Re-posted, with thanks, and in the interest of spreading the word, from Paulstramer.net. Please check in there for updated articles and posts on “what is really going on behind the scenes in the patriot movement in America, including solutions from Oathkeepers, Anna Von Reitz, Constitutional Sheriffs, Richard Mack, and many more people who are leading the charge to restore America to freedom and peace.”
This post below by Judge Anna is in response to a recent Snopes article calling into question the recent commercial lien placed by her and a group of people challenging government crimes and calling for arrests, as well as her stated status as a judge. Here Judge Anna discusses the Court system of Common Law versus the Federal Court system, and the historic nature of American citizenship as twofold–free independent people and inhabitants–in a context where language determines status.
The lien document in pdf format can be found here, and is educative both in itself and in its modeling of/and information on an affidavit, which is a notarized document and a prime statement or declaration of facts in any situation of injustice, which, if I’m reading it right, is the first step and a means of obtaining legal remedy for injustice or crime under Common Law.
This may therefore be of interest to those unable to gain remedy through the Federal court system, and who are striving to explore Common Law as a means to obtain justice.
Friday, December 18, 2015
A Reply to “Snopes” and All Others from Anna Von Reitz
Yes, an Alaskan state judge HAS called upon the US Marshals and the rest of the “law enforcement agencies” to do their real job, and I am in a position to confirm it, as I am that judge. Your ignorance is no excuse in this matter.
There are two systems of law in this country, and it is long past time for you all to learn the facts.
When The Constitution was adopted there was already a Common Law Court System in this country that had been established for over 200 years. The Constitution created an additional “federal” court system for the needs of the “federal government”—- that court system is obligated to function in two venues only: administrative (Article I) and maritime/admiralty (Article III).
As you can see for yourself if you ever wake up and bother to look, the Seventh Amendment very clearly stipulates that ALL matters involving living people and their property assets in excess of $20 are to be decided under Common Law and as you can also readily find out Erie Railroad v. Thompkins (1938) there is no such thing as Federal Common Law.
Since all the “States of States” incorporated and adopted the Uniform Commercial Code circa 1965, they have operated as “federal States of States” as defined in the UCC Definitions Section. All these things calling themselves “States” — except for one—are actually corporate franchises of the parent corporations located in Delaware or Washington, DC, respectively, and are private, for-profit organizations no different from General Electric or Macy’s and having NO public office, authority, oath, or bond at all. They are merely “governmental services corporations” in the business of doing what? Providing governmental services to you as a consumer.
All these “courts” you see calling themselves various fictitious names like the “SUPREME COURT FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA” are operated by members of the American Bar Association— all declared to be foreign agents of the British Crown employed as bill collectors. They are all corporations imposing their services upon you. Both the American Bar Association and the Internal Revenue Service are bill collection agencies employed by Northern Trust, Inc. and both have functioned as foreign crime syndicates on our shores for longer than anyone living can remember.
If “Snopes” were worth a hoot in Hell as a fact checking organization, they would have already discovered all of this and a LOT more, so my advice is to stop taking what a couple liberal Californians have to say about reality as Gospel and start using your own eyes, ears, and minds to check your own facts. Get off your lazy rumps and read the founding documents of this country for yourselves.
Go check out the Definitive Treaty of Peace known as the Treaty of Paris 1783. There you will find that two kinds of people exist in this country—– the “free sovereign and independent people of the United States” (that’s us) and the “inhabitants”—– subjects of the British Crown allowed to “reside” here (the members of the Bar and various other “public servants”) who are obligated under Article IV, Section 3, Clause 2 to provide us with “essential governmental services”.
AFTER you have read the facts for yourselves, check out our sworn and published affidavit of probable cause: “You Know Something Is Wrong When…..An American Affidavit of Probable Cause” which is available on Amazon.
Am I a judge? You’d better believe I am. I am among a handful of actual Common Law Judges in America and where I operate my court—on the land—-no admiralty court has any right to stand (See Milligan Ex Parte, 1866).
I am operating the actual Public Common Law Court required by Amendment VII as part of the American Common Law Continental Court System that predates all “federal” and “territorial” courts by 200 years. I am NOT a member of the Bar Association, and for your information, no actual judge having jurisdiction over the land can be a member of the Bar Association. All members of the Bar owe allegiance to a foreign government and are here by treaty (See Bar Association Treaty of 1947) and are precluded from holding ANY public office by The Constitution. Read it and weep.
And wake up. NOW. http://www.annavonreitz.com
A terrific debate, here. The judicial system really needs some desperate reform