Tag Archives: “Targeted Individuals”

Documentary Evidence of Covert Electronic-Weapon and Neurotechnology Use By US Government on Americans Series (2) The Limited Effects Technology (LET) Program Report | JPSG, OOTW/LE Programs, 1996

RAE (Report, Analysis, Op-Ed) | Ramola D | Posted January 30, 2020

Documentary Evidence since 1994 of Covert High-Tech Electronic-Weapon and Neurotechnology Use in Targeted Surveillance, Experimentation, Operations by US Government on Americans: A Series

(1) The DOD/DOJ Memorandum of Understanding on OOTW/LE, 1994

(2) The Limited Effects Technology (LET) Program Report | JPSG, OOTW/LE Programs, 1996

Unremarked in mainstream media, deliberately hidden from wider readership, there have been a series of declassified document FOIA-releases over the past few years which astonishingly reveal many facets of the now-known covert use of electronic-weapon and neurotechnology surveillance, experimentation, weapons-tests, and operations on the American public by various agencies and departments of the US Government and their contractors.

Similarity with Covert Global High-Tech Policing Operations: Similar operations have been unleashed worldwide, as reported extensively at this site and others online earlier. Some documentation in the public domain testifies to this global program, and will be reported more fully here shortly. For now, please see this Twitter thread, which discloses NATO High-Tech Non Lethal Weapon/Neuro Policing operations in Europe and discusses also how Non-Lethal Weapons Testing & Neuro Surveillance have been unleashed inside the USA:

HTML Page: Thread on Non-Lethal DEW Operations in USA, Europe, world, with references to US, NATO documents, articles 

On Twitter: Thread on Non-Lethal DEW Operations in USA, Europe, world, with references to US, NATO documents, articles

This series aims to address the public disclosures in recent FOIA releases of ongoing US Government use of Electronic Weapons and Neurotechnologies on Americans.

“Electronic Weapon” herein refers to the spectrum weapons used in Electronic Warfare as defined by the Department of Defense (DOD) in documents, particularly relates to anti-personnel weapons, includes all labeled as non-lethal-weapon, less-than-lethal weapon, psychotronic weapon, neuroweapon, next generation and emerging technologies, and includes RFID (Radio Frequency IDentification) and BCI (Brain Computer Interface) tech.


(2) The Limited Effects Technology (LET) Program Report | JPSG, OOTW/LE Programs, 1996

PDF: The Limited Effects Technology (LET) Program Report | JPSG, OOTW/LE Programs, 1996

Recent document releases into the public domain include this Limited Effects Technology Program Report (linked above) released by the US Department of Defense on FOIA request on May 31, 2019 to Harun Krasna via Muckrock News, on a multi-document request made in January 2018, where initial notice of delays from the DOD FOI Office (until September 2018) suggesting high volume of responsive records seems to have petered out by May 2019 into return of a single report from DARPA, as their final response letter shows.

This FOIA request was made in January 2018 and asked DOD for “Copies of all research reports, annual reports, and indices of the Joint Program Steering Group (JPSG) as established by the 1994 MOU between the Department of Justice and Department of Defense, dating from 1994 to the present.”

(NOTE: The same request was sent by Mr. Krasna to the Department of Justice in January 2018 and yielded several documents in February 2018, including the 1994 DOD-DOJ MOU reported here earlier. Of note, this writer had also queried the DOJ for this very same 1994 MOU in 2015, and was at that time denied this document, citing “no responsive records” and several claimed exemptions.)

The purpose of this article is to report on the structure, disclosure, and highlights of this JPSG LET Program Report, and offer insight into its content with an eye to more fully informing the American public what the implications and ramifications are regarding the use of anti-personnel military weaponry by domestic law enforcement and military branches on the American public, which is what this JPSG LET Program Report is premised on.

Notable About This Foia-Request Response

  1. DARPA chose to return one single document, after a 1.5 year delay, on this multi-document request for documents dating back (from 2018, time of request) to 24 years. (This should not be found acceptable to the American public—other reports obviously exist and are being withheld; DARPA should be queried again.)

  2. This document is dated 1996; no recent reports were released by DARPA; no notice of the ending of these JPSG joint DOD-DOJ programs has been given in this May 2019 response.

  3. This document is not redacted and is released in full, which implies that the disclosure of technology and policy in this document is acceptable now to DARPA; this is in line with the slow release of information on Non Lethal Weapons, Electronic Warfare, and Neuroweaponry the DOD has made online and in print—via notice of programs, weapons, conferences, articles, and recorded lectures in public-domain documents and sites online–in recent years. However it also implies the JPSG (a DOD-DOJ entity) chooses currently to reveal what’s in this document as applicable to Law Enforcement—which could be a way of corralling tacit public consent to Law Enforcement use by thus publishing notice of this insidious and pernicious weaponry.

  4. It is essential therefore for Media, human and civil rights groups to take note now of the disclosure here and ask further questions, examine implications for all, and delve deeper into what is really at stake with this “Limited Effects Technology Program.”

Basic Structure of This Limited-Effects Technology Report

This 9-page report with the JPSG Defense-Justice logo on the cover and naming David Fields as the Program Manager is divided into the following sections:

Background

Program Thrusts

The Limited Effects Technology Program

Electric Stun Projectile

Laser Surveillance and Dazzler System

Handheld Laser Dazzler

Pyrotechnic Devices

Acoustic Study

Summary

The Section Titled “Background”

Notable from the information in this section titled “Background” is the following:

  1. This Limited Effects Technology Program is acknowledged to be a JPSG program resulting from the MOU from 1994, reported earlier.

  2. The need for such a joint program merging the efforts of Defense and Justice in developing technology applicable to both is being rationalized and legitimized by recourse to stated historical reference of common “need” as technology requirements for both “converge.” This is assertion which is neither specific, transparent, nor explicatory. It is presumption which seeks to hide the fact that what is being discussed here, as the immediate technological lead-up to the 1994 DOD-DOJ MOU, discussed here, demonstrates, are Remote Human Access-and-Control Neuro/Bio Weapons—Non Lethal Weapons and Neurotechnologies (to some extent revealed in “Program Thrusts”), which are arguably highly invasive of bodily and brain privacy, integrity, health, and safety.

Please see the section Some Context to this MOU in Article 1 of this series for historic Non Lethal/EMF Spectrum & Acoustic/Neuro/Bio Weapons-Development background to the MOU and all technology programs the MOU has given rise to.

  1. Examples given of operations sharing this need are “the (Defense) provision of humanitarian assistance, peacekeeping, countering the flow of drugs into the United States, counterterrorism, etc.–and (Justice) law enforcement forces engaged in LE operations.” We are expected to agree that military operations, even “peacekeeping” (which should not be considered a military activity in the first place: weapons cannot “peacekeep,” they subjugate) share a common need for “limited effects” tech i.e., silent Human Access Weapons—which, it should be noted, are not being named as such here. This notion of “need” is presumption, and emblematic of coercion of consent.

  2. The Need to Limit Force or apply only a “minimum amount of force” as primary principle of action is posited here—again without corroboration from real-life where war casualties and police violence abound—as a severe constraint to military and police ability to function. The solution to this false claim (false because it does not seem to be a real-life principle by which either police or military adheres) then funnels down to Non Lethals or Limited-Effects weapons, which are being characterized as force-limiting weapons within a claimed hierarchy of severity which completely ignores the unethical, human-rights-violating aspects of bio-hacking and neuro-hacking weapons, which is what they are (as will be seen shortly). More accurately, this section should be headed The Need to Be Seen to Limit Force, with Public-Image-Boosting Non-Visible Weapons.

  3. Common Threats posit militarized drug-smugglers and terrorists with access to military and LE Tech, which in real-life is made possible (as we understand now from much investigative and whistleblowing reportage including from journalist Gary Webb, LAPD investigator and government whistleblower Michael Ruppert and others) by gun-running, drug-running, and open arms sales by government, military, CIA, mafia, and private-sector alike, which makes this a circular argument: Military and LE fuel the arms/police weapons industry which creates these weapons, as well as tools such as electro-optic imaging devices to aid night vision goggles and Electronic Weapon countermeasures. This circular view also promises endless escalation via blackmarket sales of new weapons. “The criminals have our guns so we need new guns” could go on forever.

  1. Common Missions which name the War on Drugs and the War on Terrorism imply that these are both military campaigns just as much as law enforcement campaigns, which would explain both the military-style DEA and LE SWAT team “drug” raids on homes, terrorizing children and families, and the non-lethal weapons-operations via DOD/USAF weapons-testing contracts on people wrongfully labeled “terrorists” as ensured by the Omnibus Counterterrorism Act of 1995 after the Oklahoma Bombing (a staged insider event, as per whistleblower evidence), and later the Patriot Act of 2001 post 9/11 (another staged insider event, as per much public analysis and testimonial). Yet, in mainstream media and government press releases, these missions are not disclosed as such—the military aspect kept hidden–with much secrecy especially attending the field testing aspect of otherwise openly-disclosed non-lethal weapons testing contracts inside America.

  2. The most significant disclosure from this section comprises notice of 1) the members of the Joint Program Steering Group, as deriving from DARPA, the National Institute of Justice, the FBI, the Bureau of Prisons, and the US Army; 2) their ability to engage at any point in R&D of the weapons mentioned here; 3) the notion that they could participate in “demonstrations” of this technology just as much as developments. Are demonstrations then, what people are reporting today as 24/7 silent microwave/milliwave/infra-red/neurotech weapons operations in their neighborhoods, with use of drones, small planes, satellites, helicopters, zooming cars, parked vans and cars, antennas, cell towers, smart meters, backpack stalkers? (These also appear to be weapons-testing activities, weapons-training activities, and weapons-operations activities.)

  3. Also significant is the information that the Limited Effects Technology Program is only one part of a multi-technology program established by the JPSG to address joint tech priorities of Defense and Justice in 1995. The other tech programs are described in Program Thrusts.

The Section Titled “Program Thrusts”

This section in the LET report discusses the actual technology programs of the JPSG, names certain technologies being developed, tested, and used in training, reveals that most if not all of these are Remote Human Access spectrum and sonic technologies, yet maintains quite some obscurity in disclosing certain of these technologies, for example using vague terms like “communications security technologies.”

It is interesting indeed that this document titled The Limited Effects Technology Program Report in actuality presents information on all JPSG DOD-DOJ programs (or all deemed safe to record), yet focuses only on some LE tech, and uses the same opening Background section to preface notice of all JPSG programs—which implies commonality of context and nature of weaponry, i.e., Non-Lethal, Remote Human Access/Control (as will be seen below).

Significant, in this section, are the following.

  1. The JPSG Program—the most essential program ensuring DOD-DOJ liaison re. “advanced technology development” as per the 1994 DOD-DOJ MOU—focuses on 7 technology areas, which, on close perusal, cover quite a bit of territory. This program in other words is being used to develop, test, and demonstrate sophisticated and secretive wireless, remote, radiation, EMF spectrum, acoustic, bio-communications detection, monitoring, tracking, and communications technologies with major implications for all individuals and the entire urban environment.

  2. The first six program areas are presented only in summary, with slightly more elaboration of the Limited Effects Technology program which titles the report. Notably, even this seventh section is not comprehensive in its coverage of the LET it purports to cover: the devices highlighted do not comprise the whole of the LET program, only that portion DARPA is willing to put in a document clearly intended for eventual public-release (after 25 years!) into the public-domain, which has happened now. (More on this subject in the LET Program section below.) 

  3. Concealed Weapons Detection:

Concealed- Weapons-Detection technologies the JPSG reports here it seeks to develop are “unobtrusive” —read, concealable in plain sight–systems which can detect weapons of various kinds, including those with little to no metallic content, from over 9 meters—27 feet, width of a couple rooms–away. Initial efforts were to cover stationary devices—but clearly this 1996 wording suggests mobile devices would also be developed.

Actual detection technologies in process then in 1996 included:

3.1 An X-ray sensor: which refers to sensor technology; X-ray sensors are variously used in medical/dental radiography and in scanning systems as in airport scanners for people or baggage.

They are possibly also used in Backscatter X-ray technology as reportedly carried in NYPD vans, about which NYPD, although sued by ACLU, was protected by the NY Appeals Court from divulging much about, while companies contracting with the US Government to produce “Z-Backscatter-Vans” offer more information on the X-ray imaging of vehicles they do;

3.2. Combined passive millimeter wave and infra-red sensors: which are sensors used in scanning systems which can detect objects by their relative millimeter wave glow or infra-red heat signature profile, literally see through clothes better than X-rays and give rise to images highly invasive of personal privacy. Both millimeter wave sensors and infra-red sensors are energy sensors, detecting bio-field energy and thermal signatures; the distance from which such sensors can be used is a matter for further research. Some infra-red sensors are used in cameras mounted on aircraft and satellites.

Interestingly, a document online from the Air Force Research Lab, written by an apparent contractor, Decision-Science Applications Inc., found online after the bulk of this article was written, reports in 1998 on Concealed Weapons Detection programs run on grants from the NIJ and DARPA--which suggests a possible connection to these JPSG programs, while revealing that NIJ and DARPA were funding the Air Force Research Lab, which in turn funded a private contractor, in a chain of inter-agency connections–and points to sensor technologies being intentionally developed to penetrate clothing.

Concealed Weapon Detection Program, AFRL Report/https://apps.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a359699.pdf

https://www.millivision.com/technology.html

Camera with Infra-red sensor showing heat signatures/https://www.wisegeek.com/what-is-infrared-imaging.htm#

3.3 Combined ultrasound and radar sensors: which translates to:

a) Ultrasonic sensors: the use of high-frequency ultrasonic pulsed transmitter/receiver sensors to send and receive waves in echo from materials to determine their composition or proximity (used in a variety of industries including healthcare, agriculture, target-tracking of animals or humans from UAVs or manned aircraft, water-level sensing, car or obstacle detection), used in short-range, up to 10-meters application;

b) Radar sensors used in short and long range (up to 100 meters) object detection, tracking target movement, collision avoidance in cars, and to detect materials with guided wave radar or special antennas which ultrasonics may miss, such as softer, powdery, foamier, dustier materials, using either Doppler pulses or frequency-modulated continuous wave radar.

https://www.maxbotix.com

3.4 Low Frequency Magnetic sensor: Magnetic sensors use a variety of physical effects related to magnetism, such as eddy current sensing, measuring small relative changes in earth’s magnetic field created by variations in magnetic material, to detect flaws in metal, movement of metals (as in weapons) carried on a person’s body, movement of large metallic objects such as cars, etc. Magnetic sensors detect metal carried on persons when radar alone, stopped by metallic-walls or reflective insulation barriers, is not enough.

Low magnetic fields relate to biofields; low frequency magnetic sensors can pick up low frequency (ELF, ULF body resonance frequency below 10 Hz, below 30 KHz) magnetic fields as indicated in rise and fall of chest cavity; this capacity is used in earthquake life-detection and through-wall surveillance in combination with radar sensors.

Then there are super-conducting quantum interference devices (SQUIDs) which also pick up very low emfs, such as brain ELFs.

MEMS and nanosensors using thin film magnetic technology also exist. (On this subject: Radar sensors used in prisons are taking recourse to radar tagging to distinguish inmates from  guards—implying the use of nanosensors in tracking, which appear to be of different kinds.)

Through-the-wall surveillance technologies/https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/07_01.pdf

Squid/Wikipedia

Finally, this section’s disclosure on then-current use notes that the X-Ray sensor was being “demonstrated”–meaning, operated–in a correctional institution in California—a prison or juvenile detention center. The use of sensor and imaging technologies in correctional and detention institutions must be thoroughly investigated, in relation to the bioeffect harms from such technology usage.

What Is Not Being Explicitly Stated But Implied In This Entire Section?

  1. These sensor technologies are being tested on populations as per the 1994 DOD-DOJ MOU in joint military-police programs, which means they are being used silently and experimentally on people.

  1. All sensor technologies, unless passive, require emission as well as reception of signal. This means that people—unwittingly, without being informed—are being subjected to X-rays, ultrasound radiation, millimeter wave technologies, radar technologies, ULFs, ELFS, and magnetic fields, at short-range and long-range, close-in and remote, ostensibly for weapons-detection testing purposes, in any number and type of environments, including but not limited to airports, train stations, public areas, and private homes. These technologies could be directed at people from inside buildings and homes, from inside cars, pickups, trucks, vans, from mountings in public locations, from parked vehicles in parking-lots and from moving vehicles while driving.

  1. Sensor technologies being tested at short and long range include low frequency magnetic sensors which track biofields, breathing activity, body resonance emfs, and low frequency brainwaves, plausibly using superconducting quantum interference and tunneling technologies, and comprising earthquake-life-detection monitoring or through-wall-surveillance as described in various other public documents, and plausibly also Remote Neural Monitoring or neurosurveillance, of the kind spoken about 28 years ago in the ex-NSA employee John St. Clair Akwei lawsuit against the NSA.

  1. As in the found document Silent Weapons for Quiet Wars, which posits the surreptitious use of socio-economic weapons of degradation to disable and disarm entire populations without their conscious awareness, the surreptitious testing of sensor technologies on populations is essentially the leveling of silent military spectrum weapons technologies on the bodies of citizens, without their knowing.

  1. The surreptitious leveling and usage of silent military spectrum weapons of bodily and brain monitoring, assault, and modification is precisely what thousands of reporting victims of EMF/Neuro DEW crimes worldwide—often labeled and dismissed as Targeted Individuals—are currently reporting, both inside the USA and out. Could it be that the testing of sensor technologies in concealed weapons detection constitutes one aspect of this surreptitious assault on citizens?

  1. Factually speaking, the disclosure in this document along with the disclosure in the 1994 DOD-DOJ MOU that these technologies are being tested is, at minimum, evidence that invisible, spectrum technologies are being operated and tested on the bodies of people, from a distance and from close-by, exactly as thousands of highly credentialled and credible people– often labeled as “Targeted Individuals” and falsely characterized for credibility-disappearance as “Mentally Ill” by mainstream Govt-propaganda-pushing media–are reporting.

4.Geolocation/Navigation/Communications:

Three aspects to location, ID, and tracking technology are being covered in these JPSG programs, as delineated in this section on Geo-Location/Navigation/Communications in the LET Program Report:

4.1 Locating or precision-finding, precision-targeting of specific people, objects, or vehicles—this implicates GPS (Global Positioning Satellite) and other satellite technologies, including handheld satellites, for GPS-tracking of RFID human/object tags, cell phones; as well as human/object RFID/other, Nano/Micro tagging technologies to facilitate GPS-tracking, in other words, Surveillance and Tagging-for-Surveillance technologies.

4.2 Identifying or pinpointing identity of individuals & things—this suggests Identifying Biometric Surveillance & Tagging-for-ID- Surveillance: Facial/Gait/Iris/Fingerprint/Body/DNA/Other Recognition Surveillance; Unique RFID Tagging (Nano/micro biosensors & object tags) & WBANS (Wireless Body Area Networks) for Identification. Again, Surveillance and Tagging-for-Surveillance technologies. Involves Biometric Data Collection.(Law Enforcement has long been involved in this.)

4.3 Monitoring or tracking movement of people and things—this suggests Surveillance & Tagging-for-Surveillance: Audio/Visual Surveillance using microphones and cameras; Cyber Surveillance of computers; Through-Wall Surveillance with RF/ULF/Magnetic sensor technologies; Medical/Health monitoring & continuous detection of RF/other Implants & WBANs using Radar, Wifi; ISR (Intelligence, Surveillance, Reconnaissance) surveillance using Radar from drones, spy/commercial planes, satellites, ground vehicles; Tagging-for-Surveillance: Unique RF/Spectrum & Nano/Micro tagging (correctional, medical) technologies, CCTL—Continuous Clandestine Tracking and Locating (military, intelligence) technologies; Sensor technologies (as discussed in the previous Concealed Weapons-Detection section). Again, Surveillance and Tagging-for-Surveillance technologies. (USAF, AFRL, USMC are currently conducting Non Lethal Weapons tests and ISR tests using these.)

Notably, “reduction of power consumption” is mentioned as a DARPA interest in tracking technologies; this might account for the increased development of passive or inert nanosensors which can be activated or energized by energy signals sent to them, rather than relying on inbuilt battery packs.

4.4 The two JPSG efforts mentioned here include Tagging, as discussed above, very slightly referenced with this line about tiny wireless sensors, termed “devices,” notably marked “modular” as in implantable WBANs, which do indeed have modules or nodes in a network. These are not just object-tagging devices, they are human-tagging devices.

Military tracking of objects and humans using sensors

The fully-implanted and centrally-monitored human

Sensors at level of cell, molecule, DNA

And this is not a slight JPSG effort at all: Tagging and sensor technologies constitute multi-billion dollar businesses and are intimately linked to all aspects of Geo-Location, Navigation, and Communications, as discussed above. Again, here too, DARPA should be more definitively and minutely questioned about these tagging technologies and how they are being used inside America, on Americans—especially since thousands of Americans, as also people worldwide, are reporting violative, non-consensual RFID micro and nano implants in their bodies.  

4.5 The first JPSG effort mentioned here, Soldier 911, is mentioned in DARPA literature as an emergency radio to help find soldiers in crisis.

However from the description in the LET report, it also sounds like a handheld satellite linked in to an emergency response network, functioning as a device to locate, identify, and track “the movement of individuals and vehicles,” which, if an additional feature (undisclosed in DARPA literature) on this device, is only possible through the use of pre-tagging of said individuals and vehicles with sensor and tagging technologies–or the use of SIGINT Remote Neural Monitoring, as described in the John St. Clair Akwei lawsuit vs the NSA in 1992, in the case of humans.

5. Sniper DetectionSniper Detection systems as mentioned here were intended to be of various kinds, including manually-portable, bodily-worn, and vehicle-mounted.

These systems, as stated above in the LET Program report–being explored and tested publicly from 1996 on–involve sensors: acoustic sensors, infra-red sensors, and integrated infrared-acoustic and infrared-laser sensors.

Interestingly, this section appears to be discussing technologies for detection of actual gunshot or sniper fire—not non-lethal fire, not spectrum-weapon-related shots. However the detection technologies themselves are spectrum technologies.

Brief research of these detection technology sensors indicates that acoustic, infra-red, and laser technologies are being developed and used by militaries to determine with pin-point precision the direction and location of fire from a weapon after a first shot. Sensors today are becoming highly sophisticated with universities (working on military grants, partnering with private firms) also involved in developing bio-mimetic systems of detection, using neural network learning and studying how bats and dolphins process sound and vibration.

It is notable that this program of Sniper Detection has been included as a JPSG program in this Limited-Effects Technology report as one of the multi-technology program thrusts of the JPSG.

JPSG, we recall, is the Joint Program Steering Group formed by the 1994 DOD-DOJ MOU employing parties from both Defense and Justice in mutually-relevant matters and projects of security and law enforcement, OOTW and LE, intending to jointly develop and test “advanced technologies” of common interest.

Some Undisclosed Conclusions

1. Could it be therefore that Sniper Detection is related to matters of Mass Shooters, the phenomenon of supposedly crazed “lone gunmen”–plausibly mind-control victims of MK ULTRA RHIC-EDOM (radio hypnosis intra-cerebral electronic dissolution of memory) radio-hypnosis—shooting up people in random settings, as well as the Live Action Drills with Active Shooters run by the Department of Homeland Security?

If so, this offers a connection not merely between the DOD and DOJ but also with the DHS; all three departments are in some way involved in these sniper detection programs.

This also offers a connection to War on Terror programs and funding, since mass shooters are characterized internally as Domestic Terrorists—even if their “Manchurian Candidate” creation is by covert agencies in Defense/Justice/DHS/CIA, undercover of Live Action Drills, for purposes of driving Agenda 21/2030 Gun Control agendas, as is often surmised by many analysts.

2. Further, the JPSG efforts noted here to develop sensors, in its inclusion of biomimetic systems and neuroscience research, now used in sniper detection in the field, may well involve the use of neuroprosthetics, as indicated by the acknowledged use of cochlear implants in medical and neuroscience research over several decades by a Defense contractor, Biomimetic Systems, Inc.

3. It is plausible therefore—and a matter for further investigation—that the non-consensual use and implantation of cochlear and other neurological implants—which numerous citizens have come forward to report, over the last three to four decades–for the study of neural networks and auditory processes has accompanied the JPSG efforts in this area of Sniper Detection.

6. Information Technology:While this section is quite opaque, a few conclusions can be drawn:

  1. The JPSG states that it is addressing the needs for instant and secure communications needs in LE and Military by taking advantage of advances in civilian and govt-sponsored IC technologies. This would not however require a separate program to do so, unless undisclosed advances were being acquired.

  1. These advances, hinted at but not specified, could include Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, autonomous systems, cybernetics, cognitive computing, Internet of Things, Internet of Humans, lesser-known Neuro/Bio-communications technologies such as V2K (Voice to Skull) and Synthetic Telepathy, Hive Minds and Brain Nets revealed by whistleblowers like Richard Alan Miller and Robert Duncan (while some brain projects are openly revealed by public-domain DARPA information and known to exist via academic/government focus in US and worldwide), robotics, nanotechnology, the miniaturization of electronics, quantum computing, and other aspects of modern ICT which are left unnamed here. Simulating all 100 billion neural connections of brain on future supercomputers/https://www.kurzweilai.net/new-algorithm-will-allow-for-simulating-neural-connections-of-entire-brain-on-future-exascale-supercomputers

    Brainternet-Connecting a Brain to the Internet as an IOT device/Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LSdN–axYbA

This possibility—of such undisclosed advanced projects being part of the IT program sketchily noted here–is once more underlined by the opaque disclosure of “innovative exploitation” of existing ICT infrastructure intended in the creation of interagency crisis management systems.

  1. Communications security technology” in common parlance includes encryption and authentication technologies which today include biometrics and RFID microchips, but is not further specified in this section.


Considering that the rollout of biometrics (iris, fingerprint, face, voice recognition) at airports and borders is being overseen by TSA, a part of DHS, and that DNA is collected by LE at jails and detention centers, it can be safely concluded that any joint program of Defense and Justice in this area would indeed encompass all of these certainly exploitative technologies.

  1. “Sharing information among agencies” points to shared information from different databases collected by different parties, including DNA collection databases managed by LE, and recently exposed for massive privacy violations. Police databases are apparently highly insecure, and corrupt officers have made it a practice to sell databases to private companies for thousands of dollars, a practice revealed by recent news articles, including by Chief Jones on Ramola D Reports.

Information Sharing across Law Enforcement/RAND report/https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR645.html

Law enforcement investigators seek out private DNA databases/Mashable

Police Are Collecting DNA From People Without Telling Them/Futurism

Police use of surveillance technology raises privacy concerns/MintPressNews

Across US, police officers abuse confidential databases/AP

Agencies Behaving Badly: Government Surveillance and Privacy Act Violations/Jurist

Ramola D Reports| Report # 120: Retired Police Chief Daymond Jones on Policing in America Today

  1. To conclude, the opacity of this section on Information Technology appears to hide much. It is entirely possible that non-consensual, clandestine implantation of RFIDs, as part of developments in Military/LE cybernetics, telemetry, biometrics, neuroinformatics in “innovative exploitation” of communications security technologies, is being executed by this JPSG program—as reported by high numbers of Americans. Again, this presents therefore an issue to be examined further with DARPA and the Justice Department.

7. Personnel Armor:This section, like the Sniper Detection section, seems to pertain explicitly to lethal weapons and not non-lethal or spectrum weapons.

However, it notes that lethal weapons threats—bullets from rifles and handguns—affect OOTW and LE operations both.

Protection from rifle bullets via advanced lightweight body armor in the course of OOTW/LE operations of any kind appears to be the focus here; the implication appears to be that such operations could involve rifle threats; it is possible therefore that this pertains, as also the Sniper Detection section, to mass shooters and the weapons (assault weapons, rifles) some have used, as well as to regular LE activities, which do involve lethal exertion of force, warranted or unwarranted, in situations of gun violence.

It’s interesting that this has been designated an area for Defense-Justice collaboration; plenty of Defense contractors exist who research and develop body armor, as any cursory inquiry into the market shows. LE also has a dedicated market producing police gear. For the JPSG to enter this arena suggests a corralling of new Federal funds perhaps, or some kind of development of new technology – countermeasure shielding for spectrum technology? – that is not being fully disclosed here. Note that what is being stated above as aspects of this program are presented as inclusions (“efforts include”), not all-encompassing and exclusive.

8.Biomedical Technology:

This is also a relatively opaque section suggesting telemedicine application in penitentiaries and OOTW rescue operations, which implies audio-video consultation and data transmission of medical detail perhaps but does not expand on the suggestions implicit in the label of “biomedical technology” which could include medical telemetry, meaning implants, body area networks, biosensors, and implanted biomonitors, at nano- and micro-levels, to aid in remote patient monitoring and other telehealth initiatives.

New Atlas article, 2018/https://newatlas.com/profusa-health-monitoring-biosensors/53870/

To reiterate, the incidence of such biomedical implants found to have been non-consensually implanted in what can only be understood to be undisclosed and covert human experimentation and tracking operation projects involving variably, academic, medical, and military/Intelligence personnel has been reported in large numbers by Americans as also people worldwide. It is possible therefore that the opacity of the language in this section obscures the larger truths of such non-consensual implantation being part and parcel of a plethora of telehealth processes and technologies being tested silently on people.

This latter possibility in fact has increasingly been reported by people experiencing invasive radar activation of non-consensual implants within contexts of seemingly being probed in public by a rotating army of stalkers masquerading as community monitors and healthcare workers.

9. Limited Effects Technologies:


Significant, from this brief introduction (further screenshotted below):

  1. As noted earlier, this section, which titles the report and occupies 5 of the 9 pages of this report yet details only one portion of the multi-technology JPSG program.
  2. Further, its detailing is incomplete, as indicated by the language in the opening section.

  1. Crowd control and deterrence devices being studied and developed under this LET program are presented here as innocuous, benign, and needed—as per a nonspecific claim of need. There is no indication however of actual studies to establish they are such, or actually “eyesafe” or “less lethal” as stated.

A significant fact to note is the language referring to “sponsoring” and “funding” programs and projects to develop these limited-effects technologies, which means JPSG is handing out grants and contracts to Defense/LE contractor companies to develop these weapons. This might well be the protocol by which all JPSG programs work, and could explain the AFRL contract with Decision-Sciences Applications, Inc. on NIJ and DARPA grants, mentioned above in the Concealed Weapons Detection section. 

Electric Stun Projectile

This “effort” relates to a physical projectile using wireless, gas, or “conventionally propelled” means intended to electrically shock and stun a human target, as Tasers also do. Hardly a “Limited Effect” weapon, this is a stun gun intended to be used as a  shock-defence if a soldier or LE officer is attacked. Note that the intent is still incapacitation, blunt trauma, high impact force–but using an electrical charge, not a high-velocity bullet. 

Developed in San Diego, tested on the Marine Corps, probably rolled out and in use now, post 1997. Notice that the photograph is blacked out almost and reveals nothing. DARPA is not going out of its way to provide clear information here.

A look into Jaycor, the company, online, now subsumed into Titan Corporation, a larger Defense contractor engaged in large-scale DEW, satellite, and navigational systems manufacture, reveals their interest in other counter-personnel stun-gun non-lethal weapons and crowd-control devices. Titan Corporation is therefore now manufacturing both large-scale DEWs to take out battleships and smaller-scale non-lethal weapons (being characterized here as “Limited-Effects”) to take out human beings, or fell them for a while–no doubt with damages, as “crowd-control.”

Laser Surveillance and Dazzler System

While blinding lasers were banned by the European Parliament in 1995, the use of lasers to dazzle and disorient human targets did not stop, as BOSS, developed by the US Air Force’s Phillips Lab in Albuquerque, New Mexico demonstrates. It is interesting that this surveillance and dazzler system was developed for and presumably funded by the JPSG at an Air Force laboratory.

From Defense Review, 2005/Laser_Battlefield_Optical_Surveillance_System_BOSS

Notably, this system 1) involves the use of infra-red thermal sensors to find targets plus lasers to dazzle targets, 2) can be applied remotely from a considerable distance, and 3) intends both a psychological effect in alerting targeted individuals to being targeted by way of Show-of-Force bright illumination and the physical effect of deleterious uber-brighting or dazzling of the target’s eyes.

Again, not exactly Limited Effects, but labeled as such.

Finally, it is notable that further integration of this “Limited Effect” optical sensor-and-weapon system with acoustic sniper detection systems already developed under JPSG (as indicated above also by the AFRL/Decision-Sciences Applications 1998 Report) was also being explored in 1996, further evidence that sensor and “non-lethal” spectrum technologies were being developed and tested by the JPSG for multiple uses.

Handheld Laser Dazzler

Also developed by the US Air Force’s Phillips Lab, the handheld laser dazzler—whether portable in a backpack or camouflaged as a flashlight—demonstrates that non-lethal energy weapons, including lasers, promising limited-effects were being made by the JPSG on a smaller scale, at lesser power, for purposes of portability and ease of use.

Portable Handheld Laser Dazzlers/https://www.tech-lasers.com/dazzlers/portable

Again, as per the 1994 DOD-DOJ MOU, the non-lethal Spectrum/Acoustic sensor-and-weapon technologies being developed by the joint Defense-Justice partnership here were being tested—are being tested, have been tested for the past 25 years—and “demonstrated” on real targets.

Pyrotechnic Devices

The publishing of flash-bang devices designed to fast-bloom-smoke, dazzle, whistle, and other such is the one consistent element that disclosure on non-lethal weapons has maintained. Unwilling to speak openly of radar and sonic devices with silent and invisible physical bio-effects on humans, literature from the Joint Non Lethal Weapons Program has not refrained from pointing openly to these dazzle and vibrate devices, in obvious attempts to misdirect focus away from the far deadlier bio-hacking and neuro-hacking devices of non-lethal sensor technologies and neuroweapons.

Acoustic Study

This is evidence that infra-sound (below 20 Hz, the threshold of human hearing) weaponry for crowd-control was being researched in 1996 and tested on people, specifically to determine the biological effects of such transmissions, and explore means of incapacitating individuals for crowd-control purposes with infra-sound.

Prior information, available online, shows that infrasound had long been known to produce bio-effects and brain-effects–nausea, disorientation, brain fog–in humans, since Dr. Gavreau’s discoveries and experiments with infrasound in the 1950s, and efforts had already been made to create devices and systems to use infrasound in a weaponized way against humans, as in the published US Patent 3612211, screenshotted below.  

A salient point to note is that infrasound weapons (like other emerging weapons technologies) had been reviewed in the 1970s by United Nations conferences on disarmament, and efforts had been made, particularly by the Soviet Union, to halt the development of all such new weapons then seen as weapons of mass destruction. The US and UK were prominent naysayers to this plan in 1978 at the Conference of the Committee on Disarmament, where Hungary presented a paper on infrasound weapons and their effects. Now it appears that not only were such weapons not halted in development between 1978 and 1996, DARPA was arranging in 1996 for further development and testing of these dangerous acoustic weapons, long known to harm human bodies and brains.

The Section Titled Summary

While this document has touched on major program areas of the JPSG, its title and detail elaborate the more obvious flash-bang aspects of the “Limited-Effects Technology” program, while the Summary remains opaque. Notable however is the casual mention of “corrections” being aligned with the main parties involved in these joint programs, as in “military, law enforcement, and corrections” as the primary “user communities” being awarded “new, more effective tools,” with little description or specificity on the nature or kind of tools, and no summation of the high points of this document.

However, some definite conclusions can be reached regarding this entire document, in addition to all noted above at end of sections.

CONCLUSIONS

  1. DARPA returned this one 1996 document to a multi-document request on JPSG programs begun 25 years ago, after 25 years.

  2. This is not a fully disclosive document; much is being obscured, summarized, glossed over.

  3. The Limited-Effects Technology program is only one of several JPSG programs mentioned in this document.

  4. All these JPSG programs need to be understood, as stated, as deriving from the 1994 DOD-DOJ MOU which announced the testing and demonstration of “advanced technologies.” That MOU followed on the heels of a classified Non-Lethal Weapons conference in 1993, and several decades of development and study of Non-Lethal technologies and “Psycho-Corrective” Neurotechnologies. (See Background & Context, MOU.)

  5. The need to limit force is reiterated as primary motivator in bringing DOD and DOJ together in a quest to find and use common modalities in wars on drugs and terrorism—a need which points directly to Anti Personnel Non Lethal Weapons—which are EMF Spectrum and Acoustic Weapons.

These JPSG OOTW/LE programs therefore are definitely focused on Non Lethal Weapons, that is, EMF Spectrum and Acoustic Weapons, which, by nature of the physical bio-effects they have on humans’ bodies and brains, are also Bioweapons and Neuroweapons—not mentioned as such in this document, but elsewhere disclosed, as for instance, by Debra Schnelle at the 2019 Blue Ribbon Emerging Biodefense Conference as Neuro Cognitive Weapons, by Dr. James Giordiano as Neuroweapons in numerous lectures, and discussed at length in the declassified US Army document Bio-Effects of Selected Non-Lethal Weapons as Bioweapons and Neuroweapons, with intended damage to the human body and human brain.

  1. The JPSG comprises members from DARPA, US Army, National Institutes of Justice, Bureau of Prisons, and the FBI. Stands to reason that each of these institutions therefore—and their overseers, the Department of Defense and the Justice Department and leaders, the Secretary of Defense Mark Esper and the Attorney-General William Barr–is fully cognizant of the JPSG programs developing and testing sensor-and-weapon technologies on the streets of America described in this report.

  2. Further, each of these institutions is being permitted to participate in all aspects of the RDA (Research, Development, Acquisition) spectrum, meaning it is acknowledged that these non lethal neuro/bio EMF/acoustic technologies can be tested and demonstrated by the Bureau of Prisons (on prisoners), FBI, and NIJ (on watchlisted citizens? on unwitting members of the public at airports, train stations, hospitals, stores, roadways?) just as much as by DARPA and the US Army (on military personnel? On civilians near military bases? on “indefinite detainees”?) and just as much as jointly developed.

  3. Concealed weapons-detection technologies being developed indicate that people—unwittingly, without being informed—are being subjected to X-rays, ultrasound radiation, millimeter wave technologies, radar technologies, ULFs, ELFS, and magnetic fields, at short-range and long-range, close-in and remote, ostensibly for weapons-detection testing purposes, in any number and type of environments, including but not limited to airports, train stations, public areas, and private homes. These technologies could also be directed at people from inside buildings and homes, from cars, pickups, trucks, vans, from mountings in public locations, from parked vehicles in parking-lots and from moving vehicles while driving.

  4. Sensor technologies for weapons-detection being tested at short and long range include low frequency magnetic sensors which plausibly track biofields, breathing activity, body resonance emfs, and low frequency brainwaves, using superconducting quantum interference and tunneling technologies, and comprising through-wall earthquake-life-detection monitoring, remote neural monitoring, and the surveillance and monitoring of brain states and emotion states.

  5. GPS Tracking and identification technologies being tested and developed imply tagging-for-surveillance sensor technologies inclusive of RFID microchips, WBANs, biosensors, and nanosensors, and include monitoring and surveillance technologies such as different kinds of radar being tested and operated under ISR and military/Air Force Non Lethal Weapons Testing programs.

  6. Sensor technologies being developed for sniper detection, based on biomimetic systems, could include the use of cochlear implants and other neuroprosthetics in the study of auditory and neurological processes, as indicated by companies developing such systems.

  7. Innovative exploitation” of IT communications infrastructure & new technology here could include hive-minding AI projects, nanobots, Brain Nets, quantum computing, and synthetic telepathy, among other undisclosed technologies, involving non-consensual, clandestine implantation of RFIDs and BCI Tech, as well as biometrics/DNA data collection and sharing—as part of developments in Military/LE cybernetics and telemetry, and as reported today by high numbers of Americans.

  8. Personnel armor” being developed as a JPSG program could include research and development of countermeasure shielding for spectrum and acoustic non-lethal bio/neuroweapons, although not expressly stated here.

  9. Biomedical technology initiatives involving telemedicine and telehealth could include medical telemetry, meaning implants, body area networks, biosensors, and implanted biomonitors, of nano- and micro-levels, to aid in remote patient monitoring and other telehealth initiatives. Non-consensual implantation may well be part and parcel of a plethora of telehealth processes and technologies being tested silently on people, in prisons, as noted, and elsewhere.

  10. Limited-effects technologies being developed and tested under JPSG include electric stun projectiles, dazzling laser devices of both mountable and portable kinds, and other crowd-control devices.

  11. Acoustic devices using infrasound to produce physical effects for use in crowd-control to “incapacitate” was being studied at an Air Force Laboratory—and possibly being field-tested and “demonstrated” on populations to provide the needed “hard evidence” mentioned here.

  1. Factually speaking, the disclosure in this document along with the disclosure in the 1994 DOD-DOJ MOU that these technologies are being tested is, at minimum, incontrovertible evidence that invisible, spectrum technologies are being operated and tested on the bodies of people, from a distance and from close-by, exactly as thousands of highly credentialled and credible people– often labeled as “Targeted Individuals” and characterized for credibility-disappearance as “mentally ill” by mainstream Govt-propaganda-pushing media –are reporting.

  2. This document’s disclosure therefore—notwithstanding that much of its details have been withheld–is profoundly important in establishing that non-lethal weapons and sensor technologies, specifically EMF Spectrum and Acoustic Bio/Neuro Weapons have been developed, demonstrated and tested on populations under the aegis of joint Defense-Justice JPSG programs, since 1994.

Related

Documentary Evidence since 1994 of Covert High-Tech Electronic-Weapon and Neurotechnology Use in Targeted Surveillance, Experimentation, Operations by US Government on Americans: (1) The DOD/DOJ Memorandum of Understanding on OOTW/LE, 1994

Public Disclosure on Neuro Weapons and Neuro Technologies In Use Today

Extrajudicial Targeting Technologies (Weapons Use/Tests/Abuse); Biometric Surveillance, Non Lethal Weapons, Neuroweapons

False-Claim of Mental Illness in the Microwave, Millimeter Wave, Other “Non Lethal” Weapons Testing on Citizens in USA & Worldwide

Ramola D/No Longer True: The NSA “Isn’t Getting Violent Internally in the US”: Millions Today in US Are Targeted with RF/Scalar/Sonic Weapons, Nano Weapons, Neuro Weapons, Chem/Bio Weapons

Suzie Dawson and #Unity4J: Legitimate Questions, Unrevealed Allegiances, and the Public Media Ignoring of Deadly EMF/Neuro DEW Targeting

–Ramola D/Posted 12/27/2018

A few days ago, a young emerging writer, activist and friend, Cassandra alerted me on Twitter that Suzie Dawson of #Unity4J fame and “Being Julian Assange” fame, Occupy, Internet Party, #ContraSpin and #DecipherYou fame, and other journalistic work of renown, whom I have interviewed (in a 3-hour long interview where I was charmed and impressed by her warmth and brilliance and undoubtedly essential work in digging through some of Snowden’s documents as exposed by The Intercept and unearthing nuggets of importance regarding the NSA, the Five Eyes huddling of fascist global uber-surveillance, and other Intel agency shenanigans the world over), had blocked her on Twitter. She sent me the tweet that had got her blocked, which she’d responded to in a thread, where she had posted some of my article-links as well, and noted to me that she had no idea why she had been blocked for this tweet and this tweet thread.

Well, a brief glance yielded nothing to me in the way of clarity or speculation either as to why this particular tweet or tweet thread had been blocked.

So I resolved to address this in my own tweets later that day when I had a chance, and did so that night, posting my thoughts in a tweet as I retweeted Cassandra’s tweet thread.

This is the tweet by Suzie Dawson to which Cassandra responded to, after which she was blocked.

This is the full tweet by Cassandra in response to Suzie Dawson’s tweet which she reports got her blocked by Suzie Dawson:

Cassandra’s tweet thread reporting the blocking:

(I screenshot the rest of the tweets in Cassandra’s tweet-thread reporting Suzie Dawson’s blocking below).

Cassandra’s tweet-thread with links to articles can be read here: https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1075607040263905281.html

My first response on Twitter to the blocking of Cassandra by Suzie Dawson on Twitter:

Interestingly, Suzie Dawson responded, and what followed was a conversation on Twitter that appeared to me increasingly misframed and misdirected by Suzie Dawson, which I sought to correct, to no avail, as a series of censuring and increasingly repressive tweets were sent my way.

Suzie Dawson responded to my tweet above as below. My response to her follows. I will replay the conversation below in screenshots, pardon occasional repetition.

 

This nasty crack from a #Unity4J journo who along with others has spent quite some time in articles and tweets rebutting and countering smear campaigns on Julian Assange lately from mainstream journos and publications like Barrett Brown and The Guardian seems amazingly shortsighted and thoughtless to me, particularly since the recent podcasts Suzie Dawson references here were made to counter false allegations and accusations, severely defaming and slanderous, made by a former colleague who bears all the marks of being an infiltrator, impostor, and counterintelligence operative–quite possibly from an overarching ZioNazi  or GCHQ JTRIG faction infiltrating activist groups to mow down legitimate activism, advocacy, and journalism on the vital subject of uber-targeting and extreme persecution of targets with EMF/Neuro DEWs.

Suzie Dawson blocked me shortly after that tweet above. The next morning I noticed a tweet in response to this last one from @BBFromPA, whom I don’t know and have never communicated with. I responded however to her chastising and misframing and deliberately obtuse tweet–which, like Suzie Dawson’s tweets, persisted in distorting what I had said on this thread from the very beginning.

Just for the record, my support of #Unity4J and Julian Assange, whose work with Wikileaks I have, like many other writers, activists, and journalists found invaluable in helping inform the world what secretive governments and militaries are really doing, has never been in question. I too had been dazzled at the promise of the #Unity4J interviews and vigils and covered some of the opening interviews, here, praising the work Suzie Dawson and #Unity4J were doing: https://steemit.com/unity4j/@ramolad/unity4j-normalized-captivity-of-leading-whistleblower-journalist-who-s-helped-expand-humanity-s-consciousness

I have discussed the human rights ramifications of a journalist held in virtual captivity and curbed from open Internet communication while his work in releasing important information and videos has helped raise the consciousness of humanity with documentary filmmaker and Decency founder and activist Jeff Godwin:

While praising the work of #Unity4J in bringing together the valuable voices of  journalists, whistleblowers, and political commentators in supporting Julian Assange, I have also discussed the need for the US Government to back down from its stance of wishing to indict and prosecute Assange and possibly step forward to have him assist as a National Security witness, an idea put forward by NSA whistleblower Karen Melton-Stewart:

I re-published Jude Fleming’s letter to the Australian High Commission: Jude Fleming: Letter to the Australian High Commission, Ottawa/Free Assange

Three years ago, in October 2015, in keeping with the ethos of my site, The Everyday Concerned Citizen, which started off as a solutions journalism and petitions-posting site  (and has since morphed into an investigative journalism media site and blog) I started a petition for Julian Assange to receive medical care:  https://www.change.org/p/david-cameron-mp-tell-the-uk-govt-they-must-permit-julian-assange-a-hospital-visit-for-mri-treatment

I posted notice of this petition on my site and asked people to sign and speak out: Julian Assange, WikiLeaks Being Denied Medical Care/Please Speak Out

Here I wrote: “Please speak out and ask the Prime Minister of Britain to step up and act humanely and responsibly in this situation and immediately make arrangements to permit Julian Assange to visit a hospital for the medical diagnosis and treatment he needs. To all intents and purposes, he is being held as a political prisoner in the UK, and the UK would be contravening the Geneva Convention and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and every national and international coda of human rights by denying basic medical care to a prisoner.

In his unwavering pursuit of truth, as Julian Assange and WikiLeaks have exposed hidden information on the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, active deception as revealed in US diplomatic cables, and continue to expose information vital to all peoples of the world, including the text of the most-secret TPP document, he has brought us to a more awakened world where more of us are focused on pursuing and supporting truth, transparency, and justice. Please speak out for someone who has unstintingly spoken out for all of us. Julian Assange needs medical care today, and he needs our advocacy. Please sign to make your voice heard.

After learning the next morning that Suzie Dawson had blocked me, I posted a few more tweets on the subject:

Thread I posted on RNM Mind-Reading, Game-Playing, and Restriction online, which includes tweets on #Unity4J and Suzie Dawson:

Unrelenting, world-informing activist, Cassandra, whose page on Twitter features Julian Assange, and the hashtags #ReConnectJulian and #TargetedLikeJulianAndWorse has worked diligently online to support Julian Assange, Wikileaks, and myself–a fiction-writer, poet, activist, mother, children’s and adults’ creativity workshop-leader, college creative writing and English faculty up to 2011 targeted extremely since 2013–as I have battled debilitating and ruthless targeting with inhumane stealth Electronic Warfare weapons, character assassination, employment sabotage, blacklisting, and social ostracism in my community for five years while pounding articles out, or posting and publishing others’ work , week after week, month after month, year after year, since late 2013–and lately, tweets as well, and podcasts and interviews since March 2017. Articles and podcasts ignored alike–I mean with no public acknowledgement, recognition, or address–by mainstream media and altstream media, including #Unity4J journos such as Suzie Dawson, Elizabeth Lea Vos, Cassandra Fairbanks, and Caitlyn Johnstone–despite my own support of them, openly in articles, tweets, and podcasts. Also ignored by so-called “adversarial journalists” as Glenn Greenwald, Jeremy Scahill, and the entire Intercept operation–whose moderated community boards have been egregiously adversarial to “Targeted Individuals” including a targeted Time & Atlanta Journal journalist who reports cavalier responses there from Greenwald’s lawyer Mona Holland who has not merely been scathingly rude to  being-physically-irradiated-and-neuro-tortured-TIs but who has set up a False-Reality-Construct page on Wikipedia or Rational Wiki abusively decrying, mocking, and ridiculing those reporting targeting–as delusional and paranoid– including myself, by name–a rare recognition indeed of Ramola D, but one made primarily for public denigration. Also ignored by Wikileaks, Julian Assange, and Ed Snowden. Also ignored by whistleblowers such as Ray McGovern, Kevin Shipp, John Kiriakou, Thomas Drake, and Bill Binney, whom I have contacted, informed, and made interview requests to.  The Bury Ramola D at Any Cost Brigade has been in action for a very long time.

On this subject, and in stark contrast to the above-named, I will name three outstanding Government whistleblowers–also targeted extremely and being persecuted by the US Government, as I am, too (heart-hit with ultrasonics as I write, on Christmas Day, 2018, in Quincy, Massachusetts), and as Cassandra is, too–who have stood by me, supported me, recognized my work, validated me, done interviews with me, stood right beside me as we have each worked in our own intensive ways to inform the world of the horrors of ongoing EMF/Neuro DEW targeting, and given me the honor and privilege of their friendship and counsel: NSA whistleblower Karen Melton-Stewart, CIA whistleblower Barbara Hartwell, and FBI whistleblower Geral Sosbee.

I will write more on all these matters at a later date, and return here to the point I am trying to make that as a supremely-targeted and extremely-attacked writer turned journalist, I have yet supported the freedom of the Press, Wikileaks, Julian Assange, and the #Unity4J efforts in a spirit of open-heartedness and intellectual allegiance, and so has Cassandra, as any cursory glance at her extraordinary online activism–singular in its insightful and incisive perception, acuity, and analysis–will readily demonstrate.

I had not known until recently what an extraordinary job Cassandra has done in helping broadcast my articles and podcasts online–while “journalists” working as journalists in new or old media online ignore with studied fervor anything associated with my name–in nominating me for a Project Censorship award, and in rallying others online to notice the vital subject and content of my reporting. I thank Cassandra hugely for this unswerving and selfless raising of public awareness on her part and especially for her kind and continued championing of my work, my name, and the notice of my own travails as a targeted, persecuted, and being-tortured American journalist and writer–ignored also by PEN American, I should add, of which writers’ organization “supporting persecuted writers” I am a member, and whom I have notified several times, to no avail whatsoever. I especially thank Cassandra, knowing after interviewing her and speaking with her, what she too, a young EFL teacher with degrees in Modern Languages and Linguistics, is being put through and has experienced, in the UK: extreme targeting with anti-personnel DEWs as well as neuroweaponry, orchestrated police set-ups, social isolation, and employment blacklisting. It is a testament to her personal sense of humanity, open-heartedness toward others, will, resolve, and intellectual fortitude and courage that she continues to speak for those who are targeted and voiceless, and those like me who are targeted and ignored, even as I strive to speak out myself and help raise to public recognition the voices of others targeted, used, abused, and exploited by a mercenary military and industrial and Intelligence complex keen to full-spectrum-subjugate humanity at the neuro/bio level of brain, nervous system, muscle, organ, cell, and DNA.

There is a much deeper story, I suspect, to the blocking of Cassandra’s tweets by Suzie Dawson–as also to the blatant and oddly obtuse misframing and acerbic responses she sent my way–and I will discuss this further below. But first I want to thank and honor Cassandra for her extensive and diligent activism and raising of public awareness about Electronic Warfare and Neurowarfare weaponry targeting–with all the Social and Psychological Psy Ops and Police State Persecutions that go with it–and particularly for her singular recognition and insistent publicizing of my otherwise-disappeared-by-most-so-called-journos work.


 


 

I am not new to online censorship. I have experienced this distinctive repression for five years now, since 2013, as I have sought to openly discuss and publish online the current-day horrors of post-9/11 and post-Patriot Act out-of-control-fascist-surveillance, where absolutely innocent people in America and worldwide, including myself, are being hit, egregiously and outrageously, and supremely invasively, with deadly and barbaric and Physical Torture-administering Electromagnetic/Sonic/Scalar Neuroweapons, coyly hidden by the US Department of Justice as “Anti-Personnel Non-Lethal Weapons” and undisclosed “Surveillance Devices” and “Crowd-Control Devices,” while the FBI rolls their targets-of-private-sector-vengeance (activists, whistleblowers, indy journalists, people of integrity exposing local corruption or smart moms like me with a history of anti-war and human rights and animal rights activism who speak out to School Board syndicated-criminals are their especial favorite) into “Countering Violent Extremism” and FISA-Warrant-Needed-Suspected-Terrorist and Federal-Magistrate-Judge-Ordered-”Endless Fake Investigations” programs, and the CIA/NSA Black Ops Conglomerate rolls in to poach off these innocents now wrongfully blacklisted and watchlisted and feed them like shrimp into their decades-long Neuro-Monitoring, Neuro-Surveillance, Neuro-Hacking, Neuro-Modification, AI and BCI-CBI, EEG Heterodyning, EEG Cloning, Bio-Robotizing, Zombie-Making, Mass-Shooter-Hypno-Patsy-Creating, Manchurian-Milling, Cybernetic-Hive-Minding, Neuro-Retardation, Neuro-Takeover, Neuro-Colonizing, Neuro-Cannibalizing, MK ULTRA-extended Neuro-Appropriation programs, all in the interests of Supercomputing, Singularities, Transhumanism, Supersoldiering, and Full Spectrum Dominance of All Humans on Planet Earth—and let’s toss in all Insects, Animals, and Reptiles, Plants, and Trees there too, anything with a Nervous System, Brain, or EMF field, really—and the US Navy and the US Air Force and the US Army, NRO, NGA, NASA, DOE, and other US Government agencies swoops in to cluster these innocents, numbered and named, true Nazi style, as Human Test Subjects, Fully Non-Consenting, now named “mentally challenged,” “incompetent,” “autistic” “schizophrenic” “bipolar” and other carefully-concocted loophole designations, in order to on-paper justify their Use, Abuse, Exploitation, and Criminal Appropriation of these innocents in such public-domain EMF/Neuro DEW Weapons Testing contracts as Directed Energy Bio Behavioral Research contracts running field-weapons tests all over the USA—and apparently the entire world—using planes, drones, satellites, celltowers, vans, trucks, SUVs, cars, bikes, backpacks, walker-stalkers which include children and teenagers, and Project Minerva social engineering projects running self-permitted Psy Ops on whole populations, all under the guise of doing benevolent “research” intended to benefit these very innocents themselves. Yes, classification conceals crime, and the entire US government appears filled with criminals currently.

Every single reporting victim of this weapon use—in tandem with the Social Psy Op Program run on them involving massive employment and social and community Blacklisting, Character Assassination, and Life-Sabotage—has reported these crimes on their person, to me, to other writers, whistleblowers, human rights activists and journalists, and widely online in social media, on blogs, videos, Facebook, Twitter, elsewhere, as nothing less than Torture.

The physical use of physical weapons on a person’s body is indeed invasive of personal physical privacy, and is Torture; the remote neuroweapon use on a person’s brain with abusive V2K or synthetic telepathy, voiced or subliminal, and other military bio-communications technology streaming images, video, and other people’s brainwaves (EEG Heterodyning/Cloning) as well as deliberate harvesting and restreaming of one’s own anger or fear brainwaves into one’s own head is also invasive of personal physical privacy, and is Torture; every one of the military and medical “researchers” here as well as every FBI agent permitting these crimes should be prosecuted for torturing people—torture is a crime recognized as crime by US and international law.

None of what they are doing is legitimate—when reporting victims report this weapon-use as torture, then hello, let’s conclude, quite clearly, that all this “covered research” is nothing but a Cover Story for Nazi and Satanic criminals in high places to run Torture Operations on the populace—and get away with it.

These weapons clearly, are the ultimate weapons to destroy humanity with: they’re here, they’ve already been developed and fine-tuned (although, as per recent hints by US Airforce Secretary Heather Wilson, endless further finetuning in precision sensor monitoring via Intelligence, Surveillance, Reconnaissance contracts is forthcoming) and the Inhumanes Abusing Power in the military and Intelligence agencies, well-supported by their private-sector Defense and Security contractors, are doing a good job destroying humanity with them—starting with outstanding Americans whose brains, bodies, and entire lives they wish to damage.

By these means, the New World Order of George Bush and co. is already running its Fascism and Repression and Complete-Subjugation operations on humanity—and keeping the means, the remote Neuro DEWs and Remote Neural Monitoring and Covert Implantation and EMF/sonic/scalar weapons well-hidden.

My articles, videos, tweets, tweet-threads reporting my findings, speculations, opinions, and interviews with reporting victims and whistleblowers and scientists have all been censored online and shadowbanned and restricted. A cursory glance at the figures underneath my podcasts—even in comparison with similar videos by any other person such as Kerry Cassidy or Alfred Webre who have also covered similar subjects (although I do not in any way wish to suggest comparison with any extant alt media, including these above-named, regarding full-spectrum-in-terms-of-subject-matter or duration of their efforts)—will establish that.

There is indeed a singular Black Hole in operation online, whereby the work I do in interviewing those reporting targeting and persecution by fusion centers and Intelligence agencies, including whistleblowers, scientists, nurses, doctors, engineers, attorneys, in video and print journalism is simply disappeared online; only the rarest of alt media acknowledges or recognizes it at all. More often it is simply disappeared, as those who are targeted and persecuted in the USA, UK, Europe, entire Western world, Five Eyes countries—as well as elsewhere worldwide–are being disappeared. I emphasize the West because the West pirouettes the most in Government Propaganda media—aka mainstream media—touting “human rights” records, which is a bleak and macabre joke, because in-house-torture, all-locations-torture, and everywhere-in-sight-of-satellites, celltowers, drones-torture is being practiced, contracted, budgeted, taxpayer-supported, expanded, extended, entrenched, industrialized now by Western governments, starting no doubt with that beacon of human rights protection, US Inc.

Basic human rights and basic civil rights are being incontrovertibly violated, and extremely, by use of these anti-personnel neuro/bio weapons which permit remote access, invasion, and manipulation of human brains and bodies. My position on these weapons, as that of many of the whistleblowers (every “targeted individual” is a whistleblower) I have interviewed, is unflinching: they should be completely and absolutely banned.

By disappearing my journalism online, publishing notice of this weapon use on world populations—as also disappearing the groundbreaking journalism and notice of Paul Baird, Cheryl Welsh, Renee Pittmann Mitchell, Mark Rich, Dr. Rauni Kilde, Gloria Naylor, Soleil Mavis, John Finch, Barbara Hartwell, Dr. John Hall, Roseanne Schneider, Dr. Eric Karlstrom, Vic Livingston, Deborah Dupre, Mojmir Babcek, Arlene Johnson, Harlan Girard, the original Eleanor White, and the original Julianne McKinney and many others via their websites, articles, and books—journalists today in both mainstream and altream media appear to be existing in a Twilight Zone of denials, refusals, close-mindedness, behind-the-times inability to cover modern weaponized neuro/bio technology and Electronic Warfare weaponry, of which today there is ample information online—as well as outright, lies, propaganda, and deceit, practiced ardently by the most obfuscating arms of the New World Order ZioNaziMasonicVaticanBanksterSatanic State we are all being oppressed by worldwide, including such POPPCon (Psy Op Propaganda Piece Con) pushers as the New York Times, The Washington Post, Wired, VICE, The Daily Beast, Buzzfeed, Motherboard, Wikipedia, and Rational Wiki.

When I first engaged with Suzie Dawson several months ago—almost a year ago, actually, I think in January 2018 (Suzie Dawson has blocked me on Twitter currently, wiping out the record there of her conversations with me then and later)—along with former Time and Atlanta Journal reporter E. Coady (Twitter handle @HeadlineJuice), Suzie was vocal in deprecating E and myself for critiquing and criticizing Glenn Greenwald for not publishing further on those spied-on and targeted, and not covering the testimonials of those reporting extreme targeting aka, in shortform for dismissal in media today, “Targeted Individuals.” (I, like many others targeted whom I know, have all written to Greenwald and received silence in return.) Readers may recall it was Glenn Greenwald who was given Snowden’s documents and published only a miniscule fraction of them, being ostensibly bought out for millions of dollars by Pierre Omidyar’s Intercept and the NSA and CIA behind him—on whom Whitney Webb published on January 26, 2018: https://www.mintpressnews.com/fbi-whistleblower-on-pierre-omidyar-campaign-to-neuter-wikileaks/236414/, a story picked up and followed by FBI whistleblower and Newsbud publisher Sibel Edmonds, https://www.newsbud.com/2018/01/26/billionaire-omidyars-intercept-government-silicon-valley-nexus-to-intercept-censor-whistleblowers/.

Sibel Edmonds of course had earlier published on Glenn Greenwald, Paypal, and Omidyaar’s NSA and CIA connections at her site Boiling Frogs Post in 2013: https://www.boilingfrogspost.com/2013/12/11/bfp-breaking-news-omidyars-paypal-corporation-said-to-be-implicated-in-withheld-nsa-documents/

In looking back on this series of articles and interviews and all the information contained in them, I realize anew there is a lot of murky deception afoot. There are factions and unrevealed allegiances among these whistleblowers and publishers and journalists. I did not understand at the time the true nature of the politics behind Greenwald, Snowden, Omidyar and the Intercept, but now that I see a little more clearly Suzie Dawson’s own role in playing defense here—and the scales are rapidly falling from my eyes as it becomes obvious to me I need to express this in the simplest of terms—I will spell out in completely candid terms my own speculations shortly below.

In January 2018, Suzie Dawson (in her tweets to me and @HeadlineJuice then) defended Greenwald and Snowden while calling on the “targeted community” to support whistleblowers like Assange and Snowden. In the course of a heated exchange—which tapered off with an offer from me to interview Suzie Dawson and an acceptance by her—I remember writing through tears and recording that despite all evidence currently that journalists refused to cover targeting and uber-surveillance persecution being reported by those targeted (TI’s), I would myself cover till I died, while also congratulating Suzie Dawson for her earlier work reporting the Wikileaks documents covering DEWs, and her #DecipherYou project.

Snippets from that thread:

I eventually interviewed Suzie Dawson in an open-ended, non-confrontational conversation livestreamed by her on Jan 29, 2018 permitting her free rein to tell her story of targeting, activism, journalism and defending Assange and Snowden as the world’s most famous“Targeted Individuals.”

That interview, the fourth in my Changemaker series can be found here:

Over the course of this year I have supported Suzie Dawson’s #DecipherYou broadcasts, retweeted her tweets, and supported her #Unity4J campaign, as described below. I have indeed stood up for Julian Assange myself, although I found the September 2017 tweet from @AssangeDefence suggesting the US diplomats in Cuba reporting sonic weapon hits suffered from “paranoia” profoundly dismissive of Electronic Warfare weaponry and promotive of current false narratives afoot in suppressing the truth about EMF/Neuro DEW targeting.

Now, examining the virulence of Suzie Dawson’s misframing and insulting responses to me in defending Cassandra and her tweets calling for coverage and acknowledgment from #Unity4J journos of the larger spectrum of NSA/CIA/DHS/FBI EMF Neuro/DEW targeting which contextualizes Julian Assange’s own targeting and persecution, and of my work—as a journalist reporting such targeting by people all over the world—I do wonder about her unrevealed allegiances and unrevealed support base, as she continued in her responses to misframe and to fixate on defending Snowden at all costs and Assange at all costs and talking about #Unity4J as a “movement” that the persecuted targeted should emulate—including myself and Cassandra, two writers who report targeting and report on targeting, instead of simply answering Cassandra’s pleas and queries and notices regarding supporting my journalistic work or including me as an interviewee on #Unity4J vigil broadcasts or the possibility of #Unity4J journos covering the horrors of neuro/bio weaponry targeting, Surveillance Abuse, and Non-Consensual Military/Intelligence experimentation themselves.

While there are several glaring problems on this Twitter exchange with Suzie Dawson’s bulldog-behavior and repressive/patronizing attitude in striving to shut down writers and vocal targets of extreme EMF/Neuro DEW assault by government, fusion center, military and mercenary criminals in power such as Cassandra and myself, I will point out a couple especially egregious and unpardonable aspects. One, throughout this latest thread where Suzie Dawson apparently felt the need to keep responding obliquely and repressively to my clarifying responses to her inexplicable tweets, she appears to harp on building movements and starting campaigns and doing activism, while it should be fairly clear to anyone reading Cassandra’s tweets and my own that what we were really talking about was the need for more journalists and for #Unity4J journalists to cover the horrors of undisclosed targeting with undisclosed Spectrum weaponry which hundreds of thousands of people worldwide are reporting today. The notion of asking reporting victims to do their own activism—which they are actually doing, incidentally, since journalists for sure are not covering the crimes and violations of human rights they report, except myself and a few others—in itself being more than quaint. When did the Holocaust victims get asked to run their own campaigns? When will journalists like Suzie Dawson realize that what we are reporting are nothing less than targeted Killing programs, treasonous and Trojan and extreme, where every reporting victim is reporting extreme bodily harm, neuro and brain invasion, assault, injury, and persecution with the New Age Weapons of Mass Destruction, Electronic Warfare Neuro/Bio Weaponry, which crooked governments and crooked militaries and crooked Fusion Centers and crooked Intelligence agencies and crooked Law Enforcement are bending over backwards to hide? People are being experimented on with carcinogenic DEWs and torturous Direct Contact chemical and nano bioweapons and bio-robotizing neurotech and body-shocking, electro-vibrating, body-raping and brain-raping radio frequency weapons non-consensually unto death, targeted unto death, persecuted unto death. I myself, as a reporting journalist and victim both, am being heart-hit and face-hit and head-hit and back-hit and spine-hit not just on a daily basis or nightly basis but on an hourly and minute-by-minute basis. We are literally speaking from Inside the Holocaust. Anyone listening?

Two, Suzie Dawson reports being targeted, positions herself as a targeted and oppressed journalist herself, and says she supports and identifies with targets, and in these tweets to me, actually mentioned being an ally–whom apparently I had now alienated with my responses—and someone already working on the issue—to no effect that I can discern, from her recent journalism. Note that I have in the past thanked and praised Suzie Dawson for her work, including reposting her Twitter thread on DEWs not so long ago, with her predicting that this would be the year DEWs would be increasingly covered, and making noises about this future DEW coverage garnering eventual Pulitzers—completely forgetting and overlooking extant journalism and literature on this subject already published and online and in books, including my own, I may add—but then of course the Bury Ramola D at Any Cost Brigade no doubt understands that closed-eye attitude perfectly: https://everydayconcerned.net/2018/04/21/breakthrough-in-reaching-mainstream-audiences-on-dews-surveillance-abuse-wrongful-targeting-as-suzie-dawson-sets-twitter-alight/

Note also that I supported and asked others to support Suzie Dawson in that post replaying her tweet thread where she mentions many different aspects of Surveillance Abuse, field weapons testing, community policing, fusion center mayhem, non-consensual military Intelligence experimentation on populations and other aspects of uber-targeting already reported—including by myself, seeing her as a sister journalist working to bring such crimes to the wider notice of mainstream and altstream media readers. An irony in itself, since I have most certainly covered these subjects way, way more than Suzie Dawson—despite her challenging tweets to me lately suggesting, wrongfully, that she has “discussed targeting extensively”and written much about it and that I have not read all her work covering this subject and have a “slanted perception” of her work. I challenge Suzie Dawson and her followers to examine the entire compendium of work I have on my websites—both my own and my reposting and recognition of others’ work–at everydayconcerned.net and Youtube/RamolaDReports before she gets back on Twitter or online pronouncing to one and all on matters of covering, reporting, or discussing EMF/Neuro DEW targeting and State tyranny, suggesting her own primacy in this regard—she has simply not been covering the depredations of Surveillance Abuse and Military/Intelligence/Private Sector tyranny and terrorism against civilians as I have, choosing, like every other journalist in alt and mainstream media to turn away from covering this vital subject integral to all our freedoms as human beings in this benighted technology-driven century—and talks down to victimized and persecuted writers instead, telling us to “get on” with “building our own movement.”

However, what this brings me to is the note I recently received from Thomas McFarlan after I announced my intention to write further on the subject of Suzie Dawson’s repressive tweets to me, saying he wished to further inform me on her unknown-to-me intentions by letting me know that Suzie Dawson had recently reached out to him—with no previous contact efforts on his part—after reading an article he had recently published on Medium on targeting, and told him she wished to work further with him to expose “organized stalking” and help promote his article which she had found very impressive and so forth. Now this is all well and good and rather interesting all around but the question does cross my mind: why would Suzie Dawson not contact me on this subject at all, given my previous support of her work, and given my longstanding, quite-evident body of work online on this subject, but instead, a little while later, not having informed me of her interest in promoting McFarlan’s article or indeed any other effort on her part to further cover this subject, excoriate me repressively on Twitter for supposedly “berating” and “trying to shame” journos like her into covering targeting, and chastising me for being ignorant about her ongoing efforts and alliances in this area—which I was never informed about?

Over the last few months, Thomas McFarlan, newly arrived on the scene of journalism on targeting and Surveillance Abuse, has been publishing a few articles on the subject—which I have indeed found encouraging and helpful, given, as noted before, the dearth of journalism on this subject, even though I do not agree with his characterization of targeting as “security-service-stalking” or his focus on “organized stalking”: extreme-targeting is being run out of fusion centers and fusion-center trafficking into military, Intelligence, and mercenary private-sector EMF/Neuro DEW Torture, Terminal Experimentation, and Cheka/Stasi-style Social Terrorism projects; “gangstalking” or “organized stalking” is an aspect of these cybernetic hive-minding and Social Psy Op programs. One of his articles was noticed and promoted at Collective Evolution by Richard Enos whom he had contacted, and another, republishing portions of an article of mine (with my permission) was also noticed by Richard Enos.

Interestingly, both have let misspellings of my name stand, one as “Ramola Reports” rather than “Ramola D Reports” and the other as “Ramola Dharmaraj” rather than “Ramola D,” my publishing name. Is this an honest mistake or some kind of underground express ZioNazi Magick spelling trick I know little to nothing about–again, designed to Bury Ramola D at Any Cost Online?

Returning to my central question here, what really is behind Suzie Dawson’s repressive admonitions to me to cease bothering her—with a misframed and quite inaccurate construct of “berating journos”–while behind-the-scenes connecting and seeking to promote Thomas McFarlan instead? How is it Richard Enos or Collective Evolution has never republished my work except only after Thomas McFarlan contacted him? (And really, how is it no other alt media online ever bothers to republish or notice my work—which features the voice of important whistleblowers as well?) I bring these questions up for a reason, and I bring them up only because Suzie Dawson’s authoritarian and oppressive language to me in her tweets does make me wonder why she is so vehement in her uber-defensive attitude about Snowden and in her repressive attitude toward me—when I have been the lone, continually publishing journalist on the subject of targeting, “targeted individuals,” and all attendant crimes for quite a long time, almost five years now. Is the Bury Ramola D At Any Cost Brigade working overtime to bury me online? And is she working for them?

I have certainly experienced an uptick in repressive operations aimed at me lately, as for instance Katherine Horton’s recent smear campaign against me, apparently a counterintel construct seeking to defame and slander and tie me up in knots which I have written about—where I have made reference to the constellating of alt media around those who pose no significant problem to the controllers of controlled opposition working in our midst, whereas I do, being non-controllable as a writer, and further, non-belonging to the special tribe of operatives who all appear to have underground connections with each other—despite working in separate pods or cells but apparently all riding the ZioNazi underground express together.

So is that what we are seeing here unfold now? Is Suzie Dawson a sophisticated media quarterback playing defense for limited-hangout whistleblowers such as Snowden playing Oppressed, and possibly/putatively even more secretively limited-hangout whistleblowers like Assange, and reaching out to other new journalists riding the same Inner Circle Rothschild Circus while bumping off non-belongers-to-the-tribe such as yours truly and doing so in fact quite offensively? Is the whole spectacle of Snowden and his focus on spying via phone and email, landline and cell, computer and electronics the set-up snow job to detour attention from the Greatest Scandal of All Time—the ZioNazi Empire/Central-Bankster-Run Neuro Hacking and Bio Hacking of people’s bodies and brains worldwide, in hidden covers of Biometric Surveillance and Sources & Methods of Gathering Intelligence, with deadly stealth weaponry these Covert Factions assaulting all peoples equally worldwide wish fondly to keep stealthy forever and undisclosed to the increasingly-targeted, progressively-sickened, mind-controlled, brain-damaged, and bodily-subjugated world public?

These are the sorts of speculations not aired so often in media—which is maintaining all sorts of other pretences and deceits as well. And I raise these speculations openly not because I am convinced they are all true but because I too have started probing the field for subterranean connections and unspoken allegiances. In this quest, I have been working with Dr. Eric Karlstrom, retired Emeritus Professor in Geography from California State University, on the Global Gestapo series where we have been exploring different facets of this worldwide program of torture-targeting and surveillance abuse, where we especially examine the Segregating, Racist, and Gentile-Excluding Crypto-Jewish or Zionist Empire aspect of the Global Gestapo in Episodes 7 and 8:

For ultimately, the most hidden secrets are also the most egregious. Unrevealed allegiances and infiltration in every field are rife currently. Dual citizens from Israel run all our offices and councils and governments and insinuate themselves into every group. “We always lead our own opposition,” according to Theodore Hertzl, father of Zionism.

I don’t care if Americans think we’re running the news media, Hollywood, Wall Street or the government. I just care that we get to keep running them.” –Joel Stein

Well, I am pretty sick and tired of the ZioNazi primacy carnage corporation. I have spent an entire lifetime chasing after literary journals, literary agents, and the bogus literary publishing industry, helmed in New York, which I now see clearly—from research, reading, and newfound awareness of the Crypto-Jewish/Zionist/Jesuit/Satanist/Eugenicist/Bankster aspect to the longstanding CFR/Tavistock and CIA-run Operation Mockingbird hold on journalism, literature, and publishing–is controlled from the inside and most definitely has a high Zionist profile. I have seen my manuscripts of poetry and fiction rejected year after year while seeing the publication of surprising text ranging from insipid to mediocre to absolute tripe all around me, and witnessing the cultivation of literary and teaching careers by those inside this Zio system, willing to be tokenized by this system, or willing to remain subjugated and hierarchized by it. I have had my manuscripts read and patronized by literary agents incapable of understanding what they were reading. Some careers are supported by the ZioNazis, some careers are interfered with and destroyed or seriously thwarted. My first collection of short fiction, Temporary Lives, which took over ten years of endless submittals to publish, was, notably, not reviewed by a single literary reviewer when it came out, even though it had just won the prestigious national AWP Grace Paley Award in Short Fiction (2008). And unlike other talented writers whose work sees publication much faster, I have several fiction and poetry manuscripts, acclaimed by highly-credentialled readers and well-known writers and academics, from one and two and three decades ago, still in search of publishers.

Now, after surviving five years of absolute carnage—with implants sharpshot into me, implants clandestinely implanted in me, remote radiation weapons sending microwave pulse hits into every part of my body, consistent heart-hits for over three years, massive migraines, electromagnetic rape, laser burns, millimeter-wave weapon burns and blisters, nanoweapon attacks, direct-contact chemical weapon attacks, continuous access by precision tracking radar and scalar pencil weapons, remote electro-shocks, remote electro-vibrations—along with all sorts of other indignities such as neighborhood and family character assassination and social and employment blacklisting and Psy Ops Gangstalking Even By Relatives also reported by others so persecuted by the Satanist Masonic ZioNazi crowd infiltrating fusion centers and local governments alike—through all of which I continued to read, research, do FOIA requests, investigate, discuss, speak, write, and publish on these crimes levelled at others as well, and in persistent danger for my life, which is continuously and egregiously attacked every single day, I have neither time nor patience for beating around the bush here.

Despite her statement regarding #Unity4J being a “single-issue movement,” the fact remains that Suzie Dawson and the journalists and public commentators she has featured on #Unity4J vigils—in their public #Unity4J silence on this subject–have established their absolute disregard for the reportage of extreme Surveillance targeting and persecution, as well as of the DE and neuroweapons being used to accomplish this tyranny, which I have been covering and exposing for years. Instead of disrespectfully snapping online on Twitter at writers like me who are still surprisingly alive to tell the tale of nasty targeting here, I suggest she come clean and break free of her unrevealed allegiances and biases if she wishes to be seen as a truly concerned investigative journalist and not the putative puppet of a secret and sophisticated Illuminati/Rothschild ZioNazi & Israeli Cons and Carnage Operation running Snow Ops on the entire world—of which Snowden and Greenwald and Omidyaar it seems are most definitely a part. (Just as an aside, Greenwald in particular has been informed about Uber-Targeting by several highly-educated people, including myself; two highly accomplished and intellectual people I know, one long-targeted, the other not, have informed me of conversations they have had with him via email and in person at a book-signing, informing him, and receiving cognizance of his awareness on the subject.)

The jury’s still out on Julian Assange—but I must note here he has never spoken publicly of EMF/Neuro DEW targeting and Brain/Body Control Weapons either, although he has indeed made one historic reference to “enforced telepathic readings”–about which he is wrong too, it’s not “only a few years left” to get to that point, we have been at that point for over three decades already. Remote Neural Monitoring, Surveillance, and Modification have been practiced for a while now—yes, people’s minds are being eavesdropped on and being read, via trauma-based mind control, courtesy the Paperclip Nazi #MengeleMen who litter our Universities, DOD, and Intelligence agencies. The 1992 John St. Clair Akwei vs NSA lawsuit offers massive disclosure on NSA Signals Intelligence which can pull this off from satellites. There is much other disclosure—covered elsewhere, and to be covered further as well elsewhere.

It’s that complete lack of truthful coverage on DEW targeting and New Age neuroweaponry that alt media journalists, mainstream media journalists, and indy media journalists alike are refraining from offering, that continues to keep the wider public in the dark about the true state of brain and bio hacking, now in late 2018 being used definitely as a tool of torture, terrorism, tyranny, eugenics, and genocide by Black Ops Banksters running governments worldwide.

However, I am no longer holding my breath and advise that no-one else sit around either waiting for the ZioNazi Underground Express and the Inner Circle Rothschild Circus to “reveal” and “expose” targeting in no doubt covered and constricted terms to the world–while creating fake superstar “truthtellers” who play to scripts and have been pre-marked for Pulitzers, in themselves questionable given their being-situated in the selfsame ZioNazi Industry of Publishing & Media Deceit.

I am already covering this subject—as a few others are–and aim to do so to the end. We, the truly targeted, the truly speaking-out, and the truly publishing for decades, have already exposed these crimes, and continue to expose them. Despite being censored, censured, banned, shadowbanned, proxied, spoofed, cyberhacked, cybersabotaged, hidden, shut down, thwarted, obstructed, restricted and perennially oppressed online. 

Note to the many ZioNazi infiltrators cybertrolling among the targeted in various guise, running Controlled Opposition ops in our midst as they gatekeep, reframe, misframe, misdirect, and attempt continuously to repress the whole Truth: I do not, cannot, will not ever again work with you.  My interest is Complete and Absolute Exposure of Every Single Covered Crime Being Indulged In by Tax-Paid and Fiat-Floated Criminals–which is resulting in the absolute persecution, extreme suffering, utter human rights violations, and killing of hundreds of thousands of innocent, beautiful, accomplished and wonderful human beings in America and worldwide, my sister and brother victims in this Publicly Unacknowledged But Extreme Third World War EMF/Neuro/Nano DEW Full-Spectrum Eugenics-Laced Lucifer-Driven Holocaust running worldwide.

As always I invite other new-and-true-media outlets to freely republish, in full, my many articles on the subject, with full accreditation and linkback. I do ask that you kindly get my name and the name of my sites and channels right. Thank you.