Judge Anna von Reitz: Note About the National Liberty Alliance

Re-posted, with thanks, from Judge Anna von Reitz‘s Facebook page/February 15.

***

Judge Anna addresses issues she has had with the National Liberty Alliance--many of us may have wondered why they were not working together. Apparently they had been, at one time. Her note below is quite illuminating–a lot of information here on the American Common Law Court System, and what it needs to become fully functional. “...(T)he Common Law Grand Jury is only about one-fourth of the Common Law Court System we are owed, and without the Common Law Judges (properly called Common Law Justices) and Trial Juries and Clerks and other members of the Common Law Courts including the Sheriffs operating the land jurisdiction of this country, the Common Law Grand Juries have no enforcement capability. They can hand down their findings, and the “District Attorney” can ignore them, so that the entire effort goes astray and has no teeth.”

***

About me and the NLA: I TRIED to work with NLA early on. I also in good faith delivered a wet-ink signed and thumb-printed and sealed copy of our affidavit of probable cause to John Daresh, but nothing was done about our affidavit—which has been published as “You Know Something Is Wrong When….An American Affidavit of Probable Cause” available on Amazon.com.

When I attempted to contact NLA regarding their silence and inaction with regard to the grave accusations of criminality our affidavit raised, they hung up on me. A couple weeks later, Mr. Gary Jolly, contacted me and said something inane like, “we know who you are and we don’t trust you”— as if this was an excuse for failure to address capital crime?

I also rubbed them the wrong way when I revealed that the Common Law Grand Jury is only about one-fourth of the Common Law Court System we are owed, and without the Common Law Judges (properly called Common Law Justices) and Trial Juries and Clerks and other members of the Common Law Courts including the Sheriffs operating the land jurisdiction of this country, the Common Law Grand Juries have no enforcement capability. They can hand down their findings, and the “District Attorney” can ignore them, so that the entire effort goes astray and has no teeth.

Therefore I pointed out the need to elect people to fill the other, additional vacated Public Offices we are owed and to re-established the American Common Law Court System that is supposed to be in place and acting in support of the Common Law Grand Juries. Mr. Daresh and Mr. Jolly would hear none of it.

Three years have gone by with the Citizens Common Law Grand Juries being set up and spinning their wheels, accomplishing nothing much for all their work and good will. Meanwhile, those who waved good-bye to NLA and proceeded to set up their counties on the land and elect and fill the vacated Public Offices have made great strides. They are actively setting up and restoring County-level government and educating people all over this country, while NLA continues to accomplish…….what?

As a result of all this, I have grave concerns about NLA’s leadership. Some months ago, I heard that John Daresh is actually a Bar Attorney from New York named John Vidurek. So I asked him, up front, in good faith— just wanting to know the truth of the matter. He refused to answer me, but he did answer Rodger Dowdell in Florida, that yes, this is so. His given name was John Vidurek and yes, he is from New York and yes, he is a Bar Attorney.

To me, a Bar Card is a strong indicator that Mr. Daresh may not be operating in good faith.

A second indicator is that he has adopted a nom de guerre that has nothing whatsoever to do with his real name.

Third, why quote me out of context in a major Writ of Mandamus and not even bother to contact me, yet leave it seeming that I was involved? That doesn’t add up, either.

Fourth, why harbor vaguely stated and semi-threatening “suspicions” such as Gary Jolly expressed toward me? Honest men ask honest questions. They don’t hide behind vague insinuations.

A fifth concern about NLA leadership is the lack of progress by the CLGJ organizations in the states where NLA is in control of the CLGJ’s compared to what is going on in other states where people have struck off and done it without NLA’s “help and direction”. These spin off groups are miles ahead in addressing the real problems we are facing.

A sixth concern in NLA’s failure to admit and educate people regarding the fact that the CLGJ’s are just a part— about one quarter– of the Common Law Court System that we are owed and which we need up and fully functioning to give the CLGJ’s both teeth and administrative support. How can you run a wagon train with one-wheeled carts?

A seventh concern is NLA’s complete lack of response to a signed, sealed, witnessed affidavit of probable cause that has been exhaustively researched and demonstrated. We brought forward damning evidence of immense, systemic, institutionalized fraud— fraud against the Republic, fraud against the probate and bankruptcy courts, fraud against American States and American people—- and NLA puts the blinkers on and pretends it never heard a word?

So we are supposed to ignore capital level crimes, including war crimes, being committed by foreign banks and their storefront organizations run as “governmental services corporations” because……? Why?

If it is NOT the job of the CLGJ’s to investigate crimes against Americans, just exactly what does Mr. Daresh propose that their job is? To stand around issuing pointless documents filled with ignorance and outrage so that his buddies down at the local Bar Association can have a good laugh?

Daresh is a Bar Attorney. He knows better than to send a Writ of Mandamus to an Admiralty Court. He was playing everyone for laughs. He was saying, “Oh, look at this, boys! These people are SO clueless, SO dumb, that they are going to put their time and energy into doing this! Hahahahahah! — And for EXTRA fun, I am going to sign Anna’s name to it and take her work out of context, so everyone can laugh at her, too! Hahahahahahah!”

I believe that many, many of the people in NLA are wonderful, patriotic, well-intentioned, and determined. I believe that the vast majority are trying in good faith to make a badly needed difference and to fill in a very necessary Public Office—- but I also believe that they are being purposefully limited and misguided by leaders who have their own contrary agenda, which is simply to keep the horse in the barn and not let the CLGJ’s function as they could and ought to, and also prevent people from addressing the need to restore the ENTIRE American Common Law Court System which is owed and needed to make the work of the Common Law Grand Juries count.

The way things are run under Daresh, you might as well be riding unicycles. It’s entertaining, but without the other “wheels” of the American Common Law Courts in place—- the Justices, the Clerks, the Recorders, the Bailiffs, the Sheriffs operating on the land jurisdiction, and the Trial Juries—-you are stuck, chasing around in circles without enforcement, wasting your time. Apparently, that kind of window dressing role is what Mr. Daresh wants. Just “be there” appearing to do something and creating an illusion of remedy, while in fact providing no real alternative to the Admiralty Court and Administrative Court System at all.

If the CLGJ’s were operating as they should, as part of the American Common Law Court System, they would hand down orders to a Sheriff operating on the jurisdiction of the land of this country, and the Sheriff would bring the orders to a Common Law Justice who would issue the warrants for arrest and to Public Prosecutors who would prepare the discovery subpoenas and complaints, and this would all wind up in front of a Jury of Twelve Honest Peers who would review the facts and hand down a decision for the Justice to read in open court on the record and execute. That is how it is supposed to work.

As it is, the CLGJ’s are misguided to function as laughingstocks for the Bar Members and spend their days making pleas to District Attorneys who ignore the CLGJ’s just like they ignore everyone else, and writing Writs in Law addressed to Admiralty Courts that can’t even hear a Land Writ.

Sigh. So, there is my assessment of the current status of the CLGJ’s and their role under the limitations imposed by John Daresh and NLA—- and right where they are is where they are likely to stay, in my opinion, until or unless people wake up a second time and realize that they are spinning their wheels at a moment in history when they ought to be making desperately needed progress.

NLA could be instrumental in restoring the entire American Common Law Court System, in reviving and restoring the land-based government we are owed—- but that isn’t where the NLA leadership has gone and that doesn’t appear to be where they are going.

Source: Facebook/Anna von Reitz

One response to “Judge Anna von Reitz: Note About the National Liberty Alliance

  1. Judge Anna is Absolutely Correct. I WAS a County coordinator for Montgomery County PA with NLA (still have the 60.00 dollar seal I bought with my funds ( about 2 years ago) still have it if anyone wants to buy it, I was the one who said about the 2 cent Postage was 3 cents an ounce not 2 as John said. Still doing it today no returns so far,,,,until I was Kicked out for some of the remarks on the Monday Night calls. Like are you aware there are 2 Constitutions? And that The USA is a corporation. I said this about 2-3 years ago. Common knowledge now…. I was changed According to Gary with to many complaints about my remarks. He would not give examples or any other info. However before I got the boot They received request thru the County Organizer (Jan) from people who wanted to meet me, which I did. I believe I was asking for results that were not and believe to this day are still non existent. So Judge Anna is correct in all her Points I believe. If you join be forewarned NLA is Like a boat, a hole in the water you throw money into that will sink someday.

Leave a Reply