical safeguard protects brain data from being subject to the same data-mining and privacy intruding measures as other types of information.” Among the world media only the British newspaper The Guardian wrote about their proposal:  https://www.theguardian.com/science/2017/apr/26/new-human-rights-to-protect-against-mind-hacking-and-brain-data-theft-proposed?CMP=share_btn_fb. This fact suggests that in the actual democratic world, there exists no political will to forbid remote control of human thoughts and feelings, no matter that such perspective breaks elementary principles of democracy.

In 2016 and 2017, 10 European organizations tried to convince the European Parliament and the European Commission to enact the legislation that would ban the remote control of activity of the human nervous system, since pulsed microwaves could be used to manipulate the human nervous system at a distance at present time already: https://www.globalresearch.ca/electronic-weapons-radio-frequency-radiation-remote-manipulation-of-the-human-nervous-system/5584676. The European Commission excused itself finding excuse that according to the principle of subsidiarity this legislation must be created in each of the European Union member states individually.

We ask you therefore to create in the Czech Republic a legislation which would ban, under heavy penalties, interference with the human nervous system and organism by external energies. This legislation should establish as well the teams, with participation of human rights organizations, equipped with technical devices, which would enable them to supervise obedience to this legislation. Otherwise there is a danger that in the Czech republic a political system will evolve, which will simulate for the public, that it is defending human rights, but in reality it will be suppressing them by classified means of remote control of the human nervous system. In the Czech Republic, there live at present time some 30 people who claim that they are subjected to experiments with weapons based on the effects of pulsed microwaves and have no legal means to defend themselves. In the future it could be the whole nation. Current fast advances in scientific research can discover other physical means how to manipulate the human nervous system than are pulsed microwaves or connection of brains to cell phone systems or Internet. It is high time to create legislation which will protect the brain, human nervous systems, and the human organism from harmful electromagnetic waves and attacks on freedom of thought and decision making.

–Citizen’s Association for the Ban of Manipulation of Human Nervous Systems by Radiofrequency Radiation

Source: Mojmir Babacek, email, May 24, 2019

UK Whistleblower Calls for Australian High Commission to Issue Witness Protection Order for Julian Assange and Reminds Jeremy Corbyn to Express Public Interest and Provide Witness Protection for Persecuted Whistleblowers Sabine McNeill, Melanie Shaw and Julian Assange

–Posted by Ramola D/5/17/2019

Expressing the public interest, speaking for millions of supporters of Julian Assange, and forthright in her approach to the Australian High Commission in London, whistleblower, child & human rights advocate, pharmacist by profession and powerful public speaker Neelu Berry has issued a call this week to both the Australian High Commission and the Opposition Leader Jeremy Corbyn to step forward to issue witness protection and safe passage to whistleblower Julian Assange and to other politically persecuted whistleblowers in the UK who are currently wrongfully imprisoned, Sabine McNeill and Melanie Shaw.

Neelu Berry, who is also publishing the ongoing work of redressal of cases of corruption and crime reported by UK citizens, has been working alongside Equity Lawyer Edward William Ellis who has initiated and is commandeering the Mass Corruption Remedy Process in the UK as a revived function of the Equity Monarch Trusts, reported earlier here, and covered in ongoing conversations, with this latest, at Ramola D Reports.

In a verbal statement made over the telephone to Daniel Holden of National Intelligence at the Australian High Commmission, she demanded Julian Assange’s extradition to Australia and restitution in his job as a journalist, stating this was “a formal notice against all the corrupt officials in Australia who are continuing to ignore the public interest, to ignore the public demand for his immediate release from HMP Belmarsh, to silence him for the truths that he and WikiLeaks (have brought forward)”.

Statement to Australian High Commission, National Intelligence Office by Whistleblower Neelu Berry on Behalf of Millions of Supporters of Julian Assange

“We are the million supporters of Julian Assange and we demand his extradition to Australia on grounds that he’s been held a political prisoner by the UK state terrorists and this government in the UK is conspiring with the USA to end his life.

His life is in danger, he requires urgent medical attention, and the Australian government and the Australian Embassy in London will be held fully responsible for all the tortures he’s been subjected to in the UK and in the Ecuadorian Embassy over the last seven years, and the false prosecutions against him to persecute him for being a whistleblower of mass assassinations and massacres of civilians and women and children in the Middle East by the USA in conspiracy with the UK and the global media, so this is a formal notice of treason against all government officials who refuse to take appropriate action to bring Julian Assange to safety in his country where he is an Australian citizen.

The Australian government has so far failed in its duty to its citizens and has conspired with the UK and USA to terrorize him in the last seven years, and this is a formal notice against all the corrupt officials in Australia who are continuing to ignore the public interest, to ignore the public demand for his immediate release from HMP Belmarsh, to silence him for the truths that he and the work of WikiLeaks (has brought forward).

And the Australian government is part and parcel of the crimes of treason, of denying humanity the truth of the terrorism this planet is being subjected to by the USA UK pirate currencies in conspiracy with Ecuadorian–Ecuador and the Ecuadorian Embassy in London—government and Australian government and the Australian Embassy in London and I speak on behalf of the million supporters of Julian Assange of WikiLeaks.

And this is a demand for a witness protection order to be issued by the Australian Government to extradite him to safety where he can be rehabilitated, recuperated and restituted in his job as a journalist.”

Personal Liability Claim for Jeremy Corbyn, Opposition Leader for Failing to Enforce Witness Protections for Whistleblowers

In earlier calls made to the Australian Embassy and Jeremy Corbyn’s office, where Ms. Berry sought to relay the immediacy of the need for Julian Assange to be offered witness protection and removed from custody of the prison system because his health was in danger, she was met with cool disinterest and canned advice to call instead for an emergency vehicle from “police authorities,” obviously a meaningless suggestion.

On May 14 however, speaking to a person named Louie at Jeremy Corbyn’s office whose voice appeared oddly distorted, and who spoke repeatedly over her, Neelu Berry brought up the situation of Sabine McNeill wrongfully incarcerated in Bronzefield Prison since January this year, sentenced for 9 years (and who recently won permission to appeal her conviction in the Criminal Appeal Court in Royal Courts of Justice, London) after whistleblowing on crimes against children, and of Julian Assange in Belmarsh Prison, and stated that “Jeremy Corbyn was personally liable for all the crimes committed by the prison service, the courts; as the Opposition Leader it’s his job to ensure that witnesses are protected and protected witnesses are not held in jails as political prisoners by the organized crime network in the UK.”

She also stated fearlessly and unequivocally that it was a “treasonous crime to deny remedy to whistlebowers in the UK, and Jeremy Corbyn cannot continue in his office if Julian Assange is not released” adding that Louie needed to send him this recording, and would be obstructing remedy if he could not listen to and convey concerns from the public to an elected public servant. To Louie’s neutral note that Corbyn did not have the authority to release Assange, she said “If he does not have authority he should step down because he has failed to protect Julian Assange,” as also Prime Minister Theresa May, she noted.

Especially powerful was her concluding statement where she urged Louie to pass on the information that this was notice of “personal liability of Jeremy Corbyn and he is unfit for office and he will be removed from office as of 24 hours from now if Julian Assange and Sabine McNeill are not released from these prisons, and Theresa May as well.

{Click on graphic for video link to Neelu’s conversation with Jeremy Corbyn’s office on Facebook.]

Australian High Commission Consul Says He Cannot Discuss War-Crimes-Whistleblower Julian Assange Because of the Privacy Act

In a truly astounding conversation with Mr. Gerrard Woodward, a Consul at the Australian High Commission on May 15, Neelu Berry, who introduced herself as a spokesperson for the millions of supporters of Julian Assange was first asked peremptorily if she was calling about a consular matter then told the Consul could not speak with her about this matter because of the Privacy Act.

Neelu corrected him, reminding him that Julian Assange was a whistleblower on mass massacres of civilians who qualified for whistleblower protections for protected witnesses under the Public Interest Disclosure Act and the Criminal Law Act of 1967, where “he is protected from any prosecutions pending the corruption investigations of the Mass Remedy Process of the Equity Monarchy Trusts.”

She also informed him that by refusing to act he was criminally covering up the fact that Julian Assange was actually a “protected witness who is being tortured in a prison in the UK–I have demanded his release and I have demanded the Australian Embassy is responsible for his false persecution.”

The consul sounded affronted when told he was criminally covering up and demanded to know his caller’s name and number and the exact allegations, at which point Ms. Berry, informing him he was threatening and intimidating her, referred him to Edward Ellis, the Equity Lawyer, on whose behalf she said she was speaking, which he did not seem to appreciate.

He also seemed to think it was critical to state that this was not the Australian Embassy but the Australian High Commission, to which Ms. Berry responded, classically: “It doesn’t matter what you call yourself you are failing to do what you’re supposed to do for the Australian citizen.”

Two matters of note: One, the Consul actually stated that if she had “imminent concern” for him being in imminent harm or danger, she needed to report it to the local police, not the Australian High Commission. Is there anyone in the UK or world who is not aware Julian Assange has been imprisoned? How exactly would reporting his situation to the local police—who arrested and assisted in incarcerating him—help? But of course, the Consul was striving to ignore it was Assange being spoken of here, and stated again he could not help with this.

Neelu responded: “You’re just proving to me that you’re subservient to the state terrorists in the UK, USA, and Europe, you’ve just confirmed that to me the Australian Embassy is subservient to criminals.

Two, the consul appeared irate and stated, “As a consul I am posted to the UK and under the Vienna Conventions I am an internationally protected person –and for you to ring up and make allegations against me, I can take action against you.”

Neelu pointed out that he had not provided any public service and was now “threatening (her) with legal action for demanding public service, for demanding the rescue of Julian Assange who is an Australian citizen,” and was proving he was not fit for public service. She also stated, “I hope this call is recorded and sent to the Commissioner for your immediate dismissal” stating “This is a criminal complaint this is a formal complaint, this is a formal complaint against you for embezzling public money.

The nature and tenor of this exchange suggests that the Australian High Commission—or this Consul speaking for them–has little interest currently in protecting Julian Assange. It also establishes that Neelu Berry is an outstanding advocate for humanity, willing and able to speak out for persecuted whistleblowers. Her emphasis on the need for witness protections for Julian Assange is an important one; it’s true, whistleblowers are protected on paper, they need to be protected in fact. Crime to cover up crime—incarcerating a whistleblower who published evidence of war crimes and much else does seem to be a way of drawing attention away from and concealing the massive war crimes of Iraq and Afghanistan wreaked by corrupt UK and US governments — when in reality, more of those actions should be exposed and prosecuted.

This conversation which Neelu notes comprises a complaint about the denial of remedy and public service regarding a whistleblower who should be protected is here:

Many thanks to Neelu Berry for her actions of speaking truth to installed bureaucrats, and her insistence on witness protections for whistleblowers.

(Information on Sabine McNeill above updated 5/18/2019.)

***