Melanie Vritschan with 2-week-old Baby Amethyst Vritschan, Erasme Hopital, Nov 3, 2017
Powerful and hard-hitting (livecast today at 4:30 pm Eastern/10:30 pm CET/1:30 pm Pacific Time on Ramola D Reports/Youtube) conversation featuring particle physicist Dr. Katherine Horton, War Crimes Tribunal judge Alfred Lambremont Webre, and founder of ICATOR, Melanie Vritschan, whose baby has been “medically-kidnapped” and is still inexplicably being held by Erasme Hopital, Brussels, Belgium.
A court hearing date has been set for December 21, two months after the baby’s birth on October 18, one day after which psychiatrists at Erasme Hopital set off a train of traumatic events for Melanie and Amethyst Vritschan including abusive psychiatric assessments for Melanie and brutal separation from her mother for Amethyst—all on the basis of impetuous and completely-off-the-mark diagnostic conclusions they jumped to, following misconstrued conversations relayed as hearsay from a midwife to whom Dr. Horton had spoken.
One week after her unlawful confinement in Psychiatry, Melanie was pronounced perfectly free of mental illness by a judge, but the 30-day separation edict set in motion by Erasme psychiatrists remained in place, with the hospital eventually authorized by the separate Juvenile Court to set up visiting hours for mother and child.
Melanie offers an update as to what is going on currently, what her visiting hours currently comprise, and all of the various events surrounding, for instance, the recent revocation followed by reinstatement of her son’s visiting rights.
Alfred Webre offers the big-picture view of what is happening as part of the framework within which these events are taking place; he reminds us that high level criminality involving the aristocracy has set up pedophilia and child trafficking networks through the children’s and family court system, with hospitals also being complicit. His intent therefore is to secure a win for humanity by analyzing the situation and offering his best counsel based on several decades of experience in law and with crooked courts.
Dr. Katherine Horton points out that it is fairly clear a criminal conspiracy is in play here, with a child being kidnapped on flimsy grounds, which point definitively to professional error and incompetence by Erasme doctors if not downright medical malpractice, where a diagnosing psychiatrist failed to examine whether a report made about an implant removed from a patient’s body was true or false, but chose instead to deliver a pernicious verdict of “paranoid delusions” in the mother, and caused the Procureur du Roi and the Juvenile Court to issue an immediate edict to separate the baby from her mother, one day after she was born. Dr. Horton spells out several of the steps leading to this outcome, including lies told by the midwife who misconstrued her conversation, and lies told by the nurse who removed Melanie’s baby from her room, saying she had jaundice or hepatitis.
Inevitably, we went over various traumatic events faced by mother and child several times, examining also what the implications would be for Erasme Hospital if the child is placed in a foster or adoptive home by the judge, totally ignoring the fact that the mother has no mental illness diagnosis, was wrongfully put in psychiatry by Dr. Marie Delhaye, the Erasme psychiatrist, is a great mother, and should be reunited with her child—total ruination of reputation, lawsuits, criminal complaints etc.
The best outcome of course is the release of baby Amethyst to her mother on Thursday. With that in mind, please help support court and translation fees with a donation to ICATOR at www.icator.be. Click on either Join Us or the Go Fund Me page links to donate.
Earlier video reports, articles, posts, press releases can be found here.
Alfred Lambremont Webre, publisher of NewsInsideOut.com and international War Crimes judge, conducted this recent video interview with Melanie Vritschan, founder of ICATOR, on the subject of the criminal abduction of her newborn baby daughter, Amethyst Vritschan.
Please watch this interview to hear the whole story, in Melanie’s own words, of how irresponsible doctors and psychiatrists in L’Hopital Erasme, a well-known hospital in Brussels literally ganged up on this human rights advocate to, without cause, criminally label her mentally ill and remove her newborn baby daughter from her care. The child is still being held–despite the fact that Judge Kristine Hansch found Melanie Vritschan to be perfectly whole, sane, and normal, and had her released from the hospital last week, on Oct 25. These are crimes against humanity, and the hospital administration and corrupt psychiatrists should be held accountable.The situation is urgent; critical bonding times shortly after birth have been disrupted by this criminal action by Erasme Hospital
Please follow this story, spread the news widely, and take action to help this tireless advocate for humanity get her baby back from this Belgian hospital, which, assisted by the Youth Court, has essentially kidnapped Amethyst.
In an Oct 22 webinar hosted by Alfred Lambremont Webre of Newsinsideout.com with Dr. Katherine Horton, high-energy physicist and former CERN scientist, and attended by JIT members Dr. Millicent Black and Ramola D, further details emerged in the story of how L’Hopital Erasme has subjected ICATOR founder and renowned human rights advocate Melanie Vritschan to a succession of traumas as they removed her newborn from her care, subjected her to a late-night interrogation without painkillers one day after her Ceasarean delivery, locked her up in a psychiatric ward room in a different building, and then involved the State prosecutor, the Procureur du Roi, to issue a state order to separate her from her baby.
Psychiatrists Intentionally Name Ms. Vritschan Delusional Despite Evidence to the Contrary
Around the time of the birth, a team of four psychiatrists at Hopital Erasme seemed to swing into action shortly after Dr. Horton had a conversation with a nurse-midwife about an implant partially retained in Melanie Vritschan’s throat and causing her difficulty in breathing during anesthesia. Dr. Horton had clearly indicated part of this implant was indeed removed from Ms. Vritschan and scientifically analyzed.
Mis-attributing Dr. Horton’s words to Ms. Vritschan and extrapolating from an educative and generalized statement Dr. Horton had made about various modern implant technologies such as in-ear microchip transmitters being used covertly on victims currently to mimic voices in heads, psychiatrists swung into action, claiming that Ms.Vritschan had mentioned implants and voices, had herself asked to be psychiatrically evaluated, and therefore needed a psychiatric evaluation.
On conversation with Ms. Vritschan, this was found to be untrue. In fact, in Catch 22 fashion, Ms. Vritschan had been threatened with forceful removal of her person to be psychiatrically assessed if she did not permit psychiatrists to assess her without coercion. “She was clearly coerced anyway,” said Dr. Horton.
When informed by Ms. Vritschan of the validity of Dr. Horton’s statement regarding implant-removal, and when shown physical evidence in documents and photographs on Ms. Vritschan’s laptop, the psychiatrists refused to listen and refused to look. In fact, in the later presence of police, a police officer who was shown the evidence requested that the psychiatrist be shown the evidence—which the psychiatrist refused to look at.
This fact cannot be stressed clearly enough: hospital psychiatrists failed to act like medical doctors or scientists, refusing to look at, assess, and understand clear and present evidence of implant-removal, but claimed that Ms. Vritschan was delusional by way of a “delusional belief in being implanted” and needed a psych evaluation.
Evidence of intentional foul play is also suggested by the fact that Dr. Horton was astonishingly evicted from the Maternity Ward room on Oct 19 where she was intending to stay overnight to assist Melanie Vritschan, by staff who informed her it was hospital policy to not permit guests to stay in the hospital when the baby was not in the room. When Dr. Horton questioned this policy, pointing out she was acting in the capacity of companion to Ms. Vritschan, and was there for the mother just as much as for the baby, staff brought in three burly security guards in an obvious act of intimidation and stated they would physically evict her if she did not leave.
Later that evening, after Dr.Horton had left, police were called in and Ms. Vritschan was moved against her will across Brussels to another hospital, Hospital Brugman, to be interrogated CIA rendition-style at midnight for over two hours by another psychiatrist, and then confined like a criminal to a psychiatric jail cell with no toilet and only a low bed with straps, of the kind used to restrain violent psychiatric patients.
The upshot of the rendition-assessment, it turns out, was positive; the psychiatrist who conducted the interrogation stated there was “nothing wrong” with Melanie Vritschan and that she needed to be returned to the Maternity Ward.
The psychiatrist then received a couple of telephone calls and changed his tune; now, he said, Ms. Vritschan needed to be returned to the Psychiatric Ward.
Had the doctor—supposedly the hospital authority to determine a patient’s psychiatric condition–just heard from the political pipeline from the Attorney-General’s office and thereby been persuaded to change his medical opinion completely?
It should be noted that Ms. Vritschan is currently engaged in bringing a class-action lawsuit against the State seeking redress for the actions of covert implantation and harassment brought against her and many other victims in Belgium. Alfred Lambremont Webre, International War Crimes judge and expert in international law, has provided an affidavit for this lawsuit. Were the current actions taken by Erasme Hopital and the Attorney-General’s office to dismiss her as delusional and steal her child thinly-disguised retaliation and attempt to obstruct this lawsuit? It would appear so.
Update as of Oct 23
Thanks to dozens of calls made to the Psychiatric ward following the previous press release, the hospital has been made aware of the international attention drawn to this scandal.
However the latest from this seeming bastion of fascism is that the hospital is curtailing all visitation rights for this mother who has already been traumatized by the separation of the baby, and not permitting anyone to visit her over the next two days, citing disruption caused by visitors.
The hospital is also denying Melanie Vritschan access to her own medical records.
It should be noted as well that the false diagnoses of delusions pronounced by the psychiatrists who deliberately refused to examine scientific evidence completely contradicting their diagnoses were used as excuse for the separation of the child from the mother. There was no evidence whatsoever of malfeasance or ill-treatment of the child by the mother—in other words, no legitimate reason whatsoever to separate the child from the mother.
All concerned citizens, human rights activists, journalists, doctors, mothers are asked to kindly call the hospital and demand that the baby be released to the mother and the wrongful charges of delusions be dropped. The chief administrator of the hospital can be reached at this email address:
Re-posted, with many thanks, from Alfred Webre’s NewsInsideOut.Com, which recently posted a tribute to Dr. Rauni Luukanen-Kilde,where this draft was included. A tremendous joint effort from Alfred Webre, Dr. Kilde, and others, the draft of the Model Statute below offers a means to use existing legal systems internationally and domestically within countries, at the UN, EU, and others, to establish a ban on all pernicious neurotechnologies and neuroweaponry being used, tested, and operated currently in Brain Entrainment of humans, remote manipulation of humans, infliction of harm to humans, and torture of humans, in addition to all other New Age technologies such as aerosol weapons, ELF weapons, scalar weapons currently being used worldwide by Global Military/Intelligence entities via an Artificial Intelligence network in the vast, planned, and calculated subjugation of humanity.
From Exopolitics.blog.com:Alfred was General Counsel to the New York City Environmental Protection Administration, a futurist at Stanford Research Institute (where he directed the proposed 1977 Carter White House extraterrestrial communication study), and was a NGO delegate to the United Nations and the UNISPACE conference. He was also a an Administrator of the Brownsville Community Health Center in the Lower Rio Grande Valley of Texas as well as a Judge on the Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Tribunal.
Alfred has been active in public broadcasting in the United States (WBAI-FM) and Canada (Vancouver Coop Radio); public interest counter intelligence (Assassination Information Bureau); deconstruction of the Transhumanist Agenda; the peaceful uses of outer space (Institute for Cooperation in Space); Life on Mars (Mars Anomaly Research Society); multidimensional online education (Omniversity in development); and news (NewsInsideOut.com; Exopolitics.com).
A most powerful mechanism to defeat sentient predatory AI Artificial Intelligence is to restore and enforce Universal, natural, international, humanitarian, and criminal law so that AI Artificial Intelligence and its AI-entrained infrastructure of compromised humans cannot carry out its destructive Agenda and acts against humanity and Earth using technology and violations of fundamental human rights.
Dr. Rauni Kilde and others worked with me in developing this Model Statute that can be adopted and enforced in international, regional (European Union), national, provincial and municipal jurisdictions to do so.
Please take this Model Statutes to the United Nations, the EU, the Parliaments of Poland and other nations, the municipalities of the world such as Brussels and let us stop the Transhumanist Agenda and predatory AI Artificial Intelligence.
Model Statute banning AI Artificial Intelligence technologies to entrain or torture humans
MODEL STATUTE concerning weapons systems operating on new physics principles used by AI Artificial Intelligence to entrain humans and/or to torture or inflict other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment including electronic weapons, electromagnetic weapons, magnetic weapons, directed energy weapons, geophysical weapons, wave-energy weapons, frequency weapons, genetic weapons, scalar weapons, psychotronic weapons, chemtrail aerosol weapons, implant weapons, nanotechnology weapons, high frequency active aural high altitude ultra low frequency weapons, information technology weapons.
MODEL STATUTE FOR THE EUROPEAN UNION
Council Regulation (EC) No _________________ of _________, 201_
Council Regulation (EC) No _________________ of _________, 201_ concerning weapons systems operating on new physics principles used by AI Artificial Intelligence to entrain humans and/or to torture or inflict other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment including but not limited to electronic weapons, electromagnetic weapons, magnetic weapons, directed energy weapons, geophysical weapons, wave-energy weapons, frequency weapons, genetic weapons, scalar weapons, psychotronic weapons, chemtrail aerosol weapons, implant weapons, nanotechnology weapons, high frequency active aural high altitude ultra low frequency weapons, information technology weapons.
Official Journal _______________________________________
Council Regulation (EC) ________________________________
of ______________ 201_
concerning weapons systems operating on new physics principles used to torture or inflict other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment including but not limited to electronic weapons, electromagnetic weapons, magnetic weapons, directed energy weapons, geophysical weapons, wave-energy weapons, frequency weapons, genetic weapons, scalar weapons, psychotronic weapons, chemtrail aerosol weapons, implant weapons, nanotechnology weapons, high frequency active aural high altitude ultra low frequency weapons, information technology weapons.
(hereinafter collectively referred to as “new physics torture weapons”).
THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 133 thereof,
Having regard to the proposal from the Commission,
(1) Pursuant to Article 6 of the Treaty on European Union, respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms constitutes one of the principles common to the Member States. In view of this, the Community resolved in 1995 to make respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms an essential element of its relations with third countries.
(2) Article 5 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Article 7 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and Article 3 of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms all lay down an unconditional, comprehensive prohibition on torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment.Other provisions, in particular the United Nations Declaration Against Torture and the 1984 United Nations Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment, place an obligation on States to prevent torture.
(3) Article 2(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union states that no one shall be condemned to the death penalty or executed. On 29 June 1998, the Council approved “Guidelines on EU policy towards third countries on the death penalty” and resolved that the European Union would work towards the universal abolition of the death penalty.
(4) Article 4 of the said Charter states that no one shall be subjected to torture or to inhuman or degrading treatment. On 9 April 2001, the Council approved “Guidelines to the EU policy toward third countries, on torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment”. These guidelines refer to both the adoption of the EU Code of Conduct on Arms Exports in 1998 and the ongoing work to introduce EU-wide controls on the exports of paramilitary equipment as examples of measures to work effectively towards the prevention of torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment within the Common Foreign and Security Policy. These guidelines also provide for third countries to be urged to prevent the use and production of, and trade in, equipment that is designed to inflict torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment and prevent the abuse of any other equipment to these ends.
(5) It is therefore appropriate to lay down Community rules on use and on trade with third countries in new physics torture weapons. These rules are instrumental in promoting respect for human life and for fundamental human rights and thus serve the purpose of protecting public morals. Such rules should ensure that Community economic operators do not derive any benefits from trade that either promotes or otherwise facilitates the implementation of policies on torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment, which are not compatible with the relevant EU Guidelines, the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and international conventions and treaties.
(6) For the purpose of this Regulation, it is considered appropriate to apply the definitions of torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment laid down in the 1984 United Nations Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment and in Resolution 3452 (XXX) of the General Assembly of the United Nations. These definitions should be interpreted taking into account the case law on the interpretation of the corresponding terms in the European Convention on Human Rights and in relevant texts adopted by the EU or its Member States.
(7) The Guidelines to the EU Policy toward third countries on torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment provide, inter alia, that the Heads of Mission in third countries will include in their periodic reports an analysis of the occurrence of torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment in the State of their accreditation, and the measures taken to combat it. It is appropriate for the competent authorities to take these and similar reports made by relevant international and civil society organisations into account when deciding on requests for authorisations. Such reports should also describe any new physics torture weapons used in third countries for the purpose of torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment.
(8) In order to contribute to the prevention of torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment, it is considered necessary to prohibit the supply to third countries of technical assistance related to goods which have no practical use other than for the purpose of torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment by new physics torture weapons.
(9) The aforementioned Guidelines state that, in order to meet the objective of taking effective measures against torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment, measures should be taken to prevent the use, production and trade of new physics torture weapons, including parts and equipment thereof, which are designed to inflict torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment. It is up to the Member States to impose and enforce the necessary restrictions on the use and production of such equipment.
(10) In order to take into account new data and technological developments, the lists of new physics torture weapons and parts and equipment thereof covered by this Regulation should be kept under review and provision should be made for a specific procedure to amend these lists.
(11) The Commission and the Member States should inform each other of the measures taken under this Regulation and of other relevant information at their disposal in connection with this Regulation.
(12) Member States should lay down rules on penalties applicable to infringements of the provisions of this Regulation and ensure that they are implemented. Those penalties should be effective, proportionate and dissuasive.
(13) This Regulation respects the fundamental rights and observes the principles recognised in particular by the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union,
HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:
Subject matter, scope and definitions
Subject matter and scope
This Regulation lays down Community rules governing new physics torture weapons.
For the purposes of this Regulation:
(a) “new physics torture weapons” means weapons or weapons systems operating on new physics principles used to torture or inflict other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment including but not limited to electronic weapons, electromagnetic weapons, magnetic weapons, directed energy weapons, geophysical weapons, wave-energy weapons, frequency weapons, genetic weapons, scalar weapons, psychotronic weapons, chemtrail aerosol weapons, implant weapons, nanotechnology weapons, high frequency active aural high altitude ultra low frequency weapons, information technology weapons.
(b) “torture” means the use of new physics torture weapons to commit any act by which severe pain or suffering, whether physical or mental, is intentionally inflicted on a person for such purposes including but not limited to intentional psychological programming, experimentation, voice to skull communication, artificial telepathy, remote influencing, remote inducement of physical or mental illness, mood management, mind control of persons or populations, remote virtual sexual assault, remote virtual rape, forced reproductive sterilization by means of chemtrails aerosol weapons, forced reproductive sterilization by means of vaccinations, (“RHIC- EDOM”) radio hypnotic intracerebral control and electronic dissolution of memory, remote transmission of images or films to brain, remote reading and controlling of thoughts, subliminal thought control, tinnitus, remote introduction of implants into body via vaccination, remote introduction of implants into body via chemtrails aerosol weapon, remote introduction of implants into body via food, water or potable liquid, remote introduction of implants into body via nanobot, remote scarring of body, remote introduction of inorganic particles into body, telephone terror including remotely induced epilepsy, muscle pains and cramps in neck and legs, headaches, severe toothaches, sudden falling off of healthy teeth while talking on the phone, remotely induced backaches, vibrations in various parts of the body, itching, ear tumors, brain tumors, respiratory diseases, asthma, immediate diarrhea and vomiting, remote deformation of victim’s body parts and organs including deformed bloated abdomen, deformed neck, lumps and channels on the head, shoulders widened, blown up arms and legs, deformed genitals and other deformations, remote inducement of extreme weight gain or abnormal weight loss endangering the victim’s health, remote inducement of blindness, cataracts or eye cancer, remote control of gangstalking or gangstalkers, gangstalking, commission of the following crimes in conjunction with the use of new physics torture weapons: harassment, breaking and entering of private property, ransacking of private property.
(c) “assassination” means the intentional use of new physics torture weapons to cause the death of a person by means including but not limited to heart attack; strangulation; suffocation; fast-acting cancer; diabetes; myocardial infarction; hemorrhage in brain; thrombosis in lungs; infectious disease.
Weapons systems operating on new physics principles used to torture or inflict other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment
Any use of a new energy torture weapon to torture or inflict other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment on any individual in the European Union or on any European Union citizen shall be prohibited, irrespective of the geographical location of such weapon, inside or outside of the European Union.
Any export of a new energy torture weapon shall be prohibited, irrespective of the origin of such weapon.
The supply of technical assistance related to a new energy torture weapon, whether for consideration or not, from the customs territory of the Community, to any person, entity or body in a third country shall be prohibited.
Any import of a new energy torture weapon shall be prohibited, irrespective of the origin of such weapon.
The acceptance by a person, entity or body in the customs territory of the Community of technical assistance related to a new energy torture weapon, supplied from a third country, whether for consideration or not, by any person, entity or body shall be prohibited.
High frequency active aural high altitude ultra low frequency weapon – The manufacture, deployment, or operation of any new physics torture weapon known as a high frequency active aural high altitude ultra low frequency weapon that uses high frequency (HF) electromagnetic or scalar wave transmission to excite the ionosphere or any other part of the Earth’s atmosphere over the territory of the Community in order to torture or inflict other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment on any individual, weather modification in the European Union or on any European Union citizen, irrespective of the geographical location of the ground component of such weapon, inside or outside of the Community shall be absolutely prohibited. The combination of those weapons from different locations is also forbidden.
Chemtrail aerosol weapon – The manufacture, deployment, operation, or dispersal of any new physics torture weapon known as a chemtrail aerosol weapon in or over any part of the Earth’s atmosphere over the territory of the Community in order to torture or inflict other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment on any individual in the European Union or on any European Union citizen shall be absolutely prohibited.
General and final provisions
In any case where an individual, organisation or Member State charged with violation of this Regulation shall plead national security or other reasons for secrecy as a legal defense to its actions, that individual, organisation or Member State shall be required to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that its actions were in fact directly related to national security or other reasons for secrecy and not to an intention or negligence to torture or inflict other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment.
Penalties and Compensation for Victims –
Member States shall lay down rules on penalties applicable to infringements of this Regulation imposing a minimum criminal penalty of twenty (20) years without possibility of parole to a maximum of life in prison without possibility of parole plus a fine of 1,000,000 Euros for each individual infringement and shall take all measures necessary to ensure that they are implemented. The penalties provided for must be effective, proportionate and dissuasive.
Compensation for Victims – Member States shall lay down rules on compensation to victims of any infringement of this Regulation which shall include:
(a) the costs of any surgery and physical or psychological therapy to fully restore the physical and mental health of the victim;
(b) financial compensation to the victim’s family for pain and suffering endured as a result of any infringement of this Regulation;
(c) financial compensation to the victim for loss of income and loss of property due to any infringement of this Regulation.
Member States shall take all measures necessary to ensure that such rules are implemented. The compensation provided for must be effective, proportionate and fair to the victim and the victim’s family. Wherever possible, the individual or organisation committing the infringement shall be held financially responsible for paying compensation, except that the victims and their families shall be entitled to compensation hereunder regardless of the ability of the individual or organisation committing the infringement to pay.
Member States shall notify the Commission of those rules by _____________201_ and shall notify it without delay of any subsequent amendment affecting them.
This Regulation shall apply to the customs territory of the Community.
Entry into force
This Regulation shall enter into force on ____________ 201_.
This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at _____________________, ______________ 201_
For the Council
“There are three basic types of EU legislation:
regulations, directives and decisions. “A regulation is similar to a national law
with the difference that it is applicable in all EU countries.”
European Commission ec.europa.eu
“The European Commission differs from the other institutions in that it alone has legislative initiative in the EU. Only the Commission can make formal proposals for legislation: they cannot originate in the legislative branches. However, the Council and Parliament may request the Commission to draft legislation, though the Commission does have the power to refuse to do so. Under the Lisbon Treaty, EU citizens are also able to request the Commission to legislate in an area via a petition carrying one million signatures, but this is not binding.”
This Model Statute can be adapted of adoption and implementation in any international and national jurisdiction.
In this wide-ranging conversation with Alfred Lambremont Webre on various subjects including after-life experiences and extraterrestrial contact, Dr. Rauni Luukanen-Kilde emphasizes how important it is for information on ongoing Military/Intelligence experiments and activities in the areas of Mind Control and Behavior Control using remote EMF weapons and technologies to be widely disseminated, and how essential it is for more of the world to wake up to what’s in process today as underlying agenda for all humanity behind the testing and operation of these technologies today on select “Targeted Individuals” in communities worldwide.
The agenda is transhumanist in nature, and the agenda is robotization of humanity, with RFID chips and brain EMFS being picked up and read remotely by satellites and drones, and thence influenced remotely, with remote Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and other remote-influencing technologies. Humans can thus be influenced to think, feel, act, behave, as State controllers behind the cyberneticists and neuroscientists and Artificial Intelligence engineers want humans to think, feel, act, and behave–this is what they want for our children. This is also the future envisioned for the remainder of humans post-depopulation scenarios already being enacted in skies above us via nanotoxin-loaded chem trails, now loaded as well in the waters we drink and use, in the food laced with GMOS and pesticides and processed with endocrine-disruptors we are being served, unlabelled, in viruses, vaccines, and other bio-weapons we are both being sprayed with and sold on, scenarios expected to remove 85% of humanity so the rest can subsist as servants of the “elite.”
“They can do anything these days, they can induce a myocardial infarction in a minute, they can induce brain damage in a minute–and people don’t know about it!…If people knew, they would all say they don’t want their son or daughter to be robotized, that is not what they envision for humanity–but people don’t know. The only way we can get out of this is through goodness, through connecting with the goodness of the Universe through the goodness of our own hearts and to ask for help, for assistance, but we cannot do that if people don’t know about these weapons. Awareness, Awareness, Awareness! We need people to know about these technologies, about what is going on.“
Free Keene’s web site/A peace-liberty-voluntarism project pursuing and promoting peaceful living in Free Keene, New Hampshire
Free State Project
Free State Project’s website/A Liberty in our Lifetime project in New Hampshire, pursuing liberty, community, and peaceful living
New Earth Project
New Earth Project website/Open platform to unite humanity and create initiatives to support the emergence of absolute freedom and sovereign creative expression for all
Public Intelligence Blog
Blog for Earth Intelligence Network, Phi Beta Iota the Public Intelligence Blog/Promotes hybrid transparent governance, collective intelligence, true cost economics, and whole systems understanding