Lovely February forecast and advice from astrologer Lee Harris on taking time this month to find your own center, your stability, to take time for your self, to focus on your own healing, energizing, and finding and emitting your own light as we rock further into this tumultuous year. Happy Valentine’s Day!
“FIND AND FOCUS ON THE LIGHT
February will be a great month for you to practice observing yourself between negativity and positivity—between those two polarities. They both exist on the Earth, so we need not be afraid of either of them. They go hand-in-hand; they have a relationship with each other. But we are at a time now where more positive thought and more positive energy—and more positive light—is needed for our consciousness, for our planet, for the whole human race … with everything that is going on right now, with such a heavy focus on destruction and war.
The light that you yourself can find—and grow, and nurture, and emit—is a crucial part of what we are seeing taking place on Earth right now in this consciousness shift.
It’s very easy to feel small inside the consciousness shift. It’s very easy to think, “Well, I’m sitting in my house, by myself, and I don’t really see anyone. What part do I play?”
You play a HUGE part.
But I think what I want to remind all of you about—those of you out there who identify with the idea of being a lightworker—is that it’s not just about playing your part for others. It’s about playing your part for yourself. Many of you lightworkers know the old healer story of looking after everyone else at your own expense. There is a powerful alchemical shift that takes place in the body when you are able to give light to yourself and foster light for yourself, thus recognizing it will then emit to others. And that’s a very tricky learning, because it’s something that has been written out of our history; it’s not something that is very evidently taught in our culture. If we were to live in a society of people who are lit up from the inside, the current paradigm would no longer be able to exist. And there are some who would like this paradigm to continue to exist.
Re-posted, with many thanks to Derrick Broze for this timely pulling-together of information, from Activist Post. “Domestic Extremism” and “Domestic Terrorism” are labels that have long been touted by DHS and the Department of Justice as intrinsically meaningful. But are they really? As we see increasing signs of totalitarian control stepped up around us, one has to ask: Are all Americans engaging in and creating free speech, independent thinking, and independent media, as well as Americans speaking out and pursuing sovereignty, liberty, peace, harmonious co-existence, representative democracy, and justice–all of these hallmarks of once-free USA–now going to be labelled Domestic Extremists or Material/Media Supporters of Domestic Extremism? Who puts the brakes on such misled efforts at absolute control? Please note the Stong Cities Network references below, as well as excerpted Truth in Media‘s findings on current Govt. characterizings of interest in sovereignty, including the attitudes and acts of some of the earliest Americans, the Founding Fathers, who sought to break away from British colonial rule, as extremist.
In the convoluted world of language appropriation evident in Military and Homeland Security training manuals, as noted—and linked below–by Jay SyrmoPoulos’Truth in Media article, criticism, enquiry, and dissent are being re-cast as Hate, and as we know, there is a huge movement underfoot currently, including on our University campuses, that seeks Political Correctness in decrying a vast multitude of expressions of Free Speech as Hate Speech.
How does awareness, clear thinking, critical thinking, or critiquing Government policy or actions become “anti-government extremism”?
Perhaps it is time for American Departments of English to speak out.
The Department of Justice Prepares to Step up War on Domestic Extremists
Senior officials with the U.S. Department of Justice recently announced possible legal changes which could allow the government greater room to combat so-called “anti-government extremists”.
On Thursday February 4, Reuters reported that John Carlin, the Justice Department’s chief of national security, and federal prosecutors are looking for new tools to deal with the rise of “domestic extremists.”
“Based on recent reports and the cases we are seeing, it seems like we’re in a heightened environment,” Carlin told Reuters. Reuters notes that the U.S. government is facing an increase in opposition from militia groups, “sovereign citizens,” and other “anti-government extremists.”
However, federal officials like Carlin claim they are impeded in their pursuit of violent domestic terrorists because, although there is currently a U.S. law that prohibits “material” support of internationally recognized terror groups, there is not such a law for domestic groups. Reuters reports:
Carlin and other Justice Department officials declined to say if they would ask Congress for a comparable domestic extremist statute, or comment on what other changes they might pursue to toughen the fight against anti-government extremists.
The U.S. State Department designates international terrorist organizations to which it is illegal to provide “material support.” No domestic groups have that designation, helping to create a disparity in charges faced by international extremist suspects compared to domestic ones.
Carlin told Reuters that his counter-terrorism team is taking a “thoughtful look at the nature and scope of the domestic terrorism threat” and looking for “potential legal improvements and enhancements to better combat those threats.” The Justice Department will identify cases being prosecuted at the state level that “could arguably meet the federal definition of domestic terrorism.”
Carlin and his team are not only remaining quiet about whether or not they are pursuing the legal changes but the entire team has not been revealed to the public. This means we have an unelected, secret team of people working on identifying which Americans should be deemed “domestic extremists.”
Will Freedom Activists be Targeted?
Carlin’s silence should alarm all activists who consider themselves opposed to the policies of the U.S. government. Not only are those who espouse anti-government or pro-freedom rhetoric likely to be targeted but the penalty for being a part of such a group, or supporting such a group could eventually mean years in prison. Current laws allow for a maximum sentence of 20 years in prison for Americans who support groups on the State Department list of designated terrorist organizations.
Under a 1994 law federal prosecutors could attempt to bring “material support” terrorism charges against people who are linked to groups not on the State Department’s list but this has only happened twice since the law was enacted. If the Justice Department creates a list of groups that are deemed extremist or terrorist this could lead to stifling of free speech and expression.
Part of the problem is the broad definition of “extremism” itself. As far as the pursuit and defense against “extremism” is concerned, the United States government has failed to adequately define the term, and by doing so, is allowing for perfectly legal behavior to become taboo or even criminalized. In June 2014, TruthInMedia’s Jay Syrmopoulos wrote about this trend:
First there was the MIAC report, which claimed that potential terrorists include people who own gold, Ron Paul supporters, libertarians, and even people who fly the U.S. flag.
Then in 2012, there was a leaked Homeland Security study that claimed Americans who are ‘reverent of individual liberty,’ and ‘suspicious of centralized federal authority’ are possible ‘extreme right-wing’ terrorists.
More recently, there is a Department of Defense training manual, obtained by Judicial Watch via a FOIA request, that lists people who embrace “individual liberties” and honor “states’ rights,” among other characteristics, as potential “extremists” who are likely to be members of “hate groups.”
This document goes on to call the Founding Fathers extremists, stating, “In U.S. history, there are many examples of extremist ideologies and movements,“ including “[t]he colonists who sought to free themselves from British rule.”
If the United States government cannot clearly define who it is targeting in its war on extremism how are the people supposed to trust that these programs will not simply be used to target outspoken activists and critics of the government?
A Domestic War on “Extremism”
These possible legal changes are only the latest effort to combat “extremism” by the Justice Department. In October 2015 Anti Media reported that the United Nations and the Department of Justice announced the creation of a new program designed to help local communities combat “violent extremism.” Called the Strong Cities Network (SCN), the plan calls for “systematic efforts” to “share experiences, pool resources and build a community of cities to inspire local action on a global scale.”
U.S. Attorney General Loretta E. Lynch said, “The Strong Cities Network will serve as a vital tool to strengthen capacity-building and improve collaboration,”and will “enable cities to learn from one another, to develop best practices and to build social cohesion and community resilience here at home and around the world.”
“To counter violent extremism we need determined action at all levels of governance,” said Governing Mayor Stian Berger Røsland of Oslo. “To succeed, we must coordinate our efforts and cooperate across borders.”
The creation of the Smart Cities Network comes after the Justice Department announced it would revive a task force on domestic terrorism in an attempt to stop violence within the United States. In June 2014, former Attorney General Eric Holder stated the Domestic Terrorism Executive Committee would work to eliminate dangers from violent individuals who may be motivated by anti-government or racist views. The Federal Bureau of Investigation, the National Security Division of the Justice Department, and the Attorney General’s Advisory Committee are in charge of the efforts. The committee was originally launched to focus on right-wing extremism in the aftermath of the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing.
As Americans slowly awaken to the truth of the American Empire, the powers that wish they were are scrambling to tighten their control grid. If the American public will not be subdued and distracted by elections or deadstream media bread and circuses, the Ruling Class will have to resort to more direct methods of stifling freedom. This presents the perfect opportunity for those living amongst the zombies to organize and strategize for solutions that do not rely on government or their corporate partners.
I found this video of David Icke/interviewed by Alex Jones posted by Elite NWO Agenda inspiring; it features David Icke’s views on what could happen in 2016 and why it’s important for anyone working to shape awareness and influence reality today to understand that this year, 2016, is going to be a pivotal year for humanity. His message here offers both direction and anchor: it is not time to give up, and it is not time to sit back yet. There is work to be done, and consciousness to raise. While much has been accomplished already in the way of exposure, truth, expansion of human consciousness, it is time for all of us working together in our own ways and spheres of influence/focus to redouble, persist, continue in, and accelerate all efforts to raise consciousness and bring change. Just as Dane Wigington notes in his analysis of Americans afflicted with the Stockholm Syndrome (of pandering naively and blindly to the Government oppressor) needing to wake up, David Icke underlines the need for renewed and redoubled efforts currently to change our present reality. If we do not pull together now, get informed, and start taking profound and positive action to address the criminality and corruption we are seeing everywhere, as well as to expose and force the termination of the many-pronged assault on humanity we are experiencing on so many fronts, we are going to very quickly tumble into a horrific situation of totalitarian control and planetary enslavement that we may find we cannot extricate ourselves from easily or at all. Now is the time to pay attention. Now is the time to act, and to continue taking action, we may not have a second chance!–whether it is to speak out or stand up against the controls and assaults already tightening around us. Please watch, share. 25 minutes long/from the Alex Jones show.
Re-posted, with thanks, from a Feb 8 post at Geo-Engineering Watch. Please visit there for comments on this article as well as regular news, videos, analyses, and information on the continuous toxic aerosol assault the entire planet is currently experiencing (with emphasis in certain geographic areas, which include the “Five Eyes” countries & Europe–maps of aerosol spraying can be viewed on videos and pages posted there), and suggestions on what you can do about it.
This post emphasizes the need for concerted action and asks all to please get informed and take action at some level. Paraphrasing loosely, from the video linked below: “The ship is sinking, and you’re on it. Don’t let anything stop you from speaking out.”
Though “Stockholm Syndrome” is a factor in countries and populations around the globe, it is truly an epidemic in America. The masses must be awakened from their well programmed condition of apathy and denial if we are to have any chance of turning the tide in time. The fight for the greater good is a responsibility that must be born by us all, make your voice heard in the critical battle to expose the complete criminality of those in power. Time is not on our side. DW
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. Re-posted from Common Dreams, with many thanks. Please visit there (link above) for comments on this article, posted there on Saturday, 2/6/2016. Color highlights below added here.
Those of us following the focus–among others–on clandestine human experimentation (within the United States and also overseas, in many countries/related to Neurotechnologies/EMF weapons) at this site will understand why this article and its disclosures are of particular interest here. We know from Abu Ghraib and from Guantanamo that torture and abuse don’t just spring out of nowhere, and cannot be ascribed to errancy on the part of a few misled Privates and Officers but always point to systemic abuse, hierarchized sanctioning of abuse, and a culture of permissivity of abuse.
“What the photos that the government has suppressed would show is that abuse was so widespread that it could only have resulted from policy or a climate calculated to foster abuse,” said ACLU staff attorney Alex Abdo, who noted that no senior official has been held accountable “or even investigated” for these abuses.
Withholding disclosure and suppressing evidence, record, and awareness of such sickening abuse is really in the continuum of permitting such abuse to proceed, unchecked. Can we live with that kind of permissive silence and suppression, as a nation and a people? It is unconscionable that the DoD would argue that “the release of the remaining images would jeopardize national security and “may incite others to violence against Americans and US interests””–it is up to Americans to point out that such an answer is unacceptable. Would revealing and prosecuting a crime jeopardize national security–or merely the security of those who believe claiming refuge in “national security” will forever keep them safe and inviolate from exposure, address, prosecution, reform–of anything, whether shamefully abusive treatment of prisoners or shamefully abusive covert experimentation on humans without consent?
Imagine:It took12years of litigation by ACLU to yield this information.
‘What the photos that the government has suppressed would show is that abuse was so widespread that it could only have resulted from policy or a climate calculated to foster abuse.’
Photo relating to prisoner abuse released by DoD on February 5, 2015 in long-running ACLU lawsuit.
The Pentagon on Friday was forced to release nearly 200 photographs of bruises, lacerations, and other injuries inflicted on prisoners presumably by U.S. military personnel in Iraq and Afghanistan.
The record-dump was the result of a Freedom of Information Act request and nearly 12 years of litigation by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), which fought to expose the Bush-era torture.
The images, the group says, prove that there was “systemic abuse of detainees.” And while troubling, attorneys say that even more problematic is the roughly 1,800 photographs that the government refused to disclose.
“The disclosure of these photos is long overdue, but more important than the disclosure is the fact that hundreds of photographs are still being withheld,”said ACLU deputy legal director Jameel Jaffer, one of the attorneys in the case.
“The still-secret pictures are the best evidence of the serious abuses that took place in military detention centers,” Jaffer continued. “The government’s selective disclosure risks misleading the public about the true extent of the abuse.”
Eliza Relman, a paralegal with the ACLU’s National Security Project, said that documents and emails that the government has been forced to release over the course of the litigation give an idea of what the remaining images may contain.
“We have found more than 100 documents that either reference photos related to cases of abuse or actually contain photos that were redacted before they got to us,” Relman said.
The photos still being withheld include those related to the case of a 73-year-old Iraqi woman detained and allegedly sexually abused and assaulted by U.S. soldiers. According to the Army report detailing the incident, the soldiers forced her to “crawl around on all-fours as a ‘large man rode’ on her,” striking her with a stick and calling her an animal. Other pictures depict an Iraqi teenager bound and standing in the headlights of a truck immediately after his mock execution staged by U.S. soldiers. Another shows the body of Muhamad Husain Kadir, an Iraqi farmer, shot dead at point-blank range by an American soldier while handcuffed.
The Department of Defense argues that the release of the remaining images would jeopardize national security and “may incite others to violence against Americans and US interests,” the ACLU explains.
“What the photos that the government has suppressed would show is that abuse was so widespread that it could only have resulted from policy or a climate calculated to foster abuse,” said ACLU staff attorney Alex Abdo, who noted that no senior official has been held accountable “or even investigated” for these abuses.
“That is why the government must release all of the photos and why today’s selective disclosure is so troubling,” Abdo added.
The ACLU first filed its request six months before the notorious Abu Ghraib images were leaked by the press in March 2006.
In 2009, then-defense secretary Robert Gates issued a blanket certification preventing hundreds of photographs from being made public. An identical certification was issued in 2012 by Gates’ successor, Leon Panetta.
In March 2015, a U.S. district court judged ruled in favor of the ACLU, which argued that the certifications are “unsupported and overbroad.” Defense Secretary Ashton Carter certified the photographs again last November, with the exception of the 198 now made public.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
Re-posted, with many thanks, from Alfred Webre’s NewsInsideOut.Com, which recently posted a tribute to Dr. Rauni Luukanen-Kilde,where this draft was included. A tremendous joint effort from Alfred Webre, Dr. Kilde, and others, the draft of the Model Statute below offers a means to use existing legal systems internationally and domestically within countries, at the UN, EU, and others, to establish a ban on all pernicious neurotechnologies and neuroweaponry being used, tested, and operated currently in Brain Entrainment of humans, remote manipulation of humans, infliction of harm to humans, and torture of humans, in addition to all other New Age technologies such as aerosol weapons, ELF weapons, scalar weapons currently being used worldwide by Global Military/Intelligence entities via an Artificial Intelligence network in the vast, planned, and calculated subjugation of humanity.
From Exopolitics.blog.com:Alfred was General Counsel to the New York City Environmental Protection Administration, a futurist at Stanford Research Institute (where he directed the proposed 1977 Carter White House extraterrestrial communication study), and was a NGO delegate to the United Nations and the UNISPACE conference. He was also a an Administrator of the Brownsville Community Health Center in the Lower Rio Grande Valley of Texas as well as a Judge on the Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Tribunal.
Alfred has been active in public broadcasting in the United States (WBAI-FM) and Canada (Vancouver Coop Radio); public interest counter intelligence (Assassination Information Bureau); deconstruction of the Transhumanist Agenda; the peaceful uses of outer space (Institute for Cooperation in Space); Life on Mars (Mars Anomaly Research Society); multidimensional online education (Omniversity in development); and news (NewsInsideOut.com; Exopolitics.com).
A most powerful mechanism to defeat sentient predatory AI Artificial Intelligence is to restore and enforce Universal, natural, international, humanitarian, and criminal law so that AI Artificial Intelligence and its AI-entrained infrastructure of compromised humans cannot carry out its destructive Agenda and acts against humanity and Earth using technology and violations of fundamental human rights.
Dr. Rauni Kilde and others worked with me in developing this Model Statute that can be adopted and enforced in international, regional (European Union), national, provincial and municipal jurisdictions to do so.
Please take this Model Statutes to the United Nations, the EU, the Parliaments of Poland and other nations, the municipalities of the world such as Brussels and let us stop the Transhumanist Agenda and predatory AI Artificial Intelligence.
Model Statute banning AI Artificial Intelligence technologies to entrain or torture humans
MODEL STATUTE concerning weapons systems operating on new physics principles used by AI Artificial Intelligence to entrain humans and/or to torture or inflict other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment including electronic weapons, electromagnetic weapons, magnetic weapons, directed energy weapons, geophysical weapons, wave-energy weapons, frequency weapons, genetic weapons, scalar weapons, psychotronic weapons, chemtrail aerosol weapons, implant weapons, nanotechnology weapons, high frequency active aural high altitude ultra low frequency weapons, information technology weapons.
MODEL STATUTE FOR THE EUROPEAN UNION
Council Regulation (EC) No _________________ of _________, 201_
Council Regulation (EC) No _________________ of _________, 201_ concerning weapons systems operating on new physics principles used by AI Artificial Intelligence to entrain humans and/or to torture or inflict other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment including but not limited to electronic weapons, electromagnetic weapons, magnetic weapons, directed energy weapons, geophysical weapons, wave-energy weapons, frequency weapons, genetic weapons, scalar weapons, psychotronic weapons, chemtrail aerosol weapons, implant weapons, nanotechnology weapons, high frequency active aural high altitude ultra low frequency weapons, information technology weapons.
Official Journal _______________________________________
Council Regulation (EC) ________________________________
of ______________ 201_
concerning weapons systems operating on new physics principles used to torture or inflict other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment including but not limited to electronic weapons, electromagnetic weapons, magnetic weapons, directed energy weapons, geophysical weapons, wave-energy weapons, frequency weapons, genetic weapons, scalar weapons, psychotronic weapons, chemtrail aerosol weapons, implant weapons, nanotechnology weapons, high frequency active aural high altitude ultra low frequency weapons, information technology weapons.
(hereinafter collectively referred to as “new physics torture weapons”).
THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 133 thereof,
Having regard to the proposal from the Commission,
(1) Pursuant to Article 6 of the Treaty on European Union, respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms constitutes one of the principles common to the Member States. In view of this, the Community resolved in 1995 to make respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms an essential element of its relations with third countries.
(2) Article 5 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Article 7 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and Article 3 of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms all lay down an unconditional, comprehensive prohibition on torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment.Other provisions, in particular the United Nations Declaration Against Torture and the 1984 United Nations Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment, place an obligation on States to prevent torture.
(3) Article 2(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union states that no one shall be condemned to the death penalty or executed. On 29 June 1998, the Council approved “Guidelines on EU policy towards third countries on the death penalty” and resolved that the European Union would work towards the universal abolition of the death penalty.
(4) Article 4 of the said Charter states that no one shall be subjected to torture or to inhuman or degrading treatment. On 9 April 2001, the Council approved “Guidelines to the EU policy toward third countries, on torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment”. These guidelines refer to both the adoption of the EU Code of Conduct on Arms Exports in 1998 and the ongoing work to introduce EU-wide controls on the exports of paramilitary equipment as examples of measures to work effectively towards the prevention of torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment within the Common Foreign and Security Policy. These guidelines also provide for third countries to be urged to prevent the use and production of, and trade in, equipment that is designed to inflict torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment and prevent the abuse of any other equipment to these ends.
(5) It is therefore appropriate to lay down Community rules on use and on trade with third countries in new physics torture weapons. These rules are instrumental in promoting respect for human life and for fundamental human rights and thus serve the purpose of protecting public morals. Such rules should ensure that Community economic operators do not derive any benefits from trade that either promotes or otherwise facilitates the implementation of policies on torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment, which are not compatible with the relevant EU Guidelines, the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and international conventions and treaties.
(6) For the purpose of this Regulation, it is considered appropriate to apply the definitions of torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment laid down in the 1984 United Nations Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment and in Resolution 3452 (XXX) of the General Assembly of the United Nations. These definitions should be interpreted taking into account the case law on the interpretation of the corresponding terms in the European Convention on Human Rights and in relevant texts adopted by the EU or its Member States.
(7) The Guidelines to the EU Policy toward third countries on torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment provide, inter alia, that the Heads of Mission in third countries will include in their periodic reports an analysis of the occurrence of torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment in the State of their accreditation, and the measures taken to combat it. It is appropriate for the competent authorities to take these and similar reports made by relevant international and civil society organisations into account when deciding on requests for authorisations. Such reports should also describe any new physics torture weapons used in third countries for the purpose of torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment.
(8) In order to contribute to the prevention of torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment, it is considered necessary to prohibit the supply to third countries of technical assistance related to goods which have no practical use other than for the purpose of torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment by new physics torture weapons.
(9) The aforementioned Guidelines state that, in order to meet the objective of taking effective measures against torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment, measures should be taken to prevent the use, production and trade of new physics torture weapons, including parts and equipment thereof, which are designed to inflict torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment. It is up to the Member States to impose and enforce the necessary restrictions on the use and production of such equipment.
(10) In order to take into account new data and technological developments, the lists of new physics torture weapons and parts and equipment thereof covered by this Regulation should be kept under review and provision should be made for a specific procedure to amend these lists.
(11) The Commission and the Member States should inform each other of the measures taken under this Regulation and of other relevant information at their disposal in connection with this Regulation.
(12) Member States should lay down rules on penalties applicable to infringements of the provisions of this Regulation and ensure that they are implemented. Those penalties should be effective, proportionate and dissuasive.
(13) This Regulation respects the fundamental rights and observes the principles recognised in particular by the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union,
HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:
Subject matter, scope and definitions
Subject matter and scope
This Regulation lays down Community rules governing new physics torture weapons.
For the purposes of this Regulation:
(a) “new physics torture weapons” means weapons or weapons systems operating on new physics principles used to torture or inflict other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment including but not limited to electronic weapons, electromagnetic weapons, magnetic weapons, directed energy weapons, geophysical weapons, wave-energy weapons, frequency weapons, genetic weapons, scalar weapons, psychotronic weapons, chemtrail aerosol weapons, implant weapons, nanotechnology weapons, high frequency active aural high altitude ultra low frequency weapons, information technology weapons.
(b) “torture” means the use of new physics torture weapons to commit any act by which severe pain or suffering, whether physical or mental, is intentionally inflicted on a person for such purposes including but not limited to intentional psychological programming, experimentation, voice to skull communication, artificial telepathy, remote influencing, remote inducement of physical or mental illness, mood management, mind control of persons or populations, remote virtual sexual assault, remote virtual rape, forced reproductive sterilization by means of chemtrails aerosol weapons, forced reproductive sterilization by means of vaccinations, (“RHIC- EDOM”) radio hypnotic intracerebral control and electronic dissolution of memory, remote transmission of images or films to brain, remote reading and controlling of thoughts, subliminal thought control, tinnitus, remote introduction of implants into body via vaccination, remote introduction of implants into body via chemtrails aerosol weapon, remote introduction of implants into body via food, water or potable liquid, remote introduction of implants into body via nanobot, remote scarring of body, remote introduction of inorganic particles into body, telephone terror including remotely induced epilepsy, muscle pains and cramps in neck and legs, headaches, severe toothaches, sudden falling off of healthy teeth while talking on the phone, remotely induced backaches, vibrations in various parts of the body, itching, ear tumors, brain tumors, respiratory diseases, asthma, immediate diarrhea and vomiting, remote deformation of victim’s body parts and organs including deformed bloated abdomen, deformed neck, lumps and channels on the head, shoulders widened, blown up arms and legs, deformed genitals and other deformations, remote inducement of extreme weight gain or abnormal weight loss endangering the victim’s health, remote inducement of blindness, cataracts or eye cancer, remote control of gangstalking or gangstalkers, gangstalking, commission of the following crimes in conjunction with the use of new physics torture weapons: harassment, breaking and entering of private property, ransacking of private property.
(c) “assassination” means the intentional use of new physics torture weapons to cause the death of a person by means including but not limited to heart attack; strangulation; suffocation; fast-acting cancer; diabetes; myocardial infarction; hemorrhage in brain; thrombosis in lungs; infectious disease.
Weapons systems operating on new physics principles used to torture or inflict other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment
Any use of a new energy torture weapon to torture or inflict other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment on any individual in the European Union or on any European Union citizen shall be prohibited, irrespective of the geographical location of such weapon, inside or outside of the European Union.
Any export of a new energy torture weapon shall be prohibited, irrespective of the origin of such weapon.
The supply of technical assistance related to a new energy torture weapon, whether for consideration or not, from the customs territory of the Community, to any person, entity or body in a third country shall be prohibited.
Any import of a new energy torture weapon shall be prohibited, irrespective of the origin of such weapon.
The acceptance by a person, entity or body in the customs territory of the Community of technical assistance related to a new energy torture weapon, supplied from a third country, whether for consideration or not, by any person, entity or body shall be prohibited.
High frequency active aural high altitude ultra low frequency weapon – The manufacture, deployment, or operation of any new physics torture weapon known as a high frequency active aural high altitude ultra low frequency weapon that uses high frequency (HF) electromagnetic or scalar wave transmission to excite the ionosphere or any other part of the Earth’s atmosphere over the territory of the Community in order to torture or inflict other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment on any individual, weather modification in the European Union or on any European Union citizen, irrespective of the geographical location of the ground component of such weapon, inside or outside of the Community shall be absolutely prohibited. The combination of those weapons from different locations is also forbidden.
Chemtrail aerosol weapon – The manufacture, deployment, operation, or dispersal of any new physics torture weapon known as a chemtrail aerosol weapon in or over any part of the Earth’s atmosphere over the territory of the Community in order to torture or inflict other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment on any individual in the European Union or on any European Union citizen shall be absolutely prohibited.
General and final provisions
In any case where an individual, organisation or Member State charged with violation of this Regulation shall plead national security or other reasons for secrecy as a legal defense to its actions, that individual, organisation or Member State shall be required to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that its actions were in fact directly related to national security or other reasons for secrecy and not to an intention or negligence to torture or inflict other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment.
Penalties and Compensation for Victims –
Member States shall lay down rules on penalties applicable to infringements of this Regulation imposing a minimum criminal penalty of twenty (20) years without possibility of parole to a maximum of life in prison without possibility of parole plus a fine of 1,000,000 Euros for each individual infringement and shall take all measures necessary to ensure that they are implemented. The penalties provided for must be effective, proportionate and dissuasive.
Compensation for Victims – Member States shall lay down rules on compensation to victims of any infringement of this Regulation which shall include:
(a) the costs of any surgery and physical or psychological therapy to fully restore the physical and mental health of the victim;
(b) financial compensation to the victim’s family for pain and suffering endured as a result of any infringement of this Regulation;
(c) financial compensation to the victim for loss of income and loss of property due to any infringement of this Regulation.
Member States shall take all measures necessary to ensure that such rules are implemented. The compensation provided for must be effective, proportionate and fair to the victim and the victim’s family. Wherever possible, the individual or organisation committing the infringement shall be held financially responsible for paying compensation, except that the victims and their families shall be entitled to compensation hereunder regardless of the ability of the individual or organisation committing the infringement to pay.
Member States shall notify the Commission of those rules by _____________201_ and shall notify it without delay of any subsequent amendment affecting them.
This Regulation shall apply to the customs territory of the Community.
Entry into force
This Regulation shall enter into force on ____________ 201_.
This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at _____________________, ______________ 201_
For the Council
“There are three basic types of EU legislation:
regulations, directives and decisions. “A regulation is similar to a national law
with the difference that it is applicable in all EU countries.”
European Commission ec.europa.eu
“The European Commission differs from the other institutions in that it alone has legislative initiative in the EU. Only the Commission can make formal proposals for legislation: they cannot originate in the legislative branches. However, the Council and Parliament may request the Commission to draft legislation, though the Commission does have the power to refuse to do so. Under the Lisbon Treaty, EU citizens are also able to request the Commission to legislate in an area via a petition carrying one million signatures, but this is not binding.”
This Model Statute can be adapted of adoption and implementation in any international and national jurisdiction.
In this wide-ranging conversation with Alfred Lambremont Webre on various subjects including after-life experiences and extraterrestrial contact, Dr. Rauni Luukanen-Kilde emphasizes how important it is for information on ongoing Military/Intelligence experiments and activities in the areas of Mind Control and Behavior Control using remote EMF weapons and technologies to be widely disseminated, and how essential it is for more of the world to wake up to what’s in process today as underlying agenda for all humanity behind the testing and operation of these technologies today on select “Targeted Individuals” in communities worldwide.
The agenda is transhumanist in nature, and the agenda is robotization of humanity, with RFID chips and brain EMFS being picked up and read remotely by satellites and drones, and thence influenced remotely, with remote Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and other remote-influencing technologies. Humans can thus be influenced to think, feel, act, behave, as State controllers behind the cyberneticists and neuroscientists and Artificial Intelligence engineers want humans to think, feel, act, and behave–this is what they want for our children. This is also the future envisioned for the remainder of humans post-depopulation scenarios already being enacted in skies above us via nanotoxin-loaded chem trails, now loaded as well in the waters we drink and use, in the food laced with GMOS and pesticides and processed with endocrine-disruptors we are being served, unlabelled, in viruses, vaccines, and other bio-weapons we are both being sprayed with and sold on, scenarios expected to remove 85% of humanity so the rest can subsist as servants of the “elite.”
“They can do anything these days, they can induce a myocardial infarction in a minute, they can induce brain damage in a minute–and people don’t know about it!…If people knew, they would all say they don’t want their son or daughter to be robotized, that is not what they envision for humanity–but people don’t know. The only way we can get out of this is through goodness, through connecting with the goodness of the Universe through the goodness of our own hearts and to ask for help, for assistance, but we cannot do that if people don’t know about these weapons. Awareness, Awareness, Awareness! We need people to know about these technologies, about what is going on.“
Re-posted, on request, from Mind Control in Deutschland und Europa, who are seeking to disseminate information on a call-in television program in Poland tomorrow, on Feb 8, to raise public awareness of Mind Control (EMF radiation/scalar/sonic) weaponry being used extra-judicially and covertly on citizens in Europe and worldwide, and discuss issues related to Mind Control Harassment, on the occasion of the newly-instituted International Day Against Mind Control, created to honor the anniversary of Dr. Rauni Luukanen-Kilde’s passing. As many know, Dr. Kilde, who was Chief Medical Officer of Finland, was a vocal opponent of Governmental and military mind control programs using Covert Electromagnetic weapons that she learned about in the course of her professional life, researched, authored books on, and took every opportunity to speak widely about. The TV program mentioned below is a joint venture of Swedish WHITE TV and Polish NTV, and will include Skype call-ins, more information below.
Dr. Kilde’s December, 2000 essay, posted here earlier, titled Microchip Implants, Mind Control, and Cybernetics traces the history of brain implants, the abuse of neurotechnologies in non-consensual brain experimentation projects being conducted worldwide today by governments and militaries, and warns against the very real and imminent dangers of human robotization implicit in these trends. You can explore her several informative and insightful talks and interviews on Youtube. Dr. Kilde, whose death is attributed to covert assault by Directed-Energy EMF weapons, which she had reported earlier, also spoke and wrote widely on subjects of spirituality, consciousness, and evolution, and was known and loved for her positive outlook, vitality of spirit, and outspokenness.
World Day against Mind Control on February 8th, 2016
Contributed by redaktion on Feb 06, 2016 – 01:20 PM Pageviews: 156
First international day in memory of Rauni Kilde and for TIs worldwide called for Monday, Februay 8th 2016. Polish NTV will send 3 hours special program. National Groups to send victims’ reports.
The following message was published by Tomek Bieniek from Poland.
As you recall, in Berlin I proposed on behalf of the Polish delegation and the originator, the NTV editor, Mr Zagórski, to proclaim the date of death of Dr. Rauni Luukanen-Kilde, International Day Against Mind Control. You have liked the idea and 8th of February is coming soon, so it’s time to put it into life and pay back the moral debt to her, who made so much for the TI’s movement.
Establish World Day for e-harassment victims
On this occasion STOPZET association together with the internet televisions: Swedish – WHITE TV and Polish – NTV propose to all the TIs’ of the world and their allies to take part in the common medial event.
Our aim is to proclaim the International Day Against Mind Control, to pay tribute to Dr. Kilde and to broadcast most widely via Internet the information about necessity of immediate prohibition of inventing, testing, producing and using the newest generation weapons that can remotely control human behavior.
On this occasion we plan to put online 2 following petitions to sign for you:
1) To the Polish Parliament about the prohibition of testing those weapons on the Polish citizens and about setting up the special parliamentarian committee to research the issue of secret EU and NATO experiments that were undertaken on us in this matter.
2) To EP (the letter edited by Mojmir Babacek that you know from Berlin)
International guests on Polish NTV
We plan at least 3 hours long program block. Our guests in studio will be Mojmir Babacek and Dr. Henning Witte that you know from Berlin, but we also count on the presence of the other TI friends on Skype or by video.
The first hour will be devoted to Dr. Kilde’s memory and the necessity of lobbying for the prohibition of weapons remotely influencing human beings’ nervous system. The second hour will be filled up with the statements of the victims of secret harassing from Poland and from all over the world.
Then we start the debate with the participation of Polish politicians and journalists. We would like to invite also you to take part in this event. .. watch NTV Poland on Monday
National Groups: Please contribute
We ask the representatives of national groups for a short video recording (2-3 min) about the situation of TIs in a relevant country. If there are a few associations in a country, we ask each of them to introduce itself, give the number of members, estimated number of victims of mind control, if it is known, as well as briefly mentioned the most important issues and initiatives. Please send us the recorded video till 5 february into the following address email@example.com by WE TRANSFER.
The point is to make other Internet users aware of global scale of the problem and the fact that it may happen to themselves at any time as well. In addition, we would like the decision-makers and persecutors realize that their victims start organising themselves and demanding the compensation.
You need not expose your personal details or the face if you don’t want. However a tongue of the transmission i.e. English is a crucial element, because the entire meeting and all video materials are live broadcast online, repeated in the evening program. Later it will be put on YT on the special Playlist. In the case your English was a barrier, please record yourself in your mother tongue and provide the recording with English subtitles.
Marathon of revealing silent violence
We also want to invite the politicians and journalists, who feel displeasure of the violence applied towards us and would like to hurry with help. They will be invited into the studio in person as well as virtually (via Skype). If you know such people in your countries, ask them to support our event with the brief presentation on video. Best in English, and if it is impossible, then with translation in subtitles into English. A few words will literally be enough in a style like this: My name is, I am representing …, I am supporting etc.
Please, do it as soon as possible, as we will still have to put Polish subtitles and assemble that for Polish viewers in the end. In order to make the work easier for editors, we ask you to mark every recording with a category in English:
TI – for groups and associations of Tis, JOURNALIST, POLITICIAN or DIFFERENT. We are waiting for your recordings till 4 February and this deadline is intransigent.
At last, we will open a special page for private persons or organizations, which would like to express their support for the movement of TIs. An e-mail address, a full name or a name will be enough for an organization. You will get relevant links and materials soon and we ask- let us do it together.
It is only a small pace and marathon is in front of us, but it is necessary to start one day. Jointly and definitely. See you in NTV!
for NTV – Janusz zagórski for STOPZET – Ewa Pawela for WHITE TV – Henning Witte
From Farm Wars: “Barbara lives on a small ranch in Oregon where she raises geese, chickens, goats and horses. This rural lifestyle is under attack at the most basic level. Federal regulations and the corporate takeover of our food supply with Monsanto’s invasive GMO technology is designed to make it next to impossible to raise animals and organic food.
It is time to step up to the plate and fight or lose it all without a whimper. Choose to take a stand and fight. We can make a difference.”
Recent events in Burns, Oregon have shed light on just who is “grabbing the land.” Government operatives in the midst of the Malheur Wilderness turmoil have planted a false narrative that the BLM is simply trying to protect public lands from ranchers such as the Hammonds, who are trying to grab it for themselves, and supposed “environmentalists” are stepping up to support this propaganda.
But to understand the real story behind who is actually doing the land grabs, let’s take a little ride on the wayback machine starting with this 2010 press release:
Congressman Rob Bishop (UT-01), Chairman of the Congressional Western Caucus, today announced that he recently obtained the preceding 14 pages previously missing from an internal Department of Interior (DOI) memo leaked last February. The original document obtained in February by Bishop detailed planning within the DOI to use the Antiquities Act to potentially designate up to 13 million acres throughout the West as new national monuments. The newly obtained 14 pages further detail plans within the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) to completely overhaul the way federal lands are managed in the U.S., including the creation of new ecosystem areas that require the acquisition of new federal lands. The plans would vastly expand the power, reach and control of federal land managers.
“These 14 pages are further evidence of this Administration’s efforts, under the guidance of Secretary Salazar, to control western lands by unilaterally locking them up without input from local residents and stakeholders nor the approval of Congress. Their plotting behind closed doors is disingenuous at best and flies in the face of this Administration’s so-called ‘transparency’,” said Congressman Bishop. “Thousands of westerners whose livelihoods depend upon access to our public lands stand to be affected by these decisions and yet this document blatantly goes out of its way to exclude their input or participation. If there was any question about whether or not this Administration has declared a war on the West, these new documents are evidence enough.”The BLM is only one of the divisions of the DOI that have compiled similar memos. On February 26, 2010, Congressman Bishop, House Natural Resources Committee Ranking Member Doc Hastings (WA-04) and other Western Caucus Members sent a letter to DOI Secretary Ken Salazar requesting all relative information pertaining to the DOI’s plans to designate new national monuments throughout the West. It has been more than five months since the request was made and the DOI continues to refuse to fully comply with the official document request.“The reality is that this is NOT the complete set of documents pertaining to the Administration’s plans to overhaul the way public lands are managed in this country. We know that other documents like this are out there. We’ve requested them, but the folks at Interior continue to stonewall,”Bishop added. “My biggest concern is that if they’re willing to let documents this damning out from their safekeeping, they are surely protecting others that are far worse and even more revealing.”
Page 3, paragraph 6: The sentence, “In order to expand this network of treasured lands to include the diversity of landscapes currently managed by the BLM…,” shows that the Administration is working to broaden the jurisdictional scope of lands currently managed by the BLM.
Page 5, paragraph 5: The sentence, “Should the legislative process not prove fruitful, or if a nationally significant natural or cultural land resource were to come under threat of imminent harm, the BLM would recommend that the Administration consider using the Antiquities Act…,” shows that the Administration is constructing a new management structure without the approval of Congress.
Page 6 (b), page 7 (4.), page 8 (3.): Details planning for further land acquisition and funding mechanisms.
Page 7, paragraph 1; Page 6, paragraph 7: By their own numbers, the Administration will target the “acute” problem of private landholdings in BLM administered areas to the sum of 412,675 acres, or more than 370,000 football fields.
Page 9, paragraph 5: The sentence, “The BLM recommends that any major funding increases be phased in over a five-year period to allow the BLM time to build capacity in order to accomplish the increased work-load,” shows that the BLM will require an increase in funding to accommodate the proposed expanded management of lands throughout the West.
“I remain committed to forcing Secretary Salazar and all others involved in this matter into the light of full transparency, which as these documents prove, is not a place they seem to be comfortable,”Bishop concluded.“But this potential land and power grab needs to exposed, it needs to be laid out before the public, and it needs to be stopped.”
Please take special note of the section highlighted in red:
Page 7, paragraph 1; Page 6, paragraph 7: By their own numbers, the Administration will target the “acute” problem of private landholdings in BLM administered areas to the sum of 412,675 acres, or more than 370,000 football fields.
Fast forward to the following, published in 2014:
Published on May 13, 2014
The newly obtained 14 pages further detail plans within the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) to completely overhaul the way federal lands are managed in the U.S., including the creation of new ecosystem areas that require the acquisition of new federal lands. The plans would vastly expand the power, reach and control of federal land managers.
Now, let’s understand just where the Hammond family of cattle ranchers fit in with all of this. They are the last private property holdouts in an area surrounded by BLM land. The court has declared that the BLM has first right of refusal to buy their land if/when they decide to sell. This is a polite way of stating that since the government is intent on grabbing the land for Agenda 21, everything will be done to get that accomplished. And when the Hammonds can no longer run their ranch due to unjust imprisonment, restriction to water and loss of grazing rights, no one will be able to buy it or even want to except for, you’ve got it, the BLM. And the agency will get it for pennies on the dollar.
By the way, while people are shouting “save public land from cattle and the ranchers” at Malheur, this is what the BLM is actually doing with some of the other public lands it grabs via Agenda 21:
Posting these two articles together since they seem to address the same subject, and offer further clarification re. what has transpired with recent postings of liens, rebuttals, claims, and insight into current status in the efforts underway to restore the USA covered in these recent posts (& others):
From Clarification: For now, we have saved The Constitution for the united States of America. The rats sought to “vacate” the contract by entering the UNITED STATES, INC. into bankruptcy without naming a successor to contract. That left the “federal” side of the contract vacant and flapping in the wind. We formed an agreement with the American Native Nations — the Athabasca and Lakota– to fulfill the federal side. We issued two sets of Sovereign Letters Patent, one to reaffirm the united States of America, and one to establish a new arrangement with the Native people to bring them out of their POW status and incarceration in the Jurisdiction of the Sea and put them back on the land as free, sovereign, and independent people. We then sealed this arrangement with a Declaration of Joint Sovereignty, spelling out the intent of our actions. These actions were sent by Registered Mail to the Pope, the Queen, the UN Security Council, the United Nations Secretary General and others.
From Answers:I hate to tell everyone in America that they have been outrageously swindled by institutions they trusted—by banks, by what they thought was their government, by law firms and judges they trusted— but such is the case. Because nobody was minding the store after the Civil War, thieves settled in and milked us in ever-increasingly terrible acts of fraud and enslavement and oppression— and now that the whole fraud is discovered and falling apart, these criminals have offered their “Final Solution”—- kill their creditors. Just like they killed off the hapless Jewish people in Germany. They took out million dollar life insurance policies on each and every one of us Americans, on Germans, on Japanese, on Aussies, on Canadians. They figure that if they kill off six and a half billion creditors, they can save themselves and have the whole planet to themselves.
We have a better solution. We intercept their plans and we tell everyone worldwide what these unspeakable vermin have planned and intended to do, simply because they don’t want to pay back what they owe to all the rest of us.
Wed, Feb 3, 2016: Clarification — What We Have Done, from Anna von Reitz
I am not a legal counsel for the General (Dunford). We are all working on reclaiming American assets for Americans. For right now, it’s improper to call what we are doing a “New Republic”— that will require a public education process, each one making their political status (citizenship, etc.) choices, the election of Fiduciary Deputies from each State to attend a Continental Congress to either amend or abolish the existing actual Constitution.
For now, we have saved The Constitution for the united States of America. The rats sought to “vacate” the contract by entering the UNITED STATES, INC. into bankruptcy without naming a successor to contract. That left the “federal” side of the contract vacant and flapping in the wind. We formed an agreement with the American Native Nations — the Athabasca and Lakota– to fulfill the federal side. We issued two sets of Sovereign Letters Patent, one to reaffirm the united States of America, and one to establish a new arrangement with the Native people to bring them out of their POW status and incarceration in the Jurisdiction of the Sea and put them back on the land as free, sovereign, and independent people. We then sealed this arrangement with a Declaration of Joint Sovereignty, spelling out the intent of our actions. These actions were sent by Registered Mail to the Pope, the Queen, the UN Security Council, the United Nations Secretary General and others.
For the first time since the original Constitution was adopted, the federal side of the contract is now in the hands of Americans devoted to America— not British (Federal Reserve) or French (IMF) interlopers. For the first time, the Federal Agents have a vested interest in truly and honestly protecting America and Americans, because if they hurt or plunder us, they hurt and plunder themselves.
And now we are all going after the assets that are owed to Americans which have been purloined by international banks and the “governmental services corporations” they have run as storefronts —under conditions of gross fraud and deceit.
Please note there is no “statute of limitation” on the crime of fraud, much less malicious fraud tort claims.
Monday, February 1, 2016
Answers for Tom— and the Rest of the World, Too. by Anna Von Reitz
ANSWERS FOR TOM:
1) A few years back I wrote a series of replies concerning the argument that “US citizens are not protected under the Constitution and Bill of Rights because they were not signatories to the documents” or similarly that “the documents only apply to Federal employees and to Washington DC and its territories only”.
My reply was that every American should SIGN these documents and notarize them and then file such with a County Clerk or other registered authority. This provides a clear statement of jurisdiction and the fact that one has decided to be under “Land Law” and not Admiralty Law. This would in essence negate any and all Federal or corporate law as being binding on that individual.
To date I have not found anyone who can confirm or negate this assertion or are even willing to respond.
The Declaration of Independence is the most important document of our Organic Law so far as the living people are concerned. The function of The Declaration of Independence is that of a Last Will and Testament made for the Future Generations of Mankind by the Testators–the Founding Fathers who in pledging their lives, fortunes, and sacred honor made their bequest to all future generations of Americans, and it must be more fully appreciated, to all Mankind.
The Declaration is the embodiment of our national trust, our inheritance, and our founding document. It remains the form and foundation of our National Will, which we pass on in turn to our children and all those who are born on our shores and to all those people wheresoever they may be, who are willing to pledge their lives, their fortunes, and their sacred honor to the same cause of freedom and justice for all people everywhere, now, and in the future.
You don’t have to be an American and you don’t have to be born on our soil to claim The Declaration of Independence as your birthright: The Declaration of Independence stands for all Mankind, throughout all Time. We continue to give its words meaning and we continue to pass it on to an ever-widening progeny of people all over the world who have taken it into their hearts and lived it with their lives and who strive to pass this most important of all inheritances on to their children.
The Constitution is by comparison a trivial document. The Constitution is a tri-lateral treaty of interesting form, also a simple trust indenture binding the new “federal government” entity to guard and respect our national trust, guarantee our Bill of Rights, and other than that, it is a commercial services agreement that sets up the organizational management structure to deliver those nineteen enumerated services all of which are functions to be undertaken in the international jurisdiction of the sea and under the international Law of the Sea.
When Federales call the Constitution “The Supreme Law of the Land” they are looking at it from their perspective–that is, as people who do their duties in the jurisdiction of the sea and who have to respect the agreements of the Constitution when they go ashore on the jurisdiction of the land. The Constitution is their supreme law with respect to us and their interactions with us, not any “supreme law” over us. Similarly, the United States Supreme Court is their supreme court, not ours. The United States Congress is their legislative body, not ours. Ours top legislative body is the Continental Congress—when and if we elect Deputies and seat one.
The Constitution is a treaty and commercial service agreement between the united States of America and the so-called Federal Government created as a result of the agreement—not the people. Except for the Preamble and Bill of Rights, the people have no part in it. The people are not signatories to The Constitution— the delegates who signed it were all functioning as Fiduciary Deputies for their respective colonies doing business as the united States of America and the focus of the document is so entirely on the business of setting up international representation in the jurisdiction of the sea that it barely mentions the pre-existing Common Law Court System owed to the people— just a passing nod in Article I and Article 6, and a single direct and explicit directive in Amendment VII.
Many American have grown up with the completely silly idea that The Constitution is the source of their rights, when in fact The Constitution merely recognizes and guarantees pre-existing rights claimed and delivered by The Declaration of Independence. The Constitution limits the Federal Government, not the people.
Many have also grown up with the idea that the Federal Government created by The Constitution is our government, when in fact it is not our government and never has been. The Federal Government is an association of sovereign nation states acting together in mutual self-interest with regard to the nineteen enumerated powers delegated to it–and it has never been a sovereign government with respect to us at all. Our sovereign government is vested in the organic states and the people. That thing in Washington, DC, is under obligation to protect our national trust, to respect the treaties created under The Constitution, and to provide nineteen enumerated services all in the international jurisdiction of the sea and under the Law of the Sea. Period. Put bluntly, the Federal Government works for us under contract. It’s our employee, and it has abused its position of trust to commit credit fraud and identity theft against its employers and benefactors.
Signing onto the Constitution would just commit us each as parties to the contract, and our Forefathers purposefully ordained that we should NOT be parties to that contract, so as to not be bound to it and enslaved by it. Only states are bound by treaties and obligated to pay the public debts. We retain subrogated rights through the united States of America, and the actual united States of America are the entities that need to be operated on the land jurisdiction and used to ensure enforcement.
Having covered all this you are prepared to understand that the United States Statutes-at-Large provide the only process by which anyone born on the land of one of the organic states of the Union can ever become a Federal United States Citizen. This process set down in 1804 has numerous requirements including filings and notices and a two year waiting period. It is literally impossible for any American to actually vacate their birthright status without performing this duty— which voids all claims that we ever did or ever could trade our birthright for a bowl of porridge.
Our own United States Statutes-at-Large adequately protect us from false claims against our true political status despite the best attempts of the perpetrators to deceive the other nations of the world and continue their campaign of Breach of Trust, Mischaracterization, Press-Ganging, Inland Piracy, Identity Theft, Credit Fraud, Unlawful Conversion, Kidnapping, Loan Fraud, Securities Fraud, Currency Fraud, Copyright Theft, and more against us.
We can also formally “Expatriate” from any presumption of foreign political status— but our position is that we never were and never could be removed from the land jurisdiction of our nation by any fraudulent action undertaken by a private corporate Board of Directors secretively occupying vacant Public Offices and abusing them for private gain.
Please help spread the word throughout the world that we have been the victims of identity theft and credit fraud, undisclosed enslavement, probate fraud, and numerous other crimes and that the same loathsome practices have similarly been applied to other innocent nations worldwide including Canada, Australia, New Zealand, South Africa, the EU, Japan, and more. Every nation on Earth has been victimized by the scourge of these criminal banks and their henchmen, the members of the Bar Associations working as the “Enforcers” of this malicious fraud scheme.
Please also help spread the word that The Declaration of Independence belongs to all Mankind, not just Americans. We welcome our brothers and sisters throughout the world to embrace our heritage and fulfill our pledge to our sons and daughters to their sons and daughters, too.
2) Your recent article on the TRUE REVALUATION of the Dollar is for the most part correct but it stops short of valuing the Dollar in the US only. 80% of all Dollars are OVERSEAS with NO backing. These and all currencies are backed by the Collateral Accounts and agreements that gave rise to the Treaty of Versailles and the Historical Boxes issued by the FEDs in the 30’s and all the fraud that surrounds such a mess.
Currently I am fighting the lodging of USD in T’s into the Malaysian Central Bank in exchange for local currency. This will leave the Central Bank holding what may be toilet paper and a bunch of greedy politicians, bank official and lawyers with real cash and all indebted to the Holder of the bulk of the funds for financing national projects. Basically this is a scam with big pigs at the trough.
My question is what do you really think will happen to all those Overseas Dollars in a revaluation? Particularly since these were not created by the US or by trade, but often through rollover programs and other bank interest outside of the US and often through fraudulent or illegal activities. This also involves derivatives and other market manipulations.
I feel that there will be a lot of “Zeros” written off and the separation of domestic banking from bank fraudulent gambling. I am not for throwing banksters in jail but permanent retirement from the banking industry is a must. They can get jobs at McD’s.
We are in the process of repudiating the odious debt compiled by the IMF and its minions against our credit, and tracking down the American Assets that Secondary Creditors have falsely claimed as “abandoned property”—such as the American portion of the gold reserves being held by the World Bank/IBRD.
Our actual dollar— the only real dollar there is — the United States Silver Dollar issued by the Republic will be backed, but not one penny-worth of our assets or credit will go to back any private script of any kind issued by any bank anywhere on Earth. That includes “United States Treasury Notes” and the rest of the “Federal Reserve Notes” that are floating around everywhere— we won’t be buying any of that foreign currency back and we don’t suggest that anyone else take any wooden nickels, either. Here’s the situation:
In a debt-credit system, as you know, you can’t have a debt without an equal credit being created. So how did we wind up with an $18 trillion dollar “National Debt”? Where’s the “National Credit” that goes with the debt? Answer: we paid it all as it accrued with our goods and labor, and that National Credit should have been applied to the National Debt. Instead, the criminal banks and the bogus “Treasury Department” siphoned off the National Credit owed to us into their own pockets and simply never paid the debts we thought in good faith that we were paying.
We gave them the labor, the assets, and the resources to pay all our debts plus interest and they just sat there, year after year, letting the debt side of the transactions pile up against the victims. It would be like collecting someone’s rent money for years, never paying the landlord, and then pretending that the victim was a deadbeat who still owed the rent when the landlord came to town for an accounting. So the rats owe us $18 plus trillion dollars and they left town, filed for bankruptcy protection for themselves, and left us holding the bag.
Number 1: They did all this with criminal intention and via fraud and malicious, purposeful deceit, including copyright fraud against our given names. They deserve no bankruptcy protection, and they deserve no protection from any “corporate veil”. Consider the corporate veil already pierced and picture the outraged American people as well as all the angry creditors–like China– who haven’t been paid by these rats on the other side of the swindle, coming to dinner and going after all these criminal banks and their “governmental services corporations” and the people behind all this crappola.
Number 2: If they didn’t make enough profit after stealing us blind for a hundred years to pay their lawful debts including the debts they owe our creditors, that’s a problem for them, not for us.
Here’s another part of the swindle. The perpetrators gave themselves a fixed exchange rate for their “Federal Reserve Notes” against our actual United States Dollars defined as an ounce of fine silver—-one of their worthless I.O.U.’s in exchange for an ounce of fine silver. In this way they quietly emptied out Fort Knox of all our gold and silver reserves in “equitable exchange” for paper they printed using our credit, and then charged us interest for the “loan” of their private bank script. This was only possible because the American people were kept in the dark and trusted what they believed to be their own government.
Number 3: We repeat — if they didn’t make enough profit from this outrageous currency swindle to pay all their lawful debts plus treble damages to the victims, that’s a problem for them, not for us. They stole our gold and silver and hoarded it and now plan to sell it back to the people they stole it from at 5000% or better profit margins. Either that, or all the people who have been harmed by their criminality demand that these banks be liquidated and these banker’s private fortunes be seized and used to repay the victims. Please note– we were not the only ones who suffered outright theft of large gold and silver reserves. Almost every nation on this planet suffered the same.
In addition to the exchange rate swindle, we also suffered confiscation of privately held gold in the 1930’s. King Rat Franklin Delano Roosevelt gave our gold to the Federal Reserve Banks to hold as collateral backing their phony version of “United States Dollar” used in international trade. For over 80 years our gold sat in their vaults and was used as collateral benefiting them and when the bankruptcy was finally over in 1999— were we notified as the Priority Creditors and known Heirs of the Priority Creditors to come reclaim our assets? The titles to our land and homes that had been used as collateral backing the debts of the United States of America, Inc. bankrupted by FDR? The gold stolen by jack-booted FBI and Revenue Agents from our Grandmothers and Grandfathers? We were not told a word, not notified at all. Instead, the World Bank/IBRD came forward as Secondary Creditors and claimed our gold as “abandoned assets” belonging to “unknown heirs”.
All these banks can find every one of us right smart quick when they have a tax bill or a fee-bearing charge to make against the “persons” they created as franchises benefitting their governmental services corporations and named after us by stealing and copyrighting our given names, but when it came time to pay us the receipts of all the escrow accounts related to the bogus “mortgages” they sold us, they couldn’t find us. They didn’t even know who we are or where we lived. And they didn’t know where to return all the land titles they seized and placed on our property under color of law back in the 1930’s, nor did they know where the confiscated gold needed to go, either. So they just seized it all as “abandoned assets” belonging to “unknown heirs” and got ready to sell our property and our inheritance off to the highest bidder to profit themselves some more.
Now they have set up a “Drop Box” and called it the “Global Debt Facility” and put Karen Hudes and the 188 members of the Board of Governors of the World Bank (one of the perpetrators) in charge of getting rid of the stolen loot. They have had the brass cajones to try to pass themselves off as great philanthropists for offering to give our assets and the assets of other victims away, but sorry, nobody is buying it anymore.
Number 4: While the “Federal Reserve” was busy committing all this crime against us and the “IMF” was colluding with the Federal Reserve to pull all this off, and other banks like the World Bank and IBRD and HSB and Bank of Scotland and lots of others were busy getting their fingers extremely dirty, the Priority Creditors didn’t come forward because they were never told a word about any of this. God does work in mysterious ways. Not all Americans are crooks and not all were asleep. So a few — a very few — claimed back the assets owed to all Americans. Think of it as a Class Action in Commerce.
I hate to tell everyone in America that they have been outrageously swindled by institutions they trusted—by banks, by what they thought was their government, by law firms and judges they trusted— but such is the case. Because nobody was minding the store after the Civil War, thieves settled in and milked us in ever-increasingly terrible acts of fraud and enslavement and oppression— and now that the whole fraud is discovered and falling apart, these criminals have offered their “Final Solution”—- kill their creditors. Just like they killed off the hapless Jewish people in Germany. They took out million dollar life insurance policies on each and every one of us Americans, on Germans, on Japanese, on Aussies, on Canadians. They figure that if they kill off six and a half billion creditors, they can save themselves and have the whole planet to themselves.
We have a better solution. We intercept their plans and we tell everyone worldwide what these unspeakable vermin have planned and intended to do, simply because they don’t want to pay back what they owe to all the rest of us.
Still think that a job at McD’s is an appropriate punishment for what these people have done? Bear in mind that they think they are smart and that the rest of us are just dumb animals, here to serve them and be sacrificed as needed. Bear in mind that they are completely unrepentant, even now, when the guillotines they purchased to use on others are being prepared for them, they remain cocky and arrogant, confident that they are going to live to collect on our life insurance policies and the assets of the public transmitting utilities they recently named after us—-which they call “derivatives”.
You give the government of Malaysia a message for us—- help us nail these rats to the wall and seize their assets and liquidate their banks and their private fortunes and their foundation shelters—-nail them before they murder billions of innocent people they owe money to— and we will be happy to settle all legitimate debts that any American may have and we will pay those debts in gold or silver or other mutually acceptable commodities having actual value and we will back any script we issue with actual value, too.
To follow this story, or another facet of it (Global Collateral Accounts, President Sukarno, JFK, and more) at Neil Keenan‘s site, please visit his (rather mind-bending 🙂 History and Events Timeline page, and check in on current status there with ongoing cabal-closedown efforts by Neil Keenan and Group K on his home page.
Exclusive Reportage on Counter-Terrorism “Manufactured-Target” Targeting & Gross Human Rights Violations in Amoral Human Experimentation Crimes by Intelligence Agencies, Law (Lie) Enforcement, & US/NATO Military Divisions: Off-the-Charts Torture & Abuse of “Targeted Individuals”
GLOBAL BRAIN ENSLAVEMENT, DNA BIORESONANCE, & EXOTIC MILITARY TECH: TARUN RAVI REPORTS | REPORT 296 | At Bitchute | At Brighteon | At Odysee | At Rumble | Posted Oct 4, 2022
CARNICOM DISCLOSURE UPDATE 2022 – PANEL 2 | BIOTECH TRANSFORMATION VS RESILIENCE IN DIVINE CREATION | At all channels | Posted Sep 28, 2022 Report 295 | Michelle Ford/California Assembly on Restoring Your Status as American on Land & Soil | At Bitchute | Brighteon | Odysee | Rumble| Posted Sep 25, 2022
Free Keene’s web site/A peace-liberty-voluntarism project pursuing and promoting peaceful living in Free Keene, New Hampshire
Free State Project
Free State Project’s website/A Liberty in our Lifetime project in New Hampshire, pursuing liberty, community, and peaceful living
New Earth Project
New Earth Project website/Open platform to unite humanity and create initiatives to support the emergence of absolute freedom and sovereign creative expression for all
Public Intelligence Blog
Blog for Earth Intelligence Network, Phi Beta Iota the Public Intelligence Blog/Promotes hybrid transparent governance, collective intelligence, true cost economics, and whole systems understanding